Devin Foley
76f7019bdf
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Every company has an issue prefix. It is the visible half of each task and case identifier, and a self-hosted company derives it from the name it was created with > - A hosted or managed instance does not use the create-company flow. The trusted-header auth path claims the tenant company instead > - That path minted the prefix from a hash of the stack id, and it wrote a placeholder description that nobody chose > - So a hosted company showed opaque task IDs such as `PC7F2A-14`, and a rename never changed them > - This pull request derives the prefix from the company name on that path too. It re-derives the prefix when the name changes on a managed instance, and it rewrites the stored issue and case identifiers so existing tasks follow the rename > - It also repairs each company that an earlier build claimed. The repair runs once, on the next authenticated request > - The benefit is that task IDs on a hosted instance read like the ones on a self-hosted instance, and they stay correct after a rename ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. The description below follows `.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/enhancement.yml`. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The tenant company claim in `resolveCloudTenantActor` (`server/src/middleware/auth.ts`) and the company update in `companyService.update` (`server/src/services/companies.ts`). Both decide the `issue_prefix` and the `description` of a company on a hosted or managed instance. **Subsystem affected** `server/` — REST API and orchestration services. One small hint was also added in `ui/`. **Current behavior** A self-hosted company gets its issue prefix from its name. "Acme Robotics" becomes `ACM`, and its tasks read `ACM-14`. A hosted or managed instance claims the company through the trusted-header auth path. That path wrote a different prefix: `"PC"` plus the first four hex characters of the SHA-256 of the stack id. The same path also wrote a placeholder description, `"Provisioned by ... for stack <stack id>."`. The result is a task ID such as `PC7F2A-14`. It says nothing about the company. A later rename of the company does not change it, because nothing re-derives the prefix after creation. **Proposed behavior** The claim path derives the prefix from the company name, exactly as the create-company flow does. It writes no description. On a managed instance, a rename re-derives the prefix. The stored issue and case identifiers move with it, so `ACM-14` becomes `NOR-14` when "Acme Robotics" becomes "Northwind Traders". A rename that keeps the same three-letter base keeps the current prefix, including any disambiguating suffix. A self-hosted instance is unchanged. A rename there still keeps the prefix the company was created with. Companies that an earlier build already claimed get a one-time repair on their next authenticated request. The repair re-derives the prefix from the current name, re-keys the identifiers, and clears the placeholder description. **Reason and benefit** A task ID is the primary handle for a task. People type it, paste it into chat, and read it in a URL. On a hosted instance that handle was an opaque hash, and it disagreed with the company name that the same user chose during signup. The name is the only prefix source a hosted user ever supplies, so the prefix now follows it. **Breaking changes** Yes, on hosted and managed instances only. A company rename now rewrites the stored issue and case identifiers. Links that carry an old identifier stop resolving after the rename. The company settings page states this before the user saves. The one-time repair applies the same rewrite once to companies that carry the old hash prefix. Self-hosted behavior does not change. ## What Changed - Added `server/src/services/issue-prefix.ts`. It holds the prefix helpers that used to live inside the `companyService` closure: `ISSUE_PREFIX_FALLBACK`, `deriveIssuePrefixBase`, `issuePrefixSuffixForAttempt`, and `isIssuePrefixConflict`. The companies service now imports them. - Added `pickAvailableIssuePrefix` to that module. It reads the prefixes in one base family and returns the first free candidate. A standalone `INSERT` can retry on a unique violation, because each failed statement is its own implicit transaction. A caller that already holds a transaction cannot, because the violation aborts the whole transaction. Such a caller picks first, then writes. - Added `rekeyCompanyIssueIdentifiers` to that module. It rewrites the prefix of the stored `issues.identifier` and `cases.identifier` values of one company in the caller's transaction, and it returns the two row counts. - `companyService.update` re-derives the prefix when the name changes on a managed instance, re-keys both tables in the same transaction, and writes a `company.updated` activity entry after the commit. - `resolveCloudTenantActor` claims the company with a name-derived prefix and a null description. The claim retries with the next suffix when the prefix is taken. - `resolveCloudTenantActor` also runs a one-time repair for companies that carry the old hash prefix. An exact-match fence on the update lets a concurrent rename win. The repair is idempotent, because its guards stop matching after it lands. - The rename takes a row lock on the company before it compares anything against it, and it re-keys from the prefix it reads under that lock. Only patch and environment facts gate the lock, so no stale read can steer the decision. Two overlapping updates would otherwise leave a company whose prefix disagrees with its own identifiers, in either direction: two renames, where the second