Files
PaperClipAI/maps/agent-access-map/app-permissions.md
T
DottaandPaperclip 9ef434fe79 docs: expose feature map IDs and add a recipe index (#16987)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Its feature map describes user journeys and their verification
paths.
> - The map already defines feature IDs and full capability IDs.
> - The README and child pages did not show those IDs consistently.
> - Readers need those IDs to connect issues, tests, stories, and
evidence.
> - This pull request adds a recipe index and displays the existing IDs.
> - The benefit is clear references across the product and agent access
maps.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Issue type**

Missing documentation.

**Where is the issue?**

`maps/feature-map/README.md`, the child recipes, and their agent access
companions.

**What's wrong?**

The README sends readers to Storybook to browse features. Child pages
show local keys, such as `installation`, without the full
`plugins/installation` ID. Readers must inspect the generator to find
the full reference.

**Suggested fix**

List recipe links and existing IDs in the README. Show each feature ID
and full capability ID in its child pages. Explain capability IDs and
entry-point references. Keep the current keys and anchors.

Related work: Refs #15288. Refs #16052. Refs #15983. No duplicate open
PR or issue was found by title search.

## What Changed

- Add an index grouped by feature area. It lists every recipe, feature
ID, and full capability ID.
- Explain how IDs are formed and used in issues, tests, Storybook, and
evidence.
- Add feature IDs to all product recipes and agent access companions.
- Show full capability IDs beside recipe keys and below access and
Storybook guidance headings.
- Preserve existing keys, heading anchors, and generated ID values. Keep
the latest upstream company capability in the index.

## Verification

- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes for 34 feature families and 175
capability IDs.
- `node --test scripts/check-maps.test.mjs
scripts/storybook-feature-index.test.mjs` passes all 17 tests.
- `node scripts/storybook-feature-index.mjs` passes on this checkout and
generates the feature indexes and overview inputs.
- `git diff --check` passes.
- A source comparison confirms that the README matches the recipe index.
After removal of the added ID labels, all 68 child pages match the
upstream prose and headings.
- Full workspace checks were attempted: `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm
test:run`, and `pnpm build`. They could not start because the local pnpm
wrapper could not fetch and verify the pinned pnpm 9.15.4 release. This
checkout also has no workspace dependencies installed.
- `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs` could not run because
`storybook/internal/csf-tools` is not installed. The direct map and
index checks above pass without that dependency.
- Remote typecheck, release-registry, and full build checks passed. The
first attempts of [server shard
3/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39460473910/job/118758430448)
and [server shard
12/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39460473910/job/118758429932)
stopped after their runners received a shutdown signal. The test steps
were canceled. GitHub rejects the rerun request with HTTP 403: "The
workflow run containing this job is already running". Five other CI jobs
remain active. The next action is to rerun the two interrupted shards
after workflow 39460473910 ends. No application changes were made to
address these runner interruptions.
- To inspect the result, open the feature-map README, follow a recipe
link, and compare its full capability IDs with its access companion.

## Risks

- Low risk. The change updates map documentation only. It changes no
application code or ID schema.
- The readable README index and child labels repeat source IDs. Keep
them aligned when a capability changes.
- Generated capability descriptions now include the visible ID prefix.
Generated IDs, labels, navigation order, and verification fields remain
the same.
- Full local workspace checks and catalog generation remain unverified
for the environment reasons above.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, model `gpt-6.1-sol`, with a 475,000-token context window
and `xhigh` reasoning effort. The model used local file tools, shell
commands, and GitHub CLI access.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-20 12:00:36 -05:00

