mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 21:05:21 +02:00
fa40a1b8d502ac19cfca2fcc5bbbdbf331410787
3828
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Devin Foleyandgithub-actions[bot]
|
fa40a1b8d5 |
docs(release): canonicalize stable notes for v2026.824.0 (#12139)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Stable notes are drafted beta-keyed during the soak and published verbatim as the GitHub Release > - After the stable ships, the canonicalize job moves the file to its durable home, releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md > - v2026.824.0 just shipped from the master-side beta notes, and the job pushed this rename branch > - This pull request lands that rename, keeping the stable-notes record complete at the canonical path > - The benefit is one canonical notes location per stable, with the pinned shipped content ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The `releases/` record on master after the v2026.824.0 promotion. **Current behavior** The shipped notes live at `releases/beta/v2026.818.0-beta.1.md`; `releases/v2026.824.0.md` does not exist. **Proposed behavior** The file moves to `releases/v2026.824.0.md`, content pinned to the revision the release read (machine-generated by the `canonicalize_stable_notes` job). **Reason and benefit** The durable stable-notes invariant holds: every shipped stable has its notes at `releases/vYYYY.MDD.P.md`. ## What Changed - `git mv`-equivalent rename of the beta-keyed notes to `releases/v2026.824.0.md`, exactly as the release published them. ## Verification - Branch pushed by the release run's `canonicalize_stable_notes` job (run 32806191945) from the preflight-pinned notes revision; the GitHub Release v2026.824.0 body matches this content. ## Risks - None; docs-only rename. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Claude Code) — PR opened for the machine-pushed branch; a GITHUB_TOKEN-created PR would not run required checks. ## Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.825.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
14867bd186 |
test(release-smoke): follow the mission-less onboarding reorder (#12135)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The nightly release lane publishes only after the release smoke suite passes against the newest canary > - Onboarding was reordered: step 1 now creates the company and routes straight to the agent step, and the mission step is gone (collected later in the tenant app, deliberately writing no goal) > - The smoke spec still walked the removed mission step, so the scheduled nightly has been red since the reorder shipped > - This pull request updates the spec to the current flow and asserts the deliberate empty goal list > - The benefit is a green nightly lane and an unblocked beta promotion from current master ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The scheduled `Release` nightly run fails in `smoke_nightly / smoke` since 2026-08-23 (runs 32630184811, 32710905212): `docker-auth-onboarding.spec.ts` waits for the `Define your mission` heading after step 1, but the wizard now routes 1 → 3 with no mission step (the step buttons literally skip from 1 to 3). The retry then fails on step 1 because the first attempt's company persists. **Expected behavior** The smoke passes against canaries carrying the reordered wizard, and the nightly lane publishes again. **Steps to reproduce** Run `scripts/docker-onboard-smoke.sh` with `PAPERCLIPAI_VERSION=2026.824.0-canary.7` and `pnpm run test:release-smoke` against it. **Paperclip version or commit** `2026.824.0-canary.7` Related (not duplicates): #11565 updated this same spec for the chat-first rewrite; this is the follow-up for the mission-less reorder. ## What Changed - Remove the mission-step interaction; step 1's "Next" now creates the company and the spec goes straight to the agent step. - Replace the mission-goal API assertion with the truthful one: onboarding deliberately writes no goal, so a fresh company's goal list is empty. - Update step comments to match the shipped flow. ## Verification - Local run of the exact CI harness against `paperclipai@2026.824.0-canary.7`: 1 passed (6.8s), exit 0. - The suite's remaining API assertions (company, CEO agent, seeded task assignment, landed issue URL, assignment-sourced heartbeat run) pass unchanged. ## Risks - Low risk: test-only. The spec remains copy-coupled to the wizard — this is the third drift in two weeks; stable `data-testid` hooks in the wizard remain the durable fix and can follow separately. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Claude Code) ## Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue templatecanary/v2026.825.0-canary.1 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
890ab9acfe |
feat(release): thorough notes skeletons — nest each PR's summary at creation (#12124)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The release workflow drafts the upcoming stable's notes skeleton the moment a beta publishes > - That skeleton was a bare list of commit subjects, so the notes only reached the shipped stable's depth after a later authoring pass during the soak > - Stable release notes are consistently verbose and thorough; the initial draft should start that way too > - This pull request nests each referenced PR's own summary under its subject line at creation time, and states the density bar in the authoring skill > - The benefit is a thorough raw document from day one of the soak, with no LLM tokens in Actions ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The `draft_stable_notes` skeleton generated at beta publish (`scripts/draft-stable-notes.sh`). **Current behavior** The skeleton groups bare commit subjects by conventional-commit type. All substance arrives later, when a maintainer or agent rewrites it — reviewed maintainer feedback: stable notes are a lot more verbose, and the initial beta notes should be consistent with that. **Proposed behavior** Each subject that references a PR carries that PR's own summary nested beneath it — the PR template's "What Changed" bullets, else the first prose lines — fetched best-effort via `gh` and skipped silently when unavailable. The release-changelog skill now states the density bar explicitly: the beta-keyed draft ships verbatim as the stable's notes and is written at the previous stable's depth from the first pass. **Reason and benefit** The notes author starts from a thorough raw document instead of a commit list, and beta-time notes match the verbosity the stable will ship with. ## What Changed - `scripts/draft-stable-notes.sh`: `enrich_pr` nests PR summaries under subjects; best-effort (`gh` failure or `DRAFT_NOTES_SKIP_PR_ENRICHMENT=1` degrades to today's output); pipefail-safe when a "What Changed" section has no bullets. - `.github/workflows/release.yml`: the `draft_stable_notes` step gets `GH_TOKEN` so `gh` can read PR bodies. - `.agents/skills/release-changelog/SKILL.md`: "write at full stable depth from the first pass" guideline. - `scripts/draft-stable-notes.test.mjs`: three new tests — enrichment rendering via a fake `gh`, silent degradation without one, and the sparse-body case that previously killed the script under `set -o pipefail`. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/draft-stable-notes.test.mjs` — 11 pass. - Live run against the real repository for the current beta (`2026.818.0-beta.1`, 172 commits): exit 0, 439 nested summary lines; spot-checked entries carry the correct PRs' What Changed bullets. - `bash -n` on the script; `release.yml` re-parsed as YAML. ## Risks - Low: the publish path is untouched; enrichment is read-only `gh` calls in the post-publish draft job and degrades to the current skeleton on any failure. Roughly one API call per commit in the range (~170 today) — well inside the token's rate budget, adds a couple of minutes to a job with a 10-minute timeout. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Claude Code) ## Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
ae9711da48 |
docs(release): re-date the 2026.818.0-beta.1 stable notes to v2026.824.0 (#12113)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Stable versions date the promotion, and the promotion reads its notes from master > - The merged notes for beta 2026.818.0-beta.1 assumed an Aug 21 promotion; the beta soaked longer > - This pull request re-dates the header to today's resolved version, v2026.824.0 > - The benefit is a GitHub Release whose title, date, and body agree ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The stable notes header for the promotion happening today. **Current behavior** `releases/beta/v2026.818.0-beta.1.md` is titled `# Paperclip v2026.821.0`, `> Released: 2026-08-21`. **Proposed behavior** `# Paperclip v2026.824.0`, `> Released: 2026-08-24` — matching `./scripts/release.sh stable --date 2026-08-24 --print-version`. **Reason and benefit** The file publishes verbatim as the GitHub Release body; the header should match the version actually minted. ## What Changed - Three header/intro lines re-dated. Nothing else. ## Verification - `./scripts/release.sh stable --date 2026-08-24 --print-version` → `2026.824.0`. ## Risks - None; docs-only. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Claude Code) ## Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue templatecanary/v2026.825.0-canary.0 nightly/v2026.825.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
d1573244b5 |
refactor: disambiguate the Telemetry and Observability data paths (#12128)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip records first-party events, OpenTelemetry data, and local run-log events > - The code and documents used one term for these three data paths > - This naming made the required review level unclear > - This pull request names each data path in the module names, documents, and code comments > - The benefit is a clear review rule without a runtime change ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Unclear or confusing. **Where is the issue?** `packages/shared/src/telemetry/README.md`, `doc/observability.md`, `doc/run-log-events.md`, and the duplex instrumentation modules. **What's wrong?** The repository used Telemetry for first-party events, OpenTelemetry data, and local run-log events. This usage made the data path and review level unclear. **Suggested fix** Use Telemetry only for Paperclip first-party events. Use Observability for OpenTelemetry data. Use the run log for rows in `heartbeat_run_events`. Related public pull requests: #8476 and #9672. ## What Changed - Rename the duplex instrumentation modules and identifiers from `Telemetry` to `Observability`. - Move the Observability and run-log contracts out of the Telemetry README. - Add `doc/observability.md` and `doc/run-log-events.md` as the canonical documents. - Add a file-path review rule to `AGENTS.md`. - Correct the remaining code comments that name the wrong data path. - Keep all event names, payloads, database records, spans, configuration keys, environment variables, and runtime paths unchanged. ## Verification - `npx vitest run packages/shared/src/telemetry/readme-contract.test.ts` passes. - `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/published-exports.test.ts` passes. - `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/startup-timing.test.ts` passes with 42 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` passes. - `pnpm --filter server typecheck` passes. - The old module name does not remain in TypeScript or JSON files, except for the intentional publication guard. - CI and Greptile checks remain pending after PR creation. ## Risks - The old duplex module subpath no longer has a compatibility shim. The board accepted this intentional hard break. - The new duplex module subpath stays blocked from package publication. - The change has no runtime effect. The main risk is an incorrect document or module reference. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5`, with tool use and code review support. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR with the documentation issue fields - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
42b8f7ab2f |
feat(runner): authorize semantic tool dispatch (#12126)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The runner package defines a provider-neutral protocol and semantic action catalog. > - Catalog membership alone must not grant access to an action. > - Each run needs current company, actor, task, claim, mode, and application-binding authority. > - Mutating actions also need safe retry behavior and durable receipts. > - This pull request adds a package-local authority and dispatch layer. > - The benefit is a small and testable trust boundary before server integration lands. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11962 This pull request replaces one bounded part of the archived large runner change. ## What Changed - Add run-scoped tool projection and optional tool discovery. - Require an explicit application binding before an action is visible. - Intersect actor claims with claims delegated to the run. - Recheck company, actor, task, mode, state, role, claim, and policy authority before each call. - Validate action input and output with the canonical catalog schemas. - Redact protected values and keep raw tool content out of semantic receipts. - Require atomic idempotency claims for mutating actions. - Replay exact completed retries and reject changed or concurrent retries. - Recover a durable completed receipt if the primary receipt commit fails, without re-executing the mutation. - Add bounded authorization records and PRP semantic input and result receipts. - Document that this change adds no server binding or production tool installation. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - `pnpm build` - 60 package TypeScript tests pass. - 56 Rust unit and integration tests pass. - Protocol, replay, and cross-language conformance checks pass. - `pnpm test:run` completed with 4,684 passing and 19 skipped tests. It reproduced 32 local baseline failures across 9 unchanged server files; all corresponding hosted test shards pass. - Every applicable GitHub Actions gate passes. The Storybook job skipped because this PR has no UI changes. - Socket and Snyk pass with no findings. Superagent completed neutral with zero annotations because its external sandbox did not start within 120 seconds. - Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved actionable comments. - The diff changes 11 files. ## Risks The main risk is an authorization or idempotency error at the tool boundary. The dispatcher fails closed for malformed authority, unavailable receipt storage, stale authority, unauthorized actions, protected input, invalid binding output, and unrecoverable receipt completion. The receipt store must recover a completed mutation outcome idempotently if its primary commit fails; otherwise the claim remains reserved for operator recovery rather than allowing automated re-execution. Unbound actions are absent. No server or provider installs these tools in this change. Existing adapters and application behavior do not change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. Agentic coding mode used repository tools, code execution, and automated tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the affected tests locally and they pass; full-suite baseline exceptions are documented above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.824.0-canary.7 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
23048f1219 |
Add canonical semantic action catalog to Paperclip Runner (#12121)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner now has a durable PRP transport and a Codex provider bridge. > - Codex must use stable, provider-neutral action contracts before Paperclip can grant run-scoped tool access. > - A catalog must describe actions without granting permission to discover or invoke them. > - Generated inventory must stay synchronized with its TypeScript source. > - This pull request adds the canonical Codex-spine semantic action catalog inside the runner package. > - The benefit is a small review unit for schemas and inventory before authorization and dispatch land. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This pull request extends private runner infrastructure in `packages/paperclip-runner`. **Problem or motivation** The Codex provider bridge has no canonical description of the Paperclip actions that a later authorization layer can project into a run. Independent operation lists can drift in names, claims, task modes, effects, and input bounds. **Proposed solution** Add one immutable v1 catalog for the first 27 Codex-spine actions. Give each action a stable identifier, placement, effect, required claims, supported task modes, and JSON Schema input and output contracts. Generate a deterministic JSON inventory from that source and fail package checks on drift. **Alternatives considered** The combined runner branch contains larger live and scenario catalogs with authorization, bindings, labs, and other providers. That change is too large for this review unit. A generic API escape hatch would also bypass the operation-level boundary, so this catalog excludes it. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports the governed tool access direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not add a tool gateway, application binding, server endpoint, or production authorization decision. **Additional context** Refs #12111 and #11962. Pull request #12111 was squash-merged first. This branch starts at the resulting `master` commit. Its delta is 10 files. ## What Changed - Added 27 versioned, provider-neutral semantic action declarations for the Codex spine. - Added bounded JSON Schema input contracts and normalized operation receipt output contracts. - Added placement, effect, claim, mode, and role metadata. - Added a deeply frozen public catalog and an operation lookup helper. - Added a deterministic checked-in JSON inventory and generation commands. - Added a byte-for-byte drift gate to the package build. - Added AJV schema compilation, mutation-bound, forged-field, immutability, inventory, and non-executable-boundary tests. - Exported only the catalog types and declarations from the existing package root. - Documented that catalog membership does not grant discovery, authorization, dispatch, or application binding. - Kept server code, UI code, other providers, scenario-only actions, labs, generic API access, authorization, dispatch, and receipts processing out of this pull request. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` passes. - TypeScript protocol tests pass: 8 Node tests and 49 Vitest tests. - All package Rust tests and conformance and replay parity checks pass. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:semantic-action-catalog` passes. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - `pnpm build` passes. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - Prettier and `git diff --check` pass for the changed source and documentation files. - The generated catalog matches its source byte for byte. - The secret scan is clean. - The delta against `master` is 10 files. `pnpm-lock.yaml` is unchanged. - `pnpm test:run` completed locally with 4,692 passing tests, 19 skipped tests, and 24 failures in 8 unchanged server test files. The failures reproduce the established local macOS path-alias, listener, and workspace-runtime baseline. No changed-file test failed. Linux CI remains the repository handoff authority. - The full Linux PR workflow passes, including the aggregate `verify` gate. - Snyk, Socket, Superagent security, and supply-chain checks pass. - Greptile is 5/5 with no actionable comments, recommendations, or follow-ups. - Storybook visual regression skipped by design because this pull request changes no UI file. - Browser and migration tests are not applicable because this pull request changes no server, UI, database, or migration file. ## Risks Production behavior is unchanged because no consumer projects this catalog into a provider run. The main risks are contract drift, unbounded mutation input, forged scope fields, accidental executable authority, and generated inventory drift. Closed input schemas, explicit bounds, a frozen catalog, tests, and the byte drift gate cover these risks. The later authorization layer must still bind every action to the active run and company before discovery or invocation. I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This change is private contract infrastructure for the governed tool access direction. It does not duplicate a shipped or public product surface. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 was used. The exact serving model ID and context size were not exposed. The model used high reasoning, repository tools, GitHub tools, and local code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4ffa8de4e2 |
Add Codex provider bridge to Paperclip Runner (#12111)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The package-local runner now has a durable PRP transport, but it cannot execute a real provider. > - The first provider must preserve PRP identities while using Codex native thread and turn identities. > - Recovery must resume the same Codex thread without starting a duplicate turn. > - Provider output must become bounded and provider-neutral before it crosses PRP. > - Semantic tools must remain unavailable until the catalog and authorization layers exist. > - This pull request adds the Codex provider bridge inside the runner package only. > - The benefit is a reviewable provider slice with no server or user-facing behavior change. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This pull request extends private provider infrastructure in `packages/paperclip-runner`. **Problem or motivation** The durable runner from #12100 has no production provider. It cannot start Codex app-server, map its events, cancel or steer a turn, deliver a structured question, or recover a native thread after process restart. **Proposed solution** Add a supervised Codex app-server transport and a normalized runner backend. Persist the Codex thread and active turn identities. Resume and inspect the exact thread after restart. Convert supported notifications into bounded PRP events. Keep the dynamic tool inventory empty. **Alternatives considered** The combined runner branch implements several providers, semantic tools, server coordination, and UI integration together. That change is too large for one review unit. Reusing the direct `codex_local` adapter would also couple this package layer to the existing server execution path. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports the governed tools and self-healing run direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not add a server endpoint, runtime adapter, rollout flag, or user-facing behavior. **Additional context** Refs #12100 and #11962. Pull request #12100 was squash-merged first. This branch starts at the resulting `master` commit. Its current delta is 16 files. ## What Changed - Added a Codex-only app-server process transport with bounded JSONL frames and buffered notifications. - Added strict provider descriptor validation for the Codex driver, working directory, launch arguments, model, instructions, and non-interactive approval policy. - Started new Codex threads with an empty dynamic tool inventory and the named workspace-only permission profile. - Added native turn start, steering, interruption, cancellation, thread reads, and structured question responses. - Added thread and active-turn binding checks for provider requests and notifications. - Added provider-neutral normalization for session, turn, item, plan, usage, tool execution, notice, and structured input events. - Bounded and redacted provider text and process output before durable persistence. - Added private atomic provider state for the descriptor, thread ID, account session ID, active turn ID, and unacknowledged normalized events. - Added exact-thread recovery through `thread/resume` and `thread/read`. Recovery does not issue another `turn/start` for an active turn. - Preserved active native turn identity across unexpected provider exit and reconciled it before later start, interrupt, or snapshot commands. - Added stable provider-event identities, per-event durable commit and acknowledgement, and a bounded fingerprint receipt journal that prevents duplicate delivery across outbox and provider-ack crash windows. - Extended the durable command executor with provider event polling and explicit process shutdown on stop, suspend, revocation, lease expiry, and runtime expiry. - Preserved completed shutdown behavior when the command result is replayed after a disconnect. - Added a fake Codex app-server and integration tests for response buffering, structured questions, interruption, provider exit, unacknowledged-event recovery, durable resume, and duplicate-turn prevention. - Added a focused `test:codex` package command for the provider integration suite. - Kept server code, UI code, other providers, semantic catalogs, tool authorization, and production runtime selection out of this pull request. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` passes. - TypeScript contract tests pass: 8 Node tests and 44 Vitest tests. - Rust tests pass: 43 unit tests, 5 Codex integration tests, 3 public durable-recovery tests, 2 local-runner tests, and 3 process-supervisor tests. - Rust conformance and replay parity checks pass against the shared PRP fixtures. - `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -A clippy::filter-map-bool-then -D warnings` passes. The narrow allow covers an unchanged replay implementation from the preceding contract pull request. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - `pnpm build` passes. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - `git diff --check` passes. - The delta against `master` is 16 files. The package lockfile is unchanged. The PR workflow generates its temporary lockfile artifact from the changed package manifest. - `pnpm test:run` completed locally with 4,690 passing tests, 19 skipped tests, and 26 failures in 8 unchanged server test files. The failures reproduce the established local macOS path-alias, listener, port-range, and workspace-runtime baseline. No changed-file test failed. Linux CI remains the repository handoff authority. - Browser and migration tests are not applicable because this pull request changes no server, UI, database, or migration file. - The full Linux PR workflow passes. One unchanged heartbeat recovery test timed out on the first pass and passed on the failed-only rerun; the aggregate `verify` gate is green. - Greptile is 5/5 on the final commit. All four review threads are resolved. ## Risks Production behavior is unchanged because no server code starts this provider. The main risks are a provider process escape, cross-thread event confusion, secret leakage, duplicated turns, duplicated or lost provider events, lost questions, and unsafe recovery. Process-group supervision, identity binding, private bounded state, redaction, durable command replay, retained event acknowledgements, bounded durable receipts, exact-thread reconciliation, and integration tests cover these risks. Semantic tools remain undiscoverable in this layer. I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This change is private provider infrastructure for planned control-plane work. It does not duplicate a shipped or public product surface. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 was used. The exact serving model ID and context size were not exposed. The model used high reasoning, repository tools, GitHub tools, and local code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.824.0-canary.6 |
