mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-08 00:54:38 +02:00
bf3eecdd2d888fe548c59e459ab25a66520d652b
4854
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 dependabot[bot]
|
bf3eecdd2d |
build(deps-dev): bump vite from 6.4.3 to 8.3.2
Bumps [vite](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/tree/HEAD/packages/vite) from 6.4.3 to 8.3.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/main/packages/vite/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/commits/v8.3.2/packages/vite) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: vite dependency-version: 8.3.2 dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> |
||
|
|
03cf6a6ecb |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#15359)
Co-Authored-By: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>nightly/v2026.1007.0-nightly.0 canary/v2026.1007.0-canary.5 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
799e4d556f |
fix: make accounting durable and synchronize cost reporting (#14997)
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
99a9de9940 |
fix(mcp): personalize assistant connections and hide revoked grants (#15411)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Assistant connections let people use their organization from another assistant. > - Setup begins with an invitation and returns to a list of connected assistants. > - Client-only labels obscure the authorizing person, while revoked rows clutter that list. > - This pull request shows the person’s avatar, names connections by owner and client, and hides revoked rows. > - It also shortens the copied invitation while keeping the approval instructions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #14933 and #15380. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Invitation copy and assistant connection management, in the organization’s Connections screen and the account-wide management page. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: shared MCP connection types, server profile projection, UI and Storybook. **Current behavior** Connections are labeled only with a client name such as “Codex.” Revoked connections remain visible. The invitation includes an extra sentence about agent identity. **Proposed behavior** Show the authorizing person’s avatar and use names such as “Dotta’s Codex connection.” Hide revoked rows after successful revocation and when loading retained revoked grants. Failed revocation leaves the connection visible. Remove the extra identity sentence from invitation copy. **Reason and benefit** Make connection identity clear and keep the list focused on usable connections. **Breaking changes** The connection response adds optional `user` metadata with name and image. Older servers remain usable. Names and revoked-row visibility change in the UI; OAuth client identity, authorization and audit retention remain unchanged. ## What Changed - Shorten the shared invitation text. - Project the authorizing person’s name and avatar through the user-scoped connection endpoint, without returning email or credentials. - Reuse the existing Identity component and owner naming conventions across the connection page, catalog card and account-wide list. - Hide revoked grants and remove a successfully revoked row from the shared cache, even if the subsequent refresh fails. - Update documentation, regression tests and production-page Storybook fixtures and revocation journeys. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm build-storybook` and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass. Final UI type checks also pass. - Focused consent and connection UI tests: 31 pass, including company filtering, legacy metadata, custom client names, user-initial fallbacks, failed revocation, retained revoked rows and refresh failure after successful revocation. - Existing MCP regression suite: 6 pass; 71 database checks are skipped locally because embedded PostgreSQL cannot start on this machine. The added database check verifies user-profile isolation and retained revocation history; CI runs these checks. - Browser verification with Storybook fixtures: owner avatar and name render; revocation removes the selected row in both production pages, leaves other connections visible, and restores the empty state after the last revocation. - All 54 current-head CI checks pass, with two optional Storybook jobs skipped. CI includes database, browser, runner, typecheck, build and clean-install canary coverage. - Greptile reviewed commit `1368d79e1066b418712224378d89d64c2b11cb86`: 5/5, no actionable findings or unresolved threads. - The full local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after complete CI passed. Local database coverage remains unavailable because embedded PostgreSQL cannot start; no full local-suite pass is claimed. ## Risks Low risk. The additive profile field is optional for compatibility. Revoked grants are filtered only from management UI and retained for audit. Revocation failure does not hide an active connection. No authorization scopes, token handling or schema changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with code editing, command execution and browser verification. The exact deployment ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1007.0-canary.4 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a9a20fb5c6 |
feat(security): add read-only customer-success inspection APIs (#15405)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents need a persistent identity and a verified active run for governed access. > - Customer-success inspection needs broad reads without tenant writes or secret access. > - Ordinary board login and database credentials give more authority than this task needs. > - This pull request adds a dedicated inspection API and strict managed-run authority. > - Cloud owns short grants, human approval, replay protection, and audit records. > - The benefit is inspectable access that an operator can disable immediately. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #15352. This change reuses the persistent Ed25519 identity from that PR. **Subsystem affected** Server authentication, pure resource readers, and the shared wire contract. **Problem or motivation** One internal Paperclip agent must inspect customer onboarding work. It must not receive owner login or database credentials. Reads must not create customer sessions, memberships, activity, or read receipts. **Proposed solution** Add disabled-by-default run authority and versioned tenant inspection endpoints. Require strict instance-bound managed-run JWTs on the home instance. Require exact-operation, single-use Cloud permits on tenants. Execute a reviewed company-scoped catalog in read-only transactions. Cloud applies seven-day stack-age eligibility and human exceptions. **Roadmap alignment** This is access support for Cloud deployments and governed agent identities. Bot creation, scheduling, scoring, and reports are separate work. The maintainer requested this implementation. ## What Changed - Reuse existing public identity reads and managed private-key injection. Reject unprovisioned keys, paused agents, ended runs, legacy signatures, and wrong instances. - Mount `/api/customer-success/v1` before actor/session synchronization. Verify Cloud permits and consume them centrally before reading. - Add explicit company-scoped database readers and bounded instruction, skill snapshot, run log, workspace, and asset reads. Preserve existing redactions and file protections. - Add protocol, security, database immutability, and managed-agent qualification tests. Add deployment and rollback documentation. ## Verification - Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. Server typecheck passed after review fixes. - The broad local `pnpm test:run` recorded 14,277 passes and four failures in unchanged suites: two timeouts and two PR-metadata mock assertions. All three affected suites passed on isolated reruns (36 tests). The complete CI matrix passes at the final head, including every test lane, typecheck, build, runner checks, canary dry run, and the security scan. - Focused inspection, JWT, and existing identity tests pass. The catalog test compares every public database table before and after reads. - Inspection and route-contract tests: 22 passed. The coordinated test runs a real managed process agent against separate home/customer PostgreSQL databases and a PostgreSQL broker over HTTP. It proves wake through the existing controller, bounded binary file reads, single challenge consumption across replicas, concurrent grants with a two-connection pool, scoped SQL audits, append-only runtime auditing, one-year retention, and unchanged tenant data/files. - Run the coordinated test with `PAPERCLIP_INSPECTION_CLOUD_DIST` pointing at the sibling Cloud build. Normal unit runs skip that optional private integration. - Final-head Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings. - No production deployment or customer inspection occurred. ## Risks - This adds an authentication boundary. Keep both feature flags disabled until coordinated staging and canary qualification. - Cloud support must deploy after this API. Unsupported tenants fail closed. There is no owner-login or database fallback. - Existing redactions remain the content boundary. Arbitrary pasted secrets in readable prose or files may remain. - Remote files and suppressed provider traces remain unavailable. Wake can cause normal startup/background writes; test those separately. - Disable Cloud policy first during rollback. Preserve existing identity material and Cloud audit history. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, code execution, and browser testing. The session does not expose a more specific deployment ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks and isolated reruns; broad-run flakes are documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1007.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
caf120105c |
test: prepare neutral native connection guidance evals (#15407)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents need to discover connections, obtain consent, and continue from saved decisions. > - We want to reduce repeated instructions only when measured behavior supports the change. > - The existing decline tasks tell the model not to retry. One provider-decline check can pass without an explanation or an observed service counter. > - This PR adds neutral tasks and stricter saved-evidence checks before any connection instruction reduction. > - Production instructions remain unchanged. The new cells are configured, not live-qualified. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15218. Refs #15389. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The Product E2E connection workflow evaluation and its instruction measurement provenance. **Current behavior** Some decline prompts supply the policy they intend to test. The provider-decline workflow does not require a saved post-decision explanation. Its old no-call check can use a missing fixture counter as zero. OpenCode has no connection cases in the original Everyday matrix. **Proposed behavior** Add an explicit-only suite with five connection stories on native Codex, ACPX Claude, and OpenCode. Require an explanation attributed by exact run ID after a saved decline. Observe the provider fixture counter. Preserve the original cases and grades. ## What Changed - Add fifteen configured cells with one attempt, twelve-minute deadlines, and verified 1,000-cent company and agent budget stops. - Remove procedure hints from the three new decline prompts. Keep a user-permitted explanation fallback and the existing positive controls. - Require saved decline state, one decision, unchanged connections, observed zero service calls where applicable, and a post-decision explanation from a successful run on the same task. - Add negative grader calibration and test the actual fixture budget payloads. Exclude the suite from default and generic selection. - Extend the existing full-catalog measurement source manifest with connection descriptions and schemas. Add an audit of fixed text, tool descriptions, returned instructions, and unqualified behavior. - Rebase on master `a6306ba606eb87c89b9ef0344e9fe8e0025580f9` and preserve its new Cursor suites. No production, credential, workflow, or lockfile change. ## Verification - Before rebase: Product E2E support passed 1,424 TypeScript tests and 128 Node checks. Six catalog measurement tests, repository typecheck/build, Product E2E typecheck, and exact fifteen-cell discovery passed. - The full pre-rebase repository test run was stopped when master advanced. Its partial result is not a pass. - After rebase and the review correction: repository build/typecheck, Product E2E typecheck, 1,799 TypeScript support tests (one skipped), 128 Node checks, six measurement tests, and exact fifteen-cell discovery pass. The duplicate local full-suite run was stopped incomplete after about 20 minutes once complete CI passed; no local full-suite pass is claimed. - Review found that the initial grader read `runId` instead of public `createdByRunId`. A regression calibration reproduced both rejection of valid public comments and acceptance of the wrong alias. The fix uses the actual field and binds the evidence type to the shared `IssueComment` contract. A subsequent type-only import path correction passes Product E2E typecheck. - Final source `0de306b9664bfbdebb6709ddb54c95152740d1ad` passes [complete CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37560250545): 51 successful checks and two intentional Storybook skips, plus separate Snyk success. Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 with the single review thread resolved and no new findings. The PR is clean and mergeable. - Local commands: `pnpm build`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`, `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck`, and `pnpm test:e2e:runner -- --list --suite native-connection-guidance`. The measurement uses `PAPERCLIP_NATIVE_PROCEDURE_MEASUREMENT=/tmp/connection-measurement.json pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/native-procedure-measurement.test.ts`. Validation used pinned pnpm 9.15.4. - No paid provider campaign was started. There is no baseline/candidate behavior result for these new cells. - The audit records 654 UTF-8 bytes of fixed connection guidance. A clean capture at `a04b8c6a452315625014888335d45670a2094fb6` confirms 41 supplied tools, 53,341 normalized bytes at start/resume, 50,949 at compact continuation, and a 48,195-byte authenticated OpenCode MCP catalog. These are byte counts, not tokens, bills, vendor-private prompt sizes, or savings from this PR. ## Risks - This is eval preparation. Passing support tests do not establish live model behavior or qualify an instruction reduction. - The explanation oracle checks attributed saved output. It does not prove cognition or arbitrary prose truthfulness. One saved interaction also does not prove the absence of repeated idempotent tool calls. - Successful new authentication and tool refresh, existing-connection agent grants, independent work while waiting, explicit retry after decline, and blocking when mandatory work remains still need separate coverage. - Notion setup decline does not execute a real Notion service. Positive service approval uses an already installed deterministic service; it does not qualify new connection creation. - The original historical failures remain unchanged. Future comparisons must freeze source, fixture, model, input, and grading controls and retain every actual attempt. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size were not exposed in this session; they are not inferred. No model provider was invoked by the eval suite in this PR preparation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1007.0-canary.2 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a6306ba606 |
feat(runner): consolidate Cursor production integration (#15075)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The native Runner keeps provider sessions under company authority, approvals, budgets and durable recovery. > - Cursor work was spread across candidate branches. The published branch lacked later plan, permission and cleanup fixes. > - Production also needs public installation and matching runtime assets for local and Daytona execution. > - This pull request consolidates Cursor onto current mainline recovery behavior and completes that installation path. > - The installed v11 release passed focused local and Daytona qualification after the generic mode and lifecycle cleanup. The later model-selection correction and current mainline merge produce v14 artifacts that need matching release qualification. > - Cursor admission is enabled in source; publish only an artifact combination with matching qualification. Native AskQuestion and complete per-run dollar accounting remain excluded. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #14435, #14631, #14669, #14699, #14724. This completes the Cursor implementation by @cryppadotta from combined source `22c78242a4e0c2369fecf0c2dc4e7600fbad6706`. It preserves newer mainline recovery, completion and warm-directory behavior. Pi and Copilot remain gated. ## What Changed - Generate named Rust and TypeScript ACPX release profiles from one manifest. Share runtime pins with packaging and server verification. Preserve vendor runtime versions; bind the updated ACPX patch to Cursor profile v14 and reject stale generated declarations at build/typecheck. - Remove ACPX model allowlists, including the former Codex and Pi restrictions and the duplicate developer test-drive gate. Send any explicit model ID unchanged to its provider and verify the effective selection before prompting. The bundled ACPX package forwards unlisted IDs, rejects mismatched acknowledgements, and restores the exact selection after session load. It does not expand Cursor model aliases. Provider rejection, mismatch, or missing model controls fails without a fallback. Model examples live in evaluation fixtures, outside runtime declarations. - Add pinned Cursor execution, contained instructions, exact model verification and Agent/Plan/Ask modes. - Carry an opaque generic `mode` identifier in shared native execution, sidecar, Rust and recovery contracts. The provider adapter owns supported modes, defaults, native translation and acknowledgement. - Keep native RPC recognition, accepted-plan interpretation and permission evidence behind provider adapters. Shared settlement and recovery verify normalized facts and their committed evidence. - Replace the Cursor-only warm-attachment branch with a runner-owned capability. Only Cursor opts into it. Move profile compatibility and optional usage parsing into provider metadata and adapters. - Write generic plan-wait receipts. Read exact historical Cursor receipts through a separate compatibility decoder. Reject mixed formats and preserve existing authority checks. - Carry native plans, semantic questions, todos, child activity, permission identities and partial usage diagnostics through the Runner. - Preserve durable response delivery, cancellation, warm ownership and process retirement. - Finish accepted planning runs successfully. Keep their tasks open for explicit direction. Acceptance does not start implementation. - Ship `paperclipai runtime setup cursor` and its provisioner through the public package. npm installation does not download Cursor. Setup uses the OS account's closure-keyed cache so system-wide npm packages can remain read-only. Run it as the Paperclip service account. - Include Cursor in normal provider packs and Daytona images for macOS ARM64/x64 and Linux x64. - Reject stale release packs by source revision and current ACPX/Cursor pins before assembly writes files. Verify current Cursor version/profile/closure again at runtime. - Ship all three daemon targets and the expected Linux image-pack identity. A macOS controller uses its packaged Linux daemon for Daytona. Image mismatches fail before provider launch. - Use the vendored Runner boundary for installed readiness probes. Verify the actual installed Cursor probe. - Verify compiled public Daytona plugins and their release versions in installed smokes. - Record exact artifacts, the acceptance matrix, retained failures, supported capabilities and rollback behavior in the [readiness report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/cursor-production-readiness/doc/plans/2026-10-03-cursor-production-readiness.md). ## Verification - Current head `f7ec5cc1f0e30c62a829c016ff2013a2a9d79037` merges mainline `faa8e452c73bae5e044dd6379179a00106abb131`. It keeps Cursor plan and cancellation guards alongside mainline historical-question filtering. The evaluation catalog includes both Cursor and expanded adapter accounting cases (683 total). Recursive typecheck, full build, 696 lifecycle/recovery tests, 45 fixture tests and fixture typecheck passed. Current-head CI passed: 56 successful checks, one neutral and four skipped. [Complete CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37557996535). The fresh Base Greptile review is 5/5 on this exact head, with 304 files reviewed, zero new comments and zero unresolved threads. The user authorized overriding the CODEOWNER review gate after checks passed; no failing checks are overridden. Prior results below retain their own head identities. - Corrective head `3d2b168366258036f6b6a6fccb382c49138cc601` fixes the post-merge Apex finding. Automatic-review and new-evidence reconciliation preserve pending child results and recheck delivery under the status lock before completing. Account repair now excludes unrelated secret consumers and requires the failed agent's identity. Regression coverage includes the commit race, delivery statuses, current-run/current-intent exclusions, repeated reconciliation, both database reconciliation paths, and credential consumer boundaries. All 184 affected tests, server typecheck and server build passed. Current-head Base Greptile review is 5/5, with 304 files reviewed, zero new comments and zero unresolved threads. Current-head CI passed: 56 successful checks, one neutral and four skipped. [Complete CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37535994724). This Base review is distinct from the earlier Apex review. - Merge head `5957c257a` reconciles mainline `b508a05c4`. It preserves both accepted-plan waits and pending-child-completion checks, current provider selectors, task-creation response identities, and mainline ACPX missing-file handling. The combined patch is bound to Cursor profile v14; historical records keep their original identities. - Merge head `5957c257a` passed recursive typecheck, full build, 43 installed ACPX/package contracts, 107 provider UI and plan/recovery tests, 593 database-backed lifecycle tests, 49 profile/native contract tests, 45 Product E2E fixture tests, fixture typecheck, token gates, three provider-free browser task-creation cases, and Runner conformance/replay checks. Its complete CI passed (55 successful checks, one neutral and four skipped), while Apex returned 2/5 with a child-delivery finding addressed below. - The local full-suite attempt again failed the unchanged Git streaming test (360-second timeout) and was stopped. The concurrent local Rust attempt failed four unchanged Codex process/deadline tests; all four passed serially without code changes in 7.29 seconds after removing the competing test load. These failed commands are retained and are not reported as full-suite passes; the fresh Linux CI runs are tracked separately. - The previous head `907bdb2a2778c7ffeb4a662a91460c9d1ddfc9c5` earned Apex 5/5 with zero comments after fixing all three findings: per-user install cache, stale release-pack rejection, and public Linux smoke account/home handling. Its real built installer passed from read-only public packages on macOS ARM64 and Linux x64. All 137 release-registry checks and 64 ACPX package contracts passed. That review does not cover this mainline reconciliation. - Prior `beadd3654` passed the full CI matrix; its one unchanged chat test failure and successful single retry remain in the [CI history](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37521449327). Historical results below remain attributed to their original builds. - Fixture follow-up `dd59d7e82b103a88b7cbd7d2c38b612c0fbbff7a` removes provider-specific model choices from generic offline ACPX tests. The fake sidecar preserves the model and session identity selected at open through suspension. Affected verification passed: 106 Rust tests and 73 TypeScript tests. This commit changes test code only; the production-code checks below retain their recorded identities. Its CI and Greptile review later passed; those results belong to that historical head. - Model-selection cleanup `9a070808b48960a41fdfd369ae0636b95af82459`: 252 focused Runner tests passed (six platform skips), covering all six ACPX agents, native model acknowledgement, rejected selections, installation integrity and recovery identity. The merged branch passed recursive typecheck, full build, token gates, server admission (19 tests), and the Product E2E catalog (45 tests). The acceptance catalog passed all four tests. The full Rust suite passed: 643 tests, 2 ignored. It verifies sidecar acknowledgement of unlisted models and rejection of model mismatches. The final commits only update Rust tests; production sources match the verified build at `65ec3279ac50185e3cda109b5cfd9b4f56105de0`. No new paid provider calls were made. - The merge preserves both Cursor and the new mainline public-MCP fixture cases. Auto-merge remains disabled; the latest follow-up status is recorded above. The local `pnpm test:run` attempt hit the unchanged Git streaming test's 300-second timeout and was interrupted before merging mainline. The broad Runner attempt found obsolete single-model assertions plus three macOS fixture-path failures caused by a `/private/tmp` override. The assertions are corrected; affected TypeScript checks passed with the standard macOS temporary directory, and the complete Rust suite passed. Neither interrupted command is a full-suite pass. - Earlier declaration-cleanup head `6f4a5e9e2` passed recursive typecheck, build, Rust and focused tests. Its CI later exposed a test expecting duplicated Grok digest literals. The current source fixes that assertion to compare launcher bytes with the shared manifest. Historical successes and failed attempts are retained; no new live provider qualification is claimed. - Previous head `e75fde6098b0ddd8cec765bfb6ecaeecb88a26a6` passed complete CI (56 successful checks, one neutral, four skipped) and Greptile 5/5. [Historical complete CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37489112305). Those results are not claimed for the cleanup head. - Frozen live application: `d7b696f9b8f79095233e9e3d56d23e6a6018dd48`. Public package version: `0.0.0-cursor-verify.3d0c9b7761c6`. The declaration cleanup preserves release pins and does not relabel that tested artifact as a build of the new source. Mainline through `e34abee670` was reconciled while preserving accepted-plan waits, provider-capacity handling, and both Cursor and public-MCP fixtures. - Clean normal installation, explicit Cursor setup and daemon resolution passed on macOS ARM64, macOS x64 under Rosetta, and Linux x64. npm lifecycle hooks ran without silently downloading Cursor. - Historical v11 live matrix: **18/18 passed with cleanup** (nine local, nine Daytona) after the generic mode and lifecycle cleanup. The campaign has 23 attempts; all five failures and their diagnoses remain recorded. Exact case identities, hashes and limits are in the readiness report. All provider calls are real, use the explicit Luna model and company-bound credentials, and run without qualification or runtime-asset overrides. - The immutable Daytona image is `ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip-daytona-runner@sha256:d6259b6bba094702c13fc2283bd85550849c1c53145b656fb2746778f9fa1747`. The public Daytona plugin is installed independently and its version is checked. - Recursive typecheck, full build, token gates and Runner contract/conformance/replay checks passed on the frozen application. Its complete Linux CI suite passed. The duplicate local full-suite command was incomplete after timing failures; affected repeats passed, but that command is not reported as a clean pass. - Qualification fixtures passed typecheck, 1,675 Vitest tests (one skip), 128 Node checks, three provider-free browser tests, and 150 focused lifecycle tests after the final diagnostic correction. The affected legacy Cursor command file also passed all five tests after removing its shorter 10-second override; it now inherits the suite’s standard 15-second timeout. Greptile is 5/5 on `e75fde609` with no unresolved review threads. CI results above are recorded separately from historical build results. ## Risks - Cursor v14 includes the updated ACPX dependency patch and release identity. The v11 live matrix and image below remain historical evidence. They do not certify new v14 package/image artifacts. - ACPX accepts models beyond the qualification fixtures. Availability and entitlement depend on the provider. Successful configuration is not a claim of live qualification for every model. - Shared mode is an opaque identifier. Provider adapters own its meaning. Incompatible historical sessions remain fenced; exact committed plan waits and task history remain inspectable. - Native AskQuestion is excluded. Paperclip semantic questions are supported. Authoritative per-run dollar accounting is unavailable; partial counters remain diagnostics and unknown cost is not zero. - Image input, detailed native diffs, deeper child transcripts and native plan-file export remain follow-ups. - macOS x64 has clean-install and daemon-startup proof under Rosetta, not a separate live campaign on Intel hardware. - Release only the tested package/image combination. Merging this PR does not publish npm packages or deploy that image. Later builds need their own release verification. Rollback disables new Cursor admission while preserving records and recovery inspection. - A model can fail an exact instruction: one cancelled-plan attempt returned the wrong summary marker despite correct cancellation. The unchanged repeat passed; both results remain in the report. > ROADMAP.md was checked. This completes existing native Runner/Cursor work; it does not add an independent core feature proposal. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact serving variant and context window are not exposed in this session. The agent used reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, protocol tests and browser-backed Product E2E tools. Cursor acceptance uses the explicit `gpt-5.6-luna[context=272k,reasoning=medium,fast=false]` model. That is the evaluated provider model. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — affected suites passed; full CI and the retained local failed attempts are recorded separately above. - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — 56 successful checks, one neutral and four skipped on `f7ec5cc1f0e30c62a829c016ff2013a2a9d79037` - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — fresh Base review passed on `f7ec5cc1f0e30c62a829c016ff2013a2a9d79037`; zero new comments and no unresolved threads. The earlier Apex finding remains fixed. - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1007.0-canary.1 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
