Commit Graph
2246 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip f34a1c81a9 merge: compose current canonical runner prerequisite
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

* commit 'dae808fe02694d13d322c535944910813b21f6d6':
  perf(chat): stop polling failed run retries (#15871)
  docs(release): stable notes for the 2026.1012.1-beta.0 soak (v2026.1015.0) (#16053)
  Support test Cloud connector identities (#16033)
  fix(inbox): keep automatic recovery cleanup out of personal participation (#16063)
2026-10-12 22:32:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip dae808fe02 fix(runner): preserve bounded recovery fixture synchronization
Merge current master and reuse the durable-resume test envelope correction. Wait for actual callback entry under the existing recovery deadline and preserve original early errors.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 22:29:13 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 12113e431e merge: reconcile task-workspace canonical prerequisite
Preserve Claude v7 effort, lease ownership, historical readers, and Pi25 source binding while composing canonical16a and task-workspace masterf329. Protocol/surfaces noemit and all generation checks pass.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 21:52:28 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip e168512f7b perf(chat): stop polling failed run retries (#15871)
Stop one-second scans of failed chat-run retries. Wake the existing retry queue after transaction commits and at saved retry or stale-claim deadlines. Preserve claim fences, authorization, recovery, and idempotent agent admission.

Resolve conflicts with the current chat-service extraction by applying the retry signals and shared deadline predicate in the failed-run retry module.

Verified with pnpm typecheck, pnpm build, all 1,328 chat and coordinator regression tests, and current-head CI. Greptile reviewed the final head at 5/5 with no unresolved threads.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 19:49:47 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 16a53254c4 merge master and retain bounded install failure evidence
Preserve guarded test-home cleanup and both Storybook source reviews. Keep the installer deadline and all artifact/lifecycle/runtime assertions intact while retaining its failed npm progress.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 21:44:39 -05:00
56a0bf0d49 Support test Cloud connector identities (#16033)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Its Cloud connector uses an environment-bound identity to call a
hosted broker.
> - The identity parser and enrollment flow accept development, staging,
and production.
> - A separate test broker needs its own environment identity.
> - This pull request accepts test identities and maps the test broker
to that environment.
> - Known hosted brokers still reject identities from other
environments.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Cloud connector configuration and self-host enrollment.

**Current behavior**

The app rejects an identity with environment `test`. Self-host
enrollment infers development for the test broker.

**Proposed behavior**

Accept `test` identities at `https://test.paperclip.app`. Infer test
during self-host enrollment. Reject development, staging, and production
identities at that broker. Continue to reject test identities at the
production and staging brokers.

**Reason and benefit**

Branch testing needs a separate broker so test identities and requests
stay in their selected environment. The existing identity, enrollment,
and signature flow can provide that isolation with a new allowed
environment value.

**Breaking changes**

Existing environment values and broker checks keep their current
behavior. Older app versions cannot use test connector identities.

## What Changed

- Add `test` to managed and self-hosted connector environment types and
validation, and to the board API enrollment status type.
- Infer test from its hosted broker and enforce the matching
environment.
- Test enrollment persistence, signed request environment/audience
claims, and broker mismatch rejection.
- Document test broker configuration in the development guide.

## Verification

- Connector, enrollment, and board API-client suites passed: 63 tests
across three files. Board UI typecheck and token gates passed after
synchronizing its enrollment response type.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed, including after rebasing
onto current master.
- `pnpm test:run` completed its general server stage: 17,867 passed, 105
skipped, and 9 failed across 5 files. The runner stops at that failing
stage, so it did not run subsequent workspace/serialized stages locally.
All nine failures also reproduce on the unchanged base commit in a
separate checkout. Five skill-related cases resolve an unrelated
ancestor skills directory; two workspace cases accept a remote main
branch that their fixture expects to be absent; two permission-cleanup
cases return macOS `ENOTEMPTY` instead of the expected permission error.
- Current-head GitHub CI passed, including full general and serialized
test suites, typecheck, build, runner checks, and browser e2e. Greptile
is 5/5 with no unresolved comments.
- `git diff --check` and Gitleaks passed.

## Risks

The new environment value is additive. The test broker must support test
identities before use. This change preserves existing signature
handling, managed identity overrides, and rejection of mismatched
identities at known hosted brokers. A local full-suite pass is not
claimed; the nine failures above also occur without this change.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning and tool execution. The exact
serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Dotta <34892728+cryppadotta@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-12 19:32:33 -07:00
83e13db8fa fix(inbox): keep automatic recovery cleanup out of personal participation (#16063)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The personal inbox uses issue activity to identify a person's
participation.
> - Issue reads can cancel stale recovery actions and record that
cleanup as the reader's action.
> - This adds unrelated tasks to the inbox and refreshes their activity
timestamps.
> - A workspace owner hold can also alternate between creation and
cancellation after a task finishes.
> - This pull request corrects cleanup attribution, excludes historical
read cleanup, and retains one exact owner hold.
> - Agents can read authorized issue activity to diagnose the same
problem themselves.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15742 excludes logs by the execution-recovery actor from activity
timestamps. This PR covers reader-attributed stale recovery cleanup,
personal inbox participation, exact workspace owner holds, and sandbox
issue activity access. I searched open issues and PRs for recovery inbox
and activity bridge fixes. I found no duplicate for this defect.

**What happened?**

Loading issue lists cancels stale recovery actions under the reader's
identity. The personal inbox treats those rows as user participation.
One completed issue had hundreds of such rows and no edits or comments
by the affected reader. A retained native workspace owner repeatedly
creates a verification action that read projections then cancel. Sandbox
agents cannot inspect the issue activity because the reverse bridge
rejects the route.

**Expected behavior**

Automatic cleanup belongs to the system and does not add an issue to a
reader's inbox. Historical cleanup rows remain auditable but do not
count as participation or recent activity. An unresolved physical
workspace owner keeps one stable verification action. Agents can inspect
activity only for issues their identity may read.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Finish a task whose native run retains an unverifiable workspace
owner receipt.
2. Repeat workspace recovery checks and GET requests for issue detail,
compact lists, and recovery actions.
3. Observe new recovery action IDs and reader-attributed cancellations
in the activity history.
4. Query the personal inbox for that reader and observe the unrelated
task.
5. From a sandbox agent, request GET /api/issues/:id/activity and
observe Route not allowed.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Observed at f5346c05b9. Regression tests
use current master behavior.

**Deployment mode**

Authenticated hosted instance with native and legacy sandbox agents. The
inbox defect is independent of the adapter.

## What Changed

- Attribute automatic stale recovery cleanup to the recovery system
actor.
- Exclude exact historical read cleanup rows from personal inbox
membership, unread counts, and both activity timestamp queries. Keep all
audit rows and explicit user recovery decisions.
- Retain owner verification holds only while the exact company, run,
issue, and owner fingerprint still match. Apply the same rule to reads
and background recovery.
- Make repeated checks for the same owner hold leave its identity,
attempts, and timestamps unchanged. Keep physical takeover blocked.
- Allow GET issue activity through the sandbox bridge. Keep the existing
company and issue-read authorization and reject broader audit routes.
- Add regressions and update the runtime API and recovery documentation.
Refresh generated source references for the documentation edits. Update
the paired activity, inbox, and recovery maps.

## Verification

- Focused Vitest verification: 315 tests pass across five files. The
updated terminal owner hold regression also passes. The files cover
issue service, recovery routes, activity authorization, sandbox callback
bridge, and native workspace finalization.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass locally. The full general
and serialized unit test matrix passes in CI on the latest commit. The
duplicate local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after about 30 minutes once
that full CI coverage passed; it did not report a local full-suite pass.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes for all paired areas and
capability IDs.
- Apex is 5/5 on commit 44c3787888. Its
access map finding is fixed and resolved. All CI checks are green on
this commit.
- The new regression repeats reads and background sweeps for done and
cancelled tasks. It checks one unchanged hold, zero physical copyback,
zero personal inbox participation, and system cleanup after the exact
receipt is cleared.
- Historical cleanup tests preserve explicit recovery decisions,
nullable metadata, unread counts, and the original audit rows.
- Authorization tests permit an authorized agent and reject
cross-company or issue-boundary reads. Bridge tests reject write
methods, extra path segments, and company-wide audit routes.

## Risks

Existing inbox items can disappear if their only participation evidence
was automatic read cleanup. No data migration or audit deletion is
needed. An unresolved workspace owner remains visible after task
completion; this preserves the physical writer fence. A stale or cleared
owner does not retain the hold. Issue activity access expands only the
sandbox transport allowlist and still uses existing controller
authorization.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code
editing, shell execution, and test tools. The session identifies the
model family as GPT-6. A more specific runtime model ID and context
window size are not exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Amy (Opus) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 19:25:15 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip f329b24ee1 feat: give tasks durable project-optional workspaces (#15749)
Give tasks durable company-scoped workspace bindings independent of project assignment, channel defaults and authorized repository preparation. Reuse verified input seeds and sparse output recovery while preserving trust, privacy and controller provisioning boundaries.

Full CI and E2E, Superagent, legacy checks and Greptile Apex 5/5 passed on reviewed head 753680b61c. All review findings are resolved; the PR records focused verification and historical acceptance limits.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 20:45:18 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 48ffca9438 merge: reconcile published native prerequisite and current master
Preserve canonical startup ownership, scoped evidence, current Storybook IDs, and the Codex form controls while carrying Claude effort and immutable source bindings.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 20:40:11 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip c1b9933a24 chore: follow source comment contribution rules
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 20:33:39 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 9f59ff36cf merge: reconcile runtime qualification with current master
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

* origin/master:
  fix(server): keep classified provider quota runs out of Sentry (#16029)
  refactor(chat): extract delivery, reaction, and setup boundaries (#16024)
  fix(heartbeat): answer an unsettled adapter Stop with a 409 instead of a 500 (#16032)
  refactor(storybook): organize folders and navigation by feature map (#16049)
  test: remove repeated setup and strengthen regression proof (#16022)
  feat: maintain Storybook through a downstream feature catalog (#16046)
  ci: route PR admission through reserved AWS capacity (#16042)
  docs(release): canonicalize v2026.1012.0 release notes (#16045)
  ci: add protected routing workflow for reserved AWS capacity (#16039)
  docs: add PR rules for file size and code comments (#16036)
  Add managed Slack setup with an independent own-app path (#15679)
2026-10-12 20:02:47 -05:00
4b958ecbd8 fix(server): keep classified provider quota runs out of Sentry (#16029)
A run that stops because the user's provider account hit its usage
limit is an expected wait, not a Paperclip defect. The adapter already
classifies it (errorCode and resultJson.errorFamily are both
provider_quota) and recovery schedules a retry at the reset time.

Skip the Sentry report only when both adapter-owned fields agree, the
run status is failed, no signal stopped it, and the failure did not
happen during setup. Timeouts, cancellations, signals, other codes and
missing or mismatched families still report.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Dotta <cryppadotta@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-12 15:59:27 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 64bd6e9e07 refactor(chat): extract delivery, reaction, and setup boundaries (#16024)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Chat channels connect that work to provider conversations.
> - One shared service contains callback, delivery, reaction, and setup
logic.
> - These responsibilities have distinct contracts and existing
public-path tests.
> - This PR moves ten cohesive responsibilities into focused modules.
> - The service retains shared runtime ownership and scheduling.
> - Provider behavior is easier to locate and review.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15995, #16026, #16027, #16030, #16031, #16035, #16037, #16038,
#16041, #16043.

This PR consolidates the reviewed extraction stack. The plan is
`doc/plans/2026-10-12-chat-channel-delivery-boundaries-refactor.md`.

## What Changed

- Move Slack callback verification into the Slack folder.
- Move Discord Gateway events and root-thread admission/recovery into
the Discord folder.
- Extract durable receipt reactions and inbound reaction
admission/replay.
- Extract inbound attachment ingestion and outbound integrity-checked
hydration. Preserve the public hydration export.
- Extract durable provider effects. Keep Telegram callback notices in
the Telegram folder.
- Extract conversation/activity reads and setup qualification. Keep
Slack and Teams projections in their channel folders.
- Preserve the merged managed Slack setup behavior, shared workers,
credential leases, and transaction boundaries.
- Reduce `chat-channels.ts` from 26,493 lines / 1,048,769 bytes to
21,460 lines / 862,284 bytes. This removes 5,033 lines from the service.

