DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 5f1b1bb81d fix(recovery): continue from the last save when a retained source cannot be verified (#19867)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - When a native run cannot save its files, a retained-file recovery
hold blocks the task until the worker saves them from the retained
sandbox.
> - The worker verifies the recorded source strictly. This includes the
reusable-lease chain of the sandbox.
> - A reusable sandbox chain can cross from a parent task into a child
task. The check then refuses the source with
`allocation_ownership_ambiguous` on every attempt.
> - Retry repeats the same refusal. The task stays blocked by three
gates: the saved-work wait, the repair flag and the remote writer hold.
The only text left tells a person to inspect the run and its
environment.
> - The source check must stay strict. Recovery must still work without
a person.
> - This pull request adds an automatic fallback: the task continues
from its last committed workspace save, the unverified files are
attached to the task but never applied, and the unverified workspace
epoch is abandoned so its root is never reused.
> - The benefit is that tasks with an unverifiable retained source
continue by themselves, with no lost saved work and no admin action.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #19840 (removes the "inspect the run and its environment" text and
keeps Retry; this change removes the need for that Retry).

**What happened?**

A child task ran in a reusable sandbox that it inherited from its parent
task. The run saved a checkpoint, wrote more files, and then failed to
save them. Retained-file recovery refused the source with
`allocation_ownership_ambiguous`, because the lease history of the
sandbox crosses into the parent task. The hold was exhausted after one
attempt. Retry made a new generation that failed the same way. The task
stayed blocked with `saved_work_recovery_failed`,
`workspaceRepairRequired: true`, and the failed run still the dirty
writer of the workspace. A second task had a stale exhausted hold for a
run whose files a sibling recovery action had already saved. That hold
also kept the task from continuing.

**Expected behavior**

Recovery works without a person. When the source cannot be verified, the
task continues from its last saved version. The unverified files are not
applied, but they stay available. A stale hold whose files were already
saved settles as recovered.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Use a native run with a remote workspace whose reusable sandbox lease
history includes a lease of another task.
2. Let the run save a checkpoint, write more files, and fail its final
save.
3. Let retained-file recovery run, or press Retry.
4. Before this change, the hold is exhausted with
`allocation_ownership_ambiguous` and the task stays blocked.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Observed on deployed builds that include `630411af53`. Holds saved by
the Nov 3–6 releases have this shape.

