mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-11 14:10:50 +02:00
be9c775d9e7d00d58e8d1ea33489bb3f259a2dd4
4485
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
be9c775d9e |
feat(plugins): load image-owned catalogs and persistent app overlays
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
64895f187b |
fix(runner): clarify completion errors and restart test failures (#13682)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work across persistent agent sessions. > - The runner validates completion calls before accepting their results. > - Generic validation errors can leave the agent unable to repair a rejected call. > - Restart tests also exempted every later failure on an intentionally interrupted run. > - This change gives bounded schema feedback and limits the test exemption to expected interruption outcomes. > - Failures become easier to repair and diagnose without changing authorization or task prompts. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13674 and #13676. Related environment and Agent Chat fixes landed in #13677 and #13678. Those changes do not cover these diagnostics. **What happened?** A malformed completion call received a general field list without the failed schema location. The everyday restart test hid later adapter errors on an intentionally interrupted run until its deadline. A clean pnpm install also broke the shutdown test because it resolved an undeclared Playwright package. **Expected behavior** Return enough schema information to repair completion calls without returning submitted values. Fail promptly on an unexpected recovery error. Resolve the declared test package's CLI. **Steps to reproduce** Run the new completion-validation and everyday lifecycle regressions against the parent commit. The new assertions fail there. Run the shutdown test in a clean workspace installation. **Paperclip version or commit** Based on master |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f589660ec0 |
feat(routines): add safe webhook setup and in-routine run management (#13637)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Routines turn scheduled work and external events into tasks for an assigned agent. > - Webhook setup was disabled, and actor authentication rejected valid webhook bearer keys. > - Operators need to connect and test a sending app before events can start work. > - This pull request adds a guided setup with durable connection tests that cannot dispatch a task. > - It keeps trigger management, execution tasks, and activity within the routine. > - The benefit is a webhook that can be configured, verified, and operated from one place. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #11937. Related: #13216 adds provider-specific Sentry support. This PR addresses general routine setup and ingress. #6841 addresses legacy secret bindings; this PR retains the existing secret service. **Current behavior** Webhook creation is disabled. Bearer deliveries can fail in agent authentication before the routine checks its key. Setup has no safe connection test. Runs and Activity send the operator away from the routine. **Proposed behavior** Choose a schedule or a webhook. Follow the setup steps, copy credentials or complete agent instructions, and test delivery without creating work. Finish setup to allow future events to start tasks. Edit or remove compact trigger cards, undo removal, and inspect tasks and activity inside the routine. **Reason and benefit** An operator can verify credentials and delivery before enabling automatic work. Durable setup state survives refreshes and restarts. Retry receipts prevent an old test event from starting work after activation. ## What Changed - Add a production trigger wizard using reusable Slack setup navigation and footer components. - Add schedule and webhook choices, one-time credentials, agent instructions, and live connection feedback. - Persist pending setup, test delivery receipts, connection status, and reversible trigger removal. - Keep setup checks free of routine runs, tasks, and agent wakeups. Preserve delivery idempotency after activation. - Add compact trigger cards, inline editing, key rotation, pause controls, removal, and Undo. - Keep Runs and Activity in the routine. Use the shared task list and compact activity rows. - Permit only exact public delivery POSTs through actor authentication. Retain webhook authentication, JSON-object validation, and log redaction. - Add production-backed Storybook states and focused server, database, and UI coverage. - Document signing modes, setup checks, retries, rotation, HTTPS ingress, and navigation. ## Verification - Full workspace typecheck, build, and token gates passed on the rebased branch. Storybook also builds. - Focused routine, middleware, logging, shared wizard, and UI coverage passes on the rebased branch: 195 tests across 14 files. The migration passed on a fresh PostgreSQL database and on two repeated applications. - Browser testing used the real app, database, and a deterministic process worker through Tailscale HTTPS and the current Cloud proxy code. - Verified rejected keys, safe setup deliveries, persisted state after restart, activation, retry deduplication, key rotation, schedule editing, removal, and Undo. - Fresh bearer and GitHub-signed deliveries created tasks that the worker checked out and completed. Runs and Activity stayed within the routine. - Current Cloud ingress tests passed. Public delivery POSTs passed through without a browser session; management routes remained gated. - All 54 current-head PR checks pass, including general and serialized tests, all eight browser E2E shards, typecheck, build, runner checks, security checks, and the canary dry run. Two optional Storybook jobs are skipped by workflow conditions. - Greptile is 5/5 on commit `7ea63a61e`, with no unresolved review threads. The stale connection-status finding is fixed and covered by a regression test. - No production deployment was performed. ## Risks - Migration 0281 adds three trigger columns and a test-receipt table. It is additive and safe to reapply. Apply it before running the new server. Existing triggers remain live by default. - Requests without delivery IDs are new events after activation. Senders must reuse an event's delivery ID for retries. - Completed webhooks keep normal dispatch behavior. Their management connection check can start work; the UI states this. - Removing a trigger archives it. Undo restores the URL and credentials. Permanent deletion remains available through the existing API. - Public ingress must remain restricted to the delivery POST route. The tenant verifies credentials. Cloud sleeping-stack behavior is unchanged. - Shared setup components also serve Slack. Existing setup contracts and navigation tests cover that integration. - Senders must use application/json with an object. Other media types receive 415. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, shell execution, and browser testing. The exact deployment model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.919.0-canary.8 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
20d26117c9 |
fix(chat): use the claimed Cloud origin for connector URLs (#13680)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat connectors publish callback URLs and links to the board. > - Cloud can assign a warm instance its final origin after the server starts. > - The signed runtime identity already tracks that change. > - The chat service kept a copy of the startup origin and continued to publish it. > - This pull request resolves the trusted origin when it creates each URL. > - New connector setup uses the claimed hostname without a server restart. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Chat setup in a claimed warm instance used its old pool hostname in provider callbacks. Account confirmation and task links could also use the old hostname. **Expected behavior** Chat URLs follow the signed canonical origin after the claim. An explicit webhook ingress override still applies only to provider callbacks. Self-hosted URL precedence stays the same. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Construct the chat service with a pool origin. 2. Apply the Cloud claim without restarting the service. 3. Open Slack setup or create an account-linking intent. 4. Observe the startup hostname in the returned URL. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `9335b7db1`. **Deployment mode** Paperclip Cloud warm-instance claim. Related: #12766 introduced the signed canonical runtime identity. ## What Changed - Resolve the signed Cloud origin when building chat setup, account confirmation, and task URLs. - Use the same callback origin for Telegram registration and GitHub webhook recovery. - Preserve explicit webhook ingress and self-hosted configuration precedence. - Add regression coverage for existing and new endpoints across Slack, GitHub, Teams, and Telegram. - Document the origin precedence and the need to update callbacks already saved at a provider. ## Verification - Reproduced both new regression cases against the original code. - Full chat integration and signed Cloud identity suites: 1,015 tests passed after the production-code correction. - Five origin and ingress cases passed after review additions, including Telegram registration and GitHub webhook repair after a live claim. - Focused origin, ingress, callback, task-link safety, and tenant-isolation checks: 67 passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. Server typecheck and compilation passed again after the task-link validation correction. - A broad local `pnpm test:run` started before the correction was stopped after the final-commit CI suite passed. It is not counted as a passing local run. - Final-commit CI: 54 successful checks; two optional Storybook checks skipped. Greptile: 5/5 with all review threads resolved. - No live deployment or Slack app mutation was performed. ## Risks - Cloud chat URLs now follow the signed runtime identity. Request host headers cannot set this value. - An explicit webhook ingress override still takes precedence for callbacks. - Existing Slack app settings are external state. Operators must replace an old callback URL in Slack. - This change does not deploy the app or change gateway ingress policy. No schema migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with repository search, code execution, and automated tests. The exact model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c1f6c3310a |
fix(runner): repair catalog runtime and grading boundaries (#13676)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages tasks across persistent agent sessions. > - The full Runner E2E catalog exposed failures in session restoration, tool validation, and test controls. > - These failures prevented valid work from resuming or made a valid interaction fail the test. > - Invalid completion reports also reached finalization before the provider received useful feedback. > - This pull request repairs those boundaries without changing production prompts or approval policy. > - Focused regressions and fresh paid cases verify each fix. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to #13655. Stacked on the trusted worker prerequisite fix in #13674. **What happened?** Read-only skill uploads failed in resumed Daytona sandboxes. Invalid criterion IDs escaped tool validation. A progress event could park a run before its tool response settled. Partial question forms hid required answers. Two test assumptions rejected valid plan keys or failed to navigate an optional question page. **What did you expect to happen?** Resume identical skill bundles, give repairable feedback for malformed completion calls, preserve in-flight tool responses, show all required questions, and test the rendered workflow accurately. **Steps to reproduce** Inspect the failed cases in https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35417932353. Fresh campaigns: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35444497313 and https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35445327618. The later backup cleanup is tested in https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35446477285. Combined report: https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-operational-35444497313/investigation.html. ## What Changed - Compare immutable archives before reusing read-only Daytona bundles. Reject corrupted content and preserve unrelated files. - Validate exact criterion IDs before accepting completion. OpenCode returns a tool error instead of emitting a result that terminates runnerd. - Complete the activity item for rejected OpenCode calls. - Remove retired read-only harness backups without altering live files or following symlinks. A fresh paid rerun exposed this later checkpoint-cleanup failure. - Exclude progress messages from the governed-wait completion boundary. - Reject newly created question forms that omit questions or contradict their stored answer semantics. Keep historical rows readable. - Navigate all rendered question pages and recognize revision-bound descriptive plan keys in the continuation suite. ## Verification - Harness unit suite: 383 tests pass. Harness typecheck passes. - Native session executor and status corpus: 381 tests pass. - Shared question and interaction-service tests: 42 pass; native question bridge and executor: 360 pass. Daytona sync: 21 pass, including foreign-owner archives and corrupted immutable content. - OpenCode driver: 29 tests pass, including wrong, missing, and duplicate criterion IDs followed by a valid retry. - Repository typecheck and build pass. The later OpenCode activity fix also passes its package build. - The latest commit passes all 52 PR checks and Greptile 5/5. The backup-cleanup fix also passes 351 related local tests and server typecheck. Local full-suite coverage completed across runs. adapter-auth-signal-routes and pipelines-routes encountered transient socket resets; both pass on retry, and all remaining 24 serialized files pass. Paid reruns are complete: 27 of 29 unique cases pass using the latest recording per case. Both Daytona controller-restart cases still fail with runner_state_identity_mismatch; the report describes this remaining runtime issue. Eight affected cells need #13674 on master before their rerun. ## Risks Creation rejects inconsistent dual question representations but does not change historical records. Immutable bundle comparison must verify bytes before skipping extraction. Completion feedback must use the contract bound to the current run. Durable suspension and approval checks remain enforced. Production prompts are unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with repository inspection, code editing, and test execution. The exact API model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4cfc0e3f6c |
fix(runner-e2e): provision complete worker prerequisites (#13674)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip manages work performed by AI agents.
> - Runner E2E tests verify that work in local and remote environments.
> - The full catalog exposed setup failures before agents could execute
tasks.
> - ACPX Codex missed sandbox provisioning, and new artifact cases
missed Docker preparation.
> - A host Claude version probe also stopped native Claude stories that
use a packaged provider.
> - This pull request repairs trusted worker setup and keeps its
selectors covered by catalog tests.
> - The resulting reruns can measure behavior instead of missing
prerequisites.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Follow-up to #13655. Full-catalog campaign:
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35417932353.
**What happened?**
ACPX Codex could not start its sandbox. New artifact stories missed
Docker preparation. Native Claude stories tried to spawn an unrelated
host CLI. The report job failed on trusted lockfile drift.
**What did you expect to happen?**
Prepare each worker's required capabilities before paid execution and
publish the retained results from trusted code.
**Steps to reproduce**
Run local ACPX Codex, everyday agent-review-handoff, or native Claude
everyday cells in the full-stack workflow at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
36dbb7ed1c |
fix: harden agent chat runner tools and recovery (#13678)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent Chat turns discussion into plans, tasks, reviews, and hires. > - These workflows need reliable tool results and task context on the native runner. > - Live Claude and Codex tests exposed lost retry requests, invalid project inputs, and a child startup crash. > - Recovery also exposed a misleading retry action and missing child task context. > - This pull request fixes those paths and adds regression coverage. > - Agents can continue the original request and operators can inspect a stopped run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A failed Agent Chat retry could lose the user's question. Project creation accepted unsupported icons in its tool schema. Codex could stop when a helper's MCP startup event arrived before its thread lineage. A stopped task offered Retry even when the server required execution reconciliation. Resumed agents could miss existing delegated tasks. Hiring and review instructions did not describe the native runner's available tools and source requirements. **Expected behavior** Retries retain the selected request. Tool schemas match the API. Child startup information does not gain authority over the parent or stop it. Recovery actions match the server's requirements. Task context exposes existing child work. Handoffs contain the material the assignee needs. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Enable experimental Agent Chat in an isolated development instance. 2. Configure native Codex and ACPX Claude agents on Paperclip Runner. 3. Ask for a plan, revise it, approve task creation, and request a hire and status report. 4. Retry a failed chat turn and check that it answers the original request. 5. Start a Codex helper before its thread lineage arrives. 6. Resume a delegated task and inspect its existing children and saved output. **Paperclip version or commit** The live failures were found at `f2c5e54dc`. This branch is rebased onto `86b7ee992`. **Deployment mode** Isolated local development instance with native Codex and ACPX Claude. No database migration or default permission change. Related work: Refs #13284 for Agent Chat. Refs #13438 for the server-side API receipt fix, which this branch preserves. The transport also accepts the earlier HTTP receipt format. Refs #13655 for the current Codex continuation and helper lineage handling, which this branch also preserves. ## What Changed - Preserve failed Agent Chat wake-comment IDs and session generation from the authorized source run. Reject pre-reset retries. - Wrap API receipts with the correct semantic call identity. Test current and earlier receipt formats through real HTTP and runnerd. - Classify early child MCP startup notifications as information. Keep foreign completion and result events rejected. - Constrain project icons on both tool surfaces and regenerate the protocol contracts. - Include bounded, company-scoped visible direct child tasks in task context. Filter hidden tasks before applying the limit. - Replace the rejected Retry action with Inspect run for native continuation reconciliation. - Update hiring, review handoff, status reporting, and development guidance. ## Verification - Live tests covered Claude and Codex questions, plan revisions, approval, task creation, hiring, status, chat reset, failures, and recovery. - The recovered task produced its saved checklist and example. A later follow-up read the existing child tasks and document without creating more work. - Full build, repository type checks, token gates, 142 focused tests, 188 runner TypeScript tests, and the Rust notification/descendant regressions passed after rebase. The separate local full-suite run was stopped after the complete CI suite passed. - Review fixes passed the updated route, tool-authority, and icon regression tests plus server type checking. - Required commands: `pnpm build`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, `PAPERCLIP_IN_WORKTREE=false pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm check:token-gates`. - At `4ce8047b0`, all 55 applicable GitHub checks pass (two Storybook checks are intentionally skipped), including the complete general/serialized test matrix, runner tests, browser tests, build, type checks, Docker checks, and canary dry run. - Fresh Greptile review is 5/5 on `4ce8047b0`; all three findings were fixed with regressions and there are no unresolved review threads. - Two initial CI service-startup timeouts passed unchanged in local reproductions and in the latest CI run. ## Risks - The new event classification is limited to MCP startup information. It does not authorize foreign task completion, results, or tool requests. - Task context returns at most 100 direct child tasks and reports truncation. It excludes hidden tasks and other companies. This improves delegation context but does not enforce semantic duplicate detection. - Native reconciliation still requires an operator to inspect and record prior outcomes. The new link does not replace the recovery API. - API tools remain opt-in. Claude permission choices remain explicit. No default permission, schema, or workflow changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, repository editing, code execution, API tools, and browser testing. The exact deployment identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Live acceptance agents used OpenAI `gpt-5.6-sol` and Anthropic `claude-sonnet-4-6`. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9335b7db10 |
fix(runner): validate inherited environments and replace stale sandbox binaries (#13677)
Resolve the effective environment for account adoption and adapter tests. Preserve saved-agent overrides when the request omits environmentId, and treat explicit null as inheritance from the instance. Reject sandbox runners that lack unlimited-runtime and connection-lease-renewal capabilities. Stage the bundled runner before launch when the image binary is stale. Add regression coverage for environment precedence, fail-closed validation, adapter switches, API-key reverification, and runner artifact fallback. Document the operational workaround for older controllers. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.919.0-canary.6 |
||
|
|
86b7ee992c |
