mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-12 06:10:44 +01:00
9d7c8a1b6153b591c7bd56e79e052dd5706a7a73
4791
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
9d7c8a1b61 |
docs(evals): qualify retained browser failure evidence
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
64986c5f25 |
docs(evals): preserve limited sidecar and strict action results
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a6ca91266d |
docs: publish native hiring read-evidence carrier audit
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8eb517ca14 |
test(evals): retain bounded hiring lifecycle accounting
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f051264765 |
docs(evals): publish complete original hiring pairs
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c897bea111 |
docs: publish original paired Claude hiring failures and coverage limits
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e3720f369d |
docs: publish pending matched hiring qualification evidence
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9f5404ad3a |
eval: freeze matched hiring admission with shared stock context
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c471504099 |
test(evals): correct hiring template comparison evidence
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
430db408d5 |
Combine hiring templates with the qualified stock instruction context
Unfrozen comparison preparation; no provider qualification claimed. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f46492a453 |
Align native qualification docs with the integrated 29-cell catalog
Record the two classic document repair cells and preserve the distinction between original native grades and analytical regrading. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
664c1899ef |
Fix blocker browser grading and retain the complete native comparison
Accept the requested marker plus concrete blocker explanation, calibrate contradictory and future-condition replies, and clarify future fixture punctuation. Preserve every original paid failure and label retained-DOM replay separately from live qualification. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
44b06c53fd |
docs(evals): publish first native completion result and pending matrix
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f592498fce |
test(evals): require a useful visible native blocker explanation
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
12d9276baf |
test(evals): qualify native blocked reports with persisted outcomes
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0afb70c59e |
Record native completion guidance verification
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c0861720ba |
Clarify native Runner completion tool guidance
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2d6e27f47e |
Support unnumbered issues in the document link recipe
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5b05d9dcf9 |
test(evals): qualify production hiring templates
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
826799311b |
fix(agents): keep hiring instructions focused on roles
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
74d0d3d945 |
Derive document handoff links from the current issue and saved key
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
51b63829d4 |
Retain matched OpenCode routing results and original handoff defects
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d7bdfc422c |
fix(ui): show agent avatar and align chat header controls (#14726)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Agent chat shows which agent receives each message. > - The chat header used initials instead of the agent avatar. > - The name and controls did not use the same center alignment. > - This change uses the shared avatar and centers the header content. > - Users can identify the agent and open its settings from the same row. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The agent chat header showed initials instead of the agent avatar. The settings control did not align with the name and avatar. **Expected behavior** Show the agent avatar. Put the avatar, name, and settings control on the same horizontal center line. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable Agent Chat in Experimental settings. 2. Open a conversation with an agent that has an appearance set. 3. Check the avatar and settings control in the top bar. Related navigation work: #14706. ## What Changed - Use `AgentAvatar` in the conversation breadcrumb. - Update the breadcrumb key when the agent appearance changes. - Center breadcrumb labels that have an adjacent action. Keep task identifier baseline alignment unchanged. - Add regression checks for avatar props, appearance changes, and center alignment. ## Verification - PASS: affected Vitest suites, 129 tests. - PASS: `pnpm check:token-gates`. - PASS: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` on an isolated retry. - PASS: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build`. - PASS: browser checks at 1000 and 390 CSS pixels. Avatar, name, and settings control all have center Y = 29.5 CSS pixels. - Screenshots use the real header and avatar renderer with isolated context fixtures. No screenshot or fixture is part of this diff. - Full typecheck and build cannot complete because Cargo is not installed. - Full tests stopped with SIGKILL. The first UI typecheck also stopped with exit 137. These runs do not prove full-suite success. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only affects UI rendering. It changes no API or database contract. - Breadcrumbs with adjacent actions now use center alignment. Ordinary task identifiers keep baseline alignment. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex agent, with code editing, shell tools, and browser checks. The runtime did not expose the exact model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge No behavior or command documentation needs an update for this rendering fix. The execution environment requires the assigned branch name to stay unchanged. Pending review gates are not marked complete. Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
5b8b2b38ca |
feat(apps): add Neon connection (#14980)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents reach external services through the Apps catalog. Each catalog entry is a reviewed `AppDefinition` that wires a provider's hosted MCP server into Paperclip's shared vault, grants, policies, gateway, and audit trail. > - Neon is a widely used serverless Postgres provider with an official hosted MCP server, but it is not in the catalog. Teams that run their databases on Neon must use the generic "connect your own MCP server" path, which has no branding, no guidance, and no project or read-only controls. > - The connector playbook requires a catalog entry for a provider like this: the hosted server supports dynamic client registration and bearer API keys, and the common definition fields can express every option Paperclip can serialize. > - This pull request adds the Neon definition, its official artwork, the research and permission-review ledger rows, documentation, and deterministic tests, without any provider-specific runtime code. > - The benefit is a one-click, governed Neon connection with optional project pinning and read-only mode, and a documented path to live qualification. