mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its user journeys span tasks, agents, projects, connected apps, governance, and CLI operations. > - Existing tests do not provide a shared index of entry points and verification steps. > - Contributors need to see which surfaces a change affects and what evidence exists. > - This pull request adds an optional product feature map with recipes and explicit coverage gaps. > - The map adds no CI checks or required maintenance for future pull requests. > - Contributors can use it to find verification steps and state what they checked. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Missing documentation. **Where is the issue?** User-journey verification guidance in AGENTS.md and doc/DEVELOPING.md. **What's wrong?** There is no shared index of product features, user entry points, available test evidence, and remaining coverage gaps. Shared components can hide differences between their hosts. **Suggested fix** Add a documentation-only capability index and verification recipes. The format takes inspiration from [Omnigent's feature map](https://github.com/omnigent-ai/omnigent/tree/91acfbbb59f6fc210ff95a9e9428aadd62e06582/feature-map). The recipes describe Paperclip's own behavior and tests. Searched GitHub PRs and issues for `feature map` and `feature-map`. No duplicate change was found. Checked ROADMAP.md. This PR documents existing capabilities. ## What Changed - Added 35 feature recipes, 171 named sub-features, and 91 entry points across product, CLI, operator, and developer surfaces. - Each recipe describes setup, expected results, existing automated evidence, manual verification, and coverage gaps. - Added a dated source snapshot of 185 non-test page TSX modules in 15 areas. The snapshot describes documentation coverage, not runtime health. - Included entry points within existing pages, CLI/API operations, and experimental surfaces. Identified helper-only test evidence where a rendered journey has no automated proof. - Linked the map from AGENTS.md and doc/DEVELOPING.md as an optional reference. - The final diff contains only Markdown and the inventory JSON. It adds no checker, tests, package commands, workflows, dependencies, scheduled work, or mandatory inventory updates. ## Verification - PASS: local documentation links resolve and the inventory JSON parses. Confirmed the final PR diff contains only 39 documentation files. - PASS: `node --test '.github/scripts/tests/*.test.mjs'` — 381 existing tests after removal of the feature-map tests. - PASS: `git diff --check`. - Earlier local build and typecheck passed. The full local test run was stopped after 26 minutes with failures in unchanged chat-channel and native-runner integration tests. It did not complete. These application checks were not repeated for the documentation-only removal. - [CI on the preceding head](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/37398407523) passed all applicable checks. Checks on the final documentation-only head are pending. - PASS: Greptile review on final head `45c4b0aeb26540324825da43e81bee2336ad1c1f` is 5/5. There are no unresolved findings. - Live product/provider journeys were not run to author the map. The recipes identify available evidence and manual steps, not new qualification results. ## Risks Low product risk: the PR changes documentation only. Recipes and the source snapshot can become stale. Maintenance is optional and based on review. Linked tests do not prove that every documented journey works. The map states remaining coverage gaps. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with repository inspection, reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact serving model ID and context window were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
231 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
231 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
# AGENTS.md
|
|
|
|
Guidance for human and AI contributors working in this repository.
|
|
|
|
## 1. Purpose
|
|
|
|
Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies.
|
|
The current implementation target is V1 and is defined in `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`.
|
|
|
|
## 2. Read This First
|
|
|
|
Before making changes, read in this order:
|
|
|
|
1. `doc/GOAL.md`
|
|
2. `doc/PRODUCT.md`
|
|
3. `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`
|
|
4. `doc/DEVELOPING.md`
|
|
5. `doc/DATABASE.md`
|
|
|
|
`doc/SPEC.md` is long-horizon product context.
|
|
`doc/SPEC-implementation.md` is the concrete V1 build contract.
|
|
|
|
When adding or changing an Apps catalog connection, also follow
|
|
`doc/connections/CONNECTOR-PLAYBOOK.md`. It is the canonical connection
|
|
authoring runbook for provider research, supported transport/auth patterns,
|
|
credential handling, branding, implementation, testing, live proof, and PR
|
|
submission.
|
|
|
|
## 3. Repo Map
|
|
|
|
- `server/`: Express REST API and orchestration services
|
|
- `ui/`: React + Vite board UI
|
|
- `packages/db/`: Drizzle schema, migrations, DB clients
|
|
- `packages/shared/`: shared types, constants, validators, API path constants
|
|
- `packages/adapters/`: agent adapter implementations (Claude, Codex, Cursor, etc.)
|
|
- `packages/adapter-utils/`: shared adapter utilities
|
|
- `packages/plugins/`: plugin system packages
|
|
- `packages/skills-catalog/`: app-shipped skills catalog (`@paperclipai/skills-catalog`)
|
|
- `packages/teams-catalog/`: app-shipped teams catalog (`@paperclipai/teams-catalog`)
|
|
- `cli/`: `paperclipai` CLI package (published bin, agent-facing commands)
|
|
- `skills/`: Paperclip runtime/operational skills (not part of the app catalog)
|
|
- `doc/`: operational and product docs
|
|
|
|
## 4. Dev Setup (Auto DB)
|
|
|
|
Use embedded PGlite in dev by leaving `DATABASE_URL` unset.
