mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-07 07:23:08 +02:00
07e528256e8a492589486db2dbcf5a50b1f36fbd
3043
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
07e528256e |
fix(ui): bound shared polling cache (#9406)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The board coordinates repeated API polling across tabs to reduce redundant requests > - The shared polling coordinator retained cached result and publication entries after the last subscriber left > - Dynamic polling keys could therefore grow those maps for the lifetime of the page > - This pull request evicts inactive keys while preserving useful short-lived handoff state and request deduplication > - The benefit is bounded client memory without regressing cross-tab polling behavior ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### What happened? Shared polling cached result/publication entries indefinitely after a polling key no longer had subscribers. ### Expected behavior Inactive keys are eventually removed, while recently published values remain available long enough for normal subscriber handoff. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Create and unsubscribe many distinct shared polling keys in one page lifetime. 2. Inspect the coordinator's cached results and publication timestamps. 3. Observe that the old maps retain every historical key. ### Paperclip version or commit `origin/master` at `02e2dd271` ### Deployment mode Local dev; built from source; not adapter-specific; not database-related. ## What Changed - Track inactive polling keys and schedule bounded cache eviction. - Preserve cached data while a key is active or inside its retention window. - Cancel stale cleanup timers when polling resumes and clear coordinator caches during disposal. - Add focused fake-timer coverage for retention, resubscription, and disposal behavior. ## Verification - `vitest --project @paperclipai/ui src/lib/cross-tab-poll.test.ts` — 11 tests passed. ## Risks - Low-to-moderate risk: eviction timing affects client polling coordination. - Tests cover the retention boundary, resumed subscriptions, and coordinator cleanup to reduce regression risk. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.3 Codex, reasoning with repository tool use and code execution; context-window size was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
5618ea91f6 |
fix(ui): wrap company skill source paths (#9405)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Company skills expose their source metadata in a narrow details sidebar > - Long filesystem paths and repository locators were truncated, hiding the part operators often need to distinguish sources > - The sidebar can preserve the complete value by wrapping at arbitrary path boundaries instead of ellipsizing it > - This pull request renders full source paths and repository labels without widening the layout > - The benefit is that operators can inspect and copy the actual skill source from the UI ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I can reproduce this on `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the behavior originates in Paperclip itself, not an agent adapter, API provider, or local configuration. ### What happened? Long company-skill source paths and repository locators were truncated in the skill details sidebar. ### Expected behavior The complete source value remains visible and wraps within the available sidebar width. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Open a company skill whose source path is longer than the details sidebar. 2. View the Source field. 3. Observe that the old UI replaces the middle or end of the value with an ellipsis. ### Paperclip version or commit `origin/master` at `02e2dd271`. ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`). ### Installation method Built from source (`pnpm dev` / `pnpm build`). ### Agent adapter(s) involved None; this is a company-skills UI layout issue. ### Logs, configuration, or screenshots Not applicable; the behavior is directly visible in the Source field. ### Additional context The narrow sidebar should remain width-constrained. Wrapping intentionally trades vertical space for full source inspectability. ## What Changed - Replace source-path truncation with width-constrained arbitrary wrapping. - Apply the same wrapping behavior to linked repository/source labels. - Add a regression test proving the full long path is rendered without ellipsis. ## Verification - `vitest --project @paperclipai/ui src/pages/CompanySkills.test.tsx` — 11 tests passed. - `node scripts/check-token-gates.mjs` — all token gates clean. ## Risks - Low risk: the change is limited to text layout in the company skill details view. - Very long unbroken values may make the Source section taller, intentionally trading vertical space for inspectability. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.3 Codex, reasoning with repository tool use and code execution; context-window size was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.711.0-canary.5 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
02e2dd271b |
feat(ui): add selection debug instrumentation (#9397)
Adds debug-gated selection instrumentation and focused tests for issue document annotations. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.711.0-canary.4 |
||
|
scotttongandClaude Opus 4.8
|
7fd321d622 |
feat(ui): use Lucide icons for task status glyphs (#9395)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Operators scan task state constantly, so the task **status** vocabulary (backlog / todo / in progress / in review / done / blocked / cancelled) has to read instantly > - Those statuses render through one shared component, `StatusGlyph`, whose icons were hand-rolled SVG geometry lifted from an internal spec > - Hand-rolled glyphs are harder to reason about, drift from the rest of the UI (which uses Lucide everywhere else), and mix fill/stroke styles across statuses > - This pull request swaps the hand-rolled geometry for named Lucide icons — one clean, consistent icon family — with no change to colours, sizing, or accessibility > - The benefit is a status icon set that is consistent with the rest of the app's iconography, trivially adjustable (change a mapping, not SVG path math), and simpler to maintain ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public GitHub issue. Describing the change in-PR (feature/polish): **Problem / motivation.** The task status icons in `StatusGlyph` were bespoke inline SVGs (a half-filled disc for *in progress*, a filled disc + knockout check for *done*, ring+bar for *blocked*, ring+slash for *cancelled*, etc.). The rest of the UI uses [Lucide](https://lucide.dev) icons, so the status set was the odd one out — and its mixed fill/stroke shapes were harder to scan and to tweak. **Proposed solution.** Map each status to a Lucide icon and render that instead: | Status | Lucide icon | | --- | --- | | backlog | `circle-dashed` | | todo | `circle` | | in_progress | `rotate-cw` | | in_review | `circle-dot` | | done | `circle-check` | | blocked | `circle-minus` | | cancelled | `ban` | | in_queue (covered-blocked) | `circle-minus`, recoloured blue | Colours (the `--status-task-icon-*` tokens), the `sm/md/lg` size scale, `currentColor` recolouring, and the `role="img"` / `aria-label` behaviour are all unchanged — only the shapes change. **Alternatives considered.** Keeping the bespoke geometry (rejected: inconsistent with the app and harder to maintain). **Related PRs** (linked for reviewer context, not dependencies): - Refs #8580 — the merged PR that established the current hand-rolled status glyphs this PR restyles. - Refs #8838 — open PR forwarding Radix trigger props through `StatusGlyph`; touches the same component (no overlap with this change). - Refs #1760 — open proposal to redesign the *cancelled* status icon specifically; this PR moves cancelled to Lucide `ban`. ## What Changed - `ui/src/components/StatusGlyph.tsx`: replaced the per-status hand-rolled SVG `glyphBody()` geometry with a `status → Lucide icon` map (`circle-dashed`, `circle`, `rotate-cw`, `circle-dot`, `circle-check`, `circle-minus`, `ban`). Kept the token-driven colour wiring, size scale, `currentColor` recolouring, a11y label handling, and the `in_queue` = blocked-icon-recoloured-blue behaviour. - `ui/src/components/StatusGlyph.test.tsx`: updated to lock the new icon mapping (per-status Lucide class, size scale, colour var, `in_queue`, a11y) instead of the old geometry. Net: two files, +74 / −138 (the component got smaller). Because every status surface (list, board, detail header, status picker, sub-task/blocked-by pills, chips) routes through `StatusGlyph`, this single-component edit covers them all. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` → **3/3 clean** (no hardcoded colour/spacing/font values introduced). - `pnpm typecheck` → clean across all packages. - `cd ui && pnpm vitest run` → **2509/2509 passing**, including the updated `StatusGlyph` test. - Manual: ran the worktree dev server and confirmed the new icons render everywhere (task list, task detail, related-task chips, and the status picker showing all seven). **Storybook visual-regression note:** this is an intentional visual change, so the status-icon stories will diff against the published baseline. The baseline snapshots need to be regenerated and republished by a maintainer (`pnpm test:storybook-visual:update` from a trusted environment) as part of accepting this change — the visual-regression CI check is expected to be red until then. No baseline is published in the environment this PR was authored in, so that step is left to a maintainer. ## Risks - **Low risk / cosmetic.** No logic, data, or API changes — only the rendered icon shapes. Colours, sizes, and accessibility labels are unchanged. - The most noticeable shifts are *in progress* (half-disc → rotating arrow), *done* (solid disc+check → outline circle+check), and *cancelled* (ring+slash → ban). These are deliberate. - The only CI check expected to fail is the Storybook visual-regression job, pending a maintainer baseline update (see Verification). ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), run in Claude Code with extended thinking and tool use (file edits, local test runs, browser-driven visual verification). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.711.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e0f1905222 |
[codex] Quiet packaged version fallback diagnostics (#9207)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server startup path reports the product version from package metadata and, in source checkouts, Git metadata. > - Packaged installs can run from `node_modules`, where Git metadata is normally unavailable and that absence is expected. > - The fallback path was still attempting Git metadata probing in packaged contexts, which could print scary diagnostic noise during onboarding even though the package version fallback was working. > - This pull request makes the packaged path skip Git probing only when the package does not look like a source checkout, and keeps fallback diagnostics opt-in. > - The benefit is a quieter first-run experience without weakening source-checkout version detection or debug diagnostics. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. ### Bug Report #### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I am on the latest released version of Paperclip or can reproduce on `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip itself, not in an agent adapter, API provider, or local configuration. #### What happened? When Paperclip starts from a packaged install, server version resolution can fall back from Git metadata to package metadata. That expected fallback path could emit scary Git diagnostic noise during onboarding even though startup could continue normally. #### Expected behavior Packaged Paperclip startup should use package metadata quietly when Git metadata is unavailable. Source checkouts should still use Git-derived versions, and operators who explicitly opt into version-resolution diagnostics should still receive useful Git failure details. #### Steps to reproduce 1. Run Paperclip from a packaged install where the server package is under `node_modules` and does not include package-local Git metadata. 2. Start the server in an environment where `git describe` cannot resolve repository metadata for that package. 3. Observe that version fallback can produce Git diagnostic noise during startup even though the package version fallback is expected. #### Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against the pre-fix server version resolution behavior on `master`-derived builds. #### Deployment mode Self-hosted server / packaged local install. #### Installation method npm / pnpm package install. #### Agent adapter(s) involved Not adapter-specific; this is core server startup/version behavior. #### Database mode Not database-related. #### Access context Unclear / not applicable. #### Relevant logs or output Git fallback diagnostics from `git describe` could appear during packaged startup. The exact path and Git output depend on the operator environment. #### Additional context The fix keeps diagnostics available behind `PAPERCLIP_DEBUG_VERSION_RESOLUTION=1` and preserves source-checkout Git version detection, including source paths that happen to contain a `node_modules` segment. #### Privacy checklist - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for PII and redacted where necessary. ## What Changed - Skip Git metadata probing for packaged installs under `node_modules` only when no package-local Git metadata is present. - Preserve Git-derived version detection for source or linked workspace checkouts, even when their path contains a `node_modules` segment. - Keep fallback diagnostics behind the existing debug/diagnostic opt-in path. - Include useful Git failure details such as stderr/stdout/stack/cause when diagnostics are enabled. - Add version tests covering packaged fallback behavior, source-checkout detection, richer diagnostics, and quiet default output. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/version.test.ts` passed after the Greptile follow-up changes. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed. - `git diff --check` passed. - Greptile completed with confidence score 5/5 and no blocking issues on the latest reviewed commit. ## Risks Low risk. The change is scoped to version fallback behavior. Source-checkout Git version detection remains covered, while packaged `node_modules` contexts intentionally rely on package metadata instead of Git probing. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent with shell/tool use in the Paperclip workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.711.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
49d1abc458 |
fix(ui): detail the env unsaved-changes banner and guard against draft loss (#9391)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Instance settings include an Environments section where operators configure execution environments, each with an environment-variables editor for run-time bindings > - The editor showed a bare "Unsaved changes" banner that never said which variables changed, sometimes appeared the moment a saved config was opened (a lossy round-trip through the editor's emit rules made clean values look dirty), and the environment form let you navigate away without any confirmation, silently dropping the draft > - Operators could not tell what was unsaved, distrusted the phantom banner, and lost half-finished environment edits to a stray click — the agent configuration page already confirms before discarding, so environments behaved inconsistently > - This pull request lists the new/edited/removed variable names under the banner, normalizes both sides of the dirty comparison so saved values no longer look dirty on open, and confirms before cancel, in-app navigation, or tab unload while the form has unsaved changes > - The benefit is that the banner is trustworthy and specific, and unsaved environment edits can no longer be lost without an explicit confirmation ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related (not fixed by this PR): #8930 introduced the current environment-variables editor and its unsaved-changes banner; #9386 moved environment create/edit from a modal to routed pages, which this PR's navigation guard builds on. No existing public issue for the defects themselves; described per the bug report template: **What happened?** The environment-variables editor in Environments settings showed a bare "Unsaved changes" banner with no indication of which variables changed. For some saved configurations (names with surrounding whitespace, incomplete secret references, duplicate names differing only by whitespace) the banner appeared immediately on opening the edit form, before any user input. Navigating away from the environment form — cancel, an in-app link, or closing the tab — silently discarded the draft with no confirmation. **Expected behavior** The banner should say which variables are new, edited, or removed; a freshly opened saved configuration should show no banner; and leaving the form with unsaved changes should require an explicit confirmation, consistent with the agent configuration page. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open Settings → Instance settings → Environments and edit an environment whose saved config round-trips lossily (e.g. an env var name stored with trailing whitespace) — the "Unsaved changes" banner appears with no user edits. 2. Add or edit a variable — the banner gives no hint of what is unsaved. 3. With a dirty draft, click any in-app link or Cancel — the draft is dropped with no confirmation. **Deployment mode** Self-hosted (local development instance), reproducible on `master`. ## What Changed - The unsaved-changes banner in `EnvironmentVariablesEditor` now renders a change summary line — `New: … · Edited: … · Removed: …` — showing up to three names per group with a `+N more` overflow and the full list in a `title` tooltip. A rename shows as one addition plus one removal. - Dirty detection normalizes both the committed value and the draft through the same rules the editor uses when emitting values (trimmed names, incomplete secret refs dropped, last-writer-wins on trimmed duplicates), so a saved config that round-trips lossily no longer shows a phantom banner on first open. - The editor exposes an `onDirtyChange` callback and warns via `beforeunload` while its local draft is dirty. - The environment create/edit page (`CompanyEnvironments`) tracks a payload-level baseline fingerprint of the form as initialized and treats the page as having unsaved changes when the current form differs from it or the editor draft is dirty. While dirty it confirms ("Discard unsaved environment changes?") on Cancel, intercepts same-origin in-app link clicks, and warns on tab unload. ## Verification - `node_modules/.bin/vitest run ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx ui/src/components/environment-variables-editor/EnvironmentVariablesEditor.test.tsx` — 48 tests pass, including new coverage for: the change-summary banner text, no phantom banner for lossy round-trip values, beforeunload only while dirty, cancel confirmation on the edit page, and unload/link-click warnings after edits are staged into the form. - `tsc -b` in `ui/` passes. - Manual: edit an environment, add/edit/remove variables, observe the summary line; click Cancel or an in-app link and observe the confirmation; save and observe navigation proceeds without prompting. ## Risks - Low risk, UI-only. The click interceptor is scoped to same-origin anchor navigation while the environment form page has unsaved changes and is removed on cleanup; modified-key/middle-button clicks and external links are left alone. - The dirty-normalization intentionally ignores differences the editor could never persist (incomplete secret refs, untrimmed duplicate names); those were previously reported as unsaved changes that could not be saved away. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic) via Claude Code, with extended thinking and tool use (code editing, test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.711.0-canary.1 |
||
|
|
9cde4e128c |
