PaperClipAI

0 Fork 0

mirror of https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git synced 2026-11-03 17:51:58 +01:00

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Nicky LeachandPaperclip	f8a888a072	feat(runner): define bounded startup lifetime contracts (#18490 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Native sessions and plugin workers have separate startup lifetimes. > - A caller timeout does not prove that a worker or an accepted host write has stopped. > - Shared startup code needs an exact deadline and an actual settlement contract. > - This PR adds those contracts and tests them before any production caller uses them. > - The dependent integration in #18405 will use the contracts with verified cleanup. > - This split lets reviewers assess the lifetime rules separately from runtime activation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18405. This PR extracts the foundation from that change. The integration will depend on this PR. Problem or motivation A bounded startup must distinguish the caller's wait from actual worker completion. A late worker reply or an accepted host request can outlive the original RPC promise. A shorter timeout must not discard that responsibility or authorize a replacement run. Proposed solution Add one Core execution context, optional Runner startup deadlines, and worker settlement and retirement APIs. Test the contracts with real child-process IPC. Keep production context creation, transport projection, capability negotiation, durable cleanup, and Stop/recovery integration in #18405. Alternatives considered One combined PR mixed the lifetime contract with its activation and cleanup policy. Activating a shorter deadline before the complete transport and cleanup path is unsafe. Splitting only the SDK declarations would not provide a useful behavioral review boundary. Roadmap alignment This supports the existing plugin, sandbox execution, and bounded recovery capabilities. It adds no new product workflow, endpoint, migration, provider or runtime dependency. ## What Changed - Add `NativeExecutionContext`. It retains the selected input, binds one transport target, rejects work after cancellation or expiry, and tracks actual worker settlement. Expiry alone does not complete pending work. - Add worker startup groups. A caller timeout retains the group's responsibility. Retirement revokes obsolete invocation scopes, waits for accepted host handlers, and retires only the verified group's bookkeeping. Each cleanup wait is bounded; an unfinished handler remains pending for a later retry. - Add an optional Runner startup signal and absolute deadline for session open and retained attachment. Clean up abort listeners after synchronous failures. Existing callers keep their default timeout path. - Expose the remaining confirmed controller-lease budget without a new query or renewal timer. - Add optional SDK context and preparation-retirement fields. No production bridge sends or advertises them in this slice. - Keep the required lease mock update with the new `remainingMs()` contract so this foundation typechecks independently. Production activation files, including the native executor and environment task bridge, match the current master base. No production caller constructs `NativeExecutionContext` or passes the new Runner startup option. This PR adds no durable cleanup producer and claims no standalone TTFT improvement. The dependent integration must enable the context, transport and verified cleanup together. ## Verification Initial split verification on `8ebc8a2f9c6c02e90f920356138b3742a4067b28`, based on `9a3f395737e7a92faf99971459979061d423531a`: - From `server`: `../node_modules/.bin/vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-execution-context.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-execution-context-worker.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-execution-lease.test.ts` — 17 passed. Includes real child IPC, caller timeout with late reply, worker death, accepted host-handler draining, obsolete cleanup invocation rejection, unrelated work preservation, context scope, expiry, and confirmed lease budget. - From `packages/paperclip-runner`: `../../node_modules/.bin/vitest run src/native-session-runtime.test.ts` — 188 passed. Includes existing callers without the new option and new synchronous-failure/expired-deadline cases for fresh and retained sessions. - Direct TypeScript checks for `packages/plugins/sdk/tsconfig.json` and `packages/paperclip-runner/tsconfig.json` — passed. Built only their shared/eval TypeScript prerequisites. - From `server`: `../node_modules/.bin/tsc --noEmit` — passed. - Checked the partition against the reviewed combined candidate. The twelve selected files match exactly. The thirteenth file carries only the required test-mock update. The production executor, bridge and target wiring remain equal to the base. - `git diff --check`, added-line secret/private-data scan, and added-code-comment scan — passed. No generated files or run artifacts are committed. - The first old-base split passed its focused tests but failed server typechecking because the unchanged executor test mock lacked `remainingMs()`. The original failure is retained. Moving that one-line mock update into this foundation resolved the split dependency; the final current-master checks above pass. - Full local CI suites, Rust builds, deployments and provider calls were not run, as requested. GitHub CI will provide full regression coverage. Current-head GitHub CI, standard review and Apex are complete; exact acceptance is recorded below. Review follow-up `d7635f4d280dab757a3666703737bcda955c9361` fixes three reproduced lifetime edge cases. A retiring startup group rejects new calls and shares one retirement promise; failed bounded retirement remains retryable. Transport identity uses a fixed field tuple rather than object-property order. Finishing a context rejects pending lookup waits without aborting an already-started backend or pretending the worker completed. All three new regressions failed before the fix; the updated foundation selection passes 20 tests, including actual IPC and failed-retirement retry. Server typechecking and added-line checks pass. These replace the earlier 17-case selection, rather than adding 20 unique cases to it. The original failures and passing reruns are retained. Apex follow-up `cb8860bab5ab9d6357a352e11f276be0d0cdb26d` keeps removed worker handles reachable while they own startup calls, accepted host handlers or retirement work. Drain/retirement includes active and retained handles; completion callbacks remove settled handles. Stop and replacement remove only the exact handle they observed. This adds no database/network operation, polling loop or generic shutdown wait. The SDK, Runner, context and transport bridge are unchanged. Seven additional IPC regressions failed on the prior manager and pass after the fix, covering removal/replacement, Stop-all, host-handler settlement, bounded retirement failure/retry, pruning, and replacement ownership. The updated foundation selection passes 27 tests, with server typechecking passing; these supersede the earlier 20-case selection. A separate real-PostgreSQL/child-IPC characterization uses the integration's actual SDK host, storage registry and run-control path with the exact corrected manager bytes. Before the fix, cleanup released run ownership while an accepted host write was blocked, then the late write restored obsolete metadata. After the fix, ownership and cleanup remain pending until the write completes; cleanup then removes the stale metadata before releasing ownership. The original failure, corrected result and source snapshots are preserved. Final head `cb8860bab5ab9d6357a352e11f276be0d0cdb26d` passes GitHub CI (53 successful checks, 2 expected skips, Snyk success), standard Greptile 5/5 and fresh Apex 5/5. All review threads are resolved and the PR is conflict-free. ## Risks The shared Runner helper now observes synchronous operation failures through its asynchronous cleanup path. The affected runtime file's 188 tests pass, but full regression coverage still depends on CI. The new lifetime APIs require honest settlement signals. A future caller must not treat a deadline, worker crash or Stop intent as verified retirement. Production activation remains dependent on the complete integration and its cleanup tests in #18405. This foundation introduces no shorter production startup budget or new cleanup policy by itself. The context's transport projection is process-local. It must not be persisted or used as a general authorization cache. No production caller supplies it in this PR. There is no database migration, new dependency, or deployment requirement for merging this foundation. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, assisted with repository inspection, the split, tests and command execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal issue identifier - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — this description documents the inactive contracts; operational activation documentation remains with #18405 - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green on `cb8860bab5` - [x] Current-head standard Greptile and Apex are 5/5 with no unresolved findings - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 08:22:42 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	412834a860	test: overlap long recovery and maintenance waits (#18544 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - CI verifies recovery, execution authority, and background work before changes merge. > - Diff selection saves work, but a selected file still runs its cases in sequence. > - The three longest files in a recent full master run each took over eight minutes. > - Many of these cases must observe real lease expiry or idle periods. > - This pull request gives independent cases separate fixtures so those periods can overlap. > - The benefit is a shorter test path with the same assertions and observation windows. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18464. The latest measured successful master [Cloud readiness run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41300933157) spent 581 seconds in issue recovery, 569 seconds in native restart recovery, and 512 seconds in maintenance server routes. File-level selection cannot divide those long serial files. Shortening their lease or idle windows would weaken the regressions they protect. ## What Changed - Split issue recovery into four files with separate database and worker fixtures. Keep all 18 cases. - Split native restart coverage into recovery, lease renewal, preparation, checkpoint cost, and disk-loss files. Keep all original 79 cases, including the existing container-qualified cases. The master update also retains its newly added recovery cases. - Close each native case's database clients after pending failure reports drain. The shortened file must not rely on idle timeouts to stay below PostgreSQL's connection cap. - Run the native Runner lane with two isolated fork workers. Register every new file in the lane and verify that the partition still includes every suite. - Give each maintenance case an owned database. Run at most two cases together with test-local assertion contexts. Keep both real 90-second quiet windows and all 17 cases. - Preserve serial execution when any explicit shared `PAPERCLIP__TEST_DATABASE_URL` is present. An admin URL that creates a separate database per fixture can run concurrently. - Refresh shard weights from the protected master run. Mark the initial split-file weights as conservative estimates until master measures them. - Anchor the attention-retention fake clock to PostgreSQL time. Its fixed clock started trailing real database timestamps after 12:00 UTC on November 1, causing an archive-deadline test to time out. Keep its deadline assertions and timeout unchanged. - Document the fixture and concurrency rules. Leave runner authorization and workflows unchanged. ## Verification - Final head `c9a4ff11b3ba81277341294c7721b34fb8705ede`: [full PR CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41477848686), including typecheck, build, all test shards, E2E, and the final verification gate. The rollup has 55 successful checks, one neutral review check, four expected skips, and no pending or failed checks. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no actionable findings. - November 2 master update: merge commit `c9a4ff11b3ba81277341294c7721b34fb8705ede` resolves the native recovery import conflict while retaining the new busy-row and remote continuity cases from master. All 38 test-runner checks and the three new busy-row cases passed locally. - Retention verification after the master update: the first local full run passed 52 cases and timed out at 15 seconds in the paged-backlog case. That case passed in isolation. The unchanged master suite passed all 53 cases (82.95 seconds), and a full PR rerun also passed all 53 (76.65 seconds). The initial timeout cause remains unproven; no timeout or assertion was weakened. - Previously verified head `fd288a8e8c88df54dcdca7b7e42366b019182782`: [full PR CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41312625439). There are 55 successful checks, one neutral review check, four expected skips, and no pending or failed checks. Greptile reviewed this head at 5/5 with no actionable findings. - Issue recovery: 18/18 passed before and after the split on the same local machine and PostgreSQL fixture path. Wall time changed from 630.6 seconds to 319.7 seconds* (49% less). All case titles match. - Maintenance also passed all 17 cases on AWS: structured file cost dropped from 511.8 to 282.6 seconds across the linked master run and the first PR run. These are different CI runs, so the matched local comparison below is the stronger isolated measurement. - Maintenance: 17/17 passed before and after with the restored pinned dependencies. Wall time changed from 488.1 seconds to 317.2 seconds (35% less). All 120 assertion lines remain. Both real 90-second windows also passed a final targeted run. - Native restart: 71 passed and eight existing container-only skips before and after the split. Wall time changed from 632.1 seconds to 346.8 seconds (45% less). All 79 cases and 254 assertion lines remain. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - Extra TypeScript checking of the moved recovery and maintenance tests passed. The standard server config excludes `src/__tests__`. A separate check of attention-retention fixtures reports existing type errors; the unchanged baseline has identical diagnostics, with none introduced by the clock fix. - `node --test scripts/__tests__/run-vitest-stable-shard.test.mjs scripts/ci/test-selection.test.mjs`: 61 passed. - `pnpm test:run`: stopped in the second chat partition: 335 passed and four failed (two GitHub retry-state assertions and two Teams timeouts), after 339 passed in the first partition. These chat tests are unchanged. All four pass in a focused run (19.1 seconds). The full-suite ordering/load cause remains unproven. All three CI chat jobs passed. The previously failing cases passed there in 1.3, 1.3, 2.4, and 2.2 seconds; see [the chat job log](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41309691650/job/124857580714). The attention-retention timeout repeated in CI and in an isolated local run. Its fake clock was fixed at November 1 noon, which had fallen behind real PostgreSQL timestamps. Anchoring it to the database clock passes all 53 cases; the failed case now takes 425 ms. - The native CI lane passed all 162 runnable cases with eight existing skips after client cleanup: 650.7 seconds on the earlier master run to 391.0 seconds on this PR*. - CI found native connection exhaustion after the long waits moved out of the main file. The same failure reproduced locally at a 100-connection cap. Per-case client cleanup fixes the shortened file at that cap, and all five native files now pass together at that cap (71 passed, eight existing skips). - Early attempts exposed a missed fixture reference and a missed reporting setup hook during extraction; both were restored. The first CI policy run also required moving the new native fixture under test helpers; that boundary check now passes locally. A separate auxiliary command picked up the host pnpm version and removed dependencies. The original maintenance baseline reproduced the same missing-package failures, so that failed attempt is excluded from timing comparisons. A later unchanged-baseline run passed all 17 cases. The pinned install was restored before the passing maintenance run. The audit also covered heartbeat process recovery, deferred receipts, chat, workspace recovery, attention, and connection management. Their shared fake clocks/provider mocks or existing partitioning need different changes. The 16,400-row attention case and the large checkpoint stream remain intact because their size protects real limits. ## Risks - Two isolated processes use more memory and database connections than one. Concurrency is capped at two. Shared database overrides force serial execution. - Moving setup into helpers can change test lifecycle order. The split suites keep the same case assertions and use independent process state; focused runs and the full CI suite check the move. - Split-file weights are estimates based on case timings from the linked run plus repeated setup cost. The next protected-master refresh replaces them. Weights never permit tests to be skipped. - Local timing varies with host load. CI measurements after merge are needed to establish the overall PR wall-time improvement. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, tool use, and code execution. The exact backend revision and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (changed suites and focused reruns; the full local-run caveat is recorded above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 10:19:24 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	baa4a2e64e	fix(runner): restore Codex auth before source recovery (#18612 ) Restore disposable Codex authentication and safe provider configuration before cold source recovery. Preserve source receipts and conversation state until reconciliation, and rebuild assigned tools from the admitted launch binding. Validate remote launch destinations, clear stale authentication when no selected credential exists, and atomically publish SSH file transfers without following retained links. Red/green recovery regressions, a real two-turn Codex/MCP probe, and all current PR checks pass. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 10:14:24 -06:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip	aab87ce707	Prove workspace delivery before inspecting cleanup candidates (#18493 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Completed tasks leave workspaces that need safe cleanup. > - Providers without ancestry inspection currently need a recorded merged PR before cleanup can start. > - A squash merge changes commit identity, so direct ancestry cannot prove that delivery. > - This change proves delivery from the finalized HEAD and captured destination before storage inspection. > - Fresh storage checks and a second delivery check still protect removal. > - This reuses the existing worker and receipts. It adds no table or timer. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18410. Related: #13400 addresses workspace identity during inspection; this change adds destination-aware delivery discovery. ## What Changed - Resolve direct ancestry or discover an associated merged GitHub PR without a recorded work product. Require exact HEAD, destination repository and branch, and a reachable integration commit. - Use the latest settled finalization receipt as a candidate. Reject missing, failed, pending, conflicting, or changed evidence. - Inspect storage only after positive remote proof for providers that disable ancestry inspection. Recheck HEAD, branch, source identity and delivery before removal intent. - Add an optional provider capability for a specific PR recovery hint and an optional prepared destination receipt. Older providers keep their existing protocol. - Wake cleanup when finalization writes settle or gain a workspace binding. Keep remote-only retries for concrete unresolved delivery. Park missing or unsupported candidate identity. - Reuse the source project's explicit GitHub consent for delivery checks through the existing authorization service. Revalidate the bound repository and consent before removal; missing or revoked consent retains storage without switching identities. Public sources remain anonymous. - Update the contracts, documentation, access map, and targeted regressions. ## Verification - Initial-head GitHub CI passed at `5acd4c818be6f1764f8319f42891f9956c357c26`, including full build and typecheck. Standard Greptile is 5/5 with no open threads. The first Apex review scored 3/5 and found startup latency from remote proof lookups and removal retry identity changes across provider capability changes. Both corrections are pushed in `9d1a38df3d`, with the qualified destination-ref length fix. Red regressions reproduced each issue. Latest targeted checks passed: cleanup/worker 26, provider integration 41, SDK contract 8. Head `9d1a38df3d` passed standard and Apex reviews at 5/5 with no open threads, plus all CI including full build/typecheck. Canary Dry Run initially failed on an npm 404 fetching `rollup-4.67.3.tgz`; the exact tarball subsequently returned HTTP 200, and one targeted retry passed without source changes. Aggregate verification also passed. After #18403 merged, master introduced conflicts in shared workspace cleanup and metadata handling. Resolved them in `7700832536`, preserving remote snapshot cleanup and Git delivery-proof cleanup. Targeted merge verification: 93 tests passed in the first run (59 opt-in skips), then all 16 remote lifecycle tests passed with explicit database opt-in; map checks passed. The isolated database is stopped. The merge head received standard review 5/5. Its CI found two failures in unchanged test cleanup paths: native runtime temporary-directory ENOTEMPTY and agent-chat cancellation lock timeout. Those failures remain recorded and require successful final-head verification. The subsequent project-consent change has targeted coverage: authorization36, resolver33 and cleanup19 tests passed, including revoked consent, anonymous public access and source-binding races. The positive consent test failed before the fix. Current head `c772679e05` has green GitHub CI, including full build/typecheck and both previously failing test jobs, plus standard Greptile 5/5 with no open threads. Neither cleanup failure required changes to its test path. Apex also completed at 5/5 on this exact head (check `124651548532`, summary updated 2026-10-31 20:45 UTC), with no open review threads. The PR remains draft. Earlier failures remain recorded above. - Final focused run on the rebased branch: 182 tests passed across six files, covering the resolver, delivery cleanup, provider bridge, finalization notifications, existing workspace service and SDK contracts. The disposable test database was stopped afterward. - Targeted resolver tests: 33 passed. These cover ancestry, discovered squash PRs, wrong HEAD/base/repository, removed integration commits, bounded responses, cancellation and credential isolation. - Targeted cleanup integration tests: 17 passed. Provider bridge integration: 36 passed. SDK contract tests: 7 passed. Finalization notification tests: 9 passed. - A negative control that removed the final delivery check failed the race regression as expected. The check was restored. - Read-only live GitHub probe: the new resolver discovered PR #18410 from HEAD `3f5ade4cd42b707040e9a82fdaed343e3d736a09`, without PR hints. It proved integration commit `6484f96c28bfb11a793ce4be6cc5ac15643a5a02` reachable from observed master `5bc029bf6c1db6647e96acea323f3723fd1d3eba`. GitHub also advertised the exact original HEAD at `refs/pull/18410/head`. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passed. Structural checks do not prove deployment behavior. - Local tests are targeted by user request. Full build, typecheck and test suite run in GitHub CI. A standalone server typecheck could not complete because local Runner build declarations were absent; no changed-file diagnostics were reported. - Initial local execution hit a stalled pnpm wrapper, sandbox socket denial and stale generated SDK declarations. Direct installed binaries, the authorized isolated test database and rebuilt SDK resolved those setup failures. No deployment was performed. ## Risks - Destructive cleanup still requires fresh storage safety and lifecycle checks. Remote proof alone never authorizes removal. A persisted removal intent preserves existing recovery semantics. - Legacy workspaces without an unambiguous destination or completion HEAD remain retained. This does not guess the original default branch. - Private repositories use the explicit standing GitHub consent on the bound source project, with current membership, grant, repository access and trust checks. No separate company token is required when that consent is valid. Missing or revoked consent and unavailable or rate-limited access retain storage; the worker does not borrow a task or agent identity. - A known undelivered commit keeps the existing five-minute retry because external GitHub changes have no guaranteed ingress to this lane. This can keep cleanup scheduled. Missing evidence parks instead. - Providers need the new recovery capability to clean a squash merge whose original HEAD is reachable only through its PR ref. Providers without it remain conservative. - The resolver currently supports GitHub.com. Existing local and other-provider ancestry paths stay in place. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools and parallel code agents. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size were not exposed to this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 07:59:17 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	71a20453e1	fix(workspaces): honor inherited remote workspace bindings (#18611 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Task creation can bind a child to its parent's execution workspace. > - Native sandbox runs reserve that workspace before the provider starts. > - Remote reservation rejected inherited isolated workspaces and operator branches because the original source task differed. > - This check stopped valid child tasks before their existing access and writer checks could run. > - This pull request uses the persisted binding and existing source-access checks to admit that continuation. > - The benefit is that authorized child tasks can continue saved work while the single-writer lock stays effective. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A child inherited an active isolated remote workspace through normal task creation. Its next run failed during setup with `Workspace ownership changed.