## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Every pull request runs the `Build` check. Its last step is the public npm install verifier, `scripts/verify-grok-npm-install.mjs`, which stages the eighteen public packages reachable from the server and the CLI, packs them, and installs them in a clean consumer. > - Before it stages anything, the verifier runs `scripts/build-standalone-public-packages.mjs`. That script installs and compiles the seven sandbox-provider plugins that live outside the pnpm workspace: one network `pnpm install --ignore-workspace` and one `tsc` per plugin. The line was copied from the build block of `release.sh` when the verifier was written in #14024. > - release.sh needs that build because it publishes those plugins. The verifier does not for anything it stages. Its package closure follows `workspace:` specs from the server and the CLI, and a `workspace:` spec can only name a workspace package, so none of the eighteen packages it packs is a standalone package and no tarball reads that build's output. > - One optional path at the end of the verifier does read it: qualification-package retention, which `docker-runner-check.yml` enables with `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_QUALIFICATION_PACKAGES_DIR` after running only `pnpm build`, packs the Daytona plugin from its `dist`. The PR `Build` job never sets that variable. > - The timing line from #15868 and #15888 puts the verifier's staging phase at 75.8s on the latest run, of which the staged sources, the bundled installs and the packs account for 46.5s. The rest, about 29s, is the work before staging, and the standalone build is almost all of it. `Build` at 433-530s is the slowest check in most PR runs once the server shards drop, so that time sits on the run's critical path. > - This pull request runs the standalone build only when retention is requested, keeps the `ui-dist` copy the server package needs, and times both on the timing line so what is left before staging is visible. > - The benefit is a `Build` job about 21-28s shorter, with no change to what the verifier installs or checks, no loss of coverage for the standalone build because Canary Dry Run still runs it through `release.sh`, and no change to the retention path that reads it. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Replaces #15892, which GitHub closed automatically when the branch of #15888 (its base at the time) was deleted on merge. Same two commits, rebased onto `master` on top of #15888 (1ac48aff), #15868 (026bdcd0) and #15861 (85f4205d), which are all merged. #15892 reached Greptile 5/5 with every check green on the same content; the review history is there. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The `Build` PR check. Its public npm install verifier builds the seven standalone sandbox-provider plugins before it stages the eighteen packages it installs, and none of those packages uses that build. **Subsystem affected** CI and release scripts (`scripts/verify-grok-npm-install.mjs`, `scripts/build-standalone-public-packages.mjs`). **Current behavior** The verifier runs `node scripts/build-standalone-public-packages.mjs` and then `bash scripts/prepare-server-ui-dist.sh` before it stages any package, on every run. The first script removes each sandbox-provider plugin's `node_modules`, runs `pnpm install --ignore-workspace` against the registry, links the in-repo plugin SDK, and runs the plugin's `tsc` build, four plugins at a time. On the last `Build` run before this change ([38146108750](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38146108750)) `stage_packages_ms` was 75.8s and the staged sources, bundled installs and packs inside it took 0.9s, 15.7s and 29.9s, which leaves about 29s before staging. The verifier's package closure, computed in the same way as the script computes it, contains eighteen workspace packages and no sandbox-provider plugin. **Proposed behavior** Run the standalone build only when `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_QUALIFICATION_PACKAGES_DIR` is set, because that is the one path that reads it, and report it as `stage_standalone_build_ms` when it runs. Always run the `ui-dist` copy before staging. With `PAPERCLIP_RELEASE_REUSE_UI_DIST=1`, which the verifier already sets, that copies the `ui/dist` that `pnpm build` produced into `server/ui-dist`, which the server package publishes. Report that copy as `stage_ui_dist_ms` on the timing line. Leave `release.sh` unchanged, so the release flow and Canary Dry Run still build the standalone packages where they are published. **Reason and benefit** The verifier proves that the eighteen public packages install cleanly from the public registry. The standalone build adds seven network installs and compiles whose output is never packed. Removing it from the PR path shortens the staging phase by about 21-28s. Measured on this PR's first commit ([38150787810](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38150787810)): `stage_packages_ms` 54.2s against 75.8s, with `stage_ui_dist_ms` 21ms, and the time before staging, `stage_packages_ms` minus the four staging keys, down from about 29s to under 0.1s. **Breaking changes** None. The same eighteen packages are staged, packed, checked and installed from the same sources. The retention path builds exactly what it built before. `scripts/build-standalone-public-packages.mjs` exports two existing helpers for the new guard test and otherwise does not change. ## What Changed - `scripts/verify-grok-npm-install.mjs`: the `build-standalone-public-packages.mjs` call before staging runs only when `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_QUALIFICATION_PACKAGES_DIR` is set, in the same position as before, and reports `stage_standalone_build_ms`. The flag is read once into `retainQualificationPackages`, and the retention call at the end is gated by the same variable, so the build and the retention that reads it cannot diverge. The `prepare-server-ui-dist.sh` call