2451 Commits

This Branch

This Branch

All Branches

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
DottaandPaperclip	e6ec96cef7	Preserve LLM Wiki event ingestion sources ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-10 07:54:56 -05:00
Dotta	6de996489d	Split LLM Wiki entrypoint implementations	2026-05-10 07:45:44 -05:00
Dotta	ebcd5d326f	Remove LLM Wiki design screenshot assets	2026-05-10 07:38:47 -05:00
Dotta	7bbc705413	Support restoring archived LLM Wiki spaces	2026-05-09 23:41:04 -05:00
Dotta	dc015bea9a	Remove LLM Wiki health job stub	2026-05-09 23:41:04 -05:00
Dotta	559ab2afdc	Fix LLM Wiki update-space archive response	2026-05-09 23:41:04 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	284e0d49b9	Validate LLM Wiki space status updates ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-09 23:41:04 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	fb86c6c8e5	Add LLM Wiki plugin package ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-09 23:41:03 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	6bd30232c6	Stabilize heartbeat dependency scheduling test ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
Dotta	667102c1a8	Polish plugin local folder host utilities	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
Dotta	4de53ef96f	Tighten managed skill reconcile behavior	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
Dotta	ce42fb3c97	Preserve legacy config path defaults	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
Dotta	beaac4c21e	Update server tests for default space roots	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	8b71335622	Update data dir tests for default spaces ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	c118fb48be	Update ACPX Codex home test for spaces ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	9d45f8820d	Address LLM Wiki host review feedback ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	90062af85f	Add LLM Wiki host support ... Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-09 23:40:41 -05:00
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot	a1b2875165	chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#5610) ... Auto-generated lockfile refresh after dependencies changed on master. This PR only updates pnpm-lock.yaml. Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com>	2026-05-09 23:40:25 -05:00
Devin Foley	2f72cb29ea	chore: update drizzle-orm to 0.45.2 (#5589) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - The server, DB package, and CLI all rely on the shared Drizzle ORM dependency for core persistence flows. > - A published install was still resolving nested `drizzle-orm@0.38.4`, which left the production package graph behind the intended security update. > - The repo’s documented dependency policy says GitHub Actions owns `pnpm-lock.yaml`, so the correct maintainer workflow is to update dependency manifests in the feature PR and let the lockfile refresh happen separately after merge. > - This pull request therefore keeps the Drizzle upgrade to the package manifests only and leaves lockfile regeneration to the existing `Refresh Lockfile` automation. ## What Changed - Updated `drizzle-orm` dependency declarations in `cli/package.json`, `packages/db/package.json`, and `server/package.json` from `0.38.4` / `^0.38.4` to `0.45.2` / `^0.45.2`. - Re-verified the packed `@paperclipai/db` and `@paperclipai/server` publish payloads to confirm their generated `package.json` files advertise `drizzle-orm ^0.45.2`. - Removed the temporary lockfile/CI follow-up commits so the branch now matches the intended manifest-only protocol. ## Verification - `pnpm list drizzle-orm -r --depth 0` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/db/src/client.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-service.test.ts` - `pnpm run test:release-registry` - Packed `@paperclipai/db` and `@paperclipai/server` locally and inspected the tarball `package.json` files to confirm they advertise `drizzle-orm ^0.45.2`. ## Risks - Low to moderate risk: the runtime code paths are unchanged, but downstream lockfile refresh now depends on the existing post-merge GitHub automation working as documented. - A separate packaging/versioning issue around unpublished `@paperclipai/plugin-sdk@1.0.0` showed up during a raw local tarball install experiment; that is called out for reviewers but is not part of this Drizzle bump. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex via the `codex_local` adapter, using a GPT-5-based coding agent with terminal tool use and code execution. The adapter does not expose a public exact model ID or context-window value in this environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-05-09 21:31:57 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	e3af7aa489	Add shared sidebar section controls (#5585) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for AI-agent companies. > - The board UI sidebar is one of the main ways operators scan active agents and projects. > - Agents and projects had duplicated section header behavior, which made collapse controls, add actions, and future section menus harder to keep consistent. > - Operators also need lightweight ways to switch between their curated sidebar order and common scan orders like alphabetical or recent activity. > - This pull request introduces a shared sidebar section header and uses it for the Agents and Projects sidebar sections. > - The benefit is a more consistent sidebar surface with reusable header controls and persisted sort modes without losing the existing drag-ordered Top view. ## What Changed - Added a reusable `SidebarSection` component that supports collapsible content, header actions, and section dropdown menus. - Updated the Agents sidebar section to use the shared header and add persisted `Top`, `Alphabetical`, and `Recent` sort modes. - Updated the Projects sidebar section to use the shared header and add persisted `Top`, `Alphabetical`, and `Recent` sort modes. - Added local-storage helpers and cross-tab update events for agent/project sidebar sort preferences. - Added focused component coverage for the shared section behavior and the updated Agents/Projects sidebar ordering paths. ## Verification - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/SidebarSection.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarProjects.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarAgents.test.tsx` - 3 test files passed - 18 tests passed ## Risks - Low-to-moderate UI risk: this changes sidebar section header interactions and adds persisted client-side sort preferences. - Drag ordering is intentionally limited to `Top` mode; non-top modes render sorted lists and do not persist drag order changes. - No database migrations or API contract changes. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5-based model, tool-use enabled; exact hosted model build/context-window identifier was not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.510.0-canary.1	2026-05-09 19:49:59 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	433dfed33d	Enable CI publish for plugin-daytona (#5586) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The release pipeline gates new public packages behind a bootstrap policy: `scripts/check-release-package-bootstrap.mjs` requires every package marked `publishFromCi: true` in `scripts/release-package-manifest.json` to already exist on npm > - PR #5580 added the new Daytona sandbox provider plugin but had to land with `publishFromCi: false` because the package had never been published, so CI's release plan would have failed bootstrap validation otherwise > - Now that `@paperclipai/plugin-daytona` has been bootstrap-published to npm by hand, the temporary `false` flag is the only thing keeping it out of the standard CI publish flow > - This pull request flips the Daytona entry to `publishFromCi: true`, matching every other release-enabled package in the manifest > - The benefit is that future tagged releases will publish the Daytona plugin automatically alongside the rest of the monorepo's public packages ## What Changed - Single-line flip in `scripts/release-package-manifest.json`: `@paperclipai/plugin-daytona` is now `publishFromCi: true` ## Verification - `node ./scripts/release-package-map.mjs check` → `Release package manifest OK: 19 enabled for CI publish, 0 disabled pending bootstrap` (was 18 + 1) - `node ./scripts/check-release-package-bootstrap.mjs scripts/release-package-manifest.json` against `origin/master` → `Release bootstrap OK for changed manifests: @paperclipai/plugin-daytona`, confirming npm sees the bootstrap-published package - No code changes; no tests required beyond the existing manifest validators ## Risks - Low risk. Only effect is that the next release run will include `@paperclipai/plugin-daytona` in its publish set - If the npm bootstrap was incomplete, CI's bootstrap check will fail loudly before any release tag goes out — same safety net the policy is designed to provide ## Model Used - Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`), extended thinking, tool use enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [ ] I have added or updated tests where applicable (N/A — manifest-only flag flip, covered by existing validators) - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (N/A — release config) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.510.0-canary.0	2026-05-09 16:58:35 -07:00
