Files
PaperClipAI/maps/feature-map/tasks.md
T
DottaandPaperclip 5ef385f7e6 Run reusable Product E2E journeys across deployment targets (#17262)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents and their work.
> - Product E2E tests check complete user journeys.
> - The current harness prepares self-hosted instances.
> - Hosted workspaces need separate authentication, setup, and cleanup.
> - The same in-app story should run on either deployment.
> - This pull request adds deployment targets and explicit
prerequisites.
> - The private Cloud adapter owns fleet access and lifecycle
operations.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Product E2E harness, fixture registry, and reports.

**Problem or motivation**

Self-hosted test setup cannot qualify a deployed Cloud workspace.
Copying each story into a second harness would make its assertions
diverge.

**Proposed solution**

Add explicit deployment targets, setup recipes, and ordered campaigns.
Reuse a no-model task-properties story on both deployments. Let fresh
Cloud onboarding provide verified context for that same story. Keep
Cloud lifecycle and credentials behind a private target provider.

**Roadmap alignment**

This supports Cloud deployment qualification and the existing agent eval
system. It adds no application endpoint or scheduler. Related work:
#17112. The separate onboarding gateway UI prerequisite is #17253.

## What Changed

- Add explicit target configuration and a credential-free preparation
preview. Keep historical selectors and the current `--all` matrix
unchanged.
- Resolve requested fixture prerequisites, including a run-owned backlog
task prepared before measurement. Reuse verified onboarding context
without counting recipe setup as onboarding coverage.
- Add task assignment persistence and the actual onboarding parent/child
first-task journey, with an independent artifact oracle and native trace
requirement.
- Preserve failed boundaries and blocked dependents, deployment
identity, costs, phase outcomes, and private evidence in the existing
dashboard.
- Validate success assertions and accounting before successful cleanup.
Bound collection by the campaign deadline and cleanup/evidence hooks by
a separate ten-minute grace, with cancellation and stop-only fallback.
- Stage dashboard rendering separately so a timed-out renderer cannot
overwrite retained failure results. Add evidence finalization hooks so
the private provider can save evidence before target deletion and lease
release.
- Reject private journey bundles in the public history publisher.
Browser-only results have no model or provider.

## Verification

- The unchanged task-properties story passed on managed self-hosted and
a registered testing Cloud workspace. Authentication, setup, journey,
collection, and cleanup passed. Model calls: zero. Earlier attempts
remain private and retained.
- Final journey and report tests: 96 passed in eight files. Catalog
compatibility: 39 passed. The wider focused run exposed three stale
master catalog expectations; these now match the already shipped
case-handoff v4 metadata and four-cell matrix. The default 385-cell
selection is unchanged.
- Review regressions reproduced premature success for a zero-request
receipt and a missing required assertion. Both now fail before success
cleanup while retaining cost receipts. The initial lifecycle fixes
passed 33 checks. A subsequent review exposed a late renderer write that
could erase saved failures; rendering now writes into isolated staging
and publishes HTML only after it settles. Combined campaign,
fixture-contract, and retained-report checks: 67 passed, including late
writes, delayed timer callbacks, stalled collection, release, stop,
evidence hooks, and browser close. Harness typecheck passed after the
fixes.
- A broader harness unit attempt completed 3,601 passing cases, two
failures, and two skips. The failures exposed a stale Pi count and an
omitted active Copilot fixture in the Daytona image input closure. The
focused compatibility fixes passed 83 tests. After all source fixes, the
full harness support suite passed: 160 files, 3,621 tests, two skips,
plus 128 native-source checks. The earlier failures remain recorded.
- Harness typecheck, repository typecheck, repository build, map checks,
and Storybook catalog checks passed on the rebased branch.
- The required full `pnpm test:run` attempt timed out after 35 minutes.
It had 1,195 completed passing cases and one chat integration failure
before its first suite completed. That case and nine adjacent cases pass
in isolation. The original failure remains unresolved and retained; this
is not a full-suite pass.
- Current-head remote checks
(`39b2a1ed8c49222fabd1ba8e225cac81bff5c6f7`): 53 passed, two skipped,
none pending or failing. Greptile completed successfully at 5/5 with no
unresolved review threads.
- Fresh paid Cloud onboarding, dependent reuse, and disposable cleanup
have not been qualified live. They require deployment of the separate UI
prerequisite and actual Cloud gateway budget admission. The trusted
Cloud workflow remains disabled.