` No provider work started. The reservation guard treated the original `sourceIssueId` as exclusive ownership, although task creation had persisted a valid child binding. Expected behavior A bound child or follow-up can reserve the workspace after the prior writer saves. Current task/run access, source visibility, trust, company scope, closed-workspace state, and writer checks must still apply. The original source task remains provenance. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a task with an active saved remote isolated workspace or operator branch. 2. Create a child without an explicit workspace override. 3. Confirm that the child inherited the execution workspace ID. 4. Start its native sandbox run. The old reservation guard rejects it before provider execution. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on source based on `06bc8db75c71142ed108e0f331394c5187015d6a`. The same guard is present at `1a6017d6460267ad89d7e1784e2b521c28d8e9ac`. Related: #17156 proposes separate workspaces for child tasks. This repair preserves the current inheritance contract and enforces the remote writer lock. #16911 addresses child bindings across repositories. ## What Changed - Remove the original-task equality restriction for active remote workspaces. Keep the existing persisted-binding and retained-source authorization path. Explicit task-root selection follows the existing V1 filesystem contract; task-assignment grants do not define filesystem permissions. - Keep closed workspace rejection and unfinished-writer checks. - Add database-backed regressions for inheritance, replay, competing children, an unbound task, private source data, company isolation, and closed records. - Extend real save/restore tests for inherited isolated workspaces and operator branches. Keep shared-workspace discovery coverage. - Update the development guide and workspace maps. ## Verification - Red: before the repair, the inherited isolated/operator cases fail with `Workspace ownership changed.` The shared case passes. The unfixed suite has five failures and four passes. - Green: 11 reservation cases pass with real PostgreSQL 18 in an isolated Docker container. - An earlier run of the four affected workspace/preparation/trust suites passed 191 tests. The review follow-up passes all 15 selected reservation/save/restore cases. Inherited cases remove the original files, use a distinct allocation and target, restore the saved file, append child work, and independently read that work from the child's new snapshot. Shared-source discovery stays covered. The filter excludes 42 other integration cases. - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, and `git diff --check` pass. A direct server typecheck also passes after the final test edit. - `pnpm test:run` stopped in its first chat shard: 338 passed, one Discord receiver-lease setup failure, 1,478 outside the shard. The failing test passes in isolation on both the unchanged baseline and the fix. Its suite-order failure is not explained by that retry and remains recorded. The unchanged baseline also fails three other Discord publication cases in that chat shard, while its next chat shard passes. This does not reproduce or explain the original lease failure; both results remain recorded. CI is complete on `e697f6e1b8`: 54 successful check runs, one successful legacy status, three skipped checks, and one neutral check. No check is pending or failed. Greptile gives this commit 5/5 with no remaining findings. The security reviewer accepted the V1-contract explanation; both review threads are resolved. - Live sandbox acceptance remains unverified. The available test credentials could not resolve the required sandbox snapshot. The provider rejected creation before workspace execution, and a scoped follow-up found no allocation. No live model turn, deployment, or original-task recovery is claimed. - Local environment: macOS arm64, Node 26.4.0, pnpm 9.15.4. Native PostgreSQL startup hit the host semaphore limit; tests use disposable Docker databases. No shared database was reset. ## Risks - A bound child can now write after the prior writer releases the workspace. Incorrect binding or access checks could expose source data. Regressions cover unbound, private-source, and foreign-company rejection. - Concurrent children must not become two writers. A real transaction race grants exactly one reservation; saved-file tests keep the second writer blocked until save completes. - No schema or migration changes. This PR does not change task-creation inheritance, requested models, credentials, trust, approval gates, or recovery budgets. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, tool use, code execution, and browser diagnostics. No sub-agents were used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — the targeted workspace suites pass; the full local chat-suite failure and baseline comparison are documented above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 09:36:05 -06:00
Dotta devinfoley Paperclip	06bc8db75c	fix(runner): install verified API artifacts in execution workspaces (#18494 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Native agents use authorized API tools to read saved results. > - Copying a large response as model-generated text can lose bytes. > - The execution workspace needs an exact copy of the saved artifact. > - This change copies the authorized bytes without shell API credentials. > - The runtime verifies size and SHA-256 before it reports success. > - A live evaluation checks capture origin, installation and delivered bytes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A native agent lost one byte while copying a 24576-byte API text page. Existing capture and paging controls passed. The runtime had no verified saved-artifact-to-workspace copy tool. A separate historical screening refusal does not establish capture corruption. Expected behavior An authorized native run can install the complete saved artifact. The stored and installed bytes must match in size and SHA-256. A conflicting file must remain unchanged. A lost publication receipt must not cause an unsafe repeated write. Steps to reproduce Run `server/src/services/native-runtime/artifact-transfer.integration.test.ts` on baseline `c46b8f35add9255fc71be294d27f5a7865bcb47f`. Its capability assertion fails because `download_artifact` is absent. Apply this PR and run the same regression with the filesystem and API controls. It verifies 388131 synthetic bytes through the authority and installation boundary. Refs #18429. Related #17393, #17086 and #17285 cover paging, transfer foundations and remote output reads. This PR adds the inbound installation contract. ## What Changed - Add `download_artifact` for supported standard-mode native runs, with a 10 MiB limit. - Reuse current company, task, run, asset-content and responsible-user access checks. Check authority again before publication. - Bind installation to the current execution lease. Stage through confined Linux descriptors and publish with an atomic create-only link. Keep API credentials out of execution commands. - Verify bytes at storage and execution boundaries. Reject unsafe paths, symlinks, different existing files, truncation and corruption. Reconcile an unknown publication through verification only; an identical explicit retry remains safe. - Add API documentation, access-map entries and content-free audit records. - Preserve only the pinned Daytona SDK numeric HTTP status when failed creation cleanup is unconfirmed. Keep provider exception messages and headers private. - Keep only the finished runner binary and portable provider pack in their builder layers. Remove Rust targets/downloads and the Node install workspace/store before export. Report tree sizes. - Add one explicit Codex/Daytona Product E2E cell. Its independent oracle checks the server capture audit, redacted tool receipts, stored source, delivered attachment and browser link after reload. Uploaded substitutes and one-byte loss fail. ## Verification - Merge update at `6766b46553cab5b9787ade87a002eccaf50e68fc`: merge current master and preserve both explicit suites in the catalog. Focused catalog, image and oracle checks: 122 pass. Filesystem and authority integration: 20 pass. Maps, module boundaries and whitespace checks pass. New-head CI and Greptile are running. Full local build and typecheck remain unavailable because cargo is absent. - Behavioral red/green: the absent-tool regression failed before implementation and passed afterward. The initial missing-package attempt is recorded as setup failure. - Linux filesystem and real PostgreSQL/authority integration: 19 filesystem tests and 1 authority test pass. Existing API authority, capture and paging controls: 70 pass, 2 skipped. Provider transport in these integration controls is simulated. - Qualification calibration: 118 focused tests pass. The real persisted-event redaction case and a byte-identical uploaded substitute each failed before their oracle repair. The unchanged controls then passed. Harness typecheck passes. - Full recursive typecheck and build pass locally on the integrated production source at `086f7a2901`. Later commits change only qualification tests and documentation. - Structural map/module checks and whitespace checks pass. - Full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted by the implementation worker and stopped under its 8 GiB memory limit, with no full-suite verdict. Current-head CI must supply the full test result. - The complete local Product E2E support suite has 13 failures. The unchanged pre-qualification baseline reproduces all 13: host PostgreSQL semaphore capacity, stale timeout/profile/workflow inventory expectations, and expired fixed-date allowance fixtures. This is not a full local suite pass. - Earlier CI at `086f7a2901` failed a browser test during cleanup cancellation with a database lock timeout. It remains recorded. All browser shards passed on both later fully checked heads. - Two qualification campaigns were canceled during setup before provider execution while correcting the oracle. They provide no live product verdict. - Previous-head CI at `28fa001457f59df1c300c016dc569049e72d0061`: 53 checks pass, 3 intentional selection skips; no failed or pending checks. - Real image/export regression: campaign 41272351780 compiled the Linux runner and passed root/unprivileged CLI and transport checks, then failed BuildKit export with `no space left on device` (exit 102, filesystem 99.99%). No provider cell ran. Removing the Rust build trees alone was insufficient: campaign 41273604815 also failed during provider-pack export with exit 102. Commit `5bbb549c54` also consolidates dependency installation and pack construction so the disposable workspace/store can be removed in the same layer. All 122 image/oracle/catalog checks pass. Image and remote-pack publication then passed in campaign 41275196741 after cleanup changes plus a scoped 60-to-120 GiB expansion of only its delete-on-termination builder disk. The VM terminated and the expanded volume was deleted. This does not establish that cleanup alone makes the default 60 GiB builder sufficient. - The Daytona admission probe then failed before agent creation, with unconfirmed provider cleanup. The queued continuity case was canceled because it shares this prerequisite. No artifact-transfer or continuity success is claimed. - Status-diagnostic regression: the original generic wrapper failed the HTTP-status assertion. After the repair, the full plugin suite passes 501 tests, with 7 skips; its standalone TypeScript check passes. Controls reject invalid status values, avoid accessors, preserve the original create status and exclude credential canaries. - Previous-head Greptile: 5/5; its summary names `28fa001457f59df1c300c016dc569049e72d0061`. All review threads are resolved. - Live artifact transfer and three-turn warm continuity: NOT VERIFIED. The diagnostic case in https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41277598289 confirmed Daytona HTTP 401 before agent creation. The configured `DAYTONA_API_KEY` in the existing `runner-e2e-paid` environment needs verification or refresh. The queued continuity control was not run after its shared admission prerequisite failed. No further provider attempt is planned until the credential changes. Unconfirmed provider cleanup remains recorded. ## Risks - Source-provenance changes can repeat the provider dependency install. The combined build layer trades install-cache granularity for lower retained disk use. - Linux descriptor semantics and Node are required on the execution host. Unsupported providers and restricted runtime profiles fail closed. - Storage reads buffer at most 10 MiB. A provider outage can leave a reserved staging file. Partial bytes never become the destination. - A lost publication receipt can leave a complete file with an unknown result. Recovery verifies the existing file without installation. Conflicts are never overwritten. - Artifact contents remain untrusted. The copy does not bypass screening or authorize downstream execution. - Live qualification uses the governed Codex API profile. It does not establish every model, subscription profile, platform or historical failure cause. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex assisted with diagnosis, code, tests and qualification. The desktop runtime does not expose a more specific model deployment ID or context-window size. The model used reasoning, source inspection, tools and code execution. The native implementation agent is configured with OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 08:27:09 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	67948173f4	fix(sentry): report saved-message task attempt failures (#18541 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Tasks retain user messages when an execution attempt cannot finish. > - The task interruption projection drives the saved-message failure notice. > - That state can occur without a new terminal run transition, which the existing Sentry reporter requires. > - This pull request reports that failed task state through the existing Sentry capture path. > - Operators can find the failure through the same tag and saved run links. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13446 and #16300. The related PR search found no open implementation of this change. What happened? A task can show “Couldn’t finish this attempt. Your message is saved.” without a matching run-failure Sentry event. A stale saved-message wait can produce this state after the previous run succeeded. Expected behavior When run-failure reporting is enabled, this failed task state also reports with `event_kind=run_failure`. Steps to reproduce 1. Enable the backend Sentry DSN and `PAPERCLIP_SENTRY_RUN_FAILURES=unexpected` or `all`. 2. Leave a saved-message wait on an unfinished task after its last run has ended. 3. Read the task after the wait grace period expires. 4. The task shows the failure notice. Before this change, that read does not report it to Sentry. Paperclip version or commit Base commit: `e122478368`. ## What Changed - Report the system-owned failed presentation from the existing batch task reader. The pure projection remains unchanged. - Reuse `captureRunFailure()` with `event_kind=run_failure`, `failure_source=task_interruption`, and `error_code=task_attempt_failed`. - Preserve the actual saved run status and company, agent, task and run references. Load the run agent's adapter through a company-scoped join in the existing run query, including after reassignment. Add no database query or background timer. - Send fixed error text. Do not read chat bodies, prompts or raw run diagnostics for this event. - Suppress repeated reports for the same company/task/run/intent with a bounded process-local cache. Failed or disabled captures do not consume the report. - Document the enabled modes, event fields, duplicate behavior and cache limits. ## Verification - Regression before implementation: the two new Sentry tests failed because the capture entry point was absent; the existing 38 Sentry tests passed. - Focused verification: 332 tests passed across `run-failure-sentry.test.ts`, `task-interruption-query.test.ts`, `task-interruption-presentation.test.ts`, and `run-failure-report.test.ts`. The reassignment regression first reproduced the missing adapter, then passed after the query correction. - Command: `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_ADMIN_URL=<local-test-admin-url> pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry.test.ts server/src/__tests__/task-interruption-query.test.ts server/src/services/task-interruption-presentation.test.ts server/src/services/__tests__/run-failure-report.test.ts`. - PostgreSQL tests used isolated databases on a local PostgreSQL 17 server, with automatic cleanup. Initial embedded starts failed because installation scripts had not restored library links; after repair, the host semaphore limit prevented new clusters. The existing external-database helper supplied the working test path. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - `git diff --check` passed. - `pnpm test:run` was attempted. It stopped in the unchanged chat integration shard collection step with “No test found” for line filters. The complete local suite has not passed. - Sentry capture assertions use the SDK test double. Live Sentry ingestion and a deployed browser journey were not tested. ## Risks - An enabled instance can send more Sentry events when task reads discover retained failures. It can emit a task-state event alongside the separate terminal run event. The source tag distinguishes them. - Deduplication is process-local and retains 1,000 reports. Restarts, multiple replicas or cache eviction can report a retained failure again. - No schema, permission, execution or UI changes. The existing opt-in reporting gate stays in place. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with tool use, code editing and test execution. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-02 08:17:22 -06:00
TonioandClaude Opus 5.5	8ea240218d	feat(ui): bring the Refine-v2 layout to the agent page (#18378 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The agent page is where an operator reads and changes one agent. > - The page grew one tab at a time. Ten tabs sit in one flat list, the header holds many buttons, and the audit links leave the agent. > - A design pass, called Refine-v2, made a calmer layout for this page. It ran in a prototype on fixture data only. > - This pull request moves the Refine-v2 layout and behavior into the live agent page. Where the prototype and the live page differ, the live behavior stays. For example, the floating save bar stays on screen. > - The benefit is a shorter navigation, edits in place, and audit data that stays inside the agent. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13716 Refs #9166 Both pull requests mount plugin tabs or slots on the agent page. They touch the same files, so one of the three needs a rebase after the others merge. Subsystem affected The agent detail page in `ui/` (`ui/src/pages/AgentDetail.tsx`, its sidebar, header actions, and the shared agent config form). Problem or motivation The agent page is hard to scan. The navigation shows ten items in one list. The header shows Run now, Pause, Clear error, and Assign task as separate buttons. The name, title, and manager are form fields deep in the Harness tab. Activity, Runs, Costs, and Budgets open company-wide pages, so the operator loses the agent context. Each tab uses a different card and table style. Proposed solution Use one layout system for every agent tab. Group the navigation into Agent and Audit. Edit the name and title in the header. Move the work actions into the actions menu. Show audit views inside the agent. Keep the persistent save bar and add a status dot to it. Alternatives considered We considered a flag that lets operators opt in to the new layout. We did not use a flag, because two layouts on one page double the test surface. We also considered moving the save button to the end of the scrolling content, as the prototype did. We kept the floating save bar, because it is always visible. Roadmap alignment `ROADMAP.md` has no item for the agent page. This change is a UI refinement of an existing page. It adds one optional field to an existing API request and no database schema change. ## What Changed - Navigation. The agent sidebar shows two groups. Agent has Overview, Identity, Harness / Runtime, Secrets & variables, Permissions / Trust, and Advanced. Audit has Activity, Runs, Costs, and Budgets. Skills, Tools, Channels, and API Keys leave the navigation. Their URLs still open. The Instructions tab is now Identity, at `/identity`. The old `/instructions` URL redirects. - Header. The agent character shows at a larger size. The name and title edit in place. Enter or blur saves. Escape cancels. An error restores the old value. A rename updates the URL. While a tab has unsaved changes, the header refuses the edit and asks the operator to save or discard first. The third line shows the title and a link to the manager. A crown button to the right of the name replaces the "Set as my primary" link and the separate primary indicator. It is outlined and dimmed until the agent is your primary, then fills with a short pop. Replacing an existing primary asks for confirmation first, and the pop plays after the dialog closes. Reduced motion skips the pop. Run now, Pause or Resume, Clear error, and Agent history move into the actions menu. Assign task is the primary button. For an agent that still needs setup, Finish setup is the primary button and Assign task moves into the menu. - Agent history. A new dialog in the actions menu replaces the Revisions entry. Each row shows a plain-language summary, the person or agent who made the change, the date, and Restore. Restore asks for confirmation. A failed restore shows its reason inside the confirmation. - Overview. Four metric tiles show activity this week, runs this week, costs this month, and budget used. Each tile links to its audit view. When the list behind a count is capped, the tile shows a lower bound, for example 200+. The activity tile follows live updates. Profile, Skills, and Recent tasks panels follow. The Profile panel lists direct reports under their label in at most two rows, then a "+N more" button that expands the list. The Latest run card is removed. - Identity. The file preview shows the raw text. A pencil button switches to a plain text editor. Copy and Delete are icon buttons. A chip next to the file name says "Managed by you" or "Managed externally". Per-file history and unsaved edits stay. - External instructions. "Advanced settings" opens Root path and Entry file fields and a Load profile button. Load profile asks the server to switch only if the root directory and the entry file already exist. If either is missing, the server refuses and the panel shows the reason. The entry file can have any name inside the root. - Instructions bundle API. `PATCH /agents/:id/instructions-bundle` accepts an optional `requireExistingEntry` flag (`packages/shared` validator, `server` service, `ui` client). With the flag, the server checks the root directory and entry file before it creates or copies anything. Without the flag, the behavior does not change. - Harness / Runtime. The config form gets a `panels` layout: Harness and Execution side by side, then the runtime test, then environment variables. The identity and run-policy sections are hidden from this tab. - Secrets & variables and Advanced. These tabs use the same filled panels and table headers. - Permissions / Trust. The trust presets show as selectable cards. An Allowed connectors panel shows up to three connector logos and links to Apps, filtered to installed connectors. Capabilities sit in their own panel. Changes on this tab save at once, with no save bar. - Audit inside the agent. Activity, Runs, Costs, and Budgets render inside the agent page. Runs is locked to the current agent. A failed budget incident action shows its reason under the incident. - Save bar. The floating save bar stays. It shows an amber dot for unsaved changes and a green dot with "Changes saved" after a save. Discard stays. - Leave guard. If the form has unsaved changes and the operator clicks a link, a dialog asks to keep editing or discard the changes. Browser back and the header actions keep the native confirm. - Apps. `/apps?source=installed` opens the Apps page on the Installed filter. - Tokens. New `--agent-detail-` tokens in `ui/src/index.css` hold every spacing and fill value. Each fill is a mix of foreground into background, so one value works in light and dark themes. - Tests and maps.* Tests cover the navigation model, sidebar, header menu, Overview layout, Identity editor, and helpers. The agent-configuration recipe in `maps/feature-map/agents.md` describes the new page. ## Verification - `cd ui && npx vitest run`: 849 test files and 10,081 tests pass. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/agent-instructions-routes.test.ts src/__tests__/agent-instructions-service.test.ts`: 40 tests pass. - `npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/onboarding.spec.ts tests/e2e/chat-adapters-ui-providers.spec.ts`: 26 tests pass. - `cd ui && pnpm typecheck` passes. This includes the Storybook catalog check. The `server` and `packages/shared` typechecks pass. - `cd ui && pnpm build` passes. - `pnpm run check:token-gates` reports all gates clean. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs --check` pass. - Manual check on a local instance, in light and dark themes: 1. Open an agent. Confirm the sidebar shows the Agent and Audit groups. 2. Click the agent name in the header. Type a new name and press Enter. Confirm the URL changes. Rename it back. 3. Open the actions menu. Open Agent history. Confirm the rows and the Restore confirmation. 4. Open Identity. Click the pencil. Change a line. Confirm the save bar shows the amber dot. Click a sidebar link. Confirm the discard dialog. Click Keep editing, then save. Confirm the green dot. 5. Open Harness / Runtime, Secrets & variables, and Permissions / Trust. Confirm the panels and the trust cards. 6. Open Runs under Audit. Confirm the list shows only this agent and the page stays inside the agent. ## Risks - This changes a high-traffic page for every operator at once. There is no flag to switch back. - Run policy and Reports to are no longer editable on the agent page. The header shows the manager as a link only. - Skills, Tools, Channels, and API Keys are reachable by URL only. Operators who use them from the sidebar must use the URL. - The pull request conflicts with #13716 and #9166 in `AgentDetail.tsx` and the agent sidebar. - Storybook stories for the agent page and `DESIGN.md` are not updated in this pull request. - The new `requireExistingEntry` flag is opt-in. Existing API callers keep the old behavior, which creates a missing external directory and entry file. - I ran two e2e spec files locally, not the full `pnpm test:e2e` or `pnpm test:release-smoke`. CI runs the full e2e suite. I did not run the repo-wide `pnpm -r typecheck`, because the local toolchain has no Rust. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), in Claude Code, with reasoning and tool use (shell, file edits, and a browser for visual checks). A person directed every design decision. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-01 22:27:09 -08:00
