mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-08 01:57:31 +01:00
a6f786479e46ad70da4d2fce3b13171771e1ebda
6502
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
a6f786479e |
Runner: verify provider eligibility before parking (#19133)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip coordinates AI agents and their execution. > - Hosted Runners can retain a provider process between turns. > - The host must prove that process is idle before allowing its VM to sleep. > - A completed turn alone does not rule out an active goal or trailing provider work. > - This PR adds a conservative park-readiness hook for the existing Codex process. > - The later host-control consumer can use this proof with its identity and sequence fences. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Current behavior** There is no provider eligibility hook for host parking. The earlier implementation in #19060 also missed an active goal that arrived during its tail drain. **Proposed behavior** Default every executor to ineligible. Permit the surviving native Codex process only when its completed-turn authority still matches and it has no live or unsettled work. **Reason and benefit** Keep active goals and unresolved provider obligations awake. Review the provider proof separately from socket handling and the native park/reclaim loop. ## What Changed - Add `host_park_ready` with a default false result. - Refresh the configured credential observer before checking pending delivery. Refuse parking during credential delivery, without selecting or restoring a provider. - Verify the current Codex process and completed-turn identity; reject startup, active turns/goals/tools, and unsettled event queues. - Require completion actually observed by that process. Accepted-finish reconciliation still preserves ordinary result authority without qualifying a restored process to park. - Refuse known helper lineage, whose diagnostics do not prove that helper work has finished. - Drain bounded trailing output through the existing accounting path. Retain goal updates and clears in durable state and normal event delivery, then recheck live goal state. - Add process tests for normal eligibility and the late-goal race. Assert that a restored process is ineligible until it completes an authoritative turn in its new generation. This PR is based on master, which contains the merged Codex (#19132) and ACPX (#19153) recovery foundations. The private socket codec in #19129 is merged; #19140 consumes this proof in the shared native loop. This PR does not advertise parking support. A separate ACPX readiness change must prove its live sidecar/session has no active or unsettled work. Both Codex App Server and qualified ACPX are required in the remaining park/reclaim, Core restart, eviction, and live sleep/wake acceptance phases. ## Verification - `cargo test --offline --locked --manifest-path packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml -p paperclip-runner-core --test codex_provider hosted_park` — 5 passed. - `ordinary_recovery_restores_a_completed_idle_session` passes and asserts that the genuinely restored provider cannot park before it completes an authoritative turn in its new generation. The fixture proves two provider starts and only one admitted turn. - The initial live-goal recheck mutation failed as expected. Review then identified that goal changes also needed durable retention. The new activation and clear cases verify saved goal state, retained events, and eligibility after delivery. - Existing goal, active-goal attachment, warm-tail, and late-accounting process regressions passed after sharing the goal event path. - The initial late-goal fixture timed out because it omitted `--durable-turn-ids`, which enables its existing first-turn gate. Added that fixture switch; both park tests then passed. - The credential-observation regression fails before the fix and passes afterward. Three focused credential cases prove durable replay and acknowledgement, fresh ACPX startup, and readiness without provider selection. The three provider parking checks also pass after the fix. - Full regression testing is left to GitHub CI. - Changed lines scanned for secrets, personal data, and private deployment references before push. Current head `28d41b083f58ee93db4305b1217719796bf3171d` adds one scoped review-fix commit to readiness `e8ba82374e0f72c82ac3195d4b1b3798c9072bab`, based on master `3d0d178ff7051aa44e07cd873fd4281357e0d815` without duplicating either recovery foundation. The PR remains eight parking-specific files. Review identified quiet helper work and reconstructed accepted-finish authority that could incorrectly qualify. The provider now records its actually observed terminal authority separately in memory, and parking refuses known helper lineage in both the saved state and the live inventory after draining. No durable field, lifecycle, public API, or ordinary recovery policy changed. Both process regressions fail when the parking guards are removed and pass when restored. Seventeen focused checks pass, including ordinary recovery, helper requests, receipt replay, credentials, and ACPX ineligibility. Rustfmt, diff and added-line scans passed. All exact-head CI is green: [PR run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42087773928), [Runner Windows](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42087773720), and [Docker Runner](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42087773712) passed; Storybook was skipped. Standard review 15 scored 5/5 before the authorized follow-up [Apex review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/runs/127471966630). Apex review 16 also scored [5/5 on this exact head](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19133#issuecomment-6645371152), with zero new comments and zero unresolved threads. On this current head, the first server shard 11/12 [job 127458190155](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42087773928/job/127458190155) failed the unchanged decision-model concurrency test: after releasing the database lock, its `waitFor` observed one provider call instead of two. The identical file passed all 37 tests on the prior reviewed head. One targeted unchanged-head retry [job 127466020677](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42087773928/job/127466020677) passed all 1,779 tests, including those 37 decision-model cases; 13 tests were skipped. No code, test timeout, or CI configuration changed between attempts. The original failure's cause remains unestablished. On prior reviewed head `e8ba82374e0f72c82ac3195d4b1b3798c9072bab`, the first `General tests (workspaces-c)` job [127389771745](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42068371976/job/127389771745) failed the unchanged database SIGTERM test at `packages/db/src/test-postgres-command.test.ts:44`: `JSON.parse` read empty readiness-file content immediately after an existence check. The fixture writes directly to that path, leaving a create-before-content race. One targeted unchanged-head retry [127398676711](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42068371976/job/127398676711) passed all **313 tests in 72 files**, including SIGTERM and SIGINT. No source or timeout changed between attempts. On the superseded `ca088abd552b` head, one Cloud sign-in recovery case returned to the expected task URL but missed its heading within the five-second assertion window; the other 40 cases passed. One targeted unchanged-head retry (job 127136265280) passed all **41 cases**. No test timeout or application code changed between attempts, and the first failure's cause remains unestablished. The superseded c7 parent failed eight retained-cleanup settlement cases because prepared restoration started a provider during a drain-only epoch. The corrected parent preserves ordinary prepared behavior; the new completed-source path excludes prepared providers. The parent reports all 19 settlement rows passing. This PR adds no prepared-session proof or restoration policy. ## Risks Known helpers remain conservatively ineligible even after their progress diagnostics: this slice has no authoritative helper-completion ledger. The eligibility check drains the existing bounded provider tail and can persist late accounting. That accounting must settle before parking succeeds. This hook alone does not prove VM suspension or vendor goal behavior across a process restart. Live sleep/wake qualification remains a later rollout check. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), High reasoning, through Codex with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
377e98f1a2 |
test(runner): keep the production close budget for recovered prepared-descriptor closes (#19309)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The Paperclip Runner closes a native session only after it proves
that the provider drained and the runner suspended
> - The test "runs an environment-prepared descriptor without Core
filesystem preparation (rotated-recovery)" closes recovered transports
with a 5s close grace
> - A 5s grace leaves only 2.5s for the provider drain, and a recovered
successor needs several drain round trips
> - On a loaded CI runner with the debug runnerd, the drain does not
finish in 2.5s, so close correctly fails closed and the test fails
> - This pull request makes those closes use the production close budget
> - The benefit is that the Runner Vitest lane stops failing on
unrelated PRs, and the close assertions stay the same
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No issue exists. The problem, in the bug report format:
**What happened?**
The Runner Vitest lane failed on PR #19265 (run 42075789869, job "Verify
Paperclip Runner (vitest package)"). The change in that PR is not
related to the Runner:
```
FAIL src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts > runs an environment-prepared descriptor without Core filesystem preparation (rotated-recovery)
NativeSessionCloseUnrecoverableError: provider_transport_failed: runner did not durably suspend before checkpoint
❯ src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts:2768:21
Serialized Error: { settlement: { runnerSuspended: true, providerDrained: false, suspensionState: null, ... finalProviderState: null } }
```
**Expected behavior**
The test fails only when recovered close behavior is wrong. It does not
fail because the CI machine is slow.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. In the rotated loop of the test, set the close grace to 700ms instead
of 5_000.
2. Run `npx vitest run src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts -t
rotated-recovery`.
3. The second (recovered) close fails with the same error and the same
settlement (`runnerSuspended: true`, `providerDrained: false`,
`suspensionState: null`).
Root cause: `runnerCloseDeadlines` keeps half of the grace (max 2.5s)
for suspension. The rest is the preparation budget for the provider
drain. With `closeGraceMs: 5_000`, the drain gets 2.5s. In a local
measurement, the recovered close needed 4 `runner.drain` commands and
about 440ms on an idle machine. Each drain is a full runner round trip,
because a drain receipt is `true` only after the controller ACKs the
prefix that the previous drain moved. On a loaded CI runner with the
debug runnerd binary, those round trips use more than 2.5s. The
transport then fails closed, which is correct product behavior.
Production uses a 10s default grace (7.5s for preparation, with the
drain capped at 5s).
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
canary/v2026.1105.0-canary.18
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c56aa689ac |
fix(server): say where secret-sensitive requests fail in Sentry (#19040)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The server sends unexpected 5xx errors to Sentry through the shared
Express error handler
> - Some routes carry credentials: chat setup, provider webhooks, MCP,
company observability settings, Muse, avatars, and similar routes
> - On these routes the handler replaces the error with a generic
`Secret-sensitive request failed` error, because the original name and
message can contain secrets
> - That replacement also removes every useful fact. The Sentry event
does not show the route, the status, the error type, or the throw site,
so a maintainer cannot find the cause
> - This pull request adds a small fixed-shape record to that generic
error. The record says where the failure came from, and it never copies
request data or error text
> - The benefit is that the next event on these routes points to a route
and a code location, while the privacy rule stays the same
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A hosted staging server reported one event with the message
`Secret-sensitive request failed`. The event had only the stack of the
sanitizer itself. It had no route, no status, no error type, and no
frame from the original error. The trace had no spans and no logs. A
maintainer cannot find the root cause from this event.
**Expected behavior**
The event keeps the generic message, so no secret leaves the process.
The event also tells the maintainer which secret-sensitive route family
failed, the HTTP method and status, the error type, a safe error code
when one exists, the matched route definition, and the original throw
site.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Make a route handler throw on a secret-sensitive path, for example
`PUT /api/companies/:companyId/observability`.
2. Enable the backend Sentry DSN.
3. Look at the captured event. It shows only `Secret-sensitive request
failed` and the sanitizer stack.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
03eb49053f |
test(runner): bound Codex provider event waits by a hang ceiling, not 5s (#19306)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Rust runner drives provider processes such as Codex, and CI tests it on Linux, macOS and Windows > - The "Runner Rust (Windows x64)" job fails at random on pull requests that do not touch the runner > - The failures come from Codex provider integration tests that wait for fake-provider events under a fixed five-second deadline > - On a loaded Windows runner, process spawn, antivirus scans and fsyncs of durable state make these exchanges take longer than five seconds, so the wait stops before the event arrives > - This pull request keeps each wait on its condition and changes the deadline to a shared hang ceiling > - The benefit is that unrelated pull requests do not fail on this job, and a real hang still fails the test ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The "Runner Rust (Windows x64)" job failed on pull requests that do not change the runner. Examples: - Run 42073331106 (PR #19273) and run 42058757139: `rejected_declared_completion_stays_failed_when_the_provider_completes` panicked with `called Option::unwrap() on a None value`. The loop ended at its 5 s deadline before `session.failed` and `run.terminal` arrived. - Run 41892735530 (master): the same test failed in the same way. - Runs 41718881566 and 41670873220: `durable_descendant_lineage_survives_capacity_and_provider_restoration` failed with "capacity exhaustion must become a specific durable recovery reason". Its third phase waited only 5 s. An earlier phase of this test already had a 30 s deadline with a comment about this contention. **What did you expect?** The tests wait until the fake provider produces the event. They fail only when the provider hangs. **Steps to reproduce** Run `cargo test --release --workspace` for the runner on a contended Windows x64 runner. The suite takes about 380 s there, and some tests run for more than 60 s. The failures are intermittent. ## What Changed - `tests/codex_provider.rs`: add `EVENT_WAIT_TIMEOUT` (120 s) and `event_deadline()`. Replace all 50 fixed 5 s and 30 s wait deadlines with `event_deadline()`. Each wait already stops when its condition holds, so passing tests do not get slower. - `rejected_declared_completion_stays_failed_when_the_provider_completes`: assert that the run reached `run.terminal`, and print the observed event types if it did not. Replace the bare `unwrap()` on `session.failed` with a message that names the scenario. - `src/bin/fake-codex-app-server.rs`: the two background gate threads used 5 s and 10 s bounds. A test releases a gate only after its own waits succeed, so these bounds had the same problem. They now use one `TEST_GATE_TIMEOUT` of 120 s. - No production code changes. The two remaining `from_secs(5)` values are the unused `max_runtime` in the test config and a Unix-only latency assertion. Both stay the same. ## Verification - `cargo test --release -p paperclip-runner-core --test codex_provider --locked`: 109 passed, 0 failed, 2 ignored. - I ran the two flaky tests 48 times, with 6 copies in parallel per round to load the machine. All 48 runs passed. - `cargo fmt --all --check`: clean. - `cargo clippy -p paperclip-runner-core --test codex_provider --bin fake-codex-app-server`: no new warnings in the changed lines. The lib target already has clippy findings from the local toolchain (Rust 1.97). They are not in the changed files, and CI does not run clippy. - I did not reproduce the original failure on macOS. The slow condition occurs only on the loaded Windows runner. The Windows CI job on this pull request is the main check. ## Risks - Low risk. The change affects only tests and the test fixture binary. - If a test hangs for real, it now fails after 120 s and not after 5 s. This makes a broken run slower, but the failure message stays the same. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, GitHub CLI). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
b37188ce42 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#19317)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip uses a dependency lock for reproducible builds. > - Dependency changes on master need matching lock entries. > - Paid eval reports also pin a reviewed offline correction. > - Reports must install before paid model work starts. > - This automated PR keeps the lock and report proof together. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Dependency manifests on master changed after the last committed lock refresh. **Expected behavior** Frozen installs must match those manifests. Eval reports must retain matching offline lock proof. **Steps to reproduce** Run a frozen install before and after this lock refresh. ## What Changed - Refresh the dependency lock from the manifests on master. - Include the matching offline report correction and hashes. ## Verification - Pinned pnpm resolution completed with lifecycle scripts disabled. - The report proof refresh accepted the reviewed committed baseline. - The workflow rejected changes outside the lock and report proof files. ## Risks The lockfile bot merges this PR without CI or review when every added package version is at least 3 days old on npm. Otherwise the PR waits for a maintainer, and the daily refresh tries again. The bot merges only the exact commit this workflow generated from manifests already reviewed on master. Unknown report lock baselines remain blocked. This update changes no permissions or paid enable gates. ## Model Used None — generated by pnpm and the deterministic report-lock updater. ## Checklist - [x] Thinking path and problem description included - [x] Generated lock and matching report proof included - [x] Release-age gate decides between bot merge and maintainer review Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
1eff07f29e |
feat(task-chat): show Claude subagents as a collapsible tree in the runner turn (#19264)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task chat shows what an agent does in a run. The Paperclip Runner sends this activity as canonical provider events. > - Claude runs subagents through its Agent (Task) tool. A run that delegates showed a confusing burst of unrelated tool calls. > - The subagent data was already sent, but it was lost: ACPX dropped `_meta`, the hardened sidecar dropped `rawInput`, and async subagents report "launched" as the tool result. > - This pull request maps each Agent call to a canonical `delegation` event, links each child tool to its subagent, and shows subagents as a collapsible card or tree. > - The benefit is that operators can see what each subagent was asked, what it is doing now, which tools it used, and what it returned. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (the docked plan card used the same canonical-event pattern) Refs #19259 (ACPX `_meta` passthrough, merged). This PR builds on it. **What happened?** When a Claude agent used its Agent tool, the task chat showed one generic "Task" row and then the subagents' tool calls as flat rows in the parent turn. The subagent type, prompt, progress and result were not visible. **Expected behavior** Each subagent shows as its own card with its type, description, prompt, live progress summary, nested tool rows and result. Subagents that start together show as one tree with status dots. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Assign a Claude (Paperclip Runner, ACPX) agent a task that asks it to launch three Explore subagents in parallel. 2. Open the task while the run is live. 3. Before this change, the subagents' tool calls appear flat in the parent turn. ## What Changed - **claude-agent-acp patch:** Under the isolated runner context, the patch turns on the SDK option `agentProgressSummaries`. It forwards each subagent's `task_progress` summary and its terminal state and summary onto the spawning tool call as `_meta.claudeCode.subagentProgress` and `subagentState`. Native subagent sessions stay off, because ACPX cannot follow child ACP sessions. - **Runner:** The new file `claude-subagent-lineage.ts` tracks each Agent/Task call across ACP update deltas. It maps the call to `delegation.started|updated|completed` events and stamps child tools with `parentItemId`. An async subagent stays running after its "Async agent launched" result until its own state settles. - **Sidecar path:** `acpx-runtime-sidecar.ts` reads the lineage before it drops `_meta` and `rawInput`. Delegations go out as schema-checked rich events. Child tools carry `parentToolCallId`, which Rust (`acpx_event_payload.rs`, `provider_events.rs`) maps to `parentItemId`. - **Contracts:** The provider-event schema adds optional `prompt` and `result` to delegation children and optional `parentItemId` to tool executions. The protocol modules are regenerated. ACPX Claude now advertises the `delegation` event family. - **UI:** `native-run-events.ts` keeps delegation payloads and the tool parent link. `buildTurnTimelineRows` groups adjacent delegations into a new `subagent_group` row, nests child tool rows (plain and provider-activity shapes), and hides the spawning call's own tool row. The new `TaskChatSubagentCard.tsx` renders the card and tree. A new size token caps the result height. - **Storybook:** The new story `Tasks and conversations/…/Task chat/Subagents` has 7 states. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/cli src/drivers/acpx src/provider-events.test.ts src/claude-subagent-lineage.test.ts src/protocol` (2069 passed) - `cargo test --release --locked -p paperclip-runner-core --lib` in `packages/paperclip-runner/runner` (488 passed, including the new parent-link test) - `node --test test/protocol-contract.test.mjs test/acpx-sidecar-contract.test.mjs test/acpx-codex-package-contract.test.mjs test/acpx-rich-extensions-package-contract.test.mjs` (48 passed) - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript`, including the new `subagent-timeline.test.ts` - `check:protocol-types`, `check:protocol-manifest`, `check:acpx-profiles` and `pnpm check:token-gates` pass. - **Live test:** A local test-drive instance ran a Claude Opus 5.5 agent on the Paperclip Runner (hardened sidecar path). The agent ran real tasks that launched three parallel Explore subagents. The live view showed "Running 3 subagents · 2 done" with a progress summary. The settled view showed "Ran 3 subagents", each with its prompt, nested tools and its own result text. ## Risks - `agentProgressSummaries` makes Claude Code generate a short progress summary for each running subagent about every 30 seconds. This adds a small model cost to runs that delegate. - The adapter patch reads `task_notification` and terminal `task_updated` messages. A future claude-agent-acp version can change these. The patch hunks then fail to apply, and the dependency bump must update them. - If a delegation event is lost, child tools stay at the top level as before. Nothing is hidden without a matching delegation. - Codex is not changed. Codex subagents need `multi_agent`, which Paperclip keeps off on purpose. Changing that is a separate policy decision. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, browser automation). It did the investigation, implementation, tests and live test. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
a695398052 |
fix(server): preserve inactive rebase bookmarks in workspace snapshots (#19310)
Preserve a validated standalone REBASE_HEAD and its commit without changing the source workspace. Keep active Git operations, unmerged indexes, invalid markers and concurrent changes blocked. Verified 156 affected tests, workspace typecheck and build. All hosted CI checks passed, and Greptile scored the exact head 5/5 with no unresolved threads. The bounded full local suite stopped during its fifth chat shard; this incomplete result is recorded in the PR. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5de779848b |
