mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-24 10:13:11 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Product E2E probes measure when acknowledgements and replies become visible. > - A poll gives a time interval for an event. > - The first positive poll can occur after a target that the event could still meet. > - This pull request compares the full interval with a strict or inclusive target. > - Reports retain the raw observations and the original verdict when the timing verdict changes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A historical acknowledgement was absent at 1901 ms and first present at 2427 ms. A report marked the 2000 ms target as failed. The interval crosses that target, so the available evidence cannot give a pass or fail verdict. **Expected behavior** Return pass when the full interval meets the target. Return fail when the full interval rules out the target. Return inconclusive for overlap, invalid evidence, or insufficient evidence. Respect strict and inclusive targets and open and closed endpoints. **Steps to reproduce** Run the deterministic timing tests. Use the acknowledgement interval `(1901, 2427] ms` with `<= 2000 ms`. Compare the late reply interval `(52965, 53334] ms` with `<= 30000 ms`. The first is inconclusive. The second fails. **Paperclip version or commit** The source includes master at `14afc12124017d4ec30d0f4bfd6892f8ce475d21`. Related PR: [#13710](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13710) changed chat latency and session reuse. This change corrects probe evidence and report verdicts. ## What Changed - Add a shared interval classifier with explicit endpoint and target operators. - Start observation before dispatch. Use a monotonic clock. Bound asynchronous reads by request start and completion. - Measure the first visible response separately from message creation and final settlement. Share browser reads with an optional acknowledgement probe. - Keep raw bounds, clock resolution, message metadata, failed reads, and original verdicts in retained report evidence. - Add deterministic coverage for threshold equality, missing data, edited messages, asynchronous reads, teardown, report correction, and a finite-domain oracle. - Bound observer shutdown to one second across pending and final reads. Retain timeout counts. Ignore late completions and start no more reads after shutdown. - Document the timing contract in the existing Product E2E guide. - Keep current startup reuse evidence after the master merge. Update four stale test expectations for qualified Copilot admission. Keep the explicit suite and provider restrictions. ## Verification - Current head: `c42e87e6d3b4b347e7cb176f56819c1d0abe106d`. - Passed: `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` (3,287 Vitest tests and 128 native completion tests; two explicit skips). - Passed: `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm check:token-gates`, and `git diff origin/master --check`. - Passed: [exact-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39607140418), including both required checks (`ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`), all general and serialized test jobs, all eight browser shards, build, canary dry run, and the clean public npm-install smoke. - Greptile reviewed the complete current diff and returned [5/5 with no actionable issues](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16829#issuecomment-6266704814). All review threads are resolved. - The redundant local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after the exact-head CI test jobs passed. It did not produce a complete local verdict; the full repository test evidence is the CI run above. - The [earlier broad run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39249282597) failed on the old head. Its full test command timed out after 15 minutes. Five E2E support failures came from ambient `NODE_PATH` and a missing historical Git object. Current master supplies the closed-environment launcher and retained source fixture. The full support suite passes with these fixes. - After the current master merge, four stale Copilot assertions and the nested unit launcher failed. Copilot is now qualified. Those assertions now require no qualification override and retain the rejected suite/provider cases. The full documented unit command passes. - The first local typecheck after the merge used stale generated package declarations and failed. The typechecks pass after `pnpm build`. - These checks use synthetic timing evidence. They make no live provider calls and claim no new live latency measurement. ## Risks - The browser diagnostic depends on the existing message and receipt DOM markers. Controlled tests cover visibility, receipt separation, concurrent reads, and teardown. - Corrected timing verdicts can become inconclusive. The report keeps the original verdict and does not change the overall workflow grade. - This change adds no database migration or product surface. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 Codex. Model family: GPT-6. This session does not expose a more specific model ID or context window size. The agent used reasoning, shell tools, code inspection, and deterministic tests. The earlier implementation session did not retain its exact model ID. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
502 lines
30 KiB
Markdown
502 lines
30 KiB
Markdown
# Paperclip evaluation guide
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [case handoff workflow](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#persistent-case-handoffs-explicit-only)
|
|
contains arithmetic and receipt smoke cells for a same-task round trip among three native agents using real case/task
|
|
APIs, saved documents, handoff receipts, and browser readback. Receipt smoke has
|
|
an explicit terminal handoff to `done` on its fourth run, proving case closure
|
|
through normal task completion without a fifth provider run. It also has
|
|
an initial task-owned brief supplied at kickoff through `initialDocuments`,
|
|
ordinary native task document reads/writes, and case-page rollup readback.