## What Changed

- New `server/src/services/workspace-recovery-fallback.ts`:
- `continueFromLastSavedWorkspace` runs when a hold is exhausted by a
permanent source refusal: `allocation_ownership_ambiguous`,
`source_binding_invalid`, `source_unavailable` or
`historical_source_missing` with retry class `service_required` or
`use_alternative_strategy`. It applies only to remote workspace sources
in the `prepared` state.
- Quarantine (secrets omitted under the workspace file policy: `.env`,
keys, repository metadata, dependency directories): if the retained root
is readable, the worker copies it with the existing read-only capture
(no write to the sandbox), converts it to a `.tar`, stores it, and
attaches it to the task as `unverified-files-run-<runId>.tar`. A
`workspace_recovery_quarantine` operation records it as `verified:
false, applied: false`. If the root is not readable, the worker records
a closed reason label.
- Stop proof: every allocation of the source run must carry a provider
stop receipt. A missing receipt is obtained through the same stop-only
cleanup as normal recovery (`prepareSandboxStopAndRetain` /
`prepareHistoricalSandboxStopVerification`,
`retryPendingSandboxTeardown`, `settleStopOnlyCleanup`). A sandbox that
another lease holds (`active` / `pending_cleanup`) is never read or
stopped from here; the hold waits.
- One transaction (lock order: task, coordinator, run, recovery action,
workspace) re-checks all facts including the stop receipts, abandons the
epoch, resolves the hold with the named outcome
`retained_source_unverifiable_continued_from_last_saved`, records an
`executionReconciliation` decision with `retainedSourceFallback`, and
denies native replacement. A Blocked task belongs to the hold only while
the hold's own `workspaceFinalizationBlock` receipt still owns that
status version, or, for receipt-less holds saved by older releases,
while the block was set by the run's terminal failure (within its
finalization window) and no status decision followed. Only then is the
task restored to `todo` and a continuation scheduled; a newer block is
kept and no continuation starts. The decision carries machine
`workspaceRepairEvidence`, which the reconciled admission requires for
runs with a restore failure.
- Continuation: with no waiting user input, the hold uses
`continuationDelivery: "pending"`, so the existing reconciled delivery
starts one continuation. Waiting user input continues the task itself
(`not_requested`), so there is never a second continuation.
- Agent note: the decision's `outcomeEvidence` (part of the
continuation's recovery outcomes) says that the run's unsaved changes
could not be verified and were not applied, where the attached copy is,
that the agent should check what to redo, and that completed external
actions must not be repeated.
- `settleSiblingRecoveredHold`: an exhausted hold whose run has a
verified repair receipt from a different recovery action settles as
recovered. It runs for every exhausted hold, including adoptable native
sources. A sibling marked recovered whose receipt no longer verifies
records a permanent deferral, so discovery does not reselect it.
- Deferral: when the fallback cannot settle yet, the hold records
`retainedSourceFallbackCheck` (reason, generation, count). Transient
reasons (live writer, running operation, missing stop, sandbox in use,
pending status effect, lock busy, storage failure) are checked again
after 5 minutes, at most 12 times. Permanent reasons (uncertain external
action, non-remote source) wait for new input, Retry or a new
generation. Storage or database failures after a successful read are
retryable and never recorded as "unreadable".
- New `server/src/services/workspace-recovery-fallback-discovery.ts`:
SQL for pending and due fallbacks. `retainedWorkspaceCandidates` (the
production worker's obligations sweep) and `nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt`
(its scheduler) include them, so the worker reaches old holds without
saved input.
- New `server/src/services/remote-workspace-epoch-abandonment.ts` (kept
out of `remote-workspaces.ts`, which is near 1,000 lines): authority
transition `abandonUnverifiedRemoteWorkspaceEpoch`. It clears the writer
and the dirty flag, keeps `snapshotId`, drops `location`, advances the
epoch, clears `providerRef` and the migration root, and records the
abandoned epoch. The next preparation restores the last save into a new
`<workspace>-<epoch>-<lease>` root.
- `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.ts`: hooks. An exhausted hold
first tries the sibling settlement, then the fallback (under the
existing workspace ownership lock). A fresh permanent refusal in an
attempt runs the fallback in the same pass, under the same ownership.
- `remote-workspace-transport.ts`: export the existing read-only
capture.
- `packages/shared`: optional `retainedSourceFallback` on
`ExecutionReconciliation`.
- `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the fallback.
- No new polling or worker: the fallback runs inside the existing
retained-workspace recovery pass
(`rules/sleep-aware-background-work.mdc`).

Safety:

- The cross-task lease check (`retiredReusableLeasePredecessors`) is
unchanged and stays strict. Unverified files are never applied.
- No second executor: the source run, its controller and its finalizer
must be stopped. A live writer of the task or workspace, or a running
workspace operation, keeps the hold.
- No repeated external side effects: pending status effects,
non-completed or unknown API receipts, and uncertain tool invocations
keep the existing reconciliation path. The continuation keeps the
existing API receipt fences.
- Never overwrite another run's files: only the exact epoch that the
failed run wrote is abandoned, and the old root is never reused.
- Bounded and idempotent: a settled hold is never revisited. The
quarantine record is reused. A changed generation or revision leaves the
hold unchanged.

Previous-release story (`rules/upgrade-safe-run-state.mdc`): holds saved
by earlier releases carry forward. A hold saved by the Nov 3–6 releases
(`systemRecovery` exhausted with `allocation_ownership_ambiguous` /
`service_required`, board owner, old admin text) takes the fallback on
the next worker pass after deploy (restart sweep, Retry, or a new
message). No migration is needed. Refusals that do not qualify keep
today's behavior. The only new persisted shapes are additive:
`retainedSourceFallback` and `siblingWorkspaceRecovery` on the hold,
`remoteWorkspaceAbandonedEpochs` on the workspace, and a
`workspace_recovery_quarantine` operation. Earlier releases ignore them.