fix(recovery): save a reassignment-stopped writer's files from its stopped reusable sandbox (#19304)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A remote task workspace stays held by its last writer run until that writer's files are saved > - A reassignment stops the old owner's run. The stopped writer still holds the workspace with unsaved files. > - When the run used a reusable (warm) sandbox, the stop leaves its lease `released` under the reusable policy, with a stop-and-retain receipt > - Cancelled-workspace preservation only admitted `active` or `ephemeral` sources. It never recorded the save for this stopped writer, so no workspace recovery ran, and the hold stayed forever > - The new owner waited, then failed setup after the one-hour cutoff with "The workspace still has an unfinished writer or save operation" > - This pull request admits the stopped reusable source, so Paperclip saves the stopped writer's files and releases the hold. A waiter keeps waiting while that save is in progress. > - The benefit is that a reassigned task continues with the old owner's saved work, and the new owner does not fail setup ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19285 (parks a waiter behind an ended writer). Refs #19074, #18820. **What happened?** A board user reassigned a task during a native run on a reusable sandbox. The old run was cancelled with `issue_reassigned`. Its sandbox was stopped and its lease was released under `reuse_by_environment`. The workspace still named the stopped run as its dirty writer. No save operation and no workspace recovery action were ever recorded for that run. The new owner's runs were cancelled `workspace_busy` repeatedly. After more than an hour, a new run failed setup: "The workspace still has an unfinished writer or save operation." **Expected behavior** Paperclip saves the stopped writer's files from its stopped sandbox within a bounded time and releases the hold. The new owner waits for that save and then continues. If the save cannot finish, its retries end with a named board recovery action. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a native run a prepared remote workspace on a lease with policy `reuse_by_environment`. 2. Stop the run (for example by reassignment), so the lease is stopped and released with a stop-and-retain receipt. 3. Run cancelled-workspace preservation. Before this fix, it records nothing, and the writer hold stays. ## What Changed - `native-failed-workspace-recovery.ts`: Cancelled-workspace preservation (the delivery worker and the startup scan) now admits a `released` reusable lease with a stopped termination receipt and a stop-and-retain receipt. - `preserveNativeFailedWorkspace` retains such a reusable source only with the exact confirmed stop-and-retain receipt, and only while the workspace is still bound to that writer (`preparedRemoteWorkspaceSource`). Otherwise it writes nothing. - `remote-workspace-writer-hold.ts`: For an ended writer, the holder cutoff now uses the latest progress of an in-progress save of that writer's retained files (a workspace recovery that is not complete, exhausted, or recovered). Reservation and the parked `workspace_busy` wait both read this rule. A waiter waits for the save instead of failing setup. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: Documents the stopped reusable source and the save-progress cutoff. ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after: - `npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts` — new cases "preserves a reassignment-stopped writer's files from its stopped reusable sandbox" (worker and startup scan) failed before the fix: no `workspaceRestoreRecovery` was recorded. - `npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-remote-workspace-busy.test.ts` — new cases "keeps a waiter parked while an ended writer's save is in progress" failed before the fix: the parked retry was released past the cutoff. - Safety cases: - A reusable source without a confirmed stop, a workspace now owned by another writer, and an already saved workspace are not retained, and the run row does not change. (The writer and saved cases fail if the new guard is removed.) - Preservation does not replay the stopped run, does not create a wake, keeps the stop receipt and lease policy unchanged, and keeps the writer hold until the save publishes. - An exhausted or complete save does not extend the cutoff. The existing past-cutoff test (no save in progress) still fails setup and keeps the held files. - Related suites: workspace recovery, remote workspace reservation, native workspace reconstruction, native failed-workspace recovery, legacy workspace restore recovery. - Not verified on staging: this change is not deployed. The staging task needs this fix deployed. Then the preservation worker records the save, workspace recovery saves the files, and the waiting owner continues. ## Risks - More cancelled runs are now admitted for preservation. The retention guard requires the exact stop-and-retain receipt and the workspace bound to this writer, so a reusable sandbox that another run resumed or that no longer holds unsaved work is not retained. - A stopped reusable source stays `reuse_by_environment` while Paperclip saves it. This matches the existing retention path for reusable native sources. - The writer-hold read adds one indexed query (`issue_recovery_actions_source_run_idx`) for an ended writer only. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, code editing, test execution) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5d2fb8f737 |
fix(server): split run-failure Sentry groups that have no usable root code (#19308)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server sends each unexpected terminal run failure to Sentry. A custom fingerprint groups these events. > - The fingerprint is `[errorCode, agentAdapter, failurePhase?, rootErrorCode?]`. The root code is used only when it is an identifier. > - Many setup failures have no identifier root code. Some have a numeric JSON-RPC code (`-32002`). Some have only an HTTP status (`409`). Some have no code. > - All of these failures get the same fingerprint, `setup_failed / paperclip_runner / setup`. One Sentry group now holds about ten unrelated failure types: a controller lease loss, Daytona create timeouts, sandbox resume timeouts, remote-workspace 409 errors, S3 throttling and more. The group title changes with each new event. A fix for one cause cannot close the group. > - This pull request adds a bounded fallback when there is no usable root code. The fallback is the root exception class name plus its HTTP status or numeric code. > - The benefit is that each failure type gets its own Sentry group, so a fix can be verified and resolved for each cause. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16359 Refs #16802 Refs #19156 **What happened?** Unrelated `paperclip_runner` setup failures go into one Sentry issue. The root exceptions include `LegacyControllerLeaseLostError`, `JsonRpcCallError` with code `-32002` (Daytona create timeout), `JsonRpcCallError` with code `-32003` (sandbox resume timeout), plain `Error` with status `409` (remote workspace writer still pending), and AWS `SlowDown`. None of them has an identifier root code, so the fingerprint drops the root element. **Expected behavior** Failures with different root exceptions go into different Sentry issues. Failures with the same root exception and status still group together. The fingerprint does not contain message text. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Report two setup failures for the `paperclip_runner` adapter with error code `setup_failed`. 2. Give the first failure the root exception `LegacyControllerLeaseLostError` with no code. 3. Give the second failure the root exception `JsonRpcCallError` with code `-32002`. 4. Read the two fingerprints. Before this change, they are the same. **Additional context** Only events without an identifier root code get a new fingerprint. Events with an identifier root code (for example `ECONNRESET`) keep their current fingerprint and their current Sentry group. ## What Changed - `server/src/sentry.ts`: when there is no identifier root code, `captureRunFailure` adds fallback fingerprint elements from the deepest recorded exception: - `exception:<Name>` when the name is an identifier. - `status:<n>` when the exception has an HTTP status (already validated as 100–599 by the diagnostics collector), or else `code:<n>` when the code is a number of up to 10 digits. - Names or codes with other shapes are not used, so message text and secrets cannot go into the fingerprint. - The `root_error_code` tag does not change. - `server/src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry.test.ts`: new tests for the fallback groups, for an identifier root code that keeps the current fingerprint, and for rejected unbounded names and codes. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry.test.ts src/__tests__/run-failure-sentry-real-sdk.test.ts src/__tests__/sentry-links.test.ts src/services/__tests__/run-failure-report.test.ts`: 358 tests pass. The real-SDK suite ran against `@sentry/node@10.71.0`. - I reverted only `server/src/sentry.ts` and ran the new grouping test. It failed, because all six fingerprints were the same. With the change, it passes. - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.json`: no errors. - `src/__tests__/sentry.test.ts` did not load in my local environment (`AI_InvalidArgumentError: baseURL must be a non-empty string`). It fails in the same way on unchanged `master`, so I depend on CI for that suite. ## Risks - Events without an identifier root code get a new fingerprint. Sentry puts them in new issues. The old mixed issues stop getting these events. This is the intended result. Alerts or saved searches that point to an old mixed issue must move to the new issues. - The number of groups increases by a small, bounded amount. Exception class names, HTTP statuses and numeric codes have low cardinality. No message, ID or free text goes into the fingerprint. - No change to what the server sends in tags or contexts, and no change to run control flow. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs, GitHub and Sentry connectors). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d361f92071 |
feat(task-chat): show harness status notices as chips, out of the answer (#19267)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through the native runner. The runner turns harness events from Codex and Claude into canonical provider events, and the task chat shows them. > - Harnesses report their own lifecycle: context compaction, retries, model fallback, and warnings. Paperclip lost or mangled these reports. > - Claude (claude-agent-acp 0.73) sends compaction, model-fallback and warning banners as ordinary message text, so "Compacting..." ended up inside the agent's answer and the issue comment. > - Codex sends `error` with the text in `error.message` and a `willRetry` flag. Paperclip read `params.message`, so every Codex error said "Provider notice", and every retry looked fatal. > - This pull request keeps these reports out of the answer and shows them as small status chips between the turn's activity. > - The benefit is that users can see why an agent paused, retried or forgot earlier context, and the answer text stays clean. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Native runner provider-event mapping (TypeScript driver, ACPX sidecar and Rust runner-core) and the task chat transcript. **Problem or motivation** Claude status banners are mixed into assistant answer text. Codex error notices lose their message and their retry state. The task chat hid all of these notices, and settled turns stripped every provider notice. **Proposed solution** Classify Claude banners as provider notices at the ACPX boundary. Map Codex `TurnError` fields and `willRetry` correctly. Render status notices as inline chips. A retry chip fades after later provider work. A final error shows the real provider message. **Alternatives considered** Patch claude-agent-acp to tag banners in `_meta`. ACPX keeps only `origin`, `kind` and `source` from `_meta`, and other sessions own the ACPX `_meta` passthrough work. Banner chunks already have no `messageId`, and model output always has one, so the classification needs no adapter patch. **Roadmap alignment** This makes existing harness signals visible. It adds no new protocol schema. It uses the existing `paperclip.provider.notice.v1` `category` and `details` fields. ## What Changed - Codex `error` notifications (TypeScript `provider-events.ts` and Rust `runner-core/src/provider_events.rs`): read `error.message`, map `willRetry: true` to a recoverable `provider_retry` notice, keep category `error` for a final error, and add the `CodexErrorInfo` kind, HTTP status, and the "Reconnecting... n/m" attempt count as notice details. Retries in one turn share one notice id. - New `claude-status-banners.ts`: classifies the claude-agent-acp compaction, model-fallback and SDK informational banners. A chunk must have no `messageId` and match a known banner exactly. - ACPX sidecar and the TypeScript ACPX driver emit these banners as `provider_notice` events instead of answer text. Compaction start and end share one notice key and carry a `Phase` detail. - Rust runner-core accepts an optional `noticeKey` and bounded `details` on ACPX `provider_notice` events. - UI: new `TaskChatStatusNotice` chip and `status-notice-presentation.ts`. Status notices become top-level timeline rows, render as chips wherever protocol cards render, and stay visible in settled (historical) turns. Generic warnings stay hidden as before. - New tokens `--tc-status-notice-warning-*` in `ui/src/index.css`. - Storybook story `Tasks and conversations/.../Task chat/Status notices` with eight states. - `doc/run-log-events.md`: describes the status notice categories. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/claude-status-banners.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/codex-acpx-driver.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts` - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events` and `--test acpx_provider_events` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - Storybook: open `product-task-chat-status-notices--all-states-gallery`. - Live test-drive on an isolated worktree instance: - Codex (gpt-5.6-sol, app-server 0.160): a local pass-through proxy in front of the real OpenAI API cut the first two response streams. Codex ran its own retries. The chat showed an amber "Reconnecting" chip live, then "Recovered after retry" once work continued. With every stream cut, Codex made five retries and then sent a final error with the real message. - Claude (claude-haiku-5-5 through claude-agent-acp 0.73): a long reading task triggered Claude's own auto-compaction twice. The chat showed "Compacting context…" live and "Context compacted" afterwards. The final answer and the issue comment contained no compaction text. - Not verified live: model fallback and Claude informational banners. They need a model refusal or a blocking hook. Unit tests cover them. ## Risks - Low to medium. A Claude model message that is exactly a banner text and has no `messageId` would become a notice. Model output from claude-agent-acp always carries a `messageId`. - Older stored Codex `error` notices (category `error`, not recoverable) now render as a red row instead of being hidden. - Claude retries (`api_retry`) are still not visible. claude-agent-acp reports them only to clients that negotiate session-failure records, and ACPX drops `_meta`. This is a follow-up that depends on the ACPX `_meta` passthrough work. - On a failed Codex turn the thread collapses to a summary, so the red row does not show there. The existing task banner already shows the real provider message. - Some local suites failed on this machine. They do not touch the changed code: Cursor Cloud staging-custody tests, the ACPX Claude dependency-graph pin test (a timeout), and the Rust `task_memory` monitor tests. CI is the reference for these. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use, code execution and browser automation. Default context window. Extended reasoning was not enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Refs paperclipai/paperclip#19252 (plan card precedent). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
phant0umandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c4171af889 |
fix(cli): skip POSIX key file mode check in doctor on Windows (#14308)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - `paperclipai doctor` checks the local install, including the local encrypted secrets key file > - The check reads the POSIX permission bits of the key file and warns when group or others can read it > - On Windows, `fs.statSync().mode` is always `0o666` for a writable file, and `chmod` cannot restrict it > - So on Windows the check always warns, and the suggested `chmod 600` has no effect > - The server secret provider health check has the same check and the same false positive > - This pull request skips the POSIX permission-bit check on `win32` in both places > - The benefit is that `doctor` and the secret provider health endpoints on Windows no longer show a permanent false-positive warning ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Fixes #14255 ## What Changed - `cli/src/checks/secrets-check.ts`: skip the key file permission-bit check when `process.platform === "win32"`. Linux and macOS behavior does not change. - `cli/src/__tests__/secrets.test.ts`: add two tests. One test mocks `process.platform` as `win32` and expects `pass` for a `0o666` key file. One test pins the POSIX behavior: a `0o644` key file still gives `warn` (skipped on Windows runners). - `server/src/secrets/local-encrypted-provider.ts`: the same `win32` skip in the local encrypted provider health check. This check feeds `GET /api/companies/{id}/secret-providers/health`, `POST /api/secret-provider-configs/{id}/health`, and the `validateConfig` warnings. - `server/src/__tests__/secret-provider-registry.test.ts`: add a `win32` test that expects status `ok` with no warnings for a `0o666` key file. Mark the existing `0o644` warning test `skipIf(win32)`. ## Verification - `cd cli && npx vitest run src/__tests__/secrets.test.ts`: 10 of 10 tests pass on macOS (Node 22.22.3). - Red before the fix: with the fix reverted, 1 failed and 9 passed. The new Windows test fails with `expected 'warn' to be 'pass'`. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/secret-provider-registry.test.ts`: 3 of 3 tests pass. Red before the fix: the new `win32` test failed 2 times with status `warn`. - Full CLI suite (`cd cli && npx vitest run`): the same 28 tests in `doctor`, `install-command`, `update-command`, and `worktree` fail on `master` without this change and with it. My local checkout has no workspace builds, because I installed with `--ignore-scripts`. This change adds 2 passing tests and no new failures. - `cd cli && npx tsc --noEmit`: 233 errors on `master` and 233 with this change. All errors come from unbuilt workspace packages. No error is in `cli/src`. - I did not run the check on a real Windows machine. The Windows test mocks `process.platform`. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only removes a warning on Windows. On Windows the old check always fired, so it gave no signal. - The repo already skips the same kind of check on `win32`: `server/src/services/decision-signing.ts` returns early in `assertOwnedByCurrentUser` and `enforceKeyFilePermissions` for its key file. - On Windows, `doctor` no longer checks key file access at all. NTFS ACLs control access there, and the old check could not read them. An ACL check is out of scope for this fix. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`, Anthropic), in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edit). It reproduced the bug with a failing test, wrote the fix, and drafted this description. A human reviewed the change. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no documentation describes this warning) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
cd3832d235 |
ci(evals): route trusted catalog authorization to AWS (#19301)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents at work. > - The chat catalog workflow checks each manual dispatch before protected work. > - Its credential-free authorize job waits for GitHub-hosted capacity. > - A recent run waited about 16 minutes before that short gate could start. > - The existing public-CI runner group already allows this catalog workflow on master. > - This change places only the approved first manual master attempt on that fleet. > - Every other context retains hosted placement and the actual dispatch guard. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #16042, #18067. The latter changes preparation after authorization in a different workflow. This change covers only the chat catalog authorize job. **What happened?** The authorize job requests ubuntu-latest even for the approved main-branch operator. Hosted runner queue time delays all later work. The current run remains untouched. **Expected behavior** Use existing AWS public-CI capacity only for the exact approved first manual master context. Retain the hosted route for all other contexts. The existing guard must still verify the actual API identity and both actors after checkout. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Dispatch Chat catalog TestOps from master as the approved operator. 2. Inspect authorize placement before a runner starts. 3. Compare the branch, actor, attempt and workflow rejection controls. ## What Changed - Add repository name and ID, exact workflow ref, master ref, event, actor ID, attempt and triggering-actor placement fences. - Reuse the existing placement evaluator for 15 allocation cases. - Keep the actual dispatch guard and exact-SHA checkout. Keep select and all reporting jobs unchanged. ## Verification - Local focused controls: 16 passed. The parent workflow failed all 15 new placement cases because it had no conditional route. - Existing full routing and workflow suites: 192 passed on the final patch. - A temporary select-to-AWS mutation failed the bounded select control; restored placement passed. - actionlint for chat-catalog-testops.yml and git diff --check: passed. - The first full local run hit sandbox EPERM on existing loopback HTTP controls. That result is retained. The same unchanged suites were then run with listener permission. - No application build, SDK build, model call, eval dispatch, workflow retry or fleet change was performed. - Latest-head checks: all 55 succeeded. Required `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` passed; genuine Greptile review is 5/5 on this exact head with no unresolved threads. ## Risks This reuses the existing trusted-main fleet boundary. It is not a privilege-free worker. The current instance profile has IMDS enabled with required tokens and includes SSM GetParameter/GetParameters capability. No IAM, runner-group or network policy changes are included. The group already permits this exact catalog workflow on master. Placement checks run before allocation. The actual API and both-actor guard still runs after checkout. An unauthorized context selects hosted capacity and must pass the unchanged guard before protected work. Select still waits for hosted capacity and keeps its protected token boundary. AWS capacity can also queue. This change does not promise a fixed latency gain or move a queued job. ## Model Used OpenAI gpt-6.1-sol with reasoning, code editing and tool use. The runtime does not report its context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
088f85c5fe |
fix: rename the managed environment to Paperclip Sandbox (#19296)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their execution environments. > - Managed installations supply a default sandbox through managed configuration. > - Most selectors show the configured environment name. > - A fallback label, two errors, and examples still use Paperclip Computer. > - This pull request changes that stock copy to Paperclip Sandbox. > - Existing and custom environment names continue to come from the stored row. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The managed environment label in agent settings and the errors shown when the managed sandbox is unavailable. **Subsystem affected** The agent configuration UI, runner selection, and environment reconciliation tests. **Current behavior** Fallback copy and current examples call the managed sandbox Paperclip Computer. The actual environment name is already configurable. **Proposed behavior** Use Paperclip Sandbox for stock copy and current examples. Keep configured names unchanged in selectors, including legacy names and custom names. **Reason and benefit** The name identifies this environment as a managed sandbox and removes ambiguity. **Breaking changes** The displayed fallback and error text change. Error codes, execution behavior, and environment identity remain the same. No migration is needed. **Additional context** No duplicate rename issue or pull request was found. This is a copy update, with no new roadmap feature. ## What Changed - Update the managed fallback label and two unavailable-sandbox error messages. - Update current test and Storybook fixtures without changing story IDs or behavior. - Test configured names, fallback copy, and the unavailable-sandbox message. - Add a PostgreSQL regression test for a rename that retains the environment ID, instance default, agent binding, environment variables, and lease. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - Focused coverage: 956 cases across nine changed suites. The new fixture initially tried to insert an existing singleton; its corrected upsert passed with all 52 environment-service cases. The updated runner suite also passed all 243 cases. - The two UI suites passed all 189 cases, including configured legacy/custom names and the missing-default fallback. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs --check` passed. The catalog is structural evidence only. - `node --test scripts/check-maps.test.mjs scripts/storybook-catalog.test.mjs scripts/storybook-feature-index.test.mjs` passed. - Full `pnpm test:run` is in progress. No live provider or browser journey is claimed by these tests. - CI passed on the current head after one server-shard rerun. The first attempt hit a 10 ms deadline assertion in the unchanged status-card timing test; its isolated local run and the complete rerun shard passed. The original failure and rerun are retained in the PR comment. - Reviewed the diff for secrets, personal data, and run artifacts. ## Risks Low risk: runtime edits change three display strings. Managed reconciliation is unchanged. The regression test exercises the existing rename against PostgreSQL. The configured name still controls normal display, so this code change alone does not rename existing database rows. A managed configuration update uses the existing reconciliation path. Roll back the copy by reverting this commit. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) through Codex in T3 Code, xhigh reasoning, with repository tools and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used, version, and capabilities - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md; this copy update does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs - [x] I have described the issue in the PR with the enhancement template fields - [x] No internal or instance-local issue references - [x] The branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket ID - [x] Focused tests pass locally - [x] Relevant tests were added or updated - [x] Relevant copy and examples were updated; no API or schema documentation changed - [x] Risks are documented - [x] All CI gates passed on the current head, including the server 11/12 rerun and aggregate verify - [ ] Full local test suite completed (still running; six chat shards passed) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 on the current head with no unresolved findings - [x] I will address all reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7351a9d74f |