|
|
Earlier case-document campaign results remain preserved and do not qualify
|
|
this subsequent document ownership change. The suite has
|
|
separately selectable local Codex API-key and subscription profiles with the
|
|
same model and limits. The API profile uses an encrypted company-secret
|
|
reference; the subscription profile receives only an explicitly supplied private
|
|
login fixture. The original arithmetic cell remains subscription-only.
|
|
The receipt cell declares exactly four task work runs, 90-second work-run limits,
|
|
a five-minute attempt, and 100-cent accounted-work budgets. Initial agent setup
|
|
also performs production hello probes outside heartbeat counts, budget accounting
|
|
and the work-run usage report. Up to three initial probes are expected; their
|
|
detailed tokens and cost are unavailable, and a timeout need not cancel an
|
|
in-flight probe immediately. These limits do not establish an absolute provider
|
|
inference cap, and unknown setup usage is not free. The original arithmetic cell
|
|
retains its own limits.
|
|
Service tests and workflow discovery remain distinct from a completed provider run.
|
|
|
|
The [Slack connector probe catalog](../server/src/services/connectors/slack/evals/README.md)
|
|
organizes eleven manual model acceptance probes and a selector for existing
|
|
deterministic regressions (`pnpm test:slack-connector`). It is not a registered
|
|
model campaign; transport fixtures do not prove that an agent chooses a tool
|
|
or that a real Slack interaction completes.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [live provider connection suite](../tests/runner-e2e/PROVIDER-CONNECTIONS.md)
|
|
is a Product E2E workflow for fresh subscription/API-key/gateway connections,
|
|
with attended login and independent artifact checks against local or staging targets.
|
|
|
|
The bounded [personal Muse receiver probe](muse-personal-agent.md#bounded-24-hour-probe)
|
|
uses ordinary task APIs and retained native receipts to measure unattended
|
|
receiver behavior. It is a separate manual qualification probe, not a registered
|
|
Product E2E campaign. Synthetic receiver tests cannot qualify personal Muse;
|
|
real setup, clarification and fresh-conversation collaboration remain separate
|
|
release gates.
|
|
|
|
Paperclip has two live eval families with different questions, owners, and
|
|
evidence. Choose the family before selecting a model, profile, or case.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [native instruction consolidation comparison](plans/2026-10-03-native-completion-consolidation.md)
|
|
uses six Product E2E cells per source variant. It measures the completion
|
|
constraint reduction separately from the earlier native tool-description
|
|
trial. Provider-free start/resume payload capture is a byte measurement;
|
|
behavioral qualification requires the original paired live outcomes and
|
|
retained content. Neither source admission nor a scripted pass proves model
|
|
behavior.
|
|
|
|
- **Runner Evals:** real Runner/provider behavior against a seeded mock control
|
|
plane. Definitions live in `paperclip-evals/evals/paperclip-runner`; see the
|
|
[direct live protocol evals](../packages/paperclip-runner/docs/runner-protocol-live-evals.md).
|
|
- **Product E2E Evals:** real browser, Paperclip server, database, Runner,
|
|
provider, and (where selected) Daytona, using an isolated instance and
|
|
grading oracle. See [`tests/runner-e2e`](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md) and
|
|
[Everyday Workflows](../tests/runner-e2e/EVERYDAY-WORKFLOWS.md).
|
|
|
|
Runner Evals answer whether a real runner/provider can perform a bounded
|
|
protocol operation against the expected control-plane contract. Product E2E
|
|
Evals answer whether a person can complete a product workflow through the real
|
|
Paperclip surfaces and whether the resulting artifact and state are usable.
|
|
The names describe the system under test; “headless” is an execution option,
|
|
not an eval category.
|
|
|
|
The explicit Product E2E `completion-updates` suite compares onboarding and
|
|
idle, busy, multiple-task, and restart Agent Chat handoffs on native Claude/Codex. It separates mechanical
|
|
completion delivery/result access from semantic review of the retained answer;
|
|
see the [probe contract](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#completion-update-probes-explicit-only).
