Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/runtime-tools-token.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip b3343dbd64 feat(connections): add self-serve intent runtime (#12345)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agents need a governed way to request app connections during issue
work.
> - The catalog now describes the available providers and setup methods.
> - A request must become a durable, company-scoped intent before an
operator acts on it.
> - This pull request adds that intent runtime across server, agent,
CLI, and shared contracts.
> - The benefit is a safe bridge from agent need to operator-approved
setup.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #11965

This is stack 7 of 11. It depends on stack 6 and replaces another
reviewable part of #11965.

## What Changed

- Add connection intent types, validation, service logic, and routes.
- Add agent runtime tools and CLI support for connection requests.
- Add issue-thread interaction support for connection intents.
- Add runtime, route, adapter, and contract tests.
- Hold the final resolved-continuation row lock through asynchronous
adapter preparation until an actual process spawn, so parking or
reassignment cannot cross that boundary.
- Report Hermes Gateway's first remote run request through the shared
dispatch hook so the resolved-intent lock is released at the true
dispatch boundary.
- Revalidate the addressed user's live non-viewer membership and
connection-management authority for every intent mutation, including
OAuth completion.

## Verification

- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts`
- Result: 176 tests passed.
- `pnpm build`
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run
src/__tests__/heartbeat-stale-queue-invalidation.test.ts` (32 passed;
includes non-process dispatch lock-release coverage)
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server
server/src/__tests__/connection-intents-service.test.ts -t
"addressed-user mutation"` (1 passed)
- `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server
server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts -t "binds OAuth
callback completion to the initiating board session"` (1 passed)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/hermes-paperclip-adapter test --
src/gateway/server/execute.test.ts` (23 passed; includes dispatch-hook
ordering and exactly-once coverage)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/hermes-paperclip-adapter typecheck`

## Risks

- A malformed intent could create an unusable operator request.
- Validators and company checks reject invalid or cross-company
requests.
- The final continuation gate holds the issue row lock through adapter
preparation until process or remote dispatch; later operator changes use
the normal active-run interruption path.
- The change does not add a database migration.

> I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This stack continues the existing app
connection work from #11965 and does not duplicate another planned item.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime model ID and context window were not
exposed. The model used reasoning, tool use, and code execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have linked the public source pull request with `Refs #`
- [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues
or links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-08-29 12:08:34 -05:00

96 lines
3.2 KiB
TypeScript

import { createHmac, timingSafeEqual } from "node:crypto";
import { resolvePaperclipInstanceId } from "./home-paths.js";
export interface RuntimeToolsTokenClaims {
sub: string;
company_id: string;
run_id: string;
responsible_user_id: string;
scope: "connection_intents";
iat: number;
exp: number;
instance_id: string;
}
const TOKEN_TTL_SECONDS = 60 * 60;
function secret() {
return process.env.PAPERCLIP_AGENT_JWT_SECRET?.trim()
|| process.env.BETTER_AUTH_SECRET?.trim()
|| null;
}
function encode(value: unknown) {
return Buffer.from(JSON.stringify(value), "utf8").toString("base64url");
}
function sign(value: string, companyId: string, instanceId: string) {
const master = secret();
if (!master) return null;
const key = createHmac("sha256", master)
.update(`runtime-tools:${instanceId}:${companyId}`)
.digest();
return createHmac("sha256", key).update(value).digest("base64url");
}
function safeEqual(left: string, right: string) {
const a = Buffer.from(left);
const b = Buffer.from(right);
return a.length === b.length && timingSafeEqual(a, b);
}
export function createRuntimeToolsToken(input: {
agentId: string;
companyId: string;
runId: string;
responsibleUserId: string;
}) {
if (!secret()) return null;
const now = Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000);
const instanceId = resolvePaperclipInstanceId();
const claims: RuntimeToolsTokenClaims = {
sub: input.agentId,
company_id: input.companyId,
run_id: input.runId,
responsible_user_id: input.responsibleUserId,
scope: "connection_intents",
iat: now,
exp: now + TOKEN_TTL_SECONDS,
instance_id: instanceId,
};
const signingInput = `${encode({ alg: "HS256", typ: "JWT" })}.${encode(claims)}`;
const signature = sign(signingInput, input.companyId, instanceId);
return signature
? { token: `${signingInput}.${signature}`, expiresAt: new Date(claims.exp * 1000).toISOString() }
: null;
}
export function verifyRuntimeToolsToken(token: string): RuntimeToolsTokenClaims | null {
const parts = token.split(".");
if (parts.length !== 3) return null;
let header: Record<string, unknown>;
let claims: Record<string, unknown>;
try {
header = JSON.parse(Buffer.from(parts[0]!, "base64url").toString("utf8"));
claims = JSON.parse(Buffer.from(parts[1]!, "base64url").toString("utf8"));
} catch {
return null;
}
if (header.alg !== "HS256") return null;
const companyId = typeof claims.company_id === "string" ? claims.company_id : null;
const instanceId = typeof claims.instance_id === "string" ? claims.instance_id : null;
if (!companyId || !instanceId || instanceId !== resolvePaperclipInstanceId()) return null;
const expected = sign(`${parts[0]}.${parts[1]}`, companyId, instanceId);
if (!expected || !safeEqual(parts[2]!, expected)) return null;
if (
typeof claims.sub !== "string"
|| typeof claims.run_id !== "string"
|| typeof claims.responsible_user_id !== "string"
|| claims.scope !== "connection_intents"
|| typeof claims.iat !== "number"
|| typeof claims.exp !== "number"
|| claims.exp <= Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000)
) return null;
return claims as unknown as RuntimeToolsTokenClaims;
}