## Verification

- `cd server && npx vitest run
src/services/workspace-recovery-fallback.test.ts` — 15 tests:
- cross-task hold, saved by the previous release and refused fresh:
continues from the checkpoint snapshot, the quarantine `.tar` holds the
unverified file, the epoch is abandoned, `getExecutionBlocker` is
`null`, the task is `todo`, explicit continuation is not blocked by
`saved_work_recovery_failed` or `workspace_repair_required`, one
reconciled continuation is delivered, and the next writer restores into
a new root while the old root keeps its files;
  - unreadable root: continues and records the reason;
- idempotency: a second pass changes nothing and delivers no second
continuation;
  - waiting user input: no second continuation;
- negatives (live writer, pending side effect, uncertain external
action, sandbox held by another lease): the hold stays, the authority is
unchanged, nothing is attached or delivered, the deferral reason and
recheck time are recorded;
- an allocation without a stop receipt is stopped (stop-only) before the
hold settles;
- the production worker (`reconcileRetainedWorkspaces` with
`obligationsOnly`) and `nextWorkspaceRecoveryAt` discover and settle an
old hold with no saved input; a transient deferral is not revisited
until due, then settles;
- an old-release hold without a Blocked receipt keeps its status; a
current hold with the receipt is restored to `todo`;
- stale exhausted hold with a sibling-saved receipt settles as
recovered; one whose sibling receipt no longer verifies is recorded and
no longer discovered;
- a newer Blocked decision is kept and no continuation is delivered,
while the file hold settles;
  - the attached copy omits `.env` and key files.
- RED: with `workspace-recovery.ts` and `system-recovery.ts` reverted to
master, all tests fail.
- Regression suites pass: `workspace-recovery-warm-handoff`,
`workspace-recovery-retry-copyback`,
`workspace-recovery-preparation-gates`, `workspace-recovery-source`,
`task-retry`, `execution-blocker-read` (288 tests), and
`workspace-recovery-admission`, `workspace-recovery-preparation*`,
`remote-workspaces.integration`, `native-failed-workspace-recovery`,
`remote-workspace-transport`, `workspace-restore-repair-route` (683
tests).
- `server` typecheck passes.

## Risks

- A task now continues without the unverified changes of its failed run.
The agent receives a note and the attached copy, so it can redo or
re-apply the work. This replaces an indefinite block.
- Abandoning an epoch on a workspace shared with a parent task also
moves the parent to the last save. This is correct: the unverified
changes are not part of the saved lineage.
- Clearing the migration root means sessions bound to the old root start
fresh. The fallback continuation already forces a fresh session.
- The quarantine capture reads a sandbox that can be shared with another
task. It writes nothing there, and it verifies the copy against
inventories taken before and after.

## Model Used

- Provider: Anthropic. Model: Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with
tool use (shell, file edits, read-only browser for API inspection) in
Claude Code.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-07 18:34:05 -06:00
…
…
…
…

Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.

Quickstart · Docs · GitHub · Discord · Twitter · Website

MIT License Stars Discord Security posture verified by Superagent

Star History Rank


Sign up for the Paperclip Cloud waitlist →


Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.

Open-source orchestration for teams of AI agents.

If OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company.

Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track work and costs from one dashboard. Choose models and harnesses per agent while keeping your team's tasks, skills, permissions, and history in one place.

It looks like a task manager. Under the hood: org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.

Manage business goals, not pull requests.

Step Example
01 Define the goal "Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR."
02 Hire the team CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider.
03 Approve and run Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard.

Works
with
OpenClaw
OpenClaw
Claude Code
Claude Code
Codex
Codex
Cursor and Cursor Cloud
Cursor
+ Cloud
Gemini CLI
Gemini CLI
OpenCode
OpenCode
Pi
Pi
Hermes and Hermes Gateway
Hermes
+ Gateway
Grok Build
Grok Build
Kimi Code
Kimi Code

If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

Custom processes, HTTP endpoints, and external adapter packages extend the roster. See the adapter overview for setup and capabilities.