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [task-titles suite](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#automatic-task-titles)
|
|
checks that production guidance causes a real native agent to name prompt-only
|
|
standard/Ask tasks early, while preserving user-supplied titles. Its oracle
|
|
correlates browser creation, native tool receipts, durable titles, audit ownership,
|
|
and the reloaded task UI; fixture prompts contain no naming instructions.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [native connection guidance suite](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#native-connection-guidance-explicit-only)
|
|
adds neutral decline prompts, same-task run-attributed explanations, and measured
|
|
no-use controls across three native local profiles. Its fifteen configured cells
|
|
are preparation for future matched instruction comparisons, not a live result.
|
|
Historical Everyday cases and production prompts are preserved.
|
|
|
|
## Selecting a family
|
|
|
|
Pi's explicit-only `pi-controls` Product suite tests Stop while native permission
|
|
is unanswered and browser-originated same-turn steering, locally and on Daytona.
|
|
Its [fixture contract](../tests/runner-e2e/FIXTURES.md#pi-active-controls) separates
|
|
control acknowledgment, actual message consumption and owned process retirement.
|
|
The current Pi matrix has 26 explicit cells (13 local and 13 Daytona), including
|
|
these four controls, pending-native-question controller restart, and a Daytona-only
|
|
exact-Pi-child provider-death journey. Provider death must expire the original
|
|
unanswered card and reject stale replies without a replacement run; any durable
|
|
fallback is distinct from restoration. File editing
|
|
also requires native edit/validation events and a registered artifact download.
|
|
All remain unqualified until measured on the exact candidate runtime and harness.
|
|
|
|
Use **Runner Evals** for a runner protocol, adapter, transport, native session,
|
|
tool grant, or one-turn provider qualification question. The workflow checks
|
|
out an exact `paperclip-evals` revision, builds the Runner and viewer, runs a
|
|
live roster, and renders the canonical Evalbook report. The control plane is a
|
|
seeded test authority, so a passing result does not prove browser UX, production
|
|
server behavior, database persistence, Daytona behavior, or a real third-party
|
|
mutation.
|
|
|
|
Use **Product E2E Evals** for browser interaction, issue/task lifecycle,
|
|
approval and clarification UI, project/repository selection, persistence over a
|
|
controller restart, artifact delivery, billing/evidence behavior, or runner
|
|
continuity in local or Daytona environments. The harness creates a fresh
|
|
Paperclip instance per cell and uses public APIs and the production browser
|
|
surface. The suite's [Everyday Workflows](../tests/runner-e2e/EVERYDAY-WORKFLOWS.md)
|
|
are Product E2E even when their results are imported into Evalbook.
|
|
|
|
Do not combine a partial Runner campaign and a partial Product E2E campaign into
|
|
one score. A campaign is comparable when its definition/grader, model/profile,
|
|
environment, and contract match. The evaluated Paperclip revision may
|
|
intentionally differ for a before/after fix comparison; record it as a
|
|
comparison axis.
|
|
|
|
## Ownership and codepaths
|
|
|
|
Runner Evals are owned by the Runner/evals maintainers. Definitions, rosters,
|
|
case prompts, and the report program live in the sibling private repository
|
|
`paperclipai/paperclip-evals`; Runner integration, viewer, aggregation, and
|
|
publication code live under `packages/paperclip-runner` and the
|
|
`runner-protocol-live-evals.yml` workflow. The public-facing report uses the
|
|
same Evalbook renderer and Runner Lab viewer as the trusted report after
|
|
sanitization.
|
|
|
|
Product E2E Evals are owned by the runner E2E maintainers. The catalog and
|
|
harness are under `tests/runner-e2e`; the package scripts are `test:e2e:runner`,
|
|
`test:e2e:runner:unit`, `test:e2e:runner:typecheck`, and
|
|
`test:e2e:runner:report`. `README.md`, `FIXTURES.md`, `SECURITY.md`, and
|
|
`EVERYDAY-WORKFLOWS.md` are the detailed sources of truth. The harness starts
|
|
the server and embedded database, creates the company/agent/task through the
|
|
real APIs, drives Chromium, and invokes the selected local or Daytona runner.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only `agent-chat-hardening` Product E2E suite covers native chat
|
|
recovery, hiring, status evidence, and review handoff on local and selected warm
|
|
Daytona paths. Its [fixture contract](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md) distinguishes
|
|
startup cancellation from active response cancellation and HTTP send replay
|
|
from ambiguous provider action recovery. Select it explicitly; `--all` excludes it.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [production hiring templates suite](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#production-hiring-templates)
|
|
adds two local native Codex/Claude cells. It exercises API-created production
|
|
CEO defaults, an explicitly requested hiring skill/reference read, a permanent
|
|
coder hire, independently computed saved JSON fixtures and worker reuse.