faa8e452c7 |
fix(tasks): stop repeated reminders for historical questions (#15392)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task questions remain saved so a person can answer them later. > - The composer moves an old question into history after a newer human message. > - Native completion still treated every pending question as a required response. > - This caused agents to demand an old answer after the person moved work forward. > - This pull request shares the historical-question rule across context and task execution. > - Agents can finish verified work while the original question remains answerable. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15229, Refs #14613, Refs #13130. **What happened?** An agent repeatedly asked a person to answer a question that had moved into feed history. Completion feedback explicitly told the agent to request a response. The saved pending row also blocked task completion. **Expected behavior** A question before newer human direction remains answerable in the feed. Its pending state alone must not require another reminder or stop completed work. A new input blocker, an approval, or a configured review stage must keep its gate. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Let a task agent create an ordinary question. 2. Dismiss the question and send a newer task message. 3. Let the agent finish the requested work and submit its completion report. 4. Observe a demand to answer the old question and a retained completion gate. ## What Changed - Add one company-scoped predicate for historical questions. Only later human comments count. Exclude agent attribution, run attribution, system notices, and untrusted source data. - Apply the predicate to completion feedback, native waits, finalization, commit validation, retry validation, blocked routing, and successful-run handoff. - Include question classification and guidance in heartbeat context and both native task-context tools. Add the guidance to fresh and resumed task prompts. - Replace automatic reminders for current ordinary questions with instructions to assess the real blocker, continue independent work, and withdraw obsolete questions through the existing API. - Preserve historical question rows during completion while cancelling their live native source runs through the existing post-commit and recovery paths. Let an authorized human answer them after completion without reopening work or creating a response wake. Preserve cancellation, current-input, approval, permission, credential, connection, and review gates. Add no dismissal storage or migration. - Document the rule in the execution contract and agent skill. Refresh generated capability source anchors. Add database-backed status, context, attribution, and governance regression tests. ## Verification - `pnpm build` passed. The server rebuild also passed after the lifecycle fix. Generated capability contract and inventory checks passed after the agent documentation update. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. Final `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit` also passed after the last test additions. - Lifecycle and interaction regressions passed: 224 tests in 3 suites. Context and prompt tests also passed. Final historical-question cases passed (33 tests), native cancellation/recovery cases passed (6 tests), and the existing interaction/confirmation suites passed (72 tests). The full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after more than two hours with unrelated fixture/hook timeout failures; it did not pass. All 52 successful GitHub checks are green on the latest commit, including the complete test matrix; no checks are pending or failing. Greptile is 5/5 and both review threads are resolved. - Regression cases cover the old-question/new-human-message sequence, final task status, answering after completion with no wake, live-run cancellation and crash recovery, current input blockers, both task-context tools, API context, timestamp precision, attribution boundaries, and protected gates. ## Risks - A later human task message makes an earlier ordinary question historical even if its input is still missing. The agent must identify the current blocker and ask only for information that still prevents work. - Browser dismissal remains a local preference. Dismissal without a later human message is not recorded by this change. - No schema change or data migration. Completion retains ordinary historical questions; cancellation still expires them. A completed task accepts historical answers only from an authorized human and creates no response-delivery outbox row. Governed requests retain their gates. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository editing, code execution, and browser diagnostics. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2d0c138122 |
Expand direct assistant MCP tools for work and configuration (#15380)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - People also use assistants in Codex, Claude, and other MCP clients. > - The existing assistant connection can read work and create tasks or comments. > - It cannot edit tasks, exchange files, or manage normal agent and project settings. > - These operations must retain the person's permissions and Paperclip's execution rules. > - This pull request adds an explicit operation registry and separately consented configuration access. > - Assistants can manage work without receiving credentials or runner authority. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: assistant MCP, domain routes, consent UI, storage, and Product E2E. **Problem or motivation** A connected assistant cannot update tasks, maintain documents, attach files, or configure existing agents, projects, and skills. Users must leave the assistant for these routine actions. **Proposed solution** Add named tools and a restricted API registry to direct connections. Require separate configuration consent. Reuse domain routes and retry receipts. File uploads save the attachment when the byte transfer succeeds. **Alternatives considered** Arbitrary REST forwarding would expose administration and credential operations. Runner impersonation would bypass execution ownership. Separate upload completion calls add unnecessary client state. **Roadmap alignment** Checked ROADMAP.md and related MCP pull requests. This extends the human-authorized connection from #14933. It does not replace the runner or introduce agent impersonation. Companion Cloud routing and directory isolation: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/pull/678. ## What Changed - Add task editing, finish/block, documents/revisions, deliverables, agent settings/instructions, projects/repositories, and skills/files. - Add an allowlisted API search/call registry with identical field restrictions, scopes, and retry identities. - Add unchecked configuration consent. Existing write grants retain their current authority. - Add hashed, expiring file transfer tickets and atomic upload receipts. No completion call is required. - Preserve company boundaries, human attribution, active native execution ownership, and execution review gates. - Add protocol/domain tests, consent stories, and eight paid Product E2E workflows. - Repair two CI fixture races: await cold route setup before assertions, and wait for asynchronously loaded connection copy. Both fixture suites pass (24 + 48 tests). ## Verification - Consent revision: one write-access checkbox controls requested work and configuration permissions in browser and device flows. All 16 consent tests, UI typecheck/build and token gates pass. Updated interactive stories cover default approval, opt-out and viewer restrictions. The paid browser helper uses the new exact label. Real GPT-5.4 Mini Product E2E passes 2/2 at `64f96373118eb190f8cba1c2ab17cb979555f3ad` (configuration + permission denial), campaign `local-2026-10-07T00-51-14-337Z`, no automatic retries, cleanup passed; $0.04149375 estimated assistant cost plus unpriced worker usage. Raw results, usage and source fingerprints are retained in the worktree. UI and Product E2E typechecks pass. - Prior head `2f246d4b74f1f98c75ebcb37ae6753a748237fac`: all 52 checks pass; two optional Storybook checks skip. Greptile 5/5 on that head, no unresolved review threads. Final consent head `64f96373118eb190f8cba1c2ab17cb979555f3ad` also has all checks passing and Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved threads. The unchanged Cursor sandbox test had one 10-second timeout, passed in local isolation, and passed its single CI rerun; the failed attempt remains in [the CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37554106934). The existing chat retry-denial browser test had one visibility failure; its single rerun passes, and the failed attempt remains in [the CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37542735691). - Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass at final runtime source `b2196fae1`. UI token gates pass. - 139 MCP/OAuth/transfer/privacy tests and 76 grader calibration tests pass, including one-connection PostgreSQL OAuth and concurrent upload retries. - Paid Product E2E: all eight expanded cases qualified across Mini, Haiku and Sonnet. A merged-source repeat passed 23/24; one Haiku cell timed out before application startup. Final affected-case qualification passes 9/9 on all three models with grader v16, including the failed cell. Automatic retries disabled; failures, costs, source hashes and independent durable-state/file assertions are retained in [the verification record](doc/plans/2026-10-06-expanded-assistant-mcp-verification.md). - Actual Codex CLI, Claude Code and OpenCode clients completed local reads/mutations. Codex wrote a report, Claude updated it in a later conversation, and OpenCode uploaded/downloaded a file with matching SHA-256 and registered the attachment. Revoking the CLI grant rejects subsequent bridge initialization. - Butter staging is verified on final runtime `b2196fae1` ([deployment](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/actions/runs/37538432138)). A fresh OpenCode workspace fetched the copied invitation, configured remote MCP, started OAuth and reached real consent with configuration unchecked. Invalid transfer tickets return 403 through Cloud. Human approval for the new persistent staging grant is pending; hosted task/file success is not yet claimed. The final transaction fix is deployed. - Full local `pnpm test:run` passed 15,614 general-server tests but stopped on two macOS timeouts. The heartbeat test passed in isolation; the existing 40,000-file Git stress fixture timed out again. Its Linux CI lane passes. Later local full-suite phases did not run after the timeout; this is not an all-green local full-suite claim. - Instructions and security limits are in `doc/public-mcp.md`; the saved plan is `doc/plans/2026-10-06-expanded-assistant-mcp-tools.md`. ## Risks - This expands the experimental direct MCP surface. Explicit schemas and domain permissions must stay synchronized. - Migration 0311 adds transfer tickets and upload receipts. Expired orphan cleanup must not remove committed attachments. - Configuration requires a new consent request containing that scope; the single write-access choice controls it alongside work mutations. Refreshing an old grant does not add it. - The public directory keeps its original ten tools through the companion Cloud change. - Hosted consent/work proof remains the final delivery gate. The PR stays draft while approval of the new staging grant is pending; code checks and review are green. Merging is a separate action. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6, tool use and code execution). The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Paid evaluation models: gpt-5.4-mini, claude-haiku-4-5-20251001; claude-sonnet-4-6. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full-suite macOS limitation disclosed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
892b0b3606 |
fix: scope quota reports to authorized subscription accounts (#14994)
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
eab93fd4a0 |
fix: checkpoint adapter usage and preserve unknown prices (#14991)
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
3ebd7bc0c9 |
test: isolate accounting fixtures and include all adapter suites (#14989)
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1007.0-canary.0 |
||
|
|
ac8f3eb143 |
feat(ui): remove star and leave buttons from agent index (#15400)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Agents index page (`/agents/all`) shows one row per agent in both the streamlined and production sides of the UI > - Each row had a star toggle and a leave/join button that write per-user state through the resource-memberships API (`agent_memberships` table) > - The default streamlined sidebar no longer lists agents, so the star and leave actions on the index no longer feed a visible pinned list > - This pull request removes the star toggle and the leave/join button from agent index rows and org-tree nodes > - The backend resource-memberships endpoints and the `agent_memberships` table stay live because the agent detail page and the legacy sidebar still use them > - The benefit is a cleaner index page with no redundant actions for state that is not surfaced on the page itself ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this change; the description follows the feature request issue template inline. **Subsystem affected** ui/ — React + Vite board UI. The change is presentational only; no backend or schema code is touched. **Problem or motivation** The agent index rows show a star toggle and a leave/join button. Those two buttons write per-user membership state that the default streamlined UI no longer surfaces anywhere on the page itself. The default sidebar shows a plain "Agents" nav item and does not list agents. The buttons are now redundant on the index. **Proposed solution** Remove both buttons from the agent index list rows and org-tree nodes in both UI variants. Keep the data layer. The agent detail page still renders the header star toggle and the join/leave banner, and the legacy sidebar still renders star and leave rows for instances that opt out of the streamlined UI. **Alternatives considered** - Remove the backend endpoints too. Rejected: the agent detail page and the legacy sidebar still read and write the same state. - Keep the buttons hidden behind a setting. Rejected: no product need, and the plan approved the straightforward removal. **Roadmap alignment** This is a small presentational change. It does not overlap any section in `ROADMAP.md`. **Additional context** Rows whose membership state is `left` keep their dimmed styling on the index. ## What Changed - Removed the `StarToggle` component from agent index list rows in `ui/src/pages/Agents.tsx` and `ui/src/pages/Agents.production.tsx` - Removed the `MembershipAction` (Leave/Join) component from agent index list rows in both files - Removed both actions from the org-tree nodes in both files - Dropped now-unused imports and derived values (`StarToggle`, `MembershipAction`, `isStarred`, `useResourceMembershipMutation`, and the per-row pending/starred variables) - Kept `useResourceMemberships` and the dim-on-left row styling so rows whose membership is `left` remain visually identified - Updated `ui/src/pages/Agents.test.tsx`: a new test asserts both modes omit star and leave/join actions from list and org-chart views; the dim-on-left tests are kept ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passes - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` passes - UI Vitest suite for `Agents.test.tsx` passes (21 tests) - `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean - Manual check on `/agents/all`: no star and no Leave/Join buttons in the list view or the org-chart view; star/leave still work on the agent detail page ## Risks Low risk. This is a presentational UI change with no backend or schema changes. Star/leave remain available on the agent detail page and the legacy sidebar. No migration is involved. ## Model Used - Provider: DeepSeek (via the Paperclip opencode_local adapter, model `openrouter/~deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-latest`) - Model: deepseek-v4-flash (OpenRouter `openrouter/~deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-latest`) - Context window: 128K; used with tool use in the repository - Assisted with the code change and this PR body; the plan and scope came from the tracking work item ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
f77fcbf4bf |
feat(apps): add Telem.AI web search connection (#15379)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Research agents need current web information. > - The Apps catalog connects agents to remote MCP tools through the normal access rules. > - Telem.AI supplies web search and page reading through one API key. > - This PR adds its catalog entry, optional search settings, artwork, and setup guide. > - The connection keeps an operator's saved header policy when they reconnect. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15302. Related catalog work: #13881. This PR continues #15302 by Yifei Ai (@aiwen324). Thank you for the connector and its review fixes. All seven original commits are preserved. GitHub denied the attempt to push to the contributor's fork, so this branch retains the repair commit and merges current master. Master now includes the same test fix. For a squash merge, keep the original author in the final commit message: ```text Co-Authored-By: Yifei Ai <aiwen324@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> ``` A search found no separate public Telem issue or competing Telem PR. The existing Apps path matches the roadmap. **Agent or provider** Telem.AI provides web search and page reading through a hosted MCP server. **Why this adapter is useful** Agents can use multiple search providers through one governed connection. Operators can set the search tier, auto routing, and provider lists. **How the agent is invoked** The remote MCP server uses Streamable HTTP at `https://mcp.telem.ai/mcp`. The API key uses an `Authorization: Bearer` header. See the [official MCP guide](https://docs.telem.ai/integrations/mcp/). ## What Changed - Add the Telem.AI definition, research entry, permission review, and generated registry entry. - Add four optional settings. Unset settings send no request header. - Add official light and dark artwork, source records, and a setup guide. - Forward company, issue, agent, run, project, and correlation IDs by default. Preserve a saved policy, including disabled forwarding, on reconnect. - Add catalog and connection tests. ## Verification Current head: `b4164477fb1b312a504789bf17b51c963244c0fd`. Merged master: `228f0e2807c5b59d2aa129cf2d80b9777ebabf07`. - Resolved five shared catalog conflicts after the Superagent connection merged. - Keep both providers in the research ledger, generated registry, generator, branding manifest, and connection guide index. - Correct the combined catalog totals: 52 self-serve candidates, 55 research entries, and 68 Apps entries. - The published Git tree exactly matches the tested local resolution. - Catalog and Apps UI suites: **295 tests pass** after the catalog count fixes. - Connection service suite: **387 tests pass** in the full run. Its only failure was the old catalog count. That test passes on a focused rerun after the fix. This gives **388 passing service tests** across the two runs. - Total focused coverage: **683 passing tests**. The first runs exposed four fixed-count assertions that needed the combined totals. - Shared package build and plugin SDK compile pass. Token gates and whitespace checks pass. - Generation with `--definitions-only` reproduces the Telem definition and registry. The unrelated AgentMail and Linear drift remains excluded. - Local UI typecheck ended with exit 137 at the container memory limit. Full local typecheck, test, and build are not claimed. Earlier runs also recorded missing Cargo and Node development headers. - GitHub reports a clean merge state against master `228f0e280`. - All 54 checks are complete: **52 passed and two Storybook checks skipped**. No check failed or remains pending. - [CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37545412406) passes on this head. This includes typecheck, build, tests, browser shards, Runner checks, and Canary Dry Run. - [Greptile](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15379#issuecomment-6024519537) is **5/5 on this head**. There are no review threads, open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups. - [Superagent](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/runs/112548142930) passes. - Final recovery checks confirm all seven original commits and current master remain in history. Token gates and whitespace checks pass. - The final recovery run makes no source change. It verifies the published repair and retains the local check limits below. - [Commitperclip](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37545407943) passes with no failures. Its only informational note asks the merger to keep the author trailer above. - All seven original contribution commits remain in history. The diff against master contains the same 14 Telem files. It adds no dependency, lockfile, schema, or workflow change. - The managed GitHub CLI capability was missing in this run. The installed GitHub connection applied the base files, merged master, then restored the tested combined catalog. No history was rewritten. The previous head `2d32a0094` passed all remote gates and had Greptile 5/5. Those results do not verify this new head. The original PR reports live setup, discovery, settings headers, gateway calls, and context-header forwarding. This repair does not repeat those account-bound checks. The permission record still marks maintainer live qualification as outstanding. ## Risks - Telem.AI receives the six context IDs by default. The saved header policy controls forwarding. Search use is billed to the account that owns the key. - All agents on a connection share its search settings. - The merge uses master's route-test setup unchanged. The company-boundary assertions remain intact. - No schema, dependency, or workflow change is included. - Live provider evidence is attributed to the original contributor. Maintainer live qualification remains outside this CI repair. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Original contribution: Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), 1M-token context, through Claude Code with shell, editing, and test tools, as disclosed in #15302. - CI repair and review: OpenAI `gpt-6-astra`, through Codex with reasoning, shell, editing, and GitHub tools. The runtime does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Yifei Ai <aiwen324@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.25 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
228f0e2807 |
fix(ui): make pull request review waits visible (#15375)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people supervise agent work and review its outputs. > - A task can wait for a human to review a pull request while an agent schedules checks. > - The PR work product and detected external links use separate display paths. > - A private PR can disappear from the useful sidebar view when its provider lookup fails. > - The monitor countdown says when the next check runs but omits the saved review request. > - This change shows the saved PR and requested review in the task's existing surfaces. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A task kept checking whether a private GitHub PR had merged. Its work product requested board review, but the Properties sidebar used detected external objects instead. The PR URL was stored only in metadata, which the PR refresh path did not read. The composer showed a generic monitor countdown with no PR link or review action. **Expected behavior** Show saved PR links even if provider access fails. During a GitHub monitor wait, make outstanding review requests visible with the next check time and a status-check action. Stop requesting review when a PR merges or closes. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Register a PR work product with `reviewState: needs_board_review` and its URL in `metadata.url`. 2. Schedule an external-service monitor for GitHub. 3. Open the task with external-object lookup unavailable or unable to access the private repository. 4. Inspect Properties and the composer wait strip. Related work: #14469 added rich artifact cards. #8759 addresses attention on monitored task blockers. This change uses the existing work products and monitor action; it adds no blocker or approval mechanism. ## What Changed - Show saved PRs in Properties, including metadata-only links, independent of external-object availability. - Deduplicate equivalent GitHub PR URLs while preserving the saved navigation link, and put explicit review requests first. - Keep provider status and freshness on the combined PR row; keep private PR links usable when lookup fails. - Show the saved PR review request above the composer and in the existing monitor banner during a GitHub monitor wait. - Label the existing monitor action `Check status` and show check failures inline. - Suppress review prompts for merged, closed, or archived PRs even if their review flag is stale. - Refresh PR metadata using `metadata.url` and the existing `repository` alias. - Share saved work-product reads across the thread, Properties, and Artifacts. Refresh GitHub in a separate query and enrich only matching PR versions. - Start a fresh saved-row request on live invalidation so late provider responses cannot hide new artifacts or changed review requests. - Cover stalled GitHub lookups in both panels so refresh latency cannot hide saved work. - Scope monitor-check mutation state to the task so failures and late responses do not leak across navigation. - Refresh GitHub status when the displayed run finishes, including when saved PR rows have not changed. - Clarify that PR review and external release handoffs need a saved human-input interaction with an agent assigned for continuation; a flag, monitor, or handoff comment alone does not create that card. ## Verification - 386 tests pass across eleven affected UI and server suites on `184c7d8746`. Regressions cover saved links, provider status, cold-cache loading, panel reopening, monitor errors during navigation, and live updates during provider refresh. - Three live-update regressions and two run-completion regressions fail before their fixes and pass afterward. These tests use the real API client's GET coalescing and abort handling. - Full repository typecheck and build passed on the merged parent `1a49112dd2`. The latest UI changes pass UI typecheck and token gates; CI also verifies the latest build. Capability contract/inventory checks pass. - Storybook build and browser checks passed before the query race fix. Browser checks cover desktop and 390px mobile review waits, plus video, mixed-file, and empty artifact galleries after background refresh. - The earlier full local `pnpm test:run` was stopped under disk pressure. It reported failures outside the changed suites; an isolated skill-cache run reproduced three existing macOS permission failures. The full local suite was not rerun for this follow-up. - Latest-head CI passes on `184c7d8746`, including the browser shards and canary dry run. Apex is 5/5 with no actionable findings and no unresolved threads. All eight reported findings are addressed. ## Risks - This uses saved PR review state. When GitHub access fails, the saved state can remain stale until the agent updates it. The link remains visible and the status check remains available. - `Check status` wakes the existing monitor owner. It does not merge a PR, accept an approval, or mark the task done. - No schema, permissions, or scheduler behavior changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with reasoning, repository analysis, code editing, and test execution. The exact deployment model ID and context window were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — 277 affected tests - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
8cbd21b3e7 |