fix(native): restore retired backups after warm lease handoffs (#19299)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and keeps their work across turns. > - A native session can keep the same sandbox through several warm lease handoffs. > - Each handoff keeps the old lease row and records matching receipts on both owners. > - The retired-backup guard required exactly one row for a provider allocation. > - That rule rejected valid history after Paperclip destroyed the sandbox. > - This change uses the existing handoff proof to select the final owner. > - A verified backup can then restore without discarding ownership checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19208. **What happened?** A follow-up received a new sandbox after its old sandbox was destroyed. The old allocation had a normal warm lease handoff. Both lease rows remained in PostgreSQL. The guard rejected them with `runner_harness_state_mismatch: backup_without_reusable_lease`. Its later same-run retry failed with `native_remote_recovery_lease_mismatch`. **Expected behavior** Restore the verified backup when one final owner has a valid destroyed receipt and every earlier owner has a matching handoff receipt. Keep uncertain ownership blocked. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a native warm turn. 2. Hand the reusable sandbox to another turn. 3. Complete that turn and save its backup. 4. Close the workspace and destroy the sandbox. 5. Send a follow-up. The new allocation must restore the saved session. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced in the PostgreSQL regression on the parent of this change. The affected deployed build also contains #19208. ## What Changed - Select the single final lease owner. Validate all predecessor rows with `retiredReusableLeasePredecessors`. - Keep the destroyed receipt, exact backup stamp, and newer-provider-work checks. - Add database regressions for one and three handoffs. Reject missing or changed receipts, an active predecessor, missing history, an unrelated owner, a stopped source, another backup, and later provider work. - Document the valid lease-history shape. ## Verification - Red before the source change: the two valid-handoff cases returned false. The other 16 database cases passed. - Green after the change: all 18 database cases passed. They also passed on current head `d16e098b8c2e6c0dda70984c1df21e3dc792ab34`. - Command: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-retired-backup-source.integration.test.ts`. - The database, executor, retry-admission, and lease suites passed: 4 files, 1,308 tests. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. The build stamp names head `4ee733c3a979436196522f36537ff182e9df5398`. The full local suite stopped in chat shard 3 after a 15-second timeout in `materializes direct external-chat finals once and accepts the next turn without agent bookkeeping writes`. Earlier shards passed 702 cases; that shard passed 303 other cases. The isolated test passes on this branch and unchanged master `10a7d039c8efeac0fd655c24970df5ae3658414b`. All current-head CI chat shards also passed. The earlier full-suite attempt remains failed; its timeout cause is not established. No test or timeout was changed. CI is waiting for its last Runner job. - Current head `d16e098b8c2e6c0dda70984c1df21e3dc792ab34` removes four comment lines from the previously tested head. Its 18 database cases passed. Greptile reviewed this head at 5/5 with no actionable findings: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19299#issuecomment-6665446098. CI remains pending. - Live inspection found the matching predecessor/successor receipts and the final owner's destroyed receipt. This was read-only evidence from the affected build. - A live provider run at the fixed revision has not been exercised. Local Daytona credentials and an immutable test image are unavailable. No deployment or original-task retry is claimed. - Initial wider tests could not resolve the unbuilt plugin SDK. The SDK build is now available. A sandboxed database launch could not bind loopback; the same regression passed with the disposable database outside that restriction. ## Risks - A wrong owner could allow an old backup to rewind a session. The shared validator must account for every lease row and match both sides of each handoff. - Live, unrelated, incomplete, or conflicting history stays blocked. The existing backup integrity and provider-progress checks remain. - No migration, permission, model, trust, timeout, or retry-policy change is included. - The original task still needs the fixed build and normal recovery. Hosted acceptance remains unverified. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, code execution, and tool use. The session does not expose the exact model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
cb0b7525e0 |
feat(task-chat): warn at the top of a run when an MCP server failed to start (#19289)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Each agent run shows its activity in the task chat. The Paperclip runner turns harness events into that activity. > - Codex reports `mcpServer/startupStatus/updated` when an MCP server fails to start. The runner dropped this event at the notification allowlist and in the Rust normalizer. > - When an MCP server fails, the agent runs without its tools. The agent then says "I could not reach the server", and the user cannot see why. > - This pull request maps a failed MCP start to a user-facing provider notice and shows it as one warning line at the top of the run. > - The benefit is that the cause of a "cannot reach my tools" answer is visible next to that answer. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (the plan card, which set the pattern for promoting a dropped harness signal to a dedicated task-chat surface). **Problem description** Codex sends `mcpServer/startupStatus/updated` (`name`, `status`, `error`, `failureReason`) during `thread/start`. The TypeScript allowlist (`codex-thread-normalization.ts`) and the Rust normalizer (`runner-core/src/provider_events.rs`) both dropped it. A run with a broken MCP server showed no sign of the failure. The agent only said that it could not reach the tools. **Proposed solution** Map `status: "failed"` to `provider.notice.recorded` with `category: "mcp_server_startup_failed"`, `severity: "warning"`, `scope: "session"` and `userActionable: true`. Show these notices as one run-health line under the runner header: "github MCP server failed to start: No such file or directory (os error 2)". **Alternatives considered** An inline notice row in the timeline. It scrolls away and sits among tool rows. A run-level line next to the header is easier to connect to the agent's answer. ## What Changed - Runner (Rust, production Codex path): `normalize_codex_notification` maps a failed `mcpServer/startupStatus/updated` to a `provider.notice.recorded` notice. `starting`, `ready` and `cancelled` stay out of the transcript. The new helper removes the Codex wrapper text ("MCP client for \`x\` failed to start: MCP startup failed:") so that the line shows the real reason. `reauthenticationRequired` becomes "needs re-authentication". - Runner (TypeScript): the same mapping in `canonicalProviderEventsFromCodex`, and the method is added to `isSupportedCodexNotificationMethod`. - Server: the `view=conversation` run-event query keeps `mcp_server_startup_failed` notices. A settled run can then still show the warning. Other notices stay out of that view. - UI: new `TaskChatRunHealthBanner`. `partitionRunHealthItems` takes MCP failures out of the run's items, with one line per server where the latest report wins. `TaskChatRunnerTurn` (live runs) and `TaskChatTurn` (settled, historical and merged turns) show it under the header. `coalesceSettledTurns` merges the failures when it merges turns. - Storybook: `Tasks and conversations/…/Task chat/Run health` shows one failure, several failures, a finished run and a healthy run, all through the production runner turn. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/drivers/codex src/protocol`: 508 tests pass. - `cargo test --release -p paperclip-runner-core --lib -- provider_events`: 20 tests pass. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx`: 1340 tests pass, including the new `TaskChatRunHealthBanner.test.tsx` (persisted event to rendered banner, deduplication, settled historical turn, merged turns). - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/__tests__/task-cold-open.test.ts`: the conversation view keeps the MCP notice and still excludes other notices. - `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean. `node scripts/typecheck-low-memory.mjs` passes. - Live test on a local instance with Codex 0.160: a Codex agent with a preconfigured Codex home whose `config.toml` has `[mcp_servers.github] command = "github-mcp-server-not-installed"`. Codex reported the failure during `thread/start`. The persisted event had the summary "github MCP server failed to start: No such file or directory (os error 2)". The banner showed while the run was live. It also showed on the settled turn after "More run output", above the agent's answer that it could not reach the GitHub MCP server. ## Risks - Low risk. The change adds one notice category. It does not change how existing notices map or render. - A settled run whose transcript is deferred on a cold open (a successful run with a posted agent comment) shows the warning only after "More run output". This is the same as all other run activity under the current compact history. - Claude does not report MCP startup failures over ACP. `claude-agent-acp` reads MCP status only for OAuth. This change is therefore Codex-only. - Provisional task titles from provider session names are not part of this change. Codex app-server does not generate thread names (only its TUI does). Claude generates its title after the turn ends, and ACPX drops the title text. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser automation for Storybook and the live test). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
99c68455e6 |
fix(workspaces): omit an untracked Python virtual environment from workspace snapshots (#19274)
`python -m venv` links its interpreter by absolute path. The portable workspace archive rejects absolute symlinks, so a workspace with an untracked .venv could never be saved and the task blocked with native_workspace_sync_out_retry_exhausted. Treat an untracked directory with a regular PEP 405 pyvenv.cfg at its root like an untracked node_modules: record it as excluded and do not archive it. Tracked environments are still archived; other absolute links are still rejected. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
10a7d039c8 |
fix(dispatch): keep a workspace wait parked while an ended writer's save settles (#19285)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A run that finds its task workspace held by another run waits as a `workspace_busy` scheduled retry. #19143 keeps that wait as one parked retry while the holder is live. > - A remote task workspace stays held by its last writer run until the writer's save and sandbox release settle. This hold continues after the writer run ends, for example when a reassignment stops the writer. > - The parked-wait check counted only a `running` holder. For an ended writer whose save had not settled, it released the waiter at each due check. Preparation deferred again, cancelled the run, and created a new retry run. > - After a mid-run reassignment, the new owner got five cancelled `workspace_busy` runs in eleven minutes, and the task did no work. > - This pull request makes the parked wait use the same writer-hold rule as workspace reservation, so the waiter stays parked until the hold releases. > - The benefit is one durable wait, one start when the hold releases, and no churn of cancelled runs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19143 (parks a workspace-busy wait). Refs #19184 (releases a recovered hold for a new assignee after reassignment). **What happened?** A board user reassigned a task in the middle of a run. The old run was cancelled with `issue_reassigned`. The new assignee's runs were each created, started and cancelled with `workspace_busy`: "Shared execution workspace is busy: run … ended, but its workspace save has not settled". This repeated every 1–2 minutes (five cancelled runs in 11 minutes). Every cancellation named the stopped run of the previous assignee as the holder. The new assignee's other tasks were not the holder. **Expected behavior** The reassigned task waits as one parked retry. It starts once when the stopped writer's save and sandbox release settle. The wait stops at the one-hour holder cutoff. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Give a task a remote execution workspace whose writer run has ended, but whose save has not settled (`writerRunId` set, `dirty: true`). 2. Wake the task's assignee. The run defers with `workspace_busy` and schedules a retry. 3. Make the retry due and promote scheduled retries. Before this fix, the retry is promoted and dispatched, defers again, and creates another run. ## What Changed - New `server/src/services/remote-workspace-writer-hold.ts`: `readRemoteWorkspaceWriterHold` holds the rule for who holds a remote workspace (a running writer, or an ended writer whose save or sandbox release has not settled). The code is moved from `reserveRemoteWorkspace` without a behavior change. - `reserveRemoteWorkspace` uses that function. It throws the same errors as before. - `parkWorkspaceBusyRetryInTx` (from #19143): when the recorded holder is not running, it reads the same hold for the waited execution workspace. If the recorded holder is an ended writer that still holds it, the retry stays parked. The cutoff clock starts at the writer's end, the same value that reservation measures. Earlier waiters keep their arrival order. - New `WORKSPACE_BUSY_SETTLING_RECHECK_MS` (60 s). Settling has no single completion point that can wake the waiter, so a wait behind a settling writer re-checks every minute. Each check creates no run. In the promotion transaction it reads the workspace, the writer run, its task, and the writer's leases (one row per sandbox lease of that run). The checks last only while the wait exists, up to the one-hour cutoff. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents the parked wait behind a settling writer. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-remote-workspace-busy.test.ts`. The two new tests failed: the due retry was promoted (`expected [ … ] to not include '<retry id>'`). - Green after the fix, with: - `parks one waiter while an ended writer's save settles, then admits it once the hold releases`: three due checks keep one parked run, each re-check is bounded by the writer's end plus one hour, there is one `workspace_busy` cancellation in total and no new retry run. After the hold releases, the next check promotes the same run. - `stops parking behind an ended writer once its unsettled save reaches the holder cutoff`: parked before the cutoff, promoted after it (preparation then fails with the existing unfinished-writer error). - Existing suites pass: `heartbeat-workspace-busy.test.ts` (live-holder parking, arrival order, stop, workspace move), `modules/run-dispatch`, `remote-workspace-reservation.test.ts`, `remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`, `isolated-remote-workspace-source.test.ts`, `heartbeat/workspace-preparation.test.ts` (476 tests in all). - `tsc --noEmit` for `server` shows no errors in the changed files. - Not done: a live run on staging. The fix is not deployed. ## Risks - Low. Parking applies only to a retry that recorded a `workspace_busy` wait on an execution workspace whose recorded writer is that holder. If the hold settles, moves to another run, or the task changes workspace, the retry is released to normal dispatch as before. - The wait stays bounded by the existing one-hour holder cutoff from the writer's end. After that, preparation fails as before. A user can still stop the parked run. - One writer per workspace is unchanged. Reservation still decides admission with the same rule. - The one-minute re-check runs only while a wait exists. It is not idle polling. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of staging diagnostics). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.1105.0-canary.17 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b05d3db2b3 |
fix(recovery): continue a pre-turn interrupt after recovery, not after the destroy (#19292)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A board user can interrupt a native run with a comment. The next turn should start soon after the run stops > - When the stop leaves sandbox files unsaved, recovery saves them, re-stops the sandbox, and then queues the destroy for an ephemeral lease > - #19224 kept the verified stop on that lease as `workspaceRecoveryCleanup.stopReceipt`, and taught the continuation gates to accept it > - One gate was missed: `acknowledgedNativeStopExecutionHasStopped`. An interrupt that lands before the provider turn opens leaves no gating hold, so the saved comment goes through this gate, not through the explicit continuation gate > - That gate still wanted the raw `remoteExecutionTermination` receipt, so the comment waited about 5 minutes for the destroy retry > - This pull request lets that gate accept the carried-forward stop receipt too > - The benefit is that an interrupt during startup continues right after recovery, as #19224 intended for every lease policy ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19224 Refs #19206 **What happened?** On hosted staging, an `interrupt: true` comment reached a native run of an ephemeral-lease agent while the run was still in startup (the provider pack upload). The run stopped before any provider turn. Recovery saved its files at once. The follow-up turn started about 6 minutes after the interrupt. The stopped run's lease was released by `pending_cleanup_retry`, and the follow-up started 2 seconds later. Agents whose interrupt landed after the provider turn opened continued in 30 to 50 seconds on the same build. **Expected behavior** The saved comment starts a new turn right after recovery saves the files and the sandbox is stopped. The destroy of a stopped sandbox is cleanup and must not hold the next turn. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use an agent whose sandbox lease is ephemeral (destroy after each turn). 2. Post an `interrupt: true` comment while its native run is still starting, before the provider turn opens. 3. Let recovery save the files. See the follow-up start only after the destroy retry releases the lease. **Paperclip version or commit** Hosted staging at `e37ab23d` (includes #19206 and #19224). ## What Changed - `server/src/services/acknowledged-native-stop.ts`: `acknowledgedNativeStopExecutionHasStopped` accepts a remote lease that has `hasRemoteTerminationReceipt` or `hasRecoveredCleanupStopReceipt`. Before, it accepted only the first one. - `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts`: new regression for a pre-turn interrupt on an ephemeral lease. Recovery completes, the destroy is queued, and the saved comment is handed to `resumeRemoteStopComments` twice. With a verified carried stop, exactly one turn starts while the lease is still `pending_cleanup`. Without the stop receipt, the comment stays deferred and no turn starts. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: one sentence that extends the #19224 paragraph to the pre-turn Stop case. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts -t "starts the interrupt redirect once after recovery"` failed the `verified-stop` case with `expected [] to have a length of 1 but got +0`. The `no-stop-receipt` case passed. - Green after the fix: the same command passes both cases. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts`: 382 passed. - Related suites pass: `acknowledged-native-stop`, `explicit-native-continuation`, `heartbeat/run-control`, `heartbeat/recovery`, `heartbeat/native-stop-evidence-read`, `native-session-executor`, `heartbeat-observed-workspace-preservation`, `native-startup-cleanup-recovery`, `execution-control-work`. Two `run-control` cases timed out at 30 s under parallel load and passed when run alone. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck` passes. - Not done: a live re-run on staging. This change is not deployed. ## Risks - Low risk. `hasRecoveredCleanupStopReceipt` is the same check #19224 added to the other gates. It is true only for a lease whose recovery cleanup belongs to its own run, which was released, and whose carried stop receipt matches the company, run, lease, provider, and provider lease id. A lease without that receipt still blocks. - The no-replay hold is unchanged. The successor still goes through ordinary admission with all task gates. The test calls the resume twice and sees one turn only. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of staging). Extended reasoning was used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b400f76647 |
feat(ui): submit task composers with Enter by default (#19272)
Use Enter to submit task replies and new tasks, with Shift+Enter for a new line. Add an experimental preference to require Command/Ctrl+Enter. Preserve autocomplete selection and IME confirmation, and retain the modifier shortcut until saved settings load. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
b4e7b76635 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#19294)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip uses a dependency lock for reproducible builds. > - Dependency changes on master need matching lock entries. > - Paid eval reports also pin a reviewed offline correction. > - Reports must install before paid model work starts. > - This automated PR keeps the lock and report proof together. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Dependency manifests on master changed after the last committed lock refresh. **Expected behavior** Frozen installs must match those manifests. Eval reports must retain matching offline lock proof. **Steps to reproduce** Run a frozen install before and after this lock refresh. ## What Changed - Refresh the dependency lock from the manifests on master. - Include the matching offline report correction and hashes. ## Verification - Pinned pnpm resolution completed with lifecycle scripts disabled. - The report proof refresh accepted the reviewed committed baseline. - The workflow rejected changes outside the lock and report proof files. ## Risks The lockfile bot merges this PR without CI or review when every added package version is at least 3 days old on npm. Otherwise the PR waits for a maintainer, and the daily refresh tries again. The bot merges only the exact commit this workflow generated from manifests already reviewed on master. Unknown report lock baselines remain blocked. This update changes no permissions or paid enable gates. ## Model Used None — generated by pnpm and the deterministic report-lock updater. ## Checklist - [x] Thinking path and problem description included - [x] Generated lock and matching report proof included - [x] Release-age gate decides between bot merge and maintainer review Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
c6996799c4 |
