Commit Graph
5364 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
aaeff418cf fix(acpx): add a positive control to stalled-tool permission evidence (#16769)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The ACPX engine runs Claude agents. A watchdog ends a turn when a
pending tool call gets no update for 30 minutes.
> - #16688 added a field to stalled runs. The field records if the
stalled call's permission request reached Paperclip.
> - Recent stalled runs show `acpStalledToolPermissionRequested: false`.
We can read this as "the call stopped before its permission request".
That reading is correct only if calls of the same kind usually send a
request.
> - We have no data that shows if finished calls of that kind sent
requests. Thus we cannot tell if the missing request is a real signal.
> - This pull request records a positive control: the number of finished
calls of the stalled call's kind, and how many of them sent a permission
request.
> - The benefit: the next stall event tells us if the missing request
locates the stall, or if it gives no information.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16688

**What happened?**
Runs stop with the stalled-tool watchdog error. The diagnostics show
that the stalled call sent no permission request. The diagnostics do not
show if finished calls of the same kind sent requests.

**Expected behavior**
The stalled-run diagnostics contain enough data to show if a missing
permission request is a real signal.

**Steps to reproduce**
A pending tool call gets no ACP update for 30 minutes. The watchdog ends
the turn. The run result contains the stalled-tool fields.

## What Changed

- `packages/adapter-utils/src/acpx-engine/execute.ts`: when the watchdog
fires, count the finished calls of the stalled call's kind, and count
how many of them sent a permission request. Write the counts to the run
result as `acpSettledSameKindToolCount` and
`acpSettledSameKindToolPermissionRequestedCount`.
- `server/src/services/run-failure-diagnostics.ts`: allow the two new
fields as non-negative safe integers. Other values are dropped.
- `doc/observability.md`: explain how to read the two fields with the
existing permission-request field.
- Tests: extend the existing stalled-tool tests in `execute.test.ts` and
`run-failure-diagnostics.test.ts`.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run src/acpx-engine/execute.test.ts` in
`packages/adapter-utils`: 244/244 pass.
- `pnpm exec vitest run
src/services/__tests__/run-failure-diagnostics.test.ts` in `server`:
115/115 pass.
- Mutation check: remove the kind filter, or count every finished call
as "requested". Each mutation makes the stalled-tool test fail.
- `tsc --noEmit` passes in `packages/adapter-utils` and in `server`.
Note: the full `server` `typecheck` script did not run locally, because
the runner vendor build step failed in this sandbox. I ran `tsc
--noEmit` directly.

## Risks

- Low risk. The change only adds two counts to the run result after the
watchdog fires. It does not change the decision to stop the turn, or any
permission decision.
- The fields hold only counts. They contain no tool titles, inputs, or
identifiers. This is the run-log and run-result path. It is not
Telemetry. The fields reach Sentry through the existing allowlist in
`run-failure-diagnostics.ts`.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude
Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs).

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.13
2026-10-18 13:59:16 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 10d92eb468 fix(daytona): clear idle guard after verified sandbox cleanup (#16760)
Replace the lifetime provider-use guard with scoped allocation and pending-request evidence. Fence cleanup observations against overlapping work, retain timed-out raw requests, and wait for completed remote deletion before permitting idle sleep.

Verified with 436 Daytona tests, package and workspace typecheck/build, full CI, and Greptile Apex 5/5 on the reviewed head. Four deletion-boundary regressions and two concurrency regressions fail on the earlier implementation and pass with the fixes. Live-provider and local full-suite limits are documented in the PR.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-18 13:56:20 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 1558d9962c fix(idle): exclude completed feedback history from background work (#16764)
Allow private feedback history and acknowledged uploads to stop blocking idle sleep. Pending, failed, unfamiliar, and inconsistent delivery records remain blocked; preserve all other work and cleanup gates.

Verified with 220 idle-safety tests, workspace typecheck/build, full CI, and Greptile Apex 5/5 on the reviewed head. Local full-suite limitations and isolated rechecks are documented in the PR.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-18 13:56:08 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 5dced3c766 perf(tools): narrow profile and attention catalog reads (#16761)
Read only the catalog, connection, and invocation fields needed by profile summaries, reviews, and attention counts. Preserve company scope and response contents while reducing query payloads.

Verified with 445 affected service tests, workspace typecheck/build, full CI, and Greptile Apex 5/5 on the reviewed head. Local full-suite limitations and isolated rechecks are documented in the PR.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.12
2026-10-18 13:56:04 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 27709a99b1 perf(scripts): emit a server module beside the runtime bundle entry (#16765)
The runtime bundle now also has a server entry point, dist-runtime/server.mjs: the bundled dist/index.js without the argv shim. index.mjs loads it, so importing server.mjs loads the server code without starting it, and a compile cache warmed from it covers exactly the files a boot loads. bundleRuntime reports it as serverModule.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.11
2026-10-18 12:16:13 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip c9669a6c22 docs(grok): record production qualification and Cloud setup (#16722)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and their work.
> - Grok Bot uses the shared Runner and an agent MCP connection.
> - The experimental Cloud release now passed real production setup and
work.
> - The setup guide does not list the Cloud opt-in controls or the
observed routine-panel workaround.
> - The readiness plan still describes the production rollout as
pending.
> - This pull request records the release evidence and the supported
setup path.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Issue type**
Outdated documentation and missing setup instructions.

**Where is the issue?**
`doc/grok-bot-agent.md` and
`doc/plans/2026-10-13-grok-bot-production-readiness.md`.

**What's wrong?**
The guide starts after the opt-in step. The plan predates completed
production acceptance and the visibility rollout.

**Suggested fix**
List the three opt-ins and the Agents entry path. Record the exact
tested versions, rollout result and limits. Related runtime work:
[#16394](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16394),
[#16444](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16444),
[#16445](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/16445).

## What Changed

- Add the Cloud MCP, Runner and Grok opt-in steps.
- Explain the supported external-agent entry and the Grok Webhook-panel
link workaround.
- Record both tested production versions, assigned and proactive
results, cleanup, the 43-target rollout and a fresh-workspace check.
- Keep the historical failure and evidence limits explicit.

## Verification

- `git diff --check origin/master...HEAD` passed.
- Compared the report with saved production receipts, serving-version
observations, provider image digest, authenticated challenge, download
hashes and cleanup receipts.
- Real assigned work, question/answer, document/file delivery and
proactive work passed on Core
`4415665d67b16ffefbe4519c4bdd521f37bb87b9`.
- Current production source CI passed its required lanes. The collected
non-export checks contain 50 successes, 29 skips and no failures.
- A fresh Cloud workspace exposed the opt-ins, saved them after reload
and offered Grok in the external-agent picker. All test switches were
then restored to off.
- This change edits only Markdown. Runtime typecheck, tests, build,
token and Storybook checks were not rerun locally for this documentation
commit. The plan distinguishes earlier staging recovery proof from
current production tests.

## Risks

Low runtime risk. This change edits no source, schema, workflow or
feature setting. The report qualifies the named versions only. The
first-company model wizard still does not offer external agents. Grok
usage, spending and remote termination remain unknown.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools and
browser/native-app testing. The session does not expose the exact
deployed model ID or context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used, including the runtime metadata
that is available
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run the applicable local documentation checks and they
pass; runtime tests were not rerun for Markdown-only edits
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable; no new tests apply
to these documentation edits
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green (55 passed; two optional
Storybook skips)
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.10
2026-10-18 07:15:53 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 8de28c12e4 test(server): prove execution span overlap with explicit barriers (#16712)
Prove overlapping execution spans with per-run promise barriers, live recording checks, and exported span identity matching. Preserve the existing run ownership, parent, ingress-link, count, and test-budget assertions.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.9
2026-10-18 03:00:21 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip bfadb66556 fix(daytona): retain already archived workspaces on stop (#16710)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Stop-only recovery must keep unfinished remote workspace files safe.
> - Daytona can archive a stopped sandbox while those files remain in
object storage.
> - The stop handler sent another Stop request for that archived source.
> - Daytona rejected that request, so recovery could not record its
required receipt.
> - This change accepts the freshly confirmed archived state after
retention is verified.
> - Recovery can proceed while the source stays cold and its files
remain available.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #16583, #16700.

**What happened?**

Stop-only cleanup rejected a retained workspace after Daytona archived
it. The live provider returned `DaytonaValidationError` for Stop while
its state was `archived` and auto-delete was already disabled. The host
correctly kept the recovery gate closed.

**Expected behavior**

Confirm the exact source and its retention policy. Treat an archived
source as having no running process. Record the stop-only receipt
without starting or deleting the source.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Keep an unfinished native workspace with stop-and-retain intent.
2. Let its stopped Daytona sandbox become archived.
3. Request stop-only cleanup.
4. Observe the rejected Stop request and missing receipt.

## What Changed

- Accept `archived` after a fresh provider read confirms that
auto-delete is disabled.
- Stop the source if that fresh read instead shows it has resumed.
- Add regression cases for confirmed retention, unconfirmed retention,
and a resumed cached handle.
- Update the recovery runbook and capability map.

## Verification

- The new baseline fixture failed on the old handler: 1 failed, 2
passed.
- Daytona provider suites: 417 passed, 6 skipped.
- Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed.
- Full workspace `pnpm build`: passed on `fc8b1c1bb8`.
- Maps and Git whitespace checks: passed.
- The live provider rejection was reproduced on the exact retained
source. No model turn, file change or delete was performed. The fixed
source handler was then run against that same archived allocation with
the declared SDK version. It returned the stopped-process receipt while
the provider stayed archived with auto-delete disabled. No process was
started. All 58 exact-head CI checks passed; independent review is 5/5.
A full local run is also in progress on a separate frozen checkout of
this revision; it is not reported as complete.
- [Daytona lifecycle
documentation](https://www.daytona.io/docs/en/sandboxes/) confirms that
archive follows Stop and preserves the filesystem in object storage.

## Risks

- An archived source grants a generic stopped-process receipt. Its
physical provider state stays archived.
- Retention confirmation remains required. A stale archived handle that
has resumed still requires Stop.
- The host still checks the original allocation, ownership, stop receipt
and file-recovery evidence before continuation.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use and code execution.
The session does not expose an exact backend model ID or context-window
size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-18 02:50:49 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 6bec153410 fix(runtime): retain cancelled workspaces before reconstruction (#16700)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Native runs must preserve files when Stop ends a turn before its
result is saved.
> - The cancellation path could skip file retention and leave a prepared
remote workspace active.
> - An older controller could also admit an extra run while an earlier
lost-source hold was unresolved.
> - Rejecting every later run then prevented recovery even after that
extra run was stopped and its files were reconciled.
> - This change retains cancelled workspaces and records the exact proof
for a safely reconciled intervening cancellation.
> - Recovery can proceed without changing cancelled history, replaying
actions, or weakening execution gates.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #16583, #16690, #16696.

**What happened?**

Stop could acknowledge a native turn without recording its unsaved file
obligation. Reconstruction also rejected a later cancelled run after its
exact environment and files had been reconciled. The task could remain
inactive with an `in_progress` status, which the reconstruction endpoint
rejected.

**Expected behavior**

Retain unsaved files after Stop. Permit a board operator to reconstruct
from saved sources only after each intervening cancellation has a
confirmed stop and a file-only repair record. Preserve the original
failed export and the cancelled run.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Prepare a native workspace and cancel the turn before a structured
result exists.
2. Inspect its file retention and remote lease state.
3. For a task with an older destroyed export, reconcile the later
cancelled run's exact files and unperformed actions.
4. Request reconstruction from verified same-task attachments.

## What Changed

- Pin prepared native files before cancellation settlement. Defer
teardown if pinning fails. Use the existing stop-only cleanup worker.
- Repair active warm and ephemeral sources, plus stopping and
confirmed-stopped historical cancellations in bounded startup and
periodic batches. Preserve the existing exact-source checks. Bound
row-lock waits and advance past a busy source.
- Accept only same-owner native run-only cancellations with no result or
current coordinator, confirmed stopped leases, and board file-only
repair with `not_performed` action outcomes.
- Save hashes of each intervening repair and recheck them at queue claim
and final dispatch. Reject changed evidence or another later run.
- Expose saved-source reconstruction in the issue API for inactive
`blocked` and `in_progress` tasks, and hide it when an execution or
checkout owner exists. Permit the same inactive source at submission.
Keep the source, owner, version, attachment, budget, pause and retry
checks.
- Update the shared evidence type, recovery runbook and capability maps.
Add an optional cancelled-native no-action confirmation to file
recovery, resetting evidence when its source changes. No migration, new
endpoint, permission or dependency.