3 people	778e775c35	Add secrets provider vaults and remote import (#5429) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI-agent companies and needs secrets handling to work across local development, hosted operators, and governed agent execution. > - The affected subsystem is the company-scoped secrets control plane: database schema, server services/routes, CLI workflows, and the Secrets settings UI. > - The gap was that secrets were local-only and operators could not manage provider vaults or import existing remote references without exposing plaintext. > - This branch adds provider vault configuration plus an AWS Secrets Manager remote-import path while preserving company boundaries, binding context, and audit trails. > - I kept the PR to a single branch PR, removed unrelated lockfile/package drift, rebased the full branch onto the current `public-gh/master`, and addressed fresh Greptile findings. > - The benefit is a reviewable implementation of provider-backed secrets with focused tests covering provider selection, import conflicts, deleted secret reuse, rotation guards, and AWS signing behavior. ## What Changed - Added provider vault support for company secrets, including provider config storage, default vault handling, health checks, binding usage, access events, and remote import preview/commit. - Added an AWS Secrets Manager provider using SigV4 request signing, bounded request timeouts, namespace guardrails, cached runtime credential resolution, and external-reference linking without plaintext reads. - Added Secrets UI surfaces for vault management and remote import, plus CLI/API documentation for setup and operations. - Stabilized routine webhook secret binding paths and SSH environment-driver fixture bindings discovered during verification. - Addressed Greptile and CI findings: no lockfile/package drift, monotonic migration metadata, disabled-vault default races, soft-deleted secret hiding/recreate behavior, remove behavior with disabled vaults, soft-deleted external-reference re-import, non-active rotation guards, managed-secret soft deletion through PATCH, and per-call AWS SDK credential client churn. - Rebased this branch onto `public-gh/master` at `0e1a5828` and force-pushed with lease to keep this as the single PR for the branch. ## Verification - `git fetch public-gh master` - `git rebase public-gh/master` - `git diff --name-only public-gh/master...HEAD | grep '^pnpm-lock\.yaml$' || true` confirmed `pnpm-lock.yaml` is not in the PR diff. - Confirmed migration ordering: master ends at `0081_optimal_dormammu`; this PR adds `0082_dry_vision` and `0083_company_secret_provider_configs`. - Inspected migrations for repeat safety: new tables/indexes use `IF NOT EXISTS`; foreign keys are guarded by `DO $$ ... IF NOT EXISTS`; column additions use `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS`. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed before the Greptile follow-up commits. - `pnpm test:run` ran the full stable Vitest path before the Greptile follow-up commits; it completed with 3 timing-related failures under parallel load: `codex-local-execute.test.ts`, `cursor-local-execute.test.ts`, and `environment-service.test.ts`. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/codex-local-execute.test.ts src/__tests__/cursor-local-execute.test.ts src/__tests__/environment-service.test.ts` passed on targeted rerun (`24/24`). - `pnpm build` passed before the Greptile follow-up commits. Vite reported existing chunk-size/dynamic-import warnings. - After Greptile follow-up commits: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/secrets-service.test.ts` passed (`26/26`). - After Greptile follow-up commits: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/aws-secrets-manager-provider.test.ts src/__tests__/secrets-service.test.ts` passed (`39/39`). - After Greptile follow-up commits: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed. - Captured Storybook screenshots from `ui/storybook-static` for visual review. - Latest PR checks on `5ca3a5cf`: `policy`, serialized server suites 1/4-4/4, `Canary Dry Run`, `e2e`, `security/snyk`, and `Greptile Review` pass; aggregate `verify` is still registering the completed child checks. - Greptile review loop continued through the latest requested pass; all Greptile review threads are resolved and the latest `Greptile Review` check on `5ca3a5cf` passed with 0 comments added. ## Screenshots Before: the provider-vault and remote-import surfaces did not exist on `master`; these are after-state screenshots from the Storybook fixtures.    ## Risks - Migration risk: this adds new secret provider tables and extends existing secret rows. The migrations were checked for monotonic ordering and idempotent guards, but reviewers should still inspect upgrade behavior carefully. - Provider risk: AWS support uses direct SigV4 requests. Automated tests cover signing, request timeouts, vault-config selection, namespace guardrails, pending-version archival, sanitized provider errors, and service-level cleanup paths. A real-vault AWS smoke test remains deployment validation for an operator with AWS credentials rather than an unverified merge blocker in this local branch. - UI risk: the Secrets page and import dialog are large new surfaces; screenshots are included above for reviewer inspection. - Verification risk: the full local stable test command hit parallel-load timing failures, although the exact failed files passed when rerun directly. - Operational risk: remote import intentionally avoids plaintext reads; operators must understand that imported external references resolve at runtime and may fail if AWS permissions change. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent with local shell/tool use in the Paperclip worktree. Exact context-window size was not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> canary/v2026.509.0-canary.2	2026-05-09 18:22:17 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip	06e6ee25cd	Add Daytona sandbox provider plugin (#5580) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Agents need isolated sandbox environments to execute work safely; Paperclip already supports E2B as a sandbox provider plugin > - Users want to use Daytona (https://www.daytona.io/) as an alternative sandbox backend, but no plugin existed for it > - Without a Daytona plugin, teams that prefer Daytona's pricing/regions/runtime can't run Paperclip agents on it > - This pull request adds a `@paperclip/sandbox-provider-daytona` plugin that mirrors the existing E2B plugin shape and wires up Daytona's `@daytonaio/sdk` for sandbox lifecycle, command execution, and shell detection > - The benefit is that operators can pick Daytona as a first-class sandbox provider without touching core code, broadening Paperclip's runtime options ## What Changed - New plugin package `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona` with manifest, worker entry, and provider implementation backed by `@daytonaio/sdk` - Implements sandbox create/destroy/exec/upload/download lifecycle, shell command detection, and config/env wiring consistent with the E2B plugin - Adds unit tests under `src/plugin.test.ts` and a README documenting setup and the `DAYTONA_API_KEY` requirement - Minor adjustments in `scripts/paperclip-issue-update.sh`, `packages/shared/src/issue-thread-interactions.test.ts`, and `packages/shared/src/validators/issue.ts` to support the integration ## Verification - Re-ran the full sandbox provider matrix on the QA Paperclip instance using Daytona as the runtime — all 6 adapters executed inside the Daytona sandbox with zero `environmentExecute` timeouts - 5/6 adapters pass cleanly (or with informational warns); the only failure is `codex_local`, which is an OpenAI quota/billing issue unrelated to Daytona - `pnpm --filter @paperclip/sandbox-provider-daytona test` runs the plugin unit tests ## Risks - New optional plugin; no behavior change for users who don't enable it - Requires `DAYTONA_API_KEY` for runtime use — documented in the plugin README - Daytona SDK is a new external dependency; tracked in the plugin's own package.json so it doesn't affect the core install footprint ## Model Used - Claude Opus 4.7 (`claude-opus-4-7`), extended thinking, tool use enabled ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots (N/A — backend plugin) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.509.0-canary.1	2026-05-09 11:50:12 -07:00
Devin Foley	f784d8d90e	Retry canary registry verification (#5579) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies, and the release pipeline is part of keeping that control plane shippable. > - The relevant subsystem here is the release automation in `scripts/release.sh`, which publishes canary builds and then verifies npm registry state. > - The failing CI run showed a successful publish followed by an immediate registry-state verification failure while npm dist-tag metadata was still propagating. > - That made the canary job flaky even when the publish itself had succeeded, which is the wrong failure mode for release automation. > - This pull request adds bounded retries around the post-publish registry-state verification step instead of failing on the first stale read. > - The benefit is that canary releases tolerate transient npm propagation lag while still failing clearly if registry metadata never converges. ## What Changed - Wrapped the post-publish `verify-release-registry-state.mjs` call in a bounded retry loop inside `scripts/release.sh`. - Reused the existing publish verification retry defaults and added optional overrides via `NPM_REGISTRY_STATE_VERIFY_ATTEMPTS` and `NPM_REGISTRY_STATE_VERIFY_DELAY_SECONDS` for dist-tag-specific tuning. ## Verification - `bash -n scripts/release.sh` - CI will also exercise the release path via the existing `Canary Dry Run` workflow job in `.github/workflows/pr.yml`. ## Risks - Low risk. The main behavioral change is that a genuinely broken registry-state verification can now wait through the configured retry window before failing. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex local agent, GPT-5-based Codex runtime in Paperclip with tool use and shell execution. The exact backend model ID/context window is not surfaced in this local heartbeat environment. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge canary/v2026.509.0-canary.0	2026-05-09 11:40:02 -07:00
Devin Foley	0e1a582831	Revert "Add experimental newest-first issue thread" (#5460) ... This is actually bad. Glad it was under experiments.	2026-05-07 16:50:31 -07:00
Devin Foley	a904effb96	Add experimental newest-first issue thread (#5455) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies, so issue threads are a core operator surface for reviewing work. > - The issue detail page is the place where humans read agent messages, user comments, and execution context together. > - That thread originally rendered oldest-first, which made recent activity harder to see during active review. > - Reversing the thread order changes navigation expectations, timestamp placement, and the "Jump to latest" affordance, so the UI behavior needed to move as a coherent set. > - Because this is a visible core-product behavior shift, it also needed a safe rollout path instead of becoming the default immediately. > - This pull request adds the newest-first issue thread behavior behind an Experimental setting, updates the thread UI to match that mode, and keeps the legacy oldest-first experience unchanged by default. > - The benefit is that reviewers can opt into a more recent-first issue workflow without forcing a global behavior change on every Paperclip instance. ## What Changed - Reversed issue thread rendering so the newest comments and messages appear first when the experiment is enabled. - Moved the plain comment timestamp into the card header in newest-first mode and kept the legacy timestamp placement for oldest-first mode. - Moved the `Jump to latest` control to the bottom of the thread in newest-first mode while leaving the existing top placement for the legacy mode. - Added the `Enable Newest-First Issue Thread` experimental instance setting and wired issue detail to read that toggle. - Added regression coverage for thread order, timestamp placement, jump-button placement, and the issue-detail experiment toggle behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` - `pnpm test:run` - `pnpm build` - Focused checks that also passed during issue review: - `pnpm vitest run src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` in `ui/` - `pnpm vitest run src/__tests__/instance-settings-routes.test.ts` in `server/` - Manual review path: - Enable `Instance Settings > Experimental > Enable Newest-First Issue Thread` - Open an issue with comments/messages and confirm newest activity renders first, timestamps move into the header, and `Jump to latest` sits below the thread - Disable the experiment and confirm the legacy oldest-first behavior returns ## Risks - Low risk: the behavioral change is gated behind an instance-level experimental toggle and defaults off. - The main regression risk is thread navigation drift between the two modes, especially around anchor scrolling and the `Jump to latest` affordance. - There is some UI coupling between issue-detail query state and experimental settings fetches, so future changes in that area should keep both modes covered. - Screenshots are not attached in this PR body; verification is described with automated coverage and manual steps instead. > I checked [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md). This is a scoped issue-thread UX improvement and rollout gate, not a duplicate of a roadmap-level planned core feature. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex via the local `codex_local` Paperclip adapter, GPT-5-based coding agent with terminal tool use and local code execution in this repository worktree. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge canary/v2026.507.0-canary.4	2026-05-07 16:45:12 -07:00