## Verification

- Each extraction passed its selected existing tests before and after
through public service paths.
- On updated master, all 55 selected Slack cases passed before
extraction. All 194 selected chat/managed-Slack cases passed on the
final stack tip.
- `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, module-boundary checks, and
whitespace checks passed on that tip.
- The normalized syntax audit verifies 69 moved declarations and all
retained statements, including their relative order, against updated
master.
- The eight earlier stack merges retain the exact validated repository
tree. The combined root equals the validated tip merged with current
master. All chat-channel files remain byte-identical to the validated
tip. Current combined-root CI and review are pending.
- Full local verification remains unverified. The unchanged
`workspace-git-snapshot-streaming.test.ts:56` stress test timed out at
300,000 ms in a clean run and again in isolation. The full run was
stopped after the reproduced failure. No timeout or assertion was
weakened.
- These checks use assembled services, real local databases, and
provider fixtures. They do not prove live third-party execution.

Reviewers can run the public-path suites:

```sh
pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/chat-channels.integration.test.ts server/src/services/chat-outbound-attachment-hydration.test.ts server/src/__tests__/slack-development-manager.test.ts
```

## Risks

- Factory wiring must preserve live values, shared state, and
initialization order. Identity-link construction retains deferred access
to the provider-effects callback.
- Credential fences, authorization transactions, and delivery settlement
must keep their original ordering. Syntax parity and public-path
integration cases cover these boundaries.
- Full local verification has the recorded Git-streaming timeout. The
combined PR must pass master’s required CI before merging into master.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and repository tools. The
exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this
session. No separate agent was used.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 22:46:25 +00:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 9b1b905e01 fix(heartbeat): answer an unsettled adapter Stop with a 409 instead of a 500 (#16032)
An owned adapter Stop that is still settling when the 60s request wait
expires now returns 409 adapter_stop_pending instead of escaping as an
HTTP 500. Stop proof, lease and restore ownership are unchanged.

Sentry is notified only when the same execution is still unsettled ten
minutes after the Stop request (measured from stopRequestedAt), so real
Stop hangs stay visible and slow workspace sync-back no longer pages.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <Paperclip-Paperclip@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-10-12 15:44:47 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip dabb8c5daf test: remove repeated setup and strengthen regression proof (#16022)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Its tests protect company boundaries, approvals, durable tasks,
credentials and the board UI.
> - Several owner suites repeat large database fixtures and render
frames.
> - Some tests repeat stronger proof or pass when the behavior they
describe is broken.
> - This pull request shares exact setup, removes proven duplicate cases
and repairs weak observations.
> - It preserves distinct security, lifecycle, concurrency and
user-facing contracts.
> - The benefit is 5,027 fewer test lines and stronger regression
checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15978. This continues the merged test-audit cleanup in [PR
#15978](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15978), which
removed 11,976 test/support lines. The savings in this pull request are
additional.

Related open work: [PR
#13460](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13460) changes
legacy OAuth parent/version lock ordering. This pull request retains
those production paths and the existing lock-order test. Its secrets
changes compact fixtures and repair the two AWS wrapper exclusion
observations.

Scoped title searches found no open duplicate audit or
fixture-consolidation PR and no matching audit issue. The problem is
described here using the enhancement template.

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The maintenance and regression value of the existing server, UI, CLI,
shared and wiki-plugin test suites.

**Subsystem affected**

Cross-cutting test code. Two UI modules also lose unused test inspection
exports.

**Current behavior**

Owner tests repeat database rows, service inputs, HTTP setup and render
frames. Some cases repeat stronger assertions. Two AWS lock tests record
only cleanup events, so an AWS provider write can happen inside the held
lock without failing those observations. Several other negative tests
accept or do not observe the wrong result. Worktree fixtures also use a
temporary path alias that conflicts with the existing canonical-path
checks on macOS.

**Proposed behavior**

Use small local helpers that preserve exact inputs, fresh allocations,
callbacks, query order and await positions. Remove only cases with named
stronger keepers. Tighten negative assertions and observe actual AWS
provider entry while a confirmed lock holder remains parked. Resolve
temporary fixture roots to their canonical paths.

**Reason and benefit**

Remove 5,027 net test lines and 15 redundant registered executions.
Remove 11 lines of unused UI inspection exports. Keep every distinct
company, actor, approval, credential, persistence, stale-write and
concurrency contract. No wall-time speedup is claimed for setup
compaction.

**Breaking changes**

None for application behavior, APIs or stored data. The removed exports
expose private UI test state and have no remaining callers.

## What Changed

- Consolidate repeated runtime, workspace, portability, route,
tool-access, policy, gateway and state-service fixtures.
- Share repeated UI render frames and CLI/wiki-plugin setup while
retaining the original actions and expected results.
- Remove 15 repeated case executions only where the audit records an
exact stronger keeper.
- Repair weak HTTP/UI negative assertions and two AWS account-home lock
observations. Keep the existing durable results and cleanup behavior.
- Remove the unused `__inflightGetCount` and `__secondTickInternals`
inspection exports. Keep observable request coalescing and ticker
lifecycle checks.
- Canonicalize temporary worktree fixture paths without weakening
production path checks.
- Record the owner decisions, savings, independent preservation reviews
and validation in [the dated audit
report](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/58c5c4aa241c85f4665a3159c192888bbb2a5cfa/doc/plans/2026-10-12-test-audit-rounds.md)
and [the compact control
evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/58c5c4aa241c85f4665a3159c192888bbb2a5cfa/doc/plans/2026-10-12-test-audit-controls.json).

## Verification

- Complete owner and retained-sibling baselines passed before each audit
cutover. Independent reviewers checked the full original tests, actual
helper bodies, exact inputs, receipt provenance, async order, fresh
allocations and case registrations.
- All 14 UI/route/wiki mutations failed at their intended assertions:
ten UI/API/ticker controls, one route control and three wiki
persistence/receipt controls. Each mutated production source was
restored to its exact original bytes.
- Both old AWS lock tests passed with their respective AWS-only lock
bypass. Both repaired tests failed at the intended assertions with the
same bypasses. These give 16 intended failures and two passing weak
controls across 18 executions. Each source was restored exactly.
- Final complete state-owner/sibling run: 329/329 passed at code
revision `64370831ebe191e5ce092f85f79b6fb661df7e16`.
- Final `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm check:token-gates` and `pnpm build`:
passed at the same code revision.
- Delivery head `58c5c4aa241c85f4665a3159c192888bbb2a5cfa` includes the
evidence commit and master `4b766b872993045a2e787404f0475503683e5ded`.
All 27 audited test files and both application files match the locally
verified code revision byte-for-byte. Current-head CI validates the
integrated branch, including the incoming master changes.
- All eight production-owner SHA guards for the 16 deliberate failing
mutation controls still match the integrated delivery checkout. The
mutation receipts therefore apply to those current owners.
- Full default `pnpm test:run`: **failed** with exit 1 at frozen code
revision `64370831ebe191e5ce092f85f79b6fb661df7e16`; HEAD and tracked
source bytes remained unchanged. The first general-server group reported
878 passing files, four failing files and six skipped files; 17,846
passing cases, 24 failing cases and 105 skipped cases. Later groups did
not run. Failures were `http-log-redaction` (socket hangup),
`public-mcp` (initial 15-second timeout followed by hosted token
“Refresh before subscribing” failures), `remove-test-home` (macOS
`ENOTEMPTY` where permission errors were expected, plus cleanup
failure), and `workspace-git-snapshot-streaming` (300-second timeout).
All four failing test files and the relevant cleanup/MCP production
owners are unchanged by this audit. Full local success is not claimed.
- Focused complete-owner diagnosis at the same frozen revision: 149/152
passed, three failed, zero skipped. `public-mcp` passed 82/82 and
`http-log-redaction` passed 66/66 unchanged. The two `remove-test-home`
cases reproduced macOS `ENOTEMPTY` against an expected `EACCES`/`EPERM`
contract; the 32 MiB workspace snapshot case reproduced its existing
300,000 ms timeout. HEAD and tracked files stayed clean. Exact blob
comparison confirmed all four test files and the relevant cleanup/MCP
owners match both inspected master
`4b766b872993045a2e787404f0475503683e5ded` and the frozen local
revision. The three remaining local failures are unresolved; no timeout,
retry or assertion was weakened.
- Current-head CI: [workflow
38299262149](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38299262149)
has passed runner selection and created all downstream
test/typecheck/build gates; those gates are queued, with no failures
reported. Greptile completed successfully at
`58c5c4aa241c85f4665a3159c192888bbb2a5cfa` with [5/5 and zero
comments](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16022#issuecomment-6131457592).
All review threads are resolved or absent. This pull request will remain
open after verification.

Reviewers can reproduce the required workspace checks:

```sh
pnpm -r typecheck
pnpm check:token-gates
pnpm test:run
pnpm build
```

Browser suites were not run. Their sources and user journeys are
unchanged by this audit.

## Risks

- A fixture helper can hide a specialized input or change object
freshness. Full-program expansion checks and independent reviews
preserve the exact old inputs and execution order.
- Removing duplicate proof can remove a distinct contract by mistake.
The audit records the keeper for each deletion; all distinct security
and lifecycle cases remain.
- Concurrency checks can miss progress during a fixed delay. The AWS
repairs record actual provider entry, confirm holder entry, use measured
entry windows, require exact final event order and drain both operations
in `finally`.
- The full local default run failed. Focused diagnosis reproduced two
macOS cleanup failures and one existing snapshot timeout in unchanged
owners; these remain unresolved. Current-head CI is pending. No test
deadline, retry policy, skip or CI shard was weakened to obtain a pass.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex with GPT-6, reasoning, repository inspection, code
execution and delegated audit/review. The runtime does not expose the
exact served model identifier or context-window size; those values are
unavailable and are not inferred from the model catalog.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 22:23:11 +00:00
DottaandPaperclip fe1ecf1c34 fix(agents): retain Legacy ACP network restrictions during selection
Reject restrictive or unresolved ACP network settings with field-specific Legacy guidance instead of silently discarding them. Preserve unused CLI flags, recorded native profiles and trusted server policy. Synchronize the required feature and access maps without claiming live qualification.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 17:21:16 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip b63b779fe1 fix(agents): preserve requested controls and imported native settings
Apply Legacy ACP alias precedence before native Codex compatibility checks. Project actual import edits onto the saved native configuration, preserving hidden runtime and credential settings while honoring explicit removals and harness changes.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 16:56:31 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 5d02b25124 Merge atomic environment qualification preservation
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

* codex/runner-native-platform-prerequisites:
  fix(environments): preserve measured proof atomically on metadata saves
2026-10-12 16:39:37 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip cae179c214 fix(environments): preserve measured proof atomically on metadata saves
Explicit null clears user metadata. Preserve only the current database proof during metadata and status saves, and invalidate it atomically on config or driver updates. Real PostgreSQL interleaving controls protect concurrent qualification writes.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 16:39:34 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 64d0746f8a test(agents): distinguish measured and unknown sandbox defaults
Keep the discovery fixture truthful for unknown platforms and add a measured GNU2.39 ARM64 control. Record existing managed fixture, cost reporting and route qualification evidence without claiming missing live acceptance.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 16:30:25 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 65700c6908 fix(agents): preserve legacy policy and require measured sandbox defaults
Keep explicit Legacy permission choices through automatic selection, import editing, draft reset and policy display. Use company-scoped measured immutable-image facts for automatic sandbox defaults without allocating resources during creation or discovery.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 16:19:00 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip f340d92b39 Merge final immutable-image qualification guard
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

* codex/runner-native-platform-prerequisites:
  fix(environments): bind platform facts to the effective immutable image
2026-10-12 16:17:20 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip cf19e086ae fix(environments): bind platform facts to the effective immutable image
Reject named template bindings over an immutable base image. Preserve the measured company and custom-image identity without claiming compatibility for a different boot source.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 16:17:12 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip a1bfe8f5be Merge reviewed runtime and measured-platform fixes before Codex defaults
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

* codex/runner-native-platform-prerequisites:
  fix(runner): close review gaps in setup and platform qualification
2026-10-12 16:14:48 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 2a19f3721d fix(runner): close review gaps in setup and platform qualification
Read inert exact-source target data before selecting hosted native jobs. Bound registration teardown and retain unconfirmed recovery state. Record company-scoped sandbox platform facts only for immutable OCI images after confirmed cleanup; preserve existing connection and runner behavior.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 16:14:34 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 8de43be4cd Merge verified remote resume admission before Codex defaults
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

* codex/runner-native-platform-prerequisites:
  fix(runner): admit verified suspended SSH backups on restart
2026-10-12 15:43:31 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 00ac509b0a fix(runner): admit verified suspended SSH backups on restart
SSH already persists suspended harness backups. Permit the same integrity and full-scope verification used by sandbox targets during a cold controller continuation.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 15:43:29 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip f0e12c8519 Add managed Slack setup with an independent own-app path (#15679)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Slack connects a person to an agent through an installed app and a
verified identity.
> - Independent installations must remain usable without Paperclip Cloud
or manager credentials.
> - Approved Cloud deployments can use Slack manager grants to create
and install each agent's app.
> - Both paths should share credential storage, identity checks,
recovery, and the existing runtime.
> - This pull request adds gated managed setup and keeps independent app
setup under Advanced.
> - It also makes ongoing connection settings and personal test messages
easier to use.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Slack setup, connection settings, tenant credential storage, and the
Cloud connector handoff.

