Add native read, update, history, and restore operations with server-bound identity and revision compare-and-swap safety. Register the default catalog and API discovery paths; cover real authority authorization and exact revision restore.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Implement PAP-66 foundation: exact content history, transactional compare-and-swap saves, current responsible-user authorization, recoverable materialization, and editor history. Keep run staging and cleanup integration with PAP-63.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Keep Markdown review documents available alongside explicit attachment tabs. Preserve direct card downloads and separate the preview action. Regressions fail with the text context enabled before the fix; 199 focused tests and both desktop/mobile browser cases pass afterward.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Preserve the accepted result and retained sandbox, distinguish repairable unsafe paths from missing sandboxes, and keep transient copy-back failures retryable.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Keep large response artifacts inspectable through the existing authenticated API route. Preserve company and run authority, UTF-8 boundaries, and transfer limits. Reproduce the artifact loop through real HTTP and add an explicit full-stack fixture.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Preserve the existing eval and MCP inventories; rebuild only the skill inventory and its derived outputs with the canonical generator functions.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Restore the recovered PAP-61 viewer, use accessible icon controls for rendered/raw Markdown and downloads, and keep explicit mobile file requests on the visible panel. Verify uploads, rendering, tab selection, and exact original downloads on desktop and mobile.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Remote runs need a snapshot of the task workspace before the agent
starts.
> - The snapshot lists untracked filenames through the shared Git scan
scheduler.
> - A generated directory with a few thousand long filenames can exceed
the 1 MiB output limit.
> - This stops setup and prevents the agent from continuing its task.
> - This change gives that listing a 32 MiB bound and keeps the explicit
file snapshot.
> - Normal generated trees can now pass setup, while larger snapshots
still fail at a finite limit.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #11572 and #12214 for the existing bounded scan and ignore-scan
protections.
**What happened?**
An agent continuation failed during workspace setup with `Workspace Git
scan exceeded its output limit`. A real Git fixture reproduces the
untracked-file path: 5,000 long filenames in one generated directory
exceed its 1 MiB output limit.
**Expected behavior**
The workspace snapshot must support ordinary generated trees with
thousands of files. It must keep a finite output bound and select
explicit files before staging.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Commit a base file in a Git repository.
2. Add 5,000 untracked files with long names in one new directory.
3. Call `readGitWorkspaceSnapshot` with the normal scan limits.
4. Observe the output-limit error before this change.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Base commit: `640dee1`.
**Deployment mode**
Remote sandbox execution from source.
## What Changed
- Increase the untracked-file snapshot output bound from 1 MiB to 32
MiB.
- Keep explicit file selection, the shared scheduler, the timeout, and
the other scan bounds.
- Test that 40,000 long filenames above the old 8 MiB bound reach the
snapshot. Reuse those files with deeper paths to prove that output above
32 MiB still fails.
- Test that files created after the snapshot, including an ignored
secret, stay out of the overlay archive.
- Check the workspace root identity and reject selected paths with
symlinked parent directories before upload.
- Test root replacement after path resolution, including root-level
selected files.
- Preserve existing workspace root aliases by capturing the resolved
root before snapshot selection. Test that later alias retargeting cannot
change the archive contents.
- Stop staging on permission and I/O errors; continue to allow missing
files.
- Test these failures and preserve selected symlink entries.
- Accept valid case-renamed directories by checking ancestor file types.
A modeled case-insensitive regression failed before this correction and
now passes.
- Give the 40,000-file fixture enough time to remove its files.
- Document the larger bound and staging behavior.
## Verification
- Red: the 5,000-file regression failed with `stdout maxBuffer length
exceeded` before the fix.
- A separate check through the real server scheduler reproduced
`workspace_git_scan_output_limit` on the original code. The revised code
selected all 5,000 files.
- The late-file regression failed against the first PR revision because
the archive contained `drafts/late.secret`. It passes with the final
explicit-file approach.
- The staging regressions failed before the review fix: a substituted
parent directory and permission/I/O errors were accepted. All three
cases now stop before upload.
- Green: 134 tests passed across `git-workspace-sync.test.ts` and
`sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` with Vitest 4.1.11. This includes
complete selection above 8 MiB and rejection above 32 MiB.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils... typecheck` passed after
the revision.
