mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-08 01:57:31 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The app store needs stable provider marks that do not depend on remote image hosts. > - The connector layer adds many recognizable services. > - Local assets must work in light and dark themes and follow the design token gate. > - This pull request adds the provider asset set and its rendering support. > - The benefit is fast and consistent app identification across the UI. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11965 This is stack 5 of 11. It depends on stack 4 and replaces another reviewable part of #11965. ## What Changed - Add local provider logos for the connection catalog. - Add light and dark asset selection where providers need it. - Add deterministic fallback behavior and UI tests. - Document the fixed brand-color allowlist in the token gate. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/apps/AppLogo.test.tsx` - `pnpm build` ## Risks - A missing asset path can show the deterministic letter fallback. - Brand SVG colors use the documented asset allowlist because provider marks cannot use product theme tokens. - The change does not add a database migration. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This stack continues the existing app connection work from #11965 and does not duplicate another planned item. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime model ID and context window were not exposed. The model used reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Refs #` or (b) described the issue in this pull request - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2 lines
670 B
XML
2 lines
670 B
XML
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="#362D59"><path d="M13.91 2.505c-.873-1.448-2.972-1.448-3.844 0L6.904 7.92a15.478 15.478 0 0 1 8.53 12.811h-2.221A13.301 13.301 0 0 0 5.784 9.814l-2.926 5.06a7.65 7.65 0 0 1 4.435 5.848H2.194a.365.365 0 0 1-.298-.534l1.413-2.402a5.16 5.16 0 0 0-1.614-.913L.296 19.275a2.182 2.182 0 0 0 .812 2.999 2.24 2.24 0 0 0 1.086.288h6.983a9.322 9.322 0 0 0-3.845-8.318l1.11-1.922a11.47 11.47 0 0 1 4.95 10.24h5.915a17.242 17.242 0 0 0-7.885-15.28l2.244-3.845a.37.37 0 0 1 .504-.13c.255.14 9.75 16.708 9.928 16.9a.365.365 0 0 1-.327.543h-2.287c.029.612.029 1.223 0 1.831h2.297a2.206 2.206 0 0 0 1.922-3.31z"/></svg>
|