Devin Foley	4269545b19	Stabilize Cursor sandbox runtime resolution (#5446) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The Cursor adapter spawns the Cursor CLI against local, SSH, and sandbox execution targets; on a fresh sandbox lease, it has to resolve where Cursor was installed > - The previous resolver only looked for `~/.local/bin/cursor-agent` even though the official installer (and the adapter's own `SANDBOX_INSTALL_COMMAND`) sometimes lays the binary down as `~/.local/bin/agent`, so a sandbox where the install ran successfully would still fail to find the CLI > - This pull request lets the resolver accept either basename and lets the caller pass an optional `remoteSystemHomeDirHint` so a probe doesn't pay the cost of a remote `printf $HOME` round-trip when the home directory is already known > - The benefit is sandboxed Cursor runs find the binary that the install actually produced, and runtime probes are cheaper when the home dir is already resolved ## What Changed - `packages/adapters/cursor-local/src/server/remote-command.ts`: accept either `agent` or `cursor-agent` as the preferred basename; new optional `remoteSystemHomeDirHint` short-circuits the home-dir probe - `packages/adapters/cursor-local/src/server/execute.ts`: thread the home-dir hint through, prefer the resolved binary path, and shift the effective execution cwd to the per-run managed subdirectory once the runtime is prepared - New `remote-command.test.ts` and `execute.test.ts` cover both basenames, the hint short-circuit, and the cwd shift - `packages/adapters/cursor-local/src/index.ts`: update doc string to reflect the broader resolution - `execute.remote.test.ts` updated to expect the managed-subdirectory cwd shape introduced by the cwd shift ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local` — 6/6 passing - `pnpm typecheck` clean - Manual: a fresh sandbox lease with `npm install -g …`-installed Cursor (binary lands as `~/.local/bin/agent`) now runs cleanly through the adapter ## Risks Low. Resolver is strictly broader (matches a superset of paths); existing setups with `~/.local/bin/cursor-agent` continue to work. The home-dir hint is opt-in; callers that don't pass it get the existing probe behavior. Cursor's effective execution cwd now matches the rest of the adapters (per-run managed subdirectory) — sessions previously rooted at the workspace root will land in the new subdirectory. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — new tests cover both basenames + hint short-circuit + cwd shift - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --- > **Stacked PR.** Sits on top of #5445 (which sits on #5444). Cumulative diff against `master` includes both of those PRs' content; the files touched by *this* PR's commit are listed under "What Changed" above. Will rebase onto `master` and force-push once the prerequisite PRs merge. canary/v2026.507.0-canary.3	2026-05-07 15:00:28 -07:00
Devin Foley	fe3904f434	Stabilize runtime probes and Codex env tests (#5445) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Adapters expose a Test action that probes the configured runtime — install, resolvability, hello — to give operators a fast yes/no on whether an environment is healthy > - The Codex test path was running its hello probe directly without going through the managed-runtime preparation that production runs use, so a healthy production setup could still report a probe failure > - The plugin worker manager wasn't surfacing terminated workers cleanly, leaving the runtime probe waiting on a dead worker until the request timed out > - This pull request routes the Codex test probe through `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` (so it sees the same managed Codex home production sees), exposes `commandCwd` on `createCommandManagedRuntimeClient` so callers can target a per-probe directory without leaking the workspace `remoteCwd`, and propagates plugin-worker termination as a usable error instead of a hang > - The benefit is the Codex Test action mirrors production behavior end-to-end, and probes against a terminated plugin worker fail fast instead of timing out ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/command-managed-runtime.ts`: rename the `remoteCwd` knob to `commandCwd` so callers can target a per-probe directory without inheriting the workspace cwd; matching test coverage in `command-managed-runtime.test.ts` - `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.{ts,test.ts}`: small fixes to keep callback bridge stop semantics deterministic - `packages/adapters/codex-local/src/server/test.ts`: thread the Codex hello probe through `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` + `prepareManagedCodexHome` so the probe sees the same managed home production sees; new `test.remote.test.ts` covers the remote probe path - `packages/adapters/cursor-local/src/server/execute.ts`: small probe-side cleanup that aligns with the new commandCwd contract - `server/src/services/plugin-worker-manager.ts`: surface plugin-worker termination as a structured error so callers fail fast; new `plugin-worker-terminated.cjs` fixture and `plugin-worker-manager.test.ts` cases pin the behavior ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils --project @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local --project @paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local --project @paperclipai/server` — 1749/1750 passing (1 unrelated skip) - `pnpm typecheck` clean ## Risks Low–medium. The `remoteCwd → commandCwd` rename is a parameter renaming on an internal helper used only by adapter test/execute paths in this repo. The plugin-worker-terminated path was previously a hang; failing fast may surface latent timeouts as explicit termination errors in callers that already expected them. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — new tests cover commandCwd, plugin-worker termination, and Codex remote test path - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --- > **Stacked PR.** Sits on top of #5444 which adds the per-run runtime API surface this PR builds on. Cumulative diff against `master` includes that PR's content; the files touched by *this* PR's commit are listed under "What Changed" above. Will rebase onto `master` and force-push once #5444 merges.	2026-05-07 14:52:31 -07:00
Devin Foley	12cb7b40fd	Harden remote workspace sync and restore flows (#5444) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - When an agent runs against a remote target, Paperclip syncs the workspace out to the remote at run start and restores changes back to the local workspace at run end > - The previous restore flow naïvely overwrote local files with whatever the remote returned, so files that the remote run never touched but had timestamp/mode drift could be needlessly rewritten — and a single static `refs/paperclip/ssh-sync/imported` ref made concurrent SSH workspace exports race on the same git ref > - This pull request adds a `workspace-restore-merge` module that diffs a pre-run snapshot against the post-run remote state and only writes back files the remote actually changed; SSH workspace exports now use a per-import unique ref so concurrent runs can't trample each other > - Every adapter's execute path threads the snapshot through `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` so the merge has the baseline it needs > - The benefit is workspace restores no longer churn untouched files, and concurrent SSH runs no longer collide on the import ref ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/workspace-restore-merge.{ts,test.ts}`: new module — directory snapshot (kind/mode/sha256/symlink target) plus snapshot-aware merge that writes only the files the remote changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh.ts`: SSH workspace export uses a per-import unique ref (`refs/paperclip/ssh-sync/imported/<uuid>`); restore goes through the new merge helper; `ssh-fixture.test.ts` covers the unique-ref + merge paths - `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.ts` + `remote-managed-runtime.ts`: thread the snapshot/merge through the sandbox and SSH paths - `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.{ts,test.ts}` + `execution-target.ts`: helpers for capturing the pre-run snapshot; `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` gains required `runId` and optional `workspaceRemoteDir`, and returns the realized `workspaceRemoteDir` - Each adapter's `execute.ts` (acpx, claude, codex, cursor, gemini, opencode, pi) takes the snapshot at run start and passes it through to the runtime restore - Remote execute test mocks updated to match the new `prepareWorkspaceForSshExecution` return shape and the per-run `${managedRemoteWorkspace}` cwd subdirectory ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils --project @paperclipai/adapter-acpx-local --project @paperclipai/adapter-claude-local --project @paperclipai/adapter-codex-local --project @paperclipai/adapter-cursor-local --project @paperclipai/adapter-gemini-local --project @paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local --project @paperclipai/adapter-pi-local` — 196/196 passing - `pnpm typecheck` clean across the workspace ## Risks Medium. The restore path now writes a strict subset of what it previously did — files the remote did not touch are no longer rewritten. If any flow was relying on a touch-without-content-change being copied back (timestamp or permission propagation only), that behavior is now skipped. Snapshot capture adds an O(N-files-in-workspace) hash pass at run start; the cost is bounded by the existing exclude list. The `runId` parameter on `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` is now required — every in-tree caller is updated; out-of-tree adapter authors need to pass it. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — new module + every adapter execute path covered - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge canary/v2026.507.0-canary.2	2026-05-07 14:44:45 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	824298f414	Route sidebar search icon directly to search (#5440) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Operators use the sidebar as their primary board navigation surface > - The board now has a dedicated search page, so the header search icon should behave as normal navigation instead of only dispatching a command-palette shortcut > - The Work nav also had a separate Search row, which duplicated the always-visible header search affordance > - This pull request keeps search one click away while making it a direct `/search` link and reducing sidebar nav noise > - The benefit is a smaller, clearer sidebar with search still accessible from the top-level chrome ## What Changed - Changed the sidebar header search icon into a direct `NavLink` to `/search`. - Removed the duplicate `Search` row from the Work navigation section. - Added focused Sidebar coverage that asserts the header search link target and confirms Search is not rendered in the Work nav. - Refactored the Sidebar test setup helper to avoid repeating the React Query wrapper across tests. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` in the PR worktree so workspace package symlinks existed for test execution. This completed with existing plugin SDK bin warnings for missing built artifacts. - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/Sidebar.test.tsx` — 3 passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. ## Risks - Low: this changes a sidebar navigation affordance only. Users who previously clicked the header icon now land on the full search page instead of opening the command-palette shortcut path. - Low: removing the Work nav Search row could affect users who expected Search in that section, but the icon remains in the fixed sidebar header and is covered by a targeted DOM test. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5 model family (`gpt-5`), tool-enabled Paperclip heartbeat environment. Context window and internal reasoning mode are not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots or equivalent focused UI verification - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-07 15:20:58 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	e400315cbf	Guard assigned backlog liveness (#5428) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The issue graph and liveness recovery system decide whether assigned work is executable or parked > - Assigned issues created without an explicit status could silently land in backlog, making parents look blocked with no productive wake path > - The server, shared validators, recovery analysis, and UI all need to agree on that execution semantic > - This pull request makes assigned issue creation default to `todo`, flags assigned backlog blockers, and surfaces the state in the board > - The benefit is that parked assigned work becomes intentional and visible instead of creating silent liveness stalls ## What Changed - Adds contract tests for assigned issue creation defaults. - Defaults assigned issue creation to `todo` when status is omitted while preserving explicit `backlog` parking. - Exposes `resolveCreateIssueStatusDefault` through shared validators. - Teaches liveness/blocker attention paths to distinguish assigned backlog blockers. - Adds UI notices, row/header badges, and issue detail safeguards for assigned backlog blockers. - Adds Storybook fixtures and execution-semantics documentation for the assigned-backlog behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-assigned-backlog-contract-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-blocker-attention.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-liveness.test.ts server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-issue-liveness-escalation.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueAssignedBacklogNotice.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueRow.test.tsx` — 50 passed, 23 skipped. - Skipped tests were embedded Postgres suites on this host with the repo skip message: `Postgres init script exited with code null. Please check the logs for extra info. The data directory might already exist.` - Pairwise merge check against the issue-controls PR branch completed without conflicts via `git merge --no-commit --no-ff` in a temporary worktree. - Screenshots for assigned-backlog UI states: [light](docs/pr-screenshots/pr-5428/assigned-backlog-light.png), [dark](docs/pr-screenshots/pr-5428/assigned-backlog-dark.png). - Follow-up checks: `pnpm --filter /ui typecheck`; `pnpm --filter /mcp-server build`; `pnpm --filter /mcp-server test`; `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts`; focused UI component tests. - Remote PR checks on head `6300b3c`: policy, verify, serialized server shards 1/4-4/4, Canary Dry Run, e2e, Greptile Review, and Snyk all passed. ## Risks - Medium: changes status defaulting for assigned issue creation when the caller omits status. Explicit `backlog` remains supported, and server/shared tests cover both paths. - Medium: liveness classification changes can affect blocker attention labels; focused service and UI tests cover the new assigned-backlog state. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5 model family (`gpt-5`), tool-enabled Paperclip heartbeat environment. Context window and internal reasoning mode are not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-07 12:25:26 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	6f30003421	Polish operator UI task controls (#5427) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Operators spend most of their day scanning skills, routines, inbox groups, and activity cards > - Several small UI rough edges made those surfaces harder to scan or easier to crash on real API payloads > - These fixes are grouped together because they are low-risk operator quality-of-life improvements rather than separate control-plane contracts > - This pull request polishes skills metadata, routine run-now access, grouped issue creation defaults, monitor activity rendering, and activity row identity layout > - The benefit is a smoother board workflow with fewer small interruptions while keeping the change set compact ## What Changed - Improves company skill source display and the used-by agent list. - Truncates long skill source paths and adds a copy affordance. - Adds a row-level run-now button to the routines table. - Adds grouped issue creation defaults for inbox issue groups and aligns grouped add buttons to the right. - Fixes `IssueMonitorActivityCard` when `monitorNextCheckAt` arrives as an ISO string. - Polishes activity row actor avatar/name layout by using the shared avatar primitive. ## Verification - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssuesList.test.tsx ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueMonitorActivityCard.test.tsx` — 91 passed. - The routines test emitted the pre-existing Radix warning about missing `DialogTitle`/description in dialog content; tests still passed. - Pairwise merge checks against the other two PR branches reported no textual conflicts. ## Risks - Low: changes are UI-focused and covered by targeted component/lib tests. - Low-to-medium: activity row layout changes could affect dense feed scanability; the implementation uses the shared avatar component and keeps truncation behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5 model family (`gpt-5`), tool-enabled Paperclip heartbeat environment. Context window and internal reasoning mode are not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-07 12:24:02 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	772fc92619	Add issue controls and retry-now recovery (#5426) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Issue operators need clear controls for execution settings, model overrides, and recovery retries > - Existing issue properties hid useful adapter override state and did not expose a board-triggered retry for scheduled heartbeat recovery > - Scheduled retries also need to respect the same safety gates as normal execution instead of bypassing budget, review, pause, dependency, or terminal-state checks > - This pull request adds the issue property controls and retry-now surfaces together because they share the issue details/properties UI > - The benefit is that operators can inspect and adjust issue execution settings and safely trigger pending scheduled recovery without hidden control-plane behavior ## What Changed - Adds editable issue assignee model override controls in `IssueProperties`, with focused coverage. - Removes the stale workspace tasks link from issue properties. - Adds a scheduled retry `retry-now` backend path and shared response types. - Adds main-pane and properties-pane scheduled retry UI, backed by a shared `useRetryNowMutation` hook. - Adds suppression coverage for budget hard stops, review participant changes, subtree pause holds, unresolved blockers, terminal issues, and company scoping. - Updates the `IssueProperties` test harness with toast actions required by the retry-now hook. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueScheduledRetryCard.test.tsx` — 31 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-scheduled-retry-routes.test.ts` — exited 0, but this host skipped the embedded Postgres route tests with: `Postgres init script exited with code null. Please check the logs for extra info. The data directory might already exist.` - Pairwise merge check against the assigned-backlog PR branch completed without conflicts via `git merge --no-commit --no-ff` in a temporary worktree. ### Visual verification screenshots Storybook story: `Product/Issue Scheduled retry surfaces / ScheduledRetrySurfaces`.   ## Risks - Medium: this touches issue execution/retry behavior, so CI should run the embedded Postgres route tests on a host that can initialize Postgres. - Low-to-medium UI risk around duplicated retry-now entry points; both surfaces share one mutation hook to keep behavior consistent. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex coding agent, GPT-5 model family (`gpt-5`), tool-enabled Paperclip heartbeat environment. Context window and internal reasoning mode are not exposed by the runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-07 12:23:13 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	d0e9cc76f2	Show workspace changes and stale notices in issue threads (#5356) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The issue thread is the operator's durable audit trail for what changed and why > - Workspace changes and stale disposition notices need to be visible in that same timeline without noisy or misleading rendering > - The local branch already contained backend activity details, timeline conversion, and UI rendering work for those events > - This pull request isolates the issue-thread activity work into a standalone branch against `origin/master` > - The benefit is a focused audit-trail PR that can merge independently of the sidebar/operator UI polish branch ## What Changed - Adds readable workspace-change activity details to issue update activity events. - Surfaces workspace-change events in issue chat/timeline rendering. - Makes the existing issue comment migration idempotent. - Folds and renders stale disposition notices inline so they match activity-log styling and spacing. - Adds focused route, timeline, and issue-thread system notice coverage. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-activity-events-routes.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-timeline-events.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueChatThreadSystemNotice.test.tsx` — 3 files passed, 22 tests passed. - Confirmed the PR changes 9 files and does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*`. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-closed-workspace-routes.test.ts` — 1 file passed, 4 tests passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-activity-events-routes.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-timeline-events.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueChatThreadSystemNotice.test.tsx server/src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.test.ts packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts` — 5 files passed, 54 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` after adding the Storybook screenshot fixture. - Captured Storybook screenshots for the new UI rendering paths: - Collapsed stale notice + workspace-change row: `docs/pr-screenshots/pr-5356/issue-thread-notices-collapsed.png` - Expanded stale notice details: `docs/pr-screenshots/pr-5356/issue-thread-notices-expanded.png` ### Screenshots Collapsed stale notice with workspace-change row:  Expanded stale notice details:  ## Risks - Moderate risk: this touches issue activity serialization and issue-thread rendering, both of which are central operator surfaces. - Migration risk is low: the only migration change makes an existing migration idempotent. - No new migrations are introduced, so there is no cross-PR migration ordering requirement. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, shell/tool-use enabled, used to split the existing branch, verify the isolated PR branch, and create this PR. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.506.0-canary.9	2026-05-06 09:00:54 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	4103978578	Polish operator sidebar and issue property controls (#5355) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Operators use the board sidebar and issue properties panel to move between companies and understand task metadata > - Small UI regressions in these controls make repeated board operation slower and less predictable > - The local branch already contained targeted fixes for company ordering, issue date display, and sidebar rail sizing > - This pull request isolates those operator UI quality-of-life fixes into a standalone branch against `origin/master` > - The benefit is a focused, reviewable PR that can merge independently of the issue-thread activity work ## What Changed - Shows issue property timestamps with time, not just dates. - Adds edit-mode support for ordering companies in the sidebar company menu. - Fixes a workspace switcher rail regression and keeps the account menu aligned with the rail width. - Includes focused component coverage for the touched controls. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarCompanyMenu.test.tsx ui/src/components/Layout.test.tsx ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx` — 4 files passed, 29 tests passed. - `pnpm --filter /ui typecheck` - PR checks on `a4030f7a` are green: policy, verify, serialized server suites 1/4-4/4, e2e, Canary Dry Run, Greptile Review, and Snyk. - Captured a local Storybook screenshot of `Product/Navigation & Layout` after the sidebar polish: `/tmp/pap-3659-screenshots/navigation-layout-after.png`. - Confirmed the PR changes 8 files and does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or `.github/workflows/*`. ## Risks - Low to moderate UI risk: this touches shared sidebar components and issue metadata rendering. - The company ordering behavior depends on existing query/cache behavior, so stale cache bugs would show up as ordering inconsistencies. - No database, API, workflow, or lockfile changes are included. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, shell/tool-use enabled, used to split the existing branch, verify the isolated PR branch, and create this PR. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.506.0-canary.8	2026-05-06 08:59:39 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	68f69975a4	Harden control-plane safety and issue identifiers (#5292) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip relies on issue identifiers, execution policies, and agent heartbeat rules to keep autonomous work auditable. > - Safety checks need to reject ambiguous agent handoffs, and identifier parsing needs to support Cloud tenant prefixes. > - Agent instructions also need to make final-disposition rules explicit so work does not stall in vague states. > - This pull request isolates backend correctness and governance hardening from the UI and recovery-system-notice branches. > - The benefit is safer in-review transitions, better identifier compatibility, and clearer agent operating contracts. ## What Changed - Fixed run-aware confirmation ordering and interrupted-run state cleanup. - Added Cloud tenant identity bootstrap and alphanumeric issue identifier support across shared parsing and server routes. - Guarded agent-authored `in_review` updates unless a real review path exists. - Tightened heartbeat disposition instructions in adapter utilities/default AGENTS/Paperclip skill. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/issue-references.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-identifier-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy-routes.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` initially had the first execution-policy test hit Vitest's 5s timeout under the parallel bundle while the rest passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-execution-policy-routes.test.ts --testTimeout=20000` passed with 10/10 tests. - Follow-up: `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps` passed. - Follow-up: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - Follow-up: `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-comment-reopen-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-portability.test.ts server/src/__tests__/costs-service.test.ts` passed. - Follow-up: `pnpm vitest run ui/src/context/LiveUpdatesProvider.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-reference.test.ts ui/src/lib/issue-timeline-events.test.ts` passed. ## Risks - Medium control-plane risk: in-review update validation changes agent behavior. The error message is explicit and tests cover allowed review paths. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-06 07:49:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	a1b30c9f35	Add planning mode for issue work (#5353) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane for autonomous AI companies. > - Issues are the core unit of work, and issue comments are how board users and agents coordinate execution. > - Some issue conversations need to produce plans and approvals instead of immediate implementation work. > - The existing issue contract did not distinguish standard execution comments from planning-oriented issue work. > - This pull request adds an issue work-mode contract and board UI affordances for standard vs planning mode. > - The benefit is that planning-mode issues can be created, displayed, discussed, and carried through agent heartbeat context without losing the normal issue workflow. ## What Changed - Added `standard` / `planning` issue work-mode contracts across DB, shared validators/types, server issue flows, plugin protocol, and adapter heartbeat payloads. - Added an idempotent `0081_optimal_dormammu` migration for `issues.work_mode`, ordered after current `public-gh/master` migrations. - Updated heartbeat/context summaries and issue-thread interaction behavior so planning work mode is preserved when creating suggested follow-up issues. - Added UI support for planning-mode issue creation, issue rows, detail composer styling, and composer work-mode toggles. - Added focused server/shared/UI tests plus a Playwright visual verification spec for planning-mode surfaces. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` and added durable planning-mode screenshots under `doc/assets/pap-3368/`. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db run check:migrations` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/shared packages/shared/src/validators/issue.test.ts` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-context-summary.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-thread-interactions-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issues-goal-context-routes.test.ts --pool=forks --poolOptions.forks.isolate=true` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui ui/src/components/IssueChatThread.test.tsx ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx ui/src/components/IssueRow.test.tsx ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx` - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.test.ts` - `PAPERCLIP_E2E_SKIP_LLM=true npx playwright test --config tests/e2e/playwright.config.ts tests/e2e/planning-mode-visual-verification.spec.ts` ## Screenshots Desktop planning detail:  Desktop planning row:  Desktop staged standard toggle:  Mobile planning detail:  Mobile planning row:  ## Risks - Medium migration risk: this adds a non-null issue column. The migration uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so installations that applied an older branch-local migration number can still apply the final numbered migration safely. - Medium contract risk: issue payloads, plugin payloads, and adapter heartbeat payloads now include work mode; compatibility is handled by defaulting missing values to `standard`. - UI risk is moderate because composer controls changed; focused component tests and visual e2e coverage exercise standard vs planning display and toggle behavior. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent in a local Paperclip worktree, with shell/tool use. Exact context-window size is not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.506.0-canary.6	2026-05-06 07:01:28 -05:00