feat(apps): add Superagent connection (#15394)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents reach external services through the Apps catalog. Each catalog entry is a reviewed `AppDefinition` that connects a provider's hosted MCP server to Paperclip's shared vault, grants, policies, gateway, and audit trail. > - Superagent (`superagent.sh`) is a security platform. Its hosted MCP server lets agents read and triage security findings, start red-team reports, run Contributor Trust and dependency update jobs, and score web pages, email, files, skills, MCP repositories, and packages before an agent trusts them. > - Superagent is not in the catalog. Operators must use the generic "Connect your own MCP server" flow. That flow has no branding, no key guidance, and no warning about billable or destructive tools. > - The connector playbook supports this provider with existing definition fields. The server accepts an organization API key as a bearer header. It publishes no OAuth authorization-server metadata, so browser sign-in is not possible. > - This pull request adds the Superagent definition, its artwork, the research and permission-review ledger rows, documentation, deterministic tests, and one reviewed risk-classification rule. > - The benefit is a branded, governed Superagent connection with clear key guidance and a warning about tools that cost credits or delete data. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Teams that use Superagent for PR security, red teaming, and agent guardrails want their Paperclip agents to read findings, return structured reports, and score content before they use it. Superagent is not in the Apps catalog. Operators must paste the MCP URL and an `Authorization` header into the generic remote-MCP flow. That flow gives no branding and no provider guidance. It also does not tell the operator that the key reaches the whole organization, or that some tools consume credits or permanently delete findings. **Proposed solution** Add a catalog-only Superagent connection that follows the connector playbook. It has one method: a customer organization API key (`sk_live_...`), sent as an `Authorization: Bearer` header to `https://www.superagent.sh/mcp`. The field helper text explains that Superagent keys are not scoped. The method warning tells operators to set billable and destructive actions to Ask first before agents run unattended. All discovered tools stay governed by the normal per-action policies. **Alternatives considered** A browser sign-in method was not added. The server's protected-resource metadata names `https://superagent.sh` as its authorization server, but that origin publishes no `oauth-authorization-server` or `openid-configuration` document, so Paperclip cannot discover OAuth endpoints. A plugin was not needed because the connection needs no custom UI, tables, workers, or webhooks. Relying on the generic risk classifier was not enough. Several Superagent mutations (`triage_finding`, `scan_*`, `restore_agent_builtin_rule`) use names that it reads as reads, so a narrow reviewed Superagent rule was added instead. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing self-serve remote-MCP connection catalog. It does not overlap planned core work. ## What Changed - Added the `superagent` row to `packages/shared/src/self-serve-mcp-research.json` (API-key auth, risk tier S4). - Added the `superagent` provider to `scripts/ingest-app-definitions.mjs` (category, key placement and placeholder, console links, guidance, description). Regenerated `packages/shared/src/app-definitions/superagent.json` and the generated registry. - Added the `superagent/mcp-api-key` permission review to `doc/connections/tool-method-permission-reviews.json`, with key-permission text and evidence links. - Added Superagent's official mark (`ui/public/brands/apps/superagent.png`, the 460×460 avatar of the official `superagent-ai` GitHub organization) and the brand manifest entry. - Added gallery copy for the Superagent card. - Added a reviewed Superagent rule to `classifyRisk` in `server/src/services/tool-access.ts`. Only `list_*` and `get_*` tools, and tools that Superagent marks read-only, are reads. `delete_*` and `revoke_agent_client` are destructive. All other tools are writes, so billable and rule-changing tools can be set to Ask first. - Put the Ask-first advice in the API-key helper text, because the key form shows helper text and not method warnings. - Added `doc/connections/SUPERAGENT.md` (transport and auth, why there is no OAuth, administrator setup, capabilities and policy, manifest, brand provenance, validation hook). Linked it from the connections README and the permission audit. - Tests: definition shape, store visibility and artwork, URL recognition, the bearer header on discovery with the key kept out of connection config, read/write/destructive classification of fixture tools, the Superagent risk rule (including `triage_finding` and `restore_agent_builtin_rule`), the visible Ask-first advice and API-key gating of the connect form, and the pinned catalog counts. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/app-definitions.test.ts packages/shared/src/app-definitions-url.test.ts ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/Browse.test.tsx ui/src/lib/app-brand-assets.test.ts ui/src/pages/apps/AppLogo.brand-assets.test.tsx`: 317 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts`: 385 passed. - `node scripts/check-app-brand-assets.mjs` and `node --test scripts/app-brand-validation.test.mjs`: passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`, `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`, and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`: clean. - Manual: in a local instance, open Apps → Browse and confirm the Superagent card and icon. Open `/apps/connect?source=superagent`. Confirm the single API-key method, and confirm that Connect enables only after a key is entered. - Live metadata probe on 2026-10-06: an unauthenticated `initialize` on `https://www.superagent.sh/mcp` returns 401 with `resource_metadata="https://www.superagent.sh/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource"`. That document returns 200. No authorization-server metadata exists at the named issuer. ## Risks - Low risk to existing providers. The change is additive catalog data plus tests. The generated registry only gains one import. The new risk rule runs only for Superagent connections. - A Superagent key reaches its whole organization. Some tools consume credits (`create_*_report`, `triage_finding`) or delete data permanently (`delete_finding`). Every action starts Allowed under the current product default. The key helper text tells operators to set these actions to Ask first. - The permission-review ledger records live proof as not run. No Superagent account was used. The lifecycle checklist in `doc/connections/SUPERAGENT.md` needs a documented pass before the entry is fully qualified. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`, 1M context) in Claude Code, with extended thinking and tool use (shell, file editing, web fetch, browser checks). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
5c15be3715 |
build(deps): bump actions/cache from 5.1.0 to 6.1.0 (#12962)
Bumps [actions/cache](https://github.com/actions/cache) from 5.1.0 to 6.1.0. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/releases">actions/cache's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v6.1.0</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Bump <code>@actions/cache</code> to v6.1.0 - handle read-only cache access by <a href="https://github.com/jasongin"><code>@jasongin</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/cache/pull/1768">actions/cache#1768</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/compare/v6...v6.1.0">https://github.com/actions/cache/compare/v6...v6.1.0</a></p> <h2>v6.0.0</h2> <h2>What's Changed</h2> <ul> <li>Update packages, migrate to ESM by <a href="https://github.com/Samirat"><code>@Samirat</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/cache/pull/1760">actions/cache#1760</a></li> </ul> <p><strong>Full Changelog</strong>: <a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/compare/v5...v6.0.0">https://github.com/actions/cache/compare/v5...v6.0.0</a></p> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/55cc8345863c7cc4c66a329aec7e433d2d1c52a9"><code>55cc834</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/cache/issues/1768">#1768</a> from jasongin/readonly-cache</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/d8cd72f230726cdf4457ebb61ec1b593a8d12337"><code>d8cd72f</code></a> Bump <code>@actions/cache</code> to v6.1.0 - handle cache write error due to RO token</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/2c8a9bd7457de244a408f35966fab2fb45fda9c8"><code>2c8a9bd</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/actions/cache/issues/1760">#1760</a> from actions/samirat/esm_migration_and_package_update</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/e9b91fdc3fea7d79165fceb79042ef45c2d51023"><code>e9b91fd</code></a> Prettier fixes</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/e4884b8ff7f92ef6b52c79eda480bbc86e685adb"><code>e4884b8</code></a> Rebuild dist</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/10baf0191a3c426ea0fa4a3253a5c04233b6e18f"><code>10baf01</code></a> Fixed licenses</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/e39b386c9004d72a15d864ade8c0b3a702d47a37"><code>e39b386</code></a> Fix test mock return order</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/b6928203372a8571ff984c0c883ef3a1adfb0c06"><code>b692820</code></a> PR feedback</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/60749128a44d25d3c520a489e576380cf00ff3f1"><code>6074912</code></a> Rebuild dist bundles as ESM to match type:module</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/commit/5a912e8b4af820fa082a0e75cfd2c782f8fbfe0e"><code>5a912e8</code></a> Fix lint and jest issues</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/actions/cache/compare/v5.1.0...v6.1.0">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
45ac4e945d |
docs(release): stable notes for the 2026.1006.0-beta.0 soak (v2026.1009.0) (#15388)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The release process promotes a soaked beta to stable. The stable GitHub Release body comes from `releases/beta/v<beta-version>.md` on `master` > - The `draft_stable_notes` job pushed a commit-log skeleton to this branch when `2026.1006.0-beta.0` published today (workflow run 37516507660) > - The skeleton is grouped commit subjects. It is not in release-notes voice and it does not tell a self-hoster what to do before an upgrade > - This pull request replaces the skeleton with curated notes. Each claim traces to a pull request in `v2026.1005.0..22a3ea34` > - The benefit is that the earliest stable promotion (v2026.1009.0) finds finished notes on `master` on time ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Missing content **Where is the issue?** `releases/beta/v2026.1006.0-beta.0.md` — the stable-notes file for the `2026.1006.0-beta.0` soak. It exists only on this machine-owned branch and only as the auto-generated skeleton. **What's wrong?** The stable promotion reads this file from `master` and publishes it as the GitHub Release body. Until this branch merges, the stable preflight has no notes to resolve. The skeleton lists raw commit subjects with nested PR summaries. It does not call out the two changes that need operator action before the upgrade. **Suggested fix** Merge the curated notes so the notes invariant holds for the v2026.1009.0 promotion. Correct the `> Released:` date in a follow-up if the promotion date slips. ## What Changed - Replaced the skeleton in `releases/beta/v2026.1006.0-beta.0.md` with curated stable notes for v2026.1009.0 in the same layout as `releases/v2026.1005.0.md`: overview, Breaking Changes, Highlights, Fixes, Improvements, Upgrade Guide, Contributors - Breaking Changes lists the SQLite restore-lock protocol change (#14869) and stricter stored tool-grant enforcement (#14915) - Upgrade Guide enumerates migrations `0294` through `0305`, the three new default-off experimental settings, the `PAPERCLIP_CONNECTION_INSTRUCTIONS_FILE` contract for custom adapters, and the harness pin moves - Release and CI internals, smoke specs, and canary tooling are left out. Features already described in the v2026.1005.0 notes are not repeated ## Verification - Beta publish is complete: npm dist-tag `beta` is `2026.1006.0-beta.0`, tag `beta/v2026.1006.0-beta.0` points at `22a3ea3414e9039a538fbb0374b3cfa7fc4371eb`, and the `publish_beta`, `smoke_beta`, and `draft_stable_notes` jobs in run 37516507660 all succeeded - `git rev-list --count v2026.1005.0..22a3ea3414e9039a538fbb0374b3cfa7fc4371eb` returns 130, which matches the overview and Contributors section - `git shortlog -sn --no-merges` over the same range shows 8 human authors after the two bot accounts are excluded - `./scripts/release.sh stable --date 2026-10-09 --print-version` returns `2026.1009.0` - Every `#NNNN` link in the file resolves to a pull request inside the range. Migration numbers, setting keys, env var names, and defaults were checked in the code on the source commit, not in commit subjects - The file contains no internal ticket ids or instance-local links ## Risks - Low risk: a single markdown file, no source changes. If the promotion date slips past 2026-10-09, the `> Released:` line and H1 need a one-line update before the stable dispatch. The beta-keyed filename makes that re-date harmless ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5-1` (Claude Fable 5.1), extended thinking enabled, tool use via Claude Code ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.24 |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
c365a16e34 |
build(deps): bump actions/deploy-pages from 4.0.5 to 5.0.1 (#12963)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The repository runs a weekly full-stack end-to-end campaign for the runner, and that workflow publishes its merged dashboard to GitHub Pages > - The publish flow has two actions: `actions/upload-pages-artifact` packages the dashboard, and `actions/deploy-pages` deploys it > - #12964 moved `actions/upload-pages-artifact` to version 5, and `actions/deploy-pages` is still pinned to a version 4 commit > - Version 4 of `actions/deploy-pages` runs on the Node.js 20 runtime, and GitHub-hosted runners are moving actions to Node.js 24 > - This pull request moves the pin to the commit that upstream tags as `v5.0.1` > - The benefit is that both Pages actions are on the same major version, the deploy step runs on Node.js 24, and the pin stays a commit SHA ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists for this change. Refs #12964 (the matching `actions/upload-pages-artifact` update, now merged) and Refs #12962 (another pinned GitHub Action update). They are related, and they are not duplicates. The description below follows the enhancement template. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The weekly runner end-to-end workflow deploys its merged dashboard to GitHub Pages. This change updates the action that performs that deployment. **Subsystem affected** CI and release automation — `.github/workflows/runner-full-stack-e2e.yml`. **Current behavior** The `pages` job uses `actions/deploy-pages` at commit `d6db90164ac5ed86f2b6aed7e0febac5b3c0c03e`, which runs on `node20`. **Proposed behavior** The `pages` job uses `actions/deploy-pages` at commit `368f82528645a54fb793d4d04e342629a3f51346`, which upstream tags as `v5.0.1` and which runs on `node24`. Version 5.0.1 also adds backoff and jitter to the deployment status polling. **Breaking changes** None for this repository. The `action.yml` of both versions declares the same six inputs (`token`, `timeout`, `error_count`, `reporting_interval`, `artifact_name`, `preview`) with the same defaults, and the same `page_url` output. The job passes `artifact_name` only. The job runs on `ubuntu-latest`, which supports the `node24` runtime. ## What Changed - Change the pinned commit of `actions/deploy-pages` in `.github/workflows/runner-full-stack-e2e.yml` from the version 4 commit to `368f82528645a54fb793d4d04e342629a3f51346`, which upstream tags as `v5.0.1`. ## Verification - The pinned commit matches the upstream tag. `gh api repos/actions/deploy-pages/git/ref/tags/v5.0.1 --jq .object.sha` returns `368f82528645a54fb793d4d04e342629a3f51346`. - The input and output contract stays the same. A comparison of `action.yml` at the old pin and at the new pin shows identical inputs, defaults and outputs. Only the runtime changes from `node20` to `node24`. - The repository CI suite passes on this branch after a rebase onto the current base branch. - One limit applies. The changed step runs only in the `Runner Full-Stack E2E` workflow. That workflow starts on a weekly schedule and on a manual dispatch, so no pull-request run exercises the step. A maintainer can exercise it with a manual dispatch of that workflow, or the next scheduled run exercises it. ## Risks - Low risk, with one limit. The changed step does not run on a pull request, so the pull-request checks do not prove the new action version in this workflow. - The runtime moves to Node.js 24. GitHub-hosted runners support it, and this job uses a GitHub-hosted runner. - The rollback is one commit. Restore the previous pinned commit of `actions/deploy-pages`. ## Model Used Dependabot generated this dependency update automatically, so no AI model produced the code change. A maintainer wrote this description with Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic, model id `claude-opus-5`, extended thinking, tool use). ## Checklist Three boxes stay unticked on purpose. This change pins one GitHub Action version in one workflow file. No local test covers a pinned action version, no new test applies, and no document refers to this pin. - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub #NNN / github.com/paperclipai/paperclip URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. docs/..., fix/...) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b508a05c43 |
feat: add internal agent complaints and suggestions (#15367)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents use legacy skills or native runner tools to work on tasks. > - Those agents can encounter friction that does not belong in the task thread. > - A complaint should preserve the raw reaction. A suggestion should describe an improvement. > - This pull request adds attributed local storage and both submission paths. > - Agents can submit feedback once and continue their primary work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Server, database, shared contracts, runtime skills, and native runner tools. **Problem or motivation** Agents have no default internal channel for incidental complaints and suggestions. Sending this feedback through task comments adds noise and can alter task workflows. **Proposed solution** Store free-form feedback in the current instance database. Derive agent, run, company, and task attribution from active authority. Provide default legacy skills and provider-neutral native actions. Keep the instructions close to Warp's MIT-licensed originals. **Alternatives considered** Task comments and external Slack delivery add unwanted side effects. Mandatory suggestion fields and short editorial limits would discard useful feedback. This release has no listing API, UI, read tool, automatic triage, or external forwarding. **Roadmap alignment** This is a maintainer-requested addition to the existing runtime skills and runner tool paths. It does not duplicate a listed roadmap milestone. Searches for complaint tooling, suggestion-box, and agent commentary found no overlapping public PR or issue. ## What Changed - Add the company-scoped `agent_commentary` table, shared validation, and idempotent migration `0310`. - Add one transactional service and the agent-only POST route. Validate active authority before writes or replay. Redact known credentials. Commit a content-free audit with each new record. - Add `submit_complaint` and `submit_suggestion` to standard, ask, and planning modes. Keep review, revocation, and completion restrictions. Store replay identity on the commentary row. - Mount `complain` and `suggestion-box` by default for legacy agents. Bundle a dependency-free Node.js stdin helper in the operational skill and allow its POST through the sandbox bridge. - Preserve Warp's complaint voice and suggestion guidance, with attribution and local transport adaptations. Keep source attribution and MIT notices in each skill's LICENSE, outside runtime instructions. - Document custom-runtime HTTP use and database inspection. Add real-database tests and a repeatable live Codex smoke for local and Daytona execution. - Pin the lagging-source migration fixture before the identity-repair migration so later migrations preserve its regression coverage. ## Verification - Personally ran real Codex submissions in all four environments on 2026-10-06. Local runs passed at 20:35 UTC. Daytona native passed at 20:31 UTC; Daytona legacy passed at 20:33 UTC. Each stored exactly two rows with company, agent, run, and task attribution, wrote the continuation marker, exited zero, created no task comments, and left task status unchanged. Each recorded two content-free activity entries. - Daytona used production provider hooks, real remote execution and file transfer, the legacy queue callback bridge, and native private WebSocket ingress. The current Linux runner was built from `abf47b595`, staged, and verified against controller contracts. Both sandboxes were confirmed deleted. This is a focused feedback transport smoke; it does not claim full Runner E2E catalog or browser qualification. - The immutable base image and Linux binary digest are recorded in [the verification documentation](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/agent-commentary/doc/agent-commentary.md#verification). The smoke script can save content-free JSON evidence. No credentials or feedback bodies are in these reports. | Environment | Runner | Complaint row | Suggestion row | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | local | legacy Codex | `59413a00-1de2-4bb1-bcc6-9c4b54c64aa6` | `3db2364d-3e15-4f47-846f-875d3902999d` | | local | native Codex | `5da22b5f-41df-4de5-8ba0-d9345ab01267` | `2d5abe17-dd41-403c-a5ee-4729f2d58921` | | daytona | legacy Codex | `27c9d0aa-8477-409f-9da0-e8ffa48dee50` | `209681c9-d1e9-4ce1-999e-48fa07692389` | | daytona | native Codex | `6eb001bb-4bcf-43f7-8717-f662f53dc7c3` | `77c383d8-a997-49e5-a33e-25c70e15c0b2` | - Run the local check with `node cli/node_modules/tsx/dist/cli.mjs server/scripts/verify-agent-commentary-live.ts`. The documentation gives the Daytona invocation. Both use disposable instance databases and normal Codex provider usage. - Repository `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed after the test extension. The build includes runner generation, contracts, and replay checks. The smoke scripts also passed a separate TypeScript check. The lagging-source migration regression passed. All equivalent current-head Vitest CI shards passed. The local monolithic `pnpm test:run` invocation was stopped after CI supplied that coverage; it did not complete locally. - Focused tests cover company isolation, spoofing, revoked credentials, stale ownership, post-finish rejection, concurrent replay, conflicting keys, atomic rollback, and deletion through existing services. Boundary tests cover empty text, Unicode, text beyond 8,000 characters, and the 524,288-character ceiling without truncation. Mounting tests cover Codex, Claude, and sandbox staging. Helper tests cover standalone Node execution, stdin, invalid UTF-8, redirects, HTTP failure, and its deadline. Privacy and bridge tests cover successful and rejected requests. - Instructions were compared with Warp's originals. MIT notices and source credits live only in LICENSE files. Native tools preserve truthful disclosure when asked, without routine announcements. - [Full CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37508559190) and Greptile 5/5 passed on the earlier feature commit `5209c3501`. The later head found the migration-fixture assumption fixed in this update. On `8a4965164`, all 55 check contexts passed after one browser shard rerun. Its initial reviewer signoff failure also passed an isolated local browser run (1 test). Greptile scored that head 5/5 and identified one smoke cleanup gap. `6ecbafb0b` fixes failed-acquisition cleanup with four passing tests and a passing smoke-script typecheck. Fresh CI is pending for this final test-only fix. No commentary production code changed during verification. ## Risks - Feedback is internally attributed. It is not anonymous. Existing redaction removes known credentials, but agents must still omit sensitive content. Normal provider transcripts can include their submitted arguments. - Default skill availability changes for existing legacy agents. Runtime policy filtering still applies. The helper uses the existing Node.js runtime with no extra dependencies; custom runtimes can call the HTTP endpoint. - Feedback is removed with its run, agent, or company. Task deletion clears only the issue pointer. Normal database backups include the table. - The migration is additive and has no backfill. Writes serialize on the active run for replay consistency. No server suggestion quota is imposed. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6-astra` through Codex, with `xhigh` reasoning effort and a reported 258,400-token context window. Capabilities used: repository inspection, code execution, and live runtime verification. No subagents were used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
fe9d865250 |
fix(native): wake parents after revised child completions (#15372)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and the tasks they perform. > - A parent needs a new notification when a child finishes requested revisions. > - Native completion currently identifies that wake by the parent and child only. > - An already consumed notification can suppress the child's next completion. > - This PR binds ordinary child notifications to the committed status decision. > - A replay keeps the same identity, while a new completion can wake the parent. > - Live evaluation then exposed new child results being swallowed by an active parent. > - The repair preserves that input for a fresh turn and prevents premature Done from discarding it. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #15218. The procedure experiments remain unshipped. This fixes native completion wake identity and durable delivery to a busy parent. Related open work: #10559 and #4507 address legacy wake deduplication, #11179 addresses delivery during an active parent run, and #13044 addresses watchdog signals. This PR changes native committed-decision keys and their delivery to an active parent, while preserving exact watchdog behavior. **What happened?** A native child completed, its parent consumed the notification, and feedback reopened the child. The second completion found the old completed wake and created no new notification. **Expected behavior** Each new ordinary child completion can notify the parent. Replaying the same committed completion must not add a notification. If the parent is already running, the new result must remain available for a fresh turn; an unread result must survive a parent Done claim. **Steps to reproduce** Complete a native child, consume its parent wake, reopen and complete that same child, then inspect the parent wakes. The regression fails on unchanged master because only one wake exists after two completions. **Paperclip version or commit** Baseline: `0fe47882cfcb12082035113c59ca96091c46ebfc`. **Deployment mode** Native runner with the standard server and PostgreSQL control plane. ## What Changed - Include the durable status-decision ID in ordinary child completion wake keys. - Defer new ordinary native child completions behind an active parent, carrying the committed decision identity and revised summary. - Keep a parent in progress while that result is still queued, claimed or deferred; recheck before the status commit. Use the existing continuation without reviving cancelled tasks. - Lock the parent before ordinary child status writes, making the notification/Done ordering explicit without upgrading an implicit foreign-key lock. - Cover exact sequential delivery, dispatcher replay, and queued/claimed/deferred versus consumed/current-run completion identities in database tests. - Apply it when the child is also a dependency and when it is only a child. - Preserve the stable key for exact `task_watchdog` origins to avoid repeated watchdog loops. - Extend real database conformance coverage for both relationships, ordinary and near-match origins, watchdogs, revised summaries, and replay. - Reconcile the working checklist with the merged guidance PRs and record the bounded next step. - Reuse the current composer helper for Everyday task creation: capture the returned task ID, preserve the exact prompt and chosen assignee/project, and cover the setup with paused-agent browser tests. The same setup correction is present in both comparison variants. ## Verification **Ready for review and merge at `e2fc0c8e3ddb84dd9bc045704c3d1ecb23ee3447`: both original live cases pass, zero new failures against the frozen baseline, all checks green, CLEAN/MERGEABLE and out of draft. Not merged.** | Profile | Original baseline | Initial candidate | Fixed candidate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | native Codex / `gpt-5.6-sol` | PASS | FAIL | PASS | | ACPX Claude / `claude-sonnet-5` | FAIL | PASS | PASS | One new pass, one unchanged pass, zero new failures and no pending pairs against the original baseline. The earlier failed candidate is preserved; it was fixed and measured at a new source, not regraded or rerolled unchanged. ### Current source and live evidence - [Completed campaign 37523025407](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37523025407) and [public report with original screenshots](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-37523025407-1/index.html). Report and screenshots return HTTP 200; screenshot bytes match original retained evidence. - Measured candidate `e2fc0c8e3ddb84dd9bc045704c3d1ecb23ee3447`; reused frozen baseline `7d700f43e93e89e4c196f8799b0aa3cef41d20da`. Trusted workflow `88ff98b83d15eaa6640ee1848df4f0ad9bc82af3` is distinct from measured sources; workflow blob `0600886144d3e22ea2e4a38329a79177882f3948`. Prompts, fixture, oracle, model/profile and input controls are unchanged. Both variants include the same composer setup repair. - Both original candidate grades PASS: all 31 checks per cell, parent and child Done, independently tested revised ZIPs, successful cleanup. Exactly one first attempt per profile on this source: 10 actual runs, no retries. Reusing nine baseline runs gives 19 matched runs; the baseline was not rerun. - Claude directly exercised the repair: its revised child completed while the parent was active, the parent's Done claim became InProgress with `native_child_completion_pending`, and a fresh parent turn then completed with the revised artifact. - Both persisted final provider comments refer to the same attachment whose parent-registration hash matches the revised ZIP tested by the original oracle; native final evidence also references that attachment. Codex provides a clickable download link. Claude describes the new `--max-length` behavior but uses a backticked attachment ID, without a clickable URL in the final prose. The artifact is registered on the parent and independently downloaded/tested; prose-link usability remains a presentation limit outside the original oracle. Artifact identity and observed execution do not prove cognitive review. - 68 focused scheduling/conformance/arbiter tests pass. Four regressions fail against the original production files while four controls pass. The database scheduler test proves one sequential continuation with the revised summary and replay deduplication. It uses a mock adapter and is separate from the live proof. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. [Exact-head full CI 37522126627](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37522126627): 51 successful checks, two intentional skips, separate Snyk success. Fresh exact-head Greptile [5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15372#issuecomment-6022179172), no new actionable findings; all review threads resolved. - Ready-transition Contributor trust and Superagent Security Scan both pass. The security scan completed at 2026-10-06T20:26:53Z with zero annotations. Final total: 53 successful check runs, two intentional skips and separate Snyk success; aggregate SUCCESS, source unchanged, zero unresolved threads. - The explicit parent lock precedes child writes. Its controlled PostgreSQL ordering also passes on previous production through an implicit foreign-key lock; this is hardening, not a reproduced additional live failure. The four original failing regressions remain the before/after proof of the active-parent repair. ### Preserved failures and accounting - Initial candidate `a2ae2324ce7692e704fc43e99904b076d6246fee`: Codex PASS → FAIL, Claude FAIL → PASS. Equal totals concealed a new failure and did not qualify that source. Its Codex parent ended Blocked after the revised child result coalesced into the active parent; there was no retained later parent execution and the independent ZIP oracle was never reached. A later server backstop log did not prove recovery. - In the initial Claude cells, both parent finals referenced an earlier parent ZIP while the oracle tested the revised child's ZIP. The original candidate PASS did not establish latest-artifact delivery. Earlier parent ZIP bytes are absent, so different hashes alone do not prove missing functionality. Those original grades and content findings are unchanged. - Original baseline [report](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-37509893406-1/index.html); original candidate Claude [artifact](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37509916344/artifacts/11434353106); failed candidate Codex [campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37513070706). The original cohort contains 17 actual runs, no retries, successful cleanup. - Campaign 37509916344 was cancelled after its Codex job waited over 16 minutes without a runner or steps. Completed Claude evidence was preserved; only the missing Codex first trial was dispatched in 37513070706. The trusted workflow revision differs but workflow bytes are identical. The cancelled campaign has no published HTML. Earlier campaigns 37506546098 / 37506550087 retain four composer setup failures, zero agent runs; the identical fixture-only repair restored setup without changing the prompt or outcome oracle. - Intermediate `3c1cf6830ce9db4123b834ffb99c594c383a8986` [campaign 37518652522](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37518652522) was cancelled after a concurrency review finding. Both paid-cell steps started and both tasks were created. Only invocation policies survived; no grade, run inventory or cleanup receipt. Provider activity and charges are unknown: two incomplete attempts, not passes or zero-provider setup failures. - Cumulative accounting: **27 known actual runs** (17 original + 10 fixed-candidate), plus unknown activity in those two cancelled intermediate attempts. The 19-run matched comparison reuses nine baseline runs and is not additional execution. Reported LLM amounts are zero with original billing `complete=true`; actual charges are unknown and local/hosted runtime is unmetered. No free-run, speed or cost claim. - Original and new results pass the canonical result validator. Retained source, input, result/API/story/final-ledger/usage run identities and artifact hashes were audited. Each downloaded package omits the pre-upload-declared `playwright-output/.last-run.json`; primary result, API, final ledger, story, screenshots and reached ZIP oracles are retained. No full-package completeness claim. - The initial redundant local full test invocation was stopped after 2,492.5 seconds once that head's CI passed; completed groups recorded 23,045 passes and 87 skips. That local invocation remains incomplete. Current full CI is the repository-wide test evidence. ## Risks A revised completion can schedule another sequential parent run and its normal budget use. A parent Done claim remains non-terminal while a newer native child result awaits delivery. Company scope, governance, workspace-finalization, terminal cancellation and exact watchdog behavior remain enforced. This changes native completion authority and scheduling, so the durable identity, replay and concurrent-commit controls matter. The two live trials qualify the observed revised-child handoff, not broad task quality or causal/general equivalence. Claude's final prose still gives an attachment ID without a clickable URL, although the registered revised artifact passes the original download oracle. Completion before any new child result exists, removal of unfinished dependencies and broader instruction reduction remain separate questions. There is no schema or prompt change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository inspection, shell execution and code editing. The exact serving model ID, reasoning setting and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ee3c728b95 |