## Verification

- The new fixture fails on the original validator with
`workspace_reconstruction_stale` after valid cancelled-run file repair.
- Focused source and Stop retention tests: 94 passed before the final
contention case. The subsequent three-suite run passed 123 tests,
including real PostgreSQL lock contention and public
startup/API/final-dispatch paths. The final narrow-query rerun passed
all 123 tests. Review correction: all 143 tests passed across four
suites, including real lock contention through the teardown boundary and
stopping/stopped allocations.
- Six broader cancellation, executor, heartbeat and restart suites: 831
passed, 9 existing skips.
- Final correction: all 145 backend tests and all 36 recovery UI tests
passed. Real contention covers both warm reusable and ephemeral sources.
Optional no-action confirmation defaults to uncertified, and changing
source clears evidence. Workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and token gates
passed on these sources.
- Maps, module boundaries and Git whitespace checks: passed. Full `pnpm
build` passed on the final `4e8c0e73ac` revision as well as the prior
reviewed heads. A full local run of the preceding fix completed with
21,724 passes, 109 skips and three failures in webhook body limits, a
status-card timeout, and a port-allocation fixture. All three suites
then passed unchanged in an isolated rerun (209 tests). The full local
run remains recorded as failed; the final head's full CI passed (55
completed checks, no failures). A fresh full local run is also in
progress on the frozen reviewed head.
- Preserved failures: the first attempt lacked a built plugin SDK; after
building prerequisites, the regression reached the expected validator
rejection. Treatment tests caught the file-only action's deliberately
null continuation owner. A real lock test then caught the database
driver's wrapped timeout error. Both defects were corrected and
retested. Independent review then found a teardown race after a failed
retention write. A second review found active warm sources excluded by
the historical policy filter; the regression reproduced both warm
failures before correcting the query. Its real-row-lock fixture
reproduced the failure; the fixed release guard and historical
stopping/stopped cases pass. No checks were weakened.
- A pre-deployment walkthrough caught the issue API still hiding
reconstruction for an inactive `in_progress` task. The status/capability
baseline reproduced three failures, including inappropriate capability
flags for execution/checkout owners. The fix uses the same
inactive-state requirements as submission; its positive fixture reads
the assembled issue API before reconstructing. All 117 tests in those
three recovery suites pass, and all 28 heartbeat-recovery tests pass
separately. Full workspace typecheck passed again. Full build passed
with the exact `4e8c0e73ac` stamp; latest-head independent review is 5/5
with no open findings. All 55 latest-head checks completed with no
failures.
- Live tenant acceptance remains pending. No successful reconstruction,
export or warm-process proof is claimed by these local tests.

## Risks

- Stop retains unfinished work, so storage remains until file recovery
and explicit cleanup complete.
- Reconstruction remains held for unknown or performed external actions,
foreign owners, live or rebound environments, accepted results, changed
evidence, and unrelated later runs.
- The sweep examines at most five candidates per pass. It uses a fair
cursor and bounded transaction waits. It performs no provider call and
starts no new turn.
- Intervening verification reads only the needed JSON fields. The source
transaction still serializes recovery for the same task.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use and code execution.
The session does not expose an exact backend model ID or context-window
size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
nightly/v2026.1018.0-nightly.0 canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.7
2026-10-18 01:33:11 -05:00
5623304586 test(runner): isolate provider fixture targets and executables (#16701)
Scope the existing Grok and Pi fixture callbacks to their declared Linux x64
target, and restore the original process descriptors after each callback.
Keep OpenCode executable mode changes inside test-owned temporary copies.

Adapt the two-file OpenCode fixture isolation from caniko's PR #14580,
commit f329db3d6f. Extend the same isolation
to the remaining per-turn reasoning fixture. Preserve every existing test
assertion, case, skip and budget without changing provider support or pins.

Co-Authored-By: Can H. Tartanoglu <gpg@rotas.mozmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-18 00:58:47 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 39c345ec5c test(runner): bind Copilot pack fixture to a supported target (#16697)
Scope the Copilot candidate registry fixture to the supported Linux x64 target and restore both process property descriptors. Preserve every existing assertion and production provider pin. The five-case focused treatment and current PR CI passed; fresh review is 5/5.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.6
2026-10-18 00:09:00 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 69ac928d2b fix(runtime): preserve bounded retries after workspace reconstruction (#16696)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - An operator can rebuild a destroyed workspace from saved task
attachments.
> - The first reconstruction run must pass current source and execution
checks.
> - A temporary bootstrap failure can create a bounded retry before
provider work starts.
> - The retry has a new run ID, so the first-run-only reconstruction
check rejects it.
> - This change verifies the retry chain back to the approved first run
and keeps current safety checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16690.

**What happened?**

After an operator records workspace reconstruction, a safe bootstrap
retry is cancelled before provider startup. The normal retry scheduler
creates the successor. The reconstruction check then rejects its
immediate predecessor because it expects the original failed export run.

**Expected behavior**

A verified automatic retry can continue under the same reconstruction
decision and remaining retry budget. Changed sources, unrelated
executions, uncertain outcomes, pause and later human blocks must still
stop startup.

**Steps to reproduce**

Record reconstruction with a retry budget remaining. Let its first run
fail before provider work starts with recorded bootstrap evidence. Use
the normal bounded retry scheduler and the locked dispatch gate. Before
this change, the scheduler succeeds but dispatch returns false.

## What Changed

- Verify the predecessor chain back to the recovery action's exact first
continuation.
- Check company, task, agent, terminal predecessor state and each
scheduler-owned wake. Reject cycles, foreign parents and forged wakes.
- Exclude only those verified predecessors from the unrelated-newer-run
check. Keep source hashes, original result identity and all current
execution gates.
- Reuse the existing reconciliation proof for failed predecessors. Keep
the original retry limit.
- Add real PostgreSQL scheduler and assembled-heartbeat regressions.
Update the recovery guide and feature map.

## Verification

- The baseline regression failed at final dispatch after the normal
retry scheduler created its successor.
- The corrected focused group passes 133 tests across reconstruction,
retry scheduling and dispatch. It admits two bounded bootstrap retries
and refuses a third. The assembled heartbeat enters the provider once
for an eligible retry and zero times after a controlled post-claim human
block.
- An intermediate negative case exposed missing predecessor-outcome
validation. Reusing the existing reconciliation proof fixes it. Deleted
sources, pause, forged wakes, foreign parents, unrelated runs and new
recovery holds remain refused.
- Full workspace typecheck and build pass on rebased head
`bd301ec8a703fa1cdc9e1db2638440d203e8d57a`. The rebased focused group
passes all 133 tests. All CI gates pass on that exact head, including
general/serialized tests, Runner, build and browser gates. Greptile is
5/5 with no unresolved threads. A clean full local `pnpm test:run` is
running; the local source stays frozen for that run.
- Module boundaries, maps and diff whitespace checks pass. Live staging
acceptance follows the qualified full Cloud deployment.
- The earlier full local run for #16690 failed while files changed and
its PATH hid `lsof`. All five affected suites then passed in a clean
run: 246 passed, three skipped. Those results do not establish a full
local pass for this follow-up.

## Risks

- Retry ancestry is a rare recovery path. Its primary-key reads grow
with the chain and stop at 64 predecessors. Ordinary runs perform no new
ancestry reads.
- Unknown effects and active recovery obligations stay held. This does
not reset budgets, change provider lifecycle policy, grant access or
replay completed actions.
- No schema migration or new API is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use and code execution.
The session does not expose an exact backend model ID or context-window
size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused checks; full-run
scope is recorded above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-17 23:48:28 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 1678aae862 fix: expire unused bases with generated repository ignore metadata (#16695)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Finished tasks can release Git caches that Paperclip can restore
later.
> - Nested repository preparation adds an ignore entry to the base
repository.
> - Base cleanup currently treats this generated entry as custom
metadata.
> - This pull request accepts the exact generated entry and keeps other
metadata protected.
> - Unused private bases can then expire with their workspaces and
return on demand.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16691. Related #15404 and #14443 change repository preparation or
sync, not base expiration.

**What happened?**
A finished workspace with a nested project repository expires, but its
unused private base remains with `custom_git_metadata`. Normal
preparation added `/.paperclip-repositories/` to the stock Git exclude
file.

**Expected behavior**
Cleanup removes a verified, unused base with this generated entry.
Custom metadata still prevents base deletion.

**Steps to reproduce**
Create an isolated workspace with a nested repository through normal
preparation. Finish the task, wait for the retention period, and run
expiration. The workspace disappears but its private base remains.

**Paperclip version or commit**
790b729086.

## What Changed

- Accept stock `info/exclude` bytes or stock bytes plus the exact single
entry produced by Paperclip.
- Verify base deletion and restoration of both repository commits and
settings after upstream advances.
- Preserve custom patterns, comments, extra bytes, duplicate entries,
and symlinks.

## Verification

- Captured a failing lifecycle baseline: the workspace expired but the
base remained with `custom_git_metadata`.
- Both new real Git/PostgreSQL lifecycle cases pass. Restoration returns
main and nested commit A after upstream moves to B, preserves settings
permissions, and permits a subsequent commit.
- Six focused metadata controls pass. The retained baseline fixture
passes the storage check without edits to its files.
- Server typecheck passes. Full local build passes. Required CI is
tracked on this PR.
- Independent review found no actionable findings. Staging reclamation
and product reopening remain deployment acceptance checks.

## Risks

This expands a deletion allowlist. Matching is byte-exact and limited to
the generated suffix. Other ownership, authenticated fetch, consumer,
file, and Git history checks remain required. No schema or retention
changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), with code execution and independent agent review.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-18 04:40:05 +00:00
DottaandPaperclip 2befcd9a0a Harden Board CLI approval and native verification fixtures (#16482)
Preserve governed Board CLI authority and strict verification fixtures on the Muse stack.

Keep approval/cancel ownership, current membership/key authority and durable first-change audit atomic. Bound Retry-After scheduling within the original challenge; never automatically resubmit consent. Retain descriptor ownership until identity-based cleanup and close it on success and error. Keep strict Git-origin and synchronized provider-entry fixture assertions.

Related public work: LukeAbell's existing PR #13919 proposes the same production descriptor-lifetime fix. This independently measured local integration retains the original tests and adds real-descriptor coverage. Do not treat this local integration as ownership of that contribution.

Carry actual merged UI source 896f3c7f3b through a normal forward merge, preserving canonical workspace recovery, Muse authority and existing migration bytes. Current-head CI and substantive review remain merge gates. Complete qualification of the final immutable canonical source and actual provider acceptance remain separate.

Refs #16482, #13919.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.5
2026-10-17 23:22:57 -05:00
63306f6660 fix(acpx): record whether a stalled tool call's permission request arrived (#16688)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Hosted `claude_local` runs use the ACPX engine. Claude can start
background subagents, and those subagents call the runtime MCP tools
that Paperclip attaches.
> - #16671 added a stalled-tool watchdog. It ends a Claude turn when a
pending tool call gets no ACP update for 30 minutes. That PR said the
most likely cause of the stall is a lost ACP permission round trip, but
it could not prove it.
> - A staging run tripped the watchdog. Two background subagents started
12 MCP calls. ACP reported each call as `pending`, and no call got
another update. The MCP gateway logs show the 9 earlier calls from the
parent agent, but no request from the 12 subagent calls.
`MCP_TOOL_TIMEOUT` (15 minutes) did not end them. So the calls stalled
before Claude sent them to the MCP server.
> - The run record cannot say if the permission request for a stalled
call reached Paperclip. Without that fact, the next stall gives no new
evidence about the cause.
> - This pull request records, for a stalled run, whether the stalled
call's permission request reached Paperclip, and how many pending calls
had a permission request.
> - The benefit is that the next stall tells us which side of the
permission round trip stopped, so the real fix can go to the correct
layer.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

- Refs #16671 (the stalled-tool watchdog; this PR tests the cause that
PR suspected)
- Refs #16360 (the MCP client deadline that cannot reach a call that was
never sent)

**What happened?**

A hosted staging `claude_local` run started two background subagents.
Each subagent started six `execute-sentry-tool` MCP calls. ACP reported
all 12 calls as `pending`. None got a result, an update, or an error.
The MCP gateway received no request for them. The parent turn finished
its answer but stayed open for the subagents. After 31 minutes the
watchdog ended the turn with `acpx_tool_stalled`. A single background
subagent with six parallel calls to the same tool did not stall in a
later test.

**Expected behavior**

When a tool call stalls, the run record shows if the call's permission
request reached Paperclip. Then the stall can be put on the agent side
or on the relay side of the round trip.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start an ACP `claude_local` run in a sandbox that uses two background
subagents to call runtime MCP tools.
2. Wait until a subagent's tool calls stay `pending` with no further ACP
update (in staging this happened without a known trigger).
3. See that the watchdog fails the run with `acpx_tool_stalled`, but the
record has no evidence about the permission round trip.

**Paperclip version or commit**

`master` at 1f27427.

## What Changed

- The ACPX engine passes an `onPermissionRequest` hook to the ACPX
runtime. The hook records the tool call ID of each permission request
and returns `undefined`. ACPX then uses its permission mode to decide
the request, the same as before.
- When the watchdog fires, it records `permissionRequested` for the
stalled call and counts the pending calls that had a permission request.
- A stalled run's result has two new fields:
`acpStalledToolPermissionRequested` (boolean) and
`acpPendingToolPermissionRequestedCount` (non-negative integer). The
`[paperclip]` stderr line also says if the request reached Paperclip.
- The server run-failure diagnostics allowlist the two fields. They
accept only a boolean and a safe non-negative integer.
- `doc/observability.md` describes the fields. It also says that a
background subagent's Task call completes when the subagent starts, so
the watchdog watches the subagent's own calls.