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Neon is a common Postgres host for the applications agents work on, but Paperclip's Apps catalog has no Neon entry. Operators who want agents to inspect schemas, run SQL, or manage branches must paste the MCP URL into the generic remote-MCP flow, which gives no branding, no provider guidance, no project boundary, and no read-only switch. **Proposed solution** Add a catalog-only Neon connection built from the connector playbook: browser sign-in through Neon's dynamic client registration with the reviewed `read` and `write` scopes, or a customer API key sent as an Authorization bearer header. Both methods expose Neon's documented `projectId` pin and `readonly` switch as optional Advanced fields. Every discovered tool stays governed by the normal per-action policies. **Alternatives considered** A plugin was not needed because no custom UI, tables, workers, or webhooks are involved. A separate read-only method was not added because the playbook treats read-only switches as advanced fields rather than methods. Neon's repeatable `category` query filter was left out because tenant fields serialize lists as one comma-joined value, so it cannot be sent correctly without new runtime code; per-action policies cover catalog narrowing instead. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing self-serve remote-MCP connection catalog and does not overlap planned core work. ## What Changed - Added the `neon` provider to `scripts/ingest-app-definitions.mjs` (category, API-key placement, methods, tenant fields, guidance, warnings) and regenerated `packages/shared/src/app-definitions/neon.json` plus the generated registry. - Added the Neon row to the self-serve MCP research ledger with `dcr_or_api_key` auth and risk tier S4. - Added permission reviews for `neon/mcp-oauth` (explicit scopes `read`, `write`, taken from Neon's live authorization-server metadata) and `neon/mcp-api-key` (provider key), with evidence links. - Added Neon's official tile icon (`ui/public/brands/apps/neon.png`, copied byte-for-byte from the icon linked by neon.com) and the brand manifest entry. - Added prosumer gallery copy for the Neon card. - Added `doc/connections/NEON.md` (service involvement, endpoints, administrator setup, capabilities and policy, manifest, brand provenance, validation hook) and linked it from the connections README and the permission audit. - Tests: Neon definition shape, store visibility and artwork, URL recognition, reviewed scopes with scope-widening rejection, URL projection of the project pin and read-only flag, invalid project ID rejection, the connect form's API-key gating, and the pinned catalog counts. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/app-definitions.test.ts packages/shared/src/app-definitions-url.test.ts` — 34 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts` — 367 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/Browse.test.tsx ui/src/lib/app-brand-assets.test.ts ui/src/pages/apps/AppLogo.brand-assets.test.tsx` — all passed. - `node scripts/check-app-brand-assets.mjs` and `node --test scripts/app-brand-validation.test.mjs` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck`, `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`, `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`, `pnpm check:token-gates` — clean. - Manual: in a local instance, open Apps → Browse, confirm the Neon card and icon, open `/apps/connect?source=neon`, confirm both methods, the Advanced project pin and read-only toggle, and that Connect enables after an API key is entered. The operator completed a live connection against a Neon account on this build. - Live metadata probed on 2026-10-02: both `.well-known` documents at `mcp.neon.tech` return the recorded endpoints and scopes; an unauthenticated `initialize` returns 401 with `resource_metadata`. ## Risks - Low risk to existing providers: the change is additive catalog data plus tests. The generated registry only gains one import. - Neon's hosted server grants broad project and database management. The definition carries two warnings, recommends a development project, and keeps every write under the normal action policies; the read-only switch is enforced by Neon's server, not locally. - The permission-review ledger records live proof for both methods as not run; the full lifecycle checklist in `doc/connections/NEON.md` still needs a documented pass before the entry is considered fully qualified. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5.1 (`claude-fable-5-1`) in Claude Code, with extended thinking and tool use (shell, file editing, browser verification). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1002.0-canary.18 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
fe9dc1e3c5 |
Route legacy task work to the operational skill and show clickable delivery
Use stock discovery metadata and an actual Markdown document-link example. Clarify the future explicit UI-link fixture and retain the original task request and all measured failures. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ed42cb2be3 |
Use one declared skill source list for both capability inventories
Include the issue-document reference in the normative inventory and calibrate coverage of every declared source without changing each inventory’s existing heading parsing scope. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b85668c406 |
Fix skill capability metadata and publish the bounded repair comparison
Regenerate both capability inventories for the early issue-document recipe and reject stale derived manifests before stock-harness provider admission. Preserve the eight measured repair results, automatic recovery cost, and OpenCode delivery diagnosis. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
19b22b907a |
Clarify legacy issue document delivery in the operational skill
Preserve the tiny hire manual and original assigned-skill case. Add a focused public document/revision/link oracle and explicit presence/absence provenance for a matched skill-only comparison. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ee26b2caf5 |
docs(evals): keep timeout document outcomes unknown
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
374e000601 |
docs(evals): close the unchanged-source baseline recovery
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9ab1714bee |
docs(evals): retain matched stock-harness results and failures
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
70603a58c4 |
fix(evals): retain prerequisites inside the campaign artifact root
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4b8de1e7ac |
fix(evals): use complete Rust protocol test preparation
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0ce454e8a0 |
fix(evals): bind protocol evidence to the built daemon
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2dd8931eee |
fix(evals): build the cold daemon before protocol prerequisites
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f65f1b9454 |
fix(evals): prepare cold prerequisites and fingerprint connection guidance
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a2b9d62e52 |
test(evals): enforce exact-source stock harness prerequisites
Run credential-free gates before live admission and verify retained evidence in direct browser execution. Include evaluated instruction sources in suite revisions and calibrate stale/missing evidence rejection. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
668d8d9591 |
test(evals): cover production default hires across stock harnesses
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
48020514d7 |
fix(agents): reduce default manual and shared legacy guidance
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
d6d88b9de2 |
