mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-21 08:22:20 +02:00
f6ab82d490cb314f021a0187f07c56096a70f24e
3270
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
f6ab82d490 |
feat(interactions): add interaction withdrawal and terminal-issue expiry (#10251)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents and boards coordinate through issue-thread interactions (request_confirmation, ask_user_questions, suggest_tasks, …) that wait as `pending` cards until someone resolves them > - Two lifecycle gaps existed: an interaction's creator could not take back a card it no longer stands behind, and interactions left `pending` on issues that reached a terminal status lingered forever as live-looking approval requests > - Stale pending cards mislead humans (they look actionable), distort attention/liveness signals, and in the worst case invite acting on a proposal whose issue is already closed or cancelled > - This pull request adds an explicit withdraw route for pending interactions and automatically expires pending interactions when their issue reaches a terminal status (including a catch-up sweep for issues closed before this change) > - The benefit is that interaction cards now faithfully reflect reality: only genuinely actionable requests stay pending, and creators can retract requests that events have overtaken ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #5787 Refs #7403 Related prior PRs found while searching for duplicates (all overlap partially; none combine both lifecycle paths or the route-level authorization used here): #6709 and #7312 (creator-withdraw attempts), #8169 (terminal expiry), #8081 and #5137 (generalized cancel/expire endpoints), #6094 (stale confirmation auto-resolve). Related merged context: #9568 (agent cancel for ask_user_questions), #10119 (tolerating legacy `withdrawn_by_creator` result outcomes — the reader side of the outcome this PR writes). ## What Changed - New route `POST /issues/:id/interactions/:interactionId/withdraw` that resolves a `pending` interaction to status `withdrawn` with a structured result (`outcome: "withdrawn"`, optional trimmed `reason`), stamps `resolvedBy*`/`resolvedAt`, touches the issue, logs activity, and emits resolved-interaction telemetry - Withdrawal authorization: board users, the interaction's creator agent, or the issue's current assignee agent (assignees additionally pass the standard issue-mutation gate); task-watchdog runs are explicitly rejected, and authorization-boundary plus low-trust control-plane checks apply - Withdrawing an already-resolved interaction returns `409`; unknown/cross-issue/cross-company interaction ids return `404` - New service method `expirePendingInteractionsForTerminalIssue`: when an issue transitions to a terminal status, all of its `pending` interactions are resolved to `expired` with `outcome: "issue_closed"`, guarded by a `status = 'pending'` predicate so concurrent resolutions are not overwritten - The same expiry runs as a catch-up when interactions are listed on an already-terminal issue, so cards stranded by issues closed before this change also get cleaned up; expired request_confirmations are logged with a distinguishing source - Shared package: new `withdrawIssueThreadInteractionSchema` validator, `WithdrawIssueThreadInteraction` type, and `withdrawn` / `issue_closed` result-outcome support for all interaction kinds (kind-aware result shapes for `ask_user_questions` and `request_item_verdicts`) - UI helper `ui/src/lib/issue-thread-interactions.ts` recognizes the new outcomes for card rendering - Docs: bundled skill API reference updated with the withdraw endpoint - Review follow-up: terminal expiry moved from the HTTP route hooks into `issueService.update`'s status-transition block, so direct service callers (tree control, recovery, pipelines, status cards) expire pending cards too; the list-endpoint catch-up remains for issues closed before this change - Review follow-up: withdrawing or issue-close-expiring a `request_confirmation` also settles its linked `tool_action_requests` row (withdraw -> `cancelled`, issue closed -> `expired`), so a parked tool call cannot stay approvable after its card is gone - Review follow-up: interaction cards render dedicated copy for the new outcomes ("Withdrawn" with the reason, "Expired when issue closed") instead of falling through to superseded-by-comment / stale-target variants; withdrawn plan reviews badge as "Withdrawn" rather than "Changes requested" ## Screenshots Card states rendered from a local ux-lab harness with mocked data ([full gallery](https://pages.paperclip.ing/pr-10251-interaction-withdrawal-cards/)): | Light | Dark | | --- | --- | |  |  | ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared build` — clean tsc - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts` — 22 tests pass, including new coverage for: creator-agent withdraw success, non-creator/non-assignee agent 403, watchdog-run 403, double-withdraw 409, and board-user withdraw - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts` — 4 tests pass, including terminal-issue expiry writing `issue_closed` results and leaving already-resolved interactions untouched - `cd ui && pnpm typecheck` — clean - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts` — includes a new embedded-Postgres test proving a direct `issueService.update` terminal transition expires pending interactions and writes the activity-log entry - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.test.tsx` — 32 tests, including new coverage for withdrawn / issue-closed confirmation and question cards - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit` — matches the pre-existing repo error baseline exactly (no new errors) - Manual: `POST /issues/:id/interactions/:interactionId/withdraw` with `{"reason":"superseded"}` as the creator agent resolves the card to `withdrawn`; closing an issue with a pending confirmation flips it to `expired` with `outcome: "issue_closed"` ## Risks - Interactions on terminal issues now auto-expire (including retroactively via the list-time catch-up), so consumers that expected to resolve a pending interaction on a closed issue will get `409`; this is the intended semantics and matches how the attention feed already wants to treat dead cards - New result outcomes (`withdrawn`, `issue_closed`) are written to stored results; readers were already made tolerant of these outcome strings in #10119, so mixed-version reads are safe - No schema/migration changes; per-row conditional updates (`status = 'pending'`) avoid clobbering concurrent resolutions - Withdrawal is a new mutation surface, but it is strictly narrower than existing resolve paths (board, creator, or assignee only; watchdog runs blocked) ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic Mythos-class tier) with extended thinking and agentic tool use (Claude Code harness); commit authored in a Paperclip-managed engineering session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.728.0-canary.0 |
||
|
|
a3b293e26d |
perf(adapter-utils): parallelize the two Daytona sandbox bridge setups (#10334)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip runs AI-agent work through adapter-backed execution paths. > - Sandbox-backed local adapters pay startup overhead in two host-side bridge setups. > - Those setups were happening serially even though most of the work is independent. > - The remaining dependency is only the merged env that must reach the process-session launch. > - This pull request overlaps the independent setup work while preserving that launch-time dependency. > - The benefit is lower end-to-end startup latency without changing execution semantics. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this change. Problem / motivation: - Sandbox-backed local adapter startup waited for two largely independent bridge setups in series, so users paid roughly the sum of both setup times. - The only hard dependency is the merged Paperclip env that must reach the process-session launch. Proposed solution: - Start the paperclip callback bridge and the process-session bridge concurrently. - Keep the env merge as the single sequencing point before process-session launch. - Stop whichever bridge started if either startup path fails. - Keep the concurrent bridge telemetry duration-only so shared runner counters are not double-counted. Alternatives considered: - Keep the bridges serial, which preserves the current telemetry shape but leaves the startup latency unchanged. - Move env merging earlier, which would complicate launch ordering and risk changing runtime semantics. Roadmap alignment: - This is the approved Daytona start-speedup work, focused on bridge startup concurrency rather than broader runtime behavior. ## What Changed - Started the paperclip callback bridge and the process-session bridge concurrently in `execute.ts`. - Added a memoized env finalizer so the process-session launch still waits for the merged paperclip env at the correct moment. - Updated `execution-target.ts` so the process-session bridge can accept a deferred env resolver and consume it only at launch time. - Added tests that cover the overlapped launch path and the failure-cleanup path when one bridge start fails. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils exec vitest run src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils test` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils exec tsc --noEmit` - `git log --oneline origin/master..origin/perf/parallelize-daytona-bridge-setups` - `git diff --stat origin/master...origin/perf/parallelize-daytona-bridge-setups` ## Risks - A regression in the launch-time env merge could change what the process-session bridge sees at startup. - The concurrent start/cleanup logic could leak a bridge if the stop paths were incorrect, which is why the failure cleanup test matters. - This is low-to-moderate risk because the change is isolated to adapter-utils startup plumbing and is covered by targeted tests. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool-using code execution mode. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.727.0-canary.3 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
273315a4d0 |
feat(server): provision managed sandbox environments from the managed config (#10324)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Hosted/managed deployments configure instances entirely from the control plane: `PAPERCLIP_MANAGED_CONFIG` already delivers feature flags and `plugins.autoInstall` (bundled sandbox provider plugins), parsed fail-closed at boot > - A plugin alone is not usable for execution: runs need an instance-level `driver: "sandbox"` environment row pointing at the provider, and today only Kubernetes has a boot path for that (`PAPERCLIP_EXECUTION_MODE` → `ensureKubernetesEnvironment`); every other provider requires a manual product-API call the control plane cannot make on a managed instance > - Adding one `ensureXxxEnvironment` per provider would multiply near-identical boot hooks and env-var surfaces > - This pull request generalizes the existing Kubernetes machinery: the managed-config document gains an optional `environments` section that declares a sandbox environment for any bundled provider, ensured idempotently at boot by a provider-agnostic service function (the Kubernetes hook becomes a thin wrapper over it) > - The benefit is that a managed fleet can provision any sandbox provider (Daytona, Modal, E2B, …) purely from configuration — no per-provider code, no manual API calls, no secrets in the document — while self-hosted behavior is untouched ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. Refs #10157 (the cloud image variant that bundles sandbox provider plugins — this PR is the configuration half that makes an installed provider usable). **Problem (feature-request shape):** on a managed instance the control plane can auto-install a bundled sandbox provider plugin via `PAPERCLIP_MANAGED_CONFIG.plugins.autoInstall`, but cannot create the environment row that makes the provider schedulable. The only boot-time environment provisioning is Kubernetes-specific (`PAPERCLIP_EXECUTION_MODE=kubernetes` + `PAPERCLIP_K8S_*`). A generic, config-driven path is needed so any bundled provider can be provisioned without per-plugin code or manual API calls. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/managed-config.ts`: optional `environments` top-level section — `[{ name, description?, provider, config? }]` — validated fail-closed: unknown keys, more than one entry (the DB permits exactly one Paperclip-managed sandbox row, `environments_managed_sandbox_idx`), a `provider` not present in `plugins.autoInstall`, `config.provider`, or secret-looking config keys at any depth (`api_key`/`token`/`secret`/`password`/`credential`) all refuse startup. Absent section ⇒ `environments: []`, so pre-section documents keep booting newer builds. - `server/src/services/environments.ts`: new provider-agnostic `ensureManagedSandboxEnvironment({ name, description?, provider, config?, extraMetadata? })` — idempotently owns the single managed sandbox row: refreshes name/description/config each call, adopts the slot across provider switches (dropping the stale `managedKubernetesSandbox` marker), adopts a same-name unmanaged sandbox row (stamping it managed) instead of colliding on `environments_name_idx` every boot, and falls back to keeping the current name if the desired name belongs to a different row. `ensureKubernetesEnvironment` is now a thin wrapper that pins `provider: "kubernetes"` and stamps the legacy marker. - `server/src/services/managed-environments.ts` (new): `applyManagedEnvironments` boot step — no-op for self-hosted/empty; throws (fail startup) when `PAPERCLIP_EXECUTION_MODE` is also set, since both would own the same managed sandbox row; otherwise ensures each declared environment fail-safe per entry (log + continue boot, matching bundled-plugin provisioning posture). - `server/src/index.ts`: runs the new boot step right after the execution-policy bootstrap, before the heartbeat resumes queued runs. - `server/src/services/index.ts`: exports `applyManagedEnvironments` and `ManagedEnvironmentSpec`. - Secrets stay out of the document by construction: provider credentials reach managed instances only as process env vars (each provider's documented fallback, e.g. `DAYTONA_API_KEY` for the Daytona plugin). ## Verification ```sh cd server pnpm exec tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.json pnpm exec vitest run \ src/__tests__/managed-config.test.ts \ src/services/managed-environments.test.ts \ src/services/execution-policy-bootstrap.test.ts \ src/__tests__/environment-service.test.ts \ src/__tests__/environment-instance-routes.test.ts \ src/__tests__/environment-routes.test.ts \ src/__tests__/plugin-install-guard.test.ts \ src/__tests__/environment-execution-target.test.ts \ src/__tests__/instance-settings-managed-overlay.test.ts \ src/__tests__/bundled-plugins.test.ts ``` All pass locally (typecheck clean; environment-service suite runs against embedded Postgres and exercises the refactored Kubernetes wrapper plus the new generic ensure: create/refresh, provider switch, unmanaged-row adoption, name-conflict fallback). New tests cover the parser (12 cases incl. secret-key rejection at depth) and the boot step (no-op, mutual exclusion, pass-through, fail-safe). ## Risks - **Self-hosted: none intended.** Without `PAPERCLIP_MANAGED_CONFIG` nothing new executes; the `PAPERCLIP_EXECUTION_MODE=kubernetes` path is regression-covered by the existing bootstrap/service/route suites (all green). - **Behavioral shift in `ensureKubernetesEnvironment` (deliberate):** it now also refreshes `name`/`description` to their managed defaults each boot (desired-state semantics, same as config today) and adopts a `managedByPaperclip` sandbox row that lacks the Kubernetes marker — previously that state made the ensure throw every boot. - **New startup failure modes are all explicit misconfigurations** (malformed section, provider not auto-installed, secret in config, execution-mode conflict) and fail with precise errors; DB-side ensure failures never block boot (fail-safe per entry, logged). - No migrations; no API surface changes. ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic, model ID `claude-fable-5`) with extended thinking and tool use, driving the change end-to-end inside a Claude Code / agent-harness session (code, tests, and verification runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the managed-config module header is the contract doc) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.727.0-canary.2 |
||
|
|
197718bc00 |
feat(acpx): per-step round-trip + provider-latency attribution for sandbox startup (#10222)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Sandbox-backed runs need more precise startup observability so operators can see where time is spent before an adapter is invoked > - Aggregate startup timing hides which boundary is actually slow, especially in remote execution where the bottleneck can move between host round-trips, provider-boundary latency, and handshake phases > - This pull request keeps the existing startup timing channel additive while attributing the latency to the specific startup steps that caused it > - The benefit is better diagnosis of sandbox startup regressions without changing control flow or introducing a schema migration ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #10204 This PR extends the existing sandbox run-startup timing observability with per-step round-trip and provider-latency attribution for the Daytona startup path. It keeps the event payload additive and free-form, and it leaves the control flow, database schema, and external adapter interfaces unchanged. ## What Changed - Added per-step round-trip counting for the host-to-sandbox execute seam - Added provider-boundary duration accumulation for the Daytona execute and re-fetch steps - Split the ACP handshake timing into `createRuntimeMs` and `ensureSessionMs` while preserving the warm-handle skip - Kept the startup timing payload additive and did not add a schema migration ## Verification - `adapter-utils` acpx-engine and startup-timing suites: pass - Daytona plugin suite: pass with mocked SDK and injected-clock duration assertions - `server` environment-execution-target suite: pass - `tsc --noEmit` for adapter-utils and server: pass - Git validation: fetched `origin/feat/sandbox-start-step-timing-attribution`, confirmed it matches the authorized submit SHA `53c573266e618af05c57a0720aaa9d9e0452de61`, and confirmed the branch contains only the expected commit on top of `origin/master` - Searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs/issues; found one closely related merged PR and no open duplicate on this branch - Checked `ROADMAP.md`; the broad sandbox-agent roadmap section does not call out this specific startup-timing attribution work as a duplicate ## Risks - Low risk: the change is additive and only enriches existing timing data - Downstream consumers that assume aggregate-only startup timing may need to tolerate the additional per-step fields - The finer spawn/initialize/session split remains a follow-up in the external ACP client because that hook is not available here yet ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5, tool-using coding agent ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.727.0-canary.1 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
aed4478c81 |
fix(pr-gardening): scope runs to instance-authored PRs (#10323)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI-agent companies > - Maintainers use the pr-gardening skill to keep referenced pull requests reviewable and moving toward merge > - The skill previously treated every recently referenced repository PR as owned work, including community PRs and stale references > - That oversized scope caused noisy reports, capped-search failures, and follow-up actions aimed at PRs this Paperclip instance should not manage > - The workflow also stopped at reminders instead of dispatching the repository's standard PR-preparation process > - This pull request scopes gardening to the authenticated instance identity by default and makes exclusions explicit and inspectable > - The benefit is a smaller, ownership-correct queue that automatically routes actionable PRs through the established preparation workflow ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists for this maintenance fix, so the bug report is included inline. ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I searched existing open and closed issues and found no duplicate. - [x] The behavior reproduces on the current `master` branch. - [x] The behavior originates in Paperclip's repository skill, not an adapter, provider, or local configuration. ### What happened? The `pr-gardening` skill included community-authored and stale pull requests in its actionable candidate set, aborted when issue-to-PR extraction hit its cap, and only notified assignees rather than dispatching the standard PR-preparation workflow. ### Expected behavior By default, gardening should act only on PRs authored by the current GitHub identity, report excluded community and stale PRs explicitly, tolerate capped match sets, and dispatch actionable PRs through `/prepare-paperclip-pr`. Operators should retain explicit overrides for broader author scopes. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Run Stage A against issue history containing recently referenced PRs from both the authenticated operator and community contributors. 2. Include an issue whose PR-reference extraction reaches the configured match cap and an open PR with no activity inside the configured window. 3. Observe that the prior workflow admits non-owned and stale PRs, aborts on the capped extract, and leaves Stage C at assignee reminders. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduced on upstream `master` at `2568bdecc4577c60d76d58a45c5eaf3dc58f7e13`. ### Deployment mode Local repository skill execution. ### Installation method Built from source. ### Agent adapter(s) involved Not adapter-specific; this is a repository maintenance skill. ### Database mode Not database-related. ### Access context Agent execution using the repository's authenticated GitHub CLI identity. ### Node.js version Current repository development environment. ### Operating system Linux. ### Relevant logs or output Live verification before the fix showed 264 community PRs entering discovery scope. The corrected discovery retained 54 candidates, all authored by `cryppadotta`. ### Relevant config Default author resolution via `gh api user --jq .login`; no secret or user-specific configuration is included. ### Additional context The fix retains `--authors` and `--include-community` overrides for intentionally broader maintenance runs. ### Privacy checklist - [x] I reviewed all included output and configuration details for secrets and PII. ## What Changed - Resolve the default author allowlist from the authenticated `gh` login, with `--authors` and `--include-community` overrides. - Default the activity window to 14 days and record community-authored and stale PRs in explicit dropped lists. - Preserve capped issue-extract match sets with warnings instead of aborting discovery. - Add PR author and a one-line purpose summary to readiness data and rendered reports. - Rewrite Stage C to dispatch `/prepare-paperclip-pr` for PRs that need gardening. - Expand the focused Node test suite to cover the new scoping, stale-drop, cap, summary, reporting, and guardrail behavior. ## Verification - `node --test .agents/skills/pr-gardening/scripts/pr-gardening.test.mjs` — 15/15 passing, including contributor-controlled Markdown escaping. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — clean. - Live discovery verification excluded 264 community PRs and retained 54 candidates, all authored by `cryppadotta`. ## Risks - Low-to-moderate behavioral risk: default candidate scope is intentionally narrower; operators who want community PRs must opt in with `--include-community` or provide `--authors`. - The authenticated `gh` login must be available unless an explicit author override is supplied. - No database, API, UI, migration, workflow, or dependency-lock changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex using GPT-5.4 with reasoning, repository tool use, shell execution, GitHub CLI access, and focused test execution. The original implementation commit also records Claude Fable 5 assistance. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.727.0-canary.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