|
|
Each cell requires five work turns and admits at most two strictly attributed
|
|
server task-completion turns. Every actual run remains counted; unknown or
|
|
extra-work turns fail. Source/read coverage and workflow outcome are
|
|
separate: missing read provenance leaves the candidate/baseline pair
|
|
uncomparable even if work succeeds. Baseline bundles and coder examples derive
|
|
from their own source revision, without requiring candidate wording or length.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only `context-integrity` Product E2E suite covers ordered public
|
|
comment continuation and explicit invocation of an assigned pinned skill across
|
|
the seven selected legacy/native local profiles. Select it by suite or exact
|
|
execution ID because `--all` excludes explicit-only suites. Each cell applies a
|
|
1,000-cent company and agent budget hard stop before task creation and records
|
|
both limits in its evidence.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [stock-harness suite](../tests/runner-e2e/STOCK-HARNESS.md)
|
|
reuses skill, ordered-continuation, and chat-restart journeys across eight local
|
|
legacy/native profiles with production-default hires. It closes the custom QA
|
|
manual coverage gap. Its required credential-free prerequisite maps vendor
|
|
instruction layering, the tiny hire bundle, and shared startup/resume reductions
|
|
to executable checks. The 24 live cells are configured; no live qualification is
|
|
claimed from their setup or unit calibration.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only `agent-chat-stories` suite covers the experimental settings
|
|
lifecycle for a configured native agent and follow-ups during active work. Its
|
|
fixture-driven file wait and persisted-plan oracle are documented in the
|
|
[Product E2E guide](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md). It does not qualify the native
|
|
onboarding wizard or change the native API-tool rollout defaults.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only `grok-qualification` and `grok-subscription-qualification`
|
|
Product suites exercise Grok Build with API and company subscription
|
|
authentication respectively. Keep their results separate; the subscription
|
|
fixture seeds an explicitly supplied login and does not qualify interactive
|
|
login. See the [Grok fixture contract](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#grok-build-qualification).
|
|
|
|
The explicit [Direct blocker guidance suite](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#direct-blocker-guidance)
|
|
checks the legacy coordination skill against human authority, missing hiring
|
|
permission, and requester scope decisions through saved browser interactions.
|
|
|
|
## Validation ladder
|
|
|
|
The native Codex Daytona `recover-controller` cell in Everyday Workflows
|
|
requires active process and lease continuity, native receipt continuity and
|
|
workspace finalization. See the [restart evidence contract](../tests/runner-e2e/EVERYDAY-WORKFLOWS.md).
|
|
Catalog discovery and deterministic calibration do not establish live recovery.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [public MCP suite](../tests/runner-e2e/PUBLIC-MCP.md) evaluates
|
|
paid assistant delegation, later retrieval, feedback, review, uncertain retries
|
|
and permission boundaries. It uses the Product E2E fixtures, launcher, evidence
|
|
packaging and dashboard, with separate external-assistant and team-worker billing.
|
|
The [2026-10-01 results](plans/2026-10-01-public-mcp-paid-eval-results.md) retain
|
|
two complete model matrices, provenance, costs and the earlier failure history.
|
|
|
|
Start with credential-free checks and a catalog listing. For Product E2E:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck
|
|
pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit
|
|
pnpm test:e2e:runner -- --list
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
For one explicitly selected local cell, configure only the credentials named
|
|
by that cell in `.env.runner-e2e.local`, then run a narrow ID:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pnpm test:e2e:runner -- --id core-compatibility.runner-codex.local.message-marker
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Use the selectors documented in the [runner E2E README](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md)
|
|
for a suite, profile, case, group, or environment. Daytona needs the immutable
|
|
image digest and `DAYTONA_API_KEY`; follow the README and fixture security guide.
|
|
`--all` excludes manual suites such as `everyday-workflows`. Select that suite
|
|
explicitly; use a narrow selector while developing a fixture.