feat(task-chat): show an inline diff for every file edit (#19269)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The task chat shows what an agent did during a run, including each tool call > - Codex and Claude both report the patch for every file edit, but Paperclip dropped it. Claude's ACP `diff` content was never read. The Codex `fileChange` item became a generic item with no patch. Codex `turn/diff/updated` had no native-runner mapping > - A reviewer could not see what an agent changed without opening the workspace > - This pull request carries a bounded patch on each edit call and shows it in the edit row. Each turn that changed files ends with a "Changed in this turn" card > - The benefit is that a reviewer can check every change in the conversation, with the same view for Codex and Claude ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (precedent: canonical `plan.updated` events as a docked plan card). **Subsystem affected** Paperclip runner (Rust and TypeScript canonical event mapping), PRP provider-event schema, and the task-chat UI. **Problem or motivation** Edit rows say "Edited a file" with no content. Claude Edit/Write `diff` content is lost after the ACPX sidecar. The Codex native runner drops `fileChange.changes` and `turn/diff/updated`. The existing workspace-changes card showed a raw text patch in a dialog, and only on the in-process Codex path. **Proposed solution** Add an optional, bounded `fileChanges` list to `paperclip.tool.execution.v1`. Fill it from Codex `fileChange` items and Claude ACP `diff` content. Map Codex `turn/diff/updated` to `workspace.change.updated` on the native runner. In the UI, show `+N −M` on each edit row, open a compact colored diff, and end the turn with the change set. **Alternatives considered** A runner-side git diff at turn end. It needs workspace access and extra cost on every turn. The harness patches are already available. For Claude, the UI builds the turn card from the edit rows instead of new per-turn runner state. ## What Changed - Protocol: optional `fileChanges[]` on `toolExecution` in `provider-event.schema.json`, with the regenerated schema bundle, validators and manifest. Paths are workspace-relative. A patch is at most 32 KiB, and a call has at most 32 files. - Runner (Rust): new `tool_file_changes.rs`. A Codex `fileChange` item now also emits `tool.execution.*` with `fileChanges`; the native item event stays for the recovery and progress projections. `turn/diff/updated` becomes `workspace.change.updated`. `normalize_acpx_tool_call` re-validates the sidecar's `fileChanges`. `normalize_codex_notification_in` resolves absolute paths against the session cwd. - Runner (Rust): `has_bounded_rich_display_shape` accepts schema-valid workspace diffs. Without this change, durable storage cut each patch string to a 4 KiB preview. Patches use the uncapped secret redactor. - Runner (TS): new `tool-file-changes.ts`. The ACPX sidecar computes `fileChanges` from ACP `diff` content with the working directory. The in-process Codex and ACPX mappers do the same, with an optional `context` argument. - UI: new `TaskChatDiffView` (colored rows, hunk labels, a height cap, "Show N more lines"). Edit rows show counts and the diff. Collapsed activity groups show edit totals. The workspace card is now "Changed in this turn", with in-place per-file diffs, and it sits at the end of the turn. When a harness sends no whole-turn diff (Claude), the card is built from the edit rows. A change set is marked complete when its run ends. - UI: `native-run-events.ts` maps `workspace.change.updated` and attaches each edit's latest patch to its row (the `diff` transcript entries now carry `toolUseId`). - Design tokens: `--diff-add-*`, `--diff-remove-*` and `--sz-edit-diff-max-h` come from the status icon hues. - Storybook: `Tasks/Edit diffs` story. Docs: `doc/run-log-events.md`. ## Verification - Real runs on a local instance (`test-drive`, native runner): - Codex (`gpt-5.6-sol`): the "Applied a patch" rows show `+9` and `+35 −2` with their diffs. The turn ends with "Changed in this turn", 2 files, `+42`, from `turn/diff/updated`. - Claude (`claude-opus-5-5` via ACPX): the Write and Edit rows show `+5`, `+14 −1` and `+9` with correct hunks. The turn card is built from the edit rows. - Codex model note: with `gpt-5.4`, pinned Codex 0.160 reports "model metadata not found". The model then wrote files through the shell, so no `fileChange` items occurred. - `pnpm check:token-gates`: all gates clean. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript src/adapters`: 1073 passed. - `packages/paperclip-runner`: `vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts src/tool-file-changes.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts` passed. `check:protocol-types` and `check:protocol-manifest` match. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core --lib provider_events tool_file_changes`: passed. `cargo fmt --check`: clean. - Storybook: open `Tasks and conversations/…/Tasks/Edit diffs`. ## Risks - Larger payloads: an edit call can carry up to 96 KiB of patch in Rust, and the sidecar keeps 48 KiB under its 128 KiB frame. Above the budget, a file keeps its counts and drops its patch (`diffTruncated`). - Redaction: each patch goes through the shared secret redactor. Before this change, a 4 KiB preview cap also applied. - Claude turn card: it joins each edit's patch in order. It is not a net diff. For a file the turn created, the counts are net and exact. For an existing file, the counts are summed over its edits. - The workspace card moves to the end of the turn. One adapter test changed to match. - Local only: four Linux cgroup `task_memory` Rust tests fail on macOS. They do not touch these modules. ## Model Used Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use (shell, browser and file editing) and a long context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3fca8a1500 |
test(evals): renew the reporting lock after iMessage update (#19283)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip verifies the selected source and reporting dependencies before it obtains model credentials. > - The reporting helper admits only an exact reviewed lock or its exact reviewed correction. > - Master updated the iMessage dependency and protobuf after the last reporting-policy review. > - The controller lock therefore stopped matching either admitted hash. > - A real five-case launch failed at this guard before any case execution. > - This PR renews the exact hashes and keeps the existing patch and rejection mechanism unchanged. > - A normal-CI repository check now exercises the real helper against the committed lock before paid execution. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19261, #18914. **What happened?** The five selected execution jobs in the retained launch 3002 stopped during “Verify source-bound build and authenticated selection before credentials.” The first observed error was `Reporting lock changed; review the dependency correction before install` in the trusted controller helper. Model-key and original case execution steps were skipped. The failed attempt remains infrastructure evidence; this PR makes no native product-grade claim. **Expected behavior** Admit the exact reviewed current controller dependency graph. Keep rejecting unknown locks, changed correction patches, and wrong output bytes before credentials or provider execution. **Steps to reproduce** Run the reporting helper against the committed current-master lock. The parent policy recognizes 754… and 60f…, while the actual controller lock is 6f252b…. The parent stops at the same pre-credential boundary as AWS. The existing correction patch reverses and reapplies cleanly to that lock. ## What Changed - Renew only the reporting policy input and output SHA256 values. The output is the exact committed current-master lock after `@photon-ai/advanced-imessage` 2.1.0→2.2.0 and `@bufbuild/protobuf` 2.15.0→2.16.0. - Derive input `ea91060774e3289d5d07bc58f72d8953f5a6dcb9db98aa9a1adf202476bf89ac` by reversing the existing correction patch from the current lock. Reapplying that byte-identical patch yields output `6f252b0c8099ed837a297f97f1fc5e14e96bc7530b0239065d0789b33b2ee477` exactly. - Keep patch SHA256 `2adced9a66052ba5752140ec6cc6670f679552a9a8559bd1faea10036afeeb97`, helper code, and guard behavior unchanged. Update the policy basis to describe the review truthfully. - Add one normal server-suite check. It copies the committed lock and reviewed policy into a temporary directory and runs the real helper. The prior focused suite already covered this contract, but its runner-e2e location is outside normal root Vitest projects. `server/vitest.config.ts` already includes `scripts/**/*.test.mjs`; no workflow change is needed. No `pnpm-lock.yaml`, workflow, source pin, descriptor, oracle, model, permission, credential, scanner, or case bound changes. Immutable source 6773 and the failed launch remain unchanged. ## Verification - Parent existing reporting suite: 4 fail and 3 pass because the committed lock is outside the admitted pair. Renewed policy: all 7 pass, including unknown-lock, changed-patch, wrong-output, and refresh-path rejection controls. - New normal-CI repository control fails with the exact paid-step reporting-lock error on the parent policy. The corrected combined run passes 8 controls across 2 suites. - Exact patch reverse/forward roundtrip preserves the full current lock bytes. The actual CLI returns `already-reviewed`; the working lock hash stays 6f252b… and is not modified. - Focused command: `node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --config ../report-lock-imessage-vitest.config.mts`. The external local config selects only the two affected suites with the existing 30-second test limit. - `git diff --check` passes. No SDK/native/source build, model call, evaluation retry, or private archive download was needed for local proof. Full workspace typecheck/build were not run for this policy-and-test change. Latest-head required CI and genuine review remain pending. ## Risks This policy deliberately rejects the next unreviewed lock change. The normal-CI check should expose that drift before paid fanout. The input is the current lock with the already approved correction reversed; it is not a claim that a new dependency graph was resolved or installed locally. Local guard controls do not prove a repaired AWS execution or any of the five product journeys. The next measured attempt still requires normal protected merge and fresh actual-controller admission. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, repository tools, and local code execution. The host did not expose a context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
29afc633f6 |
feat(runner): forward ACP _meta from ACPX as a bounded copy (#19259)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The native runner runs Claude through ACPX and maps ACP updates into canonical run events. > - Claude sends useful data in the ACP `_meta` field: the real tool name, the parent tool of a subagent call, the terminal exit code, and the rate-limit state. > - ACPX 0.13.1 drops all `_meta` before the runner sees it. > - Three planned features need this data: richer tool rows, a rate-limit gauge, and a subagent tree. > - This pull request forwards `_meta` from ACPX and bounds it once in the runner. > - The benefit is that each feature can read the data from one safe, shared place. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** ACPX keeps only the title, status, kind, locations, raw input, raw output and content of an ACP tool update. It drops `_meta`. Claude's tool name, `parentToolUseId`, `terminal_exit` and `_claude/rateLimit` never reach the runner. **Proposed solution** Forward `_meta` from ACPX on tool and status events. Copy it into a bounded, JSON-safe object in the runner before any mapper reads it. **Alternatives considered** Read the full ACP notification through `onSessionNotification` and join it to runtime events by tool call ID. That needs a side table and depends on callback order. Forwarding on the event is simpler and keeps the data with the event. ## What Changed - `patches/acpx@0.13.1.patch`: ACPX now sets `_meta` on `tool_call` events and on status events (`usage_update`, `current_mode_update`, `config_option_update`, `session_info_update`). The type declarations document the field as unvalidated producer data. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/provider-events.ts`: new `boundedAcpMeta()`. `createAcpxToolEventNormalizer` applies it to every runtime event. Limits: depth 6, 64 entries per object or array, 4 KB per string, about 16 KB in total. It drops `__proto__`, `constructor` and `prototype` keys, functions and non-finite numbers. - The hardened ACPX sidecar path keeps its explicit field allowlist. It does not forward `_meta` yet. A feature that needs a field there must add it to that allowlist. - Tests for the passthrough and for each bound. ## Verification - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/provider-events.test.ts` - The canonical mappers do not read `_meta` yet, so run events do not change. Follow-up pull requests use it. ## Risks - Low risk. The new field is additive and the mappers ignore it today. - The lockfile patch hash for `acpx@0.13.1` changes. A fresh `pnpm install` applies the new patch. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d8c47159d4 |
feat(task-chat): show Codex reasoning summaries as headline bullets (#19271)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The task chat shows what an agent does while it runs, including a "Thinking" row for provider reasoning > - Real Codex runs produced reasoning items with no text > - So the Thinking row only says "Thinking" and never tells the user what the agent works on > - This pull request asks Codex for its own reasoning summaries, keeps every summary part, and shows the parts as bullets > - The benefit is that a user can see what the agent is thinking about, and a collapsed live run shows the newest headline as its status line ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (same pattern: show a harness signal that Paperclip already receives) **Subsystem affected** Native runner (Rust runnerd Codex provider and event normalization, JS Codex driver) and the task chat UI (Thinking row and activity rows). **Problem or motivation** Codex 0.160 resolves an unset reasoning summary from the model, and current models resolve it to `"none"`. The rollout of a real gpt-5.6-sol run records `turn_context.summary = "none"`, and all of its reasoning items have `summary: []`. A local A/B with `codex exec` proved the cause: `model_reasoning_summary=none` gives no reasoning text, and `auto` gives headlines. Also, runnerd dropped `item/reasoning/*` notifications and ignored the reasoning item's `summary[]`. **Proposed solution** Send `summary: "auto"` on Codex `turn/start`. Map `item/reasoning/summaryTextDelta` and `summaryPartAdded` to reasoning deltas, with a blank line before each later part. Use the joined `summary[]` as the completed item text. In the UI, split the provider text at headline lines and show one bullet per part. **Alternatives considered** Use `summary: "detailed"`. That gives longer text, but `auto` lets the provider choose the best summarizer. **Roadmap alignment** This makes existing provider signals visible. It adds no new protocol event type or data model. **Additional context** Research note: overlooked harness signals, item 2. Claude is out of scope here. A live Claude run showed thinking blocks with signatures and empty text: current models default `thinking.display` to `"omitted"`. Claude Code ignores the `showThinkingSummaries` setting in SDK mode, and ACPX does not forward a `thinking` option, so the fix needs a claude-agent-acp patch hunk. That patch is also changed by #19264, so the Claude change follows after #19264 merges. The UI in this PR already shows prose-only (Claude) summaries. ## What Changed - Rust runnerd (`codex_provider.rs`): send `summary: "auto"` on every Codex `turn/start`. - Rust runnerd (`provider_events.rs`): map `item/reasoning/summaryTextDelta` and later `summaryPartAdded` to `item.delta` with `kind: "reasoning"` and `channel: "summary"`. Use the joined `summary[]` as a completed reasoning item's text. - JS Codex driver: send `summary: "auto"` on direct app-server transports, map `summaryPartAdded`, and read `summary[]` in `itemText`. - UI: new `reasoning-summary.ts` splits provider text into headline sections, and `TaskChatReasoningSummary` shows one bullet per part. The Thinking row and the activity row use the newest headline as their one-line status. Prose-only summaries (Claude) stay as prose. - Storybook: new "Task chat reasoning summaries" story with live, expanded, finished and Claude states. - Tests: Rust normalizer test, JS driver test, and splitter unit tests. ## Verification - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core` (provider events and the shared identity golden). - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/drivers/codex` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/task-chat src/components/transcript` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - Live test on a local worktree instance with a real Codex agent (gpt-5.6-sol). The Codex rollout now records `summary: "auto"`. Run events contain `**Assessing transaction boundary issues**`, a part break, and `**Planning atomic claim fix and verification**`. The task chat shows "Thought · Planning atomic claim fix and verification", and the expanded row lists both headlines as bullets. - Storybook: open "Tasks and conversations / Task creation and lifecycle / Tasks / Task chat reasoning summaries". - Claude was not changed. A live Claude run confirmed the cause for the follow-up (empty, signed thinking blocks). ## Risks - Codex now writes reasoning summaries, which adds a small number of output tokens per turn. This is the same cost as Codex CLI with its normal default. - The UI treats a line that is only bold text as a headline. A prose line that is only bold text also starts a new bullet. This is display only. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use, code execution and browser automation. Default context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
629abc8509 |
fix(recovery): keep pending Retry unclickable and scope failure causes (#19268)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - #19260 shows the saved-work recovery step on a task, and records why
a recovery attempt failed.
> - The review of #19260 found three gaps after the PR merged.
> - A scheduled recovery offered Retry while a Retry preparation was
already pending.
> - Classified failures could get a misleading `provider_error` cause.
> - The new cause text in the board handoff had no test.
> - This pull request closes these gaps.
> - The benefit is a Retry button that matches what is allowed, and
causes that name the correct subsystem.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #19260
**What happened?**
After #19260, a task with a scheduled recovery and a pending (`issued`
or `processing`) Retry preparation showed an active Retry button. The
server only coalesces the second request. Also, a failure that recovery
classified as `archive_unsafe`, `source_unavailable` or
`snapshot_verification_failed` still recorded a provider cause. The
handoff text could then read "last failure: archive_unsafe, cause:
provider_error".
**Expected behavior**
Retry is not offered while a Retry preparation is pending. Only the
generic transient fallback records a provider cause.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Request a chat Retry on a task while its saved-work recovery is
scheduled.
2. The task projection returns `retry_scheduled` with `canRetry: true`.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
6293e581f6 |
fix(recovery): resume cancelled workspace retries from verified waits (#19276)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A shared workspace can make a run wait before it calls a provider. > - The scheduler saves a retry for that wait. > - The control plane can cancel the retry while it is still queued. > - Recovery then asks for a process stop receipt for a run that never claimed execution. > - This pull request verifies the retry and its exact workspace-wait parent before it accepts a later user instruction. > - The benefit is that Retry and saved messages can continue through normal admission without replaying old work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13640 and #15483. Related fixes: #18838 covers dispatcher cancellation codes; this change covers a system-cancelled scheduled workspace retry. Related open PR #15383 covers claimed conversation-adapter preparation. This change requires an unclaimed retry with no run profile or owner. **What happened?** A scheduled workspace retry was cancelled before runtime selection. The run retained an expected system cancellation and a `startupCancellation.beforeNativeSelection: false` marker. It had no start timestamp, execution stage, run profile, controller, process, lease or provider events. Recovery recorded an unknown-action hold. A later user message and Retry could not pass that hold. **Expected behavior** A later authorized instruction can start a fresh turn when the saved retry and its exact parent prove that no provider work started. Missing or conflicting evidence must retain the hold. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Record a terminal workspace wait before provider dispatch, with `executionRecovery.kind: workspace_wait` and `providerWorkStarted: false`. 2. Save a scheduled retry for that same company, task and agent. 3. Cancel the retry through the control plane before it claims execution. 4. Send a new user message or request Retry after the cancellation. 5. On the base commit, admission returns no continuation. With this change, normal admission creates one fresh successor. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced in source based on master at `499712c68b3ca95801b6114d5f2f0f0ea6759318`. **Deployment mode** Source checkout with isolated embedded PostgreSQL. Hosted rollout and a real provider run remain to be verified after merge. ## What Changed - Extend the existing cancelled-startup proof with one source-bound workspace-retry case. Require the canonical retry parent and reason to match the saved context. - Verify the parent's company, task, agent, time order, immutable Runner claim and typed workspace-wait record. Reject runtime, process, lease, coordinator, result and output evidence on either run. - Keep validation of the full saved result in the database predicate. The bounded execution projection can add empty receipt fields without changing eligibility. - Reuse the existing admission, Retry and deferred-message paths. Preserve cancelled history and unknown action outcomes. Keep permission, Stop, budget and recovery-limit gates. - Add 23 regression cases, including heartbeat message and Retry admission, concurrent saved-message recovery, and 19 conflicting-evidence cases. Document the contract. The cancelled-startup service owns this proof. No provider protocol, schema, UI or shared contract changes. Reads use exact run IDs and return only narrow metadata. The new reads occur only for a cancelled, unstarted Runner retry candidate. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/services/execution-blocker-read.test.ts src/services/task-retry.test.ts` — 452 passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm build` — passed. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check` — passed. - Local diff review and secret/private-context scan — passed. Test identities are synthetic. - Regression history: the original positive case failed on unchanged source while 11 negative guards passed. Initial test fixtures then exposed ownership/contract constraints and a missing saved-wake envelope; the fixtures now use valid persisted shapes. The heartbeat Retry test exposed extra keys in the bounded evidence projection. Full-record validation now runs in SQL, and both assembled heartbeat paths pass. The unknown action outcome stays unchanged. - Platform: macOS arm64, Node 25.6.1, pnpm 9.15.4. Tests use real isolated PostgreSQL. They stop at admission and do not call a live provider. - Exact-head GitHub CI: 54 successful checks, 3 skipped, no unfinished or failed checks. Greptile scored `cfbf55cea68e3c69f65f50afcba98f775fa6fa3d` 5/5, with no actionable findings and no review threads. - The full repository `pnpm test:run` was not run locally. A previous full run in this repair effort stalled and was stopped after 2h45. The four complete affected suites pass; full PR CI must pass before merge. ## Risks - False admission could allow work before a predecessor is safe. The proof fails closed on missing parent records, different ownership, a changed retry binding, later parent completion, restore obligations, any execution resource, or any provider/output evidence. - This deliberately covers only system-cancelled, unclaimed workspace retries. Other cancellations retain their current reconciliation path. It does not grant automatic replay, certify unknown external writes, or reset exhausted recovery limits. - No migration. Verify the serving version and an existing saved-message continuation after deployment. ## Model Used - OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, xhigh reasoning, through the Codex harness in T3 Code. Used code editing, shell tools and test execution. The harness does not expose its context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
036b1860c3 |
fix(runner): bind Cursor sidecars to the runner package, not the workspace root (#19255)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native runner starts ACPX providers through a sidecar. runnerd
tells the sidecar which package owns the provider assets.
> - Cursor, Copilot, Pi, Kimi and Antigravity use pinned native
closures. Their asset guard requires the bound manifest to be the
`package.json` directly inside the bound root.
> - In a local source build, runnerd bound Cursor to the pnpm workspace
root, with the runner manifest one level down. The guard threw before it
checked the Cursor closure.
> - Every Cursor run on a local source instance failed with
`admission_installation`. The sidecar redacts the message, so the cause
was not visible.
> - This pull request gives Cursor the same runner-package authority as
the other native-asset providers.
> - The benefit is that Cursor runs start on local source builds.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A `paperclip_runner` agent with `provider: "acpx"` and `acpxAgent:
"cursor"` failed at every start on a local macOS worktree instance. The
run log showed `ACPX sidecar command session.open was rejected
(retryable=false, classification=admission_installation)`.
**Expected behavior**
The run starts, because the pinned Cursor runtime cache matches
`cursor-distributions.json`.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run `pnpm dev` from a source checkout, with the Cursor runtime set up
in `~/.paperclip/runtimes/cursor`.
2. Create a native runner agent with `acpxAgent: "cursor"` and a bound
`CURSOR_AUTH_TOKEN`.