feat: run ACP sessions in sandbox execution targets (#9390)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent adapters (Claude, Codex, Gemini) default to the ACP engine lane, which needs a live bidirectional stdio session with the agent process > - Sandbox execution targets only exposed one-shot command execution, so every ACP-capable adapter refused remote targets and fell back to the CLI lane with a "supports only the local Paperclip host" warning > - Running agents in sandboxes is a core deployment mode, and losing ACP there means losing streaming updates, structured events, and default-lane parity with local runs > - This pull request adds a provider-agnostic process-session bridge that relays the ACP stdio session into the sandbox over the existing sandbox runner contract, and updates the adapters to use it > - The benefit is that the default ACP lane now behaves the same on the local host and in any sandbox provider, with CLI fallback reserved for targets that genuinely cannot host a bidirectional session ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public issue covers this; inline description following the feature request template: **Problem or motivation** Configuring an ACP-capable adapter (e.g. Claude) with a sandbox environment made every run fall back to the CLI lane with the warning "Claude ACP currently supports only the local Paperclip host, but this run targets a remote environment." The ACP engine only knew how to spawn a local subprocess, while sandbox providers only expose one-shot command execution — so there was no way to hold the bidirectional stdio session ACP requires. **Proposed solution** Add a process-session bridge in `adapter-utils`: a local ACPX-spawnable proxy script connects to a token-authenticated loopback TCP server, which relays JSON-framed stdin/stdout/stderr events to and from a small relay script executed inside the sandbox via the provider's ordinary runner. Claude/Codex/Gemini adapters now treat sandbox targets with a runner as ACP-capable, resolve agent commands against the remote target, and fall back to CLI only when the sandbox exposes no bidirectional path. The sandbox callback bridge injects a run-scoped API endpoint and bridge token so the agent inside the sandbox can reach Paperclip (including work-product handoffs) without ever receiving the host run JWT. **Alternatives considered** A provider-specific lane was prototyped first: Daytona minting SSH access metadata at lease time, converted into an SSH execution target. It was dropped because it only worked for providers able to advertise SSH, added per-provider surface area, and left every other sandbox provider on the CLI fallback. The merged design rides the one-shot runner contract all providers already implement; a regression test pins that sandbox targets stay on the bridge lane even when lease metadata advertises SSH access. **Roadmap alignment** Directly advances the "Cloud / Sandbox agents" roadmap item — agents running in remote and sandboxed environments keep the same control-plane behavior as local ones. No overlap with other planned core work. ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target.ts`: new `startAdapterExecutionTargetProcessSessionBridge()` plus helpers — writes a token-authenticated local proxy script (spawnable by ACPX) and a remote relay script synced into the sandbox, with a loopback TCP server streaming JSON-framed stdio between them; events emitted before the ACP client attaches are buffered so none are lost. - `packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.ts`: the ACP engine can execute against remote sandbox targets through the bridge instead of requiring a local subprocess, including remote cwd/env shaping. - `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.ts`: sandbox-scoped API bridging extended to allow work-product handoffs; the sandbox payload env carries a bridge token, never the host run JWT. - `packages/adapters/claude-local`, `codex-local`, `gemini-local` (`src/server/acp.ts`): default-lane selection no longer rejects all remote targets; command resolution is remote-aware (`ensureAdapterExecutionTargetCommandResolvable`, `resolveAdapterExecutionTargetCwd`); the fallback reason is now scoped to sandboxes that expose only one-shot execution. - `server/src/__tests__/environment-execution-target.test.ts`: pins that sandbox targets resolve to the bridge lane, including when lease metadata advertises SSH access. - Non-sandbox remote targets (e.g. SSH) keep the CLI lane: the ACP engine's remote transport is sandbox-only, so default-lane selection falls back for those targets across all three adapters, and tests covering CLI-specific remote behavior pin `engine: "cli"` explicitly. - The bridge authenticates loopback connections before they can own the session or receive buffered output (token required, idle unauthenticated peers dropped), and remote event writes are serialized so the exit event always lands after stdout/stderr have drained. - Daytona plugin: formatting-only residue from the earlier iteration; no functional change. ## Verification - `vitest run` over the touched suites — `packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts`, `packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target-sandbox.test.ts`, `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.test.ts`, the three adapter `acp.test.ts` files, and `server/src/__tests__/environment-execution-target.test.ts` — 102 tests pass. - End to end: with a Claude agent configured on a Daytona sandbox environment, the primary-model test now selects the default ACP lane (no fallback warning), and the full round trip (wake → sandbox execution → API bridge → comment post) was exercised twice from inside a live sandbox. ## Risks - Behavioral shift: adapters that previously always fell back to CLI on sandbox targets now default to ACP there; `engine=cli` still pins the CLI lane explicitly. - The bridge relays stdio as JSON lines over loopback TCP guarded by a per-session random token; the remote relay runs inside the sandbox under the provider's runner. Providers with slow one-shot execution will see higher session startup latency — the CLI fallback remains for genuinely incapable targets. - No schema or migration changes. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic) — extended thinking enabled, agentic tool use via the Claude Agent SDK harness; implementation iterated with local Vitest verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no shipped docs describe the old local-only ACP limitation) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Cody <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Cody <cody@paperclip.local>canary/v2026.711.0-canary.0 |
||
|
|
0f9b1d399c |
fix(ui): make environment edit a routed page (#9386)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Instance settings include an Environments section where operators configure sandbox/SSH/local execution environments, including interactive custom-image setup sessions with a browser terminal > - The environment create/edit form was rendered inside a modal dialog, so pressing Escape anywhere — including inside the embedded SSH terminal while capturing a snapshot — closed the whole modal and destroyed the in-progress session > - Environment editing is a heavyweight, long-lived flow; losing it to a reflexive Escape keypress is destructive and surprising > - This pull request converts environment create/edit from a modal into routed standalone pages, so Escape no longer dismisses the form > - The benefit is that terminal sessions and half-completed edits survive Escape, and the flow gets shareable URLs and normal back/forward navigation ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public issue; described per the bug report template: **What happened?** While editing an environment's sandbox snapshot in the embedded SSH terminal, pressing Escape (e.g. to exit a mode inside the terminal) closed the entire environment edit modal, discarding the setup session and any unsaved form state. **Expected behavior** Escape inside the terminal or form should not dismiss the environment editor. A heavyweight flow like environment configuration should be a standalone page where Escape behaves as expected within the focused widget. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open Instance settings → Environments and edit a sandbox environment 2. Start a custom image setup session and focus the browser terminal 3. Press Escape 4. The modal closes and the session context is lost ## What Changed - Converted the environment create/edit dialog in `CompanyEnvironments.tsx` into routed pages at `/company/settings/instance/environments/new` and `/company/settings/instance/environments/:environmentId/edit` - Registered the new routes in `App.tsx` and wired breadcrumbs for the list/create/edit states - Form state now initializes from the route (create vs edit) instead of dialog open/close state, and successful saves navigate back to the environments list - Updated `CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx` and `CompanySettings.test.tsx` to render through a router with the new routes and assert against the routed form page instead of a dialog ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx ui/src/pages/CompanySettings.test.tsx` — 22/22 passing - `tsc --noEmit` on the `ui` package — clean - Behavioral coverage: the updated tests exercise the routed create/edit pages end to end (open edit via the list, interact with the setup-session controls on the form page, save navigates back to the list); with the form no longer in a dialog there is no Escape-close handler to trigger ## Risks - Low risk; UI-only routing change. Deep links into the old modal state do not exist (the modal had no URL), so no redirects are needed - The edit page resolves the environment from the route param; a stale/unknown id falls back to the environments list ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5` (Fable 5), extended thinking enabled, agentic tool use via Claude Code ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Cody <cody@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.17 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b15115e05b |
fix(ui): keep rendered markdown list markers visible (#9359)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The board UI renders agent/user-authored Markdown in task descriptions, comments, and other work-thread surfaces > - Those Markdown surfaces often live inside cards and containers that constrain overflow > - Ordered-list markers are painted outside the list content box, so too little inline padding can clip multi-digit markers at the left edge > - This pull request keeps the shared Markdown list gutter compact while giving ordered lists enough marker space for two- and three-digit counters > - The benefit is that long numbered lists in board-facing Markdown render correctly without widening unordered-list gutters or changing API, data, or editor behavior ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue found. Bug description: - What happened: rendered Markdown ordered lists with multi-digit items could show clipped marker digits when the list was flush against an overflow-constrained container. - Expected behavior: ordered-list markers such as `10.` and `100.` should render fully in task descriptions and comments. - Steps to reproduce: render a `.paperclip-markdown` ordered list with at least 100 items inside a container that clips overflow and has no extra left gutter. - Paperclip version/commit: current `master` before this PR. - Deployment mode: board UI, deployment-mode independent. Related search result: - Refs #2049 because it also touches rendered Markdown list presentation, but it styles GFM task-list checkboxes and does not address ordered-list marker clipping. ## What Changed - Set the shared `.paperclip-markdown` list padding to a compact `1.5rem` baseline for bullets and lists. - Added an ordered-list-only `2.5rem` padding override so outside-positioned multi-digit ordered-list markers have enough inline-start room. - Added a focused stylesheet regression test that verifies unordered-list gutters stay compact while ordered lists keep the larger marker gutter. - Restored the exact maintainer-skill marker phrase expected by the existing server skill utility contract test, fixing an unrelated latest-head CI failure from current `master`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/MarkdownListStyles.test.ts` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` ## Risks - Low risk: ordered lists in rendered Markdown get a larger left gutter; unordered lists keep a smaller shared gutter. - Low risk: the skill-doc marker change is text-only and matches the existing server test contract. - No database, API, migration, auth, adapter, or telemetry changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled software-engineering session. Context window size was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.16 |
||
|
|
36ec79c196 |
feat: add attention queue and Decisions surface (#9380)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies, where operators need a reliable way to find and act on work awaiting their input. > - The attention and issue-thread interaction subsystems expose those decision points across server APIs and the board UI. > - The previous navigation and interaction presentation left these actions fragmented and did not offer a controlled rollout for the Decisions surface. > - This branch adds the attention feed, richer interaction cards, grouping, dismiss/snooze behavior, and a gated Decisions sidebar entry. > - It also keeps experimental settings and API contracts synchronized, with an idempotent migration for the new dismissal state. > - This pull request delivers the complete, tested attention/Decisions experience as one reviewable unit. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Adds an operator-focused attention queue and Decisions experience: grouped decision cards, semantic interaction actions, dismiss/snooze handling, resilient interaction states, and an experimental flag to control the Decisions navigation entry. ## Feature Context ### Problem or Motivation Operators currently have to hunt across approvals, interactions, failed runs, and budget alerts to find decisions that need their action. ### Proposed Solution Provide a gated Decisions attention queue that groups actionable items, supports direct resolution, and preserves operator control through dismiss and snooze actions. ### Alternatives Considered Keep separate, source-specific views only; this leaves cross-cutting operator decisions fragmented and harder to prioritize. ### Roadmap Alignment This improves the V1 control-plane operator workflow by making pending governed actions discoverable in one company-scoped surface. ## What Changed - Added server attention-feed services, routes, interaction handling, dismiss/snooze support, and an idempotent `0145` inbox-dismissal migration. - Added shared attention, inbox-dismissal, and experimental-settings contracts. - Added Decisions/attention UI, interaction-card states, sidebar badge/navigation integration, grouping, keyboard support, and Storybook coverage. - Added tests for attention behavior, thread interactions, settings normalization, dismissals, and API behavior. - Removed generated screenshots from the final PR diff and rebased the branch onto current `master`. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/attention-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/inbox-dismissals.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts ui/src/lib/attention.test.ts ui/src/components/AttentionQueueRow.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx ui/src/pages/InstanceExperimentalSettings.test.tsx` — passed: 158 tests across 9 focused files. - GitHub Actions for `ad636f560`: build and typecheck/release-registry have passed; remaining general-server and Greptile checks are in progress. ## Risks - Moderate: this is a cross-layer attention/interaction feature with a new migration and navigation behavior. - The `enableDecisions` experimental setting defaults to off, limiting rollout impact. - Existing dismissal data is backfilled to `dismiss`; the migration is idempotent and uses guarded constraint creation. > ROADMAP.md was checked; no duplicate planned core feature was identified. Related open pull requests were searched before opening this PR. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5.5 via Codex CLI, with tool use and local code execution. Context-window size unavailable in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My public PR branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally; focused tests pass and the remaining unrelated AWS test failure is documented above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.15 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
ac66fd65cb |
Fix Cody default model adapter test config (#9365)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agent configuration includes adapter-specific model settings and a
built-in adapter test action so operators can verify runtime
configuration before saving changes.
> - Cody/Codex-style local adapters can use an adapter default model
when the user clears the explicit model field.
> - The adapter test path still passed an object containing `model:
undefined` in some create/edit flows, which is different from omitting
the model and can break default-model behavior.
> - The previous fix was reverted because it also included an unrelated
skill documentation edit.
> - This pull request reapplies only the UI default-model test-config
fix, with no doc or skill changes.
> - The benefit is that testing Cody/Codex adapter settings with the
default model follows the same contract as saving default model
settings: no explicit model key is sent.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Bug report:
- Summary: Testing a Cody/Codex local agent after selecting the default
model could send an adapter config with an undefined model value instead
of omitting the model key.
- Expected behavior: Clearing the model to use the adapter default
should test with `adapterConfig: {}` unless another model is explicitly
selected.
- Actual behavior: The UI test-config path could preserve `model:
undefined`, causing the adapter test to fail instead of exercising the
default model.
- Related PRs: Reapplies the UI-only portion of #9361 after #9363
reverted the original PR.
## What Changed
- Exported and reused `omitUndefinedEntries` so adapter test config
payloads drop undefined adapter config entries before calling the test
endpoint.
- Hardened the current model display value so create-mode values that
are nullish or non-string do not crash the model selector/test flow.
- Added render coverage for editing a Codex agent back to the default
model and for testing a create form with the default model.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run
ui/src/components/AgentConfigForm.render.test.tsx`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- Confirmed `git diff origin/master --name-only` contains only:
- `ui/src/components/AgentConfigForm.render.test.tsx`
- `ui/src/components/AgentConfigForm.tsx`
- `ui/src/lib/agent-config-patch.ts`
## Risks
Low risk. The change only removes `undefined` adapter config entries
from the UI adapter-test payload and adds focused render coverage.
Explicit model values and other adapter config fields are preserved.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-use enabled. Context window size
not exposed in this runtime.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.710.0-canary.14
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude
|
d1f6a6850a |
Fix agent detail URL after agent rename (#9340)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The agent detail page uses route references that can be based on an agent's URL key. > - Renaming an agent can change that URL key while the browser is still on the old route. > - After save or rollback, refetching the stale route reference can render an "Agent not found" state even though the agent still exists. > - This pull request redirects the detail page to the updated canonical route when the saved agent's route reference changes. > - The benefit is that agent renames keep users on the same configuration workflow without landing on a stale URL. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #1848 - Related public search performed for agent rename/not-found issues and PRs; no closer in-flight PR was found. - Bug context: after saving a renamed agent or rolling back to a revision with a different name-derived URL key, the agent detail page could continue using the old URL and show "Agent not found". ## What Changed - Added a small route-sync helper that compares the previous and updated agent route refs after mutations. - Redirects the agent detail page with `replace: true` when a save or rollback changes the canonical route ref. - Removes the stale detail-query cache entry so the old route reference is not refetched after a rename. ## Verification - Local outgoing patch scan for common secrets, private paths/emails, and internal issue/link references: no matches. - `corepack pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `corepack pnpm --dir ui run typecheck` - `corepack pnpm --dir ui exec vitest run src/pages/AgentDetail.progress.test.ts src/App.test.tsx` - `corepack pnpm check:token-gates` ## Risks - Low risk: the redirect only runs when the updated agent resolves to a different route ref than the current agent. - If a future mutation response omits both URL key and name, the existing route-ref fallback behavior still applies. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent via the local Codex adapter, with tool-assisted repository inspection, shell execution, and GitHub API use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