**Problem or motivation**

Approved deployments need an installation flow without pasted
configuration tokens. Open-source users must retain their independent
Slack app flow. A connection manager also needs a simple way to check a
bot from Settings.

**Proposed solution**

Use the managed path when the instance is configured to support it.
Choose agent and Connect are the two visible stops. Continue starts
authorization or installation. Use your own app remains under Advanced
before creation. Save personal manager grants by company, Paperclip
user, Slack user, workspace, and manager app. Reuse only verified
identities for test messages. Unknown identities must complete a private
Slack connection challenge before linking and receiving the test DM.

**Alternatives considered**

A shared bot would change each agent's Slack identity. Requiring Slack
CLI or a hosted service for self-hosted users would remove independent
installation.

**Roadmap alignment**

This maintainer-requested change improves Connected Apps and
experimental Agent Chat. It adds provisioning and management controls to
the existing Slack runtime.

**Additional context**

The companion Cloud broker profile is a separate deployment
prerequisite. Managed setup remains gated. Existing-app adoption is
deferred.

## What Changed

- Extract Slack registration, provider requests, completion,
customer-owned setup, managed setup, and personal manager grants into
focused services. Preserve the compatibility facade and independent
removal cleanup.
- Add company-scoped manager grants and a registration reference through
an additive, idempotent migration after current master. Keep runtime
credentials separate from app-registration secrets.
- Add authenticated manager authorization, sealed handoff, serialized
refresh and revocation, app creation, managed installation, and
installer-bound OAuth fallback.
- Preserve creation intent, block automatic uncertain recreation, save
credentials before downstream checks, and validate app, workspace, bot,
scopes, and installer identity.
- Add the two-stop production wizard and ordered stories. Keep the
own-app, manual, existing-app, and legacy-draft paths.
- Simplify Settings. Open Slack configuration targets the saved app. The
test-message action has its own row. Remove the old manual-avatar
section, channel-message section, and broken permissions link.
- Add paginated account discovery and a private connection challenge for
unknown accounts. Expired invitations stop waiting and offer a new
private invitation. Save send receipts before provider dispatch and
preserve confirmed delivery when activity logging fails.
- Reinstall the saved managed app on explicit reconnect, replace revoked
credentials, and resume completion. Persist reconnect intent and
duplicate-request receipts without creating another app.
- Update provider browser tests, recovery tests, secret redaction, setup
documentation, and the agent prompt. Preserve current master's durable
verification scheduling.

## Verification

- Full workspace typecheck and repository build passed on `56d389d47a`.
The subsequent reconnect retry fix in `288364eada` also passed UI
typecheck and UI build.
- 114 focused Slack registration cases and 13 production managed-wizard
cases passed, including fresh-token reconnect, retry after installation
failure, and duplicate reconnect requests.
- All nine affected Slack browser cases passed against the production UI
and a disposable fixture server. They cover managed setup, automatic
setup, own-app selection, refresh, recovery, mobile behavior, and
connection settings.
- Eight focused real-database test-message cases passed. They cover a
private ownership challenge, saved grant reuse, account pagination,
revoked and conflicting links, workspace mismatch, disabled DMs, revoked
membership, audit failure, ambiguous dispatch, and secret canaries.
- UI token gates and the production Storybook build passed.
- Greptile reviewed exact head
`288364eada5d9c114fad991ff634612639d06672` at 5/5 with no actionable
findings or unresolved review threads.
- The full repository test suite and current-head CI are running. Their
final results will replace this line before merge.
- Earlier live feature previews created two bots in the authorized
Paperclip Slack workspace and reused one personal manager grant. Local
managed Continue created and installed a bot without a configuration
token or a separate Add to Slack action. Avatars, welcome DMs, signed
callbacks, and direct replies were observed. A Settings test DM also
arrived in the signed-in user's Slack account.
- Earlier staging thread qualification required manual publication
recovery for one bot. Current-head live qualification remains required
before enabling the production default. Fixture results do not establish
Slack approval behavior in other workspaces.

## Risks

- Personal manager tokens can create apps. They stay in scoped vault
entries. The manager client secret stays at the broker. Company,
actor/session, origin, and app identity checks apply throughout setup.
- The additive migration must also work on qualification instances that
applied earlier branch migrations. Table, column, index, and constraint
creation is idempotent.
- Creation and message timeouts can leave uncertain outcomes. Saved
request IDs prevent automatic duplicate dispatch.
- Unknown Slack identities must receive and complete their private
challenge while signed in. Account selection alone does not grant
Paperclip permissions. Existing revoked or conflicting links are not
overwritten.
- A development-only manager transport uses an explicitly configured
private credential file for local qualification. Production ignores this
transport; no manager credentials are bundled with open source.
- Managed rollout requires Slack approval, the companion broker
deployment, configured secrets, and final live qualification. Removing a
connection does not delete its Slack app.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code execution, and browser
tools. The session does not expose the exact serving model ID or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 15:34:02 -05:00
Dotta d3916151f6 Merge the standalone runtime prerequisite into Codex defaults
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

* codex/runner-native-platform-prerequisites:
  feat(runner): qualify native Codex platforms and cache hosted builds
  docs: establish paired feature and agent access maps (#16025)
  fix(acpx): record turn activity at the moment a stop fires (#15962)
  refactor(chat): extract channel status, receipts, drafts and authority workflows (#15995)
  feat: add portable verification skills and refresh the feature map (#15983)

# Conflicts:
#	doc/plans/2026-10-06-default-agent-runner.md
#	packages/paperclip-runner/README.md
#	server/src/__tests__/dev-runner-native-binary.test.ts
2026-10-12 15:16:51 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip ddcd746eb6 feat(runner): qualify native Codex platforms and cache hosted builds
Extract the tested runtime and installed-package prerequisite without changing agent creation defaults or experimental gates.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 15:15:01 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip bb7591dfd0 fix: retain matching-host runner development overrides
Use the controller override only for matching remote OS and CPU, preserving explicit remote priority and strict target header verification.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 14:34:41 -05:00
4b766b8729 fix(acpx): record turn activity at the moment a stop fires (#15962)
Record stop-time ACP turn diagnostics (last-event age, oldest pending tool age, pending tool kinds) so wall-clock timeout events show whether the turn was stalled. Diagnostics only.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <Paperclip-Paperclip@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 12:33:59 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 0d0e138dad refactor(chat): extract channel status, receipts, drafts and authority workflows (#15995)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Chat channels connect that work to provider conversations.
> - Provider workflows still fill the shared service.
> - Their authority and recovery rules need clear homes.
> - This PR lands five reviewed extractions into channel folders.
> - Shared authorization, state and worker lifetime stay explicit.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15976, #15996, #15999, #16001 and #16002. This root PR now
contains all five extractions from batch three. The four upper PRs were
merged into their parents. The combined tree matches reviewed stack head
`789e918b5af49ec1958076ce4d22d31006205302` exactly.

## What Changed

- Extract Slack session status and accepted-file receipt recovery.
- Extract Telegram publication drafts and Stop handling.
- Extract Photon events and native responses.
- Extract Teams file-transfer authority.
- Reduce `chat-channels.ts` from 29,897 to 26,461 lines (3,436 lines,
11.5%).
- Preserve function bodies, runtime-map identity, leases and transaction
boundaries.

## Verification

- All 117 selected public-service cases passed before and after their
respective extractions.
- All 30 moved declarations and remaining service statements preserve
normalized syntax across the five slices.
- Server typecheck, module boundaries and whitespace checks passed.
- Cumulative `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. Combined-head
CI and review are pending on `5de1b0b99d71049a72440e8c131bf4bb30bdf3f3`.
- Fixtures exercise assembled services and disposable databases, not
live third-party providers.
- Cumulative local `pnpm test:run` on
`789e918b5af49ec1958076ce4d22d31006205302` exited 1: 32,414 passed, 125
skipped, one failure. `company-skills-routes.test.ts:1691` (`stars,
forks, and comments on skills through company-scoped endpoints`) failed
with `socket hang up`; that test and its route are unchanged by this
stack. The same 58-case suite then passed in isolation without code
changes. The original command did not reach 111 later serialized suites;
its failure is retained, so the full-local-test checklist remains
unchecked.

```sh
pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/chat-channels.integration.test.ts -t 'Slack session|Slack turns to Idle|signed Slack session stop|denies guest Slack stops'
```

- Combined-head CI attempt 1: five runners received a shutdown signal at
19:13:08 UTC (server shard 10/12, serialized shards 2/9 and 7/9, E2E
shards 3/8 and 7/8). These jobs stopped during execution without a
failing test assertion. [Original
workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38293566028).
The affected jobs will receive one unchanged retry after the other jobs
finish.

## Risks

- Changes cross durable provider recovery and authority boundaries. The
moved bodies preserve syntax, and 117 focused public-service cases
passed before and after their extractions.
- Shared workers, timers, runtime maps and generic authorization remain
in the service.
- The full local test run failed in an unchanged company-skills route
test; its result and the unrun suites are recorded above.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and repository tools. The
exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this
session. No separate agent was used.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 19:26:54 +00:00
DottaandPaperclip e79254b2fa fix: preserve saved setup and match sandbox runner targets
Share actual-target artifact selection across remote Codex setup and execution. Keep unchanged saved setup choices outside new-selection rules while retaining runtime and authentication validation. Update the served platform guide.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 14:12:14 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 665c155472 Merge master and preserve qualified runner paths
Retain both hosted cache scopes. Use shared test-home teardown and restore owned directory permissions for the observed Mac ENOTEMPTY failure while keeping unrelated errors visible.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 13:42:01 -05:00
7df517d18f perf(build): reuse a current Runner build in the server's prepare:runner-vendor step (#15926)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Its CI runs a `Build` job on every pull request. That job runs `pnpm
build` and then verifies the public npm install. Since the server test
shards got faster, `Build` is the slowest check in most runs (419-497s
on the six fully green `master` runs created 2026-10-11 19:46Z to
20:17Z).
> - Inside `pnpm build`, the server package is the last package to
build. Its first step, `prepare:runner-vendor`, runs the full build of
`@paperclipai/paperclip-runner` so the server can vendor
`packages/paperclip-runner/dist`. In `pnpm -r build` that package was
built seconds earlier by the same command. The second build took 12-16s
on those six runs and sits on the critical path of the job.
> - The step cannot just be removed. A standalone `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server build` (the Dockerfile's path) must produce a
current vendored Runner on its own.
> - This pull request keeps that guarantee and skips only the build that
is provably redundant. The Runner's `build` records a digest of its
inputs, captured before its first step and confirmed after its last,
together with a manifest of every file it left under `dist`. The
server's `prepare:runner-vendor` reuses the build when the digest
matches, the stamp is for this platform, and every recorded output is
still there at its recorded size. Any other state runs the same full
Runner build as before.
> - The benefit is 12-16s off the `Build` job and off every other `pnpm
build` (the Canary Dry Run's `release.sh` build, local builds), with no
change to what a standalone server build produces. The PR's own first
run measured it: the server step reused the build in 56ms where `master`
runs rebuilt for 11-15s.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

No GitHub issue exists for this. The description below follows the
enhancement template.