fix(ui): keep No project available in new composer (#15382)
Keep the no-project action first and available during project search, while preserving matching-project keyboard selection. Add focused regression coverage for ordering, projectless submission, and filtered Enter behavior. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.23 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
582911ba74 |
fix(access): give Operators default company editing permissions (#15377)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Human company members receive permission grants from their role preset. > - Human invitations use the Operator role by default. > - The old Operator preset only granted task assignment, so ordinary members could not edit agents or manage connections. > - This pull request gives Operators company editing and audit access while keeping join approval and member-permission management separate. > - Members can configure their agents and accounts without an Owner role. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The default permission grants for human Operators and the invitation role description. **Subsystem affected** server/ permission presets and invitation authorization, plus ui/ invitation and tool access gates. **Current behavior** Operators receive only `tasks:assign` as an explicit default grant. Agent configuration and managed account setup fail their permission checks. **Proposed behavior** Operators receive agent creation/configuration, skills, environments, invitations, task assignment, pipelines, connections, tool management/use, and audit grants. The preset excludes `joins:approve` and `users:manage_permissions`. Operators can invite Operators and Viewers. Inviting a role with either excluded power requires that power, so invitations cannot bypass the restriction. **Reason and benefit** Ordinary company members can edit company work and connect accounts through the existing routes. **Breaking changes** The Operator preset grants more permissions. The existing startup and Cloud sign-in seeding paths can insert these missing grants for existing Operators. They retain custom grant scopes. Explicit invitation grants still take precedence. Inviting Admins now requires join approval; inviting Owners also requires member-permission management. This PR adds no migration or new backfill path. Related: #5945 describes missing role grants in another membership entry point. This PR changes the preset and does not change that endpoint. ## What Changed - Expanded the Operator preset to 14 company editing, invitation, tool, and audit grants. - Kept join approval and member-permission management out of the preset. - Required those powers when an invitation's selected human role includes them, preventing Operators from delegating the excluded powers through Owner/Admin invitations. - Updated the invitation role copy and the product specifications. - Allowed active Operators (including legacy Member roles) through the invite shortcut and advanced tool/profile UI gates. Kept inactive memberships, Viewers, and other companies excluded; API grants remain authoritative. - Added tests for the default Operator grants, both excluded actions, agent editing, company boundaries, and invitation role authorization. - Simplified adapter-route test imports so authorization errors and the error handler use one module graph; retained the upstream mock-initialization fix. - Kept Owner/Admin/Viewer presets and explicit invitation grants unchanged. Added no EE code or database migration. ## Verification - Permission and invitation tests: 38 passed across access service, invitation defaults, and invitation creation routes. - UI access tests: 61 passed across invitation shortcuts, Operator tool/profile access, and invitation UI. - Adapter route tests: 15 passed after resolving the upstream test setup conflict. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed on the final branch. - The initial local `pnpm test:run` general-server batch reported three tool-access failures and eight upload-helper timeouts. Both complete affected suites passed in isolation on the final branch: 403 tests. The initial full local run was not green. - Both complete tool-access and adapter route suites also passed on an untouched snapshot of base `88ff98b83`: 387 tests. The earlier tool failures did not reproduce there. - [All CI gates passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37527422346) for `068be153b9c2a064f2aaccc0627fdf458e73747e`, including the previously failing serialized adapter lane, general tests, E2E, typecheck, build, Runner checks, and canary dry run. - Greptile scored that exact commit 5/5. Superagent passed. Both invitation review threads are resolved. ## Risks - Operators gain broad company editing and invitation access by design. - Existing default seeding can add the new missing grants during startup or Cloud sign-in. It does not replace existing scopes. - Company boundaries and the two excluded permission checks still apply. - An Admin without member-permission management can no longer invite an Owner. Operators retain invitation access for Operator/Viewer roles and agent-only invites. - This PR changes company permissions. Cloud workspace invitation rules remain separate. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact deployment model ID and context window were not exposed in this session. Used repository inspection, code editing, shell execution, and test tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting a merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
da679f113a |
build(deps): bump actions/upload-pages-artifact from 4.0.0 to 5.0.0 (#12964)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The repository runs a weekly full-stack end-to-end campaign for the runner, and that workflow publishes its merged dashboard to GitHub Pages > - The publish step pins `actions/upload-pages-artifact` to a version 4 commit > - Version 4 of that action embeds `actions/upload-artifact` at `v4.6.2`, so the publish step keeps an old upload path > - An old pinned action falls behind upstream fixes, and the gap grows with each upstream release > - This pull request moves the pin to the commit that upstream tags as `v5.0.0` > - The benefit is that the Pages publish step uses the current upload path, and the pin stays a commit SHA ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists for this change. Refs #12963 and Refs #12962 — two other pinned GitHub Action updates for the same repository. They are related, and they are not duplicates. The description below follows the enhancement template. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The weekly runner end-to-end workflow publishes its merged dashboard to GitHub Pages. This change updates the action that packages that dashboard. **Subsystem affected** CI and release automation — `.github/workflows/runner-full-stack-e2e.yml`. **Current behavior** The publish step uses `actions/upload-pages-artifact` at the commit that upstream tags as version 4. That version embeds `actions/upload-artifact` at `v4.6.2`. **Proposed behavior** The publish step uses `actions/upload-pages-artifact` at commit `fc324d3547104276b827a68afc52ff2a11cc49c9`, which upstream tags as `v5.0.0`. That version embeds `actions/upload-artifact` at `v7.0.0`. **Breaking changes** None for this repository. Version 5 keeps the `name`, `path` and `retention-days` inputs with the same defaults. Version 5 adds one optional input, `include-hidden-files`, which defaults to `false`. The step in this workflow passes `name` and `path` only. With the default value of the new input, version 5 excludes hidden files, and that matches version 4. ## What Changed - Change the pinned commit of `actions/upload-pages-artifact` in `.github/workflows/runner-full-stack-e2e.yml` from the version 4 commit to `fc324d3547104276b827a68afc52ff2a11cc49c9`, which upstream tags as `v5.0.0`. ## Verification - The pinned commit matches the upstream tag. `gh api repos/actions/upload-pages-artifact/git/ref/tags/v5.0.0 --jq .object.sha` returns `fc324d3547104276b827a68afc52ff2a11cc49c9`. - The input contract stays compatible. A comparison of `action.yml` at the old pin and at the new pin shows the same `name`, `path` and `retention-days` inputs with the same defaults, plus one new optional input. - The repository CI suite passes on this branch after a rebase onto the current base branch. - One limit applies. The changed step runs only in the `Runner Full-Stack E2E` workflow. That workflow starts on a weekly schedule and on a manual dispatch, so no pull-request run exercises the step. A maintainer can exercise it with a manual dispatch of that workflow, or the next scheduled run exercises it. ## Risks - Low risk, with one limit. The changed step does not run on a pull request, so the pull-request checks do not prove the new action version in this workflow. - Version 5 of the outer action embeds a newer `actions/upload-artifact` version. A behaviour change in that inner action appears first in the weekly campaign, and not in the pull-request checks. - The rollback is one commit. Restore the previous pinned commit of `actions/upload-pages-artifact`. ## Model Used Dependabot generated this dependency update automatically, so no AI model produced the code change. A maintainer wrote this description with Claude Opus 5 (Anthropic, model id `claude-opus-5`, extended thinking, tool use). ## Checklist Three boxes stay unticked on purpose. This change pins one GitHub Action version in one workflow file. No local test covers a pinned action version, no new test applies, and no document refers to this pin. - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2ca0d26a99 |
fix(connections): recover missing personal AI credentials in chat (#15376)
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
ea8e686197 |
fix(tools): distinguish requested from granted OAuth scopes (#14059)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Apps use OAuth connection grants to let agents reach external services. > - Paperclip stored a requested scope as a granted scope when a provider omitted `scope` from its token response. > - A live MCP connection showed why that matters: the provider reported scopes beyond the requested scope. Scope names alone do not establish write capability. > - This PR records whether a scope came from the provider or from Paperclip's request, and flags asserted extra scopes. > - The result is an honest scope record across authorization and refresh, including for self-hosted and Cloud instances. **Review order:** shared scope resolver and OAuth write paths in `server/src/services/tool-access.ts` → optional schema/types/validator fields → focused tests in `server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts`. This PR changes the shared OAuth record. The Enterpret catalog definition is separate in **#13906**. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue covers this bug. Related: **#13906** adds the official read-only Enterpret connector with OAuth and organization tokens. **What happened?** The OAuth callback stored `normalizeOauthScopes(token.scope ?? requestedScopes)`. When the provider omitted `scope`, Paperclip recorded the request as though it were a verified grant. In the live case: ```text Paperclip requested mcp:read Provider token reply no scope field Paperclip recorded ["mcp:read"] Token introspection openid email profile mcp:read mcp:write ``` The access token is opaque. A negative introspection control returned `active: false` with no scope, confirming the wider scope belonged to the live token. The grants API could therefore present requested scopes as though the provider had asserted them. This observation did not establish access to write tools. **Expected behavior** Store the provider's asserted scope when present. When absent, identify the value as an inference from the request. Preserve that provenance through refresh and report extra scopes only when the provider actually asserts them. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use an OAuth provider that omits `scope` from its token response. 2. Complete consent after requesting `mcp:read`. 3. Read the connection or grant: before this fix, the stored `scopes` looked like an asserted read-only grant. 4. The focused fixture tests reproduce the callback and refresh record without needing a live provider. **Deployment mode** The shared OAuth path affects self-hosted and Cloud. The live provider evidence came from an isolated self-hosted runtime. ## What Changed - Added `resolveGrantedOauthScopes`. It records `scopeSource: provider` when the token response asserts scope, or `requested_fallback` when it does not. `unrequestedScopes` contains only provider-asserted scopes outside the request. - Applied the resolver at initial authorization and refresh. A refresh without `scope` retains a previous provider assertion and warning; a fresh assertion can replace them. - Stored the actual authorization request per grant as `providerTenant.oauth.requestedScopes`. This keeps a multi-user connection's refresh baseline tied to the right grant. Generic MCP OAuth also records discovered scopes when it sends them; curated apps retain their reviewed request. - Carried provenance onto the connection and default organization grant. The organization grant does not receive token expiry, so its existing refresh/reconnect behavior remains intact. - Added optional fields to database JSONB schema types, shared types, and validation. Existing grants need no migration or backfill. This PR **does not change authorization decisions**, reject tokens, introspect providers, or show a new UI warning. If a provider hides an over-grant by omitting `scope`, Paperclip still cannot discover it. `unrequestedScopes: []` with `requested_fallback` means **unknown**, not least privilege. ## Verification **Current head:** `7fde922a8`. Reconciled with master `88ff98b83`; the final diff is six OAuth implementation, contract, and test files. Preserved master's generic `offline_access` consent and legacy callback baseline, and verified requested versus provider-asserted scopes on each grant. Removed four duplicated GitHub token-method fixture properties after fresh review. All 504 focused tests in seven suites pass on the final head. Local workspace build, recursive typecheck, build-gap typecheck, module boundaries, node-version, token gates, and runtime push-policy checks pass. The full local Vitest run completed with 15,610 passing tests, 91 skipped, and six failures in heartbeat/workspace suites; all six failures reproduced on unchanged master `88ff98b83` in an isolated baseline worktree. These suites and their runtime code are unchanged by this PR. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact head with no actionable findings. All current-head GitHub checks are green: 53 successful check runs, two intentional Storybook skips, and the successful Snyk status. The initially failed adapter-access and signoff-heartbeat shards both passed their single rerun. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37521588330). The regression coverage includes omitted and explicit scopes, asserted extra scopes, refresh preservation, per-user request baselines, generic MCP discovery, and organization grants. No live provider token is needed to reproduce these recordkeeping cases. ## Risks - Existing records keep their scope list but have no source marker. Historical provenance cannot be recovered from them. - A refresh that omits `scope` preserves the last known assertion. A provider that silently narrows a grant will not update the record until it asserts a new scope. - A provider that omits `scope` leaves the actual scope unasserted. This PR cannot discover scopes omitted from the response or establish endpoint capabilities. Enterpret’s provider fixes are separate follow-ups. - Scope provenance is additive metadata. No policy path uses these new fields to allow or deny an action. ## Model Used Implementation and tests: Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`) through Claude Code with extended thinking, tools, and code execution. PR text cleanup: Codex GPT-6 (exact host model ID and context window were not exposed; tool use). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] Focused tests pass locally; full-suite baseline failures are documented above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All current-head CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 on the current head with no actionable follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge This shared scope-recording fix can be reviewed and merged independently of the Enterpret connector. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e38d6d16b6 |
feat(connections): add advanced provider setup and live browser qualification (#15341)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Users connect accounts and choose an agent harness and model. > - The runtime change in #14970 supports custom providers on those connections. > - Normal setup must stay simple while advanced users can choose a compatible gateway. > - Shared connector rows and access controls keep these choices consistent. > - This pull request refines the agent setup UI and adds review stories and repeatable browser qualification. > - The qualification checks real tools and downloaded outputs, not only a successful run status. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14970, #37, #13083, #14104, #14565, #12692. The core implementation in #14970 is merged. This branch incorporates its squash commit and targets `master`. Both PRs contain our implementation. #14016 is a reference only and is not a dependency. This PR has 96 changed files. ## What Changed - Complete model-provider connector presentation beside other connectors. Each row uses the existing Connect action and connection list. Tags are stored without category UI. The base PR includes the provider forms and routes. - Show persistent Subscription, API Key, and Advanced choices. Label Advanced as Custom Gateway. Reuse provider logos, connection lists, and permissions controls. Default access to the organization and all agents when permitted; keep narrowing controls under Advanced. - Keep Configure reachable before subscription sign-in, so users can select a supported environment when the default cannot sign in. Testing and saving still require a connection. Show the execution environment in Configure. Preserve the confirmed Connect choice. Editing a method, credential, saved account, or advanced choice requires that current choice to connect before testing or saving. Use matching model and thinking-effort dropdowns and retain connection icons in selected values. - Preserve the new harness model default when switching an existing OpenCode agent to Codex or Claude, and resolve user-selected model names with the effective harness. - Load popular OpenRouter models through the shared connection-model discovery path. Keep explicit model lists and manual model entry available. - Group onboarding, connection setup, agent runtime, management, recovery, and production-component stories under AI Connections / Provider routing. - Add an explicit-only provider-connections browser suite for managed local or existing local/staging targets. Use private browser profiles and credential handoffs. Support human-assisted subscription sign-in without sharing passwords or tokens in reports. - Verify persisted connection identity, runtime probes, tool execution, exact artifact bytes, completion, and context-dependent follow-up. Retain source/model provenance, cost bounds, closed error diagnostics, original failures, and cleanup evidence. - Add Gemini startup-model and skill-root fixes, Grok private-history detection, ACP filesystem regression fixtures, selected-workspace handling for local Hermes, and artifact-helper workspace fallback. - Keep managed Grok runtime homes disposable. Remove host-side transcript retention/restoration because private file modes do not isolate same-user agent processes. Ignore earlier development archives and use a fresh task handoff when history is unavailable. Verify the absence of restored transcripts with a separate same-user process. - Capture stopped-run diagnostics before deleting an attached-company fixture agent. Track creation and owned sign-in receipts; revoke only this attempt's accounts and never adopt a concurrent campaign's newly created account. Preserve failure signals and final status through cleanup. - Require the requested environment in the saved agent and every run, including follow-ups. Reject a forced incompatible target. Keep one cancellation state through startup, every cell, reporting, and teardown for SIGINT, SIGTERM, and SIGHUP. Stop further paid cells after interruption. Document qualification limits. ## Verification - Current head `b3bb3e94d577d43d9965a6b9daba039f599b2e49` includes master `d9f600043`. The security fix in `a758fde31` passes full workspace typecheck, production build, and 119 connection/Grok regressions. The unchanged UI passes all 126 configuration/model-discovery tests and token gates. The final published-guide correction passes Grok adapter typecheck. Earlier head `eebd8225c` passed the complete deterministic runner suite (1,404 Vitest tests and 128 Node tests) and all CI jobs. Current-head CI run `37520147514` passed all 47 jobs, including the full sharded Vitest and browser matrix, production build, and canary dry run. All 55 checks completed: 53 successes and two expected skips. The current-head security scan passed, Greptile is 5/5, and no review threads remain open. - A separate same-user process reproduced reading a restored Grok transcript before the security fix. The regression now finds no transcript. Existing fresh-session fallback and ordinary session metadata behavior pass. - The final account-choice and cleanup fixes pass 85 setup tests and 26 qualification-harness tests. Regressions verify that editing a connection invalidates confirmation, Configure remains reachable before sign-in, diagnostics are captured before fixture deletion, and concurrent campaigns cannot adopt or revoke each other's accounts. UI and E2E typechecks pass. - The Storybook build and actual Chromium production-component stories passed during this change. Review the neighboring AI Connections / Provider routing stories, regular connector rows, three connection modes, model discovery, and the single execution-environment control in Configure. - Cancellation smoke verified authenticated cleanup before browser close for SIGINT, SIGTERM, and SIGHUP. Regressions cover interruption during startup and reporting, missing-file ACP resource errors, and preserved permission denials. Both ACP runtime versions and 54 ACPX/Grok regressions passed. The deterministic connection-intent browser suite passed two tests. - Historical local qualification retained 43 passing API/gateway cells out of 46, with downloaded outputs and follow-up receipts. These attempts span earlier builds; they do not qualify this exact commit or staging. Subscription combinations, Gemini overloads, and the unresolved follow-up failure remain recorded rather than counted as passing. - Use `pnpm test:e2e:runner -- --list --suite provider-connections` to inspect the matrix. Follow `tests/runner-e2e/PROVIDER-CONNECTIONS.md` for credentials, target URL, sign-in assistance, budget, evidence, and cleanup. Paid live tests remain opt-in. ## Risks - The core implementation in #14970 is merged. This PR adds no database migration of its own. - Subscription login needs an interactive provider session. Dedicated accounts and staging qualification remain follow-up work; this PR does not certify every login combination for production. - Managed Grok transcript resume is deferred until provider history has an OS isolation or authorized broker solution. Follow-ups start fresh with Paperclip task context; earlier live Grok results do not qualify this behavior. - Gemini CLI 0.58.0 has an upstream ACP new-file error conversion defect. Live overloads and one unresolved follow-up timeout remain recorded. The stock CLI is unchanged, and those cases are not marked as passing. - Real-provider tests spend credits and use private credential/evidence directories. The launcher requires explicit selection and checks target ownership. It must not attach to a developer's database by accident. - OpenClaw Gateway, Hermes Gateway, Claude Managed, AWS AgentCore, Process, HTTP, and legacy ACPX local remain outside custom provider setup. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser testing. The exact deployment model ID and context window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a7a2ed63a0 |
fix(ui): restore wheel and touch scrolling in task selectors (#15374)
Restore wheel and touch scrolling in nested task selectors and keep mobile picker controls reachable above the keyboard. Stabilize the affected server route test harnesses for Vitest 5. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.22 |
||
|
|
88ff98b83d |