DottaandPaperclip	1a6017d646	fix(server): resume suspended sessions after controller replacement (#18554 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A web server replacement must preserve a completed conversation as well as active execution. > - A warm remote Runner can suspend before the replacement admits another turn. > - The replacement restores its controller checkpoint from PostgreSQL, but lacks the Runner suspension receipt. > - It therefore tries to adopt a live process and rejects the safely suspended source. > - This change restores the verified receipt and preserves retained launch files while the old authority is reconciled. > - Later turns can keep the same provider conversation after the old web server filesystem is deleted. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18552, #18543, #18366. What happened? The real rolling-deployment journey passed both HTTP handoffs, with 765 reads and 78 verified saves. The first three agent turns kept their native and provider sessions. After the second replacement, the fourth continuation failed with `remote_warm_session_not_idle`. The remote Runner was suspended with an empty outbox and no pending terminal. A focused regression reproduced that exact failure. After restoring its suspension receipt, the same test exposed a stale launch-file read during source recovery. Expected behavior A replacement can resume the same provider conversation from a settled suspended Runner. It must validate the physical sandbox and all persisted identity fields. A live source must still pass the existing adoption checks. Steps to reproduce Enable the Linux Runner fixture for `native-runner-restart-recovery.integration.test.ts`. Run the `diskless-warm-suspended` cases. The fixture completes and gracefully suspends each source, deletes the controller projections, and admits a later turn from another process. It does not write a synthetic suspension receipt. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing per-turn suspended-receipt reader before warm admission chooses live adoption or suspended recovery. - Keep the receipt read retryable when a failed remote read leaves only the controller projection. - Leave every non-suspended warm state to the existing live-adoption checks. A preliminary backpressure observation cannot reject admission before that owner inspects the current Runner state. - Preserve current sandbox binding, settled-outbox, exact-identity, local-evidence and admission checks. - Pass the structured launch specification to remote asset preparation. Source reconciliation keeps the old authority's retained launch files; a current-authority launch still stages its current files. - Add two Linux Runner/PostgreSQL regressions for two controller-cache deletions and three turns on one provider thread, including an interrupted receipt read. - Update the deployment qualification record, including the failed live evidence and the successful staging database-idle observation. ## Verification - Before the fix, the focused regression fails with the exact live `remote_warm_session_not_idle` error. - Both new regressions pass with real PostgreSQL and Linux Runner. The provider is deterministic; this is not a live model qualification. - The first receipt-only fix failed on the deleted controller skills cache. The completed fix passes that same scenario without recreating fixture launch assets. - All 1,067 surrounding launch supervision, warm recovery, launch-asset and controller recovery tests pass. The exact `cc23019691` server build passes. All ten Linux continuity cases pass, including live adoption, graceful suspension, per-turn resume, changed configuration and failed-read retry. Each case checks provider-thread identity and exact turn counts. The live Codex/Daytona journey passes on the same clean source and exact build: 518 reads, 53 saves and 53 verified saves with zero probe failures; both predecessor homes deleted; the active execution completes once; all four turns preserve the provider conversation and native receipts; saved files and the final command output are independently checked. No automatic retries. Child credential and object-storage bucket cleanup pass. Browser reconnection remains a separate hosted acceptance check. - The review refinement has a failing-before regression: only the preliminary read reports transient backpressure; the subsequent adoption reads the real Runner state. It and both suspension cases pass on the final source (three cases), with server typecheck. The existing idle check remains unchanged. An initial retry hit a fixture port left by the intentional pre-fix failure; a fresh container resolved that infrastructure error. - Independent cleanup verification found two archived setup sandboxes left by the live harness. Both were deleted and confirmed absent. The failed automatic-cleanup check remains recorded. - No claim of the ten-deploy Railway campaign or production canary yet. ## Risks - A cold warm-session admission can now make one bounded remote state read when local lifecycle evidence is absent. Its failure stops admission and remains retryable. - This path cannot replace contradictory local evidence, transfer authority, or treat a suspended process as a live one. - Source recovery must keep the previous authority's launch files until reconciliation completes. The launch identity selects that behavior; ordinary launches still prepare current assets. - No schema migration or public API change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, shell execution and integration-test tools. The exact runtime model variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge CI qualification note: first final-head run `41322376054` passed the native/runtime and remaining suites but failed the unrelated `automatic_message_on_reactivation` browser fixture at its pre-reactivation deferred-queue count (0 rather than 1). The unchanged test passed locally against isolated PostgreSQL (1 test, 43.6 s); inspection found an asynchronous company-pause/fixture-seeding timing window. Original CI logs and local evidence are retained. The single failed-job retry passed; all final-head CI gates are green. Both reviews are 5/5 and no review threads remain unresolved. The first local embedded-Postgres launch failed before tests during cluster initialization; the isolated external-Postgres test passed, and its disposable database was removed after correcting the private launcher cleanup call. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 10:08:51 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	c0550e7010	fix(server): preserve sessions and defer busy overlap recovery (#18552 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A web server replacement must preserve remote execution and later task continuation. > - The active-run handoff now survives deletion of the departing server home. > - The next admission still compared disposable instruction and skill paths as configuration. > - A native receipt could also settle without the old adapter returning its terminal metadata. > - A replacement can also collide with a run row locked by the serving controller. > - This change preserves durable session identity and terminal evidence, and defers locked recovery work so overlap can reach readiness. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18543, #18366, #9977, #18118. What happened? A real Codex/Daytona journey replaced both control-plane servers and deleted their homes. Reads, saves, saved files and active execution passed. A later useful answer used a new provider session. All four run records lacked the native terminal contract. The whole qualification therefore failed. A later attempt also exposed startup failure: the replacement waited for a row lock held by the serving controller and aborted on its one-second lock timeout. Expected behavior An unchanged managed instruction entry and immutable skill version retain the session across server cache relocation. Actual content and configuration changes still reset it. A committed native receipt retains its terminal contract even when the originating adapter never returns. A busy recovery row defers through the existing scheduler while the replacement reaches readiness. Steps to reproduce Run the `rolling-web-deployment.runner-codex.daytona.recover-controller` Product E2E cell with separate controller homes and shared PostgreSQL/S3. The focused regressions reproduce the failures without a model call. ## What Changed - Read the managed instruction entry digest from the company-scoped durable file head. Do not restore or read the cache for this check. - Omit disposable instruction paths only when that durable authority exists. Fingerprint selected immutable skill versions in both runtime skill inputs. - Preserve the existing local and external instruction path checks, and unversioned skill identity. - Publish the accepted native terminal contract in the same transaction as the canonical result receipt. - Skip locked recovery rows and schedule the same run for retry. Avoid an audit write that would block on the same row. No ownership is transferred while busy. - Keep replacement readiness independent of an in-progress skill selection; migration and cache eviction still require exact pins. Missing durable skill versions still refuse startup. - Project only the instruction digest in SQL instead of loading the entire agent-file manifest per admission. - Add real PostgreSQL lock contention tests for the issue, run and coordinator, including the heartbeat startup caller and later claim. - Limit native test teardown to its owned database on a shared test host. The old behavior also fails on clean master. - Add cache-loss, scope, changed-content, changed-version and finalization regressions. Update the deployment qualification record. ## Verification - Both focused regressions failed before the source changes. - All 249 tests pass across `heartbeat-workspace-session`, `agent-file-durability`, and `paperclip-control-plane-port`. - Server typecheck and exact-revision build pass. - Assembled admission ran 59 passing cases but failed during native-suite teardown. The teardown failure reproduced on clean master. All 16 native resumption cases and teardown pass after the database-scope fix. - All three row-lock regressions fail with the pre-fix lock timeout and pass with deferred recovery. The full recovery suite passes 74 cases, including the startup caller; eight Docker-specific cases were not enabled. - The real attempt at `d2165dec5d` failed when B aborted on the run lock. Its credential and bucket were removed; all three provider sandboxes were independently confirmed absent. The next real attempt at `aae8a53d01` failed a different readiness gate while a run was preparing skill pins. That race now has a failing-before regression; all 33 readiness, durable-file and managed-skill tests pass after the fix. Its owned resources are cleaned. The `a15a12651c` live attempt passed both web replacements: 765 reads, 78 saves and 78 verified saves with zero HTTP probe failures. The first three turns preserved the provider session and native terminal contract. The fourth continuation failed because a safely suspended remote Runner was treated as live/idle; that distinct recovery gap is being handled in a follow-up. All three owned sandboxes were independently confirmed absent. No claim of full Railway qualification yet. ## Risks - The new fingerprint shape may reset a session once when upgrading from older fingerprint metadata. It is stable across subsequent cache replacements. - A versioned skill is identified by its immutable selected version; materialization and admission still enforce availability. Unversioned skills retain their existing path boundary. - A native terminal describes the accepted execution result. Workspace and issue settlement remain separate authorities. - This does not yet prove the ten-deploy staging campaign, natural database autosuspension or the production canary. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, shell execution and live integration-test tools. The exact runtime model variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 09:14:34 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	7751fc3107	fix(server): complete volume-free controller admission and recovery (#18543 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its volume-free web server must admit remote warm execution without depending on a local disk. > - Fresh run rows retain the initial legacy label during workspace preparation. > - The native runtime selector commits the execution mode later. > - The earlier guard rejected valid remote runs before that selection. > - This PR checks storage during preparation and the resolved lifecycle during runtime selection. > - Agent-file recovery also has to reconstruct disposable cache paths from the retained remote directory. > - The deployment test removes the complete predecessor home, including immutable caches, to enforce that contract. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18518, #18529, #18533. What happened? A real Codex/Daytona deployment test failed during setup because the volume-free workspace guard checked the initial run label. After fixing admission, controller retirement first failed on an immutable skill cache. Removing that cache exposed a production recovery failure: B rejected the saved agent-directory path from A, even though the remote execution identity was unchanged. The next live attempt recovered that directory and transferred the same runner, but adoption then tried to recreate provider launch assets from the deleted controller home. Expected behavior Allow remote workspace preparation before native selection. Reject actual legacy and per-turn execution at the runtime boundary. Delete the entire stopped predecessor home, including immutable caches, without following links to shared dependencies. B must reconstruct its local agent-file projection from the exact registered remote lease while preserving the save baseline and unsaved remote edits. Reattaching an already-running provider must not prepare a new launch or require the old launch files. The full backend must recover the admitted instructions from the matching durable run checkpoint. Steps to reproduce Run the explicit `rolling-web-deployment.runner-codex.daytona.recover-controller` Product E2E cell with a complete server/UI build, disposable PostgreSQL/S3, and an owned Daytona fixture. The new boundary regressions also reproduce the premature guard and missing runtime rejection without a model call. Paperclip version or commit The failures were observed on `247552fe0719dcc92f7b42c50b658be6f624986d`. This branch is based on `e122478368`. ## What Changed - Validate Runner and remote workspace authority before runtime selection without trusting the initial run label. - Reject resolved legacy execution and local-source fallback, preserving the native warm-policy check before admission. - Rebind remote agent-file caches on ephemeral controllers and retrieve their validated contents without uploading over the retained execution. Preserve pending saves when the remote collector is unavailable. - Restore over-quota remote directories without applying save quotas to run admission; ordinary saves still enforce quotas. - Skip provider launch asset materialization when adopting an existing Runner. A real-process regression deletes the old skill/instruction sources before reattachment. - Recover admitted system instructions through Runner-owned checkpoint validation for the same run, session and context digest. Fresh launches still compose current instructions. - Make the attention-retention test advance past its database-assigned deadline, fixing a clean-master clock mismatch. - Serialize remote collection and cleanup across controllers with an operation-scoped Postgres advisory lock; fence stale cache-path updates. - Keep synthetic deployment probe tasks in a separate disposable company so they cannot block the business completion oracle. - Share the launcher's directory cleanup with rolling retirement. Reject a symlink root and skip linked descendants. - Test admission with real PostgreSQL transactions and cleanup with real read-only directories and external symlinks. - Update developer documentation and the canonical qualification record. Broader deployment acceptance remains in progress. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. - All 156 workspace preparation, runtime selection and ephemeral contract tests passed. Two new regressions failed before the source fix. - Seven focused Product E2E cleanup/replacement tests and `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` passed. - `pnpm test:run` stopped at an unrelated 15-second chat integration timeout after 338 passes. That exact test passed in isolation without increasing its timeout. The later full-suite shards did not run. - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` reported 5,898 passes and 13 failures. Clean master reproduced 11 failures in unchanged onboarding expectations, operating receipts, Pi catalog assertions, workflow bootstrap counts and embedded PostgreSQL startup. The other two workflow assertions were fixed by the intervening master commit. These failures are retained, not counted as passes. - All 122 workspace-preparation tests pass after the reviewed host-fallback fix. The first broader attempt exposed a test environment leak; restoring the ephemeral flag between cases resolved it. - Agent-directory and instruction regressions passed 179 tests. Five focused cache-loss cases pass: different home, same path on an empty filesystem, foreign lease, concurrent controller, and missing collector. - The live fixture at `a18f6b85a3` gracefully stopped A and deleted its entire home, then failed the 420-second remote reattachment deadline on the saved local agent-directory path. That failure is retained; exact owned sandbox cleanup was independently confirmed. The next live attempt at `e14ca5f3e9` restored the cache and transferred the same runner, but failed while rematerializing launch assets from A. Both failures are retained and their owned sandboxes confirmed absent. No active-overlap, ten-deploy, or production-canary acceptance is claimed. - All 71 related Runner adoption/recovery cases pass, including the new removed-context regression (failed before the source fix). - The revised full agent-directory suite passed 110 cases and failed three cleanup timing cases. All 20 cleanup/cache-loss cases then passed in isolation with unchanged timeouts, including over-quota recovery. - Server and Runner TypeScript checks pass after the latest corrections; the live retry remains pending. - The live test at `67714af9ff` adopted the same remote execution after A was deleted, then failed while the full backend read the retired instruction bundle. All owned sandboxes were independently confirmed absent. Its regression now passes with actual backend recovery and no new thread or turn. All 59 backend factory tests and focused checkpoint identity tests pass. Runner and server TypeScript checks pass; the exact committed server build passes. A fresh paid-model retry followed. - The attention-retention CI timeout reproduced on clean master. The deadline correction passes all 53 tests in that file with unchanged timeouts. - The real `cd690de4d3` run transferred the same runner/session after deleting A, completed, and completed the next revision. During handoff, 372 reads and 38 saves had zero failures; all 38 saves were verified. The full attempt was interrupted because the probe's open task contaminated the business company oracle. This remains incomplete evidence. The scope regression fails before the fixture fix, then passes; all nine deployment support tests and E2E typecheck pass. All three owned sandboxes were confirmed absent and temporary credentials/storage were cleaned up. A clean corrected attempt is running. ## Risks - The runtime guard must still reject legacy and per-turn execution before dispatch. Tests cover these refusals and a valid resolved warm policy. - Directory permission changes apply only during cleanup of stopped, test-owned homes. Traversal does not follow symlinks. This changes no production cache permissions. - Cache reconstruction must not change remote execution authority or rebase the original save baseline. Tests verify foreign-lease rejection, preserved receipts, and absence of local-to-remote upload. - Postgres locking is scoped to active remote file work and adds no idle polling; local/durable-server locking remains unchanged. - No schema or public API changes. External conversation exemptions remain unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, shell execution and live integration-test tools. The exact runtime model variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Latest real qualification at `f5915fdc33`: both empty-home replacements completed with 523 reads, 53 saves and 53 verified saves, zero probe failures. The active remote execution survived and completed once; saved project bytes and the later useful answer passed. The full workflow remains FAILED: the later continuation reset its native/provider session and the public run row lacked the native terminal contract. These newly exposed compatibility/projection gaps are tracked in the next implementation slice; this PR is not a claim of full Railway qualification. All owned Daytona sandboxes were independently confirmed absent after cleanup. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 08:24:14 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	247552fe07	test(server): avoid deep traversal in durable file assertions (#18533 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Cloud web servers restore agent files from shared storage after replacement. > - The durability test checks restoration, corruption, cancellation and retry. > - Its generic equality assertions traverse every byte in many large buffers. > - The post-merge check for #18531 exceeded the 15-second test timeout. > - This change uses native buffer equality and keeps every byte check. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18531. The post-merge Cloud-source verification run timed out in the new cold-folder test. Other shards passed. The unchanged test passed locally. This change removes avoidable assertion cost; it does not increase test or production timeouts. ## What Changed - Use `Buffer.equals` for the cold-folder content assertions. - Keep the concurrency, cancellation, cleanup, old-projection and retry assertions. - Record packaged-image proof, the hosted deployment state and the original CI failure in the existing plan. ## Verification - Eight durability tests passed against a real local PostgreSQL fixture. Object storage uses controlled asynchronous streams. - The same test file took 10.03 seconds before and 5.90 seconds after this change. The changed cold-folder case took 561 ms after the change. - The first local attempt could not start embedded PostgreSQL and ran no tests. The existing external test database enabled the comparison. - Original failed CI: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41296253723 . That failure remains in the qualification record. - Server typecheck and build passed. All latest-head PR checks passed, including the full test, typecheck, build and browser gates. One cancelled runner job was retried after its log showed an infrastructure shutdown; the retry passed. This PR changes no production code or database schema. ## Risks - A failed content check now reports a boolean mismatch instead of a large byte diff. Equality still covers buffer length and every byte. - Local timing is evidence for the fixture, not a general CI performance guarantee. - Hosted active-agent and rollout acceptance remain incomplete as recorded in the plan. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The exact runtime snapshot and context-window size are not exposed. Used code editing, shell execution and test analysis. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 05:13:30 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	1d348bbef0	fix(server): restore durable agent folders with bounded concurrency (#18531 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A replacement web server restores agent files from shared storage. > - The old restore reads each object in sequence. > - Modest network latency makes a 1,024-file folder exceed its deadline. > - This pull request uses at most eight concurrent restore streams. > - Every file must pass its size and hash checks before the folder is published. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18518 and #18526. Local deployment qualification found that a 64 MiB folder could not be restored after the old server filesystem was removed. ## What Changed - Restore at most eight files concurrently within the existing file authority service. - Cancel sibling transfers on failure. Await all workers before removing the temporary folder. - Keep the existing deadline, file-transfer database pool, authorization and publication rules. - Add regression coverage for bounded concurrency, corruption, settled cancellation, retained previous bytes and retry. - Document the behavior and update the deployment plan with local qualification evidence. ## Verification - Real PostgreSQL and S3-compatible storage: 1,024 files of 64 KiB each, plus instructions, with 25 ms added to each object GET. Delete the entire predecessor home and disable local adoption before reading through the successor. - Before: the read failed after 30.065 seconds. After: the same case passed in 4.180 seconds and fetched 1,025 objects. All owned test resources were cleaned. - The durable-file suite passed eight tests against PostgreSQL. Server TypeScript compilation passed. All 56 latest-head CI checks are complete and green or intentionally skipped, including full typecheck, build, unit and browser suites. Greptile is 5/5 with no review findings or open threads. - The plan separately records a released-container overlap proof: 130 reads, 26 saves, zero failures, two deleted predecessor containers and a retained authenticated session. That image predates this restore change. ## Risks - A cold folder can use eight simultaneous streams instead of one. Two file-transfer database connections bound the simultaneous restore callers. Streams verify bytes without loading entire objects into memory. - The 30-second deadline is unchanged. The measured size and latency do not qualify every folder at the maximum storage limits. - No schema, API or UI changes. Paid-model and hosted deployment acceptance remain separate work. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. Tool use, code execution and repository review. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 04:09:47 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	d941ed3879	feat(server): verify existing-volume ephemeral enrollment (#18529 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Cloud web servers can now keep durable state in PostgreSQL and S3. > - Existing servers still have files and a decision signing key on their volume. > - The volume must stay attached until every data owner verifies its migration. > - This pull request adds a dedicated maintenance process for that transition. > - Cloud can preserve the original key and remove the volume only after a matching receipt. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18518 and #18526. Existing-volume enrollment is a required step in the zero-downtime web deployment work. This is the Core maintenance side; the Cloud transition is a separate private change. ## What Changed - Package a standalone maintenance entry that starts no normal app routes or execution workers. - Coordinate the existing agent-file, run-evidence and skill migration owners. Follow every page and verify shared bytes before final eligibility. - Require stopped writers. Refuse active execution, missing local bytes, local workspaces and external instructions. - Read the existing decision key without generating a replacement. Preserve normal key creation for ordinary server startup. - Require an attempt token for status and export. Export the original key only after successful migration. Keep status and errors free of secret material. - Document the Cloud ownership boundary, deadline, retry and retention requirements. ## Verification - Full workspace typecheck and build passed before the review fixes. The final server TypeScript compilation passed after correcting Drizzle's optional predicate type. - Production runtime bundling passed: 2,702 inputs, 122 chunks, including the maintenance executable. - The focused suite passed 21 cases using PostgreSQL and real S3-compatible storage. It covers multi-page migration of 26 agents, exact reads after deleting the predecessor home, corrupt-object rejection, active/missing-data refusal, and the bundled plain-Node process with authenticated export and clean SIGTERM exit. - Regression cases refuse unsaved terminal working copies, require explicit stopped/cleaned receipts for unavailable copies, clean 101 expired traces through the owning service, and enforce the deadline after migration succeeds. - Initial integration attempts exposed fixture cleanup ordering problems; corrected runs pass. CI also caught a Drizzle predicate type error, now fixed and compiled locally. - All repository CI gates passed on `a4db955403`, including typecheck, build, browser suites and serialized tests. Greptile reviewed that head at 5/5; all four review threads are resolved. Hosted enrollment and active-agent continuity remain separate acceptance work. ## Risks - This is an explicit maintenance entry. The caller must confirm all prior deployments stopped and keep normal tenant routing closed through detachment. - A timeout blocks export but an owner may finish its current bounded operation before observing cancellation. Cloud must confirm process exit before detaching. SIGTERM has a ten-second hard exit deadline. - The authenticated export contains the original signing key. The Cloud caller must put it only in the stack vault and must not log the body. - Local-workspace and external-instruction migrations remain their existing owners' responsibility. Enrollment fails closed until those data are eligible. - No database schema changes. Ordinary server startup is unchanged unless this maintenance entry is explicitly launched. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. Tool use, code execution and repository review. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 03:56:44 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	73cd8eb9a5	fix(server): deliver answers promptly during web handoff (#18530 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its web servers can overlap while Railway replaces one deployment. > - An answer can reach the replacement while the original server owns the native execution. > - A competing delivery claim can make the owner miss the first notification. > - The normal retry interval then delays the answer by 30 seconds. > - This pull request gives pending answers a one-second retry in ephemeral mode and verifies delivery between separate processes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18518 and #18526. This closes a measured native-question delivery delay during control-plane web deployment overlap. ## What Changed - Register question delivery through its owning service. Use a one-second retry for ephemeral servers and retain the configured cadence for ordinary servers. - Keep the existing durable claims, response identity, authorization and continuation behavior. - Add a two-process PostgreSQL regression for a claim held by the non-owning server. Verify one command, settlement, idle behavior and reactivation by another committed answer. - Keep the assembled startup fixture on the real registration function. Update the deployment plan with current evidence and remaining acceptance work. ## Verification - The same local two-process race took 30.157 seconds before the fix and 1.197 seconds after it. The command sink is simulated; PostgreSQL, notification transport, interaction response, delivery claim and worker are real. - The cross-process regression and assembled startup suite passed 122 tests. No further sweeps or pending inspections occur after settlement. A second answer wakes the owner through PostgreSQL without a test-owned sweep. - Server TypeScript compilation passed. All PR CI gates passed on `d1d426c0dc`, including full tests, typecheck, build, browser shards and serialized suites. Greptile reviewed that head at 5/5 with no findings. - Live provider continuation, hosted staging deployments and production acceptance are still separate work. ## Risks - An unresolved answer causes more frequent reconciliation in ephemeral mode. Settled history does not keep the worker active. Existing claim fencing and bounded error attempts are unchanged. - A 30-second abandoned claim still needs its existing stale-claim recovery. This change addresses released claims, not proof of provider liveness. - The test simulates the provider command sink. It cannot establish that a paid model consumed the answer or that a remote execution survived a deploy. - No schema, API or UI changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. Tool use, code execution and repository review. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 03:39:48 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	16787e4167	Qualify rolling web deployments and preserve Stop through handoff (#18526 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The web server owns request handling and remote execution coordination. > - Deployment must start a ready replacement while the old server still serves. > - An outage test does not prove that two live servers can overlap safely. > - This pull request adds a separate Product E2E cell for that boundary. > - The existing run, file, recovery, and retained-session checks still apply. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18518. The runtime prerequisite is merged; this PR qualifies its ephemeral server and deployment contracts. ## What Changed - Add the explicit `rolling-web-deployment` Codex Daytona workflow. - Start independent A/B/C homes and compiled builds behind a test ingress. - Wait for readiness before routing, then drain and delete the old home. - Observe active authority before handoff and use the existing read-only recovery oracle. - Require ordinary reads and saves to succeed throughout replacement. Read back every accepted save exactly once. - Preserve the five-minute outage suites and their existing validators. - Add a model-free supervisor smoke and an unready replacement control. - Require graceful exit before deleting an old home; forced cleanup cannot satisfy the oracle. - Preserve a durable Stop through lease release/expiry until the recovered execution owner acknowledges it. Permit only fenced reattachment of the original execution for Stop cleanup; submit no new turn. - Exclude events saved by A during shutdown from evidence of B making progress. ## Verification - E2E TypeScript check passed. - Affected harness checks: 143 passed. Catalog, fixture and report checks: 120 passed. - Actual supervisor smoke passed two replacements: 436 reads, 45 saves, zero request failures, and confirmed owned resource cleanup. - B became ready in 18.7 seconds; C became ready in 109.2 seconds. A prior C timeout remains failed evidence. - Fresh browser proof: 11 checks passed, 246 reads, 50 acknowledged saves, zero failures, 1,058ms reconnect, both old homes deleted and cleanup confirmed. - Stop lease-gap regression: three PostgreSQL delivery tests passed with a simulated provider edge. Current server TypeScript build/vendoring passed. - Full harness: 5,814 passed, 17 failed, four skipped. Two shutdown races passed the focused file; two report timeouts passed an isolated 42-test rerun. Onboarding/workflow-security/Pi/date-expired fixtures are unchanged on inspected master; the host embedded PostgreSQL fixture remains a setup limitation. This is not a green full local suite. - CI at `172509b8be` passed all gates. Greptile is 5/5 with every review thread resolved. The earlier access-service race failure passed its isolated regression and the subsequent full CI. - Final review corrections: six focused executor cases, three PostgreSQL command-delivery cases, 19 harness cases and server/E2E typechecks passed. - Three live attempts failed before agent creation: two harness setup gaps were fixed, then provider authentication failed. The saved OpenAI key returns 401; a refresh is pending. The Daytona probe reported cleanup uncertain, and no sandbox with that attempt label was found through the authenticated staging manager. No live model execution is claimed. - Live Runner overlap, released-container qualification and hosted deployment proof remain pending. Merging this opt-in qualification lane does not claim those results. ## Risks - The source lane shares workspace dependencies and does not establish container packaging correctness. - The live workflow needs an explicitly owned S3 bucket, PostgreSQL, pinned remote image and provider credentials. - Qualification cleanup stops all owned processes after failure. A failed replacement must not be reported as a pass. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. Tool use, code execution and repository review. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 02:53:27 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	2b2b5a43b7	fix(daytona): restore the recorded directory for file recovery (#18527 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A stopped sandbox can hold workspace files that still need a durable copy. > - File recovery must reopen the exact allocation and directory recorded by the run. > - Workspace preparation can place that directory below the allocation root. > - Daytona resume returned the allocation root even when recovery needed the recorded child directory. > - This pull request lets the file-recovery owner request that exact directory. > - Ordinary resume keeps its allocation-root behavior. The recovery source checks stay strict. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A stopped native run had a prepared remote workspace. The recovery service stopped and retained its allocation. The next file-recovery step failed with `source_binding_invalid` and `reopened_cwd_mismatch`. Daytona resumed the correct allocation and matched its sentinel, but returned the allocation root instead of the workspace directory recorded on the lease. Expected behavior The file-recovery owner must reopen its exact recorded directory without creating an allocation, an empty directory, or an agent turn. Ordinary execution resume must keep returning the allocation root for normal workspace preparation. Steps to reproduce 1. Prepare a task workspace below a Daytona allocation root. 2. Stop and retain the allocation with unsaved workspace files. 3. Request source-bound file recovery. 4. Before this change, the provider returns the allocation root and the strict cwd check rejects it. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced from `050365e09d88411960fc3bacc1c08c46c0d9b6fa`. Deployment mode Docker with the bundled Daytona provider. Local tests use synthetic provider boundaries and disposable PostgreSQL. Refs: #18517, #15749. Related retained-export work: #17916. That work does not change the Daytona resume handler. ## What Changed - Add an optional driver-only `requestedCwd` resume field to the SDK contract and existing host forwarders. - Set the field only after the owned file-recovery path verifies the recorded source. - Require Daytona to match the requested directory to the recorded lease directory. Require a normalized absolute path without NUL bytes. Keep the allocation and sentinel checks. - Keep ordinary resume unchanged when the field is absent. - Add provider, host, and real workspace-preparation regressions. Document the separate directory contracts. ## Verification - The original provider regression failed for reusable and ephemeral leases. The scoped regression also failed to read a real retained file from the wrong root. Ordinary resume controls passed before the fix. - Current provider handler: 345/345 passed. This includes exact-directory, malformed, missing, foreign, sentinel, reusable, ephemeral, ordinary-root, and real-file cases. - Removing only the owned producer's cwd request makes its real PostgreSQL regression fail with the original `reopened_cwd_mismatch`; the source file was restored exactly afterward. - Current host selection: 10/10 passed against disposable PostgreSQL 17. It covers the inspected owner, sandbox forwarding, generic plugin forwarding, normal resume without the field, same and later task workspace preparation, and ownership rejection. The same-workspace control retains saved bytes and does not append another workspace path. - Current SDK and Daytona builds, server build, module boundaries, maps, and diff checks passed. The server used its normal unchanged-Runner cache. Its canonical input digest matched the previously verified build, and the canonical assessor accepted the copied original stamp and outputs. The changed SDK and server compiled from current source. - Local package-wide validation exposed two unchanged 30-second timeouts in the 145,000-member tar-listing cases. A single-file control reproduced both timeouts. That test mocks this provider module. The failures remain recorded; no timeout changed. The earlier package run had 497 passes, two failures, and seven skips. It is historical evidence from the abandoned broader resume experiment, not final-source package acceptance. - Initial host attempts timed out during database setup before any assertion. The final host selection used the existing supported pre-migrated disposable template. No test timeout changed. - Greptile reviewed exact head `8d0e577d1234ad394887255f13707c010dee6d24`: 5/5, no actionable issues, zero review threads. [Current review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18527#issuecomment-6555253315). - The official [Ponytail review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18527#issuecomment-6555237850) also assessed exact head `8d0e577d1234ad394887255f13707c010dee6d24`: 5/5, no findings. Its check is terminal neutral; its completed source assessment is not a test-execution claim. - [Primary CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41286802674) initially lost its spot runner in the UI/CLI workspace lane. The log records an explicit shutdown signal and no test assertion result. UI, CLI, lane scripts and dependencies are unchanged; the adjacent identical-source baseline lane passed. The single failed-lane retry passed at the same source. The initial failure is retained. All exact-head CI gates are now green. - No live repair or image deployment is claimed by this PR. Commands: ```sh node packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --config packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/vitest.config.ts packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/src/plugin.test.ts node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts -t 'recovers a protected retained source\|owned export directory\|prepares the (same\|later) task workspace\|does not reopen a retained source\|resumes only the exact stopped sandbox lifecycle\|explicit export directory' pnpm -C packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona build pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server build node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs node scripts/check-maps.mjs git diff --check ``` ## Risks - A provider that does not support the optional field can still return a different directory. Recovery keeps failing closed on that mismatch. - Ordinary resumes omit the field. The tests cover the same workspace and a later task so that normal preparation does not gain an extra path prefix. - The field grants no source ownership, stop proof, file-persistence proof, or execution authority. Existing allocation, company, task, run, claim, and cwd checks remain in force. - No schema migration, retry-policy change, model replay, or historical-row repair is included. Existing failed attempts remain historical facts. Deployed file recovery still needs its normal admission and independent persistence and physical-stop receipts. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. Used reasoning, source inspection, tool use, and code execution. The exact serving model identifier and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 02:47:30 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	006d5691a6	feat(server): support volume-free web server handoff (#18518 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its web server also owns controller admission and user commands. > - A rolling deployment starts a replacement before the old server exits. > - Shared database state alone does not preserve local agent files, browser chunks, or in-process commands. > - This pull request adds an opt-in ephemeral server contract and a local overlap test. > - The benefit is a web server that can relinquish traffic and local files without losing acknowledged work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18403, #18327, #18335, #18341. Current behavior The control-plane web server still has local agent-file authority and local command targets. A new container can miss saved bytes or send a command to the wrong process. An existing browser tab also needs chunks from its original build. Proposed behavior Eligible servers share only PostgreSQL, object storage and stable secrets. A replacement waits for readiness. The old server drains admitted requests, keeps owner commands available through handoff, and releases controller leases. Explicit maintenance adopts existing files before the volume is removed. Reason and benefit This is the application prerequisite for rolling app-only deployments. Schema migrations and permanent multi-replica operation are outside this change. ## What Changed - Store agent-file manifests in PostgreSQL and immutable bytes in S3. Treat local roots as disposable projections. Preserve existing permission checks and edit conflicts. - Add an explicit migration, eligibility and object-retention command to the production runtime bundle. - Add `/api/ready`, admitted-request drain, browser restart signaling and retained immutable UI chunks. - Carry transaction-aware work hints across controllers during handoff and active execution. Keep listeners closed when idle. - Deliver durable Stop and runtime responses to the execution owner. Recheck request lifecycle and access before response dispatch. - Reject local-only configuration in ephemeral mode. Keep the feature disabled for existing installations by default. - Add an isolated PostgreSQL/S3/proxy/browser deployment harness with independent server homes and retained failure evidence. ## Verification - All CI checks pass on `ce17b95019d3cf1cabd357d19b6d37f96782cc5c`: workspace typecheck, build, Runner checks, server/general tests and browser shards. Greptile reviewed the runtime changes at 5/5 with all findings resolved; the final commit updates maps and the plan. - Local targeted checks passed: coordinator 27; Stop/recovery 33; PostgreSQL command delivery 6; route/workspace regressions 8; bootstrap Stop 1; restart recovery 75. PostgreSQL command tests simulate the provider edge. - Local browser proof passed 91 reads and 19 saves; reconnect took 1,013ms. The tab opened Audit from S3 after deletion of A's whole home/build. This uses compiled workspace code and local-trusted auth, not released containers or live agents. - Local workspace typecheck/build passed; current server and runtime bundle passed. The earlier broad local suite was stopped after three hours and is not a passing receipt. Its retained failures and isolated reruns are documented in the plan. - Stacked #18526 adds stricter graceful-exit proof, an unready replacement control, live Runner qualification and a Stop handoff correction. Hosted enablement remains gated on those results and Cloud #1096. No hosted stack has been enabled. ## Risks - Apply migration 0422 before enabling the feature. Existing data must pass each owner's migration and eligibility checks. Do not discard a volume based on a single migration page. - Durable manifests remain authoritative after the opt-in is disabled. Rolling back to a binary that ignores them is unsupported. - Cold directory restoration and complete shutdown timing still need qualification before enabling a hosted stack. - Retained UI assets must cover the supported browser and rollback window. Cleanup is explicit; no new idle maintenance polling is introduced. - This change does not claim production zero downtime or authorize a fleet-wide enablement. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model ID and context-window limit are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, code editing, shell execution and browser automation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 01:58:54 -06:00
DottaandPaperclip	050365e09d	Preserve native workspace files after lifecycle Stop (#18517 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent termination must stop execution and preserve unfinished workspace files. > - A native run can acknowledge a lifecycle Stop, then finish without an accepted result. > - The file preservation worker required a board actor even when the exact native Stop receipt was valid. > - This left a prepared remote workspace allocated without a file recovery action. > - This pull request admits the exact audited receipt for file preservation only. > - The existing recovery service can then save the files and stop the same allocation without another agent turn. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A cancelled native run can have a terminal, unowned coordinator and a prepared remote workspace. Agent lifecycle cancellation records a valid run-only Stop receipt without a board user. The preservation worker rejects that receipt because it uses the board Stop predicate. The source lease remains active. A resolved execution watchdog does not supply the missing file recovery action. Steps to reproduce Seed a cancelled native run with a terminal-failure coordinator, no result or owner, an acknowledged and audited run-only Stop, and a prepared remote workspace. Omit board attribution. Start the registered cancellation preservation worker. Before this change, it records no workspace recovery marker. Expected behavior Record file recovery for the exact bound allocation. Keep the cancelled result, accounting, task state and watchdog history. Use the normal recovery service to stop, save and clean up that allocation without another provider turn. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on source `1e8e32290c657227857aeda2620a73db52bab4f2` with real local PostgreSQL 17. The observed deployment uses a sandbox provider and remote workspace storage. Related current workspace work: #18514. Public PR and issue searches found no duplicate repair. ## What Changed - Expose the existing exact run-only Stop receipt check. Reject empty audit identifiers. - Use that receipt only in cancelled workspace preservation. Keep board Stop and continuation checks unchanged. - Defer preservation while the run still holds a live controller lease. - Schedule that wait at the actual controller lease expiry. A lease renewal observed under the preservation lock also sets the next deadline. - Add a PostgreSQL regression for the remote-workspace-only lifecycle record, resolved watchdog history, normal recovery admission, ownership controls, rollback and idle behavior. - Document the separate file recovery obligation and its physical cleanup limits. ## Verification - Before the fix: the registered-worker PostgreSQL regression fails because the file recovery marker is absent. - After the original repair at `6fd1042efd`: 20/20 focused tests and all five sibling suites pass, 320/320 tests. The exact-head server build and typecheck pass. - The repository reviewer then found that a live controller caused a fixed 30-second retry. Both the existing-lease and real row-lock renewal cases fail against that source. The new `adb1d4eccdd48be4c86906d5bd111a6e39f20191` schedules the actual recorded deadline before locking and after the locked reread. The lock still enforces the ownership guard. - At `adb1d4eccd`: all 22 focused PostgreSQL controls pass. The directly affected retention and board receipt sibling suites also pass, 124/124 tests across three files. They prove no intermediate reads or transactions before expiry, preservation after expiry, and no extra execution. Server typecheck and the exact-head server build pass. - Map checks, module boundary checks and `git diff --check` pass. - Run `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/native-runtime/native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts server/src/services/native-runtime/native-failed-workspace-recovery.test.ts server/src/services/acknowledged-native-stop.test.ts` with the supported external test-database variable set to a disposable local PostgreSQL database. The earlier broader run also covered run control and workspace recovery. - Exact-head [canonical CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41274963476) completed successfully. All 59 current-head checks are terminal with zero failures; required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` pass. Both [Greptile](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18517#issuecomment-6553528545) and the [repository assessment](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18517#issuecomment-6553542139) reviewed exact `adb1d4eccd` at 5/5, with zero findings or unresolved threads. The repository assessment's check concludes `NEUTRAL`; the validated assessment itself is 5/5. Earlier reviews, including the valid 4/5 deadline finding at `6fd1042efd`, remain in review history. The [earlier CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41273965963) is also retained. No old result substitutes for a current-head gate. - Real sandbox recovery and physical cleanup remain unverified. Earlier failed QA outcomes remain failed. This PR changes no test grade or historical row. - Repo-wide local tests and typecheck were not run. The focused server checks cover this change; canonical CI supplies the remaining repository gates. ## Risks - The newly admitted receipt permits only file preservation. It cannot authorize a continuation, accept a native result or certify provider termination. - Recovery still requires exact company, task, run, lease, allocation and workspace bindings. Accepted results and live owners remain with their existing owners. - Provider or storage failure can leave recovery pending. The source must remain retained until saved-file and physical termination receipts exist. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. Used reasoning, source inspection, tool use and code execution. The exact serving model identifier and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-11-01 00:17:46 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	1e8e32290c	Give metadata project tasks private remote workspaces (#18514 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A task can belong to a project without using that project's files. > - The specification gives a task without a selected or configured source its own private folder. > - The remote source planner instead rejects such a task when its project has no configured workspace. > - This stops an ordinary delegated task before native execution starts. > - This pull request selects an empty, task-owned remote source for that narrow default case. > - Explicit source choices, existing workspace authority, and repository requirements retain their current checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18504 and #18351. The earlier reference-project fix covered additional project mentions. This fix covers the task's own organizational project. What happened? A task in a project with no configured workspace fails with `remote_workspace_source_unavailable`. Its project has no workspace policy, its four workspace selection and binding fields are null, and it requests no repository, branch, or local folder. The failure occurs before native runtime selection. A derived project folder exists in the project facade even when no source is configured; that derived path does not grant file access. Expected behavior Use the task's private remote workspace. Keep the project on the task for organization. Do not adopt the project folder, agent home, or another repository. Preserve explicit workspace and source requirements. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a project without configured workspaces or a workspace policy. 2. Assign a normal task in that project to a native sandbox agent. Leave all workspace selections and bindings unset. 3. Start the task with remote workspace storage enabled. 4. On the prior source, observe the source-unavailable error before allocation. On this source, observe a company-owned remote workspace whose `sourceIssueId` is the task and whose filesystem project and source IDs are null. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced against the deployed source planner at `756599e4ea069c9338c320fe8846523d3dfb92a0`. This branch starts at `987e0932bf66e703750cd04698b3c7e8993580a7`; the relevant planner and preparation inputs at that parent match the deployed source. Deployment mode Native sandbox execution with remote workspace storage. The regression tests use real PostgreSQL with the current migrations. ## What Changed - Allow an implicit empty source only after a company-scoped query confirms the project has no workspace rows and no explicit workspace policy. - Keep existing bindings, pending selections, explicit source choices, Git requirements, and local folder choices outside this default. - Add real PostgreSQL source controls and an assembled heartbeat preparation control through workspace reservation and the environment acquisition boundary. - Clarify the existing task-owned folder contract in the implementation specification. ## Verification - Causal RED: the new source control and the assembled allocation control both fail against the unchanged deployed planner with the observed source-unavailable error. - GREEN: 19 focused PostgreSQL controls pass across the source planner and assembled heartbeat preparation suites. The allocation control checks the persisted company/task owner, null filesystem project IDs, private remote root, original organizational project, and unchanged project and host sentinel files. - Negative controls retain configured repository sources and reject a configured source without a URL, an explicit missing source, an unknown selection, a required project policy, a required branch, an explicit local folder, a foreign project, and unsupported read-only project sources. - Current-source transitive TypeScript checks and `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` pass. The map check is structural evidence only. - Fresh exact-head Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved threads at `680461e180232d0f4a057528617e39b64b4f0e3a`. [Review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18514#issuecomment-6552946468). The official [Paperclip assessment](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18514#issuecomment-6552931726) is 4/5 and remains recorded unchanged. A separate non-author source review found no actionable issue after the full producer/consumer trace, with manual confidence 4/5. Neither static review ran the tests or proved deployed native execution. - Full repository tests, build, and type checks passed in [canonical CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41269733360). All 59 checks are terminal: 55 success, three skipped, and the official Paperclip check neutral; no failed or pending checks. The successful build checked out merge preview `03dce9f9bc708e778dd214ca85dfa1ba58e0a806`, with parents current main `9dbbfa4fb298448db83ace946b338bff321d8b2a` and this exact head. Its four helper blobs match this head; the four added mainline document-harness paths remain unchanged. Local tests use source aliases with the current DB, shared, and Runner source, rather than borrowed generated declarations. - Actual QA staging qualification is pending deployment. The previous failed journey and cleanup evidence remain failed; these local checks do not relabel them. ### Review follow-up - Fresh workspace retry: the normal producer sets `taskDirectory:true` for this empty-source case. [Heartbeat](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/680461e180232d0f4a057528617e39b64b4f0e3a/server/src/services/heartbeat.ts#L2288-L2296) separates the saved filesystem project from the organizational project. [Environment selection](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/680461e180232d0f4a057528617e39b64b4f0e3a/server/src/services/heartbeat/environment-selection.ts#L506) selects the fresh task directory. Preparation passes that flag, and the planner's existing task-directory return runs before the new binding guard. The proposed fresh failure omits that producer flag. The existing fresh-intent and binding checks stay strict. This is source evidence, not an extra runtime test claim. - Empty policy object: the [public project policy schema](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/680461e180232d0f4a057528617e39b64b4f0e3a/packages/shared/src/validators/project.ts#L24-L43) requires `enabled:boolean`. The project PATCH schema makes outer fields optional and does not make nested policy fields optional. A clear uses `null`; `{}` is rejected. A defensive parser's treatment of unknown stored data does not establish a valid `{}` producer. Keep the narrow fallback closed for non-null policies. - Boolean grouping: JavaScript evaluates the existing predicate as `sourceId \|\| (projectId && !implicitTaskDirectory)`. The explicit-source and metadata-default controls cover those branches. The optional parentheses suggestion does not identify a behavior change; this reviewed source remains frozen. - The official 4/5 assessment and its static verification limits remain visible. The independent manual review withdrew its initial fresh-retry concern after the full producer trace. Actual staging qualification still requires deployment and a new real journey result. ## Risks - The new query runs only for a source-less default admission. It reads one authorized project and uses `NOT EXISTS` for that project's source rows. It adds no recurring poll, write, provider call, or local folder access. - A project with an explicit workspace policy remains subject to the prior source requirement. This conservative rule does not reinterpret policy fields. - The allocation control uses the real planner and PostgreSQL reservation. It stops at environment acquisition, so it proves workspace ownership rather than provider filesystem execution. Live staging qualification is still required. - No API, database schema, permission, model, budget, run limit, or QA journey oracle changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. This session does not expose a more precise backend model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 23:09:30 -05:00
Devin Foley devinfoley Paperclip Dotta cryppadotta	34f8d25089	fix(github): expose review finding categories (#18429 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - GitHub review bots submit structured assessments through task-bound tools. > - Each repository can set its own finding categories. > - The schema accepts a string, but the server rejects values outside the saved review policy. > - Review instructions did not list the accepted values. The error did not list them either. > - This change gives agents the values before submission and keeps server validation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? Review submissions failed with an unknown finding category. The agent corrected the assessment before publication. The sampled trace has two rejections followed by a processed review. Historical tool inputs are null. Authorized diagnostic inspection found no saved raw provider trace for the representative run. The exact rejected values remain unknown. Expected behavior Agents can find the accepted categories before submission. Unknown values still fail validation. Steps to reproduce Set a custom finding category. Start a review. Submit a different category. Before this change, the instructions and error do not list the accepted value. ## What Changed - List configured categories in manual and automatic review instructions. - Return categories from the saved assessment policy in `begin_review`. - Describe the dynamic constraint in the shared discovery schema. Keep custom categories valid. - List accepted values in category errors. Keep authorization and publication checks. - Add contract and database integration tests. Update documentation and access maps. ### Hypothesis and thesis for a fix The missing category guidance can cause avoidable submission retries. A model can also ignore the policy returned by metadata reads; the historical inputs do not establish which occurred. The repair belongs to the GitHub review contract. Use the saved policy categories at review start, explain the constraint, and retain server rejection. A fixed global enum would reject valid custom categories. ## Verification - Baseline `f1d7808`: two new contract assertions failed for missing category guidance and error detail. The same assertions pass after the change. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/chat-github-review-policy.test.ts server/src/services/chat-github-tools.test.ts`: 41 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/chat-channels.integration.test.ts -t 'returns snapshot finding categories'`: 1 passed. Real PostgreSQL and service code; simulated GitHub HTTP. Checks policy changes, rejection before publication, accepted custom category persistence, and processed publication. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`: passed. Structural evidence only. - Shared TypeScript check passed. Server TypeScript checking was killed by the 8 GiB memory limit, including a separate retry after the other checks stopped. - Full typecheck and build could not complete: `cargo` is absent. Full tests were stopped after concurrent checks exhausted memory. CI must supply the full checks. - Follow-up compiler repair: the unchanged baseline reproduces TS2352 in the category discovery test. Runtime matchers replace the unsafe schema cast. They retain both guidance and custom-category assertions. The repair is commit `0dcb94c676`, with current master merged at `14d7052854`. The final head is `c46b8f35add9255fc71be294d27f5a7865bcb47f`; the remaining code-comment review finding was removed and resolved. - Final-head CI: all gates pass, with no failed or pending checks. Greptile gives this head 5/5 with no outstanding findings; the only inline thread is resolved. The workspace test shard passed on one bounded rerun after an earlier CLI child-server readiness timeout; no code change was made for that rerun. - The review host passed full recursive typecheck and build after the compiler repair and master integration. Fresh database rechecks hit the host PostgreSQL semaphore limit. The full local test command hit a pre-existing chat line-selection failure before assertions. These local limits do not replace the passing final-head CI evidence. - No live model or GitHub publication at the changed revision. No deployment or merge. ## Risks - Instructions add policy text. An agent can still ignore it. - Existing bot catalogs get the schema description when tools are synchronized. Trusted review instructions and `begin_review` also expose categories. - The service test uses simulated GitHub HTTP. It does not prove that deployed agents avoid retries. ## Model Used The original worker used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. A later Codex review repaired the test compiler error. That review runtime exposes GPT-6 but no exact snapshot or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Dotta <bippadotta@protonmail.com> Co-authored-by: cryppadotta <34892728+cryppadotta@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-10-31 22:06:32 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	e09f40888a	fix(recovery): preserve native task access during resolution (#18489 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip controls agent execution and task ownership. > - A native run needs its task binding until it reports its result. > - Direct task updates already reject self-status changes that remove this binding. > - Recovery resolution can also change the source task status. > - That route did not use the same protection. > - This change rejects the unsafe status change before the task or recovery receipt changes. > - The run can then use semantic completion while normal recovery permissions remain effective. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18411. What happened? A running native owner can resolve an older recovery action with `sourceIssueStatus: "in_review"` or `"done"`. The request succeeds and changes its own task status. That can release the execution binding before the run reports. Later task tools fail with `paperclip_runner_tool_binding_not_authorized`. Expected behavior Return a conflict before the task status or action receipt changes. Tell the run to report through `paperclip_finish` or `paperclip_block`. Preserve unchanged-status resolution, Board recovery, legacy-agent behavior, and the existing conversation and handoff rules. Steps to reproduce 1. Give a running native owner the task execution lock and an older recovery action. 2. Call `POST /api/issues/{id}/recovery-actions/resolve` as that run. Use `outcome: "restored"` and `sourceIssueStatus: "in_review"`. 3. Before this fix, the route returns 200 and changes the status. After this fix, it returns 409 with `native_run_status_reported_by_finish` and makes no task or action mutation. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing native self-status guard inside recovery resolution's source-task transaction. - Let the guard receive the requested status from either route contract. - Add HTTP route regressions for rejected review/completion transitions and continued task editing after rejection. - Cover unchanged-status native resolution, Board recovery and legacy-agent resolution. - Update execution semantics and both recovery maps. ## Verification - Baseline `91fdf02`: the two new rejection cases fail because the real Express route returns 200. Three safety cases pass. - Fixed source: all 198 tests in `server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts` pass. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passes. This is structural evidence. - Greptile and Paperclip Review both give the integrated head 5/5 with no actionable findings. - Full recursive typecheck, full build, and a repeat of all 198 route tests pass at integrated head `0fa104dfb240500acd01303cd446363ea39c6c75`. All current-head CI gates pass (55 successful checks/statuses; no failed or pending checks). - The full local `pnpm test:run` command fails in chat-test line selection with `No test found`, before assertions. This also occurs with the unchanged master chat test file. It is not a passing full local suite. - The route tests use the real route, validation and guard. They mock service and database boundaries. The observed hosted failure establishes the original mechanism. Fixed-source live provider acceptance remains unverified. No deployment or merge is part of this PR. ## Risks - A native owner now receives a conflict for a previously accepted recovery status change. It must use the existing semantic result path. - This prevents a new binding loss. It does not prove that an old remote executor stopped or recover missing provider state. - Board, legacy, conversation and handoff behavior retains existing authority. The regression includes representative allowed paths. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific snapshot ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (198 focused route cases; the full local command has the recorded selection failure) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 22:06:08 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	c38844eafa	test: observe complete workspace retention cleanup (#18507 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and preserves their work. > - Remote workspace retention removes saved objects after their last pin clears. > - The retention worker deletes each object before it commits the final snapshot state. > - The parent-revisit test treats the first object deletion as completion of all work. > - That valid intermediate state can fail the next-deadline assertion. > - This pull request observes complete storage, database, and worker settlement within the existing bound. > - The test still fails if the parent is not revisited after the child releases its pin. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #18351 Refs: #18506 What happened? [The server6 CI job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41263476916/job/124721633674) failed at `remote-workspace-snapshot-retention.test.ts:248`. The test expected a null retention deadline after the first parent object disappeared. The parent could still have its second object and a `delete_requested` row. The worker was not finished. Expected behavior The test must wait for both parent objects, both snapshot rows, and the retention worker to finish. It must retain the four-second bound and 40ms observation interval. Steps to reproduce 1. Use the parent/unfinished-child fixture in the retention test. 2. Hold the second parent-object deletion after the first object is removed. 3. Read the old assertion while the parent row remains `delete_requested`. 4. The old assertion receives `1793361600000` instead of null. Release the hold and observe the completed state. Paperclip version or commit The failed CI checkout was `ab849702a78f6bb619b1527596cd52db402d9189`. This test-only repair starts from actual mainline `b110271c9b2fd6dd5a1beb119e7f0663385df8b9`. The relevant test, retention service, coordinator, storage, test-helper, and configuration blobs match the failed checkout and mainline `756599e4ea069c9338c320fe8846523d3dfb92a0`. Deployment mode Built-from-source server tests. The local controls used one disposable PostgreSQL17 instance and local disk storage. They used no deployed company or model. ## What Changed - Observe both parent objects and the exact parent and child database rows in one bounded assertion. - Require deleted rows with cleared deadlines, zero active tracked work, and no coordinator wake before the test ends. - Keep the original four-second timeout and 40ms interval. Production retention and scheduling code stay unchanged. ## Verification - All17 tests in `remote-workspace-snapshot-retention.test.ts` passed on Node24 with current-source aliases, current migrations, and a disposable PostgreSQL17 database. - At immutable head `1e7eeb422be260bfaf752792596f8cdd126fff8d`, the second-deletion hold control also passed all17 file tests. Removing only the parent-revisit signal still failed the affected case within four seconds. The owned database container was stopped and its automatic removal was verified. - Normal checkout command: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/remote-workspace-snapshot-retention.test.ts --reporter=verbose`. - Four bounded controls used the exact failed CI source: unchanged baseline PASS; held second deletion with the old assertion RED; the same held state with complete-settlement observation GREEN; removed parent-revisit signal RED under the original four-second limit. - The held state proved: first parent object absent, second present, child row deleted, parent row `delete_requested`, non-null deadline, and active worker. This proves a reachable observer bug. The exact interleaving in the historical CI job was not recorded and remains unknown. - The same case passed at mainline756 in [the canonical readiness control](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41260612021/job/124712930107). Source identity and a passing control alone do not establish cause; the held-state control supplies that evidence. - `git diff --check` passed. The net source change is one test file, with no added comments or runtime changes. - Final exact head `1e7eeb422be260bfaf752792596f8cdd126fff8d`: [canonical CI41264965700](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41264965700) completed successfully. All57 checks are terminal and clean, with no pending or failed checks. This includes the aggregate verify and Snyk gates. The PR is mergeable and clean. No old failed job was retried. - [Greptile reviewed this exact full head at5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18507#issuecomment-6552310742), with no actionable findings and zero open review threads. Complete thread pagination was checked. - [The current Paperclip assessment is4/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18507#issuecomment-6552292204), with a final full-head footer. Its check conclusion is neutral. It calls the fix correct and identifies one minor, non-blocking concern about a process-wide active-work counter. This score remains4/5; it is not represented as5/5. ## Risks The assertion is stricter because it checks complete deletion and worker settlement. A real missing revisit, retained object, unresolved row, or continuing worker must still fail. The bound is unchanged. No schema, API, production storage, scheduler, or deployed configuration changes are included. No user-facing command or behavior changed, so no product documentation update is needed. The Paperclip review notes that `idleWorkSnapshot().active` is process-wide. The current test configuration uses fork isolation, one worker, and serial tests, so the counter is scoped to this fixture in the present test run. We retain it because deleted rows and an empty wake queue can be observed before the coordinator finishes its active work. If test isolation or fixture concurrency changes, this assertion will need a worker-specific settlement check. This is the review's accepted non-blocking limitation; it is not waived or scored as resolved5/5. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, source inspection, code execution, and tool use. The session does not expose a more specific backend model ID or context-window size; neither is inferred. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 21:54:42 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	b110271c9b	test: observe GitHub enrollment after worker settlement (#18506 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - GitHub connection events use a worker that must return to quiet after it drains an event. > - The integration test checks that work with real PostgreSQL and signed loopback requests. > - The loopback server can receive an ACK before the worker completes that request. > - The test reads the next deadline too early and can reject valid work in progress. > - This pull request waits for the observed work state without moving the fake clock. > - It keeps the exact work counts, identity checks, deadline bound and quietness checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18395 and #18351. This is a test-only repair for the event-worker integration fixture. What happened? [CI run 41257779002](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41257779002/job/124704574485) failed at the replacement follow-up deadline assertion. `coordinator.nextWakeAt()` was `null` after the server received the second ACK. The worker can still be waiting for that ACK response at this point. Expected behavior Wait for the worker to expose a deadline or finish the exact expected follow-up. Do not drive fake time during an observation. Require the scheduled follow-up to stay within five seconds of the first observation. Keep one empty follow-up, the new identity and no I/O after the worker becomes quiet. Steps to reproduce 1. Run the existing enrollment integration test on the original CI merge `a1e25444a95f3698c3761cd1796bd1e11567224c`. 2. Hold only the second loopback ACK response after its server counter increments. 