## Verification

- `npx vitest run src/acpx-engine` in `packages/adapter-utils`: 21
files, 423 tests pass.
- Engine tests:
- The existing stall test now sends a permission request for the Task
call only. The run records `acpStalledToolPermissionRequested: false`
and a count of 1. The hook returns `undefined`. The log line says the
request did not reach Paperclip. No tool title or ID appears in the
diagnostics.
- A new test sends the permission request after the relay saw the
stalled call. The run records `acpStalledToolPermissionRequested: true`.
- Mutation check: when the hook does not record the ID, both tests fail.
- `npx vitest run
src/services/__tests__/run-failure-diagnostics.test.ts` in `server`: 115
tests pass. Invalid values for the new fields are dropped.
- `npx tsc --noEmit` passes in `packages/adapter-utils` and in `server`.
- Runtime dependency assumption: the hook must not change permission
decisions. I called the real patched `acpx@0.12.0`
`AcpClient.handlePermissionRequest` with and without the hook in
`approve-all`, `approve-reads` and `deny-all`. The responses and the
permission stats were the same in each mode, and the hook saw each
request. The hook only adds an ID to an in-memory set for the run, so it
adds no remote call and no blocking work.
- Limits: the tests mock the runtime, so they do not prove the hook runs
in a real sandbox relay. The acpx source passes the hook to the client
on every runtime path (`runtime.js`), and the real-client check above
covers the decision path.

## Risks

- Low risk. The hook only observes. If ACPX ever treats a host hook as
the decision owner, the check above would show a different decision.
That is not the case in the pinned `acpx@0.12.0`.
- The set holds one string per permission request for the length of one
run. That is bounded by the number of tool calls in the run.
- This PR does not fix the stall. It gives the evidence for the next
occurrence.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with tool use
and code execution. It read the run log, the gateway logs, and the ACP
agent and client code, ran reproduction probes, edited the code, and ran
the tests.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-17 21:05:43 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 896f3c7f3b Add personal Muse operator setup and composer controls (#16450)
Add Muse invitation, connection readiness and scoped operator controls.

Keep connection state tied to the current company, person, agent and binding. Surface failed reads and invalidate stale cleanup observations; require current authority and exact readback. Preserve Dot/Grok setup, source-trust limits and existing design tokens.

Carry actual merged backend e6dcc6b095 through a normal forward merge. Preserve its project-write authority fix, existing migration bytes and upstream idle-serving behavior; no new UI behavior is authored by this source carry. Current-head CI and substantive review remain merge gates; final canonical and deployed-provider qualification remain separate.

Refs #16450.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-17 23:01:42 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7c7d2d8d2c fix(runtime): continue from saved sources after workspace loss (#16690)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The runtime must preserve saved work and prevent duplicate
execution.
> - Older cleanup could destroy a sandbox before its workspace export
finished.
> - The existing recovery controls require either the original sandbox
or recovered original files.
> - Surviving attachments can support a rebuild, but they do not prove
that missing edits were recovered.
> - This pull request adds an explicit reconstruction decision and one
fresh continuation through the normal execution gates.
> - Operators can continue useful work while the original failed run
remains truthful.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A historical failed export can have an accepted result, a prepared
workspace descriptor, and a confirmed destroyed sandbox. Its notice can
also say `new_source_execution_path` and disappear. The task then has
neither a truthful original-file repair path nor a supported
reconstruction path.

**Expected behavior**

Keep the missing-file obligation visible. Let an authorized operator
choose surviving task attachments and record lost work and external
action outcomes. Start one fresh continuation after current execution
checks. Keep the old result and failed export intact.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Seed a failed native export with a prepared descriptor and an exact
destroyed-lease receipt.
2. Resolve its notice with the historical `new_source_execution_path`
bookkeeping value.
3. Read the task. The baseline hides the hold even though no source
reconciliation exists.
4. With this change, choose **Continue from saved sources** and submit a
reconstruction decision.

Related public work: #16451 preserves healthy warm sessions. #16583
prevents destructive cleanup of unexported work. This change handles
historical source loss that those fixes cannot undo. Searches of open
and closed work found no equivalent reconstruction endpoint.

## What Changed

- Add a board-only reconstruction endpoint with `runtime:manage` and
task visibility checks.
- Validate the exact run, result, descriptor and destroyed lease. Reject
active copyback, competing owners, newer work, stale task status, and
foreign attachments.
- Record attachment hashes, missing work, and external action outcomes.
Preserve the original failed run, accepted result, prepared descriptor
and terminal failure.
- Hold other continuation paths until the durable reconstruction intent
admits its successor. Record that successor in the same transaction and
preserve the retry count.
- Add an operator control that distinguishes reconstruction from
original-file recovery. Update the recovery runbook and capability maps.

## Verification

- Exact baseline source returns no blocker for the destroyed-source
fixture. The same fixture returns a required recovery hold with this
change.
- New real PostgreSQL and assembled API/heartbeat suite: 25/25 pass. It
covers duplicate submissions, lost acknowledgement, context reset,
source identity, task ownership, concurrent execution attachment scope,
later human blocks, deleted sources and agent pause.
- Existing export retry, explicit continuation and recovery-action
suites: 386 cases pass. One new-fixture constraint error in the combined
run was corrected; the full new suite then passed.
- UI recovery suites: 46/46 pass across three files. They cover disabled
actions, loss acknowledgement, failure retention and runtime authority.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass. The first sandboxed
typecheck attempt could not open the TypeScript IPC socket; the
authorized rerun passed.
- Module boundaries, map checks, token gates and diff whitespace checks
pass.
- OpenAPI route coverage: 21/21 pass. The first CI head exposed a
missing endpoint registration; this head adds the registration and the
focused suite passes.
- Review identified a missing dispatch-time check and an isolated
attachment cache. Both are fixed. Claim and final handoff recheck the
exact successor, sources and current execution gates. A controlled
post-claim operator block prevents the assembled heartbeat from entering
the provider. The shared attachment cache refreshes uploads and removes
deleted selections.
- Final focused run: 180/180 pass across six suites, including
reconstruction, existing dispatch/stale-queue contracts and UI recovery.
- A second review reproduced cancellation by an already satisfied
historical connection card while the task was `todo`. Read-only
connection availability now works before checkout; active-task mutation
checks remain strict. The baseline failed two cases; after the fix all
74 connection and reconstruction tests pass, including revoked access,
pending questions and pending approvals.
- All current-head CI gates pass on
`9d197236da11fa24f1ceadf5589cb2b81179d824`, including general/serialized
tests, Runner, build and browser gates. Greptile is 5/5 for that exact
head with no unresolved threads. The full local `pnpm test:run` is still
running its serial server group; no full local pass is claimed. Live
staging recovery is pending deployment.

## Risks

- Reconstruction cannot restore missing bytes. The operator must
identify surviving sources and actions that must not be repeated. The
agent must verify those attachments before rebuilding.
- This path is limited to exact, confirmed destroyed remote sources with
an accepted result. Retained or uncertain sources keep their existing
repair path.
- No schema migration, credential change, budget increase or
warm-session policy change is included. Normal pause, ownership, budget,
approval and dispatch gates still apply.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use and code execution.
The session does not expose an exact backend model ID or context-window
size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full local
run limitation recorded above)
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-17 22:57:10 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 790b729086 fix: restore nested project repositories and settings after expiration (#16691)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agents use isolated Git workspaces with managed project repository
copies.
> - Finished workspaces can expire when Git can reproduce their
contents.
> - The saved recipe records the main commit but omits nested commits
and local settings.
> - Reopening can therefore use newer nested code and lose merged user
settings.
> - This pull request saves and restores those contents before workspace
provisioning.
> - It also permits verified FETCH_HEAD metadata so ordinary fetches do
not block safe expiration.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16457, #16586, #16621. Related performance work: #16579.

**What happened?**

After a finished workspace expires, its nested project checkout can
reopen at the current upstream commit instead of its previous commit.
Cleanup also treats local Claude settings as disposable, although that
file can contain user settings. Ordinary linked-worktree FETCH_HEAD
metadata prevents otherwise safe cleanup.

**Expected behavior**

Restore the main and nested repositories at their saved commits.
Preserve local settings bytes and permissions. Skip files and Git state
that cannot be reproduced. Permit standard fetched metadata only when
its commits remain recoverable.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Prepare a managed nested project repository at commit A and add
ignored local settings.
2. Advance upstream to B, finish the task tree, and expire its workspace
and base.
3. Reopen the workspace through the normal service path. Before this
fix, nested preparation selects B.

## What Changed

- Extend the existing restoration recipe with exact nested commits,
branches, source identity, and encrypted local settings. Keep the schema
compatible with older recipes.
- Restore nested repositories and settings before provisioning. Recheck
company/project source access and preserve conflicting files on retry.
- Recheck recorded contents under cleanup locks before deletion. Persist
lock ownership before atomic publication so process exits recover safely
and foreign locks stay intact. Preserve changed or unsupported contents,
including tracked settings.
- Keep saved project repository selections through normal preparation.
Checkpoint restored contents before provisioning so failed setup can
retry without overwriting later edits.
- Accept bounded linked-worktree FETCH_HEAD records only after local
ancestry or fresh upstream proof. Preserve local-only fetched commits.
- Add real Git/Postgres lifecycle cases and focused content, access,
publication-retry, and fetched-state controls. Document the behavior.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` passed.
- `pnpm build` passed.
- The original real Git/Postgres experiment failed with nested B instead
of A. The same path passes with this change.
- The integrated lifecycle suite passed 42 cases in 91.66s. Related
preparation, credential, content, and Git metadata controls passed 46
cases in 24.41s. The final heartbeat checkpoint persistence case passed
separately in 8.17s.
- Coverage includes exact main/nested commits, encrypted settings and
modes, upstream failure and retry, provisioning order, concurrent
reopening, changed unique files, tracked settings, malformed metadata,
and company boundaries.
- Exact-head CI passed the implementation, typecheck, build, security,
and test matrices. One browser shard passed on a single rerun after an
unrelated fixture teardown raced an activity-log write; its feature
assertions passed in the initial attempt.
- The broad local test run was stopped after about 12 minutes of
unrelated serial tests. Full parallel CI is required before merge; no
local full-suite pass is claimed.
- Single-workspace deployment, real-backlog reclamation, and ordinary
product reopening remain required acceptance work after merge.

## Risks

- Expired Git repositories still depend on upstream access. A failed
restoration returns the existing retryable error and never substitutes
the default branch.
- Saved settings use the existing local encryption provider. Recovery
requires that encryption key to remain available.
- Unsupported files, tracked settings, unknown sources, and unverified
Git state remain on disk. This can reduce reclaimed space.
- No database migration, recovery-retention change, public API, or
fleet-default change is included.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with tool use, code execution, and an
independent agent review. The runtime does not expose a more specific
model identifier.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-17 22:54:28 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip e6dcc6b095 Connect personal Muse through secure native execution and Vault OAuth (#16448)
Add company-scoped Muse native control, OAuth, wake receiver and recovery.

Recheck current authority after waits and before effects or receipt replay. Preserve task-read scope, assignment expiry, independent holds, nonblocking reassignment and truthful cleanup provenance.

Retain source trust on progress comments and verify current Muse V8 authority through real signed-JWT HTTP requests. Preserve the upstream trimmed ordinary authentication lookup.

Refs #16448.

Preserve captured canonical queue recovery and concurrent environment preparation while retaining the scoped Muse V8 exclusion. Normal migration 0354 and existing Muse SQL remain unchanged. Fresh current-head Greptile review is 5/5 with the project-write finding addressed. Required CI and independent technical review gate the merge; maintainer override is reserved for formal approval rules.

Recheck current Muse project-write authority after all receipt/task/run/admission waits, before creation or replay. Real PostgreSQL regressions reproduce four late effects/replays on the old route; the repaired three-file treatment passes 354 cases with no skips, and the scoped server typecheck passes. Ordinary/Dot behavior is preserved.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.4
2026-10-17 22:44:36 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 63fbb714e6 fix(server): release idle tracking after aborted static UI files (#16685)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip runs work for AI agents.
> - Hosts must prove that accepted work has finished before idle sleep.
> - HTTP request tracking keeps unfinished writes active after a client
leaves.
> - Static file middleware has no returned completion promise.
> - An aborted UI download can leave its request active forever.
> - This PR completes only a matched file response and keeps other work
tracked.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #15522. Found while qualifying #16679. A search found no duplicate
static-download idle fix.

**What happened?**

Closing a client during a static UI download leaves one tracked request
active. The response has closed, but the file middleware never calls the
wrapped response end method. The instance cannot report idle after that
request.

**Expected behavior**

A closed, matched static file response must not leave a permanent work
hold. Unfinished application writes must remain tracked. A missing file
must keep the normal fallback and error paths.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Serve a large local file through the static UI middleware with idle
admission enabled.
2. Start the download over HTTP.
3. Disconnect the client after its first data chunk.
4. Observe that the tracked request remains active with the original
middleware.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Reproduced on the behavior in
`d30648dee89720358271c276b9fc28cf83f18be7`. This branch starts at
`cfa9dce295970a85b3d8ee14cab0eccf50bc72e2`.