17dde9d3f2 |
fix(sandbox): keep custom-image snapshots applied to config tests, probes, and saves (#9385)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Sandbox environments can capture reusable custom images (provider snapshots) so agents boot with pre-installed tools and CLI logins > - The custom-image runtime fingerprint check included provider secret-ref paths (e.g. the Daytona `apiKey`), while capture-time fingerprinting excluded them, so any config carrying a credential never matched its captured snapshot > - As a result, agent config tests and environment probes silently booted the provider base image instead of the snapshot, test sandboxes were deleted before operators could inspect them, and any environment save orphaned the snapshot without warning > - The UI compounded the confusion by displaying an internal template id that matches nothing in the provider dashboard > - This pull request aligns runtime fingerprints with capture-time exclusions, re-stamps fingerprints on saves that cannot affect the snapshot (warning when they can), archives test/probe sandboxes instead of deleting them, and surfaces the provider snapshot ref in the UI > - The benefit is that custom images actually apply to config tests and probes, survive unrelated config edits, and are debuggable against the provider dashboard ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this; describing it in-PR per the bug template. Related: Refs #9329 (saved-environment probe company context — this branch carries an equivalent fix), Refs #8794 (introduced reusable sandbox custom images). **What happened?** With a Daytona environment whose provider config stores the API key as a secret reference and an active captured custom-image snapshot: - Agent config tests and environment probes booted the provider base image (`daytonaio/sandbox:0.8.0`) instead of the captured snapshot, so CLI upgrades/logins baked into the snapshot were missing and the probe reported "login required" and an outdated CLI. - The environment card showed an internal template id (e.g. `b5be03e1-ca5…`) that does not correspond to any snapshot name in the provider dashboard, making the active image impossible to correlate. - Test/probe sandboxes were deleted immediately after the run, so the sandbox a test used could not be inspected afterwards. - Saving the environment config (even fields unrelated to the image) changed the stored fingerprint, silently detaching the snapshot with no warning. **Expected behavior** Config tests and probes boot the captured snapshot when one is active; the UI shows the provider-facing snapshot/template ref; test sandboxes stay inspectable for a short window; unrelated config edits keep the snapshot linked, and edits that genuinely invalidate it produce an explicit warning. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure a sandbox environment on Daytona with the API key stored as a company secret reference. 2. Capture a custom image snapshot from the environment page and mark it active (e.g. after installing/logging into a CLI in the setup sandbox). 3. Run the agent config test or an environment probe: the sandbox boots the base image, not the snapshot, and the sandbox is deleted immediately after the test. 4. Save the environment config with an unrelated field change: the snapshot silently stops applying. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at the merge-base of this branch. **Deployment mode** Self-hosted local instance (macOS, pnpm dev server) with the Daytona sandbox provider plugin. ## What Changed - Runtime custom-image fingerprint checks now exclude provider secret-ref paths, matching capture-time exclusions, so configs carrying credentials match their captured snapshots (`environment-custom-image-runtime.ts`). - Agent config tests and saved-environment probes force fresh, non-reused sandboxes and pass company context so lease-backed probes can resolve company secrets and boot the real snapshot (`environment-probe.ts`, `routes/agents.ts`, `routes/environments.ts`). - Test/probe sandboxes are released by archiving (stop + 60-minute provider-side auto-delete) instead of immediate deletion, so operators can inspect the exact sandbox a test used (Daytona plugin). - On environment PATCH save, changes that cannot affect the captured snapshot re-stamp the template's source fingerprint so the snapshot stays linked; boot-source or provider-identity changes (new manifest field `templateIdentityPaths`) mark the template detached and the save response reports it (`environment-custom-images.ts`, shared plugin types/validators). - The custom-image overview exposes `activeTemplateMatchesConfig`; the environments UI shows the provider snapshot/template ref (internal id moved to a tooltip), warns via toast when a save detaches the snapshot, and shows a persistent "Not in use" warning when the active template no longer matches the saved config (`CompanyEnvironments.tsx`, `api/environments.ts`). ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/environment-custom-images-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-probe.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/agent-test-environment-routes.test.ts` — server coverage for fingerprint exclusions, re-stamp/detach on save, probe company context, and fresh-sandbox test behavior. - `pnpm vitest run packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/src/plugin.test.ts` — archive-on-release and snapshot ref handling. - `pnpm vitest run ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx` — snapshot ref display, detach toast, and "Not in use" warning. - Manually verified end-to-end on a live self-hosted instance against real Daytona: config test boots the captured snapshot (CLI login and version persist), the test sandbox remains visible in the provider dashboard as archived, and saving unrelated fields keeps the snapshot applied. ## Risks - Fingerprint exclusion widening: a provider credential rotation alone no longer detaches a captured snapshot; that is the intended behavior (the snapshot content does not depend on the credential), and provider-identity fields (e.g. Daytona `apiUrl`) still detach via `templateIdentityPaths`. - Archived test sandboxes consume provider-side resources for up to their auto-delete window instead of being freed immediately; bounded (60 minutes) and only for test/probe sandboxes. - New optional manifest field `templateIdentityPaths` is backward-compatible; providers that omit it keep current matching behavior. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking, agentic tool use via Claude Code / Claude Agent SDK. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.710.0-canary.13 |
||
|
|
70ce005bef |
Ensure worktree execution starts only after activation (#9374)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open-source control plane people use to manage AI agents and their work. > - Its scheduler, routines, and heartbeat services decide when agents automatically begin work. > - Experimental per-worktree execution is useful for isolated development, but enabling it previously allowed automatic services to consider an existing backlog. > - A worktree activation must therefore create a durable eligibility boundary rather than merely toggle execution on. > - This pull request records an activation cutoff and applies it consistently to automatic routine and heartbeat dispatch. > - The result is that an enabled worktree executes only work created after its own activation, while non-worktree behavior remains unchanged. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem type:** Bug / safety regression **Summary:** Enabling experimental run execution in an existing worktree could start automatic scheduler, routine, watchdog, and heartbeat activity for work created before that worktree was explicitly armed. **Expected behavior:** A worktree that has execution enabled only considers automatically dispatched work created on or after its activation timestamp. Ambiguous activation state fails closed. Non-worktree instances keep their existing behavior. **Related public work:** Refs #8275 (runtime worktree policy gating); this PR adds an activation-time boundary for automatic execution rather than changing the general runtime policy. ## What Changed - Persist a worktree execution activation timestamp and originating instance ID; stamp them only when the experimental toggle changes from disabled to enabled. - Resolve activation state fail-closed when the cutoff is missing, invalid, disabled, or belongs to another instance. - Gate automatic routine scheduling, webhooks, watchdog activity, and heartbeat selection at the activation cutoff; manual runs remain available. - Share the canonical worktree truthy-environment helper across routine dispatch and agent inbox filtering. - Add cutoff and truthy-runtime regression coverage, plus experimental-settings UI states that explain armed and suppressed execution. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts` — passes: 2 files, 60 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passes. - Existing CI completed successfully before the follow-up review fixes; this branch was rebased onto the latest `origin/master` before retesting. ## Risks - **Behavioral:** Automatic worktree execution is intentionally more restrictive; pre-existing work is suppressed until newly created after activation. - **Operational:** A malformed or cross-instance activation record fails closed, requiring an operator to disable and re-enable the experimental toggle on the intended worktree. - **Compatibility:** The worktree environment now accepts all canonical truthy values (`1`, `true`, `yes`, and `on`) consistently; non-worktree instances are unaffected. - **Branch metadata:** This existing execution-workspace branch predates the current naming rule and cannot be renamed under this task's workspace contract; the code and PR title do not include internal ticket references. > `ROADMAP.md` was checked; this targeted execution-safety fix does not duplicate planned core work. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Code — assisted with the original implementation; exact model identifier and context window were not recorded in the repository metadata. - OpenAI Codex CLI — assisted with PR preparation and review fixes; exact model identifier and context window are not exposed in this execution environment. Used with terminal tooling, code editing, and targeted test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.12 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Fable 5
|
23f34491e2 |
Fix apiCompression corrupting and dropping Better Auth responses for gzip clients (#9381)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Its server fronts every API route — including Better Auth sign-in — with Express middleware, and #9190 added an `apiCompression` middleware that gzips JSON responses over 1KB > - That middleware buffers `res.write()` chunks with `String(chunk)`, but Better Auth (via better-call) streams `Uint8Array` chunks and commits headers with `writeHead()` before streaming > - `String(Uint8Array)` serializes the body to comma-separated decimal bytes (~3.4x inflation), and once the inflated body crossed the 1KB threshold, `setHeader()` threw `ERR_HTTP_HEADERS_SENT` and the catch handler destroyed the socket > - Every real browser sends `Accept-Encoding: gzip`, so sign-in returned zero bytes (`net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE` / "Failed to fetch"), while curl without `Accept-Encoding` worked — making the bug easy to misdiagnose as a client or network issue > - This pull request makes the middleware byte-safe for `Uint8Array` chunks, passes through responses whose headers are already committed, and falls back to the uncompressed body instead of destroying the connection when compression fails > - The benefit is that browser sign-in (and any other streamed binary-chunk response) works again for gzip-accepting clients, with regression tests locking in all three behaviors ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #9190 (introduced the `apiCompression` middleware). No public GitHub issue exists; bug description: - **What happened:** Sign-in from any real browser failed with `net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE` / "Failed to fetch". The server logged `ERR_HTTP_HEADERS_SENT` from the compression middleware and destroyed the response socket, so zero bytes reached the client. - **Expected:** `/api/auth/*` responses are delivered intact regardless of the client's `Accept-Encoding`. - **Steps to reproduce:** Run the server with API compression active, open the web UI in a browser (which sends `Accept-Encoding: gzip`), and attempt email/password sign-in. The auth response body exceeds ~300 bytes, so after the ~3.4x stringification inflation it crosses the 1024-byte compression threshold and the response is destroyed. `curl` without `Accept-Encoding` succeeds against the same server. - **Scope:** Any route that streams `Uint8Array` chunks and/or commits headers via `writeHead()` before writing — in practice all Better Auth routes served through better-call. ## What Changed - `server/src/middleware/api-compression.ts`: - Buffer `res.write()` chunks with a `toBodyBuffer()` helper that converts `Uint8Array`/`ArrayBuffer` views via `Buffer.from()` instead of `String()`, so binary chunks are preserved byte-for-byte. - Pass responses through untouched once headers are already sent (`writeHead()`-style streaming), since compression headers can no longer be set at that point. - On any compression failure, write the original uncompressed body instead of calling `res.destroy()`, so clients get a valid (just uncompressed) response rather than a dropped connection. - `server/src/__tests__/api-compression.test.ts`: three new regression tests — small `writeHead`+`Uint8Array` responses are delivered byte-for-byte, large ones no longer drop the connection, and `Uint8Array` JSON bodies gzip without corruption (includes `/api/auth-bridge` and `/api/uint8-json` test routes mirroring better-call's streaming pattern). ## Verification - `cd server && pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/api-compression.test.ts` — 10/10 passing (7 pre-existing + 3 new regression tests). - Manual: with the fix, browser sign-in against a dev instance succeeds for gzip-accepting clients; before the fix the same request returned `net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE`. ## Risks - Low risk. The middleware still compresses large text/JSON responses exactly as before; the changes only affect paths that previously produced corrupted or destroyed responses. - Behavioral shift: responses whose headers were already committed are now delivered uncompressed instead of being (incorrectly) buffered — this is strictly less surprising than the previous corrupted output. - Failure-path shift: a compression error now yields an uncompressed 200 response instead of a dropped connection. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic), extended thinking enabled, running via Claude Code / Paperclip agent harness with tool use (shell, file edit, test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.11 |
||
|
Justin ToddandAndrew Aymeloglu
|
1e8ede4e1e |
fix(adapter-utils): runChildProcess escalates to SIGKILL on liveness, not child.killed (#8598)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Those agents run as child processes spawned by
`@paperclipai/adapter-utils`'s `runChildProcess`, which arms a
parent-side wall-clock timer at `timeoutSec` to bound a hung run
> - At the deadline `runChildProcess` sends SIGTERM, then after a grace
window escalates to SIGKILL — the SIGKILL backstop is what turns a
wedged child into a dead PID so the scheduler can reclaim and retry it
> - On the **direct-child fallback** path (`signalRunningProcess`, used
on win32 and whenever process-group signaling is unavailable or throws)
the escalation was gated on `!child.killed`
> - But Node sets `ChildProcess.killed` to `true` the instant a signal
is *successfully sent*, not when the process exits — so once the earlier
SIGTERM has been sent, `child.killed` is already `true`, the
`!child.killed` guard is `false`, and the SIGKILL escalation never runs
> - A child that ignores SIGTERM (e.g. a graceful-shutdown handler
wedged on a socket) is therefore never force-killed, outlives its
deadline, and for an unattended scheduler sits running forever with no
terminal state
> - This PR gates the fallback escalation on real liveness (`exitCode
=== null && signalCode === null`), so SIGKILL fires precisely while the
child is still alive
> - The benefit is the hard timeout actually guarantees termination
(except true uninterruptible D-state) on every platform/configuration,
not just where the process-group path is available
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing public issue — describing the bug inline, following
`.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml`:
### What happened?
When `@paperclipai/adapter-utils`'s `runChildProcess` reaches
`timeoutSec` and the spawned child ignores SIGTERM, the SIGKILL
escalation on the **direct-child fallback** path
(`signalRunningProcess`, taken on win32 or whenever `process.kill(-pgid,
…)` is unavailable or throws) never fires, so the child outlives its
deadline indefinitely. Root cause: the escalation is gated on
`!running.child.killed`, and `ChildProcess.killed` reflects only that a
signal was *successfully sent* (per the Node docs it "does not indicate
that the child process has been terminated"). After the deadline
SIGTERM, `child.killed` is already `true`, so `!child.killed` is `false`
and the follow-up SIGKILL is suppressed.
### Expected behavior
After the grace window, a child that is still alive is force-killed with
SIGKILL regardless of whether SIGTERM was already sent — the hard
timeout should guarantee termination (except true uninterruptible
D-state) on every platform/configuration.
### Steps to reproduce
1. Spawn a child that installs a no-op `SIGTERM` handler and never exits
(e.g. `process.on('SIGTERM', () => {}); setInterval(() => {}, 1000)`).
2. Drive it through the direct-child fallback, i.e.
`signalRunningProcess({ child, processGroupId: null }, …)` (the path
used on win32 / when group signaling is unavailable).
3. Send SIGTERM (the child swallows it; `child.killed` becomes `true`),
then send SIGKILL.
4. On the pre-fix `!child.killed` guard the SIGKILL call is a no-op and
the PID survives past its deadline. Covered by the new regression test
in this PR.
### Paperclip version or commit
Reproduces on `master` (the `signalRunningProcess` fallback). Also
present in published `@paperclipai/adapter-utils` (e.g. `2026.325.0`),
where the same `!child.killed` guard sits on the single direct-child
escalation path.
_Searched the open PR list for duplicates/related work on
`runChildProcess` / `signalRunningProcess` / SIGKILL escalation; found
none._
## What Changed
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts`: in
`signalRunningProcess`, replace the direct-child fallback guard
`!running.child.killed` with `running.child.exitCode === null &&
running.child.signalCode === null` (real liveness). The process-group
path is unchanged.
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts`: `export`
`signalRunningProcess` so the fallback branch can be unit-tested
directly.
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts`: add a companion
regression test (POSIX-only, like the sibling timeout tests) that forces
the fallback (`processGroupId: null`) — sends SIGTERM (child swallows
it, `child.killed` becomes `true`), asserts the child is still alive,
then sends SIGKILL and asserts the PID dies. Also keeps the end-to-end
`runChildProcess` SIGTERM-ignoring test.
## Verification
```
npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts # 52 passed
npx tsc --noEmit # clean
```
- **Regression proof:** reverting the guard to `!running.child.killed`
makes the new fallback test fail (`waitForPidExit` → false; the child
survives); the liveness guard makes it pass. This addresses the prior
review note that the existing test only exercised the process-group path
(which already escalated correctly on POSIX) and never reached the
changed branch.
## Risks
Low. A one-line guard change scoped to the direct-child fallback; the
process-group path is untouched. SIGKILL is only sent when
`exitCode`/`signalCode` are both still `null`, i.e. the process is
provably alive, so the change cannot signal an already-reaped/recycled
PID. New tests are POSIX-only and `skipIf(win32)`, consistent with the
sibling timeout tests in this file.
