fb96537e28 test(ui): verify disconnect recovery through browser outages (#18832)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage agent work through the board.
> - Deploys can interrupt reads and writes while people use the board.
> - Component tests cannot prove the browser keeps task content and
saved drafts through a reload.
> - The read and cache changes need a regression suite against the built
app.
> - This pull request drives those journeys through temporary API
failures.
> - CI discovers the new suite through the existing e2e shard plan.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
Outage recovery lacked one browser suite covering retained content,
write recovery, cached reloads, access errors and sign-out clearing
together.

**Expected behavior**
Keep loaded task content visible through a 20-second API outage. Show
one connection banner and its recovery state. Save comments once and
retain document edits. Restore approved reads after a reload. Keep real
error responses readable and clear query records on sign-out.

**Steps to reproduce**
Open a task or settings. Return 503 with `tenant_app_unavailable` from
browser API requests for 20 seconds. Type a comment, edit a document, or
reload. Restore the API and compare the visible result with the saved
server state. Repeat with real 403/404 statuses and sign-out.

Stacked on Refs #18825, which depends on Refs #18822. Related
durable-write foundation: Refs #17960.

## What Changed

- Add `disconnect-resilience.spec.ts` with ten browser cases for
comments, a queued comment across reload, document autosave, cached
settings/sidebar/task reads, legacy Inbox reloads, 403 and 404
responses, sign-out clearing, restored-draft conflict detection, and
first-socket outage control.
- Assert one connection banner, readable recovery, no transient error
boxes or raw codes, retained task text, one saved comment, and the saved
document after reload.
- Use the real local server and isolated embedded PostgreSQL. Intercept
browser API traffic for outages. Control the logout/session response for
the sign-out test. Create no agents or model runs.
- Register realtime interception before navigation. Track both ends of
current sockets, close them at outage start, and keep reconnects
unavailable through the HTTP outage deadline. Preserve normal close
forwarding and close tracked pairs during teardown. The regression
captures the first browser socket without waiting for history or open,
then checks that the outage closes it.
- Prepare complete server-derived experimental settings and workspace
preferences before the legacy Inbox navigation. Its route callbacks
serve per-test snapshots across reloads, avoiding reads from disposed
route.fetch responses.
- Document the direct test command. The existing CI e2e shards already
discover this file exactly once; no workflow or package script is added.