feat(onboarding): ClipLab sleepy-to-wake hero and step hand-offs (#13629)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents have a persistent visual identity (#13171): a ClipLab character in one of 17 palettes, rendered as cached PNGs in lists and as a live character in larger placements. > - The onboarding wizard is where a person meets that identity first, and it showed a stock ClipLab expression on the previous engine while the rest of the app would show a different character on a newer one. > - The wizard's steps also cut from one screen to the next, so the arc read as separate pages rather than one walk. > - This pull request puts one character on one engine everywhere, gives the wizard's hero the studio's sleepy → wink → idle sequence on Review, and hands the steps over inside one presence. > - The benefit is that what wakes on Review is exactly what the agent looks like on the dashboard afterwards, and the walk to it reads as one screen changing. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13171, now merged into master. This PR contains the onboarding and ClipLab update on top of that foundation. Original feature work by @tonio-alucema; merge preparation preserves the original commits. **Problem or motivation** The onboarding hero and the app's avatars were two different characters on two different ClipLab engines. Steps 1 → 4 of the wizard cut between screens, and the wizard mounted cold when a cloud-managed workspace arrived from Cloud's naming screen. **Proposed solution** Vendor ClipLab v0.2.0 as the shared engine and render one studio-exported character from it in every palette, for every pose and size. Play the export's one-shot wake on Review with the palette fading in over the gray dormant loop. Hand steps over inside one presence so the footer slides instead of jumping, and play the arrival half of that hand-off when the wizard opens directly on the agent step. **Alternatives considered** Exporting mp4/webm loops per size: no cursor following, no clean alpha, and the palette "colour in" is a runtime blend. Minting a `cap-v2` character version: nothing had shipped `cap-v1`, so the artwork is regenerated in place instead of migrated. Keeping the separately vendored runtime bundle for the hero: two engines and two characters in one app. ## What Changed - `packages/shared/src/cliplab`: re-vendored from ClipLab v0.2.0 (`987b6db0`) with the Paperclip adaptations replayed (optional graphics backend for the Node SVG snapshot path, supersampled live textures, character framing, deterministic SVG id prefixes); new upstream `particles.ts`. - `packages/shared/src/cliplab/character.ts`: the studio export, mirrored from `ui/src/assets/cliplab/onboarding.character.json` by `scripts/sync-cliplab-character.mjs` (drift caught by `check:token-gates`). `characterDefinition` builds every palette from it; the resting portrait is its idle beat. - `OnboardingCharacter`: gray `sleepy` loop through the agent and connect steps; on Review the one-shot sleepy → wink → idle plays on two lock-step canvases while the palette fades in, then the `idle` loop. Body-follows the pointer, page-scoped. 160px in the wizard. - `OnboardingWizard`: steps 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 hand over inside one `AnimatePresence` (departing content fades and gives its room back; arriving content opens its room then fills); the hero has a room that opens on the walk into the agent step; opening directly on the agent step plays the arrival half; the self-hosted naming step uses the arc's label and field. - Motion vocabulary in `onboarding-motion.ts` (`stepContentMotion`, `ledeMotion`, `heroRoomMotion`, `heroRoomArrival`, `titleSwapMotion`). - Storybook: `Onboarding / Character` (Wake Up), `Onboarding / Agent arc` walkable from the naming step plus `Arrive From Cloud`; the companies fixture answers the wizard's create call with a company. - Uses the shared runtime for onboarding; `doc/agent-personas.md` documents the shared character. - Releases both onboarding canvases after partial startup or transition failure. Registers each canvas before seeking so synchronous render errors can release it. Six component tests cover these failures and palette changes before or during wake. - Refreshes both sleeping canvases when the palette changes, including a palette change in the same render as wake. - Moves choreography values into the CSS token layer and preserves the shared motion catalog drift check across the imported stylesheet. - Repairs the static Storybook avatar route and uses accessible heading names/current button labels in the wizard play functions. - Closes the lazy avatar worker pool during application shutdown. ## Verification - Merge-preparation checks: `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm build-storybook`, and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass. The final UI typecheck and 123 focused onboarding, lifecycle, and token catalog tests pass. All 55 checks on final head `b4f5e201a1564083d163abc6f93f5b3da06ccefd` pass, including the full sharded test suite, runner verification, and all eight browser shards ([CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35445430535)). The duplicate monolithic local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after CI completed; it is not claimed as a separate completed local run. - Chromium walkthrough: palette change, wake, return to sleep, WebGL failure fallback, Review step hand-offs and cloud arrival pass with normal and reduced motion; no browser errors. The signoff happy-path browser test also passes against a disposable instance. - The final CI run confirms the catalog fix and a passing signoff browser shard. The earlier signoff failure was a heartbeat-run availability timeout; the focused local reproduction and final CI passed without signoff code changes. - Original author verification: - `pnpm check:token-gates` (includes the new character sync check); shared, server avatar/persona (17) and UI onboarding/persona (137) suites pass; `pnpm build-storybook` packages all 3,564 avatar PNGs through the worker pipeline. - Storybook: `Agents / Personas` Sizes, Expressions and Palettes render the studio character at every size and pose; `Onboarding / Character → Wake Up` plays the wake on the shared engine; `Onboarding / Agent arc` walks 1 → 4 with the hand-offs, and `Arrive From Cloud` plays the arrival (measured: content room 6 → 65px over 320ms, fade to 1.0 by ~560ms, footer travel continuous). - The original author walked the agent → connect → review flow and wake after a real sign-in on staging. - Not done here: the Linux Storybook visual baselines (`tests/storybook-visual/agent-personas.spec.ts`) need re-baselining for the new engine, hero size and naming-step changes. ## Risks - Every avatar's pixels change (new engine, new character) under the unchanged `cap-v1` name. Stacks that rendered avatars on the previous engine keep those PNGs in their cache (`generated-agent-avatars/cap-v1/...`, served immutable) until cleared; only the two pinned staging stacks ever did. - The one-shot handoff to the idle loop is timed from the sequence's authored duration (the engine reports completion by continuing into idle itself); presentation only, nothing in the wizard's state waits on it. - Reduced motion skips the wake and the hand-offs; jsdom is treated the same way, so the wizard tests see the next step's content immediately. - The committed export differs from the studio by one animation (Loop off, leading idle step removed); a re-export without that fix would play a 5.6s idle before the wake. ## Model Used Original feature: Anthropic Claude Fable 5.1 (`claude-fable-5-1`) in Claude Code, with shell, browser, and file tools. The original context window was not recorded. Merge preparation and lifecycle regression fixes: OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, shell execution, file editing, GitHub CLI, and automated tests. The session does not expose an exact runtime model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Dotta <bippadotta@protonmail.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c9e8677979 |
docs: document chat connector UX and make the runbook self-contained (#13675)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Connections let agents work with external services. > - Contributors use the connection runbook to add and review providers. > - The runbook depended on private issue references and did not capture the chat setup UX conventions. > - This pull request adds a chat connector UX guide and puts the missing requirements in the runbook. > - Contributors can apply the guidance without access to the internal issue tracker or a personal skill installation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Missing documentation and unclear contributor instructions. **Where is the issue?** `doc/connections/CONNECTOR-PLAYBOOK.md` and the chat connector setup guidance. **What's wrong?** The runbook sent contributors to private issues for validation, OAuth ownership rules, and catalog review. The Slack setup work also established useful UX rules that other providers should share. **Suggested fix** Add a companion UX document. Link it from the runbook. Include validation and review requirements directly in the public documentation. Use portable company and instance examples. Related implementation: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/13638. A search of related PRs found no duplicate documentation change. ## What Changed - Add `CHAT-CONNECTOR-UX.md` with setup, credential, identity, footer, test, and management conventions. - Include adaptation examples for Discord, Telegram, and email providers. - Link the companion from the runbook introduction, contents, and UX section. - Replace private issue references with inline architecture boundaries, risk classification, validation evidence, and per-tool review requirements. - Replace personal deployment examples with sample company and instance addresses. - Mark the recorded Notion provider observations as a dated snapshot. ## Verification - Passed `git diff origin/master --check`. - Passed local validation of all 35 relative links and heading anchors in the two documents. - Passed code-fence and private-reference scans. - Reviewed the guide against the Slack setup decisions and the existing connection docs. - Attempted `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm build`. They could not complete because this fresh worktree has no installed dependencies (`@types/node` and the CLI `tsx` entry point are missing). No application code changed. - GitHub CI passed on commit `070fefc8b2513cb9469bae76e66940c33c1465ea`, including typecheck, build, general and serialized tests, runner verification, browser tests, and canary dry run. - Security checks passed. Greptile scored the current commit 5/5 with no findings or unresolved review threads. ## Risks Low risk. This changes two documentation files only. Provider APIs and screens can change. The guide requires authors to verify provider capabilities, and the Notion example identifies its observation date. The documentation does not assert new runtime support. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, shell execution, and documentation editing. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes:` / `Closes` / `Refs` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal issue id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the applicable documentation checks locally and they pass; application checks were attempted and the environment limitation is recorded above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable (documentation validation; no runtime changes) - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
1ef3b08714 |
feat(ui): integrate agent personas across the app (#13171)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A stable agent persona is useful only when the same identity appears across the app. > - Lists, task messages, selectors, and activity feeds need inexpensive static avatars. > - Onboarding and agent headers need a larger character with expressions and pointer tracking. > - This pull request connects the persona foundation to those existing views and preserves onboarding draft assignments. > - Full-page stories and Linux checks make the placements and performance contract reviewable. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Agents need a stable visual identity in lists, tasks, onboarding, and configuration. External tools also need an image URL for that identity. **Proposed solution** Assign each agent a permanent palette from a fixed ClipLab character library. Store the assignment on the agent. Render and cache preset PNG URLs on demand. Use static images in dense views and one animated character in larger placements. **Alternatives considered** A generated image bundle requires a separate asset build. A live renderer in every avatar adds unnecessary work in large lists. Arbitrary uploaded images do not provide the requested shared character system. **Roadmap alignment** This improves agent identity across existing control-plane views. It preserves agent permissions, company boundaries, and status labels. ROADMAP.md has no separate ClipLab persona milestone. Related approaches: #2422 adds configurable image URLs and DiceBear generation; #5578 adds optional uploaded avatars. This work uses a fixed, versioned character library and preset URLs. ## What Changed - Replace agent icons with static persona images across lists, the sidebar, org charts, tasks, comments, selectors, activity, and dashboard views. - Put one animated character in the agent header. Let it follow the pointer across the page, with reduced-motion and touch fallbacks. - Add larger padded characters to agent creation. Keep the palette stable across draft refreshes and connection retries, then reveal it after success. - Pass appearance through shared projections rather than fetching each agent separately. - Add real full-page Storybook examples for the agent list, overview, task, dashboard, new-agent dialog, and connection page. - Add Linux screenshot, clipping, density, and 500-avatar performance checks. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and token gates pass on the rebased tree. Persona lifecycle tests pass. - The rebased feature passes 38 Linux screenshot/performance checks, including both display densities, corner pointer positions, and the no-WebGL/no-live-download contract for 500 avatars. - The final Linux persona suite passes all 38 visual, lifecycle, density, and full-page checks using the standard Storybook configuration and real on-demand avatar endpoint. - Final local focused verification: 45 avatar/native-recovery tests pass; UI identity/routine tests, typecheck/build, token gates, and Storybook build pass. - Current-head CI passes: full workspace/server tests, all serialized server groups, typecheck/release checks, build, canary validation, and end-to-end shards. The build passed after retrying a native-runner concurrency-test failure; its three targeted cases also pass locally. - Manual inspection covered stable identities in the app, header placement, full-page mouse tracking, onboarding size, and task/dashboard placements. ### Screenshots Linux captures use synthetic Storybook fixtures. Full-page captures use reduced motion. The live character, mouse tracking, and disposal are checked separately. <details> <summary>Agent overview with the character in its header</summary> <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/8c68f42b268ada22b67d79d0fe1bb0a2f84ec25c/screenshots/full-page-agent-overview.png" width="900" alt="Agent overview with the character in its header" /> </details> <details> <summary>Task messages and assignee identity</summary> <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/8c68f42b268ada22b67d79d0fe1bb0a2f84ec25c/screenshots/full-page-task.png" width="900" alt="Task messages and assignee identity" /> </details> <details> <summary>Larger onboarding character with room for expressions</summary> <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/8c68f42b268ada22b67d79d0fe1bb0a2f84ec25c/screenshots/full-page-meet-your-next-agent.png" width="900" alt="Larger onboarding character with room for expressions" /> </details> <details> <summary>Dashboard agent activity</summary> <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/8c68f42b268ada22b67d79d0fe1bb0a2f84ec25c/screenshots/full-page-company-dashboard.png" width="900" alt="Dashboard agent activity" /> </details> ## Risks - This PR depends on #13170, the persona foundation. Merge the foundation first, then retarget this PR to master. - Many placements change from icons to character silhouettes. Human avatars and authoritative agent status labels retain their existing behavior. - Only one character can render live per view. Reduced motion, hidden/offscreen content, touch input, and renderer failures use the defined fallbacks. - The full-page stories use fixture data. They do not contact a real company or complete real provider sign-in. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact model identifier and context window are not exposed in this session. Used code editing, shell execution, browser inspection, and Linux visual testing. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Tonio <tonework@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
43acbcc398 |
fix(runner): preserve sessions and complete question and approval continuations (#13655)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The native runner connects task state to provider sessions. > - Follow-up turns must retain provider memory and carry new user direction. > - Lost session IDs caused repeated context and extra input tokens. > - Native question answers and approval races could leave valid work blocked. > - This pull request repairs those paths and adds regression coverage. > - Agents can continue accepted work without repeating the conversation or losing the user's answer. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13574. That merged PR shortened continuation prompts and moved question instructions into tool documentation. This change preserves sessions and fixes failures exposed by broader testing. Related runtime work: #13408 and #13410. **What happened?** Native follow-up turns could lose the provider session ID. Completion guidance could replace the original task with its latest comment. Claude native questions could remain pending after the user answered. Approval during a running tool call could suspend the run before the tool response arrived. Onboarding and chat handoff instructions also caused repeated planning or missing plan documents. **Expected behavior** Reuse a valid provider session. Send only new events when that session already has the history. Preserve the task requirements and apply later user direction. Store the question answer and deliver it to the waiting run. Finish governed tool responses before suspending. Execute the accepted plan without asking for the same approval again. **Steps to reproduce** Run the continuation, local-session-integrity, first-task, and agent-chat suites with native Codex and Claude. Include provider-question-bridge, accept-while-running, and plan-handoff. **Paperclip version or commit** This branch is based on mastercanary/v2026.919.0-canary.4 |
||
|
|
3ff3b34e15 |
Return safe client errors for malformed JSON requests (#13660)
Malformed JSON requests currently reach generic crash handling and return 500 before any route handler runs. Classify the specific Express parser error as a 400 with a constant response, preserving unrelated server error reporting. Carry forward the original three commits from #7410, preserve contributor credit, and add request privacy and negative regression checks. Document the API response. Fixes #7390. Validation: 80 focused tests, direct server typecheck, and complete Linux CI passed. Greptile 5/5. Full local typecheck/build require missing Rust tooling; local test environment failures are documented in the PR. Co-Authored-By: developers-universe-1 <madelynreyes2026@gmail.com> Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>nightly/v2026.919.0-nightly.0 canary/v2026.919.0-canary.3 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
e18ed02a56 |
Validate heartbeat run IDs before database lookups (#13657)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Operators inspect heartbeat runs, logs, and provider traces through the API. > - These routes use UUID database keys. > - A malformed path value such as `undefined` reaches the database and causes a server error. > - This pull request validates run IDs before those lookups. > - Valid requests keep the existing company and permission checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: Refs #8135. That proposal guards actor run headers and activity writes; this fix covers heartbeat run path parameters. **What happened?** A request such as `GET /api/heartbeat-runs/undefined` passes a non-UUID value to a UUID lookup and returns a server error. Run logs and the other heartbeat run endpoints have the same unchecked path input. **Expected behavior** Reject malformed run IDs with HTTP 400 before any run lookup. Preserve valid run reads, company isolation, and the existing board and instance-admin checks. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Request a heartbeat run endpoint with `undefined`, `null`, another malformed ID, or a UUID with surrounding whitespace. 2. Observe the database UUID error. 3. Run the route regressions before and after this change. **Paperclip version or commit** Confirmed on master at `6d0342868`. **Deployment mode** The defect affects API deployments backed by PostgreSQL. Regression tests exercise the actual Express routes and authorization code with stubbed services. The historical request does not identify the originating client, so this change does not alter a guessed UI caller. ## What Changed - Share strict run-ID validation across the 12 heartbeat run endpoints in the agent router. - Keep existing board and instance-admin gates ahead of validation. Keep valid-run company and telemetry checks intact. - Reject surrounding whitespace, which the shared UUID helper accepts but PostgreSQL rejects. - Encode the UUID constraint and document the 400 response in OpenAPI. Test the generated parameter pattern on all 12 endpoints. - Cover malformed IDs on every affected endpoint, uppercase UUIDs, missing and cross-company runs, and permission precedence. Use UUID-shaped run fixtures in existing route tests. ## Verification - Before the fix: four malformed-ID regression cases fail; three access-control cases pass. - Focused agent route, permission, cross-company, and OpenAPI suites: 154 tests passed, including the final uppercase-UUID case. - Direct server typecheck passed: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsc --noEmit`. - The full local test attempt is still running; the complete Linux test suite passed in CI. Local results will be recorded when it finishes. - Complete Linux CI passed on the exact head: 53 checks passed, two non-applicable checks skipped. One untouched preview-service readiness test failed initially; its three targeted cases passed locally and the failed-jobs-only CI rerun passed. Greptile scored the final head 5/5 with no unresolved comments. - Full local `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` reach the native runner step and stop because `cargo` is absent. The complete Linux CI checks passed. ## Risks Low risk: this changes malformed route inputs to HTTP 400. Valid UUID requests keep their existing lookup and authorization paths. There is no migration, dependency, provider operation, or configuration change. The separate activity router and actor run headers are outside this change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with code editing, shell execution, and test tools. The exact context window size was not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run focused tests locally and they pass; full-check limits are recorded above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.919.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