feat(apps): add read-only Enterpret MCP with OAuth and org tokens (#13906)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip agents need governed access to Enterpret's hosted MCP tools for customer feedback. > - The official Enterpret MCP is read-only. Enterpret Agent’s beta write MCP is a separate service and is outside this PR. > - This PR supports both organization auth tokens and personal browser OAuth for the official MCP. > - Enterpret committed to fixing OAuth scope behavior and reducing its token-revocation cache window. The provider fixes will follow after connector deployment and do not gate this release. Paperclip functional validation remains required. New tools stay quarantined on refresh. > - This PR combines the original connector and Vivek's token-path work on current master, with live self-hosted QA recorded in the validation guide. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue covers this connector. This PR incorporates the work from #14737. The independent OAuth scope-provenance fix is #14059; it is not required for the organization-token path. #13890 is a merged connector precedent. #13692 provides the connector-authoring skill. **Problem or motivation** The generic MCP setup can reach Enterpret, but it has no reviewed Enterpret entry, method-specific setup, artwork, or policy defaults. The original connector branch had also fallen behind master. **Proposed solution** Publish the Enterpret catalog entry with an organization auth token as the selectable method. Support browser OAuth through instance-local DCR on the same read-only endpoint. Default `run_graph_query` to Ask first and quarantine tools newly found on refresh. ## What Changed - Added the Enterpret app definition, generated registry, official icon, Browse card, setup copy, tests, and Storybook states. - Combined #14737 and resolved the current-master conflicts, including the connector permission audit. - Preserved catalog quarantine on token reconnect and updated expiry guidance to follow the token's dashboard expiry. The QA token displayed three months, contradicting the former six-month copy. - Enabled personal OAuth for the official read-only MCP. Removed the write-capability inference and OAuth draft-only setup restriction. The beta Agent endpoint is excluded. - Preserved tool quarantine during token reconnect, with a regression test for existing quarantined and newly discovered tools. - Added OAuth scope and revocation-cache disclosures and an interactive Storybook retry check. - Merged master `d9f600043` into the existing PR branch without rewriting history. Resolved four conflicts, regenerated the combined registry, and retained the model-provider assertions with a catalog count of 66. - Recorded live QA and its limits in [doc/connections/ENTERPRET.md](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/950bacc52/doc/connections/ENTERPRET.md). ## Verification Current head: `6c73d3084202ccbb25080e7a4e9c3467bc1341dd`. All 513 focused connector, discovery, OAuth, policy, shared-definition, and UI-handoff tests passed across 11 suites. Full repository typecheck, build, Storybook build, token gates, module boundaries, Node policy, no-git-push policy, and typecheck-build-gaps passed. Release-registry tests passed 129/129 with modern Bash. The four failures with macOS Bash 3.2 also reproduced on untouched master. The full test suite passed in CI on this exact head, including every general-test and serialized-server shard and all eight E2E shards. The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after these remote test lanes passed; it did not complete locally. The combined registry was regenerated. Regeneration also reproduces existing Linear and AgentMail definition drift on untouched master; those unrelated changes were excluded. On an isolated self-hosted Paperclip instance, an organization token connected and discovered eight actions. `get_organization_details` returned the intended organization before and after reconnect. Catalog refresh, invalid-token failure and valid-token recovery, activity logging, local disable, and local removal were exercised. No feedback quotes or graph query were requested. Paperclip revoked both QA connection secrets and archived the QA connections. The token-path agent access preview correctly showed an action Off, but the board Test endpoint still invoked it as the board user. This shared Test-path mismatch is documented; it is not evidence that a real agent can bypass policy. An actual token-path agent-session denial, a real agent process, expiry recovery, server/VPS, and Cloud remain unverified. Enterpret's dashboard confirmed the QA token was revoked, but the same token immediately reconnected and completed a safe read. Vivek explained this as a 24-hour validity cache and committed to reducing the window. The new maximum delay and deployment remain unverified. The earlier OAuth check reported `mcp:write` and `email` for an `mcp:read` request. This is a scope mismatch; it did not prove access to write tools. On 2026-10-01 the account holder relayed Vivek’s clarification that the official MCP is read-only and the beta Agent write MCP is separate. ## Risks The organization token can read the organization's customer feedback, and provider-side revocation did not immediately stop access. Operators should check each token's displayed expiry and remove Paperclip's local connection when retiring access. The account holder confirmed the provider fixes are fast follows after deployment. Release can proceed with the current scope reporting and up-to-24-hour revocation delay documented, once fresh OAuth authorization/refresh, real-agent allow/deny, CI, and review pass. Retest the reduced revocation window after Enterpret deploys it. Scope labels alone must not be used to claim write access. Greptile is 5/5 on head `6c73d3084` with no actionable findings. All current-head CI checks pass, including the canary dry run. Live agent-session denial and fresh OAuth refresh remain explicit deployment QA items. The board Test panel does not prove agent authorization. Provider scope-reporting and revocation-cache fixes are accepted fast follows after deployment. ## Model Used Original connector and validation record: Claude Opus 5 through Claude Code. Integration, current-master reconciliation, and token-path QA: OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family (exact host variant not exposed), using repository tools and an isolated runtime. Contributor commits retain their authors. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal issue ID - [x] I have run relevant local tests and checks - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks above - [x] All current-head CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no actionable follow-ups If squash-merging, preserve contributor credit in the squash message: Co-Authored-By: Vivek Kaushal <kaushalvivek@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Vivek Kaushal <vivek@enterpret.com> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
1cebdd4c4f |
Add plugin lifecycle delivery and an initial resource baseline (#15343)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and projects for work. > - Their lifecycle changes already commit to a durable journal. > - Plugins need to read these records and track completed work. > - Existing resources need a one-time baseline before delivery is enabled. > - Worker crashes must leave unfinished records available for retry. > - Each plugin needs its own progress and company access checks. > - This PR adds a pull inbox through the existing plugin SDK and job system. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Plugins cannot consume the durable resource lifecycle journal. In-process notifications can disappear during a restart and cannot record successful completion. Resource plugins need retries, company boundaries, and ordered transitions. **Proposed solution** Add `ctx.events.listLifecycle(companyId, limit?, afterId?)` and `ctx.events.acknowledgeLifecycle(companyId, eventId)` under `events.subscribe`. Seed a one-time baseline from current resource state. Deliver creation first, then the remaining transitions in ID order. Store acknowledgments for each plugin. Use existing plugin jobs to poll configured companies. **Alternatives considered** A global sequence cursor can skip lower IDs that commit later. Fire-and-forget subscriptions cannot record completion. A new dispatcher is unnecessary because plugin jobs support polling. Consumers serialize polling and use provider idempotency keys. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing plugin system and builds on #15280 and #15306. Searches found no duplicate resource inbox work. Related #13306 exposes decision events on the in-process bus. This PR includes the initial journal baseline. Provider provisioning remains separate work. ## What Changed - Add company-scoped lifecycle reads and acknowledgments to the SDK and worker RPC host. - Gate both methods by capability, invocation or proactive company scope, plugin readiness, and company enablement. - Seed hired agents and all projects once. Preserve paused/terminated agent state and archived project state. Keep pending hires behind approval. - Preserve existing history and deliver backfilled creation before partial transition histories. - Deliver project archive events from #15371 through the SDK. Seed archive intents for archived projects and update intents for active projects with a partial archive history. - Store acknowledgments per plugin and reject acknowledgments that skip earlier resource events. - Page past failed resources while retaining their pending records. Reset the page cursor each sweep to include late commits. - Add acknowledgment storage, an index for resource ordering, tests, and authoring guidance. - Preserve native identity definitions and sequence progress in JavaScript backups. Repair journal ID generators lost by older backups before seeding the baseline, without changing existing IDs. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed after the final origin/master rebase. - `pnpm build` passed before the final metadata rebase. The final CI build also passed. - All 46 focused lifecycle, SDK harness/RPC, migration snapshot, and legacy restore checks passed again with migration 0309. - Checks cover retries, per-plugin progress, resource order, capability/company boundaries, baseline idempotency, approval gates, archive delivery, restored projects with partial histories, and atomic migration rollback. - Full CI passed on final commit `0e674b87fc`. One unrelated Cursor fixture hit a 10-second timeout; it passed locally in under one second, and the failed server shard passed on retry. - Greptile scored the final commit 5/5 with no unresolved review threads. - The branch is rebased onto origin/master and is conflict-free. - Earlier full local runs were stopped as scope changed. CI ran the complete repository suite. - `git diff --check` and a local secret/PII scan passed. ## Risks - Apply migration `0309_loving_the_hood.sql` before starting the new server. It creates acknowledgment storage and an index, then seeds the baseline in the same transaction. Agent/project writes wait for the migration to commit. Keep these writes quiesced through the migration and activation of the new capture-capable server; do not resume an older runtime that lacks capture after the baseline. - The baseline records current desired state, not historical transitions. It includes archived projects and terminated-agent cleanup intents. It runs once with the delivery migration; no later or runtime journal backfill is planned. - Delivery is at least once. Concurrent reads can repeat an event. Consumers must serialize polling, use stable company/event idempotency keys, and acknowledge successful operations only. - Reset `afterId` at the start of every polling sweep. It is a page cursor, not a persisted high-water mark. - Deleting a plugin removes its acknowledgment records. A new installation may replay existing journal events. - Records contain identity and action. Consumers must load current authorized data before acting. Cleanup and retention policy belong to the provider plugin. - Provider calls, VM/volume provisioning, and journal retention are outside this PR. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and tool use. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
854af7df19 |
build(deps-dev): bump vitest from 4.1.11 to 5.0.3 (#12969)
Bumps [vitest](https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest) from 4.1.11 to 5.0.3. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/releases">vitest's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v5.0.3</h2> <h3> 🐞 Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>Isolate <code>result.status</code> between <code>repeats</code> runs - by <a href="https://github.com/hi-ogawa"><code>@hi-ogawa</code></a>, <strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Codex (GPT-6)</strong> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11218">vitest-dev/vitest#11218</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/5dbebe9e3"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(5dbeb)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li>Don't print an interceptor warning in browser mode - by <a href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@sheremet-va</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11377">vitest-dev/vitest#11377</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/15cc006aa"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(15cc0)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li>Don't retry when <code>test.fails</code> expectedly failed - by <a href="https://github.com/hi-ogawa"><code>@hi-ogawa</code></a>, <strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Codex (GPT-6)</strong> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11219">vitest-dev/vitest#11219</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/b24585f08"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(b2458)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li>Scope cache key generators to projects - by <a href="https://github.com/ecoyoung"><code>@ecoyoung</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11281">vitest-dev/vitest#11281</a> and <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11301">vitest-dev/vitest#11301</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/92ba7fc1d"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(92ba7)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li><strong>browser</strong>: <ul> <li>Delay server <code>listen</code> until tests start running - by <a href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@sheremet-va</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11366">vitest-dev/vitest#11366</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/7d8ed3e9b"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(7d8ed)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li>Check mock path boundaries - by <a href="https://github.com/saryn17"><code>@saryn17</code></a>, <strong>Ryosei Sato</strong> and <a href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@sheremet-va</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11361">vitest-dev/vitest#11361</a> and <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11362">vitest-dev/vitest#11362</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/1c3888bce"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(1c388)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li>Keep config of browser-consumed environments - by <a href="https://github.com/kasperpeulen"><code>@kasperpeulen</code></a> and <strong>Claude</strong> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11378">vitest-dev/vitest#11378</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/aafc0996f"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(aafc0)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li>Ignore page crash while cancelling - by <a href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@sheremet-va</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11386">vitest-dev/vitest#11386</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/7c36748fa"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(7c367)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li><code>toMatchScreenshot</code> uses wrong reference on retried tests - by <a href="https://github.com/macarie"><code>@macarie</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11393">vitest-dev/vitest#11393</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/c22aba992"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(c22ab)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>cache</strong>: <ul> <li>Revalidate imports of cached modules - by <a href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@sheremet-va</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11381">vitest-dev/vitest#11381</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/38f98855f"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(38f98)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>deps</strong>: <ul> <li>Pin <code>why-is-node-running</code> to <code>3.2.1</code> to avoid users running into <code>ERR_PNPM_TRUST_DOWNGRADE</code> - by <a href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11403">vitest-dev/vitest#11403</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/f6c9a4977"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(f6c9a)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>expect</strong>: <ul> <li>Pass current equality testers to <code>expect.extend</code> asymmetric matchers - by <a href="https://github.com/hi-ogawa"><code>@hi-ogawa</code></a>, <strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Claude</strong> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11401">vitest-dev/vitest#11401</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/3e794a96b"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(3e794)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>jsdom</strong>: <ul> <li>Support Blob on jsdom 30.1 - by <a href="https://github.com/sheremet-va"><code>@sheremet-va</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11379">vitest-dev/vitest#11379</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/6c49b7197"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(6c49b)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>pool</strong>: <ul> <li>Preserve unique pool ids when <code>groupOrder</code> is set - by <a href="https://github.com/mtorp"><code>@mtorp</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11392">vitest-dev/vitest#11392</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/50312ebb4"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(50312)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>ui</strong>: <ul> <li>Split-pane handle overlapping iframe - by <a href="https://github.com/macarie"><code>@macarie</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11221">vitest-dev/vitest#11221</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/f91db0dfd"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(f91db)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>vitest</strong>: <ul> <li>Remove root temp dir on close - by <a href="https://github.com/abhinav-phi"><code>@abhinav-phi</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11248">vitest-dev/vitest#11248</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/7c7119cf7"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(7c711)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>vm</strong>: <ul> <li>Do not optimize deps from index.html - by <a href="https://github.com/ezefernandezyf"><code>@ezefernandezyf</code></a>, <strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Codex (GPT-6)</strong> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11329">vitest-dev/vitest#11329</a> and <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11360">vitest-dev/vitest#11360</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/caf2887de"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(caf28)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li>Don't reuse scripts across vite environments - by <a href="https://github.com/MO2k4"><code>@MO2k4</code></a>, <strong>Martin Oehlert</strong> and <strong>Claude</strong> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11395">vitest-dev/vitest#11395</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/346d3896b"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(346d3)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h5> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/compare/v5.0.2...v5.0.3">View changes on GitHub</a></h5> <h2>v5.0.2</h2> <h3> 🐞 Bug Fixes</h3> <ul> <li>Bind <code>process</code> in case global is overwritten - by <a href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11343">vitest-dev/vitest#11343</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/0b79231ad"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(0b792)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li><strong>detect-async-leaks</strong>: <ul> <li>Ignore <code>process.stdio</code> handles - by <a href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11333">vitest-dev/vitest#11333</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/0fd6b9790"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(0fd6b)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>expect</strong>: <ul> <li>Fix <code>toMatchObject</code> with asymmetric matchers - by <a href="https://github.com/ShreeBohara"><code>@ShreeBohara</code></a>, <strong>Claude Opus 5</strong>, <a href="https://github.com/hi-ogawa"><code>@hi-ogawa</code></a>, <strong>Hiroshi Ogawa</strong> and <strong>Codex (GPT-5)</strong> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11100">vitest-dev/vitest#11100</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/42523289e"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(42523)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>jsdom</strong>: <ul> <li>Fix <code>Request</code> with <code>Blob</code> body on jsdom 28+ - by <a href="https://github.com/harshit-d3v"><code>@harshit-d3v</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11295">vitest-dev/vitest#11295</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/d1c3ecc93"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(d1c3e)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>reporter</strong>: <ul> <li><code>agent</code> to respect <code>--silent</code> - by <a href="https://github.com/Raj4478"><code>@Raj4478</code></a> and <a href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11271">vitest-dev/vitest#11271</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/5b95efb6d"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(5b95e)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>reporters</strong>: <ul> <li>Handle concurrent <code>createReport</code> calls - by <a href="https://github.com/7rulnik"><code>@7rulnik</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11278">vitest-dev/vitest#11278</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/e8e556ff7"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(e8e55)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> <li><code>hanging-process</code> to use ESM entrypoint - by <a href="https://github.com/AriPerkkio"><code>@AriPerkkio</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11316">vitest-dev/vitest#11316</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/4e91e5668"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(4e91e)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>spy</strong>: <ul> <li>Fix stack overflow when spying <code>Set.prototype.add</code> - by <a href="https://github.com/fengmk2"><code>@fengmk2</code></a> in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/11299">vitest-dev/vitest#11299</a> <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/a0a939653"><!-- raw HTML omitted -->(a0a93)<!-- raw HTML omitted --></a></li> </ul> </li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/33cadea62e8763c455c7fca38d9ab1dda87c5f75"><code>33cadea</code></a> chore: release v5.0.3 (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11409">#11409</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/346d3896b65c3c907174447a035807342799f346"><code>346d389</code></a> fix(vm): don't reuse scripts across vite environments (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11395">#11395</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/f6c9a4977ad3363f796a737834572e54c6ad5c18"><code>f6c9a49</code></a> fix(deps): pin <code>why-is-node-running</code> to <code>3.2.1</code> to avoid users running into `...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/062c75d8b63519211d951d8293ea81b5a9e3c124"><code>062c75d</code></a> chore: fix standalone docs build, update exports maps (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11394">#11394</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/caf2887dee8987a60118d53933f6e9cabd6b3e2a"><code>caf2887</code></a> fix(vm): do not optimize deps from index.html (fix <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11329">#11329</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11360">#11360</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/50312ebb4eca6a98f6d0b2b61d5d9d38cbbabcef"><code>50312eb</code></a> fix(pool): preserve unique pool ids when <code>groupOrder</code> is set (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11392">#11392</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/7c36748fad1eae9687312f2f7ceadce6ec88b5df"><code>7c36748</code></a> fix(browser): ignore page crash while cancelling (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11386">#11386</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/92ba7fc1df16a4fa5bbee3f198c582fbd56689d8"><code>92ba7fc</code></a> fix: scope cache key generators to projects (fix <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11281">#11281</a>) (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11301">#11301</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/38f98855fa9cd7fd376afb84094eba0fda256a74"><code>38f9885</code></a> fix(cache): revalidate imports of cached modules (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11381">#11381</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commit/b24585f08f2ea267746a2d6ca0e43edcbb29726f"><code>b24585f</code></a> fix: don't retry when <code>test.fails</code> expectedly failed (<a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/tree/HEAD/packages/vitest/issues/11219">#11219</a>)</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/commits/v5.0.3/packages/vitest">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Priya Raman <priya.raman@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a590ab769d |
Give managed agents persistent cryptographic identities (#15352)
Give agents persistent Ed25519 identities encrypted with the existing instance master key. Create keys transactionally for new agents and lazily before supported managed runs, expose public identities in the API and agent UI, and protect private material during runtime delivery and output persistence. Preserve identities in recovery backups while giving imported and development-cloned agents fresh keys. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
d9f600043f |
Capture project archive and restore lifecycle events (#15371)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages projects and their repositories. > - Resource changes commit to a durable lifecycle journal. > - Project archive changes currently leave no journal record. > - Consumers need to observe archive and restore transitions. > - The record must commit with the project change. > - This PR adds project archive capture before plugin delivery in #15343. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Archiving a project does not record a lifecycle event. Restoring an archived project also emits no event when it is the only change. Consumers cannot observe these transitions through the journal. **Proposed solution** Record `archive` when an active project becomes archived. Record `update` when an archived project is restored. Keep both writes in the existing project transaction and row lock. Repeated status requests emit no new status record. **Alternatives considered** An in-process notification can disappear on restart. A separate archive service would duplicate the existing mutation path. Use the existing journal and project transaction. **Roadmap alignment** This extends lifecycle capture from #15280 and #15306. It should merge before the delivery PR #15343. The roadmap and related PR search showed no duplicate archive lifecycle capture. ## What Changed - Allow project `archive` records in the journal constraint and TypeScript type. - Capture archive and restore transitions under the existing project row lock. - Emit `update` then `archive` for an edit combined with archive. - Preserve repository records and roll back the project change if capture fails. - Add migration `0307_cool_naoko.sql`, tests, and database documentation. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed after the final master rebase. - `pnpm build` passed before the final master rebase; the final CI build also passed. - 20 targeted lifecycle, migration snapshot, and legacy restore tests passed on the current migration. - Tests cover concurrent archives, repeated archive/restore requests, repository retention, combined edits, atomic rollback, and upgrades from older JavaScript backups without the action constraint. - All 53 applicable CI checks passed on final commit `1021953035`; the two Storybook checks were skipped as expected. - Greptile scored the final commit 5/5 with no unresolved review threads. - `git diff --check` and a local secret/PII scan passed. - Prior CI found a missing-constraint restore failure; the migration now handles it. A separate runtime readiness timeout passed locally. The current full CI run passes both paths. ## Risks - Older JavaScript restores may omit the action check. The migration tolerates its absence and installs the complete check. - Apply the constraint migration before running the new capture code. It takes a short table lock and validates existing journal rows; it changes no existing records. - This PR captures future transitions only. The one-time baseline and plugin consumption remain in #15343, which must be rebased after this PR merges. - Archive records authorize no provider cleanup. Provider behavior and volume retention remain separate work. - An edit combined with archive emits two ordered records in one transaction. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and tool use. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.21 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9f7057e122 |