## Verification

- Current head `228c1b68d30` is merge-ready: all 54 check runs completed
(52 successful, one skipped, one neutral), the legacy Snyk status is
successful, and both required gates pass. The single failed-jobs debug
rerun in run `41752978283` passed on attempt 2, including Runner package
job `126328280650` and `verify` job `126332119116`. Greptile Apex
reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with zero unresolved threads; the branch
has no merge conflicts. The three-PR stack is awaiting operator merge
approval.
- Original attempt 1 of current-head CI run `41752978283` had 46
successful jobs, one skipped and two failed: Runner package tests and
the downstream `verify` gate. GitHub reports lost communication with the
Runner host; the test step was cancelled, its log returns HTTP 404, and
no Runner diagnostic artifact is available. The underlying test outcome
and disconnection cause are unknown. One failed-jobs retry with debug
logging was accepted after verifying the unchanged current head and
passed on attempt 2. No source change was made; earlier passing CI and
local tests do not certify this incomplete Runner result. Current-head
CI now passes; the earlier disconnection cause remains unknown.
- Preceding head `6531caccf62` reached merge-ready: all 54 check runs
completed (52 successful, one skipped, one neutral), the legacy Snyk
status was successful, and both required gates passed in run
`41749512329`. Greptile reviewed that exact head at 5/5 with zero
unresolved threads. Current head `228c1b68d30` carries later
account-preference and bulk-selection fixes and now has its own passing
current-head CI.
- All 23 built-UI outage/write/loading cases pass in 4.5 minutes on
exact current head `228c1b68d30`: ten outage, six durable-write and
seven loading cases. The run used bundled Chromium, a fresh
local-trusted server and isolated embedded PostgreSQL on macOS
arm64/Node 25.6.1. Owned temporary server and database stopped.
- Current integrated head `228c1b68d30` contains cache revision
`fe4f682c879` and read head `09d1db29dea`. The exact application source
passes all 1,198 focused tests across twenty-eight files, UI typecheck
and both guards. Seventeen new cases cover restored-account settings,
owned crown cleanup and pending bulk selections; sixteen fail the
previous source and one preserves denial compatibility. All three
browser specs pass standalone strict checking. All 23 current-head
browser cases pass in 4.5 minutes.
- Application revision `9c1a10f25d9` passed all 1,137 focused tests
across twenty-one files, UI typecheck and both guards. Exact preceding
application/spec head `4fec693ec94` passed all 23 built-UI
outage/write/loading cases in 4.6 minutes and standalone strict checking
of all three specs. It used bundled Chromium, fresh isolated PostgreSQL
and local-trusted auth on macOS arm64/Node 25.6.1. Owned test processes
stopped.
- Preceding integrated head `870aa709657`, containing cache
`cbb891dd37d`, passes all 23 built-UI outage/write/loading cases in 4.6
minutes: ten outage cases, six durable-write cases and seven loading
cases. It used bundled Chromium, the built UI, a fresh local-trusted
server and isolated embedded PostgreSQL on macOS arm64/Node 25.6.1.
Owned test processes stopped.
- The earlier head `763fe431b74` passes the affected legacy Inbox
outage/reload case (34.3 seconds; 50.8 seconds including startup) and
strict three-spec checking after the response-snapshot fix. The
preceding head `973a12d77f4` passed all 23 built-UI outage/write/loading
cases in 4.6 minutes: ten outage cases, six durable-write cases and
seven loading cases. Its first-socket regression fails the previous
helper because that socket stays open. The run used bundled Chromium,
the built UI, fresh isolated PostgreSQL and local-trusted auth on macOS
arm64/Node 25.6.1. That earlier isolated callback revision was verified
with its affected case; the later application/spec head `4fec693ec94`
also passes the full suite. Owned test servers and databases stopped.
- The current base gives known skills/app errors priority over sibling
loading. All 60 affected tests and both application UI typechecks
passed. Its twelve new regressions failed the preceding source. All 47
recovery-worker tests and seven related Runner fixture variants also
passed during the historical CI audit; those focused checks do not claim
a full current server/Runner suite.
- All 22 outage/write/loading cases passed in 4.7 minutes on preceding
integrated head `b7deaaee5da`, including direct cache revision
`97c0bc3966f`. The run used the built UI, bundled Chromium and a fresh
local-trusted server with isolated embedded PostgreSQL on macOS
arm64/Node 25.6.1. It covered all nine outage, six durable-write and
seven loading cases. The owned temporary server and database stopped.
- All 1,038 focused tests passed on that direct cache revision, with UI
typecheck and guards. Six regressions failed the previous source: online
retries could trigger a hidden-tab worker reload, and sign-out failed
without crypto.randomUUID. Both modes and stamp states now pass.
Standalone strict checking passes for all three browser specs.
- The restored cached-A/draft-B/server-C test asserts zero replay
PATCHes and retains the conflict. The queued-comment case holds fresh
session verification after general API recovery and asserts zero POSTs
until release. Denial, logout and cached-navigation cases require saved
records. Sign-out seeds several company records to exercise native
Storage key reordering. Healthy navigation waits for
conversation-history readiness.
- Earlier runs exposed real cached-header, storage cleanup and replay
defects in the base. Those failures and corrected fixture assumptions
remain in the discussion. A prior run passed 21/22 while real sockets
remained available during simulated HTTP failures. A diagnostic trace
established the contradiction. The first repair gated new sockets, but
review identified the first pre-existing socket still escaping. This
revision intercepts before navigation and closes existing pairs too. The
new regression fails the preceding helper, and all 23 current cases pass
without weaker assertions. Shared-memory exhaustion prevented two
earlier diagnostic startups; only unused segments from completed owned
test databases were removed.
- All six separate cross-organization link/upload variants passed on an
earlier integrated base. Standalone strict checking of that unrelated
spec reports five existing errors in its shared fixture; this PR does
not claim that check passes.
- CI on older head `53d979e384c` failed the legacy Inbox case with
`apiResponse.json: Response has been disposed` inside a route.fetch
callback. Its other 25 cases passed and one skipped. The seven other
browser shards succeeded; the aggregate only reports that child failure.
The new snapshot callbacks remove those fetched-response lifetimes.
Original CI evidence remains recorded in the discussion.
- Greptile Apex reviewed exact current head `228c1b68d30` at 5/5 with no
actionable findings and zero unresolved threads (summary updated
2026-11-04 at 01:26:14 UTC). The branch has no merge conflicts.
Current-head CI now passes; the earlier disconnection cause remains
unknown. Controlled local outages do not prove hosted authentication or
a real Cloud restart/deploy.