- The module-boundary check and `git diff --check` passed.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` stopped in the Rust runner steps
because this environment has no `cargo` executable.
- The full `pnpm test:run` attempt ended with `SIGKILL` during the
general server suite. It did not finish. That full-suite result belongs
to the earlier revision. Fresh checks are required for this revision.
- The new regression fails at the old 8 MiB bound with `stdout maxBuffer
length exceeded`. All 134 focused tests pass with the 32 MiB change.
- The affected typechecks and module-boundary check pass. The full local
typecheck requires Cargo, which is absent in this environment.
- Final verification for `b43e9bc95e55382c6a9bfe200487c164770c8be8`: 54
successful checks/statuses and two skipped Storybook checks. No checks
remain pending or failed.
- The [CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36315569674)
passes on attempt 2. The first attempt had one unrelated preview-fixture
readiness timeout. That exact test passed locally; its CI shard passed
on the single rerun.
- [Greptile reports
5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14194#issuecomment-5852045501)
on this revision. All review threads are resolved.
- [Security review accepts the documented memory
tradeoff](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14194#discussion_r4115149465)
for this finite mitigation. The separate streaming follow-up will remove
full-list buffering.
- This revision also passes affected local typechecks and the
module-boundary check. Full local typecheck/build stop because Cargo is
absent. The full local Vitest attempt was stopped after about 18 minutes
once all remote gates passed; it did not complete locally.
## Risks
- Each untracked-file scan can buffer up to 32 MiB instead of 1 MiB. The
scheduler still limits concurrent scans and execution time.
- Snapshots above 32 MiB still fail with the existing error. Tracked and
ignored-file scan bounds stay unchanged.
- A workspace that replaces a selected path’s parent with a symlink now
fails staging.
- Detailed logs from the reported host were unavailable. The exact
command that exceeded its limit on that host is unconfirmed.
## Model Used
OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code
execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model build or
context window size.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub references)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app that people use to manage AI agents
for work.
> - The task properties panel helps operators inspect and update task
data.
> - The status, assignee, and project rows used different leading icon
sizes.
> - The mixed sizes made the rows look uneven.
> - The assignee avatar already provides the correct 24px visual size.
> - This pull request sets the status and project visuals to that same
size.
> - The benefit is a tidy and consistent properties panel.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
The task properties panel showed a 12px status icon, a 24px assignee
avatar, and a 16px project tile.
**Expected behavior**
The status, assignee, and project rows must use the same 24px leading
visual size.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Open a task.
2. Open the Properties panel.
3. Compare the Status, Assignee, and Project rows.
## What Changed
- Keep the Status glyph at 16px and use spacing to give it the 24px
avatar footprint.
- Set the Project row tile to the 24px small tile size.
- Add a regression check for the Status row size.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx` (72
tests passed)
- `pnpm check:token-gates` (all gates clean)
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` (passed)
- Full repository typecheck and build reached the Rust runner step, but
this environment does not contain `cargo`.
- The full test command was stopped after unrelated chat integration
tests did not finish. The focused UI suite passed.
## Risks
- Low risk. This change only changes visual sizes in three property
rows.
- The wider status footprint can use slightly more horizontal space in a
narrow panel.
> This fix does not overlap with planned core work in `ROADMAP.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.6, tool use and code execution enabled.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The new task dialog lets an operator assign work on a phone.
> - The mobile picker used fixed coordinates inside the Radix wrapper.
> - iOS Safari already makes fixed coordinates relative to the visual
viewport.
> - The old code added the visual viewport offset a second time.
> - This pull request removes the second offset and gives the mobile
wrapper full viewport geometry.
> - The benefit is a visible picker and search field when the iOS
keyboard opens.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
The assignee and project pickers could move outside the visible screen
in the new task dialog on iOS.
**What did you expect to happen?**
The picker and its search field must stay visible above the bottom edge
and the software keyboard.
**Steps to reproduce**
Open the new task dialog on an iPhone. Select Assignee or Project. The
picker can move outside the visual viewport when Safari pans the page.
**Paperclip version or commit**
The problem exists after the change in PR #13343.
**Deployment mode**
The problem affects the board UI in local and authenticated modes.
Refs #13343
## What Changed
- Use visual viewport local coordinates for the new task dialog.