re-keys from a prefix the first already moved; or a rename plus a stale form that resubmits the original name, where the second sees an unchanged name, skips re-derivation, and restores the old name on top of the first rename's prefix. Only a managed instance takes the lock, and only for an update that carries a name. - Both helpers compare an exact identifier head instead of a LIKE pattern. A stored prefix is data, so it must never be read as a pattern. - The company settings page shows a hint under the name field on a managed instance: renaming can change the task ID prefix. ## Verification Automated tests: ``` pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run \ src/services/issue-prefix.test.ts \ src/__tests__/companies-service.test.ts \ src/__tests__/cloud-tenant-company-provisioning.test.ts \ src/middleware/cloud-tenant-actor.test.ts \ src/__tests__/auth-session-route.test.ts \ src/__tests__/cloud-routes.test.ts \ src/__tests__/cloud-instance.test.ts \ src/__tests__/company-branding-route.test.ts \ src/__tests__/company-cloud-floor.test.ts \ src/__tests__/companies-route-cross-company-authz.test.ts \ src/__tests__/companies-route-path-guard.test.ts \ src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck ``` New coverage: - `server/src/services/issue-prefix.test.ts` covers the derivation, the suffix ladder, the cause-chain walk of the unique-violation detector, and `pickAvailableIssuePrefix` against a stubbed select. - `server/src/__tests__/companies-service.test.ts` covers a managed rename against a real Postgres database: the prefix moves, both identifier tables are re-keyed, and the activity entry is written. It also covers a same-base rename, a collision that takes the suffixed candidate, a non-name patch, and a self-hosted rename that leaves the prefix alone. Two more tests drive the overlap cases: two concurrent renames of the same company, and a rename racing a stale form that resubmits the original name. Both assert that the surviving name's base matches the company prefix and that the stored identifiers sit on that prefix. - `server/src/__tests__/cloud-tenant-company-provisioning.test.ts` covers the claim path and the repair against a real Postgres database: a name-derived prefix, a null description, a suffixed prefix on collision, the full repair, a second pass that changes nothing, a description-only repair, and an operator-written description that the repair leaves alone. - `ui/src/pages/CompanySettingsRenameHint.test.tsx` covers the hint on a managed instance and its absence on a self-hosted instance. The `substring` cast in `rekeyCompanyIssueIdentifiers` is load-bearing and the database tests prove it. The driver binds the offset as text. Without the `::int` cast Postgres resolves the SQL-regex overload of `substring`, and every identifier becomes NULL. ## Risks - **Re-keying changes existing identifiers and URLs.** This is deliberate, and it happens on hosted and managed instances only. After a rename, a link that carries an old task identifier stops resolving. The settings page warns about this before the user saves. - **Identifiers inside comment text are not rewritten.** Only the `identifier` columns of `issues` and `cases` move. A task ID that someone typed into a comment, a description, or a document keeps the old prefix. - **A lost prefix race inside the rename transaction surfaces as a conflict.** The rename picks a free prefix and then writes, because a unique violation inside a transaction aborts the whole transaction. Two *different* companies renamed onto the same base at the same moment can still collide. The loser sees its PATCH fail with the unique violation. The write is retryable by the client, and the window is a single statement wide. Two renames of the *same* company no longer race: the row lock serializes them, and the second one re-keys from what the first committed. - **The rename holds a row lock.** A managed rename takes `SELECT ... FOR UPDATE` on its own company row for the rest of the transaction. It is one row, and no other path in the transaction locks a company row, so there is no lock-order cycle. A self-hosted instance and every non-rename company update never reach the lock. - **The one-time repair is best effort.** It runs inside a try/catch and logs a warning on failure, so it never blocks authentication. A failed pass is retried on the next request, because its guards still match. - No schema change and no migration. ## Model Used - Provider: Anthropic (Claude) - Model: Claude Opus, model id `claude-opus-5[1m]` - Context window: 1M - Reasoning mode: extended thinking - Capabilities used: agentic tool use through Claude Code (file edits, shell, test runs against an embedded Postgres database) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge
Quickstart · Docs · GitHub · Discord · Twitter · Website
Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.
Open-source orchestration for teams of AI agents.
If OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company.
Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track work and costs from one dashboard.
It looks like a task manager. Under the hood: org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.
Manage business goals, not pull requests.
| Step | Example | |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Define the goal | "Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR." |
| 02 | Hire the team | CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider. |
| 03 | Approve and run | Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard. |
| Works with |
 OpenClaw |
 Claude Code |
 Codex |
 Cursor |
 Bash |
 HTTP |
If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.