feat(connections): configure custom model providers across agent harnesses (#14970)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents use a harness, a model, and a credential to run tasks. > - Connections already store credentials and control who can use them. > - Custom providers also need an endpoint and a supported API format. > - A per-agent endpoint would duplicate credentials and access rules. > - This pull request stores routing on the connection and projects it into the harness. > - Isolated credentials and protocol checks keep the selected connection authoritative. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #37, #13083, #14104, #14565, #12692. #14016 is a reference only. This PR has its own schema, vault persistence, routing validation, runtime projection, and tests. None of the five commits in #14016 is an ancestor of this branch. We do not depend on or plan to merge it. #14967 addresses task-pinned account pools. #14422 addresses another provider integration. This is the first of two linked PRs. Merge this connection change before #15341, which refines agent setup and adds the qualification harness. The split keeps each review below 100 changed files. Provider catalog entries have usable setup forms in this PR. Local browser subscription sign-in is included. ## What Changed - Store non-secret routing metadata on AI connections. Vault provider API keys, including Bedrock bearer API keys. Reject general AWS access keys. - Enforce company, owner, human audience, agent access, connection status, and protocol checks before resolving credentials. Keep reconnect destinations immutable and retain connection identity during key rotation. - Project OpenRouter and compatible custom endpoints into Codex, Claude, OpenCode, and local Hermes. Carry these settings through both legacy and native runner transports. Clear conflicting host credentials and redact keys from diagnostics. - Preserve older OpenRouter accounts and native personal defaults. Add Google API-key accounts and migration `0306` for the two provider-default constraints. - Run local Claude and Codex subscription sign-in behind the existing browser sign-in card. Use private attempt homes and owner-bound completion instead of a copied terminal command. - Seed isolated Gemini authentication and preserve OpenCode workspace permissions. Keep the selected connection authoritative. The independent Gemini and Grok workflow fixes are in #15341. - Keep native OpenCode custom gateway keys in a runner-owned selected-model proxy; the harness config contains only a session-scoped capability. Honor runtime outgoing proxy and certificate settings. Preserve streamed responses and revoke the proxy on close or startup failure. - Allow ordinary members to connect native personal accounts before an agent exists. - Repair routed accounts from task cards using the saved provider destination, protocol, model aliases, and connection identity. - Add provider catalog definitions, model discovery, pinned logos, and complete native and routed setup forms. Allow a personal routed connection before a new agent exists. Keep endpoint authentication keys out of Hermes terminal children. - Recover cancelled or restarted browser sign-in with a clear restart action. Support no-auth endpoints without a vault credential. Add isolation and recovery regressions and runtime documentation. ## Verification - Updated with `origin/master` at `22a3ea341`. Migration `0306` follows the new master migration and passes migration and snapshot checks. - The integrated connection regressions passed 152 tests and 50 native OpenCode driver tests, including key-free child-shell configuration reads, authenticated/no-auth forwarding, streaming, model/path restrictions, cancellation, outgoing proxy routing, and NO_PROXY bypass. Provider setup has 14 passing tests. The pinned real OpenCode 1.18.34 executable also completed a turn through the proxy against a local synthetic provider; the reusable key was absent from its config. A second real-executable smoke passed with an HTTPS CONNECT proxy and runtime-specific synthetic certificate trust. Certificate-file and certificate-directory regressions pass. - Task-card repair passed 48 tests, including OpenRouter, Bedrock, and custom gateway reconnect cases. UI typecheck and token gates passed. - The prior core regression set passed 133 tests across new-agent setup, provider forms, browser sign-in, routing projection, and connection authorization. Token gates and UI typecheck passed. - Full workspace typecheck and production build passed again after the latest integration and credential-proxy fix. The merged deterministic runner E2E suite passed 1,400 Vitest tests and 128 Node tests. - Full workspace typecheck passed on the prior linked combined implementation. Production build, Storybook build, 1,316 browser-harness Vitest tests, and 128 Node tests passed. Head `9d964c8d9` includes the latest master integration and regenerated migration. This exact head passed 54 remote checks with four expected skips and Greptile 5/5; no review threads remain open. An unchanged server fixture had a random six-character issue-prefix collision on its first attempt. All 245 tests passed locally and the single CI retry passed. - A provider-free terminal check used the cited supported Hermes source and dummy keys. Gateway and OpenRouter terminal children could not read the selected key. - The broad local Vitest attempt passed 15,442 tests but was not green. It had an embedded-Postgres startup failure, an HTTP logger timeout, an origin socket error, and a browser cancellation wait timeout. The cancellation wait was corrected. The relevant connection tests and the full origin test file passed separately. Latest-head CI must pass before merge. - Prior credential-backed acceptance exercised task creation, tool use, artifact delivery, completion, and context-dependent follow-up. Claude legacy and native runners passed Bedrock with `us-east-1` and `us.anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6`. - Historical local qualification retained 43 passing API/gateway cells out of 46. Those attempts span earlier builds. They do not qualify this exact commit or staging. All subscription combinations and staging remain unqualified. - Verify native subscription and API-key setup. Connect a regular provider catalog row. Verify an incompatible harness and a changed reconnect URL are rejected. Use #15341 for the complete browser campaign. ## Risks - Migration `0306` changes two check constraints. It preserves rows and is safe to reapply. It takes normal constraint-change locks. - Credential projection touches several harnesses. CLI upgrades can change provider configuration and session behavior. - The native OpenCode proxy adds a loopback hop, pins requests to the selected model, limits request bodies to 16 MiB, rejects redirects, and expires at session close. It prevents reusable keys in the child configuration; it is not an OS isolation boundary against a process debugger running as the same user. - Custom endpoints must be reachable from the agent environment. Saving a connection does not prove connectivity. Bedrock keys require rotation before expiry. - Gemini CLI 0.58.0 has an upstream ACP new-file error conversion defect. Provider overloads and an unresolved follow-up timeout also affect live Gemini qualification. We have not patched the installed CLI or marked those cases as passing. - OpenClaw Gateway, Hermes Gateway, Claude Managed, AWS AgentCore, Process, HTTP, and legacy ACPX local are excluded. Vertex, ambient AWS identity, arbitrary auth headers, and custom routing for other harnesses are excluded. - These PRs do not establish production or staging qualification for every provider and login method. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser testing. The exact deployment model ID and context window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foleyandgithub-actions[bot]
|
7be51f30e1 |
docs(release): canonicalize stable notes for v2026.1005.0 (#15357)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The release process keeps stable notes under a beta-keyed path during the soak and renames them to the versioned path after the stable ships > - Stable v2026.1005.0 is published. The `canonicalize_stable_notes` job pushed the rename branch but it does not open a pull request > - Until the rename merges, `releases/v2026.1005.0.md` does not exist on master and the announcement links do not resolve > - This pull request merges the workflow's rename commit. It is a pure rename with no content changes > - The benefit is that the repository returns to the canonical release-notes layout and the notes link in the announcements resolves ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Missing content **Where is the issue?** `releases/` — the stable notes for v2026.1005.0 still live at the beta-keyed path `releases/beta/v2026.1002.0-beta.0.md`. **What's wrong?** The `canonicalize_stable_notes` job in the stable release run pushed branch `release-notes/v2026.1005.0-canonicalize` with the rename, but it does not open a pull request. The versioned path `releases/v2026.1005.0.md` does not exist on master until this merges. **Suggested fix** Merge the workflow's rename commit. The notes were already corrected before the stable dispatch in #15251, so no content change is needed here. ## What Changed - Renamed `releases/beta/v2026.1002.0-beta.0.md` to `releases/v2026.1005.0.md` (workflow commit `ecc10236`, authored by `github-actions[bot]`) - No content changed. This is a pure rename. The file already carries the correct header, commit count, and Contributors section from #14928 and #15251 ## Verification - The compare view for this branch against master shows one commit and one file with status `renamed`, zero line changes - The GitHub Release body for v2026.1005.0 is identical to this file (one trailing newline differs) - `git rev-list --count v2026.1001.0..v2026.1005.0` returns 179, which matches the Contributors section - After merge, https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/master/releases/v2026.1005.0.md returns 200 ## Risks - Low risk: a documentation-only rename with no content changes. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5-1` (Claude Fable 5.1), extended thinking enabled, tool use via Claude Code ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.20 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
22a3ea3414 |
Invite assistants from Connections with scoped browser and device consent (#14933)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Public MCP lets people use their organization from an external assistant. > - Operators need a visible control for this experimental access. > - Hosted users should select an organization once and then approve its permissions. > - This pull request adds the setting, invitation-first setup, and browser or device consent. > - Connections provides a copyable invitation with public instructions that grant no access. > - Users reach browser consent from their assistant and return to inspect or revoke access. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Builds on merged foundation #14846. This PR now targets master. Related settings convention: #13905. **Current behavior** The preview uses an environment variable to enable MCP. Hosted consent repeats organization selection. Assistant access has no entry in Connections, so users must already know the endpoint and how to reach consent. **Proposed behavior** An administrator enables Settings → Experimental → Assistant connections (MCP). A hosted connection shows the selected organization and its icon, then asks for permissions. Requested write access starts checked when the user’s role permits it; the user can opt out before connecting. Direct instance connections show an organization picker with the first available organization selected. The selection stays fixed across refetches and still requires an explicit Connect action. Connections includes Assistant Connection (MCP). Its setup page explains the canonical endpoint, client configuration, browser authentication, and connected access. It connects as the current person and does not select or impersonate an agent. **Reason and benefit** Operators manage access with the other experiments. Users select one organization, and both the UI and server enforce that choice. **Breaking changes** The old enable variable has no effect. Preview operators must enable the setting once. Apply the additive consent-request migration before deploying the tenant, then deploy the compatible Cloud broker. Existing direct requests and grants keep their behavior. ## What Changed - Simplify OAuth and device consent: show the Paperclip logo beside “Connect {client} to Paperclip”, fall back to “your assistant”, and show the identifying origin plus its favicon below, with the callback URL also visible when different. Remove the hosted-organization creation action. Default to the first available organization without silently changing it on refetch; preserve company restrictions and write opt-outs. Keep the button row contained on narrow screens. - Make Copy invitation the primary action, using the shared animated AgentSetupPrompt and a collapsed manual setup section with icon-labeled line tabs. Remove redundant link actions, copy-status text, the extra first-prompt well and revocation explanation from the setup page. Serve shared version-aware HTML and Markdown instructions without private organization data. - Support guarded Client ID Metadata Documents alongside dynamic registration, and include authorization response issuer identification. - Add RFC 8628 device authorization with separately hashed codes, expiry, shared request quotas, persistent polling backoff and atomic redemption. Reuse human consent, role checks, scoped grants, audit and revocation. - Add CLI device login and a local stdio bridge. Store credentials separately with private permissions and serialize rotating refreshes. - Add device consent stories and five cold-start paid Product E2E cases with independent grant, configuration and durable-work assertions. - Add `enablePublicMcp` to the settings validator, normalizer, feature catalog, and toggle UI. Check it live for OAuth, tools, subscriptions, and event delivery. Keep connection management and revocation available while disabled. - Default the MCP origin to the existing auth public URL, with strict validation and an explicit override. - Persist the optional OAuth `company_id` restriction. Describe only that company and reject approval for any other company, even if the person belongs to both. Keep active-membership and role checks. - Show the Paperclip icon and a large organization icon during consent. Return the saved company logo through the company-scoped request response and reuse the standard fallback icon. Use the requested concise permission labels: “Read all of your Paperclip data” and “Allow write access and creating tasks as me”. Use concise permission copy, retain a compact client and callback-origin disclosure, and remove the footer link. - Default requested write access on for eligible roles. Preserve opt-out across organization changes and refetch, reset defaults for a new request, and submit read-only access when the request or role does not allow writes. Align the shared checkbox with its label. - Use organization wording in consent, management, settings, and walkthroughs. Keep the organization fixed for hosted requests and retain direct-instance choice. - Add an Assistant Connection (MCP) card to the Connectors catalog, a setup page in the app shell, and a return link from Experimental settings. Include Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, and generic remote MCP instructions. - Read the live gate and canonical server URL through authenticated setup metadata. Show only the current person’s grants for the selected organization, refresh after consent, and support revocation. Surface catalog status failures with an explicit retry action; do not present them as an empty connection list. Opening setup grants no authority. - Start the eight guided chapters in Connections. Keep presenter notes and chapter controls around real product pages in the app shell. Explain the terminal, consent, delegation, retrieval, and revocation handoffs. Mark conversation examples as illustrative. Cover first use, client setup, connected, loading, and error states. Keep the existing consent and management stories. - Keep the paid-eval setup and browser helper aligned with the setting and consent button. ## Verification - Warm-standby integration fix `ec64ea05e`: public MCP ingress now follows the Cloud claim guard; MCP and discovery paths return 503 instead of SPA HTML while unclaimed. Event polling checks the in-memory claim before reading the persisted experimental setting. All 97 focused OAuth/Cloud tests and server typecheck pass, including new request and timer regressions for idle-before-claim and resume-after-claim behavior. Fresh review is 5/5 with no unresolved threads, and all security scans pass on this final head. All browser shards, typecheck, build, canary installation and other test groups passed on the first attempt. The unchanged Cursor sandbox default-command test timed out at 10 seconds; the exact test passed locally without edits in 587 ms. The single failed-job retry passed, with the original failure retained in workflow 37500711895. All 54 final-head checks pass on `ec64ea05e9a03e2179d4e2f84c2de03761f7ce26` (two optional Storybook jobs are intentionally skipped). - Final master integration `8457828fc`: merged foundation #14846 and current master, preserving the invitation changes and all 33 files from the two newer upstream changes. No migration renumbering was required. All 95 focused OAuth/Cloud integration tests, full recursive typecheck and token gates pass. All CI gates passed on that integration head; review identified the warm-standby issue fixed above. - Security-review fix `8c1d0b696`: commit shared global/per-source admission before outbound CIMD work, preserve failed-attempt receipts, and validate resource/scope before fetching. Added migration `0305_chubby_vin_gonzales.sql` and six concurrent/adversarial regression cases. All 69 OAuth/metadata tests, 26 migration checks, full recursive typecheck and production build pass. The security scanner passed that commit. Follow-up `87f9658e7` limits only actual cache-miss fetches; 18 authorization requests sharing one proxy across two service instances use just two fetches. All 70 OAuth/metadata tests and server typecheck pass after that refinement. Final follow-up `8ebeae84c` reports admission-storage failures as retryable HTTP 503 instead of invalid client metadata. Its regression proves no outbound request before admission and successful retry after storage recovers. All 71 OAuth/metadata tests and server typecheck pass. Final-head security scanning passes; Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings. CI passed all browser shards, typecheck, build, token gates and canary installation. One unchanged adapter-utils bridge test raced a response-file write (expected a JSON error, received the safe file-changed error). The exact test passed locally without edits. The single failed-job retry passed; the original failure is retained in workflow 37490609192. All 54 checks now pass on final head `8ebeae84ca77c0cf7ac12c2006f0f8743fe50e0b`, with security scan and fresh Greptile 5/5 and no unresolved threads. Foundation #14846 subsequently merged as `e34abee670069cca84afb2efb86041bce7dccbec`; the final integration above now targets master. - Integration with current master: preserved the new Connections source filters and pagination, kept all eval suites, and regenerated the consent/device snapshots as migrations 0303/0304. All four MCP migration SQL hashes are unchanged from the staging versions. Full recursive typecheck and production build, 132 focused UI tests (including catalog filtering), 89 server authorization/settings tests, 26 migration tests, 120 eval calibration tests and token gates pass. Review follow-up `4820ce74c` also keeps active assistant grants in Installed, with pending/error recovery and revocation/company-isolation coverage. All 76 setup/catalog tests, UI typecheck and token gates pass after that fix. The unchanged signoff browser test timed out waiting for a heartbeat in CI at `4820ce74c`; the exact test passed locally without code changes, and the preceding CI head passed that shard. That same unchanged test failed at the reviewer stage in the next CI run. All five signoff tests passed three times locally (15/15), without test changes. All eight browser shards pass at final head `8ebeae84c`; no browser-test edits or failed-browser-job retries were needed. - Setup-page refinement at `9ab009178`: all 17 focused setup/consent tests pass, along with UI typecheck, production build, Storybook build and token gates. Browser exercised the shared prompt preview and client tab switching, and the updated InvitationCopied Storybook interaction checks its clipboard fixture. All final-head CI checks pass at `9ab009178`, with no unresolved review findings. Deployed successfully to Butter in https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/actions/runs/37475189524. Verified the actual page, tab switching and line styling, removed actions/copy, and successful native copy/paste of the complete Butter invitation into a local-only test field. The existing Claude grant was left intact. - Consent follow-up at `dc8e9fd11`: all 10 consent tests and token gates pass. UI typecheck and production build passed again at `4e4d5e4d9`; Storybook build and eval-helper typecheck passed for `28101cf91`. Follow-ups let the primary button wrap on narrow screens, preserve a distinct callback URL, and use only bundled icons to avoid pre-consent requests to client-selected sites. Browser-verified the real consent component in desktop and 320px mobile stories, including default selection, write access and preserved opt-out. Updated E2E heading/default-selection helpers. All CI checks passed at `dc8e9fd11`, with review 5/5 and no unresolved threads. The Butter preview publication needed a retry because npm initially accepted the DB package before making it visible; the retry succeeded and `dc8e9fd11` deployed. Verified a fresh, unapproved native Codex CIMD request on Butter: default organization/write selection, known-client heading and icon, distinct callback origin, and removed creation action. No grant was approved for this UI check. Prior paid runs below retain their exact source provenance; this UI-only follow-up did not rerun paid qualification. - Source-pinned paid matrix at `2992ef2710f47230e7f484c709c6ba02524f884c`: **15/15 passed**, five cases each on GPT-5.4 Mini, Claude Haiku and Sonnet. Campaign `local-2026-10-06T02-41-14-462Z`. Covers cold start, existing config, unavailable host, denied consent and reconnect/later retrieval, with independent configuration/grant/task/run/document assertions. Original failures, transcripts, source fingerprints and billing remain retained. - Final instruction follow-up `cda8178af`: **3/3 cold starts passed** on Mini, Haiku and Sonnet. Campaign `local-2026-10-06T02-58-30-041Z`. Latest `0637b9f1c` shares that same guidance across HTML, Markdown and manual UI after review; generated Markdown is verified byte-identical to the paid-evaluated version. Shared build, server/UI typechecks, token gates and 63 auth/metadata tests passed again. Every CI gate passed at prior HEAD `0637b9f1c`, with review 5/5 and no unresolved threads. - Other focused checks: 11 CLI credential/refresh-lock tests, 120 eval calibration tests, server/UI/eval typechecks, token gates and Storybook build passed. Full recursive typecheck and production build passed during implementation; CI also passed them at `2992ef271`. - Local full-suite limitations: a large-file Git streaming test times out on this Mac, and broader CLI/route runs hit DB hook timeouts. Fresh MCP reruns passed, and the corresponding CI groups passed. No claim that the local full suite is green. - Actual clients: Codex 0.153.4 and Claude Code 2.1.245 reach CIMD consent; device CLI reaches verification/consent. New grants await human approval. Existing local OpenCode retrieved a saved result in a fresh conversation through its previously approved grant. - Fresh OpenCode 1.18.17 on Butter: started with no MCP config, received the exact copied invitation, read public setup, configured its server and started PKCE consent. Its shell command timed out; background retry reached the client's own callback deadline while approval remained pending. Latest instructions cover that handoff. **No completed Butter read/delegation/result retrieval is claimed.** - Cloud companion https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/pull/672 passes checks/review and deployed. Anonymous setup and device-protocol routing verified. Core `2992ef271` deployed successfully and the actual Claude web flow now reaches consent. Its extra JWT-bearer metadata is filtered to implemented grants; unsupported token grants remain rejected. Final `0637b9f1c` deployed successfully to Butter in https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/actions/runs/37409195300; live HTML and Markdown both contain the final guidance. The superseded instruction-only build was canceled before deployment. This is a core-only staging preview; private Cloud plugins are omitted. ChatGPT web is signed out, so browser connector use is unverified. - Screenshot gallery begins at Butter's dashboard and distinguishes real setup/pending consent from local reuse and fixtures. It records the timeout finding. New persistent access needs human confirmation before the remaining actual-client acceptance work. - Manual path: Connectors → Assistant Connection (MCP) → Copy invitation → paste into assistant → configure and start authorization → sign in and approve → verify `paperclip_connection` → delegate → retrieve the saved report later. - Plan and instructions: `doc/plans/2026-10-05-assistant-invitations.md` and `doc/public-mcp.md`. ## Risks - Apply additive, replay-safe migration `0304_curvy_shadow_king.sql` before using device authorization. The public setup link carries no credential. Device codes and tokens stay private; neither sharing instructions nor installing a plugin authorizes access. - Apply additive migration `0305_chubby_vin_gonzales.sql` before deploying the shared metadata admission gate. It retains at most 60 short-lived, hashed-source receipts per instance and rejects excess attempts with 429. - CIMD metadata fetching is a new external-input boundary. It requires HTTPS, exact client ID and redirect validation, bounded responses and guarded DNS/network access. Client names remain self-reported. - Device support is per-instance. The central Cloud broker retains its existing grant support. Host installation and tool reload capabilities vary by client; instructions describe manual settings and restart requirements. - Consent names the registered client in its heading and displays its identifying origin below. Known-origin icons are bundled; all other origins show a neutral site icon without contacting client-selected sites. Client names are self-reported; the callback origin is the recipient check. The Cloud chooser also displays the original client and receiving origin before tenant handoff. - A user who accepts the preselected write permission can create tasks and comments. Task creation and comments can start or wake agents and use execution budget; the consent label uses the concise wording explicitly requested by the maintainer. Scope requests, role checks, and the final Connect action still apply. - Migration `0303_supreme_garia.sql` adds one nullable UUID column with `IF NOT EXISTS`. Requests without a company restriction keep the direct-instance picker. The binding stays recorded if its company is deleted; consent then fails closed. - Deploy tenant support before the Cloud broker sends `company_id`. Unknown or inaccessible organizations must never fall back to a different company. - The setting defaults off. Disabling access does not cancel work already delegated. Existing tokens and unexpired subscriptions can resume when enabled again; revocation remains separate. - The catalog entry is visible for discovery while the feature is off. Setup instructions, OAuth, and tool execution remain gated. No access is granted by viewing the entry. - Assistant sign-in starts in the external client so it owns PKCE and callback state. Client command syntax can change and links to official setup documentation are included. - An authenticated instance and valid public URL are required. Hosting, paid execution, and store publication remain separate rollout steps. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with tool use and code execution. The exact serving model version and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks pass; unrelated local full-suite timeouts are explicitly recorded above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>nightly/v2026.1006.0-nightly.0 beta/v2026.1006.0-beta.0 canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.19 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
0fe47882cf |
Allow configurable Runner listening ports (#15353)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner supports authenticated provider ingress. > - Each listening Runner currently binds port 43127. > - Concurrent Runner processes on one computer need distinct listening ports. > - This pull request permits an explicit listening port and retains the default. > - Providers can route each run without changing the Runner protocol. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Paperclip Runner launch and durable transport. **Problem or motivation** Two listening Runner processes in one network namespace cannot bind the same fixed port. The CLI accepts a port flag but rejects every value except 43127. **Proposed solution** Accept `--listen-port` values from 1 through 65535. Default to 43127 when the flag is omitted. Preserve the wildcard bind address, exact run path, PRP authentication, and secure frames. A warm attachment retains its existing listening port. **Alternatives considered** Separate network namespaces or a shared Runner daemon need more changes. Configurable launch ports preserve the existing process model. **Roadmap alignment** This extends existing Cloud / Sandbox agent support. The duplicate search found no matching Runner listener-port change. ## What Changed - Default an omitted listener port to 43127 and reject invalid values. - Validate configurable ports in the durable transport. - Reuse the selected port during warm attachment and reject port changes. - Cover default and explicit ports, invalid input, concurrent listeners, and warm attachment. - Update transport documentation. Daytona still uses its existing default port. ## Verification - Native `cargo test --locked --workspace` passed (two existing tests ignored). - Targeted listener and CLI tests passed, including executable launches on two concurrent ports and warm listener retention. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. - Complete GitHub CI is green, including general and serialized test suites, all browser shards, Runner Rust/Vitest lanes, builds, and release checks. - The additional full local `pnpm test:run` is still running; no final local result is claimed. - `git diff --check` passes. ## Risks An explicit port can already be occupied. Runner fails its bind without choosing a different port. Port allocation and ingress authorization remain provider responsibilities. No schema or PRP wire format changes. Existing explicit port 43127 callers continue to work. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository inspection, and code execution. The session does not expose the exact model ID or context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.18 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e34abee670 |