## What Changed

- Mark the completion of a known read-only response without dropping
pending middleware promises.
- Wrap static UI file serving. A successful file match is required
before a closed response can complete its tracking. A late match
rechecks an already closed response. Missing files keep the normal
fallback.
- Use the wrapper for hashed assets, other static UI files, and public
development files. Preserve caller headers and cache options.
- Test both HTTP abort timings, nested routers, conservative
mounted-application holds, parent writes, mutating GET fallbacks, and
callback-only work.
- Update the idle contract and its verification map. Correct the
paused-message recipe from hosted qualification: an explicit Pause
cancels older queued work, so test new accepted input after the pause
and await the normal resume lifecycle.

## Verification

- The original two real stream-abort regressions fail with the original
Express static behavior.
- Three review regressions fail on
`e260f4694afab8447b0cb203f439cb3ccad254e8`: a client closing before file
lookup, an unfinished parent in a mounted application, and an unfinished
parent in a root without installed handler tracking. Fixed sources were
restored byte for byte after the comparison.
- Two focused suites: 16 passed. They cover nested routers, both abort
timings, hidden parent writes, late missing-file fallbacks, contents,
HEAD, conditional responses, and caller headers.
- Module and map checks pass. Map checks are structural only.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed on
`f242ee739344484995d3addf81635512370778c8`.
- Full CI matrix: 54 successful checks and 2 intentional Storybook
skips.
- Apex: 5/5 on the exact current head, with zero unresolved threads.
- Full local maintained test groups are still running before final
handoff.
- The initial local broad run was stopped before changing source for the
P1 review findings. Two file-mode fixture failures in that run came from
the scratch runner's inherited `0077` mask; the same suite passes with
the normal child test mask `0022`, without source or host configuration
changes. The replacement run uses `0022` for test children and
command-scoped `init.defaultBranch=master` for existing Git fixture
assumptions.
- This PR has not been deployed to a hosted environment.

## Risks

Only a matched file served by the admitted application with installed
handler tracking can complete this way. Routers share that scope.
Mounted Express applications and roots without handler tracking keep the
existing conservative response hold; this change does not claim their
hidden writes are tracked. An unfinished tracked parent promise still
blocks sleep after a file client disconnects. Redirects, missing files,
application callbacks, and other GET requests retain their guards. No
authentication, company scope, provider cleanup, or scheduling gate is
removed. No schema or API response changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, source editing, and shell
tools. The session does not expose a more specific serving model ID or
its context window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-17 20:28:57 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 1f27427ffd perf(server): batch retained workspace reader identities and policies (#16683)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Task startup checks who can read each physical workspace.
> - A shared root retains the identities of earlier runs.
> - The service reloads the same agents, tasks, projects and run
policies for each reader.
> - Database round trips grow with the retained run history and hold the
company provenance lock.
> - This pull request batches these reads within each guarded operation.
Each run keeps its own identity and policy.
> - The benefit is less task preparation time while current access
checks remain in place.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16424.

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Workspace admission, repository publication and batched read
authorization.

**Current behavior**

A synthetic shared workspace with 64 retained readers makes 680 SQL
calls during a publication check. The same principals are loaded
repeatedly.

**Proposed behavior**

Load retained identities and saved policies in batches of at most 500
IDs. Load project settings once per guarded operation. Reload records
and permission grants on the next operation.

**Reason and benefit**

The local service benchmark with an injected 4 ms loopback round trip
changed from about 7.0 seconds to 0.5 seconds and from 680 SQL calls to
47. This measures synthetic PostgreSQL data, not hosted response
latency.

## What Changed

- Extract retained-reader identity loading and acquisition trust checks
into a focused service module. Select only the identity and trust fields
used by these checks.
- Batch company-scoped run, agent and task lookups. Keep each run's task
binding, responsible user and policy checks.
- Batch saved run-policy reads in read authorization. Keep company and
agent identity checks and ordinary lookup behavior for noncanonical IDs.
- Reuse project settings within one root authorization operation.
- Add query budgets, identity failures, batch-boundary coverage, policy
comparisons and grant-revocation tests.
- Document snapshot lifetime and query scope.

## Verification

- PASS: 197 focused workspace and authorization tests.
- PASS: `pnpm -r typecheck`.
- PASS: `pnpm build`.
- PASS: all current-head hosted CI test groups, Runner checks, E2E
shards, security checks and builds (55 successful checks; two unrelated
Storybook jobs skipped). The local monolithic `pnpm test:run` was
stopped after all equivalent hosted CI groups passed. It has no complete
local result; the hosted matrix supplies the full-suite proof.
- Synthetic real-PostgreSQL benchmark: 383 workspaces and 64 retained
readers; 4 ms simulated loopback round trip. Publication check: 680 ->
47 SQL calls; 7.0-7.1 s -> 0.48-0.51 s. Three concurrent checks:
20.0-23.1 s -> 1.52-2.12 s. Setup and provider execution are excluded.
Live reply timing remains unverified.
- Regression coverage compares complete batched and ordinary
authorization decisions. It checks distinct saved policies for the same
principals, missing identities, company mismatch, task mismatch,
responsible-user mismatch, revoked project grants and changes after the
first operation.
- No new schema, API or UI contract.

## Risks

- A batch must not combine different runs' identities or policies. Each
lookup and policy decision retains its run, company and agent checks.
- Snapshots last for one guarded operation. Later admissions and
publications reload data. No authorization cache survives the operation.
- Restricted project trust checks keep their existing per-run validation
path. Hosted latency remains an acceptance gate.

## Model Used

OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex, with xhigh reasoning, code execution
and tool use. The runtime does not expose the configured context-window
size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.3
2026-10-17 21:52:08 -05:00
Dotta cfa9dce295 refactor(runner): remove unreferenced Paperclip Runner test fixtures (#16543)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The Paperclip Runner package keeps fake agent servers and versioned
profile identity declarations under `test/fixtures/` for its test
suites.
> - Five of those fixture files have no reference anywhere in the
repository: no test, script, generator, workflow step, or document loads
or spawns them.
> - Dead fixtures add maintenance cost and make the referenced sibling
fixtures harder to trust.
> - This pull request deletes only those five unreferenced fixture files
and adds an audit receipt with the reference evidence.
> - The benefit is a smaller test-fixture surface with zero loss of
executed coverage.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The test-suite hygiene of the Paperclip Runner package. The repository
keeps unused test-support files that no suite loads. This slows audits
and makes the referenced fixtures harder to trust.

**Subsystem affected**

`packages/paperclip-runner` test fixtures.

**Current behavior**

Five files under `packages/paperclip-runner/test/fixtures/` have zero
references anywhere in the repository:

- `fake-native-resume-codex-app-server.mjs` (277 LOC): an old fake codex
app-server for resume testing. Resume coverage now runs through
`fake-final-burst-codex-app-server.mjs` (used by
`server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-resume.test.ts:287`)
and `fake-durable-codex-app-server.mjs` (used by
`packages/paperclip-runner/src/live/live-session.test.ts:2192`).
- `copilot-profile-v{3,4,5,6}-identity.json` (64 LOC total): orphaned
profile identity declarations. Copilot profile tests,
`native-backend-factory.test.ts`, and
`scripts/generate-acpx-profiles.mjs` reference only v7 through v19 by
literal path. No dynamic `copilot-profile-v${...}` path exists in the
repository (the only template-literal fixture path is
`test-fixtures/pi-acp/profile-v${version}-identity.json`).

**Proposed behavior**

Delete only the five unreferenced fixture files. Keep every referenced
fixture. Keep all registered test cases unchanged.

**Reason and benefit**

Smaller test-fixture surface: 341 test/support lines removed with zero
loss of executed coverage. The audit receipt
`doc/plans/2026-10-16-runner-dead-fixture-test-audit.md` records the
per-file reference evidence.

**Breaking changes**

None. No production code, no registered test case, and no test selection
path changes.

**Additional context**

A repository-wide `git grep` for each removed filename stem returns zero
external references across all tracked file types. The
`hashFiles('packages/paperclip-runner/test/fixtures/**')` occurrences in
the workflows are Rust cache-key inputs, not execution selectors;
deleting files only changes that cache hash.

## What Changed

- Deleted
`packages/paperclip-runner/test/fixtures/fake-native-resume-codex-app-server.mjs`.
- Deleted
`packages/paperclip-runner/test/fixtures/copilot-profile-v{3,4,5,6}-identity.json`.
- Added the audit receipt
`doc/plans/2026-10-16-runner-dead-fixture-test-audit.md` with per-file
reference evidence.
- 341 test/support lines removed. Zero production, documentation, or
registered test-case changes.

## Verification

- Repo-wide `git grep -i` for each removed filename stem
(`fake-native-resume`, `native-resume-codex`, `copilot-profile-v3` …
`copilot-profile-v6`) across all tracked file types returns zero
external references.
- Selection audit: `packages/paperclip-runner/vitest.config.ts` includes
only `src/**`, `devtools/**`, `examples/**`, and two named
`scripts/*.test.mjs`; the server project selects `server/src/**` and
`server/scripts/**`; the `test:typescript:prep` `node --test` list names
no fixture. No workflow executes anything under `test/fixtures/` — the
`pr-trusted.yml`/`release-verify.yml`
`hashFiles('packages/paperclip-runner/test/fixtures/**')` occurrences
are Rust cache-key inputs, not execution selectors.
- Rust tests use their own `fake-codex-app-server` binary in
`runner/crates/runner-core`, not these `.mjs` fixtures.
- Searched open and merged PRs for each filename: zero overlap (`gh
search prs`).
- Repo-wide `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm build` were
not run this session: the removed files are unreferenced, absent from
every vitest/node-test include pattern, and excluded from all tsconfigs,
so no compiled or executed path changes. No runtime CI savings are
claimed.
- All Paperclip CI gates green on head `ce24ab3` (verified 2026-10-16
~09:00Z): every `ci /` shard (General tests, e2e shards, serialized
server suites, Verify Paperclip Runner rust/vitest/static, Build,
Typecheck + Release Registry, policy, Docker context integrity, Canary
Dry Run, gate), `review`, `Superagent Security Scan`, `Socket Security`
PR alerts + project report, and `Contributor trust` all pass; the only
skipped jobs are the Storybook deploy/visual-regression jobs, which are
not required for this change. Greptile Review: 5/5 confidence, "Low
impact", no actionable issues, last reviewed commit `ce24ab3`.

## Risks

Low risk. No executed coverage or selection path changes. The only side
effect is a one-time change to the `hashFiles` Rust cache key that lists
`test/fixtures/**`, which simply invalidates that cache on the next CI
run.

## Model Used

Zhipu `z-ai/glm-5.3` (GLM), served through OpenRouter, running as the
Paperclip Test Gardener agent. Context window size unavailable to the
agent. Capabilities used: shell tooling, git, GitHub CLI search, and
file inspection; no image or code execution capabilities were used.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.2
2026-10-17 21:18:11 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip e30550ef39 refactor: remove code comments added by recent PRs (#16681)
CONTRIBUTING.md says PRs add no code comments, but #16485, #16586, #16621 and #16672 added some. This removes the 215 comment-only lines git blame on master attributes to those merge commits, across 12 code files, plus one blank line the removal left doubled. Rewritten (not added) comments in scripts/assert-cloud-image-sentry.mjs and comments in .github workflows are left alone. No code changes.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-17 18:55:39 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip bebeb389f1 perf(server): do not watch bundled plugins for file changes (#16677)
Bundled sandbox-provider plugins are installed from local paths inside the image, so production started a chokidar dev watcher for each of them over files that never change. createPluginDevWatcher now takes unwatchedRoots (compared in resolved and real-path form), and the app passes the bundled plugin catalog root; plugins installed elsewhere are watched as before, and a plugin moving into an unwatched root closes its old watcher and cancels any pending restart.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-17 18:39:11 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip d30648dee8 Preserve accepted messages for paused recipients (#16679)
Keep accepted deferred requests pending while their recipient is paused and deliver through normal gates after resume. Preserve company, task hold, and cleanup checks.

Verification: 247 focused checks, recursive typecheck, the full CI test and build matrix, and Apex 5/5. The local Git fixture initial-branch limitation is documented in the PR.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.1
2026-10-17 18:38:17 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 391dd15ff2 fix: recover deferred messages and completed unblock waits (#16673)
Recover accepted deferred messages through the latest finished issue run and
recognize exact completed agent unblock notifications as passive idle waits.

Preserve assignment handoffs, pause and Stop, failed outcomes, and cleanup
ownership. Honor local and SSH release contracts and atomically settle cleanup
claims. Add PostgreSQL recovery, concurrency, and interruption regressions.