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The server build's `prepare:runner-vendor` step, which builds
`@paperclipai/paperclip-runner` so the server can vendor its `dist`.

**Subsystem affected**

Build and CI (`server/package.json`,
`packages/paperclip-runner/package.json`, the `Build` job).

**Current behavior**

`prepare:runner-vendor` runs the Runner's full `build` every time.
Inside `pnpm -r build`, the Runner was already built by the same command
20 to 25 seconds earlier, with every check passing. On six fully green
`master` runs (2026-10-11, 19:46Z to 20:17Z) the repeated build took
11.8s to 15.9s, measured from the `server build$ pnpm run
prepare:runner-vendor` log line to the Runner's `Finished release
profile` line. The server package builds last, so that time is on the
critical path of `Build`, which is the slowest check in most pull
request runs.

**Proposed behavior**

- The Runner's `build` starts with `node scripts/record-build-inputs.mjs
--begin` and ends with `node scripts/record-build-inputs.mjs --finish`.
`--begin` removes the previous stamp and records a digest of every build
input before the first step reads anything. `--finish`, after every step
and check has passed, recomputes the digest and writes
`packages/paperclip-runner/node_modules/.cache/paperclip-runner-build-inputs.json`
only if the inputs are still the ones the build began with, together
with the path and size of every file under `dist`. A stamp therefore
exists only for a build that completed every step on inputs that did not
move while it ran.
- The server's `prepare:runner-vendor` becomes `node
scripts/prepare-runner-vendor.mjs`. It reuses the build if the stamp is
for this platform and architecture, every recorded output is still there
at its recorded size, and the recomputed digest matches. In every other
case it removes the stamp and runs `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/paperclip-runner build`, the exact command the step ran
before.
- `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_VENDOR_REBUILD=1` forces the rebuild.

**Reason and benefit**

12-16s off the `Build` job and off every other `pnpm build` (the Canary
Dry Run's `release.sh` build, local builds), with no change to what a
standalone `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build` produces.

**Breaking changes**

None. The rebuild path runs the same command as before. A fresh
checkout, a changed input, a missing or truncated output, an edit that
landed during the build, or a stamp from another platform always
rebuilds.

## What Changed

- `packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/build-inputs.mjs` (new): defines
the input set, the digest, the output manifest and the reuse decision.
Inputs are every file under `packages/paperclip-runner` except `dist`,
`dist-browser`, `runner/target`, `node_modules` and dot-directories;
every file under `packages/paperclip-eval-kernel` except `dist` and
`node_modules` (the Runner's `build:typescript` builds it first); every
file under the root `patches` directory (`check:acpx-profiles` hashes
`acpx@0.13.1.patch`, and `build-verified-provider-entrypoints.mjs`
copies the `pi-acp` and `brace-expansion` patches into
`dist/cli/pi-provision-inputs`); and the root `package.json`,
`pnpm-lock.yaml`, `pnpm-workspace.yaml` and `tsconfig.base.json`. The
toolchain pins are inside the package (`rust-toolchain.toml`,
`runner/Cargo.lock`) and the TypeScript version is in the lockfile, so
both are covered. A symlink is hashed as its target path and is not
followed. Outputs are every file under `dist`, the tree the server
copies wholesale, recorded with their sizes. Exports `beginRunnerBuild`,
`recordRunnerBuild` and `assessRunnerBuild` (returns `current` plus a
stable reason code: `no_stamp`, `schema_mismatch`, `platform_mismatch`,
`missing_output`, `outputs_changed`, `inputs_changed`,
`inputs_unchanged`).
- `packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/record-build-inputs.mjs` (new): the
two phases, `--begin` and `--finish`, added as the first and last step
of the Runner's `build` in `packages/paperclip-runner/package.json`.
Each build chain has its own pending record under
`node_modules/.cache/paperclip-runner-build-inputs.pending/`, named
after the shell pnpm runs the chain in (the parent of both phases;
`--finish` also accepts a record named after its own pid, for a shell
that execs the last command of the chain), so two Runner builds running
at once in one checkout do not consume each other's record. `--finish`
without a pending record for its chain is an error, so the chain cannot
silently lose its first step; `--finish` after an edit that landed
mid-build prints `not recorded: inputs changed while the build ran` and
leaves no stamp. Records of builds that never finished are pruned by the
next `--begin` after a day.
- `server/scripts/prepare-runner-vendor.mjs` (new): the reuse-or-rebuild
step. It resolves the pnpm that is running it through `npm_execpath`
with the same rule as the CLI's `resolvePnpmInstallInvocation` (a
JavaScript entry runs through this Node, a native executable runs
directly, otherwise `pnpm` on PATH). It prints one
`paperclip.runner-vendor.timing.v1` line with `action`, `reason`,
`check_ms` and `build_ms`, so the saving is measured on this PR's own
`Build` job.
- `server/package.json`: `prepare:runner-vendor` now runs that script.
The `build` and `typecheck` scripts are unchanged.
- `server/src/__tests__/server-package-build-script.test.ts`: pins the
new indirection and the command behind it (imported from the script, so
the Dockerfile's standalone path stays pinned), and a new test asserts
the Runner's `build` starts with `--begin`, ends with `--finish`, and
has exactly those two record steps.
- Tests: `packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/build-inputs.test.mjs`
(node:test, added to `test:typescript:prep`) and
`server/scripts/prepare-runner-vendor.test.mjs` (vitest, in the server
lane).
- `doc/DEVELOPING.md`: a "Reused Runner build in the server build"
section under Test Commands.

## Review findings on the first head, all fixed in
[2d57542](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/15926/commits/2d575425977f87b4612222d0a1961bc9cc5ba569)

Greptile scored the first head 2/5 with three P1 findings. All three
were valid.

| Finding | Fix |
| --- | --- |
| **Patch edits leave stale output.** The root patch files the build
reads were not in the digest. | Every file under the root `patches`
directory is an input. Tests assert the patches are in the input list
and that editing the pi-acp patch, the acpx patch, or adding a patch
changes the digest. |
| **Missing helpers pass the build.** Only four outputs were checked, so
a `dist` that lost `dist/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.cjs` still counted as
current. | `--finish` records the path and size of every file under
`dist`; reuse requires all of them intact and reports `outputs_changed`
naming the first missing or resized file. Schema bumped to
`paperclip.runner-build-inputs.v2` so an older stamp is rejected. Tests
cover a deleted helper, a truncated helper, and the server step
rebuilding on `outputs_changed`. |
| **New edits count as compiled.** The digest was hashed after the
build, so a source edited while `build:binary` ran was recorded as
compiled. | The build is bracketed: `--begin` captures the digest before
the first step, `--finish` compares after the last and writes nothing if
it moved. Tests cover the mid-build edit, the undisturbed build, and the
CLI in both orders. |

## Review finding on the second head, fixed in the third commit

Greptile scored the second head 4/5 with one P1, valid: two Runner
builds running at once in one checkout (server `build` beside
`typecheck`) shared one pending record, so the second `--begin`
overwrote it, the first `--finish` consumed it, and the second
`--finish` threw `no pending build inputs` after every step of its build
had passed. Reproduced on the second head's module: two
`beginRunnerBuild`, then the first `recordRunnerBuild` records and the
second throws.

| Finding | Fix |
| --- | --- |
| **Overlapping builds fail each other.** One pending file for every
build chain. | One record per chain, named after the shell pnpm runs the
chain in: `--begin` sees it as its parent, and so does `--finish`,
unless the shell execs the last command of the chain (bash can), in
which case `--finish` is that shell and finds the record under its own
pid. Pending records of builds that never finished are pruned after a
day. An edit between two overlapping starts leaves no stamp whichever
build finishes last: the build that began before the edit reports
`inputs_changed_during_build` and removes the stamp the other wrote, so
a stamp always means every build that wrote `dist` read the inputs it
names. Tests: both finishing orders with and without an edit, the
pruning, a `--finish` that cannot use another chain's record, and two
real `sh -c` chains (plus one under `bash`) held open at the same time,
both recording. On the real repo, two `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/paperclip-runner build` chains started 8s apart with a
cargo stand-in both recorded (`files=1223 outputs=1434`) and left the
pending directory empty. |

## Measured on this PR's runs

The `Build` job ran `pnpm build` from the branch, so both builds of the
Runner in that job used the new chain.

First head (c23faab, run 38175281058), against the four fully green
`master` runs created 20:41Z to 21:37Z the same evening:

| | PR run 38175281058 | `master`, four runs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Runner build inside `pnpm -r build` | 55.3s | 47.3-62.0s |
| Server step `prepare:runner-vendor` |
`action:reuse,reason:inputs_unchanged,check_ms:56,build_ms:0` | full
Runner rebuild, 11.0-14.8s |
| Server package build | 29.7s | 32.3-43.5s |
| `pnpm build` step | 114s | 102-135s |
| `Build` job | 411s | 409-474s |

Second head (2d57542, run 38178686999), against the two fully green
`master` runs created in the same half hour (38178951607 and
38180574768):

| | PR run 38178686999 | `master`, two runs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Runner build inside `pnpm -r build` | 53.9s (`begin:` 22:03:04,
`recorded:` 22:03:57, digest 460e02616081 over 1231 files and 1434
outputs) | 62.2s, 64.6s |
| Server step `prepare:runner-vendor` |
`action:reuse,reason:inputs_unchanged,check_ms:109,build_ms:0` | full
Runner rebuild, 14.5s, 15.2s |
| Server package build | 27.4s | 43.5s, 44.8s |
| `pnpm build` step | 106s | 91s, 95s to the Runner's end plus the rest;
127s, 135s in all |
| `Build` job | 405s | 461s, 479s |

The rebuild is gone from the server build on both heads, and the check
costs 56-109ms where `master` rebuilds for 11-15s; the rest of the
spread between runs is runner speed on the `runs-on` fleet. The third
commit changes nothing on the reuse path: it only changes where the
pending record lives between `--begin` and `--finish`.

