mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The release channel system promotes builds canary → nightly → beta → stable, and stable releases publish a GitHub Release from `releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md` > - The stable lane requires that notes file to exist inside the promoted source commit, but the file is named for the promotion date, which is unknown when the source commit is created > - A promoted beta can therefore never pass the notes check: every happy-path stable is forced through the candidate-branch fix path, with a soak-gate justification, for a notes-only change > - This pull request drafts the notes automatically when the beta is published and lets the stable promotion read them from `master` > - The benefit is a walkable stable happy path: the soak gate stays exact, notes get a real review window during the soak, and the justification path returns to its real purpose (cherry-picked fixes) ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The stable promotion path in the release channel system (`release.yml`, `scripts/release.sh`). **Current behavior** `release.sh stable` requires `releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md` in the checked-out source tree, and `publish_stable` checks out the exact promoted SHA. The soak gate requires a `beta/v*` tag to point at that same SHA. No commit can satisfy both for a promoted beta, so a stable promotion must cut a candidate branch with a notes-only commit and bypass the soak gate with a written justification. Release notes are also written at promotion time, under time pressure, with no review window. **Proposed behavior** When a beta publishes, a `draft_stable_notes` job generates a grouped notes skeleton at `releases/beta/v<beta-version>.md` and pushes it to a machine-owned branch; a human opens the PR and edits it during the 3-day soak. The stable preflight resolves notes before the `npm-stable` approval gate: source-tree notes first (the candidate fix path, unchanged), then the merged beta-keyed file on `master`; it fails early with the missing path named when neither exists. After the stable ships, a canonicalization job pushes a branch that moves the file to `releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md`. Related (not duplicates): #11006 and #11008 introduced the nightly and beta lanes this builds on; older changelog PRs (for example #10669) authored notes manually at promotion time, which is the flow this replaces. **Reason and benefit** The happy path becomes: promote the exact soaked SHA, no justification, notes reviewed during the soak instead of written at the gate. The `releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md` invariant still holds durably via the canonicalization PR. ## What Changed - `scripts/release.sh`: new `--notes-file PATH` (stable only) overrides where the pre-publish notes check looks, so notes can live outside the source checkout without dirtying the worktree. - `scripts/create-github-release.sh`: same `--notes-file` override for the GitHub Release body. - `scripts/draft-stable-notes.sh` (new): deterministic skeleton generator — commit subjects from the newest stable tag (falling back to the previous beta, then full history) to the beta's source commit, grouped into Features / Fixes / Other. - `.github/workflows/release.yml`: - `draft_stable_notes` job after `publish_beta`: runs the generator and force-pushes `release-notes/v<beta-version>`; the job summary links the compare page. It recreates the beta tag locally if the tag push was rejected (the known workflows-permission case), so drafting is not blocked on manual tag recovery. - `preflight_stable`: computes the target stable version (`release.sh stable --print-version`) and resolves the notes source (`source_tree` → `master_beta` → fail early / warn on dry run); new outputs. - `publish_stable`: materializes `master`-side notes into `RUNNER_TEMP` and passes `--notes-file` to both scripts; outputs the published stable version. - `canonicalize_stable_notes` job: pushes the `git mv` branch after a stable that used `master`-side notes. - `doc/RELEASING.md`, `doc/RELEASE-CHECKLIST.md`: document the drafted-notes flow, the preflight resolution order, and the canonicalization step; the LLM changelog flow now targets the draft branch during the soak. - `.agents/skills/release-changelog/SKILL.md`, `.agents/skills/release-changelog-discord-message/SKILL.md`: the notes-authoring skills now describe this flow — range ends at the beta source commit (not `HEAD`), the file is beta-keyed on the `release-notes/v<beta-version>` branch (seeded with `scripts/draft-stable-notes.sh` for betas that predate the automation), and the canonicalization link caveat is called out for announcements. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/draft-stable-notes.test.mjs` — 6 tests, temp git-repo fixtures: grouping, stable-tag range, previous-beta and full-history fallbacks, default output path, malformed version, missing tag. - `node --test scripts/release-lib.test.mjs` — unchanged suite still green. - `bash -n` on both changed shell scripts; `release.yml` re-parsed as YAML. - `./scripts/release.sh stable --print-version` unchanged (prints the next stable version); `--notes-file` on a non-stable channel fails with a clear error. - Not exercised end-to-end: the new workflow jobs need a real beta publish to run. The first beta after merge is the live test; the draft job is additive and cannot affect the publish result (it runs after `publish_beta` completes). ## Risks - Low risk to publishing itself: `--notes-file` defaults preserve today's behavior everywhere; the draft and canonicalization jobs are additive and run after the publishes succeed. - The preflight now fails a real stable run when no notes are found. That is the intended fail-early behavior (it previously failed later, inside `publish_stable`, after the `npm-stable` approval). - `draft_stable_notes` force-pushes only the machine-owned `release-notes/v<beta-version>` branch; a beta re-cut regenerates it cleanly. - The stable version computed at preflight could differ from the published one if a run crosses UTC midnight between the two jobs; the materialized notes are passed by path, so the publish still succeeds, and the canonicalization job uses the actually-published version. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Claude Code) ## Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template
84 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
84 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
# Release Checklist
|
|
|
|
The release captain's checklist for every lane. The mechanics live in
|
|
[`RELEASING.md`](RELEASING.md); the user-facing channel guide is
|
|
[`CHANNELS.md`](CHANNELS.md).