6d03428682 |
Skip task-only connector reads for agent chat views (#13654)
Agent chat views reuse the task surface with synthetic chat-prefixed IDs. Skip their task-only email and external chat-binding queries, and reject invalid UUIDs after existing authentication checks on both read routes. Preserve normal task reads and company isolation. Verified failing regressions before the fix, all 6,377 UI tests, route and OpenAPI regressions, server/UI TypeScript checks, all Linux PR CI gates, and Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved comments. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.919.0-canary.1 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
d54b750111 |
Preserve Claude ACP quota classification and reset time (#13651)
Typed Claude ACP quota failures lost their recovery classification and reset time when the runtime reduced provider metadata to a generic category error. Inspect terminal metadata in memory and retain only safe recovery labels and a parsed reset timestamp. Preserve the existing handling of other limits. Verified real child processes on both pinned ACPX runtimes, adapter and server recovery regressions, all PR CI gates, and Greptile 5/5. Also isolate a pre-existing chat regression from unrelated fixtures’ retry work. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.919.0-canary.0 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
685d4faba3 |
Fix PostgreSQL recovery after a transaction connection closes (#13643)
Reject queued and late work from disconnected transaction and reservation scopes. Keep closed reservations out of the open pool, and clear old connection buffers and responses so new requests can reconnect safely. Twelve real-PostgreSQL regression cases cover crash prevention, recovery, and transaction isolation in both ESM and CommonJS. Database checks and all PR CI checks pass. Greptile: 5/5, no unresolved comments. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.918.0-canary.8 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
924f07be8c |
feat(chat): simplify Slack onboarding and account linking (#13638)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat connections let people start and continue that work from Slack. > - Setup mixed app creation, credentials, URL verification, account linking, and testing on the same screens. > - People also needed a safe way to link their own Slack identity after the first operator finished setup. > - This pull request gives each step a clear place and keeps membership approval separate from identity linking. > - It also makes connection details easier to use and fixes misleading callback health behind HTTPS proxies. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: chat routes and services, shared contracts, and the Apps board UI. **Problem or motivation** Slack onboarding made users find settings without enough guidance. A second user needed operator help to link their account. Activity stopped at 100 records, and TLS termination could mark working callbacks as stale. **Proposed solution** Use six setup steps with editable app names, a generated manifest, credential guidance, URL verification, account linking, and an optional message test. Send each Slack user a private, expiring confirmation link. Require company membership or an approved access request before linking. Add cursor pagination and tolerate the internal HTTP hop in callback diagnostics. **Roadmap alignment** This improves the existing connected-app surface and supports CEO Chat without changing the task-and-comments model. The maintainer requested and reviewed the flow during a live Slack test drive. **Additional context** Related work: #7, #3349, #13000, and #13620. Those cover broader chat capabilities, older webhook paths, or plugins. This PR improves the existing native connector's setup and account-linking flow. HTTPS documentation was published separately in paperclipai/paperclip-docs#128. ## What Changed - Split Slack onboarding into six clickable sidebar steps. Keep secondary and primary actions on one row. - Generate the Slack creation link and read-only manifest from editable app, bot, and command names. Add credential prefix validation and direct instructions. - Add live account-link status and an optional mention-based message test. - Add private, single-use Slack account invitations and membership access requests. Retain cloud authentication/bootstrap checks and enforce the chat rollout flag in all identity APIs. Default new Slack connections to linked users only. - Put Settings, Access, Conversations, and Activity in the sidebar. Simplify conversation rows and remove active header badges. - Add 25-item activity pages, stable timestamp/ID cursors, and replay safety across pages. Preserve the legacy array API for clients without pagination parameters. - Fix false callback warnings when HTTPS terminates at a proxy. Keep host, port, and path drift detection. - Document the setup flow, pagination, callback diagnostics, and shared wizard footer rule. ## Verification - Passed: `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and `pnpm check:token-gates`. - Passed: focused Slack callback and pagination integration tests; UI clipboard, wizard, pagination, and activity tests; OpenAPI route tests. The final access-gate fix also passes 27 focused tests covering cloud authentication/bootstrap, nonmember invitations, token validity, and the server-enforced rollout flag. - Passed: all 1,002 chat integration tests, 6,356 UI tests, and all 11 provider browser scenarios (including mobile light/dark navigation). After rebase, the identity route, sidebar, and 25 clipboard tests pass. - The full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted. The first run found 14 Slack fixtures that needed explicit guest access; those are fixed and the complete chat suite passes. Unrelated embedded PostgreSQL startup/resource failures and timeouts prevented a clean full local run. All CI checks pass on `2d858b036`, including the full chat, server, workspace, build, typecheck, and browser suites. - Live test drive: Slack app creation, credential setup, URL verification, private account confirmation, mention messages, and thread replies. Verified the callback warning clears for the existing proxied connection. - Review: create a Slack connection, follow the six steps, link a second user's account, and browse older activity with Next and Previous. ## Risks - Identity invitations carry a temporary capability. Tokens are hashed, expire after 15 minutes, work once, and require explicit confirmation by a company member. Access requests do not grant membership. - New Slack connections reject unlinked people by default. Existing connection settings remain intact. - Activity is a live ledger. Updated action rows can move forward in time. Older pages do not poll. - Proxy tolerance affects health display only. Slack signature checks and proxy authentication settings remain unchanged. - No database migration or package-lock changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser verification. The runtime does not expose an exact model build ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (targeted suites; full local-run limitations documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.918.0-canary.7 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
4b8dc416da |
Fix default isolation for projects without workspace configuration (#13636)
Require a company-scoped configured workspace before applying the operator default for Git worktree isolation. Projects that only have a plain managed directory retain their existing behavior. Explicit isolation requests still require a valid checkout. Add policy and heartbeat integration regressions and document the default. The regression fails before the fix. An isolated checkout passes 541 relevant tests, and the server TypeScript check passes. Local repo-wide typecheck and build require the missing Rust toolchain; all CI lanes passed, and Greptile reviewed the refreshed head at 5/5 with no comments. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.918.0-canary.6 |
||
|
scotttongandClaude Opus 5
|
8f69e0af9d |
fix(ui): confirm every copy action (#13603)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Much of the work means moving an opaque value somewhere else: an
agent id, a callback URL, a webhook secret, an error payload for a bug
report
> - Copy buttons all over the app do that, and most already say whether
it worked — an icon that flips to a check, a label that reads "Copied"
> - Eleven did not. They passed the promise to `.catch(() => {})` and
showed nothing at all
> - A copy that says nothing looks exactly like a copy the browser
refused, and the only way to tell is to paste somewhere and look
> - The clipboard really does refuse: over plain HTTP on a non-secure
host the async Clipboard API is unavailable, and the fallback can still
fail
> - This pull request gives every copy action an affordance, through two
shared hooks
> - The benefit is that a person can tell a copy from a failure without
leaving the page
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
Eleven copy buttons gave no feedback. They called `copyTextToClipboard`
and discarded the result:
```
onClick={() => void copyTextToClipboard(robotEmail).catch(() => {})}
```
Nothing changes on screen, whether the write succeeded or failed. This
is the same surface where most other copy buttons do show a check or a
"Copied" label, so the silent ones read as broken.
**Expected behavior**
Every copy action says whether the clipboard took the value. A rejected
write says so rather than staying silent or claiming success.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Open the connector setup flow for an app that shows a sharing email
or a callback URL.
2. Press **Copy** next to that value.
3. Before this change nothing on screen changes. Compare with the copy
button on a login panel, which flips to a check.
4. To see the failure case, open Paperclip over plain HTTP on a
non-localhost host, where the async Clipboard API is not available.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`45586170e` on `master`.
**Deployment mode**
Local.
**Agent adapter(s) involved**
Not adapter-specific (core bug).
**Additional context**
Commit `1fa36be35` moved every copy through `lib/clipboard.ts`, so the
call sites are findable. Of 62 call sites, 51 already showed feedback
and 11 did not.
## What Changed
- New `ui/src/lib/use-copy-action.ts` with two hooks:
- `useCopyAction` for a control that stays on screen. It returns
`copied` and `failed` for the inline swap the rest of the app already
uses, and resets itself.
- `useCopyToast` for a menu item, which unmounts with its menu before an
inline state could be read, so its confirmation goes to the toast
viewport.
- Both wait for the write to resolve before reporting success, and both
report a rejection as a failure. `AdapterLoginChrome.test.tsx` already
held that line for one button; the helper now makes it the default.
- The eleven silent sites now use one of the two: the connector setup
flow's sharing-email and callback-URL buttons, the runner inspector's
copy-value and copy-path buttons, the agent bubble and skill studio menu
items, annotation "Copy link" on both its hosts, both secret-error
detail buttons, the chat webhook secret, and the motion tweak panel's
export box.
- The chat webhook secret follows its own file's convention: a label
that reads "Webhook secret copied", matching the manifest buttons beside
it.
- The 51 sites that already had feedback are untouched. Converting them
would be a large diff with no visible change.
- `clipboard-usage.test.ts` gains a static check, sibling to the one
that already keeps copies on the shared helper. It fails if a new copy
site ships with no affordance.
## Verification
- `npx vitest run ui/src/lib/use-copy-action.test.tsx
ui/src/lib/clipboard-usage.test.ts ui/src/lib/clipboard.test.ts
ui/src/components/AdapterLoginChrome.test.tsx` — 18 tests pass.
- The new hook tests cover the three cases that matter: no confirmation
while the write is still in flight, a failure state on a rejected write,
and a return to rest after the reset delay. The toast hook is covered
for both tones.
- `npx vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx
ui/src/components/task-chat ui/src/components/RunnerInspector.test.tsx
ui/src/components/DocumentAnnotation` — the suites over the touched
components pass.
- `npx tsc -b ui` — clean.
## Risks
Low. Each change is additive at its own call site and the copy path
itself is unchanged. The static check is the only part that touches
future contributors: it is one assertion, and its pattern list is easy
to extend or drop.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), 1M context, extended thinking, with
tool use and code execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
canary/v2026.918.0-canary.5
|
||
|
scotttongandClaude Opus 5
|
34355e5109 |
fix(task-chat): selecting an option no longer jumps to the next question (#13602)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - An agent that needs a decision asks in the task composer, which renders a question set one question per page > - Single-choice questions use radio options, and the composer also ships a "Next" button and pagination arrows > - Selecting a radio option also set a pending advance, waited for a short confirm animation, and turned the page on its own > - That takes the page away from the reader while they are still reading it, and a misclick costs them the question > - Nothing on the option says that clicking it will navigate > - This pull request makes selection answer the question and nothing else > - The benefit is that moving between questions is always something the reader chose to do ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** In the task composer, selecting an option with a radio button jumps to the next question. `QuestionForm.toggleOption()` set `pendingAdvance` for any single-select question that was not on the last page, and an effect then read `--motion-question-confirm`, waited that long, and called `setPage(page + 1)`. With reduced motion it advanced immediately, with no pause at all. The result is that a click meant to answer a question also navigates away from it. There is no way to read the rest of the page after choosing, and no way to undo the jump other than pressing the back arrow. **Expected behavior** Selecting an option records the answer and stays on the question. Moving to the next question stays an explicit act. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Get an agent to ask a question set with two or more single-choice questions. 2. Open the question in the task composer. 3. Click one of the radio options. 4. Before this change the composer moves to the next question on its own. **Paperclip version or commit** `45586170e` on `master`. **Deployment mode** Local. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific (core bug). **Additional context** Every route forward already shipped beside the options, so removing the shortcut traps no one: - a footer button that reads "Next" on any page but the last, and the submit label on the last; - previous and next pagination arrows; - "Skip" on questions that are not required. The same question sets render outside the composer in `IssueThreadInteractionCard`, which never had the auto-advance. This change brings the two surfaces to the same behavior. ## What Changed - `QuestionForm` no longer sets a pending advance when a single-choice option is selected. The effect that turned the page is removed with it. - Selecting an option still clears a submit error about a missing answer, which is the case that error is about. - The confirm-before-advance animation existed only to soften the jump. Its `--motion-question-confirm` token, its keyframes, its class, and the now-unused `confirming` prop on the option button are removed. - Tests that asserted the jump now assert the opposite: selection leaves the page number unchanged, "Next" advances, and number-key selection stays on the same question. ## Verification - `npx vitest run ui/src/components/task-chat` — the composer, interaction card, protocol card, and motion token suites pass. - `npx vitest run ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatComposer.test.tsx` — 87 tests pass, including four new tests for the stationary behavior. - `npx tsc -b ui` — clean. - Keyboard: options keep `role="radio"` inside a `radiogroup`, and a test asserts that number-key selection selects without navigating. ## Risks Low. One deliberate behavior is removed. It costs a reader one extra click per question on multi-question sets, and the explicit control for that click already existed and is already tested. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), 1M context, extended thinking, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
scotttongandClaude Opus 5
|
378f11994b |
fix(connections): stop the sign-in screen from adding a phantom step (#13601)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Agents reach other products through connections, which people create
in the connector setup wizard
> - That wizard shows a stepper: a row of dots, a label under each, and
"Step 1 of 2" in the header
> - When a curated OAuth app hands off to the provider, a waiting screen
replaces the wizard while Paperclip prepares sign-in
> - That waiting screen drew its own stepper with three hardcoded
labels, so the stepper grew a dot at the exact moment the person pressed
Connect
> - A stepper that grows mid-flow tells the person they missed a screen
> - This pull request makes the waiting screen show the step model of
the flow that opened it
> - The benefit is that the stepper keeps the same shape from the first
screen to the handoff
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
The connector setup wizard shows a two-step stepper for a curated OAuth
app: two dots, labelled "Access" and "Sign in", with "Step 1 of 2" and
then "Step 2 of 2" in the header. When you press Connect, a third dot
appears, labelled "Ready".
The extra dot comes from the OAuth waiting screen.
`OAuthConnectStateScreen` rendered its own header with
`labels={["Access", "Sign in", "Ready"]}`, a constant that did not
depend on the wizard that opened it.
"Ready" is also not a step the wizard can reach. The success screen
hides the step header, so no one ever sees a third step become active.
**Expected behavior**
The stepper keeps the same number of steps from the first screen through
the provider handoff. Waiting for browser sign-in is part of the last
step, not a step of its own.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Open **Apps → Connect** and pick a curated app that signs in through
OAuth, for example Notion.
2. Look at the stepper. It shows two dots and reads "Step 1 of 2".
3. Complete the Access step and press the button that starts sign-in.
4. Look at the stepper on the "Preparing secure sign-in" screen. Before
this change it shows three dots and adds a "Ready" label.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`45586170e` on `master`.
**Deployment mode**
Local.
**Agent adapter(s) involved**
Not adapter-specific (core bug).
**Additional context**
The reporter suggested removing the stepper, on the condition that no
connector flow has three or more steps. One does.
`ConnectionSetupFlow.tsx` keeps `STEP_LABELS = ["Pick app", "Access",
"Add your key"]` for the generic path, which a person walks when they
paste an MCP endpoint instead of choosing a curated app. The two-step
counts apply only after an app is selected. The condition fails, so this
pull request keeps the stepper and repairs the phantom step alone.
## What Changed
- `OAuthConnectStateScreen` takes a `steps` prop: the labels and active
index of the flow that opened it.
- The curated OAuth path passes its own two-step model, so the count
does not change at the handoff.
- The generic pasted-endpoint path passes the three-step model it was
already walking, so its count does not change either.
- The default for hosts without a wizard of their own, such as the
paste-a-config tab, is `["Access", "Sign in"]`. The invented "Ready"
step is gone.
- `AppsConnect.test.tsx` gains a test that reads the stepper before and
after the handoff and fails if the two differ.
## Verification
- `npx vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx
ui/src/features/connections ui/src/pages/tools/PasteConfigTab.test.tsx`
— 185 tests pass.
- `npx vitest run ui/src/pages/apps/generic-mcp-connect.test.ts` — 27
tests pass.
- `npx tsc -b ui` — clean.
- The new test fails on the previous code. With the old three-label
constant restored it reports `["Access", "Sign in", "Ready"]` where it
expects two labels.
## Risks
Low. The change is limited to which labels the waiting screen draws. No
connection logic, no network call, and no navigation changes.