3 people	320fd5d23b	Add full company search page (#5293) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Operators need to find work, documents, agents, projects, comments, and activity across a company without jumping through separate surfaces. > - The existing Command-K flow was useful for fast navigation but not enough for deeper company-wide discovery. > - Search also needs company-scoped backend contracts, query cost controls, and indexed document matching so it stays safe as company data grows. > - This pull request adds a full company search API and a dedicated board search page that Command-K can hand off to. > - The benefit is a single searchable control-plane surface with richer result context, recents, highlights, and test coverage across server and UI behavior. ## What Changed - Added a company-scoped search endpoint/service with query validation, rate limiting, text matching, fuzzy title matching, and result typing shared through `@paperclipai/shared`. - Added idempotent search migrations for document search indexes and fuzzy matching support. - Added the full `/companies/:companyKey/search` UI, search result row components, highlighted snippets, recent searches, and sidebar/Command-K handoff. - Added Storybook coverage for search surfaces and Vitest coverage for server search behavior, rate limiting, route generation, Command-K behavior, and the search page. - Addressed Greptile findings by renaming the no-match SQL helper, applying search pagination after cross-type merge sorting, and lazy-initializing the default search service so unrelated route-test mocks do not need to know about it. - Merged current `public-gh/master` and renumbered the search migrations behind upstream `0078_white_darwin`: search indexes are now `0079_company_search_document_indexes` and fuzzy matching is `0080_company_search_fuzzystrmatch`. ## Verification - `git fetch public-gh master` - `git diff --check public-gh/master...HEAD` - `git diff --name-only public-gh/master...HEAD | rg '^pnpm-lock\.yaml$' || true` produced no output before opening the PR. - `pnpm run preflight:workspace-links && pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/company-search-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-search-rate-limit-routes.test.ts ui/src/pages/Search.test.tsx ui/src/components/CommandPalette.test.tsx ui/src/lib/company-routes.test.ts` passed: 5 files, 25 tests. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/company-search-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-search-rate-limit-routes.test.ts && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed after Greptile pagination fixes. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/issue-agent-mutation-ownership-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-search-rate-limit-routes.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-search-service.test.ts && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed after the CI mock fix. - After resolving the migration conflict with current `public-gh/master`: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db typecheck && pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/company-search-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-search-rate-limit-routes.test.ts && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passed. - DB migration numbering check passed as part of `@paperclipai/db` typecheck. - UI states are covered by the added Storybook stories in `ui/storybook/stories/search.stories.tsx`. - GitHub reports the PR merge state as `CLEAN` on head `18e54fa8`. - GitHub PR checks are green on head `18e54fa8`: policy, verify, serialized server shards 1/4 through 4/4, e2e, canary dry run, Snyk, and Greptile Review. ## Risks - Search ranking and snippets are new user-facing behavior, so reviewers should check whether result ordering feels right on real company data. - Search touches broad company data, so company scoping and query cost/rate-limit behavior should be reviewed carefully. - The migrations add search indexes/extensions; they are idempotent with `IF NOT EXISTS` for users who may have applied an earlier branch migration number. > ROADMAP.md checked. This PR adds a focused board search surface and does not duplicate an open roadmap item. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell/git/GitHub CLI session with medium reasoning effort. Existing branch commits were produced across prior agent sessions; this packaging pass verified, opened the PR, addressed Greptile findings, resolved migration conflicts after upstream PRs landed, and got PR checks green. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> canary/v2026.506.0-canary.5	2026-05-06 06:32:37 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	424e81d087	Improve operator workflow QoL (#5291) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is a control plane operators use repeatedly to supervise agent companies. > - Common operator workflows depend on fast scanning of inboxes, issue sidebars, workspaces, cost totals, and runtime services. > - Several small UI and service gaps made those workflows slower or less clear. > - This pull request groups the operator-facing QoL changes that can stand alone from recovery and adapter work. > - The benefit is a denser, clearer board experience for issue triage and workspace operation. ## What Changed - Added inbox assignee/project grouping and issue list token/runtime totals. - Improved issue properties with removable blocker chips and workspace task links. - Improved execution workspace layout, runtime controls, issues tab default, and stopped-port reuse behavior. - Added mobile markdown/routine dialog fixes, page title company names, sidebar polish, and dashboard run task label cleanup. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/inbox.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx ui/src/components/WorkspaceRuntimeControls.test.tsx server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime.test.ts server/src/__tests__/costs-service.test.ts` ## Risks - Medium UI risk because this touches several operator surfaces. The branch is intentionally grouped around workflow/QoL files and keeps the file count below the Greptile limit. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>	2026-05-06 06:30:44 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	11ffd6f2c5	Improve ACPX adapter configuration (#5290) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents across several adapter implementations. > - ACPX is a local adapter path that can proxy Claude and Codex-style execution. > - Its configuration needed stronger schema defaults, provider-aware model handling, and better UI support. > - Plugin authors also need clear docs for managed resources. > - This pull request improves ACPX adapter configuration and documents plugin-managed resources. > - The benefit is a more predictable adapter setup path without changing unrelated control-plane behavior. ## What Changed - Improved ACPX config schema, execution config handling, UI build config, and route coverage. - Added ACPX model filtering support and tests. - Updated the agent config form and storybook coverage for ACPX model/provider behavior. - Expanded plugin authoring documentation for managed resources. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/acpx-local-execute.test.ts server/src/__tests__/adapter-routes.test.ts ui/src/lib/acpx-model-filter.test.ts` ## Risks - Low-to-medium risk: adapter configuration behavior changes can affect ACPX users, but the change is isolated to ACPX/plugin-doc surfaces and covered by targeted adapter tests. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.506.0-canary.4	2026-05-06 06:06:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip	454edfe81e	Add recovery handoff system notices (#5289) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies. > - Agent runs can end productively while the source issue still lacks a durable final disposition. > - That leaves the control plane unsure whether to resume, escalate, or close the work. > - Issue comments also need a presentation contract so system-authored recovery notices can render as first-class thread messages without overloading normal comments. > - This pull request adds successful-run handoff recovery, comment presentation metadata, and system notice rendering. > - The benefit is stricter task liveness with clearer operator-facing recovery state. ## What Changed - Added successful-run handoff decisions, wake payloads, escalation behavior, and recovery tests. - Added issue comment presentation metadata with migration `0078_white_darwin.sql` and shared/server/company portability support. - Rendered recovery/system notices in issue chat with dedicated UI components, fixtures, tests, and storybook/lab coverage. - Included the current recovery model-profile hint patch so automatic recovery follow-ups use the cheap profile. ## Verification - `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/recovery/successful-run-handoff.test.ts ui/src/components/SystemNotice.test.tsx ui/src/lib/system-notice-comment.test.ts ui/src/components/IssueChatThreadSystemNotice.test.tsx` ## Risks - Migration-bearing PR: merge this before any other branch that might later add a migration. - The branch touches both recovery services and issue-thread rendering, so review should pay attention to recovery wake idempotency and comment metadata compatibility. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5 Codex via Paperclip `codex_local` adapter, with shell/git/GitHub CLI tool use. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.506.0-canary.3	2026-05-06 06:05:58 -05:00
Devin Foley	50db8c01d2	Serialize sandbox callback bridge against concurrent heartbeats (#5326) ... > **Stacked PR.** This PR's branch carries cumulative content from #5324 (bridge allowlist expand) and #5325 (env sanitization) — the mutex/sha256 logic in this PR sits on top of both. Reviewers should focus on the files this PR's commit touches: `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.{ts,test.ts}`, `packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh.ts`, and `packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh-fixture.test.ts`. Will rebase onto `master` and force-push once both prerequisite PRs are merged. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Each agent that runs in a sandbox or via SSH talks back to the Paperclip server through a per-lease callback bridge whose entrypoint script is uploaded to the remote > - When two heartbeats target the same agent on the same machine concurrently, both upload the bridge entrypoint and both write to the same response files — producing torn-write races: `SyntaxError: Identifier 'randomUUID' has already been declared` from a concatenated upload, `mv: cannot stat …` from colliding `.json.tmp` writes, and 0-byte commits from a truncated stdin > - This pull request serializes those operations with a POSIX `mkdir`-mutex (PID liveness check + atomic rename) at the bridge entrypoint upload, applies the same lock to the bridge response writer, forwards stdin into remote ssh commands so the entrypoint payload arrives intact, and verifies a sha256 of the upload before promoting it > - The benefit is concurrent heartbeats no longer corrupt each other's bridge state ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.ts`: serialize entrypoint upload and response writes via POSIX `mkdir`-mutex with PID liveness; sha256 the upload before promoting via `mv`; content-skip when the existing entrypoint already matches - `packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh.ts`: forward stdin into remote ssh commands through the SSH managed runtime so `cat > "$remote_upload"` actually receives the base64-encoded entrypoint - `packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh-fixture.test.ts`: cover the stdin-forwarded SSH path - `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.test.ts`: cover the mutex, content-skip, sha256-verify, and atomic-rename paths ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils` - `pnpm typecheck` clean - Manual: two parallel heartbeats targeting the same SSH agent no longer race on the bridge entrypoint or response files ## Risks Medium. Serializing previously-parallel operations adds latency on the contended path (one heartbeat waits on another), bounded by the entrypoint upload time. The mutex includes PID liveness so a crashed heartbeat doesn't deadlock subsequent ones. Sha256-verify gives a clear "torn upload" failure mode instead of silent 0-byte commits. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — tests cover mutex + sha256-verify + stdin-forwarded ssh - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-05-05 20:01:04 -07:00
