mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-29 12:59:13 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connected chats show safe notices when a run starts, waits, finishes, or fails. > - A recurring scan projected these notices even when no eligible work existed. > - Eligibility depends on committed run state, conversation lineage, and current authority. > - Existing database rows can reconstruct that work after restart. > - This PR wakes a scoped worker from those writes and removes lifecycle polling. > - Native progress events keep their separate existing owner until the next migration. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The chat maintenance timer repeatedly scanned run lifecycle state. Empty and settled instances still queried the database. A run-status event alone cannot replace the scan: prompt receipts, continuation receipts, identity changes, and restored authority can make a run eligible later. **What did you expect?** Committed changes wake projection. Startup reconstructs eligible work. A completed pass stops until another relevant change arrives. Failed work retains recovery without scanning settled history forever. **Steps to reproduce** Configure an automatic chat endpoint. Finish its work, or leave it unused. Observe recurring lifecycle projection queries from the chat maintenance callback. Stacked on #17592. Related foundation: #15625. This PR owns lifecycle milestones only. ## What Changed - Preserve upstream coalesced Cloud membership writes together with locked membership restoration and its committed chat notification. - Signal milestone eligibility from the real Slack account-link transaction. - Register the lifecycle worker with the existing delivery coordinator. Remove lifecycle projection from the periodic chat callback. Keep native progress in a separately named lane and preserve the explicit combined API. - Reconstruct company/issue scopes from the existing selector. Drain bounded batches with company fairness. Retry failures, retain writes through drain/resume, and disarm settled work. - Signal from supported run, presentation, interaction, receipt, lineage, conversation, recovery, and authority writers. Preserve their transaction ownership, including nested savepoints and uncertain settlement. No new table is added. - Preserve provider authorization, authored-final suppression, responsible-user continuity, deduplication, the 24-hour selection window, and raw-output restrictions. Keep provider interpretation in its owner. - Preserve PostgreSQL timestamp precision in lifecycle pagination. Rejected submillisecond candidates must not repeat the same page and starve later notices. - Document producer coverage and alternate-writer dispositions in `doc/plans/2026-10-25-chat-run-milestone-sleep-audit.md`. ## Verification Published head: `1d056f68c5b1005933b9e12de8745bf1c4cbeeca`, targeting master after #17592 merged at `7d75ae0569e41786640cf09647ae8849411d2f22`. A normal merge integrates the actual landed parent. The entire 77-path milestone patch is binary-identical to the locally verified preparation across that ancestry reconciliation; both unrelated master paths are preserved. The four earlier producer/test integration conflicts retain scoped milestone and voice notices, current onboarding completion admission, and expanded identity query/read-scope coverage. - **330 distinct selected cases pass on the verified unchanged patch:** 305 across 14 complete suites (all five milestone worker suites, run identity, board claim, Cloud provisioning, auth session routes, Cloud actor authentication, stale-lock recovery, GitHub credentials, project Git authorization, and app admission wiring), plus 25 selected real chat producer cases. The remaining 1,590 chat integration cases were skipped, not passed. - The real producer cases cover saved milestone discovery, GitHub and Slack identity changes, account-link rollback/reconfirmation, ordinary ingress reactivation, post-close action/delivery receipt settlement, all ten authority-restoration paths including Cloud synchronization, and changed native review metadata. - Worker coverage verifies outer commit, rollback, uncertain-write recovery, restart, bounded batching/fairness, timestamp precision, retries, drain/resume, and settled SQL quiet. Authorization and existing publication deduplication remain with their owning services. - Server production typechecking, build, and module-boundary checks pass. The tests above were executed separately. Production typechecking excludes `src/__tests__` and does not replace those runs. Each database owner uses its own newly created and app-migrated PostgreSQL fixture. - [Current-parent acceptance and preserved failure ledger](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/1d056f68c5b1005933b9e12de8745bf1c4cbeeca/doc/plans/2026-10-25-chat-run-milestone-sleep-audit.md#current-parent-integration-and-acceptance-october-28) records commands, counts, producer scope, conflict dispositions, and limits. Earlier combined-stack counts and failures keep their original revision scope; local acceptance does not erase old CI failures. - No new migration, queue table, dependency, workflow, or shared scheduler contract is introduced. Parent migration 0397, bounded consent recovery, voice cleanup/retention repairs, and runner checkpoint restoration remain present. - **Exact-head Greptile is 5/5 and all 55 current checks are clean.