Validation: recursive typecheck and build pass; 678 focused tests pass; full CI
passes; Apex review is 5/5 with no unresolved findings.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1018.0-canary.0
2026-10-17 16:53:29 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 27ab902d3d perf(docker): start the server from a precompiled runtime bundle (#16672)
The production image started the server through the tsx loader, which resolved about 3,100 modules and transpiled about 1,200 workspace TypeScript files on every boot (7.6-20 s before listen on a live instance). A build:runtime step now bundles server/dist/index.js with esbuild, compiling in the workspace packages, and the image starts node server/dist-runtime/index.mjs. Server dependencies stay bare so runtime resolution (including the cloud image's optional peers) is unchanged; each module keeps its original import.meta location; dynamic imports stay split; the entry presents the original dist/index.js as argv[1]. The avatar worker loads through tsx's API when the main thread has no loader, tini runs as a subreaper (-s), and PR CI boots the bundle with scripts/server-boot-smoke.sh.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.8
2026-10-17 16:22:35 -07:00
938a441944 fix(acpx): end Claude turns whose pending tool call stops receiving updates (#16671)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Hosted `claude_local` runs use the ACPX engine. Paperclip sends
runtime MCP servers to Claude, and Claude can start subagents (the Task
tool) that call those MCP tools.
> - #16360 set `MCP_TOOL_TIMEOUT` for Claude. That bound works: in a
local test with the same Claude binary, a direct MCP call and a subagent
MCP call to a server that never answers both ended at the bound.
> - A hosted run still hit the 4h sandbox timeout on a release that has
#16360. Its run log shows a subagent that started four MCP calls. ACP
reported the four calls as `pending`, and they never got another update.
About 40 other MCP calls in the same minutes finished in 3–25 seconds.
So the four calls most likely never reached the MCP server, and
`MCP_TOOL_TIMEOUT` did not apply to them.
> - The subagent's Task call got an `in_progress` heartbeat every 30
seconds for the full 4 hours. The turn looked active, so no existing
bound stopped it.
> - This pull request adds a stalled-tool watchdog to the ACPX engine.
It ends the turn when a pending tool call gets no update for 30 minutes
and no other tool call finishes in that time.
> - The benefit is that a stalled run fails in about 30 minutes with a
clear error code, not after 4 hours with a general timeout.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

- Refs #16360 (MCP client deadline; this PR covers the stall that the
deadline cannot reach)
- Refs #15962 (stop-time diagnostics that showed the pending tools and
their age)

**What happened?**

A hosted `claude_local` run gave lookups to two subagents. One subagent
started four MCP tool calls. ACP reported each call as `pending`. No
call got a result, an update, or an error. The other subagent finished
in 3 minutes. The stalled subagent's Task call got a heartbeat every 30
seconds, so the last-event age at stop was only 28 seconds. The oldest
pending tool was 3h58m old. The sandbox execution timeout ended the run
after 4 hours.

**Expected behavior**

A tool call that never gets a result ends the turn after a bounded time.
The run fails with an error that names the stall.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Start an ACP `claude_local` run that uses a subagent to call runtime
MCP tools.
2. Make one of the subagent's tool calls stay `pending` with no further
ACP update (in production this happened without a known trigger).
3. See that the run continues until the adapter execution timeout,
because the Task heartbeats keep the turn active.

**Paperclip version or commit**

`master` at 4415665.

## What Changed

- Add `ACPX_STALLED_TOOL_TIMEOUT_MS` (30 minutes),
`ACPX_STALLED_TOOL_MARGIN_MS` (15 minutes), the check interval, and the
`acpx_tool_stalled` error code in `acpx-engine/constants.ts`.
- Add `resolveStalledToolTimeoutMs()`. Claude turns use 30 minutes, or
`MCP_TOOL_TIMEOUT` / `BASH_MAX_TIMEOUT_MS` plus 15 minutes if that is
longer. Other agents are not watched. The adapter config field
`stalledToolTimeoutSec` overrides the bound for any agent, and 0
disables it. The bound is not part of the session fingerprint.
- The engine records the time of the last update for each tool call, and
the time a tool call last reached a final status.
- During a turn, the engine checks the pending tool calls every 60
seconds. If a pending call has had no update for the bound, and no tool
call reached a final status in that time, the engine:
- records the stop-time activity (the same fields as a timeout or an
operator stop),
- writes a `[paperclip]` stderr line with the closed tool kind and the
silent time,
- cancels the turn, and starts the existing fail-fast cancel deadline
that the duplex-loss path uses. The deadline helper is now shared by
both paths.
- Finalization reports the stall as a failure: `errorCode:
"acpx_tool_stalled"`, `resultJson.status: "failed"`,
`acpStalledToolKind` (one closed ACP `ToolKind` label or `unknown`), and
`acpStalledToolSilentMs`. A timeout or a duplex loss still takes
priority. A turn that completed anyway keeps its success.
- The server Sentry diagnostics allowlist the two new fields. It drops
the kind if it is not one closed label.
- Document the watchdog in `doc/observability.md` and the
`stalledToolTimeoutSec` field in the `claude_local` config notes.

## Verification

- `npx vitest run src/acpx-engine` in `packages/adapter-utils`: 21
files, 422 tests pass.
- New engine tests:
- A silent pending call next to a Task call that keeps getting
heartbeats ends the turn with `acpx_tool_stalled`, the closed kind, and
the silent time. No tool title or ID appears in the diagnostics.
- An agent that ignores the cancel: the fail-fast deadline closes the
stream and the run fails with `acpx_tool_stalled`.
  - A long tool that keeps getting updates is not cancelled.
- A queued call that waits behind slow calls that keep finishing is not
cancelled.
- `stalledToolTimeoutSec: 0` disables the watchdog, and only the
wall-clock timeout ends the turn.
- `resolveStalledToolTimeoutMs()` defaults, env bounds, other agents,
and config override.
- Mutation checks: with the watchdog disabled, the two stall tests time
out (the same hang as production). Without the "no tool finished" guard,
the queued-call test fails.
- `npx vitest run
src/services/__tests__/run-failure-diagnostics.test.ts` in `server`: 115
tests pass.
- `npx tsc --noEmit -p packages/adapter-utils`: passes.

## Risks

- A legitimate tool call that gets no ACP update for 30 minutes while no
other tool call finishes now fails the run. Claude's own tool bounds
(MCP 15 minutes, Bash 10 minutes by default) end healthy calls before
that. If an operator raises `MCP_TOOL_TIMEOUT` or `BASH_MAX_TIMEOUT_MS`
in the env, the bound moves up with it. Operators can also set
`stalledToolTimeoutSec` or disable the watchdog with 0.
- A long sync subagent stays safe while its Task call gets heartbeats.
Only a call that is itself silent can trip the watchdog.
- The run fails instead of continuing. The failure uses the normal
failed-run recovery, and it reports to Sentry under its own error code,
not under the generic timeout.
- This PR does not find why the four calls never got a result. Claude
runs with `--permission-mode default`, so each MCP call makes an ACP
permission round trip, and the ACP stream goes through the remote
process-session relay. A lost request or response on that path is the
most likely cause. The new diagnostics show how often the stall happens
and for which tool kind.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with tool use
and code execution. It read the run log and the ACP agent and client
code, edited the code, and ran the tests.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-authored-by: devinfoley <139239+devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.7
2026-10-17 14:51:49 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 4415665d67 fix(server): allow proved idle waits and verify historical cleanup (#16633)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages agents, task continuations, integrations, and
their execution resources.
> - Automatic idle sleep needs durable evidence that accepted work and
provider cleanup are settled.
> - Response-driven questions, passive board escalations, and completed
connection receipts currently look like unfinished work.
> - Legacy ephemeral leases and terminal image sessions need actual
deletion proof before their history can become idle.
> - This PR adds narrow evidence-based exceptions and read-only provider
verification while preserving queues, outcomes, and ownership fences.
> - Idle instances can sleep without losing responses, automatic
reconciliation, or cleanup obligations.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Instances with no executable work can remain awake because pending human
responses, passive recovery records, outbound integration configuration,
or completed delivery history are counted as background work. Older
failed ephemeral leases and finished setup sessions also lack the
evidence needed to distinguish retained resources from deleted
allocations.

**Expected behavior**

Permit idle sleep only for proved response-driven waits and settled
history. Continue blocking real queued work, inbound integrations
without a wake contract, unfinished accounting/retries, retained
resources, and uncertain provider cleanup.

**Steps to reproduce**

Finish an issue's producing run, leave a pending question or
confirmation, and request an owned scheduled idle report. Separately
retain a processed connection receipt or a failed ephemeral lease whose
provider allocation has already been deleted. The old checks keep those
instances awake even after executable work has finished.

Related public groundwork: #15522, #15599, #15761, #15897, #15907, and
#16325. Searched existing public idle-sleep PRs; this addresses
additional blockers in the current predicates.

## What Changed

- Recognize supported response-driven waits and passive board recoveries
without changing task state, response audiences, or continuation
policies. Bind passive issue generation into routine-only alarms too.
Keep automatically polled merge-confirmation cards awake.
- Treat processed events, delivered intents, disabled drafts, and
outbound MCP configuration as history/configuration where proved safe.
Preserve pending deliveries, downstream wake requests, and inbound
GitHub bindings.
- Permit only pristine Slack setup drafts with a matching disabled
channel connection, no provisioning registration, and no prior provider
identity/activity. A saved slash-command name remains inert
configuration.
- Repair missed routine execution-issue status hooks in bounded
awake-only maintenance. Lock and re-read exact owners, apply existing
completion/transient-failure rules, and preserve normal continuation
after an issue resumes.
- Allow human-only connection setup to wait only when no reusable active
connection of its purpose exists; available access reblocks sleep for
reconciliation. The delivery worker shares this proof, releases its
local idle hold, and retains maintenance only while already awake.
Passive-only ticks pause before admission during an owned drain,
allowing slow backups to finish; new producer notifications still
reconcile and invalidate the backup.
- Add optional `environmentInspectLease` SDK discovery/dispatch and
read-only Daytona/fake-provider implementations. Old workers remain
conservative. Daytona status inspection uses a fresh provider GET
without reconnecting or poisoning unused-worker eligibility.
- Bind historical credential reads to an unrotated initial secret
version and its immutable resolved-value hash; reject ambiguous
histories and ambient Daytona credential/API-endpoint fallbacks before
querying provider state.
- Verify bounded rotating batches of historical resources on
already-awake Cloud instances, outside readiness. Store host-owned
deletion evidence bound to exact row identity/version and reject
concurrent ownership changes. Preserve failure outcomes, cleanup/export
intents, and run continuation authority.
- Preserve cancellation provenance, defer contended routine rows
individually, and cap actual inspection RPCs across caller timeouts and
worker exits. Add database, SDK, provider, configuration-scope, and race
regression coverage and update idle protocol documentation.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed on `24fd1c0f5ec`; server
typecheck/build passed again after the final coordinator-only fix in
`60f23e6e4b6`.
- Final server regressions: 258 sleep-safety/connection cases and all 17
coordinator cases passed. Earlier focused checks also covered 331
combined idle/cleanup cases, 34 custom-image cases, 39
credential/cleanup cases, 39 connection-history cases, and 80 existing
routine cases. Counts overlap and are not additive.
- SDK: 153 passed. Daytona: 406 passed with 14 existing opt-in skips.
The provider implementation also typechecks against the locked SDK used
by the Cloud wrapper.
- Dependency boundaries were exercised with real child workers holding
provider inspection replies beyond caller timeouts, a real PostgreSQL
row lock delaying one routine owner, and real connection creation →
queue notification → worker hold release → resumption after access is
enabled without another notification. A controlled six-second backup
goes through the real coordinator, task drain, work signals, and
idle-safety generation checks; maintenance permits completion, while a
new committed transaction invalidates it.
- Full local `pnpm test:run` completed its general-server phase with
21,122 passing, 29 failing, and 109 skipped tests; later phases did not
run. That long run spanned source edits and is not a final-revision
pass. The affected Slack draft assertion passes on current source.
Restoring `/usr/sbin` for `lsof` produced 233 passing tests and two
Git-fixture failures across the other five files (3 existing skips).
Both remaining assertions pass with command-scoped
`init.defaultBranch=master`; this host defaults to main and leaves both
branches in their fixture. No source/global Git setting changed for that
comparison. Original failure logs are retained.
- A parallel typecheck/build attempt raced generated Runner outputs and
failed an import. Running the build sequentially passed with no source
change.
- Local database checks use the maintained test-constructor seam with
native PostgreSQL 16.14 because bundled PostgreSQL 18 is unreliable on
this host. No database assertions were skipped in the focused runs. An
interrupted combined run was superseded by the separate passing
coordinator and safety/connection runs; no owned test database processes
remain running.
- Apex reviewed final head `60f23e6e4b615a08591e19d86443a6c35c091ce1`:
**5/5**, zero unresolved threads. All current-head CI gates are green,
with expected policy skips. The branch is conflict-free and GitHub
reports a clean merge state.
- Current-head CI initially failed `plan-task-fixture.spec.ts:66` during
fixture deletion: the final company DELETE hit
`activity_log_company_id_companies_id_fk` after the feature assertions
completed. The deletion path is unchanged here; the final diff only
changes drain-gated passive maintenance. The preceding revision passed
this shard. Failure evidence is retained in [the original CI
job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39006936642/job/117321244396);
the targeted retry passed on the unchanged commit ([retry
job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/39006936642/job/117322535013)).
This shows recovery, not that the underlying company-deletion race is
resolved.
- These checks do not claim staging/production deployment or live
provider cleanup proof. Provider tests simulate responses. Full Cloud
staging verification requires a compatible Core/private-plugin
composition after the Core revision is on master.

## Risks

Sleep eligibility changes require the existing owned drain, final
generation validation, local-work checks, and plugin drain. Unsupported
states fail closed. Queued agent input and routine execution remain
blocked. Outbound MCP exemptions exclude inbound GitHub grants; other
unsupported inbound integrations remain awake.

