Files
PaperClipAI/doc/connections/README.md
T
Dotta a560b48d6d feat(apps): refine Postman and Shopify setup (#12357)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Apps give those agents governed access to external tools.
> - Provider catalogs must match each provider's current protocol and
credential contract.
> - Postman method labels and API-key placement were outdated.
> - Shopify now offers a UCP commerce endpoint that needs a managed
agent-profile argument.
> - This pull request updates both providers and documents the complete
connection-authoring workflow.
> - The benefit is accurate setup, safer runtime defaults, and a
repeatable provider review process.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #11965

This is stack 10 of 11. It depends on stack 9 and preserves the final
catalog work recovered from #11965.

Related: #5904 covers Shopify skill routing. This pull request covers
the Apps connection contract instead.

## What Changed

- Update Postman hosted MCP methods, capability choices, default
selection, and bearer-token placement.
- Add Shopify UCP commerce and Storefront compatibility methods with
public-store prerequisites.
- Inject the reviewed Shopify UCP agent profile at runtime and remove
that managed field from user input schemas.
- Classify Shopify checkout completion and cancellation as destructive
actions.
- Expand the connection authoring runbook from provider research through
verification and pull request handoff.
- Add focused shared, server, and UI coverage.
- Make the approved-execution waiter phase-aware so slow preparation
cannot consume the provider execution timeout and grace period.
- Settle legacy pre-execute-on-approve requests and invocations as
failed, clear their stale idempotency key, and allow a fresh governed
approval instead of leaving work stuck in `executing`.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/app-definitions.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts
ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx -t
"Postman|Shopify|normalizeConnectionMethodConfig|classifyRisk"` (16
passed)
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/services/approved-execution-wait.test.ts` (4 passed)
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/tool-gateway.test.ts -t
"enforces policy, approvals, retries, rate limits, and company
boundaries for connected remote MCP calls"` (1 passed)
- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/tool-gateway-service.test.ts` (21 passed; includes
legacy approval settlement and fresh-approval recovery)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- `pnpm -r typecheck`
- `pnpm build`

## Risks

- Shopify UCP calls now include a Paperclip-managed agent profile that
overrides caller input at the same path.
- Postman EU credentials now use the hosted MCP server's bearer-token
contract instead of the general REST API header.
- The catalog generator and checked-in definitions change together to
prevent regeneration drift.
- Approved execution preparation has an explicit two-minute bound;
provider execution retains its own 65-second timeout and persistence
grace starting from durable provider start.
- Legacy approvals created before execute-on-approve are intentionally
terminalized and must be requested again under the current signed
contract.

> I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This provider update does not duplicate
planned core work. The related open Shopify PR addresses skill routing,
not Apps connections.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime exact model ID and context window were
not exposed. The model used reasoning, tool use, and code execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
2026-08-29 12:08:35 -05:00