|
|
|
|
For Runner Evals, the narrowest useful local validation is the report program's
|
|
help/validation path and the deterministic Runner checks documented in
|
|
[`runner-workflow-evals.md`](../packages/paperclip-runner/docs/runner-workflow-evals.md).
|
|
Hosted direct live runs must use the default-branch workflow, an exact 40
|
|
character `evals_sha`, an explicitly selected roster (or the maintained
|
|
enabled `all` campaign), and the protected paid environment. The complete
|
|
hosted command is intentionally kept in the workflow and
|
|
[direct live protocol guide](../packages/paperclip-runner/docs/runner-protocol-live-evals.md).
|
|
Live provider runs can spend money; use the existing workflow authorization and
|
|
the user's stated scope when selecting them.
|
|
|
|
## Failure taxonomy
|
|
|
|
Record the primary failure class and preserve the evidence that supports it.
|
|
|
|
- **Product failure:** evidence shows Paperclip or Runner behavior violates the
|
|
authored case or a hard invariant, such as wrong task state, missing approval
|
|
gate, lost persistence, bad artifact, or incorrect protocol operation.
|
|
- **Model/provider behavior failure:** the provider turn completed with usable
|
|
evidence but the model gave the wrong answer, ignored an interaction, failed
|
|
to complete the authored operation, or violated a semantic assertion. It is
|
|
scored as behavior, not silently retried as infrastructure.
|
|
- **Grading/evidence failure:** the case or matcher cannot establish its claim,
|
|
a required recording/screenshot/result is malformed, or the report contract
|
|
is invalid. Fix the harness or grader before interpreting the score.
|
|
- **Infrastructure failure:** the evidence points to provider/profile
|
|
unavailability, transport admission failure, service startup failure, a
|
|
missing credential/image, or inability to produce usable evidence. Startup,
|
|
transport, and timeout symptoms can instead be product defects when evidence
|
|
implicates Paperclip or Runner; classify from the observed failure and
|
|
supported cause, rather than the symptom name alone. Preserve the artifact.
|
|
|
|
Missing usage or price data means unknown, not free. Keep provider-reported
|
|
costs separate from estimates, and include retry costs when available.
|
|
Latency, cleanup, billing coverage, and unpriced usage are dimensions of the
|
|
result and should remain visible alongside the primary class. A timeout after
|
|
successful product state reads can be a product behavior failure; a failed
|
|
server-health read may be infrastructure, but inspect its cause. Use the
|
|
family-specific classifier and read the attempt evidence before changing an
|
|
analytical label.
|
|
|
|
## Evidence, provenance, and history
|
|
|
|
Polling latency is an interval rather than an exact first-detection time. The
|
|
[Product E2E timing contract](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#latency-observation-bounds)
|
|
keeps last-absent/first-present bounds, resolution, strict or inclusive targets,
|
|
and pass/fail/inconclusive timing verdicts alongside the unchanged workflow grade.
|
|
|
|
Retained result snapshots and dated measurement reports belong in
|
|
`paperclip-evals`; application tests, Product E2E fixtures/graders, and executable
|
|
scenario inventories remain in this repository. Keep a compact results index
|
|
with immutable archive links and public report links, as in the
|
|
[lifecycle baseline](../tests/lifecycle-baseline/README.md#recorded-results-moved-to-paperclip-evals).
|
|
The private archive is not a dependency of app test execution. Keep large logs,
|
|
traces, and videos in the existing campaign artifact storage.
|
|
|
|
An Evalbook report is a presentation of immutable attempt records, not the
|
|
source of truth. Keep the campaign ID, Paperclip commit, `paperclip-evals`
|
|
commit, catalog/roster or definition fingerprint, model/profile, environment,
|
|
grader version, selected cells, retries, and provider/runtime usage with the
|
|
report. Public projections follow each family's reviewed allowlist and may
|
|
include sanitized fixture conversation, named tool outcomes, screenshots, and
|
|
structured evidence intended for public history. Credentials, secrets, private
|
|
data, raw unredacted records, and hidden reasoning stay out of public
|
|
projections.
|
|
|
|
Distinguish a complete campaign from a partial campaign. A narrow selector,
|
|
manual diagnostic, missing cell, or infrastructure retry can be useful evidence
|
|
without being a qualification run. History should retain both, with explicit
|
|
coverage and completeness, while trend and latest-green views compare only
|
|
compatible complete campaigns. Refreshing an existing report from retained
|
|
evidence has zero provider calls and is a new presentation of the old
|
|
measurement, not a new model run.