fix: preserve run outcomes when agent file cleanup is deferred (#14945)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The heartbeat service records each agent turn and releases its working files. > - A turn can save its work and finish before instruction-copy cleanup runs. > - A cleanup exception can replace that completed result with an adapter failure. > - This also loses result accounting and can prevent environment lease release. > - This pull request records a cleanup warning and keeps the original run outcome. > - The existing recovery sweep retries cleanup from the durable working-copy record. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related cleanup and lock work: #14866 and #14869. Related, distinct work: #14695 retains warm-process files; #12021 handles provider-process SIGTERM after a terminal result. **What happened?** An agent saved its plan, posted a comment, and requested approval. The provider completed its turn. Instruction-copy cleanup then timed out on a directory lock. Its exception escaped a `finally` block and replaced the provider result, so the completed turn showed `Run failed`. **Expected behavior** Keep the provider outcome, usage, cost, saved work, and pending approval. Record a cleanup warning and let the existing recovery sweep retry. A real provider failure must keep its original error. A failed file save must keep its failed-save receipt. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a legacy adapter turn that saves work and requests approval. 2. Make instruction-copy release throw a directory-lock timeout. 3. Read the run result. Before this change, the cleanup error replaces the provider outcome. The new heartbeat tests reproduce the failure without a live provider or external service. **Paperclip version or commit** The regression reproduces on `c83df091b1a5207375eaf23466bb5c62e4e1518e`. This branch is rebased onto `cf8ad63c80`. **Deployment mode** Server-managed agent execution with persistent instruction working copies. ## What Changed - Catch instruction-copy release failures in both heartbeat teardown paths. Stop repeating a failed cleanup attempt within the same run. - Write a sanitized `instruction_cleanup` warning. A warning-write failure also preserves the run result. - Test successful, failed, and throwing providers; both teardown paths; warning-write failure; accounting; approval state; and execution-control release. - Extend the held-lock test to prove a fresh recovery worker removes the deferred copy and preserves its failed-save receipt. - Document deferred cleanup and the run-log event. ## Verification - Red proof: all five new heartbeat regression cases fail with the original release calls. - At head `20bea4f431c916d2f5db1970213aab85f5daa34c`, all 417 tests passed across heartbeat process recovery, agent directory working copies, and directory merge locks. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `git diff --check` passed. - [GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37031119795) passed at this head. All 53 reported checks passed; the two Storybook checks were correctly skipped. This includes general and serialized tests, browser shards, runner verification, build, typecheck, and the canary dry run. - Greptile reviewed this head with 5/5, no code comments, and no unresolved review threads. The branch has no merge conflicts. - The local `pnpm test:run` attempt was stopped after it reported eight failures in unchanged suites. Four Slack/AgentMail cases selected an unrelated ancestor skills directory and failed with `ENOENT`; the two Slack cases passed with a temporary local skill-root link, which was then removed. Three company-skill cases reproduced macOS `EACCES` errors when renaming read-only cache directories. One gateway case passed when rerun alone. No full local-suite pass is claimed; the complete CI test jobs passed. ## Risks - Cleanup errors now leave recovery work pending. The durable working-copy record remains available for the existing retry sweep. - This change preserves provider failures and failed-save receipts. It does not claim that unsaved file edits were saved. - Native instruction reservation errors retain their existing behavior because they guard process ownership. - No schema, lockfile, workflow, API, or UI changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The exact backend model ID and context-window size are not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1002.0-canary.17 |
||
|
abderrahmen bejaouiandabderbj
|
d9b64ee28e |
fix(codex-local): order Codex models the way the ChatGPT app does (stacked on #14917) (#14918)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Each agent runs on an adapter, and the operator picks the agent's model from the list the adapter advertises. > - The `codex_local` adapter advertises a static, curated list. The server returns that list as written, but the list itself is not in a useful order: the default `gpt-5.6-sol` sits above the whole GPT-6 family (#14878). > - This pull request orders the list the way the ChatGPT app orders Codex models: newest model version first, then by decreasing capability inside each version, with older models at the end. > - It is stacked on #14917, which makes the model dropdown show a hand-ordered list as the adapter advertises it. Without that change the picker shows every list alphabetically. > - The benefit is that a user who knows Codex finds the right model at once, and older models sit at the end of the list. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #14878. Related: #14917 (the Claude counterpart, #14877) carries the dropdown change this PR relies on. This PR contains that commit until #14917 lands; after that it rebases to the Codex commit alone. ## What Changed - `packages/adapters/codex-local/src/index.ts`: reorder the advertised `models` list. GPT-6 (`astra`, `sol`, `luna`) first, then GPT-5.6 (`sol`, `terra`, `luna`), then `gpt-5.5`, `gpt-5.4`, `gpt-5.4-mini`, `gpt-5`, `gpt-5-mini`, `gpt-5-nano`, then the o-series and `codex-mini-latest` in their existing relative order. `DEFAULT_CODEX_LOCAL_MODEL` is unchanged. - `packages/adapters/codex-local/src/index.test.ts`: the metadata test now asserts the full order of the GPT entries. The ChatGPT app also lists GPT-6.1 Sol first. That model is not in Paperclip's list today. Adding a model needs reasoning-effort and fast-mode entries as well, so it is out of scope for an ordering fix. ## Verification Run from the repository root: ```sh pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/codex-local server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck ``` Red on `master`, green here: the updated metadata test fails against the unmodified list because `gpt-5.6-sol` comes first. Manual check: open an agent that uses `codex_local` and open the model dropdown. The list reads gpt-6-astra, gpt-6-sol, gpt-6-luna, gpt-5.6-sol, gpt-5.6-terra, gpt-5.6-luna, gpt-5.5, gpt-5.4, gpt-5.4-mini, gpt-5, gpt-5-mini, gpt-5-nano, o3, o4-mini, o3-mini, Codex Mini. ## Risks - Low risk. The list content and the default model do not change; only the order does. The server returns this list as-is for the built-in Codex adapter and the server test compares against the exported list, so no server change is needed. - The first entry is no longer the default model. Nothing reads the first entry as a default: `DEFAULT_CODEX_LOCAL_MODEL` is resolved separately. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 (`claude-fable-5-1`) through Claude Code, extended thinking on, with tool use for reading the repository, running vitest and tsc, and editing files. The account holder reviewed the change and owns the commit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: abderbj <115119179+abderbj@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.1002.0-canary.16 |
||
|
abderrahmen bejaouiandabderbj
|
92ad158ce1 |