Paperclip is right for you if
- ✅ You want to build autonomous AI organizations
- ✅ You coordinate many different agents (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
- ✅ You have 20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals open and lose track of what everyone is doing
- ✅ You want agents running autonomously 24/7, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
- ✅ You want to monitor costs and enforce budgets
- ✅ You want a process for managing agents that feels like using a task manager
- ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses from your phone
The four pillars
Four things have to work for an organization of AI agents to actually produce: the tasks, the org, the training, and the infrastructure. Paperclip is built around exactly those four pillars.
| Pillar | Built for | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic Task Manager — Declare intent. Agents work. You verify the output. | Everyone, daily | Tasks, approvals & review gates · proactive agent coworkers · auditable routines & workflows · verify from diffs, screenshots & tests |
| Org Chart for Agents — Roles, permissions & boundaries for humans and agents. | Managers | Mixed human + agent org chart · responsibilities, delegation, specialization · governance: who can do what · scoped secrets & company boundaries |
| Agent Employee Training — Design, train & evaluate your AI employees. | Enablers | Skill Studio & shared org-wide skills · evals & saved test runs · active learning loops & quality metrics · performance reviews for agents |
| Agentic OS — The infrastructure that makes the work run. | IT & platform | Cross-provider runtime: any model, any agent · sandboxing, integrations & MCP servers · SSO, GRC, RBAC & cost controls · data privacy, internal trace collection, compounding data value |
Features
🔌 Bring Your Own AgentAny agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired. |
🎯 Goal AlignmentEvery task traces back to the organization mission. Agents know what to do and why. |
💓 HeartbeatsAgents wake on a schedule, check work, and act. Delegation flows up and down the org chart. |
💰 Cost ControlMonthly budgets per agent. When they hit the limit, they stop. No runaway costs. |
🏢 Multi-OrganizationOne deployment, many organizations. Complete data isolation. One control plane for your portfolio. |
🎫 Ticket SystemEvery conversation traced. Every decision explained. Full tool-call tracing and immutable audit log. |
🛡️ GovernanceApprove hires, override strategy, pause or terminate any agent — at any time. |
📊 Org ChartHierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description. |
📱 Mobile ReadyMonitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere. |
Problems Paperclip solves
| Without Paperclip | With Paperclip |
|---|---|
| ❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. | ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots. |
| ❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. | ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why. |
| ❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. | ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts. |
| ❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. | ✅ Cost tracking surfaces token budgets and throttles agents when they're out. Management prioritizes with budgets. |
| ❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. | ✅ Heartbeats handle regular work on a schedule. Management supervises. |
| ❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. | ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work. |
Why Paperclip is special
Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.
| Atomic execution. | Task checkout and budget enforcement are atomic, so no double-work and no runaway spend. |
| Persistent agent state. | Agents resume the same task context across heartbeats instead of restarting from scratch. |
| Runtime skill injection. | Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining. |
| Governance with rollback. | Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely. |
| Goal-aware execution. | Tasks carry full goal ancestry so agents consistently see the "why," not just a title. |
| Portable company templates. | Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling. |
| True multi-organization isolation. | Every entity is company-scoped, so one deployment can run many companies with separate data and audit trails. |
What's Under the Hood
Paperclip is a full control plane, not a wrapper. Before you build any of this yourself, know that it already exists:
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PAPERCLIP SERVER │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │Identity & │ │ Work & │ │ Heartbeat │ │Governance │ │
│ │ Access │ │ Tasks │ │ Execution │ │& Approvals│ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │ Org Chart │ │Workspaces │ │ Plugins │ │ Budget │ │
│ │ & Agents │ │ & Runtime │ │ │ │ & Costs │ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │ Routines │ │ Secrets & │ │ Activity │ │ Company │ │
│ │& Schedules│ │ Storage │ │ & Events │ │Portability│ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐
│ Claude │ │ Codex │ │ CLI │ │ HTTP/web │
│ Code │ │ │ │ agents │ │ bots │
└───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘
The Systems
|
Identity & Access — Two deployment modes (trusted local or authenticated), board users, agent API keys, short-lived run JWTs, company memberships, invite flows, and OpenClaw onboarding. Every mutating request is traced to an actor. |