The inspection RPC is optional and requires a matching live worker
method. Its actual outstanding calls are capped at two across workers
even after the caller times out. Historical lease inspection requires
its recorded plugin/config; setup inspection requires an unchanged
recorded config fingerprint. Not-found under replacement account
credentials is not historical deletion proof: ambiguous/rotated secret
histories defer verification, and initial-version reads must match their
recorded value hashes. Missing provenance (including legacy image
sessions without a recorded config fingerprint), live/stopped resources,
provider authorization failures, and concurrent changes defer
verification. Routine repair replays existing
completion/transient-failure behavior and timestamps at reconciliation
time; it does not execute or discard deferred comments. No migration or
destructive provider operation is added. The new marker does not grant
run-resume authority. Full Cloud staging validation requires a
compatible Core/private-plugin composition; no production deployment is
included.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 Codex, with repository/tool access and code execution.
Exact model identifier and context-window size are not exposed by this
session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run relevant tests locally; passing focused checks and
full-run limitations are documented above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.6
2026-10-17 07:01:32 -07:00
Nicky Leach 2723168083 test(runner): control the durable resume watchdog (#16623) canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.5 2026-10-17 01:26:01 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 5555817c2b fix(server): let Git expiration verify public commits without a run identity (#16621)
Git expiration created its auth provider with only the issue ID; with a managed GitHub connection that provider throws outside a run ("No managed GitHub identity is available for this run"), so every upstream commit proof failed and was logged as inspection_failed. Expiration now falls back to anonymous access when the provider throws: public repositories verify, private ones stay kept. Upstream verification failures are reported as upstream_commit_unverified, and a managed checkout whose upstream cannot be reached or authenticated as managed_checkout_upstream_unavailable; local proof-store failures keep their own error.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.4 nightly/v2026.1017.0-nightly.0
2026-10-16 20:54:30 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 669d329f25 perf(slack): avoid unused catalog revision scans (#16630)
Slack catalog discovery now checks live task, user, endpoint and credentials without calculating an unused compatibility revision. Full authority callers retain the unchanged revision and search-token path.

Validation: 44 affected cases, full repository typecheck/build, current-head full CI/E2E and security checks, Greptile Base 5/5 with no unresolved findings. Identical production catalog output with revision statements reduced from two to zero in real-PostgreSQL comparisons. Hosted latency acceptance remains pending.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.3
2026-10-16 22:21:03 -05:00
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5 32ee2e9a6a fix(heartbeat): let a live legacy controller finish before the finalization deadline fails its run (#16622)
The execution-control reconciler now checks hasLiveLegacyController inside its locked transaction before failing a run. While a live legacy controller lease owns the run, the reconciler moves executionControlDeadlineAt to the lease expiry instead of failing, reporting, or surfacing it. Once the lease lapses, the next sweep fails and reports the run once, as before. Native runs are unchanged.

Adds an embedded-Postgres regression test that fails on master and passes with the fix.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.2
2026-10-16 19:07:50 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 0528cc7ee0 perf: overlap native GitHub and assigned-tool setup (#16620)
Prepare managed GitHub access and fresh assigned-MCP discovery concurrently for remote native Codex. Wait for both before provider construction and drain both on failure through the existing run cleanup.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.1
2026-10-16 20:19:28 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 5f5602bba7 feat(plugins): synchronize standing connection assignments (#16603)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Lifecycle plugins prepare agent runtimes outside the control plane.
> - They need committed connection assignment changes without polling.
> - A reader and its revision hooks must cover the same fields.
> - This pull request adds a bounded standing-assignment snapshot and
its matching hooks.
> - Plugins can react to assignment changes while execution keeps its
existing access checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

The agent runtime reader does not expose standing connection
assignments. Changes to connection installs, active profiles, and
connector feature switches do not request synchronization. Adding
company-wide invalidation also exposes lock inversions in assignment
writers and AI adoption.

**Expected behavior**

The owning lifecycle plugin can read a bounded assignment snapshot.
Every committed change to its stored fields advances the runtime
revision. Rollback removes both the change and its event. Assignment
writers finish without a lock-order cycle.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Install a connection or bind an active profile to an agent.
2. Read its runtime inputs through the owning lifecycle plugin.
3. Rename or disable the connection, revoke the assignment, or switch
connector features.
4. Expect a committed runtime event and an updated snapshot without
periodic polling.

**Additional context**

Extracted from #16503. Catalog publication #16602 and the separate test
maintenance PRs #16601 and #16610 are merged. This PR now targets master
and is the active review. Tool-definition hooks #16604 and
access/credential hooks #16605 remain drafts without review requests.

## What Changed

- Add SDK types and an owning-plugin runtime snapshot for installed
connections, active profile IDs, and effective connector feature
switches.
- Reject more than 512 connections or 128 active profiles instead of
returning partial data.
- Add migration 0354 for the exact stored fields used by the snapshot,
with transaction-coalesced invalidation. Agent-targeted bindings and
installs notify only their old/new target agents;
project/routine/issue/gateway bindings are outside the snapshot and
produce no notification.
- Use ordered agent locks that are compatible with foreign-key
references and exclude runtime readers. Prelock complete old/new target
sets before replacing assignments or restoring managed profiles.
- Record one company baseline at delivery startup for process-managed
feature overlays.
- Lock assignment inputs before install saves, task completion, and
email assignment. Setup finalization reads the locked connection state
and prelocks company agents before activating, re-enabling, or reviving
a profile.
- Make profile binding and reassignment writes transactional and lock
parent profiles first. Keep target validation and profile/detail reads
on the reserved transaction connection, including with a one-connection
pool.
- Lock company agents in order before validated AI adoption. Keep
adoption and shared configuration writes at `FOR NO KEY UPDATE`,
avoiding an upgrade that can deadlock foreign-key inserts during gateway
creation. Configuration fields cannot change agent identity; lifecycle
transitions and deletion retain their existing locks.
- Document supported coverage and the inputs reserved for later PRs.

## Verification

- Thirteen affected suites passed: 757 tests covering runtime
hooks/assignments/skills, concurrent skill publication, tool
access/catalog, task connection intents, lifecycle delivery, email, AI
accounts, migration histories, snapshot drift, and the agent lifecycle
module. This includes the merged catalog PR's OAuth and
overlapping-refresh regressions.
- The assignment suite passes all 24 cases, including bounded snapshots,
company/agent isolation, rollback, health-field no-ops, process-start
feature overlays, and real lock contention.
- Four one-connection PostgreSQL regressions reproduce the earlier
helper-read hangs before the correction; bind, unbind, delete, and
reassign complete with it. The earlier adoption/gateway probe exposed
both lock upgrades: changing only validation still deadlocks in shared
configuration. Current scoped coverage verifies adoption with
agent-targeted binding writes; gateway-only bindings no longer
invalidate this snapshot.
- The original ordered-adoption regression reproduces PostgreSQL `40P01`
without ordered company-agent locking. Scoped-recipient tests reproduce
unrelated-peer journaling before the trigger correction and verify
repeated bind/unbind operations leave peers untouched, ignored binding
types produce no events, both reassignment recipients are reached, and
coalescing remains intact.
- Six replacement contention cases cover installs, existing setup,
activation, re-enabling, profile revival, and profile reassignment.
Negative controls reproduce `40P01` without the corresponding
target/company prelocks; all cases pass with the guards. Activation
decisions use the connection row reread under lock.
- An initial contention fixture failed because its settings connection
lacked an MCP URL. Supplying the fixture URL and controlled lookup
corrected that test setup error.
- Server typecheck, database migration numbering/safety, five-snapshot
retention, feature-map structural validation, and `git diff --check`
passed. Migration metadata preserves historical journal entries and adds
no schema change. The complete diff was reviewed for secrets and
personal data before push.
- Earlier hosted PR CI runs 38983440861 and 38985530069 passed; the
superseded promotion run 38983440470 was cancelled. Superagent
acknowledged the recipient fix and accepted the documented company-wide
cost at `359b5b2f30a8a0248177367e458663d5379810d1`. Its two standard
Greptile summaries were conditional on a later setup correction and were
not counted as independent acceptance; the setup correction is now
included here.
- At `7da246aab46274db1a120a0546abbb404c5427c7`, hosted PR run
38986958988 passed: all 55 checks succeeded, with two optional Storybook
checks skipped. Superagent passed, all review threads are resolved, and
standard Greptile independently returned 5/5 with no blocking findings
(review completed 2026-10-17 00:40 UTC). Apex independently returned 5/5
with no actionable findings (completed 2026-10-17 00:50 UTC). CI was
rechecked after Apex and remains green; the branch is mergeable against
master. Full local build and repository-wide tests were not run.

## Risks

Migration 0354 adds database functions and triggers without changing
table schema. Apply it through the normal migration flow. Agent-targeted
bindings and installs only notify their affected agents. Explicit
company-wide assignments, connection metadata, profile
activation/removal, and connector feature switches retain synchronous,
transaction-atomic company fanout. Each such transaction takes ordered
row locks and inserts up to one connector runtime event per eligible
company agent: O(number of eligible agents) work and journal storage,
with no company-size cap or cross-transaction mutation quota. This
remains an intentional scope tradeoff for this PR; deferred fanout is
not implemented. Many of these conservative changes can request
preparation even if an individual snapshot stays unchanged. Snapshot
limits fail closed. This PR provides desired assignments, not
credentials or task authorization. Later PRs must add mutation coverage
before consumers can rely on immediate synchronization of tool
definitions or credentials.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code
execution, and testing. The exact deployment model ID and context window
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1017.0-canary.0
2026-10-16 17:55:47 -07:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 190080642e perf(tools): publish catalog refreshes in bounded chunks (#16602)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - MCP discovery publishes tools that setup and access profiles use.
> - Large catalogs currently write one row at a time.
> - Repeated page entries can produce duplicate results, and profile
writes can partly commit.
> - This pull request publishes tools in bounded chunks and makes
profile synchronization atomic.
> - The result supports large catalogs before connector runtime hooks
are enabled.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

Catalog refresh performs one database write per tool. Repeated tool
names across discovery pages appear more than once in the result.
Default-profile synchronization uses separate statements, so failure can
leave a profile without its binding. OAuth callbacks also acquire
connection/application locks in the reverse order from publication and
setup, allowing a concurrent refresh to deadlock.

**Expected behavior**

Publish at most 500 tools per catalog statement. Keep one result per
tool name, using its last descriptor. Preserve existing IDs, first-seen
timestamps, disabled actions, and unchanged review decisions. Commit or
roll back default-profile changes together. OAuth persistence must
acquire application then connection locks before secret or connection
writes.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Refresh a synthetic MCP catalog with 2,500 tools.
2. Return the same tool on two discovery pages with different
descriptions.
3. Fail the profile-binding insert during default-profile creation.
4. Overlap personal, organization, or managed OAuth persistence with
setup finalization or discovery of a new tool.

**Additional context**

This is the first feature extracted from #16503. The separate test-only
maintenance PRs #16601 and #16610 are merged. This PR now targets master
and is the active review. Standing assignments #16603, tool definitions
#16604, and access/credential hooks #16605 remain stacked drafts without
review requests.

## What Changed

- Deduplicate discovery results by tool name and keep the last
descriptor.
- Upsert catalog rows in transactions of at most 500 tools.
- Preserve row identity and operator-disabled status on conflict.
Determine default-access candidates from the rows read under each
publication lock, so an overlapping refresh cannot restore an action
turned Off after another refresh finishes.
- Lock the application before the connection during publication, setup
finalization, removal, and all three OAuth persistence paths. The OAuth
ordering fix is included here so this PR is independently safe; it does
not depend on #16605.
- Synchronize the managed default profile, its entries, bindings, and
managed policies in one transaction.
- Add PostgreSQL publication tests and document partial-failure
recovery.
- Target the existing callback failure injection at profile creation
instead of a transaction ordinal.

## Verification

- `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/tool-catalog-publication.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts`: 436 tests passed with
the OAuth and overlapping-refresh corrections on top of the merged
#16610 fix.
- The new tests exercise real PostgreSQL with 250 and 2,500 tools,
repeated discovery pages, preserved choices, lock contention, and
failures between chunks and during profile creation.
- Four selected regression cases fail with the production source
restored to the parent commit. The implementation was then restored and
rechecked.
- Six additional real-PostgreSQL regressions cover personal,
organization, and managed OAuth persistence against both setup
finalization and new-tool discovery. All six reproduce PostgreSQL
deadlock `40P01` with the OAuth ordering fix removed; all six pass with
it restored. Discovery uses synthetic credential headers to isolate
publication locking from credential rotation.
- Apex initially returned 3/5 on
`0d6013a9649388041975406fe4b0247cd0e695aa`, identifying an
overlapping-refresh permission race. Two new PostgreSQL regressions
cover both absent and quarantined tools; both prove an agent goes from
deny back to allow without the correction, and remains denied with it.
The test pauses one refresh after its initial catalog snapshot,
completes another refresh, turns the action Off through the service, and
resumes the stale refresh.
- `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: passed.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`: passed (structural validation only).
- `git diff --check`: passed.
- Reviewed the complete diff for secrets and personal data before push.
- Earlier hosted run 38975428064 failed the maximum-size newline
skill-audit watchdog; other interrupted jobs reported runner
shutdown/cancellation. The original watchdog failure did not identify
whether startup or auditing timed out, so its exact cause remains
unknown. The separate merged #16610 isolates the audit deadline from
module startup and preserves the audit hang guard. This branch is
rebased onto that fix.
- Full local build and repository-wide tests were not run. At the
previous head `0d6013a9649388041975406fe4b0247cd0e695aa`, all 55 hosted
checks succeeded (two optional Storybook checks skipped), and standard
Greptile returned 5/5 before Apex identified the permission race above.
At corrected head `dc120d2bc879c54c14347db30e74c753bcff61e6`, all 55
hosted checks succeeded (two optional Storybook checks skipped), and a
fresh standard review returned 5/5 with no open findings. The second
Apex review also returned 5/5 on that exact head (successful Apex check
completed 2026-10-16T23:36:44Z). Both earlier findings are addressed,
there are no open review threads, and the branch is mergeable against
master.