stays, is timed, and reports `stage_ui_dist_ms`. The comment explains why release.sh and the retention path need the standalone build and the staged packages do not. The timing-line comment lists both new keys. - `scripts/build-standalone-public-packages.mjs`: `parseWorkspaceEntries` and `isWorkspacePackage` are exported. No behavior change. - `scripts/__tests__/grok-public-install-sandbox.test.mjs`: one new guard test. It asserts the verifier references the standalone build exactly once, inside the retention gate, timed under its own key, and that no second reading of the retention variable exists; that `retain-runner-qualification-packages.mjs` still packs the Daytona plugin from its `dist`, and that the Daytona plugin is a standalone package, so the gate cannot pass vacuously; recomputes the verifier's package closure from `release-package-map.mjs list` and the manifests through `workspace:` specs; checks that the public package map still carries packages outside the pnpm workspace; checks that every package in the closure is inside the workspace globs of `pnpm-workspace.yaml`; checks that the server package still publishes `ui-dist`; and checks the order: closure, gated standalone build, `ui-dist` copy, then staging, with the reuse flag set and the timing keys written. ### Review fix, second commit Greptile's P1 on the first commit was valid: `docker-runner-check.yml` runs `pnpm build` and then the verifier with `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_QUALIFICATION_PACKAGES_DIR` set, and `retainRunnerQualificationPackages` copies `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/dist`. The Daytona plugin is excluded from the pnpm workspace, so `pnpm build` never produces that directory and the first commit would have failed that job with `ENOENT` after every install check had passed. The second commit restores the build on exactly that path: the verifier builds the standalone packages when, and only when, retention is requested, and the guard test pins the gate to the reason for it. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/grok-public-install-sandbox.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/pack-staged-packages.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/stage-bundled-packages.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/prefetch-child.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/retain-runner-qualification-packages.test.mjs`: 37 tests pass. - The updated guard test fails against the first commit's verifier (no retention gate around the build) and passes with the second commit. The first commit's test failed against #15888's verifier the same way. - `node --check` passes on the verifier. - The verifier itself needs Docker and a network, which this workspace does not have. The first commit's `Build` job ([38150787810](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38150787810)) ran the branch's verifier and measured the saving: `stage_packages_ms` 54.2s (was 75.8s), `stage_ui_dist_ms` 21ms, `stage_sources_ms` 0.8s, `stage_bundled_ms` 21.0s, `stage_pack_ms` 32.4s, so under 0.1s remains before staging where about 29s was. The second commit does not change the PR path: the gate is false on every PR run, so that job's timing line should show the same shape with no `stage_standalone_build_ms` key. - The retention path was not run here: it needs Docker and the `docker-runner-check` workflow's inputs. The code on that path is the same `run(process.execPath, [...build-standalone-public-packages.mjs])` call the verifier made before this PR, in the same position. - `scripts/__tests__/release-dry-run-notes.test.mjs` exercises the standalone build inside `release.sh` and is unchanged; 11 of its 12 tests spawn `pnpm`, which is not installed in this workspace, and fail the same way on #15888's head. They pass in CI, where `pnpm` is installed. - The first commit's run failed only on `General tests (server (11/12))`: all 74 files and 1257 tests passed, then Vitest caught a teardown `EACCES` removing the per-worker `PAPERCLIP_HOME` under `native-session-resumption.test.ts`, the same error as the first attempt of #15888's run 38146108750. Neither PR touches server code; the failure is noted on the tracking issue. ## Risks - If a future change makes a package the verifier installs depend on a standalone package, the verifier would stage an unbuilt `dist`. That cannot happen through a `workspace:` spec, which is the only kind the closure follows, and the guard test fails if the closure ever contains a package outside the workspace globs. - If a future path in the verifier reads a standalone build without setting the retention variable, it would see no `dist`. The guard test pins the single reference to the gate; a new reader has to extend the gate and the test together. - The sandbox-provider plugins' builds are no longer exercised on every PR by the `Build` job. They are still built by `release.sh` in Canary Dry Run on every PR, by the verifier whenever retention is requested, and the `build-standalone-concurrency` and `release-dry-run-notes` tests still cover the script. - Low risk otherwise. The bundled installs, the packs, the consumer install, and every probe are unchanged. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5.1 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5-1`, run as a Paperclip agent through the Claude Code local adapter with tool use (shell, file edits, GitHub CLI). Reasoning mode: extended thinking. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (CI is running on the second commit) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (the P1 on the first commit is fixed in the second; re-review pending) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Bender (Fable) <bender-fable@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Quickstart · Docs · GitHub · Discord · Twitter · Website
Sign up for the Paperclip Cloud waitlist →
Paperclip is the app people use to manage AI agents for work.