Commands run:

```sh
pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/disconnect-resilience.spec.ts --grep 'a legacy Inbox reload retains' --reporter=list
pnpm exec playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/disconnect-resilience.spec.ts tests/e2e/disconnect-write-recovery.spec.ts tests/e2e/task-loading-frame.spec.ts --reporter=list
pnpm exec tsc --ignoreConfig --noEmit --strict --target ES2022 --module NodeNext --moduleResolution NodeNext --skipLibCheck tests/e2e/disconnect-resilience.spec.ts tests/e2e/disconnect-write-recovery.spec.ts tests/e2e/task-loading-frame.spec.ts
```

## Risks

The suite adds about three minutes to one e2e shard and depends on
current accessible UI controls. It uses controlled outages and logout
responses. A passing local run must not be treated as real deployment
acceptance. There are no production behavior, schema, dependency, or API
changes in this PR.

## Model Used

OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex, with xhigh reasoning effort, tool
use, and code execution. The context window size is not exposed.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for related PRs and linked them above
- [x] I have described the issue following the bug report template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
ticket id
- [x] All 23 built-UI cases pass on current head `228c1b68d30`
- [x] All three browser specs pass standalone strict typechecking on the
current head
- [x] The current application source passes all 1,198 focused tests, UI
typecheck and both guards
- [x] I have added tests and updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have considered and documented risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Bender (Fable) <bender@agents.paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-04 16:11:02 -08:00
…
…
…

Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.

Quickstart · Docs · GitHub · Discord · Twitter · Website

MIT License Stars Discord Security posture verified by Superagent

Star History Rank


Sign up for the Paperclip Cloud waitlist →


Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.

Open-source orchestration for teams of AI agents.

If OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company.

Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track work and costs from one dashboard. Choose models and harnesses per agent while keeping your team's tasks, skills, permissions, and history in one place.

It looks like a task manager. Under the hood: org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.

Manage business goals, not pull requests.

Step Example
01 Define the goal "Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR."
02 Hire the team CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider.
03 Approve and run Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard.

Works
with
OpenClaw
OpenClaw
Claude Code
Claude Code
Codex
Codex
Cursor and Cursor Cloud
Cursor
+ Cloud
Gemini CLI
Gemini CLI
OpenCode
OpenCode
Pi
Pi
Hermes and Hermes Gateway
Hermes
+ Gateway
Grok Build
Grok Build
Kimi Code
Kimi Code

If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

Custom processes, HTTP endpoints, and external adapter packages extend the roster. See the adapter overview for setup and capabilities.