## Verification

- `node --test packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/build-inputs.test.mjs`:
11 tests, three consecutive runs clean. Two builds at once in one
checkout each keep their own pending record and both record, in either
finishing order; with an edit between their starts the build that began
before it leaves no stamp whichever finishes last. A build's start
prunes records older than a day and no others. A `--finish` cannot use
another chain's record. Two chains run by separate `sh -c` shells at the
same time (and one under `bash`) both record and leave the pending
directory empty. The input set is exactly the sources, the eval kernel,
the root patches and the root config, and skips outputs and caches. The
output manifest lists every file under `dist` with its size and nothing
outside it. The digest is stable across reads, does not change when
`dist`, `dist-browser`, `node_modules`, `.vite` or `runner/target`
change, and does change for a Runner source, a Rust source, an
eval-kernel source, the pi-acp patch, the acpx patch, a new patch, the
lockfile, the base tsconfig, a new file and a rename. A symlink changes
the digest but its target's files are not read. A build is current only
with a matching v2 stamp, the same platform and architecture, the four
named outputs present, and every recorded output intact (a deleted or
truncated helper is `outputs_changed`; a file the build did not produce
may appear). An input edited between `--begin` and `--finish` leaves no
stamp and removes the pending record; the next build records normally.
`--finish` without `--begin`, or after a build that left a required
output missing, throws and leaves no stamp. The CLI brackets the build
for the package it is pointed at, reports a mid-build edit, and rejects
`--finish` first, both flags, neither flag, and unknown arguments.
- `vitest run scripts/prepare-runner-vendor.test.mjs
src/__tests__/server-package-build-script.test.ts` in `server/`: 21
tests. The decision reuses a current build, rebuilds a stale one, and
rebuilds a current one only when `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_VENDOR_REBUILD=1`.
The pnpm resolver covers a JavaScript entry, a native executable, a
Windows executable, no `npm_execpath`, and npm's `npm_execpath`. With an
injected build command: a current stamp runs nothing and prints
`action:reuse`; changed inputs run the exact command from `server/` with
the stale stamp already removed; a lost
`dist/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.cjs` rebuilds with
`reason:outputs_changed`; a failing build returns its status and leaves
no stamp. End to end, the CLI with a stand-in `pnpm` on PATH that
brackets its build the way the real one does rebuilds on the first call,
reuses on the second, rebuilds after a source change, rebuilds after a
lost output, and reuses again. The guard test asserts
`prepare:runner-vendor` is the new script, the rebuild command is still
`pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner build`, the server build
still starts with the step, and the Runner's `build` starts with
`--begin` and ends with `--finish` with exactly two record steps; it
fails against the previous build script on its first assertion.
- Real repo, this checkout, with `cargo` and `pnpm` stand-ins on PATH
(no Rust toolchain here; the stand-in writes the one file
`stage-runner-binary.mjs` copies): `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/paperclip-runner build` ran the complete chain through the
real nested pnpm (every TypeScript step and check, the stand-in cargo,
the binary staging, the two binary-reading checks) and recorded
`files=1223 bytes=18735059 outputs=1434`; the stamp is 128 KB. `pnpm run
prepare:runner-vendor` in `server/` then printed
`action:reuse,reason:inputs_unchanged,check_ms:222,build_ms:0`.
Appending a newline to `patches/pi-acp@0.0.33.patch` made the assessment
`inputs_changed`; truncating or deleting
`dist/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.cjs` or
`dist/cli/opencode-app-server-proxy.cjs` made it `outputs_changed` in
1-5ms; restoring each made it current again. `--begin`, an edit to
`src/index.ts`, then `--finish` printed `not recorded: inputs changed
while the build ran` and left no stamp.
- The whole check on the real set (1223 inputs, 18 MB; 1434 outputs)
takes 165-227ms on this host and took 56ms on the CI runner; the output
manifest part is 1-5ms.
- Not run here: the real `cargo build`, and `pnpm build` end to end.
This PR's `Build` job runs `pnpm build` from the branch, so its log
carries the Runner's `begin:` and `recorded:` lines and the server
build's `paperclip.runner-vendor.timing.v1` line with the measured
result.

## Risks

- A build input outside the digest would let a stale Runner be vendored.
The digest covers the whole Runner package except its outputs, the eval
kernel the Runner builds first, the root patches, and the root files the
Runner's tsconfig and dependency graph read. The lockfile covers
dependency versions, and the pins inside the package cover the Rust
toolchain. An input missed here is a bug to fix by adding it to the set;
the fallback direction is always a rebuild, never a skip.
- The whole `patches` directory is an input, although the Runner build
reads three of its fourteen files. An edit to an unrelated patch
therefore costs one extra Runner rebuild, which is the safe direction
and avoids a hand-kept list of file names that could drift from the
scripts that read them.
- The stamp lives in `node_modules/.cache`, which pnpm does not manage
and `.gitignore` and `.dockerignore` already exclude. It is about 128 KB
with the output manifest. The Docker build has no stamp and no prior
Runner build, so it rebuilds exactly as before.
- A stamp is written only after the Runner's `build` passed every step
on inputs that did not change while it ran. The Runner's first step and
the prepare step both remove any existing stamp before a rebuild starts,
so a build that stops partway, or a build command that fails before its
first step, leaves no stamp.
- `node scripts/record-build-inputs.mjs --finish` on its own is an
error; the script is only meant to run as the two ends of the `build`
chain, and the guard test pins that.
- The pending record is keyed by the pid of the shell that runs the
chain. pnpm runs every script through a shell (`sh -c` on POSIX, `cmd`
on Windows), and both phases are children of that shell; a shell that
execs the last command of the chain is covered by matching the finishing
process's own pid too. A chain run some other way, with the two phases
under different parents, fails loudly at `--finish` rather than
recording. Two builds running at once still write the same `dist`, which
no stamp can make safe; what the record guarantees is that a stamp is
written only by a build whose own inputs did not move.
- The platform and architecture are part of the comparison, so a stamp
from another machine is never trusted; an older v1 stamp is rejected by
schema.
- The Typecheck job builds the Runner once, through this step, with no
prior `pnpm -r build`, so it gains nothing and loses nothing: there is
no stamp and it rebuilds as before.
- The step now spawns pnpm through `npm_execpath` instead of relying on
`pnpm` being on PATH, because under corepack the script shell has no
`pnpm`. Outside a pnpm script it still falls back to `pnpm` on PATH.

## Model Used

- Claude (Anthropic), model id `claude-fable-5-1` (Claude Fable 5.1),
extended thinking, with tool use (shell, file editing, GitHub CLI) in a
Paperclip agent session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 11:25:24 -07:00
0ea8ebd040 fix(test): make the vitest home teardown remove read-only runtime-context bundles (#15931)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Its CI runs the server test suite as twelve `General tests (server
(n/12))` shards on every pull request. Each shard worker gets its own
throwaway `PAPERCLIP_HOME` from
`server/src/__tests__/setup-supertest.ts`, which removes it with a
recursive `rmSync` at worker exit.
> - That removal has been failing now and then with `EACCES, Permission
denied: /tmp/.../paperclip-vitest-home-...` after every test file in the
shard passed (four shard jobs on 2026-10-11 between 14:10Z and 22:10Z,
on four different branches, each attributed to
`native-session-resumption.test.ts` because that file was running in the
worker at exit). Vitest reports it as an unhandled error and fails the
shard, so the job has to be re-run, which costs a full shard (four to
six minutes) on the run's critical path.
> - The directory it cannot remove is one a native session leaves
behind: runtime-context bundles are published under the instance root
(`$PAPERCLIP_HOME/instances/<id>/runtime-context-assets/bundles/<digest>`)
and every directory in them is made read-only by design
(`makeDirectoriesReadOnly` in
`services/native-runtime/runtime-context.ts`). A file inside a read-only
directory cannot be unlinked, so the recursive removal stops with
`EACCES`. Whether such a bundle is under the worker's home at exit
depends on timing: suites set and restore `PAPERCLIP_HOME` for their own
fixtures, and a heartbeat that is still finishing when the worker exits
can publish its bundle under whichever home is current.
> - The teardown is the right place to fix this: the bundle is read-only
on purpose, and the test home is throwaway. On a permission error the
teardown now makes every directory in the tree writable and removes it
again.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

No GitHub issue exists for this. The description below follows the bug
report template.

**What happened?**

A `General tests (server (n/12))` shard fails after all its test files
passed:

```
Vitest caught 1 unhandled error during the test run.
Error: EACCES, Permission denied: /tmp/pv-k2snZS/t/paperclip-vitest-home-qANo1F
 ❯ Object.rmSync node:fs:1282:18
 ❯ process.<anonymous> server/src/__tests__/setup-supertest.ts:32:31
This error originated in "server/src/__tests__/native-session-resumption.test.ts" test file.
 Test Files  74 passed (74)
      Tests  3226 passed | 1 skipped (3227)
     Errors  1 error
```

Seen on 2026-10-11 in the first attempt of run 38146108750 (server
(11/12)), run 38150787810 (server (11/12)), run 38178832013 (server
(12/12), branch `fix/windows-opencode-utf8`) and run 38179110043 (server
(11/12), branch `fix/sentry-timeout-assertion-event-id`). The re-run of
the same job passes every time.

**Expected behavior**

A shard whose tests all passed is green. The per-worker test home is
removed at exit whatever a finishing run left in it.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create a directory tree with a read-only directory inside it, the way
`makeDirectoriesReadOnly` publishes a runtime-context bundle: `mkdir -p
home/bundle && touch home/bundle/SKILL.md && chmod 555 home/bundle`.
2. Remove it the way the setup file did: `node -e
"require('fs').rmSync('home', { recursive: true, force: true })"`.
3. The removal throws `EACCES` and leaves the tree behind. The new
`removeTestHome` removes it.

**Paperclip version or commit**

`master` at bfe7c6357.

**Deployment mode**

CI (`pr-trusted.yml`, the general server shards on the `runs-on` fleet);
the same removal runs on every local `pnpm test` in `server/`.

## What Changed

- `server/src/__tests__/remove-test-home.ts` (new):
`removeTestHome(home)` runs the same recursive `rmSync` as before
(`force`, eight retries); on `EACCES` or `EPERM` it walks the tree, adds
owner read, write and search to every directory (`lstat`, so a symlink
is not followed and nothing outside the home is touched), and removes
the tree again. Any other error, and a second failure, still throw.
- `server/src/__tests__/setup-supertest.ts`: the exit handler calls
`removeTestHome` instead of `rmSync` directly.
- `server/src/__tests__/remove-test-home.test.ts` (new): a home with a
runtime-context bundle whose directories and files are read-only fails
the plain `rmSync` with `EACCES` (asserted, so the test documents the
failure it fixes) and is removed by `removeTestHome`; an ordinary home
is removed and a missing one is tolerated; a symlink out of the home is
not followed, so a read-only directory it points at keeps its mode and
its file.

### Review fix (second commit)

- Greptile (P1): the symlink test ran on Windows without a guard, where
`chmod` only toggles the read-only attribute (so the `0o555` assertion
cannot hold) and a directory symlink can need elevated privileges. The
test is now `it.skipIf(process.platform === "win32")`, the guard the
suite's other permission tests use; the first test already guarded its
`rmSync` assertion the same way.

## Verification

- `vitest run src/__tests__/remove-test-home.test.ts` in `server/`: 3
tests pass (three consecutive runs on the second commit). The first one
fails against a `removeTestHome` that only calls `rmSync` (it throws
`EACCES` on the read-only bundle). There is no Windows job in this
repo's CI, so the skip is verified by reading `os.chmod` semantics on
Windows plus the guard pattern already in the suite.
- `vitest run src/__tests__/env-file-policy.test.ts` in `server/`, which
loads the changed setup file: passes, and the worker exits clean.
`native-session-resumption.test.ts` itself could not be loaded in the
workspace this was written in (the AI SDK's default OpenAI provider
rejects that sandbox's empty base URL at import time, before any test
runs), so the server shards on this PR's own run are the check for that
file.
- The three files typecheck under the server's `tsconfig.json` options
(`tsc --noEmit` on a config that includes only them, since the server
project excludes `src/__tests__`).
- The CI failure itself is timing-dependent and was not reproduced on
demand; the fix is to the teardown, which now removes the tree the
failing runs left behind, as the new test shows.
- First commit's CI run (38183149920): every check green on the first
attempt, including all twelve server shards.

## Risks

- The teardown makes directories writable only under the throwaway test
home, only after a permission error, and only through `lstat` (symlinks
are not followed), so it cannot reach into a developer's real
`~/.paperclip` or any directory the home links to.
- A home the teardown still cannot remove (an entry owned by another
user, for instance) throws as before, so a real permission problem stays
visible.
- The underlying timing, a run still publishing a bundle while the
worker exits, is unchanged; this PR makes the teardown correct for what
such a run leaves behind rather than changing how runs are drained,
which is a larger change to the test harness.

## Model Used

- Claude (Anthropic), model id `claude-fable-5-1` (Claude Fable 5.1),
extended thinking, with tool use (shell, file editing, GitHub CLI) in a
Paperclip agent session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 11:25:16 -07:00
a96329dfa2 fix(test): stop the Sentry timeout assertion matching a random event id (#15929)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Every pull request runs the `Sentry SDK contract` workflow, whose
one job installs the real `@sentry/node` outside the workspace and runs
`server/src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts` to prove that
run-failure reports never carry provider output or credentials.
> - One of its assertions checks that the captured events do not contain
the provider's stderr canary `<html>504 Gateway Time-out
private-timeout-credential-canary</html>`, by matching the serialized
events against `/private-timeout-|<html>|504|Timed out after/`.
> - The bare `504` alternative also matches a Sentry event id. On pull
request #15926 (a build-script change that does not touch this code) the
job failed because that run's event id was
`f353d184e5504ee39db611f2e60f49ff`; the re-run passed. About 0.7% of
random 32-character hex ids contain `504`, and the test serializes two
events, so roughly one job in seventy fails for no reason.
> - This pull request narrows that alternative to `504 Gateway`, which
still catches the canary with or without its HTML wrapper and cannot
match a hex id.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

No GitHub issue exists for this. The description below follows the bug
report template.