203 lines
10 KiB
Markdown

# Apps, Connections, and Integrations
Audience: internal engineers and product contributors working on integrations.
Start here when adding a provider:
[Connection authoring runbook](./CONNECTOR-PLAYBOOK.md). It is the canonical
agent tutorial from provider research and protocol classification through
manifest generation, branding, secrets, deterministic tests, real-account
proof, and PR submission.
Provider notes: [Google Workspace](./GOOGLE-WORKSPACE.md),
[Gmail](./GMAIL.md), [PostHog](./POSTHOG.md). Optional credential custody:
[Vercel Connect](./VERCEL-CONNECT.md).
Post-read action: classify a new integration request, pick the right Paperclip
layer to change, and avoid creating a parallel connection framework.
## Decision Record
Board decisions from [PAP-13211](/PAP/issues/PAP-13211) make the Apps v2
substrate on the PAP-10341 branch canonical:
- **D1: Apps v2 is the substrate.** The active model is
`tool_applications`, `tool_connections`, catalog entries, profiles, policy
rules, action requests, gateway sessions, audit events, and runtime slots.
Connections v1 is retired as an implementation path.
- **D2: one credential authority per connection, brokered projections.** The
default is the Paperclip instance vault: durable third-party credentials live
in `company_secrets` as secret refs. A reviewed remote MCP method may instead
opt in to [Vercel Connect](./VERCEL-CONNECT.md), in which case Vercel is the
durable credential authority and Paperclip stores only the connector reference
and redacted grant metadata. A connection must never mix those two sources.
Adapter config, plugin config, harness credential files, and run environments
may receive only brokered or projected credentials.
- **D3: the vocabulary and three-door IA are product law.** The default product
doors are Apps, Connections, and Review. Protocol and operator-depth concepts
live behind Developer or Advanced surfaces.
- **D4: unification lands on PAP-10341.** Pages, CircleBack-style harness MCP
OAuth, provider gallery work, and plugin-provided integrations converge on
this branch instead of spawning new integration substrates.
- **D5: inbound stays thin.** External clients that call Paperclip use scoped
Paperclip tokens and existing profiles/rules. They do not get a separate
permission model.
## Canonical Object Model
Use **connection** as the unifying noun. A connection is four things:
1. A stored credential reference.
2. A capability catalog.
3. A governance layer.
4. An audit trail.
Everything else is an axis on that object:
| Axis | Values | It answers |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Direction | outbound, inbound | Who is the client? |
| Transport | MCP, native REST/OpenAPI, OAuth app install, webhook | How do bytes move? |
| Auth mode | OAuth, API key/PAT, app installation, none | What does the secret represent? |
| Credential owner | company, user, run | Whose identity acts? |
| Packaging | catalog entry, plugin, skill | How does it ship? |
MCP is a transport, not a product category. "Install the Discord app",
"connect Google Drive", and "add an MCP endpoint" all produce governed
connections with different transport/auth values.
## Layer Stack
When you are unsure where a change belongs, place it on the narrowest layer that
solves the problem:
| Layer | Owns | Examples |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Surface | user-facing Apps, Connections, Review, Developer/Advanced screens | gallery cards, setup wizard, review queue |
| Governance | profiles, bindings, allow/ask-first/block rules, quarantine, audit | read-only profile, ask-first write policy |
| Capability | action catalogs, schemas, risk classes, changed-tool review | `search_issues`, `create_comment`, schema hash |
| Credential | `company_secrets`, OAuth broker, credential resolver, token broker | Slack bot token ref, Google OAuth refresh token ref |
| Identity | actor attribution and token exchange | board user, agent run, first-party service identity |
| Transport | how the external system is reached | remote HTTP MCP, local stdio, REST/OpenAPI, webhook |
The agent should not hold a durable provider credential. It should hold a
Paperclip run/session token; the server or broker resolves the connection,
checks governance, invokes the provider, and writes audit.
## Identity vs. connections
Signing a user *in* and connecting a *resource* are different planes with
different owners, different token profiles, and different homes. Do not merge
them. This section is the public, connections-side statement of the identity
model so connector implementers inherit the rule without depending on private
identity-service documentation or re-deriving it.
| Plane | Question | Lives where | Token profile |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| **P1. Sign-in methods** | *Who are you?* | `paperclip-id` (id.paperclip.ing → Account) | Minimal-scope provider tokens (`openid email profile`), used once to authenticate, encrypted at rest, never exported |
| **P2. Connections (Apps)** | *What may your agents touch?* | Paperclip App instances (`tool_connections`), acquired via the **connect broker** for hosted + self-hosted | Rich-scope, long-lived resource tokens in the **instance's** encrypted vault; per-agent grants; risk-tier policy defaults |