Paperclip is right for you if

  • ✅ You want to build autonomous AI organizations
  • ✅ You coordinate many different agents (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
  • ✅ You have 20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals open and lose track of what everyone is doing
  • ✅ You want agents running autonomously 24/7, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
  • ✅ You want to monitor costs and enforce budgets
  • ✅ You want a process for managing agents that feels like using a task manager
  • ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses from your phone

The four pillars

Four things have to work for an organization of AI agents to actually produce: the tasks, the org, the training, and the infrastructure. Paperclip is built around exactly those four pillars.

The four pillars of Paperclip
Pillar Built for What it covers
Agentic Task Manager — Declare intent. Agents work. You verify the output. Everyone, daily Tasks, approvals & review gates · proactive agent coworkers · auditable routines & workflows · verify from diffs, screenshots & tests
Org Chart for Agents — Roles, permissions & boundaries for humans and agents. Managers Mixed human + agent org chart · responsibilities, delegation, specialization · governance: who can do what · scoped secrets & company boundaries · connection permissions & responsible-user identities
Agent Employee Training — Design, train & evaluate your AI employees. Enablers Skill Studio & shared org-wide skills · evals & saved test runs · active learning loops & quality metrics · performance reviews for agents · saved test inputs · skill version history & restore · reusable team templates
Agentic OS — The infrastructure that makes the work run. IT & platform Cross-provider runtime: any model, any agent · sandboxing, integrations & MCP servers · SSO, GRC, RBAC & cost controls · data privacy, internal trace collection, compounding data value · personal & shared app connections · run history & opt-in tracing

Features

🔌 Bring Your Own Agent

Any agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

🎯 Goal Alignment

Link tasks and projects to your organization goals. Agents receive the goal context behind their work.

💓 Heartbeats

Agents wake for assigned work, follow-up messages, or configured schedules. Delegation flows up and down the org chart.

💰 Cost Control

Company, agent, and project budgets. Track reported spend, get threshold alerts, and pause work at configured limits.

🏢 Multi-Organization

One deployment, many organizations. Separate tasks, agents, permissions, and activity histories for each.

🎫 Task Threads

Keep conversations, plans, blockers, files, and run history attached to the work. Assign tasks to agents or people.

🛡️ Governance

Configure review and approval stages, approve hires, and pause, reassign, or stop work when needed.

📊 Org Chart

Hierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description.

📱 Mobile Ready

Monitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere.

🔗 Apps & Connections

Connect services such as GitHub, Notion, and Railway, or your own MCP server. Set gateway actions to Allowed, Ask first, or Off.

👥 Shared Agents, Personal Accounts

Choose who can use a connection and which agents can access it. Managed GitHub operations can use the account of the person directing the work.

🧠 Skills & Skill Studio

Install or write shared skills, test them with saved inputs, inspect results, and restore earlier versions.

📅 Scheduled Routines

Run recurring work on a schedule or trigger it through an API or webhook. Each run has a task, an owner, and a history.

📎 Artifacts & Feedback

Find the files and documents agents produce. Preview supported formats and leave comments on specific passages in documents.

📦 Ready-Made Teams

Preview and install teams with roles, skills, projects, and routines. Choose their runtimes and make the setup your own.

Experimental Agent Chat and chat/email connectors add conversations with agents in Paperclip and through configured services such as Slack, Discord, Telegram, and AgentMail. Enable the relevant instance settings to try them.


Problems Paperclip solves

Without Paperclip With Paperclip
❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots.
❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why.
❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts.
❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. ✅ Spend tracking, budget alerts, and automatic pauses help you control the cost of ongoing work.
❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. ✅ Routines create assigned tasks on a schedule, with outputs and run history you can inspect.
❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work.

Why Paperclip is special

Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.