3. Start a run. It fails at `session.open`.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
|
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
3d0d178ff7 |
Reconcile qualified ACPX predecessors through ordinary recovery (#19153)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip runs agent work through a controller and a Runner. > - A completed provider session can outlive an abrupt Runner exit. > - The next owner must reconcile the retained source before it attaches a new run. > - The ordinary recovery foundation in #19132 first supports Codex App Server. > - Qualified ACPX providers need their own saved and live consistency checks. > - This pull request adds those checks and a separate provider attestation. > - The benefit is session continuity through existing recovery and attachment. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Builds on #19132, which has merged. This PR targets `master` and contains only the ACPX changes. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Recovery of a completed ACPX session after the Runner and provider stop. **Current behavior** Ordinary ACPX recovery and attachment preserve a qualified session. A completed predecessor also needs trusted admission by its new owner before restoration. Codex checks cannot attest ACPX state. **Proposed behavior** Reuse ordinary exact-source recovery. Compare live restored state with saved dormant state when no uncertain effect explains new work. Require the selected driver's separate ACPX prelaunch attestation. Settle retained events before authenticated target attachment. ## What Changed - Preserve baseline prepared cleanup and ordinary continuation. New predecessor admission excludes prepared provider state; snapshots and cleanup do not restart it. - Observe existing recovery command facts. Keep ordinary active same-run behavior and existing profile, workspace, model, permission, session and catalog checks. - Verify the restored qualified session's identity, turn, goal and outstanding requests when saved state was dormant. Failed verification reaps the owned process group. - Validate scoped goal updates arriving during the final status snapshot after the authoritative goal reply. Active or unknown updates fail admission; earlier and benign queued events remain available to ordinary polling. - Recognize the existing inactive `limited`, `usage_limited` and `budget_limited` goal statuses, so an unexpected active goal after restore cannot bypass live verification. Treat malformed nested working-state metadata as unproven while keeping missing-field compatibility. - Keep existing ordinary recovery of qualified session-open and suspended ACPX sessions. The new integrity check does not expand prepared restoration. - Advertise `acpxRecoveryIntegrityVersion: 1`, separate from Codex integrity. No native source mode or CLI remains. - Require `acpxSourceRecoveryVersion: 1` from the selected trusted execution driver for a stopped predecessor. Codex capability alone cannot grant it. - Reuse dynamic authenticated owner admission, retained source accounting, and existing ordinary ACPX attachment. ## Verification Current head `b294d8ae88d0` is one commit on `master` at `e80d745060fd`, the merge of #19132. The ten-file diff is byte-for-byte identical to the reviewed ACPX diff against its former base. The guide shows where `paperclip-runnerd --build-metadata` emits `acpxRecoveryIntegrityVersion: 1` and how host admission uses a separate capability. [ACPX recovery guide](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/b294d8ae88d019ef02a942e240bc5c14287239e0/packages/paperclip-runner/runner/DURABLE_TRANSPORT.md#recovering-acpx-between-turns) The rebased head passed all 14 ACPX process cases, three native snapshot checks, Runner typecheck and the binary metadata check locally. GitHub CI, Docker and Windows passed on their first attempts. Standard Greptile review 12 scored the rebased commit 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42063188178) · [Standard review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19153#issuecomment-6646809075) The preceding code commit `08df48de20d613efcd861c278a7f9929c21d6670` includes the reviewed parent `c09ebb4a2a6c140521698cf9fd681de67cfb9745`. Paid review 9 scores this exact head 5/5 with no unresolved findings (summary updated 2026-11-05 09:13:11 UTC after the 09:07:15 UTC request). Standard review 8 also scored this head 5/5. [PR workflow 41995103666](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41995103666), [Runner Windows 41995103419](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41995103419), and [Docker Runner 41995103366](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41995103366) passed on this exact head. The initial main attempt lost self-hosted runners: the Runner package log records a shutdown signal, and the other affected jobs report lost communication or cancellation. Only unsuccessful jobs were retried; their successful retry and aggregate gate are green. No source, assertion or timeout change was made for this interruption. - Combined `runnerd-acpx-source-reconciliation.test.ts` and `runnerd-source-reconciliation.test.ts`: 25 real native/fake-provider process cases passed. ACPX contributes 14 cases, including the final-snapshot goal race, process-group cleanup, same-PID adoption, exact provider identities, retained accounting, limited/paused goals and ordinary active same-run recovery. - The maintained fake sidecar emits a real `runtime.goal` frame between the dormant goal reply and final snapshot response. Before the fix, recovery succeeded. Afterward it refuses admission, reaps the owned sidecar/provider group, and records only the original provider turn. - Three native wire tests passed. They cover active updates with low/equal/missing revisions, foreign run/session identity, and unchanged ordered delivery of earlier history plus benign new events. The queue is inspected without consuming frames. - Both parent Codex final-read tests passed in the combined checkout: active-goal refusal/reap and safe paused-goal delivery. - The real native backend completes A, settles its journals, kills Runner and provider, recovers the same ACPX session, adopts the replacement Runner after controller restart, attaches B and completes a second turn, then uses ordinary warm attachment for C and completes a third successful turn. Record, backend and agent session identities remain exact; ordinary ACPX attachment may restart its sidecar. - Provider compatibility checks also passed while preparing this stack: 30 permission ordering/forwarding cases, 19 factory cases, the native inactive-goal classification unit, and six native warm/suspend integration cases. - Combined offline Runner/fake-provider build, Runner `tsc --noEmit`, `cargo fmt --all -- --check`, parent-relative `git diff --check`, and added-line secret/personal-data scan passed. - Only focused local checks ran. Full suites and platform checks run in CI. ## Risks - Fake providers prove protocol behavior, not vendor restore inertness or all vendor background work. Real provider qualification remains required. - The trusted process owner must reject unsafe completed predecessors before launch. Ordinary same-run active-goal recovery remains supported. - Probes use the existing bounded sidecar budget. A timeout can terminate the sidecar through existing transport cleanup. Null goal projections remain supported. - Ordinary ACPX attachment can restart the sidecar. Record, backend and agent session identities remain exact; the Runner PID remains the same. - This draft adds no deployment, release pin change or parking hook. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), high reasoning, through Codex with local code and command tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path and specified the model - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this does not duplicate planned work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have not included internal or instance-local references - [x] My branch name describes the change - [x] Focused local tests pass - [x] Tests and documentation cover the changes - [x] Risks are documented - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green at the revised head - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved comments at the revised head - [x] I will address review findings before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b0fa2ef9bf |
feat(task-chat): show web searches, model switches, waits and verification checks as dedicated rows (#19262)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through the native runner. The runner turns harness activity into typed canonical events such as `research.*`, `model.route.changed`, `wait.*` and the run's own verification checks. > - The task chat flattened these events into generic tool rows. A web search showed as "Ran Research eventType: research.started, summary: …". The run's verification checks were dropped completely. > - Live tests found a second break: the Rust runner core forwarded Codex `webSearch` items without their query, action or results. The canonical `research.*` events therefore had `query: null`. > - This pull request keeps the full payload for these families (as #19252 did for plans), adds small dedicated rows, and keeps the web-search fields through the durable runner. > - The benefit is that users see what the agent searched for, which model actually ran, how long a wait lasts, and whether each check passed, without opening the run log. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19252 (same pattern for the plan card) **Subsystem affected** Task chat activity rows (UI), the native run-event transcript mapping, and the Rust runner core Codex normalizer. **Problem or motivation** Provider activity that the runner already maps to canonical events reaches the task chat as unreadable generic rows. Verification checks never appear. For Codex, the web-search query and action are lost before they reach the canonical event. **Proposed solution** Keep `research`, `model_identity`, `artifact`, `review` and `wait` events as `provider_activity` entries with their full payload. Project the runner's `verification` items as a new `verification` family. Render dedicated rows: a web search with its quoted query and source-domain chips, a model switch as `from → to · reason`, a wait with a live countdown, and green/red check lines. Keep bounded web-search and sleep fields in the Rust normalizer. **Alternatives considered** A separate "Checks" block beside the final answer. We kept the checks in the activity group, because the group summary already leads with "Check failed" when a check fails. ## What Changed - `ui/src/components/transcript/native-run-events.ts`: keep research, model, artifact, review and wait events as `provider_activity` with the full payload. Map `item.completed` items of kind `verification` to the new `verification` family. Context, hook, safety and delegation stay on the generic path, because other work items own them. - `packages/adapter-utils/src/types.ts`, `ui/src/components/task-chat/task-chat-model.ts`, `ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.ts`: add the `verification` provider-activity family. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/task-chat-activity-presentation.ts`: add labels: "Searched the web “query”", "Opened a web page host/path", "Switched models a → b · reason", "Waiting 30s" / "Waited 30s", and "Check passed" / "Check failed" / "Check not run". - `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatRunnerActivityGroup.tsx` and `TaskChatProtocolActivityRow.tsx`: show up to three source-domain chips under a finished search, a live countdown for a running wait, and a check line with a tinted icon and its detail. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/completed-activity-summary.ts`: the group summary leads with "Check failed" when a check fails, and says "Switched models" for a reroute. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/transcript-adapter.ts`: verification detail keys, and a `startedAt` timestamp that stays across lifecycle merges (used by the countdown). - `packages/paperclip-runner/runner/crates/runner-core/src/provider_events.rs`: keep bounded `query`, `action` and http(s) `results` for Codex `webSearch` items, and `durationMs` for `sleep` items. Other item types do not change. - `ui/storybook/stories/tasks/task-chat-provider-activity.stories.tsx`: new story. Its fixtures are persisted run events that go through the production transcript path. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/transcript src/components/task-chat src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx src/adapters/paperclip-runner src/lib`: 275 files and 3669 tests pass. - `cargo test -p paperclip-runner-core`: all tests pass, including the new `keeps_bounded_web_search_and_sleep_identity`. - UI typecheck is clean. `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean. `cargo fmt --check` is clean. - Storybook: open "Tasks and conversations / … / Task chat / Provider activity". It shows a settled run, a live search, a live wait countdown and a narrow layout. - Live test on a local worktree instance with a real Codex agent (gpt-5.6-sol, Codex app-server 0.160). The task asked for a web search, a parser with tests, a pause, and two checks. The task chat showed "Searched the web “ISO 8601 week date first week Thursday conversion calendar date”" and two green check rows ("node --test week-date.test.js · 8 tests passed; 0 failed.", "node --check week-date.js"). The group summary read "Ran checks". Before the runner fix, the same search had `query: null`. Not verified live: - The source-domain chips. Codex 0.160 sends `results: null`, because it keeps search results on the server. The chips appear only when a provider reports sources. Unit tests and the story cover them. - The wait countdown and the model-switch row. In the live run Codex paused with a shell `sleep`, not a native `sleep` item, and no reroute occurred. Unit tests and the story cover both. - Claude. Its WebSearch and WebFetch calls arrive as generic tool executions, because ACPX drops the tool metadata. They show as tool rows, as before. The ACPX `_meta` work is separate. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only affects how canonical events display. The generic path stays for the families that this PR does not change. - The Rust normalizer now persists the web-search query and the source URLs/titles in the run events. This data was already intended for the canonical `research.v1` event, and it is bounded (4,000 characters per text field, 64 results, http(s) URLs only). - A search that Codex reports with `action: other` and no query shows as "Searched the web" with no subject. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edit, browser automation) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.1105.0-canary.16 |
||
|
dependabot[bot]
|
053ae3920f |
build(deps): bump @photon-ai/advanced-imessage from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0 (#15167)
Bumps [@photon-ai/advanced-imessage](https://github.com/photon-hq/advanced-imessage-ts/tree/HEAD/packages/advanced-imessage) from 2.1.0 to 2.2.0. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/photon-hq/advanced-imessage-ts/releases">@photon-ai/advanced-imessage's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>advanced-imessage v2.2.0</h2> <h2>Bug Fixes</h2> <ul> <li>Added the missing rate limit error codes <code>burstRateExceeded</code> and <code>newContactThrottled</code>, so server policy failures are now preserved correctly instead of falling through as less specific errors. ✨</li> <li>Added test coverage to make sure these policy errors map to <code>RateLimitError</code> and keep their original error code.</li> </ul> <hr /> <p><strong>Version:</strong> 2.2.0</p> </blockquote> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/photon-hq/advanced-imessage-ts/commit/b6b94c15df5ae4751fcf60505b1c7266dafe9fe9"><code>b6b94c1</code></a> chore: bump version to 2.2.0</li> <li>See full diff in <a href="https://github.com/photon-hq/advanced-imessage-ts/commits/v2.2.0/packages/advanced-imessage">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> [](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores) You can trigger a rebase of this PR by commenting `@dependabot rebase`. [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start) [//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end) --- <details> <summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary> <br /> You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) </details> > **Note** > Automatic rebases have been disabled on this pull request as it has been open for over 30 days. Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
34d308a331 |
fix(native): let a run retire the prior owner it reserved when its session rotates (#19263)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native Runner agent keeps a warm provider session per task. A follow-up run on the same task can reuse that session and its managed instruction directory. > - When a follow-up run cannot resume the saved session (for example, the effective run configuration changed), it first reserves the prior owner's instruction directory. Then it starts a new session identity and must retire the prior owner. > - Retirement treated the run's own directory reservation as another executor's busy turn. The run failed at startup with `native_session_supervisor_busy`. > - That failure happened after the remote workspace was prepared, so failure handling retained the sandbox and blocked the task. A board follow-up comment left the task `blocked` with no agent progress. > - This pull request lets a run retire the prior owner that it reserved itself, and keeps the directory that it adopted. Any other reservation or turn is still busy. > - The benefit is that a follow-up on a task with a rotated session runs once, and the task does not become blocked. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A board follow-up comment with reopen woke an agent on a task that had just finished a successful run. The new run reused the task's own sandbox. The saved session could not resume because the effective run configuration changed, so the run started a new session identity. At startup (right after the native execution claim) the run failed with `native_session_supervisor_busy`. The run got the error code `native_continuation_requires_reconciliation`, the sandbox was retained for workspace repair, and the task became `blocked`. The agent had another live run on a different task at the same time. That run used a different sandbox and a different workspace, so it was not the cause. The busy owner was the task's own prior warm session. The new run had reserved that session's instruction directory itself (`reserveWarmNativeInstructionDirectory` sets `preparingRunId` to the new run). `retireSupersededWarmNativeSessions` then saw `preparingRunId` and rejected the run. **Expected behavior** The follow-up run retires the prior warm owner of its own task, keeps the instruction directory it adopted, starts the new session, and runs once. The task does not become blocked. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a native Runner (Codex app-server) task to completion with a warm session and a managed instruction directory. 2. Change the agent's effective run configuration, so the saved session cannot resume. 3. Wake the same task again (for example, a board comment with reopen). 4. Before this change, the run fails at startup with `native_session_supervisor_busy` and the task becomes blocked. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed on staging at `7fd05e13`. The code is unchanged on `master`. ## What Changed - `retireSupersededWarmNativeSessions` now receives the current run id. When the prior owner of the same task (same logical owner scope) is reserved by this run (`preparingRunId === runId`), retirement continues instead of throwing `native_session_supervisor_busy`. - That retirement closes the prior owner with `preserveInstructionsForRunId`, so the directory that this run adopted is not collected. This matches the existing configuration-change branch in warm reuse. - After a successful close, the reservation is cleared. A failed close keeps the reservation, so its `release()` retries retirement as before. - A reservation by any other run, a busy owner, and an executing scope still throw `native_session_supervisor_busy`. ## Verification - Red before the fix, green after (`server/src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts`, "managed directory warm checkpoints"): - "retires its own reserved directory owner when the session identity rotates": before, the run rejected with `native_session_supervisor_busy`. After, the prior owner closes once, the new session runs once, the adopted directory is not collected during retirement, and it is collected once when the new owner retires. - "retires its own reserved directory owner after the Runner claim when the session identity rotates" (the production `useRunnerd` path, where retirement happens after the claim): before, admission rejected with `native_session_supervisor_busy`. After, admission retires the prior owner and keeps the adopted directory. - Safety case (green before and after): "still rejects a session identity rotation over another run's directory reservation". The provider does not start and the other run's owner is not closed. - Existing safety case (green): "does not retire an active turn when a new session identity arrives". - `npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/instruction-working-copy`: 1163 passed. - Staging evidence was read only. This change is not deployed. ## Risks - Low risk. The change applies only when the prior owner has the same logical owner scope (company, agent, task, workspace, environment) and its reservation names the current run. That reservation exists only after this run validated reuse of the prior directory. - The claim-path instruction copy (`claimWarmNativeInstructionCopy`, which sets `busy`) is unchanged. That path is not used by Codex app-server agents. - Two related points are unchanged and are out of scope here: a startup failure after the workspace is prepared still retains the sandbox and blocks the task, and the "Instruction edits could not be recovered" warning on that failure is advisory only. With this fix, this flow no longer reaches that failure. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, file edits, browser read of staging run records) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Refs #18893 (shared-sandbox ingress retirement). Refs #19143 (workspace-busy wait). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
e80d745060 |
Reconcile dormant Codex predecessors through ordinary recovery (#19132)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The native Runner keeps provider and controller journals between turns. > - A process can stop after a completed turn while those journals remain valid. > - The next owner must reconcile that source before it starts new work. > - This pull request reuses ordinary recovery and authenticated run attachment. > - Existing journals and owner admission keep retained work under its source. > - The benefit is conversation recovery without another snapshot format or native mode. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19057. Built on merged #19129. This is the Codex recovery transport foundation. Process selection and controller scheduling remain separate changes. On normal startup, `paperclip-runnerd` selects durable transport from its connection arguments. With `--connect-url`, the Runner dials the controller. With `--listen-address 0.0.0.0 --listen-path /api/runner/v1/connect/<run-id>` and optional `--listen-port` (default `43127`), the controller dials the Runner. Both use the same durable entry point for fresh launches and recovery. The bootstrap ticket authenticates startup, and `recoveryIntegrityVersion` advertises a recovery capability. ## What Changed - Observe the existing recovered command journal before provider restoration. A saved dormant Codex session with no uncertain effectful command must still be dormant after restore. Ordinary active same-run recovery keeps its existing behavior. - Preserve prepared providers during snapshots, drain and cleanup. New completed-predecessor admission excludes prepared state. Existing cleanup and ordinary continuation keep their established behavior. - Advertise `recoveryIntegrityVersion: 1`. Reject the removed `--source-reconcile` flag. No separate native source mode or command whitelist remains. - Derive controller admission from the authenticated `authorityRunId` and actual Runner identity. Reuse retain-only settlement through attachment, authentication and checkpoint persistence. Preserve dynamic ownership across home configuration and later warm reuse. - Require the selected execution driver's trusted `sourceRecoveryVersion: 1` prelaunch attestation for a stopped predecessor. Binary metadata alone cannot authorize that launch. Ordinary live adoption keeps its existing path. - Support fresh authorized preparation from `recoveryLaunch: { requirements }` without replacing the source's ordinary cache. Require an authenticated owner throughout that transport's lifetime. Preserve immutable recorded policy through target preparation and later warm attachment; compare explicit settings using the provider factory's effective defaults. - Complete interrupted attachment at the existing fresh-snapshot boundary: persist the checkpoint, recheck current ownership, complete the external recovery callback, then release a real predecessor dispatch hold. Keep callback/checkpoint failures retryable and cancellation cleanup retained. - Preserve completed-session event delivery after target attachment, exact-thread history projections, source registration identity, exact command replay and nullable usage redaction. - Recheck current ownership and the queued run when a slow notification consumer presents a permission request. Suppress stale presentation while preserving the committed event and pending request for source-owner settlement. ## Verification Current head `e90bb379178db75f78e440c92e108f0bbe01e073` merges master `499712c68b3c` and is fully verified. [PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42058217937), [Runner Windows](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42058217814), and [Docker Runner](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42058217365) all passed. [Standard Greptile review 18](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19132#issuecomment-6645302809) scores this exact head 5/5 with no unresolved threads. The earlier Apex review 16 applies to `c09ebb4a2a6c`, as recorded below; no new Apex review was requested after the documentation or master-forward changes. The conflict integration preserves upstream external cold-state restoration before completed-handoff inspection, predecessor ownership and pending-command checks, and the lost-source early-read exclusion. Live adoption still does not restore a backup. All 43 focused process cases passed across cold restore (including denied/foreign state), staged handoff, ordinary adoption and source recovery. Runner `tsc --noEmit`, parent-relative diff checks and added-line secret/personal-data scan passed. [Read the rewritten guide](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/e90bb379178db75f78e440c92e108f0bbe01e073/packages/paperclip-runner/runner/DURABLE_TRANSPORT.md#recovering-codex-between-turns): it explains dial and listener startup, then follows completed run A through ordinary recovery and authenticated attachment to run B. The guide was rewritten in documentation commit `75db893fb9ab` and is unchanged by the master-forward. Its listener CLI test and both goal-update process tests passed. Earlier feature head `c09ebb4a2a` includes a process regression for a goal notification arriving between the restored goal response and the final thread response. Before the fix the Runner admitted the provider. The new tests prove that an active goal refuses admission and reaps the provider, and that a paused goal is delivered normally. Both process tests and five adjacent ordinary recovery cases pass locally. GitHub CI passed on the first attempt, including the main, Windows, and Docker workflows. Standard review 15 and Apex review 16 each scored this commit 5/5, with zero unresolved threads. [GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41991764330) · [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19132#issuecomment-6645302809) - The final ownership-race checks pass 7 focused cases, including owner changes during checkpoint persistence, handler publication and saved receipt recovery. - Native `codex_provider ordinary_recovery`: 6 passed, including saved/live mismatch, pending and indeterminate same-run goals, settled idle restoration and prepared reads/cleanup without a provider restart. - Native `paperclip-runnerd tests::`: 9 passed, including metadata and legacy flag rejection. - Native `interrupted_result_delivery_reconciles_exact_receipts_without_reexecuting_operations`: passed. - Final focused compatibility run: 24 process cases passed, including all 19 retained-settlement rows with queued snapshots, both home variants of A-to-B-to-C, ordinary attachment/suspension and environment-prepared close. - Existing `recovers an active second warm business run after deleting its controller context assets`: passed. - Runner `tsc --noEmit`, `git diff --check`, and added-line secret and personal-data scans passed. - Real native processes with the maintained fake Codex provider