** No Ponytail review is present, which is an explicitly authorized nonblocker; no failing review is waived. Older reviews and parent checks are not current passes. Actual failing Ponytail findings must be fixed; an absent/stopped/paused turn without a verdict is an authorized nonblocker. Active unfinished Ponytail uses its original request/start timer, with a 25-minute monitor cutoff respecting the user's 30-minute maximum. - No complete local repository matrix, live provider tenant, external alarm, physical host/database suspension, or fleet savings claim is made. Native progress remains a separate following slice. ## Risks - A future eligibility writer must notify the existing projection boundary. Independent SQL writers or another active server process are outside this process-local signal contract. - Authority and lineage remain sensitive. The worker uses the existing selectors and publication policy; it does not grant execution or disclosure authority. - Native progress and other publication maintenance still have recurring work. This PR removes one reason, not the entire chat maintenance timer. - Worker quiet does not prove database suspension, host sleep, or external alarm coverage. Cloud sleep blockers remain unchanged. - Merge eligibility requires passing current-head CI and Greptile 5/5 after this actual-master reconciliation. Subsequent stack slices retain their own gates. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed. Used repository inspection, reasoning, shell execution, PostgreSQL tests, browser E2Es and GitHub tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details available in this session) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the documented focused tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
193 lines
6.3 KiB
TypeScript
193 lines
6.3 KiB
TypeScript
import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
|
|
import { eq } from "drizzle-orm";
|
|
import { afterAll, beforeAll, describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
agents,
|
|
chatConversations,
|
|
chatEndpoints,
|
|
chatPublications,
|
|
companies,
|
|
createDb,
|
|
heartbeatRuns,
|
|
issues,
|
|
issueThreadInteractions,
|
|
toolApplications,
|
|
toolConnections,
|
|
} from "@paperclipai/db";
|
|
import { startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase } from "../__tests__/helpers/embedded-postgres.js";
|
|
import { resolveExternalTestDatabaseUrl } from "../__tests__/helpers/external-test-database.js";
|
|
import { hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction } from "./chat-interaction-arbitration.js";
|
|
|
|
const externalDatabaseUrl = resolveExternalTestDatabaseUrl("PAPERCLIP_ARBITRATION_TEST_DATABASE_URL");
|
|
|
|
describe("provider-owned interaction arbitration", () => {
|
|
let temporary: Awaited<ReturnType<typeof startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase>> | undefined;
|
|
let db: ReturnType<typeof createDb>;
|
|
beforeAll(async () => {
|
|
if (!externalDatabaseUrl) temporary = await startEmbeddedPostgresTestDatabase("chat-interaction-owner-");
|
|
db = createDb(externalDatabaseUrl ?? temporary!.connectionString);
|
|
}, 30_000);
|
|
afterAll(async () => {
|
|
await db?.$client.end();
|
|
await temporary?.cleanup();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
async function seed() {
|
|
const companyId = randomUUID();
|
|
const agentId = randomUUID();
|
|
const otherAgentId = randomUUID();
|
|
const issueId = randomUUID();
|
|
const runId = randomUUID();
|
|
const interactionId = randomUUID();
|
|
await db
|
|
.insert(companies)
|
|
.values({
|
|
id: companyId,
|
|
name: "Arbitration",
|
|
issuePrefix: `C${companyId.slice(0, 7)}`,
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(agents).values(
|
|
[agentId, otherAgentId].map((id) => ({
|
|
id,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
name: "Chat agent",
|
|
adapterType: "paperclip_runner",
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
})),
|
|
);
|
|
await db.insert(issues).values({
|
|
id: issueId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
title: "Chat response",