fix(claude-local): order Claude models the way the Claude app does (#14917)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Each agent runs on an adapter, and the operator picks the agent's model from a list the adapter advertises. > - The `claude_local` adapter advertises a static list and merges in the models the Anthropic API returns. Neither list has a deliberate order. > - The model dropdown then sorts every list by id. For Claude this shows "Fable 5", "Fable 5.1", "Haiku 4.5", "Mythos 5", "Opus 4.6" ... which is not the order of capability, release, or version (#14877). > - This pull request gives the adapter one defined order, the one the Claude app uses: the newest release of each family first, by decreasing capability, then older releases grouped by family. The server applies it to discovered models, and the dropdown keeps the adapter's order instead of re-sorting. > - The benefit is that a user who knows the Claude app finds the right model at once, and older models sit at the end of the list. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #14877. Related: #14147 touches the same adapter's model list (the `ANTHROPIC_MODEL` default label) and does not change ordering. #14878 is the Codex counterpart and depends on the dropdown change in this PR. ## What Changed - `packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/model-order.ts` (new): `sortClaudeModels()` and `parseClaudeModelId()`. The parser reads the current scheme (`claude-opus-4-8`), the legacy scheme (`claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219`), dated snapshots, `-latest` aliases, the `[1m]` suffix, and Bedrock ids (`us.anthropic.…-v1`, `…-v2:0`). The sort puts the newest release of each family first (Fable, Mythos, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku), then older releases grouped by family with versions descending. An alias sorts before its dated snapshots, and dated snapshots of one release sort newest first. Ids that are not Claude models keep their incoming order at the end. - `packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/models.ts`: apply the order to the static fallback, to the merged API list, and to the Bedrock list. Reorder `BEDROCK_MODELS` to match. - `packages/adapters/claude-local/src/index.ts`: reorder the advertised `models` list to the same order. - `ui/src/components/AgentConfigForm.tsx`: `ModelDropdown` gets a `preserveOrder` prop. With it the dropdown shows the list as the adapter ordered it; without it the list is sorted by id as before. `ui/src/lib/model-utils.ts` adds `adapterCuratesModelOrder()`, true for the built-in adapters whose list arrives in a deliberate order (`claude_local`, `codex_local`, `paperclip_runner`, `gemini_local`, `grok_local`, `kimi_local`, `openclaw_gateway`, and `opencode_local` / `pi_local`, which the server sorts when discovered and which lead with the default model when it falls back to the declared list). Cursor is not in the set because its list comes from `agent models` discovery, and adapters not named there, including externally installed ones, keep the alphabetical fallback. The three dropdown call sites (`AgentConfigForm`, `ConfigureBuiltInAgentModal`, `NewAgentSetup`) pass it; `NewAgentSetup` decides by the resolved brand type, because a `paperclip_runner` agent fetches the Claude or Codex list for its brand. Grouped lists (`opencode_local`, `pi_local`) are unchanged. - Tests: `model-order.test.ts` (adapter, including the snapshot-date tie-breaker), `ModelDropdown.test.tsx` (ui: preserved order with the prop, alphabetical without it, provider groups unchanged), `model-utils.test.ts` (which adapters opt in), and two updated expectations plus one new order assertion in `server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts`. Mythos is not in the Claude app's list. This PR ranks it directly after Fable, in the top capability tier. The rank table in `model-order.ts` is one line to change if you prefer a different slot. ## Verification Run from the repository root: ```sh pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/claude-local server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts ui/src/lib/model-utils.test.ts ui/src/components/ModelDropdown.test.tsx ui/src/components/AgentConfigForm.render.test.tsx ui/src/components/ConfigureBuiltInAgentModal.test.tsx ui/src/pages/NewAgent.test.tsx pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck pnpm check:module-boundaries && pnpm check:token-gates && pnpm check:tokens ``` Red on `master`, green here: - `ModelDropdown.test.tsx` fails against the unmodified dropdown because the ids come back sorted alphabetically even with `preserveOrder`. - `adapter-models.test.ts` fails against the unmodified adapter because the first model is `claude-opus-4-8`, not `claude-fable-5-1`. Manual check: open an agent that uses `claude_local`, open the model dropdown. With no `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` the list reads Fable 5.1, Mythos 5, Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5, Haiku 4.5, Fable 5, Opus 5, Opus 4.8, Opus 4.7, Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6, Sonnet 4.5. With a key, the discovered models slot into the same order. ## Risks - The other built-in adapters in the set (Gemini with `Auto` first, Grok, Kimi, OpenClaw, the runner's Codex list, and the OpenCode and Pi lists in the built-in-agent modal) are now shown as their adapter delivers them instead of alphabetized. Cursor's discovered list and every adapter outside the set, including externally installed ones, keep the alphabetical order they had, so no option moves between refreshes. Grouped lists are unchanged. - The first entry of the Claude list changes from Opus 4.8 to Fable 5.1. Nothing reads the first entry as a default: `DEFAULT_CLAUDE_LOCAL_MODEL` is `claude-opus-5` and is resolved separately. - No API, schema, or migration change. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 (`claude-fable-5-1`) through Claude Code, extended thinking on, with tool use for reading the repository, running vitest and tsc, and editing files. The account holder reviewed the change and owns the commit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: abderbj <115119179+abderbj@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.1002.0-canary.15 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2ec82c5774 |
fix(runner): preserve task context when tool connections change (#14963)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents use tools through company-scoped connections and provider sessions. > - Resolving a tool connection currently forces a fresh session even when the provider can load new tools into the existing conversation. > - A fresh provider conversation can receive too little history to continue the task. > - This pull request adds explicit tool-refresh capabilities and uses them in both runner paths. > - Fresh attempts receive bounded task history with source IDs and retrieval instructions. > - The benefit is that agents can continue the same task after a connection changes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A resolved tool connection forced a fresh provider conversation. The new conversation could lose the original goal and prior answers. Claude also rejected resume when only the MCP server set changed. **Expected behavior** Resume the provider conversation when its harness can refresh tools. When a fresh session is required, supply enough bounded history to continue the task. Preserve company, agent, task, workspace, model, instruction, and skill checks. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a conversation and agree on a task and its constraints. 2. Request and connect a tool needed for the task. 3. Continue the conversation after the connection resolves. 