prove abrupt A exit, ordinary recover A, same-process attach B, a second successful turn, ordinary warm attach C and a third successful turn on the same thread. Both isolated and preconfigured homes pass. The isolated case also exercises environment option copying. - Additional process cases cover cacheless preparation, same-PID controller restart adoption, revoked preparation, retained tool-input admission, direct attachment, ordinary suspension and unexpected live goals. - A prior revised-head CI run exposed 8 retained-cleanup failures caused by prepared auto-restoration. That new behavior and its journal-binding code are removed. All 19 affected settlement variants now pass locally. The same CI run also had one environment-prepared close failure (focused check passes) and two unchanged Cloud sign-in E2E heading timeouts. Original logs remain recorded. Full suites and platform checks run in CI. Previous head `16772ad3e1abfdae9abcc64f8221fa3644ecee58`: [PR workflow 41981127140](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41981127140), [Runner Windows 41981126926](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41981126926), and [Docker Runner 41981126975](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41981126975) passed. Greptile review 14 scores this exact head 5/5 with no unresolved findings. The PR remains draft. CI evidence: an unchanged `idle-completed-history` local HTTP readiness case failed in the initial server 11/12 job (127092367616) and its first targeted retry (127096952128). The isolated case and the full 75-case file passed locally. The same-head debug retry (127103567635) passed, and the full workflow is green. Original failures remain recorded. No fixture diagnostic, assertion change, or timeout change was pushed. Focused review-fix validation: - 57 process cases passed across recovery, attachment and all 19 retained-cleanup variants. - Final staged matrix: 5 cases, each exercising queued/prepared/activated/completed boundaries, across owned connect/listen, legacy no-owner connect/listen, and retained cancellation cleanup. - Four completion-failure cases pass: synchronous/asynchronous callback failure, checkpoint failure before any callback, and owner rebind during persistence before any callback. Fresh-snapshot retry succeeds without duplicate provider work. - Saved-policy positive and explicit-conflict negative pass, including an authenticated compatible target grant and B-to-C continuity with omitted live settings. - Factory/Core checks: 34 passed, including effective ACPX defaults, real policy changes, already-dispatching target work and predecessor admission. - Ordinary adoption compatibility checks: 11 passed. Cacheless owner construction/revocation and policy checks: 6 passed. - Deferred permission ordering/forwarding: 30 passed. The new regressions reproduce owner changes before queueing and before slow-consumer delivery; matching-owner presentation and later source-owner settlement remain intact. - Runner `tsc --noEmit`, `git diff --check`, and full-PR added-line secret/personal-data scan passed at the corrected head. New tests reproduced both review findings and premature completion on failed persistence/changed ownership before the fixes. Full suites remain assigned to CI. ## Risks - Fake-provider tests do not prove vendor restore inertness or rollout fsync. - The process owner must prove stopped ownership, no successor and strict dormant provider admission before a predecessor launch. This PR does not select or stop host tasks. - Ordinary suspended active-goal continuation remains distinct from completed-predecessor admission. - Live dormant checks use bounded goal and thread reads. Unsupported or conflicting responses fail closed. - Prepared provider state is outside new predecessor admission. Reads and cleanup retain their baseline behavior. The feature targets completed between-turn session-open or exited sessions. - No tenant changes or image publication are included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), high reasoning, through Codex with local code and command tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this does not duplicate planned work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have linked the related public issue or PR - [x] I have not referenced internal issues or instance links - [x] My branch name describes the change - [x] Focused local tests pass - [x] I have added tests and updated documentation - [x] I have documented risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green at the revised head - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved comments at the revised head - [x] I will address review findings before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
b1d00eeca0 |
fix(evals): derive the controlled Runner eval policy from committed defaults (#19253)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Runner protocol qualification runs real providers against 41 cases and reports them in TestOps. > - Controlled mode (#17889) adds a spend cap, private evidence storage, and cost and trace accounting. > - Operators must hand-maintain one large JSON variable for each campaign size, price review, and lockfile change. > - A one-cell policy blocked the first 41-case run, and its prices expired after 24 hours. > - This pull request derives that policy from committed defaults and the selected cases. > - The benefit is that a full run needs no policy edit, and all three safety properties stay. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17889, #19011, #19070. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Controlled Runner protocol campaigns read `RUNNER_PROTOCOL_EVAL_CONTROLLER_POLICY_JSON`. That variable holds the cell limit, a price table with a review expiry, a pinned lockfile digest, and self-hashed bound proofs. **Current behavior** A campaign with more cells than `maxCells` fails before provider work. Expired prices also fail before provider work. Any change to the lockfile needs a new pin. A one-cell policy made all 41 TestOps cases fail as infrastructure, so an operator had to edit the variable by hand before the full run. **Proposed behavior** The workflow derives the policy at preparation time. The cell count comes from the selected catalog. Prices come from a committed table with a version and a source URL. The controller installs the committed frozen lockfile. One optional variable, `RUNNER_PROTOCOL_EVAL_MAX_USD`, can override the committed $400 spend cap. **Reason and benefit** Each piece that was hand-maintained duplicated a check that already exists. The manifest digest binds every allocation. The frozen install binds dependencies to the reviewed commit. Under model-request readiness, the self-hashed bounds never changed admission or accounting. **Breaking changes** The old variable is no longer read. It can stay set or be deleted. Retained manifests that include the old proofs still replay. ## What Changed - Add `packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/controlled-evals/hosted-defaults.json`. It holds the spend cap, duration, route, Claude Sonnet 5 prices, allocation, overhead reservation and trace limits. - Add `hostedPolicy()` in `hosted.mjs`. It derives `maxCells` from the selection. It gives each campaign a validity window from preparation to one hour after its deadline. It applies the optional spend cap override. - Remove `capacityBound` and the policy self-hash from hosted preparation. `manifest.mjs` needs model `provisionalBound` only when readiness is not `model_requests`. - Workflow: stop reading the policy variable. The controller build installs the committed `pnpm-lock.yaml` with `--frozen-lockfile` and fails on any lockfile drift. Preparation checks that the runtime receipt lockfile digest equals the committed lockfile. The catalog limit is now 1 to 512 selected cells. - Keep everything else the same: the spend-cap check before provider work, private S3 retention of the manifest and derived `hosted-policy.json`, receipts, tracing, first-attempt and zero-retry gates, and paid-environment approvals. - Update `hosted.test.mjs`, `portable.test.mjs`, `runner-protocol-eval-workflow-security.test.mjs`, and `docs/runner-protocol-live-evals.md`. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/controlled-evals/hosted.test.mjs`: 8 pass. The new tests show that `maxCells` equals the selection and that the validity window covers the deadline with no committed expiry. They also show that the spend cap override applies. With the committed defaults, 41 cells validate with $339 reserved, and 49 cells fail on the $400 budget. - Negative controls still fail: drift in selection, source or attempt; a bad lock digest; missing tracing; a duration over 4 hours; a malformed or too-low spend cap; and zero cells. - `node --test scripts/runner-protocol-eval-workflow-security.test.mjs`: 20 pass. Controlled admission now passes whether the old variable is absent, still set, or malformed. A real git checkout with a modified `pnpm-lock.yaml` fails the controller guard before install. - `node --test scripts/controlled-evals/controller.test.mjs scripts/controlled-evals/portable.test.mjs`: all pass. - `actionlint .github/workflows/runner-protocol-live-evals.yml` and `git diff --check` pass. - `tests/runner-e2e/workflow-security.test.ts` has 5 failures that this change does not cause. They concern `pr-trusted.yml`, `chat-catalog-testops-case.yml` and `runner-full-stack-e2e.yml`. This PR does not touch those files. - I have not run a live controlled campaign on this branch. Controlled mode runs only from the default branch. The current 41-case run uses master and the existing variable. ## Risks - The committed price table has no expiry. A provider price change needs a reviewed edit to the table. The spend cap still limits the maximum spend. - If the committed lockfile does not match the package manifests, the controller build fails before provider work. CI already requires a frozen lockfile. - The spend cap is now $400 by default. It was $339 in the last manual policy. The cap is a reservation limit, not expected spend. The expected spend for 41 cases is about $5–20. - Only ACPX Claude Sonnet 5 has a committed allocation, as in the old variable. A new controlled model needs a committed price entry and allocation. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
45073d97ae |
fix(evals): keep evidence for wakes retired by a terminal issue before start (#19258)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Product regression TestOps plan runs 20 Product E2E cells, and each cell saves run evidence after grading > - In the final full run, `first-task/clarify-propose-accept` passed every journey check > - The cell still failed while saving evidence: it requested a provider log for a wake that never started > - That wake was retired with `issue_terminal_status` because its child task was already done, so no log exists > - The settle oracle already accepts such a wake (`isTerminalUnstartedWake`), but the evidence collector did not > - This pull request records that wake's log as omitted, with a reason, and keeps its events > - The benefit is that a passing journey is no longer reported as failed because of a log that never existed ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19073, #19243 **What happened?** In GitHub run https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42046147744, `first-task.runner-codex.local.clarify-propose-accept` had no failed checks in `first-task.json`. The conversational acceptance was recorded through `resolve-from-comment` (200). The `finally` evidence step then threw `GET /api/heartbeat-runs/ef2295c4…/log returned 404: Run log not found`. Run `ef2295c4` is an `issue_status_changed` wake on the completed child task. It is `cancelled` with `issue_terminal_status`, and `startedAt`, `logStore` and `logRef` are all null. **Expected behavior** Evidence capture keeps that wake's events and records why it has no log, as it already does for reset, blocked, reassigned and pre-provider runs. **Steps to reproduce** Run the cell. A child status-change wake may be queued just before the child becomes `done`, and is then retired before admission. ## What Changed - `collectChatRunEvidence` (`tests/runner-e2e/chat-flow.ts`): a run that is `cancelled` with `errorCode: issue_terminal_status` and explicit null `startedAt`, `logStore` and `logRef` gets `log: null` and `logOmissionReason: "issue_terminal_before_start"`. Its events are still collected. - `chat-flow.test.ts`: a test for that case, plus negative controls. Each of the following still fails on a missing log: started, `startedAt` undefined, `failed` status, a different error code, a log store, a log ref. ## Verification - `npx vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts tests/runner-e2e/chat-flow.test.ts tests/runner-e2e/first-task.test.ts tests/runner-e2e/continuation.test.ts`: 378 pass. - `tsc -p tests/runner-e2e/tsconfig.json`: no errors in `tests/runner-e2e`. - Retained artifact from run 42046147744 (cell `clarify-propose-accept`): there are no failed checks, and the run ledger shows the retired wake with null `startedAt`, `logStore` and `logRef`. ## Risks - Low. This is an evidence-capture change in the eval harness, and the journey's grading is unchanged. The omission needs explicit positive evidence that the run never started and never had a log store. Any run that did provider work still fails on a missing log. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
01dd6ab336 |
fix(recovery): show the saved-work recovery step and record why it failed (#19260)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Sometimes a failed run left files in a sandbox. Then Retry first
runs system recovery to save those files before the task continues.
> - Recovery has steps: confirm that the previous attempt stopped, save
its files, then finish.
> - The task page did not show these steps. People saw "Queued" or
"Trying again in…" with a retry time that kept moving.
> - Each unclassified failure of the stop-confirmation step was recorded
only as `provider_unavailable`, so a repeated deferral could not be
diagnosed.
> - This pull request shows the current recovery step on the task. It
also records why each failed attempt failed, in closed labels.
> - The benefit is that people can see what Retry waits for, and
operators can see why recovery deferred.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #19249
**What happened?**
A person clicked Retry on a task whose failed run had a retained
sandbox. For about 7 minutes the task showed only "Queued", and the
retry time moved forward twice. Recovery deferred twice in the
stop-confirmation step. Each deferral was recorded only as
`provider_unavailable` with an opaque fingerprint, so the cause could
not be found.
**Expected behavior**
The task shows the recovery step that it waits for, such as "Checking
that the previous attempt stopped. Trying again in 30s…". Each failed
attempt keeps a closed-label cause, for example `sandbox_not_running` or
`transport_timeout`, with an optional errno-style code and HTTP status.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Get a remote task run to fail after its sandbox was placed, so that
recovery owns saved work.
2. Click Retry while the sandbox provider does not respond to the stop
check.
3. The task shows "Queued" or "Trying again in…". The recovery evidence
records only `provider_unavailable`.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
5f61392cd6 |
Reconcile dormant Codex predecessors through ordinary recovery (#19132)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The native Runner keeps provider and controller journals between turns. > - A process can stop after a completed turn while those journals remain valid. > - The next owner must reconcile that source before it starts new work. > - This pull request reuses ordinary recovery and authenticated run attachment. > - Existing journals and owner admission keep retained work under its source. > - The benefit is conversation recovery without another snapshot format or native mode. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19057. Built on merged #19129. This is the Codex recovery transport foundation. Process selection and controller scheduling remain separate changes. On normal startup, `paperclip-runnerd` selects durable transport from its connection arguments. With `--connect-url`, the Runner dials the controller. With `--listen-address 0.0.0.0 --listen-path /api/runner/v1/connect/<run-id>` and optional `--listen-port` (default `43127`), the controller dials the Runner. Both use the same durable entry point for fresh launches and recovery. The bootstrap ticket authenticates startup, and `recoveryIntegrityVersion` advertises a recovery capability. ## What Changed - Observe the existing recovered command journal before provider restoration. A saved dormant Codex session with no uncertain effectful command must still be dormant after restore. Ordinary active same-run recovery keeps its existing behavior. - Preserve prepared providers during snapshots, drain and cleanup. New completed-predecessor admission excludes prepared state. Existing cleanup and ordinary continuation keep their established behavior. - Advertise `recoveryIntegrityVersion: 1`. Reject the removed `--source-reconcile` flag. No separate native source mode or command whitelist remains. - Derive controller admission from the authenticated `authorityRunId` and actual Runner identity. Reuse retain-only settlement through attachment, authentication and checkpoint persistence. Preserve dynamic ownership across home configuration and later warm reuse. - Require the selected execution driver's trusted `sourceRecoveryVersion: 1` prelaunch attestation for a stopped predecessor. Binary metadata alone cannot authorize that launch. Ordinary live adoption keeps its existing path. - Support fresh authorized preparation from `recoveryLaunch: { requirements }` without replacing the source's ordinary cache. Require an authenticated owner throughout that transport's lifetime. Preserve immutable recorded policy through target preparation and later warm attachment; compare explicit settings using the provider factory's effective defaults. - Complete interrupted attachment at the existing fresh-snapshot boundary: persist the checkpoint, recheck current ownership, complete the external recovery callback, then release a real predecessor dispatch hold. Keep callback/checkpoint failures retryable and cancellation cleanup retained. - Preserve completed-session event delivery after target attachment, exact-thread history projections, source registration identity, exact command replay and nullable usage redaction. - Recheck current ownership and the queued run when a slow notification consumer presents a permission request. Suppress stale presentation while preserving the committed event and pending request for source-owner settlement. ## Verification Current head `e90bb379178db75f78e440c92e108f0bbe01e073` merges master `499712c68b3c` and is fully verified. [PR CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42058217937), [Runner Windows](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42058217814), and [Docker Runner](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42058217365) all passed. [Standard Greptile review 18](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19132#issuecomment-6645302809) scores this exact head 5/5 with no unresolved threads. The earlier Apex review 16 applies to `c09ebb4a2a6c`, as recorded below; no new Apex review was requested after the documentation or master-forward changes. The conflict integration preserves upstream external cold-state restoration before completed-handoff inspection, predecessor ownership and pending-command checks, and the lost-source early-read exclusion. Live adoption still does not restore a backup. All 43 focused process cases passed across cold restore (including denied/foreign state), staged handoff, ordinary adoption and source recovery. Runner `tsc --noEmit`, parent-relative diff checks and added-line secret/personal-data scan passed. [Read the rewritten guide](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/e90bb379178db75f78e440c92e108f0bbe01e073/packages/paperclip-runner/runner/DURABLE_TRANSPORT.md#recovering-codex-between-turns): it explains dial and listener startup, then follows completed run A through ordinary recovery and authenticated attachment to run B. The guide was rewritten in documentation commit `75db893fb9ab` and is unchanged by the master-forward. Its listener CLI test and both goal-update process tests passed. Earlier feature head `c09ebb4a2a` includes a process regression for a goal notification arriving between the restored goal response and the final thread response. Before the fix the Runner admitted the provider. The new tests prove that an active goal refuses admission and reaps the provider, and that a paused goal is delivered normally. Both process tests and five adjacent ordinary recovery cases pass locally. GitHub CI passed on the first attempt, including the main, Windows, and Docker workflows. Standard review 15 and Apex review 16 each scored this commit 5/5, with zero unresolved threads. [GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41991764330) · [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/19132#issuecomment-6645302809) - The final ownership-race checks pass 7 focused cases, including owner changes during checkpoint persistence, handler publication and saved receipt recovery. - Native `codex_provider ordinary_recovery`: 6 passed, including saved/live mismatch, pending and indeterminate same-run goals, settled idle restoration and prepared reads/cleanup without a provider restart. - Native `paperclip-runnerd tests::`: 9 passed, including metadata and legacy flag rejection. - Native `interrupted_result_delivery_reconciles_exact_receipts_without_reexecuting_operations`: passed. - Final focused compatibility run: 24 process cases passed, including all 19 retained-settlement rows with queued snapshots, both home variants of A-to-B-to-C, ordinary attachment/suspension and environment-prepared close. - Existing `recovers an active second warm business run after deleting its controller context assets`: passed. - Runner `tsc --noEmit`, `git diff --check`, and added-line secret and personal-data scans passed. - Real native processes with the maintained fake Codex provider prove abrupt A exit, ordinary recover A, same-process attach B, a second successful turn, ordinary warm attach C and a third successful turn on the same thread. Both isolated and preconfigured homes pass. The isolated case also exercises environment option copying. - Additional process cases cover cacheless preparation, same-PID controller restart adoption, revoked preparation, retained tool-input admission, direct attachment, ordinary suspension and unexpected live goals. - A prior revised-head CI run exposed 8 retained-cleanup failures caused by prepared auto-restoration. That new behavior and its journal-binding code are removed. All 19 affected settlement variants now pass locally. The same CI run also had one environment-prepared close failure (focused check passes) and two unchanged Cloud sign-in E2E heading timeouts. Original logs remain recorded. Full suites and platform checks run in CI. Previous head `16772ad3e1abfdae9abcc64f8221fa3644ecee58`: [PR workflow 41981127140](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41981127140), [Runner Windows 41981126926](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41981126926), and [Docker Runner 41981126975](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41981126975) passed. Greptile review 14 scores this exact head 5/5 with no unresolved findings. The PR remains draft. CI evidence: an unchanged `idle-completed-history` local HTTP readiness case failed in the initial server 11/12 job (127092367616) and its first targeted retry (127096952128). The isolated case and the full 75-case file passed locally. The same-head debug retry (127103567635) passed, and the full workflow is green. Original failures remain recorded. No fixture diagnostic, assertion change, or timeout change was pushed. Focused review-fix validation: - 57 process cases passed across recovery, attachment and all 19 retained-cleanup variants. - Final staged matrix: 5 cases, each exercising queued/prepared/activated/completed boundaries, across owned connect/listen, legacy no-owner connect/listen, and retained cancellation cleanup. - Four completion-failure cases pass: synchronous/asynchronous callback failure, checkpoint failure before any callback, and owner rebind during persistence before any callback. Fresh-snapshot retry succeeds without duplicate provider work. - Saved-policy positive and explicit-conflict negative pass, including an authenticated compatible target grant and B-to-C continuity with omitted live settings. - Factory/Core checks: 34 passed, including effective ACPX defaults, real policy changes, already-dispatching target work and predecessor admission. - Ordinary adoption compatibility checks: 11 passed. Cacheless owner construction/revocation and policy checks: 6 passed. - Deferred permission ordering/forwarding: 30 passed. The new regressions reproduce owner changes before queueing and before slow-consumer delivery; matching-owner presentation and later source-owner settlement remain intact. - Runner `tsc --noEmit`, `git diff --check`, and full-PR added-line secret/personal-data scan passed at the corrected head. New tests reproduced both review findings and premature completion on failed persistence/changed ownership before the fixes. Full suites remain assigned to CI. ## Risks - Fake-provider tests do not prove vendor restore inertness or rollout fsync. - The process owner must prove stopped ownership, no successor and strict dormant provider admission before a predecessor launch. This PR does not select or stop host tasks. - Ordinary suspended active-goal continuation remains distinct from completed-predecessor admission. - Live dormant checks use bounded goal and thread reads. Unsupported or conflicting responses fail closed. - Prepared provider state is outside new predecessor admission. Reads and cleanup retain their baseline behavior. The feature targets completed between-turn session-open or exited sessions. - No tenant changes or image publication are included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), high reasoning, through Codex with local code and command tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this does not duplicate planned work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have linked the related public issue or PR - [x] I have not referenced internal issues or instance links - [x] My branch name describes the change - [x] Focused local tests pass - [x] I have added tests and updated documentation - [x] I have documented risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green at the revised head - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved comments at the revised head - [x] I will address review findings before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
cb8df178c8 |