## Model Used
Claude Opus 5 (`claude-opus-5`), 1M context, extended thinking, with
tool use and code execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
canary/v2026.918.0-canary.4
|
||
|
|
352153b5ed |
fix: run the cargo-building native-runner CI suite in the Rust-cached vitest lane (#13586)
## Thinking Path Post-merge of #13557, the slowest check on the freshest fully-green PR run ([35246999382](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35246999382)) was `ci / General tests (server (1/12))` at **339s**. The cause is one suite: `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-codex-runner.integration.test.ts` runs 1 test in **277s of a 291s vitest step (95%)** because its `beforeAll` cargo-builds the Runner release binaries, and the general-server shards carry no Rust cache — every PR run cold-compiles the full third-party crate graph. The other 19 suites in that shard finish in under 70ms each. The obvious fix (a dedicated Rust-cached matrix lane) requires editing workflow files, which the available GitHub App credentials cannot push (`workflows` permission). But the `Verify Paperclip Runner` lanes **already restore the shared `release-runner-v1` Rust cache read-only**, and their commands are `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner <package script>` — so the suite can move into a Rust-cached lane purely through script changes. ## What Changed - `scripts/run-vitest-stable.mjs`: new `general-server-native-runner` group carrying exactly that suite. Under the PR workflow (`GITHUB_WORKFLOW == "PR"`, inherited from `pr.yml` by the reusable `pr-trusted.yml`) the without-chat server shards exclude it and rebalance to ~211s of tests each. Every other caller — local runs, `release-verify.yml` under the Release / Cloud readiness workflows — keeps the suite in the shards, so a renamed or unknown workflow degrades to today's slower-but-covered behavior instead of dropping coverage. - `packages/paperclip-runner`: `test:typescript:vitest` now routes through `scripts/run-pr-vitest-lane.mjs` — the identical `ensure:eval-build-deps && build:rust && vitest run` chain (shard flags passed through), plus the native-runner group on the **final PR shard only** (`--shard=N/M` with `N == M`, i.e. today's `vitest 2/2`, the 122s lane). With the restored cache the suite's cargo build becomes an incremental rebuild. - `scripts/__tests__/run-vitest-stable-shard.test.mjs`: guards pin the whole contract — PR 12-shard coverage (shards + chat + native-runner = full server group exactly), Release/local 10-shard runs keep the suite, `pr.yml` is named `PR`, the vitest lanes partition with exactly one final shard, the package-script wiring, and the wrapper's shard/workflow gating via its `--dry-run` plan output. No workflow files change. `.github/workflows/*` are untouched. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/run-vitest-stable-shard.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs`: **36/36 pass** locally on this branch (includes the new coverage, wiring, and wrapper-gating guards). Both files run in CI's `Test general-server shard partition` / `Test release verify workflow wiring` steps. - Wrapper `--dry-run` plan matrix verified for all six shard/workflow combinations plus malformed-shard rejection (pinned as a guard test). - The executing proof is this PR's own CI: `ci / Verify Paperclip Runner (vitest 2/2)` must go green while running the native-runner suite (its log will show the `general-server-native-runner` group after the package vitest shard), and the 12 `ci / General tests (server (x/12))` shards must go green without it. ## Risks - The exclusion keys on `GITHUB_WORKFLOW == "PR"`. Failure mode of a rename is safe (suite falls back into the server shards, slower but covered) and the guard test on `pr.yml`'s name makes it loud. - `vitest 2/2` grows from ~122s to an expected ~210–260s — still well under the ~306s `vitest 1/2` and ~326s e2e shards, and inside the 20-minute lane timeout. If the cache misses (key drift), the lane pays a cold compile like the server shard does today; a miss is slow, never wrong. - Double-run/coverage-loss combinations are enumerated in the wrapper header and pinned by tests: each caller runs the suite exactly once. ## Model Used Claude (Bender agent, Paperclip) — Fable 5. --- Expected savings once merged: the 339s `server (1/12)` check drops to ~265s-equivalent shard levels (~211s of tests), the slowest `ci /` check becomes the ~326s e2e shard (~13–33s off PR wall time), and every PR run stops paying ~4.5 min of billed cold Rust compile. For the merger (squash): please keep the trailer below in the squash body to preserve authorship. `Co-Authored-By: Bender (Fable) <Paperclip-Paperclip@users.noreply.github.com>` ## Related PRs Searched the GitHub PR list for prior work on this surface — related groundwork, none duplicate this change: - #13457 — restored master's Rust dependency cache on the PR runner lane (the read-only cache this PR relies on) - #13500 — made that cache key image-toolchain-independent so GitHub-hosted PR runners actually hit it - #13521 — rebalanced PR shards and split the Verify Paperclip Runner lanes this PR extends - #13557 — previous health-check iteration (split the runnerd transport suite); this PR targets the next slowest check ## Checklist - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above Co-authored-by: Bender (Fable) <Paperclip-Paperclip@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.918.0-canary.3 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandBender
|
de9414dd8b |
fix: return empty read instead of past-EOF range when log reader is caught up (#13592)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The server streams agent run logs to the UI. It reads the log in
byte ranges from a local file, or from an S3 mirror after a pod restart.
> - The range math in `readS3Range()` clamps the range end up to the
range start. A fully caught-up reader then asks S3 for the range
`bytes=total-total`.
> - S3 rejects a range that starts at the end of the object. It returns
a 416 `InvalidRange` error. The API turns this into a 500 error, and the
log poller repeats it.
> - This pull request removes the clamp. A caught-up or past-EOF reader
now gets an empty read, and the server does not send an invalid range to
S3.
> - The benefit is that log polling after a pod restart does not cause
repeated 500 errors.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No public GitHub issue exists for this bug. The description follows the
bug report template.
**What happened?**
The run-log API returns a 500 error when a client polls a run log that
lives on the S3 mirror and the client is fully caught up (`offset ===
total`). The cause is in `server/src/services/run-log-store.ts`. The
function `readS3Range()` computes `end = Math.max(start, Math.min(start
+ limitBytes - 1, total - 1))`. When `offset === total`, the
`Math.max(start, …)` clamp forces `end` up to `start`. The `start > end`
empty-read guard does not operate, and the code sends `Range:
bytes=total-total` to S3. S3 rejects a range that starts at or past the
end of the object with a 416 `InvalidRange` error. The error monitor
records this error many times, only in the staging environment, because
only the S3 fallback path is sensitive to it. The local-file path has
the same math, but Node file streams accept past-EOF reads. The function
`readFileRange()` in
`server/src/services/workspace-operation-log-store.ts` has the same
latent math.
**Expected behavior**
A caught-up reader gets an empty read: `{ content: "", nextOffset:
undefined }`. The server does not send an invalid range request to S3.
The poller sees no contract change.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a run and let it write a run log.
2. Let the log upload to the S3 mirror, and remove the local file (this
occurs when the pod restarts).
3. Poll the run-log read endpoint until the client offset is equal to
the log size.
4. Poll one more time. The server sends `bytes=total-total` to S3, S3
returns 416 `InvalidRange`, and the API returns a 500 error.
**Relevant logs or output**
```
InvalidRange: Invalid range
at readS3Range (server/src/services/run-log-store.ts)
```
## What Changed
- `server/src/services/run-log-store.ts` — remove the up-clamp in
`readLocalRange()` and `readS3Range()`. A caught-up or past-EOF reader
gets an empty read.
- `server/src/services/workspace-operation-log-store.ts` — apply the
same fix to the shared math in `readFileRange()`.
- `server/src/services/run-log-store.test.ts` — the in-memory S3 mock
now rejects past-EOF ranges with `InvalidRange`, the same as real S3.
Add two regression tests for caught-up readers on the S3 path and on the
local path.
## Verification
- Run `pnpm vitest run server/src/services/run-log-store.test.ts`. All
17 tests pass.
- Revert only the source fix, and the new regression test fails with the
exact caught-up scenario. This shows the test covers the bug.
- Run the suites that use the workspace operation log store
(`workspace-runtime-control-recovery`,
`workspace-operations-reconciliation`). All 15 tests pass.
- Run `tsc --noEmit` on the server package. It reports no errors.
## Risks
- Low risk. The change only affects the empty and caught-up boundary of
range reads. Normal in-range reads give byte-identical results.
- Behavior change: a read with `limitBytes <= 0` now returns an empty
chunk instead of one byte. No caller passes a non-positive limit (the
default is 256000).
- Caught-up local reads keep the `nextOffset: undefined` semantics, so
pollers see no contract change.
## Model Used
- Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic, model ID `claude-fable-5`), with extended
thinking and tool use, run through the Claude Agent SDK.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
Co-authored-by: Bender (Fable) <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.918.0-canary.2
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
45586170e1 |
fix(ui): reveal task history while retries wait to start (#13597)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and inspect their work. > - Task conversations combine comments with run transcripts. > - The first reveal waits for the relevant history to load. > - Scheduled retries have not started, so the log reader does not hydrate them. > - Waiting for those retries keeps the whole conversation hidden after its header loads. > - This change reveals available history while a retry waits to start. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A task header loads, but the conversation stays behind the loading overlay while a linked run has `scheduled_retry` status. The readiness check expects that run in `hydratedRunIds`, although the log reader does not read its log. A retry delay can therefore become a task-loading delay. **Expected behavior** Show existing comments and transcripts once their data is ready. A retry that has not started must not block the conversation. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a task with existing comments and a linked run waiting in `scheduled_retry`. 2. Let the comments and other run transcripts finish loading. 3. Observe that the header loads but the conversation stays hidden until the retry changes status. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `3f1d897a7` with regression tests. **Deployment mode** Web UI, built from source. This is a client readiness bug. Searched public issues and PRs for scheduled retries, conversation loading, and history loading. No duplicate found. Related: #10255 changes the server response for active runs with no log; it does not address this scheduled-retry readiness gate. This focused bug fix does not add a roadmap feature. ## What Changed - Exclude `scheduled_retry` runs from the initial task-history readiness gate. - Extend transcript mocks to expose per-run hydration state. - Add six regression cases across legacy and native runs. Existing history loads during retry waits, while unhydrated running and completed runs still block the first reveal. - Document the exception in a code comment. No user command or configuration changes need documentation. ## Verification - All six new cases fail before the production fix. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx src/components/transcript/useLiveRunTranscripts.test.tsx src/components/transcript/useNativeRunTranscripts.test.tsx`: 164 passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build`: passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` and `git diff --check`: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: attempted; both stop in the native runner package because the local machine has no Rust `cargo` executable. UI checks pass separately. - `pnpm test:run`: started locally, then stopped before completion after full CI passed on the same commit. The local full-suite result is incomplete. - CI on `46daa8b06`: all 53 checks passed; two optional Storybook jobs were skipped. This includes the full test matrix, build, typecheck, native runner checks, browser tests, and canary dry run. - Greptile: 5/5 on `46daa8b06`, with no review threads or actionable findings. The branch has no merge conflicts with master. ## Risks Low risk. The exception applies only to runs waiting in `scheduled_retry`. Running and completed runs retain their existing readiness checks. Retry scheduling, transcript fetching, and server behavior stay the same. No migration is needed. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and test tools. The exact backend revision and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.918.0-canary.1 nightly/v2026.918.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
scotttong
|
3f1d897a7c | copy(connectors): say "organization" in the connector setup flow (#13589) | ||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
5442f2d869 |
fix: repair managed Git launchers in sandbox projects (#13588)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip runs agents in local and remote execution environments. > - Managed GitHub launchers select credentials for each Git operation. > - Remote launchers are written inside the project checkout as extensionless CommonJS scripts. > - An ES module project makes Node interpret those launchers as ESM, so they crash before credential resolution. > - When the launcher can start, empty identity variables also override valid repository and command-line Git configuration. > - This change gives the launchers their own CommonJS scope and clears empty identity overrides while preserving managed credential isolation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** In a repository with `"type": "module"`, the managed `git` and `gh` launchers fail immediately with `ReferenceError: require is not defined in ES module scope`. The launchers use CommonJS but inherited the enclosing project's module type. Sandbox agents also report empty `GIT_AUTHOR_NAME` and `GIT_COMMITTER_NAME` variables and try to unset them for each command. With no managed identity available, the Git launcher recreated those empty values. `git commit` failed with `fatal: empty ident name`, even with explicit `user.name` and `user.email` configuration. **Expected behavior** Managed `git` and `gh` start in both ES module and CommonJS projects. Local commits with an explicitly configured identity work without manual environment cleanup. Managed credentials and captured identity continue to take precedence. Missing identity does not silently select the host user's details. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a sandbox project whose `package.json` contains `"type": "module"`. 2. Stage the managed GitHub launchers and run `git --version` or `gh --version`. Before this fix, the launcher fails at its first `require()`. 3. In a CommonJS project with no available managed identity, configure repository `user.name` and `user.email`, or supply them with `git -c`. 4. Run `git commit --allow-empty -m test`. Before this fix, both identity configuration forms fail with empty identity. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced from master commit `165b10bd9`. **Deployment mode** Sandbox execution. The shared launcher is also used for managed local and SSH execution. Related work: #13094 introduced the local-operation fallback; #13053 changes launcher discovery on Windows. Neither fixes empty identity overrides. Related identity work in #8945 and #8946 configures worktree authorship and does not remove these environment overrides. ## What Changed - Stage `package.json` with `"type": "commonjs"` in the launcher directory before the Node scripts. Keep the project's package configuration unchanged. - Leave inherited author and committer variables unset in the real Git process. When credentials are absent, require explicit Git identity configuration with `user.useConfigOnly`. - Clear empty identity merge overrides in staged shell profiles after environment merging. Preserve nonempty captured identity values. - Exercise real Git commits with repository and command-line identity, broker failures, and managed-user switching. Verify startup in ES module and CommonJS projects, shell cleanup, and captured identity preservation. - Document launcher module scope and local identity behavior in the execution GitHub identity contract. ## Verification - Confirmed both new local-commit regression cases fail before the fix with `fatal: empty ident name`. - Confirmed the new ES module project regression fails before the fix with `require is not defined in ES module scope`. - Focused launcher and shell tests: 28 passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/adapter-utils --exclude '**/dist/**'`: 1,216 passed, 11 skipped across 58 files. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils typecheck` and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils build`: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: attempted; both stop in the unchanged native runner because Cargo is not installed on this machine. - Full `pnpm test:run`: started locally; stopped the duplicate run after the complete CI suite passed. No local full-suite success is claimed. - CI on `99ea8050e`: all 53 checks passed (2 skipped), including full tests, typecheck, build, native runner checks, and browser checks. - Greptile reviewed `99ea8050e`: 5/5 with no findings or unresolved comments. GitHub reports no merge conflicts with master. - No live sandbox or GitHub push probe performed. ## Risks - The new package scope is confined to the run-specific launcher directory. It does not change the project's module type, launcher names, or credential selection. - Without a managed identity, an explicitly configured repository author can now create local commits. GitHub access remains subject to the existing credential broker. Global/system Git configuration, ambient credentials, and SSH identity remain isolated. - Managed identity still wins over repository settings. Missing local identity still fails instead of guessing host details. - New or resumed executions must stage the updated launcher and shell profiles. Existing processes retain their prior files and environment until refreshed. No database migration or sandbox image rebuild is required. - Revert this change to restore the prior behavior. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex, with code inspection, implementation, and local test execution. The hosted model variant and context window were not exposed. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (the affected adapter-utils package) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.918.0-canary.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
84fe89906d |