2568bdecc4 |
fix(adapter-utils): keep sandbox proxy sockets within Linux path limit (#10221)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI agents for work > - Local process adapters can enforce network allowlists through a Unix-socket proxy inside the Linux sandbox > - The proxy socket was created under `os.tmpdir()`, which can be a deeply nested run-specific directory > - Linux Unix-domain socket paths are limited to 107 usable bytes, so deep temporary paths can be silently truncated during bind > - A truncated proxy socket resets every confined outbound connection, including the model provider API, before the agent can do work > - This pull request creates proxy sockets under the short `/tmp` path when possible and validates the path length before bind > - The benefit is reliable sandboxed egress under deep `TMPDIR` values and an explicit error instead of an opaque connection-reset storm ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I can reproduce this on upstream `master`. - [x] I confirmed the error originates in Paperclip's local-process sandbox proxy. ### What happened? Sandboxed local-process agents using `networkScope: "allowlist"` could lose all proxied egress when `TMPDIR` was deeply nested because `proxy.sock` exceeded Linux's Unix socket path limit. The truncated bind surfaced as repeated connection resets, including for provider API traffic. ### Expected behavior Proxy creation should use a Linux-safe short path and fail explicitly if no safe socket path can be created. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Set `TMPDIR` to a path long enough that `<TMPDIR>/paperclip-network-sandbox-XXXXXX/proxy.sock` exceeds 107 bytes. 2. Build or run a local-process sandbox with `networkScope: "allowlist"`. 3. Make an HTTP or HTTPS request through the generated sandbox proxy. 4. Observe connection resets from the overlong Unix socket path on affected code. ### Paperclip version or commit Upstream `master` before this change. ### Deployment mode Other — Linux local-process adapters using Bubblewrap network allowlisting. ### Installation method Built from source. ### Agent adapter(s) involved Codex and any other local-process adapter using the shared sandbox utility. ### Operating system Linux. ### Additional context GitHub search found no duplicate public issue or pull request for this defect. ## What Changed - Add a Linux Unix-socket byte-length guard that reports the unsafe path before binding. - Create network proxy temporary directories under `/tmp` first, with `os.tmpdir()` as a validated fallback. - Use the safe temporary-directory helper at both allowlist proxy creation sites while preserving trusted URL handling. - Add regression coverage that sets a deliberately deep `TMPDIR` and verifies the working socket remains within 107 bytes under `/tmp`. ## Verification - `node /srv/paperclip/home/paperclipai/paperclip/node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run packages/adapter-utils/src/local-process-sandbox.test.ts` — 8 passed, 4 environment-gated tests skipped. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed. - Greptile Review — passed after reviewing 2 files with 0 comments and no unresolved threads; this repository integration did not emit a separate numeric confidence score. - Full GitHub CI matrix — passed after one rerun of an unrelated ACPX `ENOTEMPTY` cleanup flake. - Package typecheck was attempted, but the existing shared install cannot resolve `acpx/runtime`; the failure is outside the changed files and is expected to be covered by CI's clean dependency install. ## Risks - Low risk: the change is limited to Linux sandbox proxy temporary-directory selection and validation. - Systems without a writable `/tmp` fall back to `os.tmpdir()` only when the resulting socket path is safe; otherwise startup now fails loudly instead of producing connection resets. - No schema, API, UI, migration, or documentation behavior changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, `gpt-5.3-codex`, tool-enabled coding agent with managed reasoning and code execution; context-window size is not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.726.0-canary.0 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
d1b9448b57 |
fix(server): stamp the real build version into images instead of the package.json placeholder (#10257)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work; it ships as a Docker image that self-hosters and managed deployments run. > - The server resolves its own version at runtime in `server/src/version.ts` (`resolveServerVersion()`), which feeds analytics and the server debug panel. > - That resolver derives the real version from `git describe`, and falls back to `server/package.json`'s `version` when git isn't available. > - But `server/package.json`'s version is a static placeholder — CI only stamps the real CalVer at publish, so in source it is never the real version (currently `0.3.1`). > - A Docker image has no `.git` (it's dockerignored), so `git describe` can't run inside it. Every image therefore falls back to the placeholder and reports `0.3.1` in analytics and the debug panel, regardless of which commit it was built from. > - This PR computes the real version once on the CI build runner (where `.git` and tags exist), bakes it into the image, and has `resolveServerVersion()` prefer that stamp when `git describe` is unavailable. > - The benefit: self-hosted and cloud images report their true version instead of a misleading placeholder, with no change to dev checkouts, `git describe`-based resolution, or local `docker build`. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists — describing the bug inline (per the bug report template). **What happened?** Docker images built from `master` (and release tags) report the server version as the `0.3.1` placeholder in analytics and the server debug panel, instead of the real version of the commit the image was built from. **Expected behavior** An image reports the real version of its build commit (e.g. `2026.722.0+51.git.<sha>`), so operators can tell which build is running. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Build the server Docker image from any `master` commit (the `Docker` workflow, `production` target). 2. Run the image and open the server debug panel (or inspect the version reported to analytics). 3. Observe the version is `0.3.1` rather than the commit's real version. **Root cause** `resolveServerVersion()` derives the real version from `git describe`, but the image has no `.git` (dockerignored), so it falls back to `server/package.json`'s `version` — a static placeholder CI only replaces with the real CalVer at publish time. Nothing bakes the real version into the image. **Paperclip version or commit:** reproduces on `master` (`4c55f0d8`) and any published image. **Deployment mode:** self-hosted and managed (both the `production` and `-cloud` images). **Installation method:** Docker image (`ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip`). **Related PRs (dedup search):** #9103 (merged — added the `git describe`-based source-install resolution this builds on) and #9637 (closed). Neither bakes a version into the image; this PR closes that gap. No duplicate found. ## What Changed - **`.github/workflows/docker.yml`** — checkout with full history + tags (`fetch-depth: 0`), and a new `Compute build version` step that runs `git describe --tags --match 'v*' --long --dirty` on the pristine runner checkout. The result is passed as a `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION` build-arg to both the `production` and `-cloud` image builds. - **`Dockerfile`** — the `production` stage takes an `ARG PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION` (default empty) and bakes it into the runtime `ENV`; the `cloud` stage inherits it via `FROM production`. - **`server/src/build-version.ts`** (new) — `readBuildVersion()` / `parseBuildVersion()`, mirroring `build-commit.ts`: reads `PAPERCLIP_BUILD_VERSION` (or a `.paperclip-build-version` file) as a single-token stamp. - **`server/src/version.ts`** — `resolveServerVersion()` prefers the baked build version when `git describe` is unavailable, parsing it with the same rules as a live checkout (`parseGitDescribeVersion`), and falling through to the existing `build-commit` stamp and package version when unset. A live checkout's `git describe` still wins over any stamp. - Tests for the new behavior and the precedence. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk ensure-build-deps && tsc --noEmit` in `server/` — clean. - `vitest run server/src/__tests__/version.test.ts server/src/__tests__/build-version.test.ts` — **23 tests pass**, covering: stamped version used when git describe fails, stamp parsed to real CalVer, stamp preferred over the build-commit fallback, on-tag stamp collapses to the release version, a pre-resolved stamp used verbatim, and a live git describe still winning over a stamp. - `git describe --tags --match 'v*' --long` for this commit → `v2026.722.0-51-g<sha>`, which `resolveServerVersion()` reports as `2026.722.0+51.git.<sha>` — no longer `0.3.1`. - Not run locally: the full multi-arch image build (CI-only). The workflow change is verified by inspection; the version is computed on the pristine checkout before any lockfile refresh, so it carries no spurious `-dirty`. ## Risks Low. Additive and image-only: - No runtime behavior changes for dev checkouts (git describe still primary and wins over any stamp) or for local `docker build` (empty arg → server keeps its existing fallbacks). - Not a breaking change; no schema or API surface. The stamp is informational (version reporting only). - `fetch-depth: 0` makes the release-image checkout fetch full history/tags — a modest cost on a workflow that already runs at release cadence with a 60-minute budget. - Rollback: revert the commit; images simply return to reporting the placeholder. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`, 1M-context variant), extended thinking, with tool use / code execution — agentic edits, `tsc` + `vitest` runs, and a `git describe` resolution check. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work (bugfix, not core feature work) - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (#9103, #9637 — related, not duplicates) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (`fix/build-version-stamp`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no user-facing docs affected; behavior is documented inline in `version.ts` / `build-version.ts` and the workflow/Dockerfile) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.725.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4c55f0d8da |
fix(inbox): hide external object summaries (#10020)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The inbox helps operators scan and act on tasks that need attention > - Inbox task rows currently include external-object summary markers alongside the core task information > - Those markers add a column of visual noise that is not needed for inbox triage > - External-object data must remain available to the inbox filters even when the row marker is removed > - This pull request stops passing external-object summaries into inbox rows and adds regression coverage > - The benefit is a cleaner inbox while preserving external-object filtering behavior ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #4556 - **Problem:** Inbox task rows display external-object summary markers that operators do not need for triage. - **Expected behavior:** Inbox rows omit the external-object marker, while filters that depend on external-object summaries continue to work. ## What Changed - Removed the external-object summary prop from inbox task rows. - Added a regression test that provides external-object summary data and confirms the inbox row does not render its marker. - Kept external-object summary loading intact for inbox filtering. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/Inbox.test.tsx` — 18 tests passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — reproduces five pre-existing `#9627` color-literal violations; this PR adds no token values or new gate violations. ## Risks - Low risk: the change removes one optional presentation prop from the inbox row call site and leaves filtering data flow unchanged. - Regression coverage verifies summary data no longer produces the removed inbox marker. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.4, tool-enabled coding agent with shell and code execution; reasoning enabled; context-window size not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.725.0-canary.2 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c481be44e3 |
fix(task-watchdogs): deduplicate unchanged stopped-state wakes (#10207)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Task watchdogs review issue subtrees when no run or queued wake keeps work live > - Pending human interactions and approvals are valid stopped states that still need one watchdog review > - The existing fingerprint included volatile activity timestamps, so unchanged stopped trees could wake repeatedly after comments, documents, work products, or sibling completions > - This pull request fingerprints only review-material leaf and wait state, persists the reviewed snapshot, and suppresses shrink-only repeats > - The benefit is one review per materially new stopped state without weakening liveness classification or hiding human waits ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### What happened? Task-watchdog stop fingerprints changed for metadata-only activity and completed siblings, producing duplicate wakes after an unchanged stop had already been reviewed. ### Expected behavior Pending interactions and approvals remain classified as stopped, but a reviewed stopped state only wakes again when waits, non-terminal leaves, status, assignment, or blockers gain material changes. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Review a stopped watched subtree with a pending human wait or multiple non-terminal stopped leaves. 2. Add only comment/document/work-product activity, or complete one stopped sibling without changing the wait set. 3. Observe a duplicate wake from the timestamp-heavy fingerprint. Related public work: Refs #9452 for overlapping task-watchdog service edits and #10043 for related no-op fingerprint suppression. ## What Changed - Added fingerprint v2 over non-terminal material leaves plus subtree-wide pending wait ids, excluding volatile timestamps while retaining them in wake context. - Added nullable observed/reviewed JSONB stop snapshots and shrink-only reviewed-state suppression with legacy exact-fingerprint fallback. - Added pending interaction kinds and approval ids to watchdog wake context, review comments, and comment metadata. - Added classifier and scheduler coverage for waiting-leaf liveness, metadata stability, sibling shrink suppression, material changes, snapshot promotion, legacy rows, and unchanged idempotency keys. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/task-watchdogs-classifier.test.ts src/__tests__/task-watchdogs-scheduler.test.ts` — 2 files, 36 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — passed. ## Risks - Fingerprint version 2 intentionally re-fingerprints every currently stopped watched tree once after deployment, causing a one-time wake burst before the new reviewed snapshots are established. - Migration `0191_task_watchdog_stop_snapshots.sql` only adds two nullable JSONB columns with no backfill; legacy rows continue exact-fingerprint behavior until a post-deploy review promotes a snapshot. - PR #9452 edits the same service file; whichever lands second may need a trivial rebase. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.6-sol`, high reasoning mode, with repository tool use and code execution. The runtime did not expose a context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.725.0-canary.1 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4e00818574 |
fix(runtime): support in-place workspace realization (#10230)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane people use to coordinate AI agents and their execution environments. > - Environment realization decides where an agent runs and which filesystem and toolchain are authoritative. > - Copy-based realization is unsafe for container-anchored tasks because absolute paths such as `/app` can point outside the synchronized tree and task-specific binaries may be absent. > - That mismatch can let an agent successfully verify work in a phantom writable path while sync-back silently discards the result. > - Existing task environments already provide the authoritative filesystem and toolchain, so they should be executed in place rather than copied. > - Copy mode still needs explicit confinement rules so aliases target the synchronized workspace and unsynchronized writable paths fail visibly. > - This pull request adds typed realization metadata, propagates the authoritative root through orchestration, and teaches Codex to honor it. > - The benefit is that container-anchored tasks operate on verifier-visible state with the intended tools, while copy mode remains safe and backward compatible. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this defect. GitHub duplicate searches for in-place execution, workspace realization, and authoritative workspace roots found no related pull request to link. ### What happened? Environment-backed agent runs were always realized through a copied workspace. Tasks anchored to absolute container paths could therefore write outside the synchronized tree, and task-provided toolchains were unavailable in the copy. A run could report success even though sync-back discarded its output. ### Expected behavior Existing task environments should run against their real authoritative root and toolchain. Copy-mode runs should map declared absolute aliases into the synchronized tree and reject writable paths that cannot be restored. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Run a Codex task environment whose required files live under `/app` or `/workspace` and whose required binary exists only in the task container. 2. Observe that copy realization changes the effective filesystem/toolchain or permits writes outside the synchronized root. 3. Complete and verify the task inside the agent sandbox. 4. Observe that the verifier cannot see out-of-tree artifacts or that task-specific commands were unavailable. ### Reproduction context - Paperclip commit: `3a16b91217483d2c233926de5b7f7bc3a1077924` - Deployment: built from source in a task-container execution environment - Adapter: Codex local - Database: not database-related - Access context: agent execution ## What Changed - Added typed `copy | in_place` workspace-realization metadata, authoritative roots, confined aliases, and outbound restore paths to shared execution-target contracts. - Selected in-place realization for existing task environments and skipped archive prepare/restore when the authoritative environment is used directly. - Propagated the authoritative root into adapter context so Codex uses it for cwd and `PAPERCLIP_WORKSPACE_*` semantics, including ACP execution. - Bound copy-mode aliases such as `/app` to the synchronized workspace and rejected writable out-of-tree paths without explicit restore mappings. - Added focused regression coverage while preserving existing copy-mode archive restore behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/local-process-sandbox.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/acp.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/execute.remote.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-run-orchestrator.test.ts` — 48 passed, 4 skipped. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - `env -u AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID -u AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY -u AWS_SESSION_TOKEN pnpm test:run` — passed across all general and serialized Vitest shards. - `pnpm build` — passed. - Codex `k=1` acceptance run completed July 24, 2026 at 23:54:30 UTC with 4 completed, 0 exceptions, and mean reward 1.0: `build-cython-ext`, `openssl-selfsigned-cert`, `prove-plus-comm`, and `sqlite-db-truncate` each received terminal grade 1.0 against real task-environment paths and toolchains. ## Risks - In-place mode deliberately exposes the authoritative task root to the adapter; incorrect environment metadata could point execution at the wrong root. Typed metadata and focused orchestration tests cover selection and propagation. - Copy-mode writable-path validation is stricter and may reject previously accepted unsafe configurations. The rejection is intentional and produces a visible error instead of silently losing output. - The acceptance run is focused on four Codex task-environment workloads, not a broad cross-adapter benchmark. Existing copy-mode archive tests and the full repository suite remain green. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex CLI coding agent; exact model ID and context-window size were not exposed to this runtime. Capabilities used: extended reasoning, repository editing, shell execution, test/build execution, Git, GitHub CLI, and Paperclip API tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.725.0-canary.0 |
||
|
|
cca2806e57 |
test(tool-gateway): make idle-down slot test deterministic via injected clock (#10226)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server has a gateway layer that coordinates tool execution and runtime slots > - The idle-down test for the local stdio fixture slot was relying on real wall-clock timing > - On slower runners, that made the test nondeterministic because the slot could be reaped before the presence assertion ran > - This pull request switches the test to use the existing injectable clock seam so time only advances when the test says it should > - The benefit is that the idle-down behavior stays covered while the test becomes deterministic and no longer flakes under load ## Linked Issues or Issue Description This PR fixes a flaky gateway test in the server test suite. The `tool-gateway` idle-down scenario was asserting slot presence while also depending on a very short real-time idle TTL and a later sleep-based reap. On loaded runners, the intervening work could exceed the TTL, which caused the slot to disappear early and the assertion to see an empty list. The fix keeps the production code path unchanged and drives the test from the supervisor's existing injectable clock. The test now holds time steady through the presence check, then advances the clock past the idle deadline to trigger the reap deterministically. The original behavioral assertions stay intact: slot reuse, counter increments, metadata, and stop status still get verified. ## What Changed - Replaced the real-time idle-down wait in the `tool-gateway` test with the runtime supervisor's injectable clock seam. - Kept the existing assertions for slot reuse, slot identity, counters, metadata, and stop behavior. - Removed the test's dependency on wall-clock timing so the idle-down path is deterministic under load. ## Verification - Targeted server typecheck passed with `tsc --noEmit`. - `tool-gateway.test.ts` passed in full: 49/49. - The targeted idle-down scenario passed 50/50 in a tight loop with 0 failures after the clock injection change. ## Risks - Low risk: this is a test-only change and does not modify production gateway logic. - The test now exercises the idle-down logic through a controlled clock rather than real elapsed time, which is the point of the fix but does slightly reduce wall-clock realism in the test itself. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-5), tool-using coding agent; context window not surfaced in the workspace. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.17 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