feat(mcp): connect assistants to a team with user OAuth (#14846)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip gives teams durable tasks, agent execution, budgets, and approvals. > - People also use assistants in Codex, Claude, and other MCP clients. > - Those assistants need a scoped connection that preserves the person’s permissions and attribution. > - Delegating a task must not turn the assistant into the assigned agent. > - This PR adds opt-in user OAuth, ten first-party tools, browser consent, and workflow packages. > - Paid product evals verify the resulting tasks, documents, attribution, retries, and access boundaries. > - The team keeps working after the assistant conversation ends. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** A person cannot connect an external assistant to an existing team through browser consent and safely delegate durable work as themselves. **Proposed solution** Expose an opt-in `/mcp/paperclip` endpoint with individually described first-party operations. Bind every connection to a person, client, company, resource, and scopes. Reuse domain authorization and scheduling. Package shared team-review, delegation, and follow-up workflows for OpenAI/Codex and Claude. **Alternatives considered** Related PRs #9393 and #12549 cover earlier remote MCP and board-operator approaches. This change uses user OAuth and a bounded public catalog. It does not expose a generic executor, operator administration, static shared board credentials, or external agent execution. Registry listing work in #9851 is a separate distribution step. **Roadmap alignment** This maintainer-requested implementation extends the governed MCP gateway, activity attribution, durable work products, and hosted deployment direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It implements the first release of the saved design plan; external agent participation and granted third-party tools remain later releases. ## What Changed - Add MCP 2.0 discovery and task status/comment/document Events on the same authenticated endpoint. Persist subscriptions and delivery receipts, verify HTTPS callbacks, sign Standard Webhooks, encrypt callback material, recheck permissions/Cloud membership, and bound retries/expiry. Older MCP clients keep their existing tools. - Add discovery, dynamic client registration, S256 PKCE, resource validation, rotating refresh tokens, revocation, and company consent. Store credentials as hashes and recheck membership at execution. - Add tools for connection identity, agents/projects, task search/read/create, human comments, documents/deliverables, and pending-approval links. Preserve current domain permissions and scheduling. - Add durable mutation receipts across reconnects. Matching retries replay results; uncertain outcomes keep the same request ID and require inspection. - Add consent and connection-management pages, OAuth log redaction, shared plugin workflows, and separate OpenAI/Codex and Claude package outputs. - Add eight paid Product E2E cases across three models, independent durable-state grading, usage evidence, cleanup, and report integration. Add task-document guidance and regenerate the runner capability inventories. - Add migrations 0301 and 0302, the dated implementation plan, result notes, and direct-client setup instructions in `doc/public-mcp.md`. ## Verification - Merge integration `e180b1948`: resolved conflicts with current master, preserved both eval registries, regenerated capability catalogs, and regenerated migrations as 0301/0302 while keeping the original replay-safe SQL byte-identical. Local migration safety/snapshot tests (26), MCP/OAuth tests (38), redaction/OpenAPI tests (71), and eval catalog/grading tests (198) pass. Token and capability gates pass. Full recursive typecheck passed. Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 with no unresolved findings. CI is green on this exact head (55 successes, two intentional skips, one neutral result): one unchanged Cursor sandbox test timed out at 10 seconds, then passed locally in 856 ms. A single retry of that failed shard and the aggregate workflow passed. Merge remains blocked on the repository code-owner approval rule. Earlier checks passed at `6aa0962d4fb715f2190bb7bb22efacab2e58495d`: 55 successes, two intentional skips and one neutral result. [The earlier CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36901592350) includes all test shards, browser tests, typecheck, build and canary dry run. Greptile was 5/5 on that commit with no unresolved review threads. GitHub still requires code-owner review under the repository merge rules; passing checks do not bypass that approval. Paid source fingerprints remain separate below and in the dated result note. - Paid Events qualification passes **3/3**: GPT-5.4 Mini, Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6. Each uses a real public HTTPS callback, signature verification and report retrieval in a fresh conversation. A final Mini regression passes after the quota/status fixes. All evidence validates. Bounded tunnel startup retries occur before provider calls and remain visible; failed earlier attempts retain their original grades. - The earlier complete seven-case matrix passes **21/21**, with a separate **3/3** delegation regression. Two preceding matrices also passed 21/21 each. A complete 24-cell matrix including Events has not been run. [The dated results](doc/plans/2026-10-01-public-mcp-paid-eval-results.md) retain exact source fingerprints, failures, model IDs and partial costs. - Node 24: repository-wide `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass after merging master. Server typecheck passes after the final quota/status changes. Eval typecheck and all 892 eval-support tests pass. - All 33 real MCP/OAuth tests pass. The preceding combined MCP, redaction, private-address and DNS-rebinding run passed 129 tests; two later MCP regressions cover quota reuse and unchanged-status suppression. All 28 adjacent issue-tree/stale-lock route tests pass. CI then found a null checkout result in the existing concurrent-workspace path; logging now uses optional status access. All 12 closed-workspace tests and all 33 MCP tests pass after that correction. The exact-start event calibration exposed a timestamp gap; scanning now includes the subscription start, with all 33 MCP tests and server typecheck passing. These two narrow corrections follow the paid regression. - A real Core → Cloud → Core authority round trip passes OAuth, MCP 2.0 subscription/delivery, current membership loss, unsubscribe, legacy SDK tools, refresh and revocation. Its callback transport is a fixture with independent HMAC verification. The paid Events campaigns separately prove public HTTPS delivery. - Earlier component qualification passed UI 7,117 tests, CLI 502, shared 832, skills catalog 20, database 160 and OpenAPI 10. Token gates, module boundaries, migration order and plugin regeneration passed. CI covers general/serialized suites, eight browser shards, runner checks, typecheck, build and canary dry run. - **Local full-suite limitation:** the earlier monolithic run was not clean. It encountered overlapping schema rebuilding, Mac database shared-memory limits and isolated CLI/fixture failures. Targeted reruns passed. The existing >32 MiB Git filename stress test still hit its 300-second Mac timeout. The additional serialized sweep stopped after 62 passing suites once CI passed. Original failures and partial logs remain; this PR does not claim a wholly green local monolithic run. - Local Codex CLI and Claude Code OAuth login and MCP SDK interoperability were verified. Public-store installation, actual ChatGPT Work Cloud Events UI, staging HTTPS client behavior and hosted newcomer provisioning remain release gates. Enablement is moving to **Settings → Experimental → Assistant connections (MCP)** in the stacked follow-up [#14933](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14933). Merge both for the intended setup experience. This foundation branch alone still uses `PAPERCLIP_PUBLIC_MCP_ENABLED=true`. After deployment, set `PAPERCLIP_PUBLIC_URL` to the authenticated instance's HTTPS origin, and connect to `/mcp/paperclip`. Select a team and allow writes in browser consent. Configure an available agent and budget, then delegate and retrieve results later. For Events, rescan the deployed plugin catalog in ChatGPT Work Cloud; the host supplies its webhook credentials when the user asks to watch a task. See [the setup runbook](doc/public-mcp.md). ## Risks - Events are at-least-once and may arrive out of order. No replay cursor is advertised. Clients must refresh finite subscriptions, read current state and avoid comment feedback loops. Callback material uses the instance secrets master key; hosted subscriptions require the updated Cloud broker and are bounded to five minutes/the access proof expiry. - ChatGPT Work Cloud/dot event UI, plugin rescan and a hosted staging subscription remain deployment gates. Local signed-webhook and paid model evidence does not claim those surfaces have been exercised. - Disabled by default. Merging adds schema and opt-in code; it does not deploy a public endpoint, publish a store listing, create a team, or start paid agents. - Migrations 0301 and 0302 are additive and idempotent. Their SQL is unchanged from the earlier preview numbers, so hash-aware upgrade reconciliation preserves prior staging applications. Normal instance upgrades must apply it before enabling MCP. - Task creation and comments can schedule paid agent work. Consent and tool descriptions disclose that effect. Revocation blocks future calls but does not undo delegated work. - Public deployments need edge rate limits and credential-safe logging. Internal dispatch is restricted to the closed catalog and carries a request-local verified actor. - Hosted onboarding requires the companion Cloud broker, encryption-key configuration, and tenant rollout. Self-hosted direct connections can use this PR alone. - Store acceptance and agent-mode participation are not claimed. Checked-in plugin endpoints are development defaults; rebuild packages for a real deployment before installation. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. A more specific serving version and context-window size were not exposed by the session. Paid eval models: `gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17`, `claude-haiku-4-5-20251001`, and `claude-sonnet-4-6`. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted/component checks; full local-run limitations are recorded above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
202c2d307e |
fix(server): leave unclaimed warm Cloud databases idle (#15314)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work performed by AI agents. > - Managed deployments prepare empty applications before an owner claims them. > - Those applications start database pollers even though no company can have work. > - Health probes also query SQL, so idle databases cannot remain suspended. > - This pull request adds an explicit standby marker for empty, unclaimed Cloud apps. > - The existing signed, durable claim resumes normal processing without restarting the app. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An empty, unclaimed warm application runs recurring chat, email, plugin, heartbeat, cleanup, and reconciliation queries. Its health route also opens the database. This prevents idle database compute from suspending. **Expected behavior** An explicitly marked unclaimed application should keep its HTTP process and sandbox provider plugins ready while leaving the database idle. A successful signed claim should resume normal API behavior and background processing. Claimed and self-hosted instances should keep their current behavior. **Steps to reproduce** Start an empty Cloud-managed application and leave it unclaimed. Observe database activity while repeatedly requesting `/api/health`. Before this change, periodic queries continue without company data. Related: #15153 reduces allocation during chat polling. This change suppresses polling only for explicitly marked, empty, unclaimed Cloud apps. ## What Changed - Add `PAPERCLIP_CLOUD_WARM_STANDBY=1`. Check company emptiness once after restoring the persisted Cloud runtime identity. Missing Cloud configuration, existing data, or a persisted claim leaves normal processing active. - Gate recurring database pollers with an in-memory predicate. Keep startup preparation and sandbox provider plugin loading intact. - Serve unclaimed health probes without session or database reads and report `warmStandby: true`. Serve standby pages/assets directly from the UI router, bypassing session, bearer, tenant, and dynamic handlers. Refuse API requests and all WebSocket upgrades before authentication can query SQL or seed company data. - Exit standby after the existing signed identity assertion commits. Normal timers resume at their next tick; a restart restores the claim even with stale provider variables. - Document the marker, readiness semantics, rollout checks, and rollback. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. A final server typecheck also passed after adding tests. - `pnpm build` passed. - Focused standby, signed claim, restart, health, static/Vite routing, hostname, HMR, and live-events suites: 72 passed after the review fixes. Includes real HTTP upgrade admission before/after claim. - `pnpm test:run` was attempted locally; both superseded runs were stopped after encountering checkout/platform failures. A clean-checkout rerun eliminated ancestor skill-directory lookup failures. The company-skills/runtime-cache families encounter macOS read-only-directory rename failures (`EACCES`); all three company-skills failures reproduce on unmodified base `bf14f803d5`. The initial full run also reported one native runner API test failure; an isolated comparison on both revisions was blocked by local embedded PostgreSQL startup failures. The full [Linux CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37423263993) passed on final commit `5016c415ea`, including all server and workspace test shards, browser suites, typecheck, build, and release canary. This is not a claim that the full local suite passed. - Isolated full server with local PostgreSQL: after startup and connection expiry, 70 health probes, 70 page requests carrying valid synthetic tenant credentials, and 70 rejected WebSocket upgrades over 70 seconds observed zero app database connections. The signed claim completed in 62 ms and normal polling resumed (475 database transactions over 12 seconds). Restart with stale provider variables restored the durable claim. The latency is local-only, not a provider wake measurement. - Apex review: **5/5** on `5016c415ea`, both earlier threads resolved, no open recommendations. - No live-provider test or production deployment was performed. An actual database suspension/resume canary remains required before enabling the control-plane switch. ## Risks - Standby health reports HTTP readiness rather than current database connectivity. The signed claim still requires a durable database write; claimed health checks retain the SQL probe and 503 failure behavior. - Pollers resume at their usual intervals. A suspended database may add claim latency. Validate the real provider before enabling the marker. - Startup preparation and sandbox plugins remain loaded. New plugins or background loops must respect the same standby contract. - The marker is off by default. Remove it or set it to `0` and restart to roll back. No schema migration or claimed-workspace inactivity policy changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The exact serving snapshot and configured context-window size are not exposed in this session. Assistance included source review, TypeScript changes, command execution, and PostgreSQL tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass — targeted tests pass; full local suite limitations are documented above, and full Linux CI is green - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.17 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f2715e02bb |
fix(native): surface model capacity errors and retry automatically (#15347)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs preserve provider events and results, then decide task state. > - Codex can fail a turn because the selected model is temporarily at capacity. > - Paperclip displayed a generic native-session failure and left the task in recovery. > - A known capacity failure needs a clear message and a durable delayed retry. > - This pull request uses committed terminal evidence, the status-effect ledger, and existing dispatch gates. > - The task can continue automatically without an unbounded retry loop or a model switch. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #13993 adds launcher capacity deferrals before provider startup. This change handles a committed native Codex `serverOverloaded` terminal after provider work has started. **What happened?** A native Codex turn ended with `codexErrorInfo: serverOverloaded` and “Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.” Paperclip saved the result, showed a generic failure, and required recovery instead of waiting and retrying. **Expected behavior** Show the capacity error directly. Schedule bounded retries after a short delay. Preserve saved work and honor current execution gates. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native Codex task. 2. Commit a `turn.failed` event with `serverOverloaded`, then accept a failed result for the same turn. 3. Inspect the task error and its recovery state. The regression test reproduces this without a paid provider call. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against master `16b7db35ffa0f9a95913c8cbdeea3d595435691f`. ## What Changed - Classify capacity failures from committed runner events and the pinned execution identity. Preserve accepted results and display the specific capacity error. - Atomically persist one scheduled successor with the status decision. Retry after one minute, then two minutes. Share the existing failure budget and stop after two automatic retries. - Reuse dispatch gates for ownership, task holds, dependencies, budget, and locks. Wait for predecessor execution, finalization, and cleanup before claiming a retry. - Preserve pending reviewer authority and suppress retries after reassignment or a successor claim. - Consume the failed run's resume receipt and delivered wake input. Rebuild ordinary continuation from the failed run so explicitly resumed tasks can retry without borrowing one-run authorization. - Label scheduled retries “Model at capacity.” Add a Storybook example and avoid duplicate punctuation in the existing retry card. - Add regression coverage and document the runtime contract. ## Verification - Targeted recovery and UI suites: 125 tests passed. Additional final cleanup and lock regressions passed. - Latest-head continuation and authorization regressions: 57 tests passed, including all four capacity integration tests against an isolated PostgreSQL database. - Rechecked all four capacity integration tests with the full runner's isolated `PAPERCLIP_HOME`, config, temporary directory, and serial fork settings: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. Final server typecheck passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - Browser: checked the real Storybook card. It shows the capacity message, automatic retry time, and existing Retry now action. - `pnpm test:run`: attempted and restarted after an interruption. The resumed run started before the final review correction and was stopped after recorded workspace/native test failures and the five-minute Git streaming timeout already documented on master. Exit 130; no complete local full-suite pass is claimed. Current-head isolated capacity tests and the complete CI suite pass. - A combined local recovery-suite attempt also hit PostgreSQL initialization failures at this macOS host's global shared-memory limit (32 slots). The focused recovery suites passed separately; final-head capacity tests also pass with the full runner's isolated environment settings. - Latest-head GitHub checks: all 56 checks green, including general and serialized test shards, browser E2E, typecheck, build, Runner verification, and canary dry run. No merge conflicts. - Greptile: 5/5 on `813a470b8c18c05aeb7e31e63e573c3a3a2f5cac`, with zero unresolved findings after fixing the resumed-task continuation issue. ## Risks - Capacity retries can repeat a task turn after partial work. They start a fresh provider session with task history and wait for predecessor cleanup. They do not resume the failed turn. - Retries retain the configured model unless an operator changes configuration. Persistent overload consumes the existing failure budget and then needs an explicit retry or model change. - Only run-bound native Codex `serverOverloaded` failures qualify. Usage-limit exhaustion, model/account incompatibility, unbound text, and unknown provider failures retain their current recovery behavior. - No schema migration is required. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact model ID and context-window size are not exposed to this session. Used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser verification. No subagents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.16 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
16b7db35ff |
Shorten planning skills and measure task decomposition (#15296)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for AI agents. > - Planning guidance helps agents choose owners and dependencies. > - The runtime skill favors few tasks, but the catalog skill requires a child-task breakdown. > - Both add repeated process instructions that can distract from the requested outcome. > - This change keeps the ownership and dependency rules and removes the required matrix and repeated checklist. > - A bounded Product E2E comparison measures saved outcomes and task handoffs before qualification. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11057. Related measurement work: #15218. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Planning and delegation through the runtime plan-to-tasks and bundled task-planning skills. **Current behavior** The two skills contain about 1,900 words and conflicting guidance on whether plans require child tasks. **Proposed behavior** Keep cohesive work with one owner. Split only for a real owner, parallel output, dependency, independent review, or follow-up lifecycle. Preserve existing authorization and planning mechanics. ## What Changed - Shorten both skills to about 400 words combined. Preserve their keys and installed-version behavior. - Remove the duplicate operational-skill pointer and regenerate affected source metadata. - Add twelve explicit Product E2E cells: four scenarios with current, short and disabled planning skills. - Use the current task composer and actual create-response ID; calibrate public skill APIs and browser creation without providers. - Eliminate an observed collision in chat-test company prefixes with a per-suite sequence. - Grade saved documents, exact author/run attribution, child count, prerequisite execution order, review boundaries and completion handoffs. - Retain current skill bytes and report source, selections, run accounting and failures. ## Verification - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck`: pass. - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`: 1,287 Vitest tests and 128 Node checks pass. - `pnpm test:e2e:runner -- --list --suite plan-task-guidance`: twelve local Codex cells. - Archived current skills match master `72ff3a9f27e581a27acb49771e8658bbb0bbaa47` exactly. - Corrected fixture: three real public-API/database calibrations pass with zero provider runs; all 35 evaluator checks and Product E2E typecheck pass. - Setup campaign [37399550253](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37399550253) was canceled after source review found unsupported bundled edits and automatic core reinstallation. Its paid-cell step was skipped: zero provider runs, no behavioral grade. - The next setup [37401094799](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37401094799) failed before task creation on the old title-field selector: zero actual runs, original FAIL retained, cleanup passed. A real browser/API calibration of the new helper passes with paused non-provider agents and zero runs. - Full local typecheck/build pass. Full local tests retain one unchanged five-minute Git streaming timeout (also fails isolated), 9,591 passes and 5,796 skips. CI's chat failure was a proven random fixture-prefix collision; five affected cases pass after the test-only repair. - Paid behavior comparison and new-head CI/review remain pending. This PR remains a draft. ## Risks - The shorter text may change delegation decisions. Live outcomes are not yet qualified. - The initial comparison uses one profile and one attempt per cell. It cannot establish cross-model reliability or cost trends. - Disabled means unassigned company-owned copies; the company library remains discoverable. This does not qualify global removal, automatic accepted-plan wiring changes, or installed-copy migration. - Skill availability does not prove a model read or cognitively used it. - No provider/tool protocol, permission, timeout or runtime lifecycle behavior changes in production. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with repository inspection, code editing and tool use. The exact backend model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. The declared eval model is native Codex `gpt-5.6-sol`. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
44e4979d23 |
Capture project and repository update lifecycle events (#15306)
## Thinking Path > - Existing lifecycle capture records agent transitions and project creation. > - Project and repository edits need matching project update records. > - The record must commit with the mutation so failed writes cannot lose a hook. > - Creation with repositories is one creation, and repository replacement is one update. > - Archive-only changes preserve project state without creating a hook. > - Plugin consumption and provider behavior are separate work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Project edits and repository/workspace changes lack durable lifecycle records. A future resource plugin needs those changes captured alongside the existing project creation hook. Archive-only changes must produce no hook. **Proposed solution** Allow project `update` records in the existing lifecycle journal. Record project and workspace mutations in their database transaction while holding the project row lock. Suppress intermediate workspace hooks during project creation and aggregate repository replacement. **Alternatives considered** Route-only hooks miss shared service callers. Recording after commit can lose an event. Emitting a hook for each child mutation exposes intermediate repository state. **Roadmap alignment** This completes project lifecycle capture begun in #15280. Plugin delivery, VM/volume provisioning, and backfill remain separate. Searches found no duplicate project lifecycle work; related #13306 concerns decision events on the in-process plugin bus. ## What Changed - Record project edits and workspace additions, updates, and removals as project `update` events. - Commit each event atomically with its mutation under the project row lock. - Keep project creation with repositories to one creation event and repository replacement to one aggregate update. - Ignore archive-only changes and retain workspace records. - Extend the journal action constraint and document project update capture. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed on the narrowed scope. - 57 tests passed across six lifecycle, project, repository, and chat-project suites. - Seven managed-sandbox workspace route tests and the CLI lagging-worktree migration regression passed (65 targeted tests total). - Full GitHub CI passed on `8ba6f97f22`; all required gates are green. - Greptile scored the final project-only commit 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads. - The branch is current with `master` and has no merge conflicts. - `git diff --check` and a local secret/PII scan passed. ## Risks - Apply migration `0300_chunky_chamber.sql` before running the new server. It permits project update actions and tolerates older JavaScript worktree backups that omitted the prior CHECK constraint. - Event-write failure intentionally rolls back the project or repository mutation. - Records contain identity and action; future consumers must load current authorized project/workspace data. - Plugin consumption, provider calls, volume cleanup, and backfill are outside this PR. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and tool use. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.15 |
||
|
|
1477d1ecea |
test: remove the no-op sequential describe modifier (#15286)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip runs the server and runner test suites with Vitest. > - Vitest 5 removes the deprecated `describe.sequential` property, so the pending Vitest 5 upgrade fails the type-check and test jobs. > - `describe.sequential` only changes behaviour inside a `describe.concurrent` suite, or when `sequence.concurrent` is on. > - This repository has neither, so the modifier changed nothing at run time. > - The benefit is that the Vitest 5 upgrade can land, and the test files lose a modifier that did no work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #12969 ## What Changed - Replace every `describe.sequential` use with a plain `describe` call. - Drop the `{ concurrent: false }` suite option from the two runner test files. - Add a comment to `server/vitest.config.ts` that records why these suites must run one test at a time. - Leave the package manifests and the lockfile unchanged. ## Why the modifier did nothing The Vitest documentation states that `describe.sequential` is useful to run tests in sequence inside a `describe.concurrent` suite, or with the `--sequence.concurrent` option. `sequence.concurrent` defaults to `false`. This repository satisfies neither condition: - No test file uses `describe.concurrent`, `it.concurrent`, or `test.concurrent`. - `server/vitest.config.ts` sets `sequence.concurrent: false`, with `maxWorkers: 1`, `maxConcurrency: 1`, and `isolate: true`. - `packages/paperclip-runner/vitest.config.ts` sets no `sequence` block, so the `false` default applies. `packages/db` and `cli` already run the same embedded-Postgres suites with a plain `describe`, and those jobs are green. The server package was the only outlier. The modifier did carry one real piece of knowledge: these suites need their tests to run one at a time. The new comment in `server/vitest.config.ts` records that reason next to the setting that enforces it. ## Verification - `git grep` for `describe.sequential` returns nothing outside `node_modules`. - The author ran the changed server test files under the installed Vitest 4, and the results match the results without this change. - Two very large embedded-Postgres test files exceeded the author's local memory limit, so the CI test jobs cover those two. - The two changed runner test files have pre-existing local failures caused by a missing Rust toolchain and a missing global `pnpm` binary. The failures are identical with and without this change. - The author type-checked the changed files and found no new error. - CI must pass the typecheck, build, server test, and runner verify jobs. ## Risks - Low risk. Suite execution stays serial, because the Vitest config enforces it. - The change adds no dependency and changes no package manifest or lockfile. - A future change that turns `sequence.concurrent` on would break these suites. The new config comment warns against it. ## Model Used - Claude Sonnet 5 — code edits and local verification. - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 — the earlier revision of this branch. ## Test plan - [x] Every CI check reaches a terminal green state. A pending or queued check is not a pass. - [x] The `Typecheck + Release Registry` job passes. This change must not introduce a type error. - [x] The `Build` job passes. - [x] The server test jobs and the runner verify jobs pass. - [x] Greptile re-reviews this commit set and posts a passing verdict. The dependabot waiver does not apply to this pull request. - [x] `mergeable` reads `MERGEABLE` as a terminal value. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have linked the related public issue with `Refs: #12969` - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-Authored-By: Priya Raman <priya.raman@paperclip.ing> --------- Co-authored-by: Priya Raman <priya.raman@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: nickyleach <331803+nickyleach@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
90182b4f8b |