Open-source orchestration for teams of AI agents.
If OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company.
Paperclip is a Node.js server and React UI that orchestrates a team of AI agents to run a business. Bring your own agents, assign goals, and track work and costs from one dashboard. Choose models and harnesses per agent while keeping your team's tasks, skills, permissions, and history in one place.
It looks like a task manager. Under the hood: org charts, budgets, governance, goal alignment, and agent coordination.
Manage business goals, not pull requests.
| Step | Example | |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Define the goal | "Build the #1 AI note-taking app to $1M MRR." |
| 02 | Hire the team | CEO, CTO, engineers, designers, marketers — any bot, any provider. |
| 03 | Approve and run | Review strategy. Set budgets. Hit go. Monitor from the dashboard. |
| Works with |
OpenClaw |
Claude Code |
Codex |
Cursor + Cloud |
Gemini CLI |
OpenCode |
Pi |
Hermes + Gateway |
Grok Build |
Kimi Code |
If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired.
Custom processes, HTTP endpoints, and external adapter packages extend the roster. See the adapter overview for setup and capabilities.
Paperclip is right for you if
- ✅ You want to build autonomous AI organizations
- ✅ You coordinate many different agents (OpenClaw, Codex, Claude, Cursor) toward a common goal
- ✅ You have 20 simultaneous Claude Code terminals open and lose track of what everyone is doing
- ✅ You want agents running autonomously 24/7, but still want to audit work and chime in when needed
- ✅ You want to monitor costs and enforce budgets
- ✅ You want a process for managing agents that feels like using a task manager
- ✅ You want to manage your autonomous businesses from your phone
The four pillars
Four things have to work for an organization of AI agents to actually produce: the tasks, the org, the training, and the infrastructure. Paperclip is built around exactly those four pillars.