30ff3d7c58 |
feat(routines): expose activity gate API (#9438)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Scheduled routines provide recurring control-plane work without manual intervention > - The new activity gate can suppress scheduled runs when no external work occurred > - The core scheduler and database support landed without a public create/update contract > - Agents, operators, and managed plugins need validated fields plus discoverable semantics to opt in safely > - This pull request exposes the activity gate through routine APIs, revisions, plugin contracts, tests, and skill documentation > - The benefit is backward-compatible control over idle scheduled work without losing activity-triggered follow-up ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #8534 ## What Changed - Added shared activity-gate policy and scope enums with create/PATCH validation. - Persisted activity-gate fields through routine creation, updates, revision snapshots, pipeline snapshots, and revision restores. - Defaulted legacy revision snapshots during restore and added regression coverage for pre-field snapshots. - Extended managed-plugin routine declarations, production reconciliation, and the SDK test harness to preserve non-default gate settings. - Added end-to-end API coverage for create/PATCH/list/detail round-trips, defaults, and invalid enum rejection. - Documented schedule-only semantics, activity windows, own-run/read-action exclusions, scopes, and an hourly quiet-night watcher example. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/routine.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-e2e.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/plugin.test.ts packages/plugins/sdk/tests/testing-actions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-managed-routines.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts -t 'activity gate|preserves declared activity gate settings|resolves routine agent and project refs'` - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/workspace-routines.test.ts ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - GitHub CI: all final-head checks green; Storybook visual regression skipped by path rules. - Greptile: 5/5 with no unresolved review threads. ## Risks - Low risk: defaults remain `always` and `company`, preserving existing routine behavior and old revision snapshots. - Managed plugin manifests can now declare the same validated gate settings as the public routine API; omitted values retain core defaults. - Revision snapshots now include the new fields so policy changes are not lost or treated as no-ops during restore. > For core feature work, checked `ROADMAP.md`: this extends the existing Scheduled Routines roadmap item and does not duplicate a separate planned capability. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5.5 via Codex CLI, with repository tool use and code execution; context-window size was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.16 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8f08ec5ce6 |
feat(status-cards): join summary-mentioned issues to watched set (#10205)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Status cards summarize changing company work and watch issues so later changes can produce useful deltas > - A summary can explicitly reference issues that are important to the update even when those issues do not match the card's configured queries > - Previously, those referenced issues were not retained in the watched set, so their later status, assignee, or comment changes could be missed > - The watched snapshot must avoid artificial additions or removals caused only by a summary changing which issues it references > - This pull request resolves issue references when a summary is written, persists them, and joins them to the watched snapshot with stable delta semantics > - The benefit is that status cards continue tracking the exact issues their latest update called out while keeping follow-up updates relevant and non-duplicative ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I am on the latest released version of Paperclip (or can reproduce on `master`). - [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip itself — not in my agent adapter, API provider, or local configuration. ### What happened? When a status-card summary explicitly referenced an issue by identifier or `/issues/<uuid>` URL, that issue was not automatically retained in the card's watched set unless it independently matched a configured query. Later status, assignee, or comment changes to an issue highlighted by the latest update could therefore be omitted. ### Expected behavior References in the latest summary should resolve only within the card's company, appear in dry runs and the watched-issues UI, count and fingerprint like query matches, and enter or leave the watched set without artificial added/removed deltas already represented by the summary change. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Create a status card whose query does not match a second issue in the same company. 2. Write a summary that references the second issue by identifier or issue URL. 3. Inspect the card's watched count or Watched issues tab. 4. Change the referenced issue's status, assignee, or comments and run the next update. 5. Before this change, the referenced issue is absent from the watched snapshot and its later change does not produce the expected delta. ### Paperclip version or commit - Reproduced on `master` before this PR (base commit `762ce5b4ef`). ### Deployment mode - Local dev (`pnpm dev`), built from source. ### Agent adapter(s) involved - Not adapter-specific (core bug). ### Database mode - Embedded Postgres test environment; the schema change uses standard PostgreSQL JSONB. ### Access context - Board (human operator). ## What Changed - Added migration `0191` and schema support for persisted `status_cards.mentioned_issue_ids`. - Resolved summary references by issue identifier or `/issues/<uuid>` URL within the status card's company when summaries are written. - Joined mentioned issues into watched counts and fingerprints so later status, assignee, and comment changes generate normal update deltas. - Suppressed artificial added/removed deltas when the latest summary starts or stops mentioning an issue. - Added `mentionedIssues` to dry-run responses and a “Mentioned in the latest update” group in the Watched issues tab. - Updated the summarizer prompt to explain that referenced issues automatically join the watched set. - Added focused server and UI coverage for reference resolution, snapshot behavior, deltas, API responses, and rendering. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/status-cards.test.ts src/__tests__/status-card-update-engine.test.ts` — 31 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/StatusCards/StatusCardTile.test.tsx` — 11 tests passed. - Earlier implementation verification also passed database/shared/server typechecks, UI `tsc -b`, the broader StatusCards UI test set, and embedded-Postgres migration application. ### Visual Verification - Greptile T-Rex ran Playwright browser checks successfully and captured the Status Card drawer Watched tab showing the new “Mentioned in the latest update” grouping: https://app.greptile.com/trex/runs/15796101/artifacts ## Risks - The migration adds a nullable JSONB column and is backward-compatible; existing cards have no mentioned issues until their next summary write. - Reference extraction is company-scoped to prevent cross-company issue association. - Watched counts and future fingerprints change for cards whose latest summaries reference issues; tests cover additions, removals, and suppression of spurious deltas. - This targeted status-card fix does not introduce a new roadmap subsystem or external integration. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Fable 5 (Paperclip model alias; exact underlying provider model ID and context window were not recorded in the implementation task metadata), with extended reasoning, tool use, and code execution. - OpenAI Codex coding agent (runtime model identifier and context window not exposed to this task) prepared the PR, rebased the branch, and ran focused verification with terminal tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
665408c6d0 |
fix(codex): classify mid-turn harness crashes structurally as retriable infra (#10210)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI agents and their work > - Heartbeat execution relies on adapters distinguishing agent failures from failures in the harness running beneath the agent > - Codex MCP transport crashes can kill the CLI after the JSONL protocol has started but before it emits a protocol-terminal event > - Those interrupted streams were left unclassified, so the control plane terminalized the heartbeat as `heartbeat_failed` / `agent_failure` with no continuation > - Agent-level failure is already expressible through the JSONL protocol via an `error` event, `turn.failed`, or `turn.completed`, so an interrupted nonzero exit can be classified structurally without inspecting unstable error strings > - This pull request reports that shape as `codex_harness_crash` in the `transient_upstream` family and routes it through Paperclip's existing bounded retry and recovery-continuation paths > - The benefit is that transient Codex harness failures recover safely without misclassifying quoted agent output or depending on transport-specific wording ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - **What happened:** Codex MCP transport failures, including rmcp worker death, could terminate the CLI mid-turn after protocol output began but before any terminal JSONL event. The run then became an unclassified terminal heartbeat failure with `continuationCount: 0`; this occurred in 3 of 44 L3 Codex-lane trials during the associated benchmark investigation. - **Expected behavior:** a nonzero Codex exit after the protocol starts but before an `error`, `turn.failed`, or `turn.completed` event should be treated as a harness/infrastructure crash and enter the existing bounded retry policy. - **Why structural classification:** transport error strings vary, and stdout may quote agent output that merely discusses network failures. The protocol boundary identifies whether the agent itself produced a terminal result without regex matching. - **Recovery behavior:** `codex_harness_crash` maps to `errorFamily: transient_upstream`, using the existing `same_session` → `safer_invocation` → `fresh_session` ladder plus the recovery-continuation transient-infrastructure path. - Supersedes the regex-based approach in #10150, which is closed. ## What Changed - Added protocol-state tracking that identifies a nonzero exit after protocol start and before any protocol-terminal event as `codex_harness_crash`. - Propagated the structural classification as `transient_upstream` through the Codex adapter. - Added parse unit coverage, including a faithful crash-shaped stream, without matching stderr transport strings. - Added adapter execution coverage using a fake Codex process that emits a protocol prefix and then dies with the observed rmcp stderr line. - Added heartbeat bounded-retry coverage, including the `errorCode`-only fallback, and recovery-continuation classification coverage. ## Verification - `parse.test.ts` — 16 passed. - `codex-local-execute.test.ts` — 16 passed. - `heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts` — 30 passed. - `service.pause-durability.test.ts` — 6 passed. - Server and Codex adapter TypeScript checks passed. - The branch commit is unchanged from the tested and pushed `88f5464d40` handoff. ## Risks - Low risk: the classification requires a nonzero exit after protocol start and before any protocol-terminal event, so normal agent-declared failures and completed turns keep their existing behavior. - The change intentionally broadens recovery for structurally interrupted Codex runs; bounded retry limits still prevent indefinite continuation loops. - No schema, migration, public API, UI, lockfile, or workflow changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size were not exposed by the execution environment; capabilities used for the implementation included repository analysis, reasoning, code editing, and terminal-based test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details — the pre-existing, already-pushed branch name was explicitly prescribed for this replacement PR - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Fable 5
|
b996b71a38 |
Deduplicate wake-payload issue descriptions and compact resume deltas (#10216)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Heartbeat wake payloads and the task-context markdown are the two channels that deliver an issue's brief into an agent's prompt > - #10151 fixed wake-prompt-only adapter lanes waking without the issue description by adding it to the structured wake payload > - That left the description delivered twice per prompt on lanes that also inject the task-context markdown, and re-delivered in full on every resume wake, permanently bloating persistent-session context > - This pull request makes the task markdown the single description carrier on lanes that use it, and omits the description from non-assignment resume deltas on all lanes while keeping it for assignment-shaped and recovery wakes > - The benefit is that every lane receives the brief exactly once when it needs it, and long-lived sessions stop re-paying the full brief in tokens on every wake ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #10151 Related prior work: #2883, #8402 (earlier description-delivery attempts referenced by #10151). I searched the PR list for open work on wake-payload description handling and found none besides the merged #10151. **Bug:** After #10151, adapters that inject the `Paperclip task context` markdown (ACPX engine lanes, claude-local CLI, hermes server and gateway) receive the issue description twice in a single prompt — once in the wake prompt's `Issue description:` block and once in the task markdown. Separately, resume deltas re-send the full description (up to 12k characters) on every wake even though the persistent session already received it. **Expected behavior:** The description appears exactly once per prompt on every lane, and resume deltas only carry it when the resuming session may not have seen the brief (assignment-shaped or recovery wakes), leaving an explicit fetch breadcrumb otherwise. **Reproduction:** Wake a claude-local or ACPX agent on an issue with a description and inspect the assembled prompt: the description text appears in both the wake-payload block and the task-context block. Wake the same session again via a comment: the full description is present again in the resume delta. **Affected version:** Current `master` (with #10151 merged). **Deployment mode:** Adapter-backed heartbeat execution, local and sandboxed lanes. ## What Changed - `renderPaperclipWakePrompt` accepts `suppressIssueDescription`; the four task-markdown lanes pass it so the task markdown stays the single, uncapped description carrier there. - Non-assignment resume deltas omit the description and emit `- issue description: omitted from this resume delta; fetch the issue if you need the latest brief`. Assignment-shaped reasons (`issue_assigned`, `issue_reopened_via_comment`, `issue_recovery_action_restored`, `issue_tree_restored`) and recovery wakes still deliver the full brief. - `buildPaperclipTaskMarkdown` gains `includeDescription`; the server now also publishes `context.paperclipTaskMarkdownCompact` (description stripped, directives and wake comment kept), and the new `selectPaperclipTaskMarkdown` helper picks the right variant under the same resume rules, falling back to the full markdown when no compact variant exists (version skew safety). - The wake prompt's description block now carries the same user-authored trust framing the task markdown already had. ## Verification - `npx vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/acp.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/acp.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts` — 137 tests passed, including new coverage for suppression, resume omission plus breadcrumb, assignment-shaped resume inclusion, compact-variant building, variant selection, and an end-to-end ACPX prompt-assembly test asserting the description appears exactly once on fresh wakes and not at all on comment resumes. - `npx vitest run` in `packages/adapters/hermes` — 59 tests passed, including a gateway execute-level test asserting the brief is sent exactly once on fresh runs and not re-sent on stable-session resumes. - `tsc --noEmit` in `packages/adapter-utils`, `packages/adapters/claude-local`, `packages/adapters/hermes` — clean; `server` matches the `master` baseline exactly (pre-existing plugin-sdk resolution errors only, none in touched files). - Pre-existing failures confirmed identical on clean `master`: claude-local `execute.remote.test.ts` / `test.probe.test.ts`, adapter-utils `mcp-isolation.integration.test.ts` (requires a newer local Claude CLI). ## Risks - Behavioral shift, prompt-only: a resumed session woken by a comment on an issue it never handled (rare — assignment wakes normally precede comment wakes) would not get the inline description; the breadcrumb plus the standard issue-fetch path covers it. - Additive context key (`paperclipTaskMarkdownCompact`); older adapters ignore it and newer adapters fall back to the full markdown when it is absent, so mixed-version deployments degrade to current behavior. - No schema, migration, or API changes; the structured wake-payload JSON shape is unchanged. - Known follow-up deliberately out of scope: openclaw embeds the raw wake-payload JSON (which still contains the description) in prompt text for machine parsing. The hermes-gateway lane is handled: it detects stable-session resumes (issue/agent session-key strategy plus a stored prior session id), compacts the task markdown, and omits the description from its prompt-embedded JSON copy. > This is a focused correctness/efficiency fix to existing wake plumbing and does not overlap with planned roadmap feature work. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking enabled, with repository tool use, shell execution, and local test execution via Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details (execution-workspace branch, same convention as merged #10202) - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (code-level docs; no user-facing docs affected) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.15 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d3c004d1b8 |
Fix issue descriptions in structured wake payloads (#10151)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Heartbeat wake payloads provide the scoped task context an agent needs before it can act safely > - Assignment wakes already loaded the issue description for task markdown, but the structured wake-payload builder dropped it > - Agents reading `PAPERCLIP_WAKE_PAYLOAD_JSON` could therefore see a missing brief while also being told no fallback fetch was needed > - Long descriptions also need a bounded representation so wake environments and prompts remain safe > - This pull request carries the description through the server and adapter contract, and marks truncated descriptions as requiring fallback fetch > - The benefit is that agents receive the actual brief instead of inventing requirements from the title ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes: #5844 Fixes: #2882 Related prior attempts: #2883 and #8402. This change adds focused regression coverage and enforces the missing long-description fallback invariant. **Bug:** Issue-assignment wake payloads omitted the issue description from the structured payload even when the issue had a populated description. **Expected behavior:** The structured wake payload includes the issue description. If the description must be truncated for payload size, `fallbackFetchNeeded` is `true`. **Reproduction:** Assign an issue with a description to an agent and inspect `PAPERCLIP_WAKE_PAYLOAD_JSON`; before this change, `issue.description` was absent while `fallbackFetchNeeded` could remain `false`. **Affected version:** Reproduced on current `master` before this patch. **Deployment mode:** Adapter-backed heartbeat execution, including local Codex agents. ## What Changed - Include `issues.description` in the server wake-payload query and supplied issue summaries. - Bound inline descriptions at 12,000 characters and force fallback fetch when truncation occurs. - Preserve and render description metadata through shared adapter normalization and prompt rendering. - Add focused tests for long-description fallback and exact brief-string rendering. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-agent-session-message.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` — 81 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed. - `git diff --check` — passed. ## Risks - Low risk: the payload shape is additive. - Very long descriptions are truncated at 12,000 characters; the payload explicitly requests a fallback fetch for the full brief. - Prompt size increases by the issue-description length for scoped wakes, bounded by the same limit. > This is a focused correctness fix and does not overlap with planned roadmap feature work. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5.4 via Codex CLI, with reasoning, repository tool use, shell execution, and test execution. The runtime did not expose a context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.14 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b3b07ae44e |
fix(codex): preserve silent active builds (#10153)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to coordinate AI agents and their work. > - Local adapters are responsible for observing agent subprocesses and terminating runs that are genuinely stuck. > - The Codex local adapter currently treats output bytes as its only liveness signal for the 30-minute inactivity monitor. > - Healthy compile and test loops can consume CPU and perform disk I/O for longer than that without producing terminal output. > - Terminating those runs loses valid work, while removing the monitor entirely would allow truly wedged processes to run indefinitely. > - This pull request adds a Linux process-group activity probe that recognizes meaningful CPU, disk I/O, and child-process churn while retaining the existing timeout for idle processes. > - The benefit is that long silent builds can finish without weakening the adapter's hung-run safety net. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue was found in the duplicate/related search. **What happened** A healthy Codex local run executing a long compile/test loop could be terminated at the default 30-minute output-inactivity threshold when the child process emitted no stdout or stderr. **Expected behavior** The inactivity monitor should keep a silent run alive while its process group is doing meaningful work, but should still terminate a process group that is alive and idle. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run Codex local with the default `outputInactivityTimeoutMs`. 2. Have the agent start a compile or test command that consumes CPU or disk I/O without terminal output for longer than the threshold. 3. Observe the adapter terminate the otherwise healthy process group as output-inactive. **Affected version / deployment mode** Observed on a local-process Paperclip deployment using the Codex local adapter with the 30-minute default inactivity monitor. ## What Changed - Added a Linux `/proc` process-group sampler that tracks meaningful CPU tick growth, disk I/O growth, and child-process membership changes. - Reset the existing Codex inactivity timer when that sampler observes real process work, while leaving remote and non-Linux behavior unchanged. - Added diagnostics for the number of process-activity resets and documented the expanded liveness semantics. - Added unit coverage for process-activity timer resets and subprocess regressions for both a long silent CPU build and a genuinely wedged child. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/process-activity-monitor.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/output-inactivity-monitor.test.ts packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/output-inactivity-monitor.integration.test.ts` - Focused result: 23 tests passed, including a silent CPU-bound subprocess that runs four times beyond the simulated inactivity window and an idle subprocess that is still terminated. ## Risks - Low risk and Linux-scoped: the new probe reads `/proc` every 15 seconds only while a monitored local Codex child is running. - The CPU threshold requires sustained work rather than any single scheduler tick, reducing the risk that a nearly idle event loop is treated as productive. - If `/proc` sampling is unavailable or fails, the adapter falls back to the existing output-only behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with model `gpt-5.6-sol`, high reasoning effort, terminal/tool execution, code editing, and test execution. The runtime did not expose a context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.13 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e4662b1f9d |