Org Chart & Agents — Agents have roles, titles, reporting lines, permissions, and budgets. Adapter examples match the diagram: Claude Code, Codex, CLI agents such as Cursor/Gemini/bash, HTTP/webhook bots such as OpenClaw, and external adapter plugins. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired. |
|
Work & Task System — Issues carry company/project/goal/parent links, atomic checkout with execution locks, first-class blocker dependencies, comments, documents, attachments, work products, labels, and inbox state. No double-work, no lost context. |
Heartbeat Execution — DB-backed wakeup queue with coalescing, budget checks, workspace resolution, secret injection, skill loading, and adapter invocation. Runs produce structured logs, cost events, session state, and audit trails. Recovery handles orphaned runs automatically. |
|
Workspaces & Runtime — Project workspaces, isolated execution workspaces (git worktrees, operator branches), and runtime services (dev servers, preview URLs). Agents work in the right directory with the right context every time. |
Governance & Approvals — Board approval workflows, execution policies with review/approval stages, decision tracking, budget hard-stops, agent pause/resume/terminate, and full audit logging. Nothing ships without your sign-off. |
|
Budget & Cost Control — Token and cost tracking by company, agent, project, goal, issue, provider, and model. Scoped budget policies with warning thresholds and hard stops. Overspend pauses agents and cancels queued work automatically. |
Routines & Schedules — Recurring tasks with cron, webhook, and API triggers. Concurrency and catch-up policies. Each routine execution creates a tracked issue and wakes the assigned agent — no manual kick-offs needed. |
|
Plugins — Instance-wide plugin system with out-of-process workers, capability-gated host services, job scheduling, tool exposure, and UI contributions. Extend Paperclip without forking it. |
Secrets & Storage — Instance and company secrets, encrypted local storage, provider-backed object storage, attachments, and work products. Sensitive values stay out of prompts unless a scoped run explicitly needs them. |
|
Activity & Events — Mutating actions, heartbeat state changes, cost events, approvals, comments, and work products are recorded as durable activity so operators can audit what happened and why. |
Company Portability — Export and import entire organizations — agents, skills, projects, routines, and issues — with secret scrubbing and collision handling. One deployment, many companies, complete data isolation. |
What Paperclip is not
| Not a chatbot. | Agents have jobs, not chat windows. |
| Not an agent framework. | We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them. |
| Not a workflow builder. | No drag-and-drop pipelines. Paperclip models companies — with org charts, goals, budgets, and governance. |
| Not a prompt manager. | Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in. |
| Not a single-agent tool. | This is for teams. If you have one agent, you probably don't need Paperclip. If you have twenty — you definitely do. |
| Not a code review tool. | Paperclip orchestrates work, not pull requests. Bring your own review process. |
Quickstart
Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required.
curl -fsSLO https://paperclip.ing/install.sh
curl -fsSLO https://paperclip.ing/install.sh.sha256
if command -v sha256sum >/dev/null 2>&1; then
sha256sum -c install.sh.sha256
else
shasum -a 256 -c install.sh.sha256
fi
bash install.sh
The installer ensures Node.js 24.11 or newer is available, installs a managed
Paperclip CLI under ~/.paperclip/cli, and starts interactive onboarding. It
can also install Paperclip as a background service on supported Linux and
macOS systems. The checksum detects transfer or publishing mistakes, but it is
served from the same origin as the script; use a release-tag or commit-pinned
GitHub copy when you need an independently hosted source.
For a non-interactive managed install:
curl -fsSL https://paperclip.ing/install.sh | bash -s -- --no-prompt --no-onboard
paperclipai onboard --yes
The piped form requires supported Node.js, npm, and npx to already be present.
If Node.js bootstrap is required, download and review install.sh before
running it so no privileged dependency-install command is accepted through a
pipe.
To try Paperclip without installing anything permanently:
npx --registry https://registry.npmjs.org paperclipai onboard --yes
Troubleshooting: private npm registry
.npmrcIf this fails with an
E404forpaperclipai(or similar) and you use a private npm registry (for example GitHub Packages) via a global~/.npmrc,npxmay be resolvingpaperclipaiagainst that private registry instead of the public npm registry.Diagnostic:
npm config get registryWorkaround (cross-platform; force the public npm registry for this command):
npx --registry https://registry.npmjs.org paperclipai onboard --yes
That quickstart path now defaults to trusted local loopback mode for the fastest first run. To start in authenticated/private mode instead, choose a bind preset explicitly:
paperclipai onboard --yes --bind lan
# or:
paperclipai onboard --yes --bind tailnet
If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning onboard keeps the existing config in place. Use paperclipai configure to edit settings.
See doc/INSTALLING.md for pinned versions, canary and
git-ref installs, updates, rollback, service management, and uninstalling.
Or manually:
git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev
This starts the API server at http://localhost:3100. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.