- Give the mobile Radix popper wrapper full viewport geometry.
- Render both shared selector components as large, titled mobile modals.
- Keep desktop selectors as anchored popovers.
- Cover the new-task assignee, new-task project, composer assignee, and
generic searchable selector in Storybook.
- Add iPhone-sized Storybook states for the assignee and project
pickers.
- Update viewport tests for the corrected coordinate model.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx
src/components/InlineEntitySelector.test.tsx`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- Playwright used the iPhone 14 device profile. All mobile modals were
inside the 390 by 664 CSS viewport.
- Each mobile modal was `x=16, y=16, width=358, height=632`.
- A desktop check kept the anchored popover at `width=320, height=211`.
## Risks
- Low risk. The CSS only changes narrow mobile viewports.
- The full-screen popper wrapper does not receive pointer events. The
picker still receives pointer events.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI GPT-5.6, Codex agent with tool use and code execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant Storybook documentation to reflect my
changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The new task dialog lets an operator assign work on a phone.
> - The mobile picker used fixed coordinates inside the Radix wrapper.
> - iOS Safari already makes fixed coordinates relative to the visual
viewport.
> - The old code added the visual viewport offset a second time.
> - This pull request removes the second offset and gives the mobile
wrapper full viewport geometry.
> - The benefit is a visible picker and search field when the iOS
keyboard opens.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
The assignee and project pickers could move outside the visible screen
in the new task dialog on iOS.
**What did you expect to happen?**
The picker and its search field must stay visible above the bottom edge
and the software keyboard.
**Steps to reproduce**
Open the new task dialog on an iPhone. Select Assignee or Project. The
picker can move outside the visual viewport when Safari pans the page.
**Paperclip version or commit**
The problem exists after the change in PR #13343.
**Deployment mode**
The problem affects the board UI in local and authenticated modes.
Refs #13343
## What Changed
- Use visual viewport local coordinates for the new task dialog.
- Give the mobile Radix popper wrapper full viewport geometry.
- Keep the mobile picker at the visible bottom edge.
- Add iPhone-sized Storybook states for the assignee and project
pickers.
- Update viewport tests for the corrected coordinate model.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run
src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx
src/components/InlineEntitySelector.test.tsx`
- `pnpm check:token-gates`
- Playwright used the iPhone 14 device profile. Both picker boxes were
inside the 390 by 664 CSS viewport.
- The assignee picker box was `x=16, y=366, width=358, height=282`.
- The project picker box was `x=16, y=366, width=358, height=282`.
## Risks
- Low risk. The CSS only changes narrow mobile viewports.
- The full-screen popper wrapper does not receive pointer events. The
picker still receives pointer events.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- OpenAI GPT-5.6, Codex agent with tool use and code execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
ID
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant Storybook documentation to reflect my
changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Preserve native coordinator ownership while accepted results await workspace
copy-back, assessment, or arbitration. Check that ownership in the terminal
update so a coordinator recorded after the liveness read is also protected.
Keep terminal task authority and exhausted-retry cleanup unchanged.
Validation: 28 focused recovery tests, local typecheck/build, 52 passing CI
checks, and Greptile 5/5 with no open findings.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Keep assigned app tools accessible when the combined Runner catalog exceeds
its operation or byte limits. Reserve task and completion tools, then expose
bounded discovery and call tools for large catalogs. Fetch oversized schemas
in reauthorized chunks without blocking later search results.
Retain task ownership, work-mode restrictions, pinned assignments, current
gateway authorization, approvals, and audit. Small catalogs stay direct.
Validation: 46 focused server tests, two Runner capacity tests, local
typecheck/build, 52 passing CI checks, and Greptile 5/5 with no open findings.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip coordinates agent work across task turns.
> - Warm runners need reusable sandbox leases.
> - Lease acquisition read only the environment reuse setting.
> - Startup then read the agent's new warm setting and rejected the
ephemeral lease.
> - This fix requests reuse before acquisition, with provider checks
intact.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
Switching an existing native runner task from per-turn to warm fails
with `runner_warm_environment_requires_reusable_lease`. Environment
`reuseLease` defaults to false. Acquisition therefore creates an
ephemeral lease, and capability narrowing correctly denies reuse.