||
|
|
dc621184a1 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#12094)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - CI owns pnpm-lock.yaml: manifest-changing PRs merge without it, and this automation lands the regenerated lockfile right after > - The runner-supervision and PRP-transport merges (#12095, #12100) added devDependencies to packages/paperclip-runner, desyncing the lockfile > - Every frozen-lockfile install on master has failed since, taking CI down repo-wide > - This pull request lands the regenerated entries for the paperclip-runner importer > - The benefit is CI works again on every branch ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Since #12095 merged, every CI job fails in ~15 seconds at `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile`: the lockfile's `packages/paperclip-runner` importer does not match its `package.json`. **Expected behavior** `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` succeeds on master. **Steps to reproduce** `npx pnpm@9.15.4 install --frozen-lockfile` on master before this change. **Paperclip version or commit** master at `b76e36d6c`. ## What Changed - `pnpm-lock.yaml` regenerated by the refresh automation (pnpm 9.15.4, `--lockfile-only`); the diff covers only the `packages/paperclip-runner` importer's new devDependencies. A human empty commit triggered the required checks (the automation's `GITHUB_TOKEN` push cannot — fix proposed in #12115). ## Verification - `npx pnpm@9.15.4 install --frozen-lockfile` verified locally against this exact lockfile content (fails on master without it). - Full required suite green on this PR (30 checks). ## Risks - None beyond lockfile content; the diff touches no version outside the paperclip-runner importer. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Claude Code) — body authored on behalf of the lockfile automation. ## Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template --------- Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b76e36d6cf |
Add durable PRP transport and recovery (#12100)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The package-local runner can supervise a local process, but it cannot yet survive a broken controller connection. > - A production transport must authenticate both peers without putting the bootstrap secret on the wire. > - Commands and events must remain bounded, ordered, and recoverable across reconnects and crashes. > - Retrying an uncertain side effect is unsafe, so indeterminate outcomes must fail closed instead of running twice. > - This pull request adds those transport and recovery guarantees inside the runner package only. > - The benefit is a durable PRP boundary that can be reviewed before any provider or server integration exists. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This pull request extends private transport infrastructure in `packages/paperclip-runner`. **Problem or motivation** The local runner introduced by #12095 has no authenticated network handshake, durable outbox, reconnect lease, cumulative acknowledgement, or crash-safe command journal. A dropped connection could otherwise lose an event or tempt a controller to repeat a side effect whose outcome is unknown. **Proposed solution** Add an authenticated PRP v1 WebSocket transport, encrypted frames, lease-based reconnects, a bounded durable event outbox, cumulative acknowledgements, and an idempotent command journal. Preserve pending commands before execution and classify the crash window as indeterminate so an uncertain side effect is never repeated automatically. **Alternatives considered** The combined runner branch implements transport together with Codex, semantic tools, and server coordination. That change is too large for one review unit. Keeping transport in memory would make reconnect and crash recovery unverifiable. Re-running a pending command after restart would weaken the at-most-once side-effect boundary. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports the governed tools and self-healing run direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not add a production provider, server endpoint, adapter, feature flag, or user-facing behavior. **Additional context** Refs #12095 and #11962. Pull request #12095 was squash-merged first. This branch has been rebased onto the resulting `master` commit, and its current delta is 13 files. ## What Changed - Added a loopback-only WebSocket connection policy with one-time DNS resolution and pinned reconnect addresses. - Added an HMAC mutual-authentication handshake that never sends the bootstrap ticket over the socket. - Added AES-256-GCM secure frames with per-direction keys, monotonic counters, and session-bound authenticated data. - Added one-use bootstrap-ticket handling and lease-based reconnect validation with expiry, revocation, and epoch checks. - Added a private, symlink-resistant state directory with atomic, synchronized state replacement. - Added a bounded durable event outbox, priority-zero reserve, cumulative acknowledgements, and reconnect replay of only the unacknowledged suffix. - Added a bounded command journal with contiguous sequence enforcement, persistent results, and deterministic duplicate responses. Duplicate replay requires a SHA-256 match over the complete canonical command. - Persisted commands before their effects. A crash after persistence but before result storage returns an indeterminate terminal result and does not execute the command again. - Migrated pre-fingerprint command journals by compacting through their persisted controller cursor. Legacy redelivery fails closed instead of reconstructing an incomplete identity or repeating an uncertain effect. - Added strict limits and validation for frames, state, results, outbox entries, command history, and redacted diagnostics. - Added a transport-only `paperclip-runnerd --connect-url` mode. It handles lifecycle commands and rejects provider commands because no provider is present in this pull request. - Added a full disconnect-before-ack fault test that reconnects with the lease, replays identical command and event state, and proves the effect ran once. - Kept provider transports, semantic tools, server integration, and production runtime selection out of this pull request. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` passes. - TypeScript contract tests pass: 8 Node tests and 44 Vitest tests. - Rust tests pass: 33 unit tests, 3 public durable-recovery integration tests, plus the existing 2 local-runner and 3 process-supervisor tests. - The disconnect-before-ack, lease reconnect, duplicate command, malformed state, unknown command, bounds, and crash-window tests pass. - Rust conformance and replay parity checks pass against the shared PRP fixtures. - `cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -A clippy::filter-map-bool-then -D warnings` passes. The narrow allow covers an unchanged replay implementation from the preceding contract pull request. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes. - `pnpm build` passes. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - `git diff --check` passes. - The delta against `master` is 13 files. The package lockfile is unchanged. - `pnpm test:run` completed locally with 4,686 passing tests, 19 skipped tests, and 30 failures in 8 unchanged server test files. The failures reproduce the established local macOS path-alias, listener, port-range, and workspace-runtime baseline. No changed-file test failed; Linux CI remains the repository handoff authority. - Storybook visual regression is not applicable because this pull request changes no UI or story files. ## Risks Production behavior is unchanged because no server code starts or connects to this transport. The main risks are secret disclosure, forged or replayed frames, state corruption, unbounded disk growth, duplicated side effects, and incorrect recovery. Mutual authentication, encrypted counter-bound frames, private atomic state, explicit bounds, cumulative acknowledgements, a durable command journal, fail-closed indeterminate recovery, and fault-injection tests cover these risks. I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This change is private transport infrastructure for planned control-plane work. It does not duplicate a shipped or public product surface. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 was used. The exact serving model ID and context size were not exposed. The model used high reasoning, repository tools, GitHub tools, and local code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
6b20cc97cc |
Add local fake runner supervision (#12095)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner needs a small local process model before it can connect to a production provider or server. > - The TypeScript PRP contracts now define the expected replay behavior. > - A second language implementation must produce the same result from the same fixtures. > - Local child processes also need bounded input, bounded output, and complete descendant cleanup. > - This pull request adds a package-local Rust runner, a scripted fake harness, and deterministic parity checks. > - The benefit is a testable process boundary with no production Paperclip behavior change. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This pull request adds private test infrastructure to `packages/paperclip-runner`. **Problem or motivation** The PRP contracts have no second implementation on `master`. There is also no small harness that can prove process cleanup, command idempotency, terminal reconciliation, or bounded JSONL handling without a production provider. **Proposed solution** Add a minimal Rust workspace. Add a local runner process, a scripted fake harness, a bounded process supervisor, and Rust conformance and replay checks. Keep all binaries package-local. Do not connect them to the Paperclip server. **Alternatives considered** The combined runner branch includes provider transports, durable networking, SDKs, labs, and server behavior. That change is too large for this review unit. A TypeScript-only harness would not test cross-language contract parity. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports the governed tools and self-healing run direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not add a user-facing runtime, adapter, endpoint, or rollout flag. **Additional context** Refs #12091 and #11962. Pull request #12091 was merged before this branch opened. This branch is based on the current `master`. Its delta is 25 files. ## What Changed - Added a minimal locked Rust workspace with only `serde` and `serde_json` dependencies. - Added a package-local `paperclip-runnerd` local mode and a scripted fake harness. - Added bounded controller input, harness input, subprocess output queues, line sizes, log retention, script sizes, script steps, and command history. - Added contiguous controller and harness sequence checks and equivalent-command replay handling. - Added process-group supervision that cleans up child processes and remaining descendants after forced or natural harness exit. - Added runner-owned terminal reconciliation for success, failure, interruption, cancellation, controller closure, and protocol failure. - Added Rust conformance output and deterministic replay summaries for the shared PRP fixtures. - Added fake scripts for success, failure, interruption, interaction, duplicate terminal output, process cleanup, and oversized output. - Added package scripts and documentation for the Rust and cross-language checks. - Kept provider transport, server integration, semantic tools, and production runtime selection out of this pull request. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:all` passes. - TypeScript contract tests pass: 8 Node tests and 44 Vitest tests. - Rust tests pass: 20 unit tests, 2 local-runner tests, and 3 process-supervisor tests. - The Rust conformance and replay parity checks pass against the shared fixtures. - The natural-exit and forced-exit tests confirm that the harness and its worker process are stopped. - The oversized-frame test confirms that a harness frame above the configured limit is rejected. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes after the final rebase to `master`. - `pnpm build` passes after the final rebase to `master`. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - `git diff --check` passes. - The delta against `master` is 25 files. The package lockfile is unchanged. - `pnpm test:run` completed locally with 4,686 passing tests, 19 skipped tests, and 30 failures in 8 unchanged server test files. The failures are local macOS path-alias, listener, port-range, and workspace-runtime baseline failures. No changed-file test failed, and every applicable Linux CI shard passes. - Storybook visual regression skipped intentionally because this pull request changes no UI or story files. ## Risks Low production risk. No server code invokes the new binaries. The package remains private. The main risks are process leaks, unbounded local input, and cross-language drift. Bounded queues and sizes, process-group cleanup tests, fixture manifests, and parity checks cover these risks. I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This change is private test infrastructure for planned control-plane work. It does not duplicate a shipped or public product surface. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 was used. The exact serving model ID and context size were not exposed. The model used high reasoning, repository tools, GitHub tools, and local code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
83fefaadd1 |
fix(grok_local): do not warn when the default model sentinel is unavailable (#12062)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Each agent runs under an adapter. The `grok_local` adapter runs the Grok Build CLI. > - The adapter has an environment test. It probes the CLI and reports checks to the operator. > - `DEFAULT_GROK_LOCAL_MODEL` is `"grok-build"`. This value is a sentinel. It means "use the Grok CLI's own default model". > - `execute.ts` only passes `--model` when the configured model differs from the sentinel. So the sentinel is never sent to grok. > - The environment test still compared the sentinel to the models that `grok models` lists. Real grok never lists `grok-build`. > - So every probe emitted a false "Configured model not found" warning, even on a correctly configured agent. > - This pull request stops the false warning and keeps the real check for user-set models. > - The benefit is an accurate environment test: operators see a warning only when it is real. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. The problem, in bug-report form: **What happened?** The `grok_local` environment test always warns `Configured model "grok-build" not found in available models`, even when the agent works. `grok-build` is the default sentinel, not a real model id, and it is never sent to the CLI. **Expected behavior** When the model is left at the default, the test reports the CLI's own default model as info and does not warn. It warns only when a user sets a real model that `grok models` does not list. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a `grok_local` agent and leave the model at its default. 2. Run the adapter environment test. 3. See the `grok_model_not_found` warning, although `grok models` and the hello probe succeed. **Agent adapter(s) involved** grok_local (Grok Build CLI). ## What Changed - `packages/adapters/grok-local/src/server/test.ts`: the model check now treats the default sentinel as valid and reports it as info (`Using the Grok CLI's default model (<default>)`). It still warns when an explicitly configured, non-sentinel model is absent from the discovered list. This matches `execute.ts`, which never sends the sentinel to grok. - `packages/adapters/grok-local/src/server/test.test.ts`: adds a test that the default sentinel does not warn when it is absent from the real model list, and a test that a real, unavailable model still warns. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/grok-local/src/server/test.test.ts` — 5 passed. ## Risks Low risk. The change only affects one adapter's environment-test reporting. It does not change how runs pass `--model`. No schema, no runtime behavior change. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (n/a — no doc change) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.824.0-canary.5 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude
|
0dfa0fb988 |
ci: refresh general-server shard duration manifest (#12075)
<!-- Write all pull request text in Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100). --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The PR verify workflow gates every pull request; its slowest check sets the feedback time for all contributors > - The general-server test lane splits its vitest suites across five runners with a duration-weighted partition (`scripts/general-server-shard.mjs`) > - The partition reads a duration manifest that was sampled on 2026-08-04, when the lane had 279 suites and 946s of serial time > - The lane has since grown to 405 suites and 1274s; 126 suites had no recorded duration and one suite grew from 37s to 123s > - The stale weights made the partition uneven: in the fully green actions run 32708351172, "General tests (server (2/5))" ran 364s and was the slowest check in the whole run, while sibling shards ran 292-330s > - This pull request refreshes the manifest with per-suite durations measured from that same run > - The benefit is a level five-shard split (255s ±1s of predicted suite time per shard), which removes ~50s from the slowest PR check ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Describe the current behavior** In the fully green PR actions run [32708351172](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/32708351172) (2026-08-24), the check "General tests (server (2/5))" completed in 364s. Its test step ran 315s while sibling shards ran 241-276s. It was the slowest check in the run. **Describe the improvement** The duration manifest `scripts/general-server-shard-durations.json` is stale. It holds 279 suites sampled on 2026-08-04, but the lane now has 405 suites. The 126 unknown suites fall back to the median weight (~1.3s), and `server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts` grew from 37.4s to 123.3s. The partition therefore predicts a level split but produces an uneven one. Refreshing the manifest restores the level split without any code change. **Expected impact** All five server shards level at ~255s of predicted suite time (~310s job time). The slowest PR check drops from 364s to about 317s, so the PR critical path improves by roughly 50s. ## What Changed - Regenerated `scripts/general-server-shard-durations.json` from actions run 32708351172 (2026-08-24): 405 suites, 1274s total serial time (was 279 suites, 946s from 2026-08-04) - Updated the `$comment` field to name the new sample run and date - No code changes; the partition logic in `scripts/general-server-shard.mjs` is untouched ## Verification - Parsed all five "General tests (server (n/5))" job logs from run 32708351172 with the consecutive-completion-timestamp method described in the manifest `$comment`; asserted that the parsed suite set equals the exact file list that `run-vitest-stable.mjs` collects (405/405, no misses, no extras) - Ran `node scripts/run-vitest-stable.mjs --mode general --group general-server --shard-index N --shard-count 5 --dry-run` for N=0..4 with the new manifest: each shard predicts 255s (±1s) of suite time, and the five shards form a complete, non-overlapping cover of all 405 suites - Ran `node --test ./scripts/__tests__/run-vitest-stable-shard.test.mjs`: 13/13 pass ## Risks - Low risk. The change is data-only. Wrong weights cannot break correctness: the partition always covers every suite exactly once, so the worst case of a bad weight is an uneven shard, which is the current state. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5`, agentic coding session with tool use (Claude Code / Claude Agent SDK) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (no code change; existing partition tests pass) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (manifest `$comment` updated) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Related prior work: #11528 (balanced the serialized server shards by recorded duration), #10923 (split serialized tests into five shards), #11156 (split workspaces-a into two shards). Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.824.0-canary.4 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
87d68f476b |
fix: harden the sandbox bridge gateway against crashes and queue wedge (#12060)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents on remote sandbox targets reach the Paperclip API through the sandbox callback bridge: a loopback HTTP gateway inside the sandbox queues request files for a host-side worker > - The gateway process has no supervisor: nothing inside the sandbox respawns it, so a crash leaves a dead loopback port for the rest of the run > - The gateway also never cleaned up request files whose responses never arrived, so a stalled host wedged the queue at its depth cap and every later request got an immediate 503 > - #12052 made the host-side worker survive transient faults; this pull request hardens the other half of the relay > - The benefit is that a gateway fault degrades one request instead of severing the agent from the control plane until run end ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #12052 (host-side worker half of the same relay). Refs #9904 and #8977 (adjacent bridge behavior). No public issue exists for this defect. The description below follows the bug report template. **What happened?** During a staging run, an agent's API calls to the bridge's loopback port began failing at the connection level (curl reported HTTP 000) partway through the run. A dead gateway process is the only mechanism that produces connection-level failures on that port, and nothing restarts it. Separately, request files for timed-out requests stayed in the queue; after 64 accumulated, the gateway answered every request with `503 Bridge request queue is full.` until the run ended. **Expected behavior** An uncaught fault in the gateway must not kill the loopback listener. A request that times out must not leave its file counting toward the queue-depth cap. A queue full of orphaned files must recover instead of rejecting until run end. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a remote-sandbox run and stop the host-side bridge worker. 2. Send requests to the gateway until they time out; the request files stay in `requests/`. 3. After 64 such files, every request gets an immediate 503, even after the host recovers. 4. Independently, raise any uncaught exception in the gateway process; the loopback port dies for the rest of the run. ## What Changed - The generated gateway source installs global `uncaughtException` / `unhandledRejection` handlers that log to stderr (already redirected to `logs/bridge.log`) and keep serving. The relay holds no state a fault can corrupt beyond the one request it interrupted. - Survival is gated on readiness: before the gateway has written its readiness file (file mode) or sent its READY frame (duplex mode), the same handlers exit(1) instead. A startup fault (failed bind, failed readiness write) means the process can never serve, and surviving there would only leave an un-ready zombie while the host waits out its readiness poll. - The file gateway attaches an explicit `error` listener to its server and pins the event loop with a keepalive until the bind settles. Newer Node runtimes do not reliably surface a failed bind through `uncaughtException` in this shape: the process can drain and exit 0 before the error event is delivered (reproduced on Node 24/25; Node 22 delivered it). The duplex gateway already had an explicit listener. - A request that times out waiting for the host now deletes its own request file. The host's response write is guarded on that file, so the removal also signals that no caller waits anymore. - At the queue-depth cap, the gateway sweeps request files older than the response deadline (orphans from killed callers or a previous gateway process) before rejecting with 503. - Host-side, `processRequestFile` treats a request file that vanished before the read as the benign caller-gave-up race and skips it quietly instead of escalating into the recovery pass. ## Verification - `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.test.ts` — 43 passed, verified on both Node 22 and Node 25. - New end-to-end test: with no worker running, a request times out (502), its file is cleaned, and the same gateway then serves a 200 once a worker starts — no wedge, no dead port. - New end-to-end test: with `maxQueueDepth: 1` and a backdated orphan file at the cap, the gateway sweeps the orphan and admits the request instead of answering 503. - New worker test: a request file that vanishes before the read is skipped without a handler call, a response write, or a run-level error. - New generated-source test: spawned directly against an already-occupied port, the gateway exits 1 promptly with the `EADDRINUSE` fault on stderr instead of lingering un-ready (or exiting 0 silently, the pre-existing behavior on Node 24/25). - A pin keeps the crash handlers, the readiness gate, and the sweep in the generated source. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`. ## Risks - Keeping a Node process alive after `uncaughtException` is normally suspect; here the alternative is a dead loopback port for the rest of the run, and the gateway is a stateless per-request relay. The fault is logged with its stack to `bridge.log`, and survival applies only after readiness — startup faults still fail fast. - Deleting a timed-out request file could race a host that is mid-processing. The host's response write is already guarded on request-file existence, and the new host-side skip treats the vanished file as a no-op, so no duplicate mutation path is introduced. - The stale sweep runs only at the depth cap and only removes files older than the response deadline plus a 2 s grace, so a live caller's file is never swept. - Orphaned response files (host responded after the caller gave up) still linger; that pre-existing minor leak is unchanged here. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), model id `claude-fable-5`, extended thinking enabled, agentic tool use via Claude Code (CLI harness), 200k context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b2d1673b9e |