3. The original deadline assertion fails while the worker remains active. Paperclip version or commit The causal control used the exact CI merge above. This repair starts from verified master `66e8fab9447aa21350f87ddec79fcd027f3e23ad`. The fixture and relevant worker files match the earlier `b889` inputs. The original failure remains preserved. The controlled race does not prove the unique historical scheduling of that CI attempt. ## What Changed - Use bounded real I/O yields for observations. Assert that the fake clock stays fixed during each observation. - Advance fake time only to actual pending follow-up deadlines. Keep one fixed five-second reference for each drain. - Accept an already finished follow-up only when the exact expected lease count is present. Quietness must still follow. - Hold the replacement ACK on a Promise gate in the existing test. Release it during normal work and in cleanup. This keeps a deterministic regression without a sleep. - Keep the signed request, identity replacement, exact lease counts, 25-minute no-I/O checks and 30-second test budget. ## Verification - Original CI: one assertion failure at line 126; 2,619 other tests passed in that lane. It was not a test timeout or host failure. - Earlier controls: the same test and relevant worker inputs passed in two fresh CI lanes. Both used zero Turbo cache hits. Input identity alone is not the cause proof. - Causal controls on the original CI source: unchanged baseline passed; held ACK failed at the original assertion with active work; a settlement barrier passed all original assertions; a missing second hint still failed. - Final patch with real PostgreSQL 17 and current source migrations: the direct test passes, including its deterministic ACK gate. An extra 750 ms ACK delay also passes. The missing-second-hint negative still fails at the expected observation. - Focused command: `pnpm exec vitest run --project server server/src/__tests__/github-connection-enrollment-work.test.ts`. Local checks used current-source package aliases and one disposable loopback PostgreSQL instance. The test creates a unique database and no user data. - Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 for `519c3fd4a99bf77aea7b085b67c38701358fef95`. The exact head has no open review threads. The current Paperclip assessment is also 5/5 with a final response footer for that full commit. Its check conclusion is neutral. - [Canonical CI 41260540629](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41260540629) completed successfully for the exact head. All 57 checks are terminal with no failures or pending checks. This includes `ci / verify` and Snyk. The PR is mergeable and clean. - `git diff --check` passes. Full repository typecheck, tests and build are delegated to fresh PR CI. No QA journey, model run, deployment or CI retry was performed for this repair. ## Risks This change affects one integration fixture. Production worker logic, schedules and deadlines do not change. The observer retains a one-second real-time bound and the test retains its 30-second budget. The test still fails on missing work, extra work, a late deadline, a wrong identity or I/O after quiet. The database and HTTP server remain owned by the fixture. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific backend model ID or fixed context window. Used reasoning, repository tools and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the focused tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (test-only behavior; described here) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 20:40:35 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	756599e4ea	fix(workspaces): keep project references without source folders (#18504 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents can receive project references in normal task and chat messages. > - Remote workspace preparation checks those references before a native run starts. > - A project with no workspace source has no folder to attach. > - The current check rejects that project as an unsupported read-only folder. > - This pull request keeps the project reference and reports the missing source without attaching files. > - Projects with configured sources keep the current remote access restrictions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18403 and #18351. This is a product prerequisite for the hiring journey. It changes no journey code. What happened? A native chat run failed before execution when its message referenced an authorized project with zero configured workspaces. The error was `workspace_validation_failed`: “This remote runtime cannot safely provide read-only project folders.” The project had no repository or checkout. The failed QA run and original grade remain preserved. Expected behavior Keep the task workspace when a referenced project has no configured source. Report that no project folder was attached. Continue to reject configured cross-project sources that require an unsupported read-only mount. Steps to reproduce 1. Use a native remote task folder with multi-project references enabled. 2. Mention a same-company project that has no configured workspaces in a normal comment. 3. Prepare the run workspace. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `b889ac39b7fbed558c5f4cfbbc2b73c4ca916810` with the real workspace resolver and PostgreSQL migrations. The staging failure was recorded in workflow [41253428446](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/actions/runs/41253428446). ## What Changed - Distinguish authorized project references with a known empty workspace list from configured sources. - Return a resolution warning and failure receipt for an absent source. Do not attach a folder or create a workspace. - Preserve project authorization, company filtering, the disabled remote-source gate, and the read-only restriction for configured sources. - Add real PostgreSQL regression cases and document the reference contract. ## Verification - Causal RED on unchanged `b889`: the metadata-only project case failed with the same read-only error. The real repository negative already passed. - GREEN: eight PostgreSQL cases pass. They cover an absent source with the remote-source switch both on and off, a saved existing workspace, a repository, a configured source without a repository URL, the disabled remote gate, mixed references, and a foreign company. - The existing assembled workspace test also passes: a real read-only project source is rejected before reservation or environment acquisition. Total: 9 selected tests pass; 119 unrelated tests were not selected. - Tests use PostgreSQL 17 and the current source migrations. The local Vitest configuration selects current DB, shared, and Runner sources because the borrowed dependency output predates the remote workspace feature. - Current-source TypeScript checking of both changed TypeScript files and their dependency graph passes. It uses the repository's real Express actor declaration. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` pass. - Canonical reproduction: `pnpm exec vitest run --project server server/src/services/heartbeat/remote-workspace-source.test.ts` with the existing embedded PostgreSQL support or `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_ADMIN_URL` set to a disposable test cluster. - Historical `0f2b` passed all 59 CI checks. A separate non-author manual source audit reported no actionable findings at confidence 4/5; it did not rerun tests or qualify live QA. The official 4/5 review requested a flag-scope test and saved-workspace control. This test-and-documentation update adds both, with production source bytes unchanged. - Current-head canonical [CI 41258109282](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41258109282) passed: all 59 checks are terminal (55 success, 3 skipped, 1 neutral), with no failures or pending checks. Build and typecheck passed. The eight-case regression file passed in the canonical Linux server 1/12 lane. Its checkout `6f69ccca70d10e78885b133fb54a80940bf175a5` has parents `b889` and this exact head; its tree equals this head. - Fresh Greptile and official Ponytail assessments each give 5/5 for exact `27660027d12ff31427d611019e90dabfb6d8503a`, with zero unresolved review threads. The separate manual audit remains 4/5. - Live QA remains pending on a reviewed app build. This regression proof does not claim that the hiring journey passed. ## Risks A project source could be added after project hydration. This change uses the same run-preparation source snapshot as the existing authorization and source check. It only permits a positively known empty workspace list. Configured sources, unknown shapes, foreign projects, and existing execution authority keep their current checks. No schema, credentials, provider, model, budget, or filesystem permissions change. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific backend model ID or fixed context window. Used reasoning, repository tools, TypeScript and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 20:19:28 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	66e8fab944	fix: complete native chat responses and improve API discovery (#18364 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip must perform work and report its outcome accurately. > - A chat response and its delegated or operator-owned work are separate stages. > - Native chat contracts instead required literal completion of the user's whole request. > - Agents kept searching or waiting even when a truthful handoff should finish the response. > - OpenCode also has separate acknowledgement backlog and empty-response failure paths. > - This PR aligns chat completion with its current stage and makes OpenCode completion truthful. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18098 for retained OpenCode evidence and #18377 for separate eval setup, oracle and reporting repairs. What happened? Real pinned OpenCode 1.18.34 reproduced an MCP timeout behind 800 text fragments. Pilot [41222196525](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41222196525) separately exposed a fabricated successful reply after a reasoning-only response. Later restart attempts timed out without an answer. Their native criterion literally required restarting the instance, although the chat instructions and authority required an operator handoff. General authority guidance alone did not resolve it. Expected behavior: A standing chat completes its current authorized response. It performs and verifies permitted actions, verifies delegated handoffs, or explains the specific unavailable action and operator path. The worker's task remains separate. Ordinary execution tasks must still complete their requested work. Empty provider responses must not become invented success. Version and reproduction: Actual pinned OpenCode and native Rust Runner, with retained full-stack AWS attempts. Product baseline master `51ea624344`. This PR adds no historical catalog to master. ## What Changed - Build standing-chat completion contracts from the server-owned conversation identity. Scope each current request to the response stage; preserve request text, criterion IDs, order, human-response scope and source revisions. Require verified authorized actions and truthful handoffs. Ordinary task contracts stay strict. Existing admitted inputs retain their saved contract during recovery; new contract content uses the existing revision/hash mechanism. - Guide prospective defaults to their owning resource and preserve existing work unless backfill is requested. Guide unavailable board/operator operations to the supported handoff. These are general chat instructions with no eval identities or expected answers. - Batch adjacent assistant text for at most 50 ms and 4,000 UTF-8 bytes. Preserve text, metadata and order; flush before non-text frames and shutdown. - Give an empty OpenCode response one correction within its existing turn, model, reasoning, context and deadline. Accept actual completed answer parts with incomplete headers. Preserve actual active tool work, bound idle evidence grace and fail truthfully if correction stays empty. - Reject empty OpenCode terminals in Rust without actual prose or an accepted semantic result. Never invent successful replies or evidence. Refresh generated project-discovery contracts. - Preserve accurate public API-discovery descriptions for existing project defaults and managed instance restart operations, including their field scope and authority limits. ## Verification Qualified: [pilot 41256592937](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41256592937) passes 3/3, with all 35 independent checks passing. \| Case \| Checks \| Full case duration \| Evidence and cleanup \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| Instance restart \| 9/9 \| 140.1 s \| complete \| \| Project defaults \| 11/11 \| 204.2 s \| complete \| \| Project work \| 15/15 \| 204.0 s \| complete \| All three are original-attempt results from source `c51e079f7f2364305b131ffd549e263ff78c5335`, containing the exact product files from `13c2b61f31d873a475ea0c3c026b19926ff42301`. Actual saved conversation contracts were inspected, as were ordinary native worker contracts where present. Each protected archive includes the actual API state and final PNG; cleanup completes. Original queries, `openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017`, finite case clocks, concurrency one and zero eval retries are preserved. Earlier passes do not transfer into this qualification. Both current heads pass all checks: product 62 (56 success, one neutral, five skipped), catalog 56 (54 success, one neutral, one skipped). Both have exact-head Greptile 5/5, zero unresolved review threads and clean mergeability. The three trusted private-evidence protocol files remain byte-identical to the dispatch workflow. Raw evidence stays protected. - 2,044 API discovery tests pass. Red controls showed that “restart instance” selected unrelated drain/settings operations and “save project defaults” selected repository replacement. Accurate public summaries now rank the existing operations correctly; route registration preserves descriptions. No endpoint, permission or field behavior changes. - 112 real-database, authenticated HTTP, native Runner and OpenAPI consumer tests pass locally, using disposable task-owned Docker PostgreSQL. It was removed afterward; shared IPC was untouched. These cover persisted contract selection, admitted native input and the model envelope together. The isolated CI suites also pass. - 77 focused contract/input/context tests pass. Red controls catch the wrong conversation predicate; canonical identity requires both agent and user IDs, including the actual heartbeat projection. Ordinary tasks, agent-only issues and planner tasks remain strict. Coalesced requests preserve criterion identities, source hashes and human-response scope. - 144 OpenCode driver tests pass; native core 441 pass, one ignored; packaging 56 pass, six skipped. Server typecheck and build pass. - Real pinned OpenCode/native Runner: a delayed 25-second acknowledgement completes within the original 30-second MCP deadline. The text-fragment control changes 817 notifications / 54.1 seconds / timeout to 45 / 19.0 seconds / accepted finish. Separate fast, six-minute and real authenticated API probes complete 32 tool calls plus finish. These do not reproduce every remaining historical MCP timeout, and no common cause is claimed for all such failures. Retained failures remain attributed to their original source. Earlier runs exposed fabricated empty-response success, prospective-default backfill, a literal whole-task chat criterion, fixture readiness and oracle/reporting defects. The immediately preceding [41250502608](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41250502608), product `c0bf249807` / source `7b1de24ce1`, is 1/3: work 15/15; restart 4/9 with the repaired contract actually admitted but no answer; defaults timed out before settlement, then exceeded the unchanged 256 MiB original-evidence allowance. Defaults domain behavior on that attempt remains inconclusive. #18377 retains the full attempt ledger, including missing archives and pre-paid cancellations. The fresh 3/3 establishes these selected outcomes; it does not establish full-catalog reliability. ## Risks The shared contract change applies to standing native chats across providers. It changes model instructions and completion scope, while permission, approval and review gates remain enforced by their existing owners. Incorrect model claims remain possible; the product evals independently require actual mutations, native work and delivery. The correction adds at most one provider request within the existing deadline; text batching can delay adjacent text by 50 ms. Three qualified attempts do not establish full-catalog reliability. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository inspection, tool use, code execution and live eval tooling. Exact hosted model revision and context-window size are not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge - [x] Final same-source three-cell pilot passes 3/3 with required evidence and cleanup --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 19:52:42 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	b889ac39b7	fix: serialize native completion replies and bounded retries (#18502 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their work. > - A delegated task reports its result to the source conversation through a durable completion outbox. > - Native execution can succeed before the presentation worker saves the accepted final reply. > - The outbox treated that short interval as a missing answer and cleared the target run. > - The presentation worker then rejected the valid answer because its delivery no longer belonged to that run. > - This change retains the existing target for one fixed presentation grace while accepted presentation is pending. > - The existing presentation owner can save the reply without another model run or more budget. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A completion-delivery retry can run immediately after a native callback succeeds. It clears the callback's delivery target before the presentation worker saves the accepted answer. The reply then fails with `chat_completion_superseded`. A daily run limit correctly blocks the unnecessary replacement run, leaving the conversation active without its saved answer. Expected behavior The outbox must retain its current target and attempt while that exact native run has accepted presentation work. The existing presentation worker must save the answer once, acknowledge the delivery, and settle the conversation. Existing actor, session, result, digest, budget and retry checks must remain enforced. Steps to reproduce 1. Accept a native DONE result and current-turn final message for a completion callback. 2. Run its due completion-outbox handler after terminal projection but before reply presentation. 3. Run the existing presentation worker. Before this fix it rejects the reply because the outbox has cleared the target. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on `b7f1c3769c00a107ffe4128b48b0ef8cc452cf3f` through the real PostgreSQL outbox and presentation services. The reported failure remains preserved. A new QA run is required after deployment; local tests do not qualify the deployed fix. Related: #17696 schedules accepted-response recovery. #18118 preserves canonical completion receipts. #18364 handles provider output and response-stage contracts. Those changes do not protect the completion-outbox target during this interval. ## What Changed - Defer a new execution attempt when the existing selector finds pending presentation for the same company, conversation, run and agent. - Retain the queued delivery target and attempt with an atomic compare-and-set. Await the existing scoped worker notification before that write in the same transaction. - Serialize retry with reply insertion under the existing child-task-first lock. Recheck locked task Done state and the delivery's stable completion-event version, status, target, attempt and exact lease. A delivered, retargeted or newer-claim winner prevents another wake. Admit the next attempt only after the winning transaction commits and releases its locks. - Limit presentation grace to five existing one-minute delivery leases, measured from the original run `finishedAt`. Clamp both the delivery lease and the native retry deadline to that immutable limit. Repeated sweeps cannot extend it. After expiry, resume the existing retry, exhaustion and daily-limit checks. - Keep publication authority in the existing materializer. The candidate query only defers a retry. Read the freshly reloaded delivery status, target and saved receipt after acquiring its child-task lock. - Fence both hold and retry writes with the exact claimed event version, attempt and lease. A stalled old hold cannot overwrite a newer lease. - Keep completion-event identity separate from mutable task ownership versions. Ordinary Done reassignment preserves its existing completion event; a real reopen retains normal supersession. - Add real PostgreSQL coverage for the observed ordering, outer commit and rollback, one saved reply, conversation settlement, idle SQL, retry boundaries and superseded deliveries. - Document the completion-outbox and presentation contract. ## Verification - Before the fix, the real PostgreSQL regression fails with `chat_completion_superseded` in `existingChatCompletionReply` when the outbox handles the terminal run first. After the fix, the same test passes without a new model wake. - Focused command: `vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/services/native-runtime/agent-chat-response-recovery.test.ts server/src/__tests__/chat-completion-delivery.test.ts` — 95 pass on `45f53a8c32fcca0bbdacf717286d37e30c1ba308`, using a disposable database on an owned local PostgreSQL 17 container. - Controls preserve retries for failed, cancelled, missing-final, missing-accepted-result, old-generation, foreign-company and foreign-agent targets. Reset or superseded task versions retain supersession. Digest and external-context declines never authorize a reply, never extend the fixed window, and leave it at exact expiry. An external native deadline cannot extend the limit. A valid reply at the last millisecond saves once without another model run. - The first reviewed head `b6f9c484b9567bc60af6d684c04e00058c1048ed` received Greptile 5/5 but an independent 3/5 review correctly found an unbounded hold. Three new real PostgreSQL controls failed on that source. This head adds the fixed bound and makes them pass. The earlier review, controls and CI remain retained; its review score does not qualify the new head. - The bounded predecessor `7300d2a978a5c4b3c13d85899bed3e98ae3c49fa` received an independent 4/5 review that correctly found an expiry-versus-in-flight-reply race. A real PostgreSQL advisory gate reproduced it after reply authority checked the delivery but before insertion. The retry lock and exact claim CAS now make that control pass. Both orderings, outer rollback, delivered/retargeted/superseded winners and competing lease claims pass. The next-wake test can acquire both parent and child locks, proving dispatch occurs after release. The valid 4/5 review and failing control remain retained. - At `39dd86e8f51d937cf382b2757736e0477201d21d`, both reviews found valid remaining defects: the reply helper still used its pre-lock delivery snapshot, and ordinary Done reassignment could stall a delivery by changing the task version. Four real PostgreSQL controls fail on that source and pass here: concurrent retry-first, a newly saved receipt after waiting, and reassignment within grace or at expiry. A real reopen through the issue service still supersedes the old event. - A later coordinator review found the hold CAS still lacked the attempt and lease fences already present on retry. A real PostgreSQL producer barrier reproduced an old hold shortening a newer claim from 120 seconds to 60 seconds. The same exact claim fences now prevent that overwrite. This failed control is retained; no old run was blindly retried. - The real worker saves one exact run-owned reply and acknowledges the delivery only after outer commit. An outer rollback publishes no reply. After settlement, advancing the scheduler clock by 60 seconds causes no further SQL. - Module boundaries, map structure, `git diff --check` and the canonical server build (including TypeScript and Runner vendor preparation) pass. The first local build stopped in the host package-manager setup; the installed pinned pnpm completed the build. Full repository typecheck, test and build gates pass in current-head CI; they have not all been run locally. - Final local checks also caught a test cleanup type error (TS2677) and one 94/95 readiness failure: the worker saves its comment before post-commit conversation settlement finishes. The test-only follow-up removes an invalid cleanup type predicate and waits on the existing bounded worker-quiet check before reading final state. All assertions and the same five-second bound remain. Source `45f53a8c32fcca0bbdacf717286d37e30c1ba308` passes all 95 cases and the canonical server build. The earlier failures are retained. - The final policy cleanup removes only 15 newly added narrative comment lines (seven service, eight test), as required by CONTRIBUTING.md. Both TypeScript AST signatures and `removeComments=true` emitted JavaScript are identical to tested source `45f53a8c32`. This was checked with the TypeScript 6.0.3 API and the installed native TypeScript 7.0.2 compiler. Assertions, timeouts and behavior are unchanged; the 95 tests were not repeated for identical compiled code. - The superseded `45f53a8c32` CI run recorded two 15-second timeouts in attention-retention cases. That failure remains retained. The test and its ten inspected owner or support files are identical on the tested master revisions. The canonical base run passes all 53 attention cases, and the comparison PR passes the same server lane, including those two cases in 9.3 and 9.8 seconds. This does not establish the timeout cause. Current-head CI is a new run after the required comment cleanup, not a retry of the failed source. - The optional Paperclip review bot ended neutral without a completed assessment because its execution paused. That result is not an approval. A separate [independent read-only audit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18502#issuecomment-6550216227) reports 5/5 confidence on exact head `9cfd3f74c69cc7a2da7b4ee5d1fca80f15d4af0c`, with no findings. Its manual assessment does not replace or relabel the incomplete bot result. - Current head `9cfd3f74c69cc7a2da7b4ee5d1fca80f15d4af0c` has a fresh Greptile 5/5 review with no open threads. [CI run 41249007430](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41249007430) passes all primary jobs and both required gates (`ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`). All 59 PR contexts are terminal, with no failed contexts. The actual CI checkout is `18db9e2750d6a799f26b5b8ba31bcccbea254227`, which combines master `681f7b77262a9df6c1b4aad55291bf960061e491` with this exact head. Fresh QA verification on the deployed application remains required before claiming the live failure is fixed. ## Risks A candidate can retain a delivery whose stricter presentation checks still prevent publication, but only within the fixed five-minute window. The existing worker keeps publication authority. If a valid reply remains unavailable at expiry, the normal callback retry may require another admitted model run; the original result and completed child work remain preserved. Existing retry, exhaustion, model-run and spending limits still apply. Failed or cancelled execution and genuinely missing accepted output retain the existing retry path. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository inspection, tool use and code execution. The runtime does not expose the exact hosted revision or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 18:07:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	681f7b7726	perf(server): retire aggregate maintenance polling (#18425 ) Reviewed and verified at `901c4c4bdc`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 17:22:31 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	9ca9af544a	Drive remaining live run and resource recovery from durable work (#18419 ) Reviewed and verified at `6a4c193906`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 16:00:35 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	eb12cfc96b	perf(github): activate connection work from events and deadlines (#18395 ) Reviewed and verified at `f77620b9a4`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 15:38:43 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	5e4cc01073	feat(workspaces): keep remote files off the webserver disk (#18403 ) Keep native sandbox workspace files independent of the webserver disk. Use encrypted saved versions and Postgres ownership so a replacement server can recover files and continue work. Enable the path by default for new eligible workspaces when durable storage is configured. Preserve explicit opt-outs and existing host workspaces. Include safe snapshot repair, Files access, import, migration and retention. Bound saved-Files resources, preserve imported Git recovery, reject unfinished Git operations, publish immutable concurrent captures, and verify permanent object-version deletion. Validated 471 targeted local controls, build/typechecks, all 40 CI partitions, fresh Greptile 5/5 and security review. The PR records original failed attempts and scoped retries. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 14:54:01 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	75fa37f30f	fix(server): expire native backups from retention deadlines (#18380 ) Reviewed and verified at `5b137b5cda`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 14:31:31 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	453f5fbb78	perf(external-objects): schedule scoped refresh obligations (#18384 ) Reviewed and verified at `3e58e12f87`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 14:09:24 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	c32ecf6657	fix(server): schedule only outstanding merge confirmations (#18382 ) Reviewed and verified at `bc22051c56`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 13:44:46 -05:00