| Pillar | Built for | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Agentic Task Manager — Declare intent. Agents work. You verify the output. | Everyone, daily | Tasks, approvals & review gates · proactive agent coworkers · auditable routines & workflows · verify from diffs, screenshots & tests |
| Org Chart for Agents — Roles, permissions & boundaries for humans and agents. | Managers | Mixed human + agent org chart · responsibilities, delegation, specialization · governance: who can do what · scoped secrets & company boundaries · connection permissions & responsible-user identities |
| Agent Employee Training — Design, train & evaluate your AI employees. | Enablers | Skill Studio & shared org-wide skills · evals & saved test runs · active learning loops & quality metrics · performance reviews for agents · saved test inputs · skill version history & restore · reusable team templates |
| Agentic OS — The infrastructure that makes the work run. | IT & platform | Cross-provider runtime: any model, any agent · sandboxing, integrations & MCP servers · SSO, GRC, RBAC & cost controls · data privacy, internal trace collection, compounding data value · personal & shared app connections · run history & opt-in tracing |
Features
🔌 Bring Your Own AgentAny agent, any runtime, one org chart. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired. |
🎯 Goal AlignmentLink tasks and projects to your organization goals. Agents receive the goal context behind their work. |
💓 HeartbeatsAgents wake for assigned work, follow-up messages, or configured schedules. Delegation flows up and down the org chart. |
💰 Cost ControlCompany, agent, and project budgets. Track reported spend, get threshold alerts, and pause work at configured limits. |
🏢 Multi-OrganizationOne deployment, many organizations. Separate tasks, agents, permissions, and activity histories for each. |
🎫 Task ThreadsKeep conversations, plans, blockers, files, and run history attached to the work. Assign tasks to agents or people. |
🛡️ GovernanceConfigure review and approval stages, approve hires, and pause, reassign, or stop work when needed. |
📊 Org ChartHierarchies, roles, reporting lines. Your agents have a boss, a title, and a job description. |
📱 Mobile ReadyMonitor and manage your autonomous businesses from anywhere. |
🔗 Apps & ConnectionsConnect services such as GitHub, Notion, and Railway, or your own MCP server. Set gateway actions to Allowed, Ask first, or Off. |
👥 Shared Agents, Personal AccountsChoose who can use a connection and which agents can access it. Managed GitHub operations can use the account of the person directing the work. |
🧠 Skills & Skill StudioInstall or write shared skills, test them with saved inputs, inspect results, and restore earlier versions. |
📅 Scheduled RoutinesRun recurring work on a schedule or trigger it through an API or webhook. Each run has a task, an owner, and a history. |
📎 Artifacts & FeedbackFind the files and documents agents produce. Preview supported formats and leave comments on specific passages in documents. |
📦 Ready-Made TeamsPreview and install teams with roles, skills, projects, and routines. Choose their runtimes and make the setup your own. |
Experimental Agent Chat and chat/email connectors add conversations with agents in Paperclip and through configured services such as Slack, Discord, Telegram, and AgentMail. Enable the relevant instance settings to try them.
Problems Paperclip solves
| Without Paperclip | With Paperclip |
|---|---|
| ❌ You have 20 Claude Code tabs open and can't track which one does what. On reboot you lose everything. | ✅ Tasks are ticket-based, conversations are threaded, sessions persist across reboots. |
| ❌ You manually gather context from several places to remind your bot what you're actually doing. | ✅ Context flows from the task up through the project and company goals — your agent always knows what to do and why. |
| ❌ Folders of agent configs are disorganized and you're re-inventing task management, communication, and coordination between agents. | ✅ Paperclip gives you org charts, ticketing, delegation, and governance out of the box — so you run a company, not a pile of scripts. |
| ❌ Runaway loops waste hundreds of dollars of tokens and max your quota before you even know what happened. | ✅ Spend tracking, budget alerts, and automatic pauses help you control the cost of ongoing work. |
| ❌ You have recurring jobs (customer support, social, reports) and have to remember to manually kick them off. | ✅ Routines create assigned tasks on a schedule, with outputs and run history you can inspect. |
| ❌ You have an idea, you have to find your repo, fire up Claude Code, keep a tab open, and babysit it. | ✅ Add a task in Paperclip. Your coding agent works on it until it's done. Management reviews their work. |
Why Paperclip is special
Paperclip handles the hard orchestration details correctly.