Paperclip is right for you if

  • ✅ You want to build autonomous AI organizations
  • ✅ You coordinate many different agents (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
  • ✅ You have 20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals open and lose track of what everyone is doing
  • ✅ You want agents running autonomously 24/7, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
  • ✅ You want to monitor costs and enforce budgets
  • ✅ You want a process for managing agents that feels like using a task manager
  • ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses from your phone

The four pillars

Four things have to work for an organization of AI agents to actually produce: the tasks, the org, the training, and the infrastructure. Paperclip is built around exactly those four pillars.

The four pillars of Paperclip
Pillar Built for What it covers
Agentic Task Manager — Declare intent. Agents work. You verify the output. Everyone, daily Tasks, approvals & review gates · proactive agent coworkers · auditable routines & workflows · verify from diffs, screenshots & tests
Org Chart for Agents — Roles, permissions & boundaries for humans and agents. Managers Mixed human + agent org chart · responsibilities, delegation, specialization · governance: who can do what · scoped secrets & company boundaries · connection permissions & responsible-user identities
Agent Employee Training — Design, train & evaluate your AI employees. Enablers Skill Studio & shared org-wide skills · evals & saved test runs · active learning loops & quality metrics · performance reviews for agents · saved test inputs · skill version history & restore · reusable team templates
Agentic OS — The infrastructure that makes the work run. IT & platform Cross-provider runtime: any model, any agent · sandboxing, integrations & MCP servers · SSO, GRC, RBAC & cost controls · data privacy, internal trace collection, compounding data value · personal & shared app connections · run history & opt-in tracing

Features

🔌 Bring Your Own Agent

Any agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

🎯 Goal Alignment

Link tasks and projects to your organization goals. Agents receive the goal context behind their work.

💓 Heartbeats

Agents wake for assigned work, follow-up messages, or configured schedules. Delegation flows up and down the org chart.

💰 Cost Control

Company, agent, and project budgets. Track reported spend, get threshold alerts, and pause work at configured limits.

🏢 Multi-Organization

One deployment, many organizations. Separate tasks, agents, permissions, and activity histories for each.

🎫 Task Threads

Keep conversations, plans, blockers, files, and run history attached to the work. Assign tasks to agents or people.

🛡️ Governance

Configure review and approval stages, approve hires, and pause, reassign, or stop work when needed.

📊 Org Chart

Hierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description.

📱 Mobile Ready

Monitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere.

🔗 Apps & Connections

Connect services such as GitHub, Notion, and Railway, or your own MCP server. Set gateway actions to Allowed, Ask first, or Off.

👥 Shared Agents, Personal Accounts

Choose who can use a connection and which agents can access it. Managed GitHub operations can use the account of the person directing the work.

🧠 Skills & Skill Studio

Install or write shared skills, test them with saved inputs, inspect results, and restore earlier versions.

📅 Scheduled Routines

Run recurring work on a schedule or trigger it through an API or webhook. Each run has a task, an owner, and a history.

📎 Artifacts & Feedback

Find the files and documents agents produce. Preview supported formats and leave comments on specific passages in documents.

📦 Ready-Made Teams

Preview and install teams with roles, skills, projects, and routines. Choose their runtimes and make the setup your own.

Experimental Agent Chat and chat/email connectors add conversations with agents in Paperclip and through configured services such as Slack, Discord, Telegram, and AgentMail. Enable the relevant instance settings to try them.


Problems Paperclip solves

Without Paperclip With Paperclip
❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots.
❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why.
❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts.
❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. ✅ Spend tracking, budget alerts, and automatic pauses help you control the cost of ongoing work.
❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. ✅ Routines create assigned tasks on a schedule, with outputs and run history you can inspect.
❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work.

Why Paperclip is special

Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.