Add TypeScript PRP replay contracts (#12091)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner needs one typed interpretation of the language-neutral PRP contract. > - The JSON Schemas and fixtures now exist, but TypeScript consumers cannot validate or replay them yet. > - A deterministic reducer must define how duplicate delivery and source gaps affect the projected session. > - Result and question contracts must also validate untrusted provider and user input before later runtime code uses it. > - This pull request adds those TypeScript contracts and replay oracles without adding a process, provider, endpoint, or production behavior. > - The benefit is a reviewable and testable TypeScript foundation for the local runner and transport pull requests. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** This change affects the private `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner` package. It does not change an existing server or adapter execution path. **Problem or motivation** The PRP v1 schemas do not yet provide TypeScript types, runtime validators, normalized result handling, or a deterministic session projection. Later Rust, transport, provider, and server work needs one tested TypeScript oracle instead of separate interpretations. **Proposed solution** Generate a checked-in TypeScript schema bundle from the PRP v1 sources. Add derived types, AJV validation, result and question validation, deterministic replay, a reducer, and generated golden snapshots. Export only these implemented root-package surfaces. **Alternatives considered** The combined runner branch adds the TypeScript contracts together with Rust, providers, semantic authorization, SDKs, labs, and server behavior. That delta is too large for normal review. Handwritten duplicate protocol types would also create a drift risk. **Roadmap alignment** This work supports the governed tool and control-plane direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not enable a new production adapter or endpoint. **Additional context** Refs #12087 and #11962. This pull request was prepared on #12087, then rebased onto its squash merge before opening. The current delta against `master` is 37 files. ## What Changed - Added JSON-Schema-derived PRP v1 types and AJV runtime validation. - Added fail-closed required-version checks and cross-envelope binding checks. - Added provider-neutral completion-result and structured-question contracts. - Added normalization for accepted legacy provider result aliases before strict validation. - Added a deterministic session reducer for replay, duplicate delivery, source gaps, requests, items, results, and terminal state. - Added generated replay snapshots and compact parity summaries for six accepted fixtures. - Added schema-bundle, manifest, and replay-golden drift gates. - Added only the root package export. Deferred testing, SDK, evaluation, lab, provider, and browser entry points remain unavailable. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner test` passed with 8 protocol tests and 44 TypeScript tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner typecheck` passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:replay-goldens` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `git diff --check` passed. - The delta against its declared base is 37 files. - `pnpm test:run` was executed locally. The package tests pass, while the macOS repository run retains the unchanged local-environment failures documented on #12087. The complete Linux CI matrix must pass on this commit. - A scoped scan found no secret-like values, internal references, or deferred-provider file names. - Greptile found an unbounded sequence-gap allocation. Commit `4a405c17` caps detailed missing IDs at 256, records the full missing count and truncation state, and rejects sequence values above the exact JavaScript integer range. The focused tests, workspace typecheck, build, and token gates pass after this fix. ## Risks Low production risk. The package remains private. This change adds no process, network endpoint, provider bridge, server integration, database change, or execution selection. The main risk is protocol interpretation drift. Generated schema and replay gates detect that drift. Browser and CSP-specific validator packaging remains deferred to its later package boundary. I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This change defines contracts for planned control-plane work and does not add overlapping product behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 was used. The exact serving model ID and context size were not exposed. The model used high reasoning, repository tools, GitHub tools, and local code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.824.0-canary.3 |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
3708779501 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#12090)
Auto-generated lockfile refresh after dependencies changed on master. This PR only updates pnpm-lock.yaml. Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
fdbc69172d |
feat(runner): add PRP v1 schemas and fixtures (#12087)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Paperclip Runner needs a language-neutral contract between the server and the runner process. > - A shared contract must exist before TypeScript, Rust, transport, or provider implementations can depend on it. > - Required protocol versions must fail closed, while safe optional fields must remain compatible. > - The contract also needs deterministic fixtures and a drift gate for later cross-language work. > - This pull request adds that contract without adding runtime behavior. > - The benefit is a small, reviewable source of truth for the next implementation pull requests. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting. This pull request adds a private package contract for later server, TypeScript, and Rust work. **Problem or motivation** Paperclip Runner does not have a small language-neutral protocol boundary on `master`. A runtime implementation without this boundary can drift between languages, accept unsupported required versions, or silently change canonical fixtures. **Proposed solution** Add PRP v1 JSON Schemas, accepted and rejected fixtures, a Codex structured-question fixture, and a generated SHA-256 manifest. Run compatibility and manifest checks during the package build. Keep the package private and export nothing in this pull request. **Alternatives considered** The combined runner branch contains schemas together with providers, SDKs, labs, and server behavior. That change is too large for normal review. Generating TypeScript validators in this pull request would also cross into the next review unit. **Roadmap alignment** This contract supports the governed tool and control-plane direction in `ROADMAP.md`. It does not enable a new production adapter or endpoint. **Additional context** Refs #12084 and #11962. This pull request was reviewed as a stack on #12084, then rebased and retargeted to `master` after #12084 merged. The current delta is 38 files. ## What Changed - Added 20 PRP v1 JSON Schemas with stable identifiers and resolved references, including explicit cross-language conformance input and output schemas. - Added canonical replay, cross-language, and Codex question fixtures. - Added accepted cases for additive optional fields and a rejected case for an unsupported required protocol version. - Added a deterministic manifest with SHA-256 digests for every schema and fixture. - Added package-local schema-instance, schema-reference, compatibility, question-ID, conformance-pair, and drift checks. - Added a private workspace package with no public exports and no production runtime behavior. - Added the package manifest to the Docker dependency-stage inventory required for every workspace package. This does not copy or build runner runtime code into the production image. - Kept the provider descriptor and question fixture Codex-only. No deferred provider package or dependency is present. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` passed with Node 24.19.0 and pnpm 9.15.4. No lockfile change is committed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner check:protocol` passed with 8 tests. - The committed AJV 2020-12 gate accepted every canonical v1 replay, question, and cross-language conformance fixture. It rejected the required v2 fixture, a replay fixture with a missing required command ID, and conformance output with a missing session ID. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed and ran the protocol manifest drift check. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `node ./scripts/check-docker-deps-stage.mjs` passed. - `git diff --check` passed. - The delta against its declared base is 38 files. - `pnpm test:run` completed with 4,687 passing tests, 19 skipped tests, and 29 failures across 9 unchanged server files. The failures reproduce macOS path aliases, local listener probes, workspace-runtime assumptions, and one connection-retry timeout. No changed-file test failed. Linux CI must pass before this pull request is ready. - `pnpm check:tokens` reports existing personal-name references outside this pull request. A scoped scan of `packages/paperclip-runner` found no secret-like values, internal references, or deferred-provider names. - PR #12084 was squash-merged, and this branch was rebased onto that merge and retargeted to `master`. The first master-base policy run correctly caught the missing Docker dependency-stage manifest copy; commit `4fa1ea7c` fixes that gate, and the complete Linux matrix is green. - Serialized server shard 1 initially hit an unchanged heartbeat test-harness timeout and a later assertion in the same file. Its isolated rerun passed in 3m57s. All other shards passed on their first attempt. - Greptile reviewed the final commit at 5/5 with no blocking failure. Both earlier actionable validation threads are resolved, and no review thread remains open. ## Risks Low production risk. The package is private and has no exports, server adapter, endpoint, or process. AJV is a package-only development dependency that the server workspace already uses. The main risk is contract churn before the TypeScript and Rust consumers land. The generated manifest and compatibility fixtures make that churn explicit. I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This change defines a contract for planned control-plane work and does not add overlapping product behavior. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 was used. The exact serving model ID and context size were not exposed. The model used high reasoning, repository tools, GitHub tools, and local code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
41bf5cafa1 |
docs(runner): define architecture and compatibility (#12084)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent execution currently uses direct adapters inside the server process. > - The proposed Paperclip Runner adds a separate process and a new protocol boundary. > - This boundary needs clear trust, recovery, rollout, and compatibility rules before code lands. > - Large runner changes are difficult to review as one pull request. > - This pull request defines the first small boundary for the runner series. > - The benefit is a stable design contract for later implementation pull requests. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Missing documentation. **Where is the issue?** The repository does not have a concise architecture decision or compatibility contract for Paperclip Runner. **What's wrong?** The available runner design material is too large for normal review. It mixes architecture, implementation history, test evidence, and deferred work. Reviewers need a short statement of the process boundary, trust model, rollout behavior, and direct-adapter compatibility rules. **Suggested fix** Add one architecture decision record and one compatibility document. Keep implementation details and campaign evidence out of this pull request. Related public work: Refs #11041, #11297, #11634, #11639, #11640, and #11962. This pull request is the first small replacement in the new review series for #11962. ## What Changed - Added an architecture decision for the runner process, PRP v1 transport, semantic tools, durable recovery, and additive server integration. - Added a compatibility and rollout contract for the default-off adapter, existing direct adapters, persisted native runs, and the task page. - Defined the initial package and provider limits. The first production provider is Codex only. - Defined acceptance checks for later implementation pull requests. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` passed with Node 24.19.0 and pnpm 9.15.4. - `pnpm check:node-version` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` passed. - The pull request changes 2 files. - `pnpm test:run` completed with 4,686 passing tests and 30 failures in unchanged master paths. The failures reproduce macOS path aliases, invalid generated port values, and local listener behavior. This documentation-only change does not touch those paths. Linux CI must pass before this pull request is ready. - All applicable GitHub Actions and security scans passed. The Storybook visual job skipped because this documentation-only change does not match its paths. - Greptile completed at 5/5 with no actionable comments. ## Risks Low implementation risk. This pull request changes documentation only. A later implementation can still diverge from the contract. Each later pull request must prove its behavior against these compatibility rules. I checked `ROADMAP.md`. This design supports the governed tool and control-plane direction. It does not add an overlapping user feature. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5 was used. The exact serving model ID and context size were not exposed. The model used high reasoning, repository tools, GitHub tools, and local code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.824.0-canary.2 |
||
|
TonioandClaude Opus 5
|
88a0f885e8 |
Brand lockup, no idle env-check card, no Mission row (#12074)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - New customers meet the product through an onboarding arc that ends in the tenant wizard > - A staging walk of that arc found three rough edges: an ad-hoc icon standing in for the brand, an environment-check card that narrates a probe the flow already runs on its own, and a review checklist that still lists a Mission the arc stopped asking for > - Each one makes the product look less finished than it is at the exact moment a customer decides what it is > - This pull request renders the brand lockup, hides the idle environment-check card while keeping the probe and its failure surface, and drops the Mission row > - The benefit is a first-session arc that reads as one product, with no controls for questions nobody was asked ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. The changes come from walking the sign-up arc on a staging fleet. **What happened:** The model step shows an "Adapter environment check" card with a "Test now" button even though pressing Connect runs the same probe and blocks a failing hire. The review step lists "Mission" in its checklist although onboarding no longer asks for one. The auth page renders a sparkles icon beside the word "Paperclip" instead of the brand lockup. **Expected behavior:** The model step shows the check only when a probe has found something to fix. The review checklist lists only what onboarding set up. The brand renders as the lockup asset used across surfaces. **Actual behavior:** An idle card narrates a probe that runs regardless. A permanent unchecked row marks a question nobody was asked. The brand is a generic icon plus text. **Steps to reproduce:** 1. Sign up on a staging fleet and enter the tenant wizard. 2. On "Create your first agent", choose a role and press Next: the model step shows the "Adapter environment check" card before anything has been probed. 3. Continue to Review: the checklist lists "Mission" as a permanently unchecked row. **Additional context:** The Mission row outlived the removal of the mission step (#11935). The environment probe itself still runs on Connect and blocks a failing hire; only its idle card is at issue. The brand lockup lands across all three surfaces in the same round — paperclip-cloud#270 and paperclip-id#58 carry the other halves. ## What Changed - `PaperclipLockup` renders the brand asset (mark + wordmark, one geometry, `fill="currentColor"`); the auth page uses it in place of the sparkles icon. - The adapter environment check's idle card (explainer + "Test now") no longer renders. The probe still runs on Connect and still blocks a failing hire. - The check's failure content still renders when a probe has found something — the blocking error points the customer at "the reported checks", so they stay visible. - Connect retries a cached failed probe instead of reusing it. With "Test now" gone, Connect is the only retry, and a stale fail would lock out a machine the customer has since fixed. - The review checklist drops its "Mission" row. ## Verification Run the tenant suite: ``` cd ui && npx vitest run ``` - 4365 tests pass across 471 files; `npx tsc --noEmit` is clean. - New test drives the wizard to the model step and asserts the environment-check card is absent, anchored on "Connect a model" so an unrendered step cannot pass as an absence. - The review assertions anchor on the remaining rows ("Organization name", "Agent created", "Model connected"). ## Risks - **Behavioral change:** a cached *failed* probe is re-run on Connect instead of reused. Pass and warn results are still cached. This only affects the retry path that "Test now" used to serve. - **Hidden, not removed:** the environment check machinery is intact; only the idle card is gone. A failing probe still blocks the hire and still shows its checks. - **Brand:** the wordmark now ships inside an SVG; its accessible name carries the text. Screen readers announce "Paperclip" as before. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`) via Claude Code, with tool use and code execution; earlier rounds on this branch's predecessor used Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.824.0-canary.1 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
a14e51d592 |
refactor(environment): classify environment capabilities from static driver definitions (#12045)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Environment runtime drivers provide workspace, lease, and custom image behavior > - Runtime code used driver identity checks and several capability-specific members > - These checks spread capability rules across the runtime and made new drivers harder to verify > - This pull request adds one general capability classifier and one static driver support table > - The benefit is one fail-closed capability model that keeps current behavior and supports future drivers ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Environment runtime capability checks for workspace realization, custom images, lease capabilities, and duplex authorization. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting (multiple of the above) **Current behavior** The runtime selects several capability paths from driver identity and separate capability members. Custom image gates also trust provider declarations without checking every matching live worker method. **Proposed behavior** The runtime uses one general capability classifier and one static support table. Custom image gates require both the provider declaration and every matching live worker method. The public capability names remain unchanged. **Reason and benefit** The change keeps capability rules in one place. It removes identity conditions from runtime consumers and makes unsupported drivers fail closed. **Breaking changes** None. The public names sandboxCapabilities, sandboxProviders, and EffectiveSandboxCapabilities remain available. ## What Changed - Add classifyEnvironmentCapabilities and static support definitions for all four driver families. - Add resolveCapabilities to every environment runtime driver. - Move driver traits into environment-driver-traits.ts and migrate runtime consumers. - Require provider declarations and matching live worker methods for all custom image gates. - Migrate duplex authorization to the general resolver and remove the dead sandbox-only member. - Delete the unused resolveEffectiveSandboxCapabilities wrapper and update its test. ## Verification - pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck - pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/environment-capability-contract.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts — 92 tests pass - pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/environment-driver-traits.test.ts server/src/__tests__/general-capability-classifier.test.ts — 12 tests pass - pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/environment-custom-images-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-execution-target-capabilities.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-execution-target-duplex.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-execution-target-duplex-kill-switch.test.ts — 66 tests pass ## Risks The main risk is a capability gate that denies a valid driver or permits an invalid driver. The static support matrix, live worker method checks, and regression tests reduce this risk. No database, public API, or published type name changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with tool use and code execution. The deployment does not provide a separate context-window value. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes: # / Closes # / Refs # OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub #NNN / github.com/paperclipai/paperclip URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (for example, docs/... or fix/...) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
fc9e9b704f |
fix: stop teaching agents to curl literal {id} route templates (#12061)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Adapters inject prompt text that teaches agents how to call the
Paperclip API, including copy-pasteable curl examples
> - Some of those URLs contained brace placeholders like
`/api/issues/{id}/checkout`
> - Agents paste such lines verbatim; the placeholder reaches the server
as `/api/issues/%7Bid%7D` and 404s, and request logs show agents doing
exactly that
> - The acpx engine's API note already avoids this by using
`$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID`, and its test pins `/api/issues/{id}` out of the
prompt
> - This pull request applies the same standard to the gemini adapter,
the shared prompt template, and the openclaw gateway workflow
> - The benefit is that agents stop burning turns on placeholder 404s
and doc examples stay safe to execute as written
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public issue exists for this defect. The description below follows
the bug report template.