Nicky Leach	6484f96c28	fix(workspaces): inspect storage only when needed (#18410 )	2026-10-31 11:43:18 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	9a3f395737	fix(server): settle routine history without idle scans (#18399 ) Reviewed and verified at `0b65f490d9`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 13:19:31 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	91fdf02e95	perf(tasks): defer completed transcripts on compact opens (#18461 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task conversations must show the saved instruction and recent replies quickly. > - Compact task reads already limit the saved message window. > - The conversation still waits for completed run transcripts even when a saved reply contains the result. > - Removing that wait alone can insert activity after the reader starts reading. > - This pull request defers that output until the reader opens history and keeps required output in the initial reveal. > - The benefit is a useful conversation sooner, with a stable first layout and a working composer. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17593, #18092, #18312, #18358, #18422. What happened? Opening a task with a long saved investigation can wait for native events or legacy logs before showing its existing replies. A slow transcript request can hold the conversation behind the loading screen until the 15-second fallback. Expected behavior Show the bounded saved conversation without reading completed output that already has a usable saved reply. Keep that output available through the existing history controls. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a task with many completed runs and long saved agent replies. 2. Delay its run events and logs. 3. Open the compact task directly. Before this change, the transcript read blocks the saved replies and composer. ## What Changed - Defer completed successful run transcripts on compact task opens when a usable saved reply is present. Load that output through the existing history controls. - Keep required output on the initial path: live and failed runs, yielded runs, pending interactions, placeholder/progress-only replies, explicit anchors, chats, and full history. Retain output already selected during this visit when its run completes. - Keep saved plans visible when their owning run output is deferred or still loading. - Keep the same composer and draft through history expansion. Offer More run output when a single saved run has deferred output. - Position same-task comment links after their target arrives. Wait only for a missing target, with a 15-second limit. Unrelated stalled metadata cannot block an available target after the reveal deadline. - Preserve the reading anchor when a queued scroll event arrives during a properties-pane width transition. - Add a 200-reply/200-run PostgreSQL browser fixture with a saved plan, covering both task views on desktop and mobile. Correct stale browser setup for current routes and the shared mobile scroller. - Remove a random company-prefix collision in the isolated privacy test fixture that failed during CI. ## Verification - Final revision `fba3f2fcbb`: 386 focused thread/scroller unit cases and all 32 production-browser journeys passed. The browser cases cover both task views on desktop/mobile, saved plans, delayed transcripts, history, comment links, Back, drafts, retry, avatar continuity, media and pane resizing. The 25 privacy fixture cases also passed against PostgreSQL. - Workspace typecheck and full build passed with Node 24. A broader local UI run passed 10,220 cases across 849 files before the final navigation/plan review fixes; the changed components were then rechecked in the 386-case focused run. - Five alternating pairs compared master `12b0cc6304` with this revision, using 200 long saved replies and 200 completed native runs. Both production UI builds used the same loopback API/database, Chromium 151.0.7922.34, 1440 × 900, fresh browser contexts, service workers blocked, no CPU throttle, and a controlled 3-second events/log delay. Builds and other suites were stopped during measurement. No page errors occurred. \| Useful conversation + editable composer \| Baseline median (range) \| Fixed median (range) \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| Cold direct open \| 3.570s (3.538–3.616s) \| 1.056s (1.022–1.141s) \| \| Task-list navigation \| 3.373s (3.342–3.394s) \| 0.899s (0.885–0.915s) \| \| Back \| 22ms (22–25ms) \| 25ms (25–28ms) \| - Median paired savings: 2.519s cold, 2.470s from the list. Completed-output requests: two per baseline sample, zero per fixed sample. Recent-comments API control medians were 13.6ms for both, with ranges 12.1–18.7ms and 11.6–50.8ms. No Back improvement is claimed; an earlier revision's run also included one 1-second Back outlier, retained in the local evidence. - The full local default test command did not pass: it stopped on the existing chat test line-selection error. After restoring embedded PostgreSQL library symlinks omitted by an install with scripts disabled, Node 24 passed 672 cases in the first two chat shards, then failed to select the third. This is separate from the passing focused suites and remote CI. - Earlier CI failures were addressed: the privacy prefix collision is fixed; the delegated task-completion reply case passed locally after merging master's reply-recovery fix (#18465). Browser fixture corrections retain the original behavior assertions. Red tests reproduced the loading, navigation, resize and saved-plan regressions before their fixes. - Map, module-boundary, token-gate and added-line token checks passed. The full-tree token scan still finds pre-existing active-username fixtures; this PR adds zero forbidden token lines. - Greptile: 5/5, final revision, all four review threads resolved. The final-revision PR CI workflow passed, including build, typecheck, all server/chat/workspace test shards, all eight E2E shards, and every Runner lane. GitHub reports 55 successful checks and three skipped checks. The separate Paperclip Review check remains queued with Waiting for the assigned agent; it has not produced an assessment and has not been bypassed. The branch has no merge conflicts. ## Risks - The default compact task omits completed transcript details when the saved result is sufficient. The reader must open history to inspect them. - Required structural data remains inside the initial reveal boundary. Slow server responses for that data remain visible latency. - Link positioning falls back after 15 seconds when its target never arrives. The conversation remains readable. - The measurements use a controlled local delay. They do not establish a deployed staging speedup. - No API, schema, authorization, or migration changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites pass; the full default wrapper has the existing selection error documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (code CI passed; the separate assigned-agent Paperclip Review remains queued) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 12:56:06 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	dce383c733	perf(server): stop recurring attention retention scans (#18388 ) Reviewed and verified at `a61af9888e`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 12:28:40 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	b6b57079b9	fix: evaluate status cards on committed changes and deadlines (#18401 ) Reviewed and verified at `21795e222a`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 11:41:59 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	e40de0c9e8	perf(ci): refresh test weights and narrow graph dependencies (#18464 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Contributors need fast, reliable CI feedback. > - Diff-aware CI selects test files and partitions them into runner jobs. > - Stale cost estimates put several slow suites on the same runner. Broad imports also couple small tests to large modules. > - This PR refreshes test costs, runs independent graph discovery in parallel, and narrows three dependency boundaries. > - Selection safeguards and CODEOWNER-only AWS routing stay in force. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18398. This follows the audit of [PR #18427's verification run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41169978784). The audit found 403 selected general-server files without timing weights. Three suites measured at 232s, 122s and 116s shared one shard because each received a roughly 2s fallback weight. Local graph discovery across four projects took 43.7s serially and 21.7s with two workers. A reverse-order repeat took 37.7s serially and 22.6s with two workers. Both comparisons produced identical selection results. This is a local measurement, not a claim about production CI speed. ## What Changed - Refresh general-server costs for 1,285 of 1,309 current files and serialized costs for all 163 files from two successful protected-master Cloud readiness runs. Retain prior costs for unmeasured files, including dedicated chat and native-runner suites. - Record passing server file costs, including collection, setup and environment preparation. A weekly hosted workflow validates trusted source runs and opens a timing-only PR. It tests shard coverage, pauses while a refresh PR is open, and never merges automatically. - Discover at most two project graphs concurrently in isolated, heap-limited Node processes. Cache repeated inventory reads within one selection. Worker errors and timeouts retain the full task plan. - Fetch only the merge commit and parents for the selector. A real shallow-clone regression proves the complete diff still includes more than 300 files, renames and deletions. - Share the identical log viewer and run details between both AgentDetail pages. The viewer test imports the shared implementation and runs each of its 13 distinct cases once. - Extract the pure API error class while preserving the API client's public exports. Import delivery work signals through their existing narrow DB export. ## Verification - PASS: `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`. - PASS: 284 CI selection, timing, shallow-diff, sharding and routing tests. - PASS: 74 further cache, routing and graph-proof tests. - PASS: 94 targeted UI assertions across the viewer, run invocation, API errors/client and progress helpers. All 76 assertions in the 12 server suites made independently selectable also pass. - PASS: `pnpm check:token-gates`, module-boundary checks, YAML parsing and `git diff --check`. - PASS: [Full PR CI and required `ci / verify` aggregate](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41206683345), including all 12 general-server shards, all nine serialized shards, workspace groups, chat suites, Runner lanes and build checks. - PASS: [GitHub hosted real-workspace selector and cache/routing qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41206683205). - PASS: Both Greptile and Paperclip reviews are 5/5 with no actionable findings or inline comments on `7dc65c51b8`. The PR has no merge conflicts. - PASS: The production refresh parser accepted all 107 structured file-cost records from a real successful server CI job, including setup/loading cost. - Local `pnpm test:run` completed all six chat shards successfully. The duplicate monolithic local run was stopped after the complete remote suite passed; it was not completed locally. The focused log-viewer command improved from 18.84s (26 duplicate variant cases) to 8.49s (all 13 distinct behavior cases). The dependency audit confirms 12 server files and the API-error test no longer need conservative always-run retention. Repartitioning the audited PR with the new costs changes the slowest shard from 810s to 591s of summed historical test execution (1,124 of 1,142 files measured). This is a workload simulation, not measured new CI wall time. ## Risks - Two graph processes use more peak memory. Each has a 2 GiB heap limit and a three-minute timeout. Any failure preserves the original task plan. Real workspace qualification runs in GitHub CI. - Historical logs contain test/hook costs only. New reporter records add loading/setup costs after merge. The manifests identify measurement coverage and source runs. These weights change placement, never permission to skip tests. - Runner load adds timing noise. The refresh uses medians and requires at least 90% measurement coverage in each lane. - GitHub may require approval to run checks on a PR created with `GITHUB_TOKEN`. Refreshes remain reviewable and do not merge themselves. - The shared viewer is a mechanical extraction. Both pages retain their existing exports, and the behavior assertions remain covered. AWS runner authorization is unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository inspection, reasoning, code execution and GitHub tools. The exact deployment ID and context-window size were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks and six chat shards; complete suite passed in CI as detailed above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 11:05:12 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	b7f1c3769c	feat(native): record verified provider-pack session admission (#18469 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Remote native sessions can use an installed pack or a retained earlier pack. > - The current app revision does not identify the pack that a session admitted. > - Core already verifies the selected pack and binds its launch artifacts. > - Normal run records lack a closed receipt for that admitted selection. > - This pull request records that receipt after session admission and attachment. > - Operators can compare the actual Core admission identity with their expected pack. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17749 for protected provider-pack selection and #18343 for retained controller recovery. The related OpenCode producer repair is #18456. Those changes do not publish the closed run receipt added here. A search found no existing `nativeProviderPackAdmission` PR. What happened? Core can admit a compatible installed provider pack with a source revision that differs from the current app. A retained session can also keep its original pack. The normal run record does not show the admitted pack digest, proxy digest, and source revision. An expected launch path or current app revision cannot fill that evidence gap. Expected behavior The run has a closed, server-owned receipt after actual session admission and attachment. The first receipt remains immutable history. A separate current-proof state verifies only the actual current admission epoch. Retained recovery needs positive original provenance, and missing legacy evidence stays unknown. Steps to reproduce 1. Select and verify an installed pack whose digest differs from the current app pack. 2. Open the native session successfully. 3. Inspect the normal run profile for a bound admission receipt. Paperclip version or commit The original selected base was `8bcc5a01edd5d87540401521e6f30d3df43e1848`. The branch now includes exact actual prerequisite parent `3ee4c5b6138da82d0b1f51aa010540561bf43c22`; the PR diff against it is the five receipt, executor, test and documentation files. Deployment mode Core remote native execution with provider-pack selection and retained session attachment. ## What Changed - Retain the verified selected pack identity only after a backend returns the matching admitted session. - Publish `runnerProfileJson.nativeProviderPackAdmission` from the session callback after attachment succeeds. - Mark the receipt with `stage: session_admitted` and `authority: core_verified_selection`. - Store bound company, agent, run, session, runner, logical `runnerEnvironmentLeaseId`, pack digest, OpenCode proxy digest, and source revision fields. Retained attachments identify `inheritedFromRunId`. The logical Runner scope is distinct from the physical environment lease. - Lock the current coordinator claim before the profile write. Check owner, attempt, generation, controller boot, lease expiry, phase, and absence of an accepted result. Merge JSON fields without replacing other profile data. - Restore retained metadata only from the exact prior closed Core receipt, positively verified prior state and matching retained binding. Capture same-run prior provenance from the locked claim row before invalidation; cross-run recovery reads only the exact source. Legacy absence remains unknown while recovery continues. - Preserve the first receipt as history. Atomically mark a new opaque admission epoch pending in the existing mandatory claim transaction. Publish current verification only for the matching claim and epoch after actual attachment; changed or unsupported admission becomes unknown without blocking authorized execution. - Preserve synchronous session publication and quarantine ordering before the best-effort receipt write. Fresh replacement selects its newly verified pack; a captured retained-process flag cannot relabel the replacement with an older pack. Preserve the existing private pack authority even when a local dirty revision is ineligible for the closed receipt. - Add focused admission, recovery, identity, PostgreSQL ownership, lock, and JSON-preservation tests. Document the receipt contract. ## Verification - RED: the actual managed-backend path verified and admitted an installed pack but had no closed metadata. Failed open published no evidence. Additional controls fail when retained recovery invents missing history or dirty-revision eligibility gates the existing private authority. - RED calibration: removing mandatory pending invalidation fails the actual pre-admission control; reusing the retained flag for fresh replacement falsely restores the old pack. Removing the epoch fence fails the real PostgreSQL stale-callback case; reintroducing a receipt-specific execution error fails both authorized Runner/logical-lease replacement controls. - GREEN: 49 focused Core tests, all 33 admission identity/transaction tests (20 pure and 13 PostgreSQL), and all 23 existing private-authority tests passed on exact integrated head `165a9096cf3e0d34d2db1e6b52960ad4ac0ad132`. No all-skipped run is counted. - Final test-only head `11ac34baf00552a5d322b5f5f1a8e491859cacec` adds the positive executor-callback SQL-writer wiring control, exact session/identity/claim/epoch assertions, profile preservation, and null-session zero-write check. Removing only the production writer call makes it fail on a missing receipt. All70 focused identity/Core tests pass with this closure; production code, the13 PostgreSQL tests and the23 private-authority tests are byte-identical to the qualified165 source (106 distinct passing controls across the combined proof). - The PostgreSQL tests used an owned loopback-only cached Postgres 17 container with the supported `PAPERCLIP_TEST_POSTGRES_ADMIN_URL` helper and aliases to current DB/shared source. The container was removed afterward. They cover immutable history, JSON preservation, stale claims and epochs, expired leases, terminal runs, changed/unsupported replacements, and a failed write retaining pending proof. - Historical pushed `f7f12fe` CI executed all 24 earlier admission tests, including nine PostgreSQL cases, in server5. Its warm-quarantine failure exposed the new hook-ordering issue fixed here. The same run also encountered a six-character UUID fixture-prefix collision and the independently repaired cached issue-link browser selector; those historical failures are not claimed as green. - Node 24.22.2 and Vitest 5.0.3. The credential-free normal QA runtime import preflight passes with networking disabled. Map contracts, token gates and `git diff --check` pass. - Local TypeScript validation still sees stale borrowed Runner/shared declaration mismatches outside the changed ranges. No diagnostics remain in the new helper or changed test/hook ranges; clean current-head CI is required. - Repository-wide typecheck, full tests and build were not completed locally. A full local executor attempt reached this host's unsupported native PostgreSQL listener and was interrupted; its result is not counted. Canonical run `41214512239`, attempt 2, is successful on exact final head `11ac34baf00552a5d322b5f5f1a8e491859cacec`. All 59 checks are terminal: 55 success, 3 skipped and 1 neutral; none failed or pending. The actual Linux suites execute all 33 admission tests (including 13 PostgreSQL cases) and all 1,022 executor tests successfully. The [original five failures and bounded unchanged-source controls](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18469#issuecomment-6545593767) remain preserved. One failed-only request was made; GitHub expanded the reusable workflow call and dependents. No second request was made. Fresh exact-head Greptile review is 5/5, all review threads are resolved, and the PR is mergeable. - These local results claim no live provider admission, rollout or recovery. ## Risks - The authority is Core's verified selection plus successful session admission. It is not an independent provider statement or continuous runtime measurement. - Receipt fields cannot grant execution or replace the existing provider, process, lease, workspace, or recovery checks. - Legacy missing receipts and unavailable database reads remain unknown. The current release cannot label an older admitted pack. - The closed receipt requires a clean, 40-character hexadecimal source revision. Verified local `-dirty` packs still execute and retain their existing private recovery authority; their closed admission proof stays `unknown`, so it cannot certify an immutable source revision. - The first receipt is historical. Consumers must require current state `verified`; pending or unknown cannot certify the current pack. Changed Runner scope or pack evidence does not add execution policy. - A receipt save failure leaves the atomically invalidated state pending. The existing artifact authority, cancellation, workspace and process checks remain responsible for execution safety. - The receipt adds no manifest, environment, credential, or filesystem path to the run record. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, and tool use. The session does not expose an exact model build ID or context-window capacity. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 10:59:24 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	51ea624344	fix(server): reject a native run's own task status change (#18411 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs (the Paperclip Runner) report their outcome with `paperclip_finish` or `paperclip_block`, and the status arbiter then sets the task status > - Every runner tool, `paperclip_finish` included, requires that the task's `executionRunId` is the current run > - When the run sends its own status change through `PATCH /api/issues/{id}` (for example with `call_api`), the issue update clears `executionRunId` and `checkoutRunId`, so the run removes its own execution lock > - After that, every tool call fails, the run cannot report, same-run recovery spends its retries, and the task goes to `blocked` > - This pull request rejects that status change with a 409 before it commits, and the message tells the run to report with `paperclip_finish` or `paperclip_block` > - The benefit is that the run corrects itself in the same turn, and the task does not get stuck ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. This is the bug description. What happened? An agent on the Paperclip Runner followed task instructions that said "set the task to `in_review` and keep it assigned to yourself" while it waited on a scheduled monitor. It sent `call_api` with `PATCH /api/issues/{id}` and `{ "status": "in_review" }`. The server applied the change and cleared the execution lock. Then: 1. `get_task`, `set_task_monitor`, and `paperclip_finish` all failed the run binding check. The provider saw only "Paperclip semantic operation failed", or the monitor-wait message from `paperclip_finish`. 