|
|
status: "in_progress",
|
|
assigneeAgentId: agentId,
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(heartbeatRuns).values({
|
|
id: runId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
agentId,
|
|
status: "succeeded",
|
|
contextSnapshot: { issueId, source: "chat:discord" },
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(issueThreadInteractions).values({
|
|
id: interactionId,
|
|
companyId,
|
|
issueId,
|
|
sourceRunId: runId,
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
status: "pending",
|
|
title: "Native completion review",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Review native evidence",
|
|
rejectRequiresReason: true,
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "native_completion_review",
|
|
label: "Completion decision",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
return { companyId, agentId, otherAgentId, issueId, runId, interactionId };
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
it("does not suppress a chat final for a system or board completion review", async () => {
|
|
const binding = await seed();
|
|
expect(await hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction(db, binding)).toBe(false);
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({ createdByUserId: "board-user" })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, binding.interactionId));
|
|
expect(await hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction(db, binding)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("reserves the response slot only for a pending interaction authored by the source run agent", async () => {
|
|
const binding = await seed();
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({ createdByAgentId: binding.otherAgentId })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, binding.interactionId));
|
|
expect(await hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction(db, binding)).toBe(false);
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({ createdByAgentId: binding.agentId })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, binding.interactionId));
|
|
expect(await hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction(db, binding)).toBe(true);
|
|
expect(
|
|
await hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction(db, {
|
|
...binding,
|
|
companyId: randomUUID(),
|
|
}),
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(
|
|
await hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction(db, {
|
|
...binding,
|
|
runId: randomUUID(),
|
|
}),
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({ status: "accepted" })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, binding.interactionId));
|
|
expect(await hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction(db, binding)).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("keeps a resolved source run internal when its actual provider prompt exists", async () => {
|
|
const binding = await seed();
|
|
const applicationId = randomUUID();
|
|
const connectionId = randomUUID();
|
|
const endpointId = randomUUID();
|
|
const conversationId = randomUUID();
|
|
await db.insert(toolApplications).values({
|
|
id: applicationId,
|
|
companyId: binding.companyId,
|
|
applicationKey: `chat:discord:${endpointId}`,
|
|
name: "Discord",
|
|
type: "chat",
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(toolConnections).values({
|
|
id: connectionId,
|
|
companyId: binding.companyId,
|
|
applicationId,
|
|
uid: endpointId,
|
|
name: "Discord",
|
|
connectionPurpose: "channel",
|
|
transport: "chat_sdk",
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(chatEndpoints).values({
|
|
id: endpointId,
|
|
companyId: binding.companyId,
|
|
connectionId,
|
|
provider: "discord",
|
|
publicId: randomUUID(),
|
|
assignedAgentId: binding.agentId,
|
|
status: "active",
|
|
});
|
|
await db.insert(chatConversations).values({
|
|
id: conversationId,
|
|
companyId: binding.companyId,
|
|
endpointId,
|
|
issueId: binding.issueId,
|
|
externalConversationId: "discord-thread",
|
|
externalLabel: "Discord thread",
|
|
state: "active",
|
|
});
|
|
await db
|
|
.update(issueThreadInteractions)
|
|
.set({ createdByAgentId: binding.agentId, status: "accepted" })
|
|
.where(eq(issueThreadInteractions.id, binding.interactionId));
|
|
await db.insert(chatPublications).values({
|
|
companyId: binding.companyId,
|
|
issueId: binding.issueId,
|
|
endpointId,
|
|
conversationId,
|
|
idempotencyKey: `interaction:${binding.interactionId}:${endpointId}`,
|
|
state: "published",
|
|
payload: { text: "Confirm?", interactionId: binding.interactionId },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(await hasChatRunOwnedProviderInteraction(db, binding)).toBe(true);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|