Atomic task checkout. A single assignee and execution locks prevent competing runs from claiming the same task.
Persistent work context. Tasks, comments, and documents stay in Paperclip. Supporting adapters resume saved sessions across runs.
Runtime skill injection. Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining.
Governance with rollback. Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely.
Accountable connections. Human access, agent eligibility, and gateway action permissions are separate controls. Approve a call once or save a revocable rule.
Goal-aware execution. Linked tasks and projects carry goal ancestry so agents see the "why," not just a title.
Portable company templates. Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling.
Organization boundaries. Company-scoped access checks keep each organization's work, agents, and activity separate within one deployment.

What's Under the Hood

Paperclip is a full control plane, not a wrapper. Before you build any of this yourself, know that it already exists:

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                       PAPERCLIP SERVER                       │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │Identity & │  │  Work &   │  │ Heartbeat │  │Governance │  │
│  │  Access   │  │   Tasks   │  │ Execution │  │& Approvals│  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │ Org Chart │  │Workspaces │  │  Plugins  │  │  Budget   │  │
│  │ & Agents  │  │ & Runtime │  │           │  │ & Costs   │  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
│                                                              │
│  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  ┌───────────┐  │
│  │ Routines  │  │ Secrets & │  │ Activity  │  │  Company  │  │
│  │& Schedules│  │  Storage  │  │ & Events  │  │Portability│  │
│  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
         ▲              ▲              ▲              ▲
   ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐  ┌─────┴─────┐
   │  Claude   │  │   Codex   │  │   CLI     │  │ HTTP/web  │
   │   Code    │  │           │  │  agents   │  │   bots    │
   └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘  └───────────┘

The Systems

Identity & Access — Two deployment modes (trusted local or authenticated), human roles and permissions, agent API keys, short-lived run JWTs, company memberships, and invite flows. Responsible-user attribution follows work through delegation and supported managed connections.

Org Chart & Agents — Agents have roles, titles, reporting lines, permissions, and budgets. Adapter examples match the diagram: Claude Code, Codex, CLI agents such as Cursor/Gemini/bash, HTTP/webhook bots such as OpenClaw, and external adapter plugins. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.

Work & Task System — Issues carry company/project/goal/parent links, atomic checkout with execution locks, first-class blocker dependencies, comments, documents, attachments, work products, labels, and inbox state. Search across work, review document revisions, and leave anchored feedback.

Heartbeat Execution — DB-backed wakeup queue with coalescing, budget checks, workspace resolution, secret injection, skill loading, and adapter invocation. Runs produce logs, usage records, and adapter-specific session state. Bounded recovery handles supported failures and surfaces cases that need human action.

Workspaces & Runtime — Project repositories and workspaces, optional isolated execution workspaces (git worktrees, operator branches), and runtime services (dev servers, preview URLs). Sandbox providers extend execution beyond the local host; availability depends on the configured environment and adapter.

Governance & Approvals — Board approval workflows, execution policies with review/approval stages, decision tracking, budget hard-stops, and agent pause/resume/terminate. Configured task reviews govern completion; connection action approvals govern calls through the tool gateway.

Budget & Cost Control — Token and cost tracking by company, agent, project, goal, issue, provider, and model. Scoped budget policies with warning thresholds and hard stops. Enforcement uses recorded spend; usage reporting and in-flight work can delay a stop.

Routines & Schedules — Recurring tasks with cron, webhook, and API triggers. Concurrency and catch-up policies. Each routine execution creates a tracked issue and wakes the assigned agent — no manual kick-offs needed.

Plugins — Instance-wide plugin system with out-of-process workers, capability-gated host services, job scheduling, tool exposure, and UI contributions. Extend Paperclip without forking it.

Secrets & Storage — Company secrets and per-person secret values, encrypted credential storage, local or S3-compatible file storage, attachments, and work products. Secret references supply credentials to authorized runs without copying values into ordinary agent configuration.

Activity & Events — Mutating actions, heartbeat state changes, cost events, approvals, comments, and work products are recorded as durable activity so operators can audit what happened and why.