**What happened?**
Server request logs show agents issuing `GET /api/issues/%7Bid%7D` — the
literal, percent-encoded text `{id}` — which 404s. The source is adapter
prompt text: the gemini adapter's API note embeds a curl example with
`/api/issues/{id}/checkout` in the URL, the shared agent prompt template
mentions `/api/issues/{issueId}` endpoints, and the harness checkout
notice names `/api/issues/{id}/checkout`. Models copy these strings into
real requests.
**Expected behavior**
URL paths in prompt text must carry environment variables or real ids,
never brace placeholders, in every string an agent might execute
verbatim. Where a placeholder is unavoidable, the prompt must state
explicitly that the literal text must never be sent.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Give an agent the gemini adapter's API access note.
2. Watch it call `curl ...
"$PAPERCLIP_API_URL/api/issues/{id}/checkout"` as written.
3. The server logs `POST /api/issues/%7Bid%7D/checkout 404`.
## What Changed
- gemini-local's API note curl example now uses `$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID` and
tells the agent to substitute a real issue id when that variable is
absent — the same convention as the acpx engine's API note.
- The shared agent prompt template (`server-utils.ts`) uses
`$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID` in its interaction-creation and resume-endpoint
mentions, and the harness checkout notice names `POST
/api/issues/$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID/checkout`.
- openclaw-gateway's endpoint workflow keeps its `{issueId}`
placeholders — they are defined by its "determine issueId" step — but
now states explicitly that the literal text must never be sent in a URL.
- `server-utils.test.ts` pins the new form and adds negative pins that
keep `/api/issues/{id}` and `/api/issues/{issueId}` out of the shared
prompt template, mirroring the existing acpx-engine negative pin.
- The `confirmation:{issueId}:plan:{revisionId}` idempotency-key
template is untouched: it is a value-construction pattern, not a URL.
## Verification
- `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts
packages/adapters/gemini-local packages/adapters/openclaw-gateway` — 152
passed. The single failure (`pre-selects gemini-api-key auth in the
managed HOME for sandbox execution`) is a pre-existing
environment-specific failure on the development machine, unrelated to
prompt text; CI is authoritative for it.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils --filter
@paperclipai/adapter-gemini-local --filter
@paperclipai/adapter-openclaw-gateway typecheck`.
## Risks
- Low risk: prompt-text and test changes only; no runtime logic changes.
- Agents that memorized the old example strings keep working — the
routes are unchanged, only the placeholder text in prompts is.
## Model Used
- Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), model id `claude-fable-5`, extended
thinking enabled, agentic tool use via Claude Code (CLI harness), 200k
context window.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
|
||
|
Devin Foley
|
633e102971 |
fix: verify issue-update writes instead of inferring success (#12051)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents report task state to the control plane with `PATCH
/api/issues/{id}` at the end of each heartbeat
> - On remote sandbox targets those writes cross a relay that can fail
at the connection level
> - An agent that pipes its status curl through `head` cannot see that
failure; the write is lost but the run reports success
> - The issue then stays `in_progress` with no disposition, and the
missing-disposition recovery must repair it
> - This pull request makes the issue-update helper verify every write,
and it teaches the shared skill to require verified writes
> - The benefit is that a lost status write becomes a visible, retried
failure instead of a silent success
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public issue exists for this defect. The description below follows
the bug report template.
**What happened?**
A sandboxed heartbeat run answered its issue in a comment. It then sent
`PATCH /api/issues/{id}` with `status: done` through `curl -sf ... |
head -c 400`. The relay dropped the connection. The `-f` flag suppressed
the error output, and the pipe replaced curl's exit code with the exit
code of `head`. The agent saw empty output and exit 0. It reported the
write as an "empty 2xx" success and exited. The issue stayed
`in_progress`, and the successful-run recovery had to close it in a
corrective run.
**Expected behavior**
A status write that does not reach the server must surface as a failure.
The helper script must retry transient failures. It must exit non-zero
when the write is unconfirmed. Skill guidance must forbid write patterns
that hide failures.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Point `PAPERCLIP_API_URL` at an endpoint that drops connections
intermittently.
2. Finalize an issue with `curl -sf -X PATCH
"$PAPERCLIP_API_URL/api/issues/$ID" -d '{"status":"done"}' | head -c
400`.
3. Observe exit code 0 with empty output while the server never received
the PATCH.
## What Changed
- `scripts/paperclip-issue-update.sh` now captures `%{http_code}`,
retries a retryable failure (connection-level, 429, 5xx) once — two
attempts total, which matches the shared bounded-write-retry rule —
rejects an empty 2xx body, and confirms the response echoes the
requested status before it exits 0.
- Failure output states plainly that the write was NOT saved, so the
calling agent reports it accurately.
- `skills/paperclip/SKILL.md` Step 8 adds a required "Verify writes —
never infer them" rule: a successful PATCH always returns the updated
issue JSON, disposition writes must never run through `head`/`tail`
pipelines, and an unconfirmed write must be reported as FAILED.
- `server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts` pins the new
skill rule; a new `paperclip-issue-update-helper.test.ts` exercises the
helper's behavior end-to-end.
## Verification
- `bash -n scripts/paperclip-issue-update.sh`
- `server/src/__tests__/paperclip-issue-update-helper.test.ts` runs the
helper end-to-end against a local HTTP server: confirmed-echo success
(exit 0), empty 2xx (exit 1), wrong echoed status (exit 1), 422 reject
(exit 1, exactly one request), 503 then success (two requests),
connection refused (two attempts, then exit 1 with a "NOT saved"
report).
- `npx vitest run
server/src/__tests__/paperclip-issue-update-helper.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/paperclip-skill-utils.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/cli-invocation-safety.test.ts` — 50 passed.
## Risks
- Low risk. The success-path output is unchanged (the updated issue
JSON).
- The helper now exits non-zero on unconfirmed writes. Callers that
previously missed silent failures now see explicit errors. That is the
intended behavior change.
- The single retry re-sends the PATCH after a retryable failure. If the
first request committed and only its response was lost, an attached
comment can post twice. The duplicate is visible and benign; the prior
behavior lost the write silently.
## Model Used
- Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), model id `claude-fable-5`, extended
thinking enabled, agentic tool use via Claude Code (CLI harness), 200k
context window.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
canary/v2026.824.0-canary.0
|
||
|
Devin Foley
|
c7f4bc1300 |
fix: survive transient sandbox exec failures in the callback bridge worker (#12052)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents on remote sandbox targets reach the Paperclip API through the sandbox callback bridge: a loopback gateway inside the sandbox writes request files, and a host-side worker polls them over the provider's exec channel and forwards them to the server > - The worker's poll loop had one terminal catch: a single reset or slow exec ended the relay for the rest of the run > - The in-sandbox gateway kept queueing requests against the dead worker, so every later API call from the agent stranded, including its final status write > - A relay that dies on one transient fault turns a routine provider hiccup into a lost issue disposition > - This pull request restructures the loop so transient faults back off and retry, while the watchdog remains the escalation path for sustained outages > - The benefit is that one flaky exec no longer severs an agent from the control plane mid-run ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #9904. Refs #8977. Both touch adjacent bridge behavior (curl shim, header forwarding); neither addresses worker-loop lifetime. No public issue exists for this defect. The description below follows the bug report template. **What happened?** During a staging run, the host-side bridge worker hit one failed sandbox exec while relaying requests. The poll loop's only catch is terminal: it failed the pending requests and set the worker to settled, with no restart. The agent's later API calls saw connection-level failures or bridge errors until the run ended. Its final `PATCH status: done` was lost, and the missing-disposition recovery had to repair the issue in a corrective run. **Expected behavior** One transient exec failure must not end the relay for the rest of the run. The worker must back off and retry. A sustained outage must still fail queued requests fast through the watchdog. In-flight request semantics (abort plus 504 backstop, retry-safe 503) must not change. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a remote-sandbox run and let the provider exec channel reject or stall one call while the bridge worker polls. 2. The worker hits one `listJsonFiles` failure or one request-attempt timeout, and the loop exits through its terminal catch. 3. Every later bridge request strands. The loopback gateway keeps accepting requests that never complete, and after 64 queued files it answers every request with 503 until run end. ## What Changed - `startSandboxCallbackBridgeWorker`'s poll loop now separates three failure domains: - A failed poll backs off exponentially (capped at 5 s) and retries instead of dying. The first failure of a streak still lands on the run trace through the workerFailed span; later repeats only warn. - A failed or hung request attempt runs the same recovery pass the loop previously died on — abort the in-flight handler (its 504 backstop keeps the caller from stranding) and 503 the unclaimed queued requests — and the loop then continues and serves the caller's retry. - A listing where every file already has an in-flight attempt sleeps one poll interval, like an empty listing. The previous immediate re-list was a hot spin: an exec storm against a real channel, and a pure-microtask loop that starved every timer in the process when the queue client resolves synchronously. - The watchdog, the claim/finalize fences, and the stop/drain semantics are unchanged. ## Verification - `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.test.ts` — 38 passed. - New regression test: a request queued behind three consecutive poll failures is still delivered. - Updated tests: the stalled-poll test now expects recovery (the handler's real 200) instead of a terminal 503; the sustained-outage 503 path remains proven by the dedicated watchdog test; the recovery-503-write-retry test triggers the recovery pass through a hung request read, because a hung poll no longer runs that pass. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`. ## Risks - Behavior change: a transiently failing poll no longer mass-fails queued requests on the first error. Callers wait through the backoff window, bounded by the existing in-sandbox 30 s response deadline, or the watchdog fails them after 20 s of no successful iteration. This trades fast-but-terminal degradation for recovery. - A hard-down channel now retries every ≤5 s for the rest of the run instead of stopping. Each retry is one exec attempt against a channel that already fails. - In-flight mutation safety is unchanged: the guard map and the claim protocol still prevent a double-applied host mutation, and a guarded file is always finalized by its own attempt or by its 504 backstop. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic), model id `claude-fable-5`, extended thinking enabled, agentic tool use via Claude Code (CLI harness), 200k context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
c62bb4b16b |
feat: environment delete with agent reassignment and consented sandbox destroy (#12053)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Environments define where agent runs execute: local, SSH, or provider sandboxes > - Operators can create and edit environments, but the UI has no way to delete one > - The server already exposes `DELETE /environments/:id` and a delete-blast-radius preflight, but no UI consumes them, and a delete blocked by reusable sandbox leases gives the operator no path forward > - This pull request adds the delete flow to the environment configuration page: a preflight-driven modal that reassigns dependent agents, names the workspaces that hold blocking sandbox leases, and can destroy those sandboxes with explicit consent > - The benefit is that operators can retire stale environments from the UI without database surgery, and dependent agents move to a chosen replacement instead of silently falling back ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8554 Refs #11124 **Subsystem affected** Environments (server routes, environment runtime service, and the environment settings UI). **Problem or motivation** The environment configuration page has no delete control. The server delete endpoint exists, but nothing in the UI calls it. When reusable sandbox leases block a delete, the 409 error names no owner, so the operator cannot find the blocking workspace. Agents that use the environment as their default lose it silently through the FK `on delete set null`. **Proposed solution** Add a delete button with a confirmation modal on the environment edit page. The modal reads the delete-blast-radius preflight. It offers a dropdown to reassign dependent agents to another environment before the delete. It lists each workspace that holds a blocking reusable sandbox lease, with a link. When those leases are the only blocker, the confirm button destroys the sandboxes inline (`?destroyReusableSandboxLeases=true`) and then deletes. A failed teardown falls back to `pending_cleanup` for the sweep, so no sandbox is orphaned. ## What Changed - `ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.tsx`: delete button on the edit page header, confirmation modal with agent reassignment select, lease-holder list, impact notes, and a consent-labeled destroy-and-delete action - `ui/src/api/environments.ts`: `deleteBlastRadius` and `remove` client methods; `remove` takes an optional `destroyReusableSandboxLeases` flag - `server/src/routes/environments.ts`: `DELETE /environments/:id` accepts `?destroyReusableSandboxLeases=true`; it destroys the environment's reusable sandbox leases first, but only when those leases are the sole delete blocker, then re-checks the blast radius before it deletes - `server/src/services/environment-runtime.ts`: new `destroyReusableSandboxLeasesForEnvironment` — destroys every reusable sandbox lease an environment still owns while the environment config (provider credentials) is still available - `server/src/services/environments.ts`: the delete blast radius now returns `reusableSandboxLeaseHolders` (lease id, workspace, issue) so clients can name what blocks a delete - `packages/shared/src/types/environment.ts`: `EnvironmentDeleteReusableLeaseHolder` type on the blast radius - Tests: route gating for the consent flag (destroy runs, mixed-blocker rejection, surviving-lease rejection), runtime destroy scoped to an environment, blast-radius holder join, and UI tests for the reassignment flow, holder links, and the consent button ## Verification - `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/environment-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts ui/src/pages/CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx` - Manual: open Settings → Environments → edit an environment. The trash icon opens the modal. With agents on the environment, pick a reassignment target and confirm; agents move and the environment deletes. With reusable sandbox leases, the modal names the holding workspaces and the confirm button reads "Destroy N sandboxes and delete". ## Risks - The consented path destroys provider sandboxes. It runs only when reusable leases are the sole blocker, so a delete that would still be rejected never destroys anything. A failed teardown routes to `pending_cleanup` and the delete stays blocked until the sweep resolves it. - Agent reassignment issues one PATCH per agent from the client. A mid-sequence failure leaves some agents reassigned; the reassignments are valid on their own and the UI refreshes to the actual state. - Hard blockers (managed local, instance default, pending cleanup) keep the existing 409 behavior and disable the confirm button. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic) — Fable 5, model id `claude-fable-5`, extended thinking, agentic tool use via Claude Code CLI. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
627eef7cbd |
fix(plugins): retry errored plugins at boot instead of leaving them dead (#12054)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Plugins extend the server with sandbox providers, tools, and jobs; a loader activates them at boot > - When activation fails, the loader marks the plugin `error` and skips it on every later boot > - Activation failures are often environmental — missing package dependencies, a stale build output, a module that moved under a pull — and the fix lands on disk without any write to the plugin row > - The plugin therefore stays dead forever, and every feature behind it (sandbox destroys, cleanup sweeps, probes) silently stops working until an operator flips the row by hand > - This pull request makes `loadAll` retry errored plugins once per boot: flip to `ready`, attempt activation, and re-record the error if the attempt fails > - The benefit is that a plugin recovers on the next boot after its environment is fixed, with no manual database or lifecycle intervention ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Several sandbox-provider plugins sat in `error` status for weeks after a transient activation failure (a module resolution error from an older checkout state). The boot loader only loads plugins in `ready` status, so it never retried them. Environments backed by those providers lost sandbox destroys, cleanup sweeps, and probes with no visible signal other than the stale `last_error`. **Expected behavior** A plugin whose activation failure has been fixed on disk recovers on the next server boot. A plugin that still fails stays in `error` with a fresh error message. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Install a plugin whose worker cannot start (for example, delete one of its dependencies), then boot the server. The plugin lands in `error` status. 2. Restore the dependency. 3. Restart the server. Before this change, the plugin stays in `error` forever. After this change, the boot retries it and the plugin activates. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/plugin-loader.ts`: `loadAll` also fetches plugins in `error` status, flips each to `ready`, and activates it with the normal batch. The flip runs before activation because the `error` status only legally transitions to `ready` or `uninstalled`; a retry that failed while still in `error` could not re-mark itself. A failed flip logs a warning and never aborts the boot load. The stale comment at the `markError` site now describes the retry. - `server/src/__tests__/plugin-loader-error-retry.test.ts`: covers the flip-then-retry flow, the failed-flip isolation, and the empty case. ## Verification - `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/plugin-loader-error-retry.test.ts server/src/__tests__/bundled-plugins.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-lifecycle-restart.test.ts server/src/__tests__/cloud-image-bundled-plugins.test.ts` - Manual: mark an installed plugin's status to `error`, restart the server, and observe the loader log line `retrying plugins that failed activation on a previous boot` followed by a successful activation (or a fresh `last_error` if the plugin is genuinely broken). ## Risks - A genuinely broken plugin now costs one bounded activation attempt per boot (the attempts run in parallel with the ready batch under `Promise.allSettled`). It cannot crash-loop within a running process, and it returns to `error` with a fresh message. - The flip clears `last_error` before the attempt. If the process dies between the flip and the activation, the row is `ready` with no error text; the next boot simply loads it as a ready plugin. - Operators who relied on `error` as a manual "keep this off" latch should use the `disabled` status, which this change does not touch. ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic) — Fable 5, model id `claude-fable-5`, extended thinking, agentic tool use via Claude Code CLI. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ae6761e2b0 |