**Pre-submission checklist**

- [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a
duplicate.
- [x] I am on the latest released version of Paperclip (or can reproduce
on `master`).
- [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip itself — not in
my agent adapter, API provider, or local configuration.

**What happened?**

The `Sentry SDK contract` job (`Real Sentry SDK isolation`) failed on
pull request #15926 at head 2d57542, run 38178686828 attempt 1, in
`run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts > captures an early OpenCode
timeout without inventing a deadline or exporting provider output`:

```
AssertionError: expected '[{"exception":{"values":[{"type":"Err…' not to match /private-timeout-|<html>|504|Timed out after/
```

The serialized events contained no provider output. The match was the
event id `f353d184e5504ee39db611f2e60f49ff`, which contains `504`. The
pull request changes build scripts only, and the same job passed on its
previous head and on the re-run of this one.

**Expected behavior**

The assertion fails only when a captured event carries the stderr canary
or a `Timed out after` message, never because of the random event id
Sentry assigns.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. On `master`, run `node -e
'console.log(/private-timeout-|<html>|504|Timed out
after/.test(JSON.stringify([{event_id:"f353d184e5504ee39db611f2e60f49ff"}])))'`.
It prints `true`.
2. Run the `Sentry SDK contract` job repeatedly; about one run in
seventy draws an event id containing `504` and fails on that assertion.

**Paperclip version or commit**

`master` at bfe7c63.

**Deployment mode**

Other (CI, GitHub Actions)

**Installation method**

Built from source (pnpm dev / pnpm build)

**Agent adapter(s) involved**

- [x] Not adapter-specific (core bug)

**Database mode**

Not database-related

**Access context**

Unclear / not applicable

**Node.js version**

24 (the workflow's `actions/setup-node` version)

**Operating system**

ubuntu-latest (GitHub-hosted runner)

**Relevant logs or output**

```
 ❯ src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts (11 tests | 1 failed) 2571ms
   × captures an early OpenCode timeout without inventing a deadline or exporting provider output 510ms
AssertionError: expected '[{"exception":{"values":[{"type":"Err…' not to match /private-timeout-|<html>|504|Timed out after/
"[{\"exception\":{\"values\":[{\"type\":\"Error\",\"value\":\"OpenCode execution timed out\",\"mechanism\":{\"type\":\"generic\",\"handled\":true}}]},\"event_id\":\"f353d184e5504ee39db611f2e60f49ff\", ...
```

**Relevant config (if applicable)**

None.

**Additional context**

The assertion was added in #15789. The fixture's stderr is `<html>504
Gateway Time-out private-timeout-credential-canary</html>`, so `<html>`
and `private-timeout-` already cover it; `504 Gateway` keeps a third,
independent check on the status text itself.

**Privacy checklist**

- [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for PII (usernames, file paths,
API keys, tokens, company names) and redacted where necessary.

## What Changed

- `server/src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts`: the
forbidden-substring assertion matches `504 Gateway` instead of `504`.
One line.

## Verification

- With the real SDK installed outside the workspace the way the workflow
does it (`npm install --prefix <tmp> @sentry/node@10.71.0`, `NODE_PATH`
pointing at it, `PAPERCLIP_REQUIRE_SENTRY_TEST_SDK=1`), `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts` passes 11/11 on three
consecutive runs.
- The failing run's payload against both patterns: the old regex matches
it (`true`), the new one does not (`false`). The stderr canary with its
HTML wrapper and the bare `504 Gateway Time-out` both still match the
new regex.
- 100,000 random 32-character hex ids: 0.73% contain `504`; none can
contain `504 Gateway`.

## Risks

- The assertion no longer catches a leaked `504` that appears without
`Gateway` after it. The fixture's canary always carries `Gateway`, and
the `<html>` and `private-timeout-` alternatives cover the same leak
independently, so the test's purpose is unchanged.

## Model Used

- Claude (Anthropic), model id `claude-fable-5-1` (Claude Fable 5.1),
extended thinking, with tool use (shell, file editing, GitHub CLI) in a
Paperclip agent session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-12 11:25:09 -07:00
Devin Foley 4f399cec9f fix(docker): skip the full-tree ownership walk on routine boots (#15992)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The Docker image keeps all instance state under `PAPERCLIP_HOME`,
and deployments mount a volume there
> - Before it drops privileges, the entrypoint makes sure that the
`node` user owns the home (#10530)
> - The ownership probe is a first-mismatch `find` over the whole tree.
When ownership is correct, `-quit` never fires, so every boot stats
every file on the volume
> - On homes with many agent worktrees and `node_modules` trees, this
walk takes minutes before Node starts. That is close to common 300s
healthcheck windows
> - This pull request keeps a cheap shallow probe on every boot. It runs
the full-tree probe only once per volume and node UID/GID, and records
the result in a marker file
> - The benefit is that routine boots no longer scale with the file
count, and the original root-owned-volume fix stays in place

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #10431 (the open follow-up about the remaining cost of the
ownership walk). Related: #10530 (the change that added the full-tree
probe).

**What happened?**
On a hosted multi-instance deployment, we measured the time from
container start to the first app log line. Instances with many files on
the volume (agent worktrees with `node_modules`) took about 190-235s.
Small instances took 5-22s. One 30 GB volume with few files took 24s, so
the cost follows the file count, not the volume size. Almost all of this
time is the `find "$home_dir" \( ! -user node -o ! -group node \) -print
-quit` walk in `scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh`. When ownership is already
correct, `-quit` never fires, so the walk stats every inode on every
boot.

**Expected behavior**
When ownership is already correct, the entrypoint pre-start phase is
short and does not depend on the number of files in `PAPERCLIP_HOME`. A
fresh root-owned volume, a UID/GID remap, and an upgrade from an older
image are still repaired before the privilege drop.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run the image with a volume on `/paperclip` that holds a few hundred
thousand files, all owned by `node:node`.
2. Restart the container.
3. Compare the container start time with the first server log line. The
gap grows with the file count, even though no `chown` runs.

**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at a9830414c7

**Deployment mode**
Docker production image (any platform that mounts a volume on
`PAPERCLIP_HOME`)

## What Changed

- `scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh`: the ownership probe is now tiered.
- Every boot runs a shallow probe (`find -maxdepth 3`) over the home and
its first three levels. A fresh root-owned mount and a UID/GID remap
both change the owner of the home directory, so this probe catches them.
- The full-tree probe runs only when
`PAPERCLIP_HOME/.paperclip-ownership-verified` is missing or records a
different node UID/GID (format `v1 <uid>:<gid>`). This catches deep
mismatches, including the first boot after an upgrade from an older
image.
- Any mismatch repairs the whole tree with `chown -R node:node`, as
before. After a clean probe or a repair, the entrypoint writes the
marker as the `node` user (through `gosu`), so the marker never trips
the shallow probe. A failed marker write is ignored: the only cost is a
full probe on the next boot. If `find` exits non-zero without a mismatch
(for example, an I/O error), the walk is incomplete, so the entrypoint
does not write the marker and the next boot probes again.
- `scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh`: timestamped log lines at entrypoint
start, around the full probe and the repair (with durations), and right
before the `exec` of the server. You can now measure the pre-start phase
from the container log.
- `server/src/__tests__/docker-entrypoint.test.ts`: the `find` stub now
tells the shallow probe from the full probe. New tests cover each path
(see Verification).
- `doc/DOCKER.md`: documents the marker, how to force a full check, and
the new log lines.

## Verification

- `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/docker-entrypoint.test.ts
src/__tests__/container-init-reaping.test.ts
src/__tests__/docker-build-stamp.test.ts`: 40 passed. New cases:
- correct ownership + current marker → shallow probe only, no full walk,
no `chown`
- current marker + deep-only mismatch → full walk skipped (this is the
documented trade-off)
- no marker (upgrade) → one full walk, no `chown`, marker written as `v1
1000:1000`
- no marker + deep mismatch → full walk finds it, `chown -R`, marker
written
- root-owned top level with a current marker → `chown -R` without a full
walk
- full walk fails without a mismatch → no `chown`, no marker, retry
logged
- marker for another UID/GID → full walk runs again, marker rewritten as
`v1 1001:1001`
- timestamped `starting`, `ownership repair finished in Ns`, and
`starting app as node` lines, in order, before the command runs
- The new tests fail against the old script. The 11 existing tests pass
unchanged.
- `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit`: passes.
- `shellcheck -s sh scripts/docker-entrypoint.sh`: clean. `dash -n`:
syntax OK.
- Manual run with the real `find` (BSD find, script run under `dash`)
against a 200k-file tree. Only `id`/`usermod`/`groupmod`/`chown`/`gosu`
were stubbed, and `node` was mapped to the local user and group:
- boot 1, no marker, one deep group mismatch → full probe, `chown -R`,
marker written
  - boot 2, marker present → no full probe, no `chown`
- boot 3, no marker, clean tree → full probe, no `chown`, marker written
  - boot 4, marker present, clean → no full probe, no `chown`
  - boot 5, top-level group mismatch with marker → `chown -R`
- I did not build the image or measure boot time in a container. Docker
was not available on the machine I used. On a warm local disk the full
walk is sub-second, so the local timings say nothing about cold network
block storage.

## Risks

- Once the marker is current, a mismatch deeper than three levels is not
detected automatically. Examples: files written as root by `docker exec`
or a restore run as root, after the first verified boot. Before this
change, those files were repaired on the next boot. The workaround is in
`doc/DOCKER.md`: delete the marker and restart. A remap, a fresh volume,
and a root-owned top level are still detected on every boot.
- On the first boot after an upgrade, each existing volume pays one full
walk (the same cost as today). Later boots skip it.
- The marker is a new dotfile in `PAPERCLIP_HOME`. Backups and copies
that include the home carry it along. This is safe, because the marker
records the UID/GID that it verified, and a different UID/GID forces a
new full probe.
- The non-root path (restricted PodSecurity, OpenShift) does not change,
apart from two new stdout log lines.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`, 1M context) via Claude Code, with
tool use (shell, file editing). Default reasoning mode.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-10-12 10:22:43 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip a2ac5c2715 refactor(chat): isolate Telegram, Slack, GitHub and Discord workflows (#15976)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Chat channels connect that work to external conversations.
> - The shared chat service still contains provider-specific workflows.
> - Those workflows are hard to inspect in a 34,000-line file.
> - This stack extracts Telegram, Slack, GitHub and Discord workflows
into their channel folders.
> - Shared authorization and service lifetime remain explicit.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15823, #15834, #15836, #15844 and #15845. Root of the second
behavior-preserving channel-folder refactor stack. The dependent PRs
#15979, #15981, #15985 and #15987 have merged into this branch; this PR
lands all five extractions on master.

## What Changed

- Move Telegram maintenance and subscription repair into
`chat-channels/telegram/maintenance.ts`.
- Move Slack session stopping and task starts into
`chat-channels/slack/session-stop.ts` and `task-start.ts`.
- Move GitHub webhook intake and recovery into
`chat-channels/github/webhook-ingress.ts`.
- Move Discord command registration and handling into
`chat-channels/discord/commands.ts`.
- Share type-only runtime records while preserving shared authorization,
transactions, live lease checks and worker ownership.
- Reduce the original service from 34,603 to 29,897 lines, removing
4,706 lines (13.6%).