161 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown

# App access, action permissions, and testing — agent access
Product map: [App access, action permissions, and
testing](../feature-map/app-permissions.md).
Feature ID: `app-permissions`.
Review date: 2026-10-12. Source commit: `f981fa3cc10cb8663a87dec60345fbff46d54d0a`.
This is a source-reviewed baseline of representative operations and known gaps.
Each capability needs operation-level review before its entire scope can be
qualified. No live agent execution is claimed. Follow the [map contract](../README.md)
for format, permission checks, evidence and maintenance.
## `agent-access`
Capability ID: `app-permissions/agent-access`.
Review: `baseline`.
API: `present` — representative operation IDs:
- `PUT /api/tool-connections/{connectionId}/installs`.
Agent access: `restricted` — Board management API; agents use their resulting assigned
app tools.
Policy: Connection/profile/policy management routes require a board user; tool use
separately evaluates agent grants and action policies.
Evidence: `source-only` — [implementation](../../server/src/routes/tool-access.ts#L517)
at the reviewed commit above.
Verification: `not-run` — assert the documented agent denial with an owned test fixture;
verify any listed agent request/result path separately. A delegated operation needs its
own policy and access review.
Gaps: Granting access is distinct from using access. No equivalent agent management path
exists in these routes.
The owning lifecycle plugin can read bounded standing connection and active
profile assignments with `ctx.agents.getRuntime`. It requires the existing
`agents.lifecycle.manage` capability and agent ownership checks. Committed
assignment changes use the opt-in `agent_runtime` stream. These inputs contain
no grant credentials and do not authorize a task's tool calls. See the
[runtime contract](../../doc/plugins/AGENT_RUNTIME_SYNC.md#standing-connection-assignments).
## `action-policy`
Capability ID: `app-permissions/action-policy`.
Review: `baseline`.
API: `present` — representative operation IDs:
- `POST /api/tool-profiles/{profileId}/entries`.
Agent access: `restricted` — Board management API; agent execution follows
off/ask/allowed.
Policy: Connection/profile/policy management routes require a board user; tool use
separately evaluates agent grants and action policies.
Evidence: `source-only` — [implementation](../../server/src/routes/tool-access.ts#L517)
at the reviewed commit above.
Verification: `not-run` — assert the documented agent denial with an owned test fixture;
verify any listed agent request/result path separately. A delegated operation needs its
own policy and access review.
Gaps: An agent cannot authorize itself by editing the policy. Decide whether any
explicitly delegated administration should be supported.
## `catalog-change`
Capability ID: `app-permissions/catalog-change`.
Review: `baseline`.
API: `present` — representative operation IDs:
- `POST /api/tool-profiles/{profileId}/new-tools/review`.
Agent access: `restricted` — Board catalog-review API; agents can discover authorized
tools.
Policy: Connection/profile/policy management routes require a board user; tool use
separately evaluates agent grants and action policies.
Evidence: `source-only` — [implementation](../../server/src/routes/tool-access.ts#L517)
at the reviewed commit above.
Verification: `not-run` — assert the documented agent denial with an owned test fixture;
verify any listed agent request/result path separately. A delegated operation needs its
own policy and access review.
Gaps: Catalog refresh/review and quarantined-action enablement are management
operations.
Daytona also checks its deployed native contract on the board's
`GET /api/tool-connections/{connectionId}/catalog`. A changed saved catalog
refreshes under the viewing human's credential context. Retired tools are
hidden even if refresh fails. Agent discovery and dispatch reject retired names
and stale same-name contracts before refresh; new/changed tools stay quarantined until reviewed. The
[database-backed Daytona fixtures](../../server/src/__tests__/daytona-connection.test.ts)
exercise this boundary through real run-bound gateway sessions with fixture
provider responses. They do not qualify a live Daytona account or agent model.
## `test-action`
Capability ID: `app-permissions/test-action`.
Review: `baseline`.
API: `present` — representative operation IDs:
- `POST /api/tool-connections/{connectionId}/test-calls`.
Agent access: `restricted` — Board test-as-agent API; agent executes its own assigned
tools normally.
Policy: Connection/profile/policy management routes require a board user; tool use
separately evaluates agent grants and action policies.
Evidence: `source-only` — [implementation](../../server/src/routes/tool-access.ts#L517)
at the reviewed commit above.
Verification: `not-run` — assert the documented agent denial with an owned test fixture;
verify any listed agent request/result path separately. A delegated operation needs its
own policy and access review.
Gaps: A board test performed as an agent is not proof the agent can manage or invoke the
testing endpoint.
## `account-maintenance`
Capability ID: `app-permissions/account-maintenance`.
Review: `baseline`.
API: `present` — representative operation IDs:
- `POST /api/tool-connections/{connectionId}/reconnect`.
- `GET /api/tool-connections/{connectionId}/activity`.
Agent access: `restricted` — Board account management; native
connections_search/connection_request can request human setup.
Policy: Connection/profile/policy management routes require a board user; tool use
separately evaluates agent grants and action policies.
Evidence: `source-only` — [implementation](../../server/src/routes/tool-access.ts#L517)
at the reviewed commit above.
Verification: `not-run` — assert the documented agent denial with an owned test fixture;
verify any listed agent request/result path separately. A delegated operation needs its
own policy and access review.
Gaps: Agent requests and continued tool use exist; reconnect/revoke/audit management are
human paths.