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pnpm install
|
|
pnpm dev
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This starts:
|
|
|
|
- API: `http://localhost:3100`
|
|
- UI: `http://localhost:3100` (served by API server in dev middleware mode)
|
|
|
|
Quick checks:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
curl http://localhost:3100/api/health
|
|
curl http://localhost:3100/api/companies
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Reset local dev DB:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
rm -rf data/pglite
|
|
pnpm dev
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 5. Core Engineering Rules
|
|
|
|
1. Keep changes company-scoped.
|
|
Every domain entity should be scoped to a company and company boundaries must be enforced in routes/services.
|
|
|
|
Explicit exception: announcement dismissals are instance-wide user preferences,
|
|
keyed by user and announcement so they persist across companies. Their audit
|
|
context must still validate company membership. The announcement publication-ID
|
|
registry is instance-level feed metadata; it contains no company or user data.
|
|
|
|
2. Keep contracts synchronized.
|
|
If you change schema/API behavior, update all impacted layers:
|
|
- `packages/db` schema and exports
|
|
- `packages/shared` types/constants/validators
|
|
- `server` routes/services
|
|
- `ui` API clients and pages
|
|
|
|
3. Preserve control-plane invariants.
|
|
- Single-assignee task model
|
|
- Atomic issue checkout semantics
|
|
- Approval gates for governed actions
|
|
- Budget hard-stop auto-pause behavior
|
|
- Activity logging for mutating actions
|
|
|
|
4. Do not replace strategic docs wholesale unless asked.
|
|
Prefer additive updates. Keep `doc/SPEC.md` and `doc/SPEC-implementation.md` aligned.
|
|
|
|
5. Keep repo plan docs dated and centralized.
|
|
When you are creating a plan file in the repository itself, new plan documents belong in `doc/plans/` and should use `YYYY-MM-DD-slug.md` filenames. This does not replace Paperclip issue planning: if a Paperclip issue asks for a plan, update the issue `plan` document per the `paperclip` skill instead of creating a repo markdown file.
|
|
|
|
6. Attach inspectable generated artifacts.
|
|
When your task produces a user-inspectable deliverable file, follow the Paperclip skill's "Generated Artifacts and Work Products" workflow before final disposition. In this repo, prefer the self-contained skill helper at `skills/paperclip/scripts/paperclip-upload-artifact.sh` so the file is available through the Paperclip API, create/update an artifact work product when the file is the deliverable, link the uploaded artifact in the final issue comment, and then set status. Do not rely on local filesystem paths as the only access path. If an important file intentionally remains workspace-only, create/update a work product with `metadata.resourceRef.kind: "workspace_file"` and a workspace-relative path, then name that work product and path in the final comment. Treat browse/search as a fallback for recovering workspace files, not the preferred deliverable path. See `doc/AGENT-ARTIFACTS.md` for details and `.mp4`/`.webm` examples.
|
|
|
|
7. Name the three data paths correctly.
|
|
This repo has three separate data paths. Do not confuse them. Match a change to a path by its file path, not by the word "observability" or "telemetry" alone.
|
|
|
|
- **Telemetry** is the Paperclip first-party event system. It is opt-out and it sends data to a Paperclip endpoint by default. Its paths are:
|
|
- `packages/shared/src/telemetry/`
|
|
- the generated contract `packages/shared/src/telemetry/generated/paperclip-telemetry.ts`
|
|
- each caller of `packages/shared/src/telemetry/events.ts` or `packages/shared/src/telemetry/client.ts`
|
|
- **Observability** is the OpenTelemetry trace path. An operator must set an OTLP endpoint. Until an operator sets the endpoint, the tracer is a no-operation. Its paths are:
|
|
- `server/src/instrumentation.ts`
|
|
- `doc/observability.md`
|
|
- `packages/adapter-utils/src/duplex-observability.ts`
|
|
- `server/src/services/duplex-observability-recorder.ts`
|
|
- the span attributes in `packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/startup-timing.ts`
|
|
- **The run log** holds rows in the local `heartbeat_run_events` table. The data stays in the instance database. Its paths are:
|
|
- `doc/run-log-events.md`
|
|
- `packages/db/src/schema/heartbeat_run_events.ts`
|
|
- the append path `appendRunEvent` in `server/src/services/heartbeat.ts`
|
|
|
|
Apply a review level that matches the path:
|
|
|
|
- **Telemetry change (strict review).** The author updates the generated contract first. The author updates `packages/shared/src/telemetry/README.md` in the same pull request. The author requests a privacy review. Reason: a Telemetry event goes to a Paperclip endpoint by default, so a mistake sends data immediately.