## Verification

- All 205 selected integration cases passed before and after their
respective extractions: Telegram 41, Slack session stop 2 multi-step
scenarios, GitHub 84, Slack task start 25 and Discord 53. Each dependent
PR records its focused reproduction command.
- Server typecheck, module boundaries and whitespace checks passed.
- Per-slice syntax comparisons passed for moved declarations and
remaining service statements, allowing only the documented live callback
substitutions.
- Tests exercise the public service with disposable databases and
fixture provider transports. They do not claim live third-party
execution.
- Cumulative workspace typecheck and build passed on the final stack.
- Current-head CI passed on the combined stack commit
`d5b37dbe512e3e199932b6608cdc17639eda555a`; Greptile is 5/5 with no
unresolved threads.
- The [original serialized
shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38266518817/job/114870022249)
timed out in unchanged `adapter-auth-signal-routes.test.ts`. The exact
case passed locally without changes, and the [single job
retry](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38266518817/job/114874019933)
passed. The original timeout remains recorded.

Reproduce the original Telegram slice’s focused suite:

```sh
pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/chat-channels.integration.test.ts -t 'Telegram durable private draft Stop|Telegram maintenance|Telegram webhook|Telegram.*(pause|remove)|Telegram.*commands'
```

- Cumulative local `pnpm test:run` exited 1: the first server group had
**18,770 passed, 105 skipped, and one timeout** in unchanged
`server/src/services/workspace-git-snapshot-streaming.test.ts:56`
(300,000 ms on macOS). The fail-fast runner did not reach its later
workspace and serialized groups. An unchanged isolated rerun passed
using the existing timeout; this does not turn the original full run
green. The test and its Git utility code are outside this refactor; all
current-head CI jobs passed.
- Reproduce that diagnostic alone: `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/services/workspace-git-snapshot-streaming.test.ts`.

## Risks

- Credential lease ownership and provider-confirmation ordering must
remain unchanged. Existing rotation, lease-loss, recovery and durable
Stop cases pass.
- The channel factories create no workers or timers and preserve live
runtime, shutdown and gateway-ownership reads.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and repository tools. The
exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this
session. No separate agent was used.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 12:03:23 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 598e190cb3 test: bind installed native payloads and await saved state
Isolate actual Codex resolver fixtures from global bridge lookup and preserve host qualification blockers with literal evidence.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 11:45:22 -05:00
Dotta a9830414c7 Preserve repository dependencies when importing GitHub skills (#15731)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Its Skills library imports reusable instructions from GitHub.
> - Some skills depend on shared files and sibling skills outside their
folders.
> - Directory-only imports lose those dependencies.
> - This pull request keeps repository files together and lets users
select which skills appear in the library.
> - Agents receive the original files and paths through the existing
skill delivery system.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #14713. Related: #13656.

**Current behavior**

GitHub imports copy independent skill directories. Shared scripts,
policies, helper skills, and credit files can be omitted. One
shared-file error can block every skill.

**Proposed behavior**

New imports keep repository files together at the scanned commit. Show
all skills with their folders and select every skill by default.
Collapse individual package files. Omit unsupported or oversized files
with a warning. Import available content without repair choices or an
extra confirmation. Keep warnings on the saved source.

**Reason and benefit**

Skills can read their shared repository files after Paperclip delivers
them to an agent. Original instructions stay unchanged. Users can
inspect included files and understand omissions before and after import.

## What Changed

- Store immutable company-scoped repository snapshots and associate them
with skill versions. Regenerate the migration after merging master.
- Preserve original bytes, binary encoding, and executable modes.
Shared-file changes version each usable selected skill. Pinned versions
retain their original files.
- Deliver a discovery wrapper with the original tree under
`.paperclip-repository/`. Preserve invocation policy when present. Fork
and create-from-existing retain repository files.
- Keep repository files together for new UI imports. Show every skill,
select all by default, and collapse package files. Remove the
packaging-mode menu. Keep the mobile import footer visible.
- Warn about symlinks, submodules, oversized files, missing references,
and invalid optional manifests. A malformed skill remains selected with
a Needs setup warning. Usable skills still publish, and its original
file remains repository support content. Source warnings persist through
refresh. Unsafe execution and secret-disclosure findings omit the
affected files before snapshot publication.
- Expose saved repository files in the installed skill viewer, including
binary encoding and executable flags. Reads use the immutable
company-scoped snapshot; relative instruction links resolve from their
original repository directory.
- Audit delivered inventories and derive trust from all repository
files. Accept evaluation prose while retaining dynamic-execution
findings. Read blobs in one bounded Git batch and check budgets before
reading support files. Imports never execute setup commands.
- Add scanner, database, delivery, UI, and browser regressions. Update
Storybooks, screenshots, and documentation.

## Verification

- 69 focused scanner, Git snapshot, delivery, and PostgreSQL lifecycle
tests passed. They cover partial imports, warning persistence, missing
references, binary files, executable modes, copies, pinned versions,
cancellation, company isolation, and batched Git reads.
- 110 import, skill-detail, selection-tree, saved-file link, and
Markdown renderer tests passed. A file-switch regression failed before
the resolver fix and passed afterward. Browser walkthroughs cover the
all-selected open tree, repository preview, non-blocking warnings,
missing references, setup problems, warning persistence, and mobile
layout.
- Full workspace typecheck and build passed. Runner E2E TypeScript
checks and design-token gates passed. The full serial local suite was
attempted and stopped after over an hour. The existing 40,000-file Git
streaming stress test failed after 303 seconds on macOS; the broad local
suite is not counted as passed. All 55 applicable PR checks passed on
the final commit, including the full sharded CI suite. Two optional
Storybook workflows were skipped; the five local Storybook walkthroughs
passed.
- On October 12, live campaigns imported the private Poteto repository
through the production GitHub Sources UI, selected architect and bro,
and invoked them with native Codex on local and Daytona. The source
connection was disabled before invocation. Independent filesystem
inspections matched every supported Git blob, size, and executable mode.
Both tasks completed and cleanup passed. Campaigns:
`local-2026-10-12T15-07-39-504Z` (both environments),
`local-2026-10-12T16-08-39-682Z` (local), and
`local-2026-10-12T16-03-33-938Z` (Daytona). Each of the two selected
skills received all 234 supported repository files. Later changes only
affect the installed-file viewer and documentation. This qualifies skill
delivery and instruction reads, not every Poteto workflow or adapter.
- A manual source-checkout test drive imported a synthetic private
GitHub repository with a symlink, an oversized file, a missing
reference, and malformed skill metadata. Available skills published with
their shared checklist. The walkthrough found duplicate warning text
after import; the final UI fix removes that duplicate. The file viewer
exposes saved repository dependencies and resolves authored relative
links without changing the instructions. A follow-up live refresh
omitted unsafe helper files with warnings, preserved every safe file
byte, and survived a server restart.

Screenshots below use the production UI with Storybook fixtures. They do
not replace the live GitHub and runtime checks.

<details>
<summary>All skills visible and selected by default</summary>

![Default repository
import](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/skill-repository-packages/docs/pr-screenshots/pr-15731/repository-import.png?raw=true)

</details>

<details>
<summary>Import stays available with warnings</summary>

![Import
warnings](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/skill-repository-packages/docs/pr-screenshots/pr-15731/repository-warning-details.png?raw=true)

</details>

<details>
<summary>Repository file inspector</summary>

![Repository
files](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/skill-repository-packages/docs/pr-screenshots/pr-15731/repository-files.png?raw=true)

</details>

<details>
<summary>Mobile import</summary>

![Mobile
import](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/codex/skill-repository-packages/docs/pr-screenshots/pr-15731/repository-mobile.png?raw=true)

</details>

## Risks

- Each selected skill carries a repository copy in the runtime. The
database stores each snapshot once. Runtime transfer and storage
increase with the number of assigned skills.
- Runtime budgets remain: 9,990 repository entries, 1 MiB per file, and
61 MiB total. File omissions are recorded as warnings. Source-access or
download failures retain installed versions.
- Import success does not prove that every skill can run. Environment
dependencies, credentials, delegation tools, and schedules still need
configuration. Imported setup scripts are not executed.
- Live runtime coverage is native Codex on local and Daytona. Other
adapters use the shared delivery path but were not exercised in these
campaigns.

The roadmap marks Skills Manager as shipped. This extends the existing
importer. Related pull requests were checked.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with repository inspection, code
execution, automated tests, and browser tools. The exact deployment
identifier and context-window size were not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-10-12 11:30:20 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 123a188374 fix: separate Codex login and ARM host qualification
Keep daemon ABI admission separate from CLI login and preserve restricted Docker installation checks before native host startup.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 11:20:36 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 695506ad39 perf: cache native builds and verify Linux runtime targets
Preserve actual target selection, record the GNU libc baseline, and retain primary installed-startup failures for ARM qualification.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 10:53:24 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip ce08872dfb refactor(heartbeat): extract instruction working-copy lifecycle (#15984)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip runs agent tasks and preserves their managed agent files.
> - Heartbeat must prepare a private copy, collect stopped-provider
edits, and retain ownership during warm-session handoff.
> - That lifecycle is spread across preparation, adapter callbacks, and
cleanup.
> - A per-run controller can own the copy and receipt while the executor
retains teardown ordering.
> - This PR moves that coordination into a dedicated module.
> - Live getters preserve updated state and partially acquired
resources.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Maintenance of heartbeat instruction preparation. This is the second and
final PR in this batch, originally stacked on #15980. That dependency is
now merged; this PR is rebased onto its squash merge with an identical
patch and identical touched-file contents. Related-PR search found no
duplicate extraction.

**Current behavior**
After #15980, `heartbeat.ts` has 4,215 lines and 173,657 bytes. It
coordinates instruction-copy preparation, save receipts, warm handoffs,
and deferred cleanup inline.

**Proposed behavior**
`heartbeat/instruction-working-copy.ts` owns the per-run lifecycle in
233 lines. `heartbeat.ts` becomes 4,055 lines and 162,520 bytes. The
executor retains the outer release order, unavailable-copy reporting,
and environment/service cleanup policy.

**Reason and benefit**
The copy, save receipt, and warm ownership are readable together. The
remaining executor names preparation and dispatch phases without
obscuring teardown decisions.

**Breaking changes**
None intended. All 140 named public heartbeat exports remain unchanged.

## What Changed

- Extract copy preparation, save/checkpoint callbacks, warm
reservation/adoption, prompt guidance, and the deferred-release closure.
- Read the executor's current run row through a callback; expose current
copies, receipts, and acquired cleanup handles through live getters.
- Keep cleanup handles available after preparation failure, and preserve
release-before-retry on invalidated warm reuse.
- Add four public-path characterization tests with real disposable
PostgreSQL and files, plus four direct boundary tests.
- Add isolated browser acceptance with a real process that edits
instructions, completes its task, and reads the saved bytes on its next
task.
- Document the boundary and opt-in acceptance command.

## Verification

- **Before extraction:** four new public-path tests pass on the original
implementation, as do 108 existing
instruction-copy/directory/native-cleanup tests. The two-task browser
journey also passes on the baseline server.
- **After extraction:** all 112 baseline tests pass; all four new
boundary tests pass; 12 selected native-session ownership/retirement
cases pass (the other 670 cases were outside this focused selection).
- **Browser acceptance:** the fresh extracted-code server passes the
full two-task journey (25.9 seconds): real child-process edits,
saved/unchanged receipts, canonical bytes through the agent-file API,
next-task restore, completed task UI, and copy cleanup.
- `pnpm -r typecheck`, final server typecheck, and `pnpm build` pass.
Module-boundary and public-export checks pass.
- Normalized syntax comparison confirms all moved bodies and the
reconstructed executor match the base, accounting explicitly for live
run getters and delegation.
- Final rebased head: `a08872c97e587a21ffc0fc6b78f34b81e484e7b0`.
Combined entry-point and boundary regressions pass again (12/12); fresh
Greptile review is 5/5 with no findings. All 55 current-head checks pass
(two configured skips), including the hosted full-suite tests, build,
typecheck, and all eight browser shards. There are no open review
threads.