- Final live verification at `39b2a1ed8c`: the unchanged shared story
passed on managed self-hosted and the registered testing Cloud stack
using the prepared backlog-task recipe. Both cleaned up successfully
with zero model calls. Independent private S3 checks confirmed final
evidence and released QA identity/stack leases. Cloud evidence remains
private.

## Risks

- A deployed UI or Cloud control-plane change can invalidate selectors
or provider contracts. Version drift fails the attempt.
- Cloud evidence and lifecycle recovery are private-provider
responsibilities. A pending cleanup or evidence upload must keep the
target unavailable for reuse.
- No release is deployed or pinned by this change. No automatic story
retry is added. The initial pilot retains its explicit $10, one
disposable workspace, and 30-minute bounds.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and delegated agents. The runtime does not expose a more
specific deployment model identifier or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-23 06:27:49 -07:00

167 lines
14 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
navigation: {"section":"Tasks and conversations","sectionOrder":20,"order":10}
---
# Task creation and lifecycle
People create, assign, organize, discuss, and finish tasks. A task retains its owner, project, priority, history, and outputs as it moves through the work lifecycle.
Feature ID: `tasks`.
Implementation: [new task](../../ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.tsx), [task list](../../ui/src/pages/Issues.tsx), [task detail](../../ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.tsx).
Agent access: [companion](../agent-access-map/tasks.md).
## Sub-features
- `create`: `tasks/create` — capture a title/request with the intended agent, project, and attachments.
- `organize`: `tasks/organize` — filter, sort, group, and navigate tasks without losing the selected context.
- `properties`: `tasks/properties` — change status, priority, assignee, project, and relationships where authorized.
- `discussion`: `tasks/discussion` — persist comments, references, and files on the task.
- `completion`: `tasks/completion` — distinguish backlog, active work, review, blocked, done, and cancelled outcomes.
- `privacy`: `tasks/privacy` — create private tasks, share or revoke access, and inspect parent/project inheritance before changing visibility.
The [Product task-properties journey](../../tests/runner-e2e/PRODUCT-JOURNEYS.md)
checks only assignment to the signed-in user and persistence after reload. Its
source is reusable across self-hosted and Cloud; Cloud live qualification is
separate. It does not cover other property operations or agent authorization.
## How to get to it (user POV)
### `new-task`
Use New task from the global launcher, task list, or project task view.
### `task-list`
Open `/issues` or a project’s Issues view; legacy `/tasks` links redirect.
### `task-detail`
Open `/issues/:issueId` from a row, mention, or direct link.
### `task-sharing`
Use the privacy control in New task, or open an existing task’s menu and choose **Make private**, **Share…**, or **Make public** where allowed. The share sheet lists direct grants and inherited access from private ancestors or project membership. Inherited rows have no local revoke action; manage that access at its source.
## Driving it with Playwright and the Paperclip CLI
Preconditions: follow the [baseline](./README.md#before-driving-a-journey). Use a
disposable project. Persistence checks can assign work to Me or leave it
unassigned; execution checks additionally need an invokable test agent. Record
whether a real or simulated harness handles execution.
**Operation checkpoints**
Use these checks alongside the entry-point recipes below and the operation records in the [access companion](../agent-access-map/tasks.md). Record the actual actor, surface, saved result and denial separately. Source review and linked tests do not establish a live pass.
| Capability ID | Action and persisted result | Denial, race and retry checks |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `tasks/create` | Create an unassigned task or assign it to Me; save its description and context, then reopen and reload the exact task. | Exercise required fields, inaccessible parents/projects, and the same API creation key with identical and changed input. Compare task IDs and run counts; saving a draft is not creation. |
| `tasks/organize` | Find the saved task through list, project, filter, and direct-link surfaces; change supported labels separately. | Compare another actor’s private results and another company. Distinguish browser sorting/grouping preferences from saved task data. |
| `tasks/properties` | Change title, metadata, assignee, dependencies, work mode, execution settings, and monitor/watchdog configuration as separate operations. Reload each saved change. | Use an occupied checkout, stale status version, invalid dependency, stopped run, and disallowed mode. Check the specific rejection and unchanged fields; a successful title edit does not establish assignment authority. |