| Atomic task checkout. | A single assignee and execution locks prevent competing runs from claiming the same task. |
| Persistent work context. | Tasks, comments, and documents stay in Paperclip. Supporting adapters resume saved sessions across runs. |
| Runtime skill injection. | Agents can learn Paperclip workflows and project context at runtime, without retraining. |
| Governance with rollback. | Approval gates are enforced, config changes are revisioned, and bad changes can be rolled back safely. |
| Accountable connections. | Human access, agent eligibility, and gateway action permissions are separate controls. Approve a call once or save a revocable rule. |
| Goal-aware execution. | Linked tasks and projects carry goal ancestry so agents see the "why," not just a title. |
| Portable company templates. | Export/import orgs, agents, and skills with secret scrubbing and collision handling. |
| Organization boundaries. | Company-scoped access checks keep each organization's work, agents, and activity separate within one deployment. |
What's Under the Hood
Paperclip is a full control plane, not a wrapper. Before you build any of this yourself, know that it already exists:
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PAPERCLIP SERVER │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │Identity & │ │ Work & │ │ Heartbeat │ │Governance │ │
│ │ Access │ │ Tasks │ │ Execution │ │& Approvals│ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │ Org Chart │ │Workspaces │ │ Plugins │ │ Budget │ │
│ │ & Agents │ │ & Runtime │ │ │ │ & Costs │ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
│ │
│ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ ┌───────────┐ │
│ │ Routines │ │ Secrets & │ │ Activity │ │ Company │ │
│ │& Schedules│ │ Storage │ │ & Events │ │Portability│ │
│ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲
┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐ ┌─────┴─────┐
│ Claude │ │ Codex │ │ CLI │ │ HTTP/web │
│ Code │ │ │ │ agents │ │ bots │
└───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ └───────────┘
The Systems
|
Identity & Access — Two deployment modes (trusted local or authenticated), human roles and permissions, agent API keys, short-lived run JWTs, company memberships, and invite flows. Responsible-user attribution follows work through delegation and supported managed connections. |
Org Chart & Agents — Agents have roles, titles, reporting lines, permissions, and budgets. Adapter examples match the diagram: Claude Code, Codex, CLI agents such as Cursor/Gemini/bash, HTTP/webhook bots such as OpenClaw, and external adapter plugins. If it can receive a heartbeat, it's hired. |
|
Work & Task System — Issues carry company/project/goal/parent links, atomic checkout with execution locks, first-class blocker dependencies, comments, documents, attachments, work products, labels, and inbox state. Search across work, review document revisions, and leave anchored feedback. |
Heartbeat Execution — DB-backed wakeup queue with coalescing, budget checks, workspace resolution, secret injection, skill loading, and adapter invocation. Runs produce logs, usage records, and adapter-specific session state. Bounded recovery handles supported failures and surfaces cases that need human action. |
|
Workspaces & Runtime — Project repositories and workspaces, optional isolated execution workspaces (git worktrees, operator branches), and runtime services (dev servers, preview URLs). Sandbox providers extend execution beyond the local host; availability depends on the configured environment and adapter. |
Governance & Approvals — Board approval workflows, execution policies with review/approval stages, decision tracking, budget hard-stops, and agent pause/resume/terminate. Configured task reviews govern completion; connection action approvals govern calls through the tool gateway. |
|
Budget & Cost Control — Token and cost tracking by company, agent, project, goal, issue, provider, and model. Scoped budget policies with warning thresholds and hard stops. Enforcement uses recorded spend; usage reporting and in-flight work can delay a stop. |
Routines & Schedules — Recurring tasks with cron, webhook, and API triggers. Concurrency and catch-up policies. Each routine execution creates a tracked issue and wakes the assigned agent — no manual kick-offs needed. |
|
Plugins — Instance-wide plugin system with out-of-process workers, capability-gated host services, job scheduling, tool exposure, and UI contributions. Extend Paperclip without forking it. |
Secrets & Storage — Company secrets and per-person secret values, encrypted credential storage, local or S3-compatible file storage, attachments, and work products. Secret references supply credentials to authorized runs without copying values into ordinary agent configuration. |
|
Activity & Events — Mutating actions, heartbeat state changes, cost events, approvals, comments, and work products are recorded as durable activity so operators can audit what happened and why. |
Company Portability — Preview, export, and import organization packages with agents, skills, and optional projects, routines, tasks, and attachments. Referenced secret values are omitted; review packages before sharing because plain environment values and local paths can remain. Packages share an operating setup; full-instance recovery uses backups. |
What Paperclip is not
| Not just a chatbot. | Conversations stay attached to tasks, plans, decisions, and outputs. Experimental Agent Chat can hand work off to assigned tasks. |
| Not an agent framework. | We don't tell you how to build agents. We tell you how to run a company made of them. |
| Not just a workflow builder. | Routines and experimental pipelines operate within an organization, with roles, goals, budgets, and governance. |
| Not a prompt manager. | Agents bring their own prompts, models, and runtimes. Paperclip manages the organization they work in. |
| Not limited to one agent. | Start with one agent and grow into a team with shared skills, delegation, and review. |
| Not only for code review. | Coding and PR review fit alongside research, operations, content, and other work. |
Quickstart
Open source. Self-hosted. No Paperclip account required. Follow the guided quickstart to set up your first agent.