## Risks

- Acquisition can succeed before preparation throws. Boundary tests
verify that both the reservation and a transferred copy remain visible
to the cleanup owner.
- Callbacks can replace copy/save state during execution. Public tests
verify saved receipts; direct tests verify the current run row, warm
checkpoint receipt, and permission-root preservation.
- Missing edit authorization and cleanup failure must remain nonfatal.
Characterization tests revoke actual membership after dispatch admission
and inject a cleanup error while preserving the saved result.
- The browser uses a test-launcher-only instruction-capable wrapper
around the real process adapter. Production adapter capabilities are
unchanged. No live provider calls are made; native warm ownership is
covered by focused module and native-session tests rather than a live
provider browser run.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool
execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 10:52:32 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 1e0cfcb4fc test: retire redundant suites and consolidate owner coverage (#15978)
Retire duplicate ACPX and Codex proof after migrating unique assertions to their behavioral owners. Consolidate repeated fixtures and exact case matrices while preserving lifecycle, protocol, company, credential, approval, and ordering contracts. Remove the unused runtime-controls compatibility path and document test ownership and preservation evidence.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 10:44:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 94e4218310 refactor(heartbeat): extract runtime service coordination (#15980)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Heartbeat runs start workspace services and receive service reports
from adapters.
> - Service context updates and readiness notices are spread through the
executor.
> - These steps share a clear responsibility, while process and lease
ownership already live elsewhere.
> - This pull request puts service coordination in one module.
> - The executor retains the same dispatch and cleanup order.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Maintenance of heartbeat execution. This is the first of two final
focused extractions after #15973. Related #15653 changes runtime
callback origins; this PR preserves that policy.

**Current behavior**
`heartbeat.ts` has 4,372 lines and 178,459 bytes. It validates service
intents, starts services, persists adapter reports and primary URLs, and
posts readiness notices inline.

**Proposed behavior**
`heartbeat/runtime-services.ts` owns those steps in 212 lines.
`heartbeat.ts` becomes 4,215 lines and 173,657 bytes. Process registries
and leases stay in `workspace-runtime.ts`. The executor still releases
services in its original cleanup path.

**Reason and benefit**
Service coordination has named preparation and result phases. The
execution path is easier to read without changing service lifetime or
moving cleanup policy.

**Breaking changes**
None intended. All 140 named public heartbeat exports remain available,
including `postWorkspaceReadyComment`.

## What Changed

- Move service-intent validation, startup, adapter-result persistence,
and readiness notices into one module.
- Preserve mutable run context, primary URL selection, notice error
handling, and release ordering.
- Add four public-path tests using disposable PostgreSQL, real HTTP
service processes, and a fixture adapter.
- Extend browser recovery acceptance to fetch the actual service URL,
check the readiness notice, and verify listener cleanup.
- Update the module map and acceptance instructions.

## Verification

- Before extraction: all five tests pass, including the four new
characterization cases and existing notice formatting test.
- After extraction: all 17 tests pass across service coordination,
notice formatting, output recording, and runtime authorization.
- Structural comparison confirms that all moved bodies and the
reconstructed executor match the baseline. Module boundary checks pass.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass.
- Extended isolated browser acceptance: **2/2 pass** (3.7 minutes),
covering actual service readiness, recovery, bounded failure, and
cleanup. At `8e33e2032de681082f128470eb8ab0711b382afe`, all 55
current-head checks pass (two configured skips), including hosted
full-suite tests. Greptile is 5/5 with no findings or review threads.

## Risks

- Service context must be persisted before adapter dispatch and before
run completion. The tests inspect both phases and preserve the first
service URL when adapter reports arrive.
- Notice failures must remain nonfatal. The public-path test checks both
startup and result notices.
- Shared services must survive run cleanup; ephemeral services must stop
after success or failure. Tests use actual processes and HTTP requests.
- The fixture supplies UUID service report IDs, as required by the
database. The existing generated-ID fallback for reports without IDs is
outside this extraction.
- Test adapters and services are local fixtures; these tests make no
live provider calls.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool
execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 10:40:42 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip dcdf09a0f3 feat: include Linux ARM64 in native Codex runner targets
Ship a source-bound ARM64 daemon alongside Linux x64 and both Mac targets.
Use native hosted builds and the existing clean npm/native startup verifier.
Read target requirements from the immutable source to preserve historical
three-target promotions. Keep Codex payloads as official npm dependencies.

Resolve ARM64 creation and login through the shared platform contract. Share
the existing legacy CLI permission calculation with import previews without
changing execution behavior. Record targeted checks and live Mac evidence.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 10:13:34 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 914b70572c refactor(heartbeat): extract execution configuration (#15973)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Heartbeat turns task, agent, environment, and account settings into
an executable run.
> - The executor still assembles scoped credentials and skill
configuration inline between environment selection and session
preparation.
> - That phase has a clear input/output boundary, but credential
acquisition must remain visible to cleanup even when later setup fails.
> - This pull request extracts configuration assembly and immediately
notifies the executor of acquired resources and redaction state.
> - The executor retains admission, dispatch, and cleanup, with the same
statement ordering and explicit busy-account deferral.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Maintenance of heartbeat execution. This PR follows #15969 and #15966,
both now merged. The branch is rebased onto `master`; `git range-diff`
confirms that the extraction patch is unchanged.

**Current behavior**
`heartbeat.ts` has 4,561 lines and 188,950 bytes. Configuration assembly
mixes workspace overrides, secrets, managed AI preparation, and skill
delivery into the executor.

**Proposed behavior**
`execution-configuration.ts` owns this preparation phase in 269 lines
and 16,204 bytes. The executor calls it between environment and session
preparation and retains immediate cleanup ownership. `heartbeat.ts`
becomes 4,372 lines and 178,459 bytes.

**Reason and benefit**
The execution path exposes another named phase, with tests that exercise
its effective configuration, resource lifetime, failure diagnostics, and
busy-account result through public heartbeat dispatch. Related work:
#11827 changes pre-dispatch secret refresh and #15355 changes GitHub
delegation; this extraction preserves current policies.

**Breaking changes**
None intended. Public exports remain available, and the original helpers
keep their modules.

## What Changed

- Move configuration merging, scoped secret resolution, managed AI
acquisition, runtime skills, connector instructions, and managed
identity preparation into one typed module.
- Notify the executor immediately when failure-redaction values, managed
credentials, and identity redaction become available. Returning
resources only after all preparation succeeds would lose cleanup on
partial failure.
- Preserve the live failure-secret getter for later runtime environment
changes. Return an explicit deferred result for busy accounts.
- Add four real-database characterization tests through
`heartbeat.wakeup`, using actual credential files and cleanup with a
fixture adapter.
- Update the developer module map.

## Verification

- Before extraction: all 45 tests pass across the new public-path tests
and existing project-environment tests.
- After extraction: 47 tests pass across execution configuration,
project environment, and runtime skills. No skips.
- Two additional real-process managed identity tests pass; nine
unrelated cases are deliberately filtered out.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass.
- Normalized syntax comparison confirms the moved body and reconstructed
executor match after accounting for immediate ownership callbacks and
the explicit prepared/deferred result.
- Isolated browser acceptance: 2/2 pass (3.9 minutes). A real process
worker completes after Git recovery, with persisted stdout and matching
final output byte counts. Persistent failures stop after three attempts.
Both outcomes survive reload. The disposable server was shut down after
verification.
- All eleven new public-path characterization cases across the three-PR
stack pass together on the final commit.
- All 140 named public exports from the batch baseline remain available.
- CI initially failed the legacy-continuation message browser case:
periodic recovery escalated the issue, then queue admission cancelled
the run with `execution_reconciliation_required` before configuration
preparation. The unchanged predecessor shard passes, and the exact case
passes locally (5 seconds in the browser). The original failing case
passed on its single rerun (8.2 seconds), but GitHub then shut down the
runner during a different test (`The runner has received a shutdown
signal`). The separate infrastructure restart completed: 24 browser
cases passed, with two existing optional cases skipped. Assertions and
timeouts are unchanged.
- Greptile: 5/5 on `27ab7e3df64c157ba1f00c5757db812ff7a4e5aa`, with no
actionable findings. Hosted full-suite CI passes on this exact commit:
all 54 check runs and the additional commit status are successful.

- Merge preparation: all eleven characterization tests pass after
rebasing onto `master`. Fresh full CI passes for
`1758673f87eaa76a8b2c520eac4b631ada5d9ba1`: 55 successful checks and two
optional Storybook skips, including all eight browser shards, typecheck,
tests, and build. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit with zero review
threads. All heartbeat source, tests, documentation, and browser
assertions are identical to the previously reviewed final stack.

## Risks

- A failure after AI acquisition must still remove the disposable
credential home. The new public-path failure test proves actual
filesystem cleanup and diagnostic redaction before the external
reporting sink.
- The baseline exposed an existing gap: arbitrary exception text in the
local `run.error` field can contain a credential even though the failure
reporter redacts it. This behavior is unchanged and merits a separate
fix; the test does not claim the local error field is sanitized.
- Account-busy deferral must return without dispatch while retaining its
scheduled retry. The new test checks the durable run states.
- Browser acceptance uses a real process fixture and disposable data,
without live provider calls.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool
execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 10:01:00 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 37913e4907 refactor(heartbeat): extract run output recording (#15969)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Heartbeat runs stream adapter output and persist execution results.
> - Output recording currently sits inside the executor beside admission
and cleanup.
> - Log handles, sequence numbers, progress writes, and excerpt buffers
share one attempt lifetime.
> - This pull request moves that state and its callbacks into a
per-attempt recorder.
> - The executor keeps dispatch and finalization visible, while
finalization reads live output values.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Maintenance of heartbeat execution. This PR follows #15966, which is now
merged. The branch is rebased onto `master`; `git range-diff` confirms
that its extraction patch is unchanged.

**Current behavior**
`heartbeat.ts` has 4,740 lines and 195,258 bytes. It directly owns log
handles, excerpt buffers, output sequence numbers, progress flushes, and
adapter event callbacks.

**Proposed behavior**
`run-output.ts` owns the per-attempt recorder. The main file has 4,561
lines and 188,950 bytes; the recorder has 209 lines and 7,757 bytes.

**Reason and benefit**
Output state has one explicit lifetime and interface. The shared log
store and finalization policy retain their original owners. Related open
output work includes #12539 and #15524; this PR does not change
redaction policy.

**Breaking changes**
None intended. Public flush constants and log formatting exports remain
available from `heartbeat.ts`.

## What Changed

- Move log initialization, redaction, excerpts, progress persistence,
live delivery, and adapter callbacks into `createHeartbeatRunOutput`.
- Preserve the acquired log handle if later setup fails. Bind callbacks
to the execution-start run row.
- Pass live excerpt getters to success and failure completion so output
arriving during finalization remains visible.
- Add three real-database public-path tests. Extend browser acceptance
to inspect persisted worker stdout and output byte counts.
- Update the module map.

## Verification

- Before extraction: 23 tests pass, including all three new output
characterization cases.
- After extraction: 45 tests pass across output, log formatting, event
sequencing, and run completion. No skips.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass.
- Normalized syntax comparison confirms the moved bodies and
reconstructed executor match. Reviewed the factory ownership, callback
binding, getter wiring, and constant re-exports separately.
- Isolated browser acceptance: 2/2 pass, including persisted worker
stdout and matching final byte counts. The process worker completes
after recovery; persistent timeouts stop after three attempts. Both
terminal states survive reload.
- Hosted full-suite CI passes on
`d32c8fc40e72b9766bdd9e191d777e8dc554e3f2`; all 55 reported checks are
successful. Greptile is 5/5 with zero review threads.
- The initial chat shard timed out waiting for GitHub mention admission.
Its fixture mocks heartbeat wakeup and never calls the output recorder.
Both parameterized cases passed locally; the unchanged shard passed on
one rerun. No test or timeout changes.

- Merge preparation: all seven session-preparation and run-output
regression tests pass after rebasing onto `master`. Fresh full CI passes
for `60e2a49ce2879645a9f618a801e0ba0903ede161`: 55 successful checks and
two optional Storybook skips, including all eight browser shards,
typecheck, tests, and build. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit with
zero review threads.

## Risks

- A stale excerpt snapshot could lose output that arrives while
finalization awaits I/O. Passing-before/passing-after tests exercise
this for both successful and failed runs.
- Per-attempt state must not become service-wide. Each executor
constructs its own recorder and keeps the existing shared store.
- Browser acceptance uses a real process fixture and disposable data; it
makes no live provider calls.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with reasoning, code edits, tool
execution, and verification. The exact deployment model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-12 09:51:17 -05:00