Atomic task checkout. A single assignee and execution locks prevent competing runs from claiming the same task.
Persistent work context. Tasks, comments, and documents stay in Paperclip. Supporting adapters resume saved sessions across runs.
Runtime skill injection. Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining.
Governance with rollback. Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely.
Accountable connections. Human access, agent eligibility, and gateway action permissions are separate controls. Approve a call once or save a revocable rule.
Goal-aware execution. Linked tasks and projects carry goal ancestry so agents see the "why," not just a title.
Portable company templates. Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling.
Organization boundaries. Company-scoped access checks keep each organization's work, agents, and activity separate within one deployment.

What's Under the Hood

Paperclip is a full control plane, not a wrapper. Before you build any of this yourself, know that it already exists:

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                       PAPERCLIP SERVER                       │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │Identity & │  │  Work &   │  │ Heartbeat │  │Governance │  │
│  │  Access   │  │   Tasks   │  │ Execution │  │& Approvals│  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │ Org Chart │  │Workspaces │  │  Plugins  │  │  Budget   │  │
│  │ & Agents  │  │ & Runtime │  │           │  │ & Costs   │  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │ Routines  │  │ Secrets & │  │ Activity  │  │  Company  │  │
│  │& Schedules│  │  Storage  │  │ & Events  │  │Portability│  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
         ▲              ▲              ▲              ▲
   ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐
   │  Claude   │  │   Codex   │  │   CLI     │  │ HTTP/web  │
   │   Code    │  │           │  │  agents   │  │   bots    │
   └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘

The Systems

Identity & Access — Two deployment modes (trusted local or authenticated), human roles and permissions, agent API keys, short-lived run JWTs, company memberships, and invite flows. Responsible-user attribution follows work through delegation and supported managed connections.

Org Chart & Agents — Agents have roles, titles, reporting lines, permissions, and budgets. Adapter examples match the diagram: Claude Code, Codex, CLI agents such as Cursor/Gemini/bash, HTTP/webhook bots such as OpenClaw, and external adapter plugins. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

Work & Task System — Issues carry company/project/goal/parent links, atomic checkout with execution locks, first-class blocker dependencies, comments, documents, attachments, work products, labels, and inbox state. Search across work, review document revisions, and leave anchored feedback.

Heartbeat Execution — DB-backed wakeup queue with coalescing, budget checks, workspace resolution, secret injection, skill loading, and adapter invocation. Runs produce logs, usage records, and adapter-specific session state. Bounded recovery handles supported failures and surfaces cases that need human action.

Workspaces & Runtime — Project repositories and workspaces, optional isolated execution workspaces (git worktrees, operator branches), and runtime services (dev servers, preview URLs). Sandbox providers extend execution beyond the local host; availability depends on the configured environment and adapter.

Governance & Approvals — Board approval workflows, execution policies with review/approval stages, decision tracking, budget hard-stops, and agent pause/resume/terminate. Configured task reviews govern completion; connection action approvals govern calls through the tool gateway.

Budget & Cost Control — Token and cost tracking by company, agent, project, goal, issue, provider, and model. Scoped budget policies with warning thresholds and hard stops. Enforcement uses recorded spend; usage reporting and in-flight work can delay a stop.

Routines & Schedules — Recurring tasks with cron, webhook, and API triggers. Concurrency and catch-up policies. Each routine execution creates a tracked issue and wakes the assigned agent — no manual kick-offs needed.

Plugins — Instance-wide plugin system with out-of-process workers, capability-gated host services, job scheduling, tool exposure, and UI contributions. Extend Paperclip without forking it.

Secrets & Storage — Company secrets and per-person secret values, encrypted credential storage, local or S3-compatible file storage, attachments, and work products. Secret references supply credentials to authorized runs without copying values into ordinary agent configuration.

Activity & Events — Mutating actions, heartbeat state changes, cost events, approvals, comments, and work products are recorded as durable activity so operators can audit what happened and why.

Company Portability — Preview, export, and import organization packages with agents, skills, and optional projects, routines, tasks, and attachments. Referenced secret values are omitted; review packages before sharing because plain environment values and local paths can remain. Packages share an operating setup; full-instance recovery uses backups.