test(evals): pin the clarified five-case chat repairs (#19261)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - The TestOps catalog executes one reviewed immutable source with declared model, permissions, counts, clocks, and private evidence gates. > - Recent retained attempts exposed specific question, timeline, secret-handoff, and team-reporting contract gaps. > - Five focused repairs now have one qualified source; their component checks do not establish a native pass. > - This PR binds the trusted catalog lane to that source and records its exact changed definitions. > - One visible-form question is clarified and disclosed; all other catalog requests stay fixed. > - The controller, launcher, private evidence helpers, and execution authority stay unchanged. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19086, #19084, #19093, #19112, #19148, #19188. **What happened?** The retained native attempts include a timeline narrative rejected despite the saved handoff, secure-entry admission failures before downstream verification, and a truthful contextual team caveat rejected after a correct repeat. Multipart attempts4623 and4717 did not complete under the original broad request. All original statuses and evidence remain unchanged. **Expected behavior** Measure the five reviewed repairs on one immutable source with the original model, limits, and privacy gates. A component replay must not rewrite an old result or count as a product pass. The catalog must display and execute the same versioned request. **Steps to reproduce** After normal protected merge and fresh controller admission, use the existing TestOps plan102 and job100 to select the intended five cases on master. Root owns the actual Submit and original-evidence review. No evaluation is dispatched by this PR. ## What Changed - Pin only the catalog lane to `6773b1c128a2e7efa7571ff04b38238f00d06117`, tree `5669b199edc1aed3ab812403407b5930f5127da4`. - Copy its exact descriptor snapshot, SHA256 `aaf15ca6755fcfe550daa98bca1ed263e3d625159b53cd1e1f52fefbf9474778`. Advance only multipart53 v4, timeline466 v10, company-secret578 v8, personal-secret580 v9, and team-install610 v4. Add four declared source paths across the two secret cases. - Record exactly one query clarification through the existing per-case changed-field join. Old: “Help me choose the details for the launch page before you build it.” New: “Walk me through the launch-page question form so I can choose the audience and tone and enter my own headline before you build anything.” Preserve the old query and failed results in history. Retain inventory `0cf530…` and disclose clarified inventory `814bb363…`. All other243 catalog requests are unchanged. - Disclose that the company-secret second human message now uses actual saved non-secret metadata instead of repeating the initial request. Its continuation still requires the actual agent identity. No fabricated agent comment or private value establishes the handoff. - Team recovery uses independent saved canonical skill/version/member proof. No recovery-success phrase is required. A contradictory current denial still fails; a still-missing skill still requires truthful disclosure. - Keep all244 identities, the196/244 admission gate, model/profile, human/native counts, clocks, retries0, cap8, launcher, private protocol, and SDK506/efa qualification unchanged. No product code, full catalog, workflow, permissions, secret, runtime, or helper change lands on master. ## Verification - Source owner qualification:680 affected controls on the accepted parent and213 focused successor controls plus two explicit browser canaries, fresh same-source server declarations, and full E2E TypeScript pass on localNode26.4.0. Registered SDK506 Git inputs, production source, private protocol, launcher, and original limits match the accepted source. The source-only contract/flow additions are not copied into this controller. - Pin-local command: `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-reconcile.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-adapter.test.mjs` —38 pass. - Exact source descriptor and launcher bytes match the bound hashes. The manifest keeps the original metadata source and source history, joins the new descriptor, and permits only the one explicitly recorded53 query clarification. `git diff --check` passes. - Warm controller admission:10 committed helper byte checks, five required source matches, and four trusted module imports passed with the existing exact-main60f dependency graph. No SDK or native rebuild ran. Actual post-merge master and imports still require a fresh check before Submit. - The53 clarification changes the evaluated question. It does not fix or regrade the original300-second failures. All form validation, back retention, custom answer, persisted-answer, continuation, and visible-summary checks remain required. One targeted post-clarification measurement is planned; any later whole-ten regression is separate, with all attempts retained and no retry-until-green. The existing case53 description must be updated and read back after merge so TestOps displays the clarified request. - All five successor scenarios remain unrun. No new native pass, uniform-ten pass, reliability claim, or master catalog qualification is made. Focused source PRs remain separate and unmerged; their independent CI does not replace this PR's required checks. - Full workspace typecheck/build were not run locally for this metadata-only PR. Current-head required CI, Windows, genuine review, and zero unresolved material threads are required before normal protected merge. ## Risks A wrong source or descriptor would misstate the measured definition. Strict target, snapshot, field, and identity joins cover that risk. The clarified question cannot establish success for the old broad request. Safe guidance admission still needs real human entry, private UI persistence, and worker evidence in the next attempt. Component controls do not prove those outcomes or completion within the original limits. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, repository tools, and local code execution. The host did not expose a context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
499712c68b |
fix(runner): restore cold state before inspecting completed handoffs (#19254)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native Runner saves provider sessions and controller state across turns. > - A completed warm handoff leaves a receipt in the controller journal. > - A later cold continuation must restore external Runner state before it can inspect that receipt. > - The transport read the missing physical file before it called the restore hook. > - This pull request prepares admitted external state before that inspection for completed handoffs. > - Live Runner adoption and pending transitions retain their existing ownership checks. The provider thread can continue after a cold restore. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #19225 and #19157. This fix changes the shared transport read order. It does not depend on the open source-reconciliation extension in #19157. **What happened?** A cold continuation after a completed warm handoff could fail with `runner_remote_state_unavailable`. The saved controller journal was valid. The physical Runner state was absent because its restore hook had not run yet. A later automatic reattachment could then fail an allocation identity check. **Expected behavior** Restore admitted external state before inspecting a completed handoff. Retain the original provider thread. Refuse a denied restore or foreign session without starting provider work. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a Codex session and complete a warm handoff to a second run. 2. Suspend the session and retain the controller journal and provider backup. 3. Start a third run with no physical Runner state until the external preparation hook restores it. 4. Read the retained thread. Before this fix, the read fails before preparation. ## What Changed - Prepare external Runner state before inspecting a completed warm-handoff receipt. - Keep live Runner adoption, pending attachments, and active warm transitions on the existing exact-state path. - Add a real Runner and controlled Codex regression for successful restore, denied restoration, and a foreign restored session. - Document the cold-continuation order in the execution contract. ## Verification - Red: the new real-process regression fails on unpatched source because resume reads the absent `runner-state.json` before preparation. - Green: all three new cases pass. The restored thread keeps its identity. The controlled provider starts one thread and resumes it once. No turn is replayed. - Adjacent safety suites: 60 cases passed across warm attachment, interrupted attachment recovery, suspension, and cold restore. The new foreign-session case also passes separately. - Runner TypeScript and generated protocol checks passed. - Full workspace typecheck and build passed. Runner TypeScript checks passed again after the live-adoption guard. The full local test command remains in progress; all required CI test jobs passed on the current head. - The first CI run found two live-adoption regressions: an already completed staged handoff must not restore a backup while its Runner is live. The guard now excludes live adoption. All six cases across cold restore and staged handoff pass locally. The original CI failure remains recorded in run 42047027346. - Greptile reviewed the corrected head `f33a041c8902c39ca52b995d53128fc23b0b5499` at 5/5. There are no review threads or findings. All current-head CI gates passed. - Live staging verification remains pending normal deployment. No pinned serving image or bulk migration is part of this PR. ## Risks The change calls an existing external preparation hook earlier for completed handoffs. That hook must remain idempotent and must enforce restore authority. Live adoption, pending attachments, and active transitions do not gain this earlier call. The negative regressions assert that a refused restore and a foreign session start no provider work and do not change the authority journal. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The host does not expose the exact serving model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1105.0-canary.15 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8227259d86 |
feat(task-chat): show the agent's native plan as a task list above the composer (#19252)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents run through the native runner. The runner turns each harness's native plan into a canonical `plan.updated` event. > - The task chat did not show these plans. A small "Step 2 / 5" pill showed the checklist only on hover, and in live runs it received no plan data. > - Live tests found three breaks. The UI flattened `plan.updated` into tool rows. Headless Claude Code hides its task tools from current models. Codex ships its `update_plan` tool disabled. > - This pull request fixes the three breaks and replaces the pill with a docked plan card above the composer. > - The benefit is that users see what the agent finished, what it does now, and what comes next. The view is the same for Claude, Codex, Grok and Copilot. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Task chat UI (turn status island), native runner ACPX launch environment for Claude, and native runner Codex app-server launch arguments. **Problem or motivation** Harnesses report native plans, and the runner records them as `plan.updated` events. Users do not see them. The live transcript builder converts `plan.updated` into generic tool rows, so the plan steps are lost. Claude Code in headless mode does not offer TaskCreate/TaskUpdate for current models, so Claude never makes a plan. Codex 0.160 has `update_plan` disabled by default, so Codex writes its checklist into a Paperclip document instead. **Proposed solution** Keep the full plan snapshot in the live transcript. Enable the Claude task tools with `CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TODO_TOOLS=1` in the ACPX launch environment. Enable the Codex plan tool with `tools.update_plan.enabled=true`. Show the plan as a docked card with clear rules for when it shows, collapses and hides. **Alternatives considered** Show the plan only in the hover popover (the old behavior). Users did not find it. Write the plan into the issue Plan document. That mixes a per-turn checklist with the reviewed planning document. **Roadmap alignment** This makes existing native runner plan events visible. It adds no new protocol or data model. **Additional context** Grok and Copilot needed no harness change. Cursor could not start in a local worktree instance (an unrelated startup admission problem), so this PR does not verify Cursor. ## What Changed - `ui/src/components/transcript/native-run-events.ts`: keep `plan.updated` as `provider_activity` with family `plan` and the full payload, not as a tool row. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/TaskChatTurnStatusIsland.tsx`: replace the hover pill with a docked plan card. It shows done, current, upcoming and blocked steps, a progress bar and file-change totals. - Visibility rules: hidden with no steps and after the run ends; collapses when all steps are done; header only for one-step plans and while a question or approval is pending; window around the current step for plans over 7 steps; collapsed by default on mobile. - `ui/src/components/TaskChatThread.tsx`: pass `defaultCollapsed` (mobile) and `compact` (pending runtime request), and reset the card per run. - `ui/src/components/task-chat/transcript-adapter.ts`: keep the `failed` step status. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/acpx/environment.ts`: set `CLAUDE_CODE_ENABLE_TODO_TOOLS=1` for Claude launches. A host value cannot turn it off. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/codex/codex-security-config.ts`: add `-c tools.update_plan.enabled=true` before the policy overrides and the `app-server` subcommand. - `ui/storybook/stories/tasks/task-chat-agent-plan.stories.tsx`: new story for each state. It uses the production composer dock, composer and question takeover. - Tests for all of the above. `ui/src/index.css` replaces the unused popover size token with a list max-height token. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/transcript src/components/task-chat src/components/TaskChatThread.test.tsx src/adapters/paperclip-runner` (1345 tests pass). - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/drivers/acpx/environment.test.ts src/drivers/codex` (pass). - UI and runner typecheck are clean. `pnpm check:token-gates` is clean. - Storybook: open "Tasks and conversations / … / Task chat / Agent plan". The "All States Gallery" story shows every state. "Live Run Simulation" animates a run. - Live test on a local worktree instance with real API keys: a multi-step task for each harness. The card showed and updated during the run for Claude (Opus 5.5), Codex (gpt-5.6-sol), Grok (grok-4.7) and Copilot (gpt-5.6-luna). For Claude the card collapsed when all steps were done and hid after the run ended. - Codex probe: `codex exec` with the pinned 0.160 binary reports no `update_plan` tool by default and reports the tool with `-c tools.update_plan.enabled=true`. ## Risks - Claude and Codex now get their plan tools. Agents can spend a few tokens on plan updates. The tools are standard harness features. - The Codex flag goes before the web-search and project-instruction policy overrides, so the existing policy tail check still holds. - Runs that finish fast show the card only briefly. This is the intended hide rule. - Cursor plan display is not verified. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edit, browser automation) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
cb5d7e440c |
fix(server): retry setup when the plugin worker was not running (#19249)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Remote agent runs call a sandbox provider plugin, such as Daytona,
through a plugin worker process.
> - Sometimes that worker is not running. It can be stopped, restarting
after a crash, or retired by the host.
> - Then the host refuses the call before it sends anything to the
worker.
> - Setup recorded this refusal as a generic `setup_failed`. It
scheduled no retry, so the task became stranded and needed a person.
> - This pull request types the refusal and gives it its own transient
setup code. The bounded bootstrap retry then runs.
> - The benefit is that the task continues on its own when the worker is
available again. Users do not see a blocked task.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #19150 (removed one trigger for the worker retirement)
Refs #19245 (restarts a worker after a fail-closed retirement)
**What happened?**
A plugin worker stopped. Each run that then called `environmentExecute`
during setup failed with `Cannot call "environmentExecute" — worker for
"<plugin>" is stopped`. The run got `setup_failed`, no retry was
scheduled, and the task moved to board recovery. On one staging
instance, 15 runs failed this way in 12 minutes.
**Expected behavior**
No provider work started, so the failure is safe to retry. The run must
retry within the bootstrap budget, as it does for a reusable sandbox
resume failure or a preparation timeout.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Stop the sandbox provider plugin worker, or let the host retire it.
2. Wake an agent whose run needs that provider during setup.
3. The run fails with `setup_failed`. No retry is scheduled.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
e37ab23dbc |
fix: hold an agent's new work while its provider usage limit is active (#19246)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Routine-driven agents run on the native Runner through ACP harnesses such as Claude > - When the agent's provider account runs out of allowance, every new wake for that agent fails the same way > - The ACP harness reported the exhausted allowance as a generic "terminal limit failure" with an `unknown` category, so Paperclip could not tell it from a context or turn limit > - Paperclip recorded a reset time only for the failing run's own startup retry; other wakes of the same agent kept dispatching, each spent about two minutes on workspace setup, and then failed > - This pull request classifies the limit, keeps its reset time, and holds the agent's new work until that reset > - The benefit is that a limited agent stops burning runs, shows a clear "waiting for usage limit reset" state with a time, and resumes its queued work after the reset ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13148 Refs #13379 **What happened?** A routine-driven Claude agent on the native Runner failed 29 times in about 15 hours. 20 runs failed with `native_provider_terminal_failed` and "ACP agent reported a terminal limit failure." The recorded provider failure had category `unknown`. 6 runs failed with `provider_session_open_rejected`. Their `session.open` result is `command_execution_failed` with classification `provider_rate_limit`, and the provider failure is HTTP 429 `rate_limit` ("would exceed your account's rate limit"). The startup retry of one such run recorded a cooldown until one hour later. A new wake for a different task of the same agent dispatched 16 minutes later, spent two minutes on workspace setup, and failed with the same 429. Separately, 4 runs failed with "Project authentication conflicts with this agent's managed AI connection". That message did not say which file or setting conflicted. The same message was also shown when the check could not finish. **What did you expect?** A provider usage limit is classified distinctly. Paperclip records the reset time when the provider reports one. New work for that agent waits for the reset with a visible reason. Queued work resumes after the reset, and no doomed run starts. A configuration conflict is reported only when one is found, and the message names the file to fix. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Use a native Runner agent with a Claude ACP harness whose account is rate limited or out of usage. 2. Let a routine or assignment wake the agent on several tasks. 3. See each run fail with a generic terminal limit failure or a `session.open` rejection, and see new runs keep starting. ## What Changed - Runner: The ACPX turn now receives the typed AIR session failure (`onTerminalSessionFailure`) through the runtime host and the ACPX port. The sidecar adds the provider's title to the provider failure message. Only a rate-limit or quota title becomes `rate_limit` or `quota_exhausted`. Context, turn and configured budget limits stay `unknown`. The failure details stay private. - Server: A native `turn.failed` with a `rate_limit` or `quota_exhausted` provider failure is now `native_provider_usage_limit`, the same code as the Codex usage-limit terminal. - Server: `agentProviderLimitCooldown` (extracted from the startup retry) also reads a reset clock in the provider's wording, such as "resets 2am (UTC)". The clock parser moved from the recovery service to `provider-quota-reset.ts` without changes. - Server: New `heartbeat/provider-limit-wait.ts`. Before any workspace or provider work, a queued run for an agent with an active provider limit is cancelled as `provider_limit_wait`. The run records the reset time, whether the provider reported it, the category and the run that reported the limit. Paperclip schedules one retry of the same wake at the reset through the existing AI connection wait lane. That lane does not consume the failure retry budget. Manual runs, recovering runs, conversation turns and pool-routed connections are not held. - Server: The execution projection shows "Waiting for usage limit reset" with the reset time and the next step. - Server: Only a found project authentication conflict is a configuration failure. Its message names the project file and the settings to remove. A check that cannot finish (timeout or another exit code) is now an ordinary failure, not a configuration conflict. - Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the agent-level limit wait. ## Verification Red before the fix, green after: - `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-provider-limit-wait.test.ts`: An automation wake after a 429 `session.open` rejection dispatched the adapter before the fix. Now the run is cancelled as `provider_limit_wait` and a scheduled retry exists at the reset. After the reset passes, the retry is promoted and the work succeeds. A manual run, a later success, expired evidence and an unclassified terminal still dispatch. - `native-startup-retry.integration.test.ts`: "reads the reset clock from an ACP terminal limit failure's provider wording" (it fell back to one hour before). - `native-session-executor.test.ts`: An ACP `turn.failed` with a typed `quota_exhausted` or `rate_limit` failure is a usage-limit terminal; `unknown` is not. - `packages/paperclip-runner/src/drivers/provider-failure.test.ts`: A typed AIR limit title is kept and classified; context, turn and budget limits are not; details do not leak. - `execution-projection.test.ts`, `ai-connections.test.ts`: The wait label, and conflict versus unfinished check. - Safety cases: `runtime-host.test.ts` and `codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts` forward the callback. The existing startup retry, provider capacity, recovery classification, legacy reconciliation, retry scheduling and execution configuration suites pass. Commands: - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-provider-limit-wait.test.ts src/__tests__/ai-connections.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/ src/services/recovery/ src/services/execution-projection.test.ts src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-execution-configuration.test.ts` - `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/drivers/provider-failure.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/codex-runtime-adapter.test.ts src/cli/acpx-runtime-sidecar.test.ts` - `tsc --noEmit` for server and paperclip-runner; the ACPX sidecar and provider-failure contract checks pass. I did not run a live provider limit on staging. The live evidence is the staging run records for the affected agent, which I read only. ## Risks - The limit evidence is per agent, not per account. If the board changes the agent's AI connection, automatic wakes can still wait until the old reset (at most one hour when no reset was reported, and at most one day). A manual run is not held, and one successful run clears the evidence. - A new wake that arrives during a limit is now cancelled and retried at the reset, instead of failing. The task stays in its status, and the run shows the reset time. - The Runner change takes effect when the provider pack is rebuilt and deployed. Until then, the server still holds new work using the existing `rate_limit` evidence from `session.open` rejections. - A turn terminal with a typed rate limit or quota is now `native_provider_usage_limit` instead of `native_provider_terminal_failed`. Both are terminal and board-owned. The recovery text now asks the board to restore provider usage capacity. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads of staging run records) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
d0afeacdd5 |
fix(remote-workspaces): keep retained runner state when replacing a retired root (#19251)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Remote workspaces save a task's files as snapshots. Runtime state under `.paperclip-runtime` is never in a snapshot, because it belongs to the sandbox > - #19231 lets a parent task on a retained sandbox restore newer child work over its own retired workspace root > - That replace removed the whole retired root, including the parent's retained runner session state under `.paperclip-runtime/paperclip-runner/` > - The parent's native continuation then reads that runner state on the resumed sandbox, cannot find it, and fails with `runner_remote_state_unavailable` > - This pull request moves the retired root's runtime state into the restored root before it removes the retired root > - The benefit is that delegating parents on retained sandboxes continue their session with the children's saved work ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19231 **What happened?** After #19231, a parent task on an agent with a retained sandbox delegates two subtasks. Both subtasks finish. The parent's wake run now restores the newer saved work successfully, but the run fails right after with `runner_remote_state_unavailable: exit=1 timedOut=false`. The run error code is `native_continuation_requires_reconciliation` and the task becomes `blocked`. In one staging wave, 4 of 4 such parents failed. Root cause: the native continuation on a resumed sandbox reads `<remoteCwd>/.paperclip-runtime/paperclip-runner/sessions/<session>/runner/runner-state.json`. Snapshots exclude `.paperclip-runtime`, so the restored root has only the new restore receipt. #19231 parked the retired root and then removed it, so the runner state was removed too. **Expected behavior** The restored root has the newest saved files and the sandbox's retained runtime state. The parent's continuation reads its runner state and continues. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Prepare a remote workspace on sandbox A. Write files and runner state under `.paperclip-runtime/paperclip-runner/`. Save. 2. Make a second run the writer on sandbox B. It restores, writes new files, and saves. 3. Make a third run the writer on sandbox A again and prepare. The restore replaces the retired root. 4. Read the runner state with `readRemoteRunnerState`. Before this change, it fails with `runner_remote_state_unavailable: exit=1 timedOut=false`. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `26391707fb`, which includes #19231. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/remote-workspace-transport.ts`: before it removes the retired root, the restore script moves each entry of the retired `.paperclip-runtime` into the restored root's `.paperclip-runtime`. It does not move `workspace-ready.json`, `workspace-restored.json`, or `workspace-snapshots`, and it does not replace an entry that already exists. The move is a rename, so it keeps sockets and large session state. The script also finishes an interrupted carry when the same restore repeats. Only an authorized replace with that restore identity creates the `<root>.retired-<identity>` path. - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`: the retained-sandbox regression now writes parent runner state, restores newer child work, and reads the state with the same `readRemoteRunnerState` call that the continuation uses. It also covers an interrupted carry on a repeated restore. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document that runtime state moves with the restored root. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts -t "retired root"` failed in the `own retired root`, `own restored root`, and `read-only folder` cases with `Error: runner_remote_state_unavailable: exit=1 timedOut=false`. This is the same error as the staging failure. - Green after the fix: all nine cases pass. The continuation read returns the parent's runner state. The old `workspace-ready.json` is gone and the new restore receipt is present. A repeated restore finishes an interrupted carry and removes the retired root and its stale files. - `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts`: 250 passed. - Staging evidence (read-only): the failed parent wake run recorded a succeeded `remote_workspace_restore` at the parent's own provider lease, and then failed in the runner-state read. - I did not run a live staging run. This PR does not deploy. ## Risks - Runtime state from the retired root now persists into the restored root. The state is the sandbox's own state for this workspace path, which is the same state that a same-allocation reuse keeps. - If the restored root already has an entry with the same name, the old entry is not moved and is removed with the retired root. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic. It used tool use for code search, shell, test runs, and read-only staging inspection in the browser. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
21640b6d51 |