fix: preserve control plane access in Codex sandbox (#10152)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI agents for work > - Local coding adapters can be confined with filesystem and network sandbox policies > - Codex confinement proxied only user-allowlisted hosts, so it denied Paperclip's own run API and managed MCP endpoints > - The same proxy returned untyped plaintext denials, which MCP clients could treat as a fatal unexpected content type > - Host-only `PAPERCLIPAI_CMD` values could also leak into agents even when the referenced checkout module did not exist > - This pull request gives the sandbox an explicit trusted-URL channel for Paperclip endpoints, returns structured JSON errors, and removes the inherited host CLI pointer > - The benefit is confined Codex agents retain control-plane access without broadening the operator's external network allowlist or crashing on policy denials ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #3802 Related foundation: #9504 ### What happened? A `codex_local` agent configured with `networkScope: "allowlist"` and an external-only allowlist could not reach its own Paperclip API or Paperclip-managed MCP endpoints. The sandbox proxy returned a `403` plaintext response without `Content-Type`, and an inherited `PAPERCLIPAI_CMD` could point at a missing checkout-local CLI module. ### Expected behavior Paperclip's run-scoped API and managed MCP endpoints remain reachable regardless of the user external allowlist. Policy denials are valid structured JSON responses with an explicit media type, and host-only CLI pointers are not inherited by agent processes. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure a `codex_local` agent with `networkScope: "allowlist"` and `networkAllowlist: ["api.openai.com"]`. 2. Run the agent and request its Paperclip issue API or a Paperclip-managed MCP endpoint. 3. Observe the sandbox proxy deny the request with an untyped plaintext `403` response. ### Environment - Paperclip commit: `f49a3f99` originally exhibited the defect; fix is based on current `master`. - Deployment: local source build on Linux. - Adapter: Codex. - Database: not database-related. - Access context: agent bearer/run-scoped credentials. ## What Changed - Added internal trusted URL rules to the local network allowlist proxy and supplied the Codex run API plus managed MCP endpoints. - Returned JSON error envelopes with `Content-Type` and `Content-Length` for HTTP and CONNECT policy denials. - Removed inherited `PAPERCLIPAI_CMD` from child process environments while preserving explicitly constructed runtime variables. - Added focused proxy and environment sanitizer regression tests. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/local-process-sandbox.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils-env.test.ts --reporter=verbose` - 2 test files passed; 8 tests passed; 4 platform-dependent tests skipped. - `git diff --check` - Package typecheck was attempted; it reaches unrelated current-`master` type drift in untouched files (`spawnCwd` in `adapter-utils`, and staged-runtime ACP types in `codex-local`). ## Risks - Low risk: trusted access is restricted to exact HTTP(S) hostname and port pairs derived from Paperclip-provided URLs. - Invalid or non-HTTP trusted URL values are ignored rather than broadening access. - Denial response bodies change from plaintext to structured JSON; status codes remain unchanged. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent (exact model ID and context window are not exposed to this runtime), reasoning and terminal/tool execution enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.12 |
||
|
|
762ce5b4ef |
feat(acpx): per-step timing observability for sandbox run-startup (#10204)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Sandbox-backed runs need observable startup behavior so operators can see where time is spent before an adapter is invoked > - The current startup path only surfaced aggregate timing, which makes it hard to identify the slow boundary in the bring-up sequence > - That gap matters because sandbox startup latency is often dominated by one specific step, and aggregate timing hides the bottleneck > - This pull request adds per-step startup timing events for the named sandbox bring-up boundaries > - The benefit is more precise observability with no control-flow change and no schema migration ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Subsystem affected Cross-cutting (multiple of the above) ### Problem or motivation Sandbox run startup only exposed aggregate timing. That makes it hard to identify which bring-up boundary is responsible for slow starts, especially in remote or sandboxed execution where the bottleneck can move between workspace setup, skill reconciliation, bridge setup, and adapter handshake. ### Proposed solution Emit a structured timing event for each named startup boundary before the adapter is invoked, so the existing run-event stream carries per-step duration data. This keeps the event path additive and lets operators see which step dominates startup latency without changing control flow or introducing a schema migration. ### Alternatives considered - Keep only the aggregate startup duration: simpler, but it hides the bottleneck and makes regression analysis much harder. - Add a new telemetry sink or schema field: rejected because the existing run-event payload already carries structured event data and does not need a new storage path. - Log unstructured text for each step: rejected because it is harder to query and aggregate than a structured `step` + `durationMs` event. ### Roadmap alignment This fits the roadmap direction around cloud / sandbox agents and enforced outcomes by improving observability for sandboxed execution without changing the control plane model. The roadmap section is broad, but it does not call out this specific startup-timing work as a planned duplicate. ### Additional context This PR is intentionally additive. It records timing for the named startup boundaries in the existing event stream and leaves the bridge, database shape, and adapter invocation order unchanged. ## What Changed - Added a `measureStartupStep` helper that times a startup step, emits one structured `run.startup.step` event, and rethrows failures after recording duration - Wrapped the seven sandbox bring-up boundaries in `execute.ts` so the structured timing covers each named step before adapter invocation - Added unit coverage for the helper and integration coverage for the startup-step events in the adapter-utils execute path - Kept the event path additive, with no bridge change and no database migration ## Verification - `tsc --noEmit` for `@paperclip/adapter-utils` - `pnpm test` in `packages/adapter-utils` equivalent suite coverage: 292 passed, 4 skipped - Adjacent server event/log-store suites: `run-log-store.test.ts` and `heartbeat-run-log.test.ts` passed (11 total) - Git validation: fetched `origin/feat/sandbox-startup-step-timing`, confirmed it matches the authorized submit SHA, and confirmed `origin/master..origin/feat/sandbox-startup-step-timing` contains the expected single commit - Searched GitHub for duplicate or related open PRs/issues and found no overlapping open items - Checked `ROADMAP.md`; the roadmap covers sandboxed environments generally, but does not call out this specific startup-timing observability work as a planned duplicate ## Risks - Low risk: the change is additive and only emits additional structured events - If downstream consumers assume startup events are aggregate-only, they may need to ignore or account for the new `run.startup.step` entries - Timing is measured via the injected clock and event emission happens in a `finally`, so failures still report duration before rethrowing ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5, tool-using coding agent ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.11 |
||
|
|
7014e46e5b |
fix(recovery): wake ambiguous successful runs on normal model (#10184)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to coordinate AI agents and their work. > - The heartbeat recovery subsystem detects successful runs that leave assigned issues `in_progress` without a durable disposition or continuation path. > - The existing corrective wake used a cheap, status-only model profile, so the assignee could not perform missing verification or deliverable work before choosing the issue disposition. > - The existing wake prompt also omitted the original issue context and the agent's own final report, making an honest finish/blocked/continue decision harder. > - This pull request keeps the structural handoff guards and one-attempt loop bound, but wakes the assignee on its normal model lane with context-rich instructions. > - The benefit is that Paperclip asks the responsible agent to inspect its own evidence, perform the smallest missing verification when needed, and then record a real disposition without server-side prose classification. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related prior approach: #10154 (closed; this PR intentionally does not reuse its regex classifier or route-level gate). **Problem** A succeeded agent run can leave its issue `in_progress` with no valid disposition. Paperclip already detects this structurally and queues a corrective handoff, but that wake currently runs as cheap/status-only recovery and receives little context. The assignee may be unable to create deliverables or verify the work, and the prompt does not quote the report that caused the ambiguity. **Expected behavior** The corrective wake should use the assignee's normal model and adapter settings, include the issue identifier/title/description, quote the agent's own final report, include any recorded next action, preserve the four disposition options, and explicitly require concrete verification before marking the issue done. **Scope** This change does not classify run prose, add a route-level disposition gate, alter run-liveness classification, or change the one-attempt handoff loop bound. ## What Changed - Switched successful-run corrective handoff payloads and context snapshots from `status_only` to `normal_model`, removing cheap-model and status-only guard hints. - Added issue description, final-report, next-action, and detected-progress fallback context to the handoff decision and instruction builder. - Reworked the instruction into clear "supposed to do / what happened / options / what to do" sections with bounded description/report excerpts and verbatim blockquotes. - Added unit and heartbeat integration coverage for normal-lane payloads, context plumbing, evidence quoting, fallback behavior, and truncation while preserving structural skip tests. ## Verification - `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.test.ts` — 24 tests passed. - `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts -t "queues one finish-handoff wake when a successful run leaves in-progress work without a next action"` — 1 passed, 90 skipped. - `pnpm --dir server typecheck` — passed. - `git diff --check` — passed. ## Risks - Low-to-moderate behavioral risk: an ambiguous successful run now consumes the assignee's normal model rather than a cheap profile and may perform verification or finish work before disposition. - Prompt excerpts are bounded to approximately 1,200 description characters and 2,000 report characters; very long context is intentionally ellipsized. - The existing structural skip guards, idempotency key, and single corrective attempt remain unchanged to prevent loops. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex using `gpt-5.6-sol`, high reasoning effort, with repository/tool execution. Context-window size was not exposed by the runtime configuration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.10 |
||
|
|
c9881223e4 |
fix(routines): show routines grouped by folder name (#10201)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Routines page is part of the operator UI for scheduled routine management > - The grouped-by-folder view was not presenting folder sections inline in the main pane > - That made the folder grouping mode harder to scan and hid the separation between custom folders, Unfiled routines, and built-in routines > - This pull request updates the Routines page rendering so folder groups appear as inline sections and built-in routines still split into their own section afterward > - The benefit is that grouped routines stay readable and the page matches the intended folder organization ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No corresponding public GitHub issue exists, so the problem is described directly below following the bug template. ### What happened On the Routines page, selecting Group → Folder flattened the grouped list into a single "All routines" section with only the separate built-in routines section below it. ### Expected behavior Group → Folder should render one inline section per folder, keep routines with no folder in an Unfiled section, and preserve the separate built-in routines section after the custom folder groups. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Open the Routines page. 2. Change grouping to Folder. 3. Observe the main pane. 4. The routine list is flattened instead of grouped into folder-labeled inline sections. ### Paperclip version / commit Current PR head: `a8e384c838e362de3437c7a88bc7aa38b10fd9c0` on `fix/routine-folder-grouping`. ### Deployment mode Local development workspace for the Paperclip app UI. ## What Changed - Updated the Routines page rendering so grouped folders render as inline sections instead of flattening into a single list. - Kept routines without a folder grouped under Unfiled. - Preserved the built-in routines section after custom folder groups. - Added and updated tests for the folder-grouped rendering behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/Routines.test.tsx` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` - `pnpm check:token-gates` ## Risks - Low risk: the change is localized to the Routines page rendering and its test coverage. - The main behavioral risk is accidental grouping regressions if future routine-grouping logic changes without updating the tests. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool-use enabled, 256k-context class model. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.9 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Fable 5
|
3a16b91217 |
feat(status-cards): single-message setup drives query and update prompt (#10202)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI-agent companies and their ongoing work. > - Status cards turn a standing question into recurring, agent-generated summaries on the board. > - The existing setup split intent across a watch prompt and separate update instructions, which made creation and later behavior harder to understand. > - A status card should have one durable source of truth for both deciding what to watch and telling the summarizer what each update must contain. > - This pull request makes the card prompt that source of truth, simplifies creation to one step, and lets operators choose the running agent immediately. > - The benefit is a smaller mental model, fewer configuration modes, and consistent update instructions throughout the card lifecycle. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Status cards currently require operators to express the same intent in two places: the watch prompt and optional update instructions with append/replace/none modes. This feature simplifies the experimental status-card workflow so a single prompt defines both the watch query and every generated update. The create flow must also support selecting the responsible agent without a second setup step. Related prior status-card work: #10101. ## What Changed - Use the status card's single prompt to compile the watch query and directly instruct every summary update. - Add migration `0190_status_card_single_prompt` to remove `status_cards.instructions_mode` and `status_cards.instructions`. - Add `agentId` to `createStatusCardSchema`, validate company membership, and default new cards to the built-in Summarizer. - Replace the two-step create flow with one prompt-and-agent dialog and extract a shared `SummarizerAgentSelect` for create/settings surfaces. - Remove the extra-instructions settings section, reset incremental history when the prompt changes, and rename the board page to "Status". - Update the bundled `status-card-query` skill and board-operator documentation, then regenerate the skills catalog manifest. ## Verification - Server status-card suites: 29/29 passing. - UI `StatusCards` suites: 22/22 passing. - Skills catalog suite: 20/20 passing. - `tsc -b` passes for server, UI, shared, and database packages. - `pnpm check:migrations` passes. - Light and dark mode screenshots cover the new create dialog and settings tab. ## Risks - Migration `0190` intentionally drops existing separate instruction text. Existing card prompts remain and become the update instructions under the new model; status cards are experimental and feature-flagged. - Prompt edits now reset the incremental summary chain and trigger a full rebuild, which is intentional because the prompt is also the update contract. - Agent selection is company-scoped; invalid agent ids return a validation error rather than creating a misrouted card. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Implementation: Anthropic Claude via the `claude_local` adapter, agent label "Claude Fable 5"; extended reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact provider model id and context-window value were not retained in the task metadata. - PR preparation: OpenAI GPT-5.4 through Codex CLI, with reasoning, repository inspection, GitHub CLI, and Paperclip API tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.8 |
||
|
LeonSGPandAndrew Aymeloglu
|
b083b173ea |
fix(db): use calendar month retention for backups (#3718)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip includes built-in database backup and retention behavior as part of its operational reliability surface. > - The retention implementation lives in `packages/db/src/backup-lib.ts`. > - Monthly pruning is intended to keep the newest backup per retained calendar month. > - The current cutoff uses a fixed 30-day approximation, which deletes January backups too early when the current month has 31 days. > - This pull request switches the monthly cutoff to calendar-month boundaries instead of a fixed day multiplier. > - The benefit is that monthly retention now matches the documented calendar-month behavior and does not prune valid backups prematurely. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #3713 Two other pull requests implemented the same fix and have already been closed as duplicates of this one: - #3798 — same author's later take. Anchors the cutoff to the 1st correctly, but mutates the date in local time and leaves `monthKey` on local time, and unit-tests the helper in isolation rather than end to end. - #4031 — decrements the month without anchoring to the 1st, so partial-month drift and a `setMonth` day-overflow edge case remain. No tests. ## What Changed - Replaced the fixed `30 * 24h` monthly retention cutoff with a calendar-month cutoff anchored to the first day of the earliest retained month. - Added a regression test that freezes `Date.now()` at March 31 and proves the newest January backup is retained when `monthlyMonths=2`. - Kept the rest of the pruning behavior unchanged: daily and weekly tiers still use their existing windows and bucket selection rules. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db exec vitest run src/backup-lib.test.ts` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db exec tsc --noEmit` - Note: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck` hits an environment-specific `check:migrations` runtime failure on this host (`Cannot find module ./cjs/index.cjs from ` via Bun), so I used plain `tsc --noEmit` to validate the code changes themselves. ## Risks - Low risk. This only changes the monthly retention cutoff calculation. - The pruning buckets are still selected the same way; the fix only widens the retained month window to align with calendar-month semantics. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex GPT-5 coding agent with terminal tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --- <sub>Edited by commitperclip during triage: added the **Linked Issues** section (`Fixes #3713`) and the duplicate-PR search line the PR template requires. The duplicate search was performed by the triage pipeline, which grouped this PR with #3798 and #4031 and selected this one as the canonical fix. Everything else is the author's original description.</sub> --------- Co-authored-by: Andrew Aymeloglu <aaymeloglu@gmail.com>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.7 |
||
|
|
7e40ed8c43 |