## Model Used
Anthropic **Claude Opus 4.8**, driven via the Cursor agent (extended
reasoning + tool use, large context). Diff, tests, and the regression
proof above were produced and run by the agent; reviewed by a human
before pushing.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com>
|
||
|
|
1fe89eb8f8 |
Enforce durable external-wait liveness (#9373)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The heartbeat/recovery subsystem decides whether an agent run has a durable continuation path after the process stops. > - External waits need stricter semantics than local background watchers: a killed local process is not durable, while a first-class blocker/monitor/scheduled wake is. > - Without that distinction, recovery can repeatedly treat adapter-failed continuations as live work and obscure the real reason a task stopped. > - This pull request adds explicit durable external-wait liveness handling and documents the expected execution semantics. > - It also improves operator-visible recovery evidence so invalid external-wait paths explain why they were rejected. > - The benefit is clearer recovery behavior, fewer duplicate continuation recoveries, and a safer contract for monitor-backed external waits. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #5978 - Related PRs: #4988, #7495, #8502 ## What Changed - Added durable external-wait liveness classification so local/background watchers are not accepted as durable live paths after the owning process exits. - Preserved first-class blocker/monitor/scheduled wake paths as valid external-wait continuations. - Added backend regression coverage for killed watcher failure, monitor-backed durable wait resumption, normal completion, blocker behavior, and no duplicate recovery. - Added adapter utility coverage for terminal cleanup behavior used by local process adapters. - Surfaced invalid external-wait recovery evidence in the recovery action card and run ledger. - Updated execution semantics documentation and the V1 implementation contract. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `node scripts/run-vitest-stable.mjs --mode general --group general-server` equivalent lane passed in CI-clean env: 238 files, 2164 tests passed, 1 skipped. - `node scripts/run-vitest-stable.mjs --mode general --group general-workspaces-a` passed in fully Paperclip-env-clean env: UI 305 files / 2430 tests; CLI 43 files / 230 tests. - `node scripts/run-vitest-stable.mjs --mode general --group general-workspaces-b` passed in fully Paperclip-env-clean env: shared/db/adapters/plugin packages all green. - `node scripts/run-vitest-stable.mjs --mode serialized` passed in fully Paperclip-env-clean env: 107 serialized server suites green, including 84/84 heartbeat-process-recovery tests. - `pnpm build` passed in fully Paperclip-env-clean env. Notes: running `pnpm test:run` directly inside the Paperclip heartbeat environment exposed local harness env contamination in existing tests (`PAPERCLIP_CONFIG`, `PAPERCLIP_DB_BACKUP_DIR`, and `PAPERCLIP_WORKTREE_START_POINT`). Re-running the same lanes with inherited `PAPERCLIP_*` and port env removed produced the CI-equivalent green results above. ## Risks - Medium behavioral risk: this changes recovery classification for stopped local external-wait processes, so adapters relying on unmanaged background watchers must use blockers, monitors, scheduled wakes, or explicit durable handoff instead. - Low UI risk: recovery-card copy changes are covered by component tests and Storybook screenshot QA. - No database migration is included. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-enabled terminal/code execution. Exact context-window metadata was not exposed in the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.10 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
1f07690184 |
fix(ui): keep issue threads from jumping to latest comment (#9354)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Issue and item detail pages use a shared issue chat thread to show comments, runs, activity, and interactions. > - That thread still defaulted to landing on the latest comment when messages first loaded. > - On long issue/item pages, that default can yank the operator away from the top of the page before they choose to inspect the newest message. > - Deep links to comment hashes can create the same kind of initial viewport jump when they are used as generic navigation targets. > - This pull request makes initial latest-comment and initial thread-hash scrolling opt-in instead of default behavior. > - The benefit is stable initial page position across issue-thread surfaces while keeping the explicit Jump to latest control available. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No exact public GitHub issue was found for this bug. Bug description: - What happened: opening a page with a shared issue conversation thread could automatically move the viewport toward the newest comment/thread target. - Expected behavior: ordinary page loads should keep the initial viewport stable unless the user explicitly clicks Jump to latest. - Steps to reproduce: open an issue or item detail page with a long conversation thread and observe whether the page jumps to the newest thread entry on initial load. - Paperclip version/commit: reproduced while working on the current `master` branch lineage. - Deployment mode: local trusted/dev UI. Related public thread/comment UX work: Refs #3916, Refs #7972, Refs #8800. ## What Changed - Changed `IssueChatThread` so initial latest-comment scrolling defaults to off. - Added a separate opt-in for initial thread-hash scrolling, also defaulting to off. - Preserved stale deleted-comment hash cleanup without scrolling the page. - Updated regression coverage so default initial load stays put, comment hashes do not scroll by default, and manual Jump to latest still scrolls. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed on the clean PR branch. - `pnpm --dir ui exec vitest run src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx -t "loads from the pending state into issue detail without changing hook order"` passed on the clean PR branch. - `pnpm --dir ui exec vitest run src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx` was attempted on the clean PR branch, but the file fails before changed assertions with the existing `TypeError: act is not a function` test-harness issue across 58 tests; 14 tests passed. - Static check: no `autoScrollToLatestOnInitialLoad={true}` or `autoScrollToHashOnInitialLoad={true}` call sites remain in `ui/src`. ## Risks Low risk. This only changes initial scroll defaults in the shared issue thread. The main behavioral shift is that direct comment/thread hashes no longer auto-scroll on first load unless a caller explicitly opts in; the Jump to latest button and post-submit scroll behavior are unchanged. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex coding-agent runtime; exact context window not exposed in this environment; tool-enabled repository inspection, editing, testing, git, GitHub CLI, and Paperclip API usage. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.9 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
be1fcb2b46 |
Fix agent sidebar liveness churn (#9358)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board UI includes an agents sidebar so operators can see which agents are currently active. > - That sidebar depends on live-run polling, heartbeat events, and cross-tab cache sharing to stay current without overloading the API. > - The sidebar was visually churning because agents could leave the live section immediately after a run ended, while progress events and cross-tab broadcasts kept forcing hot query updates. > - This pull request stabilizes live sidebar membership and makes shared polling broadcasts monotonic/deduplicated. > - The benefit is a calmer operator sidebar that still reflects real live state without flashing between stale and fresh snapshots. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this operator-facing bug. Bug summary: - What happened: the agents sidebar could flash or reshuffle around active agents while live-run and heartbeat data was updating. - Expected behavior: active and recently-active agents should remain visually stable, and cross-tab cache sharing should not overwrite fresher data with older snapshots. - Reproduction context: run Paperclip with multiple tabs or rapid live-run/progress updates and watch the agents sidebar while agents enter/leave live execution. - Deployment mode: local/operator board UI. Related PR: - Supersedes #9357, which carried the same fixes on a branch/title/body that were not suitable for public contribution hygiene. ## What Changed - Restored the maintainer-only warning wording in the developer skill guide so the existing server skill-utils CI gate passes on current master. - Added a 120-second linger window for streamlined sidebar agent rows so an agent does not immediately disappear from the live section as soon as its last run ends. - Deferred the recent-agent fallback until there are no live or lingering agents, while keeping the live badge tied only to actually-live runs. - Stopped broad live-runs/heartbeats/agents-list invalidation on every run progress event, while preserving targeted agent-detail invalidation. - Added producer timestamps to cross-tab shared polling result messages so older-or-equal snapshots are dropped before `setQueryData`. - Added per-resource broadcast dedupe/rate limiting so tabs do not rebroadcast equivalent cached data in a loop. - Added focused coverage for sidebar linger behavior, staggered multi-agent linger expiry, live update invalidation scope, shared polling timestamp handling, and cross-tab broadcast dedupe. ## Verification Run locally on the rebased PR branch: - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/SidebarAgents.test.tsx src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.ts` — 44 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/lib/cross-tab-poll.test.ts src/hooks/useSharedPolling.test.ts` — 10 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — exit code 0. ## Risks - Low migration risk: the sidebar/polling changes are UI/client cache behavior only, with no database or API contract changes. - Sidebar visibility now intentionally lingers for 120 seconds after the last live run; stale rows could remain briefly visible, but their live badge is removed when they are no longer actually live. - Cross-tab broadcasts are now more conservative; a missed publish should be corrected by the next normal poll or accepted newer timestamp. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via the Paperclip Codex coding-agent runtime; exact API model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this environment. The agent used terminal/tool execution for repository inspection, focused tests, branch preparation, and PR creation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.8 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
e84731af70 |
Revert "Fix default model adapter test config" (#9363)
Reverts paperclipai/paperclip#9361 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandCody
|
ebd62ca5ae |
Fix default model adapter test config (#9361)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board UI lets operators create and edit agent adapter configuration, including a primary model field and an adapter test action. > - For Cody and similar adapter forms, selecting the default model means the model value is intentionally unset so the adapter can use its default. > - The adapter test path still allowed `model: undefined` to survive in the generated adapter config, which could send an invalid test payload instead of omitting the field. > - This pull request normalizes create/edit adapter test config so default-model selections omit `model` entirely. > - The benefit is that testing an agent configured to use the adapter default model exercises the same clean config shape that should be saved and run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found for this local UI bug, so the problem is described inline. Bug description: - What happened: using the adapter test action after choosing the default model could include `model: undefined` in adapter config and surface a UI/runtime error instead of testing with the adapter default. - Expected behavior: choosing the default model should omit the `model` field from adapter config so the adapter default is used. - Steps to reproduce: edit a Codex/Cody-style agent with a concrete model, switch the model selector to Default, then run the adapter Test action. - Paperclip version/commit: current `master` before this PR. - Deployment mode: board UI, deployment-mode independent. ## What Changed - Sanitized adapter test config assembly so undefined adapter config entries are omitted before the test request is sent. - Made create-mode current model display resilient when the model is unset for adapter defaults. - Added regression coverage for editing an existing agent from a concrete model back to Default and testing it. - Added regression coverage for create-mode testing with an unset/default model. - Hardened the developer skill wording used by the existing server skill utility contract test. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/AgentConfigForm.render.test.tsx` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` - GitHub PR checks on this branch are green, including Typecheck + Release Registry, Build, General tests, e2e, verify, security scans, and Greptile Review. ## Risks - Low risk: this only removes undefined values from adapter test config payloads, which aligns with the existing persisted patch behavior. - Low risk: default-model display now treats unset create-mode model values as an empty string. - No database, API schema, migration, auth, or adapter runtime contract changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected - check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled software-engineering session. Exact context window size was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Cody <cody@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.7 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
a4993a72a6 |
Fix live run streaming text readability (#9330)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The issue thread UI renders live agent output from adapter run logs and transcript parsing. > - Some adapter streams emit many small or repeated token chunks, and live UI updates can expose partial words, duplicated slices, or transient markdown placeholders. > - That makes active run updates look like gibberish even when the underlying agent output is valid. > - The fix needs to preserve raw logs while making the live thread view stable, readable, and ordered. > - This pull request adds monotonic run-log sequencing, safer live transcript dedupe/order handling, markdown placeholder hiding, and readable live text stabilization. > - The benefit is a live issue thread that updates smoothly without showing confusing partial parser artifacts. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists yet, so this PR includes the bug details inline. ### What happened? Live run updates in the issue thread can show confusing repeated or partial text while an adapter is streaming. The visible text appears to lose parsing boundaries during active updates, especially with ACP-style token deltas, so the live output can briefly render duplicated chunks, incomplete words, or HTML-comment placeholders. ### Expected behavior Live text should remain readable while preserving the underlying run output for raw inspection. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Start a live agent run whose adapter emits small stdout token deltas. 2. Watch the issue thread while the run is still active. 3. Observe transient duplicated chunks, incomplete words, or markdown placeholder artifacts in the live rendered text. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against current `master` before this PR branch. ### Deployment mode Local dev issue-thread UI with live local adapter runs. ### Additional context GitHub PR search for `live run streaming text markdown transcript` found one broad merged PR, `#252` (“Dotta updates - sorry it's so large”), but no targeted duplicate for this live streaming readability bug. ## What Changed - Added per-run monotonic sequence numbers to persisted and live run-log chunks. - Dedupe and order live transcript chunks by sequence before falling back to timestamp ordering. - Hide markdown HTML comment placeholder text from rendered markdown output. - Smooth live issue-thread text updates so partial additions reveal at readable word boundaries and sliding-window removals do not produce gibberish. - Added coverage for run-log ordering/deduping, markdown comment hiding, live issue-thread stabilization, and Greptile-reviewed edge cases where overlap rewrites could synthesize text or no-boundary additions could stay hidden. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts src/components/MarkdownBody.test.tsx src/components/transcript/useLiveRunTranscripts.test.tsx` passed before the review fix: 3 files, 86 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts` passed after the review fix: 1 file, 30 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts src/components/transcript/useLiveRunTranscripts.test.tsx` passed after the final Greptile overlap fix: 2 files, 40 tests. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - Local PII/secret scan of touched files found only expected code/test words such as `secret`, `token`, and redaction-related strings; no literal credentials found. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed after restoring declared dependencies with `CI=1 pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` and running with a short `TMPDIR` because `tsx` IPC sockets fail under the long sandbox temp path. - `pnpm build` passed with existing Vite CSS/font/chunk warnings. - GitHub PR checks passed on head `4c052dfe86aecb5feb73504e6b48843f68fce813`: build, typecheck/release registry, server and workspace test shards, serialized server suites, e2e, canary dry run, policy, review, Socket, Superagent, Snyk, and verify. - Greptile review passed on head `4c052dfe86aecb5feb73504e6b48843f68fce813` with confidence score 5/5 and no blocking issues found. - `pnpm test:run` failed in unrelated server workspace tests on this macOS local environment: - `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment.test.ts`: two assertions compare `/tmp/...` with `/private/tmp/...`. - `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-worktree-suppression.test.ts`: expected one heartbeat run but observed two, followed by cleanup fallout in the full run. - Isolated rerun of those two server suites reproduced the same three failures. ## Risks - Low product risk for the UI changes: the readable smoothing only affects active live-run display stabilization, not stored comments or raw run logs. - Moderate verification risk: local full Vitest did not pass because of unrelated server workspace tests. Targeted tests for this change, typecheck, token gates, and build passed. - Run-log sequence fields are optional for compatibility with older log rows that do not include `seq`. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, tool-using local workspace execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I searched the GitHub PR list for similar PRs and confirmed this is not a duplicate - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
991279f52c |
Fix Skill Studio markdown dirty tracking (#9356)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Skill Studio is the UI surface for editing skill package files, including `SKILL.md`. > - Markdown files are split into frontmatter fields plus a rich markdown body editor. > - The dirty-state guard intentionally ignores markdown editor normalization during initial mount. > - That guard was too narrow: rich markdown body edits could happen before the file was marked as user-interacted, so edits did not reliably enable Save. > - This pull request broadens the user-interaction signals around the markdown body editor and adds a regression test for saving body edits. > - The benefit is that editing `SKILL.md` in Skill Studio now behaves like normal file editing: changes show as unsaved and Save persists the full markdown document. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. Inline bug description follows. ### What happened? Editing a Skill Studio markdown body did not reliably mark the file dirty, so the Save action could remain unavailable or fail to persist the body edit. ### Expected behavior User edits in the markdown body editor should mark the file unsaved and allow saving the updated `SKILL.md` content. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Open a Skill Studio markdown file such as `SKILL.md`. 2. Edit the markdown body in the rich editor. 3. Observe whether the unsaved state appears and Save becomes enabled. 4. Save and reload the file. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `master` before this fix. ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`). ## What Changed - Mark markdown body interaction on capture-phase key, pointer, paste, drop, before-input, and input events around the rich editor. - Preserve the existing guard that prevents MDXEditor mount-time normalization from dirtying a clean file. - Add a Skill Studio regression test that edits the markdown body, observes the Unsaved state, enables Save, and verifies the saved `SKILL.md` includes both frontmatter and the edited body. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run ui/src/pages/SkillStudio.test.tsx` Manual reviewer path: - Open a Skill Studio markdown file such as `SKILL.md`. - Edit the body text in the rich markdown editor. - Confirm the UI shows an unsaved state and the Save button is enabled. - Save and confirm the updated markdown body persists. ## Risks Low risk. The change only broadens interaction detection before applying existing dirty-state logic, and the guard still prevents initial editor normalization from marking an unopened file dirty. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex CLI using GPT-5, with repository file editing, shell execution, and GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a02fe8d575 |
Update Codex adapter GPT-5.6 defaults (#9352)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Codex local is the adapter subsystem that exposes OpenAI Codex CLI model choices to agents and issue overrides. > - OpenAI has GPT-5.6 Codex-capable models that should appear in Paperclip's built-in Codex model list and refresh behavior. > - Paperclip's server model listing falls back to the adapter metadata and merges OpenAI refresh results with known Codex defaults. > - This pull request updates the Codex default model metadata to include GPT-5.6 options and adds regression coverage for fallback and refresh paths. > - The benefit is that operators can select the new Codex models without relying on manual model IDs, and refresh behavior keeps known GPT-5.6 options visible. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #9322. Refs #9342. Refs #9346. ### Agent or provider Codex CLI (OpenAI). ### Why this adapter is useful OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Codex-capable models should be available in Paperclip's Codex adapter defaults and model refresh path. ### How the agent is invoked `codex` ## What Changed - Changed the `codex_local` default model metadata from `gpt-5.5` to `gpt-5.6`. - Added `gpt-5.6-sol`, `gpt-5.6-terra`, and `gpt-5.6-luna` to the built-in Codex adapter model list. - Updated adapter and server model-listing tests to cover GPT-5.6 fallback and refresh behavior. - Aligned Codex Fast mode support and helper text with the new `gpt-5.6` default, while preserving GPT-5.5, GPT-5.4, and manual model ID support. ## Verification - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/codex-local/src/index.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/codex-args.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-models.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-model-refresh-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` ## Risks Medium risk because changing `DEFAULT_CODEX_LOCAL_MODEL` from `gpt-5.5` to `gpt-5.6` changes the adapter's default model selection for new blank configurations. The model-list additions are otherwise low risk and covered by adapter/server metadata tests. This PR intentionally overlaps related PRs #9342 and #9346, so reviewers may prefer to close or fold it into one of those branches. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with shell, git, GitHub CLI, and repository editing tool use. Exact served model ID and context window were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
953b315dfb |