Company Portability — Preview, export, and import organization packages with agents, skills, and optional projects, routines, tasks, and attachments. Referenced secret values are omitted; review packages before sharing because plain environment values and local paths can remain. Packages share an operating setup; full-instance recovery uses backups.


What Paperclip is not

Not just a chatbot. Conversations stay attached to tasks, plans, decisions, and outputs. Experimental Agent Chat can hand work off to assigned tasks.
Not an agent framework. We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them.
Not just a workflow builder. Routines operate within an organization, with roles, goals, budgets, and governance.
Not a prompt manager. Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in.
Not limited to one agent. Start with one agent and grow into a team with shared skills, delegation, and review.
Not only for code review. Coding and PR review fit alongside research, operations, content, and other work.

Quickstart

Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required. Follow the guided quickstart to set up your first agent.

Just ask your agent to install Paperclip

Share the installation guide with your agent.

Or install it yourself

With Node.js 24.11 or newer installed:

npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes

The CLI runs from npm's cache; your instance configuration and data persist locally.

See the installation guide for managed installs, pinned versions, canary and git-ref installs, updates, rollback, service management, and uninstalling.

For an isolated manual test instance that is already initialized with a CEO agent, use test-drive. It stays in the foreground, never installs a service or creates a first task, and opens the browser only after setup succeeds:

ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive
OPENAI_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive --harness codex
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive \
  --harness opencode \
  --model openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5

Each run without --data-dir gets a unique, retained temporary directory; its absolute path is printed at startup. Pass --data-dir to reuse one, or --no-browser to leave the initialized instance unopened. When invoked from a linked Git worktree, test-drive also enables task execution in that worktree. See the test-drive guide for credential and reuse behavior.

Troubleshooting: private npm registry .npmrc

If this fails with an E404 for paperclipai (or similar) and you use a private npm registry (for example GitHub Packages) via a global ~/.npmrc, npx may be resolving paperclipai against that private registry instead of the public npm registry.

Diagnostic:

npm config get registry

Workaround (cross-platform; force the public npm registry for this command):

npx --registry https://registry.npmjs.org paperclipai@latest onboard --yes

That quickstart path now defaults to trusted local loopback mode for the fastest first run. To start in authenticated/private mode instead, choose a bind preset explicitly:

npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes --bind lan
# or:
npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes --bind tailnet

If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning onboard keeps the existing config in place. Use npx paperclipai configure to edit settings.

Or manually:

git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev

This starts the UI and API at http://localhost:3100. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.

Requirements: Node.js 24.11+, pnpm 9.15+

Local Claude and Codex subscription sign-in also needs Python 3 and the corresponding provider CLI on the Paperclip host. The Docker image includes them.

Source development also builds the native Paperclip Runner when enabled (the self-hosted default). Install a Rust toolchain, or set PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_BINARY to a compatible prebuilt runner.


FAQ

Q: Is this project maintained or just slop?

A: Paperclip is maintained by the Paperclip team. We've merged over 2,700 pull requests.


Q: What does a typical setup look like?

A: Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.

For remote access, use authenticated mode with a private-network bind such as Tailscale, or deploy the persistent server with Docker. See deployment modes and the Docker guide.


Q: Can I run multiple companies?

A: Yes. A single deployment can host multiple organizations with company-scoped data and access checks.


Q: How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code?

A: Paperclip uses those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.


Q: Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello?

A: Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.

(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)


Q: Do agents run continuously?

A: Agents wake for assigned work and follow-up messages. Optional timer heartbeats let them check for work periodically; routines create recurring tasks on their own schedules. You can also connect externally running agents such as OpenClaw. A mention alone does not assign work or wake another agent.


Development

pnpm dev              # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once         # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server       # Server only
pnpm dev:mobile       # Serve prebuilt UI on :3101 for phones/tablets (proxies /api → :3100)
pnpm dev:both         # Run `pnpm dev` and `pnpm dev:mobile` together
pnpm build            # Build all
pnpm typecheck        # Type checking
pnpm test             # Cheap default test run (Vitest only)
pnpm test:watch       # Vitest watch mode
pnpm test:e2e         # Playwright browser suite
pnpm db:generate      # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate       # Apply migrations

pnpm test does not run Playwright. Browser suites stay separate and are typically run only when working on those flows or in CI.