|
|
|
|
Existing public histories are available at
|
|
[Runner protocol history](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-protocol-evals/index.html)
|
|
and [Runner Product E2E history](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/).
|
|
The consolidated eval hub is at
|
|
[pages.paperclip.ing/evals](https://pages.paperclip.ing/evals/).
|
|
|
|
For a repeatable workflow, use the matching skill: [paperclip-evals](../.agents/skills/paperclip-evals/SKILL.md),
|
|
[add-runner-eval](../.agents/skills/add-runner-eval/SKILL.md), or
|
|
[add-product-e2e-eval](../.agents/skills/add-product-e2e-eval/SKILL.md).
|
|
|
|
## Diagnose failures before buying another campaign
|
|
|
|
Use this loop to turn eval failures into product improvements. The unit of work
|
|
is a broken user outcome or invariant, not an individual red cell.
|
|
|
|
1. **Freeze the evidence.** Record the inspected application revision and each
|
|
campaign's evaluated revision, definition/grader fingerprint, model/profile,
|
|
environment, exact selected IDs, attempts, and usage coverage. Read the
|
|
history feed and retained attempt records before launching models. A report
|
|
refresh, skipped workflow, passing unit suite, or old-definition green cell
|
|
is not a new live measurement. Inventory explicit-only suites separately
|
|
from `--all`.
|
|
2. **Reconstruct the failed boundary.** Read durable task state, interactions,
|
|
event chronology, source/worker identity, delivered output, and the failing
|
|
assertion. State whether the test reached the boundary it claims to test.
|
|
Separate observed failure, machine class, analytical cause, and confidence.
|
|
A cancelled queued wake does not by itself prove lost work; a failed decline
|
|
assertion does not prove unauthorized execution. A saved artifact does not
|
|
prove the user received a correct completion update.
|
|
3. **Group by cause and product contract.** Join cells only when their evidence
|
|
supports the same mechanism. Check for already-merged fixes and definition
|
|
corrections before proposing new work. Keep product defects, provider/model
|
|
behavior, grading defects, infrastructure, and unexercised boundaries
|
|
distinct. Preserve the original grades when attribution changes.
|
|
4. **Design the smallest general correction.** Name the desired user behavior,
|
|
the authoritative state/transaction or provider boundary that owns it, the
|
|
affected callers, and the existing guarantees that must survive. Check it
|
|
against `PRODUCT.md` and `SPEC-implementation.md`. A change to an intentional
|
|
product rule is a contract change, not an excuse to delete its guard. Avoid
|
|
case-name branches, phrase-specific prompts, unconditional retries, or
|
|
weakening approval, ownership, cancellation, and budget gates to get green.
|
|
5. **Prove the mechanism cheaply.** Calibrate a grader against correct and
|
|
plausible wrong retained evidence. Reproduce a product race with scripted
|
|
providers or service tests. Pair every proposed fix with a regression that
|
|
exercises the opposite boundary (for example, eligible delivery versus
|
|
revoked access, benign obsolete wake versus interrupted active work).
|
|
Presentation-only changes use the existing report refresh path and make no
|
|
provider calls; do not claim replay can prove changed runtime behavior.
|
|
6. **Select a bounded live confirmation.** Write the exact failed representative
|
|
IDs and only the passing controls affected by the change. Pin the source,
|
|
definitions, models, and remote image. Record an attempt cap, provider and
|
|
compute budget, wall-clock deadline, and concurrency before dispatch under
|
|
the existing live-run authorization. Missing pricing means unknown, not free.
|
|
Do not rerun unaffected green cells during diagnosis or retry usable behavior
|
|
failures until they happen to pass. Preserve every attempt. Expand to a
|
|
compatible qualification campaign only after the causal fix passes.
|
|
7. **Close with evidence and remaining scope.** Report original versus new
|
|
measurements, exact selected coverage, regression results, cost coverage,
|
|
and unresolved boundaries. A partial verification may close one defect; it
|
|
cannot turn the full catalog green or establish reliability from one attempt.