Shorten skill frontmatter descriptions (#9353)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip agents can load repository and catalog skills, and Codex renders skill names and frontmatter descriptions into startup context. > - Long descriptions consume the fixed skill metadata budget before Codex can use the progressively disclosed skill bodies. > - The repo `.agents/skills` descriptions and a few shipped catalog descriptions had grown into operational documentation instead of short trigger metadata. > - This pull request keeps the strongest trigger language in frontmatter while leaving detailed procedures in each skill body. > - The benefit is lower prompt overhead, more reliable skill triggering, and a regression guard that prevents description drift from returning. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue found for this maintenance item. ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I am working against `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the issue originates in Paperclip's shipped skill metadata, not in a local agent adapter or provider. ### What happened? Codex startup renders discovered skill names and frontmatter descriptions into a fixed skill metadata budget. Several repository skill descriptions and one shipped catalog description had grown into long-form operational guidance, which can force Codex to truncate descriptions before the model has enough trigger signal to select the right skill. ### Expected behavior Skill frontmatter descriptions should stay short trigger summaries: one capability sentence plus a “use when” clause. Detailed procedures should stay in the skill body and load only after the skill triggers. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Inspect `.agents/skills/*/SKILL.md` and `packages/skills-catalog/catalog/**/SKILL.md` frontmatter descriptions. 2. Measure folded YAML `description` values. 3. Observe descriptions above the intended short-trigger range, including descriptions above 300 characters. 4. Run the new shipped catalog test to verify future descriptions stay capped. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `master` at `cc81eefb6047d8eaf57faf785f421c03dc97073c`. ### Deployment mode Local dev / source checkout metadata inspection. This is not database-related. ### Installation method Built from source. ### Agent adapter(s) involved Codex, because Codex startup uses the skill metadata prompt budget. The metadata source itself is core repository/catalog content. ### Database mode Not database-related. ### Access context Not applicable; this is static repository metadata. ### Node.js version `v22.22.2` in the verification environment. ### Operating system Linux container environment. ### Relevant logs or output Final measurement after this PR: 29 source `SKILL.md` files, max description length 215 chars, 5,449 total description chars, estimated 1,363 description tokens at 4 chars/token. ### Relevant config None. ### Additional context The shipped catalog manifest was regenerated so the generated package metadata matches the edited catalog `SKILL.md` sources. ### Privacy checklist - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for PII and redacted where necessary. ## What Changed - Shortened long `.agents/skills/*/SKILL.md` frontmatter descriptions to concise capability plus use-when trigger clauses. - Shortened the over-budget shipped skills catalog descriptions for wireframe, Paperclip capsules, and reflection coach. - Regenerated `packages/skills-catalog/generated/catalog.json` so shipped metadata matches source skill frontmatter. - Added a Vitest regression guard that caps repo skill source descriptions and generated catalog descriptions at 300 characters. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog build:manifest` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog test` — 5 files passed, 19 tests passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog typecheck` - Final measurement: 29 source `SKILL.md` files, max description length 215 chars, 5,449 total description chars, estimated 1,363 description tokens at 4 chars/token. Note: the clean PR worktree was created from `origin/master` and contains only this commit, but it does not have `node_modules`; running `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog test` there failed at tool/package resolution (`vitest`, `tsc`, `@paperclipai/shared`). The dependency-equipped workspace passed the commands above before the commit was cherry-picked onto the clean branch. ## Risks Low risk. This changes skill metadata and tests only. The main risk is over-trimming a useful trigger phrase, mitigated by keeping explicit “use when” clauses and leaving detailed guidance in the skill bodies. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent via Paperclip/Codex, with shell and file-edit tool use. Exact API model ID and context window were not exposed in the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0f5f461729 |
Avoid startup crash when Reflection Coach assets are missing (#9351)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server has built-in agent definitions that are loaded during startup and used to provision optional operational agents such as Reflection Coach > - Reflection Coach stores richer stock instructions, a routine description, and a bundled skill as markdown assets outside the TypeScript module body > - A deployed server can fail before it is healthy if one of those copied markdown assets is absent from `server/dist` > - A recent build fix preserves those assets during normal server builds, but runtime should still degrade gracefully if a packaged asset is missing or unreadable > - This pull request adds resilient loading for built-in Reflection Coach assets and keeps a minimal compiled fallback available > - The benefit is that a missing optional built-in agent file no longer turns into a process-wide startup crash ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Bug fix. No public GitHub issue found for this exact startup crash. - Related public PR: #9339 - What happened: the server could throw `ENOENT` while importing the built-in agent service if `server/dist/built-ins/agents/reflection-coach/AGENTS.md` was missing from a deployed build. - Expected behavior: the server should keep starting, log that the built-in asset was missing, and use safe fallback text for the optional built-in agent resource. - Steps to reproduce: build the server, remove the compiled Reflection Coach `AGENTS.md` asset from `server/dist`, then import/start the server path that loads built-in agent definitions. - Paperclip version/commit: reproduced against a deployed build containing the Reflection Coach built-in agent assets; fixed against current `master` after #9339. - Deployment mode: Node server deployment using compiled `server/dist` output. ## What Changed - Added built-in agent text loading that checks the compiled asset path first, then source/package fallback paths, then a minimal compiled-in fallback string. - Added fallback text for Reflection Coach instructions, routine description, and bundled skill content so startup does not depend on optional markdown assets being present. - Added regression coverage for readable candidate selection and missing-file fallback behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm -w exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/built-in-agents.test.ts` — 1 test file passed, 24 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build` — server TypeScript build completed and copied `src/built-ins` into `dist/built-ins`. - Manual smoke: temporarily moved `server/dist/built-ins/agents/reflection-coach/AGENTS.md`, imported `server/dist/services/built-in-agents.js` through the repo-pinned `tsx` runtime, and confirmed Reflection Coach definitions still loaded with output `reflection-coach:3732`; the asset was restored afterward. ## Risks Low risk. The normal path still uses the full packaged markdown assets. The fallback path is only used when those files are missing or unreadable, and it logs a warning so packaging drift remains visible. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex coding agent, with repository tool access and shell-based verification. Exact context window was not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.6 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
cc81eefb60 |
Make plan-approval continuations durable after failed wakes (#9331)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents often work from reviewed plans that are approved through issue-thread interactions. > - Accepting a plan is not just a UI decision; it must reliably resume the assignee so approved work continues. > - A failed continuation wake could leave an approved plan stranded in review with no durable retry or visible recovery path. > - This pull request makes approved plan continuations retryable, recoverable, and visible when resume fails. > - The benefit is that operators can trust plan approval to either resume the agent or produce an explicit actionable failure instead of silent limbo. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists. Inline bug report follows the repository bug template. ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I am on the latest released version of Paperclip or can reproduce on `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip itself, not in my agent adapter, API provider, or local configuration. ### What happened? When a plan-confirmation interaction was accepted, the assignee continuation wake could fail before useful agent execution. In that case the issue could remain in review even though the plan had been approved, because the failed wake was fire-and-forget and there was no durable retry or recovery path for accepted continuations. ### Expected behavior Accepted plan continuations should either wake the assignee successfully, retry bounded infrastructure failures, recover dropped wakes, or surface an explicit failure state that operators can act on. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Create an issue with an assignee and a plan confirmation that wakes the assignee on accept. 2. Accept the confirmation. 3. Simulate a pre-flight continuation failure, such as process loss before agent start or workspace validation failure. 4. Observe that the approved issue can remain in review without an active assignee wake or visible retry/failure state. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproducible on `master` before this PR's retry/recovery changes. ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`) and server-side recovery paths. ### Installation method Built from source (`pnpm install`, `pnpm dev`, test runner). ### Agent adapter(s) involved Not adapter-specific; this is a core continuation/recovery bug. The tests cover local-agent failure shapes without relying on a provider-specific API. ### Database mode Embedded Postgres test database for verification. The affected logic is database-backed and applies to normal Postgres deployments as well. ### Access context Board accepts the interaction; agent execution resumes through the assignee wake path. ### Relevant logs or output No sensitive logs are needed. The regression tests simulate the failed wake and recovery states directly. ### Relevant config No special config is required beyond an assignee with wake-on-demand enabled. ### Additional context This PR also prevents a stale workspace-validation payload from quarantining another issue's active workspace and prevents unrelated successful runs from masking a continuation that never resumed. ### Privacy checklist - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for PII, usernames, file paths, API keys, tokens, and company names, and redacted where necessary. ## What Changed - Added bounded infrastructure retries for failed accepted-interaction continuation wakes. - Extended stranded issue recovery so dropped accepted-plan continuation wakes are requeued. - Recorded and rendered explicit resume-failure state on accepted confirmation cards. - Added clean-workspace fallback for workspace-validation failures while preventing cross-issue workspace quarantine. - Tightened recovery so unrelated successful runs do not mask an accepted continuation that never resumed. - Added focused server/UI coverage for retry scheduling, recovery, visible failure state, and interaction card rendering. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` — 106 tests passed. - Earlier branch verification also covered the issue-thread interaction card tests for the visible resume-failure UI. - GitHub CI is green on the replacement PR head, and Greptile reports 5/5 with no blocking issues. ## Risks - Medium behavioral risk: this changes recovery behavior for accepted continuation interactions and workspace-validation retries. - Mitigation: retries are bounded, scoped to same-company issue context, and workspace quarantine now requires ownership by the issue being retried. - Existing stored confirmation results remain compatible because the new resume-failure field is optional. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled terminal workflow. The runtime does not expose an exact context-window value to the agent. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.5 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d166069bc4 |
Preserve built-in agent assets in server builds (#9339)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server package ships compiled runtime code plus static runtime assets. > - Built-in agent definitions live under `server/src/built-ins` and runtime code resolves them relative to compiled server files. > - The server build already copied onboarding assets into `dist`, but it did not copy built-in agent assets alongside the compiled code. > - Packaged server builds could therefore miss built-in agent definitions even though source-based development runs worked. > - This pull request extends the server build copy step to preserve built-in agent assets in `dist/built-ins`. > - The benefit is packaged server builds keep the same built-in agent runtime assets available as source-based development runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue found. This PR describes the underlying bug inline using the bug report template fields. ### What happened? `@paperclipai/server` build output copied `server/src/onboarding-assets` into `server/dist/onboarding-assets`, but did not copy `server/src/built-ins` into `server/dist/built-ins`. Runtime code for built-in agents resolves those assets relative to the compiled server files, so packaged builds could omit built-in agent markdown assets that are present during source-based development. ### Expected behavior Packaged server builds should include built-in agent assets under `server/dist/built-ins`, matching the runtime location expected by the compiled server code. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Check out current `master` before this PR. 2. Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build`. 3. Check for `server/dist/built-ins/agents/reflection-coach/AGENTS.md`. 4. Observe that the built-in agent asset is missing from the server build output. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduces on current `master` before this PR. The fix is verified on commit `2b89984ccb7857f06359bf65c48222f110c7aeff`. ### Deployment mode Build/package artifact behavior. This can affect any deployment mode that runs from the built server package rather than directly from source. ### Installation method Built from source with `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build`. ### Agent adapter(s) involved Not adapter-specific. This is a core server packaging bug for built-in agent assets. ### Database mode Not database-related. ### Access context Not applicable. This happens during package build output generation. Related search: - Searched public PRs/issues for `built-ins build copy repo:paperclipai/paperclip`. - Found no directly related open issue. One old closed Hermes adapter PR was not directly related. ## What Changed - Updated the `@paperclipai/server` build script to create `dist/built-ins`. - Added the copy step from `server/src/built-ins` into `server/dist/built-ins` alongside the existing onboarding asset copy. - Added a focused server package build-script test that asserts both onboarding and built-in static runtime asset directories are copied into `dist`. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/server-package-build-script.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build` - `test -f server/dist/built-ins/agents/reflection-coach/AGENTS.md` ## Risks Low risk. This changes only the package build asset copy step and adds focused test coverage. The main risk is build-script portability, but it follows the existing `mkdir -p` and `cp -R` pattern already used for onboarding assets. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent in a tool-enabled Paperclip heartbeat. Exact model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.4 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
05973b2073 |
Enable sandbox environments for Grok local adapter (#9338)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Local CLI adapters can run against Paperclip-managed execution environments instead of only the host filesystem. > - The environment picker and environment capability API derive sandbox support from shared adapter capability lists. > - The Grok Build adapter is implemented as a local CLI adapter, but it was missing from those shared environment capability lists. > - That made Grok agents look local-only even when sandbox environments were configured. > - This pull request registers `grok_local` in the shared adapter constants and remote-managed environment support path. > - The benefit is that Grok Build agents can select the same local, SSH, and sandbox environment overrides as other local CLI adapters. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this bug. Inline bug report follows. ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I am on `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip itself, not in the Grok adapter provider or local configuration. ### What happened? When configuring a Grok Build local agent in the board UI, Paperclip did not expose configured sandbox environments as selectable environment overrides. The shared environment capability helper treated `grok_local` as local-only because it was missing from the remote-managed local adapter allowlist. ### Expected behavior Grok Build should behave like other local CLI adapters: when environments are enabled and a runnable sandbox environment exists, the agent configuration form should show the environment override selector and allow the sandbox to be selected. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Enable environments in instance experimental settings. 2. Configure at least one runnable sandbox environment. 3. Open the agent configuration form for a Grok Build local agent. 4. Observe that the sandbox environment is not offered as an override before this fix. ### Paperclip version or commit `master` before this PR. ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`). ### Installation method Built from source (`pnpm dev` / `pnpm build`). ### Agent adapter(s) involved - Grok Build local adapter. - Core bug in shared environment capability logic. ### Database mode Not database-related. ### Access context Board human operator. ### Relevant logs or output No runtime error is emitted; the issue is a missing UI option caused by shared capability metadata. ### Relevant config No secret-bearing config required. Reproduction only needs environments enabled and a runnable sandbox environment configured. ### Privacy checklist - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for PII, usernames, file paths, API keys, tokens, company names, and redacted where necessary. ## What Changed - Added `grok_local` to the shared built-in adapter type list. - Added `grok_local` to the remote-managed adapter set used by environment capability helpers. - Added shared regression coverage for Grok local sandbox provider and driver support. - Added a UI render regression test that confirms Grok Build agents show the environment override when a runnable sandbox exists. ## Verification - `git diff --check` - Changed-file secret scan with `rg` for common token/key patterns. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared exec vitest run src/environment-support.test.ts` - `pnpm --dir ui exec vitest run src/components/AgentConfigForm.render.test.tsx` ## Risks - Low risk. This expands environment support for an existing local adapter to match the local CLI adapter behavior already used by Claude, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, Cursor, and Pi. - Operators still need at least one configured runnable sandbox environment before a Grok agent has a sandbox option to select. - This PR was created from a Paperclip execution workspace branch whose name is runtime-provided; the PR body intentionally avoids internal issue identifiers or instance-local links. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled terminal/code execution environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
|
5c85ae64a0 |
Cases: experimental first-class case object (#9198)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The board currently uses issues for execution, but longer-lived content work needs a separate object that can survive beyond a single task thread. > - The Cases subsystem adds an experimental, company-scoped record for content artifacts and their supporting metadata. > - The backend needs durable storage, API routes, revision history, issue linkage, and company-boundary enforcement before the UI can depend on Cases. > - The UI needs an opt-in navigation surface, list/detail views, reference chips, and issue-page context so operators can inspect Cases without making them the default workflow. > - The agent-facing skills need a contract for creating and updating Cases so automated content workflows can dogfood the feature. > - This pull request ships that experimental end-to-end path behind the `enableCases` flag. > - The benefit is a first-class place to collect content work, references, attachments, revisions, and related execution threads without polluting the core issue model. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this experimental feature. Feature request fields: ### Problem Content-oriented work such as release notes, announcements, docs, and campaigns can span many execution issues, which makes the final artifact hard to find and reason about after the execution thread moves on. ### Proposed solution Add an experimental Cases object that is company-scoped, linked to issues, queryable through the API, inspectable in the board UI, and writable by agent workflows through documented conventions. ### Alternatives considered Continue encoding content artifacts directly in issues or documents only. That keeps the data model smaller, but it does not give operators a stable artifact-centric view or a clean way to link related execution history. ### Roadmap alignment Checked `ROADMAP.md`; this PR does not duplicate an existing planned core roadmap item. ## What Changed - Added the `cases` data model, migration, schema exports, and experimental `enableCases` instance setting. - Added company-scoped Cases API routes for list/detail/update, issue links, revisions, children, activity events, annotations, attachments, and idempotent agent-oriented upserts. - Scoped case and issue lookup helpers before access checks so inaccessible cross-company identifiers resolve as not found rather than leaking existence. - Fixed case PATCH timestamp handling so non-status updates cannot overwrite `completedAt` from a stale pre-transaction row snapshot. - Moved Cases list type/status/project filters into the server request before the server-side limit is applied, including multi-select filters and no-project filtering. - Added backend route coverage for creation, updates, idempotency, issue linking, attribution, company-boundary enforcement, OpenAPI registration, list filtering, timestamp patch behavior, and inaccessible lookup regressions. - Added the experimental Cases UI surface: sidebar entry, gated routes, list filters/grouping, detail overview, activity, revisions, children, attachments, and issue-page case rail. - Added case reference rendering and company-prefixed case href generation so case links resolve directly inside the active company route. - Added Paperclip skill documentation for agent workflows that create or update Cases. - Wired release-content skills to emit Cases for dogfooding. - Rebased onto current `master` and renumbered the Cases migrations to `0143`/`0144` after the latest upstream migration sequence. ## Verification - Current PR head: `ecc13be0d`. - Rebased on current `master` (`606aa4f266`) and pushed to the existing PR branch. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed before the first update push; subsequent committed diffs were also checked with `git diff --check` before commit. - Guardrails checked: no `pnpm-lock.yaml` changes, no `.github/workflows` changes, and changed-file count is below the Greptile 100-file limit. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/cases-routes.test.ts src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts src/__tests__/openapi-routes.test.ts` — passed, 3 files / 26 tests before review-fix commits. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/cases-routes.test.ts` — passed after each server-side Greptile fix, latest 1 file / 15 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed after the timestamp and lookup fixes. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/Cases.test.tsx src/pages/CaseDetail.test.tsx src/pages/CompanySkills.test.tsx src/App.cases-routing.test.tsx` — passed, 4 files / 30 tests before review-fix commits. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/Cases.test.tsx` — passed after the list-filter fix, 1 file / 12 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed after the list-filter fix. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed after UI changes. - Remote PR checks on head `ecc13be0d` are green: Paperclip CI, build, typecheck, test matrix, e2e, Canary Dry Run, policy, commit review, Superagent Security Scan, Socket, Snyk, and Greptile passed; Storybook visual regression is skipped and security-review is neutral. - Greptile Review: 5/5 confidence, zero unresolved Greptile threads. ## Risks - Medium feature risk because this introduces a new experimental domain object across database, server, shared contracts, skills, and UI. - The feature is gated behind `enableCases`, which limits default operator exposure while the model is exercised. - Case links now prefer company-prefixed hrefs; the unprefixed redirect remains for externally entered URLs. - Cases list filtering now sends multi-select filters to the server before limiting; the UI still applies the same local filters as a second pass for ancestor/context rows. - Migrations were renumbered on top of current master; the SQL uses guarded `IF NOT EXISTS` / `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` patterns where relevant for safer replay. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex in the Paperclip local coding environment was used for this PR curation, rebase verification, review-fix implementation, push, and PR description update. The runtime exposes tool use and shell execution; context-window size is not exposed by this Paperclip adapter. Several implementation commits also include AI co-author trailers recorded in git history. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I searched the GitHub PR list for similar PRs and confirmed this is not a duplicate - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9a1d4b7983 |