## Risks

Each successful catalog chunk remains committed if a later operation
fails. A retry completes publication. Provider discovery occurs outside
database locks. Default-profile changes commit separately from the
catalog chunks and roll back together on failure. Tests use a controlled
MCP response; they do not qualify a live provider. There is no schema
migration or new plugin API in this PR.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code
execution, and testing. The exact deployment model ID and context window
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 16:40:12 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip dc499ae02b perf(server): reject shared Git cleanup paths before history scans (#16614)
Check the existing global execution/project shared-path veto before scanning retained run contexts. Preserve the full unshared-path query, lifecycle locks and all deletion-phase rechecks.

Verify with 35 focused real PostgreSQL/Git cases, full repository typecheck/build, exact-head full CI/E2E and Greptile Base 5/5. A read-only same-snapshot query pair retained the false verdict while reducing round trip from1089ms to9.4ms; this is not a full-agent latency result. The first security scan was inconclusive after an infrastructure checkout failure; one actual rescan passed.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 18:17:15 -05:00
Nicky Leach 564d4e1bce test(skills): separate audit deadline from process startup (#16610) canary/v2026.1016.0-canary.20 2026-10-16 15:52:54 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 9a3290fe10 perf(runner): overlap default remote artifact preparation (#16608)
Prepare the native runner and default image Codex harness together on providers that declare concurrent sync support. Preserve all executable checks, wait for both operations on failure, and retain serial explicit harness installs.

Verified with 881 affected cases, full typecheck/build, exact-head full CI and Greptile Base 5/5. The real Daytona component median fell from 839ms to 432ms; full deployed reply latency remains unproven.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1016.0-canary.19
2026-10-16 17:29:27 -05:00
Nicky Leach c0ac2772b0 test: stabilize migration and recovery fixtures (#16601) 2026-10-16 15:19:11 -07:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 73659c6b27 fix(server): let Git expiration discard Paperclip-managed checkouts (#16586)
Reconstructable Git expiration rejected nearly every terminal worktree with unique_ignored_files, because Paperclip writes two ignored paths into every worktree itself: .claude/settings.local.json and the managed project checkouts under .paperclip-repositories/. Expiration now accepts the settings file, and accepts a managed checkout only through a prover the expiration worker supplies. The prover maps the checkout back to its project workspace row and proves it reproducible against that row's repository URL: worktree and stock-storage checks, no linked worktrees, no unreachable objects, and every ref, reflog and HEAD commit reachable from upstream refs fetched fresh into a proof store. Every inspection Git command now runs with core.fsmonitor disabled.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 14:31:06 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 3db33c131e perf(slack): overlap endpoint preparation and narrow credential reads (#16593)
Prepare Slack endpoints in pairs with a per-call concurrency limit of two, and resolve only the current bot token for live tool authority. Preserve candidate-order errors, active-sibling settlement, credential rotation and authorization revocation.

Verified with real PostgreSQL regression controls, full repository CI/E2E, security checks and current-head Greptile Plus5/5 with no unresolved findings.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 16:05:46 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip d1463fb79e Preserve saved delivery deadlines across clock ticks (#16589)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agent work and message delivery.
> - Delivery workers restore saved retry and maintenance deadlines.
> - The coordinator converts each future deadline to a delay and back.
> - A clock tick between those reads can move the deadline.
> - This pull request keeps the saved future timestamp.
> - A deterministic test covers the clock tick.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #16503. This separate fix addresses an unrelated CI failure found
during its review.

**What happened?**

The unchanged delayed GitHub publication restart test intermittently
reports a wake deadline one millisecond after the saved timestamp. The
coordinator subtracts one clock reading from the deadline, then adds the
delay to a later reading.

**Expected behavior**

Keep a future saved deadline exactly. Preserve the current retry
behavior for expired deadlines during idle reconciliation.

**Steps to reproduce**

Register a task with a future `nextRunAt` timestamp. Advance
`Date.now()` by one millisecond on each read. The old coordinator
reports `nextWakeAt()` one millisecond after the saved timestamp. The
new unit test forces this sequence.

## What Changed

- Let the internal scheduler accept the existing absolute future
deadline.
- Keep relative retry and immediate wake scheduling unchanged.
- Add a deterministic advancing-clock regression. Keep the chat
integration assertion unchanged.

## Verification

- Based on `origin/master` at `c91f7a6e5f`.
- Coordinator suite and the unchanged delayed GitHub publication restart
case: 16 passed, 1346 unrelated cases skipped.
- The new regression fails against the original coordinator with the
exact one-millisecond offset.
- Server typecheck passed.
- On head `d2db3e15d6dfafd390bab59529474abebb19d09c`, all 55 hosted
checks passed, with 2 expected skips. This includes all server/chat
shards, Runner checks, build, canary dry run, security checks, and
end-to-end tests.
- Standard Greptile and Apex are both 5/5 on that exact head, with no
review threads. Apex completed after green CI; final CI verification
remains fully green and the branch is mergeable.
- `git diff --check` and the pre-push secret/PII scan passed.

## Risks

Low risk. The change keeps the saved future timestamp. Existing tests
cover retry, idle drain, preemption, and shutdown behavior. No schema or
API change is required.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code
execution, and testing. The exact deployment model ID and context window
are not exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub references)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal
Paperclip ticket id
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no
public contract changed)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1016.0-canary.16
2026-10-16 12:09:38 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 93ab7bad11 Add immutable Muse clients and OAuth grant contracts (#16447)
Add immutable Muse client assets and the grant-linked private contract.

Keep the grant migration safe for replay and partial schema recovery, preserving exact preview receipts and existing data. Keep public wake signals separate from private provider authority.

Refs #16447.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 14:09:26 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 2cc7992369 Share the external Runner lifecycle and add strict Muse contracts (#16444)
Add the external Runner foundation with distinct Dot/Grok V6, canonical home-mode V7 and Muse V8 contracts.

Keep generated schemas and profiles synchronized. Bound default question-answer command IDs in a disjoint namespace while preserving existing IDs and durable replay. Preserve canonical migration history and add normally generated, replay-safe Muse schema milestones with literal preview-history fixtures.

Refs #16444.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 13:46:50 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 4de6335c3b perf(server): trim saved run JSON from agent authentication (#16577)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip coordinates AI agents that work for companies.
> - Agent JWT authentication checks each request against its saved run.
> - Saved runs can contain large prompts and result payloads.
> - The first run lookup needs only identity fields, cancellation state,
and the conversation flag.
> - Reading all saved JSON transfers data that this lookup does not use.
> - This PR selects the required JSON fields in PostgreSQL and preserves
the existing authorization decisions.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

The initial saved-run lookup in agent JWT authentication.

**Subsystem affected**

Server authentication and database queries.

**Current behavior**

The lookup transfers the full context and result JSON on each request.
It uses only the cancellation state and conversation flag from those
values.

**Proposed behavior**

Select the required JSON fields in PostgreSQL. Keep the run, company,
and agent predicates. Read current state on every request.

**Reason and benefit**

A synthetic lookup with a 96 KiB prompt and 4 KiB result returns 102,520
JSON bytes before this change and 134 bytes after it. This reduces data
transferred by this query.

**Breaking changes**

None intended. Identity fields, write revocation, read access, and
cancellation response codes retain their current behavior.

Related: #9280 addresses authentication round-trip counts. This PR only
reduces the data returned by the existing initial run lookup.

## What Changed

- Extract the initial run lookup and select only the JSON fields that
authentication consumes.
- Add real PostgreSQL tests for legacy JSON shapes, fresh cancellation
state, payload size, and run/company/agent scope.
- Add a reproducible benchmark that loads the original query from an
explicit baseline commit.
- Document the lookup and benchmark.

## Verification

- Baseline: `06689c1b3410000bcd65ff40cb469e600209c4db`.
- `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed.
- `pnpm build`: passed.
- Final server typecheck: passed.
- Final-head GitHub checks: all green at
`2be1c38e6bf51616b69993cf84cee1eef9657517`. Apex: 5/5, zero unresolved
threads, conflict-free.
- `pnpm check:module-boundaries`: passed. The standalone synthetic
benchmark now uses the existing root benchmark directory and resolves
Drizzle through the server workspace.
- Focused HTTP middleware and database tests: 29 passed on real Homebrew
PostgreSQL 16.14. The SQL test compares 270 combinations of status,
cancellation JSON, and conversation JSON. It also checks fresh state and
company/agent/run scope.
- Broad native verification: 873 passed across the HTTP middleware, SQL
projection, run diagnostics, and native executor suites.
- The default local full command completed its general server lane with
12,090 passed and 8,885 skipped tests. It could not finish the root
workflow: the host could not start the bundled PostgreSQL; a diagnostics
assertion matched a directory name; and Git fixtures retained the host
default branch. These failures remain in the verification record. All 68
failed files now pass on replay with disposable Homebrew PostgreSQL, an
isolated checkout, and command-scoped Git defaults. The 68-file replay
passed 2,588 tests and left two email skill-resolution failures. Moving
the checkout outside an unrelated ancestor skills directory resolved
those last failures: all 44 tests in that file passed. Product code and
test assertions were unchanged for these host adjustments.

Benchmark command:

```sh
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsx ../scripts/benchmark-agent-authentication.ts --baseline-ref=06689c1b3410000bcd65ff40cb469e600209c4db
```

The final benchmark ran at treatment commit
`2be1c38e6bf51616b69993cf84cee1eef9657517` with a clean worktree. The
local run used PostgreSQL 16.14 and the maintained test constructor seam
to start disposable Homebrew clusters. The bundled PostgreSQL binary
could not start on this host. Both versions use the same schema and
predicates. Each case has two warmup rounds and ten measured rounds with
alternating order. Random content prevents unrealistic compression.
Complete authentication decisions match.

| Context / result | Before JSON bytes | After JSON bytes | Before
median | After median |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| 1 KiB / 4 KiB | 5,240 | 134 | 0.157 ms | 0.157 ms |
| 96 KiB / 4 KiB | 102,520 | 134 | 0.331 ms | 0.140 ms |

These are local query round trips, including result transfer and
decoding. The small control has no material latency gain. The large case
improves by about 2.4x. Both plans read the same single row. The primary
result is reduced response size. This does not measure HTTP latency,
server CPU savings, or fleet-wide cost savings. Full samples and plans
are retained with the verification evidence.

## Risks

- JSON types must retain their meaning. The real database tests compare
the consumed authorization contract with the original projection,
including SQL null, JSON null, scalars, arrays, objects, string
booleans, and cancellation states.
- The change covers the first JWT run lookup. Later run identity capture
keeps its existing full-run reads and transaction locks. Those reads
remain a separate cost.
- The change adds no schema migration or authorization cache.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, and shell
tools. This session did not expose a more specific serving model ID or
its context window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 11:44:14 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip c91f7a6e5f perf(runner): overlap verified sandbox launch assets (#16585)
Native sandbox launch preparation stages fresh harness files and immutable runtime context in sequence. Overlap them only under the verified concurrent-sync capability, settle every started transfer before launch or cleanup, and preserve serial SSH behavior and error priority.

A matched real-Daytona comparison reduces staging from 1,552 ms to 1,017 ms. The larger active-run difference includes model variation and is not attributed to this change. Add an explicit single-attempt diagnostic and synchronize stale Pi evidence metadata with its shipped profile.

Validation: 764 native runner/tracing cases, 2,764 support cases, repository typecheck/build, fresh exact-head full CI/E2E/security and Apex 5/5 pass. Observability remains a silent no-op when no endpoint is configured.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1016.0-canary.15
2026-10-16 13:35:26 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip f5534717b0 fix(runtime): preserve unexported native work during lease cleanup (#16583)
Preserve the exact native workspace source until its export is finalized. Apply the same guard to cleanup sweeps and direct environment teardown. Keep stop-only recovery and healthy warm retention available.