| `tasks/discussion` | Post a unique comment, reload, and inspect attribution. Read history, inspect a queued message, and delete only an owned disposable comment where allowed. | Separate an ordinary comment from steering or a wake. Check inaccessible task history, author-only deletion, queued cancellation, and duplicate delivery. Feedback votes have their own human authority. |
| `tasks/completion` | Complete, block, request review, reopen, and cancel separate disposable tasks through offered controls. Inspect the saved outcome, review gates, and execution state. | Test pending dependencies/reviews, a stale or active checkout, and late writes after handoff. Terminal status does not prove provider stop or saved files. Verify checkout/release and destructive deletion separately from completion. |
| `tasks/privacy` | Create private work with a responsible person; share a child, inspect direct/inherited rows, revoke a direct grant, and check publication constraints. | Use separate ordinary people and an actual agent. Shared readers cannot manage grants; ancestor/project access changes at its source. Reload and retry discovery/direct reads after revocation; keep unrelated direct grants. |
### `new-task`
Automated: [creation dialog](../../ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx) is component coverage with mocked requests.
Manual: Create a uniquely named task with an agent and project. Open its resulting link and reload. Confirm text, attachment, assignment, and project persisted, and verify execution started only when the task and agent are eligible.
Creation is request-first: enter **Describe a task…**, choose the assignee and
project, and submit **Create task**. A standalone title field is not always shown.
Use a human/unassigned task to verify persistence without invoking a model.
### `task-list`
Automated: [task-list helpers](../../ui/src/pages/Issues.test.tsx) cover search URLs, pagination, deduplication, and presentation constants. The suite does not render the page or exercise filtering, grouping, opening a task, and returning; those interactions still need a running-browser check.
Manual: Seed human-created, agent-created, scheduled routine, human-initiated chat-channel, and creator-less tasks. Confirm automation is hidden by default, **show agent-created tasks** reveals it, reload preserves the choice, and Clear filters hides it again. Verify list and board search with automation newer than the human results, and expand contextual ancestors/subtasks without promoting unrelated automated roots. Repeat in project task lists. Agent profiles and task-detail subtasks retain complete history.
Manual: Filter by status and assignee, change grouping/sort, open a task, and return. Verify the correct records and selected view survive navigation and reload. Include an empty result and a failed request.
### `task-detail`
Automated: [task detail](../../ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx) covers component behavior, while [issue service](../../server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts) covers server contracts.
Failure markers have no dashed divider rules. An adjacent run error and
no-live-execution-path notice show only the last error, with its details and
retry action, including a permitted legacy run retry carried onto a later
recovery notice. Intervening messages, unrelated system notices that quote error
text, and credential-access denials stay visible. Explicit non-recovery titles
stop grouping. Saved stranded-recovery action metadata plus a known recovery
statement also identify recovery notices with a default or source-run title.
Only known recovery statements use the legacy text fallback.
[Grouping tests](../../ui/src/components/task-chat/adjacent-errors.test.ts) and
[marker tests](../../ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatMarker.test.tsx) cover
the presentation. The [Failure notices stories](../../ui/storybook/stories/tasks/failure-notices.stories.tsx)
mount the production thread view with fixture data. The focused
[browser suite](../../tests/storybook-visual/failure-notices.spec.ts) checks
play assertions, disclosure, retry callbacks, themes and phone width. These
checks do not dispatch a real retry or change stored run history.
Automated: [paused assignee relevance](../../tests/e2e/completed-task-paused-assignee.spec.ts)
uses a real disposable server and paused process agent, with no inference, to
check both task interfaces. Done and cancelled tasks hide the paused-agent
warning; reopening restores it. The agent stays paused and no run starts.
Manual: For a disposable task owned by a legacy agent, have its current run
assign the task to a human with status In review. Verify that assignment and
status persist, that the current run finishes without `issue_reassigned`, and
that slow workspace restoration does not turn the task Blocked. Try a later edit