fix(ui): use prose editor for markdown agent instructions (#9332)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent setup depends on instruction files that are readable and editable from the board UI > - The instructions tab already receives server-side metadata describing whether each file is Markdown > - The UI was deciding Markdown editor usage primarily from the file extension, which makes extensionless Markdown instruction files feel like raw code > - This pull request makes the instructions editor trust server Markdown metadata for existing files and keep extension fallback only for new unsaved files > - The benefit is that AGENTS-style prose instructions render and edit like prose while explicitly non-Markdown files still use the raw textarea ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #8201 - Refs #5652 - Refs #3427 - Refs #2068 - Related PRs: #2468, #2620 ## What Changed - Use server `markdown` metadata from instruction file details/summaries to choose the prose Markdown editor for existing instruction files. - Keep extension-based Markdown detection only for pending new files before server metadata exists. - Remove the monospace content styling from the Markdown editor path so prose instructions read like normal text. - Add focused tests for extensionless Markdown files, new `.md` files, and `.md` files explicitly marked non-Markdown by the server. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/AgentDetail.instructions.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` ## Risks - Low risk. The editor selection now depends on server metadata for existing files, so incorrect server metadata would choose the wrong editor. The fallback still preserves extension-based behavior for newly created unsaved files. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex coding agent, tool-enabled terminal workflow. Context window details were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.2 |
||
|
|
606aa4f266 |
feat(search): filters, sorting, operators & command-palette parity (#9327)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Company search is the primary way operators find issues, comments, documents, artifacts, agents, and projects across a busy company > - Search previously supported only a bare text query: no way to narrow by status/assignee/project/label/date, no sort control, no typed operators, and weak relevance/snippets meant hunting through noise > - As companies accumulate tens of thousands of items, unfiltered single-sort search stops scaling for day-to-day operator workflows > - This pull request adds a full filtering model (filter bar, chips, mobile sheet, URL state), sort modes, typed query operators (`status:`, `assignee:`, `type:`, …) with command-palette parity, relevance/snippet/deep-link improvements, zero-results recovery, and the supporting shared validators, backend service work, and DB indexes > - The benefit is that operators can go from a vague query to the exact item in a couple of keystrokes, on desktop and mobile, with shareable filtered-search URLs ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public GitHub issue; describing the underlying feature request inline (per feature_request template): - **Problem:** Company search accepted only a plain text query. Users could not filter results by status, assignee, project, label, or recency; could not change result ordering; and got no guidance when filters emptied the result set. - **Desired solution:** Structured search filters (UI controls + typed query operators + URL parameters), selectable sort modes, better relevance and snippets with exact deep links, and parity between the search page and the command palette. - **Alternatives considered:** Client-side filtering of unfiltered results (does not scale past the fetch limit); a separate "advanced search" page (splits the surface and duplicates state handling). Related (not duplicate) PRs found while searching: #4848 (issue search query planning), #8235 (search rate limiting). ## What Changed - **Shared contract:** new search filter/sort/count/zero-results types and validators in `packages/shared` (`validators/search.ts`, types index). - **Backend:** `server/src/services/company-search.ts` supports issue filters, sort modes, per-filter option counts, snippets, artifact visibility, and zero-results loosen suggestions; single-statement match replaces per-scope scans and predicates are trigram-index compatible (~3.7s → ~350ms on a live 14.8k-hit corpus). - **DB:** migration `0142_company_search_sort_indexes.sql` adds the supporting indexes. - **Search page (`ui/src/pages/Search.tsx`):** filter bar, removable chips, mobile filter sheet with result-count preview, sort menu, URL round-tripping, zero-results recovery UI. - **Query operators (`ui/src/lib/search-query-parser.ts`):** typed operators parsed into filters, operator autocomplete, filter pills. - **Command palette:** operator-aware parsing and full-search handoff. - **Stale-operator fix (latest commit):** typed operator filters are no longer folded into persistent URL-filter state, so deleting a token (e.g. removing `status:blocked` from the input) actually removes the filter from subsequent requests; filter-control edits materialize control state and strip typed tokens so a removed chip cannot resurrect from the input. ## Verification - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/pages/Search.test.tsx` — 19 tests including two new red→green regressions for the stale-operator paths (both fail on the previous commit, pass now). - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/CommandPalette.test.tsx` and `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/company-search-service.test.ts` — operator parity and backend filter/sort/count coverage. - `cd ui && npx tsc --noEmit` — clean. - Manual: open `/search`, type `auth status:blocked`, confirm the status filter applies; delete `status:blocked`, confirm results are unfiltered again; drive the same filters from the filter bar/chips/mobile sheet and confirm the URL round-trips (reload/back/forward preserves state). - Full end-to-end QA pass (9/9 acceptance checks) against the wireframes on desktop (1280px) and mobile (390px) with a live API and browser automation. ## Risks - Additive migration (indexes only, no data rewrites) — safe to roll forward; index creation cost is paid once at migrate time. - Search request shape gains optional parameters only; old clients keep working. - Behavioral shift: filter-control edits now strip typed operator tokens from the query text (their values persist as filter state) — deliberate, so removed filters stay removed. - Ranking changes alter result ordering for existing queries; covered by service tests and the QA pass. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic, extended thinking + tool use) — stale-operator-filter fix, regression tests, PR preparation. - GPT-5 Codex (`codex_local` adapter) and Claude Opus 4.6 (`claude-opus-4-6`) — earlier implementation phases (backend contract, filter UI, operators, ranking) under agent orchestration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details — pre-existing branch name retained to avoid closing/reopening the PR - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no user-facing docs affected) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending re-run on latest commit) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending re-review of the stale-filter fix) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.1 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
cec0fc249a |
[codex] Parallelize release verify workflow (#9168)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Releases publish the same app and package set that operators install, so release verification should keep full release-strength coverage. > - The release workflow currently verifies stable and canary releases with one serial job that typechecks, runs all tests, and builds. > - The PR workflow already proves the test surface can be split into grouped general suites and serialized shards without changing coverage. > - This pull request extracts the release verify work into a reusable workflow and fans out the independent lanes. > - The benefit is faster stable and canary release verification while preserving the existing publish and preview gates. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this CI improvement. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting (multiple of the above) **Problem or motivation** Release verification spends most of its wall time in a single serial test step even though the same stable test surface is already partitioned for PR CI. Stable dispatches and master-push canaries therefore wait on one long runner after setup, typecheck, tests, and build run sequentially. **Proposed solution** Add a reusable release verification workflow with parallel typecheck, grouped general tests, serialized test shards, and build lanes. Have both stable and canary release verification call it with the ref they need to verify. **Alternatives considered** Keeping the serial `pnpm test:run` job preserves the old shape but keeps stable and canary releases waiting on one long runner. Skipping verification when a source SHA already has green CI would be faster, but adds stale-check and lookup risk beyond this change. **Roadmap alignment** No overlapping item found in `ROADMAP.md`; this is release CI maintenance. **Additional context** The new workflow keeps the release-strength full `pnpm -r typecheck`, uses the existing stable test grouping/sharding entry points, and leaves publish/preview jobs unchanged. ## What Changed - Added `.github/workflows/release-verify.yml` as a `workflow_call` workflow accepting a `ref` input. - Split release verification into parallel `typecheck`, `general_tests`, `serialized_tests`, and `build` jobs with 20-minute lane timeouts. - Mirrored the PR workflow's stable test partition: `general-server` shards 1-3, `general-workspaces-a`, `general-workspaces-b`, and four serialized shards. - Replaced `release.yml` `verify_canary` and `verify_stable` job bodies with calls to the reusable workflow while leaving publish and preview jobs unchanged. - Added a Node test that guards the release workflow delegation and split verify surface. ## Verification - `actionlint 1.7.12 .github/workflows/release.yml .github/workflows/release-verify.yml` - `node ./scripts/release-package-map.mjs check` - `node --test ./scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs ./scripts/__tests__/run-vitest-stable-shard.test.mjs` - `git diff --check` ## Risks - Release verification now starts more jobs per release event, increasing total runner setup/install minutes. This matches the existing PR CI tradeoff and should reduce release wall time substantially. - The called workflow checks out the requested ref shallowly. That is intentional for verify lanes; publish and preview jobs still retain their existing full-history checkouts. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-class coding agent in local tool-use mode with shell execution, repository editing, GitHub connector access, and medium reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d3e26a8d02 |
docs: point Paperclip docs links at docs.paperclip.ing (#9300)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The public README files are owned discovery surfaces for users who arrive from GitHub or npm. > - Some documentation links still used the old `https://paperclip.ing/docs` redirect path. > - Redirect hops are worse for users and for SEO because crawlers and readers do not land on the canonical docs host immediately. > - Package metadata should still point at the GitHub repository, because npm package homepages are expected to identify the source/project page. > - This pull request updates only explicit documentation links to the canonical docs subdomain. > - The benefit is a smaller, clearer link sweep with no package homepage metadata change. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - No public GitHub issue exists for this small documentation maintenance change. - Problem: public README documentation links used a redirecting docs URL instead of the canonical docs host. - Expected behavior: README documentation links should point directly at `https://docs.paperclip.ing`. - Scope: root README, CLI README, and the Hermes adapter README docs reference. - Related search results reviewed: #793, #592, #675, and this PR. No open duplicate PR was found for this README-only canonical docs URL sweep. ## What Changed - Updated the root README Docs navigation link from `https://paperclip.ing/docs` to `https://docs.paperclip.ing`. - Updated the CLI README Docs navigation link from `https://paperclip.ing/docs` to `https://docs.paperclip.ing`. - Updated the Hermes adapter README Paperclip Docs link from `https://paperclip.ing/docs` to `https://docs.paperclip.ing`. - Kept all `package.json` homepage fields pointing at the Paperclip GitHub repository or package-specific GitHub README pages. ## Verification - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` - `rg 'https://paperclip\.ing/docs|https://docs\.paperclip\.ing' README.md cli/README.md packages/adapters/hermes/README.md` - `rg '"homepage": "https://docs\.paperclip\.ing"' -g 'package.json'` returned no matches. - Reviewed the final diff against `origin/master`; only the three README files changed. ## Risks - Low risk: this is a documentation-only URL update. - The main review risk is scope creep into npm metadata; that was explicitly avoided by keeping package homepages on GitHub. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5-based Codex coding agent with local shell, git, GitHub CLI, and Paperclip API tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3369c0dab7 |
fix(prompt): render exact branch name with backtick-safe fence in wake branch guard (#9326)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run heartbeats inside execution workspaces pinned to a specific git branch; the wake prompt now carries a one-time "stay on this branch" guard (#9319) > - Greptile's final review round on #9319 landed after the PR merged: the guard sanitized the branch name by stripping backticks, which mutates the ref, so the prompt could tell the agent to stay on a branch name that does not exist > - A guard that names the wrong branch defeats its purpose and still leaves the workspace contract breakable > - This pull request keeps the pinned ref name exact and instead escapes it at render time with a backtick fence longer than any backtick run inside the name (standard Markdown inline-code escaping) > - The benefit is the guard always names the real branch while a hostile ref name still cannot close the code span or inject prompt text ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #9319 — follow-up addressing the final Greptile review round that arrived after that PR merged. ## What Changed - `normalizePaperclipWakeExecutionWorkspace` no longer strips backticks from the branch name; it removes only control characters (illegal in git ref names, and the newline route into the prompt), trims, and caps length. - Added a `markdownInlineCode` helper that wraps a value in an inline-code span whose backtick fence is one longer than the longest backtick run in the value, and used it when rendering the branch guard line. - Updated the hostile-branch-name test to assert the exact ref is preserved and fenced, and control characters are removed. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` — 58 tests pass, including the updated hostile-branch-name case. - `npx tsc --noEmit` in `packages/adapter-utils` — clean. - Manual: render a wake payload with `branchName: "evil` + backtick + `name"` and confirm the guard line reads ``` `` evil`name `` ``` and the span does not break. ## Risks - Low risk: prompt-rendering-only change; the normalized payload shape is unchanged. Branch names containing backticks (extremely rare) now render exactly instead of mutated. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic) with extended thinking and tool use, via Claude Code / Paperclip agent harness. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.710.0-canary.0 |
||
|
|
f3ca4d24bc |
fix: repair dirty/foreign-branch execution worktrees (#9297)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Execution workspaces are the bridge between Paperclip's control plane and a local agent's checked-out repository state. > - When a workspace is restored after a failed or interrupted run, the recorded branch can disagree with the branch currently checked out on disk. > - A clean branch mismatch can be reconciled safely, but a dirty mismatch needs a lossless path that does not discard uncommitted agent work. > - This pull request adds a quarantine-and-restore path that saves dirty work to a rescue branch, restores the recorded branch, and exposes the repair from the board UI and run page. > - The benefit is that operators can recover wedged execution workspaces without losing work or moving another live branch unexpectedly. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this workspace-recovery failure, so this PR includes the bug report inline. **What happened** A git worktree-backed execution workspace could become wedged when Paperclip expected one branch but found a different checked-out branch with dirty tracked or untracked files. The existing safe repair path refused the restore, leaving the source task blocked with no lossless one-click recovery path. **Expected behavior** Paperclip should preserve dirty work before restoring the recorded workspace branch. If another live workspace claims the checked-out branch, or an attached runtime service is active, the repair should refuse with clear operator-facing evidence instead of risking work loss or file contention. **Steps to reproduce** Create a git worktree execution workspace whose persisted branch name differs from the checked-out branch, add dirty tracked or untracked files in that worktree, then trigger workspace validation or use the branch reconcile endpoint. Before this change, the dirty mismatch remained blocked because Paperclip had no quarantine restore mode. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed on the pre-fix workspace-recovery implementation. Verified on this PR head after rebasing onto current `master`. **Deployment mode** Local trusted development/worktree deployments using git worktree execution workspaces and optional workspace runtime services. ## What Changed - Added dirty-worktree quarantine repair that creates a rescue branch, commits dirty tracked and untracked files there, restores the recorded branch, writes audit comments/activity, and preserves the live foreign branch ref. - Added `quarantine_restore` branch reconcile API support, recovery-action resolution, source-task wake behavior, execution-review preservation, claimant refusal, runtime-service refusal, and coverage for the non-transactional git ordering. - Added board UI controls for the repair action in the recovery card plus a compact failed-run workspace recovery surface that uses the same reconcile handlers. - Hardened Greptile follow-up cases by best-effort restoring the recorded branch after a mid-sequence rescue commit failure and by refusing quarantine restore while attached runtime services are active. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts -t "quarantine_restore"` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts -t "workspace dirty quarantine branch repair"` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-finalize-branch.test.ts -t "repairs clean unrecorded branch drift|adopts unrecorded forward branch drift"` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-routes-authz.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - Earlier PR verification covered the route, service, heartbeat, UI component, and run-page recovery surfaces; Cutter posted public preview screenshots for the repair popover and run-page panel at https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/9297#issuecomment-4926934211. - GitHub PR checks are green on `dcac76b05f4cf6e1ee16544c2831d83c7857e475`. - Greptile is 5/5 with zero annotations and no unresolved review threads on `dcac76b05f4cf6e1ee16544c2831d83c7857e475`. ## Risks - Moderate risk because the change intentionally runs git commands against local worktrees; the implementation refuses dirty repair when another claimant or active runtime service is detected and records rescue refs for auditability. - Compatibility / release-note callout for self-hosted operators: existing instances that left `enableWorkspaceBranchReconcileForward` unset now get automatic forward branch reconciliation during heartbeat workspace recovery. Operators who want the previous advisory-only behavior can set `experimental.enableWorkspaceBranchReconcileForward` to `false`; dirty quarantine repair can likewise be disabled with `experimental.enableWorkspaceDirtyQuarantineRepair: false`. - If the git rescue succeeds but a later database write fails, the worktree may already be restored while the recovery action remains open; this ordering is documented in code because git side effects cannot participate in the database transaction. - UI risk is limited to the workspace recovery surfaces and covered by component tests plus the existing Cutter visual preview. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, with repository tool use, shell execution, and local test execution. Earlier preserved commits on this branch also show Claude Code / Claude Opus 4.8 assistance in their commit metadata. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] Branch naming exception documented: this PR preserves the existing worktree branch requested for publication while keeping the PR title and body public-facing - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
4d898aa7af |
feat(prompt): one-time execution-workspace branch guard in wake prompt (PAP-13326) (#9319)
## Summary
When a task runs in a branch-pinned execution workspace, agents
sometimes switch or rename the workspace branch, which breaks the
worktree contract. This adds a short, one-time prompt hint telling the
agent to stay on the pinned branch.
- **heartbeat.ts**: after the execution workspace is resolved, attach
`executionWorkspace: { branchName }` to the wake payload (only when a
branch pin exists — agent-home runs without a branch are untouched).
- **server-utils.ts (adapter-utils)**: normalize the new payload field
and render one bullet in `renderPaperclipWakePrompt`:
> `- execution workspace branch: you are running in an execution
workspace on branch \`<name>\`. Do not switch, rename, or re-point this
branch; keep all commits on it.`
- The hint renders **only on non-resumed sessions** — resume-delta
prompts skip it, so it appears the first time an issue's session starts,
not on every turn, and it never pollutes the issue thread. One renderer
change covers every adapter (claude, codex, cursor, gemini, grok,
opencode, pi, hermes, acpx engine) with zero per-adapter edits.
## Tests
- `server-utils.test.ts`: branch guard renders on first prompt, absent
on resumed-session prompts, absent when no branch is pinned; payload
round-trips through `stringifyPaperclipWakePayload`.
- `heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment.test.ts`: the finalize-path
adapter mock now asserts the wake payload the adapter receives carries
the branch pin matching `context.paperclipWorkspace.branchName`
(end-to-end heartbeat wiring, embedded postgres). All 6 pass.
- Full `server-utils` (56) and acpx-engine execute (34) suites green;
adapter-utils typechecks clean; no new server tsc errors.
