mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-01 06:42:06 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The app store needs stable provider marks that do not depend on remote image hosts. > - The connector layer adds many recognizable services. > - Local assets must work in light and dark themes and follow the design token gate. > - This pull request adds the provider asset set and its rendering support. > - The benefit is fast and consistent app identification across the UI. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11965 This is stack 5 of 11. It depends on stack 4 and replaces another reviewable part of #11965. ## What Changed - Add local provider logos for the connection catalog. - Add light and dark asset selection where providers need it. - Add deterministic fallback behavior and UI tests. - Document the fixed brand-color allowlist in the token gate. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/apps/AppLogo.test.tsx` - `pnpm build` ## Risks - A missing asset path can show the deterministic letter fallback. - Brand SVG colors use the documented asset allowlist because provider marks cannot use product theme tokens. - The change does not add a database migration. > I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This stack continues the existing app connection work from #11965 and does not duplicate another planned item. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5. The runtime model ID and context window were not exposed. The model used reasoning, tool use, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Refs #` or (b) described the issue in this pull request - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2 lines
1022 B
XML
2 lines
1022 B
XML
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="#0061D5"><path d="M.959 5.523c-.54 0-.959.42-.959.899v7.549a4.59 4.59 0 004.613 4.494 4.717 4.717 0 004.135-2.457c.779 1.438 2.337 2.457 4.074 2.457 2.577 0 4.674-2.037 4.674-4.613.06-2.457-2.037-4.495-4.613-4.495-1.738 0-3.295.959-4.074 2.397-.78-1.438-2.338-2.397-4.135-2.397-1.079 0-2.038.36-2.817.899V6.422a.92.92 0 00-.898-.899zM17.602 9.26a.95.95 0 00-.704.158c-.36.3-.479.899-.18 1.318l2.397 3.116-2.396 3.115c-.3.42-.24.96.18 1.26.419.3 1.016.298 1.316-.122l2.039-2.636 2.096 2.697c.3.36.899.419 1.318.12.36-.3.42-.84.121-1.259l-2.338-3.115 2.338-3.057c.3-.419.298-1.018-.121-1.318-.48-.3-1.019-.24-1.318.18l-2.096 2.576-2.04-2.695c-.149-.18-.373-.3-.612-.338zM4.613 11.154c1.558 0 2.817 1.26 2.817 2.758 0 1.558-1.259 2.756-2.817 2.756-1.558 0-2.816-1.198-2.816-2.756 0-1.498 1.258-2.758 2.816-2.758zm8.27 0c1.558 0 2.816 1.26 2.816 2.758-.06 1.558-1.318 2.756-2.816 2.756-1.558 0-2.817-1.198-2.817-2.756 0-1.498 1.259-2.758 2.817-2.758Z"/></svg>
|