| **P3. Login with Paperclip** | *Who may authenticate against us?* | `paperclip-id` OIDC provider + DB-backed client registry | Our ES256 ID/access tokens issued *by* us to registered RPs (instances, the broker, future third parties) |
Everything in `doc/connections/` — the [First-30 matrix](./FIRST-30-MATRIX.md),
the [connection authoring runbook](./CONNECTOR-PLAYBOOK.md), and the connect-broker work —
lives on **plane P2**. It never acquires, stores, or brokers a P1 sign-in token.
### The standing rule (D7)
Adopted as a standing rule (decision D7) with the identity-model plan. State it
verbatim in any P2 design so the app-store work cannot drift into merging the
planes:
> Sign-in tokens are never reused as resource tokens; id.paperclip.ing never
> stores resource tokens; no connections hub on the ID service.
P2 tokens flow broker → instance vault as pass-through only; the id.paperclip.ing
Account page therefore must **not** grow a "Connections" hub. The reasons to
hold the planes apart (from the plan §3):
- **Scope discipline.** Sign-in wants the narrowest grant; connections want
deliberately broad ones. One button that does both is how you grant repo
access just to log in.
- **Blast radius.** id.paperclip.ing holding every customer's Vercel/Slack/GitHub
resource tokens would make it the single juiciest target in the fleet; the
broker is intentionally pass-through.
- **Self-hosted symmetry.** Instances own their vaults, so self-hosters don't
depend on our uptime to *use* their own connections.
- **Legibility.** Sign-in and connections answer different user questions, and
every product we benchmarked (Vercel, Railway, GitHub, Google) keeps them on
separate pages with separate names.
The explicit Vercel Connect exception does not change D7 or merge P1 and P2.
The operator chooses Vercel as the P2 credential authority for an individual
connection. `id.paperclip.ing` is not involved, and neither sign-in tokens nor
provider tokens pass through it. The deployment's Vercel access token or
workload OIDC identity is bootstrap authority for that external vault, not a
provider resource credential.
### Naming alignment
Use the surface-correct name for each plane; they intentionally differ:
| Surface | Plane | Name to use |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Paperclip App instances | P2 | **"Connections"** |
| id.paperclip.ing Account | P1 | **"Ways to sign in"** |
| id.paperclip.ing admin | P3 | **"OIDC clients"** (until the app store productizes it) |
## Packaging Rule
Default to a **catalog entry** when an integration can be described as metadata:
manifest, auth config, action catalog, resource filters, and policy defaults.
Use a **plugin** only when the integration needs product code such as custom UI
pages, its own tables, workers, migrations, routines, or specialized ingestion.
A plugin may bundle catalog entries, but it must not bypass the connection,
profile, policy, credential, and audit model.
Use a **skill** for agent instructions. Skills may use connections; they must
not own durable tokens.
## Canonical Docs
- [Glossary](./GLOSSARY.md) defines product and internal terms.
- [Identity vs. connections](#identity-vs-connections) is the public statement
of the P1/P2/P3 boundary and the D7 standing rule for connections work.
- [Security threat model](./SECURITY-THREAT-MODEL.md) harvests the keeper from
[PAP-2359](/PAP/issues/PAP-2359) and maps it onto Apps v2.
- [First-30 matrix](./FIRST-30-MATRIX.md) harvests the keeper from
[PAP-2432](/PAP/issues/PAP-2432) and is the source matrix for connector
playbook work.
- [Connecting any remote MCP server](./GENERIC-REMOTE-MCP.md) is the baseline:
how an operator connects a standards-compliant remote MCP endpoint with no
Paperclip code change, and how sign-in resolves a client.
- [Connection authoring runbook](./CONNECTOR-PLAYBOOK.md) is the one
end-to-end, agent-executable guide for adding a vendor as a catalog entry on
Apps v2: research, connection-type selection, OAuth/API-key/generated-URL
setup, encrypted credential handling, branding, implementation, browser and
live-provider testing, verification, and PR submission.
- [Vercel Connect operator guide](./VERCEL-CONNECT.md) documents the optional
external credential source, deployment flags, runtime resolution, recovery,
and smoke requirements.
- [MCP access governance](../MCP-ACCESS-GOVERNANCE.md) remains the operator
runbook for the current gateway, profile, policy, approval, runtime, and audit
APIs.
## Migration Notes
Connections v1 contributed useful policy, UX, and rollout thinking, but its
implementation branch is no longer the target. When you see old tickets or code
using `connections`, `connection_grants`, or a provider-directory mental model,
translate the intent into Apps v2:
| Connections v1 intent | Apps v2 home |
| --- | --- |
| Provider directory | Apps gallery / `tool_applications` |
| Configured provider instance | Connection / `tool_connections` |
| Grant allowlist | Profiles, profile bindings, policies |
| Resource filters | Policy/profile conditions plus provider config |
| Tool broker | Tool gateway and runtime supervisor |
| Connection UX tail | Apps, Connections, Review, Developer/Advanced IA |
Do not add new work to the retired v1 branch. If an old ticket still describes a
valid product gap, retarget it to an active Apps v2 issue or close it as
superseded with a link to the replacement.