fix: complete native agent review handoffs (#13581)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native execution uses durable runs, issue locks, wake requests, and typed tool authority > - A child can finish with a native agent review request while its original assignee stays responsible for the work > - The reviewer then needs a bounded execution path that can inspect the child, record one decision, and finish safely > - Before this change, assignee-only gates rejected the reviewer or left the parent waiting after the child review ended > - This pull request adds typed reviewer admission, scoped reviewer tools, durable wake and recovery handling, and parent continuation evidence > - The benefit is that native review handoffs complete without changing child ownership or granting broad mutation access ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #13314 Refs: #13574 **What happened?** A native child run could report `needs_review` for an agent reviewer. The reviewer wake then failed assignee and execution-lock checks. The child remained in review and the parent remained waiting. **Expected behavior** The named reviewer should receive one durable wake. The reviewer should inspect the child and resolve the exact review card. The child assignee should stay unchanged. The parent should receive the recorded review outcome after the child reaches its terminal state. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native task with a different named agent reviewer. 2. Keep the child assigned to its original worker. 3. Let the worker finish with a native completion review request. 4. Start the durable reviewer wake. 5. Resolve the review and finish the reviewer run. 6. Observe the child and parent state. **Paperclip version or commit** Base: `e926b1301`. PR head: `b31ad9ab8`. Live reviewer verification source: `eea171aae`. **Deployment mode** Built from source. **Installation method** Built from source (pnpm build). **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific (core bug). **Access context** Both. **Database mode** Embedded PostgreSQL in the isolated live test fixtures. ## What Changed - Add server-validated native review assignment facts. - Admit only the exact company, issue, source run, decision, revision, addressee, and resolver policy. - Give reviewer runs a narrow set of Paperclip read and resolve tools. File and shell access follow the configured agent and environment policy, so reviewers can run tests. - Separate server-owned reviewer instructions from untrusted persisted review data. Escape the data boundary; retain server-enforced authorization. - Keep the child assignee unchanged. Atomically claim the reviewer run, wake request, and issue execution lock. A competing lock prevents provider startup. - Require the exact running reviewer session and current issue lock to resolve its assigned card. Reject missing, unrelated, or terminal reviewer runs. - Add durable reviewer wake, lock, stale-card, and abandoned-run recovery handling. - Prevent duplicate native wake dispatches during deferred admission and recovery. - Carry accepted or rejected child review outcomes into parent task context and continuation evidence. - Add focused server, runner, and native protocol coverage. - Preserve upstream continuation rules. Add child review decisions as separate evidence, while keeping real human answers in their own field. - Return actionable completion validation feedback to both providers. Permit a corrected completion after rejection. Keep strict terminal acknowledgment validation. - Apply exclusive shared-workspace locks to sandbox environments. Local and SSH folders can run concurrently, including when old settings request serialization. - Repair test timing, native event parsing, and the review artifact assertion. Allow a valid reject, correct, and accept review sequence. Check the accepted card against its reviewer run and decision. Keep polling within the existing deadline when review acceptance precedes the parent wake projection; report a specific missing-continuation error at timeout. - Apply the ACPX pending-call limit to reserved finish/block calls, with capacity-release and cancellation tests. ## Verification - `pnpm build`: passed on `eea171aae`. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed on `eea171aae`. - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`: 359 tests passed in 30 files on `b31ad9ab8`; runner E2E typecheck also passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - Focused DB review, reviewer authority, and prompt-boundary checks: 31 tests passed. They cover invalid reviewer runs, competing locks, atomic admission, duplicate claims, and valid resolution. - Heartbeat, workspace, and recovery checks: 30 tests passed. - ACPX sidecar suite: 27 tests passed. Moving the capacity guard back below reserved handling makes both new regression cases fail. - Four focused live continuation checks passed on their first attempt at `f15f55e0a`: answer updates scope (6/6 each on Codex and Claude) and question tool guidance (12/12 each). These cases do not use the reviewer prompt path changed afterward. - Fresh Codex and Claude review-handoff checks passed all 29 native checks each on their first attempt at `eea171aae`. Both runs received the expected fixed prompt and completed cleanup. Only the six selected live flows were tested; no full paid provider catalog run. - The final commit only extracts the existing test-harness timeout diagnostic into a shared helper and adds positive and negative coverage. Removing the accepted-review guard makes two regression assertions fail; restoring it passes all six timeout tests. Production runtime code, prompts, deadlines, and grading criteria are unchanged by this final commit. - Deadline regressions: a valid continuation delayed 20 seconds succeeds within its 30-second unit-test deadline; an absent wake returns a specific candidate-failure diagnostic at that same deadline. Both assertions failed before the fix. Production E2E deadlines remain unchanged. - Historical native failures remain recorded: Docker availability failures; a valid reject/correct/accept sequence that the first-card grader misread; and a test that rejected the gap between accepted child review and parent wake projection. No failed result was regraded. The latest tests use a protected reference to the pinned Docker image and the unchanged artifact oracle and time limits. - Full repository verification runs in GitHub CI. Local verification uses the focused suites above, full build, and full typecheck. An unchanged Codex shutdown timing test failed once in CI, passed in isolation, and its full shard passed on the final commit without changes to that test or its causal code path. The original failure is retained in the verification record. Greptile reviewed `b31ad9ab8` at 5/5 with no outstanding actionable findings. All review threads are resolved. All current-head CI gates passed, including the isolated native runner Docker build (55 successful checks; two skipped by the workflow). ## Risks - Reviewer admission depends on exact persisted decision and interaction bindings. A stale or changed card is rejected. - Paperclip control-plane tools are limited to inspection and review resolution. This is not a filesystem permission boundary; provider file and shell access retain the configured policy. - Deferred wake recovery changes dispatch receipt coalescing. A scheduler regression could delay a continuation if the receipt state is wrong. - Parent review outcomes are evidence for the model. They do not grant tool authority or change issue ownership. - This change does not address legacy lease-hold handoff behavior. > Roadmap review: native execution, review gates, and durable recovery are existing roadmap capabilities. This PR completes a narrow reliability path for those capabilities. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6-astra` with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. OpenAI `gpt-5.6-luna` assisted with bounded implementation, review, and journal work. Context window size is not exposed by this session. Live test subjects use `gpt-5.6-sol` and `claude-sonnet-5`; they are not the PR authors. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.917.0-canary.6 |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
e926b13017 |
fix: keep sandbox termination progressing after bridge loss (#13287)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip must stop remote execution after losing its controller. > - A bridge can remain blocked while the sandbox still incurs costs or performs actions. > - Waiting forever for that bridge prevents provider termination. > - A temporary provider outage can also exhaust cleanup attempts permanently. > - This pull request bounds bridge drain and persists cleanup retries with backoff. > - Cleanup ends only after provider confirmation, without a user accepting uncertain side effects. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Builds on merged #13285. Related #13254 added exact provider termination receipts; merged #13272 adds explicit user retry. Merged #13352 stops active sandbox startup before waiting for setup. This PR preserves that immediate cancellation path and extends bounded teardown to ordinary release and destroy. Cleanup continues automatically after repeated provider failures. Refs #12953 for provider failures blocking execution. **What happened?** Daytona release waits for in-flight bridge activity before stop/delete. A dead bridge can prevent that wait from finishing. The host also stops cleanup after five failed attempts. **Expected behavior** Provider termination proceeds after a bounded bridge drain. Cleanup retries survive service restarts and provider outages. **Steps to reproduce** Start a sandbox command whose bridge promise never resolves, then release its lease. Separately, persist a pending-cleanup lease with five failed attempts and recover the provider. **Deployment mode** Hosted Paperclip with a Daytona provider; rebased onto master at `728f7185f` on September 14. ## What Changed - Bound bridge drain and provider lifecycle calls. Prefer stop for reusable sandboxes, with delete fallback. - Persist cleanup attempt identity, renewable in-flight deadline, and cooldown. Fence completion writes against superseded attempts. - Preserve scoped explicit Retry and its activity log. Explicit Retry can skip cooldown, but cannot take over a live cleanup attempt. - Continue cleanup after five failures with slower retries and an operator warning. - Exclude leases in cooldown before paging so they do not starve due work. - Add hung-bridge, restart, provider-recovery, and concurrent-cleanup regressions. ## Verification - Rebased onto master at `728f7185f`. The outstanding diff contains only cleanup changes; the merged controller-ownership prerequisite is excluded. - Daytona plugin suite: 160 passed, including immediate startup cancellation, graceful release, hung activity, and teardown regressions. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-pending-cleanup-sweep.test.ts`: 31 passed. Two added integration cases verify explicit Retry during cooldown and while another cleanup owns the lease. They also verify run scoping and the activity log. - Targeted cleanup and cancellation cases in `environment-runtime.test.ts`: 20 passed. - Earlier live disposable Daytona test: provider stop ended background work, resume preserved files without restarting the old process, a new command succeeded, and the sandbox was deleted. This verifies provider behavior; it was not repeated for this rebase. - Latest-head CI and automated review are pending. Broad local tests, typecheck, and build were not rerun for this focused rebase; CI supplies those checks. ## Risks - Timing out bridge drain permits provider termination; it never supplies a stop receipt. - A crashed cleanup attempt remains protected for 15 minutes, then becomes eligible again. Repeated failures retry every 30 minutes after escalation. - The existing counter saturates at the escalation threshold; the new attempt identity and deadline prevent overlapping claims. - No schema, UI, telemetry, lockfile, or workflow change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, using reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and test tools. The precise backend revision and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.917.0-canary.5 |
||
|
mouse-value-add
|
fcdb3f2499 |
feat: add optional you.com search integration (#13555)
<!-- Simplified Technical English (ASD-STE100). --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents that do research work need live information from the web > - Paperclip reaches external systems through governed, catalog-based MCP connections > - The Apps catalog is data-driven: a researched provider with a hosted remote MCP server becomes a connectable app with no runtime code change > - You.com operates a hosted remote MCP server for web search, content extraction, and research tools > - The server supports OAuth 2.1 with dynamic client registration, an API key in a bearer header, and a keyless free profile at a separate endpoint > - This pull request adds You.com to the self-serve MCP research ledger and generates its catalog entry with three connection methods: browser sign-in, API key, and the keyless free profile > - The benefit is that an operator can give agents live web search through the normal connection governance, and the free profile needs no account at all ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists for this provider. The problem description follows the new-adapter issue template. **Agent or provider** You.com — web search and research tools over a hosted remote MCP server. **Why this adapter is useful** Agents that do research, monitoring, or fact-finding tasks need current web results. You.com exposes web search (`you-search`), live page extraction (`you-contents`), citation-backed research (`you-research`), and finance research (`you-finance`) as MCP tools. Any Paperclip company can connect it in a few clicks. The free profile offers `you-search` without an account, so a new company can try agent web search at zero cost and zero setup. **How the agent is invoked** Hosted remote MCP server (Streamable HTTP) at `https://api.you.com/mcp`. Three supported access paths, verified against the live server on 2026-09-16: - OAuth 2.1 browser sign-in. The server returns a `WWW-Authenticate` challenge with RFC 9728 protected-resource metadata and advertises a dynamic client registration endpoint, so Paperclip's automatic DCR path applies. - API key. Sent as an `Authorization: Bearer` header per the provider's official server manifest and docs. Keys come from you.com/platform and unlock higher rate limits plus the full tool set. - Keyless free profile at `https://api.you.com/mcp?profile=free`. Provides a reduced, read-only tool set. Official docs: https://you.com/docs/build-with-agents/mcp-server **Are you willing to implement it?** Yes. Implemented in this pull request. **Additional context** Research evidence collected 2026-09-16, from live protocol probes and official provider sources only: - Unauthenticated `POST https://api.you.com/mcp` returns HTTP 401 with `WWW-Authenticate: Bearer resource_metadata="https://api.you.com/mcp/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource" scope="Tools offline_access"`. - RFC 9728 metadata lists one authorization server with scopes `Tools` and `offline_access`. - The authorization-server metadata (RFC 8414) publishes authorization, token, and revocation endpoints, and advertises a `registration_endpoint`, so DCR is available. No registration was performed during research, per the runbook's non-registering preflight rule. - The keyless free profile answers `initialize` (server `You.com`, version `4.0.1`), lists the tools `you-search` and `you-discover`, and executed both tools successfully during the probe. - The API-key placement matches the provider's official `server.json` in the youdotcom-oss/mcp repository: header `Authorization`, value `Bearer <key>`. ## What Changed - Added You.com (slug `youcom`, wave 4, risk tier S2) to the self-serve MCP research ledger in `packages/shared/src/self-serve-mcp-research.json`, and refreshed the ledger verification date. - Added the You.com category (`ai`) and API-key header spec to `scripts/ingest-app-definitions.mjs`. - Added a You.com case to `specialMethodsFor` that emits three methods: browser sign-in (`mcp-oauth`, DCR), API key (`mcp-api-key`, bearer header), and keyless free profile (`mcp-free`, no auth). - Regenerated `packages/shared/src/app-definitions/youcom.json` and the generated registry via the ingestion script (`--definitions-only` mode; no unrelated provider churn). - Added the official You.com wordmark artwork (light and dark theme variants, taken from the provider's docs site) under `ui/public/brands/apps/`, with a manifest entry. - Updated `packages/shared/src/app-definitions.test.ts`: ledger counts (47 providers, 44 candidates), store count (48), verification date, and assertions for the three You.com methods and their endpoints. ## Verification - `node scripts/ingest-app-definitions.mjs --definitions-only` — passed. Generated the new definition and registry import only; no other provider JSON changed. - `node scripts/check-app-brand-assets.mjs` — passed (71 identities). - `node --test scripts/app-brand-validation.test.mjs` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/app-definitions.test.ts ui/src/lib/app-brand-assets.test.ts ui/src/pages/apps/AppLogo.brand-assets.test.tsx` — passed (39 tests). - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/shared/src/app-definitions.test.ts server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/generic-mcp-connection.test.ts server/src/__tests__/tool-connection-removal.test.ts ui/src/pages/apps/AppsConnect.test.tsx ui/src/pages/apps/Browse.test.tsx` — passed (181 tests). Two server suites that require embedded Postgres skipped on this machine by their own environment gate; the gate is unrelated to this change. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk ensure-build-deps` — passed; builds `@paperclipai/shared` with the new definition. - `pnpm test:run` (full Vitest suite) — 7,930 passed, 18 failed, 4,592 skipped. Every failure is environmental on this container: the embedded-Postgres suites refuse to start because the machine runs as root, the native runtime suites need the Rust runner binary that this container cannot build, and one media suite needs a native HEIC binary. No failure touches the app-catalog, connection, branding, or shared-package surface; those suites pass locally. CI is the authoritative gate for the full suite. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — not completed: the script's `prepare:runner-vendor` prelude builds the Rust runner, which cannot build on this container. A direct `tsc --noEmit` reports only pre-existing errors from the missing vendored runner types; no error touches this change. No server code is changed. - Live You.com proof on 2026-09-16 (keyless free profile, real network calls): preflight 401 challenge with RFC 9728/8414 metadata and DCR endpoint ✓, `initialize` ✓, `tools/list` ✓, `you-search` call returned results ✓, `you-discover` call returned results ✓. - Live proof NOT run: an authenticated OAuth connect and an API-key call against the full server. This environment has no You.com account or API key. Per the runbook, this proof stays outstanding and must not be assumed from the keyless probe. Both paths match the reviewed `mcp_remote` patterns (DCR and bearer header) used by existing providers. - Browser e2e suites not run: opt-in per `AGENTS.md`, and this change adds catalog data only, with no UI code. ## Risks - Low risk. The change is catalog data plus generated output. It adds no runtime code and touches no existing provider. - The free-profile method is a fixed keyless endpoint. If You.com changes or removes `?profile=free`, that method breaks and the entry needs a ledger update. The OAuth and API-key methods do not depend on it. - The authenticated tool catalog is discovered live at connect time, so provider-side tool changes appear through the normal catalog refresh and quarantine flow, not through this definition. - Rollback is a single revert; no migration and no state are involved. ## Model Used - Provider: Zhipu AI, via OpenRouter - Model: GLM-5.3 (`z-ai/glm-5.3`) - Context window: 200K tokens - Capabilities used: tool use (shell, file edits, live HTTP probes), long-context repository reading - The change was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by a human before submission. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergecanary/v2026.917.0-canary.4 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandBender
|
ec40bd8bf6 |
ci(runner): split retained-settlement suite out of runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts (#13557)
Moves the 19-case 'settles only retained control authority' family (~156s) plus its two private helpers from runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts (8,895 lines, 398s sequential) into a new runnerd-codex-transport-settlement.test.ts so vitest can schedule the two files onto separate workers. Pure code move, no test-logic changes; vitest collects the identical 182 test names. Measured on the PR's own CI run: 'ci / Verify Paperclip Runner (vitest 1/2)' dropped from 531s to 340s and the end-to-end PR workflow from ~545s to ~415s. Co-Authored-By: Bender (Fable) <Paperclip-Paperclip@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e26d787928 |
Shorten continuation prompts and verify question tool guidance (#13574)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents must continue tasks using user answers without losing earlier requirements or approval gates. > - The wake prompt mixed human decisions with prior tool evidence and repeated detailed question instructions. > - Those instructions belong with the question tool, with a short routing hint in the wake. > - The Runner evals need to prove that answers, approvals, and completed work survive later turns. > - This PR shortens the prompts, separates authenticated answers, and adds continuation tests with useful screenshots. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13517. This is a follow-up to the merged onboarding skill and Runner E2E work. Related #13539 covers responses received while a run is active; this PR preserves its cases and adds continuation coverage. Existing continuation/recovery and question PRs were searched; none covers this prompt/documentation and eval change. **What existing behavior does this improve?** The instructions sent when an agent continues a task, the native human-input tool documentation, and the evidence captured by Runner full-stack E2E. **Current behavior** The wake repeats a long question-tool guide. Human answers appear alongside untrusted prior results. Screenshot capture can finish at DOM load while the task still shows a spinner, even when backend behavior checks pass. **Proposed behavior** Keep earlier requirements unless the user changes them. Treat clarification as distinct from approval. Give authenticated human responses a scoped field. Keep tool and agent results as evidence. Put detailed question behavior in the tool descriptor and retain one routing sentence in the native wake. Wait for the correct task and loaded conversation before taking screenshots. **Reason and benefit** Reduce repeated prompt text and make authority boundaries clear. Test that real question cards, later answers, approval gates, and completed child tasks still work. Make screenshots useful for human review. ## What Changed - Shorten shared continuation instructions for legacy and native runners. Separate authenticated user responses from tool results and agent summaries. - Remove the detailed question guide from native wake prompts. Keep its behavior in the canonical `request_human_input` descriptor and existing payload schema. Regenerate semantic contracts and fixture hashes. - Add five continuation cases across four local profiles. Add a dedicated choice-then-text case for native Codex and native Claude. All 22 cells join the shared full E2E campaign. - Cover revised scope, clarification without approval, hostile instructions in a handoff file, and reuse of a completed child after restart. Keep production instructions and fixed user facts. - Capture continuation screenshots only when the intended task and conversation have rendered. Add provider-free browser regressions for loaders and wrong-task capture. - Preserve current master’s extra tool and onboarding cases. The default campaign now contains 166 cells; 35 manual everyday cells remain separate. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed after replay on current master. - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit`: 340 passed. Harness typecheck passed. - `PAPERCLIP_PLAYWRIGHT_CHANNEL=chrome pnpm test:e2e:runner:browser-support`: 4 passed. These tests failed against immediate screenshot capture and passed after the fix. - Focused continuation and native-input tests: 36 passed locally. The tool-authority suite could not initialize embedded PostgreSQL locally, including one isolated retry; its 17 assertions did not run locally. The full remote server shards passed on this PR commit. - `pnpm build`: passed after replay on current master. `pnpm test:run` was attempted locally but hit the same embedded PostgreSQL initialization failure; the remaining local run was stopped after complete remote CI passed. This is not claimed as a full local test pass. - [Full PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35232755685): passed on `6a22128c14f4552d0613a6d9a25955db4a1ed02f`. All server/chat/workspace/serialized shards, browser shards, Runner checks, typecheck, build, canary and policy checks passed. The isolated native Runner build and security checks also passed: 57 successful checks, with two expected Storybook skips. - Greptile reviewed the exact PR head at 5/5, with no findings or unresolved review threads. The PR has no merge conflicts. - [Live question-docs report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-question-docs-35227647794/): 3/3 passed at source `83dd132f2` before replay on master. Native Codex and Claude each asked a choice, waited, asked a text question, and saved both answers. Claude also passed a completed-child restart case. All three native turns are checked for absence of the old question block. - [Earlier continuation report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-continuation-35154943615/): all five continuation cases passed on native Claude. The report retains campaign and revision provenance and separately shows two unresolved onboarding behavior failures. - [Before/after prompt report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-prompt-comparison-20260917/): full text, current recorded Claude inputs, and reproducible reference-token counts. The controlled wake comparison removes 401 reference tokens; the net counted input reduction is 339 after charging the larger tool description. These are text-size estimates, not measured billing savings. ## Risks - Prompt wording affects model behavior. Live results cover the stated cases, not every provider or conversation. Legacy profiles are registered but were not rerun for this change. - The optional continuation field changes prompt data only; there is no database migration or new production API. - Authenticated answer projection excludes generated summaries and agent-resolved interactions. It preserves the answer’s question or approval scope. - The screenshot guard can expose UI loading failures that earlier runs hid. Backend grading alone no longer makes those captures valid. - The two prior onboarding failures remain separate product issues: work before acceptance and a missing saved plan. This PR does not claim the entire onboarding suite passes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser verification. The exact deployed model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — targeted tests above; the full local database-startup limit is documented - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.917.0-canary.3 |