PAP-13326
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.709.0-canary.15
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
176645187c |
Fix request storm polling and issue-list coalescing (#9190)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The board UI keeps issue, agent, activity, and run state fresh through polling across several pages and sidebar surfaces > - When multiple components or browser tabs poll the same company data at the same time, the API can receive bursts of duplicate issue-list requests > - Those duplicate requests increase database and server load without returning meaningfully different data > - This pull request adds server-side compression/coalescing plus client-side visibility-aware and cross-tab shared polling > - The benefit is lower request volume during normal board usage while preserving fresh UI data for active users ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No exact public GitHub issue was found for this request. Problem: - The board can issue redundant polling requests for the same issue-list data from multiple UI surfaces and tabs. - In busy operator sessions, those bursts can trigger request-storm behavior and unnecessary issue-list load. - Expected behavior is to reuse identical in-flight work server-side and reduce hidden-tab or duplicate-tab polling client-side while preserving normal refresh behavior. Related public context found during duplicate search: - #8206 covers a different board UI 404-storm scope. - #5165 covers separate issue-list behavior around page-size truncation. ## What Changed - Added API compression middleware foundation and a company/created-at index for heartbeat run access. - Added server-side issue-list request storm detection and identical in-flight request coalescing. - Added UI fetch metadata, visibility-aware polling, and request deduplication for issue/activity/client calls. - Added cross-tab shared polling primitives and wired them into the sidebar, inbox, dashboard, issue, project, routine, and agent surfaces. - Resolved the latest `master` migration collision by keeping upstream `0140_built_in_managed_resources.sql` and renumbering this branch's heartbeat-run index migration to `0141_heartbeat_runs_company_created_at_index.sql`; the SQL uses `CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS` for idempotency. - Stabilized server heartbeat cleanup tests exposed by the PR check matrix. - Fixed the Greptile compression follow-up by weakening strong ETags on encoded JSON responses and bypassing compression for streamed/download responses. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` — passed after resolving the latest `master` conflict in `IssuesList.tsx` and updating the 200-result cap expectations. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed after the UI conflict resolution. - `jq -e '.entries | length as $n | (map(.idx) | unique | length == $n) and (map(.tag) | unique | length == $n)' packages/db/src/migrations/meta/_journal.json` — passed after renumbering the migration to `0141`. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/api-compression.test.ts` - passed after the compression follow-up. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-list-assignee-filter-routes.test.ts` - passed after the compression follow-up. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - passed after the compression follow-up. - Greptile Review for head `8dbddac41ec273fda404100b4981ddb912fad57b` - passed after the latest conflict/migration fix; all Greptile review threads are resolved. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/api-compression.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-list-assignee-filter-routes.test.ts ui/src/api/client.test.ts ui/src/api/issues.test.ts ui/src/lib/polling.test.ts ui/src/lib/cross-tab-poll.test.ts ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarProjects.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx ui/src/lib/issueDetailCache.test.ts` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/api/client.test.ts` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarProjects.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx ui/src/lib/issueDetailCache.test.ts` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-worktree-suppression.test.ts` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/low-trust-red-team-routes.test.ts` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-finalize-branch.test.ts` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - GitHub PR checks for head `8dbddac41ec273fda404100b4981ddb912fad57b`: all GitHub Actions/status checks passed; Greptile, Superagent, Socket, Snyk, build, typecheck/release registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary dry run, policy, and commitperclip review are green; Storybook visual regression and security-review were skipped/neutral by policy. - Confirmed this branch does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows` changes. ## Risks - Medium risk: issue-list coalescing changes request timing and cache semantics for a hot API path. - Medium risk: cross-tab polling uses browser coordination primitives, so older or unusual browser environments need fallback behavior to stay correct. - Low migration risk: the new index migration is ordered after current `master` and uses `CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS`. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5-based model, tool-enabled with shell/git execution. Exact hosted deployment identifier and context-window size were not surfaced in the agent runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.14 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9acce52aa5 |
[codex] Polish operator UI work state details (#9320)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Operators use the issue list, blocked-work notices, pipeline body documents, and issue documents to understand what agents are doing > - Some of those surfaces had low-information details: live-work blockers were visually easy to miss, revision history showed generic actor labels, and selected active subtasks carried an extra accent border > - These details matter because Paperclip's default UI should make agent state and work history legible without requiring users to inspect raw logs > - This pull request groups a small set of related operator UI polish changes for those work-state and document-history surfaces > - The benefit is clearer review context for blocked work, better attribution in document revision history, and cleaner active-subtask row styling ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue found during dedup search. ### Bug Report **Pre-submission checklist** - Searched existing open PRs/issues for `document revision authors` and `blocked notice live work`; no duplicates found. - Reproduced against the current `master` base for this PR. - Confirmed this is core board UI behavior, not adapter/provider/local configuration. **What happened?** Blocked live-work notices, document revision history, pipeline body document revision history, and active subtask rows exposed technically correct but low-signal UI details. Revision menus could show generic `Board`/`Agent` labels instead of the specific author, and selected active subtasks had an extra accent border. **Expected behavior** Operators should see clear blocked-live-work copy, recognizable revision authors using available agent/user profile data, and visually consistent selected task rows. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open an issue with a live-work blocker and inspect the blocked notice. 2. Open an issue document revision menu with agent/user-authored revisions. 3. Open a pipeline item body document revision menu with agent/user-authored revisions. 4. Inspect a selected active subtask row in the issue list. **Paperclip version or commit** `8b6a06ee2` (`origin/master` at branch creation). **Deployment mode** Local dev / self-hosted board UI. **Installation method** Built from source. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific (core board UI). **Database mode** Not database-related. **Access context** Board operator UI. **Relevant logs or output** Not applicable. **Relevant config** Not applicable. **Additional context** This PR is a small polish/fix contribution. `ROADMAP.md` allows tightly scoped bugs and polish without roadmap-level coordination. **Privacy checklist** Reviewed the PR body for private instance references and omitted internal ticket links. ## What Changed - Polished the live-work blocked notice copy and tests so operators get a clearer explanation of what is blocking progress. - Show issue document revision authors with agent/user names and avatar treatment instead of generic actor labels. - Show pipeline body document revision authors with the same available agent/user profile data. - Removed the extra left accent border from selected active subtask rows. - Stabilized the document revision test helper for React runtimes where `act` is not exported as a function. ## Verification - `git diff --check origin/master..HEAD` - `git diff --name-only origin/master..HEAD -- .github/workflows pnpm-lock.yaml` produced no output. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed: all color literal, arbitrary bracket value, and raw font-size gates clean. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueDocumentsSection.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueRow.test.tsx` passed: 3 test files, 32 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - Remote PR checks passed on head `3e18fe3f`: 22 complete, 0 pending, 0 failing. - Greptile completed at 5/5 with no blocking issues after addressing the pipeline revision author feedback. ## Risks Low risk. The change is limited to board UI rendering and component tests. The main risk is a subtle visual regression in issue/document surfaces that are not covered by screenshots; the affected component tests cover the intended copy, attribution, and row-style behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5 model family, tool-enabled CLI session. Exact runtime context window is not exposed by this execution environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
4856558fd9 |
Fix skills routes to skip user secret resolution
Skip user_secret_ref bindings when resolving adapter config for agent skill listing and sync paths, while keeping normal runtime resolution strict. Add route and service regression tests for required user-secret refs in adapter config.canary/v2026.709.0-canary.13 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8b6a06ee25 |
[codex] Add built-in agents and Reflection Coach bundle (#9206)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators need first-party agent capabilities for repeatable company work, not just manually created one-off agents. > - Built-in agents need to behave like normal company-scoped agents while preserving approval gates, permissions, budgets, and audit trails. > - Reflection and coaching work also needs bundled instructions, skill content, and a routine so the feature can be installed and reset predictably. > - The API, database, UI, portability, and tests all need to agree on the built-in lifecycle from not provisioned through setup, approval, ready, paused, and reset. > - This pull request adds built-in agent provisioning and the Reflection Coach bundle end-to-end. > - The benefit is a safer first-party path for Paperclip-managed agents without bypassing the same governance model used for operator-created agents. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found for this exact built-in agent and Reflection Coach bundle work. Problem/motivation: - Paperclip did not have a first-party built-in agent lifecycle for product-owned agents. - Bundled agent resources such as default instructions, skills, and routines needed managed ownership and reset semantics. - Approval-gated companies needed built-in setup to preserve requested adapter, budget, manager, and permission state through board approval. - The board UI needed clear built-in badges, setup affordances, readiness state, and bundle status without exposing secrets. Proposed solution: - Add a company-scoped built-in agent registry, provisioning/reset/reconcile/status APIs, and Reflection Coach bundled resources. - Track bundled managed resources in the database with idempotent migration behavior. - Reuse existing agent approval, authorization, budget, and activity-log paths instead of creating a bypass. - Add UI setup, badges, gates, bundle panels, and route coverage for built-in agents. Duplicate search: - Searched GitHub PRs for `built-in agents Reflection Coach repo:paperclipai/paperclip`; only this PR was returned. - Searched GitHub issues for the same query; no public issues were returned. ## What Changed - Added built-in agent definitions, lifecycle state derivation, provisioning, reset, reconcile, status, and routine-control routes. - Added the `built_in_managed_resources` migration and schema exports for bundled instructions, skill, and routine ownership. - Added the Reflection Coach built-in bundle with default instructions, skill catalog content, routine template, default permissions, and managed-resource drift handling. - Added approval-aware provisioning behavior that preserves requested adapter config, budgets, manager assignment, and built-in permissions through hire approval. - Added authorization and mutation gates for built-in agent and skill changes, including consented Reflection Coach change paths. - Added UI surfaces for built-in agent setup, roster/detail badges, readiness gates, bundle status, routine controls, and route filtering. - Added company import/export and validator coverage for built-in managed resources and low-trust/red-team presets. - Addressed Greptile follow-ups for pending approval reconciliation, consent-gate error propagation, config-read authorization fallback, approval-path manager preservation, and non-model adapter provisioning. ## Verification Local verification: - `git diff --check public/master..HEAD` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed with all gates clean. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/ConfigureBuiltInAgentModal.test.tsx` passed: 1 file, 4 tests. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/EntityRow.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Agents.test.tsx ui/src/components/BuiltInAgentGate.test.tsx ui/src/components/ConfigureBuiltInAgentModal.test.tsx ui/src/components/BuiltInBundlePanel.test.tsx ui/src/pages/InstanceExperimentalSettings.test.tsx ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx` passed: 7 files, 64 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/built-in-agents.test.ts src/__tests__/authorization-service.test.ts src/__tests__/company-skills-routes.test.ts` passed: 3 files, 91 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed after the rebase; `pnpm --filter ui typecheck` passed after the final UI review fix. Remote verification on latest head `1c61f693a4ec881d739022b0e75a8ca8bf8c2cd8`: - Merge state: `CLEAN`. - Greptile: `5/5`, zero unresolved Greptile threads. - PR check rollup: all checks successful, neutral, or skipped as expected. - Passing gates include Build, Typecheck + Release Registry, all server shards, all workspace shards, all serialized server suites, e2e, Canary Dry Run, policy, review, verify, Socket, Superagent, and Snyk. ## Risks - This adds a new managed-resource table and migration; the migration uses idempotent create/add/index guards and passed migration safety checks. - Built-in agent provisioning touches approval and authorization paths; tests cover pending approval preservation, stale retry rejection, consent gates, and config-read fallback behavior. - Reflection Coach creates managed instructions, skill, and routine resources; drift/reset behavior is covered by service tests and redacted API responses. - Non-model adapter setup now provisions a `needs_setup` built-in row before command/endpoint fields are complete; this matches the server lifecycle and is covered by the setup modal regression test. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5. Exact hosted model ID, context-window size, and reasoning-mode labels are not exposed in this runtime; tool use, shell execution, GitHub CLI/API access, and local code editing were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.12 |
||
|
scotttongandClaude Fable 5
|
53d09d4c34 |
fix(ui): inbox/task list parity, nesting alignment, hover perf, and routine detail polish (#9317)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip's UI is governed by the design system merged in #9134 and the component convergence in #9240 — one Card, one Badge, one nav row, one `IssueRow`, a single multiplicative radius ladder. > - With those primitives in place, the remaining rough edges were interaction and alignment details on the surfaces people use every day: the inbox, the task list, the sidebar, and the routine/task detail pages. > - Each item here was reported from live use and fixed against a running instance, then verified by measurement (pixel alignment, frame timing) rather than by eye alone. > - The result is that the inbox and task lists now behave as one system (same hover, keyboard nav, tree-guide, and archive language), list nesting reads correctly, list hover is smooth, and the routine detail page scrolls and aligns like the rest of the app. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this work; describing per the feature template. - **Problem**: after the design-system foundation (#9134) and component convergence (#9240), the inbox/task lists still had interaction and alignment gaps — hover lag on long lists, keyboard navigation that only partly matched between the two lists, workspace/parent nesting whose guides and chevrons didn't line up, an inbox that sat offset from the task list, and a routine detail page with an odd double-scroll and a bespoke sub-nav. - **Proposed behavior**: the inbox and task lists share one interaction contract (hover, keyboard nav, collapse, archive), list nesting aligns to the status column with clean chevrons, list hover is CSS-only (no per-hover re-render), and the routine detail page uses a fixed header/sub-nav with a single scrolling content region and a sub-nav that matches the primary nav. ## What Changed - **List hover performance**: hover is now painted purely by CSS `:hover` and records the hovered row in a ref, instead of writing list-selection state on every `mouseenter` (which re-rendered 100–300 non-memoized rows per hover). Keyboard nav reads the ref so it still continues from the hovered row; the keyboard band clears on the first real mouse move so hover and keyboard selection never show two bands at once. The row's `transition-colors` fade was removed so the highlight snaps (no comet-tail). Measured on a 100-row scrub: worst frame **333 ms → 33 ms**, long frames (>50 ms) **12 → 0**, avg **41 → 60 fps**. - **Inbox ↔ task-list parity**: keyboard navigation works on every inbox tab (archive/read keys stay scoped to the archivable tab); group headers and parent tasks collapse/expand with the arrow keys in both lists; the task list gains the same j/k / arrows / Enter selection model as the inbox; hover selection bands match; the `g` then `i` go-to-inbox chord works app-wide. - **List nesting & alignment**: the workspace group-header chevron lines up exactly with the task chevrons below it (both lists); the parent→child connector line drops from under the parent's **status icon** rather than its chevron and breaks with a 14px gap around a nested row's own chevron; and inbox rows line up with the task list (read rows no longer reserve a mark-read column). - **Inbox archive affordance**: moved from a bare `x` left of the status icon to an `Archive` icon + label button on the right (before the timestamp), revealed on row hover; the left slot now carries only the unread dot; swipe-to-archive is unchanged. - **Sidebar**: when no agent has a live run, the AGENTS section shows 3 recent agents (was 5) plus "See all agents"; the working-agents view is unchanged. - **Routine detail page**: the layout is bounded to the main scroll area so the header (Run now + automation toggle) and the sub-nav stay fixed and only the section content scrolls (was a page-level scroll competing with a `sticky` sub-nav). The sub-nav items adopt the primary nav's rhythm — row padding/height, inset rounded pill, type scale, and 16px icons — and its background matches the main nav. - **Task detail**: dropped the redundant `🔵` prefix the breadcrumb added for live/in-progress tasks; the status glyph already conveys that state. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` → 3/3 CLEAN - `pnpm typecheck` → green (all packages) - `cd ui && npx vitest run` → 2255/2255 (assertions updated in lockstep where behavior changed) - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` → exit 0 - Storybook visual regression: run locally throughout (the baseline-manifest archive is still unpublished, so CI cannot run this suite — pre-existing condition from #9134). Every visible delta was reviewed against a live instance and, where it was intentional (nesting alignment, routine sub-nav restyle, unread-row shift), the affected snapshots were re-baselined locally. - Manual/measured: inbox + task lists (grouped and nested, light + dark), hover-scrub frame timing, keyboard navigation, and the routine detail scroll/alignment were exercised on a running instance. ## Risks - Behavior-and-alignment changes concentrated in `IssueRow` / `IssuesList` / `Inbox` (the shared task-row surfaces). The riskiest area — the hover/keyboard-selection model — is covered by unit tests (updated in lockstep) and was measured and driven live. - The routine detail scroll change restructures that page's layout container; verified the page's own scroll stays fixed while only the section content scrolls. - The visual suite cannot yet run in CI (unpublished baseline archive — pre-existing); snapshot coverage is local-only until that lands. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic) via Claude Code — agentic coding with tool use (file editing, test execution, Playwright measurement/screenshot verification); extended thinking enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
bc85b456a1 |
fix(ui): keep agent names visible on mobile agents index (#9236)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Agents index (`ui/src/pages/Agents.tsx`) is the main roster view, with both a list layout and an org-tree layout > - On mobile viewports the roster could render rows with no visible agent names because shrink-resistant trailing controls competed with the fixed-width title cell > - A roster where names are unreadable is unusable on phones, and the org-tree view had a related narrow-width overflow risk for deeply indented names > - This pull request lets the list title flex below `xl`, hides nonessential row controls on mobile, keeps Join/Leave reachable, and truncates org-tree names safely > - The result is a readable agents index on mobile while preserving desktop meta-column alignment and truncation ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing public GitHub issue; describing the bug per the bug report template: **What happened?** On a mobile-width viewport, the agents index showed rows where agent names could become unreadable or disappear because trailing controls consumed the available row width. In the org view, deeply indented names could overflow the row. **Expected behavior** Agent names remain visible on every viewport, Join/Leave stays reachable, and desktop rows continue to align and truncate as before. **Steps to reproduce** Open Paperclip in a browser at a narrow viewport, navigate to the Agents index, and observe rows with long names or left-membership controls. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproducible on `master` prior to this fix. **Deployment mode** Local dev instance. The bug is viewport-width dependent, not deployment-mode dependent. ## What Changed - `EntityRow` now lets callers control title text, subtitle text, and the meta spacer classes while keeping the default truncation behavior unchanged. - Agents list rows now use `flex-1 xl:flex-none xl:w-56`, so names get mobile width while desktop meta columns keep their aligned fixed title column. - Long list-view names/subtitles wrap below `xl` but return to truncation at `xl` and above. - Join/Leave stays visible on mobile; run/status/star row controls stay hidden on mobile to avoid squeezing names. - Org-tree rows use `min-w-0 truncate`, so deep indentation shortens names with an ellipsis instead of overflowing. - Regression tests cover mobile name visibility, left-membership dimming, responsive title/meta behavior, and mobile Join/Leave reachability. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/EntityRow.test.tsx src/pages/Agents.test.tsx` — 2 files, 18 tests passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — all gates clean. - `git diff --cached | rg -n "(AKIA|ASIA|SECRET|TOKEN|PASSWORD|PRIVATE KEY|BEGIN RSA|BEGIN OPENSSH|api[_-]?key|bearer|paperclip_api_key|DATABASE_URL|postgres://|sk-[A-Za-z0-9]|xox[baprs]-)"` — no matches before push. ## Risks - Low risk: UI-only change scoped to the agents index. The main behavior change is that nonessential row controls remain hidden on mobile while Join/Leave remains available there and all controls remain available on larger screens/detail pages. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex (`codex_local` adapter), agentic code editing and local/GitHub verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.11 |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