|
|
- **Observability change (lighter review).** The operator endpoint gate stays in place. The no-operation behaviour stays when no endpoint is set. A privacy review is not necessary while the change stays inside the closed span-attribute allowlist.
|
|
- **Run-log change (no extra review).** A run-log change needs neither review level above, because the data stays in the instance database.
|
|
|
|
**Exclusion.** The word "observability" in a file such as `server/src/services/recovery-observability.ts` names a different concept. Apply this rule by path, not by word match.
|
|
|
|
## 6. Database Change Workflow
|
|
|
|
When changing data model:
|
|
|
|
1. Edit `packages/db/src/schema/*.ts`
|
|
2. Ensure new tables are exported from `packages/db/src/schema/index.ts`
|
|
3. Generate migration:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pnpm db:generate
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
4. Validate compile:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pnpm -r typecheck
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
- `packages/db/drizzle.config.ts` reads compiled schema from `dist/schema/*.js`
|
|
- `pnpm db:generate` compiles `packages/db` first
|
|
|
|
## 7. Verification Before Hand-off
|
|
|
|
[feature-map/README.md](feature-map/README.md) is an optional reference for user
|
|
entry points, verification recipes, and coverage gaps. The map records coverage
|
|
scope, not proof that a live journey passed.
|
|
|
|
Default local/agent test path:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pnpm test
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This is the cheap default and only runs the Vitest suite. Browser suites stay opt-in:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pnpm test:e2e
|
|
pnpm test:release-smoke
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Run the browser suites only when your change touches them or when you are explicitly verifying CI/release flows.
|
|
|
|
For normal issue work, run the smallest relevant verification first. Do not default to repo-wide typecheck/build/test on every heartbeat when a narrower check is enough to prove the change.
|
|
|
|
Run this full check before claiming repo work done in a PR-ready hand-off, or when the change scope is broad enough that targeted checks are not sufficient:
|
|
|
|
```sh
|
|
pnpm -r typecheck
|
|
pnpm test:run
|
|
pnpm build
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If anything cannot be run, explicitly report what was not run and why.
|
|
|
|
## 8. API and Auth Expectations
|
|
|
|
- Base path: `/api`
|
|
- Board access is treated as full-control operator context
|
|
- Agent access uses bearer API keys (`agent_api_keys`), hashed at rest
|
|
- Agent keys must not access other companies
|
|
|
|
When adding endpoints:
|
|
|
|
- apply company access checks
|
|
- enforce actor permissions (board vs agent)
|
|
- write activity log entries for mutations
|
|
- return consistent HTTP errors (`400/401/403/404/409/422/500`)
|
|
|
|
## 9. UI Expectations
|
|
|
|
- Keep routes and nav aligned with available API surface
|
|
- Use company selection context for company-scoped pages
|
|
- Surface failures clearly; do not silently ignore API errors
|
|
- Form and wizard footers: keep Save & exit (or Cancel/Back) left and the primary action right in the same vertically aligned row. Each step owns the entire footer; never append Save & exit as a separate row. See `DESIGN.md`.
|
|
|
|
## 10. Pull Request Requirements
|
|
|
|
When creating a pull request (via `gh pr create` or any other method), you **must** read and fill in every section of [`.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md`](.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md). Do not craft ad-hoc PR bodies — use the template as the structure for your PR description. Required sections:
|
|
|
|
- **Thinking Path** — trace reasoning from project context to this change (see `CONTRIBUTING.md` for examples)
|
|
- **What Changed** — bullet list of concrete changes
|
|
- **Verification** — how a reviewer can confirm it works
|
|
- **Risks** — what could go wrong
|
|
- **Model Used** — the AI model that produced or assisted with the change (provider, exact model ID, context window, capabilities). Write "None — human-authored" if no AI was used.
|
|
- **Checklist** — all items checked
|
|
|
|
## 11. Definition of Done
|
|
|
|
A change is done when all are true:
|
|
|
|
1. Behavior matches `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`
|
|
2. Typecheck, tests, and build pass
|
|
3. Contracts are synced across db/shared/server/ui
|
|
4. Docs updated when behavior or commands change
|
|
5. PR description follows the [PR template](.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md) with all sections filled in (including Model Used)
|
|
|
|
## Design system
|
|
|
|
`DESIGN.md` at the repo root is the source of truth for UI design decisions. The token-only rule applies to all `ui/` changes: every color, spacing, radius, type, shadow, and motion value in `ui/src/components/**` and `ui/src/pages/**` comes from the token layer in `ui/src/index.css` — no hex, raw px, arbitrary Tailwind bracket values, or raw `font-size`/`fontSize` declarations in components, outside the documented allowlist in `ui/src/index.css`. Run `pnpm check:token-gates` (`scripts/check-token-gates.mjs`) before committing UI changes — it fails on any violation not covered by that allowlist.
|