Devin Foley	f6bad8f6bf	Sanitize remote execution envs at the boundary (#5325) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Adapters spawn CLIs against local, SSH, and sandbox targets, threading a runtime env through `runAdapterExecutionTargetProcess` and the SSH/sandbox runners > - Host identity vars (HOME, TMPDIR, XDG_*, NVM_DIR, PATH) routinely leak into the env we send to remote targets — sometimes via test probes, sometimes via runtime config — and break sandboxed/SSH'd CLIs whose own profiles set those values correctly > - The sanitization logic existed but lived alongside other helpers in `server-utils.ts` and was applied piecemeal at adapter callsites, so it was easy to bypass > - This pull request lifts the sanitization into a standalone `remote-execution-env.ts`, applies it at the SSH and sandbox runtime boundary so every remote spawn goes through it, and removes the duplicated callsite-level filtering > - The benefit is identity-bound host env stops leaking across SSH/sandbox transports regardless of which adapter calls in ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/remote-execution-env.ts`: new module — single source of truth for which env keys are identity-bound and how to strip them when the value matches the host's value - `packages/adapter-utils/src/server-utils.ts`: remove the inline sanitization (now in `remote-execution-env.ts`) - `packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target.ts`: apply sanitization at the sandbox runtime boundary - `packages/adapter-utils/src/ssh.ts`: apply sanitization at the SSH spawn boundary - `packages/adapters/opencode-local/src/server/test.ts`: drop now-redundant callsite filtering - `packages/adapters/pi-local/src/server/test.ts`: drop now-redundant callsite filtering - New tests `execution-target.test.ts` and `execution-target-sandbox.test.ts` cover the sanitizer flow at both transports, including positive cases (host-shaped path stripped) and explicit-override preservation ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils --project @paperclipai/adapter-opencode-local --project @paperclipai/adapter-pi-local` - `pnpm typecheck` clean ## Risks Low–medium. The sanitization is now applied at one layer (boundary) instead of N (callsites), so behavior is more consistent. Any adapter that previously relied on a leaked host var landing on the remote shell would now see it stripped — but those reliances were what this change exists to fix. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — new tests at both transports - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-05-05 19:30:14 -07:00
Devin Foley	36eaf9778f	Expand sandbox callback bridge allowlist to cover the documented heartbeat surface (#5324) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - When an agent runs in an e2b sandbox or other non-managed environment, it talks back to the Paperclip server through a per-lease callback bridge that proxies HTTP requests > - The bridge has an allowlist of method/path patterns it will forward; anything outside the list is rejected to keep the bridge tight > - The allowlist had drifted behind what the heartbeat documentation describes as the supported callback surface — several documented endpoints (issue updates, agent-side log emit, work-status writes) were being rejected at the bridge > - This pull request expands the allowlist to cover the documented heartbeat surface and adds tests that pin every newly-allowed pattern, so the doc and the bridge stay in sync > - The benefit is sandboxed runs no longer hit "method not allowed" / "path not allowed" rejections on the documented set of callbacks ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.ts`: expand the method/path allowlist to match the documented heartbeat callback surface - `packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-callback-bridge.test.ts`: add coverage for every newly-allowed pattern, plus negative cases for patterns that should still be rejected ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils` - `pnpm typecheck` clean - Manual: previously-rejected callbacks from sandboxed runs now succeed end-to-end ## Risks Low. The allowlist only grows; nothing previously allowed is now blocked. Tests pin both the new allowed patterns and that out-of-doc patterns stay rejected. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — new tests cover added patterns + still-rejected negatives - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-05-05 19:30:11 -07:00
Devin Foley	83e7ecc58e	Preserve scope on manual heartbeat invokes (#5323) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The agent live-run route lets operators trigger a manual heartbeat invocation so an agent can pick up a specific issue or step out of band > - The current route flow drops the caller's scope (issue/run context) when forwarding the manual invoke into the heartbeat service, so the resulting run loses the targeting the operator specified > - This pull request threads the operator-supplied scope through the manual invoke path on both the server route and the UI client, with a regression test that confirms the scope round-trips > - The benefit is manual heartbeat invokes from the live-run UI actually pick up the scoped issue/run instead of falling through to the agent's default routine ## What Changed - `server/src/routes/agents.ts`: forward the operator-supplied scope into the manual invoke heartbeat service call - `server/src/__tests__/agent-live-run-routes.test.ts`: new test verifying the manual invoke path preserves scope - `ui/src/api/agents.ts`: pass scope through the live-run client API ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage server/src/__tests__/agent-live-run-routes.test.ts` - `pnpm typecheck` clean ## Risks Low. The change is purely additive on the route surface — handlers that did not previously pass scope continue to work; handlers that did pass it now have it preserved instead of dropped. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — new test covers the preserved-scope path - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (internal API change, no visible UI shift) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-05-05 19:30:08 -07:00
Devin Foley	9fb0c73e0a	Raise gemini-local hello probe timeout to 60s for SSH and E2B targets (#5322) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The Gemini adapter's environment Test surfaces a hello probe so operators can confirm the CLI runs end-to-end on the configured target > - On SSH and E2B sandbox targets the round-trip cost (login-shell sourcing, network, model warm-up) routinely exceeds the existing 10s probe timeout, so the probe spuriously fails on environments that are actually healthy > - This pull request raises the gemini-local hello probe timeout to 60s, matching the timeout we use for slower-bootstrapping adapters > - The benefit is the Gemini Test action no longer reports false negatives on remote targets that need a longer first-run window ## What Changed - `packages/adapters/gemini-local/src/server/test.ts`: hello probe timeout raised from 10s to 60s ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-gemini-local` - Manual: SSH and E2B Gemini hello probes now complete cleanly without spurious timeouts ## Risks Low. A 60s ceiling on a non-blocking probe is consistent with sibling adapters; the only behavior change is a longer worst-case wait when the probe genuinely hangs. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — N/A (one-line timeout change) - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge canary/v2026.506.0-canary.0	2026-05-05 19:30:04 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip	d6d7a7cea6	Add routine revision history and restore flow (#5285) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the control plane for autonomous AI companies. > - Routines are the scheduled/recurring work surface that keeps a company operating without manual kicks. > - Operators need routine edits to be auditable and recoverable, especially when routines control assignments, prompts, triggers, and webhook secrets. > - Documents already have revision-style safety, but routines did not have equivalent history or restore semantics. > - This pull request adds append-only routine revisions across the database, shared contracts, server routes, and board UI. > - The benefit is safer routine iteration: users can inspect history, compare changes, restore older definitions, and avoid overwriting newer edits. ## What Changed - Added `routine_revisions` storage, latest revision pointers on routines, shared types, validators, and API docs for routine revision history. - Added server service/route support for listing routine revisions, conflict-aware routine saves, and append-only restore operations. - Added a History tab on routine detail with revision preview, structured change summaries, description line diffs, dirty-edit blocking, restore confirmation, and restored webhook secret surfacing. - Extracted the line diff helper from `DocumentDiffModal` into `ui/src/lib/line-diff.ts` for reuse. - Rebased the branch onto current `public-gh/master` and renumbered the routine revision migration to `0077_unusual_karnak` after upstream `0076_useful_elektra`. - Made the `0077` routine revision migration idempotent so installs that already applied the branch-local `0076_unusual_karnak` can safely advance. - Updated the plugin SDK test harness routine fixture with the new revision fields required by the shared `Routine` contract. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db run check:migrations` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/shared packages/shared/src/validators/routine.test.ts` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui ui/src/lib/line-diff.test.ts ui/src/components/RoutineHistoryTab.test.tsx ui/src/lib/workspace-routines.test.ts ui/src/pages/Routines.test.tsx` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/routines-service.test.ts --pool=forks --poolOptions.forks.isolate=true` passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/routines-routes.test.ts --pool=forks --poolOptions.forks.isolate=true` passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk typecheck` passed after updating the SDK test harness fixture. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk build` passed; this refreshed local generated SDK output needed by plugin example typechecks. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. ## Risks - Medium migration risk: this adds routine revision storage and backfills existing routines. The migration is ordered after upstream `0076` and uses `IF NOT EXISTS` / duplicate-object guards to tolerate earlier branch-local migration application. - Restore behavior intentionally appends a new revision instead of mutating history; callers expecting an in-place rollback need to follow the new latest revision pointer. - Restoring webhook triggers recreates webhook secret material, so users must copy newly surfaced secrets after restore. - Conflict-aware saves now reject stale routine edits when the client sends an older `baseRevisionId`. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5-based coding agent, with shell/tool use in a local git worktree. Exact context-window size is not exposed in this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Screenshots: not attached in this draft PR; the new UI flow is covered by component tests listed above. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> canary/v2026.505.0-canary.4	2026-05-05 11:54:52 -05:00
Devin Foley	9578dc3da7	Wire per-adapter sandbox install commands through test and execute paths (#5280) ... > **Stacked PR.** Sits on top of the e2b sandbox chain — #5278 (stdin staging) and #5279 (honest-resolvability + login-profiles). The cumulative diff against `master` includes both of those PRs' content; the files touched by *this* PR's commit are the new `maybeRunSandboxInstallCommand` helper in `packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target.ts` and the per-adapter `index.ts`/`server/test.ts`/`server/execute.ts` wiring under `packages/adapters/{claude,codex,cursor,gemini,opencode,pi}-local/`. The honest resolvability check from #5279 is what gives this PR's install command a meaningful "did it actually land on PATH" follow-up. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - Sandbox execution targets are ephemeral — each fresh lease starts from a template image that may or may not have the agent CLIs preinstalled > - When a CLI isn't preinstalled, the resolvability probe fails at `command -v` and the hello probe never runs > - There's no shared mechanism for "before you probe or provision, install the CLI on this sandbox" > - This pull request adds a `SANDBOX_INSTALL_COMMAND` constant per adapter and a `maybeRunSandboxInstallCommand` helper that runs it via the existing sandbox login shell, captures structured output, and never throws (so the resolvability + hello probe still run after); each adapter's `test()` and `execute()` share the constant so the two callsites can't drift > - The benefit is a fresh sandbox lease without a preinstalled CLI now installs it once via `sh -lc` before the resolvability probe and before managed-runtime provisioning, with a uniform `<adapter>_install_command_run` check on the test report ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target.ts`: add `AdapterSandboxInstallCommandCheck` and `maybeRunSandboxInstallCommand` (runs the install via existing sandbox shell, captures exit/stdout/stderr, returns a structured info/warn check, never throws) - Add `SANDBOX_INSTALL_COMMAND` to each adapter's `index.ts` so `test()` and `execute()` share a single source of truth - Wire each of the 6 affected adapter `testEnvironment()`s to call `maybeRunSandboxInstallCommand` before `ensureAdapterExecutionTargetCommandResolvable` - Pass `installCommand: SANDBOX_INSTALL_COMMAND` through `prepareAdapterExecutionTargetRuntime` in each adapter's `execute()` - Per-adapter install commands use npm globals where possible so binaries land on a PATH segment the template already exports: - claude → `npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code` - codex → `npm install -g @openai/codex` - cursor → `curl https://cursor.com/install -fsS | bash` - gemini → `npm install -g @google/gemini-cli` - opencode → `npm install -g opencode-ai` - pi → `npm install -g @mariozechner/pi-coding-agent` SSH and local targets ignore `installCommand` (SSH runtime takes no such param; local short-circuits before runtime prep), so this is a no-op for non-sandbox environments. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` clean - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils` and per-adapter projects pass - Manual sandbox matrix (claude, codex, cursor, gemini, opencode, pi) — each goes `install_command_run → resolvable → hello_probe_passed` (Codex and Pi land on `hello_probe_auth_required`, which is the configured-credentials problem, not an install issue) - SSH no-regression: SSH Claude still passes; the helper short-circuits on non-sandbox targets ## Risks Medium — adds a network/CPU cost (npm install / curl) on every fresh sandbox lease. Cost is bounded (one-time per lease, typically tens of seconds for npm globals), and the helper never throws so a failing install still lets the report run resolvability and hello probes. If a sandbox image already has the CLI, the install is an idempotent reinstall. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge canary/v2026.505.0-canary.3	2026-05-05 08:29:28 -07:00
Devin Foley	af9386f879	Run a real command-v probe and source login profiles before exec in e2b sandboxes (#5279) ... > **Stacked PR.** Sits on top of #5278 (`e2b/stage-stdin-to-temp-file`) which ships the stdin-staging fix this builds on. The cumulative diff against `master` includes that PR's content; the files touched by *this* PR's commit are `packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target.ts`, `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/e2b/src/plugin.ts`, and `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/e2b/src/plugin.test.ts`. ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The adapter Test flow does an "is the command resolvable?" probe before running the hello probe so the report distinguishes "binary not installed" from "binary errored" > - For sandbox targets, that resolvability check was a no-op early-return — every sandboxed adapter test reported "Command is executable" regardless of whether the binary existed > - That made the resolvability check disagree with the hello probe in a way that looked like a PATH bug, when it was actually a missing CLI > - Separately, the e2b spawn used `sandbox.commands.run` with a non-login non-interactive shell whose PATH did not include npm-globals, nvm shims, or anything else the template installs via `.profile`/`.bashrc` > - This pull request makes the resolvability check honest by running a real `command -v` invocation through the sandbox runner, and aligns the e2b spawn with SSH by sourcing login profiles before `exec env KEY=val <cmd>` > - The benefit is the e2b sandbox spawn agrees with the hello probe and finds CLIs at template-installed paths ## What Changed - `packages/adapter-utils/src/execution-target.ts`: add `ensureSandboxCommandResolvable` that runs `command -v <cli>` through the sandbox runner; replace the early-return in `ensureAdapterExecutionTargetCommandResolvable` for sandbox targets - `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/e2b/src/plugin.ts`: replace `buildCommandLine` with `buildLoginShellScript` (sources `/etc/profile`, `~/.profile`, `~/.bash_profile`, `~/.bashrc`, `~/.zprofile`, and nvm.sh before `exec env KEY=val <cmd>`); env vars are interpolated inline so user-configured adapter env always wins over profile-exported values; drop the now-unused `envs:` SDK option - `plugin.test.ts` updated for the login-shell wrapping ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/sandbox-e2b` — 17/17 plugin tests pass - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils` clean - `pnpm typecheck` clean - Manual: previously every sandboxed adapter said "Command is executable" then the hello probe failed with "exec: not found". After this change, missing CLIs surface honestly at the resolvability step. SSH no-regression: SSH Claude probe still passes. ## Risks Medium — sandbox adapter Test reports will start failing at the resolvability step for environments where the CLI was never actually installed. This was always the real state; the previous "Command is executable" message was incorrect. Operators should expect previously-green-but-broken sandbox environments to report accurately. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — `plugin.test.ts` updated for the login-shell wrapping - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge	2026-05-05 08:21:37 -07:00
Devin Foley	cb6af7c2cc	Stage stdin to a temp file so the e2b sandbox executor delivers it reliably (#5278) ... ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip orchestrates AI agents for zero-human companies > - The e2b sandbox provider implements `onEnvironmentExecute` so adapters can spawn CLIs in an e2b sandbox > - For commands that need stdin (e.g. piping a hello prompt to a CLI), the previous implementation awaited a foreground `commands.run({ stdin: true, ... })` and then tried to call `sendStdin(pid)` on the now-dead PID > - That call resolves only after the process exits, so stdin was never delivered and e2b raised "process not found" > - This pull request stages stdin to `/tmp/paperclip-stdin-<uuid>` inside the sandbox and shell-redirects it (`exec '<cmd>' '<args>' < '<file>'`), making the command synchronous regardless of whether stdin is supplied > - The benefit is adapter Test probes that pipe a hello prompt to a CLI inside an e2b sandbox now actually deliver the prompt ## What Changed - `packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/e2b/src/plugin.ts`: replace the broken async `commands.run` + `sendStdin` flow with stdin-staging to a sandbox temp file and shell-redirection - Staged file is removed in a `finally` block; write failures propagate after best-effort cleanup ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run --no-coverage --project @paperclipai/sandbox-e2b` — all 17 unit tests pass - `pnpm typecheck` clean - Manual: a sandboxed adapter Test probe that pipes a hello prompt now receives the prompt ## Risks Low risk — `plugin.test.ts` already encodes the temp-file design; the change brings the implementation in line with the test. ## Model Used Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable — existing tests already encode the new design - [x] If this change affects the UI, I have included before/after screenshots — N/A (no UI) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge canary/v2026.505.0-canary.2	2026-05-05 08:00:49 -07:00