What Paperclip is not

Not just a chatbot. Conversations stay attached to tasks, plans, decisions, and outputs. Experimental Agent Chat can hand work off to assigned tasks.
Not an agent framework. We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them.
Not just a workflow builder. Routines operate within an organization, with roles, goals, budgets, and governance.
Not a prompt manager. Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in.
Not limited to one agent. Start with one agent and grow into a team with shared skills, delegation, and review.
Not only for code review. Coding and PR review fit alongside research, operations, content, and other work.

Quickstart

Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required. Follow the guided quickstart to set up your first agent.

Just ask your agent to install Paperclip

Share the installation guide with your agent.

Or install it yourself

With Node.js 24.11 or newer installed:

npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes

The CLI runs from npm's cache; your instance configuration and data persist locally.

See the installation guide for managed installs, pinned versions, canary and git-ref installs, updates, rollback, service management, and uninstalling.

For an isolated manual test instance that is already initialized with a CEO agent, use test-drive. It stays in the foreground, never installs a service or creates a first task, and opens the browser only after setup succeeds:

ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive
OPENAI_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive --harness codex
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive \
  --harness opencode \
  --model openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Each run without --data-dir gets a unique, retained temporary directory; its absolute path is printed at startup. Pass --data-dir to reuse one, or --no-browser to leave the initialized instance unopened. When invoked from a linked Git worktree, test-drive also enables task execution in that worktree. See the test-drive guide for credential and reuse behavior.

Troubleshooting: private npm registry .npmrc

If this fails with an E404 for paperclipai (or similar) and you use a private npm registry (for example GitHub Packages) via a global ~/.npmrc, npx may be resolving paperclipai against that private registry instead of the public npm registry.

Diagnostic:

npm config get registry

Workaround (cross-platform; force the public npm registry for this command):

npx --registry https://registry.npmjs.org paperclipai@latest onboard --yes

That quickstart path now defaults to trusted local loopback mode for the fastest first run. To start in authenticated/private mode instead, choose a bind preset explicitly:

npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes --bind lan
# or:
npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes --bind tailnet

If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning onboard keeps the existing config in place. Use npx paperclipai configure to edit settings.

Or manually:

git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev

This starts the UI and API at http://localhost:3100. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.

Requirements: Node.js 24.11+, pnpm 9.15+

Local Claude and Codex subscription sign-in also needs Python 3 and the corresponding provider CLI on the Paperclip host. The Docker image includes them.

Source development also builds the native Paperclip Runner when enabled (the self-hosted default). Install a Rust toolchain, or set PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_BINARY to a compatible prebuilt runner.


FAQ

Q: Is this project maintained or just slop?

A: Paperclip is maintained by the Paperclip team. We've merged over 2,700 pull requests.


Q: What does a typical setup look like?

A: Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.

For remote access, use authenticated mode with a private-network bind such as Tailscale, or deploy the persistent server with Docker. See deployment modes and the Docker guide.


Q: Can I run multiple companies?

A: Yes. A single deployment can host multiple organizations with company-scoped data and access checks.


Q: How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code?

A: Paperclip uses those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.


Q: Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello?

A: Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.

(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)


Q: Do agents run continuously?

A: Agents wake for assigned work and follow-up messages. Optional timer heartbeats let them check for work periodically; routines create recurring tasks on their own schedules. You can also connect externally running agents such as OpenClaw. A mention alone does not assign work or wake another agent.


Development

pnpm dev              # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once         # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server       # Server only
pnpm dev:mobile       # Serve prebuilt UI on :3101 for phones/tablets (proxies /api → :3100)
pnpm dev:both         # Run `pnpm dev` and `pnpm dev:mobile` together
pnpm build            # Build all
pnpm typecheck        # Type checking
pnpm test             # Cheap default test run (Vitest only)
pnpm test:watch       # Vitest watch mode
pnpm test:e2e         # Playwright browser suite
pnpm db:generate      # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate       # Apply migrations

pnpm test does not run Playwright. Browser suites stay separate and are typically run only when working on those flows or in CI.