|
|
|
|
Keep one triage record per cause with: affected cell IDs; evidence links;
|
|
observed failure; supported cause and confidence; existing fix/revision; proposed
|
|
product contract; invariant regressions; next exact live selection; budget and
|
|
stop condition; owner; and disposition. Useful dispositions include confirmed
|
|
product defect, model behavior, grader correction, infrastructure repair,
|
|
fixed-but-not-remeasured, historical pass, and unqualified coverage.
|
|
|
|
Parallelize independent artifact inventory, deterministic checks, and isolated
|
|
cells. Keep a cell's dependent turns ordered. When delegating, use inexpensive
|
|
agents for bounded extraction, catalog reconciliation, and test execution; keep
|
|
causal attribution, product design, and final review with the lead. Begin local
|
|
browser campaigns at the documented conservative concurrency and increase only
|
|
with measured host headroom. Hosted fanout must respect the workflow's provider
|
|
and fleet caps; more simultaneous timeouts do not improve wall-clock efficiency.
|
|
|
|
Current tools support exact-ID selection and retained-evidence report refresh,
|
|
but not an automatic cause-aware "rerun unresolved failures" planner. Build an
|
|
explicit selection manifest rather than treating `--all` as that planner. Review
|
|
the launcher's automatic retry policy when budgeting; Product E2E may create one
|
|
fresh attempt for a retryable failure.
|
|
|
|
## Install the authoring skills
|
|
|
|
The reviewable sources live in this repository's `.agents/skills`. For a
|
|
multi-repository workspace, install the three skills at
|
|
`~/paperclipai/.agents/skills` (not `~/paperclipai/skills`). From the Paperclip
|
|
checkout, run:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
for skill in paperclip-evals add-runner-eval add-product-e2e-eval; do
|
|
install -d "$HOME/paperclipai/.agents/skills/$skill"
|
|
install -m 644 ".agents/skills/$skill/SKILL.md" \
|
|
"$HOME/paperclipai/.agents/skills/$skill/SKILL.md"
|
|
done
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This replaces only the three named skill entrypoints. Run it again after
|
|
updating their tracked sources. Each skill locates the repository independently
|
|
of its installation directory.
|
|
|
|
## Maintain the public hub
|
|
|
|
The hub is a static directory with two links to the existing history systems.
|
|
It displays a dated snapshot, not a live scoreboard. It does not run models,
|
|
create another result archive, or change the existing campaign URLs.
|
|
|
|
Build from the public history feeds and check its summary logic:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
python3 -m unittest discover -s scripts/evals-hub -p 'test_*.py'
|
|
python3 scripts/evals-hub/build.py --output .paperclip/evals-hub
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The hub checks need Python 3 and do not call model providers.
|
|
|
|
For offline checks, pass `--history-dir <directory>` containing
|
|
`runner-protocol-evals-history.json` and `runner-e2e-history.json`.
|
|
For a pre-merge preview, pass `--docs-ref <branch-or-sha>` to link the guide
|
|
at that revision. The default guide link uses `master`.
|
|
|
|
Publish with the [Paperclip page helper](../.agents/skills/paperclip-page/SKILL.md)
|
|
and the configured page-uploader credentials. Use Bash 4 or newer; macOS's
|
|
system Bash 3 cannot run this helper. On macOS with Homebrew Bash installed,
|
|
put `$(brew --prefix bash)/bin` first in `PATH` before these commands:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
export PAPERCLIP_PAGE_BUCKET=pages.paperclip.ing
|
|
export PAPERCLIP_PAGE_BASE_URL=https://pages.paperclip.ing
|
|
export AWS_REGION=us-east-1
|
|
bash .agents/skills/paperclip-page/scripts/publish.sh .paperclip/evals-hub --slug evals --dry-run
|
|
bash .agents/skills/paperclip-page/scripts/publish.sh .paperclip/evals-hub --slug evals
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
For later refreshes, rebuild in the same output directory and publish with
|
|
`--update`. Keep its ignored `.paperclip-page/state.json` ownership record;
|
|
without that record, the helper will refuse to overwrite an existing prefix.
|
|
Verify the public page and its links after publication. This manual refresh
|
|
does not add a scheduled workflow. Preserve the measurement date when choosing
|
|
a newer rendering of the same campaign.
|
|
|
|
Remaining native chat boundaries are in the explicit-only
|
|
`agent-chat-qualification` suite: active task reassignment, user Retry after
|
|
verified worker process loss, and multi-turn answers grounded in actual task
|
|
records. See the [workflow and qualification limits](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#remaining-native-agent-chat-qualification).
