Try each standard preinstalled pack with the same integrity verifier. Keep Darwin SSH Auto on Legacy while preserving explicit assets and saved native execution.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Explicit null clears user metadata. Preserve only the current database proof during metadata and status saves, and invalidate it atomically on config or driver updates. Real PostgreSQL interleaving controls protect concurrent qualification writes.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Keep the discovery fixture truthful for unknown platforms and add a measured GNU2.39 ARM64 control. Record existing managed fixture, cost reporting and route qualification evidence without claiming missing live acceptance.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Use the existing environment probe before native-generation Codex creation and inspect automatic server defaults. Include only the owned setup probe lease in the existing runtime estimator. Preserve explicit and Legacy cases, cleanup, unknown failure costs and reporting.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Keep explicit Legacy permission choices through automatic selection, import editing, draft reset and policy display. Use company-scoped measured immutable-image facts for automatic sandbox defaults without allocating resources during creation or discovery.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Reject named template bindings over an immutable base image. Preserve the measured company and custom-image identity without claiming compatibility for a different boot source.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
* codex/runner-native-platform-prerequisites:
fix(runner): close review gaps in setup and platform qualification
Read inert exact-source target data before selecting hosted native jobs. Bound registration teardown and retain unconfirmed recovery state. Record company-scoped sandbox platform facts only for immutable OCI images after confirmed cleanup; preserve existing connection and runner behavior.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
Enable Intel Mac, Linux x64, and Linux ARM64 after passing package consumers and the bounded API task/continuity pairs. Keep unsupported targets, overrides, and explicit Legacy choices intact.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
SSH already persists suspended harness backups. Permit the same integrity and full-scope verification used by sandbox targets during a cold controller continuation.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
SSH already persists suspended harness backups. Permit the same integrity and full-scope verification used by sandbox targets during a cold controller continuation.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
* codex/claude-runner-default:
docs: record Claude qualification and runner access contracts
# Conflicts:
# doc/plans/2026-10-12-claude-runner-default.md
Extract the tested runtime and installed-package prerequisite without changing agent creation defaults or experimental gates.
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Contributors use the feature map to understand and verify product
capabilities.
> - Agents need APIs and usable entry points within their permission
boundaries.
> - Product recipes and agent access need separate records with shared
capability IDs.
> - This pull request establishes that contract and gives maintenance
ownership of both maps.
> - The benefit is repeatable access review without changing product
behavior or permissions.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs: #15983, which added the portable verification skills and updated
the feature map. This is its contract-only follow-up. Related: #15288
added the original feature map.
**Issue type**
Missing documentation and maintenance contract.
**Where is the issue?**
The product map, its missing agent access companions, and the
verification skills.
**What's wrong?**
There is no shared convention for API presence, agent entry points,
permission boundaries, access gaps, or evidence. An API declaration does
not prove that a permitted native or remote agent can use it.
**Suggested fix**
Keep the product and agent access maps as siblings under `maps/`. Reuse
capability IDs. Record representative source inventory separately from
operation review and live proof. Keep both maps aligned through the
maintenance skill.
## What Changed
- Move the existing product map to `maps/feature-map/`. Preserve its
recipes and Poteto format. Update relative links and add companion
links.
- Add `maps/agent-access-map/` with 35 area files and 171 matching
capability IDs. Seed representative API operations, agent paths,
policies and known gaps from the reviewed source inventory. Mark entries
as `baseline`, `source-only`, and live verification `not-run`.
- Define the shared contract in `maps/README.md`. Track API presence,
agent availability, policy, evidence and review depth separately.
Require operation enumeration before marking a broad capability
operation-reviewed.
- Extend `maintain-verification-skill` to reconcile both maps and
inspect actual route policy and production tool admission. Update
creation, verification, notices and contributor references to use the
shared contract.
- Add `scripts/check-maps.mjs` and ten regression tests. Check matching
areas/IDs, indexes, references, contract fields, API method/path
examples, justified exceptions and evidence-state consistency.
- Keep the coverage inventory unchanged. Preserve skill invocation
policies and both MIT license blocks. No product API, permission, UI,
runtime helper, migration, dependency or workflow changes.
## Verification
- Passed: `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` reports 35 paired areas and 171
matching capability IDs. All local map references resolve.
- Passed: `node --test scripts/check-maps.test.mjs` runs ten tests.
Fixtures cover missing companions, renamed/orphan/duplicate IDs, broken
references, missing operation fields, empty exceptions, missing API
examples, empty policy fields, and verified evidence without passed
verification.
- Passed: metadata validation for all three verification skills. Skill
and contributor links resolve. Invocation policies and both license
blocks are unchanged.
- Compared relocated recipes with current master. Contents differ only
in relative links and companion links. `coverage.json` is byte-for-byte
unchanged. Master's updated read-only interaction test reference is
retained.
- Passed: `git diff --check`. The branch starts from current master and
contains only this contract change.
- Repository-wide typecheck, tests and build were not run locally for
this documentation and Node structural-check scope. Live agent access
was not exercised. Those gaps are explicit in the baseline entries; the
structural check does not certify behavior. CI and automated review are
pending.
## Risks
- The companions are representative source baselines. They are not
complete operation inventories or passed agent journeys.
- The checker cannot establish actual permissions, native tool
admission, operation completeness or truthful live evidence. Maintenance
must inspect source and verify with the actual permitted agent context.
- External links to the old product-map directory may need updates.
Repository references have been updated.
- Existing access gaps and board/user restrictions remain recorded. This
contract does not change authority or implement missing paths.
## Model Used
OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted with this change. The session does
not expose the exact serving model ID, configured context-window size,
or reasoning setting. Capabilities used: source analysis, file edits,
shell commands, and structural regression tests.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