See doc/DEVELOPING.md for the full development guide.


Roadmap

  • ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
  • ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
  • ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
  • ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
  • ✅ Skills Manager, Skill Studio & Skills Store
  • ✅ Scheduled Routines
  • ✅ Better Budgeting
  • ✅ Agent Reviews and Approvals
  • ✅ Multiple Human Users
  • ✅ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e2b, Cloudflare, Daytona, Modal, Novita, boxd, self-hosted Kubernetes)
  • ✅ Artifacts & Work Products
  • ✅ Deep Planning (planning mode, revisioned plans, plan approvals)
  • ✅ Enforced Outcomes (watchdogs, recovery actions, review gates)
  • ✅ MCP Tool Gateway & Apps (governed tool access)
  • ✅ Secrets Manager with per-agent access
  • ✅ Activity log & action attribution
  • ✅ Self-healing runs & automatic recovery
  • ✅ Agent evals & feedback
  • ✅ Connected Apps
  • ✅ Personal & Shared AI Accounts
  • ✅ Shared Agents Use Personal GitHub Identities
  • ✅ Skill Version History & Restore
  • ✅ Document Comments & Revision History
  • ✅ Company-Wide Search
  • ✅ Multi-Model & Multi-Harness Teams
  • 🟡 Memory / Knowledge
  • ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
  • ⚪ Work Queues
  • ⚪ Self-Organization
  • ⚪ Automatic Organizational Learning
  • 🟡 Agent Chat
  • 🟡 Cloud deployments
  • ⚪ Desktop App
  • ⚪ Bring-your-own-ticket-system (Asana / Linear / Jira as on-ramps)

This is the short roadmap preview. See the full roadmap in ROADMAP.md.


Community & Plugins

Find Plugins and more at awesome-paperclip

Observability

Paperclip ships with opt-in OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation for the server (traces only). It activates when OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is set and supports grpc, http/protobuf, and http/json via the standard OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_PROTOCOL env var. @opentelemetry/api is a normal server dependency; the SDK, auto-instrumentation, and exporter packages are optional peer dependencies — install them only if you want tracing. See doc/observability.md for install commands and the full env-var reference.

Paperclip also ships with opt-in Sentry error monitoring for the server and the browser. Set SENTRY_DSN_FRONTEND to activate it for the browser and SENTRY_DSN_BACKEND to activate it for the server — each variable is optional, and the legacy SENTRY_DSN variable still works as a fallback for either component. The supported server SDK version is @sentry/node@10.71.0; it is an optional peer dependency for the server, so install it only if you want error monitoring. The browser SDK, @sentry/browser, is pinned to the same exact version. See doc/observability.md for the install command, the privacy settings, and the full default capture set.

Telemetry

Paperclip collects anonymous usage telemetry to help us understand how the product is used and improve it. No personal information, issue content, prompts, file paths, or secrets are ever collected. Private repository references are hashed with a per-install salt before being sent.

Contributors changing emitted telemetry events should follow the Telemetry Data Contract. For proposed first-party events that are not in the generated contract yet, follow Telemetry Workflow.

Telemetry is enabled by default and can be disabled with any of the following:

Method How
Environment variable PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1
Standard convention DO_NOT_TRACK=1
CI environments Automatically disabled when CI=true
Config file Set telemetry.enabled: false in your Paperclip config

Contributing

We welcome contributions. See the contributing guide for details.

We're hiring


Community


License

MIT © 2026 Paperclip Labs, Inc

Star History

Star History Chart

Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to get work done, not babysit agents.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme MIT
3.2 GiB
0 Stars 1 Watchers 0 Forks
Languages
TypeScript 91.9%
JavaScript 4.1%
Rust 2.8%
Python 0.4%
CSS 0.3%
Other 0.3%