Verified with 317 targeted tests, server typecheck, module boundary check, all current-head CI gates, and Greptile 5/5.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 12:56:09 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 6f8ad3d77b Add verified session-local stdio MCP transport to Runner (#16526)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agent runs and their tool authority.
> - Runner supplies provider sessions with assigned MCP connections.
> - The current native connection binding supports an HTTP gateway only.
> - Execution hosts also have private local tools with stdio MCP
interfaces.
> - Those tools need session-local registration and safe concurrency.
> - This pull request adds verified local stdio assignments beside the
existing gateway.
> - Providers receive the existing tool schemas and image content.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Problem or motivation**

Runner can supply a native provider session with an HTTP MCP gateway,
but cannot also assign a verified local stdio MCP server without
persistent provider configuration. Execution hosts need a session-local
transport for local MCP tools, coordination for calls sharing a
resource, and native schema/image delivery. The pinned native Codex
client drops MCP images when `structuredContent` is also present.

**Proposed solution**

Add general stdio MCP transport support using host-assigned executable
digests, arguments, environment and a private Unix socket identifying
the shared resource. Tool implementations supply their own schemas and
responses; Runner forwards their native MCP schemas and content.
Register the transport for the current provider session. Serialize calls
across processes, keep unknown outcomes fenced, and authorize assigned
native Codex tools without a new prompt while routing explicit tool
confirmations through existing PRP permission requests. Retain the HTTP
gateway and applicable permission policy.

**Alternatives considered**

Reimplementing tools or translating their actions into provider-specific
APIs would tie the transport to individual tool implementations. Global
provider config would leak session assignments. Shell commands alone do
not deliver native MCP images or preserve MCP approval requests.

**Roadmap alignment**

This completes the existing Runner transport boundary. Related: #10690
(operator config for the legacy ACPX engine), #11605 (gateway delivery
of installed stdio connections), #16486 (preconfigured provider homes).
This change assigns local tools on the execution host and leaves those
administration paths intact.

## What Changed

- Add reserved, verified stdio bindings for native Codex and through the
shared ACPX runtime. ACPX clients must support stdio MCP assignments.
Read-only sessions omit the binding. No home/project config is
rewritten.
- Run the backend with only its assigned environment through the
verified executable launch path.
- Serialize all calls sharing a private Unix socket across sessions.
Metadata remains responsive. Queued cancellation prevents execution;
active calls remain fenced until acknowledgement. Unknown outcomes
require a resource restart.
- Authorize host-assigned native Codex tools without a new per-call
prompt, matching existing execution-host shell utilities. Preserve
explicit tool deny/prompt rules. Route requested MCP tool confirmations
through one-time PRP approvals, bound to the active thread and turn.
Keep shell escalation disabled and existing tool deny rules effective.
ACPX adapters retain their applicable ACPX permission policy.
- Preserve schemas and image blocks. For native Codex 0.160/0.162,
retain structured metadata as MCP text on image-bearing results to avoid
the client's image-loss bug. ACPX adapters receive the original
response.
- Document transport authority, cancellation and recovery limits.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed with pnpm 9.15.4 and Rust
1.97.1 on macOS arm64.
- Before Apex, full `paperclip-runner-core` Rust tests passed. After the
fixes, all 379 library tests and eight subprocess tests using a generic
stdio MCP fixture pass. Those subprocess tests cover schema/image
passthrough, assigned-only environment, executable drift, call
serialization, cancellation and unknown outcomes. The native Codex suite
passed 91 tests with two intentionally ignored;
`receipt_limit_rejects_the_call_and_keeps_polling_when_interrupt_fails`
timed out waiting for `turn.interrupted`, including an isolated retry.
The unchanged pre-fix commit `80917b301a2309f7966a466cf0c198a2112be2d5`
reproduces the same timeout in isolation; this local native-suite run is
not claimed as fully passing.
- All 252 native controller tests pass against the final narrowed
approval branch. Focused TypeScript transport/permission suites passed
(298 tests); final binding, read-only host, policy and adapter checks
passed (105 tests).
- **Provider-client smoke coverage:** pinned Codex 0.160.0 through
native Runner and Claude SDK 0.3.286 used local stdio MCP servers and
loopback model API fixtures without live model credentials. These
clients define the smoke-test coverage; this is not an exhaustive
adapter compatibility test. Image responses reached the next model
request as typed image blocks. Native Codex checks also verified
unattended execution without approval requests, explicit per-tool prompt
denial without backend execution, disabled-tool rules, and stale-turn
approval rejection.
- Two Greptile concurrency findings were reproduced with failing
subprocess tests and fixed: pending cancellation under output
backpressure, and a ctime-based fence reset after chmod. Initial checks
exposed Codex CLI option-scope and key-quoting errors, which were
corrected. The existing ordinary elicitation regression also exposed an
overly broad request branch; the final branch handles explicit tool
approvals only.
- `pnpm test:run` was attempted. The broad local server suite hit
persistent embedded PostgreSQL startup failures and unrelated local Git
fixture failures; it was stopped with the failure log retained. Those
local results are not claimed as passing. Hosted Linux CI gates passed
on the reviewed runtime commit, as recorded below.
- First Apex review found three additional defects, now fixed with
regressions: keep the resource-lock socket snapshot instead of sampling
the socket twice; project native permission requests with durable
turn/item IDs while retaining provider IDs in details; validate provider
response conversion before marking a request as settling. The retry
regression failed before the fix. Focused Codex request/adapter checks
pass (23 tests), server permission projection passes (16 tests), and all
379 Runner library tests pass. The broader database-backed bridge suite
was attempted but its local PostgreSQL setup timed out; 29 tests did not
execute. This local failure is retained, not claimed as passing.
- Runtime acceptance before the documentation clarification, on
`bd4fccae001157beb5bc76ff17c1920a5db3105a`: standard Greptile 5/5, then
Apex 5/5 with no unresolved threads; all 60 checks complete successfully
or intentionally skip. Ten CI jobs were interrupted by the same runner
shutdown, including one stale job that required cancellation before
retry; the same-commit retry passed. Hosted Rust tests also pass,
including the native suite with the local baseline timeout noted above.
- `git diff --check`, map validation, and pre-push secret/PII scan
passed.

## Risks

- No live model account or deployment isolation qualification was run.
The loopback fixture proves the actual vendor-client request format, not
model interpretation.
- Stdio MCP support uses the current host-assignment contract: each
binding requires a verified executable and a private Unix socket
identifying the serialized resource. Other platforms retain the HTTP
path. No provider version was upgraded.
- A lost acknowledgement blocks subsequent calls until the host restarts
the assigned resource. Direct shell calls are outside this MCP fence and
retain the existing shell policy.
- Preconfigured Claude remains unattended and denies interactive
approval requests. Host assignment authorizes native Codex local tools;
it must be supplied only for sessions already authorized to use the
resource.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning and repository/tool execution. The
session does not expose a more specific model identifier or
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [ ] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-16 10:39:38 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip ce0eff7d1f perf: reduce fresh workspace clone and sandbox staging waits (#16487)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Each run needs a private workspace and safe persistence.
> - Fresh isolated repository sources download upstream Git history
again.
> - Sandbox staging also verifies an optional seed cache before it
uploads the workspace.
> - That verification holds a company lock during a full extraction and
hash scan.
> - This pull request reuses pristine Git objects through an
authenticated remote clone.
> - It also overlaps seed verification with upload and moves
verification outside the publication lock.
> - The benefit is less repeated transfer and less serial preparation
work, with the same task isolation and recovery contract.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What existing behavior does this improve?**

Fresh task-private repository preparation and inbound sandbox workspace
staging.

**Current behavior**

Each isolated remote source clones the full upstream history. Optional
seed verification then extracts and hashes another full tree before
upload. One workspace's verification can hold the company cache lock
while other workspaces wait.

**Proposed behavior**

Use a company and credential scoped cache of pristine upstream objects
for GitHub HTTPS sources. Each task still clones from the current
remote. It disconnects from the cache before publication. Run seed
verification alongside upload. Hold the company lock only for final
capacity checks and publication.

**Reason and benefit**

These operations lie on the workspace preparation path. Removing
repeated Git pack transfer and serial verification can reduce startup
time. Local measurements below cover these boundaries. They do not
establish hosted agent latency.

Related: #16425, #16454, #16398, #16461, #16468, #16473. The cache
inspection and durable folder proposal in #13376 covers separate product
work.

## What Changed

- Add a pristine upstream Git object cache for fresh isolated GitHub
HTTPS sources. Key it by company, repository and current credential
fingerprint. Do not store credentials.
- Keep online clone authorization and current remote refs. Use
`--reference-if-able --dissociate` so task objects remain independent. A
reference failure retries once online without the cache and resolves
credentials again.
- Cap cache storage at 64 entries and 4 GiB per company, with 2 GiB per
entry. Skip contended publication. Bound priming by a cooperative
five-second budget and a 4,096-entry scan allowance. Keep the existing
free-space reserve.
- Overlap optional seed verification and required workspace upload.
Settle both before returning or deleting temporary files. Recheck quotas
and company directory identity under the publication lock.
- Keep the independent fresh upstream reproducibility proof, task
commits, dirty source copies, ignored files, nested repositories and
durable recovery behavior.
- Suppress optional Git server-info generation during dissociation so
generated storage passes the existing safe-expiration checks. This uses
[the supported Git
setting](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config/2.43.0#Documentation/git-config.txt-repackupdateServerInfo).
- Add bounded timing phases, regression coverage and two repeatable
local benchmarks. No first-party Telemetry or dependency changes.

## Verification

- `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed.
- `pnpm build`: passed.
- Affected adapter suites: 240 tests passed. Native workspace
persistence/history and tracing: 33 tests passed. Server
checkout/isolation/tracing batch: 53 tests passed. Final object-cache
authority, path and capacity suite: 12 tests passed. These batches
overlap.
- Cache and expiration/restoration lifecycle batch: 34 tests passed. A
direct generated-storage check covers cached clones.
- Real HTTP Git fixture: a matching cache does not bypass revoked remote
access. Other fixtures cover current refs/tags, hidden cached commits,
independent objects after cache removal, corruption fallback,
credential/company scope, quota limits and publication contention.
- Initial restricted runs hit SQLite write and Unix socket permission
failures. The adapter batch passed with disposable writable instance
state and socket access. The first typecheck rejected the test use of
`Promise.withResolvers`; typed deferred gates now use the supported
library contract.
- Repository benchmark on final head
`9047368bf3b7fa2061e00d698b8b51cf4ae1da32`: five alternating samples,
real local `file://` Git transport, synthetic 32 MiB history, no
injected latency. Median 1143.8 ms to 240.5 ms; ranges 1085.7–1486.6 ms
and 188.0–254.8 ms. Received Git pack bytes fell from 33,569,788 to
zero. Initial cache priming took 1208.4 ms and is reported separately.
- Sandbox benchmark, five alternating samples per mode on 10,000 files
with real packing, extraction and verification: with a controlled
3-second transfer delay, median 9.450 s to 7.620 s (ranges 9.280–12.115
s and 7.296–7.983 s). With no injected delay, median 6.808 s to 6.450 s
(ranges 6.255–7.029 s and 5.709–6.902 s). The no-delay ranges overlap;
local copying competes with verification for disk. Both modes verify
final tree contents, ignored-file exclusion and Git HEAD. These are
synthetic local fixtures, not hosted agent runs.
- Reproduce with `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsx
../scripts/benchmark-repository-object-cache.ts` and `pnpm --filter
@paperclipai/server exec tsx ../scripts/benchmark-workspace-staging.ts
--baseline-ref=307eb16c0c --transfer-delay-ms=3000`.
- Prior head `af766bc820` received Greptile 5/5 with no findings. Its
E2E shard 7 failed in `plan-task-fixture` cleanup: company deletion
raced an `activity_log` foreign key. That fixture has no provider run or
Git workspace. The failure is retained here; final-head CI must pass.
The corrected corruption fixture now forces a pack and verifies a real
damaged archive. Current head `9047368bf3b7fa2061e00d698b8b51cf4ae1da32`
has Greptile 5/5 with no review threads or findings. Final head has 55
passing checks and two optional Storybook skips. [The first
workspace-shard
attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38802441857/job/116655485350)
passed all 1,778 cases, then reported a late `EPIPE` from unchanged
`server-utils.ts` while the ACP reuse test was active. That case mocks
workspace preparation and passed locally in isolation. [Its single retry
on the same
commit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/38802441857/job/116659728034)
passed, as did the dependent verification gate. The earlier E2E cleanup
fixture passed on this final head. Both initial failures remain recorded
here. A full local suite was not duplicated; the affected boundaries
were run locally and the complete suite runs in CI.

## Risks

- First cache population adds local copying. Cold clones, credential
rotation, capacity exhaustion and a corrupt cache retain the online
clone path. No eviction is added. Cached data is bounded, but many
companies can each consume their allowance.
- Individual filesystem calls and cleanup can exceed the cooperative
priming budget. Failed reference clones make one additional online
attempt.
- Parallel verification and upload compete for disk and CPU. The local
no-delay benchmark shows a smaller gain than a slow-transfer case.
Verification still checks contents before cache publication, and
required upload failures remain failures.
- Local fixtures do not prove hosted throughput or the 15–30-second
end-to-end target. The fresh checkout still writes its working tree, and
model startup, copyback and other preparation costs remain.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The exact serving model ID and context
window are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, source editing,
shell tools and test execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` /
`Closes: #` / `Refs: #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the
relevant issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task
identifiers
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.1016.0-canary.14
2026-10-16 12:21:47 -05:00