Just ask your agent to install Paperclip
Share the installation guide with your agent.
Or install it yourself
With Node.js 24.11 or newer installed:
npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes
The CLI runs from npm's cache; your instance configuration and data persist locally.
See the installation guide for managed installs, pinned versions, canary and git-ref installs, updates, rollback, service management, and uninstalling.
For an isolated manual test instance that is already initialized with a CEO
agent, use test-drive. It stays in the foreground, never installs a service
or creates a first task, and opens the browser only after setup succeeds:
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive
OPENAI_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive --harness codex
OPENROUTER_API_KEY=... npx paperclipai test-drive \
--harness opencode \
--model openrouter/anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5
Each run without --data-dir gets a unique, retained temporary directory; its
absolute path is printed at startup. Pass --data-dir to reuse one, or
--no-browser to leave the initialized instance unopened. When invoked from a
linked Git worktree, test-drive also enables task execution in that worktree.
See the test-drive guide for credential and
reuse behavior.
Troubleshooting: private npm registry
.npmrcIf this fails with an
E404forpaperclipai(or similar) and you use a private npm registry (for example GitHub Packages) via a global~/.npmrc,npxmay be resolvingpaperclipaiagainst that private registry instead of the public npm registry.Diagnostic:
npm config get registryWorkaround (cross-platform; force the public npm registry for this command):
npx --registry https://registry.npmjs.org paperclipai@latest onboard --yes
That quickstart path now defaults to trusted local loopback mode for the fastest first run. To start in authenticated/private mode instead, choose a bind preset explicitly:
npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes --bind lan
# or:
npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes --bind tailnet
If you already have Paperclip configured, rerunning onboard keeps the existing config in place. Use npx paperclipai configure to edit settings.
Or manually:
git clone https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
cd paperclip
pnpm install
pnpm dev
This starts the UI and API at http://localhost:3100. An embedded PostgreSQL database is created automatically — no setup required.
Requirements: Node.js 24.11+, pnpm 9.15+
Local Claude and Codex subscription sign-in also needs Python 3 and the corresponding provider CLI on the Paperclip host. The Docker image includes them.
Source development also builds the native Paperclip Runner when enabled (the self-hosted default). Install a Rust toolchain, or set PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_BINARY to a compatible prebuilt runner.
FAQ
Q: Is this project maintained or just slop?
A: Paperclip is maintained by the Paperclip team. We've merged over 2,700 pull requests.
Q: What does a typical setup look like?
A: Locally, a single Node.js process manages an embedded Postgres and local file storage. For production, point it at your own Postgres and deploy however you like. Configure projects, agents, and goals — the agents take care of the rest.
For remote access, use authenticated mode with a private-network bind such as Tailscale, or deploy the persistent server with Docker. See deployment modes and the Docker guide.
Q: Can I run multiple companies?
A: Yes. A single deployment can host multiple organizations with company-scoped data and access checks.
Q: How is Paperclip different from agents like OpenClaw or Claude Code?
A: Paperclip uses those agents. It orchestrates them into a company — with org charts, budgets, goals, governance, and accountability.
Q: Why should I use Paperclip instead of just pointing my OpenClaw to Asana or Trello?
A: Agent orchestration has subtleties in how you coordinate who has work checked out, how to maintain sessions, monitoring costs, establishing governance - Paperclip does this for you.
(Bring-your-own-ticket-system is on the Roadmap)
Q: Do agents run continuously?
A: Agents wake for assigned work and follow-up messages. Optional timer heartbeats let them check for work periodically; routines create recurring tasks on their own schedules. You can also connect externally running agents such as OpenClaw. A mention alone does not assign work or wake another agent.
Development
pnpm dev # Full dev (API + UI, watch mode)
pnpm dev:once # Full dev without file watching
pnpm dev:server # Server only
pnpm dev:mobile # Serve prebuilt UI on :3101 for phones/tablets (proxies /api → :3100)
pnpm dev:both # Run `pnpm dev` and `pnpm dev:mobile` together
pnpm build # Build all
pnpm typecheck # Type checking
pnpm test # Cheap default test run (Vitest only)
pnpm test:watch # Vitest watch mode
pnpm test:e2e # Playwright browser suite
pnpm db:generate # Generate DB migration
pnpm db:migrate # Apply migrations
pnpm test does not run Playwright. Browser suites stay separate and are typically run only when working on those flows or in CI.