4. Check that the agent remembers the task and can use the new tool. **Paperclip version or commit** The bug was reproduced on master at `c46e41e81`. This branch is rebased on current master. **Deployment mode** Self-hosted server. Both legacy adapters and the native runner are affected. Related public work: Refs #13282 for task-backed conversations. Refs #13057 for the broader session-compaction proposal. Refs #14659 for another report about local CLI session continuity. This change fixes tool-connection continuation. Provider authentication repairs keep their existing recovery behavior. ## What Changed - Expose tool-refresh support in native harness descriptors and legacy adapter metadata. - Request tool refresh after connection resolution. Keep provider authentication repair as a fresh-session wake. - Reload current tools and credentials while retaining supported Claude, Codex, Grok, and other provider conversations. - Allow MCP-only changes during qualified native recovery. Keep all other compatibility checks. - Refresh managed-provider and ACPX tool bindings when attaching a new run. - Add a fresh-session handoff for both runner paths. Bound database reads, excerpts, and the final packet to 24,000 bytes. - Include the original request, recent messages, decisions, plans, prior answers, and source IDs. Mark omitted content. Apply reset boundaries, wake cutoffs, quarantine, and secret redaction. - Add regression tests and document the capabilities and handoff behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. Rust formatting passed. - Final review fixes passed 314 server tests, 333 adapter utility tests, 139 native-session runtime tests, and 12 managed-provider Rust tests. They verify historical quarantine, raised budgets across attachment, no history reads on successful resume, and handoff delivery on fresh retry. - Broader branch verification also passed 1,401 adapter utility tests, 1,047 runner TypeScript tests, 43 Grok adapter tests, and 311 Rust core tests. - Live Claude CLI and Grok ACP probes preserved the provider session ID, recalled a prior task constraint, and called a newly added read-only MCP tool. - GitHub CI passed on `b21486d18084a7aa4cafbe8e012f7cad6585d9cc`: 55 successful checks and 4 skipped checks. This includes all test shards, all eight browser shards, runner checks, and the Grok clean public npm install canary. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37057514976). - A full local test attempt encountered a separate Git snapshot timeout. All affected local suites passed after the final edits, and the full CI test gates passed. - Review the capability matrix in `packages/paperclip-runner/README.md`. Repeat the four reproduction steps with a supported provider and with an unsupported harness. ## Risks - Provider tool refresh can fail. Existing recovery falls back to a fresh conversation where policy permits it. - A new transport can replace an old process while preserving the provider conversation. Tests cover current credentials and unchanged identity. - Long history can omit older context. Explicit markers and source IDs let the agent retrieve needed context within task scope. - Unknown and unqualified harnesses use the fresh-session path. No database migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, code execution, and live provider testing. The exact model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Claude and Grok also ran as test subjects. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
43f391e807 |
refactor(slack): clarify browser setup prompt from live testing (#14965)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Slack chat connections let people start and continue agent work from Slack. > - The setup prompt guides an agent through the Paperclip and Slack browser interfaces. > - A live setup completed, but several instructions did not match the current interfaces. > - Those gaps can send users to the wrong connection flow or leave them waiting for controls that do not appear. > - This pull request updates the prompt with the steps observed during the live setup. > - The benefit is a clearer path from a fresh instance to a verified Slack conversation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #13920 and #14862. The first added the Slack conversation flow. The second updated the shared setup prompt control. A search found no duplicate open PR or matching public issue. **Issue type** Outdated instructions and missing setup guidance. **Where is the issue?** `ui/src/pages/apps/chat/SlackSetupPrompt.tsx` **What's wrong?** The prompt omits the Chat connectors setting on fresh instances. It uses an old navigation label. It assumes an avatar crop dialog and a Save button always appear. It also assumes the suggested bot username matches Slack and that the Slack reply contains a task link. **Suggested fix** Use the current labels. Explain the feature prerequisite, avatar save behavior, real mention selection, clipboard recovery, and the path to task and run evidence. ## What Changed - Add the Chat connectors prerequisite and current Connectors, resume, and identity-link labels. - Explain Slack's combined Create and Install action and how to continue from its success page. - Handle avatar uploads that save immediately. Require a reload to confirm the saved icon. - Select the real bot from Slack's mention suggestions, including names with punctuation. - Recover from an empty or stale clipboard without exposing credentials. - Find the linked task through Conversations and inspect the agent's Runs page. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/chat/SlackSetupPrompt.test.tsx`: 10 tests passed after rebasing onto current master. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - Full Vitest suite: passed in CI for this commit, including all server, chat, workspace, and serialized test shards. The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after CI finished; it did not complete locally. - Current-commit CI: all checks passed, including build, typecheck, E2E, Runner verification, and canary dry run. Greptile rated the change 5/5 with no findings or unresolved review threads. - Live browser test before the wording update: created and installed a new Slack app, verified the callback, uploaded and reopened the avatar, linked the configuring user's identity, and enabled the selected test channel. The first mention received a reply. A follow-up without another mention recalled the first message. Both agent runs succeeded. - The wording update does not repeat Slack app installation. Existing tests verify the complete copied prompt, clipboard fallback, and instance URL handling. - This is a prompt-text refactor. No runtime behavior changes, so the existing tests cover the copied result without a new test that repeats the wording. ## Risks - Low risk. This change updates prompt text in one file. - Provider interfaces can change. The prompt tells the agent to inspect the current page and handle optional controls. - The prompt handles the observed mention mismatch. This change does not alter the generated suggested username. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser automation. The session does not expose an exact runtime model ID or context window size. The live test also used an earlier model whose exact ID was not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
144083fd48 |