2. The `call_api` receipt for the PATCH showed `status: null, outcome: unknown`, because the authority check after the response failed when the lock was gone. 3. The session ended with no semantic result. Exact-checkpoint resume ran out of retries (`native_session_retry_exhausted`), and recovery would not replay the run because the mutation outcome was unknown. The task went to `blocked`. This occurred on each check where the agent tried the status change. Runs that did not try it completed normally. Expected behavior A native run that holds the task's execution lock cannot remove its own lock. It gets a clear, actionable error and reports its outcome through `paperclip_finish` or `paperclip_block`. Steps to reproduce 1. Assign a task to an agent that uses the Paperclip Runner (native runtime). 2. While the run executes, have it send `call_api` with `PATCH /api/issues/{id}` and `{ "status": "in_review" }` for its own task. 3. Look at the next tool calls of the run. They fail, `paperclip_finish` cannot complete, and recovery blocks the task. Paperclip version or commit `master` at `493e229d93`. ## What Changed - `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: add `assertNativeRunKeepsOwnExecutionLock` to `PATCH /issues/:id`. The guard returns 409 `native_run_status_reported_by_finish` when all of these are true: - the actor is the assigned agent, and its run is the task's execution or checkout run - the run is `native` and `running` - the request changes the status and keeps the assignment - the task is not a conversation - The 409 message names `paperclip_finish` (`needs_review`, `done`, or `yielded` with a `monitor` continuation) and `paperclip_block`. `call_api` returns HTTP denials as data, so the provider can read the message. - Conversation tasks are out of scope. A conversation turn settles from its final reply (`nativeConversationReplyResult`), not from a runner tool. So a reply that moves its conversation to `in_review` still settles, and that contract stays. - When the request also carries blockers, the guard first runs `assertOnboardingFirstTaskDependenciesAllowed`. A blocker that the dependency rules reject keeps its specific 400. Every other case gets the 409, including `{ "status": "todo", "blockedByIssueIds": [] }`. - `server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts`: add 14 cases. They cover rejection for `in_review`, `done`, and `blocked` (also with an explicit self-assignment, an empty blocker list, and a real blocker), and the onboarding 400 that wins over the 409. Pass-through cases assert a 200, the patched status, and one update for: other field edits, legacy runs, native runs without the lock, stopped runs, handoffs to a human (after a confirmed stop), conversation replies, and board users. ## Verification - `npx vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts` passes (193 tests). - With the guard disabled, the 4 rejection cases fail. With the `native` runtime condition removed, the legacy pass-through case fails. The tests pin both sides. - `chat-project-tools` and `onboarding-first-task-admission` pass (74 tests). These are the integration suites that caught the first version of the guard in CI. - `npx vitest run` on `issue-queued-comments-routes`, `task-workspace-binding`, and `issue-recovery-actions` together with the ownership suite passes (455 tests). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server/tsconfig.json` is clean after `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner build`. ## Risks - Behavior changes only for native runs that change the status of the task whose execution lock they hold. That change always stranded the run before this PR, so no working flow depends on it. - Legacy adapters, board users, agent handoffs or reassignments, and conversation tasks do not change. - Other validation errors that run later (in the service update) are replaced by the 409 for these requests. Each request is still rejected, and the 409 points the run to `paperclip_finish` or `paperclip_block`. The onboarding parent-blocker error keeps its 400, because the guard runs that check first. - If a request names the current assignee with a reference that is not its id, the guard does not apply, and the request follows the earlier rules. - No migration. Related gaps this PR does not change: - The authority check after the response turns a committed mutation into `outcome: unknown`. - The runner hides tool binding errors as "Paperclip semantic operation failed". - The `paperclip_finish` monitor-wait error does not say that the run lost its lock. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs). It did the root-cause analysis from run events and the activity log, wrote the code and tests, and ran local verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 08:44:44 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	3ee4c5b613	Make saved execution receipt recovery react to durable work (#18409 ) Reviewed and verified at `8f306e0a6e`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 10:03:59 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	42fd568cf8	Drive issue recovery from committed changes and exact deadlines (#18402 ) Reviewed and verified at `11b49125db`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 09:41:27 -05:00
Dotta	12b0cc6304	fix(chat): recover committed native Agent Chat replies (#18465 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and keeps its results available to users. > - Agent Chat needs a visible reply before the conversation can wait for more input. > - Native result commitment and reply presentation are separate obligations. > - A completed conversation can retain a valid final message without a saved reply. > - Existing reply recovery excludes these completed conversation turns. > - This pull request repairs that persistence gap through the existing recovery worker. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What happened? A native Agent Chat turn completed successfully and saved its workspace. Its accepted result and final assistant message were durable, but no reply appeared in the conversation. The chat stayed active. The deployment hiring journey in #18351 then reached its deadline while waiting for the first reply. Expected behavior Recover the exact accepted turn's final reply once, then use normal conversation settlement. Keep later user input active. Do not run the agent again or replace a selected or deleted reply. Steps to reproduce 1. Create an active conversation with one admitted native turn. 2. Commit an accepted DONE result and a final-channel assistant message for that exact run, session and turn. 3. Finish workspace finalization before live heartbeat reply presentation. Leave no saved reply. 4. Run normal response recovery. Before this fix it finds no conversation candidate and leaves the chat active. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced with actual services at frozen master `8bcc5a01edd5d87540401521e6f30d3df43e1848`. The production predicate also exists in the deployed revision that exposed the failure. Related work: #18351. The broader receipt and recovery work in #18118 and #18409 does not touch these source files. ## What Changed - Discover unanswered committed Agent Chat turns through the existing native response presentation worker. - Recheck company, agent, responsible user, current execution and conversation generation under the normal transaction locks. - Require the accepted result digest and an exact final message from the same native run, session and accepted turn. Keep external publication authority separate. - Commit the reply and presentation receipt before normal conversation settlement. Later input stays active. Recovery does not repeat agent work. - Preserve skip decisions and selected or deleted replies. Add database controls for foreign identity, stale sessions, partial commitment, duplicates and ordinary internal task behavior. - Document the recovery boundary in the developer guide. ## Verification - Real-service RED/GREEN uses all 418 canonical migrations in isolated PGlite and the exact new regression fixture. Before the fix: zero candidates, no reply, recovery returns false and the chat stays active. After the fix: one candidate, one exact reply, recovery returns true and the chat waits. A repeat returns false and creates no second reply. - All 20 canonical regression cases pass locally through a fixture-only PGlite bridge. Only local database provisioning and `createDb` selection differ from the normal embedded PostgreSQL fixture. Production services, SQL queries, transactions, protocol validation and assertions remain real. Linux embedded PostgreSQL CI is required before merge. - Focused current-source no-emit typing passes for both production modules and the new regression file, with normal Express augmentation and source aliases. The broader local presentation/ownership and conversation-settlement PGlite bridge run was interrupted before it reported results; it is not counted as a pass. No repository-wide local build is claimed from borrowed workspace dependencies. Clean-build CI and canonical PostgreSQL consumer tests remain required. - `git diff --check` and the scoped source/test secret scan pass. No captured run data, credentials or private target identities are committed. - No live journey retry, deployment, configuration change or test-plan admission was performed. The original failed journey remains failed; this production fix still needs deployed qualification through the unchanged journey. - Current-head [canonical Linux CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41207018345) passed all 57 terminal checks with no failure or pending check. The new 20-case database regression actually passed in [server shard 8](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41207018345/job/124555006090), at 13:59:25 UTC (2,643 ms). Typecheck, build and the existing consumer lanes passed. Fresh [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18465#issuecomment-6544208002) on exact `f32a432e10b377ae6277d6f728995d5fedcf9d7b` is 5/5; the review-thread inventory is empty with no pagination. No live deployment or journey pass is claimed by these checks. ## Risks Eligible active conversations can gain a previously missing reply. Recovery accepts only the exact saved final message under its accepted result and current conversation identity. It does not run a model, repeat hiring or change a prior test grade. Reply persistence precedes waiting-state settlement; existing conversation recovery retains ownership of a later interrupted settlement. No schema or public API changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific backend model ID or fixed context window. Used reasoning, repository tools, TypeScript and real database test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-10-31 09:08:20 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	baf651c8d0	perf(heartbeat): drive retry promotion from durable deadlines (#18387 ) Reviewed and verified at `f1c48c924d`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 09:07:52 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	12d8c3043e	fix(native): fence retries when replaying an audited Stop (#18457 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs keep Stop intent and retry state in durable records. > - A provider error can leave a failed retry with an earlier acknowledged Stop. > - The replay path returned the existing receipt before it closed that retry. > - This pull request applies the existing retry fence to the validated replay. > - The same Stop can settle without another provider cancellation or a new receipt. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14733 for the related caller-bound Stop contract. This change covers a later retry that already has a Stop acknowledgement. The older CI-only #14743 is not a production delivery PR. What happened? A failed native run can have a retryable coordinator and an earlier audited Stop. A repeat Stop returns the old acknowledgement without moving the coordinator to `terminal_failure`. The final failed-to-cancelled transition requires that fence, so the Stop cannot settle through that path. Expected behavior A valid replay closes the same retry and keeps the original intent and acknowledgement. It does not send a second provider cancellation. Physical stop and workspace cleanup still require their own evidence. Steps to reproduce 1. Store a failed native run with a `retryable_failure` coordinator. 2. Store a matching run-scoped Stop with a dispatched acknowledgement and audit IDs. 3. Call `cancelNativeSession` for that same run and inspect the coordinator. Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on public master `f2db909393de124caf6a5380a52d4e0e1d621661`. Deployment mode Core native execution. The regression uses the real cancellation executor with controlled persistence and provider boundaries. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing guarded coordinator fence for a validated Stop replay. - Test repeated replay, unchanged receipts, one fence, and no second provider cancellation. - Reject foreign company, run, issue, scope, effect, and missing-audit receipts before any write. - Check that an acknowledged Stop with an unconfirmed remote lease still fails the physical-stop guard. - Document the separate retry fence and physical-cleanup requirements. ## Verification - RED on the selected public base: the new executor case returned success but left the coordinator in `retryable_failure` with a future retry. One case executed and failed for that assertion. - GREEN: 62 focused tests passed across `native-session-executor.test.ts` and `native-cancellation-request.test.ts`. These include ownership, caller conflict, changed-phase, and receipt controls. - Command from `server/`: `node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-cancellation-request.test.ts -t 'native session cancellation\|caller-bound native cancellation\|failed native retry caller admission'`. - Canonical Linux CI passed all 1,018 executor cases and all 32 caller-cancellation cases. The exact file completion lines are in [server shard 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386/job/124545366271) and [server shard 10](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386/job/124545366219). - Node 24.22.2 and Vitest 5.0.3. Map contract checks and `git diff --check` pass. - Local dependencies are linked from an existing checkout. Full local TypeScript validation reports older Runner/shared declarations that lack current Kimi and continuity APIs. The changed ranges have no diagnostics. The canonical clean CI Typecheck + Release Registry gate passed. - A broader two-file run was stopped when an unchanged integration case tried to start embedded Postgres and hit the host listen restriction. It is not a passing full-suite result. No host settings or other services were changed. - Repository-wide `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm build` were not completed locally. Current-head CI passed against clean source and dependencies. - Fresh [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18457#issuecomment-6543772487) on `dbc1c1a5b71450194d568725592969660864cb5a`: 5/5 with no actionable findings. The review-thread inventory has no threads and no pagination. Full [current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386) passed: 59 terminal checks, 55 successful, 3 skipped, and 1 neutral. No failure or pending check remains. Merge status is CLEAN. No live recovery, rollout, or physical termination is claimed. ## Risks - A wrong or stale Stop must not close another retry. Existing run/coordinator locks, caller checks, receipt binding, and the final compare-and-set remain in place. - This fix changes logical retry settlement only. Provider termination, workspace preservation, lease cleanup, and continuation gates remain separate. - The regression controls persistence and provider boundaries. It does not establish the physical state of a remote provider. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, and tool use. The session does not expose an exact model build ID or context-window capacity. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 08:25:16 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	ab51cabbbd	test: await async outcomes and drive saved deadlines deterministically (#18416 ) Reviewed and verified at `ab0b15d234`. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 08:18:15 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	c2971badde	perf(server): recover independent native replies concurrently (#18421 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for AI agents. > - A native run can commit its result before its reply is saved. > - The response recovery worker saves replies from those committed results. > - It checks each candidate in series, so one task can delay unrelated tasks. > - This pull request checks up to four independent tasks at once. > - Each task keeps serial checks, and the existing coordinator owns retries and shutdown. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description What existing behavior does this improve? Recovery of committed native task replies. Current behavior The worker checks one candidate at a time in a batch of up to 25. A database lock or a slow read for one task delays replies for other tasks. Proposed behavior Check up to four company-and-task groups at once. Check candidates within each group in their existing order. Keep the current batch limit and company selection. Reason and benefit A ready task reply can be saved while another task waits for a database lock. The change reduces waiting under a reply backlog. Breaking changes Replies for different tasks can be saved in a different order. There are no API or schema changes. Other deadline workers keep serial dispatch. Related work: #17696 adds the recovery worker. #17501 reduces its read payloads. #18367 adds its timing spans. These changes are already merged. The PR search found no open change that adds this concurrency. ## What Changed - Add optional keyed concurrency to the shared scoped deadline worker. - Enable a limit of four for native response recovery, keyed by company and task. - Await all active checks before the pass ends. Retain per-candidate failure backoff, drain behavior and pending work. - Test concurrency limits, task order, company separation, drain/resume, shutdown, retries and idle wake behavior. - Add a PostgreSQL regression that holds one task's finalization row lock while a second task saves its exact accepted reply. - Document the worker's concurrency and sleep contract. ## Verification - The PostgreSQL lock regression fails with serial dispatch. It passes with this change. Both accepted replies are saved once after the lock is released. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/scoped-deadline-work.test.ts server/src/__tests__/delivery-work-coordinator.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-work-batch.test.ts server/src/__tests__/deadline-work.test.ts server/src/services/execution-preparation-timing.test.ts` — 55 tests pass. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/presentation-ownership-read.test.ts` with its documented dedicated PostgreSQL URL — 21 tests pass. The disposable database was dropped. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passes. - `pnpm build` — passes. - One matched local replay with 25 older pending replies and one fresh reply used the real worker, a 10-connection PostgreSQL pool and 8 ms delay in each network direction. The saved fresh reply was first observed after 29.193 s with serial dispatch and 9.798 s with this change. All 26 replies were saved exactly once in both runs, with no worker errors. Both disposable databases were dropped. This is one synthetic workload pair, not a staging measurement. - `pnpm test:run` was attempted. Embedded PostgreSQL could not initialize its template after five attempts, so the broad run was stopped. The changed PostgreSQL tests pass on the separate local server. Remote CI is green. This PR does not claim a measured staging speedup. - The [first CI browser shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41162257463/job/124422204506) failed during company cleanup after its task assertions and empty-run check passed. Company deletion hit the `activity_log_company_id_companies_id_fk` constraint. The fixture uses paused process agents and reported no runs. The one failed-jobs rerun passed all 45 browser tests. All CI checks are now green. ## Risks - Four checks can use more database connections than serial recovery. The limit applies to this queue only; the batch limit stays at 25. - The shared helper has more dispatch logic. Its default remains serial. Tests cover task order, retry deadlines, drain and waiting for active checks during shutdown. - This improves reply recovery under backlog or lock contention. It does not establish a target for total agent-turn latency. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code editing, tool use and local test execution. This session does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 07:39:53 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	d5766e4074	perf(chat): scope task questions and batch inbox queue checks (#18422 ) ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Standing chats show recent messages and current task questions. > - Recent-message pagination bounds history work, but it does not bound question work. > - The question read built the full company attention feed before it selected the chat's tasks. > - Each feed read also checked seeded queue membership with one insert per item. > - This pull request scopes question collection in the attention owner and batches queue membership checks. > - Chats keep their current question cards and initial layout while doing less work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to #18358 and #18323. Related work: #18312. What happened? A hosted standing chat remained slow after recent-message pagination shipped. On commit `4eaa435bf4`, an embedded-browser reload made the conversation usable at about 8.6 seconds. Recent comments finished at about 1.9 seconds. The pending-question request held the initial reveal until about 8.4 seconds. That request called the complete company attention feed and then filtered its results. The separate badge summary also did broad work. Expected behavior Chat question cost should depend on the relevant tasks. Reading an existing queue must not require a separate insert for every member. Current access and decision policy must remain in force. Steps to reproduce 1. Create a standing chat with questions on tasks assigned to its agent. 2. Add many unrelated tasks and pending questions to the company. 3. Open the chat from a fresh application cache. 4. Compare recent-comment arrival with the pending-question response and content reveal. Paperclip version or commit Baseline: `909e29dd071b1aeeb24c2933af049da90a6066d3`. Its affected services match the observed hosted revision `4eaa435bf4`. ## What Changed - Add an internal task-question projection to the attention service. Filter pending interactions by company, task IDs and question kind before card enrichment. - Keep the same access, audience, dismissal, queue, snooze, retention, archive and training-example logic. Ranks are local to the returned question list. - Use the projection from the conversation receipt service. Keep current chat audience and session checks there. - Batch seeded membership inserts in groups of 500. Keep the queue lock, conflict protection, audit events and activity logging for each new membership. Existing members produce no new audit records. - Add real PostgreSQL regression cases and a reproducible paired benchmark. No schema migration or UI reveal change is needed. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. The final server typecheck also passed after the queue change. - `pnpm build` passed. - Real PostgreSQL service coverage: 57 attention and chat-handoff tests passed. Seven queue-route tests passed, including concurrent reads, mixed existing/new items, duplicates, disabled seeds and audit preservation. - Red/green proof: the unrelated-attention regression fails with the baseline conversation implementation and passes with the scoped read. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check` passed. - Full `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped with exit 130 after embedded PostgreSQL startup failures and 17 failures in the untouched native-session executor suite. It is not a local pass. The focused Docker/PostgreSQL results above completed before Docker Desktop became unavailable. A direct native PostgreSQL probe identified the host semaphore limit (`could not create semaphores: No space left on device`). No shared kernel settings or other test clusters were changed. [Full CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41162314995) passed on `2809f096b3fb2c01b44a96a1b82a27809c9359df`, including all eight browser shards. Final status: 55 successful checks/statuses, three skipped and one neutral. Greptile is 5/5 with no findings or unresolved threads. The fresh local browser retest is blocked because Docker Desktop cannot start and native PostgreSQL cannot allocate semaphores. The original hosted reproduction above is complete; no candidate browser pass is claimed. Local service benchmark: PostgreSQL 17.11, two relevant tasks, five alternating pairs per scenario, after warmup. These are local service timings, not a claim about deployed latency. \| Fixture \| Read \| Baseline median (range) \| Candidate median (range) \| SQL calls \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| 1,000 unrelated tasks/questions \| Chat questions \| 670 ms (632–1,905) \| 12 ms (11–15) \| 1,076 → 22 \| \| 1,000 unrelated tasks/questions \| Company badge summary \| 641 ms (622–717) \| 167 ms (161–171) \| 1,068 → 69 \| \| Small company \| Chat questions \| 38 ms (37–52) \| 13 ms (12–16) \| 52 → 22 \| \| Small company \| Company badge summary \| 34 ms (33–39) \| 34 ms (32–40) \| 44 → 43 \| All question fields and ordering matched, except rank is relative to the scoped list. Summary fields matched except the generation timestamp. The interaction plan changed from 1,002 selected rows to two rows through the existing company/issue/status index. The benchmark loads baseline attention, conversation and queue modules together so the queue change cannot contaminate the baseline. ```sh pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsx ../scripts/benchmark-chat-questions.ts \ --baseline-ref=909e29dd07 --unrelated=1000 ``` ## Risks - Scoped and complete feeds must share policy. This change reuses the same attention collection and finalization path and tests dismissals, named audiences, snoozing, archives and private access. - Batched inserts must audit only new members. The concurrent PostgreSQL test checks unique membership and one event/activity record per new item across batch boundaries. - Full inbox summaries still collect the company feed. The small-company summary timing is unchanged. Other chat requests and transcript hydration can still contribute to hosted latency. - The first reveal still waits for question cards to preserve layout. This follow-up has not been deployed, so its hosted effect remains unverified. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution and browser profiling. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-10-31 07:37:47 -05:00

1 2 3 4 5 ...