Requirements: Node.js 24.11+, pnpm 9.15+
FAQ
What does a typical setup look like? Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.
If you're a solo entrepreneur you can use Tailscale to access Paperclip on the go. Then later you can deploy to e.g. Vercel when you need it.
Can I run multiple companies? Yes. A single deployment can run an unlimited number of companies with complete data isolation.
How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code? Paperclip uses those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.
Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello? Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.
(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)
Do agents run continuously? By default, agents run on scheduled heartbeats and event-based triggers (task assignment, @-mentions). You can also hook in continuous agents like OpenClaw. You bring your agent and Paperclip coordinates.
Development
pnpm dev # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server # Server only
pnpm dev:mobile # Serve prebuilt UI on :3101 for phones/tablets (proxies /api → :3100)
pnpm dev:both # Run `pnpm dev` and `pnpm dev:mobile` together
pnpm build # Build all
pnpm typecheck # Type checking
pnpm test # Cheap default test run (Vitest only)
pnpm test:watch # Vitest watch mode
pnpm test:e2e # Playwright browser suite
pnpm db:generate # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate # Apply migrations
pnpm test does not run Playwright. Browser suites stay separate and are typically run only when working on those flows or in CI.
See doc/DEVELOPING.md for the full development guide.
Roadmap
- ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
- ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
- ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
- ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
- ✅ Skills Manager, Skill Studio & Skills Store
- ✅ Scheduled Routines
- ✅ Better Budgeting
- ✅ Agent Reviews and Approvals
- ✅ Multiple Human Users
- ✅ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e2b, Cloudflare, Daytona, Modal, Novita, self-hosted Kubernetes)
- ✅ Artifacts & Work Products
- ✅ Deep Planning (planning mode, revisioned plans, plan approvals)
- ✅ Enforced Outcomes (watchdogs, recovery actions, review gates)
- ✅ MCP Tool Gateway & Apps (governed tool access)
- ✅ Secrets Manager with per-agent access
- ✅ Activity log & action attribution
- ✅ Self-healing runs & automatic recovery
- ✅ Agent evals & feedback
- ⚪ Memory / Knowledge
- ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
- ⚪ Work Queues
- ⚪ Self-Organization
- ⚪ Automatic Organizational Learning
- ⚪ CEO Chat
- 🟡 Cloud deployments (multi-tenant isolation & company Import/Export shipped)
- ⚪ Desktop App
- ⚪ Bring-your-own-ticket-system (Asana / Linear / Jira as on-ramps)
- ⚪ Connected Apps (one-click integrations, e.g. Vercel)
This is the short roadmap preview. See the full roadmap in ROADMAP.md.
Community & Plugins
Find Plugins and more at awesome-paperclip
Observability
Paperclip ships with opt-in OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation for the server (traces only). It activates when OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is set and supports grpc, http/protobuf, and http/json via the standard OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_PROTOCOL env var. @opentelemetry/api is a normal server dependency; the SDK, auto-instrumentation, and exporter packages are optional peer dependencies — install them only if you want tracing. See doc/observability.md for install commands and the full env-var reference.
Paperclip also ships with opt-in Sentry error monitoring for the server and the browser. Set SENTRY_DSN to activate it — the server and the browser then report to the same Sentry project. The supported server SDK version is @sentry/node@10.71.0; it is an optional peer dependency for the server, so install it only if you want error monitoring. The browser SDK, @sentry/browser, is pinned to the same exact version. See doc/observability.md for the install command, the privacy settings, and the full default capture set.
Telemetry
Paperclip collects anonymous usage telemetry to help us understand how the product is used and improve it. No personal information, issue content, prompts, file paths, or secrets are ever collected. Private repository references are hashed with a per-install salt before being sent.
Contributors changing emitted telemetry events should follow the Telemetry Data Contract. For proposed first-party events that are not in the generated contract yet, follow Telemetry Workflow.
Telemetry is enabled by default and can be disabled with any of the following:
| Method | How |
|---|---|
| Environment variable | PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 |
| Standard convention | DO_NOT_TRACK=1 |
| CI environments | Automatically disabled when CI=true |
| Config file | Set telemetry.enabled: false in your Paperclip config |
Contributing
We welcome contributions. See the contributing guide for details.
Community
- Discord — Join the community
- Twitter / X — Follow updates and announcements
- GitHub Issues — bugs and feature requests
- GitHub Discussions — ideas and RFC
License
MIT © 2026 Paperclip Labs, Inc
Star History
Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to get work done, not babysit agents.