fix(server): authorize agent resume through direct grants (#12047)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip keeps agent lifecycle changes behind control-plane authorization > - Plugins can create agents in a paused state until an operator activates them > - An agent with a direct configuration grant could not resume these agents > - A paused plugin-managed agent also had no stable provenance in its pause reason > - This pull request adds one protected resume path and preserves every other lifecycle gate > - The benefit is safe recovery from plugin provisioning without a broad permission change ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8168. That pull request uses a role capability and also opens clear-error. This change uses the current grant system and keeps clear-error closed. **What happened?** A plugin can create a paused managed agent. An agent actor cannot resume that agent, even when the actor has a direct `agents:configure` grant. The paused agent can also have a null pause reason. **Expected behavior** An agent with a direct `agents:configure` grant can resume an accessible paused agent. An agent without that grant cannot resume it. Plugin-managed paused agents show stable plugin provenance. A completed resume stays in effect after reconcile. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Install a plugin that declares a managed agent with `status: paused`. 2. Give a same-company agent a direct `agents:configure` grant. 3. Call `POST /api/agents/{id}/resume` with the granted agent key. 4. On the base revision, observe a board-only authorization error. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `63df7ad2b3`. **Deployment mode** All deployment modes. This is a server authorization and reconcile behavior. ## What Changed - The resume route now uses the protected `agent_config:update` decision with `requiresChangeGrant: true` for agent actors. - The route keeps board access, tenant non-disclosure, and invalid organization-chain protection. - Resume activity now records the real user or agent actor, run, and API key. - Plugin-managed paused agents now receive a stable provenance reason and pause time at creation. - Reconcile backfills only a null reason on an agent that is still declared and stored as paused. - Reconcile preserves manual, budget, system, and other pause reasons. It does not pause a resumed agent again. - The implementation specification now records the narrow resume exception. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/agent-cross-tenant-authz-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-managed-agents.test.ts` passed: 2 files and 26 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - GitHub CI passed all policy, typecheck, build, test, e2e, canary, and security gates on commit `306edf469c`. - Greptile reviewed all 5 changed files. Its check passed with 0 comments and 0 unresolved threads. - The host uses Node 22.22.2. The repository requests Node 24.11 or newer, so pnpm printed engine warnings. - A broad `pnpm test:run` attempt did not complete its general-server group. Runtime port fixtures failed because host port `52000` was already bound. The isolated failing fixture reproduced the same port conflict. The focused feature tests passed before and after the final commit. ## Risks The main risk is an unintended lifecycle permission increase. The change limits agent access to resume only. It requires a protected direct-change decision. It does not open pause, clear-error, terminate, approval, or key-management routes. Tests cover denial, self-denial, tenant isolation, organization-chain checks, and activity attribution. There is no database migration. > This change fixes a narrow gap in the completed plugin, approval, and activity-log roadmap areas. It does not add a new roadmap feature. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex `gpt-5.6-sol`, with xhigh reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The runtime did not expose its context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.823.0-canary.4 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
63df7ad2b3 |
feat(login): use the login pseudo-terminal for Codex device login and de-Claude the shared channel (#12020)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent adapters use provider-specific login flows > - Codex device login needs a live pseudo-terminal (PTY), while the shared channel still uses Claude-specific names > - The old streamed-exec path does not provide the prompt transport that Codex needs > - This pull request moves Codex device login to the shared login PTY and removes the dead streamed-exec path > - The benefit is one controlled login transport with fail-closed capability checks and safer credential reads ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Codex device login used a streamed-exec path that did not provide the required prompt transport. The shared login channel also exposed Claude-specific names outside Claude code. **Expected behavior** The host selects a fixed login command from trusted adapter data. Codex login uses the provider login PTY. Providers without that capability fail closed. **Proposed solution** Use a server-controlled session home, create and validate it as a fresh 0700 directory, read credentials from one validated descriptor, and rename shared channel names to the neutral login PTY family. **Alternatives considered** Keep the shared login PTY as the single transport. Do not keep the removed streamed-exec path because it cannot provide the required prompt transport. **Roadmap alignment** This change supports the planned login transport work. It does not add a separate roadmap item. ## What Changed - Route Codex device login through the shared login PTY transport. - Select the login command from a closed internal command key. - Carry a server-controlled session home through the launch contract. - Create and validate the session home as a fresh 0700 directory owned by the login user. - Read the credential file with descriptor-relative, no-follow path walking and final descriptor checks. - Gate the login route and run lease on the provider login PTY capability. - Rename shared channel names to the neutral login PTY family. - Remove the streamed-exec transport value, selector field, driver branch, and related tests. - Hide Codex login in the user interface when the provider lacks the login PTY capability. ## Verification - Server unit suites pass: 89/89. - Adapter-utils suites pass: 262/262. - Codex-local suites pass: 326/326. - Credential-read reader suite passes: 20/20. - Daytona login PTY suite passes: 30/30. - Device-login suites pass: 56/56. - TypeScript checks pass for server, adapter-utils, and UI. - GitHub Actions must pass after pull request creation. - Greptile review must reach 5/5 with no open P2 findings, recommendations, or follow-ups. ## Risks - Providers without a login PTY capability lose Codex login support by design. - The credential read rejects invalid ownership, mode, type, path, and size. - The launch-time sandbox directory race remains outside the threat model because the login runs inside the sandbox and a hostile sandbox already controls its credential. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool use and code review assistance. The exact context window and reasoning mode are not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.823.0-canary.3 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
16b59c9315 |
feat(adapter-utils): stream duplex bridge bodies as sequenced chunks with receive-side spill (#12006)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent adapters use a duplex bridge to send requests and responses across an isolated boundary > - The bridge held each request body and response body in memory on both ends > - Large bodies can exhaust memory and reduce the safe size of adapter traffic > - This pull request sends receive-side bodies as sequenced chunks and spills large bodies to disk > - The benefit is bounded memory use with strict size, order, and cleanup checks ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The adapter-utils duplex bridge transports request and response bodies across the sandbox boundary. **Current behavior** The bridge stores each complete body in memory on both ends of the duplex channel. **Proposed behavior** The bridge sends body chunks with sequence checks. The receive side keeps bodies up to 1 MiB in memory and spills larger bodies to a temporary file. **Reason and benefit** This change reduces memory pressure and keeps malformed or oversized input on a terminal error path. **Breaking changes** The duplex frame version changes to version 2. The request and response envelopes now carry bodyByteCount, and body_chunk frames carry the body data. ## What Changed - Add version 2 body_chunk frames with 256 KiB raw slices encoded as canonical base64 text. - Add receive-side memory and spill reassembly with per-channel disk and file limits. - Reject malformed, reordered, oversized, truncated, and non-canonical body chunks. - Stream reassembled request bodies to the host forward handler with a web stream and half-duplex request. - Remove spill files on success, failure, channel death, and startup cleanup. ## Verification - Run the adapter-utils type-check. - Run the adapter-utils duplex test suite. - Run all pull request checks. - Run the Greptile review and confirm a 5/5 score with no open findings. ## Risks The wire format changes from version 1 to version 2. Older bridge peers cannot use this protocol. The receive path adds temporary file operations and cleanup paths. The implementation fails closed when a body violates size or sequence rules. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex, tool-enabled coding agent. The exact context-window size and reasoning mode are not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes: # / Closes # / Refs # OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub #NNN / github.com/paperclipai/paperclip URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. docs/..., fix/...) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
zach-hermesandPaperclip
|
8db826d18a |
fix(issues): cycle-aware issue_blockers_resolved after terminal reset (#11979)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents resume blocked work through the `issue_blockers_resolved` wake when every durable blocker is `done` > - That wake is level-triggered: one ready state produces one wake, shared by the issue update route, workspace-finalize backstop, and periodic liveness backstop > - The ready-state key hashed only the dependent id and blocker set, so it ignored a later reset from a terminal status back into `blocked` > - After that reset, completing the same blockers found the previous cycle's completed wake and suppressed the new continuation > - This pull request folds the dependent's `blockedTransitionAt` into the ready-state key, with compatibility for old no-cycle keys > - The benefit is that a reset blocked issue receives exactly one new wake without watchdog status repair or a change to blocker edges ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/issues/5985 Refs: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/issues/6555 Related: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/8009 Related: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/11570 This change does not auto-flip `blocked` to `todo`. The wake is the continuation. It also does not treat cancelled blockers as resolved. **What happened?** A blocked assigned issue that was previously `done` or `cancelled`, then reset to `blocked` on the same blocker set, did not receive `issue_blockers_resolved` when those blockers later returned to `done`. A completed wake from the previous cycle reused the same level-triggered state key and suppressed the new wake. Route-time emit, workspace-finalize backstop, and periodic liveness backstop all used that helper. **Expected behavior** When every durable blocker is `done`, a currently `blocked` assigned issue must receive exactly one valid `issue_blockers_resolved` continuation for the current blocked cycle. A completed wake from an earlier cycle must not suppress it. Watchdog `blocked` → `todo` repair must not be required. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Assign issue B, block it on issue A, mark A `done`, and let B receive `issue_blockers_resolved`. 2. Mark B `done`. 3. Reset A to `todo` and reset B from `done` to `blocked` on the same A id. This refreshes `blockedTransitionAt`. 4. Mark A `done` again. 5. Observe that B stays `blocked` with no new `issue_blockers_resolved` wake. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `cc42a67e7e9e8eb183097afc8ff4ebfa694fb3e0` **Deployment mode** Self-hosted server ## What Changed - Extend `buildIssueBlockersResolvedWakeStateKey` so the digest includes the dependent's `blockedTransitionAt` as UTC ISO-8601, or `none` - Thread `blockedTransitionAt` through `listWakeableBlockedDependents`, both route emit sites, and both backstop candidate selects - Keep compatibility: new cycle-aware keys suppress in idempotent statuses; old no-cycle state keys suppress when in-flight, or when completed and `requestedAt >= blockedTransitionAt` (or the cycle is null); legacy per-edge keys stay in-flight-only - Do not rewrite `blockedByIssueIds`, auto-flip `blocked` → `todo`, or delete historical wake rows - Add helper, route, restore, chained dependent, and backstop tests for the reset cycle ## Verification ``` pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run \ src/__tests__/issue-dependency-wakeups-routes.test.ts \ src/__tests__/heartbeat-issue-liveness-escalation.test.ts \ src/services/issue-dependency-wakeups.ts \ src/services/issue-dependency-wakeups.test.ts ``` Local result: all named tests passed (helper 9, routes 8, liveness 26). ## Risks - Deploy overlap: in-flight and same-cycle completed wakes still exist under the old no-cycle key. The lookup keeps those as suppressors so this change does not enqueue a duplicate in the current cycle. - A completed old-key wake from before the current `blockedTransitionAt` no longer suppresses. That is the intended fix. - No schema migration. Rollback is revert of this PR. - This does not change cancelled-blocker semantics or watchdog `blocked` → `todo` repair. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Provider: xAI - Model: Grok 4.6 - Tool use and code execution: yes - Human-authored: no ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.823.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
05b35d4669 |
feat(duplex): bound aggregate duplex route resource consumption with a process-owned byte ledger (#12003)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip runs AI agents through adapters and sandboxed execution targets. > - Duplex routes retain bytes across route data, broker messages, decoder buffers, and readiness replay. > - Per-route limits bound each route but do not bound the total retained bytes across many routes. > - A process-owned ledger must charge each retained buffer before allocation and release the charge during cleanup. > - This pull request adds the aggregate ledger, connects it to host and sandbox duplex paths, and adds route coverage. > - The benefit is a fail-closed process-wide byte limit that keeps concurrent duplex work within a safe resource budget. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** This change affects packages/adapter-utils and server duplex orchestration. **Problem or motivation** Many routes can each stay below their per-route limits while their combined retained bytes exceed a safe process budget. **Proposed solution** Add a process-owned aggregate byte ledger. Charge route data, broker bytes, decoder buffers, and readiness replay bytes before allocation. Release each charge during cleanup. Use a separate sandbox_process decoder cap for the in-sandbox path. **Alternatives considered** Keep only per-route limits. This does not bound the combined process use. Set a fixed limit at one call site. This misses retained bytes in other duplex paths. **Roadmap alignment** This is a tightly scoped reliability and resource-safety improvement. It does not duplicate a roadmap feature. **Additional context** The aggregate ceiling uses a safe 256 MiB default. An invalid override falls back to that default and reports the rejected value. ## What Changed - Add a process-owned aggregate byte ledger for duplex route resource use. - Charge and release route data, broker forward and response bytes, decoder buffers, and readiness replay bytes. - Bound host-to-worker pending writes and standard input transport bytes. - Add a separate decoder cap for the sandbox_process path. - Make invalid aggregate-ceiling overrides fall back to the safe default without host startup failure. - Add adapter-utils and server tests for charging, release, rejection, cleanup, and many-route aggregate limits. ## Verification - pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils exec tsc --noEmit - pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit - Run the focused adapter-utils duplex ledger and execution-target tests. - Run the server aggregate-ledger route test. - Confirm all required pull request checks pass on this branch. ## Risks The ledger touches several duplex buffer paths. A missed release could reduce later capacity until process restart. The tests cover charge, release, rejection, cleanup, and route aggregation. The change uses a safe default when configuration input is invalid. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 Codex. The runtime model ID and context window are not exposed to this task. The model used tool calls, shell commands, and code review workflow support. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes/Closes/Refs OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub issue references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.823.0-canary.1 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
c5050396c7 |
fix(daytona-duplex): chunk host-to-sandbox writes and make a transport close legible (#11986)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip runs agent work through adapters and sandbox providers > - The Daytona duplex path sends host input through a provider pseudo-terminal WebSocket > - Large messages exceed the provider limit, and a transport close can look like a process exit > - This pull request chunks UTF-8 input and carries transport-close state through the duplex path > - The benefit is reliable large input and accurate loss reporting ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The Daytona duplex path sent a full input payload as one WebSocket message. A payload above the provider limit closed the channel. The wait path also mapped a non-numeric exit result to a process exit without exit data. **Expected behavior** The provider must receive large input as ordered UTF-8 chunks. A transport close without exit data must record `transport_closed`, while a numeric exit must record `provider_exit`. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a Daytona duplex session. 2. Send an input payload larger than 65536 bytes. 3. Observe that one message closes the provider channel. 4. End a session without a numeric exit code. 5. Observe that the loss reason reports a process exit. **Paperclip version or commit** Commit `1761e79ec9097c65d94f90a8ba20416f8ab718a6`. **Deployment mode** Built from source with the Daytona sandbox provider. ## What Changed - Add a shared UTF-8 byte chunker with a 32768-byte cap. - Route both Daytona pseudo-terminal write paths through the chunker. - Preserve multi-byte UTF-8 sequences across read-side chunks. - Carry an explicit `transportClosed` state through the worker and host wait paths. - Record `transport_closed` for a reason-less transport close and `provider_exit` for a numeric exit. - Keep orderly completion suppression for both exit paths. ## Verification - The Daytona plugin suite passes 194 tests. - The adapter-utils broker, codec, and telemetry suites pass 73 tests. - The plugin SDK duplex and worker RPC host suites pass 37 tests. - The server plugin worker manager duplex suite passes 78 tests. - The execution target sandbox and ACPX execute suites pass 257 tests. - TypeScript checks pass for adapter-utils, plugin SDK, server, and the standalone Daytona plugin. ## Risks The chunk size adds a loop for large input payloads. The 32768-byte cap stays below the provider limit. The optional loss field preserves compatibility for other providers. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, extended reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The runtime does not expose a separate context-window value. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.823.0-canary.0 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
141b815294 |
fix(adapter-utils): enforce the duplex frame size bound on encode in both codec copies (#11983)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip uses adapter utilities to move bounded messages between agent processes. > - The duplex frame codec encodes and decodes these messages. > - The decoder rejects frames above the documented byte limit. > - The encoder did not apply the same limit before it sent a frame. > - This mismatch let a sender write a frame that the peer rejected after transmission. > - This pull request applies the same byte limit to both codec copies and keeps the broker channel open. > - The benefit is a local error with stable request telemetry instead of a channel loss. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this change. The problem follows the bug report fields below. **What happened?** The duplex encoder could write a frame larger than `DEFAULT_MAX_DUPLEX_FRAME_BYTES`. The peer decoder then rejected the frame after transmission. In the WebSocket 1009 case, this closed the channel and reported a process exit. **Expected behavior** The encoder should reject an oversized frame before it writes bytes. The gateway should return HTTP 413. The broker should return a bounded terminal response and keep other requests active. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Encode a duplex frame above `DEFAULT_MAX_DUPLEX_FRAME_BYTES`. 2. Send the frame through the gateway or broker. 3. Observe that the old path writes the frame or drops the channel after peer rejection. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced from the `master` development line before this change. **Deployment mode** Local dev (`pnpm dev`). ## What Changed - Add `encodeDuplexFrameChecked` to the host and embedded gateway codecs. - Measure encoded JSON bytes without the trailing newline. - Return a typed `frame_too_large` result without throwing. - Return HTTP 413 for oversized gateway requests without writing a frame. - Share one frame bound between broker decode and encode checks. - Return a bounded, non-retryable terminal response for oversized broker responses. - Add encode vectors to the shared wire-compatibility fixture. ## Verification - Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck`. - Run `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/duplex-frame-codec.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/duplex-bridge-broker.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target-sandbox.test.ts`. - Confirm the oversized-response broker test keeps the channel open and serves the other in-flight request. - Confirm the gateway test returns HTTP 413 and keeps the channel open. ## Risks The encoder now rejects oversized frames before transmission. This changes an unsafe write into a typed local error. The broker and gateway keep existing frame limits and affect only oversized frames. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool use and code execution. The model assisted with review and repository operations. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.822.0-canary.4 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