**Expected behavior**
Changing lifecycle between turns requests a compatible lease without
replacing the task workspace or changing the shared environment.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a native runner task with inherited lifecycle and environment
reuse disabled.
2. Change the agent from per-turn to warm.
3. Continue the task on a reusable-capable sandbox provider.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced on `a6c4e7a`. Related: #12904 established warm workspace
continuity; this fixes the earlier lease-selection mismatch.
## What Changed
- Pass agent settings into acquisition and derive a run-scoped reuse
request.
- Respect explicit environment lifecycle overrides; leave other adapters
unchanged.
- Keep provider capability, ownership, cleanup and restore gates intact.
- Add orchestration and database-backed transition tests; document the
contract.
## Verification
- Red: three new assertions failed before the fix.
- Green: 156 tests pass in environment-run-orchestrator,
environment-runtime, native-sandbox-lifecycle, and
environment-execution-target-capabilities.
- Database-backed regression proves ephemeral → reusable → resumed
lease, same workspace, and unchanged stored environment. Provider RPCs
are mocked, not live Daytona.
- `git diff --check` passes.
- Latest-head CI passes typecheck, build, tests, runner checks, E2E, and
canary dry run. Greptile: 5/5; no open threads.
- Recovery uses the persisted lifecycle. Direct regression: red before,
six cases green after. CI runs the added Vitest cases.
- Full local checks were unavailable (missing dependencies and earlier
memory limits).
## Risks
Warm mode now requests retained resources despite an environment's
default `reuseLease:false`. Existing idle timeout and cleanup still
apply. Unsupported providers remain denied. No migration, credential
[REDACTED], or shared-environment mutation.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex agent; reasoning, code editing and test execution. Exact
model ID and context size were not exposed to this run.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details available)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket [REDACTED] or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run targeted tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native runner exposes tools for company tasks.
> - API search and call tools cover operations without a dedicated tool.
> - The current default hides these tools unless an operator sets an
environment variable.
> - This pull request enables the tools when that variable is absent.
> - Operators can still disable the tools or restrict them to selected
companies.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #13003, which added the guarded API tools.
**What happened?**
The native runner does not advertise `search_api` or `call_api` with the
default server configuration.
**Expected behavior**
The tools are available without a special environment variable. Existing
authorization checks still apply.
**Steps to reproduce**
Remove `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_API_TOOLS_ENABLED` and
`PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_API_TOOLS_COMPANY_IDS`. Create a normal runner
authority. Inspect its tool definitions.
**Paperclip version or commit**
a6c4e7a.
## What Changed
- Enable API tools when the server flag is absent.
- Keep explicit disable, invalid-value rejection, company restrictions,
and binding restrictions.
- Test default tool definitions and run HTTP integration tests without
the enabling flag.
- Update operator and hiring documentation. The existing shared gate
also controls `hire_agent`.
- Use the same policy in the E2E evidence summary so an unset flag is
not reported as disabled.
- Isolate default-availability tests from operator environment
variables.
## Verification
- Red test: two new rollout policy assertions failed before the fix.
- Focused policy, authority, and HTTP tests: 3 files passed; 41 tests
passed, 2 skipped. The two runnerd transport cases require a Rust-built
binary absent from this workspace.
- Command: `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/services/native-runtime/runner-api-rollout.test.ts
server/src/services/native-runtime/paperclip-runner-tool-authority.test.ts
server/src/services/native-runtime/runner-api.integration.test.ts`.
- Attempted `pnpm -r typecheck`: blocked by missing `cargo` in this
workspace.
- Attempted `pnpm build`: terminated at the 4 GiB memory limit.
- Attempted `pnpm test:run`: stopped after memory pressure to run
focused tests alone.
- Repeated the 41 passing focused tests with an inherited disabled flag
and a foreign-company restriction; test isolation passed.
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`: 44 files and 543 tests passed.
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` exceeded the workspace memory limit,
including a retry with bounded Go memory settings.
- CI results will be recorded before handoff.
## Risks
- More native runs can discover API tools and the existing `hire_agent`
tool by default.
- The change does not remove company, run, mode, credential, lifecycle,
or approval checks.
- Explicit operator restrictions still take precedence. No database
migration is required.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex agent. The runtime does not expose the exact model ID or
context-window size. Used reasoning, repository tools, shell execution,
and tests.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