fix(interactions): wait for workspace readiness before enabling approval (#14893)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and review their work. > - Task confirmations must use the work produced by their source run. > - The server blocks approval while that run still needs to sync its workspace. > - The card currently enables approval before that check can pass, so an ordinary click produces an error. > - This PR exposes the existing readiness check and shows “Preparing approval…” with acceptance disabled. > - The card refreshes itself and enables approval when the source workspace settles. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A confirmation appears while its source run is still preparing or syncing its workspace. Its enabled approval button returns a conflict asking the user to retry after syncing. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run an agent in an isolated workspace. 2. Have it create a confirmation before workspace finalization completes. 3. Click the approval button while the source workspace is still active. **Expected behavior** The card explains that approval is preparing. Acceptance becomes available automatically when the same server check permits it. Reject and revise remain available. Related work: #10770 handles this conflict after a click with retries. #9520 proposes changing the workspace acceptance barrier. This PR preserves that barrier and exposes readiness before the click, including in compact task chat. It preserves the terminal-finalize behavior from #10099. ## What Changed - Add an optional, read-only `acceptanceBlocker` to interaction responses. Readiness uses the existing source-run workspace predicate, with one check per pending source run. - Disable acceptance and show a shared preparation notice in classic and compact confirmation cards, including checkbox and secret-binding confirmations. - Refresh preparing cards every two seconds in task detail, attention, pipelines, and Skill Studio. Restore each surface's previous polling cadence when preparation clears. - Preserve live tool reviews, questions, rejection, revision, and the server acceptance barrier. No automatic acceptance occurs. - Document the preparation state and cover readiness, terminal sync outcomes, unrelated runs, historical cards, and automatic refresh. ## Verification - Focused service, card, query-refresh, and helper tests: 217 passed across five files. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm build-storybook`: passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - `pnpm test:run`: incomplete locally. Stopped after about 17 minutes once it reproduced seven existing environment failures: two Slack tests and two email tests lack ancestor-directory skill fixtures; three company-skills tests fail on macOS runtime-cache staging permissions. These are outside this change. The full CI test matrix passed. - CI: all 53 checks passed; two optional Storybook jobs were skipped. The branch has no conflicts with `master`. - Greptile: 5/5 on commit `8a6f216d8d`, with no review threads. - Reviewed added lines and new files for credentials, private URLs, internal task references, user paths, and run artifacts. None found. ## Risks - No database migration or change to acceptance authorization. Readiness is advisory; the server still enforces its existing gate at acceptance. - An open preparing card adds a read every two seconds. This cadence stops after readiness clears; historical cards add no workspace checks. - Failed or stale finalization retains the existing server behavior. This PR does not change recovery policy. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, tool execution, and automated tests. No sub-agents. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (217 focused tests; full local-suite limitations are recorded above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
806af230b6 |
docs(release): curate stable notes for the 2026.1002.0-beta.0 promotion (#14928)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The release pipeline publishes a beta, waits three days, and then promotes it to stable. > - The stable promotion reads `releases/beta/v<beta-version>.md` from `master` and publishes it as the GitHub Release body. > - Beta `2026.1002.0-beta.0` (source `467125fa`, 179 commits after v2026.1001.0) is published and its soak has started. The planned stable is around 2026-10-05. > - The beta publish job pushed an auto-generated scaffold. The scaffold lists raw commit subjects and PR bodies. It is not in release-notes voice. > - This pull request replaces the scaffold with curated stable notes. > - The benefit is that the stable release ships with readable notes that tell self-hosters what changed and what they must do. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Docs: release notes. **Where is the issue?** `releases/beta/v2026.1002.0-beta.0.md` on branch `release-notes/v2026.1002.0-beta.0`. **What's wrong?** The file is the auto-generated scaffold from the beta publish job. It lists 170+ raw entries with no grouping, no breaking-changes section, and no upgrade guide. **Suggested fix** Rewrite the file in the standard release-notes structure. The notes are planned as `v2026.1005.0`. **If the promotion date moves past 2026-10-05, change the title and the Released date before you dispatch stable.** ## What Changed - Rewrote `releases/beta/v2026.1002.0-beta.0.md` into the standard structure: overview, Breaking Changes, Highlights, Fixes, Improvements, Upgrade Guide, and Contributors. - Breaking Changes: operator UI snippet settings removed ([#13789](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13789)); keyboard-shortcut settings and `/api/auth/preferences` removed ([#14141](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14141), [#14643](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14643)); agent @-mentions no longer start a run ([#14577](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14577)). - Highlights: Grok Build on the native runner, persistent agent files, skills synced from GitHub, Browser Use Cloud, one-screen connector setup, two-way Slack, Agent Chat navigation and handoffs, per-message model and effort picker, governed API tools on by default. - Upgrade Guide: migrations `0284`–`0293` with one-phrase descriptions, new default for `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_API_TOOLS_ENABLED`, and the new optional variables `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_API_COMPANY_CAPTURE_MAX_BYTES`, `PAPERCLIP_WORKSPACE_GIT_SNAPSHOT_TIMEOUT_MS`, and `PAPERCLIP_WORKSPACE_MANIFEST_MIN_FREE_BYTES` with their defaults. - Removed release-infra noise: CI-only PRs, eval and test-only PRs, lockfile refreshes, release-notes bookkeeping commits, and cloud-control-plane-only changes. ## Verification - Docs only. Each PR number and commit SHA in the notes is in `git log v2026.1001.0..467125fafb47a8520856504fecc48d6e32055db1`. - Migration range `0284`–`0293` checked against the `packages/db/src/migrations` diff for that range. - Environment variable defaults checked in the code, not in commit subjects. - Contributor count and external handles computed from `git shortlog` over the same range. ## Risks Low. Documentation only. The stable preflight only requires that the file exists on `master`. The content can change during the soak. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 (`claude-fable-5-1`) via Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (docs only; no tests apply) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (none apply) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending on this fresh PR) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.1002.0-canary.14 |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
0a2385eb31 |
build(deps): bump dompurify from 3.4.14 to 3.4.16 (#14783)