||
|
|
327ab2fe38 |
fix(grok-local): do not pin empty GROK_HOME over host login (#13570)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Local adapters such as `grok_local` invoke a host CLI (`grok`) for each heartbeat > - Grok authenticates from `GROK_HOME/auth.json` when that env var is set, otherwise from `~/.grok` > - Recent work (#12469, #12618) isolated subscription credentials into a company-scoped Grok home filled only by sandbox device login > - Local_trusted instances have only a Local environment, so that login never runs, the company home stays empty, and execute still sets `GROK_HOME` to it > - This pull request stops pinning `GROK_HOME` on local subscription runs unless the company home already has usable auth, a managed AI connection supplied a home, or the run is remote/sandbox > - The benefit is that `grok login` on the host works again for local Grok agents, without leaking host credentials into sandboxes ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes: #13568 Related PRs (predecessors, not duplicates): - Refs #12469 - Refs #12618 - Refs #12696 I searched GitHub for `GROK_HOME`, `grok login`, `not signed in`, and `device-code`. No existing PR restores host-login fallback for local `grok_local` runs. ## What Changed - Local subscription execute no longer sets `GROK_HOME` when the company Grok home has no usable `auth.json` - Remote/sandbox runs and managed AI connections still pin `GROK_HOME` so they cannot fall through to the host login - Local runs still pin `GROK_HOME` once a company home has a usable credential (completed device login) - Adapter configuration notes document the host-login vs company-home split - Subscription detection respects an explicit empty `XAI_API_KEY` that clears an inherited host key. This keeps a valid company login selected. - Tests cover a real child process reading fixture host credentials, custom host homes, malformed company credentials, API-key overrides, managed connections, and empty remote homes. - Original fix by @hawikk. The follow-up preserves the contributor commit and adds independent regression coverage. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapters/grok-local`: 131 tests pass in 12 files. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-grok-local typecheck`: passes. - The new subprocess host-login regression fails against `master` and passes with this fix. It uses disposable fixture credentials and makes no provider request. - The explicit-empty-key regression fails against the contributed commit and passes with the follow-up. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: pass locally. - `pnpm test:run`: attempted locally, then stopped after embedded PostgreSQL startup failures. A focused retry of `ai-legacy-compatibility.test.ts` reproduced the same startup failure after five attempts. - All CI checks pass on `f4a380fec`: 54 successful checks and two intentional Storybook skips. This includes all general tests, serialized server suites, runner checks, browser shards, typecheck, build, and canary packaging. - Greptile reviewed `f4a380fec` at 5/5 with no actionable findings. GitHub reports no merge conflicts. - Grok CLI 1.0.13 is installed on the verification host, but it has no signed-in account. A live authenticated inference run was not performed. ## Risks - Low. Behavior changes only local subscription runs whose company Grok home has no usable `auth.json`. - Remote/sandbox isolation is unchanged: those runs still pin `GROK_HOME` and never use host `~/.grok`. - Managed AI connections still pin even with an empty home (fail closed rather than using the host account). - Operators who previously copied `auth.json` into the company home keep the pinned-home path. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Provider: xAI Grok - Model: Grok 4.6 (`grok-4.6`) - Tool use: yes (repository search, local tests, GitHub issue/PR) - Human-authored: no — AI-assisted implementation - Follow-up review, code, and tests: OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. Exact backend model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Dotta <bippadotta@protonmail.com>canary/v2026.917.0-canary.2 |
||
|
|
5d9b20ccf0 |
fix(ui): keep task composer available while pause state loads (#13562)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task messages enter through the shared task composer. > - The task page waits for a separate tree-control query to find active pause holds. > - The old loading guard disables the composer until that request settles. A slow or stalled request blocks messages on both desktop and mobile. > - This PR allows sends while that query is pending. The server still rejects paused board messages before saving a comment or waking an agent. > - Query failures and known pause holds still block the composer. > - Regression tests cover pending sends, successful responses, query failures, and late root or inherited pauses. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes: #13561 Related: #13569 adds pending/error coverage for the same fix. This PR now covers those cases and the late-pause transitions. The report overstates two details: `isPending` clears after a successful response, and the shared loading guard also affects mobile. The reproduction holds the request pending. It does not prove why the reporter's request remained unresolved. ## What Changed - Preserve the original two-line fix that removes the pending-state composer block. - Add eight page regression cases using a real QueryClient and a controlled API promise. Cover desktop and mobile, submission before the query completes, successful resolution, rejected resolution, and late root/inherited pause responses. - Repair an existing server CI failure in a separate commit. Reuse the shared unique-violation helper so Drizzle-wrapped duplicate inserts become retryable document conflicts. Add a deterministic regression and preserve unrelated database errors. - Repair an existing Inbox test race in a separate commit. Wait for workspace metadata, which resolves independently of the task list. ## Verification - Red: restore the pre-fix `IssueDetail.tsx` and run the new `composer tree control` cases. Both desktop and mobile pending-send cases fail with `Checking task status…`. The other six cases pass. - Green: restore the original PR fix. All 343 tests in IssueDetail, TaskChatThread, and TaskChatComposer pass. - The server comment/reopen and artifact-review suites pass (179 tests). They include POST and PATCH pause checks that return 409 before any comment, task mutation, or wakeup. - The document error regression fails before the shared-helper fix and passes after it. The document, artifact-review, and database-error suites pass (31 tests). The handler matches only the issue-document key constraint; revision and other constraint errors retain their original identity. - The Inbox suite passes (27 tests). - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass locally. The full CI matrix passes on `5af1ed0b43269247aaba406cf4fd4d7fe1a22e75`: 54 successful checks and two opt-in Storybook skips, including all general/serialized tests, runner checks, release checks, and eight browser shards. - One server shard initially hit an unrelated `EADDRINUSE` on test port 52000. Its single rerun passed without code changes. - Greptile completed successfully on that exact commit with 5/5 and no outstanding findings or review threads. - The serial local `pnpm test:run` was started, then stopped after the complete parallel CI matrix passed. It is not claimed as a completed local full-suite run. The focused local suites above did finish successfully. For a manual reproduction, delay the task's `/tree-control-state` response, open the task, and enter a message. Send should remain available during the delay. Resolve the response with an active pause hold and confirm that the pause takeover replaces the composer. Reject the request and confirm that the error blocks sends. ## Risks A user can attempt a send before the pause response arrives. The server remains authoritative and returns 409 for a paused task before saving or waking work. The known pause takeover and query-error block remain. There are no schema, API, or styling changes. The document change restores the existing conflict/retry behavior for wrapped database errors. It does not retry unrelated database failures. The Inbox change affects test synchronization only. ## Model Used - Original fix: Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 (`claude-sonnet-4-6`), 200k context, tool use and code editing, as reported by the author. - Review, regression tests, and CI repairs: OpenAI GPT-6 (`gpt-6-astra`) through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The session does not expose its context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: austinpilz <austinpilz@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Dotta <bippadotta@protonmail.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
165b10bd98 |
fix: enable GitHub Actions MCP toolset (#13553)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The GitHub connector lets agents use repository tools through MCP. > - GitHub excludes Actions from its default MCP toolsets. > - Approval of Actions permissions therefore does not make workflow tools appear in Paperclip. > - This pull request adds Actions to the requested toolsets for discovery and execution. > - Users can refresh existing connections and use workflow tools under the existing access rules. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** GitHub Actions tools remain absent after the GitHub App receives Actions read/write access and the user refreshes actions in Paperclip. Paperclip does not request the Actions MCP toolset. **Expected behavior** Authorized GitHub connections expose workflow tools, including `actions_run_trigger` with `method: "run_workflow"`, so agents can dispatch an existing release workflow. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Connect GitHub to Paperclip with access to a repository that has a dispatchable workflow. 2. Grant the GitHub App Actions read/write permission and approve the installation update. 3. Refresh the connection's actions in Paperclip. 4. Observe that the workflow tools are absent. **Paperclip version or commit** Base commit: `fae698031`. **Deployment mode** Hosted instance with a managed GitHub connection. The same missing header affects PAT connections. No matching public issue or pull request was found in the duplicate search. ## What Changed - Send `X-MCP-Toolsets: default,actions` through the shared GitHub MCP header helper. This covers discovery, refresh, and execution for existing and new managed or PAT connections, including legacy rows identified through `transportConfig`. - Test catalog refresh, tool risk classification, and workflow dispatch through a mock MCP server. - Document tool names, workflow arguments, required GitHub permissions, and the refresh step. ## Verification - Passed both affected test suites: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts server/src/__tests__/tool-gateway.test.ts` (391 tests). - Passed `pnpm check:token-gates` and `git diff --check`. - Live provider check: the default catalog returned 45 tools. `default,actions` returned 49 tools, with no tools removed. The four added tools were `actions_get`, `actions_list`, `actions_run_trigger`, and `get_job_logs`. - Live `actions_get` / `get_workflow` call succeeded. No workflow was dispatched during live verification. - Passed `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` with the existing Rust toolchain added to PATH. - Rechecked server typecheck and build after the legacy-connection fix; both passed. - The full local test run has reported three skills-cache failures in `company-skills-service.test.ts`. All three reproduce on the untouched base commit (`fae698031`) on this macOS host: runtime-cache directory renames fail with `EACCES`. The full run remains in progress. - Greptile: 5/5 on `7d391e3c7`, with no unresolved review threads. - After deployment, use **Refresh actions** on an existing GitHub connection and verify the workflow tools appear. ## Risks - Refreshed GitHub catalogs expose more tools. Existing access, approval, and quarantine rules still apply. `actions_run_trigger` keeps GitHub's destructive classification because it also supports cancellation and log deletion. - GitHub still enforces token and installation permissions. Dispatch requires Actions write permission and a workflow with `workflow_dispatch`. - No database migration or saved connection edit is required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with code execution and tool use. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.917.0-canary.0 nightly/v2026.917.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
fae6980310 |
revert(apps): restore Google connector visibility (#13552)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents for work. > - The Connectors catalog lists services that agents can use. > - PR #13551 temporarily hid Google connectors. > - We now want to restore their catalog visibility. > - This PR reverts that change and restores the previous catalog behavior. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #13551 Revert the temporary removal of Google connectors from the UI. ## What Changed - Restore Gmail and eight Google Workspace entries to the catalog. - Restore the matching branding flags and original catalog and service tests. - Remove the temporary-hiding documentation note. This is an exact revert of commit `cf1e873ab24277d55ffd3ab06074f77014dc4015`. ## Verification - Passed: 507 catalog, UI, and connection service tests. - Passed: `pnpm check:token-gates` and `node scripts/check-app-brand-assets.mjs`. - Passed: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui... build` and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui... typecheck`. - Full local build and typecheck stop at the Rust runner because `cargo` is not installed. - Full local Vitest was not repeated because the unchanged base has confirmed macOS skill-cache permission failures. The full CI suites passed. - Passed: all GitHub CI gates; Greptile 5/5 on commit `4e3dddef0ebfef1f99001e7735822ed4cba852ab`, with no review threads. - Reviewer check: open Connectors and confirm that Gmail and Google Workspace entries appear again. ## Risks Low risk. This restores the previous catalog visibility and setup entry points. Connector implementations and saved connection data are retained. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact deployment ID and context window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.916.1-canary.6 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
cf1e873ab2 |
fix(apps): temporarily hide Google connectors (#13551)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents for work. > - The Connectors catalog lists services that agents can use. > - We need to temporarily remove Google connectors from the UI. > - The catalog already separates visibility from retained definitions. > - This PR uses that setting so Google can return with a small change. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The Connectors catalog and its setup entry points. **Current behavior** The catalog shows Gmail and eight Google Workspace connectors. **Proposed behavior** Temporarily hide those nine entries. Keep their definitions and existing connections. **Reason and benefit** Make the temporary UI removal easy to reverse. **Breaking changes** Fresh catalog setup no longer offers Google. Saved connections keep the existing management and reconnect paths. ## What Changed - Add the nine Google connector slugs to the existing hidden list. - Match the branding manifest visibility flags. - Update existing catalog and service tests. Keep backend Google connection coverage and document how to restore visibility. ## Verification - Passed: 507 targeted tests covering catalog definitions, URL matching, setup routing, connector UI, branding, and the connection service. - Passed: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui... build` and `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui... typecheck`. - Passed: `pnpm check:token-gates` and `node scripts/check-app-brand-assets.mjs`. - Full local build and typecheck stop at the Rust runner because `cargo` is not installed. - Stopped the full local Vitest run after skill-cache permission failures. Three failures in `company-skills-service.test.ts` also reproduce on the unchanged base branch. The final connector service suite passes all 319 tests. - Greptile: 5/5 on the current commit, with no open review threads. CI is retrying one unrelated preview-server readiness timeout. That test file passes all seven tests locally. - Reviewer check: open Connectors in a company with no Google connections. Gmail and Google Workspace entries should be absent. Existing saved connections remain manageable. ## Risks Low risk. This uses the existing catalog visibility mechanism. No connector implementation, credential, or database schema is removed. Restoring visibility requires updating both the hidden list and branding manifest. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact deployment ID and context window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.916.1-canary.5 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
6fe8e30625 |
feat(apps): add Railway connection and governed deployment tools (#13415)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Apps gives agents governed access to external resources. > - Operators need to inspect Railway services, read logs, deploy code, and run container commands. > - Railway offers hosted MCP with OAuth, but broad remote actions hide their internal operations. > - This PR adds a branded connection and fixed direct operations through the existing gateway. > - Separate SSH keys enable container commands under the same grants and policies. > - Operators can require approval for an action and inspect the resulting audit record. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Apps catalog, connection setup, gateway execution, and connection documentation. **Problem or motivation** Agents need Railway access through Paperclip. Operators need to grant and revoke that access, inspect available actions, and govern deployment and container operations without giving agents provider credentials. **Proposed solution** Reuse hosted MCP OAuth, vault storage, catalog discovery, grants, and the gateway. Probe the actual credential before enabling fixed GraphQL operations. Use a dedicated grant-owned SSH key for bounded container commands. **Alternatives considered** A catalog entry alone cannot execute the missing operations. The hosted general agent has opaque internal effects. An unrestricted CLI runtime can bypass action policy and inherit ambient credentials. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the existing MCP Tool Gateway & Apps path and the Connected Apps direction in ROADMAP.md. It does not add a plugin or parallel connection service. Related PRs #311, #939, and #7861 concern hosting Paperclip on Railway. They do not add this outbound Apps connection. The separate shared agent-picker fix is #13414 and is not included here. ## What Changed - Add the generated Railway catalog entry, official marks, provenance, and OAuth setup guidance. - Add fixed service/deployment status, bounded logs, and redeploy/restart/rollback tools. Block source deployment until the provider can atomically bind the approved repository and commit. - Verify API access with an explicit workspace before exposing direct tools. - Add grant-owned SSH key setup and a bounded runner with host verification, target checks, isolated state, and cleanup. - Block the opaque hosted railway-agent and accept-deploy actions. Preserve normal Allowed defaults and Ask-first policies for other actions. - Quarantine new or changed Railway schemas after initial discovery, including reconnect. - Add provider, lifecycle, gateway, SSH, UI, and browser fixtures. Document setup, limitations, and the release checklist. ## Verification - Security follow-up: removed the unsafe source-deployment mutation. Direct calls and old active catalog entries are denied before any upstream request, including normalized aliases. Refresh marks retired entries disabled. All 386 focused Railway, catalog and gateway tests passed, and server TypeScript checking passed. Full [GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35139421144) passed oncanary/v2026.916.1-canary.4 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d0b67bfe71 |