feat(status-cards): add experimental status card update view (#10101)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI-agent companies. > - Operators need a board-level way to monitor a changing slice of company work without repeatedly rebuilding filters or reading raw task threads. > - Existing summaries are useful snapshots, but they do not provide a dedicated query-backed card with refresh policy, change tracking, update history, and per-update cost visibility. > - The capability needs to be safe to evaluate before it becomes part of the default product surface. > - This pull request adds end-to-end experimental Status Cards, from schema and query compilation through update orchestration and operator UI. > - The entire feature is gated behind the `enableStatusCards` experimental toggle, including its route and sidebar entry. > - The benefit is a governed, inspectable way to keep focused operational rollups current while preserving explicit controls over refresh frequency and spend. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Subsystem affected Cross-cutting (`packages/db`, `packages/shared`, `server/`, `ui/`, and bundled skills/docs). ### Problem or motivation Operators cannot currently define a reusable natural-language view of company work, compile it into an inspectable query, and keep its summary current as matching issues change. Rebuilding filters and rereading task threads makes board-level monitoring repetitive and hides the relationship between source changes, refresh cost, and the resulting summary. ### Proposed solution Add experimental Status Cards that compile operator intent into a query, summarize matched work, record each update, expose manual/interval/reactive refresh policies and costs, and preserve the last good result across stale, updating, paused, and error states. The capability is off by default and fully gated behind `enableStatusCards`, including its route and navigation entry. ### Alternatives considered - Extend existing one-off summaries: rejected because status cards require persistent query provenance, refresh policy, update history, and card-specific cost controls. - Add a dashboard-only filter widget: rejected because it would not provide governed background refresh, an update ledger, or an inspectable compile pipeline. - Ship the surface by default: rejected in favor of an experimental toggle while behavior and operator value are evaluated. ### Roadmap alignment This advances Paperclip’s board-level execution visibility and output-first product goals. `ROADMAP.md` was checked and no duplicate status-card initiative was found. ### Additional context No related open PR was found in the public GitHub search for status cards. The PR-only design wireframes were removed from the repository after review; the published prototype remains external to the production source tree. ## What Changed - Added company-scoped status-card schema, CRUD APIs, compile provenance, update ledger, shared contracts, validators, and OpenAPI coverage. - Added the text-to-query compile pipeline, bundled `status-card-query` agent skill, query versioning, and authorized write-back flow. - Added the experimental board, create flow, lifecycle tiles, detail/settings/debug drawers, archived view, routing, navigation, and instance setting. - Added a change-gated update engine with manual, interval, and reactive refresh policies, trigger selection, active hours, and daily token caps. - Added per-update token/cost recording, today and lifetime rollups, and policy-derived cost previews. - Added operator documentation and agent-authoring hardening for compile and update behavior. - Added PR-prep integration coverage for settings/startup wiring and replaced raw UI values with design-system tokens. - Removed the PR-only `design/pap-15023-status-cards` wireframe artifacts so the repository contains only production feature assets. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passes on the PR head; includes `ui` `tsc -b` passing. The UI compile gate was also independently recorded as passing at `6d7f3cf96b` on July 23, 2026. - `pnpm build` — passes. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passes with all three gates clean. - `pnpm test:run` — 2,880 tests passed and 1 skipped; the sole failure was an unrelated 10-second `afterAll` database-cleanup timeout in `execution-workspaces-service.test.ts`. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts` — passes on immediate focused rerun (25/25). - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts src/__tests__/server-startup-feedback-export.test.ts` — passes (31/31). - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/pages/StatusCards/StatusCardSettingsForm.test.tsx src/pages/StatusCards/StatusCardTile.test.tsx src/pages/StatusCards/format.test.ts src/lib/status-card-state.test.ts` — passes (26/26). - Recorded pre-PR QA: compile-pipeline e2e PASS; full lifecycle and cost QA PASS; security re-review PASS after write-back hardening; UX approved. - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/db/src/status-card-migrations.test.ts` — passes; reapplies migrations `0185`–`0189` against an already-migrated embedded Postgres database. - `pnpm --filter /db check:migrations` — passes migration numbering and safety checks. - `pnpm --filter /db typecheck` — passes. - Merged current `origin/master` on July 24, 2026 with no conflicts; migrations `0185`–`0189` remain unclaimed on master. ## Risks - The feature introduces five database migrations and a new background update path; all new DDL is repeat-safe after partial application, migration numbering/safety checks pass, and update execution is company-scoped and change-gated. - Natural-language compilation can produce invalid or overly broad queries; compile provenance, query validation, debug visibility, and version history make failures inspectable and recoverable. - Reactive or interval refresh could increase spend; active hours, max refresh frequency, daily token caps, per-update cost records, and budget-paused states bound and expose that risk. - The branch name contains an internal execution identifier because it is a fixed handoff branch; it was intentionally not renamed or rebased per the release handoff instructions. - Overall rollout risk is limited because the route, navigation, services, and UI are disabled by default behind `enableStatusCards`. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex using GPT-5.5 with reasoning, repository tool use, shell execution, GitHub CLI, and test/build execution. The runtime did not expose a context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change; the fixed execution-workspace identifier is documented as an authorized handoff exception - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass, with the one cleanup timeout passing on focused rerun - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
2002c4fff3 | refactor: remove redundant archived project filters (#10177) canary/v2026.724.0-canary.6 | ||
|
Devin Foley
|
965a827ee7 |
feat(docker): publish a cloud image variant with built bundled plugins (#10157)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Managed (cloud-hosted) deployments configure instances through `PAPERCLIP_MANAGED_CONFIG`, including a `plugins.autoInstall` key list that the boot-time installer resolves against the bundled plugin catalog > - The installer requires each bundled plugin's `dist/manifest.js` (`server/src/services/bundled-plugins.ts`), but the published image only ships the sandbox providers' *source* — they are intentionally excluded from the pnpm workspace, and the Dockerfile never builds them > - Every managed auto-install therefore logs `bundled plugin bundle not present; skipping auto-install` and no sandbox provider can be provisioned through managed config > - Baking built plugins into the single published image would fix it but makes every self-hosted pull carry the providers' `node_modules` for a managed-only mechanism > - This pull request adds a `cloud` Dockerfile target extending `production` with built bundled plugins — parameterized by build arg and currently just `daytona` — published alongside the default image with a `-cloud` tag suffix > - The benefit is working plugin auto-provisioning for managed deployments while the self-hosted image stays byte-identical and the cloud variant only carries what is actually deployed ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #10158 (filed for this problem; no prior issue existed — searched for duplicate/related PRs and issues around bundled plugins, docker image variants, and auto-install). Summary: **What happened:** on a managed instance with `plugins.autoInstall: ["daytona"]` delivered via `PAPERCLIP_MANAGED_CONFIG`, boot logs `bundled plugin bundle not present; skipping auto-install` with `pluginPath: /app/packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona`, and the plugin is never installed. **Expected:** the advertised bundled-catalog keys are installable from the published image. **Why:** the image ships plugin source without `dist/` — nothing in the Dockerfile builds the workspace-excluded sandbox providers. ## What Changed - `Dockerfile`: new `cloud-plugins` stage (based on `build`, so devDependencies are available for `tsc`) that installs and builds each provider named in the `CLOUD_BUNDLED_PLUGINS` build arg standalone (`pnpm install --ignore-workspace --no-lockfile && pnpm build`, exactly as the providers' READMEs prescribe), asserting `dist/manifest.js` exists per plugin and failing loudly on unknown names; new `cloud` stage = `production` + the built plugin tree. The arg defaults to `daytona` — the only provider managed deployments auto-install today; every entry adds its `node_modules` to the image, so the list grows only with actual need (a one-line workflow change). - `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: the existing build step is pinned to `target: production` (without this, the new trailing stage would silently become the default build target — this pin is what keeps the self-hosted image identical); new metadata + build-push steps publish the `cloud` target (with `CLOUD_BUNDLED_PLUGINS=daytona`) under the same tag set with a `-cloud` suffix (`sha-<short>-cloud`, `latest-cloud`, `<version>-cloud`), same schema labels, reusing the GHA layer cache ## Verification - All seven sandbox providers build standalone from a clean checkout with the exact commands the new stage runs, each producing `dist/manifest.js` — so the current `daytona` default works and future list additions are known-good - The stage's shell loop was dry-run against the checkout (directory existence + per-plugin assertion logic) - Workflow YAML lints clean - **Not run:** a full multi-arch `docker build` (no local docker daemon). The `cloud` stage is additive and the default target is pinned, so the risk is contained to the new build step; the first master build after merge proves it end-to-end ## Risks - Self-hosted behavior: unchanged. The default image build is pinned to the `production` target, which produces the same layers as before this change; the `cloud` stages run only for the new build step. - The plugin installs in the `cloud-plugins` stage use `--no-lockfile` (the providers are workspace-excluded and lockfile-less by design), so plugin dependency resolution is not pinned at image-build time. This mirrors the existing Plugins-page install path, which resolves from npm at install time. - CI cost: one additional build-push per master push. It reuses the layer cache from the production build, so the marginal work is the single plugin's build layers. - An unknown name in `CLOUD_BUNDLED_PLUGINS`, or a provider that stops producing `dist/manifest.js`, fails the cloud build loudly rather than publishing a broken variant. ## Model Used Claude (Anthropic), model ID `claude-fable-5[1m]` via Claude Code CLI — extended thinking and tool use (code edits, standalone plugin build verification, workflow lint). ## Checklist - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] Self-hosted behavior unchanged (default build target pinned to `production`) - [x] One clear change: publish a cloud image variant with built bundled plugins |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ee3ed0117e |
fix(opencode): register configured model in runtime config (#10178)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agent runs depend on adapters translating Paperclip configuration into each agent runtime's native configuration > - The OpenCode local adapter passes configured models through the `--model provider/model` argument > - OpenCode only resolves that argument when the model id exists in the provider's runtime `models` map > - Valid provider-served model ids missing from OpenCode's bundled catalog therefore fail locally with `Model not found` > - This pull request registers the configured model in the injected runtime configuration without overwriting explicit provider definitions > - The benefit is that uncataloged routing variants and newly released models resolve while cataloged models retain their metadata ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Pre-submission checklist - [x] I have searched existing open and closed issues and this is not a duplicate. - [x] I can reproduce this on current `master`. - [x] I have confirmed the error originates in Paperclip's OpenCode adapter rather than the provider or local configuration. ### What happened? OpenCode local runs failed with `Model not found` when a configured `provider/model` id was valid at the provider but absent from OpenCode's bundled model catalog. OpenRouter routing variants such as model ids ending in `:nitro` are one example. ### Expected behavior Any configured provider-served model id should resolve when Paperclip starts OpenCode, including ids not yet present in the bundled catalog. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Configure the OpenCode local adapter with a valid provider/model id that is absent from OpenCode's bundled catalog. 2. Start an agent run. 3. Observe that OpenCode rejects the `--model` value with `Model not found` before the session starts. ### Paperclip version or commit Current `master` before this change. ### Deployment mode Local dev using the OpenCode local adapter and an existing provider API key. ### Installation method Built from source. ### Agent adapter(s) involved OpenCode local. ### Database mode Not database-related. ### Relevant logs or output `Model not found` ### Additional context Reproduced with OpenCode 1.15.5. No duplicate or related public GitHub issues or pull requests were found. ### Privacy checklist - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for sensitive information and no secrets or PII are included. ## What Changed - Register the configured `provider/model` id as an empty custom model entry in the injected `opencode.json` provider configuration. - Preserve explicit model definitions from user configuration and `PAPERCLIP_OPENCODE_PROVIDERS`. - Skip registration for model strings that do not use the `provider/model` form. - Add focused coverage for uncataloged models, explicit definitions, and invalid model strings. ## Verification - `cd packages/adapters/opencode-local && pnpm exec vitest run src/server/runtime-config.test.ts` — 14 tests passed. - `cd packages/adapters/opencode-local && pnpm exec tsc --noEmit` — passed. - Manual reproduction with OpenCode 1.15.5: the uncataloged OpenRouter routing variant fails without the injected model entry and resolves with it. ## Risks - Low risk: the empty entry deep-merges with catalog metadata for known models, and existing explicit model definitions take precedence. - The behavior is limited to syntactically valid `provider/model` configuration values in the OpenCode local adapter. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact runtime model `gpt-5.6-sol` (context-window size not exposed by the runtime), with reasoning, tool use, terminal execution, and code-editing capabilities. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.5 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7f766526a6 |
feat(sandbox): add task-scoped egress grants (#10155)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Confinement providers protect agent runs with default-deny network policies > - Kubernetes environments currently apply only provider-level, namespace-wide egress allowances > - Tasks that legitimately need GitHub or package registries therefore cannot request narrow access, while network failures do not explain the governing policy or how to request a grant > - This pull request adds issue-scoped egress grants that become workload-owned, run-label-selected policies and carries the effective grant through lease audit metadata > - The benefit is that internet-dependent work can run without enabling broad egress for every concurrent task, and denied requests point operators to the exact grant path ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. Related but distinct: Refs #9944, which adds a provider-wide open-internet posture; this PR keeps provider defaults narrow and adds per-task grants. **Problem / motivation** Kubernetes sandbox egress is configured at the provider/tenant level. A task that needs to clone from GitHub or install from PyPI cannot request those destinations without changing the policy for every run in the tenant namespace. DNS/connectivity failures also surface as generic tool errors with no policy name or remediation path. **Proposed solution** Accept `executionWorkspaceSettings.networkEgress.allowFqdns` and `allowCidrs`, forward the setting through heartbeat environment acquisition, and create a workload-owned NetworkPolicy or CiliumNetworkPolicy selected by `paperclip.io/run-id`. Record the effective grant in lease activity/metadata, expose policy context through `PAPERCLIP_NETWORK_EGRESS_*`, and append the grant path to likely policy-related stderr failures. **Alternatives considered** A provider-wide open-internet switch is broader than required and is already covered by #9944. Mutating the existing namespace policy would leak each task's destinations to other concurrent runs. Standard Kubernetes NetworkPolicy cannot enforce FQDNs exactly, so standard mode uses the existing hardened public-IPv4 TCP 80/443 fallback only for the selected run; Cilium mode remains exact. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing cloud/sandbox agent roadmap capability with task-level control-plane policy and does not duplicate a planned roadmap item. ## What Changed - Added validated `networkEgress` grants to issue execution workspace settings and forwarded them through environment lease acquisition. - Added workload-owned, run-label-scoped NetworkPolicy/CiliumNetworkPolicy resources for task FQDN/CIDR grants. - Added lease audit metadata, sandbox policy environment variables, and actionable network-denial stderr guidance. - Added focused parser, manifest, policy creation, and denial-message tests plus Kubernetes provider documentation. ## Verification - `pnpm -C packages/shared exec vitest run src/validators/issue.test.ts` — 27 passed. - `pnpm -C packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/kubernetes test -- --run test/unit/network-policy.test.ts test/unit/cilium-network-policy.test.ts test/unit/scoped-network-egress.test.ts` — 21 passed. - `pnpm -C server exec vitest run src/__tests__/execution-workspace-policy.test.ts` — 15 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-plugin-environment.test.ts server/src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts` — 26 passed. - `pnpm --dir packages/db build && pnpm --dir packages/shared build && pnpm --dir packages/plugins/sdk build` — passed, including migration safety checks. - `pnpm --dir packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/kubernetes typecheck && pnpm --dir server typecheck` — passed after refreshing the worktree's frozen offline dependencies. - End-to-end cluster validation of the `build-cython-ext` benchmark remains for CI/maintainer Kubernetes infrastructure; the focused tests assert `github.com` and `pypi.org` produce a policy selected only by the granted run. ## Risks - Standard NetworkPolicy cannot express FQDNs, so an FQDN grant allows hardened public IPv4 TCP 80/443 for that run; use Cilium mode for exact hostname enforcement. - The new field is additive and absent by default, so existing runs keep the current provider-level policy. - Workload owner references garbage-collect scoped policies with the Job/Sandbox; a cluster/controller that ignores owner references could temporarily strand a policy that still selects no future run ID. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.6-sol`, high reasoning mode, tool use and code execution. The runtime did not expose a context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.4 |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
564870020b | Exclude archived projects from the default project list route (#10146) canary/v2026.724.0-canary.3 | ||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
14f20be92b |
ci: harden Docker image build workflow against lockfile drift and runner disk exhaustion (#10142)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Docker image publish workflow (`.github/workflows/docker.yml`) builds and pushes the multi-arch `ghcr.io` image on every master push, so users pulling the container get the latest code > - The two newest master runs of that workflow failed, so no images have been published past a recent master commit > - The failures had two distinct causes: run [30054330748](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/30054330748) hit `ERR_PNPM_LOCKFILE_CONFIG_MISMATCH` (committed `pnpm-lock.yaml` drifted from `patchedDependencies` in package metadata), and run [30050197392](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/30050197392) hit `no space left on device` during the multi-arch buildx export > - This pull request hardens the publish job against both failure modes: it refreshes the lockfile (lockfile-only, guarded) before the build, and frees runner disk space before buildx setup > - The benefit is that image publishing keeps working through routine lockfile drift and the growing multi-arch build footprint, so `ghcr.io` images stay current with master ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Refs #8286 — same class of Docker-build lockfile mismatch failure - Refs #8827 — pnpm 9.15.x pin / lockfile regeneration discussion - Note: the immediate lockfile drift on master was fixed by #10132; the refresh step here prevents the *next* drift from breaking image publishing again ## What Changed - Added a pnpm + Node setup and a **"Refresh lockfile for Docker build context"** step to the image job in `.github/workflows/docker.yml`: runs `pnpm install --lockfile-only --ignore-scripts --no-frozen-lockfile`, exits cleanly if nothing changed, and **fails the job if anything other than `pnpm-lock.yaml` was modified** by the refresh - Added a **"Free runner disk"** step (before buildx setup) that prunes the pnpm store, apt caches, preinstalled toolchains (`/usr/share/dotnet`, Android SDK, Swift, Boost, PowerShell, GHC, CodeQL/PyPy/Ruby toolcache), and dangling Docker state, logging `df -h` before/after - No changes outside the workflow file (54 added lines, nothing removed) ## Verification - Pulled the logs of both failed master runs and matched each failure to the step that addresses it: [30054330748](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/30054330748) failed with `ERR_PNPM_LOCKFILE_CONFIG_MISMATCH`, [30050197392](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/30050197392) failed with `no space left on device` during the buildx export - Confirmed pnpm `9.15.4` in the new setup step matches the repo `packageManager` field and the version used in the Dockerfile, so the refreshed lockfile is generated by the same pnpm the image build consumes - Validated the workflow YAML parses cleanly - The workflow triggers on master pushes / manual dispatch; the definitive check is the first master run after merge — reviewers can also `workflow_dispatch` it from this branch if desired ## Risks - The lockfile refresh runs with `--ignore-scripts` and a guard that aborts on any non-lockfile change, so it cannot silently pull unexpected code into the image; worst case it fails the job with a clear diff - The published image could be built from a refreshed lockfile that differs from the committed one when drift exists — that keeps publishing alive but can mask drift on master, which still needs the committed lockfile fixed (as #10132 did) - Disk cleanup removes preinstalled toolchains only on the ephemeral runner for this job; other jobs/workflows are unaffected - Low risk overall: additive steps in a single workflow file ## Model Used - Claude (Anthropic) — `claude-fable-5` (Claude Code agent harness, extended thinking, tool use). Used to diagnose the failing CI runs from logs, author the workflow changes, and prepare this PR. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (no runtime code touched; workflow YAML validated — see Verification) - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable (n/a — CI workflow change) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (none needed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (pending — will confirm once checks run) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (pending review pass) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Michael NguyenandPaperclip
|
caae2778f0 |