cc42a67e7e |
fix(adapter-utils): extend the duplex fail-closed run disposition to the CLI lane (#11966)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip runs agents through adapter execution lanes > - Duplex adapters can lose their control channel before a process completes > - The ACP lane already fails closed, but the CLI lane can report false success > - This pull request applies the same completion rule to the CLI lane and shares the loss code > - The benefit is consistent failure reporting when a duplex channel closes during a run ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A CLI-lane duplex run can lose its control channel before clean process completion. The run can then report `succeeded` with exit code 0 and no error code. **Expected behavior** The execution target must fail closed when the channel dies before clean completion. It must return exit code 1, the typed `duplex_channel_lost` error code, and a short stderr note. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a duplex adapter run through the CLI execution lane. 2. Close the duplex control channel before the process completes cleanly. 3. Inspect the run result and error code. **Paperclip version or commit** Commit `5e01523d4eb6df4a20a0bddd05374c9c42225203`. **Deployment mode** Built from source. **Installation method** Built from source with pnpm. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, Kimi, OpenCode, and Pi local adapters. **Database mode** Not database-related. ## What Changed - Add an optional `errorCode` field to `RunProcessResult`. - Add a one-read completion seam to the execution target process options. - Fail closed when a duplex channel dies before clean process completion. - Add `settleRunDisposition()` to atomically read and mark orderly completion. - Share the typed duplex loss error code across the ACP and CLI lanes. - Mark non-success terminal results as orderly completion before teardown. - Wire the seam through the seven duplex adapters. - Add regression tests for channel loss, clean completion, and non-clean terminal results. ## Verification - `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target-sandbox.test.ts` — 118 passed. - `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts -t "sandbox duplex run-disposition seam"` — 4 passed. - The author confirmed a clean type-check for `@paperclipai/adapter-utils` and the seven duplex adapter packages. - Pre-existing environment failures remain outside this change. They include `EACCES mkdir '/srv/paperclip'` and remote file-size setup failures. ## Risks The change alters terminal status for CLI duplex runs that lose control before clean completion. The typed error code and stderr note keep the failure visible. The broker marks failed, cancelled, and timed-out results as orderly completion to prevent false loss events during teardown. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool use and code execution, with the standard GPT-5 context window. The model assisted with the implementation and test work. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.822.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f572e08678 |
fix(recovery): stop automatic stranded-task takeovers (#11961)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The recovery service restores execution when a task loses its live path. > - The service retries the original agent for a limited number of attempts. > - The old fallback could select a manager or an executive and wake that agent. > - That fallback changed the effective recovery owner without a board decision. > - This pull request keeps the source owner and gives the exhausted recovery decision to the board. > - The benefit is a clear ownership rule with no automatic task takeover. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #11807 Refs: #11817 **What existing behavior does this improve?** This improves stranded-task recovery in the server and the recovery action card in the board UI. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: server recovery orchestration, recovery observability, board UI, and execution documentation. **Current behavior** Paperclip retries the original agent for a limited number of attempts. After the retry limit, it can select a manager, task creator, CTO, or CEO as a recovery owner. It can then wake that substitute agent. The source task keeps its assignee, but the automatic substitute wake creates an implicit takeover path. **Proposed behavior** Paperclip keeps the limited retry path for the original agent. If recovery is exhausted or unsafe, Paperclip creates one board-owned source recovery action. It keeps both source assignee fields. It does not wake a substitute agent. The board can repair, retry the original owner, explicitly reassign, or resolve the task. **Reason and benefit** Source task ownership must remain stable until a person or an approved policy changes it. The new rule removes implicit manager and executive takeover. It also gives operators clear evidence through the `board_escalation_no_takeover_v1` routing marker. **Breaking changes** Automatic recovery no longer wakes a manager or executive after the original-agent retry limit. Existing active agent-owned recovery actions remain visible and can resolve. Paperclip does not schedule a new takeover wake for those legacy actions. ## What Changed - Route exhausted and unsafe stranded recovery to a board-owned source action. - Preserve agent and user assignee fields during automatic escalation. - Keep limited same-agent continuity repair and provider quota monitoring. - Stop new manager, creator, CTO, and CEO recovery wakes. - Keep legacy agent-owned recovery actions readable and resolvable. - Add the routing marker to new board escalation evidence and observability. - Update recovery notices, the board UI card, tests, and execution documentation. ## Verification - Run `pnpm -r typecheck`. - Run `pnpm build`. - Run `pnpm check:token-gates`. - Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts`. - Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment.test.ts`. - Run the focused recovery and UI Vitest files changed by this pull request. - Confirm that a paused or over-budget source owner creates one board action, keeps the source assignee, and creates no substitute wake. ## Risks - Operators must now make the final recovery decision after the original-agent limit. - Legacy agent-owned actions use their stored contract. This avoids a rollout-time ownership rewrite. - No database migration or API response shape changes are included. - The tests cover concurrent escalation, paused and over-budget owners, legacy actions, provider quota monitoring, and UI presentation. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The hosted exact model revision and context window are not exposed. Reasoning, tool use, and code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.822.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
10d2781a29 |
feat(sandbox): add the duplex bridge broker, gated transport selection, and fixed observability (#11769)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Sandbox adapters provide controlled execution for untrusted provider environments. > - The sandbox channel needs one persistent duplex transport with strict host control. > - The transport must remain off unless the instance setting and provider capability both allow it. > - The host must detect loss, bound resource use, and expose only safe telemetry. > - This pull request adds the broker, gated selection, kill-switch wiring, fixed observability, and real-process proof. > - The benefit is safer sandbox execution with bounded failure behavior and inspectable transport results. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists for this change. The related pull requests are #11738 and #11750. **Problem or motivation** The sandbox duplex channel needs a host-controlled broker, strict transport gates, bounded provider input, and safe loss telemetry. Without these controls, a provider can cause replay, resource growth, unsafe endpoint selection, or data exposure through telemetry. **Proposed solution** Add a host broker with nested time limits, request limits, one-shot loss, and per-id deduplication. Select duplex transport only when the instance setting and provider capability both equal true. Assign the endpoint and nonce on the host. Reject invalid readiness data and use the file bridge on failure. Add fixed redacted telemetry and a real-process end-to-end test harness. **Alternatives considered** Keep the file bridge as the only transport. This avoids new channel behavior but does not provide persistent duplex operation for supported sandbox providers. **Roadmap alignment** This change supports the Cloud / Sandbox agents section in ROADMAP.md. ## What Changed - Add the duplex bridge broker with bounded forward, response, and gateway wait budgets. - Bound concurrent requests, lifetime requests, and request-id bytes before retention or forwarding. - Select duplex transport only when both required gates are true. - Assign the loopback port and nonce on the host and enforce a liveness-only READY frame. - Fall back to the file bridge after invalid readiness, contamination, bind failure, or timeout. - Carry the kill switch through the server, acpx engine, and six local adapters. - Add fixed, redacted duplex telemetry with a provider allowlist. - Add a real-process end-to-end harness for readiness, round trips, loss, and teardown. - Add regression coverage for limits, loss, UTF-8 splits, concurrency, and telemetry dimensions. ## Verification - Adapter-utils, server, and Daytona typechecks pass locally. - Adapter-utils tests pass, including the codec, broker, execution-target sandbox, and real-process harness. - Server kill-switch tests pass. - Live Daytona tests pass with the required provider key and skip without that key. - The root pnpm-lock.yaml file has no diff. - The branch contains ten commits after origin/master. ## Risks - Duplex transport remains disabled unless both gates equal true. - A provider remains an untrusted boundary and needs least-privilege credentials and quotas. - The server telemetry recorder stays deferred; the default recorder does nothing. - A provider that pre-binds the host port causes a fail-closed fallback to the file bridge. - The change adds no database migration and changes no root lockfile. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5, exact model family GPT-5, large context window, reasoning, and tool use. The model assisted with Git handoff validation and PR preparation. The implementation commits came from the engineering worktree. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with Fixes: # / Closes # / Refs # OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub #NNN / github.com/paperclipai/paperclip URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. docs/... or fix/...) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge - [x] I searched the GitHub PR list for similar PRs and confirmed this is not a duplicate --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.822.0-canary.1 |
||
|
TonioandClaude Opus 5
|
3ff636bc48 |
Drop the mission step from the wizard arc (#11935)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - New customers arrive through an onboarding arc that spans Paperclip Cloud and the tenant app > - Cloud's naming screen stopped asking for the company mission, but the tenant wizard still decided its first step by asking whether the company had one > - Every Cloud-created company therefore looked mission-less on arrival, so every walk detoured through a "Define your mission" screen the design had already removed > - This pull request removes that step from the arc, and makes step 1 create the company itself > - The benefit is a shorter arc that matches the design, and a three-step progress strip that now counts the steps that exist ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. The problem was found by walking staging end to end. **What happened:** A new customer signs in, names their organization, and waits for it to build. The tenant wizard then asks "Define your mission" before it asks for the first agent. Cloud no longer collects a mission, so this screen appears for every new customer. **Expected behavior:** The wizard asks for the first agent, the model, and a review. The progress strip counts three steps. **Actual behavior:** The wizard asks for the mission first. The progress strip counts five segments, because the run does not enter on the agent arc. **Additional context:** Three merged pull requests built the mission-based step choice this change removes: #11352, #11416 and #11429. The mission is now collected later, inside the tenant app, so onboarding does not ask for it at all. ## What Changed - `onboardingStepForCompany` always returns the agent step. The `companyHasMission` parameter is removed, because it cannot change the answer. - `resolveRouteOnboardingOptions` no longer accepts `companyHasMission`. - The dashboard no longer waits for the goal lookup before it opens the wizard. That wait only chose a step, and the step is now fixed. - Step 1 creates the company in a new `handleCreateCompany`. Company creation used to sit at the end of `handleConfirmMission`. - No company goal is written during onboarding. - The three-step strip now shows on the agent, model and review steps, because every Cloud-first run enters on the arc. - The full-length bar drops its second segment. No run can fill it. - The grow path keeps its step 2 questionnaire. Only the create path skips ahead. - Back from the agent step goes to the screen the run came from. - Four end-to-end specs no longer drive the wizard through the mission step. ## Verification Run the tenant test suite: ``` cd ui && npx vitest run ``` - 4356 tests pass. 471 files pass. - `npx tsc --noEmit` reports no errors. - Fault injection: forcing `skipsMissionStep` to `true` fails the grow questionnaire test. Removing the Back rule fails the Back test. Both tests fail on the exact defect they guard. - The three-step strip is asserted by an existing test. It checks `Step 1 of 3` and `aria-label="Create your first agent"`. Manual check on staging after the paired Cloud change: 1. Open a new incognito window. 2. Sign in with a new account. 3. Name the organization. 4. Confirm the wizard shows "Create your first agent" and "Step 1 of 3". ## Risks - **Behavioral change.** Onboarding no longer writes a company goal. An agent hired during onboarding starts without a seeded mission. This is intended. The mission moves to the tenant app. - **Dead code.** `ONBOARDING_MISSION_STEP` and the mission screen stay in the codebase, but nothing in the app opens them. They wait for the surface that collects the mission later. - **Grow path.** The grow path is unchanged, but it shares step 2 with the removed screen. New tests cover it. - **Superseded work.** #11352, #11416 and #11429 tuned the mission-based step choice. This change removes the branch they tuned. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), extended thinking, with tool use and code execution through Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
scotttongandPaperclip
|
dc5b070709 |
fix(runtime): guard empty Bash 3.2 array expansion (#11891)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents can run in isolated worktrees with a separate Paperclip runtime. > - Runtime provisioning uses a Bash script on macOS hosts. > - macOS ships Bash 3.2, where an empty array expansion fails under `set -u`. > - The source-config argument array is empty when the base workspace already has a config. > - This pull request guards that expansion and tests the normal base-config path on Bash 3.2. > - The benefit is that managed worktree provisioning no longer fails before database seeding. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this problem. PR #11752 added the conditional source-config argument that exposed the failure. **What happened?** `scripts/provision-worktree-runtime.sh` expands an empty `source_config_args` array while `set -u` is active. Bash 3.2 reports `source_config_args[@]: unbound variable` and stops provisioning when the registered base workspace already has `.paperclip/config.json`. **Expected behavior** Runtime provisioning must call `worktree ensure-seeded` without a source override when the base workspace config exists. It must work with the Bash 3.2 version that macOS supplies. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use macOS system Bash 3.2. 2. Create a base workspace with `.paperclip/config.json`. 3. Run `scripts/provision-worktree-runtime.sh` with `set -u` active in the script. 4. Observe the unbound-variable error before `worktree ensure-seeded` runs. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `origin/master` before this change. **Deployment mode** Local managed worktree runtime on macOS. ## What Changed - Guard all three optional source-config array expansions with Bash 3.2-compatible parameter expansion. - Add a regression test that uses the base-config path and verifies that no `--from-config` argument is sent. - Document the Bash 3.2 compatibility requirement in the runtime script. ## Verification - `/bin/bash -n scripts/provision-worktree-runtime.sh` - `node --test --test-name-pattern='runtime provisioning invokes ensure-seeded once|runtime provisioning omits the source override|runtime provisioning guards every optional source-config expansion' scripts/__tests__/provision-worktree-self-heal.test.mjs` - `git diff --check` ## Risks Low risk. The change only affects expansion of an optional two-element CLI argument array. The regression tests cover both the empty and non-empty paths. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex with model ID `gpt-5`. The runtime did not expose the context-window size. Reasoning, tool use, and code execution were enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
35b5105f07 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#11915)
Auto-generated lockfile refresh after dependencies changed on master. This PR only updates pnpm-lock.yaml. Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
TonioandClaude Opus 5
|
24913064ff |
feat(commitperclip): surface the Co-Authored-By trailers a squash merge needs (#11498)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work, and it takes contributions from outside the core team > - Those contributions arrive as PRs, and this repository squash-merges every one of them > - A squash collapses the whole branch into a single commit authored by whoever pressed the button > - So when a maintainer rebases and lands a contributor's stale PR, the contributor's name survives only if the squash message carries a `Co-Authored-By` trailer > - Nothing prompts for that trailer, and the PR page keeps showing the original author either way, so losing it is invisible at the moment it happens > - This pull request has commitperclip detect the situation and print the exact trailers to paste > - The benefit is that keeping an outside contributor's name is a default rather than something a maintainer has to remember ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. The problem follows, and it is not hypothetical. **What happened?** #11370, #11371 and #11379 landed @stubbi's work yesterday. Each of those PRs carries a comment from me telling them their authorship would be preserved. All three squash commits went in without a `Co-Authored-By` trailer, so `git log` credits none of them: | commit | landed from | credited | | --- | --- | --- | | `66515582e` | #9900 | Claude only | | `bc0b5a164` | #9501 | Claude only | | `35a9b9873` | #8982 | Claude only | | `6542ad1f4` | #11259 | ✅ Jannes Stubbemann + Claude | The last one has the trailer because that message was written by hand with the contributor in mind. The only difference between the two outcomes was memory. Master history cannot be rewritten, so those three are now credited by comment on the original PRs — which is a worse record than a commit trailer, and the reason to make this automatic. **Expected behavior** When a branch carries commits by someone other than the PR author, the merger is told what trailers the squash needs. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `92047cac4`. ## What Changed - `.github/scripts/check-pr-coauthors.mjs` — new gate. - `.github/scripts/run-quality-gates.mjs` — fetches the PR's commits and runs it. - `.github/scripts/tests/check-pr-coauthors.test.mjs` — 12 cases. - `.github/workflows/pr.yml` — runs `.github/scripts/tests/`. ### Informational, not a failure The squash message does not exist while the PR is open. This can neither be verified there nor fixed there, so failing a PR on it would block work on something its author cannot satisfy. The gate notices that the situation applies and prints the lines to paste. Run against #11370's actual commits it produces exactly what was missing: ``` This branch carries commits by stubbi. Squash-merging drops that authorship unless the squash message carries their trailers, and nothing else will notice if it does not. Add to the squash body when merging: Co-Authored-By: Jannes Stubbemann <stubbi@users.noreply.github.com> ``` ### Edge cases it handles Bots skipped; the PR author's own commits skipped; logins compared case-insensitively (`PR_AUTHOR` does not always arrive in the same case as the commit author login); each contributor listed once however many commits they wrote; and a commit GitHub could not match to an account falls back to its raw git author — that identity being the one most likely to be lost, not least likely. Paging stops at the API's own 250-commit ceiling rather than spinning on full pages of nothing new. ### The test directory was not running `.github/scripts/tests/` held ten test files covering the existing gates, and no workflow ran any of them. Adding an eleventh would have meant adding a test that never executes, so `pr.yml` now runs the directory. All **149** pass, including the 137 that were already there and previously unverified in CI. ## Verification - 149 tests pass via `node --test '.github/scripts/tests/*.test.mjs'` — the exact command CI now runs. - The gate was run against the real commit shape from #11370 and produces the missing trailer verbatim. This PR is its own negative control: the branch carries only my commits, so the new gate should stay silent on it. If commitperclip prints a co-author note below, the gate is wrong. ## Risks Low. Informational output only — it cannot fail a PR, and `allPassed` is unchanged. It adds one API call per gate run (`/pulls/{n}/commits`), fetched in the same `Promise.all` as the existing PR and files calls. Enabling the previously-unrun test directory could in principle surface a pre-existing failure; all 149 pass locally, so it does not. Revert the commit to restore. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), through Claude Code. Extended thinking enabled. Tool use enabled: file read and edit, shell for test runs. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.822.0-canary.0 nightly/v2026.822.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