|
|
|
|
## Canary (automatic, every `master` push)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] the push's `Release` run is green (verify + publish)
|
|
- [ ] `npm view paperclipai@canary version` matches the expected canary
|
|
- [ ] Docker `:canary` updated (the same push's `Docker` run)
|
|
- [ ] a canary publish failure is a release-infra regression — fix it before
|
|
trusting later promotions
|
|
|
|
## Nightly (automatic, 09:00 UTC)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] the scheduled run selected the newest green canary, or skipped with a
|
|
job-summary reason (no new candidate / already shipped / red smoke)
|
|
- [ ] the release smoke suite passed against the exact candidate canary
|
|
before anything published
|
|
- [ ] `npm view paperclipai@nightly version` shows the new `-nightly.N`
|
|
- [ ] `nightly/v*` tag pushed; `:nightly` and `:nightly-cloud` images built
|
|
- [ ] on a tag-push rejection (workflows-permission error), follow the
|
|
recovery commands in the job summary
|
|
|
|
To force a nightly: dispatch `release.yml` with `channel: nightly`
|
|
(optional exact canary in `source_version`; `dry_run` to preview).
|
|
|
|
## Beta (manual promotion)
|
|
|
|
Happy path:
|
|
|
|
- [ ] pick the nightly to promote (empty `source_version` selects the newest)
|
|
- [ ] dispatch `release.yml` with `channel: beta`
|
|
- [ ] approve the `npm-beta` environment gate
|
|
- [ ] `npm view paperclipai@beta version` shows the new `-beta.N`
|
|
- [ ] `beta/v*` tag pushed; `:beta` and `:beta-cloud` images built
|
|
- [ ] post-publish smoke (`smoke_beta`) is green
|
|
- [ ] `draft_stable_notes` pushed `release-notes/v<beta-version>`; open the
|
|
notes PR from the job-summary link
|
|
- [ ] during the soak: edit the notes PR into release voice and merge it
|
|
(the stable promotion reads `releases/beta/v<beta-version>.md` from
|
|
`master`)
|
|
|
|
Fix path (cherry-picked candidate):
|
|
|
|
- [ ] cut `candidate/beta-<target>` from the chosen nightly's source commit
|
|
- [ ] cherry-pick only the required fixes; push the branch
|
|
- [ ] dispatch `channel: beta` with `candidate_branch`
|
|
- [ ] confirm the job summary records the cherry-picked commits and that
|
|
full verification ran on the candidate head
|
|
- [ ] after shipping: reconcile the fixes to `master`, delete the branch
|
|
|
|
## Stable (manual promotion)
|
|
|
|
- [ ] pick the beta to promote; its source commit is `source_ref`
|
|
- [ ] the beta has soaked ≥ 3 days with no open beta-blocker issues
|
|
- [ ] the beta's notes PR (`releases/beta/v<beta-version>.md`) is merged on
|
|
`master` — preflight fails, before the approval gate, without it
|
|
- [ ] dispatch `release.yml` with `channel: stable` (a dry run first shows
|
|
the resolved version and soak state without publishing)
|
|
- [ ] approve the `npm-stable` environment gate
|
|
- [ ] `npm view paperclipai version` (dist-tag `latest`) shows the stable
|
|
- [ ] `vYYYY.MDD.P` tag pushed; GitHub Release created; `:latest` and the
|
|
versioned Docker tags built
|
|
- [ ] if the soak gate was bypassed, `skip_soak_justification` carries a
|
|
real written reason (it lands in the job summary)
|
|
- [ ] open and merge the canonicalization PR
|
|
(`release-notes/v<version>-canonicalize`) so the notes land at
|
|
`releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md`
|
|
|
|
Fix path: `candidate/release-<target>` from the beta's source commit; the
|
|
soak gate will demand a justification because the exact bits were not
|
|
soaked — write one that stands on its own. A candidate branch carries its
|
|
own `releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md` (preflight prefers source-tree notes), so
|
|
author the notes as a commit on the candidate.
|
|
|
|
## After any incomplete run
|
|
|
|
The failure playbooks in [`RELEASING.md`](RELEASING.md) cover: red canary,
|
|
skipped or failed nightly, a beta that looks bad during soak, partial
|
|
stable releases, broken `latest`, and rejected tag pushes. Every publish
|
|
job's summary names what completed and what remains.
|