fix: deliver plugin agent session turns and replies (#10137)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent execution through heartbeat runs and adapter-specific sessions > - Plugins can open an agent session and send a conversational message through the host service > - The host previously stored that message only in opaque wake payload metadata, so local adapters never saw it in their CLI prompt > - The host also forwarded run log chunks but did not expose the persisted final assistant text as the session reply > - This pull request defines both sides of the session contract in the shared wake renderer and terminal run event > - The benefit is that local adapters receive the actual conversational turn and plugins receive one canonical final reply ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related context: Refs #629 and Refs #2880 describe adjacent `claude_local` final-text visibility failures. They concern issue comments rather than plugin agent sessions, but exercise the same need for a canonical persisted run summary. Companion consumer change: paperclipai/paperclip-gateway#3. Bug description: - **Observed:** calling the plugin host's `agents.sessions.sendMessage()` with `prompt: "hello"` woke a `claude_local` agent, but the generated CLI prompt omitted `hello`. On completion, the session emitted log chunks and a generic `Run completed` done event, so callers could not reliably recover the assistant reply. - **Expected:** the prompt becomes the user-supplied conversational turn for that agent session, and the successful terminal event carries the run's canonical final user-facing assistant text. - **Reproduction:** create a plugin agent session for a local adapter, call `sendMessage()` with a non-empty prompt, inspect the adapter prompt and terminal session event. - **Affected baseline:** `b517b887a` on `master`, local trusted deployment with plugin host services and `claude_local`; `codex_local` shared the wake-rendering gap because both use the common Paperclip wake prompt renderer. ## What Changed - Added a typed `agentMessage` wake payload rendered by the shared adapter prompt path used by `claude_local`, `codex_local`, and other local adapters. - Labeled session content as user-supplied and explicitly non-authoritative: it cannot expand authorization, permissions, task scope, or company boundaries. - Preserved ordinary heartbeat behavior by omitting the section when no agent-session message exists. - Added canonical `finalText` to terminal heartbeat status events from the already-persisted run summary/result/message. - Defined successful `AgentSessionEvent.message` as the canonical final user-facing reply (or `null`) and forwarded it on the terminal `done` event. - Added host, wake-renderer, normal-heartbeat, and terminal-reply regression coverage. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-agent-session-message.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-status-payload.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-agent-sessions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-summary.test.ts` — 87 passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed across all 31 workspaces. - `pnpm build` — passed. - `pnpm test:run` — 2,860 passed, 1 skipped, 3 unrelated failures: two existing macOS temp-path alias assertions (`/tmp` vs `/private/tmp`) in workspace branch-containment tests and one reproducible auto-port runtime-service adoption failure. The same three failures reproduce when the two files run alone; none touch this change. - Live Slack verification intentionally remains operator-gated because it requires rebuilding/restarting the host. ## Risks - User-controlled chat text now reaches the model prompt, which is an intentional prompt-injection surface. The renderer labels it as untrusted conversational content, while the existing plugin/session company checks and caller authorization remain unchanged. - `finalText` is added to company-scoped heartbeat status events. It is derived from the same persisted summary/result/message already used for run comments; no raw stdout or secrets are added. - Consumers that ignore the new field remain compatible, and successful runs without usable final text still emit `message: null`. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex (GPT-5), agentic reasoning with repository/tool use and code execution; context-window size is not surfaced in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.1 |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
0650ae970f |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#10136)
Auto-generated lockfile refresh after dependencies changed on master. This PR only updates pnpm-lock.yaml. Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.724.0-canary.0 |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
b517b887ad | fix(acpx): decouple host proxy spawn cwd from in-sandbox remoteCwd (#10122) canary/v2026.723.0-canary.20 | ||
|
|
e41ba306c5 |
feat(secrets): thread audit actor into skip-user-secret skills routes (#10124)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and needs auditable control over secret resolution > - The skip-user-secret skills routes still have to attribute access to the real actor > - These routes were calling the adapter config resolver without an access context > - That dropped actor attribution from the company `secret_ref` audit trail > - This pull request threads the existing actor-secret context helper into both skills routes > - The benefit is that audit fidelity is restored without changing `skipUserSecrets` behavior ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #10115. This PR fixes a gap in the skills read/sync routes where `resolveAdapterConfigForRuntime` was being called without an audit access context, so company secret resolution could not reliably attribute the request to the acting user or agent. The change keeps `skipUserSecrets: true` intact and only restores audit fidelity. ## What Changed - Threaded `buildActorSecretContext(req, { consumerType: "agent", consumerId })` into `GET /agents/:id/skills` - Threaded the same actor context into `POST /agents/:id/skills/sync` - Updated the route tests to assert a non-`undefined` actor context reaches the resolver while `skipUserSecrets: true` stays unchanged ## Verification - `tsc --noEmit` - `agents` and `secrets` Vitest suites: 33 files / 448 tests green - Route spy assertions confirm both skills routes now pass an actor-derived context to the resolver ## Risks - Low risk: the change is limited to audit context propagation on two skills routes - If a downstream resolver assumes the third argument can be `undefined`, this makes the context explicit on these routes - The user-secret authorization behavior does not change because `skipUserSecrets` remains true ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-5 via Codex, tool-using coding agent, 256k context window ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.19 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
58ae799dbd |
fix(ci): regenerate lockfile for patch changes (#10132)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip uses GitHub Actions to keep generated lockfile changes deterministic in CI > - The workflow decides when to regenerate the lockfile based on file/path changes > - Patch changes can live under a top-level `patches/` directory, and those changes also affect dependency resolution > - If the workflow misses that path, CI can skip lockfile regeneration when it should run > - This pull request adds top-level `patches/` to the trigger so patch updates participate in the existing lockfile regeneration flow > - The benefit is that patch-related dependency changes continue to get the same CI protection as the other manifest and workspace triggers ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue is linked here. The underlying problem is that top-level `patches/` files are part of pnpm's dependency graph, but the PR workflow's lockfile-regeneration gate only looked at package manifests, workspace config, `.npmrc`, and `pnpmfile.*` changes. That meant patch-only edits could skip `pnpm install --lockfile-only` and leave downstream frozen-install jobs on a stale lockfile. This PR keeps the existing manual lockfile edit guard in place. The intended behavior is still: CI owns lockfile regeneration, and patch changes are allowed to trigger that regeneration without letting contributors commit `pnpm-lock.yaml` directly. ## What Changed - Added top-level `patches/` to the PR workflow's dependency-resolution trigger. - Left the manual `pnpm-lock.yaml` edit blocker unchanged so CI still owns lockfile regeneration. ## Verification - `git diff --check .github/workflows/pr.yml` - Verified the workflow path predicate matches `patches/acpx@0.12.0.patch`, `package.json`, `packages/shared/package.json`, `pnpm-workspace.yaml`, `.npmrc`, `pnpmfile.cjs`, `pnpmfile.js`, and `pnpmfile.mjs`, while excluding nested patch paths and unrelated files. ## Risks - Low risk: this only broadens the workflow trigger set for lockfile regeneration. - The main behavioral change is that patch updates at the repository root now participate in the same CI path as manifest and workspace changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based tool-using agent. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.18 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
176a9e8230 |
fix(built-in-agents): allow first-time setup of a needs_setup built-in under board-approval policy (#10129)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Companies can require **board approval for new agents**; built-in agents (e.g. the Reflection Coach / Briefs) are provisioned through the `built-in-agents` service `provision()` > - Some built-in agents are *auto-provisioned* as a hire that, once approved, resolves to an idle agent row whose `adapterConfig` is still empty — status `needs_setup` > - When the board operator then opens that agent's setup dialog and submits the adapter config, `provision()` saw `adapterType`/`adapterConfig` on an already-existing row and classified it as a **reconfiguration**, throwing a dead-end 409: *"Built-in agent adapter changes require board approval before they can be applied."* > - The operator *is* the board, so there was no one left to grant an approval they already implicitly hold — setup could never be completed > - This pull request treats first-time adapter setup of a `needs_setup` built-in as the first-time configuration it actually is, applying it directly while still gating genuine reconfiguration of a live agent > - The benefit is the board can finish setting up an auto-provisioned built-in agent without hitting an unsatisfiable approval wall ## Linked Issues or Issue Description <!-- No public GitHub issue exists; describing the underlying bug in-PR following the bug_report template. --> **What happened?** With "require board approval for new agents" enabled, completing the adapter setup of an auto-provisioned but unconfigured built-in agent (status `needs_setup`, e.g. the Reflection Coach) failed with a 409 — *"Built-in agent adapter changes require board approval before they can be applied."* — even for the board user. Because the operator *is* the board, no additional approver existed, so setup was permanently blocked. Root cause: in `builtInAgentService.provision()`, any request carrying `adapterType`/`adapterConfig` against an existing row was treated as a reconfiguration and gated, regardless of whether that row had ever completed its initial adapter setup. An auto-provisioned hire resolves to an idle row with an empty `adapterConfig` (`needs_setup`), so its very first configuration was misclassified. **Expected behavior** The board can complete first-time setup of an already-sanctioned built-in agent without a fresh approval, matching the behavior when board approval is not required. Genuine reconfiguration of an already-configured (`ready`/`paused`) agent should still require approval. **Steps to reproduce** 1. In a company with `requireBoardApprovalForNewAgents` enabled, have a built-in agent auto-provisioned so its row exists but its adapter is unconfigured (status `needs_setup`). 2. As the board user, open that agent's setup dialog and submit an adapter type + config. 3. Observe the 409 "Built-in agent adapter changes require board approval before they can be applied." with no way for the board to grant the approval. **Deployment mode** Local single-instance / self-hosted (server `built-in-agents` service). ## What Changed - `server/src/services/built-in-agents.ts`: In `provision()`, when the existing built-in row has **not** yet completed adapter setup (`!hasCompleteAdapterConfig(...)`, i.e. `needs_setup`), first-time adapter configuration now applies directly via `ensure()` — the same path used when board approval is not required. The hire that created the row was already sanctioned, so no fresh approval is required. - Reconfiguration of an already-configured (`ready`/`paused`) built-in agent stays gated behind board approval exactly as before, and `pending_approval` rows are handled before the new branch. - `server/src/__tests__/built-in-agents.test.ts`: Added a regression test — under `requireApproval: true`, completing first-time setup of a `needs_setup` built-in returns `approval: null`, transitions the agent to `ready`, and creates **no** approval row. ## Verification ```bash cd server npx vitest run src/__tests__/built-in-agents.test.ts # Test Files 1 passed (1) # Tests 31 passed (31) ``` - New test `completes first-time setup of a needs_setup built-in without a fresh board approval` passes. - Full `built-in-agents.test.ts` suite (31 tests) passes, including existing tests that assert genuine reconfiguration of a configured agent **remains** gated. ## Risks Low risk. The change narrows an over-broad approval gate: it only opens the direct-apply path for rows that have never completed adapter setup (`needs_setup`), determined by the existing `hasCompleteAdapterConfig` predicate that already drives `deriveBuiltInAgentStatus`. Already-configured (`ready`/`paused`) agents, and `pending_approval` rows, are unaffected and still gated. No schema or migration changes. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`), 1M context, extended thinking, with tool use / code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above (searched my open PRs and compared patch-ids — no duplicate exists) - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.723.0-canary.17 |
||
|
Michael NguyenandPaperclip
|
e2068319e7 |
fix(interactions): tolerate legacy stored result outcomes so listInteractions can't fail the whole list (#10119)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents and humans coordinate on issues through interaction requests
(confirmations, decisions, task suggestions and more) that are stored
per issue and listed by both the web UI and plugin workers such as chat
gateways
> - `listForIssue` hydrates every stored interaction row by hard-parsing
its persisted `result` blob against the current Zod schema
> - Stored rows outlive code: one live row written by an older build
carried `result.outcome: "withdrawn_by_creator"`, a value no longer in
the enum, and that single row made hydration throw
> - Because the throw happened inside the list mapping, it failed the
entire issue's interaction list — the web thread errored, and every
plugin consumer of `issues.listInteractions` (notification drain, digest
confirmation sweep, pending-ledger reads) failed continuously, so
interaction cards never reached chat surfaces
> - This pull request parses stored `result` blobs tolerantly — a
`parseStoredInteractionResult` helper wrapping `safeParse`, applied to
all five interaction kinds — so an unparseable result degrades to `null`
with a warning instead of failing the whole list
> - The benefit is durable robustness at the storage→hydrate boundary:
legacy or future schema drift in a single row can no longer take down an
issue's entire interaction surface
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No pre-existing public issue; the underlying problem is described here
following the bug-report template. Related (not a duplicate): Refs #6709
— the creator-withdraw flow it explores matches the legacy outcome value
observed in the wild; whether or not that lineage wrote the row, this PR
is defensive against any such stored-schema drift.
**What happened**
Listing interactions for an issue (`GET /api/issues/:id/interactions` on
the web, or the `issues.listInteractions` plugin RPC) fails for the
entire issue when any single stored interaction row carries a
`result.outcome` written by an older build (observed live:
`"withdrawn_by_creator"`). Downstream plugin consumers that poll this
RPC fail continuously — notification drain, digest confirmation sweep,
and pending-ledger reads.
**Expected behavior**
One legacy/unreadable stored `result` should degrade gracefully — the
interaction still lists with its result treated as absent — rather than
failing the whole issue's interaction list.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Persist a resolved `request_confirmation` interaction whose
`result.outcome` is not in the current enum (e.g.
`"withdrawn_by_creator"`, as written by an older build).
2. Call `issues.listInteractions` (or `GET
/api/issues/:id/interactions`) for that issue.
3. The call throws `invalid_enum_value` and returns nothing, instead of
returning the remaining rows.
**Version or commit**
master @
canary/v2026.723.0-canary.16
|
||
|
|
e3f8380e70 |
feat(skills): make summarize-status actions-first (#10117)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Its built-in Summarizer keeps status slots useful for people overseeing issue trees > - Those summaries need to tell the reader what they must do now to unblock progress > - The existing skill instead imposed rigid Decide:/Review:/Recent work: sections, cost commentary, and restrictive issue-fetch guidance > - This pull request rewrites the summarize-status instructions to lead with 1–3 specific, concrete unblock actions while letting the model use its judgment for the remaining context > - The benefit is a shorter, clearer summary that is immediately actionable without changing slot writes or the streaming status protocol ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #9713 The built-in summarizer currently prioritizes a fixed reporting template over the reader's immediate unblock actions. Summaries should instead open with the 1–3 specific actions the reader needs to take right now, then provide only the context needed to act. This prompt-only update preserves all summary-slot mechanics and protocols. ## What Changed - Rewrote the bundled `summarize-status` skill to open with 1–3 specific, concrete, actionable items needed right now to unblock the work. - Removed the rigid Decide:/Review:/Recent work: template, the Cost discipline section, and the restrictions against fetching issue detail. - Kept slot-write mechanics and the streaming `STATUS`/sentinel protocol unchanged. - Updated all materialized copies and tests for the same skill text: the `SKILL.md` source, regenerated catalog manifest hashes, compiled fallback string, summarizer built-in `AGENTS.md` and routine, summary generation-issue instructions, and the two tests pinning those strings. - Although the diff touches eight files, every file is either the same skill text in another materialized form or a test asserting it. No behavior outside the summarizer's prompt text changes. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/skills-catalog test` — 20/20 tests pass. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/summary-slots.test.ts server/src/__tests__/built-in-agents.test.ts` — 46/46 tests pass. - `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` — clean. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/summary-slots.test.ts` — 16/16 tests pass after the Greptile consistency fix. - Latest-head GitHub checks — 25 terminal checks, all successful, neutral, or skipped. ## Risks - Low risk: this intentionally changes generated summary wording and prioritization, but does not change APIs, persistence, slot-write behavior, or the streaming protocol. - The branch name contains an internal task identifier because it was pre-created and pre-pushed for this assigned change; the PR title and body do not expose the internal ticket. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex using `gpt-5.6-sol`, high reasoning mode, with repository, terminal, GitHub CLI, and code-execution tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.15 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
148a5b11f5 |
Route blocked transitions to explicit unblock owners (#10112)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane people use to coordinate AI-agent companies. > - Issue status transitions determine whether work keeps moving or silently stalls. > - A blocked issue previously could rely on prose alone, leaving the intended unblock owner unstructured and unnotified. > - Existing blocker-attention classification could identify stalled chains, but the signal was not delivered to the board attention feed. > - Blocked transitions also need rollout-safe deduplication so upgrades do not notify for historical issues and repeated processing does not create notification storms. > - This pull request adds structured unblock descriptors, prospective transition timestamps, owner delivery, and board attention routing with focused authorization controls. > - The benefit is that newly blocked work has an explicit, routable next action without weakening company boundaries or allowing agents to inject arbitrary human attention items. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related documentation PR: #10094. ### Subsystem affected Cross-cutting: `server/`, `packages/db`, and `packages/shared`. ### Problem or motivation An issue can enter `blocked` without a machine-readable unblock path. Prose-only ownership does not reliably wake the responsible agent or surface human-owned work, while the existing `blockerAttention` classifier is not delivered to an operator-facing attention feed. ### Proposed solution Require new transitions into `blocked` to have unresolved blockers, a pending interaction/approval, or a structured `{ owner, action }` descriptor. Notify an allowed owner once per prospective transition, route human-owned cases to board attention, and leave pre-rollout blocked issues untouched. ### Alternatives considered - Keep prose-only blockers: rejected because ownership remains unroutable. - Backfill all historical blocked issues: rejected because upgrades would create notification storms. - Let agents target arbitrary users or the board: rejected after security review because it creates an attention-injection channel. ### Roadmap alignment Aligns with `ROADMAP.md` → “Enforced Outcomes (watchdogs, recovery actions, review gates)” by making blocked work carry an explicit continuation path. ### Additional context The implementation is prospective-only and deduplicated per blocked transition. Agent-authored descriptors are limited to the acting agent; board actors retain human-owner routing. ## What Changed - Added persisted unblock descriptors and prospective blocked-transition delivery timestamps with an idempotent migration. - Added shared types and validation for board, user, and agent unblock owners. - Enforced valid blocked transitions and same-company owner validation in the issue update route. - Restricted agent-authored descriptors to the acting agent itself, preventing board/user attention injection by compromised agents. - Added one-per-transition agent wake delivery and prospective-only rollout gating. - Routed human-owned blocker attention into the board attention feed. - Added focused tests for validation, prospective delivery, flap deduplication, attention routing, route authorization, and stop-relay compatibility. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/routable-blocked.test.ts server/src/__tests__/attention-service.test.ts packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts` - `AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID= AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY= pnpm test:run` - `pnpm build` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db check:migrations` ## Risks - Behavioral shift: new `blocked` transitions without a real blocker, pending governed action, or structured descriptor now return `422`. - Notification abuse is constrained by same-company validation, agent self-only routing, prospective rollout gating, and transition-scoped deduplication. - Migration risk is low: columns are additive, nullable, and use `IF NOT EXISTS`; historical blocked issues are not backfilled or notified. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex CLI with GPT-5.4, reasoning-enabled tool use and code execution. The runtime did not expose a context-window value. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.14 |