TonioandClaude Opus 5
|
3d366ba15f |
Rebuild the onboarding agent arc on the prototype's step design (#11905)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The onboarding wizard in `ui/` hires that first agent. It runs three steps: create the agent, connect a model, and review > - A standalone prototype holds the agreed design for these steps. #10786 ported that prototype, but #11067 reverted it in full because the port deleted `OnboardingWizard.tsx` while four pull requests were editing that file > - Those four pull requests have since merged. The revert said the port can "re-land incrementally", and this is that re-land > - This pull request takes the presentational layer from the prototype only. It keeps master's wizard as the source of behaviour, so the eight onboarding fixes merged since the revert stay in place > - The benefit is that the three agent steps match the agreed design, and no merged fix is lost to get there ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #10786 — the first attempt to land this design. Refs #11067 — the revert that asked for it to re-land in smaller steps. No public issue exists for the re-land. The problem is described below. **Subsystem affected** The `ui` package. The change touches the onboarding wizard, the agent capsule, and one Storybook story. It adds four small presentational components under `ui/src/components/onboarding/`. **Current behavior** The wizard's agent steps do not match the prototype. Each step shows a small heading beside an icon, above a form. The agent capsule sits below that heading and does not animate. The agent gets a name but no role, so every first agent is created as `ceo`. The wizard also shows a five-segment progress bar on these steps. A walker who enters on the agent step cannot reach the first two segments, so two of the five can never be filled. **Proposed behavior** The three steps use the prototype's card, its centred display heading, and its footer. One capsule sits above the heading and stays mounted across all three steps, so it reads as one object being built rather than three screens that each show their own. A three-segment strip counts these steps for a walker who enters on them. The full-length bar stays for a walker who starts at step one, so that count never restarts partway. The agent step gains a role. The options come from the agent role enum, not from the prototype's mock list. **Reason and benefit** The design is agreed and already built once. Re-landing it presentation-first keeps the behaviour that master gained after the revert. Sourcing roles from the enum matters. The prototype offers "Coder", which is not a valid role — the enum uses `engineer` — so a walker who picked it would fail validation at hire time. **Breaking changes** None. The wizard keeps its routes, its draft format, and its hire call. The draft gains one optional field, `agentRole`. A draft saved before this change loads without it and falls back to the default. ## What Changed - Add `ui/src/components/onboarding/`: `Stepper`, `OnboardingCard`, `OnboardingHeading`, `FooterNav`, `AgentPreview`, and shared motion constants - Rebuild wizard steps 3–5 on those parts: one card, the capsule above a centred heading, and one footer - Hold one `AgentCapsule` across the three steps. It springs in once, then morphs from dashed slot to traced outline to filled - Add `strokeDraw` to `AgentCapsule`. It traces the outline instead of cross-fading it. The dashed layer holds until the trace ends - Add a role select to the agent step. Choosing a role fills the name, unless the walker typed one - Show one progress indicator per run, not two - Label strip segments by destination, not by number - Add `motion` to the `ui` package - Add a Storybook story for the strip and the capsule states ## Verification Run the tests: ``` pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec tsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit ``` 4235 tests pass. The typecheck is clean. To see the steps, start the app and open `/<PREFIX>/onboarding` for a company that has a company-level goal. The wizard opens on the agent step. Step three requires a hire. Three absence assertions were checked by fault injection. Each one fails when the old behaviour returns: - put the step counter back, and the "shows no step counter" test fails - default `strokeDraw` to true, and the cross-fade test fails - restore the timer gate on the strip, and the indicator test fails ## Risks Low to medium. `motion` is one new dependency in `ui`. #11067 gave dependency weight as one of three reasons to revert #10786, so this branch carries the smallest set that works. `motion` drives the step transitions and the capsule choreography, and three files import it. An earlier revision of this branch also added `three` and `@types/three`. Both are removed. They existed for the 3D backdrop, which belongs to the auth and welcome screens rather than to these three steps, so nothing on this branch imported them. The role select changes what the wizard sends. Before this change every first agent was hired as `ceo`. Now the walker chooses. The values come from the enum, so the server accepts all of them. Steps 1 and 2 keep the older design. They do not run on the Cloud-first path, where the company already exists. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), with extended thinking, tool use, and code execution. Used for the code, the tests, and this description. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.821.0-canary.12 |
||
|
|
14027df09e |
fix(workspaces): read process cwd on macOS so port-owner adoption works (#11763)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A workspace can run a shared local service, such as a dev server, on an automatic port > - Paperclip adopts a live service again after it loses the runtime registry state > - Paperclip must first prove that the port owner runs inside the workspace > - Linux reads the process working directory from `/proc/<pid>/cwd` > - macOS has no `/proc`, so the check returned `null` and adoption always failed > - This pull request reads the process working directory with `lsof` on macOS > - The benefit is that macOS keeps a healthy live service after startup reconciliation, instead of recording it as stopped ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Closes #9911. That pull request reports the same defect and was opened first, on 2026-07-20. Its checks have been red since that day, because its inline issue description does not use the label format the gate parses. It has had no author activity since. This pull request keeps that author's test-fixture commit, with the author unchanged, and adds NUL-delimited parsing, adoption-boundary tests, and fail-closed Darwin registry handling. Maintainers may prefer to land #9911 instead. I will close this one again if they do. This pull request replaces #11600, which I closed earlier as a duplicate. It carries the same work, rebased onto current `master`, with the review feedback from that pull request applied. No public issue exists. The problem follows. **What happened?** On macOS, `readLocalServiceProcessCwd` returned `null`. Startup reconciliation found a live port owner, but it could not verify the working directory. It rejected the candidate and recorded the live service as stopped. **Expected behavior** Paperclip adopts a healthy port owner when the working directory is inside the requested workspace. Paperclip rejects the process when the working directory is outside the workspace, or when it cannot be read. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Build Paperclip from source on macOS. 2. Start a shared workspace runtime service on an automatic port. 3. Remove the runtime registry state while the service stays alive. 4. Run startup reconciliation. 5. Read the result. Unpatched `master` reports `adopted: 0` and `stopped: 1`. **Paperclip version or commit** This branch is based on `master` at `7c8064da1b35527865c1d523c9f0016e304ae46d`. **Deployment mode** Local development from source. **Installation method** Built from source with pnpm. **Operating system** macOS 26.4, Darwin 25.4.0, arm64. **Node.js version** Node.js 22.22.2 on macOS. Node.js 24.19.0 on Linux. pnpm 9.15.4. ## Darwin Registry Adoption Now Fails Closed This pull request changes one existing Darwin registry-adoption behavior in addition to enabling port-owner adoption. Before this change, `readLocalServiceProcessCwd` always returned `null` on Darwin. `isLocalServiceRegistryCwdCompatible` treated a null cwd as compatible on every non-Linux platform, so a service with an existing registry record could still be adopted when its port owner, process group, and command matched, even though Paperclip had not verified the process's real working directory. Darwin can now inspect the process cwd through `lsof`. If that inspection returns `null` — including a missing `lsof`, a command failure, or missing cwd output — registry-backed adoption now fails closed and the stale registry record is removed. This is a deliberate behavior change. It prevents a failed Darwin cwd probe from silently falling back to trusting stored registry metadata. The no-registry port-owner path already rejected a null cwd before this pull request, so its failure behavior has not changed. ## What Changed - Add a Darwin branch to `readLocalServiceProcessCwd`. - Run `lsof -a -d cwd -p <pid> -F0n` to read the process working directory. - Parse the NUL-delimited field output. - Do not trim the path. Do not split it on newlines. A directory name can contain a trailing space or a newline, and a changed path would name a different directory. - Keep the Linux `/proc/<pid>/cwd` path unchanged. - Return `null` for an invalid pid, a missing `lsof`, a command error, or missing output. - Reject a Darwin registry record when the working directory cannot be read. Darwin can now read it, so a failed read means the check failed. It no longer means the platform has no way to check. - Keep the registry fallback only on platforms that cannot read a process working directory. - Run the existing foreign-workspace rejection test on macOS. - Add a test: Paperclip adopts a port owner inside the workspace when no registry record exists. - Add a test: Paperclip rejects a listener in a sibling directory that differs only by a trailing space. - Add helper tests for newline and whitespace parsing, an invalid pid, and a missing `lsof` binary. - Resolve the branch-containment temporary repository root before the path comparison. This test-only commit comes from #9911 and keeps its author. ## Verification Head of this branch: `2be1b74746d8a0db4b680062f0c57995a6ff3912`. **Linux, on this head** ```sh pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run \ src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts \ src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment.test.ts ``` Result: 138/138 pass. `workspace-runtime.test.ts` is 132/132. `heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment.test.ts` is 6/6. **macOS, on this head** macOS 26.4, Darwin 25.4.0, arm64, Node.js 22.22.2, pnpm 9.15.4. - Controlled baseline: `workspace runtime startup reconciliation > adopts a live auto-port shared service after runtime state is reset` fails on the rebase base `7c8064da1b35527865c1d523c9f0016e304ae46d` and reports `adopted: 0`, `stopped: 1`. The same test passes on this head. That test uses the normal managed start path, which starts the service detached. - Focused working-directory, registry, adoption, and boundary tests: 8/8 pass. - `heartbeat-workspace-branch-containment.test.ts`: 6/6 pass. Two assertions failed before the fixture change, because `/var/...` and `/private/var/...` name the same macOS directory. - Server typecheck: pass. - Full `workspace-runtime.test.ts`: 131/132 pass. The one failure is `realizeExecutionWorkspace > records teardown and cleanup operations when a recorder is provided`: ```text expected: /var/folders/... received: /private/var/folders/... ``` I ran that same test alone on the rebase base `7c8064da`, with no patch applied, and got the identical failure. It is a pre-existing macOS fixture that builds a path from `os.tmpdir()` and compares it against a realpath. It does not run the changed adoption path. This description does not claim the whole file is green on macOS. **macOS listener evidence** In the `adopts a port owner running inside the workspace when the registry record is gone` scenario, the auto-port listener bound port `54360`: ```text COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF NODE NAME node 6808 <local-user> 12u IPv4 0xee4e36b2c8c094cf 0t0 TCP 127.0.0.1:54360 (LISTEN) ``` To hold the listener open long enough to capture this, that one diagnostic run added a temporary pause, which exceeded the Vitest timeout. The pause was reverted, the unmodified test was run again on this head, and it passed 1/1. The process and the port were then released. Note for maintainers: an existing test already covered this defect. That test never runs on macOS, because CI runs on Linux. A macOS job would have caught it in July. ## Risks Low risk. - Linux keeps the existing procfs implementation. - Other platforms keep the existing registry fallback. - macOS makes one extra `lsof` call, and only when it must read a process working directory. - A probe failure returns `null`. - Darwin port-owner adoption and Darwin registry adoption both fail closed. - The parser keeps significant whitespace and embedded newlines. - There is no database migration and no API change. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), with extended thinking, tool use, and code execution. It wrote the original implementation and the adoption tests, reviewed the branch, ran the Linux test suite, rebased onto current `master`, and prepared this text. OpenAI GPT-5.6-sol, through Hermes Agent, added the failure-mode coverage and ran the macOS checks. A human reviewed the change and controls publication. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (see Verification for the one disclosed macOS baseline failure) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (this change affects an internal helper and tests only) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: tim <tf00185077@i-mps.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: scbailey-build <scott@bequall.com>canary/v2026.821.0-canary.11 |
||
|
|
417336f8be |
fix(workspaces): attach PR preparation to existing branches (#11703)
<!-- Write all pull request text in Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100): short sentences, one instruction per sentence, simple approved vocabulary, and the active voice. --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Execution workspaces isolate an agent task from the primary checkout. > - Pull request preparation can need a branch that already contains completed work. > - The workspace policy could not require an exact existing branch. > - Workspace cleanup also treated worktree creation as branch ownership. > - This pull request adds an exact existing-branch policy and separate branch ownership metadata. > - The benefit is safe pull request preparation that preserves every existing commit and operator-owned branch. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A pull request preparation run could not pin its execution workspace to an exact existing branch. Workspace reuse and cleanup could also confuse worktree creation with branch ownership. **Expected behavior** The run must attach only to the requested branch in an isolated Git worktree. It must fail if the branch is missing, busy, or inconsistent. Cleanup must not delete a branch that Paperclip does not own. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a branch that contains completed work. 2. Configure a pull request preparation task to use that branch. 3. Start the task and observe that the prior policy cannot require the exact branch. **Paperclip version or commit** This behavior reproduces on the base revision before this pull request. **Deployment mode** Local development with isolated Git worktrees. ## What Changed - Add `existingBranch` to the execution workspace policy and shared validation contracts. - Require `existingBranch` to use an isolated Git worktree and reject conflicting branch templates. - Attach to the exact branch without creating, renaming, resetting, or deleting it. - Track branch ownership separately from worktree creation and use that ownership during cleanup. - Return HTTP 422 for invalid existing-branch settings on every issue-producing route. - Add a bounded repair script for existing pull request preparation tasks. - Add focused policy, route, heartbeat, runtime, and ready-comment tests. - Document the exact-branch behavior and safety rules. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/execution-workspace-policy.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-existing-branch-validation-status.test.ts server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts server/src/services/workspace-runtime-exposure.test.ts server/src/services/workspace-runtime-ready-comment.test.ts` passed 335 tests. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed for all workspace projects. - `pnpm test:run` passed 4,431 tests. Two unrelated embedded-Postgres setup hooks timed out under aggregate load. Their isolated rerun passed 74 tests. - `pnpm build` passed for all workspace projects. - The two review regressions passed with 139 unrelated tests skipped. - All latest-head CI gates passed after one unrelated timing-sensitive test passed on rerun. - Greptile scored the latest head 5/5 with no unresolved review threads. ## Risks - Invalid workspace settings now return HTTP 422 instead of a generic validation response. - The exact branch must already exist and must not be checked out by another worktree. - The new policy fails closed when it cannot prove branch identity or ownership. - This change has no database migration. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex from the GPT-5 family assisted with this change. The runtime did not expose its exact deployment ID or context window. The agent used high-reasoning mode, repository tools, shell execution, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.821.0-canary.10 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
fbd20b28d3 |
fix(grok-local): stop defaulting --permission-mode to dontAsk (#11898)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The `grok_local` adapter runs the native Grok Build CLI in headless
mode for unattended agent heartbeats
> - Grok CLI 1.0 started to enforce the `dontAsk` permission mode as
deny-by-default, and it takes precedence over `--always-approve`
> - The adapter passes both flags on every run, so each run dies on its
first tool call and is still recorded as a success
> - This pull request removes the `dontAsk` default so unattended runs
rely on `--always-approve` alone
> - The benefit is that `grok_local` agents can execute tools again on
current Grok CLI releases
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public issue exists. Description per the bug template:
**What happened?**
Every `grok_local` run on Grok CLI 1.0.x stops on its first tool call.
The stream shows the tool call move from `pending` to `failed` with
"User cancelled the execution for tool `run_terminal_command`", and the
session ends with `stopReason: "cancelled"` after one turn. The CLI
exits 0, so Paperclip records the run as succeeded with no work done,
and the issue lands in missing-disposition recovery.
**Expected behavior**
Unattended runs must auto-approve tool executions. The adapter already
passes `--always-approve` for this.