|
|
The 26 native `first-task` cells inspect the production wizard's saved native
|
|
default on qualified targets, without an API runner switch. The 26 Legacy cells
|
|
select Legacy explicitly in Advanced. Live results and semantic answer reviews must accompany
|
|
any qualification claim; catalog presence alone is not a pass.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [native question/resume qualification](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#task-continuation)
|
|
separates a completed two-answer user journey from semantic-tool documentation
|
|
qualification. It verifies the exact provider-pause or semantic-response-wake
|
|
binding for each answer and preserves prior grades when the definition changes.
|
|
|
|
## Lifecycle behavior baseline
|
|
|
|
The credential-free [lifecycle baseline](../tests/lifecycle-baseline/README.md)
|
|
joins unit, scripted-runner, and database integration assertions to a scenario
|
|
inventory before changing narrative-based lifecycle policy. Run
|
|
`pnpm test:lifecycle-baseline` to retain current passes and failures. Its Product
|
|
E2E matcher calibration is separate from live execution; unrun live coverage
|
|
remains explicitly unmeasured.
|
|
|
|
The separate [live lifecycle baseline](../tests/runner-e2e/LIFECYCLE-BASELINE.md)
|
|
defines 46 real-provider Product E2E cells, including paired narrative probes and
|
|
named existing controls on legacy and native Codex. Discover it with
|
|
`pnpm test:e2e:runner -- --list --suite lifecycle-baseline`. Historical execution
|
|
results and follow-up coverage are recorded in that suite's guide.
|
|
|
|
Continuation accounting has an explicit-only eight-cell Product E2E [baseline suite](../tests/runner-e2e/CONTINUATION-ACCOUNTING.md), complementing the deterministic lifecycle inventory.
|
|
|
|
The explicit Product E2E `instruction-persistence` suite verifies private file
|
|
edits, nested and binary agent files, stopped-provider directory saves, server restart, and a fresh task's
|
|
downloaded proof on local native/legacy Codex and native Daytona. See the
|
|
[Product E2E runbook](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md).
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only Product E2E `api-response-reading` suite verifies retrieval of
|
|
large saved API responses on local and Daytona native Codex runs. See the
|
|
[Runner E2E guide](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#bounded-api-response-reading).
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only Product E2E `extended-harnesses` suite covers pending Cursor,
|
|
Copilot and Pi ACP profiles on local and Daytona. See the
|
|
[fixture admission, credentials and budget contract](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#extended-acp-harnesses-explicit-only).
|
|
The private Runner Evals campaign of the same name provides complementary
|
|
semantic protocol cases; catalog membership is not live qualification.
|
|
|
|
The explicit local [Copilot protection fixtures](../tests/runner-e2e/FIXTURES.md#copilot-native-protection)
|
|
exercise native permission denial with operator cancellation and bounded attached
|
|
command settlement. Their registration remains separate from paid qualification;
|
|
source/pack provenance and complete persisted evidence are required.
|
|
The explicit-only Product E2E `confirmation-replies` suite tests conversational
|
|
approval and rejection, persisted message provenance, approval before execution,
|
|
ambiguous proposals, and the existing card-click path with native Claude/Codex.
|
|
See the [suite contract](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#conversational-confirmation-replies-explicit-only).
|
|
|
|
Hiring notification accounting now also requires exact completed action attribution. Missing native/provider ID mapping is uncomparable evidence; it must not be reported as a model task regression or waived through name/order matching. The fixture waits for both known completion callbacks and settled bracketed observations, including the gap before pending outbox work becomes a wake. Strict action replay and original machine verdicts are retained separately.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [planning guidance utility comparison](../tests/runner-e2e/PLAN-TASK-GUIDANCE.md) measures task decomposition and handoffs with current, short, and disabled skills.
|
|
|
|
The explicit-only [task-workspaces Product E2E suite](../tests/runner-e2e/README.md#projectless-task-workspaces-explicit-only)
|
|
covers projectless task files, deferred repository acquisition, controller restart
|
|
and nested Git/dirty-file persistence on legacy local, native local and native
|
|
Daytona OpenCode. Its three configured cells use independent filesystem, public
|
|
API and download oracles; no live qualification is implied by fixture registration.
|