||
|
|
81f47e70a6 |
feat(secrets): thread the acting user into user-scoped secret resolution (#10115)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies > - Its agents and adapters need to resolve secrets through the same governed runtime path that checks ownership and company boundaries > - This change fixes a gap where user-scoped secret resolution could lose the acting-user context before adapter runtime startup > - Without that context, a required user secret could fail closed with responsible_user_missing even though an authenticated user was in scope > - This PR threads the acting user into the user-scoped secret resolution path and keeps the owner boundary explicit > - The benefit is adapter runtime setup can resolve the right credential without broadening access ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #8309 (related: agent secret_ref env drift and binding context) No exact public GitHub issue for this specific behavior. ### Bug report - Problem: two agent-management routes resolved user-scoped secrets without an acting-user binding, so a required `user_secret_ref` could not be resolved before runtime. - Expected behavior: the authenticated acting user should be threaded into user-scoped secret resolution so the owning user secret can be selected safely. - Actual behavior: adapter startup paths failed closed with `responsible_user_missing` even though a user was already in scope. - Steps to reproduce: configure an adapter test-environment or login flow that depends on a user-scoped secret, then invoke it with an authenticated user context that does not carry the acting-user binding into runtime secret resolution. - Impact: the adapter test-environment probe and login path cannot start, so the runtime never reaches the work it was supposed to do. ## What Changed - Added an actor secret-context helper so the server can derive responsible-user context without inventing config-path or binding allowlists. - Added an explicit user-secret mediation mode for runtime config resolution, with an owner-scoped path that resolves by definition plus owner boundary and fails closed when an allowlist is present. - Wired the adapter test-environment route to owner-scoped mediation with an audit-only consumer and kept claude-login on the declared path with its persisted agent identity. - Added and updated tests for the factory, owner-scoped resolver mode, and adapter route coverage. ## Verification - `tsc --noEmit` clean - Factory tests: `authz-secret-context` 5/5 - Service tests: `secrets-service-user-secret-owner-scoped` 5/5, including fail-closed allowlist coverage and company-secret non-regression - Route tests: `agents-adapter-config-user-secret` 5/5, including `responsible_user_missing` and `binding_missing` coverage - Regression suites: `agents` + `secrets` 194/194 ## Risks - A regression in the owner-scoped mediation path could accidentally loosen secret access if the audit consumer or allowlist guard changes. - The change depends on the server-derived responsible user; if auth context regresses, the system should fail closed with responsible_user_missing. - The new mediation mode adds a branch in runtime config resolution, so future changes need to keep declared-mode behavior intact. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 (Codex tool-use session) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.13 |
||
|
Michael NguyenandClaude Opus 4.8
|
f2f168f6a1 |
fix(plugins): seed proactive company scopes before worker setup() + events.subscribe resolver parity (LOOA-695) (#10113)
- [x] I searched the GitHub PR list for similar PRs (dedup search). No open PR touches the proactive `events.subscribe` ordering path; #10103 (merged) is the predecessor whose ordering bug this fixes. ## Thinking Path The gateway worker's outbound push path is permanently dead (`eventSubscriptions: 0`, `notifier.received: 0`, `decisions.delivered: 0`). The plugin loader authorizes the worker's **proactive company scopes only AFTER `startWorker` resolves**, but a proactive plugin issues its one-shot `events.subscribe` calls from `setup()` — which runs *while `startWorker` is still awaiting the worker's initialize response*. So at subscribe time `proactiveCompanyScopes` is still empty → `contextForWorkerMessage` resolves no scope → the governed-access gate rejects every subscribe with `company context is required`. The gateway subscribes once and never retries, so `eventSubscriptions` stays 0 for the worker's life. This is an **ordering bug in the #10103 fix**, not a new method — same #9557 governed-access class as `config.get` (#10092) and `state.get` (#10103). Confirmed live at the 18:21:21Z worker respawn on `3093c5e` (host log), and again at the 19:01:04Z restart (still `events.subscribe: company context is required`, `eventSubscriptions:0`). ## What Changed 1. **Loader ordering** (`plugin-loader.ts`): load `registry.listConfigs(pluginId)` in a new step 4b **before** `startWorker`, and thread the configured company set into `WorkerStartOptions.proactiveCompanyScopes` so the worker handle is authorized *before the child process issues any host call*. The same rows are reused for startup config delivery (step 5b) — no second `listConfigs` round-trip. The runtime config-change path (`routes/plugins.ts`) still refreshes scopes via `setProactiveCompanyScopes` (unchanged). 2. **Handle seed** (`plugin-worker-manager.ts`): `createPluginWorkerHandle` seeds its `proactiveCompanyScopes` set from options at creation, before spawn. 3. **Resolver/gate parity** (`plugin-worker-manager.ts`): `referencedCompanyId(method, params)` now mirrors the SDK gate `requestedCompanyScope` exactly in the functional direction — adds `events.subscribe → params.filter.companyId` (how `ctx.events.on(name, { companyId }, fn)` issues its subscribe), and declines the gate's wildcard cases (`companies.list`, `scopeKind:"company"` without `scopeId`) so proactive access only ever grants a **single explicit configured company, never "all"**. Answers LOOA-693 AC#4 (host/gate extraction parity) in the functional direction. ## Tests New `plugin-worker-manager.test.ts` cases (drive a real worker): - a `setup()`-time `events.subscribe({ filter: { companyId } })` for an options-seeded company is **admitted** (fails on prior code — no options seed, no filter parity); - an unconfigured company stays **denied**; - an unseeded worker stays **denied**. Full `plugin-worker-manager.test.ts` suite: **21 passed**. Server `tsc --noEmit`: clean. All PR CI green (typecheck, server/workspace suites, e2e, build, security scans). ## Risks - **Scope-widening risk (primary).** The change grants proactive host access keyed off configured company rows. Mitigated by: the authorized set is exactly `registry.listConfigs(pluginId).map(companyId)`; wildcard cases (`companies.list`, company-scoped key without `scopeId`) resolve to `null`, never `{ kind: all }`; empty/whitespace ids dropped; an empty config set grants zero proactive access. This is the surface SecurityEngineer must sign off (see Security gate). - **In-invocation path unchanged.** Calls carrying a host-issued `paperclipInvocationId` keep the existing strict single-company match; the proactive branch only applies when there is no invocation id — so no regression to the enforced request path. - **Blast radius.** Loader step 4b is best-effort: a `listConfigs` failure logs and proceeds with an empty seed (fails closed — no push, not a crash), matching today's behavior. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.8 (`claude-opus-4-8`) via Claude Code (agent: CTO). ## Security gate Touches the company-scope resolution path (same surface as #10103). Routed through **SecurityEngineer review before merge** (tracked on LOOA-696) — must not widen beyond configured companies; in-invocation strict single-company match untouched; wildcard cases deliberately declined in the proactive direction. ## Verification once live - Host log clean of `events.subscribe: company context is required` at worker start - loader logs `eventSubscriptions: N>0` - beat `notifier.received` / `decisions.delivered` move on real issue/approval activity Parent: LOOA-629 (outbound push half of "gateway active"). LOOA-695. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.12 |
||
|
Michael NguyenandPaperclip
|
3093c5e694 |
fix(plugin-worker): resolve a company scope for proactive worker→host calls (#10103)
Host authorizes the plugin's configured companies as the worker's proactive scopes, set by the loader right after the #10092 config-delivery step and refreshed on operator config-save. At the single worker→host chokepoint, a no-invocation call (notifier drain, decision reconcile, mirror drain, digest, aging, liveness beat) that references a configured company resolves to that company's scope, so the #9557 governed-access gate admits it. One change covers the full proactive surface (state.*, issues.*, approvals.*, config.get, secrets.resolve, etc.). Safety: never widens beyond configured companies (any other company stays denied); in-invocation calls keep #9557's strict single-company match untouched. Fixes the Slack gateway DM round-trip for LOOA-629. Security review PASS (LOOA-693); non-blocking LOW follow-up tracked in LOOA-694. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a17bee98f2 |
Allow trust-gated direct-parent issue reports (#10098)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane used to coordinate and govern AI-agent companies. > - Agent issue access must preserve company boundaries and trust-policy containment without preventing legitimate task coordination. > - Checked-out standard-trust child runs need a narrow way to report progress directly to their parent issue, but existing authorization treated that report like an arbitrary cross-boundary write. > - Low-trust review runs must remain contained, and stop propagation must not copy potentially untrusted child prose into a higher-trust parent context. > - This pull request adds an audited, one-hop direct-parent comment grant only for standard checked-out runs and a sanitized, idempotent relay for blocked or cancelled child stops. > - The benefit is restored parent/child liveness while retaining least privilege, complete mediation, and low-trust output quarantine. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### What happened? A standard-trust agent running a checked-out child issue could not post a progress comment to the direct parent issue because the authorization boundary treated it as an arbitrary cross-issue write. This could stall parent/child coordination. Low-trust review runs also need stop propagation without exposing quarantined child-authored prose. ### Expected behavior A standard checked-out child run may add a comment only to its direct parent issue. The grant must not allow grandparent or sibling access, issue mutation, document writes, reopening, or resuming. Low-trust runs remain denied unless separately mentioned, while blocked/cancelled stops relay only sanitized system metadata once. ### Steps to reproduce 1. Create a parent issue and a child issue assigned to different standard-trust agents. 2. Check out the child issue in a heartbeat run and authenticate as that run. 3. Post a comment to the parent issue and observe the authorization denial before this change. 4. Mark a low-trust child blocked or cancelled and observe that no bounded sanitized parent notification preserves liveness before this change. ### Paperclip version or commit Reproduces on `master` before this PR, including base commit `d36ea13e08`. ### Deployment mode Local dev (`pnpm dev`). ### Installation method Built from source (`pnpm dev` / `pnpm build`). ### Agent adapter(s) involved Not adapter-specific (core authorization and issue-routing behavior). ### Database mode External Postgres in the focused route regression suite; behavior is database-mode independent. ### Access context Agent (bearer API key associated with a checked-out heartbeat run). ### Additional context The implementation deliberately distinguishes a direct-parent report decision from general issue mutation permission and records successful grants in the activity log. ### Privacy checklist - [x] I have reviewed all pasted output for PII, API keys, tokens, company names, and private instance references. ## What Changed - Adds a distinct authorization decision for standard checked-out runs commenting on their direct parent issue. - Keeps low-trust direct-parent reports denied unless an existing explicit mention grant applies. - Forces direct-parent grants to remain comment-only even when a closed parent is unassigned or assigned to the reporting agent. - Audits successful direct-parent report grants in issue activity details. - Adds sanitized, parent-scoped, idempotent system comments and parent wakeups for blocked or cancelled child stops. - Extends the low-trust red-team route suite for allowed parent reports, forbidden upward/sibling writes, closed-parent mutation suppression, and non-laundering stop relays. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/low-trust-red-team-routes.test.ts` — 11 tests passed after the review fix. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — passed after the review fix. - Confirmed the PR changes four files and excludes `pnpm-lock.yaml`, workflow changes, migrations, and unrelated branch commits. ## Risks - This is an authorization behavior change. An overly broad grant could enable cross-boundary writes, while an overly narrow grant could preserve the liveness failure. - The implementation constrains the grant to a standard-trust checked-out run, a direct parent target, and comments only; activity auditing and red-team coverage make regressions observable. - Stop relays intentionally contain only system-generated child identity/status metadata and are deduplicated; child-authored prose is not copied. - SecurityEngineer approval is mandatory before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex using GPT-5.5 with reasoning, repository tool use, shell execution, and test execution. The runtime does not expose the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
429792f1f3 |
fix(interactions): stop wedging confirmation accept on a terminal workspace_finalize (#10099)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - When an agent finishes work in an execution workspace, the board can confirm the result through an issue-thread interaction (e.g. the "Merged" / mark-done confirmation button on a `request_confirmation`). > - That accept action is gated: it must not race a worktree sync-back (`workspace_finalize`) that is still copying the agent's commits out of the sandbox, or the board could act on a base that hasn't received them yet. > - The gate (`runWorkspaceIsFinalized`) treated the sync-back as "settled" only when the latest `workspace_finalize` op was `succeeded` — so a run whose finalize reached a terminal `failed` state, or died leaving a stale `running` op, was treated as "still syncing" forever. > - Users hit a permanent, misleading `... has not finished syncing its workspace` error and could never click "Merged", even though nothing was syncing and the run had long since ended. > - This PR fixes the settle semantics so the gate blocks only while a sync-back is genuinely pending or in flight, and treats any terminal (or stale-orphaned) finalize as done. > - The benefit is that a failed or abandoned sync-back no longer wedges the human confirmation, while a genuinely in-flight sync-back on a live run still blocks correctly. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue exists for this. Describing the bug in-PR (bug report): **What happened** Clicking the "Merged" / mark-done confirmation at the bottom of an issue thread returns an error that the workspace "has not finished syncing its workspace" — but nothing is actually syncing, and the run that created the interaction has already ended. The confirmation is permanently stuck; the only workaround is to merge and mark the task done manually. **Expected behavior** Once the source run's worktree sync-back has finished — whether it succeeded, failed, or was skipped — the confirmation should be acceptable. The gate should block only while a sync-back is genuinely still running on a live run. **Steps to reproduce** Have an agent run reach `workspace_finalize` and end without a `succeeded` finalize (e.g. the sync-back fails, or the run process dies mid-finalize leaving a `running` op). Then attempt to accept the `request_confirmation` interaction it created → 409 "... has not finished syncing its workspace" with no way to proceed. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on the current `master` line (server service); root cause is in `runWorkspaceIsFinalized` in `server/src/services/issues.ts`. **Deployment mode** Local / self-hosted instance (server service). **Root cause** `runWorkspaceIsFinalized` returned `true` only when the latest `workspace_finalize` operation was `succeeded`. A terminal `failed` finalize (the sync-back ran and failed; it will not retry within that run) and a `running` finalize left behind by a dead run both left the gate closed forever. ## What Changed - `runWorkspaceIsFinalized` (server/src/services/issues.ts) now treats a sync-back as **settled** when the latest `workspace_finalize` op reached any terminal status (`succeeded`, `failed`, or `skipped`), instead of only `succeeded`. - A `workspace_finalize` still marked `running` blocks only while its owning run is alive; a `running` record left behind by a terminal/missing run is treated as stale (settled), so a dead run can no longer wedge the gate. - Preserved existing behavior for the other cases: no operations recorded at all → settled; earlier phases recorded but no `workspace_finalize` yet → still blocks (the sync-back hasn't been attempted). - Extracted the run-liveness check into a shared exported helper `heartbeatRunIsTerminalOrMissing` and reused it from the existing `isTerminalOrMissingHeartbeatRun` closure (no behavior change there). - Added a short comment at the confirmation-accept gate (server/src/services/issue-thread-interactions.ts) documenting the relaxed settle semantics. - The dependency-readiness / blocker barrier (`listPendingFinalizeBlockerIssueIds`) is deliberately left unchanged: an automated dependent must not proceed onto a base that never received a blocker's synced-back commits, so a failed finalize keeps that gate closed. Only the human-driven confirmation accept is relaxed. - Added regression tests for: failed finalize, stale `running` finalize on a dead run, and a genuinely `running` finalize on a live run (must still block). ## Verification - `cd server && node_modules/.bin/vitest run src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts -t "accept"` → 17 passed (includes the 3 new regression tests), 21 unrelated tests skipped by the name filter. - Manual reasoning walkthrough of `runWorkspaceIsFinalized` for each op-history shape (no ops / earlier-phase-only / terminal finalize / running-on-dead-run / running-on-live-run) confirms the intended block-vs-settle outcome. ## Risks - Low risk and narrowly scoped to the human confirmation-accept gate. The only behavioral change is that a terminal (`failed`/`skipped`) or stale-orphaned `running` finalize now settles the gate instead of blocking forever. - A genuinely in-flight sync-back on a live run still blocks (covered by a regression test), so the accept cannot race commits that are actively being synced back. - The blocker/dependency barrier for automated dependents is unchanged, so no dependent will be advanced onto a base missing a failed blocker's commits. ## Model Used - Provider/model: Claude (Anthropic), **Opus 4.8**, model ID `claude-opus-4-8`, 1M context window. - Capabilities used: extended thinking, tool use (repo inspection, local test execution). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.723.0-canary.11 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
d36ea13e08 |
feat(acpx): stage once per remote ACP session - compatible resume reuses staged runtime, no cross-session credential reuse (#10089)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip coordinates autonomous agent work across isolated company-scoped sessions > - The ACP remote lane stages workspaces and managed home state inside the sandbox so sessions can resume safely > - If a compatible resume re-staged everything every time, it would waste work and risk inconsistent session reuse behavior > - If an incompatible resume reused the wrong staged runtime, it could cross session boundaries or leak credentials > - This pull request keeps the session fingerprint as the scoping key and adds a staged-runtime cache keyed to that fingerprint > - Compatible resumes now reuse the already staged runtime while incompatible fingerprints stage fresh > - The benefit is faster safe resumes without weakening session isolation or credential separation ## Linked Issues or Issue Description ### Problem or motivation The ACP remote lane currently needs to preserve safe resume behavior without repeatedly re-staging work that is already valid for the same session. The failure mode to avoid is letting one session reuse another session's staged workspace or credentials. ### Proposed solution Keep the session fingerprint as the scoping key and add a staged-runtime cache keyed to that fingerprint. When the fingerprint matches, reuse the already staged workspace and managed home. When the fingerprint changes, stage fresh. ### Alternatives considered - Always restage on resume: safest mechanically, but wastes work and breaks the compatible-resume optimization. - Reuse without fingerprint scoping: too risky because it could cross session boundaries. ### Roadmap alignment This is a narrow implementation change for the ACP remote lane and does not duplicate any broader roadmap item I could find in `ROADMAP.md`. ### Additional context The change preserves the existing session fingerprint contents and codex auth copy-back cadence while adding tests for compatible reuse, incompatible fresh staging, no cross-session credential reuse, and failed-turn eviction. ## What Changed - Added a staged-runtime cache in the ACP remote execution path keyed by the session fingerprint. - Reused the existing staged workspace and managed home for compatible resumes. - Kept incompatible fingerprints on the fresh staging path. - Preserved the existing session fingerprint contents and codex auth copy-back cadence. - Added tests for compatible reuse, incompatible fresh staging, no cross-session credential reuse, and failed-turn eviction. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts` (74/74 pass, including the active-turn lease regression) - `pnpm exec tsc -p packages/adapter-utils/tsconfig.json --noEmit` - Verified the PR touches only `packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.ts` and `packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts` ## Risks - A cache eviction bug could cause an unavailable or partially staged runtime to be reused. - If the fingerprint scoping regressed, a session could incorrectly reuse another session's state. - The change is isolated to the ACP remote lane, but it still affects resume behavior for that path. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, reasoning-capable coding agent, tool-enabled session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.10 |
||
|
|
a7186dce4b |
fix(plugin-sdk): thread companyId through configChanged + fail-closed cross-tenant guard (LOOA-687) (#10096)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - First-party **plugins** run as isolated workers spawned by the host
`plugin-loader`, reading company-scoped config through a governed
`ctx.config.get(companyId)` channel.
> - The host→worker `configChanged` RPC carries `{ config, companyId }`,
but the SDK dispatch dropped the scope — `onConfigChanged(newConfig)`
was companyId-blind by design — so a **proactive** worker kept a single
worker-global config.