4d50fa9f29 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#9304)
Auto-generated lockfile refresh after dependencies changed on master. This PR only updates pnpm-lock.yaml. Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
b13eb5b2b5 |
Skill Studio: three-pane skill IDE with sandboxed test runs (#9241)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Skills Manager gives operators a reusable skill layer, but iteration still required manual edits, ad hoc prompts, and indirect run inspection. > - Skill authors need a focused workflow for editing skill files, saving representative test inputs, and running those inputs through an agent without exposing harness tasks as normal company work. > - The backend therefore needs durable test inputs, reusable run templates, hidden harness issues, scoped run execution, retention metadata, and read-containment rules around hidden work. > - The frontend needs a three-pane Studio that keeps skill files, saved inputs/templates, and run output/history visible together while preserving the existing design system and token rules. > - This pull request ships that Skill Studio surface end to end: database migrations, shared contracts, server APIs/services, hidden harness execution behavior, UI routes/components, and focused tests. > - The benefit is faster and safer skill iteration, with inspectable outputs and fewer ways for internal harness work to leak into normal task lists, costs, or adjacent read APIs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this feature. Feature request summary: - Problem: Skill authors need to edit and test company skills in one place instead of switching between the skill detail page, task creation, run output, and manual prompt history. - Proposed solution: Add a Skill Studio workbench with saved inputs, reusable templates, hidden sandboxed test runs, live run status, output inspection, run history, rerun/delete controls, and frontmatter-aware editing. - Expected users: Paperclip operators and agent-company maintainers who create, fork, import, and tune skills. - Related public PRs: Supersedes #9205, which was replaced so the public PR branch name follows contributor policy. - Duplicate search: searched public GitHub issues and PRs for "Skill Studio"; no other active public issue or PR directly covers this feature. ## What Changed - Added database migrations for Skill Studio test inputs, test runs, test run retention, and reusable run templates. - Added shared Skill Studio types, validators, route helpers, frontmatter utilities, and status handling. - Added server services and routes for saved inputs, test runs, templates, reruns, terminal-run deletion, hidden harness issue execution, and run-detail hydration. - Strengthened hidden-issue read containment across issue-adjacent routes and cost rollups used by skill test harness work. - Added the Skill Studio UI with skill file editing, frontmatter editing, saved inputs, templates, run creation/cancel/rerun/delete flows, output rendering, history, route support, and responsive pane behavior. - Added focused backend, shared, and UI tests for the new APIs, routing logic, editor/run behavior, hidden-issue containment, and migration safety. - Rebased onto current `master`, removed the generated lockfile diff from the PR, and verified no workflow files are changed. ## Verification - [x] `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations` - [x] `pnpm check:token-gates` - [x] `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/company-skills-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-skills-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-skill-test-runs-service.test.ts ui/src/lib/skill-studio.test.ts ui/src/pages/SkillStudio.test.tsx` — 5 files, 132 tests passed - [x] Greptile review on the latest PR head - [x] GitHub PR checks on the latest PR head ## Risks - Medium risk because this is a broad feature touching database schema, server orchestration, issue visibility, and a large UI surface. - Hidden harness issue containment is security-sensitive; this PR includes regression coverage for adjacent read paths and cost rollups. - The new migrations are additive and use idempotent guards where applicable, but deployed databases that previously tested draft migration numbers should still be checked carefully. - The UI depends on a new resizable panels package in `ui/package.json`; the lockfile is intentionally left to repository automation. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with shell, git, and GitHub CLI tool use. Earlier feature commits include assistance from other Paperclip coding agents; this PR preparation, rebase, cleanup commit, and PR body were completed by OpenAI Codex in a Paperclip worktree. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.10 |
||
|
|
3571b6c38b |
feat(models): add gpt-5.4-mini to Codex and OpenCode selection (and openai/gpt-5.5 to OpenCode) (#4357)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent runtimes are selected through adapters, and each adapter exposes the model IDs an operator can pick in the UI > - The `codex_local` and `opencode_local` adapters hardcode those lists, so a newly released model stays unreachable until it is added > - `gpt-5.4-mini` is available via both the Codex CLI and the OpenCode CLI, but neither adapter lists it; `openai/gpt-5.5` is likewise missing from `opencode_local` > - This pull request adds those entries, and deliberately keeps `gpt-5.4-mini` out of the Codex Fast mode allowlist because the model does not support Fast mode > - The benefit is that operators can select these models from the UI instead of falling back to a manual model ID, and Fast mode fails closed rather than sending unsupported overrides to the CLI ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No existing issue covers this. Describing it inline, following the feature request template: ### Problem or motivation `gpt-5.4-mini` is absent from the `models` list of both the `codex_local` and `opencode_local` adapters, and `openai/gpt-5.5` is absent from `opencode_local`. (`codex_local` already ships `gpt-5.5` — it is the default model on master.) Operators who want these models must type a manual model ID. For `codex_local` that has a real side effect. `isCodexLocalFastModeSupported` treats any *unknown* model as Fast-mode-capable and passes `service_tier="fast"` and `features.fast_mode=true` through to the CLI. Because `gpt-5.4-mini` does not support Codex Fast mode, an agent configured with a manual `gpt-5.4-mini` model ID and `fastMode` enabled silently sends overrides the CLI cannot honor. ### Proposed solution Add the three missing entries to the two `models` lists, and leave `CODEX_LOCAL_FAST_MODE_SUPPORTED_MODELS` untouched. Listing `gpt-5.4-mini` in `models` is precisely what makes it a *known* model, so `isCodexLocalFastModeSupported` returns `false`, `buildCodexExecArgs` omits the Fast mode overrides, and `fastModeIgnoredReason` is surfaced to the operator. ### Alternatives considered Adding `gpt-5.4-mini` to `CODEX_LOCAL_FAST_MODE_SUPPORTED_MODELS` as well — rejected, because the model does not support Fast mode and the overrides would be rejected at run time. Leaving the models unlisted so operators keep using manual IDs — rejected, because that is the path that silently enables Fast mode for a model that cannot use it. ### Roadmap alignment Not core roadmap work. `ROADMAP.md` does not plan adapter model-list maintenance; this is routine upkeep as upstream CLIs ship new models. ## What Changed - Add `gpt-5.4-mini` to the `codex_local` adapter's `models` list, positioned after `gpt-5.4` (newest-first ordering). - Add `openai/gpt-5.5` and `openai/gpt-5.4-mini` to the `opencode_local` adapter's `models` list. - Add a `buildCodexExecArgs` test asserting Fast mode is ignored for `gpt-5.4-mini`. `CODEX_LOCAL_FAST_MODE_SUPPORTED_MODELS` is intentionally unchanged. No behavior changes to existing models or adapter logic. ## Verification ``` pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local --filter @paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local typecheck npx vitest run packages/adapters/codex-local packages/adapters/opencode-local ``` Both pass: typecheck clean on both packages, and 22 test files / 133 tests green, including the new `ignores fast mode for gpt-5.4-mini` case. ## Risks Low risk. The change is additive: three entries appended to two model-selection lists, plus one test. No default model changes, no adapter logic changes, no migrations. One behavioral shift is intended. An operator who had `gpt-5.4-mini` configured as a *manual* model ID with `fastMode` enabled was getting Fast mode overrides passed through to the Codex CLI. After this change `gpt-5.4-mini` is a known model, so those overrides are dropped and `fastModeIgnoredReason` explains why. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex CLI with GPT-5 / GPT-5.5-assisted code editing (the original commits on this branch). - Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`, 1M context, extended thinking, tool use) for the master merge, conflict resolution, and the scope reduction in the latest commit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched the GitHub PR list for similar or duplicate PRs and confirmed this one is not a duplicate - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (N/A; the adapter docs describe Fast mode support, which is unchanged) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.9 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
1c75a46c10 |
feat(ui): add waiting-on-live-work blocked notice (#9298)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators rely on the issue detail thread to understand whether a task is blocked, live, or waiting on another task. > - A blocked issue can have a healthy blocker chain where downstream work is actively running and the parent will resume automatically. > - Showing that case with the same amber blocked notice as a stalled or attention-needed blocker makes the state look more severe than it is. > - The UI already receives blocker-attention state, blocker summaries, and company live-run ids, so this can be clarified without a new API shape. > - This pull request adds a blue "Waiting on live work" notice for covered blocker chains while preserving the existing amber notice for the other blocked states. > - The benefit is that operators can distinguish healthy queued work from blocked work that needs intervention. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #3820 Refs #8271 Related PR: #3877 Supersedes #9295 ## What Changed - Added a blue `IssueBlockedNotice` variant when `blockerAttention.state` is `covered` and the blocker chain has live work. - Rendered blocker-chain progress as done, running, and queued steps, including a "Now running" row for live terminal blockers. - Preserved the existing amber blocked notice for stalled, attention-needed, ordinary blocked, and successful-run handoff states. - Plumbed the existing `liveIssueIds`, `blockedBy`, and `blockerAttention` data from issue detail into the chat-thread blocked notice. - Added regression coverage around the covered live-work state, the no-confirmed-live fallback, numeric step ordering, and amber fallback states. - Hardened a low-trust server route test cleanup helper so CI deletes heartbeat run events before deleting heartbeat runs. ## Verification - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueBlockedNotice.test.tsx` - GitHub PR workflow is green on head `52ab6d9076ce233c183bf7133fa666e8597b6765`. - Greptile check is green on head `52ab6d9076ce233c183bf7133fa666e8597b6765` with zero unresolved review threads. ## Risks Low runtime risk: the product change is frontend-only and uses data already returned to the issue detail page. The main risk is visual regression in the blocked notice; the change keeps non-covered states on the existing amber path and adds focused regression coverage. The server-side change is test-only cleanup for an existing CI shard failure. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex using GPT-5, tool-use enabled in a repository workspace. The runtime did not expose a more specific model build id or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.8 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
97e0752158 |
Fix work timeline visible stats and kickoff attribution (#9271)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The work timeline helps operators understand what agents did, when they did it, and who kicked off each run > - Timeline statistics should describe the window the operator is viewing, not hidden work outside the viewport > - Kickoff chips should point to the run that was actually closest to the triggering edge, not stale later runs on the same issue > - This pull request scopes timeline summary stats to the visible window and deduplicates kickoff attribution to the nearest matching run > - The benefit is that operators get a more accurate, less misleading timeline while scanning agent work ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No matching public GitHub issue was found. Public duplicate search found no open PR for "work timeline visible window kickoff". ### What happened? Work timeline summary stats could count hidden spans outside the selected visible window, and kickoff attribution could appear on a stale matching run instead of the closest run associated with the edge. ### Expected behavior Visible timeline stats should reflect only the current visible range, and each kickoff edge should attach to the nearest matching run. ### Steps to reproduce 1. View a work timeline with agent spans that begin before or end after the selected visible window. 2. Compare the summary stats against only the spans visible in the viewport. 3. View repeated runs for the same actor and issue that share a kickoff edge. 4. Check which run gets the kickoff chip. ### Paperclip version or commit Current `origin/master` before this PR. ### Deployment mode Board UI. ## What Changed - Filters timeline summary stats to the visible time window. - Passes visible-window metadata into the work timeline chart and page state. - Assigns each kickoff edge to only the closest matching run, with deterministic tie-breaking. - Adds focused regression coverage for visible stats and stale kickoff attribution. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/timeline/WorkTimelineChart.test.tsx ui/src/lib/timeline/layout.test.ts ui/src/pages/Timeline.test.tsx` -- 38 tests passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` -- all gates clean. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` -- passed. ## Visual Evidence Public review artifacts for the user-visible timeline behaviours. The SVGs use sanitized run labels and no internal Paperclip issue identifiers.   Artifact gist: https://gist.github.com/cryppadotta/dc2645d54c4bc56ffc0323224b3ea4bf ## Risks - Low risk. The change affects timeline rendering and summary calculations only; the main risk is a subtle difference in which run gets a kickoff chip when multiple runs are very close together. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, tool-enabled shell workflow. Exact hosted model variant and context window were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.7 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7cf0d3ebb0 |
Require health readiness for Paperclip dev services (#9269)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents often run against managed workspace runtime services, including reusable Paperclip dev servers > - A running process and an open root URL are not enough to prove the Paperclip API is actually ready > - If the API health endpoint is still failing, agents can reuse a service that looks alive but cannot safely serve the board or API clients > - This pull request makes Paperclip dev runtime readiness probe the resolved `/api/health` endpoint > - The benefit is that runtime service reuse waits for the same health signal operators and agents depend on ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No matching public GitHub issue was found. Public duplicate search found no open PR for "workspace runtime health readiness". Bug report: ### What happened? A managed Paperclip dev runtime service could satisfy HTTP readiness at the exposed base URL even when the Paperclip health endpoint was returning an unhealthy status. ### Expected behavior Paperclip dev runtime services should not be considered ready until their health endpoint succeeds. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Start a workspace runtime service named `paperclip-dev` whose base URL responds successfully. 2. Make that same service return HTTP 503 from `/api/health`. 3. Ask Paperclip to ensure the runtime service for a run. 4. Observe that the service can be reused even though the API health endpoint is not ready. ### Paperclip version or commit Current `origin/master` before this PR. ### Deployment mode Local workspace runtime service management. ## What Changed - Resolve Paperclip dev runtime readiness checks to the service health URL before polling. - Surface readiness errors with the actual health URL that failed. - Add a regression test that fails when `/api/health` returns HTTP 503 even if the service process is running. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts` — 81 tests passed. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed. ## Risks - Low to medium risk. This tightens readiness for Paperclip dev runtime services, so a service that previously looked ready while unhealthy will now fail fast instead of being reused. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex coding agent based on GPT-5, tool-enabled shell workflow. Exact hosted model variant and context window were not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.6 |
||
|
|
3e63a7e3e5 |
Fail fast stalled Daytona Git network commands
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Daytona sandbox provider executes agent commands inside ephemeral Daytona workspaces via `executeCommand` > - Git operations inside these workspaces can block indefinitely when remotes are unreachable or when git prompts for credentials interactively (e.g. via askpass or terminal prompts) > - When git blocks, it consumes the full 900s adapter RPC ceiling, which surfaces as a hard timeout crash on the Paperclip side rather than an actionable error > - This PR adds noninteractive credential defaults and a 120s cap on detected Git network subcommands so stalled operations fail fast with a useful message > - The benefit is that engineers and agents see an actionable error pointing at missing credentials or unreachable remotes instead of an opaque 900s RPC crash ## Linked Issues or Issue Description <!-- No public GitHub issue exists for this internal infrastructure fix. Describing the issue inline. --> **Bug: Daytona sandbox Git network commands stall for up to 900 seconds** **What happened?** `executeCommand` hangs for the full 900 s adapter RPC ceiling when a Daytona workspace git network command (push/fetch/pull/clone) prompts for credentials interactively or the remote is unreachable. The command blocks silently for up to 900 s then crashes with a generic timeout error that names no actionable root cause. **Steps to reproduce** Run any agent handoff that includes a `git push`, `git fetch`, or `git pull` to a remote inside a Daytona workspace where the remote is unreachable or credentials are missing. **Expected behavior** Command fails fast (within ~120 s) with an actionable error naming the unreachable remote or the missing noninteractive credential. **Deployment mode** Daytona sandbox provider (`packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona`). Root cause: Daytona one-shot execution wrappers did not set `GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT=0`, `GCM_INTERACTIVE=Never`, or disabled askpass helpers, so git blocked waiting for interactive terminal input; no per-operation timeout existed for network-bound git subcommands. ## What Changed - Added `GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT=0`, `GCM_INTERACTIVE=Never`, `GIT_ASKPASS=echo`, `SSH_ASKPASS=echo`, `SSH_ASKPASS_REQUIRE=force` to all Daytona one-shot execution wrapper invocations so git never blocks waiting for a credential prompt; callers may override via the `env` parameter - Detects Git network subcommands (`push`, `fetch`, `pull`, `ls-remote`, `clone`, `remote update`, `submodule update`) and caps their timeout at 120 s instead of the full 900 s adapter RPC ceiling - Returns an actionable timeout message that names the unreachable remote or the missing noninteractive credential rather than propagating the raw SDK error - Adds two new Vitest tests: one verifying noninteractive credential defaults are injected, one verifying the 120 s network cap and the improved timeout message ## Verification - `corepack pnpm exec vitest run packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/src/plugin.test.ts --config packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/vitest.config.ts` — 40 tests pass - `corepack pnpm exec tsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit` from `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona` — clean - `corepack pnpm check:no-git-push` — clean > **Known CI note:** The standalone provider package is intentionally excluded from the root workspace. Direct `corepack pnpm test` from the provider directory fails before running tests due to Vitest tsconfig-root resolution in a grafted checkout. The root-config Vitest invocation above is the passing test signal. ## Risks - **Low overall risk.** The new `GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT=0` / askpass defaults only affect Daytona one-shot execution; they do not touch any shared git config or host environment. - Callers that previously relied on interactive credential prompts inside Daytona (an unlikely pattern for agent workspaces) will now fail fast instead of prompting — this is the intended behavior. - The 120 s network timeout applies only when the command string starts with a recognized git network subcommand, so non-network git operations and all non-git commands are unaffected. - No PII, telemetry schema, crypto, auth flow, or new external endpoint changes. ## Model Used Claude Sonnet 4.6 (`claude-sonnet-4-6`) — extended thinking mode, tool use, code execution. Anthropic Claude running via Paperclip Claude Code adapter. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold.kim@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.709.0-canary.5 |