Bumps [dompurify](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify) from 3.4.14 to 3.4.16. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/releases">dompurify's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.16</h2> <ul> <li>Fixed a problem with <code>IN_PLACE</code> node removal when working with hooks, thanks <a href="https://github.com/manus-pi"><code>@manus-pi</code></a></li> <li>Fixed a problem with <code>IN_PLACE</code> sanitization and raw-text roots, thanks <a href="https://github.com/h-t-m"><code>@h-t-m</code></a></li> <li>Fixed a problem with ESM default exports landing in CommonJS declarations, thanks <a href="https://github.com/ssi02014"><code>@ssi02014</code></a></li> <li>Migrated from <code>rollup</code> to <code>rolldown</code> because performance, thanks <a href="https://github.com/ssi02014"><code>@ssi02014</code></a></li> <li>Bumped several dependencies where possible</li> </ul> <h2>DOMPurify 3.4.15</h2> <ul> <li>Added better clobbering hardening when XML content is involved, thanks <a href="https://github.com/gnyselcuk"><code>@gnyselcuk</code></a></li> <li>Added several smaller hardening and edge-case improvements, thanks <a href="https://github.com/leechristensen"><code>@leechristensen</code></a></li> <li>Bumped several dependencies where possible</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/b9b9d80f7e401771c2ccaef5f45def7eec8f27d7"><code>b9b9d80</code></a> release: 3.4.16 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1636">#1636</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/1d7460c4f8a27be825c11b1c9d346d79db32c1e5"><code>1d7460c</code></a> release: 3.4.15 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/issues/1609">#1609</a>)</li> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/compare/3.4.14...3.4.16">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/network/alerts). </details> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d034ba7491 |
fix(interactions): derive question storage from canonical forms (#14946)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents request human input through durable issue interactions. > - A question form has a canonical presentation and a compatibility storage format. > - The creation API required agents to write both formats. > - Tool guidance told agents to split text and choice questions across those formats. > - This pull request accepts one complete canonical form and derives storage fields on the server. > - The benefit is a complete question card with stable answer and retry behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related work: Refs #13630 and #14430. PR #13630 addresses the display of historical partial forms. This change fixes creation and keeps the check that rejects conflicting new forms. **What happened?** A question save supplied three compatibility questions and one canonical text question. The API correctly rejected the incomplete canonical form. The Runner's tool description encouraged this split. Sending only a complete canonical form also failed because the API required compatibility questions. **Expected behavior** An agent sends one complete `payload.questionSet` with every text and choice question. Paperclip derives `payload.questions` for storage and answer compatibility. Existing legacy requests remain valid. Explicitly conflicting dual forms remain invalid. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Call `paperclip_request_human_input` with `interactionKind: "questions"`. 2. Send `payload: { version: 1, questionSet: ... }` with a required text question and a required choice question. 3. The old API rejects the missing compatibility questions. With this change, it stores both questions and preserves the canonical form. 4. Retry with the same idempotency key. Confirm that only one interaction exists. 5. Submit both answers. Confirm that the normal resolver and continuation rules apply. **Paperclip version or commit** The branch is based on `cf8ad63c8`. The problem affects the native Runner and the interaction creation API. **Deployment mode** Server deployment with the native Paperclip Runner. Integration tests use the real interaction service and an embedded test database. ## What Changed - Add one shared canonical-to-storage projection. Reuse it for native harness question requests. - Accept canonical-only question creation at the shared validator and server boundary. - Export the input type and update the plugin SDK and its RPC contract. - Advertise a typed, complete question form in the live and scenario tool schemas. - Enforce canonical text and custom-answer constraints before ordinary or native resolution. Preserve harmless display whitespace. - Run regex matching in isolated workers with a deadline and resource limits. Both answer paths await the result before persistence. Saved native delivery uses the validated answer without taking another worker slot. - Update agent guidance and generated Runner contracts. - Test mixed forms, option-ID collisions, retries, answers, legacy requests, and conflicting forms. ## Verification - Interaction service, HTTP route, native bridge, and Runner authority suites: 221 tests passed after correcting an obsolete tool-description assertion. - Shared validator, plugin SDK, CLI, and UI compatibility suites: 67 tests passed. - Runner core tool-contract suite: 20 tests passed. AJV validates live and scenario schemas. - Final review regressions: 172 shared, service, native bridge, and authority tests passed. These cover text length, pattern, numeric limits, whitespace, custom option IDs, and historical pending cards. - Runner session suites: 67 tests passed. Published example tests: 4 tests passed. - Server typecheck and the shared/server builds passed after the compatibility fixes. - Final delivery verification: 35 response-delivery tests passed. The native delivery regression proves saved answers do not enter pattern workers; server typecheck and build passed. - Pattern security and answer-flow verification: 205 tests passed after repairing the child fixture loader. These cover pathological matching, event-loop responsiveness, worker concurrency, slot cleanup, HTTP routes, native delivery, and the full helper in a child process. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed on the bounded-worker revision. - `pnpm build` passed on the bounded-worker revision. - All 55 GitHub checks passed on `fe457af`; four optional jobs were skipped. An unchanged Cursor adapter test timed out once in CI, passed locally, and passed on one failed-job rerun. - Reviewers can send the canonical-only mixed form above and verify that the saved interaction contains both canonical and compatibility questions. ## Risks - The creation API accepts a new input shape. Stored rows and answer contracts keep the existing shape. - The shared projection must preserve synthetic free-text option IDs. Collision and native round-trip tests cover this behavior. - Historical partial rows remain readable. New conflicting dual forms, including written-answer mismatches, remain rejected. - Existing pending cards retain the written-answer paths offered by their stored options. Canonical text constraints still apply. - Ordinary answers now enforce declared canonical constraints before persistence. Invalid answers leave the card pending. - Regex validation has a one-second deadline and a four-worker capacity limit. A complex pattern or capacity error leaves the card pending with a validation error. - No database migration or change to company authorization is required. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The session exposes the GPT-6 model family; its exact runtime model identifier and context window size are not exposed. Used reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
8fd3cf74ea |
build(deps): bump @grpc/grpc-js from 1.14.4 to 1.14.5 (#14786)