from the outgoing run and verify rejection. Repeat a board
reassignment and confirm that the outgoing run still stops.
Manual: Add a comment and edit authorized properties. Reload and verify history, actor, and values. Complete a disposable task and inspect its deliverable; reopen through an available action and confirm the next execution follows current policy.
Manual: Ask a standard native agent to schedule a future check on its current
task. Reload and confirm the persisted monitor. After the agent yields, verify
one later wake and a consumed schedule. For malformed-call recovery, use the
[agent access recipe](../agent-access-map/tasks.md#properties) and verify that
schema feedback supports a corrected call before a wait is claimed.
For a due monitor held by execution recovery, confirm that the schedule remains
and task activity explains the deferral. Repeated checks must not replay the held
work. Resolve the hold through its existing recovery action, then verify one wake.
Hold native finalization after the provider has stopped, and verify that both
scheduled and manual checks retain the due monitor. After settlement, verify one
wake. If its timeout passes during workspace recovery, verify settlement followed
by the configured expiry recovery, with no ordinary monitor wake or duplicate
escalation. For a timer already dispatched before recovery, verify that the saved
result settles without changing the task, removing a successor's checkout, or
creating another wake. The [monitor regression](../../server/src/services/native-runtime/task-monitor.integration.test.ts)
and [scheduler regression](../../server/src/services/heartbeat/scheduling.test.ts)
cover these boundaries with PostgreSQL.
Manual: Add an ordinary Board comment while a task retry is queued or running.
Confirm that the same execution keeps working and receives the saved message,
without a second executor or an implicit move to Todo. Repeat with a parked retry
and verify that fresh instructions can supersede it. Explicit Stop must still
cancel active work. The [comment route regressions](../../server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts)
and [HTTP/process and interrupted-cancellation tests](../../server/src/__tests__/issue-scheduled-retry-routes.test.ts)
cover these boundaries locally; deployed runner acceptance remains separate.
### `task-sharing`
Automated: [Share sheet](../../ui/src/components/IssueShareSheet.test.tsx), [privacy controls](../../ui/src/components/PrivateTaskPrivacyControls.test.tsx), [grant routes](../../server/src/__tests__/issue-access-grants-routes.test.ts), and [privacy production review](../../server/src/__tests__/privacy-production-review.test.ts) cover component actions, persisted grants, inheritance, and actor/resource denials. They do not establish a live two-person browser journey.
Manual: Use authenticated mode with two ordinary operators, an eligible agent, and disposable parent/child/sibling tasks. Create private work as the first person; confirm the second person cannot discover or cold-open it. Share only the child, reload both sessions, and verify child/descendant access without exposing the private parent, sibling, or unreadable project metadata. Inspect direct and inherited rows in Share; inherited rows must identify access managed at its source and offer no local revoke action. Confirm a shared reader cannot manage the task’s grants. Revoke the direct grant as its manager, reload, and retry list and direct reads; change inherited access at its ancestor or project source separately. Inspect blocked Make public actions under a private parent or nonpersonal private project; separately confirm the offered personal-project publish action removes that project binding while private descendants remain private. With an actual granted agent, test the responsible user’s access intersection and the allowed restriction to private; agent access must not permit sharing or publishing.
Sources: [Privacy actions](../../ui/src/components/IssuePrivacyActions.tsx), [share sheet](../../ui/src/components/IssueShareSheet.tsx), [issue routes](../../server/src/routes/issues.ts), and [authorization](../../server/src/services/authorization.ts).
## Gotchas
- Private task sharing and private project membership are distinct read sources. Revoking a direct task grant does not revoke an independent ancestor/project grant; inspect the actual access source.
- Priority remains an API field, but ordinary priority UI editing is hidden.
- A status label alone does not prove that the requested work exists.
- Single-assignee and atomic checkout rules still apply when tasks are created from different hosts.
- Use [coordination](./task-coordination.md), [steering](./steering.md), and [documents](./documents-artifacts.md) for their distinct workflows.
### Documentation scope: Tasks, conversations, and attention
Recipes cover the main task/conversation/attention workflows. Full shell, permission, attachment, long-thread, and concurrency permutations remain to be enumerated.