See doc/DEVELOPING.md for the full development guide.


Roadmap

  • ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
  • ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
  • ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
  • ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
  • ✅ Skills Manager, Skill Studio & Skills Store
  • ✅ Scheduled Routines
  • ✅ Better Budgeting
  • ✅ Agent Reviews and Approvals
  • ✅ Multiple Human Users
  • ✅ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e2b, Cloudflare, Daytona, Modal, Novita, boxd, self-hosted Kubernetes)
  • ✅ Artifacts & Work Products
  • ✅ Deep Planning (planning mode, revisioned plans, plan approvals)
  • ✅ Enforced Outcomes (watchdogs, recovery actions, review gates)
  • ✅ MCP Tool Gateway & Apps (governed tool access)
  • ✅ Secrets Manager with per-agent access
  • ✅ Activity log & action attribution
  • ✅ Self-healing runs & automatic recovery
  • ✅ Agent evals & feedback
  • ✅ Connected Apps
  • ✅ Personal & Shared AI Accounts
  • ✅ Shared Agents Use Personal GitHub Identities
  • ✅ Skill Version History & Restore
  • ✅ Document Comments & Revision History
  • ✅ Company-Wide Search
  • ✅ Multi-Model & Multi-Harness Teams
  • 🟡 Memory / Knowledge
  • ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
  • ⚪ Work Queues
  • ⚪ Self-Organization
  • ⚪ Automatic Organizational Learning
  • 🟡 Agent Chat
  • 🟡 Cloud deployments
  • ⚪ Desktop App
  • ⚪ Bring-your-own-ticket-system (Asana / Linear / Jira as on-ramps)

This is the short roadmap preview. See the full roadmap in ROADMAP.md.


Community & Plugins

Find Plugins and more at awesome-paperclip

Observability

Paperclip ships with opt-in OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation for the server (traces only). It activates when OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is set and supports grpc, http/protobuf, and http/json via the standard OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_PROTOCOL env var. @opentelemetry/api is a normal server dependency; the SDK, auto-instrumentation, and exporter packages are optional peer dependencies — install them only if you want tracing. See doc/observability.md for install commands and the full env-var reference.

Paperclip also ships with opt-in Sentry error monitoring for the server and the browser. Set SENTRY_DSN_FRONTEND to activate it for the browser and SENTRY_DSN_BACKEND to activate it for the server — each variable is optional, and the legacy SENTRY_DSN variable still works as a fallback for either component. The supported server SDK version is @sentry/node@10.71.0; it is an optional peer dependency for the server, so install it only if you want error monitoring. The browser SDK, @sentry/browser, is pinned to the same exact version. See doc/observability.md for the install command, the privacy settings, and the full default capture set.

Telemetry

Paperclip collects anonymous usage telemetry to help us understand how the product is used and improve it. No personal information, issue content, prompts, file paths, or secrets are ever collected. Private repository references are hashed with a per-install salt before being sent.

Contributors changing emitted telemetry events should follow the Telemetry Data Contract. For proposed first-party events that are not in the generated contract yet, follow Telemetry Workflow.

Telemetry is enabled by default and can be disabled with any of the following:

Method How
Environment variable PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1
Standard convention DO_NOT_TRACK=1
CI environments Automatically disabled when CI=true
Config file Set telemetry.enabled: false in your Paperclip config

Contributing

We welcome contributions. See the contributing guide for details.

We're hiring


Community


License

MIT © 2026 Paperclip Labs, Inc

Star History

Star History Chart

Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to get work done, not babysit agents.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme MIT
1.8 GiB
0 Stars 1 Watchers 0 Forks
Languages
TypeScript 92%
JavaScript 4%
Rust 2.9%
Python 0.3%
CSS 0.3%
Other 0.3%