Bumps [@grpc/grpc-js](https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node) from 1.14.4 to 1.14.5. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/releases">@grpc/grpc-js's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2><code>@grpc/grpc-js</code> 1.14.5</h2> <ul> <li>Fix a bug that caused clients to automatically transmit excessive error details to clients by default (<a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/security/advisories/GHSA-f596-whhp-79r4">advisory GHSA-f596-whhp-79r4</a>)</li> <li>Fix a bug that caused <code>getAuthContext</code> to return unverified certificates as though they were verified in some configurations (<a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/security/advisories/GHSA-m9gg-hp2v-232j">advisory GHSA-m9gg-hp2v-232j</a>)</li> <li>Fix a bug that could cause stale call data to accumulate if a channel failed to connect for a long period of time (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-node/issues/3078">#3078</a>)</li> <li>Fix a bug that could cause call status to be reported with expected fields missing (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-node/issues/3079">#3079</a>)</li> <li>Avoid redundant end() calls on completed HTTP/2 streams (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-node/issues/3082">#3082</a> contributed by <a href="https://github.com/olavloite"><code>@olavloite</code></a>)</li> <li>Unify call numbers and avoid disabled trace allocations (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-node/issues/3084">#3084</a> contributed by <a href="https://github.com/olavloite"><code>@olavloite</code></a>)</li> </ul> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/56567d9604b4e45cdca0d2e3c2a60ac227ee659d"><code>56567d9</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-node/issues/3086">#3086</a> from murgatroid99/grpc-js_1.14.5</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/748ae86f7bb8af4a8d917d6fcf01c7a4c070f0a4"><code>748ae86</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-node/issues/3088">#3088</a> from murgatroid99/grpc-js_perf_improvement_backport</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/526702d8ed335a99960878aea19cf6748f6d2314"><code>526702d</code></a> test(grpc-js): fix type errors in client stream lifecycle tests</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/26a8d3d7d919098ded374b1c246d113161d69eb1"><code>26a8d3d</code></a> fix(grpc-js): avoid redundant end() calls on completed HTTP/2 streams</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/152eebdcd5bbb1548b7779d14e0f5046784c21c1"><code>152eebd</code></a> chore(grpc-js): unify call numbers and avoid disabled trace allocations</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/c5ae75026d7f07d24ab1bbd76cb84d78ab3a4a8d"><code>c5ae750</code></a> grpc-js(-xds): Increment version numbers (1.14.x)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/735a09a4f967400667fbbeda54584437e1bcf721"><code>735a09a</code></a> Merge commit from fork</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/af9b1401fbf72d7cbe8b569c8df45cb4d4905e24"><code>af9b140</code></a> Merge commit from fork</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/45ac33e74312ccd34cd7015147b36ef21b12b6c3"><code>45ac33e</code></a> Merge commit from fork</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/commit/9df49e3ca3ea20f8626f62339d703d7284ed13e9"><code>9df49e3</code></a> Merge pull request <a href="https://redirect.github.com/grpc/grpc-node/issues/3081">#3081</a> from murgatroid99/grpc-js-xds_weighted_target_fix_ba...</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/grpc/grpc-node/compare/@grpc/grpc-js@1.14.4...@grpc/grpc-js@1.14.5">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9786f6df56 |
fix(runner): preserve credential content in document saves (#14937)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Runner sends authorized tool calls to the control plane. > - Agents use these calls to save plans and instruction files. > - The Runner used diagnostic secret detection to reject execution arguments. > - Ordinary credential-related prose could reject a document save before persistence. > - This pull request forwards the original arguments and leaves credential policy to the provider harness. > - The benefit is reliable saves with useful diagnostic records. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related foundation: Refs #12415 and #14430. No duplicate save-policy fix was found. **What happened?** A `write_document` call failed before the server saved its plan. The Runner reported `semantic tool input contains credential material; refusing to execute altered arguments`. The detector also masked ordinary phrases such as `secret manager` and `credential handling` in diagnostics. Both TypeScript dispatchers had equivalent execution gates. One dispatcher also rewrote structured approval and question payloads before execution. **Expected behavior** Paperclip forwards authorized arguments unchanged. The provider harness decides credential-content policy. Log and audit redaction does not reject or rewrite save input. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Send an authorized `write_document` call with a plan that discusses credential handling. 2. Include an intentional credential value in the body to exercise harness-owned policy. 3. The old Runner rejects the call. With this change, the document service stores the exact body. 4. Diagnostic records still mask explicit credential values. Qualified credential fields, short bearer values, opaque diagnostic pairs, and valid encoded JSON token headers have regression coverage. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced at `c46e41e81c03cd3c8b64cf993615b604d7fe8c62`. The branch is based on current `master`. **Deployment mode** Server deployment with the native Paperclip Runner. Local regression tests use the real document service and an embedded test database. ## What Changed - Remove credential-content vetoes from Rust admission and both TypeScript semantic dispatchers. - Preserve original structured approval and question arguments during execution. - Keep transport bounds, schema checks, authorization, idempotency, and audit masking. - Require explicit credential syntax or recognized formats for diagnostic masking. Preserve ordinary prose, metadata, and dotted identifiers. - Test exact document persistence, replay, nested argument identities, and masked audit copies. - Remove obsolete retry guidance and document harness-owned credential policy. ## Verification - `cargo test --manifest-path packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --lib --test acpx_event_payload --test acpx_provider_state --test acpx_provider_turns`: 355 tests passed. - Focused server and adapter tests: 189 tests passed after rebase. These include the real document save and the complete tool-gateway suite. - Semantic dispatcher and conformance tests: 34 tests passed. - Diagnostic redaction and MCP tests: 46 tests passed, including all six review examples. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on the repaired branch. - The broad local root suite was interrupted after database fixture setup failures. The focused database suites passed. CI runs the complete configured test lanes. ## Risks - Authorized tool arguments can intentionally contain credentials. The harness must enforce its content policy. - Diagnostic detection is narrower. Explicit assignments, credential fields, and recognized credential formats remain masked. - The change does not add a database migration or change company authorization. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The session exposes the GPT-6 model family; its exact runtime model identifier and context window size are not exposed. Used reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |