docs(release): canonicalize stable notes for v2026.1005.0 (#15357)

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The release process keeps stable notes under a beta-keyed path
during the soak and renames them to the versioned path after the stable
ships
> - Stable v2026.1005.0 is published. The `canonicalize_stable_notes`
job pushed the rename branch but it does not open a pull request
> - Until the rename merges, `releases/v2026.1005.0.md` does not exist
on master and the announcement links do not resolve
> - This pull request merges the workflow's rename commit. It is a pure
rename with no content changes
> - The benefit is that the repository returns to the canonical
release-notes layout and the notes link in the announcements resolves

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Issue type**

Missing content

**Where is the issue?**

`releases/` — the stable notes for v2026.1005.0 still live at the
beta-keyed path `releases/beta/v2026.1002.0-beta.0.md`.

**What's wrong?**

The `canonicalize_stable_notes` job in the stable release run pushed
branch `release-notes/v2026.1005.0-canonicalize` with the rename, but it
does not open a pull request. The versioned path
`releases/v2026.1005.0.md` does not exist on master until this merges.

**Suggested fix**

Merge the workflow's rename commit. The notes were already corrected
before the stable dispatch in #15251, so no content change is needed
here.

## What Changed

- Renamed `releases/beta/v2026.1002.0-beta.0.md` to
`releases/v2026.1005.0.md` (workflow commit `ecc10236`, authored by
`github-actions[bot]`)
- No content changed. This is a pure rename. The file already carries
the correct header, commit count, and Contributors section from #14928
and #15251

## Verification

- The compare view for this branch against master shows one commit and
one file with status `renamed`, zero line changes
- The GitHub Release body for v2026.1005.0 is identical to this file
(one trailing newline differs)
- `git rev-list --count v2026.1001.0..v2026.1005.0` returns 179, which
matches the Contributors section
- After merge,
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/master/releases/v2026.1005.0.md
returns 200

## Risks

- Low risk: a documentation-only rename with no content changes.

## Model Used

- Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5-1` (Claude Fable 5.1),
extended thinking enabled, tool use via Claude Code

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Devin Foleyandgithub-actions[bot] authored and GitHub committed 2026-10-06 11:10:54 -07:00
1 parent 22a3ea3414
commit 7be51f30e1
1 file changed
File renamed without changes.