feat: queue approvals and answers during active runs (#13539)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Users guide running agents through messages, questions, and approval cards. > - Messages already wait in a queue when an agent is running. > - Card responses did not appear in that queue. Some question answers also steered a later run without a user click. > - A fast approval could invalidate the agent's review handoff and cause it to stop its own run. > - This pull request gives card responses the same queue controls and preserves the exact response during delivery. > - Users can wait for completion or explicitly send the response with Interrupt or Steer. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13517, which is merged. This PR targets master and adds queued interaction responses on top of the onboarding changes. Related continuation work: #10519 and #12866. **What happened?** Accepting a proposal while its source run was active left a saved response outside the message queue. The agent could then lose its review path, reassign the task, and cancel itself. Answers to older questions could also steer another active turn without a click. **Expected behavior** Save the response immediately. Queue its continuation behind the active run. Deliver it after completion, or when the user explicitly chooses Interrupt or Steer. Preserve approval revisions and answer choices. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Let an agent publish a confirmation card while its run is still active. 2. Accept the card before the agent finishes its review handoff. 3. Inspect the message queue and the task's next run. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on da8a3876c with the onboarding changes from #13517. **Deployment mode** Local development from source. The fix covers legacy adapters and native Runner turns. ## What Changed - Project resolved cards into the existing queue as immutable responses. Keep answers and exact approval revisions. - Require an explicit click to steer a response into a compatible native turn. Use Interrupt when a fresh session is required. - Preserve typed response context through interruption, cleanup waits, and normal queue promotion. Keep the direct answer channel for a provider blocked on its original question request. - Accept the source run's review handoff after its card resolves. Reject stale agent reassignment that would orphan a queued response. - Add deterministic regression tests and an `accept-while-running` case to the first-task suite. Require recorded timestamp overlap before that case can pass. - Keep the first-task skill name out of user-facing messages. ## Verification - Red-green: the original route failed the queue regression; the changed route passes it. - Focused server/UI tests: 139 passed, including 64 queue-route tests. - Runner harness unit tests: 314 passed. - Server, UI, and Runner E2E typechecks passed. UI token gates passed. - Full repository typecheck and build passed. Server typecheck passed again after review fixes. - Review regressions: 165 queue/reopen route tests, 53 wake admission tests, and 18 run identity tests passed. Approval acknowledgement recovery and both message/approval arrival orders are covered. - Full local test run: 12,401 passed; three new admission regressions ran against a cached pre-fix module. A fresh run of that entire suite passed (53 tests). The complete CI suite passed on the final commit. - Previous-head CI at `c28e2ef12`: 32 checks passed and 2 optional Storybook checks skipped. Every server/workspace/browser shard, Runner verification, build, typecheck/release registry, canary, policy, and security check passed. Greptile: 5/5, no unresolved threads. Earlier interrupted CI workers were replaced by this fresh complete run. - After integrating the updated parent: 314 harness tests, 119 queue/admission tests, 44 onboarding/question-delivery tests, and 13 native recovery tests passed locally. Full repository typecheck and build passed. - Clarified the skill wording preference: routine replies describe the action without announcing the internal skill; direct questions and permission/security/execution disclosures remain truthful. - The paid `accept-while-running` scenario is registered for all four local first-task profiles. It has not been run against a model in this change. - Rebased onto the merged parent at `11921075a`; the resulting tree exactly matches the locally verified integration tree. Final-head CI on `b53054807` passed: 54 successful checks, 2 optional Storybook checks skipped, no failed checks. Every new server/browser shard, aggregate verify/e2e gate, Runner, typecheck, build, canary, and security check passed on the first attempt. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no unresolved threads. ## Risks - Responses now wait instead of implicitly steering another active turn. A provider blocked on the original question still receives its answer directly. - Approval receipts cannot be edited, discarded, or reordered as comments. This preserves the recorded decision. - Interruption must still prove that the prior execution stopped. The tests cover cleanup waits and duplicate delivery. - The new paid overlap case can be unexercised if the model finishes before the click lands. It cannot pass without evidence of overlap. - No database migration is required. This repairs the existing approvals and execution controls; it does not implement the roadmap's work-stream queues. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact deployed model ID and context-window size were not exposed in this session. Capabilities used: agentic reasoning, repository inspection, code editing, terminal commands, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.916.1-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
11921075a4 |
Add first-task onboarding skill and Runner E2E coverage (#13517)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The first task helps a new user define and approve useful work. > - That workflow needs reusable instructions and tests against the production experience. > - Native Codex and Claude must load the assigned skill, including after resume. > - Maintainers need recorded conversations and precise failed checks to judge regressions. > - This pull request adds the first-task skill and a suite in the shared Runner E2E harness. > - It keeps behavior results separate from informational quality scores and incomplete recordings. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The first onboarding task and the Runner E2E report used to review it. **Current behavior** Onboarding embeds its policy in a hidden brief. Native Codex drops the skill-instructions setting at the Rust boundary. The shared E2E harness has no onboarding suite or full conversation view. **Proposed behavior** Assign and invoke `/first-task` for the onboarding task. Send selected Codex skills as structured protocol inputs. Run twelve scenarios across legacy Codex, legacy Claude, native Codex, and native ACPX Claude. Include all 48 cells in full campaigns. Show recorded chat, question and approval cards, exact checks, instructions, and billing in the shared dashboard. **Reason and benefit** Measure the real onboarding experience before changing prompts. Distinguish infrastructure failures, behavior failures, and unexercised journey steps. **Breaking changes** No database migration or production API change. First-task instructions now live in an assigned skill. The user-edited persona is preserved; the skill includes the maintainer-approved proposal-mode mapping and saved-plan requirement. Related: #11043 is earlier onboarding work. #13422 already fixes native Claude model pinning, context delivery, and read permissions on master; this branch includes those fixes through its base. The new Claude recovery test supplements them. ## What Changed - Extract and assign the first-task skill while retaining the production greeting and opening question. - Carry the Codex skill-instructions flag through thread start and resume. Resolve explicit task skill references only against assigned skills and send native skill inputs. - Invoke an unambiguously selected assigned skill through Claude ACPX’s native slash-command parser on initial and resumed turns, retaining the entire task/wake envelope as its argument. Do not carry that invocation into ordinary tasks. - Restore the saved single-task proposal modes: confirmation card, or saved plan with revision-targeted checkbox approval. Explicit plan requests also require a saved plan. - Add first-response and complete-journey cases with fixed user facts, acceptance checkpoints, durable outcome checks, and accounting for child runs. - Fail the eval when choice questions have fewer than two real options. Recognize planning documents without treating them as completed work. - Add optional, bounded quality judging as explicit post-processing. - Render full conversations and static interaction cards in the shared report. Conversations start folded. Show original and regraded results and incomplete journeys distinctly. - Keep credential-persistence scanning outside the first-task behavioral suite; retain public evidence redaction. - Refresh generated capability references after the API-reference edits. - Correct shared native question guidance and tool schemas: choices need at least two meaningful options; open-ended questions use canonical text fields with the required compatibility payload. Verify both formats through real tool-authority persistence. - Disable announcements automatically for every isolated Runner E2E process and label the gallery environment/provider/target explicitly. - Remove CI races in the GitHub connection browser test and native session recovery test by waiting for the actual async work before asserting its results. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/onboarding-first-task-assets.test.ts server/src/__tests__/issue-onboarding-first-task-routes.test.ts`: 19 passed. - `pnpm --dir packages/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/native-skill-prompt.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts`: 70 passed. Native command forwarding and the 1 MiB input boundary both failed before their fixes and passed afterward. Coverage includes changed skills on reopen, approval context, and an ordinary subsequent task. - Runner E2E unit suite: 306 passed. Harness typecheck passed. The 64 first-task fixture and grader tests also pass. - Full repository typecheck and build passed locally. Server typecheck and Runner build passed again after the native-command change. - Full GitHub Actions CI passed on `23e56447b`: all server/workspace/browser shards, Runner verification, typecheck/release registry, build, canary, policy, and Docker checks. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no unresolved threads. The earlier broad local run had database startup/timing failures that passed isolated retries; the complete remote suite is green. - Merge verification against current master: 312 harness tests and 13 native recovery tests passed. Regenerated semantic contracts and fixture hashes pass their consistency check. Full local typecheck and build also passed on the stacked queue branch. After merging the latest master and preserving the GitHub setup timing regression in the split browser suite, both focused GitHub browser tests passed. Three CI timing/startup flakes passed local verification and one remote retry; all latest-head checks are green. - Real pinned Claude SDK and Claude ACP JSON-RPC probes against a local mock API confirmed that `/skill-name` expands the assigned skill body before the model request and retains the task arguments. A prose mention does not. The probes made no paid model calls. The ACP probe used the current first-task skill body and retained the wake arguments. - [Full 48-case campaign and report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-first-task-35053063880/): 44 passed after three interrupted Codex cases completed in targeted reruns. Original results, regrades, and all 51 executions remain in the report provenance. - [Claude campaign after the shared-question fix](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-first-task-claude-35099525201/): 10/12 passed with zero single-option failures. All 12 recorded the current assigned skill and corrected guidance. The failures exposed skipped skill invocation and a missing saved plan. This PR adds native command invocation and explicit saved-plan instructions; the subsequent report below still shows behavior failures. - [Fresh 12-case Claude report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/runner-e2e-first-task-claude-35102737804/) at `78452129e`: 10/12 pass after correcting two false proposal-matcher failures. The recordings said “Here is the task I will create and run/complete” in approval cards; the old matcher missed that word order. Regression tests failed before the fix and pass after it. Original results and offline regrade provenance remain linked. No agent rerun was needed. Zero single-option-question failures; two behavior failures remain: direct work before acceptance on a plain first message, and an explicit plan request without a saved plan. Neither check was relaxed. The follow-up `82087ac7e` fixes command-prefix size accounting; `94aefb1f3` fixes only that proposal matcher. - Report browser checks confirm folded conversations, rendered cards, explicit Local/Daytona labels, and no page errors. The published-object audit scanned 1,306 text files across 2,154 objects with no credential-format findings or prohibited files. Image pixels and unknown token formats are outside that scan. ## Risks - Model behavior is nondeterministic. One campaign is evidence, not a guarantee. The two remaining Claude behavior failures are visible in the report and require further product work; this PR does not claim all onboarding scenarios pass. - The suite checks persisted Paperclip effects. It cannot prove the absence of arbitrary external effects. - Historical recordings can miss later journey steps. These remain incomplete, never passes. - Native profiles switch runtime after the production onboarding wizard because it does not yet expose a native option. - Quality scores are informational and cannot override behavioral failures. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The exact deployed model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.916.1-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
dcb04a8062 |
fix(claude-local): read a macOS isolated login from its suffixed Keychain item (#13519)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Connecting a Claude subscription during onboarding uses an isolated
login: the wizard points `claude` at a per-connection
`CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR` and then verifies the credential before saving the
connection
> - The verifier reads `.credentials.json` from that directory — but on
macOS, Claude Code does not write a credentials file at all: it stores
the OAuth credential for a custom config dir in a per-directory Keychain
item named `Claude Code-credentials-<first 8 hex chars of sha256(dir)>`
> - So on macOS the connect step can never verify a successful sign-in,
and onboarding dead-ends at "Could not verify the local subscription"
(Linux works because the CLI falls back to writing the file there, which
is why the Docker-based smokes pass)
> - This pull request teaches the credential readers to consult the
login home's own suffixed Keychain item when the file is missing
> - The benefit is that macOS self-hosted users can connect a Claude
subscription during onboarding, while the standing isolation invariant —
an isolated login must never fall through to the machine-level operator
login — is preserved, because only the per-directory suffixed item is
ever read
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing issue. Description follows the bug-report template:
**What happened?**
On macOS, connecting a Claude subscription during onboarding (or from
Connections) always fails with "Could not verify the local subscription.
Run the sign-in command shown for this connection, finish signing in,
then try Connect again" — even after `claude auth login` completes
successfully in the isolated `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR`.
**Expected behavior**
After finishing the browser sign-in for the printed command, clicking
Connect verifies the subscription and saves the connection.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. On macOS, run onboarding on a fresh instance and reach "Connect a
model" → Claude → Subscription.
2. Run the printed `export CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR=… && claude auth login`
command in a terminal on the same machine and complete the browser
sign-in.
3. Return and click Connect. Verification fails every time. Inspecting
the isolated directory shows `.claude.json` with a fully populated
`oauthAccount` but no `.credentials.json`; `security
find-generic-password -s "Claude Code-credentials-<suffix>"` shows the
credential landed in the Keychain, where the verifier never looks.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced on `2026.915.0-canary.11` (`dffc2b3ca`) with Claude Code
2.1.231.
**Deployment mode**
Self-hosted, authenticated instance on macOS.
**Installation method**
`npx paperclipai onboard` (also affects any macOS install; Linux is
unaffected).
## What Changed
- `packages/adapters/claude-local/src/server/quota.ts`:
- New exported helper `readIsolatedClaudeKeychainToken(loginHome)` —
computes the suffixed service name (`Claude Code-credentials-` + first 8
hex chars of `sha256(loginHome)`) and reads only that item via
`/usr/bin/security`; returns null off macOS
- `readClaudeToken` with a custom `CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR` now consults that
directory's suffixed item after the file reads miss (previously it
refused the Keychain entirely for custom homes). The unsuffixed operator
item is still gated behind the explicit `allowKeychain` opt-in with no
custom home, unchanged
- `server/src/services/local-ai-credentials.ts`: for anthropic isolated
logins, fall back to the suffixed Keychain item after the hardened
credentials-file reads miss. The file path is untouched and still
preferred; the hardened file reader (`readLocalAiCredentialFile` with
its uid/mode/symlink checks) is not bypassed
- Tests: adapter keychain suite extended (suffixed lookup for custom
homes, no unsuffixed fallback when the suffixed item is absent,
off-macOS null); server verifier suite extended (keychain fallback when
the file is missing, file preferred over keychain, absent-login failure
still never touches the ambient reader)
Security note: the suffix binds each Keychain item to exactly one auth
home, so reading it can only surface the login performed inside that
home. The account-isolation invariant the old code enforced by refusing
the Keychain outright ("never substitute the server operator's login for
a user's isolated login") is preserved — the unsuffixed item is never
consulted for an isolated login, and a new test pins that.
The suffix derivation was confirmed against a live login on macOS: a
real `claude auth login` into an isolated home left no credentials file,
wrote the full `oauthAccount` to `.claude.json`, and created a Keychain
item whose suffix equals the first 8 sha256 hex chars of the exact
`CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR` string; reading it back with the same `security`
invocation returned the live token, which the new code path then
verifies via the existing quota probe.
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/server/quota-keychain.test.ts`
(claude-local): 10 tests pass; full claude-local suite: 287 passed, 1
skipped
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/local-ai-credentials.test.ts`
(server): 11 tests pass
- Reverting only the verifier change makes the two new server tests fail
— the suite reproduces the live bug
- End-to-end on macOS: a dev server built from this branch, fresh data
dir, full onboarding walk with a real `claude auth login` into the
printed isolated dir — the connect step verifies and saves the
connection
## Risks
- Low. The change is additive and fail-closed: when the suffixed item is
absent (Linux, older Claude Code versions, no login performed), behavior
is byte-identical to today — the file reads run first and the failure
message is unchanged
- The `security` call runs with the existing 10s timeout and swallowed
errors, matching the established unsuffixed-item code path
- No migrations, no API surface changes
## Model Used
Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking with tool use
(Claude Code).