**Steps to reproduce**
In a clean Linux environment with Grok CLI 1.0.3 and `XAI_API_KEY` set,
run the adapter's exact invocation shape:
`grok --output-format streaming-json --permission-mode dontAsk
--always-approve --disable-web-search --single "Run the shell command:
echo ok"`
The tool call is denied. Drop `--permission-mode dontAsk` (or use
`--permission-mode bypassPermissions`) and the same command executes the
tool. On Grok 0.2.x the original combination worked because the CLI
accepted `dontAsk` without enforcing it; the 0.2.39 embedded docs state
the flag takes effect only for `bypassPermissions` / always-approve.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master (
canary/v2026.821.0-canary.9
|
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
69590890d4 |
Fix remote-only workspace base refs and pre-adapter retry loops (#11892)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Execution workspaces give each run an isolated directory and a selected base ref > - A remote-only base ref can fail before `git worktree add` when the ref is not local > - A setup failure before adapter dispatch must block the run without an agent-only retry > - This pull request resolves both remote-tracking ref forms and bounds recovery for the same unresolved ref > - The benefit is correct workspace setup and no repeated pre-adapter recovery loop ## Linked Issues or Issue Description This PR has no existing public issue. It addresses a workspace setup bug. **What happened?** A remote-only base ref could fail before `git worktree add`. A setup failure before adapter dispatch could also queue an agent-only missing-comment retry. **Expected behavior** Paperclip must resolve `fix/foo` and `origin/fix/foo` before it creates a worktree. An unresolved ref must create a human-owned configuration blocker. Paperclip must not queue an agent-only retry when the adapter never starts. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Configure an execution workspace with a base ref that exists only on the remote. 2. Start a run that creates a fresh worktree. 3. Repeat the run with the same unresolved ref. 4. Observe one configuration blocker and no repeated agent-only recovery action. **Paperclip version or commit** `7664e323189bc219d8cbe00433b2e82b682b0504` **Deployment mode** Built from source with `pnpm dev`. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific. The failure occurs before adapter dispatch. **Database mode** Not database-related. **Access context** Both board and agent execution paths can use execution workspaces. Related public pull request: `Refs #11123`. ## What Changed - Resolve remote-only base refs with the authenticated fetch helper before `git worktree add`. - Support both unqualified refs and remote-tracking refs. - Raise a `configuration_incomplete` blocker when the requested ref remains unresolved. - Suppress missing-comment retries when setup fails before adapter dispatch. - Add the requested ref to the recovery fingerprint to bound identical recovery actions. - Add focused tests and update the execution semantics document. ## Verification - `tsc --noEmit` passed for the changed server code. - Focused Vitest suites passed, including four base-ref tests, fingerprint deduplication, and pre-adapter retry suppression. - GitHub Actions must run the full pull request gate. ## Risks Low risk. The change affects workspace setup before adapter dispatch. Existing worktree reuse remains unchanged. An unresolved ref now creates a clear configuration blocker instead of starting an adapter run. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5; exact model ID `gpt-5`; agentic tool use and repository review. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.821.0-canary.8 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
adfbe2d4b9 |
feat(environments): refer to the managed default environment by name, not the sandbox driver key (#11838)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Managed deployments provision a platform-managed default environment
for agent runs; the UI shows this environment in selectors, the agent
form, run details, and the environments page
> - Those surfaces append the raw driver key to the environment name, so
users see labels like "Paperclip Computer (sandbox)", "Paperclip
Computer · sandbox", and fallback copy such as "Managed sandbox" and
"The sandbox has no ready authentication"
> - "sandbox" is infrastructure vocabulary, not the product name of the
environment; showing it next to the managed environment's name is
confusing and off-brand
> - This pull request renders platform-managed environments by name
alone and rewords the sandbox-phrased copy, while user-created
environments keep the driver suffix so mixed lists stay distinguishable
> - The benefit is that the default environment reads as one clear
product name everywhere, and self-hosted users lose nothing: their own
environments still show the driver
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
Display of the platform-managed default environment across the UI.
**Subsystem affected**
UI (environment selectors, agent config form, environments page, agents
page, run details) and the claude-local/codex-local adapter auth checks.
**Current behavior**
The agent form labels the inherited default environment as "Name
(sandbox)". Environment selectors and the environments list render "Name
· sandbox". The agents page describes the environment as "<provider>
sandbox provider". The agent form's fallback label is "Managed sandbox".
Adapter auth checks say "The sandbox has no ready authentication for
this adapter."
**Proposed behavior**
Platform-managed environment rows (`metadata.managedByPaperclip`) render
their name alone. The fallback label is "Paperclip Computer". The agents
page describes managed environments as "Managed by Paperclip". Run
details omit the driver suffix for sandbox-driver environments (the
adjacent Provider entry already identifies the mechanism). Adapter auth
checks say "This environment has no ready authentication for this
adapter."
**Reason and benefit**
The managed environment carries a product name. Appending the raw driver
key ("sandbox") to it is noise and contradicts the product naming.
User-created environments keep the driver suffix, so mixed lists stay
distinguishable.
**Breaking changes**
None. Message text of the auth check is not read programmatically; the
UI keys off `ADAPTER_AUTH_MISSING_CHECK_CODE`. Rows without the managed
marker render exactly as before.
## What Changed
- New `environmentDisplayLabel` helper in
`ui/src/lib/managed-sandbox-environment.ts`: managed rows → name alone;
other rows → "Name · driver".
- `AgentConfigForm`: inherited-default label uses the helper; fallback
copy "Managed sandbox" → "Paperclip Computer"; environment options use
the helper.
- `ProjectProperties`, `CompanyEnvironments`: environment selector
options use the helper; the environments-list row hides the driver
suffix on managed rows; the managed detail page's fallback description
no longer says "sandbox".
- `Agents` page: managed environments are described as "Managed by
Paperclip" instead of "<provider> sandbox provider".
- `CommentThread` run details: the driver suffix is omitted for
sandbox-driver environments.
- claude-local and codex-local adapters: auth-missing check message/hint
reworded from "sandbox" to "environment" (ACP and environment-test
paths); claude-local probe/effort/login hints reworded the same way.
- Run status lines: "Syncing workspace to sandbox", "Exporting git
changes from sandbox", "Starting adapter in sandbox", and friends now
say "environment"; "Finalizing sandbox workspace" → "Finalizing
workspace". Templated transfer-progress lines map the `sandbox`
transport key to "environment" for display (`runtime-progress.ts`).
- Agent form sign-in panel: "Sign in to the sandbox" → "Sign in to the
environment"; "Authenticated. The sandbox has credentials now." → "…The
environment has credentials now."
- Feature catalog + instance settings card: "Managed Sandbox Only" →
"Managed Environment Only" (setting key unchanged; the card keeps its
alphabetical slot).
- Server agents routes: execution-target failure and test-identity copy
no longer say "sandbox"; workspace-mode label "Cloud sandbox" → "Cloud
environment".
- Tests: new `environmentDisplayLabel` unit cases; new `AgentConfigForm`
render case asserting the managed default renders without "(sandbox)" or
"· sandbox"; status-line assertions updated across adapter-utils, server
heartbeat/live-run, and UI chat suites.
## Verification
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — clean.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local typecheck` and
`--filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck` — clean.
- `vitest run` for `managed-sandbox-environment.test.ts`,
`AgentConfigForm.render.test.tsx`, `CompanyEnvironments.test.tsx`,
`Agents.test.tsx`, `CommentThread.test.tsx`, `NewAgent.test.tsx` — all
green (118 tests across the two runs).
## Risks
Low risk. Cosmetic label changes only; no data or API changes. Rows
without `metadata.managedByPaperclip` render exactly as before, so
self-hosted deployments with their own environments see no change. The
only self-hosted-visible wording changes are the adapter auth-check
message and the driver suffix omission on sandbox-driver rows in run
details.
## Model Used
- Claude (Anthropic) — claude-fable-5 (Claude Fable 5), Claude Code CLI,
extended thinking, tool use.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no
docs reference these labels)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
canary/v2026.821.0-canary.7
|
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
0148c2c6eb |
test(server): cover buffered duplex chunk drain after a late listener bind (#11865)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip uses duplex routes to carry data from plugin workers. > - PR #11860 added the product fix for buffered data after an early route end. > - The fix needs a regression test for a listener that binds after the byte cap ends the route. > - This pull request adds that test and protects the fix from later regressions. > - The benefit is clear test coverage for late-listener delivery. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description This pull request adds regression coverage for the fix in [PR #11860](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/11860). The product fix already exists on `master`. Before that fix, a late listener could receive no data after the byte cap ended the route. The test sends two three-byte `€` chunks to a route with a four-byte cap, waits for route end, then binds the listener. It expects the first valid chunk. ## What Changed - Add one server regression test for late-listener delivery after byte-cap route termination. - Keep the product code unchanged in this pull request. ## Verification - The test passes on the current branch. - PR #11860 merged the product fix into `master` at commit `33eb68b3ae4ce7ee27b31c59bd41db600ad47d19`. - GitHub CI passes on the current head. - Greptile reports 5/5 with no blocking finding. ## Risks Low risk. This pull request changes one test file and no product code, schema, public API, or authentication flow. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5. Runtime model ID: GPT-5. Context window: not exposed in this run. Capabilities used: repository review, GitHub operations, and tool use. The implementation came from the engineer's authorized test commit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used with version and capability details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this pull request does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related pull requests and linked them above - [x] I have either linked an existing issue or described the issue in this pull request - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id - [x] I have run the relevant test and GitHub CI passes - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation, or documentation does not apply - [x] I have considered and documented the risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.821.0-canary.6 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
5bc6031f79 |
fix(server,ui,claude-local): verify auth on the adapter Test lane and enforce managed-sandbox tenant binding (#11810)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Adapter Test checks whether an agent adapter can run with its configured environment, and every local-driver adapter (Claude, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, Pi, Cursor, etc.) shares this Test route and its UI resolution logic > - The Claude ACP Test lane could report pass without checking local or remote authentication, and the shared Test route and UI had gaps in environment binding, probe safety, and managed-sandbox resolution that affect every adapter that uses the Test button, not only Claude > - This pull request verifies authentication on every Claude ACP target, and closes the shared Test-route/UI gaps: tenant-binding on the route, a managed-sandbox-only redirect that matches the real run path, and a three-tier environment resolution in the UI > - The benefit is a truthful Test result with safer probe execution and tenant isolation, for Claude specifically and for every other local adapter that shares this Test surface ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The Claude ACP Test lane returned `status: "pass"` without checking authentication for some local and non-sandbox targets. Separately, the shared `/companies/:companyId/adapters/:type/test-environment` route — used by every local-driver adapter, not only Claude — accepted a foreign environment id, and its UI resolution did not mirror the server's managed-sandbox-only redirect. **Expected behavior** The Test lane checks the resolved credential and hello probe for every Claude ACP target. The shared adapter Test route rejects a foreign environment before it reveals environment details or starts a lease, for any adapter type. The Test's environment resolution (UI and server) matches the real run's three-tier resolution, including the managed-sandbox-only redirect. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run the Claude ACP Test lane against a local target without a valid credential. 2. Run the adapter Test route with an environment id from another company (any adapter type). 3. Observe the pass result on step 1, or the missing tenant-binding rejection on step 2. **Paperclip version or commit** `933749e01f74e82ce5d315c071be534d04e01158` **Deployment mode** Local dev (`pnpm dev`) and server route tests. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Claude Code directly (the ACP auth-verification work). The tenant-binding guard, managed-sandbox-only redirect, and UI three-tier resolution apply to the shared adapter Test route and affect every local-driver adapter (Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, Pi, Cursor, etc.), not only Claude — see "What Changed" below for the split between Claude-only and shared changes. **Database mode** Not database-related. **Access context** Both board and agent paths use the affected Test surface, for every local-driver adapter. **Additional context** Two commits that were previously bundled into this PR — a `plugin-worker-manager` duplex-channel frame-bound fix and a `workspace-runtime` exit-persist crash fix — are unrelated to the adapter Test lane and have been split out into their own PRs: #11860 and #11861. ## What Changed Claude-only (`packages/adapters/claude-local`): - Verify `CLAUDE_CODE_OAUTH_TOKEN` and run the hello probe for every Claude ACP target. - Keep `adapter_auth_missing` sandbox-only and report missing non-sandbox credentials as a warning. - Add a deny-by-default probe environment builder for the ACP and CLI local probes. - Log only fixed probe context and allowlisted classifications. - Seed the host OAuth token into the hello probe environment. Shared, cross-adapter (`server/src/routes/agents.ts`, `ui/src/lib/adapter-test-environment.ts`, `ui/src/components/AgentConfigForm.tsx`, `ui/src/components/OnboardingWizard.tsx`): - Add a company-binding guard and a binding assertion for the generic `/companies/:companyId/adapters/:type/test-environment` route, so a foreign-company environment id is rejected before any secret resolution or sandbox lease, for every adapter type. - Resolve all three server environment tiers (agent default, instance default, local default) in the UI, and add the managed-sandbox-only redirect so the Test probes the same target a real run would use. - Enforce onboarding Test results: block hire on a failed environment test. - Add regression tests for authentication, tenant binding, probe safety, diagnostics, and UI resolution. ## Verification - Adapter suites pass for the Claude local server probe, remote, ACP, auth, probe environment, and config paths. - Server route tests pass, including the five tenant-binding cases. - UI adapter Test environment resolver tests pass for all three resolution tiers. - Adapter package `tsc --noEmit` exits 0. - Full CI must pass on this pull request. ## Risks The probe environment now denies caller variables by default. A required variable that is not on the allowlist could stop a probe from starting. The route now rejects foreign environment ids with a fixed 403 response. The managed-sandbox-only redirect changes where the Test (and the login affordance) probes for every local-driver adapter under that policy, not only Claude — operators running other local adapters under managed-sandbox-only will see their Test target move from local to the managed sandbox, matching what real runs already do. The change limits secret and diagnostic exposure. ## Model Used Original implementation: OpenAI Codex, GPT-5; exact context window not exposed in that run; tool use and code execution. This revision (commit split and title/description correction): Claude, Sonnet 5 (claude-sonnet-5). The original title and description described this PR as Claude-only; review found it also changes the shared adapter Test route and UI resolution used by every local-driver adapter, and carried two unrelated server fixes. Claude split those two commits into #11860 and #11861 via `git rebase --onto` (verified byte-identical to the original tree minus those commits) and rewrote this description to reflect the actual scope. No functional code in this PR was authored by Claude. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
917d2350f8 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#11867)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip uses a pnpm workspace for its packages. > - Package manifests and the lockfile must stay synchronized. > - A merged Node version policy fix changed package manifests on master. > - The frozen lockfile no longer matched those manifests. > - This automated pull request refreshes the generated lockfile. > - The benefit is that clean installs and required CI jobs can run again. ## What Changed - Regenerated `pnpm-lock.yaml` from the current package manifests. ## Verification - `pnpm install --lockfile-only --ignore-scripts --no-frozen-lockfile` - The repository PR workflow validates the generated lockfile with a frozen install. ## Risks Low risk. This is an automation-generated lockfile-only update after manifest changes on master. ## Model Used None — automation-generated. Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
1746783d40 |
fix(kimi): align package with Node 24 policy (#11890)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Paperclip now requires Node.js 24.11.0 or later > - Each workspace package must publish the same Node.js engine requirement > - The Kimi adapter entered `master` after the Node.js upgrade branch started > - Its package still used Node.js 22 types and had no engine requirement > - This pull request aligns the Kimi adapter with the repository Node.js policy > - The benefit is that the Node.js policy check passes again on `master` ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The `pnpm check:node-version` command fails on `master`. The Kimi adapter uses `@types/node` 22 and has no `engines.node` value. **Expected behavior** All workspace packages must use Node.js 24 types and declare Node.js 24.11.0 as the minimum version. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Check out commit `a7e689b3c`. 2. Use Node.js 24.11.0. 3. Run `pnpm check:node-version`. **Paperclip version or commit** `a7e689b3c` **Deployment mode** Local dev (`pnpm dev`). ## What Changed - Update the Kimi adapter to use `@types/node` 24. - Add the repository minimum Node.js engine requirement to the Kimi adapter package. - Keep `pnpm-lock.yaml` out of this pull request. ## Verification - `npx -y -p node@24.11.0 -c 'node --version && pnpm check:node-version && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-kimi-local typecheck'` - The command reports Node.js `v24.11.0`. - The Node.js policy check passes. - The Kimi adapter typecheck passes. - A broader local suite was started and stopped at the maintainer's request after the focused checks passed. ## Risks - Low risk. This change updates package metadata and development types only. - The lockfile refresh runs in separate repository automation. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, with repository inspection, shell tools, and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
scotttongandClaude Fable 5
|
a7e689b3c3 |
feat(ui): rename "Agent mode" to "Auto mode" and show full work-mode labels (#11866)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The task composer and the New Task dialog show a work-mode chip (how
the agent will run a task)
> - The default mode was labeled "Agent mode", and the New Task dialog
chip abbreviated every mode to one word ("Auto", "Plan", "Ask")
> - "Agent mode" is confusing because every mode runs an agent, and the
abbreviated chip hid what the label means
> - This pull request renames the mode to "Auto mode" and makes every
mode chip show the full label
> - The benefit is a clearer, consistent mode name in every place the
user selects a work mode
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists for this change. Description follows the
enhancement template:
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
The work-mode selector chips in the task composer and in the New Task
dialog.
**Subsystem affected**
UI (`ui/src/lib/work-mode-meta.ts`,
`ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.tsx`).
**Current behavior**
The default work mode is labeled "Agent mode". The New Task dialog chip
shows a shortened label ("Auto", "Plan", "Ask") from a separate
`shortLabel` field.
**Proposed behavior**
The default work mode is labeled "Auto mode". Every chip shows the full
label ("Auto mode", "Plan mode", "Ask mode"). The `shortLabel` field is
removed so no surface can fall back to the short form.
**Reason and benefit**
"Agent mode" does not describe the behavior — all modes use an agent.
"Auto mode" states what the mode does. One label field keeps every
surface consistent.
**Breaking changes**
None. This is a display-string change only. No API, storage, or mode-key
changes.
## What Changed
- Renamed the `standard` work-mode label from "Agent mode" to "Auto
mode" in `ui/src/lib/work-mode-meta.ts`, the single source for all mode
chips.
- Changed the New Task dialog mode chip to render the full `label`
instead of `shortLabel`.
- Deleted the `shortLabel` field from `WorkModeMeta` so nothing can
silently regress to the short form.
- Updated unit tests and fixtures to pin the full labels.
## Verification
- Run `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui test --
src/lib/work-mode-meta.test.ts src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx
src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx
src/components/task-chat/TaskChatComposer.test.tsx`. All tests pass. The
tests assert the labels are exactly "Auto mode", "Plan mode", and "Ask
mode".
- Manual: start the dev server, open the board, press `c` to open the
New Task dialog, and press Cmd+Period to cycle modes. The chip reads
"Auto mode", "Plan mode", then "Ask mode". The composer chip on an open
task shows the same labels.
## Risks
- Low risk. Display strings only. The chip is a few pixels wider in the
New Task dialog; no layout overflow was observed in any of the three
modes.
## Model Used
- Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic, model ID `claude-fable-5`), extended
thinking with tool use, run inside a Claude Code agent session.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
canary/v2026.821.0-canary.5
|