mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-24 10:13:11 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
59d1b7b43d
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their operating budgets. > - Product E2E runs retain accounting for each campaign. > - The usage collector reads completed GitHub jobs without rerunning paid work. > - GitHub returns a null runner ID for jobs that it skips before assigning a runner. > - The collector rejected those jobs and could not retain the completed campaign inventory. > - This change accepts that skipped-job representation while preserving started-job checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17009. **What happened?** The usage collector rejected completed qualification run 39971835384. GitHub returned skipped jobs with null runner IDs. The collector accepted only zero for jobs without a runner. **Expected behavior** Retain completed run usage when skipped jobs have a null or zero runner ID. Do not count VM time for those jobs. Continue to reject missing runner identity for started jobs. **Steps to reproduce** Read the completed first-attempt Product E2E run with operating-receipts.ts github. Before this fix, a skipped job with runner_id set to null throws Invalid workflow job identity. **Paperclip version or commit**ed3f067dbd. ## What Changed - Accept a null or zero runner ID only for completed skipped jobs. - Keep run, attempt, labels and started-job identity validation. - Test both skipped-job forms and reject absent runner IDs. - Document the treatment of skipped jobs. ## Verification - Reproduced the observed null-runner failure: 1 failed, 4 passed. - Usage collector and operating receipt tests: 17 passed. - Eval TypeScript check passed. - Read the same completed hosted run successfully without dispatching or retrying tests. The inventory retained 1,303 job seconds and 290,156,153 artifact bytes. - Full hosted CI passed atfb57826c22, including typecheck, tests, build and browser shards. - Greptile and Paperclip reviews rated the exact commit 5/5 with no actionable findings. ## Risks - The exception applies only when GitHub reports a completed skipped job and an explicit null or zero runner ID. - Current usage remains an inventory. This change does not convert it to a bill, release cost holds, or enable recurrence. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution and test tools. The exact backend model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>