See doc/DEVELOPING.md for the full development guide.
Roadmap
- ✅ Plugin system (e.g. add a knowledge base, custom tracing, queues, etc)
- ✅ Get OpenClaw / claw-style agent employees
- ✅ companies.sh - import and export entire organizations
- ✅ Easy AGENTS.md configurations
- ✅ Skills Manager, Skill Studio & Skills Store
- ✅ Scheduled Routines
- ✅ Better Budgeting
- ✅ Agent Reviews and Approvals
- ✅ Multiple Human Users
- ✅ Cloud / Sandbox agents (e2b, Cloudflare, Daytona, Modal, Novita, self-hosted Kubernetes)
- ✅ Artifacts & Work Products
- ✅ Deep Planning (planning mode, revisioned plans, plan approvals)
- ✅ Enforced Outcomes (watchdogs, recovery actions, review gates)
- ✅ MCP Tool Gateway & Apps (governed tool access)
- ✅ Secrets Manager with per-agent access
- ✅ Activity log & action attribution
- ✅ Self-healing runs & automatic recovery
- ✅ Agent evals & feedback
- ✅ Connected Apps
- ✅ Personal & Shared AI Accounts
- ✅ Shared Agents Use Personal GitHub Identities
- ✅ Skill Version History & Restore
- ✅ Document Comments & Revision History
- ✅ Company-Wide Search
- ✅ Multi-Model & Multi-Harness Teams
- 🟡 Memory / Knowledge
- ⚪ MAXIMIZER MODE
- ⚪ Work Queues
- ⚪ Self-Organization
- ⚪ Automatic Organizational Learning
- 🟡 Agent Chat
- 🟡 Cloud deployments
- ⚪ Desktop App
- ⚪ Bring-your-own-ticket-system (Asana / Linear / Jira as on-ramps)
This is the short roadmap preview. See the full roadmap in ROADMAP.md.
Community & Plugins
Find Plugins and more at awesome-paperclip
Observability
Paperclip ships with opt-in OpenTelemetry auto-instrumentation for the server (traces only). It activates when OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT is set and supports grpc, http/protobuf, and http/json via the standard OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_PROTOCOL env var. @opentelemetry/api is a normal server dependency; the SDK, auto-instrumentation, and exporter packages are optional peer dependencies — install them only if you want tracing. See doc/observability.md for install commands and the full env-var reference.
Paperclip also ships with opt-in Sentry error monitoring for the server and the browser. Set SENTRY_DSN_FRONTEND to activate it for the browser and SENTRY_DSN_BACKEND to activate it for the server — each variable is optional, and the legacy SENTRY_DSN variable still works as a fallback for either component. The supported server SDK version is @sentry/node@10.71.0; it is an optional peer dependency for the server, so install it only if you want error monitoring. The browser SDK, @sentry/browser, is pinned to the same exact version. See doc/observability.md for the install command, the privacy settings, and the full default capture set.
Telemetry
Paperclip collects anonymous usage telemetry to help us understand how the product is used and improve it. No personal information, issue content, prompts, file paths, or secrets are ever collected. Private repository references are hashed with a per-install salt before being sent.
Contributors changing emitted telemetry events should follow the Telemetry Data Contract. For proposed first-party events that are not in the generated contract yet, follow Telemetry Workflow.
Telemetry is enabled by default and can be disabled with any of the following:
| Method | How |
|---|---|
| Environment variable | PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1 |
| Standard convention | DO_NOT_TRACK=1 |
| CI environments | Automatically disabled when CI=true |
| Config file | Set telemetry.enabled: false in your Paperclip config |
Contributing
We welcome contributions. See the contributing guide for details.
Community
- Discord — Join the community
- Twitter / X — Follow updates and announcements
- GitHub Issues — bugs and feature requests
- GitHub Discussions — ideas and RFC
License
MIT © 2026 Paperclip Labs, Inc
Star History
Open source under MIT. Built for people who want to get work done, not babysit agents.