Report bounded Cloud portfolio failure diagnostics (#15340)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for AI agents and their companies. > - Cloud instances proxy a trusted user's portfolio through the control plane. > - A failed request returns a generic error to the client. > - That replacement error loses the failure phase and network code in Sentry. > - Operators need bounded evidence without upstream messages or credentials. > - This PR adds safe diagnostics while preserving the existing request behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #10850, which added the portfolio proxy. No open PR for this diagnostic gap was found. **What happened?** A rejected portfolio fetch becomes a generic 502 in Sentry. The event cannot distinguish a connection reset, deadline, HTTP response failure, or body failure. The route's previous warning also included the original error and a stack identifier. **Steps to reproduce** Make the portfolio proxy's fetch reject with a TypeError whose cause has `code: ECONNRESET`. The client correctly receives the generic 502, but the captured replacement error loses that code. **Expected behavior** Keep the existing client response. Attach only bounded server-side diagnostic fields to the failure event. Do not retry the request or expose the original error. ## What Changed - Add a typed portfolio error with a private frozen diagnostic record: phase, upstream HTTP status, elapsed milliseconds, and an allowlisted network code. - Read at most four error/cause objects through own data properties. Unknown codes, messages, getters, and out-of-range values do not enter the record. - Replace the route's raw-error warnings with safe fields. Send a plain error plus event-local context through the existing optional Sentry gate. Keep the route callsite and default fingerprint policy. - Preserve authentication, trusted headers, cookies, exact HTTP error bodies, cache behavior, the ten-second deadline, and one fetch per request. Public responses receive no diagnostic fields. - Document the fields and test HTTP behavior, privacy, and event isolation with the real Sentry SDK. ## Verification - `PAPERCLIP_REQUIRE_SENTRY_TEST_SDK=1 pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/cloud-portfolio-error.test.ts server/src/__tests__/cloud-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/sentry.test.ts server/src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts`: 65 passed, with the audited optional SDK installed. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on Node 24.21.0 and pnpm 9.15.4. - Independent review found no blockers and independently passed all 65 tests, including the real SDK checks, on this exact commit. - Full Linux CI passed on this exact commit and provides aggregate suite coverage (54 successful checks, 2 intentional skips). A duplicate full local aggregate was not run. - The first SDK contract job failed before tests when npm could not resolve an OpenTelemetry transitive package. A subsequent empty-cache install first encountered a missing tarball, then succeeded after the registry artifact became available. All 6 real-SDK tests passed against that fresh install; the single unchanged-head CI retry passed. The SDK pin, workflow, and dependency files are unchanged. - The first browser shard 8 run timed out waiting for the inbox retry reply after 45 seconds. The unchanged isolated case passed (1/1), and the test, UI handler, fixture, and recovery files match the base commit. The failed log contains no wakeup POST before the test's immediate navigation; a navigation/request timing race is suspected but unproven without a trace. The single unchanged-head shard retry passed (20 passed, 1 skipped); no timeout or source change was made. - Greptile reviewed this exact commit at 5/5 with no unresolved review threads. - No live portfolio request was replayed. Route tests use controlled local upstream responses. - The added diff passed the secret and PII scan and `git diff --check`. ## Risks This is a diagnostic change. It does not identify or repair the origin of a connection reset. Unknown transport failures remain `unknown`. Elapsed values outside 0–60,000 ms become null. Default Sentry fingerprinting remains enabled; exact historical group membership is not guaranteed. No retry, migration, deployment, or configuration change is included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, code execution, and independent agent review. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
3290d97417 |
Scope the release smoke opening question to its card (#15339)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The release lane checks onboarding before it promotes a nightly candidate. > - The first task shows an unanswered-question summary and an open question card. > - Both display the same prompt, so the smoke test's page-wide text locator fails strict matching. > - This pull request scopes that assertion to the open interaction card. > - The smoke still requires the actual prompt and verifies that onboarding does not start an agent run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** [Scheduled release run 37441718130](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37441718130) failed `smoke_nightly / smoke` on both attempts. The page-wide `getByText("What would you like to do?")` matched two elements: the timeline summary and the open question card. This skipped `publish_nightly`. **Expected behavior** The test confirms that the seeded task's open question card displays the exact prompt. A summary row alone must not satisfy that check. **Steps to reproduce** Run the Docker onboarding smoke against published candidate `2026.1006.0-canary.11`, then run the release-smoke Playwright spec. The old assertion fails after the greeting appears. **Paperclip version or commit** Release workflow commit `f858207161ba29c01c82f4674aef83d91b74480f`; published candidate `2026.1006.0-canary.11`. The assertion is unchanged on the current master base `9b3fe260bac576d622ffdfefb923db73cc5273f7`. **Deployment mode** Docker smoke harness, authenticated/private, with its existing mock provider. Related: #13166 added the first-task chat assertion. I also reviewed open #12316, which fixes a separate bootstrap race and does not change this selector. Searches found no duplicate selector fix or public issue. ## What Changed - Scope the exact opening-prompt text to `task-chat-interaction`. - Explain why the timeline summary cannot satisfy the assertion. - Preserve the rest of the smoke flow, including the 15-second check for no agent runs. ## Verification - Local Docker harness ran the exact failed published candidate, `2026.1006.0-canary.11`, with the existing mock provider. - The old spec reproduced the same two-element strict-mode error in Chrome. - The fixed spec passed the full authenticated onboarding flow and the 15-second no-run check: 1/1, 32.6 seconds. The executed spec copy was byte-identical to the changed repository file; only artifact output paths and the local port were overridden. - Independent Chrome checks: the scoped locator passes with both summary and card present. Summary-only, wrong prompt, hidden prompt, and duplicate active prompts each fail as intended. - `pnpm typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on Node 24.21.0. Canonical Linux CI passed all 55 checks (53 success, 2 intentional Storybook skips), including the full aggregate tests, build, typecheck, all eight E2E shards, and post-ready security scan. - Greptile scored the exact head `5a30e667396600a052a4041c819652c19b8c68ff` at 5/5 with no actionable issues. Independent review found no issues; there are no review threads. - `git diff --check` passed. The diff and PR text were scanned for secrets and private identifiers. ## Risks Low risk: one assertion in a release smoke test changes. A missing or hidden prompt still fails, and multiple matching prompts in interaction cards still fail strict mode. This does not change the product, release selection, or publishing. The scheduled release lane still needs its next normal successful run to prove nightly recovery. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, shell tools, and an independent Codex review. The exact serving model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9b3fe260ba |
fix(tasks): surface Codex ChatGPT model rejection (#15299)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner runs report provider errors and can also save a structured failure result. > - Codex rejects a model that the user's ChatGPT account cannot use. > - Master now diagnoses this rejection, but the task's compact run data omits its message. The thread can still call it a generic run failure. > - Users need the account restriction and a clear step to repair the model selection. > - This pull request shows the existing diagnosis as “Model unavailable” on the task. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Codex returns HTTP 400 with `invalid_request_error` and the message `The 'gpt-6.1-sol' model is not supported when using Codex with a ChatGPT account.` Master now stores an actionable diagnosis for this rejection. The task thread still labels it “Run failed” and does not receive its error text in compact run data. **Expected behavior** Show the account restriction on the task and in the run error. Tell the user to choose a supported model or clear the task's model override before retrying. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use a Native Runner Codex agent signed in with a ChatGPT account. 2. Select a model that produces the rejection above and start a task. 3. Let the runner save its generic failed result. Inspect the task's failure marker and recovery notice. **Additional context** Refs: #15304. That merged PR diagnoses the provider failure and preserves worker and review recovery rules. This PR adds its task-facing message and guidance without changing that diagnosis or those rules. Refs: #13134. That PR improves model discovery for ChatGPT accounts. This PR exposes the rejection when a configured model still fails at execution time. ## What Changed - Return a bounded model rejection message in compact issue-run data. - Show “Model unavailable” and model-change guidance in the task thread and recovery notice. - Add database and UI regression tests, including both the original rejection text and master's fixed diagnosis. Document the new failure message. ## Verification - Focused merged-branch validation: 279 tests passed across activity service, native provider failure observation and PostgreSQL integration, TaskChatThread, and ExecutionBlockerNotice. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `pnpm check:token-gates` passed on the merged source tree. - Greptile reviewed conflict-resolution commit `1db39c4e636a92e2e76ba224b71c6f1e2f556c81` at 5/5 with no findings or inline comments. - All 55 check runs completed without failure on that commit. The two optional Storybook jobs were skipped. The legacy Snyk status passed. The branch has no merge conflicts. - UI regression assertion: the task's failure marker says “Model unavailable” and retains the account restriction. It no longer says that this failure happened after a final response. ## Risks - Provider recognition and recovery are owned by the existing master implementation. This PR exposes only bounded error text for failed runs with `native_provider_model_rejected`. - Historical runs with the generic `adapter_failed` code are not reclassified. No stored run is rewritten. - Existing retry and reconciliation gates remain in place. No schema migration or model configuration change is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, code execution, and browser inspection. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
63f3aa2dbf |
fix(runner): continue restart-interrupted Codex turns (#15297)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs retain their provider conversation across server restarts. > - A dead runner can restore a Codex conversation after its active turn is lost. > - The old recovery path synthesized a failed task result from that interruption. > - The task then required operator action even though its conversation and workspace were available. > - This pull request preserves the interruption cause and uses the admitted restart attempt for one continuation in the same conversation. > - The agent can reconcile unfinished actions and complete the current request without resending the original task. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #12845 added native restart recovery. #15042 covers admission during shutdown. #14796 covers legacy shutdown recovery. This change covers a lost native Codex turn after successful conversation restoration. **What happened?** After a server restart killed the local runner, Paperclip restored the saved Codex thread. Runnerd found that the old turn was no longer active. It synthesized a failed terminal and a needs-review result from the last progress message. The transport also discarded the terminal error when it reconstructed thread history. The task failed instead of continuing. **Expected behavior** After proving that the old process stopped and admitting a bounded recovery attempt, resume the current request in the same conversation. Preserve the workspace. Inspect unfinished actions before proceeding. Keep real provider failures, accepted results, intentional stops, unknown unreconciled effects, and exhausted attempts subject to their existing rules. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a local native Codex run and leave its turn active. 2. Kill the isolated runner and provider processes, as can happen during a server restart. 3. Restore the same provider thread with no active turn. 4. Observe the synthetic task failure. The new real-process regression reproduces this boundary with a scripted provider. ## What Changed - Record an explicit recoverable process-loss cause without inventing a task result. - Preserve terminal errors and prior turns in reconstructed provider history. Recover the authoritative saved result when adopting an accepted continuation. - Send one continuation in the same conversation for an admitted dead-runner recovery. Require reconciliation of unfinished commands and external actions. - Persist the interrupted terminal before submission and retain the existing recovery marker across another controller loss. - Keep provider attempt limits, terminal failures, and intentional cancellation behavior. - Add red/green regressions, real process-kill coverage, restart checkpoint coverage, and retry-budget coverage. Document the behavior and run-log evidence. ## Verification - Red: the new native runtime regression rejected with `NativeProviderTerminalFailure` on the original code; the Rust restore regression found a missing recovery cause. - Red/green: if restoring the conversation fails and replacement is allowed, the replacement receives the full task and fresh-session handoff. Both prepared and legacy execution inputs are covered. - Red: a second controller crash after the provider accepted the continuation caused an extra `turn/start`. The regression now proves there are exactly two submissions total: the original and its continuation. - Green: focused runtime, backend, driver recovery, and real-process restart suites (207 tests). After the final history/result changes, driver recovery and real-process restart suites passed again (36 tests). - Green: complete Codex transport suite (186 tests), server restart classification/database integration suites (34 tests), and Rust Codex provider suite (92 passed, 2 ignored). - Full `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on `60141e649`. The subsequent replacement-prompt guard passed the Runner TypeScript check and the complete runtime plus process-restart suites (148 tests). - Local full-suite attempt: `pnpm test:run` reported two failures in the untouched chat integration suite. Both passed individually, and the complete chat suite passed on rerun (1,063 tests). After all remote test shards passed, the duplicate serial local run was stopped with SIGINT; it is not claimed as a full local-suite pass. - Latest-head CI (`b1297dcd4`): 55 successful checks and 4 intentionally skipped checks, including all test shards, typecheck, build, native Runner verification, end-to-end tests, and canary dry run. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37405346303). - Greptile: 5/5 on the latest head, with no unresolved review threads. The PR is mergeable. - The process tests use the real runner binary and a scripted Codex provider. They do not call a live model service. ## Risks - This changes local Codex recovery after process loss. A continuation can execute more work in the retained conversation. Its prompt requires state inspection before repeating an uncertain action; the system does not replay tool calls. - Recovery shares the existing three-attempt budget and one-shot continuation marker. Real failures and older unmarked failed checkpoints are not reopened. - No database migration or API change is required. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The exact model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. - Capabilities: reasoning, source inspection, tool use, code editing, code execution, and test analysis. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.13 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a1ab55a56d |
fix(agents): grant configuration access by default (#15283)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and permissions for a company. > - Agent setup can require one agent to configure another agent. > - New standard agents could create agents, but they had no direct configuration grant. > - Existing agents must keep their current permissions after an upgrade. > - The requested new-agent defaults include 13 more direct permissions for suggestions, skills, tools, audit, inbox, and task assignment. > - This pull request adds the 14-grant set at creation and approval activation, retains it through invitations, and keeps existing agents unchanged. > - The change keeps low trust and built-in agents on their narrower permissions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The agent creation and approval flows, and the agent configuration authorization path. **Current behavior** A new standard agent can create an agent. It cannot make protected changes to a peer agent unless an operator adds an `agents:configure` grant. **Proposed behavior** Add direct grants for `agents:configure`, `agents:suggest-changes`, `skills:create`, `skills:suggest-changes`, `tools:manage_connections`, `tools:manage_profiles`, `tools:view_audit`, `audit:view_agent_actions`, `tools:use`, `tools:manage_runtime`, `inbox:manage`, `tasks:assign`, `tasks:assign_scope`, and `tasks:manage_active_checkouts` to new standard agents. Scope `tasks:assign_scope` to the agent’s reporting subtree. Keep existing agents and their grants unchanged. **Reason and benefit** New standard agents can complete agent setup and the requested tool, skill, inbox, and task workflows under existing route, scope, and approval checks. **Breaking changes** Existing agents keep their current permissions. There is no permission migration. Related PR: #12212 adds scoped grant routes. This PR changes the default grant. ## What Changed - Add the 14 requested direct grants in agent creation and approval activation. Keep them when invitation approval replaces grants, preserving explicit scopes. Remove them when an agent is deleted. - Apply defaults only to new agents. Remove the existing-agent permission migration, its snapshot, and its journal entry. Preserve existing scoped grants. - Add permission, scope, invitation, and existing-agent regression tests. Document all default and excluded permissions. - Prevent agent keys from creating, changing, or restoring host-executed process or local adapter command settings, and from restoring workspace commands through rollback. ## Verification - Run `node_modules/.bin/vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-default-configure-grants.test.ts server/src/__tests__/invite-join-grants.test.ts packages/db/src/migration-snapshot-drift.test.ts`. All 15 tests pass. These cover new-agent defaults, unchanged existing grants, pending approval, invitation grants, and migration history. - Run `node_modules/.bin/tsc -p server/tsconfig.json --noEmit`. It passes. - Run `packages/db/node_modules/.bin/tsx packages/db/src/check-migration-numbering.ts` and `packages/db/node_modules/.bin/tsx packages/db/src/check-migration-safety.ts`. Both pass. - Confirm that this PR has no files under `packages/db/src/migrations/` in its final diff. - GitHub CI at `e8173b2c41` passes build, typecheck, server suites, browser shards, and canary verification. One unchanged OpenCode transport test reached its five-second timeout in the first Runner shard run. That test passes locally in 2.55 seconds. The shard passed on one retry. All 54 checks pass, with two expected skips. - Greptile gives this exact head 5/5. Security review passes. The PR has no unresolved review threads or merge conflicts. ## Risks - The 14 default permissions apply only to new standard agents. Existing permissions stay unchanged. Low trust and managed built-in agents are excluded. - New grants include connection, runtime, and active-checkout management. Existing company, responsible-user, scope, and approval checks remain in force. The default inbox grant carries a responsible-user-only scope so it cannot override another user's inbox settings. - Protected changes still need the responsible user's authority when that check applies. Company boundaries and approval gates still apply. - Agent-authenticated requests cannot configure process adapters or host command settings on local adapters. Known provider credential references remain allowed, as do narrow plain authentication overrides on new peers when the caller uses an AI connection pool. Arbitrary environment settings remain blocked. Board operators retain the host configuration paths. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This is a narrow fix to existing agent configuration behavior. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 series. This runtime did not expose its exact hosted model ID or context window. This revision uses OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex with tool use, code execution, and tests. The runtime does not expose the exact hosted model ID or context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.12 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
f858207161 |
Guard routine UUID lookups without narrowing valid inputs (#15313)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for AI agents and their companies. > - Routines expose details, triggers, and management actions through resource IDs. > - These resource IDs are UUIDs. The UI and CLI do not resolve short prefixes. > - A malformed ID reaches a PostgreSQL UUID comparison and returns a server error. > - A lookup guard can return the existing not-found response before that query. > - This PR preserves valid PostgreSQL UUID input forms and the existing access checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11471. This is a credited continuation of the lookup-guard approach from @mv2woods. That older PR remains open and unchanged. Its review requested the required PR description sections. This continuation uses current master and adds UUID compatibility and authorization coverage. The earlier `isUuidLike` guard restricts UUID versions to 1–5 and trims input. The database currently accepts other UUID values and input forms. This guard preserves the existing [PostgreSQL UUID input contract](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-uuid.html), including uppercase, paired braces, omitted hyphens, and hyphens after groups of four digits. It rejects whitespace and short prefixes without rewriting the value sent to the database. ## What Changed - Guard the shared routine and private-trigger UUID lookups. Malformed resource IDs return null, so existing routes return their normal 404 response. - Keep company access, assignee permissions, body validation order, and database error propagation unchanged. - Add real PostgreSQL tests for stored UUIDv4, UUIDv7, nil, and max values in six input forms. Add no-query checks for malformed input and HTTP coverage across all 15 root-resource route handlers. - Document complete resource IDs and distinguish them from opaque public webhook IDs. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts`: 91 passed, including the new PostgreSQL and HTTP regressions. - Independent review found no blockers and passed all 9 focused PostgreSQL and HTTP regression cases on this commit. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on Node 24.21.0 with pnpm 9.15.4. - Full Linux CI passed on `0a2990eca2f904335821027a322e4db868151eb3`: 53 successful checks and 2 inapplicable Storybook skips. No retries were needed. This provides aggregate suite coverage; a duplicate full local aggregate was not run. - [Greptile reviewed this exact commit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15313#issuecomment-6010222312) at 5/5 with no findings or unresolved threads. The PR is ready for review and has no merge conflicts. - `git diff --check` and the added-diff secret and PII scan passed. ## Risks Malformed routine and private-trigger IDs now return 404 instead of a database error. Full UUIDs retain the existing company and assignee checks. This change does not add prefix lookup, alter public webhook IDs, or validate unrelated nested revision/thread IDs or query parameters. No migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, code execution, and independent agent review. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1006.0-canary.11 |
||
|
Barış ÖZDEMİR
|
bf14f803d5 |
fix(ssh): transport project repositories as their own git checkouts (#14782)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A project can attach more than one repository. The task workspace keeps the selected repository at its root and puts the other project repositories under `.paperclip-repositories/<name>-<key>`, each with its own `.git` > - Agents can run on an SSH execution environment. Paperclip copies the task workspace to the remote host before the run and restores it after the run > - The SSH copy excludes `.git` at every depth, but the restore baseline excludes it only at the workspace root > - So the other project repositories reach the remote host without Git, and the restore then deletes their `.git` directories on the Paperclip host > - The next run of the same task fails during workspace setup, and the agent cannot commit to those repositories on the remote host > - This pull request transports each project repository as a Git workspace of its own, the same way the sandbox path already handles them > - The benefit is that multi-repository projects work on SSH environments across consecutive runs ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11632 (SSH workspace transfer exclude list). Related SSH workspace PRs: #14233, #14428, #14472. I found no issue or PR for this bug. **What happened?** A project has two repositories and its agent runs on an SSH environment. After the first run, the second repository under `.paperclip-repositories/` has no `.git` directory on the Paperclip host. The next run of the same task fails during setup with `Managed workspace path "…/.paperclip-repositories/<repo>" already exists but is not a git checkout.` On the remote host, `git` inside that repository resolves to the parent repository. **Expected behavior** Each project repository reaches the remote host as a Git checkout with its local changes. Remote commits and edits come back after the run. The next run of the same task starts normally. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a project with two repositories. 2. Configure an SSH execution environment and make it the agent's default environment. 3. Assign a task to the agent and let it run once. 4. Look at `.paperclip-repositories/<repo>` in the task workspace: `.git` is gone. 5. Wake the agent on the same task again: the run fails with `setup_failed`. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `v2026.916.1` and on `master` (`5edf55d73`). **Deployment mode** Self-hosted (Docker), authenticated, with an SSH execution environment. ## What Changed - `ssh.ts`: `prepareWorkspaceForSshExecution` lists the project repositories under `.paperclip-repositories/`. It applies the discovery rules of `readGitWorkspaceSnapshot`: each entry must be a directory with a valid name and must be a Git repository root, else the prepare step fails before any transfer. - `ssh.ts`: the anchor copy leaves `.paperclip-repositories/` out. Each project repository then gets the same import, sync, and deleted-path steps as the anchor. The remote anchor repository ignores `/.paperclip-repositories/`, as the local checkout does. - `ssh.ts`: `prepareWorkspaceForSshExecution` returns the transported repositories (the field is present only when there are repositories). `restoreWorkspaceFromSshExecution` accepts them with their baselines. It validates each path and baseline first, then restores the repositories before the anchor and stops at the first failure, as the sandbox restore does. - `remote-managed-runtime.ts`: the anchor baseline excludes `.paperclip-repositories/`, and each project repository gets its own baseline for the restore merge. - `ssh-fixture.test.ts`: regression tests for two consecutive managed runs and for the direct restore path, on a workspace with a project repository (commits, dirty edits, and a deleted file). Two tests for the new validation. - `docs/guides/board-operator/execution-workspaces-and-runtime-services.md`: one line about project repositories in the SSH round trip. ## Verification - The new regression test fails on `master` (`expected 'backend initial\n?? ../\n' to contain 'frontend initial'`) and passes with this change. - `PAPERCLIP_ENABLE_DARWIN_SSH_ENV_LAB=1 npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh-fixture.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/remote-managed-runtime.test.ts`: 32 passed, with the sshd fixture running. - `tsc --noEmit` passes for `packages/adapter-utils` and `server`, and `pnpm -r typecheck` passes for the other workspaces. The Rust step of `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner` did not run locally because `cargo` is not installed. - `node ./scripts/check-no-git-push.mjs` and `pnpm check:module-boundaries` pass. - `pnpm test:run` did not complete locally. Before it stopped, 5 tests failed: 2 in `server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts` and 3 in `server/src/__tests__/company-skills-service.test.ts`. The same 5 tests also fail on the base commit `5edf55d73` without this change. CI runs the full suite. - `pnpm build` passes for all workspaces except `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner` and `server`, because their build compiles the Rust runner binary and `cargo` is not installed. `tsc --noEmit` passes for `server`. - Manual test on a self-hosted `v2026.916.1` instance with the same change applied: a project with two repositories and an SSH environment. Two runs on the same task passed. After each run, the second repository keeps its `.git` on the host. On the remote host it is a Git checkout, and the remote anchor ignores it. ## Risks - Low risk. Workspaces without `.paperclip-repositories/` take the same path as before, and the return value is unchanged for them. - A workspace with an invalid entry under `.paperclip-repositories/` now fails the SSH prepare step. The sandbox path already rejects such entries. - If one repository fails to restore, the restore stops, as in the sandbox path. The remote run directory keeps the agent's work. - Each project repository adds one bundle import and one restore per run. The time grows with the number and size of the repositories. - Out of scope: other nested `.git` directories (for example a vendored checkout inside a repository) keep the existing SSH behavior. ## Model Used - Provider and model: Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), in Claude Code. - Capabilities: extended thinking, tool use, and code execution. The context window size was not recorded. - Use: the model investigated the bug, wrote the change and the tests, and ran the checks. A separate Claude Code agent reviewed the diff. The author reviewed the change. The manual test ran on the author's self-hosted instance. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.1006.0-canary.10 |