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
canary/v2026.916.1-canary.1
|
||
|
Devin Foley
|
d08abcba15 |
ci: cut PR wall clock from ~16 to ~6 minutes (#13521)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Every pull request runs the Trusted PR CI workflow before merge > - The test suites roughly tripled in six weeks, and shard balance did not keep up, so PR runs crept from ~4 to ~17 minutes > - Slow CI delays every merge and every contributor > - This pull request rebalances the shards from fresh measurements, splits the largest test files, reuses the Rust build cache in three more jobs, and takes the policy job off the critical path > - The benefit is a PR wall clock near 6 minutes with the same coverage ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** PR CI wall clock. A typical green run took 16-17 minutes. Two months ago it took about 4 minutes. **Subsystem affected** The Trusted PR CI workflow (`.github/workflows/pr-trusted.yml`), the shard-duration manifests, the vitest shard runner scripts, the `paperclip-runner` package scripts, and the dry-run branch of `release.sh`. **Current behavior** The shard-duration manifests were stale. The general-server manifest had durations for ~400 of 649 suites. The e2e manifest was missing 14 of 29 specs. Stale median weights made shard steps range 417s-806s (server) and 277s-745s (e2e). Three jobs each paid a ~3m40s cold cargo release build. Every test lane waited ~60s for the policy job before it could start. **Proposed behavior** All lanes finish in a narrow ~200-290s band. The manifests carry fresh measured durations for every suite. The three largest test files are split so no single file caps a shard. The Rust cache restore runs in every job that builds the Runner binary. Test lanes start as soon as the gate resolves. **Reason and benefit** Merges stop waiting on CI. The projected wall clock is ~6 minutes for the same test coverage. ## What Changed - Rebuild `scripts/general-server-shard-durations.json` (646 suites) and `scripts/e2e-shard-durations.json` (all specs) from per-suite completion timestamps in runs 35036001734 and 35024948947. - Move the PR server lane to the release-verify shape: `general-server-without-chat` across twelve duration-balanced shards, plus the chat integration suite split by collected test location across three dedicated lanes. - Split `tests/e2e/chat-adapters-ui.spec.ts` into `-providers` and `-messaging` specs, and `tests/e2e/agent-chat.spec.ts` into `-sessions` and `-projects` specs. Each pair shares fixtures through a `.shared.ts` module. Playwright collects the same test sets (39 and 20 tests). - Raise e2e shards to eight and serialized shards to nine. - Run the runner package's `check:all` as four matrix lanes: `check:static`, `check:runner`, and two native vitest `--shard` halves. The union is exactly `check:all`. - Add the read-only Rust cache restore (toolchain pin, `save-if: false`) to the Canary Dry Run, Build, and Typecheck jobs. - Make release.sh preview publish payloads concurrently in batches of eight during `--dry-run`. The real publish path stays strictly serial. - Drop the policy-job lockfile artifact chain. Each lane installs with `--frozen-lockfile` and falls back to an inline `--resolution-only` regeneration. The policy job stays a required check through the `verify` and `e2e` aggregates. - Update the shard-count mirrors and workflow assertions in the partition and gate tests. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/__tests__/run-vitest-stable-shard.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/e2e-shard.test.mjs` — 30 pass. - `node --test '.github/scripts/tests/'*.test.mjs` — 410 pass. - `node --test scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs scripts/cloud-source-verification.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/release-dry-run-notes.test.mjs` — 42 pass. - `playwright test --list` collects 39 tests across the chat-adapters split and 20 across the agent-chat split, equal to the original files. - A local vitest collection of the chat suite partitions 995 tests into 498/497 line shards. - Projected shard weights: server 230s x12, chat ~143s x3, e2e 207-242s x8, serialized ~216s x9. ## Risks - The split spec files reorder tests relative to the original files. Every describe seeds its own company, so the specs stay independent; a hidden cross-describe dependency would surface as a deterministic failure in one shard. - The inline lockfile fallback changes install behavior for manifest-changing and stacked PRs. The policy job still validates resolution as a required check. - `release.sh` changes are confined to the `--dry-run` preview branch. The publish loop is untouched. `bash -n` passes and the release dry-run tests pass. - One PR now schedules ~44 fleet runners. If the RunsOn fleet caps concurrency, queueing may absorb part of the gain; watch the first runs. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Anthropic), extended thinking, with tool use (shell, file edits) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
Devin Foleyandgithub-actions[bot]
|
c49336acdf |
docs(release): canonicalize v2026.916.0 release notes (#13548)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Stable v2026.916.0 shipped today; its release notes were maintained during the beta window at `releases/beta/v2026.916.0-beta.0.md` > - The release workflow's canonicalize step renames the file to its canonical stable path once the promotion completes, pushing the rename to a branch for a human-opened pull request (bot-opened PRs trigger no CI) > - This pull request is that rename: `releases/beta/v2026.916.0-beta.0.md` → `releases/v2026.916.0.md` > - The benefit is that the published GitHub Release body and the in-repo notes file agree on the canonical path ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Routine post-release canonicalization for the `v2026.916.0` stable, generated by the release workflow's `canonicalize_stable_notes` job (run 35126040769). Content is byte-identical to the notes published on the GitHub Release. **What happened?** Stable promotion completed; the notes file needs its canonical name. **Expected behavior** `releases/v2026.916.0.md` exists on master matching the published release body. **Steps to reproduce** n/a — mechanical rename. ## What Changed - Rename `releases/beta/v2026.916.0-beta.0.md` to `releases/v2026.916.0.md` (no content change) ## Verification - Diff is a pure rename; content matches the published GitHub Release body for v2026.916.0 ## Risks - None — docs-only rename. ## Model Used None for the change itself (generated by the release workflow); PR opened via Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`, Claude Code). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.916.1-canary.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
9fd2e50310 |
feat: create company skills from runner tasks (#13538)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Runner gives agents tools to change company resources. > - Users need agents to save reusable skills during a task. > - A saved skill needs a visible result that users can inspect and edit. > - This pull request adds `create_skill` and a task feed card linked to Skill Studio. > - Users can open the saved skill from the task and edit the same resource. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Runner tools, company skill storage, task feed, and Skill Studio. **Problem or motivation** The Runner has no dedicated tool to create a company skill. A user cannot follow a creation result from the task feed to the saved skill. **Proposed solution** Add a company-scoped `create_skill` tool. Save the skill with the existing company policy. Add one creation card to the task. Open a named sidebar tab from that card. Let the user open the same skill in Skill Studio. **Alternatives considered** An agent can write a local file, but that file is not a company skill. A second document copy in the task would become stale after a Studio edit. The sidebar therefore reads the saved skill directly. **Roadmap alignment** This extends the shipped Skills Manager, Skill Studio, and Skills Store milestone. The maintainer requested and approved this scope. Search found no duplicate `create_skill` PR or issue. Related UI validation work: #8715. This PR does not change that validation display. ## What Changed - Add the real Runner tool, its contract, and its mock implementation. - Validate the complete SKILL.md and derive company, task, agent, and run identity from authentication. - Apply the existing company skill policy. Do not assign the skill to an agent. - Make keyed retries return one skill and one creation event. Reject conflicting retries. - Make concurrent file creation safe. Never replace an existing published skill during creation. - Add a creation card, a named sidebar tab, and an Open in Skill Studio action. - Show saved Studio edits when the user returns to the task. - Add storage, policy, mode, retry, UI, and Product E2E tests. Document the tool. - Fix deleted-name reuse, onboarding panel persistence, immediate feed refresh, and mock validation parity from review. - Serialize Studio file edits and renames with skill deletion and recreation. Reject stale editor requests before they can change a replacement skill. - Generate the standalone mock parser and validator from the production contract. Use portable UUIDs so the browser scenario bundle builds. ## Verification - All latest-head PR checks pass on `145dd76a5`, including all server shards, browser E2E, Runner verification, build, typecheck, and release dry run. Greptile: 5/5 with no open findings. An interrupted CI runner was retried successfully. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - Review regressions: 73 storage tests, 6 real API tests, 63 UI tests, and 61 semantic runtime tests passed. Parser synchronization passed. - CI exposed existing fire-and-forget Sentry test races. Reproduced the resumption race locally, then synchronized the related sweep and finalizer assertions on the actual report; all 27 tests across the three affected files pass. - Runner scenario browser build and strict content-security-policy check: passed. - Runner suite: 2,012 tests passed; 10 skipped. - `pnpm test:run`: the general-server batch had 12,416 passes and two failures. The old tool-count assertion was fixed; all 16 authority tests then passed. The chat webhook test had a socket error; it passed four isolated reruns. - Both workspace test groups passed. The isolated route suites completed. Two socket failures in the initial route batches passed on individual reruns; all remaining 61 files passed. - Product E2E `create-skill-studio`: passed with local Codex and local ACPX Claude. - Manual browser test: submit a task, observe the real tool call and creation card, open the sidebar, edit in Studio, save, and return. The task reached Done. The saved second revision and sidebar tab survived a server restart. - The new companion headless Runner Eval passed. Companion coverage PR: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-evals/pull/23. Daytona was not run because no immutable runner image was configured. ## Risks - Database writes and local file writes cannot share one transaction. Recovery accepts only an exact file-for-file retry after a database rollback. Conflicting files remain untouched. - The sidebar displays the current skill. The feed card remains the historical creation receipt. - No database migration, dependency, or workflow change is included. - Remote Daytona behavior still needs a run with a configured immutable image. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (`gpt-6-astra`) handled design, integration, review, and browser verification. OpenAI `gpt-5.6-luna` assisted with bounded implementation and eval work. Both used code execution and tool access. The host did not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
5b6e54fba8 |
fix(cli): accept prompt defaults in onboarding wizard validators (#13520)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The CLI onboarding wizard's custom-setup path collects server,
database, storage, and secrets configuration through `@clack/prompts`
text prompts, most of which show a sensible default
> - `@clack/prompts` runs each prompt's `validate` callback on the raw
typed value, and only substitutes `defaultValue` after validation passes
— so pressing Enter to accept a shown default hands the validator an
empty string
> - Eleven of the wizard's validators reject the empty string, which
makes their own displayed defaults unacceptable: accepting "Embedded
PostgreSQL port: 54329" fails with "Port must be an integer between 1
and 65535", "Backup directory" fails with "Backup directory is
required", and so on through every prompt in the custom path
> - This pull request makes each affected validator accept empty input
when a default exists, while keeping all real validation for typed input
> - The benefit is that the custom-setup wizard is walkable by pressing
Enter through the defaults, as the UI clearly intends
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing issue. Description follows the bug-report template:
**What happened?**
In `paperclipai onboard` custom setup, pressing Enter to accept a
prompt's displayed default fails validation on eleven prompts. Confirmed
live on the "Embedded PostgreSQL port" prompt (default 54329 → "Port
must be an integer between 1 and 65535") and the "Backup directory"
prompt (populated default path → "Backup directory is required"). The
only way through is to retype every default by hand.
**Expected behavior**
Pressing Enter accepts the displayed default, as in every standard
`@clack/prompts` flow.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. `npx paperclipai onboard` → choose Custom setup.
2. At "Embedded PostgreSQL port", press Enter to accept the shown
default.
3. Validation rejects it. Same for the backup directory, backup
interval/retention, server port, bind host, storage directory, S3
bucket/region, and secrets key-file prompts.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Reproduced on `2026.915.0-canary.11`; the same validators exist in the
latest stable (`v2026.831.1`) — long-standing, not a recent regression.
**Deployment mode**
Any (the bug is in the CLI wizard).
**Installation method**
`npx paperclipai onboard`.
## What Changed
- Audited all 15 `validate:` callbacks across
`cli/src/prompts/{database,server,storage,llm,secrets}.ts`. Eleven
rejected the empty string while displaying a default; two were already
fine (hostname CSV prompts, where empty parses to `[]`); one is an
intentionally required password with no default (left alone); one
(PostgreSQL connection string) and one (public base URL) are
conditionally required — empty now passes only when a saved default
exists, so fresh setups still enforce the field
- Fix pattern: allow empty/undefined input at the top of each affected
validator; every check for non-empty typed input is unchanged. One
deliberate exception: the bind-host validator validates `(val ||
defaultHost)` so accepting the default still runs the loopback safety
check rather than bypassing it
- New `cli/src/__tests__/prompt-default-accept.test.ts` (repo-convention
vitest + clack mock reproducing real submit semantics — validate raw
`""`, then substitute the default): drives the four prompt modules
end-to-end and unit-exercises each captured validator (empty accepted,
garbage still rejected, required-when-fresh still rejected)
## Verification
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/prompt-default-accept.test.ts` in
`cli/`: 13/13 pass; with the prompt fixes stashed: 12/13 fail — the
suite reproduces the bug
- Full cli suite: 483 passed; 15 failures are pre-existing/environmental
on the clean tree too (macOS `/var` realpath mismatch in
`worktree.test.ts`, one parallel-run flake that passes in isolation)
- `pnpm run typecheck` in `cli/`: zero errors in `cli/src` (the 228
pre-existing errors in `../server/src` from missing prebuilt workspace
dist are identical with and without the change)
## Risks
- Low. Typed input validates exactly as before; whitespace-only input is
still rejected (clack substitutes the default only for truly-empty
input). The two conditionally-required prompts still hard-require a
value on fresh setups
- No migrations, no API surface changes; CLI-only
## Model Used
Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking with tool use
(Claude Code); implementation drafted by a subagent on the same model
and reviewed before commit.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
canary/v2026.916.0-canary.4
|
||
|
Devin Foleyandgithub-actions[bot]
|
de9ac61fb5 |
docs(release): curate stable notes for v2026.916.0 (#13522)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The release system publishes canary, nightly, beta, and stable channels; a stable promotion publishes its release notes as the GitHub Release body > - At beta publish time the workflow auto-drafts a raw commit-log skeleton on this branch (`releases/beta/v2026.916.0-beta.0.md`) for humans to edit > - The skeleton is a 1,800-line commit dump; stable `v2026.916.0` cannot ship user-facing notes in that form > - This pull request replaces the skeleton with the curated changelog for the `v2026.916.0` promotion: overview, breaking changes, highlights, fixes, upgrade guide, and contributor credits for the 483-commit range since `v2026.831.1` > - The benefit is that the stable promotion reads finished, accurate notes from master and publishes them as the release body ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13403, #13247, #13248, #13268, #13256, #13038, #13299 — the headline features this changelog describes. The notes-drafting flow itself (skeleton branch at beta publish, stable promotion reading the file from master, post-ship canonicalization) is the standing release process; this PR is the curation step it expects. ## What Changed - Replaced the auto-drafted skeleton in `releases/beta/v2026.916.0-beta.0.md` with the curated release notes for stable `v2026.916.0` (promoted from beta `2026.916.0-beta.0`, source `dffc2b3ca`) - Also removes the orphaned `releases/beta/v2026.915.0-beta.0.md`: that beta's promotion was abandoned before publishing, and this changelog supersedes it - Sections: overview, Breaking Changes (5), Highlights (Connections train leads), Improvements, Fixes, Upgrade Guide (migrations `0231`–`0279`, new env vars, removed API surface), Contributors ## Verification - Every PR link and claim was checked against the actual commit range `dbf052577..667c79ded` (the same range the skeleton header names) - Migration list enumerated from `git log --diff-filter=A` over that range; only `0231` and `0236` discard data, called out as such - New environment variables verified in code (`server/src/config.ts`): announcement flags (default on), split Sentry DSNs with legacy fallback, token-broker allowed hosts, cwd `.env` opt-out - Contributor list built from commit authors plus co-author trailers; core maintainers excluded per release-notes convention - Docs-only change: no code paths, no tests to add ## Risks - Low risk: documentation only. The stable promotion reads this file from master at dispatch time; if wording needs a follow-up after merge, the promotion pins the master revision it resolved, so edits must land before the stable dispatch - The file is renamed to `releases/v2026.916.0.md` by the post-ship canonicalization step, as with previous promotions ## Model Used Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), extended thinking with tool use (Claude Code). The commit-range analysis and draft were produced by a subagent on the same model and human-review-style checked against the range before commit. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.916.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
18989a9e73 |
docs: add eval guide, authoring skills, and public history hub (#13535)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its evaluations test both the Runner and complete product workflows. > - The guides and run histories are in separate places. > - The shared Evalbook viewer can make the test boundary unclear. > - This pull request names the two families and adds a guide, authoring skills, and a public hub. > - Contributors can choose the correct test and inspect its history. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Missing documentation. **Where is the issue?** Runner and Product E2E evaluation guides, case-authoring procedures, and public result navigation. **What's wrong?** There is no single entry point. A report format can be mistaken for an execution boundary. There are no dedicated case-authoring skills for these two families. **Suggested fix** Add a guide and three skills. Link both existing histories from a public hub. Keep existing campaign URLs and grading unchanged. ## What Changed - Add `doc/evals.md` and links from existing guides. - Add the `paperclip-evals`, `add-runner-eval`, and `add-product-e2e-eval` skills. Install copies in `~/paperclipai/.agents/skills`. - Add a static hub builder that reads the existing public history feeds. - Show a dated snapshot for each family. Label partial campaigns and preserve measurement dates across report refreshes. - Document publication and refresh commands for https://pages.paperclip.ing/evals/. ## Verification - Seven Python summary tests pass: `python3 -m unittest discover -s scripts/evals-hub -p 'test_*.py'`. Run these checks directly; this PR does not modify package scripts. - All three skills pass the skill-creator `quick_validate.py` check with `/usr/bin/python3`. - Build tested with saved history fixtures and the live public feeds. - Desktop and mobile browser checks pass. The mobile page has no horizontal overflow. - Published https://pages.paperclip.ing/evals/. Browser check: HTTP 200, no page errors, all eight links return HTTP 200, no mobile overflow. - Independent skill exercises found the existing Notion-decline case and a direct Runner permission-denial case. Roster validation with an explicit run ID passes. - Missing refresh measurement date: regression fails before the fix and passes after it. - `git diff --check` passes. - No paid evals were run for this documentation and reporting change. The preceding head passed typecheck, build, server/workspace tests, runner verification, browser E2E, and the canary dry run. Checks for the latest commit are pending. Local repository-wide typecheck, test, and build were not repeated because no product code changed. ## Risks The hub is a dated static snapshot. It can lag behind the linked histories until an operator refreshes it. A changed history schema stops the build. Existing archives and grades are not modified. The published guide link is pinned to the reviewed commit so branch deletion cannot break it. Later builds can use master. ## Model Used OpenAI gpt-6-astra for implementation and review. OpenAI gpt-5.6-luna for documentation and independent skill checks. Both used repository tools and code execution. Context window sizes are not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (latest commit pending) - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (preceding head was 5/5; latest commit pending) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.916.0-canary.2 |
||
|
|
4577d10029 |
fix: prepare everyday artifact and Codex sandbox prerequisites in CI (#13516)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The runner E2E workflow executes paid everyday workflow stories on disposable CI hosts > - The everyday artifact oracle requires a pinned Python image and fails closed when it is absent > - Fresh CI hosts did not prepare this image before the paid cell, so project stories failed during preflight > - This pull request prepares and verifies the pinned image before the affected everyday cells > - The benefit is reliable artifact isolation checks on fresh trusted CI hosts ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Fresh trusted CI runners did not have the pinned Python artifact oracle image. **Expected behavior:** The workflow prepares and verifies the pinned image before an everyday project story starts. **Steps to reproduce:** Run an everyday project story on a fresh CI host without the image cached. The `everyday-artifact.py --preflight` check fails before task creation. **Paperclip version or commit:** `master` at `bd51f157e`. **Deployment mode:** Other: GitHub Actions trusted paid workflow. ## What Changed - Add a matrix-gated CI step for everyday project and recovery cells. - Check Docker, pull the fixed digest with bounded timeouts, and verify the exact repo digest. - Apply the existing Codex sandbox preparation to both native Codex profiles, including the mini profile. - Add workflow security assertions for ordering, condition, digest, timeouts, and secret isolation. - Document that CI prepares the pinned oracle image. - Check provisioning eligibility against every catalog cell, and scope the Daytona registry inspection assertion to the Daytona image job. ## Verification - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` — 24 files and 222 tests passed. - `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts workflow-security.test.ts` — 10 tests passed. - Python artifact oracle calibration — 12/12 passed. - `git diff --check` — passed. ## Risks Low risk. The image step runs only for everyday cells that execute the artifact preflight. The Codex setup now covers both native Codex profiles. It uses a fixed public image digest and has no provider credentials. ## Model Used OpenAI gpt-5.6-luna (implementation subagent) and gpt-6-astra (review fixes and orchestration), using code execution and repository tools. Context window size is not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <paperclip@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
ae06329971 | test(server): hoist the route module graph in the issue ownership authz suite (#13524) canary/v2026.916.0-canary.0 nightly/v2026.916.0-nightly.1 | ||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
e1f245a660 |
fix(server): recover sandbox leases stranded active after a restart (#13515)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server starts and stops provider sandboxes through environment leases > - A restart can leave a terminal run with an `active` lease > - The normal orphan recovery path cannot find that lease after the run ends > - This pull request adds a bounded sweep that changes the stranded lease to `pending_cleanup` > - The existing cleanup sweep then stops the provider sandbox on the same heartbeat tick > - The benefit is that stranded sandboxes stop and do not continue to create provider cost ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A restart can occur after the server writes a terminal run status but before it releases the related environment lease. The lease then stays `active`, and later recovery does not select it. A second path skips the lease when its environment row does not exist. **Expected behavior** The heartbeat recovery path must find an `active` lease that no live run can release. It must move that lease to `pending_cleanup`, and the cleanup sweep must stop the provider sandbox. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a run that owns a provider sandbox lease. 2. End the run and stop the server between the run-status write and the lease-release write. 3. Restart the server and allow the heartbeat recovery sweep to run. 4. Confirm that the lease reaches `pending_cleanup` and the provider sandbox receives a stop request. **Paperclip version or commit** This pull request targets the current `master` branch at the base commit used for review. **Deployment mode** The change applies to local development and server deployments. **Installation method** Built from source with the repository test commands. **Agent adapter(s) involved** Not adapter-specific. The change applies to core heartbeat recovery. **Database mode** The change uses the existing database tables. It adds no migration. ## What Changed - Add `sweepOrphanedActiveLeases()` to heartbeat recovery. - Select only stale `active` leases that have no live run owner. - Skip leases with a different live lease for the same provider resource. - Preserve retained leases and write a failure reason for recovered leases. - Limit each sweep to 20 rows. - Run the recovery sweep before the pending-cleanup sweep. - Add focused tests for the recovery guards and same-tick cleanup. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-orphaned-active-lease-sweep.test.ts` — 10 tests pass. - `pnpm vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-pending-cleanup-sweep.test.ts` — 22 tests pass. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` — exits 0. - The complete CI suite remains the final check for the repository. ## Risks The sweep changes only stale `active` leases that no live run can release. The stale threshold, live-resource guard, retained-lease guard, and page limit reduce false recovery. The change adds no endpoint, schema change, or migration. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-5, tool-enabled coding agent with repository inspection, GitHub CLI, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