> - #10092 added a startup replay that fans out **every** stored
company's config through `configChanged`. With no deterministic
ordering, a plugin configured for more than one distinct company ends up
running as whichever DB row was delivered last.
> - That is a latent cross-tenant identity/secret confusion bug: one
company's bot token could be applied to another company's traffic.
> - This pull request threads `companyId` through `onConfigChanged` and
adds a fail-closed cross-tenant guard at the SDK layer, so a
single-tenant worker can never silently collapse to a second company's
config.
> - The benefit is that the config-delivery class is fixed at the SDK
boundary — before any genuinely multi-company proactive plugin ships —
without changing today's single-tenant behavior.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue — describing in-PR (hardening / latent security):
**Latent cross-tenant config collapse.** The worker-side `configChanged`
dispatch forwarded only `config` and dropped `companyId`, so a proactive
plugin kept a single worker-global config. #10092's startup replay
delivers every configured company's config sequentially with no `ORDER
BY`, so a plugin with configs for more than one distinct company would
apply a nondeterministic last-write-wins global config (one tenant's
credential applied to another's traffic).
- Builds on and must merge after #10092.
- Not exploitable today: the only proactive consumer (the chat gateway)
has single-tenant config rows, so last-write-wins is a no-op. This is a
hardening pre-condition before any multi-company proactive plugin ships.
## What Changed
- **Thread scope through:** `onConfigChanged(newConfig, context)` with a
new exported `PluginConfigChangeContext { companyId }`. Backward
compatible — the second arg is optional; existing single-arg
implementations are unaffected.
- **Fail-closed cross-tenant guard** (`worker-rpc-host.ts`): a
single-tenant plugin that receives `configChanged` for a second,
distinct company with a *different* config is rejected with the new
`PLUGIN_RPC_ERROR_CODES.CROSS_TENANT_CONFIG` instead of silently
overwriting the applied tenant's config. Idempotent replays of the
*same* config under a different scope row remain allowed.
- **Opt-in `multiCompanyConfig: true`** on the plugin definition for
plugins that genuinely serve multiple companies from one worker (keying
per-company state on `context.companyId`); the guard is bypassed for
those.
- **Deterministic `ORDER BY companyId`** on `registry.listConfigs`, so
the startup replay binds a single-tenant worker to a stable company
across restarts.
- **Loader visibility:** a `CROSS_TENANT_CONFIG` rejection is logged at
`warn` (was best-effort `debug`) so the misconfiguration is surfaced.
- **Regression test**
(`packages/plugins/sdk/tests/worker-rpc-host.test.ts`): two distinct
companies delivered via the startup-replay path fail closed and stay
bound to the first company; an idempotent same-config replay under a
different scope row is allowed; a `multiCompanyConfig` plugin receives
per-company config with the correct `context.companyId`.
## Verification
- SDK `tsc --noEmit`: clean.
- SDK vitest `worker-rpc-host.test.ts`: 7/7 pass (incl. 3 new). The
two-distinct-company case **fails against pre-fix code** and passes
after the fix.
- #10092 embedded-postgres `plugin-config-startup-delivery.test.ts`: 3/3
pass (unaffected by the new `ORDER BY`).
- Full server `tsc --noEmit` against this SDK: clean.
## Risks
- **Low functional risk.** The second `onConfigChanged` arg is optional
and existing implementations are unchanged. Today's single-tenant
gateway keeps working — idempotent same-config replays are explicitly
allowed, so the go-live is preserved.
- **Behavioral shift on misconfig:** a genuinely multi-company plugin
that has NOT opted into `multiCompanyConfig` now fails closed
(`CROSS_TENANT_CONFIG`) rather than silently collapsing to one tenant.
This is the intended safer default; opt in with `multiCompanyConfig:
true` to serve multiple companies from one worker.
- **Not in scope (residual).** Per-company workers/connections for a
genuinely multi-company gateway increase resource use and are tracked
separately (ties into the #10092 fan-out/timeout follow-up). This PR
fixes the class and fails closed; it does not build multi-tenant
connection management.
## Model Used
Claude — Anthropic `claude-opus-4-8` (Opus 4.8), extended thinking, with
tool use / code execution via Claude Code.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes:` / `Closes`
/ `Refs` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id — branch predates this rule; not renaming an open PR
mid-review
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — no
doc surface; internal SDK/host behavior only
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: anicca <annica@Michaels-Mac-Studio.local>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.723.0-canary.9
|
||
|
Michael NguyenandPaperclip
|
1ebf5254b6 |
fix(plugin-loader): deliver stored config to freshly-started plugin workers (#10092)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - One capability is first-party **plugins** that run as isolated workers spawned by the host `plugin-loader`, reading company-scoped config through a governed `ctx.config.get(companyId)` channel. > - A **proactive** plugin (e.g. a chat gateway that opens a Slack Socket Mode connection at startup) does its company work from `setup()`, where there is **no company-scoped invocation** — so `ctx.config.get()` is rejected with `company context is required`. > - The worker swallows that error and falls back to its default (feature-off) config, so the plugin comes up **inert** even though correct config exists in the database. > - This is a regression from #9557 ("governed access contracts"), which changed `plugin-loader.ts` `activatePlugin` from loading stored config into the worker bootstrap to `const config = {}`. > - This pull request replays each configured company's stored config to the freshly-started worker over the **same `configChanged` host→worker path an operator config-save already uses**. > - The benefit is that proactive plugins receive their config on worker start (both server boot and operator enable) without weakening the governed-access surface. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public GitHub issue — describing in-PR (bug): **Bug.** After a proactive plugin's worker spawns, it never receives its stored config. Governed access (`packages/plugins/sdk/src/host-client-factory.ts`) only resolves `config.get` inside a company-scoped invocation (event/action/tool, or explicit `params.companyId`). Proactive plugins operate from `setup()` where no such scope exists, so `config.get()` fails with `company context is required`, the worker falls back to defaults, and the feature stays disabled despite valid DB config. - Regression introduced by #9557. - Related follow-up (latent multi-company hardening): #10096. ## What Changed - `plugin-registry.ts`: add read-only `listConfigs(pluginId)` returning all stored company config rows for a plugin (scoped `where eq(pluginConfig.pluginId, pluginId)`). - `plugin-loader.ts`: after the worker starts in `activatePlugin`, replay each company's stored config through the existing `configChanged` host→worker RPC — one `{ config, companyId }` per row, the same payload shape as the operator config-save path in `routes/plugins.ts`. Best-effort and idempotent; covers both server-boot `loadAll` and operator enable. - test: DB-backed `plugin-config-startup-delivery.test.ts` covering `registry.listConfigs` completeness and cross-plugin isolation. ## Verification - `tsc --noEmit` on `@paperclipai/server` — clean. - New `plugin-config-startup-delivery.test.ts` (embedded-postgres, 3 cases) — pass. - Full PR CI green: typecheck, all server/e2e/serialized test shards, build, canary dry-run, verify, and the security scanners (Snyk, Socket, Superagent, Greptile). ## Risks - **Low functional risk.** Adds an outbound host→worker push that mirrors the already-shipped operator-save path. A worker without an `onConfigChanged` handler (or momentarily unavailable) simply keeps the runtime `ctx.config.get(companyId)` model. - **Startup fan-out.** One `configChanged` per configured company at activation (sequential, default RPC timeout). `plugin_config` rows are writable only by instance-admins, so fan-out size is operator-controlled — not a remote surface. - **No secret-handling change.** `configJson` is delivered as-is, exactly as `config.get`/operator-save already deliver it. No new secret sink; catch-blocks log only ids + `err.message` at debug, never `configJson`. - **Latent multi-company behavior (pre-existing, not introduced here).** The worker-side `configChanged` dispatch forwards only `config` (drops `companyId`), and `listConfigs` has no `ORDER BY`, so a plugin configured for **more than one** company would apply a nondeterministic last-write-wins global config. This is existing SDK behavior — operator-save already pushes into the same handler — and is **not reachable by the single-company consumer this fix targets**. Greptile flagged this shape (4/5). It is tracked and fixed as a separate, non-blocking hardening PR (#10096): thread `companyId` through `onConfigChanged`, deterministic ordering, bounded fan-out. ## Model Used Claude — Anthropic `claude-opus-4-8` (Opus 4.8), extended thinking, with tool use / code execution via Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes:` / `Closes` / `Refs` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id — branch predates this rule; not renaming an open PR mid-review - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes — no doc surface; internal SDK/host behavior only - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — 4/5; two latent multi-company items triaged as non-blocking and fixed in follow-up #10096 (see Risks) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge — addressed: triaged as non-blocking follow-up in #10096 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.8 |
||
|
|
e1cc63328a |
feat(acpx): per-adapter managed-home seed (x3) + Codex auth copy-back for remote ACP lane (#10073)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane that orchestrates AI agents and adapter execution for human operators. > - Agents run across local and remote execution contexts, and reliability in remote sessions depends on consistent adapter bootstrapping. > - The ACP path must prepare per-adapter runtime homes so managed credentials and config are available in sandboxed runner environments. > - Before this change, the new remote ACP lane did not yet consistently stage managed-home paths for all affected adapters or restore Codex auth state on teardown. > - We added a shared per-adapter seam in the ACP engine, then wired Codex, Claude, and Gemini remote lanes to seed managed homes and remap to in-sandbox locations. > - Codex additionally reuses the existing atomic auth restore flow to copy auth back on teardown, matching CLI behavior. > - This improves remote runner parity with existing CLI behavior and avoids credential drift in shared-code-path executions. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - This change continues the ACP remote managed-home work by completing per-adapter remote bootstrapping and Codex auth restore behavior for the remote ACP lane. - It specifically covers: `acpx-engine`, `codex-local`, `claude-local`, and `gemini-local`. - Related prior work in this repo: PR #10070. ## What Changed - Add a per-adapter remote managed-home seam (`prepareRemoteManagedHome`) in `acpx-engine` and thread it through ACP execution options. - Implement Codex ACP preparation to: - stage `CODEX_HOME` (auth/config/skills) into a sandboxed remote home, - repoint `CODEX_HOME` to the in-sandbox path, - and wire teardown copy-back through the existing managed-auth restore path. - Implement Claude ACP preparation to seed a sanitized `config-seed` into `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR` and remap that directory to the sandbox root. - Implement Gemini ACP preparation to seed `~/.gemini/skills`, set `HOME` to managed runtime root, and preselect API-key auth in `settings.json`. - Keep local and runner-less ACP→CLI behavior unchanged by only invoking the remote managed-home seam when running in remote ACP mode. - Preserve existing authorization and activity boundaries in the shared engine and adapter layers. ## Verification - `git log --oneline origin/master..origin/feat/acp-remote-managed-home-seed` confirms only the expected 4 commits. - `tsc --noEmit` is clean in `adapter-utils`, `codex-local`, `claude-local`, and `gemini-local`. - Vitest selection used during validation passed (120 tests across the ACP-related suites). ## Risks - If remote sandbox teardown occurs after token rotation but before restore timing, Codex credentials can become stale and require re-auth on next startup. - Partial provisioning of managed-home assets would cause adapter bootstrap failures in runner-backed ACP sessions. - This change is scoped to execution-path behavior; it should not affect CLI behavior. ## Model Used None — human-authored. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.7 |
||
|
|
8a3cc86531 |
feat(acpx): stage workspace + route in-sandbox cwd for remote ACP lane (#10070)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The shared ACP engine
(`packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.ts`) is responsible for
launching local and remote agent processes via the ACP protocol
> - On runner-backed remote sandbox (Daytona) targets, `buildRuntime`
never crossed the CLI's staging seam: it never called
`prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime`, left `runtimeRootDir: null` in
both the paperclip and process-session bridges, and handed the agent the
**HOST filesystem path** as the `session/new` cwd — meaning
Claude/Gemini silently operated on a path that does not exist inside the
sandbox (Codex additionally crashes on its HOST home path, addressed in
a follow-up PR)
> - The fix must cross the staging seam for remote sandboxes, thread the
real `runtimeRootDir` through both bridges, and bind the in-sandbox
workspace path as the session cwd — without touching local ACP runs or
the runner-less ACP→CLI fallback
> - This pull request introduces a `stageAcpRemoteRuntime` helper that
calls `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` for runner-backed remote
runs, captures `{ workspaceRemoteDir, runtimeRootDir, assetDirs,
restoreWorkspace }`, and reuses the in-sandbox `workspaceRemoteDir` as
the single `sessionCwd` across `session/new`, the fingerprint,
compatibility check, persistence, `ensureSession`, the process-session
bridge cwd, and the error path
> - The benefit is that remote ACP runs now operate in the correct
in-sandbox cwd and receive a non-null `runtimeRootDir` in both bridges —
fixing silent wrong-cwd degradation for Claude/Gemini on Daytona
targets; this is PR 1 of 3 and seeds no credential material
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists for this change. Inline description
follows the feature request template:
### Subsystem affected
packages/adapters — agent adapter implementations
### Problem or motivation
The shared ACP engine
(`packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.ts`) never crossed the
CLI's staging seam on runner-backed remote sandbox targets. It never
called `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime`, always passed
`runtimeRootDir: null` to both the paperclip and process-session
bridges, and handed the agent the **HOST filesystem path** as the ACP
`session/new` cwd. As a result, Claude and Gemini silently operated on a
cwd that does not exist inside the sandbox; Codex crashed with a fatal
error on the HOST `CODEX_HOME` path (that crash is in a follow-up PR).
### Proposed solution
Gate on `usesRunnerBackedSandbox` (`kind === "remote" && transport ===
"sandbox" && runner`). For runs that pass the gate, call
`prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` via a new `stageAcpRemoteRuntime`
helper that ships the workspace into the sandbox and captures `{
workspaceRemoteDir, runtimeRootDir, assetDirs, restoreWorkspace }`.
Thread the real `runtimeRootDir` into both bridges. Bind a single
`sessionCwd` (the in-sandbox `workspaceRemoteDir`) and use it at every
cwd-keyed session site (`session/new`, fingerprint, compat, persist,
`ensureSession`, process-session bridge, error path) so a warm/resumable
session is reused rather than invalidated. For local runs and the
runner-less ACP→CLI fallback, `sessionCwd` resolves to the HOST cwd —
byte-identical to the previous behavior.
### Alternatives considered
Patching each per-adapter bridge individually — rejected because the bug
is in the shared engine layer and the fix belongs there so all three
adapters (Codex, Claude, Gemini) benefit without per-adapter
duplication.
### Roadmap alignment
Internal correctness fix enabling remote ACP to work as designed; no new
user-facing features. This is PR 1 of 3 in a sequential chain: PR 1
(this PR) stages the workspace and routes the cwd; PR 2 adds per-adapter
home seeding and copy-back; PR 3 wires session-lifecycle restore.
## What Changed
- **`packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.ts`** — added
`stageAcpRemoteRuntime` helper that calls
`prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` for runner-backed remote
sandboxes and returns `{ sessionCwd, runtimeRootDir, stagedRuntime }`;
`buildRuntime` now uses this helper to derive `sessionCwd` (in-sandbox
`workspaceRemoteDir` for remote; HOST cwd unchanged for
local/runner-less) and threads the real `runtimeRootDir` to both the
paperclip bridge and process-session bridge; `stagedRuntime` is stashed
for the follow-up credential PR
- **`packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts`** — new
engine-level unit tests: staging seam crossed with no credential asset,
non-null `runtimeRootDir` in both bridges, in-sandbox `session/new` cwd,
warm-handle reuse after the cwd change, local-unchanged; 60 tests green
- **`packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/acp.test.ts`** — new
per-adapter test: runner-backed remote asserts `ensureSession` cwd ==
`workspaceRemoteDir`; runner-less sandbox falls back to CLI
- **`packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/acp.test.ts`** — same
per-adapter coverage for Claude
- **`packages/adapters/gemini-local/src/server/acp.test.ts`** — same
per-adapter coverage for Gemini
## Verification
- `adapter-utils` typecheck clean; `codex/claude/gemini-local` typecheck
clean
- Engine units (`acpx-engine/execute.test.ts`): 60/60 green — staging
seam crossed with no credential asset, non-null `runtimeRootDir` to both
bridges, in-sandbox `session/new` cwd, warm-handle reuse after cwd
change, local unchanged
- Per-adapter ACP test suites (`codex/claude/gemini-local`
`acp.test.ts`): 103 tests green — runner-backed remote asserts
`ensureSession` cwd == `workspaceRemoteDir`; runner-less sandbox falls
back to CLI
- CI green on PR (in progress)
## Risks
This is PR 1 of 3 in a strictly sequential chain; it seeds **no
credential material** (no `assets`, no `installCommand`). The
per-adapter home seeding is deferred to PR 2, which consumes the
`stagedRuntime` object stashed here. The `restoreWorkspace` callback is
carried on `stagedRuntime` for PR 3's session-lifecycle wiring (see the
`stageAcpRemoteRuntime` function comment). Local ACP runs and the
runner-less ACP→CLI fallback are untouched — `sessionCwd` resolves to
the HOST cwd for those paths, preserving existing behavior. The
`stageAcpRemoteRuntime` helper is gated on `usesRunnerBackedSandbox`, so
there is no regression risk for local or CLI-lane runs.
## Model Used
Claude Sonnet 4.6 (`claude-sonnet-4-6`) via Paperclip ACPX engine —
extended context, tool use enabled, co-authored with Paperclip agent
orchestration.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`,
`feat/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or
instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Harold Kim <harold@paperclip.ing>
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.723.0-canary.6
|
||
|
Michael NguyenandPaperclip
|
5a00040c4c |
feat(plugin-sdk): interactions/approvals respond + attachment read capabilities for the chat gateway (#10066)
Adds the remaining 5 plugin capabilities + 7 worker→host RPC methods (interactions read/respond, approvals read/respond, attachment read) needed by the Slack chat gateway plugin (v0.5.0) to pass manifest capability validation and load. - Security review: PASS (LOOA-642) after the viewer-role privilege-escalation blocker (LOOA-648) was fixed on this branch (requireActiveHumanMember now rejects viewer on impersonation write-paths, matching assertCompanyAccess). - CI: Build, Typecheck, all server suites (3/3 + serialized 4/4), workspaces, e2e shard 2/2, and all security scanners (Snyk/Socket/Superagent/Greptile/security-review) green. - One e2e flake (signoff-policy 'non-participant cannot advance stage') is unrelated: it exercises execution-policy stage advancement (routes/issues.ts, untouched by this PR) and failed on a heartbeat_run_events FK race + 409 checkout conflict. Unblocks LOOA-629 (Slack gateway go-live) and the interview-ask feature. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.723.0-canary.5 |