feat(connections): gate the built-in Google Workspace connector behind an experimental toggle (#19247)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Apps catalog lets operators connect external tools, including Google services. > - Paperclip has a built-in Google Workspace connector, but Google has not yet verified Paperclip's Google app. > - The built-in connector also hides the Composio and Arcade Google apps, because native Google definitions claim those app names. > - Users therefore see an unverified connector and cannot find the working aggregator Google apps. > - This pull request puts the built-in connector behind a default-off experimental setting. When the setting is off, the aggregator Google apps appear. > - The benefit is that users get working Google connectors now, and the team can still test the built-in connector on demand. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem** Google has not verified Paperclip's Google app yet. The Apps page still offers the built-in Google Workspace connector. The built-in Google definitions also suppress the Composio and Arcade Google apps (Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Chat), so users cannot find them. **Proposed solution** Add the `enableGoogleWorkspaceConnector` experimental setting. The default is off. When it is off, hide and block the built-in connector, and show the aggregator Google apps. When it is on, keep the current behavior. **Alternatives considered** Delete the built-in connector until verification is complete. We rejected this option because the team must continue to test the connector. **Additional context** Composio documents Gmail (63 tools), Google Calendar (50 tools), and Google Drive toolkits that use Composio-managed OAuth. These toolkits do not need Paperclip's Google app verification. ## What Changed - Added the default-off `enableGoogleWorkspaceConnector` experimental setting to the shared types, validator, feature catalog, server defaults, and the managed-key list for Paperclip Cloud staging. - Added `experimentalFeatureKey: "enableGoogleWorkspaceConnector"` to the `google-workspace` app definition. The existing generic connector gate then hides the connector in the gallery and blocks its setup, discovery, execution, and agent suggestions when the setting is off. - Added a "Google Workspace connector (Paperclip)" toggle card to **Settings → Experimental**. - Apps page (`Browse.tsx`): when the setting is off, built-in Google rows without saved accounts no longer claim aggregator app identities. The Composio and Arcade Google apps then show as aggregator rows. The legacy Google slug filter now applies only to native rows, so the Composio `gmail` row is not dropped. - Saved per-service Google connections (Gmail, Drive, and others) are not gated. They stay visible and usable. - Updated `doc/connections/GOOGLE-WORKSPACE.md`. - Tests: added tests for the hidden and visible Apps page states, the settings toggle, and the definition gate. Existing built-in Google Workspace tests now enable the setting. ## Verification - `cd packages/shared && npx vitest run` passes (1055 tests). - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/connection-management.integration.test.ts src/__tests__/tool-access-service.test.ts src/__tests__/tool-gateway-service.test.ts src/services/gmail-tool-governance.test.ts src/services/google-chat-tool-policy.test.ts src/__tests__/instance-settings-service.test.ts src/__tests__/health.test.ts src/__tests__/instance-settings-managed-overlay.test.ts` passes (864 tests). - `cd ui && npx vitest run src/pages/apps src/pages/InstanceExperimentalSettings.test.tsx src/features/connections` passes. - `tsc --noEmit` passes for `packages/shared`, `server`, and `ui`. The `ui` run shows errors only in the untouched `storybook/support/feature-map` files. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passes. - Manual check: open **Apps** with the setting off. Search for "Gmail". The Composio Gmail row appears, and the built-in Google Workspace card does not. Turn on the setting in **Settings → Experimental**. The built-in card appears again. ## Risks - Existing built-in `google-workspace` connections stop running while the setting is off, because the generic gate blocks execution. This is intentional, so that the unverified Google app is not used. Turn on the setting on instances that must keep these connections. - Saved per-service Google connections are not affected. - When the setting is on, the behavior does not change. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, running in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, web fetch). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
0c9962a9bc |
fix(plugins): replace a retired worker with a fresh process (#19245)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Sandbox providers such as Daytona run as plugin workers that the host manages in `server/src/services/plugin-worker-manager.ts` > - The host retires a worker when it cannot prove that a login pseudo-terminal or a duplex channel route is gone (fail closed) > - Retirement used `killProcess()`, which marks a deliberate stop, so the handle stayed `stopped` and no restart followed > - Every later call then failed with `Cannot call "<method>" — worker for "<id>" is stopped` until the server process restarted > - This pull request makes a retirement replace the worker with a fresh process through the existing backoff timer, with a bound on repeated retirements > - The benefit is that one unconfirmed close no longer makes a sandbox provider unavailable for the whole server ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19150 **What happened?** A Daytona plugin worker was retired after an unacknowledged duplex close. After that, every run that used the Daytona environment failed setup with `Cannot call "environmentExecute" — worker for <plugin> is stopped`. 15 runs failed in about 12 minutes. The plugin stayed unavailable until the server restarted. #19150 removed the specific trigger. It keeps fail-closed retirement for close replies that the host cannot confirm, so the same outage can still occur. **Expected behavior** The retired process, its routes, and its tombstones are never reused. The plugin comes back on a fresh process after a short, bounded backoff. A deliberate stop (plugin disable, upgrade, shutdown) stays stopped. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a plugin worker and open a duplex channel whose close acknowledgement is wrong or missing. 2. Close the channel. The host retires the worker. 3. Call any worker method. Before this change, the call fails with `is stopped` forever. ## What Changed - Add `retireWorkerProcess()`. It kills the process but does not mark a deliberate stop. The three fail-closed retirement paths use it instead of `killProcess()`. - In the exit handler, a retired exit settles every route as before, then counts the retirement and schedules a fresh process through the existing backoff timer (`crashed` → `backoff` → `running`). It emits the existing `crash` event with `willRestart`. - A deliberate stop wins. If `stop()` runs before the exit, the exit ends `stopped`. If `stop()` runs during backoff, it cancels the restart. - Bound repeated retirements: at most 5 retirements in the 10-minute crash window. A successful restart does not reset this count (it does reset the crash count), so a worker that starts cleanly and is retired again cannot loop forever. After the bound, the worker stays `crashed`. - `scheduleRestart()` / `computeBackoffMs()` take the attempt number, so the crash path and the retirement path each use their own counter. - Add an optional `crashRecovery` start option (`minBackoffMs`, `maxConsecutiveRetirements`) so tests can use short waits. - Update the Daytona worker close test: a stalled close now shows `backoff`, then a fresh `running` process with a new pid. ## Verification - Red before the fix: the three new tests in `server/src/__tests__/plugin-worker-manager-duplex.test.ts` (`plugin worker replacement after a fail-closed retirement`) failed with `expected 'stopped' to be 'running'` / `'backoff'`. - Green after the fix. The tests prove: - the retired route and a sibling route on the same worker both settle with `{ exitCode: null }`; - the fresh process has a new pid, a write to a retired route does not revive it, and a new route on the fresh process echoes data; - `stop()` during backoff stays `stopped` with no process; - with `maxConsecutiveRetirements: 2`, the third retirement leaves the worker `crashed` and `call()` rejects. - The real Daytona plugin worker test (`plugin-worker-manager-daytona-close.test.ts`, `stalled-close`) now shows the replacement with the actual provider bundle. The closed lease still rejects on the fresh process. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/plugin src/__tests__/managed-plugin src/services/plugin` → 48 files, 649 tests pass. The new tests passed 5 runs in a row. - `npx tsc --noEmit -p server` shows no errors in the changed files. - Not run: a live staging run. This PR does not deploy. ## Risks - A plugin that keeps causing retirements now restarts up to 5 times in 10 minutes (1s, 2s, 4s, 8s, 16s backoff) instead of staying dead. After that, it stays `crashed`, as a crash loop does now. - A retirement now emits `plugin.worker.crashed`, so host-service cleanup runs for the plugin, the same as for a crash. A restart emits `plugin.worker.restarted`. A retirement also counts in `totalCrashes`, so idle sleep treats the worker as it treats a crashed worker. - A call made during backoff fails with `is backoff` rather than `is stopped`. The outage is bounded to the backoff, not to a server restart. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edit, test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5498db1072 |
fix(interactions): relay a verified reply to a self-requested human-only confirmation (#19243)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents ask users to approve proposals and plans with confirmation cards, and users often answer in the conversation > - `resolve-from-comment` lets the responding agent record that verified reply on the card > - Native agents often create their own proposal or plan confirmation as `human_only`, because the `request_human_input` schema offers only that value > - `resolve-from-comment` then refuses with `interaction_human_only`, and the plan and onboarding gates keep the task in `in_review` or `blocked`, although the user explicitly approved > - This pull request adds one narrow relay for that case and keeps every other human-only gate on its card > - The benefit is that an explicit conversational approval works again, and governed, company-capped and quality-review approvals keep their existing controls ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19073 **What happened?** TestOps launch https://paperclip.testops.cloud/launch/2694 (GitHub run https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41915965118) failed three Product regression cases for the same reason: `continuation/revision-preserves-approval`, `first-task/clarify-propose-accept` and `first-task/revise-accept`. In each case the agent created a `request_confirmation` with `resolverPolicy: human_only` (`effectiveResolverPolicySource: requested`). The user replied "I approve…" or "Yes, I accept that proposal". The agent's `resolve-from-comment` call returned 403 `interaction_human_only`. The task stayed `in_review` (plan gate) or became `blocked` (onboarding decision gate). **Expected behavior** When the agent itself asked for a human-only answer, the verified latest reply of the user it serves is that human answer. The agent can record it. Company-capped, governed-action, issue-review and quality-review gates still require the human to use the card. **Steps to reproduce** 1. A native agent calls `request_human_input` with `interactionKind: confirmation` and `resolverPolicy: human_only`. 2. The conversation user posts an explicit approval comment. 3. The agent calls `POST /api/issues/{id}/interactions/{interactionId}/resolve-from-comment`. Before this change it gets 403. ## What Changed - `issue-thread-interaction-resolution.ts`: the agent actor gets an optional `relayedHumanUserId`. A human-only decision is allowed as `allow_relayed_human` only when all of these are true: - the stored policy is `human_only`, its source is `requested` and its provenance is `explicit` - the resolving agent created the card (`createdByAgentId` matches) - no governed action applies - no additional restriction (issue review) applies - any named addressee user is the relayed user Company caps, the `governed_action` source and legacy rows with an unknown source are still denied. - `confirmation-comment-resolution.ts`: the service sets `relayedHumanUserId` only after its existing comment checks pass: user-authored, not agent-attributed, posted after the card, the latest user message, the same conversation session. It also requires that the author is the card's addressee, the conversation user or the run's responsible user, that the card is not a quality review, and that the company's current cap for the kind is not `human_only` (a tied cap keeps the source `requested`). The same actor goes into the locked accept/reject re-check. The activity entry adds `resolverPolicy: "human_only"` and `resolution: "relayed_human_decision"`. - `routes/issues.ts`: the route pre-check passes the candidate comment author. The service still re-verifies everything under its locks. - `issue-thread-interactions.ts`: carries the relay field into the service's own audience re-check. - Docs: the first-task skill and `api-reference.md` describe the narrow relay. The guidance still says not to add `human_only` to ordinary proposals. ## Verification - `server/src/__tests__/confirmation-comment-resolution.test.ts` (embedded Postgres): 72 pass. - Green: relay through a conversation user and through a run's responsible user. The card is `accepted`, `resolvedByAgentId` and `resolvedByRunId` are set, `resolvedByUserId` stays null, and the audit records `relayed_human_decision`. - Negative controls, each with the card still pending and no audit: agent-authored comment, earlier comment, wrong user, unbound issue/run, `company_cap` source, `governed_action` source, `qualityReview`, `toolAction`, `connectionAuthorization`, issue-review `human_only` restriction, another addressed user, human-created card, another agent's card, inherited company default, and a real capped card created through `svc.create` with a tied cap. The tied-cap test fails as expected when the cap is removed. - Existing negative controls are unchanged, including `human_only` without a bound user and the "rechecks narrowed permissions" retry. - Red check: with the three service files reverted to `master`, the two new green tests fail and the negative controls pass. - `server/src/services/issue-thread-interaction-resolution.test.ts`: 21 pass, including the pure evaluator relay rules. - `server/src/services/native-runtime/confirmation-comment-api.integration.test.ts`: 11 pass. The real route accepts the relayed reply and refuses another user's comment with 403. - Also pass: `issue-thread-interaction-routes`, `onboarding-first-task-admission`, `paperclip-runner-tool-authority`, `runner-api`, `onboarding-first-task-assets` and `company-skills-service` (2,474 tests in total). - Changed files typecheck cleanly. - Live verification: Product regression single-case runs of the three cases are pending after merge. ## Risks - This touches an approval gate. The relay is limited to cards whose creator chose `human_only`. All existing reply-evidence checks still apply, plus a bound-user requirement. Company caps, governed actions, quality reviews, issue-review restrictions and named addressees still deny the relay. - Attribution does not change: the resolver is still the agent and run. The human's comment is kept as `result.commentId` and in the audit. - Legacy rows with a null policy source are not relayed. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), via Claude Code with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
26391707fb |
fix(runner): never settle an OpenCode reply truncated at the output limit (#19242)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Native OpenCode runs turn the provider's last assistant text into
the task's visible reply
> - A model can loop until it reaches the output limit. The provider
then reports `finish: "length"`
> - The driver used that cut-off text as the final answer, and the run
succeeded with a broken reply
> - This pull request treats a response that stopped at the output limit
as incomplete
> - The benefit is that users get the accepted completion summary or one
corrected answer, never a truncated wall of text
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
In a QA staging run, an OpenCode agent on
`openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017` called `paperclip_finish`
correctly. Then it produced about 32,000 output tokens of repeated text
(`E2E_QUIP_QUIP_...`) until the output limit stopped it. The driver
selected this truncated text as the settled final answer. The run
succeeded, and the task reply was wrong.
**Expected behavior**
A response that the provider stopped at the output limit is not a
complete answer. If an accepted completion report exists, its summary is
the reply. If not, the driver asks for one concise final answer. If that
also stops at the limit, the turn fails.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run a native OpenCode turn where the model calls `paperclip_finish`.
2. Let the next assistant message run to the output limit (OpenCode
reports `finish: "length"`).
3. Before this change, that message text is emitted as the final
`agentMessage`.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7fd05e1354 |
fix(skills): keep initial file editor drafts clean (#19241)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - People inspect and edit skill files from the Skills library. > - The Markdown editor receives the body without YAML frontmatter. > - The skill page compared that body with the entire saved file. > - Opening Edit therefore showed unsaved changes before the person typed. > - This pull request uses the same saved body for initialization, comparison and Discard. > - Clean files stay clean, while real edits retain the existing save path. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Open an editable SKILL.md with YAML frontmatter in the Skills library. Select Files, then Edit. The page immediately shows Unsaved changes without input. The draft contains only the body, while the dirty check compares it with the full file. **Expected behavior** Opening Edit leaves the file clean and Save disabled. Real input enables Save. Discard restores the original body. Saving an edit keeps the existing frontmatter. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a managed skill whose SKILL.md has YAML frontmatter and a Markdown body. 2. Select Files, then Edit. 3. Make no editor input. 4. Observe the dirty indicator and Save state. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced locally on mastercanary/v2026.1105.0-canary.14 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
03abe1f1a1 |
fix(native): keep the transport cause on a closed notification stream failure (#19240)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs read provider events from a shared session notification stream (Codex, OpenCode and ACPX drivers use it) > - When that stream closes, the driver fails the session with `notification_transport_failed` > - The run error was only "Provider notification transport failed closed." The real cause was only in a diagnostic event > - In a staging soak, many runs on OpenRouter and Grok agents showed this error. Operators read it as a provider fault. The diagnostic events showed a host-side cause: a stopped sandbox plugin worker ended remote runner supervision > - This pull request keeps the redacted, bounded cause on the terminal failure message, and does not name the provider > - The benefit is that a failed run shows why it failed, so operators do not chase the wrong provider ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Native runs failed with `native_provider_terminal_failed` and the error "Provider notification transport failed closed." The run did not show a cause. All failures in one cluster happened inside one minute, on several agents and models (OpenRouter DeepSeek, Grok). Each run's `harness.diagnostic` event had the real cause, for example `runner_process_termination_unconfirmed: runnerd process supervision failed: Cannot call "environmentExecute" — worker for "<plugin>" is stopped`, or `native_adopted_runner_identity_unverifiable: runner liveness could not be revalidated`. The sandbox duplex transport reported a `provider_exit` loss about 30 seconds before (the read-only process probe budget). **Expected behavior** The terminal run error keeps the redacted cause. It does not blame the model provider when the cause is host-side runner supervision. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a native Codex-protocol session and start a turn. 2. Make the notification stream throw (for example, a supervision error). 3. Read the `session.failed` and `turn.failed` messages. Before this change they are the bare generic text. ## What Changed - `codex-session-notifications.ts`: the `notification_transport_failed` terminal message is now `Notification transport failed closed: <cause>`. The cause is redacted first, then whitespace is collapsed and it is bounded to 1,000 characters. The `Error: ` prefix is removed. The code and `recoverable: false` do not change. - New regression in `codex-protocol-integrity.test.ts`: one `session.failed`, the cause and code are present, the secret is redacted, the length is bounded, and `turn.failed` has the same message. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: an additive note that this failure can come from host-side runner supervision, and that the message keeps the redacted cause. ## Verification - Red: before the fix, the new test failed: `expected 'Provider notification transport faile…' to contain 'runner_process_termination_unconfirmed'`. - Green: `cd packages/paperclip-runner && npx vitest run src/drivers/codex/ src/conformance/local-provider-fault-matrix.test.ts src/native-session-runtime.test.ts` (565 passed). - `npx tsc --noEmit -p packages/paperclip-runner/tsconfig.json`: no new errors. The existing `src/eval/workflow-harness.ts` errors come from an unbuilt workspace package. - Staging evidence was read with read-only GETs only (run, events). ## Risks - Low risk. Only the message text changes. The failure code, `recoverable: false`, and the safe-replacement rules do not change. The server matches on the code, not on the message. - This PR does not add a retry in the same turn. Runner termination is unconfirmed when supervision is lost. A retry or replacement could start a second executor. The remote process probe already retries read-only checks inside a 30-second budget. Recovery stays with the existing ownership and recovery checks. - The cause text can include a plugin id. It goes through the existing provider-diagnostic redaction. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser reads) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b3da1d886a |
fix(ui): retain Coordinator label filters across reloads (#19233)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Operators use task filters to keep a useful view of their work.
> - Coordinator saves status and assignee filters in the task-list URL.
> - A selected label stayed only in React state, so reload removed it
and showed unrelated rows.
> - This change saves and restores selected labels through the same
page-owned URL path.
> - Operators can reload and share that filtered collection without
selecting its labels again.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
In Coordinator All tasks, select a status, assignee, and label. Sort by
Task ID and reload. Status, assignee, and sort remain selected, but the
label is cleared and rows without that label appear.
**Expected behavior**
Reload and history navigation retain the selected labels with the other
URL filters. Clear filters removes the selected labels.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Open Coordinator All tasks with labeled and unlabeled tasks for the
same assignee and status.
2. Select that status, assignee, and a label.
3. Change Task ID sorting and reload the page.
4. Check both the selected label and the displayed tasks.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Source regression reproduced at master
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
e8163fc860 |
fix(remote-workspaces): restore newer saved work over a retained sandbox's own retired root (#19231)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Remote workspaces save a task's files as snapshots and restore them on the sandbox that runs the next turn > - A parent task can delegate subtasks. The subtasks inherit the parent's workspace, run on their own sandboxes, and save newer snapshots > - When the parent wakes on its retained (warm, reused) sandbox, its earlier workspace root is still on that sandbox at the same published path > - The restore refused that root with `reason=occupied_root`, so the parent run failed at setup and the task became blocked with a board recovery action > - This pull request lets the restore replace that root only when the server proves it is the workspace's own earlier, fully saved allocation on this sandbox > - The benefit is that a delegating parent on a retained sandbox continues with the children's saved work, and unknown occupants are still refused ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A parent task on an agent with a retained sandbox delegates two subtasks to other agents. Both subtasks finish. The parent's wake run fails before the provider starts with `remote_workspace_restore_failed: step=sandbox_restore; ... stage=inspect_root reason=occupied_root`. The task becomes `blocked` with a stranded-work recovery action. Parents on agents with ephemeral sandboxes complete in the same wave. Root cause: the subtasks inherit the parent's execution workspace. Each subtask becomes the writer at a new epoch on its own sandbox, restores at the same published directory name, and saves a newer snapshot. The workspace location then points at the last subtask's sandbox. The parent's wake run gets a lease on its retained sandbox, so preparation is not "same allocation" and must restore the newer snapshot. The target path on the retained sandbox still holds the parent's epoch-1 root, which has a preparation receipt (`workspace-ready.json`) and no restore receipt. The restore script refuses any occupied root that is not the same restore, so it fails with `occupied_root`. A warm reuse cannot just keep the old root, because the snapshot is newer. **Expected behavior** The parent restores the newest saved work (its own files plus the children's results) into its published root and continues. A foreign or unknown occupant is still refused. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Prepare a remote workspace on sandbox A, write files, and save (final boundary). 2. Make a second run the writer on sandbox B. It restores, writes new files, and saves. 3. Make a third run the writer on sandbox A again (same provider lease id, new lease row) and prepare. 4. Before this change, step 3 fails with `stage=inspect_root reason=occupied_root`. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `47027e7ba5`. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.ts`: add `isRetiredOwnAllocation`. It reads this workspace's snapshot and restore operations recorded at the same environment, provider lease id, and root path. It returns true only when every such use is from an earlier epoch than the current writer, the last use ended in a succeeded `final` save with quiesced save work (`unknown=false`, no active invocations), no other save in that epoch is newer or unsettled, and the saved snapshot is committed or later. Preparation passes the result to the restore as `replaceRetiredRoot`, and only when there is no migration and the authority is clean. - `server/src/services/remote-workspace-transport.ts`: the restore script accepts `replaceRetiredRoot`. In that mode it replaces an occupied root only when the root carries a well-formed Paperclip receipt (`workspace-ready.json` or `workspace-restored.json` with a 64-hex identity). It parks the old root at `<root>.retired-<identity>`, publishes the restored folder, rolls the old root back if the publish rename fails, and then removes the parked copy. A repeated restore with the same identity adopts the published folder and removes any parked copy left by an interrupted attempt. Without a receipt, the script still fails with `reason=occupied_root`. `replaceRetiredRoot` and `allowEmptyRoot` cannot be combined. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the rule. - `server/src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts`: add a red/green regression and the safety cases. ## Verification - Red before the fix: `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts -t "retired root"` failed in the `own retired root` case with `remote_workspace_restore_failed: step=sandbox_restore; remote_workspace_operation_failed: operation=restore exit=1; remote_workspace_restore_failed: stage=inspect_root reason=occupied_root`. This is the same cause text as the staging failure. - Green after the fix: all six cases pass: - `own retired root`: the parent restores on its retained sandbox. The root has the parent's file and the child's file, the parked and staging folders are removed, and the authority records the parent's lease. A repeated preparation (lost reply) keeps the parent's new unsaved edits. - `own restored root`: an occupant with a restore receipt from a different preparation is also replaced. - `receipt missing` and `forged receipt`: the occupant is refused with `occupied_root`, and its files stay. - `later allocation`: a later use of that root on that sandbox without a final save is refused. - `never saved here`: a different sandbox with an unknown folder at that path is refused. - `npx vitest run src/services/remote-workspaces.integration.test.ts src/services/remote-workspace-transport.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts`: 247 passed. This includes the existing `occupied root` cold restore case, which is still refused. - `tsc --noEmit` shows no errors in the changed files. The local tree has unrelated errors from unbuilt workspace packages. - I did not run a live staging run. Staging is read-only for this work, and this PR does not deploy. ## Risks - The replaced root is removed after the publish. The server proof states that its content is in the saved lineage. If a process wrote to that root after its final save and outside a Paperclip run, those writes are lost. The same assumption applies when authority moves to another allocation today. - The proof uses operation records that have `exportCleanup` location metadata. Older records without that metadata do not qualify, and those cases still fail closed with `occupied_root`. - A warm runner process that kept an open working directory in the old root sees a removed folder. This is not verified live. The new turn is given the published path, which holds the restored files. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic. It used tool use for code search, shell, test runs, and read-only staging inspection in the browser. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |