mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-01 15:35:12 +01:00
a3615c8cc196808a4db8fa79423ae558eae172aa
6064
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
a3615c8cc1 |
test(chat): avoid optional titles in completion link checks
Match the visible task identifier and retain the exact destination in the same completion paragraph for pending and resolved issue links. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
fa36e7cd35 |
test(chat): scope completion assertions to the delegated task link
Assert the completion prefix and visible expected task link in the same message, including its exact destination, without relying on flat text across a status glyph. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
91368f4c87 |
test(testops): preserve early diagnostic failures with null rows
Keep diagnostic-only traversals safe when later links or attachments contain null. Original validation remains byte-exact. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4f0879a302 |
test(testops): identify post-upload verification predicates
Retain closed phase, match booleans and type metadata for existing failure branches without changing validation or successful results. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Dotta
|
12b0cc6304 |
fix(chat): recover committed native Agent Chat replies (#18465)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and keeps its results available to users. > - Agent Chat needs a visible reply before the conversation can wait for more input. > - Native result commitment and reply presentation are separate obligations. > - A completed conversation can retain a valid final message without a saved reply. > - Existing reply recovery excludes these completed conversation turns. > - This pull request repairs that persistence gap through the existing recovery worker. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native Agent Chat turn completed successfully and saved its workspace. Its accepted result and final assistant message were durable, but no reply appeared in the conversation. The chat stayed active. The deployment hiring journey in #18351 then reached its deadline while waiting for the first reply. **Expected behavior** Recover the exact accepted turn's final reply once, then use normal conversation settlement. Keep later user input active. Do not run the agent again or replace a selected or deleted reply. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an active conversation with one admitted native turn. 2. Commit an accepted DONE result and a final-channel assistant message for that exact run, session and turn. 3. Finish workspace finalization before live heartbeat reply presentation. Leave no saved reply. 4. Run normal response recovery. Before this fix it finds no conversation candidate and leaves the chat active. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced with actual services at frozen master `8bcc5a01edd5d87540401521e6f30d3df43e1848`. The production predicate also exists in the deployed revision that exposed the failure. Related work: #18351. The broader receipt and recovery work in #18118 and #18409 does not touch these source files. ## What Changed - Discover unanswered committed Agent Chat turns through the existing native response presentation worker. - Recheck company, agent, responsible user, current execution and conversation generation under the normal transaction locks. - Require the accepted result digest and an exact final message from the same native run, session and accepted turn. Keep external publication authority separate. - Commit the reply and presentation receipt before normal conversation settlement. Later input stays active. Recovery does not repeat agent work. - Preserve skip decisions and selected or deleted replies. Add database controls for foreign identity, stale sessions, partial commitment, duplicates and ordinary internal task behavior. - Document the recovery boundary in the developer guide. ## Verification - Real-service RED/GREEN uses all 418 canonical migrations in isolated PGlite and the exact new regression fixture. Before the fix: zero candidates, no reply, recovery returns false and the chat stays active. After the fix: one candidate, one exact reply, recovery returns true and the chat waits. A repeat returns false and creates no second reply. - All 20 canonical regression cases pass locally through a fixture-only PGlite bridge. Only local database provisioning and `createDb` selection differ from the normal embedded PostgreSQL fixture. Production services, SQL queries, transactions, protocol validation and assertions remain real. Linux embedded PostgreSQL CI is required before merge. - Focused current-source no-emit typing passes for both production modules and the new regression file, with normal Express augmentation and source aliases. The broader local presentation/ownership and conversation-settlement PGlite bridge run was interrupted before it reported results; it is not counted as a pass. No repository-wide local build is claimed from borrowed workspace dependencies. Clean-build CI and canonical PostgreSQL consumer tests remain required. - `git diff --check` and the scoped source/test secret scan pass. No captured run data, credentials or private target identities are committed. - No live journey retry, deployment, configuration change or test-plan admission was performed. The original failed journey remains failed; this production fix still needs deployed qualification through the unchanged journey. - Current-head [canonical Linux CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41207018345) passed all 57 terminal checks with no failure or pending check. The new 20-case database regression actually passed in [server shard 8](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41207018345/job/124555006090), at 13:59:25 UTC (2,643 ms). Typecheck, build and the existing consumer lanes passed. Fresh [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18465#issuecomment-6544208002) on exact `f32a432e10b377ae6277d6f728995d5fedcf9d7b` is 5/5; the review-thread inventory is empty with no pagination. No live deployment or journey pass is claimed by these checks. ## Risks Eligible active conversations can gain a previously missing reply. Recovery accepts only the exact saved final message under its accepted result and current conversation identity. It does not run a model, repeat hiring or change a prior test grade. Reply persistence precedes waiting-state settlement; existing conversation recovery retains ownership of a later interrupted settlement. No schema or public API changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific backend model ID or fixed context window. Used reasoning, repository tools, TypeScript and real database test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
baf651c8d0 |
perf(heartbeat): drive retry promotion from durable deadlines (#18387)
Reviewed and verified at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f46c8071fb |
fix(ui): make the Coordinator composer footer opaque (#18455)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work.
> - The Coordinator workspace shows a task transcript and a message
composer.
> - The composer footer can cover part of the transcript on desktop.
> - The footer has a transparent background, so text shows through
accessory panels and gaps.
> - This pull request gives the footer a solid background from the
active theme.
> - Users can read the composer controls without text from the
transcript behind them.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
The Coordinator composer footer lets transcript text show through the
area above the message field.
**Expected behavior**
The full footer has a solid surface in light and dark themes.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Enable the Coordinator workspace.
2. Open a task with enough messages to scroll.
3. Show a composer accessory, such as queued messages or a pending
question.
4. Scroll the transcript behind the footer on desktop.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Base commit:
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
47f81e850b |
fix(testops): verify unexpanded result job runs (#18462)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Chat feature evaluations send their results to TestOps. > - The final reader checks the result against its current GitHub run. > - A real result omitted the nested job object and had no presentation links. > - The reader rejected that passed result after a successful upload. > - This change joins the embedded job-run ID to the separate job-run response. > - The reader keeps the source, case, status, and attachment checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18394 and #18322. **What happened?** The native chat test and cleanup passed. TestOps stored a passed result and three attachments. The final read-only step failed with `chat_testops_upload_mismatch`. The result response had a job-run ID, launch ID, and current GitHub run URL. It did not include the nested job object. Its presentation links were empty. **Expected behavior** The reader must accept that response when the separate job-run response proves the exact job, launch, and current GitHub run. It must reject conflicting identity or source data. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Return a valid result with an unexpanded job run and empty links. 2. Return the matching full job run from the existing job-run endpoint. 3. Call `verifyChatUpload`. The old reader rejects the result. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed oncanary/v2026.1031.0-canary.8 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8bcc5a01ed |
fix(runner): preserve OpenCode written-answer defaults (#18456)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people answer questions while native agent work is active. > - Runner drivers translate provider question forms and answers into the shared contract. > - Pinned OpenCode 1.18.34 enables written answers when `custom` is omitted. > - The driver required explicit `true`, so it removed that input from ordinary native questions. > - The same branch could override a native opt-out or add a separate custom field to a text-only question. > - This pull request preserves the native default, explicit opt-out, original choices, and exact answer delivery. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native OpenCode question with choices and no `custom` field loses its written-answer control in Paperclip. The pinned provider enables that control by default. A legacy alias can also override native `custom:false`. A question with no choices and `custom:true` is rejected because the driver adds a separate custom field to text mode. **Expected behavior** Follow the [pinned OpenCode question contract](https://github.com/anomalyco/opencode/blob/v1.18.34/packages/schema/src/v1/question.ts). Preserve the written-answer default for choices. Honor native `custom:false`. Keep optionless questions text-only. Preserve every supplied choice and return the exact written answer to the same native request. **Steps to reproduce** Use the normalizer regression or the local OpenCode driver fixture. Emit a native question with choices and omit `custom`. The unfixed driver omits `customAnswer`; its existing written-answer roundtrip assertion fails. The separate negative controls reproduce native opt-out precedence and text-only normalization errors. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on main `f2db909393de124caf6a5380a52d4e0e1d621661`, with pinned `opencode-ai@1.18.34`. ## What Changed - Apply the native `custom` flag first, then the legacy alias, then the pinned default of `true`. - Add a separate custom field only when choices exist. Keep optionless questions text-only. - Add default, opt-out, alias, and exact response validation regressions. Make the driver fixture omit the optional native flag and retain its exact custom-answer roundtrip assertion. - Document the pinned native behavior. ## Verification - Before the fix, the real normalizer fails three targeted assertions: omitted custom input, native opt-out precedence, and optionless text with `custom:true`. - The local driver subprocess regression also fails before the fix. Its native request omits `custom`, and the driver drops the expected written-answer control. - After the fix, all **79 tests in three files pass**: the new nine-case normalizer suite, the full 65-case OpenCode driver suite, and the five question-set response tests. The driver sends the unchanged written answer in the provider's ordered answer array and records one terminal request resolution. - Runner TypeScript check passes. A first attempt lacked the isolated eval-kernel declarations; building that local dependency resolved the setup gap. Locked dependencies were installed from the existing cache with scripts disabled. - Diff checks pass. Exact-head [canonical CI run 41203866644](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203866644) passes build, typecheck, release registry, Runner checks, server tests, and all eight E2E shards at `72b21207e8590b78e24fe2cef4e3f6c374be53a4`. All current PR checks are terminal with no failures. Storybook is skipped for this scope and Paperclip Review is neutral. Full repository checks were not repeated locally for this narrow provider translation change. - [Fresh Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18456#issuecomment-6543742512) gives 5/5 on that exact head with no actionable findings. All review threads are addressed. GitHub reports `MERGEABLE` and `CLEAN`. - Local tests use a controlled provider fixture. They do not establish a paid model pass or attribute a deployment incident without its original native arguments. No QA run, runtime deployment, protected pin, journey oracle, prompt, budget, run bound, or model setting changed. ## Risks Native OpenCode choices now expose the written-answer control that the provider already enables by default. Explicit native opt-out wins over the legacy alias, and disabled custom responses remain rejected. Existing choice IDs and labels remain unchanged. Deployed users need the repaired Runner artifact through the normal delivery path. Local driver proof does not replace deployed journey qualification. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, source inspection, and code execution. The host does not expose the exact underlying model version or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with available version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs; none repairs this native default - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the bug template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
12d8c3043e |
fix(native): fence retries when replaying an audited Stop (#18457)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs keep Stop intent and retry state in durable records. > - A provider error can leave a failed retry with an earlier acknowledged Stop. > - The replay path returned the existing receipt before it closed that retry. > - This pull request applies the existing retry fence to the validated replay. > - The same Stop can settle without another provider cancellation or a new receipt. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14733 for the related caller-bound Stop contract. This change covers a later retry that already has a Stop acknowledgement. The older CI-only #14743 is not a production delivery PR. **What happened?** A failed native run can have a retryable coordinator and an earlier audited Stop. A repeat Stop returns the old acknowledgement without moving the coordinator to `terminal_failure`. The final failed-to-cancelled transition requires that fence, so the Stop cannot settle through that path. **Expected behavior** A valid replay closes the same retry and keeps the original intent and acknowledgement. It does not send a second provider cancellation. Physical stop and workspace cleanup still require their own evidence. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Store a failed native run with a `retryable_failure` coordinator. 2. Store a matching run-scoped Stop with a dispatched acknowledgement and audit IDs. 3. Call `cancelNativeSession` for that same run and inspect the coordinator. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on public master `f2db909393de124caf6a5380a52d4e0e1d621661`. **Deployment mode** Core native execution. The regression uses the real cancellation executor with controlled persistence and provider boundaries. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing guarded coordinator fence for a validated Stop replay. - Test repeated replay, unchanged receipts, one fence, and no second provider cancellation. - Reject foreign company, run, issue, scope, effect, and missing-audit receipts before any write. - Check that an acknowledged Stop with an unconfirmed remote lease still fails the physical-stop guard. - Document the separate retry fence and physical-cleanup requirements. ## Verification - RED on the selected public base: the new executor case returned success but left the coordinator in `retryable_failure` with a future retry. One case executed and failed for that assertion. - GREEN: 62 focused tests passed across `native-session-executor.test.ts` and `native-cancellation-request.test.ts`. These include ownership, caller conflict, changed-phase, and receipt controls. - Command from `server/`: `node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-cancellation-request.test.ts -t 'native session cancellation|caller-bound native cancellation|failed native retry caller admission'`. - Canonical Linux CI passed all 1,018 executor cases and all 32 caller-cancellation cases. The exact file completion lines are in [server shard 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386/job/124545366271) and [server shard 10](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386/job/124545366219). - Node 24.22.2 and Vitest 5.0.3. Map contract checks and `git diff --check` pass. - Local dependencies are linked from an existing checkout. Full local TypeScript validation reports older Runner/shared declarations that lack current Kimi and continuity APIs. The changed ranges have no diagnostics. The canonical clean CI Typecheck + Release Registry gate passed. - A broader two-file run was stopped when an unchanged integration case tried to start embedded Postgres and hit the host listen restriction. It is not a passing full-suite result. No host settings or other services were changed. - Repository-wide `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm build` were not completed locally. Current-head CI passed against clean source and dependencies. - Fresh [Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18457#issuecomment-6543772487) on `dbc1c1a5b71450194d568725592969660864cb5a`: 5/5 with no actionable findings. The review-thread inventory has no threads and no pagination. Full [current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41203989386) passed: 59 terminal checks, 55 successful, 3 skipped, and 1 neutral. No failure or pending check remains. Merge status is CLEAN. No live recovery, rollout, or physical termination is claimed. ## Risks - A wrong or stale Stop must not close another retry. Existing run/coordinator locks, caller checks, receipt binding, and the final compare-and-set remain in place. - This fix changes logical retry settlement only. Provider termination, workspace preservation, lease cleanup, and continuation gates remain separate. - The regression controls persistence and provider boundaries. It does not establish the physical state of a remote provider. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code editing, and tool use. The session does not expose an exact model build ID or context-window capacity. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes: #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
ab51cabbbd |
test: await async outcomes and drive saved deadlines deterministically (#18416)
Reviewed and verified at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f2db909393 |
fix(ui): retain startup autosave through session recovery (#18412)
Reviewed and verified at
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c2971badde |
perf(server): recover independent native replies concurrently (#18421)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for AI agents. > - A native run can commit its result before its reply is saved. > - The response recovery worker saves replies from those committed results. > - It checks each candidate in series, so one task can delay unrelated tasks. > - This pull request checks up to four independent tasks at once. > - Each task keeps serial checks, and the existing coordinator owns retries and shutdown. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Recovery of committed native task replies. **Current behavior** The worker checks one candidate at a time in a batch of up to 25. A database lock or a slow read for one task delays replies for other tasks. **Proposed behavior** Check up to four company-and-task groups at once. Check candidates within each group in their existing order. Keep the current batch limit and company selection. **Reason and benefit** A ready task reply can be saved while another task waits for a database lock. The change reduces waiting under a reply backlog. **Breaking changes** Replies for different tasks can be saved in a different order. There are no API or schema changes. Other deadline workers keep serial dispatch. Related work: #17696 adds the recovery worker. #17501 reduces its read payloads. #18367 adds its timing spans. These changes are already merged. The PR search found no open change that adds this concurrency. ## What Changed - Add optional keyed concurrency to the shared scoped deadline worker. - Enable a limit of four for native response recovery, keyed by company and task. - Await all active checks before the pass ends. Retain per-candidate failure backoff, drain behavior and pending work. - Test concurrency limits, task order, company separation, drain/resume, shutdown, retries and idle wake behavior. - Add a PostgreSQL regression that holds one task's finalization row lock while a second task saves its exact accepted reply. - Document the worker's concurrency and sleep contract. ## Verification - The PostgreSQL lock regression fails with serial dispatch. It passes with this change. Both accepted replies are saved once after the lock is released. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/scoped-deadline-work.test.ts server/src/__tests__/delivery-work-coordinator.test.ts server/src/__tests__/company-work-batch.test.ts server/src/__tests__/deadline-work.test.ts server/src/services/execution-preparation-timing.test.ts` — 55 tests pass. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/services/presentation-ownership-read.test.ts` with its documented dedicated PostgreSQL URL — 21 tests pass. The disposable database was dropped. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passes. - `pnpm build` — passes. - One matched local replay with 25 older pending replies and one fresh reply used the real worker, a 10-connection PostgreSQL pool and 8 ms delay in each network direction. The saved fresh reply was first observed after 29.193 s with serial dispatch and 9.798 s with this change. All 26 replies were saved exactly once in both runs, with no worker errors. Both disposable databases were dropped. This is one synthetic workload pair, not a staging measurement. - `pnpm test:run` was attempted. Embedded PostgreSQL could not initialize its template after five attempts, so the broad run was stopped. The changed PostgreSQL tests pass on the separate local server. Remote CI is green. This PR does not claim a measured staging speedup. - The [first CI browser shard](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41162257463/job/124422204506) failed during company cleanup after its task assertions and empty-run check passed. Company deletion hit the `activity_log_company_id_companies_id_fk` constraint. The fixture uses paused process agents and reported no runs. The one failed-jobs rerun passed all 45 browser tests. All CI checks are now green. ## Risks - Four checks can use more database connections than serial recovery. The limit applies to this queue only; the batch limit stays at 25. - The shared helper has more dispatch logic. Its default remains serial. Tests cover task order, retry deadlines, drain and waiting for active checks during shutdown. - This improves reply recovery under backlog or lock contention. It does not establish a target for total agent-turn latency. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code editing, tool use and local test execution. This session does not expose a more specific model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d5766e4074 |
perf(chat): scope task questions and batch inbox queue checks (#18422)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Standing chats show recent messages and current task questions. > - Recent-message pagination bounds history work, but it does not bound question work. > - The question read built the full company attention feed before it selected the chat's tasks. > - Each feed read also checked seeded queue membership with one insert per item. > - This pull request scopes question collection in the attention owner and batches queue membership checks. > - Chats keep their current question cards and initial layout while doing less work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Follow-up to #18358 and #18323. Related work: #18312. **What happened?** A hosted standing chat remained slow after recent-message pagination shipped. On commit `4eaa435bf4`, an embedded-browser reload made the conversation usable at about 8.6 seconds. Recent comments finished at about 1.9 seconds. The pending-question request held the initial reveal until about 8.4 seconds. That request called the complete company attention feed and then filtered its results. The separate badge summary also did broad work. **Expected behavior** Chat question cost should depend on the relevant tasks. Reading an existing queue must not require a separate insert for every member. Current access and decision policy must remain in force. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a standing chat with questions on tasks assigned to its agent. 2. Add many unrelated tasks and pending questions to the company. 3. Open the chat from a fresh application cache. 4. Compare recent-comment arrival with the pending-question response and content reveal. **Paperclip version or commit** Baseline: `909e29dd071b1aeeb24c2933af049da90a6066d3`. Its affected services match the observed hosted revision `4eaa435bf4`. ## What Changed - Add an internal task-question projection to the attention service. Filter pending interactions by company, task IDs and question kind before card enrichment. - Keep the same access, audience, dismissal, queue, snooze, retention, archive and training-example logic. Ranks are local to the returned question list. - Use the projection from the conversation receipt service. Keep current chat audience and session checks there. - Batch seeded membership inserts in groups of 500. Keep the queue lock, conflict protection, audit events and activity logging for each new membership. Existing members produce no new audit records. - Add real PostgreSQL regression cases and a reproducible paired benchmark. No schema migration or UI reveal change is needed. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. The final server typecheck also passed after the queue change. - `pnpm build` passed. - Real PostgreSQL service coverage: 57 attention and chat-handoff tests passed. Seven queue-route tests passed, including concurrent reads, mixed existing/new items, duplicates, disabled seeds and audit preservation. - Red/green proof: the unrelated-attention regression fails with the baseline conversation implementation and passes with the scoped read. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check` passed. - Full `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped with exit 130 after embedded PostgreSQL startup failures and 17 failures in the untouched native-session executor suite. It is not a local pass. The focused Docker/PostgreSQL results above completed before Docker Desktop became unavailable. A direct native PostgreSQL probe identified the host semaphore limit (`could not create semaphores: No space left on device`). No shared kernel settings or other test clusters were changed. [Full CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41162314995) passed on `2809f096b3fb2c01b44a96a1b82a27809c9359df`, including all eight browser shards. Final status: 55 successful checks/statuses, three skipped and one neutral. Greptile is 5/5 with no findings or unresolved threads. The fresh local browser retest is blocked because Docker Desktop cannot start and native PostgreSQL cannot allocate semaphores. The original hosted reproduction above is complete; no candidate browser pass is claimed. Local service benchmark: PostgreSQL 17.11, two relevant tasks, five alternating pairs per scenario, after warmup. These are local service timings, not a claim about deployed latency. | Fixture | Read | Baseline median (range) | Candidate median (range) | SQL calls | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1,000 unrelated tasks/questions | Chat questions | 670 ms (632–1,905) | 12 ms (11–15) | 1,076 → 22 | | 1,000 unrelated tasks/questions | Company badge summary | 641 ms (622–717) | 167 ms (161–171) | 1,068 → 69 | | Small company | Chat questions | 38 ms (37–52) | 13 ms (12–16) | 52 → 22 | | Small company | Company badge summary | 34 ms (33–39) | 34 ms (32–40) | 44 → 43 | All question fields and ordering matched, except rank is relative to the scoped list. Summary fields matched except the generation timestamp. The interaction plan changed from 1,002 selected rows to two rows through the existing company/issue/status index. The benchmark loads baseline attention, conversation and queue modules together so the queue change cannot contaminate the baseline. ```sh pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec tsx ../scripts/benchmark-chat-questions.ts \ --baseline-ref=909e29dd07 --unrelated=1000 ``` ## Risks - Scoped and complete feeds must share policy. This change reuses the same attention collection and finalization path and tests dismissals, named audiences, snoozing, archives and private access. - Batched inserts must audit only new members. The concurrent PostgreSQL test checks unique membership and one event/activity record per new item across batch boundaries. - Full inbox summaries still collect the company feed. The small-company summary timing is unchanged. Other chat requests and transcript hydration can still contribute to hosted latency. - The first reveal still waits for question cards to preserve layout. This follow-up has not been deployed, so its hosted effect remains unverified. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution and browser profiling. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
492d537340 |
fix(native): recover controllers across webserver replacement (#18343)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Native execution runs in a remote Runner while the webserver owns its controller. > - Encrypted PRP checkpoints and session snapshots already survive a webserver restart in Postgres. > - Ordinary warm and per-turn admission still needs local markers and supervisor metadata to find that state. > - Replacing the webserver with an empty native controller directory can therefore lose a usable retained session. > - This change adds bounded recovery metadata to the existing snapshot transaction and reconstructs local projections from the selected durable source. > - The benefit is native execution continuity across webserver replacement, with the existing ownership and agent lifecycle policies. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Native remote controller recovery and retained-session continuation during a webserver upgrade. **Subsystem affected** server/ — native runtime, checkpoint persistence, recovery scheduling and internal upgrade reporting. Product E2E qualification also changes. **Current behavior** Without both the local PRP marker and supervisor file, normal continuation can return before discovering the saved Postgres checkpoint. The snapshot already exists in Postgres, but its local reuse compatibility envelope cannot be reconstructed. **Proposed behavior** Select the existing durable source, validate its identity and ownership, restore its PRP state and supervisor projection, then use normal authenticated admission. Missing or inconsistent evidence holds recovery. It does not authorize fresh provider work. **Reason and benefit** A replacement webserver must recover active execution and later continue its retained session without the old server's native files. This is one component of deployment continuity. HTTP traffic switching, workspace storage migration and Railway rollout remain separate. **Breaking changes** No new public endpoint, schema migration or database pool. The private run-profile envelope is additive. Disk-independent rollback also requires a reader for the staged controller format and compact checkpoint part; the first production release containing these readers is the floor. Older file-backed sessions need an owner checkpoint or the bounded internal importer. **Additional context** Related foundations: #17401, #17916, #17254, #14621, #14622. The implementation contract and open acceptance gates are in [the dated plan](doc/plans/2026-10-30-native-controller-checkpoints.md). ## What Changed - Persist a versioned recovery envelope, at most 4 KiB, beside the redacted session snapshot in its existing transaction. Keep it out of public run projections. - Compare frozen admission separately from prepared attachment instructions during staged recovery, preserving exact template/identity/authority checks. - Bound the existing lazy checkpoint pool at three connections after measured two-slot burst backlog; keep request/renewal capacities and SQL operation counts unchanged. The tuning is a separate commit. - Discover and restore the exact selected retained source without local native markers. Preserve the 32-candidate window, progress barriers and current authority checks. - Fence snapshot and result writes. Acquire coordinator, issue and run locks in order and check expiry after lock waits. Combine snapshot ownership/read work into one statement. - Reuse existing recovery deadlines and drain/resume scheduling. Retained-owner waits preserve the original unstarted run and actual lease deadline. Stop, ownership and provider-progress fences precede deferral. Add bounded native evidence reporting, retained-source import and retention protection. - Admit a settled warm source with an authenticated idle goal-read suffix while retaining active-work and mixed-authority holds. - Permit lifecycle `turn.stop` checkpoints after accepted results under existing ownership fences. Claim the existing successor coordinator before retiring the old warm session, and stage shared attachments only after verified retirement. Preserve omitted isolated-home defaults and existing fresh skill-selection order during recovery without hiding real configuration changes. - Carry the exact durable six-field PRP binding during active recovery after a healthy warm handoff. Keep the Runner mismatch guard and preserve opaque attachment IDs. - Preserve an already verified active or idle warm process during remote preparation; revalidate its proof/liveness and retain later authenticated PRP attachment. Ordinary resumed leases retain suspension checks. - Drain retained source events under their original authority, reconcile immutable source accounting and block unknown source tool dispatch before target work. - Persist compact staged handoff intent through authenticated adoption and recover direct/listener command-loss windows without another Runner or duplicate attachment. - Rebuild suspended lifecycle receipts for resumed prepared tasks, and retry missing lifecycle reads after partial PRP materialization without overwriting contradictory evidence. - Add normal warm/per-turn diskless continuation coverage, real Postgres races and SQL-cost checks. Add a reproducible paired load workload. - Give only the explicit outage fixture a 15-minute provider idle window, with a red/green catalog regression preserving all production timing and lifecycle policies. - Publish the goal-less task-session pointer in the existing post-acceptance terminal checkpoint transaction, with current ownership, accepted-result, reset and newer-progress fences. Keep a private bound receipt so late completion cannot duplicate or resurrect publication. - Use a retained warm sandbox in the dedicated continuity fixture, and accept an exact output token followed by an explanation. Keep the strict identity oracle. - Extend the explicit Daytona cell to a five-minute active outage and another replacement after completion. Require retained provider identity, a new tool receipt and a useful follow-up result. Add an owned loopback Postgres E2E fixture for hosts that cannot start embedded Postgres. ## Verification **Merge recommendation — `fc68584ce6231a02e47ecd743f55b036ccea034f`: ready for the qualified native-controller component.** Full CI, fresh review, local application paths, controlled performance qualification and the strict live Linux/Daytona case pass. Independent resource cleanup is complete. Broader rollout, browser reconnection and the unexecuted transport/platform combinations remain integration gates. Integrated 484 passed full local recursive typecheck/build and ordinary active→completion→cache-loss→C component qualification. Fresh review then found a valid attached-wake failure: preparation appends attachment instructions before the verifier compares execution to the frozen admission. 9f4 fixes that by separately checking the pre-preparation admission and exact prepared execution. Both hashes are captured privately per admission; the full template, identity, configuration and authority checks remain. Its regression fails before the fix; 36 focused cases, 42 staged source/target cases and server typecheck pass afterward. The review thread is resolved. Exact-head full CI passes ([run 41168228822](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41168228822): 48 successful jobs, one intended skip); the complete `pnpm test:run` partitions are forced, with the five native suites in the Runner lane. This is not a claim that an unsharded local command passed. The fresh exact-head Greptile check succeeds with 5/5 and all six threads resolved. The original two-connection database comparison closes **steady PASS and burst FAIL**. Every relative CPU/WAL/request-p99 gate passes and all operations/ownership remain correct, but candidate arm 3 drains in 1,015.99 ms and baseline arm 4 in 1,059.67 ms against the unchanged 1,000 ms absolute gate. Those results remain failed. A separate 2→3→4→2 diagnostic reproduces drain times 1,051.57 / 956.79 / 882.02 / 1,065.72 ms: three is the smallest tested passing cap, and the repeated two-cap failure survives run-order/cache effects. Separately reviewable `fc68584ce6` changes the existing lazy checkpoint pool default to three connections. Request capacity stays ten and liveness two; idle release, shutdown fencing, transaction counts and pool count are unchanged. Thirteen DB lifecycle/cap tests and DB typecheck pass. Full recursive typecheck/build pass at exactcanary/v2026.1031.0-canary.7 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
322fa6b65c |
fix(ui): restore task document authoring and add persistence journey (#18356)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Task documents keep versioned work beside each conversation. > - The default chat interface could read general documents but hid their editor. > - People also need unfinished edits to survive a tab switch or reload. > - This pull request restores the shared editor in Artifacts. > - A portable browser journey checks exact saved content and revision history. > - The benefit is a usable document flow with independent deployment checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A person using the default task interface could read a general task document but could not create or edit one. The existing editor was available in Classic mode. A pending create could also leave newer text as a new form after its editor unmounted, causing a conflict against the person's own successful creation. **Expected behavior** A person can create and edit general documents through Artifacts. Titles, bodies and revision history persist after reopening and reloading the task. Unfinished text survives tab switches. A successful create makes retained newer text an edit of that confirmed revision. Later writes from another actor still cause a conflict. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open an ordinary task in the default chat interface, then open Artifacts. 2. Try to create a general document. The previous interface has no authoring control. 3. With authoring restored, submit a new document, keep typing, and switch to Properties before the request finishes. 4. Reopen Artifacts. The previous draft path restores a new form despite the successful create. Related public work: #17598 adds document copy/download and #18157 adds image galleries. The selected actual merged parent is `f1d780838218f975064f38333946805e0ec103a5` from #18427. It includes the stable profile-entry ordering repair and the exact recovery-fixture prerequisite. The resulting PR diff contains 32 document and reporting files. ## What Changed - Reuse `IssueDocumentsSection` for general documents in default-chat Artifacts. Keep Classic authoring in its existing task body. Ordinary tasks, conversations and Coordinator mode share the same editor options and signed-in permission wrapper. - Preserve Plans, file-review documents, attachments, uploads and work products. Hide duplicate general-document cards. Use the same general-document key rules for visible rows, validation and refused writes. - Forward image uploads, mentions, references, author maps and feedback to both editor mounts. Keep empty mention/project values stable while queries load. - Back up unfinished forms within their signed-in account, task and editor scope. Preserve text entered before its key. Record a successful create on its matching retained newer buffer, including after unmount or an early reopen. Preserve newer title/body edits, real remote conflicts and matching cancellation cleanup. - Add the model-free `task-document-persistence` journey. Setup creates only an owned empty backlog task. The browser creates and edits the document; normal APIs independently check company, task, actor, exact content and both revision records. - Reopen the owned task through the explicit Backlog view, then reload it. Require exact UI readback and zero native runs. Add only the Doc registration, definition-hash inputs, report mapping and four closed checks to the shared harness. - Count explicit zero-run browser receipts after private journey metadata is removed for publication. Preserve missing billing evidence, positive usage and native/protocol accounting. - Update browser assertions for the restored inline editor while retaining exact download bytes, revision collisions, paused-state and no-run checks. Update the feature map, usage docs and shared editor stories. ## Verification - Latest focused checks use official Node 24.22.2: 568 journey, catalog, report, billing and attempt-accounting tests across 25 suites pass. All four admitted journeys remain registered. The seven relevant UI suites pass 529 tests, including the task-page container after the parent merge. Maps, token gates, the PR-scope diff check and the owned credential-pattern scan pass. The normal QA import preflight also passes with an empty environment and network access blocked. - Billing regression: before the repair, the explicit empty public receipt counted one run, and two positive-usage receipts were discarded by browser metadata. Those three cases fail before and pass after the repair. Two additional red regressions cover aggregate usage beside an empty run list. That ambiguous shape now keeps an unavailable receipt and a minimum count of one. Missing receipts retain unavailable billing, and native/protocol one-or-more run totals retain their measurements. - The previous fresh CI run failed its unchanged snapshot-only recovery fixture: one global sweep did not call its callback. The original failure remains recorded. An isolated PGlite probe with all canonical migrations exercises the real reconciler: it processes two earlier sources, then reaches the owned third source on the next sweep. It preserves source evidence, files and run IDs. This proves bounded pagination, not full native snapshot repair. - Local native recovery tests could not start PostgreSQL because the host semaphore limit was reached. That run executed zero cases. Canonical Linux CI later passed all 143 fixture cases, including the original snapshot-only case and the new competing-candidate control. The exact fixture repair is now inherited from #18427 and is absent from this PR diff. - The portable oracle rejects 19 stale, missing, foreign or incorrect outcomes. Result validation also rejects model/provider metadata and native runs for this case. - Five real Artifacts-to-Properties unmount regressions fail before the repair and pass after it. They cover both editor modes, reopening before and after completion, later typing, and a foreign revision that must still conflict. The edit-storage failure case also checks that Cancel clears the promoted fallback copy. - UI coverage includes default chat, Classic, conversations, Coordinator, Plan rendering, document-card deduplication, reserved keys, pending-query stability, permissions and rich editor options. - Earlier real browser checks passed five upload cases and two artifact-arrival cases. They retain exact CSV bytes, original/revised content, collision, paused-state and no-run assertions. Current-head normal CI runs the updated browser suites again. - The branch merges only the selected actual parent `f1d780838218f975064f38333946805e0ec103a5`. The merge has no conflicts or manual resolution. The SQL service and recovery fixture match that parent exactly. The own document editor, persistence flow, saved-state oracle and billing repair retain their previously qualified source blobs. Follow-up, clarification, question/resumption, screenshot helpers and the Steering map are byte-identical to the merged parent. Existing project/search/question/follow-up registrations remain present. - Required document source blobs remain exact: Doc UI `22e80663b053363e5f75e1432dd9043dc0e70243`, its unmount tests `16f3f4ed0dc9b11aaff129e06e6cf2bbf4522713`, readiness helper `800a747284db19b8484650b6759e8bd1f356839d`, and budget service `3a15d489f0aa55c22e8f7fe6a6bc6a0e14e5914e`. - Local typing is limited by borrowed declarations from another checkout. They omit current `skill_test` and sandbox creation-operation fields. No dependency declarations or repository config were changed. The authoritative clean CI Typecheck + Release Registry gate passes on exact head `2ffce29827ae170420d740940c1c069c7225a74c`. - Full monorepo typecheck, tests and build were not run locally. Borrowed build declarations from another checkout limit local typing. Authoritative [clean CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41171717008) passes on exact head `82d15946c5844d3ae41c6ade62fa224053f20a9a`: 55 successful checks, 3 skipped and 1 neutral, with zero pending or failed checks. Typecheck, build, Runner, server and browser lanes pass. Greptile gives that same head a fresh 5/5. All 15 review threads are resolved, with no further thread page. The PR is mergeable and clean. - Failure history remains recorded. The earlier recovery failure was repaired with a bounded, owned-source fixture. A later CI worker shut down after 2,375 Runner unit tests passed. Its one authorized narrow retry passed those tests and all five native integration suites. The separate AgentConfig browser failure was reproduced and fixed by the merged #18427 parent. These earlier passes do not replace current-head CI. - Final-source live qualification passed on exact harness and served application `82d15946c5844d3ae41c6ade62fa224053f20a9a`. QA run `41177696858` completed all four closed checks and all five phases with zero native runs. Cleanup passed; the durable manifest is complete with no pending evidence. The coordinator verified the original grade and manifest. - The [public qualification report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/evals-qa-smoke-41177696858-1/) records zero agent runs, empty run IDs and empty run usage. Pricing remains unavailable and billing remains incomplete; the report does not claim measured zero cost. - The earlier harness `36c8d9ddd76d0b7ddb28a9a6c674d9e538f6df88` pass against application `2ffce29827ae170420d740940c1c069c7225a74c` remains historical evidence. It is separate from the final-source measurement above. - The selected parent brings profile-entry ordering, proactive chat, a database migration, Runner updates, and task-page chat/read behavior. Its new task-page container is included in the final application measurement. The coordinator retains the original evidence and owns the primary merge and daily-plan admission. ## Risks Artifacts now mounts the existing shared editor. Its autosave, conflict, revision, annotation and server access contracts remain in place. Tests cover both interface modes, shared scopes, later remote writes and unavailable edit storage. Plans and generated file-review documents keep their existing flows. The PR adds no database schema or API change. The shared billing repair requires explicit captured empty run IDs and an unambiguous usage object containing only an empty run list for public browser-only receipts. Other fields beside an empty list keep conservative unavailable billing. Missing measurements remain unavailable. Contradicting positive usage remains counted. The inherited recovery fixture keeps the production sweep limit and its source, readback and no-agent-work assertions. The live journey must fail when authoring controls or saved outcomes are absent. It must not create the expected document through setup APIs or switch to another interface to pass. Final deployment verification must retain the actual app and harness revisions separately. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with tool use and code execution. The exact runtime model ID and context window were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1031.0-canary.6 nightly/v2026.1031.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f1d7808382 |
fix(tools): stabilize tied profile entry order (#18427)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Advanced YAML editor reads shared tool profiles through their owning service. > - The editor must preserve hidden settings and reject real concurrent changes. > - Batch-created entries share a creation time. Queries sorted only by that time can return the same entries in a different order. > - The editor can then report a false concurrent tool change before it sends a profile binding request. > - This pull request adds an ID tie-breaker to profile entry reads. > - The benefit is a stable saved configuration without removing the concurrent-change guard. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18356. Related: #18168. **What happened?** The compact YAML browser case failed at its second save. Save stayed enabled and the profile binding write did not occur. The original CI artifact has no response bodies. It does not establish the exact entry order from that run. A controlled browser test reproduced this failure. It changed only the order of 30 equal-time entries in the second preflight response. The client reported `tools changed while you were editing. Reload saved before saving.` No binding request followed. A separate first-save response barrier showed that the pending-save guard worked. **Expected behavior** Reads of unchanged entries must have a stable order. Real entry changes must still trigger the existing configuration checks. Entry order does not set policy precedence; exclusions still win over matching includes. **Steps to reproduce** Create a profile with entries that share one creation time. Read the profile, change the physical row layout in a disposable PostgreSQL database, and read it again. The old service has no tie-breaker for these entries. The new regression fails against that service. ## What Changed - Sort list and detail entry reads by creation time, then ID, in the profile service. These reads supply saved configuration snapshots. Other reads retain their existing behavior. - Add one real PostgreSQL regression. It changes heap layout in both directions, checks stable list and detail values, preserves chronological ordering, checks company boundaries, and checks include/exclude results and a real entry change. - Include the exact test-only recovery prerequisite from commit `36c8d9ddd76d0b7ddb28a9a6c674d9e538f6df88`. Its file blob is unchanged. It removes a one-sweep fixture assumption while keeping bounded recovery assertions. No document UI or journey code is imported. ## Verification - Base: one frozen public master snapshot, `8c9dd1e4445e58cc9ca08076dfe9c0b27038d6ee`. The affected service, schema, projection, resolver, and save guard match the failed CI merge `94d98d5c75c8f331aad4bfab2111ee587b0c63fe`. - RED: the new real PostgreSQL test fails on the old service. Both physical layouts were verified before the ordering assertion failed. - GREEN: `cd server && pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/tool-profile-entry-order.test.ts src/__tests__/tool-profile-entry-validation.test.ts` — 18 tests pass with real PostgreSQL 17. - GREEN: `cd ui && pnpm exec vitest run src/lib/agent-configuration/save.test.ts src/lib/agent-configuration-yaml.test.ts --maxWorkers 1` — 51 tests pass. - GREEN: one focused Chromium treatment of the original compact YAML case passes. The treatment changes the actual disposable database heap after the first save. It does not transform HTTP responses. The 30 equal-time entries stay identical through the API, the second bind returns 201, and the original hidden-setting and disabled-Save assertions pass. - `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` and `git diff --check` pass. - Local tests use Node 24, a macOS source server, Chromium, and an isolated loopback PostgreSQL 17 container. The server and container are stopped. Private traces and control source are retained outside Git. These controls do not prove a deployed Cloud result. - A review follow-up removes two unnecessary query changes. Fresh real PostgreSQL verification still passes all 18 tests. The list/detail queries and browser path are unchanged from the passing heap-reorder treatment. - Prior head `59edcade203d6a05923955f5a0118e62c7e549c5` had a separate browser failure in run `41169427774`: `disconnect-write-recovery.spec.ts:204` kept the original title after a mocked session lookup failure. Its relevant test and UI source are unchanged from the base. The cause is unresolved. The two removed query changes do not repair it. The original log and artifact are retained; no unchanged job retry was issued. On the current head, this case passes in 14.3 seconds. The compact YAML case also passes in 11.2 seconds. The later success does not establish the prior failure cause. - Final exact head: `81c584aeac116b9d7a126b55dc99d5f6c70c195f`. [CI run 41169978784](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41169978784) completes with success: all 47 workflow jobs are terminal, and all 57 PR check/status entries are green or accepted neutral/skipped states. Full typecheck, build, Runner checks, security checks, and `ci / verify` pass. They were not repeated as broad local commands because the shared host is under load. - The new PostgreSQL regression also passes in Linux CI in 911 ms. Server shard 12 has 1,839 passing tests. Browser shard 3 has 45 passing tests, including the original compact YAML case. - Fresh Greptile and Paperclip reviews both give this exact head 5/5 with no findings. All review threads are resolved. The branch is mergeable and clean. ## Risks - Entries with the same creation time now use ID order. Their prior relative order was undefined. Entries with different creation times keep their existing order. - The query still sorts the same rows and adds one key to the sort. It adds no query, polling, schema change, or migration. - The configuration equality and concurrent-change checks are unchanged. This fix does not ignore real tool changes. - The original CI response order is unknown. The regression proves a permitted ordering defect and the matching failure mechanism, not the unique historical cause. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, source inspection, terminal tools, and browser test execution. The exact serving model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1031.0-canary.5 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
978ffb6e11 |
fix(adapter-utils): tolerate entries removed during workspace snapshots (#18426)
Treat ENOENT from lstat, readlink, content hashing or opendir of a listed non-root entry as an absent entry during workspace snapshot walks. A concurrent restore can rename its temporary merge file between the directory listing and the read. A missing capture root and all other errors still fail. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>canary/v2026.1031.0-canary.4 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8c9dd1e444 |
test(runner): qualify Kimi Code lifecycle and recovery (#18029)
Add the Kimi lifecycle and recovery qualification harness. Preserve original grades and cleanup evidence, strict native ownership audits, bounded startup and cleanup, and early rejection of unsupported local fault execution before credentials or resources. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
59da15066a |
feat(runner): deliver native Kimi Code (#18391)
Deliver native Kimi Code setup, exact models, scoped credentials, verified packages and runtime packs. Preserve current upstream release attestations and restore verified same-run remote retry dispatch without weakening process ownership. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1031.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
100b364264 |
Preserve selected Google services when setup resumes (#18048)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connections control which external services an agent can use. > - Google Workspace setup lets a person choose services and read or write access. > - A draft lost that choice after a declined or expired OAuth handoff. > - Finish setup could then show all services with write access instead of the saved narrow choice. > - This pull request saves the exact draft choice without treating it as granted access. > - The benefit is safe setup recovery that preserves the person's choice and existing account limits. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #15545. The duplicate search found no open PR for Workspace draft consent recovery. Related #18000 concerns satisfied gateway access requests, not saved OAuth setup intent. **What happened?** A cold Workspace draft resumed with the new-account service defaults. The selected request lived only in short-lived OAuth state. Denial consumed that state. The picker ignored draft connections. **Expected behavior** Finish setup restores the same person's saved service choice. It does not use another person's choice, a broad profile hint, or a credential grant as draft intent. An old draft with no reliable choice asks the person to choose services. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a new Google Workspace connection. Select Gmail read-only. Turn off Drive and Calendar. 2. Continue to Google, then decline authorization. 3. Close the setup page. Return through Finish setup. 4. Open the service picker. Before this fix, all three services can be enabled with write access. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced in tests on master `820c458465fa40137c81fe510f3e6dc573b4f895`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated and local source builds. The source regression uses real PostgreSQL fixtures and the production React setup components. Live provider acceptance of this repair is still pending deployment. ## What Changed - Save validated, non-secret draft intent before managed or customer-owned OAuth. Bind it to company, connection, actor, grant kind, and subject. - Restore that intent after denial, state expiry, and cold Finish setup. Keep active reconnect bound to its saved grant. Do not change new-account defaults. - Preserve agent-to-human setup handoffs. Consume only the addressed person's reviewed proposal. Keep other people's proposals. - Lock and merge the current draft before saving intent. Return 409 if its credential identity or method changed during setup. - Preserve the latest saved choice across overlapping customer-owned starts. Merge both current configuration records under short locks. Reject stale client-binding changes. Keep each OAuth state's own requested scopes. - Add shared, service, handoff, picker, and cold-page regression tests. Update the connector contract and existing feature plan. - Route the default ungrouped test/release paths through six sequential exact-cover chat partitions. Preserve remaining server/native coverage, explicit grouped CI, selection-first execution and shared-database paths. - Correct the retention test driver so pending owned real I/O does not advance logical deadlines. Pump zero-duration connection timers and add a held-I/O regression; keep production scheduling and original timing assertions unchanged. The shared helper is needed by the server and picker to validate the same narrow binding. It does not resolve credentials or grant access. No production schema migration, new route, provider scope or deployment configuration is added. The test-harness changes do not change production timers. ## Verification ### Current candidate: source qualification passed; live acceptance pending - Current published candidate: `82d13d4d698a5579378b5d506cb7a1f9cb64b5c8`, tree `78d6a821ce53f481fe3e9991edce56f0acffb22f`. It combines the Workspace repair with launcher commit `bf29c9` and retention-test commit `e25987`, then integrates master `493e229d93ba7798e80152f4549e2e9177ce50ae`. The integration brings 40 upstream commits across 713 files. One launcher conflict keeps upstream validated CI selection and its selection-first path, then applies six default chat partitions only without a selection. The authored PR diff has 16 files, 833 additions and 100 deletions; it adds no authored lockfile or `.github` changes. The public head is confirmed at this revision. Fresh CI and review passed as recorded below. Source qualification is complete using exact-tree full CI and the local results below. The separate local whole command was interrupted by host disk protection and is not called a pass. Live repaired-draft acceptance remains pending deployment. - Exact clean `82d13d4` passed one Node 24.19.0 builtin-only run: 41/41 cases (37 launcher and four CI-workflow cases), zero failures/skips. HEAD, tree and relevant file hashes stayed unchanged and clean before, at start and after. This proves launcher fixtures, not real chat execution, current typecheck/build, the dependency-backed selection graph, or full feature acceptance. - The new default ungrouped whole command uses six sequential exact-cover chat partitions, then the remaining server suites, workspaces and serialized suites: 28 expected invocations. It preserves all native suites, including upstream usage coverage. The plain ungrouped release launch path also changes. Explicit grouped CI, validated selection and shared-database execution stay unchanged. Launcher hard RED had three expected body failures and two unchanged passes; the repaired focused five and final 37 passed. A later 41-case staged-merge pass is retained separately; the clean 82 run above is the frozen proof. - Fresh [CI run 41153113944](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41153113944) completed successfully on October 31 at 01:14:53 UTC. Current head has 52 successful check runs, four conditional skips and no pending/failing checks; legacy Snyk also passed. The skips are test-file selection, the optional paired benchmark and two Storybook checks. The full server/chat/workspace/serialized matrix, all eight e2e shards, normal build, build-gap typecheck, Runner checks and final aggregate gates passed. Build and all three chat job logs identify checkout `e5e831fd3a8534d0d0f1e892118c0f8fbe12dd92`, merging this head into `493e229d93`. Its Git tree is exactly `78d6a821ce53f481fe3e9991edce56f0acffb22f`, identical to the clean candidate. The six real chat partitions passed 314, 358, 273, 239, 321 and 311 cases: 1,816 total. Other cases shown as skipped in each partition were selection exclusions, not extra passed cases. This is current tree-equivalent CI proof, not a pass of the separate default ungrouped local whole command. - Fresh [Greptile summary](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18048#issuecomment-6473856992), edited October 31 at 01:05:04 UTC, explicitly reviews exact head `82d13d4` at 5/5 with no actionable code issue. Its exact-head check passed. The prior overlapping-start discussion is resolved. This review is source-only, not provider or live acceptance. - Exact clean `82d13d4` passed full recursive typecheck and normal `pnpm build` on the independent darwin/arm64 snapshot. Typecheck finished on October 31 at 01:27:33 UTC; build finished at 01:28:33 UTC. Both exited 0. Normal native preparation and code signing passed. Source HEAD, tree and tracked/untracked state stayed unchanged and clean. `pnpm check:token-gates` also passed all token, palette and ClipLab checks on this candidate. The earlier forced-clone `ENOSYS` preflight remains recorded as setup failure, not an assertion result. - The unchanged default `pnpm test:run` started at 01:51:33.796 UTC on clean exact `82d13d4`. All six real chat partitions passed: 358, 314, 273, 239, 311 and 321 cases, or 1,816 actual cases. The original FIFO and ambiguous-retry cases both passed under their unchanged 15-second limits. General-server then reported 37 completed file rows with 5,438 passed cases and five default remote-continuity skips, including all 498 tool-access service cases and all 83 connection-route cases. At 02:39:44 UTC, the unchanged 5-GiB host-disk guard terminated the owned run. The child ended with SIGTERM and the container/harness exited 143, with no OOM or recorded assertion failure. Only seven of 28 RUN invocations started. Retention had no completed local row. Later invocations did not run. This whole local command is interrupted/incomplete, not passed. - A coverage check found no default suite missing from current full PR CI. The maintained launcher tests prove exact coverage for all 12 PR server shards, chat and five native suites; all configured workspace projects; and all nine serialized shards. The final Runner CI shard executes the five native server suites. The 41 local launcher/workflow cases cover six sequential chat children, per-child isolation, native retention, fail-fast propagation and unchanged explicit selection/shared-database paths. The actual six-chat run above exercises that changed default path. The remaining unqualified local difference is uninterrupted sequential whole-command composition and resource accumulation, not omitted test selection. Current exact-tree full CI supplies broad source-test qualification; no local whole-pass claim or provider acceptance is inferred. - A task-owned remote runner was considered to complete that separate composition check. Its provider rejected the requested allocation with per-sandbox limits of 8 GiB RAM and 10 GiB disk. No sandbox was admitted and no remote tests ran. No tests, timeouts, assertions, database synchronization, source or provider settings were changed to avoid the capacity limit. Historical a0 failures remain below. No deployment or live repaired-draft acceptance has run. ### Bounded follow-up on the prior source - On a0, one finite phase-traced chat diagnostic executed exactly the two failed cases. Both passed (1,374 and 1,767 ms); 1,814 other cases were filtered, not passed. This did not reproduce a blocked await or establish the original monolithic timeout cause. No assertion or 15-second limit changed. - The retention diagnosis preserved an initial zero-body selector failure, then corrected only the selector: one original case passed in 783 ms, with 42 filtered. Trace showed the old settling helper advancing logical time while real I/O was active. A new held-I/O regression then failed hard because the old helper advanced 1,000 ms. This proves a test-driver defect, not the precise cause of the old 5,340 ms full-run gap. - The first manual-clock repair failed the complete 44-case file: 43 passed, one body hit 15 seconds and cleanup hit 30 seconds. Its planned mutant did not run. Source then identified a fresh PostgreSQL connection's zero-duration timer. The corrected driver pumps zero-duration timers while initial readiness or tracked I/O is pending, without advancing logical Date. That pre-integration file passed 44/44 with no skips. A separate scratch-only 5,000 ms normal-continuation mutant failed the original hard `5000 < 3000` assertion; its expected failure is not a test pass. The original page-count, fairness, expiry and quiet assertions stayed intact. The authored repair does not change the production worker. The merged master changes an older retention case and dependencies; these pre-integration results are not a complete 82 retention or whole-suite pass. ### Historical qualification: SHA-bound, not 82 acceptance - Historical a0 candidate: `a0f9089fc1ff466bf4e1eeddc5b1a910d09e380b`, tree `b9d73713319dcd52b9eaa6053008b5190e43fdf1`. It adds the overlapping-start repair to parent `6c18`, which already merged pinned master `1511c92965325249ed6b52dd5be52eb6d736fbfa`. That candidate changed 12 files. Its CI and review passed; its local full qualification remained failed/incomplete. - Greptile's previous `6c18` review found P1 [Latest service choice gets lost](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18048#discussion_r4425965828), confidence 4/5. Two hard-assert regressions reproduced it on untouched `6c18`: the already-bound path overwrote the later choice, and real first-use client stamping also restored the old choice. Existing OAuth states/grants were not widened, but a later setup could restore an older request. The new repair covers both write boundaries without holding locks over external work or copying another attempt's scopes. - The complete affected service file passed 498 tests with no failures or skips. All 31 required controls ran, including both unchanged RED cases, 14 new client-drift cases, seven earlier identity guards, reconnect/cold-resume cases and upstream transaction tests. The tested three-file patch is byte-identical to this commit; the connector contract update is separate. Independent scoped review found no additional actionable issue. Fresh Greptile reviewed exact `a0f` at 5/5 with no actionable findings. The previous P1 thread is resolved. - On exact `a0f`, the five shared/UI files passed 312 tests. An initial complete connection-management run then failed: 74 passed, eight timed out at the unchanged 15-second limit, and one AI-account verification returned 422 instead of 201. The Google addressed-user handoff passed. The container exited 1 without OOM and stopped before chat/token/whole tests. This material failure remains retained and its cause unclassified; the later controlled recovery below is not a causal explanation. - One diagnostic executed the first failed gateway case and the two AI cases with temporary phase-only tracing. All three passed at 8.516, 5.511 and 3.523 seconds; 80 other cases were filtered. Original hard assertions and timeouts stayed unchanged. No timeout or suspected late provider cleanup reproduced, so the complete-file failure remains unresolved. Vitest exited 0; the harness exited 1 because its trace parser missed ANSI prefixes. All 203 events were recovered from retained logs without rerunning tests. Instrumentation was removed. This is not acceptance. - Historical a0 CI [41097596364](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41097596364) completed successfully: 52 successful checks, two expected Storybook skips and no failed/pending checks. Legacy Snyk passed. All 48 CI jobs passed, including all 1,816 chat cases and explicit passing lines for the original 20 local failures. [Server 11/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41097596364/job/124207469276) explicitly passed the complete 83-case connection file in 129.49 seconds, including all nine local failure titles. The actual checkout was synthetic merge `06851da6eb969d63e1c7dc9f7c95f08d09fa4ff1`, combining `a0f` with `aa58fa107389e8b9ae5949f7ad815943dfd94292`. This is not standalone local `a0f` qualification and does not erase the nine local route failures. - Linux admission uses Node 24.22.2, pnpm 9.15.4 and Rust 1.97.1. Frozen offline install, exact native hashes and real migrated PostgreSQL 18.1 passed. Native/protocol/build/lock inputs are identical between `6c18` and `a0f`; validated cache reuse retains the actual `6c18` native-build provenance. The selected packaged release binary is not called a fresh `a0f` build. Database synchronization settings stayed on. This admission alone does not explain the route failures. - A fresh Mac snapshot of exact `a0f` passed frozen install, workspace prerequisites, full sequential recursive typecheck and normal `pnpm build`, both on their first attempt. Typecheck completed at 17:43:05 UTC, build at 17:44:43 UTC; both exited 0 with clean tracked/untracked source. Pinned Node 24.19, pnpm 9.15.4, Rust 1.97.1, package concurrency one, Cargo jobs one and a 12 GiB V8 heap ceiling were retained. Largest-process maximum RSS was 7,668,154,368 bytes for typecheck and 10,038,837,248 bytes for build, not aggregate tree peaks. The first build correctly withheld its freshness stamp because 125 ignored, pinned Copilot assets appeared during preparation; exact path/hash analysis explained this. The normal build then recorded a genuine stamp and reused Cargo outputs in 1.18 seconds. No manual stamp, source workaround or gate retry. This is darwin/arm64 static/build proof, not Linux packaging/runtime or full tests. - The historical a0 candidate's token checker passed all four gates across 1,410 files, run directly with pinned Node 24 against the script behind `pnpm check:token-gates`. - The single controlled complete-file comparison passed: baseline `6c18` 83/83 in 287.07 seconds, then candidate `a0f` 83/83 in 293.03 seconds, with zero skips. All nine earlier failure titles passed on both. Both child/container exits were 0, no OOM/interruption; source and native/resolver/PostgreSQL guards matched. This ran only after all owned Mac compilation ended, with fresh processes/databases and identical four-CPU-quota/6-GiB/overlay inputs. No filtering, instrumentation, assertion/timeout/source changes or retry loop. This establishes standalone complete-file recovery, not the cause of the earlier eight timeouts/AI 422. - The first unchanged full `pnpm test:run` on exact clean `a0f` ran from October 30 at 18:01:43 UTC to 21:06:19 UTC. It failed naturally with test and container exit 1, without OOM. General-server reported 1,257 passed, one failed and seven skipped files; 28,633 passed, one failed and 103 skipped tests. Only the first of 22 invocations ran. The later four groups and 21 invocations did not run. The sole failure was the unchanged chat-shard CLI meta-test: its nested projectless pnpm lookup hit the offline network guard. This was a failed full gate, not Google provider acceptance. - A finite environment pair reproduced that one meta-test failure, then passed the same unchanged case after supported `corepack prepare pnpm@9.15.4 --activate` as the existing non-root node user. The cached pnpm payload was identical. Only the missing node-user last-known-good record changed. Core source, dependencies, lockfile, fixtures, assertions, timers and offline guards stayed unchanged. This isolates the nested collection defect; it does not explain the earlier route failures or complete the full gate. - The corrected unchanged full command ran from October 30 at 21:29:03.500 UTC to October 31 at 00:02:44.207 UTC on the same exact clean `a0f`. It failed naturally with exit 1, signal null and no OOM. Source stayed clean before, at start and after. It retained two visible CPUs/quota, 6 GiB, private IPC, normal overlay, matching native inputs, synchronized real PostgreSQL 18.1, and the default five groups/22 invocations. Only the first general-server invocation ran; the other 21 did not run. General-server reported 1,265 files: 1,256 passed, two failed and seven skipped. It reported 28,737 tests: 28,631 passed, three failed and 103 skipped. The two chat cases emitted `Test timed out in 15000ms` at `chat-channels.integration.test.ts:77310` and `:81790`, with durations of 15,045 and 15,058 ms. These were the durable pre-run FIFO notice and ambiguous GitHub text restart/retry cases. The retention case emitted `expected 5340 to be less than 3000` at `skill-version-retention.test.ts:593`. Its real duration was 1,727 ms; 5,340 ms was the recorded fake-time directory-page gap, not a deadline timeout. The timeout stacks do not identify the blocked internal await. The cause of these failures remains unclassified. Inside this same failed run, the complete 83-case connection file and 498-case service file passed. The former Corepack meta-case also passed in 6,396 ms. These component passes do not waive the failed/incomplete full gate. No rerun, cancellation, timeout/assertion change or full-pass claim. A later fresh two-case phase trace passed both chat cases; it did not reproduce or establish the original timeout cause. At that checkpoint, the PR stayed draft. - Prior `6c18` targeted checks passed 930 tests across eight files and token gates. Its selected queue group passed all 53 cases, including the original 20 failures and 12 new named controls. Backlog cases took 10.49 and 8.45 seconds under the unchanged 15-second limit. Another 1,763 chat cases were intentionally filtered. This is historical targeted recovery, not a full pass or proof of the new repair. No timeout or assertion was relaxed. - Prior `6c18` full local qualification failed during serial typecheck: server TypeScript was killed with code 137. Docker confirmed OOM in the 6 GiB container; full tests and build never started. The failure is retained. The new Mac resource plan avoids repeating that undersized run and does not change the shared Docker VM. - Prior CI [41089793558](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41089793558) completed successfully for synthetic merge `a73bffcfa3ede051961bcabcfa576c703d10c932` (`6c18` plus `abc270ee4c03e13b4d6eaad156a41b4ebed4bb0a`). All 48 CI jobs passed; all 1,816 chat cases passed, including explicit log lines for the original 20. Check runs were 51 success, two expected skips and one Greptile failure; legacy Snyk passed. These results do not qualify `a0f` or erase its local route failures. - Red proof on the unmodified master baseline: cold picker and Finish setup restore broad defaults; managed and customer-owned drafts lack saved intent. The stale setup tests also fail before the lock guard. - Live staging baseline `b25f3e2af8e77d882cd22d36ca55640e6468e46f` also reproduces the ordinary failure: select Gmail read-only only, cancel at Google, reload the connector catalog, then Finish setup. All three groups return enabled at read/write. Authorization was declined; no new Google access was granted. This is baseline failure evidence, not a deployed-fix pass. - Historical affected suites: 800 tests passed before the final lock guard. The final focused service and handoff cases passed 126 tests after that guard. These are not results for the integrated candidate. - Historical `pnpm -r typecheck` and final lock-guard server typecheck passed. The historical a0 candidate passed the full recursive gate separately, as recorded above. - `pnpm build`: passed again on the final lock-guard source in commit `1c31cde0ed199fbf4e41b7649590554f7886dfc2`. - Historical `pnpm check:token-gates` passed; the historical a0 candidate's direct checker pass is recorded above. - `pnpm test:run` on macOS failed on the frozen commit. It exited 1 after 9,432.41 seconds. General server results: 1,195 files passed, 10 failed, eight skipped; 26,706 tests passed, one timed out, 157 skipped. Nine setup hooks timed out while starting embedded PostgreSQL. The retained log records host-wide semaphore exhaustion (`semget`), not disk exhaustion. One unchanged publication-text performance case also timed out. Its cause is not established. Later workspace and serialized groups did not run. This is a failed and incomplete local gate. - The independent full-source Linux run also failed and was incomplete on the same frozen commit. Native and real-database admission passed. Chat integration reported 20 failures in 1,593 tests. Tool-access passed all 479 tests. Native-session-executor passed all 965 tests. Docker interrupted the run after about 48 minutes on October 29. The container exited 143 and was not OOM-killed. The run produced no final group totals or detailed assertion summary. Shell trap metadata reports zero, but this is not a valid test-pass result. Source and evidence remain unchanged. The focused diagnosis below retains those failures; their cause is not assumed from the interruption. Neither historical local full run passed. - A fresh focused replay on the frozen source then executed exactly those 20 case bodies. All 20 failed; this was not a setup-hook failure. The two backlog cases reached the unchanged 15-second timeout. The 18 FIFO cases failed on missing notices or receipt rows. All 18 FIFO cases passed when run alone in a fresh process and database. This supports an order interaction, not a complete cause or baseline conclusion. A separate two-backlog control used RAM-backed temporary storage and real PostgreSQL with synchronization settings on. One backlog case passed in 10.65 seconds; the other still timed out at 15 seconds. No source, assertion or timeout was changed. The full local gate remains open. - Earlier mixed-revision run: it began before the final guard and imported older source before collecting later regression cases. It failed those new cases with that older cached module. This run is retained, not counted as candidate acceptance. The fresh focused run passed all seven stale-setup cases. No case was skipped to hide a failure. - Historical remote gates for `1c31` were terminal and clean: 53 successful contexts and two expected Storybook skips. Main CI [40720536514](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40720536514) passed. Greptile reviewed exact head `1c31cde0ed199fbf4e41b7649590554f7886dfc2` at 5/5 with no actionable findings; the separate review job also passed, and there were no inline review comments. These results do not qualify `6c18`. - CI source qualification: the chat jobs checked out synthetic merge `ef36746b3d2ec52ba5727dcbe4da265a03421fe4`, which merges the PR into `7d75ae0569e41786640cf09647ae8849411d2f22`. All 20 locally failing case names have explicit passing CI log lines. These passes do not establish standalone local acceptance of `1c31`. The merge adds two upstream Teams tests, so it collects 1,595 chat cases instead of 1,593. Neither backlog/FIFO assertions nor their timeouts changed. - Independent source review found an earlier credential-identity race. The guard and seven deterministic cases resolve that finding. A later integration review missed the separate overlapping-start race. Both RED failures and that review miss are retained. The narrow follow-up repair passed 498 service cases, independent source review and fresh remote CI/5-of-5 review; full local qualification remains incomplete. - Source qualification is ready for merge. Live repaired-draft recovery, delivery and Google approval are not established by these results. The local whole command remains explicitly incomplete. ## Risks - Historical drafts without a matching intent now need an explicit service choice. This is deliberate and prevents silent broadening. - A concurrent credential or method edit now returns 409. Reloading lets the person review the changed setup. - Overlapping starts keep separate requested scope sets. Updating draft intent does not relabel an earlier OAuth state's consent request. - Saved intent is not consent. Provider-reported scopes and current action policies still control discovery and dispatch. - No migration is needed. No existing token or grant is rewritten by saving draft intent. - Default ungrouped launch paths now execute six chat children in sequence and 28 whole-command invocations. Exact coverage, local launcher contracts and all six real default chat partitions passed. A complete uninterrupted local whole-command run remains unqualified because of host capacity. - The retention test-clock repair depends on owned-I/O and zero-duration connection-timer progress. The controlled regression, sensitivity mutant and current exact-tree CI protect the original assertion. It did not reach a completed row in the interrupted local whole run. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, described by the runtime as GPT-5 based. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed to this task. Used reasoning, code execution, browser verification, and independent delegated review. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used, including the runtime metadata limit - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the bug report template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket or instance identifier - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — exact clean 82 passed 41 launcher/workflow cases and all 1,816 real default chat cases, full recursive typecheck, normal build and token gates. Full exact-tree PR CI passed. The separate local whole `pnpm test:run` was interrupted by disk protection and remains incomplete; it is not claimed as a local whole pass. - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green — current exact-head checks passed; the verified CI checkout tree equals clean 82. The separate interrupted local whole command is disclosed above. - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups — fresh exact-82 summary and check passed; the earlier finding is resolved. This is source review, not acceptance. - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b866fa4bdc |
feat(runner): add pinned Kimi Code native runtime (#18028)
Add the pinned Kimi Code runtime, native instruction and model admission, scoped credentials, and pending-candidate recovery contracts. Retain current master release attestations and provider-pack compatibility. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
909e29dd07 |
fix(ui): show agent-created subtasks inline in the task feed (#18320)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task feed shows agent messages, documents, and artifacts. > - An agent can create a subtask or a separate follow-up task during that work. > - The reader must open the Tasks tab to find the new task. > - This pull request adds a linked task card to the source feed at creation time. > - The card shows the current title, task number, and status. > - The reader can inspect delegated work without searching a second panel. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Task creation visibility in the source task feed. Related work: #13823 added ancestor navigation in the Tasks panel. **Current behavior** Agent-created child tasks appear in the Tasks tab. The main feed has no persistent link card for those tasks. **Proposed behavior** Show each agent-created direct child or source-linked follow-up task once in the feed. Keep the card at creation time when status changes. Keep existing chat handoff and accepted suggestion cards without duplicates. **Reason and benefit** Readers can see which work an agent created and open that task from the conversation. **Breaking changes** None. This change uses existing authorized task reads. It does not add API or database fields. ## What Changed - Pass the existing child and source-task reads from task detail to the feed. - Add a task card with a link, wrapping title, task number, and status badge. Use existing design tokens. - Suppress repeated cards and tasks already shown by accepted suggestions or chat handoffs. - Show task-read failures with Retry. Keep the conversation readable during those failures. - Add feed and page regression cases plus desktop, multiple-task, dark, and mobile stories. Update the product description and delegation recipe. - Keep task selection and rendering in the task feed module. Existing issue APIs continue to own access checks and company scope. ## Verification - Passed: 224 focused tests with `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/TaskChatThread.task-creation-order.test.tsx ui/src/pages/IssueDetail.test.tsx ui/src/components/task-detail/TaskDetailTasksPanel.test.tsx --maxWorkers=1`. - Passed: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck`. - Passed: `pnpm check:token-gates`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, and `node scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs`. - Cases cover creation order, current status, links, company filtering, direct children versus grandchildren, duplicate suppression, and read failure with retry. - Passed: browser render and link assertions for desktop, multiple tasks, dark theme, and mobile at 390px. All four story play phases finished. No page errors or horizontal overflow occurred. Screenshots use fixture task data and the production task feed. They do not prove server persistence or agent execution. - Passed: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui build` after the concurrent memory failure. - The mobile preview frame needed spacing to contain the feed scrollbar gutter. Fixed the frame and repeated the browser checks. - Addressed the first Greptile finding: source-linked follow-ups now load with Streamlined UI off. A regression test covers that setting. - Full local build and typecheck cannot complete because Cargo is absent. The first concurrent UI build and UI typecheck were killed by the workspace memory limit. Both UI commands passed when run separately. The full local test run was stopped to fit that limit. PR CI must supply the full-suite verdict. ## Risks - Low risk. Delayed task reads can insert an older card into a loaded feed. Stable task IDs preserve the card during status updates. - New cards use the same access-checked task data as the Tasks panel. No task mutation or permission change is added. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The runtime does not expose a more specific model ID or context size. Used reasoning, tool calls, code edits, tests, and browser automation. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d06c5e0eff |
fix(evals): preserve opaque TestOps parameters (#18394)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip verifies real agent work through Product E2E tests. > - The fixed Chat feature workflow uses TestOps to select and report one case. > - TestOps exposes job parameters as ID/value pairs. > - The schema does not establish that those IDs identify global environment variables. > - The reader used that unsupported relationship to infer parameter names. > - This pull request keeps IDs opaque, preserves the strict allowed values, and records closed read diagnostics. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #18322, #18375, #18385. **What happened?** A zero-model bootstrap returned HTTP 404 during context readback. The exact failed GET was not retained and remains unknown. Schema review also found no established relationship between job-parameter IDs and global environment-variable IDs, although the reader queried that namespace to label parameters. **Expected behavior** Read only the existing job-run, launch, and job records. Preserve the job's exact permitted ID/value vector without inventing parameter names. Record which fixed GET class failed, its positive resource ID, state, and available HTTP status without raw responses or URLs. **Steps to reproduce** Use the actual API helpers with a job-parameter ID that has no global environment-variable definition. The new pure controls reject an unexpected definition lookup and verify the opaque vector and diagnostics without a backend or model call. **Paperclip version or commit** This change starts from `8595efc20bda3ce20a9fbbf34a5d156a6fcf6d57` after #18385. **Deployment mode** GitHub Actions metadata setup in the protected TestOps reporting environment. ## What Changed - Remove the unsupported global environment-variable lookup from job-parameter handling. - Preserve an exact positive ID and `refs/heads/master` value. Use the fixed workflow's existing `evaluate` default. - Treat an operation parameter as such only when its ID matches the protected configured ID and its value is allowed. Keep rejecting empty, duplicate, conflicting, or unknown vectors before writes. - Project only an opaque ID with a fixed-default-ref kind and value, or an unresolved kind with the value withheld. - Add closed diagnostics for the existing job-run, launch, and job GETs. A successful call keeps HTTP status null because the API abstraction does not expose the status. - Sync one reporter-test assertion and document opaque IDs. Reporter runtime and workflow source are unchanged. ## Verification - Four new actual-helper controls fail on the parent. - `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-feature-testops-api.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/testops-chat-reporter.test.mjs`: 58 affected pure/mock/FS controls pass on Node 26.4.0. - Three MJS syntax checks and `git diff --check` pass. TypeScript noEmit was not run for this MJS/documentation change. - Two intermediate exact-projection assertion failures were retained before the assertions were synced to the new diagnostic contract. - [Normal Node 24 CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41137009579) passes on exact head `3c256fb8f7559093c5fb063170e26c01b6e8a0a4`: 48 jobs passed and one skipped. Both required `ci / e2e` and `ci / verify` pass. - Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no actionable findings or unresolved threads. At this verification cut, the optional Contributor trust check was still in progress; it is not an effective required status context. - No actual CLI, API, provider, model, app, database, build, install, or additional bootstrap was run to validate this change locally. ## Risks The original HTTP 404 route remains unknown. Removing an unsupported schema assumption does not prove that it caused that failure. The live job mapping and dispatch remain unqualified. The strict source, actor, selection, run-number, nonce, once-only send, private custody, case, model, grader, and clock checks are unchanged. Unknown metadata still stops. This PR adds no endpoint, workflow mode, permission, credential path, or passing result. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) with reasoning, code editing, tool use, and pure test review. The runtime does not expose the exact context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8ff812cdde |
feat(chat): deliver proactive task messages to agent chats (#18374)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agent Chat gives each person a persistent conversation with each
agent.
> - Tasks and routines produce results outside that conversation.
> - Those runs need a safe way to bring a requested result back to the
person.
> - The server must select the agent's own chat and check the source
task's access rules.
> - This pull request adds proactive chat messages and unread
indicators.
> - People can see the result, open its source task, and reply in the
same chat.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**Subsystem affected**
Server, native runner tools, shared contracts, database, and UI.
**Problem or motivation**
An agent can report progress on a task or comment on an authorized task.
It cannot send a routine result to its own standing chat with the
responsible person. A morning review routine therefore cannot leave a
visible digest in that person's chat.
**Proposed solution**
Add `send_chat_message({body, idempotencyKey})` and `POST
/api/agents/me/chat/messages`. The server selects the company, agent,
and responsible person from the active run. It saves an attributed
comment and audit record in one transaction. The chat shows a
source-task link and per-person unread state.
**Alternatives considered**
A destination parameter on a generic comment tool would expose
unnecessary routing authority. A new delivery worker would add another
durable delivery path. This change uses a dedicated tool and the
existing comment and live-event paths.
**Roadmap alignment**
This extends the experimental Agent Chat capability in `ROADMAP.md`. The
existing `enableAgentChat` setting controls it. Related public work:
Refs #13282, Refs #13283, and Refs #14408. Searches for proactive chat
and unread chat found no duplicate PR.
## What Changed
- Add a focused messaging service shared by the native tool and HTTP
route. It checks current run ownership, execution mode, recipient
membership, task access, and task privacy.
- Reuse the canonical company/agent/person conversation. Save the
comment and audit record together. Keep task completion and chat
execution separate from delivery.
- Add source-task provenance and source-scoped retry keys. Identical
retries return the saved receipt. Changed content returns a conflict.
- Enforce the conversation's fixed agent at the shared comment-write
boundary. Keep normal reply cancellation and session checks.
- Add chat unread state, accessible agent dots, aggregate Chat
indicators, and visible-message read cutoffs. Refresh through existing
live events.
- Add the request-key constraint, native tool contracts, documentation,
capability maps, stories, and regression coverage.
## Verification
- Local delivery/security proof: all 38 proactive-message cases pass.
Eight credential-scope regressions and four quota regressions fail
against the prior source. The repaired delivery and canonical
cross-issue cap suites pass all 49 cases; all 31 OpenAPI tests, server
typecheck, and capability-map checks pass. The shared per-run cap covers
native and HTTP sends, mixed ordinary mutations, concurrent last-slot
contention, and retry/recovery without double charging.
- Credential tests preserve the authenticated person and authorizer;
reject bridge/test credentials and persisted skill-test runs after
task-mode changes; and recheck API-key revocation, scope, and
responsible person after destination locking. The earlier
delivery/native-authority suites passed all 74 cases before the four
quota additions.
- Four PostgreSQL contention cases cover native and HTTP sends plus
retries during a native chat mutation. All four deadlock against the
earlier source and pass with destination-before-source/run locking.
Recovery and human-reply delivery enqueue only the human comment; a
proactive digest never wakes the chat agent.
- Passed 108 companion conversation, native-authority, and OpenAPI
tests; 112 runner catalog/workflow-report tests; 47 completion-delivery
tests; and 25 project-handoff tests. Focused runner tests cover native
tool availability without generic API tools.
- All 327 affected UI tests, UI typecheck, token gates, and catalog
checks pass. The read hook retries at most three times, respects server
retry delay, coalesces only seen cutoffs, recovers on reconnect, and
cancels on scope changes.
- Real browser journeys with a deterministic process agent verify
routine-to-chat delivery, first-chat creation, unread state across
reload, the source link, secondary chat navigation, and a follow-up
reply referring to the digest. This does not qualify live GitHub
retrieval or model output quality.
- The Storybook showcase uses production components with deterministic
network fixtures. Rendered interactions pass for the landing, ordinary
read success, transient read recovery, and persistent failure after
bounded retries. Both Chat navigation variants update from two unread
chats to one while only Kodi's dot clears. Mobile and light variants
were reviewed. The existing Coordinator Recents label contrast finding
is unchanged; no Linux visual baseline archive exists.
- Current master's independent sandbox migration retains 0418.
Regenerated the feature migration as 0419 from the combined schema and
retained exactly the newest five snapshots; numbering/safety, replay,
and schema-drift checks pass.
- Workspace typecheck and build passed before PR preparation; canonical
server/UI typechecks passed again on the combined tree. Migration
`0419_slippery_impossible_man.sql` passes safety and schema drift checks
on disposable PostgreSQL, including interrupted index repair, concurrent
migrators, one-time owner read-state backfill, preserved receipts, and
two SQL replays. A default five-second local snapshot comparison timed
out; a diagnostic 30-second run passed without drift.
- Earlier failures are retained in the record: full local `pnpm
test:run` and broad shards encountered embedded-PostgreSQL startup,
timing, and provider-recovery failures. Thirteen selected
external-channel cases pass in isolation on the original and changed
sources; an unordered comment-row assertion now explicitly orders both
reads. The earlier route registry, native tool count, runner catalog,
and accessible Chat badge-name failures were fixed and passed full
remote CI on `920b3bb7db`.
- Repeated managed-skill server8 failures came from CI's newer synthetic
merge: its Cloud guard correctly rejected the old local-disk fixture.
Master independently repaired the fixture in #18385; this branch keeps
that repair unchanged. All 57 managed-skill and Cloud prerequisite cases
pass on the combined tree, and that fixture has no remaining PR diff.
- Current reviewed head `dc16f314739a6d977bed21cb1446d0e80a541578`:
Greptile 5/5 with no findings, Superagent security assessment passed,
advisory Paperclip Review 5/5 with no findings, and zero open review
threads. All 55 current-head check runs pass, with five expected skips
and the advisory review neutral at 5/5; Snyk also passes. No checks are
pending or failing. Protected squash auto-merge is enabled and is
waiting for required code-owner approval. A normal exact-head merge was
refused by the base-branch policy; no admin bypass was used. The
previous head's Superagent quota finding is fixed and covered above.
## Risks
- Chat remains company-visible. Delivery rejects a source task with
private-task, project, or ancestor restrictions.
- Read state uses a comment timestamp cutoff. The server retains
database precision and never moves a read receipt backward.
- The new unique constraint changes comment query planning. An existing
regression now uses an explicit row order. The migration builds the
unique index concurrently, then takes a brief table lock to attach it.
It uses the existing top-level migration and interrupted-index recovery
path.
- The upgrade backfills missing chat-owner read-state rows at the latest
existing agent comment. Existing read receipts remain intact. New chats
can still be unread before the human participates.
- Quota observation commits atomically with delivery. A rejected send
rolls back its attempted denial audit row and any first-chat creation;
the canonical warning remains in server logs, and previously spent quota
remains enforced. Identical/conflicting retries and receipt recovery
spend no extra slot.
- This version delivers in-app only. It adds no external-channel, push,
or email delivery.
- Local full-suite acceptance remains limited by the failures recorded
above. The feature stays behind `enableAgentChat`.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex. PR preparation and CI work used `gpt-6.1-sol` with tool
use and code execution. The earlier implementation also used Codex, but
its exact model ID was not recorded in the visible session. The
context-window size was not provided.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run focused tests locally and they pass; the broad local
failures are recorded above
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7114582c63 |
fix(ci): track repository inputs across test projects (#18398)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - PR CI selects affected tests before allocating parallel runners. > - Recent audits retained about 96% of test files despite narrow changes. > - Unchanged consumer packages kept full coverage, and source scans confused data fields and message text with runtime loaders. > - File reads need explicit edges that imports alone cannot provide. > - This change follows consumer graphs and known file inputs while retaining unknown effects. > - The AWS CODEOWNERS gate stays in front of runner allocation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18376 and #18362. Narrow source changes still selected most tests because consumer packages kept full coverage and known file reads were treated as arbitrary input. Expected behavior is to retain affected import/file consumers and unknown inputs, then partition only the selected files. The shared storage failure found during the audit was fixed upstream in #18357. The candidate merge ran all 18 managed-skill storage tests successfully in [Linux qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41140209697/job/124352365547). This branch includes that upstream commit; no additional storage implementation or permanent diagnostic job is included. ## What Changed - Assess every Vitest project in the coarse plan, including unchanged consumer workspaces. - Add dependency edges for statically resolved module-relative filesystem reads and directory listings. Keep unknown paths, writes, escaped APIs, mutable path objects and untracked inputs conservative. - Distinguish data keys, erased types and message strings from runtime globals, loaders and mock bypasses. Retain destructured globals, aliased object reads and mocked filesystem/path resolution. - Normalize `fs` and `node:fs` before recording coverage so a known read cannot hide an unknown one. - Review the Drizzle SQL/schema entry points by hashes of their complete import closures. CommonJS/dynamic loaders reject the fingerprint; drivers and migration readers remain opaque, and dependency updates revoke the review. - Record file input edges and per-test retention reasons in selection audit artifacts. - Add cross-workspace, mixed-import, symlink retargeting, setup-input and dependency-review regression cases. Object-valued URL constants are explicitly opaque with and without mutation. Update the developer guide. - Preserve the AWS CODEOWNERS authorization gate, runner-group restrictions and existing lane ownership. ## Verification - Final head `eedad362e84d6b68f0f048c92db6032e45622c46` passed [complete Actions CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41144233520) on attempt 1. Overall status: 57 successful checks, three intended skips, and one neutral Paperclip review. Both Greptile and Paperclip rated this head 5/5; zero unresolved review threads. - All 17 local selector tests passed: `node --test scripts/ci/test-selection*.test.mjs`. Final [Linux qualification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41144233203/job/124365428832) passed all 18 selector/impact tests without skips, plus real workspace selection and cache/routing checks. - Same-tree local comparison against the previous selector at `d331d8481a`: Inbox changes selected 466 rather than 700 files (33% fewer); auth middleware changes selected 2,141 rather than 2,788 files (23% fewer). The sampled plans retained the same 2 and 24 jobs under existing weighted budgets. Final Linux qualification selected 466 files for Inbox and 1,949 for auth/config-test changes; platform-dependent graphs differ, so these are not a Linux before/after comparison. Chat/native Runner lanes retain their existing ownership and are excluded from these counts. - Local `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build` and `git diff --check` passed. The complete local `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after repeated embedded PostgreSQL startup failures; initdb reported exhausted macOS semaphore capacity. Full Linux CI passed on the final combined tree. - The storage regression was corrected upstream in #18357. [Focused Linux verification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41140209697/job/124352365547) ran all 18 managed-skill tests successfully, with no skips; the final full CI run also passed its server lane. ## Risks - Unknown effects must retain their consumers. Regression cases cover mixed builtin spellings, dynamic paths, escaped/mocked APIs, global aliases, reviewed dependency changes and cross-package file reads. - Graph analysis now visits unchanged consumers. Its added work must be included in rollout latency measurements; fewer test files do not by themselves prove shorter end-to-end PR time. - The weighted shard budget deliberately remains unchanged. These samples reduce file execution without reducing allocated jobs. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution and GitHub tools. The exact serving variant and context window are not exposed in this session. No subagents were used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — targeted selector suite; full local suite limitation documented above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
4eaa435bf4 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#18414)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip uses a dependency lock for reproducible builds. > - Dependency changes on master need matching lock entries. > - Paid eval reports also pin a reviewed offline correction. > - Reports must install before paid model work starts. > - This automated PR keeps the lock and report proof together. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Dependency manifests on master changed after the last committed lock refresh. **Expected behavior** Frozen installs must match those manifests. Eval reports must retain matching offline lock proof. **Steps to reproduce** Run a frozen install before and after this lock refresh. ## What Changed - Refresh the dependency lock from the manifests on master. - Include the matching offline report correction and hashes. ## Verification - Pinned pnpm resolution completed with lifecycle scripts disabled. - The report proof refresh accepted the reviewed committed baseline. - The workflow rejected changes outside the lock and report proof files. ## Risks The lockfile bot merges this PR without CI or review when every added package version is at least 3 days old on npm. Otherwise the PR waits for a maintainer, and the daily refresh tries again. The bot merges only the exact commit this workflow generated from manifests already reviewed on master. Unknown report lock baselines remain blocked. This update changes no permissions or paid enable gates. ## Model Used None — generated by pnpm and the deterministic report-lock updater. ## Checklist - [x] Thinking path and problem description included - [x] Generated lock and matching report proof included - [x] Release-age gate decides between bot merge and maintainer review Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com>canary/v2026.1031.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
cdf843371b |
fix(runner): build on Windows and add a Windows CI lane (#18250)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Paperclip Runner (`packages/paperclip-runner`) runs agent sessions
through a native Rust daemon, `paperclip-runnerd`
> - The daemon builds only for macOS and Linux. On Windows x64
(`x86_64-pc-windows-msvc`), the build stops with one compile error
> - No CI lane builds the daemon on Windows, so new Unix-only code can
break the Windows build again without notice
> - This pull request fixes the compile error and adds a Windows CI lane
for the Rust workspace. It is the first of a series of small pull
requests that port the Runner to Windows
> - The benefit is a Windows build that stays green. Each later pull
request in the series can then prove its Windows behavior in CI
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Related: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/issues/18142 and
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18144 port the server and
the development scripts to native Windows. That work does not touch the
Rust Runner.
**What happened?**
On Windows x64 with the pinned Rust 1.97.1 MSVC toolchain, `cargo build
--manifest-path packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml --locked
--workspace` fails with `error[E0599]: no method named inherited_command
found` in `process_supervisor.rs`. `VerifiedProcessLaunch::spawn_stdio`
calls `inherited_command`, but that method exists only on Linux and
macOS.
**Expected behavior**
The Runner workspace builds on Windows x64. Features that do not have a
Windows implementation yet fail with a clear error at run time. They do
not stop the build.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Use a Windows x64 host with Visual Studio 2022 Build Tools and
rustup.
2. Check out `master`.
3. Run `cargo build --manifest-path
packages/paperclip-runner/runner/Cargo.toml --locked --workspace`.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
|
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
493e229d93 |
perf(runner): cache verified native executable digests (#18390)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their task execution. > - Runner checks qualified native programs before it starts a provider. > - Installation checks and command opening can hash the same program again. > - A new sidecar process repeats this work on a later warm task. > - This pull request stores the computed digest in a private filesystem cache. > - Every cache hit still checks the independently selected trusted digest and current file metadata. > - An unchanged program can start without another full native file read. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Repeated **qualified ACPX** native executable admission in Runner. Claude, ACPX-Codex, and Grok use this verifier in both Core-owned and plugin-backed launches. The ordinary native Codex app-server launcher is a different path and is not changed. A retained provider that opens no new native command has no saved hash work here. The measured Claude task path does not require a comment backlog. **Current behavior** Installation verification and final command opening each read and hash the native executable. The qualified Linux x64 Claude file is 241,667,256 bytes. A new verification and command lease reads 483,334,512 native bytes. Another Node process repeats both reads. **Proposed behavior** Store the actual computed SHA-256 digest by device, inode, size, nanosecond modification time, and nanosecond change time. Reuse it across Runner and sidecar processes. Compare each hit with the current build-owned digest. Hash the file on a miss or changed identity. This replaces the earlier Claude-only deferral design in this same PR. **Reason and benefit** The first verification and command lease reads the native file once. Later processes read none of its native bytes while its identity stays the same. Related: #16372 established qualified executable admission. This change is independent of other preparation PRs. It does not change provider pins or profile versions. ## What Changed - Add a shared filesystem digest cache under the absolute OS temporary root at `paperclip-runner-<uid>/executable-digests-v1`. - Use private directories and files, versioned hash-only filenames, bounded JSON entries, and atomic temporary-file replacement. Cache files contain a version and the computed digest. They contain no credentials or source paths. - Fall back to full hashing when the cache is missing, unreadable, malformed, or unusable. Keep current expected-digest selection outside the cache. - Keep cache data outside task homes. Neither `HOME` nor task cwd selects the path. The OS temporary-root selection honors absolute platform `TMPDIR`, `TMP`, or `TEMP` overrides. A relative root disables caching. Hosts must keep that root outside task workspaces. Temp cleanup causes a later rehash. - Keep the no-follow executable open, regular-file and size checks, execute permission, descriptor ownership, before/after identity checks, and preparation-to-launch identity comparison. Cache publication occurs before the final identity checks. - Use this path for standalone installation checks and final command opening. Remove the earlier pending-digest type and Claude-only launch helper. Runtime host and profile selection keep their original structure. - Test changed content, all fingerprint fields, symlinks, mode changes, inode replacement, mutation during lookup/publication, concurrent cache writers, wrong trusted pins, and cache failures. - Include a deliberate trust-boundary test: a process running as the same OS user can plant a matching cached digest for changed bytes. It opens a test descriptor and executes nothing. In plain language: Runner remembers the hash for the same file. It still checks which file it opened and which hash the build requires. The cache trusts the OS user who can write it. ## Verification From `packages/paperclip-runner`: - `../../node_modules/.bin/vitest run src/drivers/acpx/executable-digest-cache.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/installation-integrity.test.ts src/drivers/acpx/runtime-host.test.ts` — 177 passed, 6 platform-specific skips. - `../../node_modules/.bin/tsc -p tsconfig.json --noEmit` — passed. - `git diff --check` and the added-line secret, PII, private-address, and code-comment scan — passed. The offline comparison uses baseline `45a3a92e6dc52d20923b9aa34a22fee2ec5443f9` and treatment `c4356df12032448de90516ae329d8f939af10984`. Each sample starts a different Node process. Each normal sample runs the actual qualified installation verifier and opens a command lease. Seven samples per case follow one warmup. The cache is removed before each cold case. The next process reuses its entry. Baseline order alternates around the treatment pair. Command digest and package paths match in every pair. | Verifier plus command opening | Baseline | Cold cache | Later process hit | | --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | | Full native reads | 2 | 1 | 0 | | Native bytes read | 483,334,512 | 241,667,256 | 0 | | Local median, ms | 1041.26 | 602.70 | 130.17 | | Local range, ms | 994.20–1133.11 | 580.27–999.83 | 121.96–179.45 | | Median whole child process, ms | 1379.96 | 988.75 | 523.01 | Raw verifier-plus-open samples in ms: - Baseline: 1133.11, 1074.40, 1061.99, 1041.26, 994.20, 1036.12, 1037.70. - Cold: 647.13, 646.33, 999.83, 584.83, 580.27, 583.37, 602.70. - Later process hit: 179.45, 138.37, 134.39, 130.17, 121.96, 122.33, 126.68. Separate direct-opener fault probes use a disposable copy of that same native file: | Change | Native bytes read | Result | Local open, ms | | --- | ---: | --- | ---: | | First copied file | 241,667,256 | Accepted | 526.14 | | Next process, different HOME and task cwd | 0 | Accepted | 24.91 | | Changed timestamps | 241,667,256 | Accepted after hashing | 531.40 | | New inode, identical bytes | 241,667,256 | Accepted after hashing | 536.70 | | Corrupt byte, same size and exactly restored mtime | 241,667,256 | Rejected | Whole process: 841.36 | | Different independent trusted pin | 0 | Rejected | Whole process: 374.76 | The corruption probe keeps `mtimeNs` exactly equal before and after, at `1000000000000000000`. Its changed `ctimeNs` invalidates the entry. Cache expiry is not required. The changed-pin probe rejects the old actual digest without a native read. The cached image is `sha256:99ce80690a0c13328f41fd84156cc73e1ac562eaed3120fd41d04d7acdfb325d`. The Node binary is `/opt/paperclip/runner/libexec/node`, version `v24.20.0`. The artifact is Claude SDK `0.3.286`, with expected digest `sha256:fe503f65c6289d59c23e5b21ae44f03583f997dd33a2cbfc75ab4f96fb8fc73f`. The container used a read-only root, a disposable writable tmpfs, and disabled network. No provider process, model request, credential, or deployment was used. **These elapsed values are diagnostics from Linux x64 CPU emulation on an ARM64 Docker host. They are not production latency or TTFT estimates.** The exact byte counts, cross-process reuse, output equality, and invalidation results are the portable evidence. The saved phase 0 exports have no directly comparable native executable hashing span. Their broad `runner.transport.attach` spans include other work. A production comparison within 20% is therefore unavailable for this seam. The earlier local 919 ms control was also an emulation diagnostic; it is not a production baseline. The initial Docker attempt was denied access to the local socket by the sandbox. The same offline command then ran with local socket permission. An initial fault probe restored mtime through a `Date`, which did not prove exact nanosecond equality. Its raw report is retained as historical; the final probe sets and verifies an exact mtime before and after corruption. The prior Claude-only implementation and its checks and measurements remain historical evidence. They do not qualify this replacement. The superseded home-directory cache head had one browser recovery test timeout in its GitHub workflow. It expected a saved title after session recovery. The failure is retained. No browser code was changed; the current head reruns CI after moving the cache outside task homes. No full local CI suite was run, as requested. GitHub CI supplies full regression coverage. Current head `c4356df12032448de90516ae329d8f939af10984` passed the complete [GitHub workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41145223331), including all browser shards. Its latest checks have 56 successes and 2 intended skips, including both security scans started when the PR became ready. Standard Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no open findings. Apex then reviewed the same head at 5/5 under the documented OS-user trust policy. It reported no new findings. There are no unresolved review threads. The PR is ready for review and remains unmerged. ## Risks - This deliberately weakens protection against the same OS user. That user can write the cache and can plant a chosen digest for a file fingerprint. A cache hit trusts that record; metadata identity is not a fresh content hash. The explicit fault test documents this accepted policy. - A read-only administrator-owned Runner can use this user-writable cache. The cache has no signature, secret, or daemon. It does not require a Launcher or ROM change. - Other users cannot use normal cache permissions to write these entries. Cache errors fall back to hashing. Removing the cache directory restores full hashing. Old fingerprints leave small unused entries until the cache is removed or OS temp cleanup evicts it. Temp eviction costs one later full hash. - A changed file normally rehashes. A digest that differs from the independent current pin still fails admission. Existing command, package, credential, process-lifetime, and final dispatch checks remain. - No schema, public protocol, package dependency, profile version, or provider pin changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, code editing, test execution, and tool use. This session does not expose a more precise serving model ID or context-window capacity. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used with the details available to this session - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the enhancement template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket ID - [x] The targeted local tests pass; the full local suite was not run as requested - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green for the replacement head - [x] Standard Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings for the replacement head - [x] Apex is 5/5 on the current head with no unresolved findings - [x] I will address review findings before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1031.0-canary.1 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
87ae20ae65 |
fix(server): reconcile failed sandbox cleanup with signed absence (#18407)
Reconcile failed ephemeral Cloud leases through a signed cleanup-only absence observation when local historical inspection is unavailable. Preserve failure outcomes, exact resource bindings, retention and row-version fences; grant no run-continuation authority. All 54 current-head checks/statuses passed. Greptile is 5/5, Medium, with no findings or unresolved threads. The 38 focused tests pass; both new reconciliation cases fail without the fallback. Isolated baseline and branch idle suites each pass all 225 cases. The original broader local teardown timeout is retained in the PR, and the full local run remains in progress. Cloud protocol support is already serving in staging. Exact candidate composition and hosted provider sleep/wake qualification follow this merge. Production has not been changed. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
105a67b52c |
Reuse signed master images for npm canaries (#18404)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Release workflows publish npm packages and multi-platform images. > - A master push can finish its image before the npm canary dispatch starts. > - The dispatch currently builds that same source again on two runners. > - This PR verifies and reuses the signed master image by digest. > - Missing images retain the native build path. Channel promotion still follows npm. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The Docker workflow dispatched after npm canary publication. **Current behavior** Every canary dispatch builds both architectures, even when master has already published the same source. This consumes runner capacity and delays the image channel update. **Proposed behavior** Resolve the full-SHA master image. Verify its platform index, digest and signed source identity. Retag that immutable digest. Build normally when the image does not exist. **Reason and benefit** Remove duplicate image builds while keeping missing-image recovery and the current npm channel check. A recent duplicate used about 25 runner-minutes. The saving depends on whether the master image exists. ## What Changed - Add a canary-only reuse job before the native matrix. - Require signed provenance from the canonical Docker workflow on master at the exact source and signer commit. Read the proof from GHCR. - Reuse the validated digest or build both platforms when the full-SHA image is absent. Stop on registry and verification errors. - Keep the serialized npm dist-tag promotion after either path. Keep other build lanes independent. - Add failure tests, register them in CI and update release documentation. ## Verification - Passed 603 tests: `node --test '.github/scripts/tests/*.test.mjs' scripts/standard-image-contract.test.mjs scripts/reuse-canary-image.test.mjs scripts/__tests__/release-verify-workflow.test.mjs scripts/cloud-source-verification.test.mjs`. - Passed `actionlint -shellcheck='' .github/workflows/docker.yml .github/workflows/pr-trusted.yml` and `git diff --check`. - Full actionlint reports the same six existing shellcheck findings as the unchanged master workflow. No new findings. - A published master image passed the exact provenance command. This was a read-only check. No images were retagged. - Gitleaks and manual diff inspection found no secrets or private references. - Attempted `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run` and `pnpm build`. They cannot start because this isolated checkout has no installed dependencies (`tsc` and `tsx` are absent). Repository CI passed on `3c46f0152d4db94a7f393bc79f466aa6c2c745e2` after the documented browser-test rerun. All checks are complete. The original failure and prior baseline occurrence remain recorded in the PR comments; its root cause remains unknown. ## Risks - The image can appear just before its attestation. Verification then fails closed. Rerun after the master producer completes. - Reuse preserves the first build's resolved dependencies and tool versions. It intentionally does not rebuild the same source to refresh floating inputs. - A skipped or unfinished master image still needs a full build. No speedup is claimed for that path. - End-to-end reuse and runner savings require observation after merge. No live publication was performed. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, through the Codex harness in T3 Code, with xhigh reasoning effort and shell/code tools. The context window size is not exposed by this runtime. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
9e904ee519 | perf(server): overlap independent heartbeat preparation reads (#18372) | ||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
1353a232f2 |
test(e2e): add a portable active follow-up journey (#18345)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people direct agents while their work is active. > - Product E2E checks must prove that saved user input reaches the intended work. > - The existing active chat story depends on a file in a local agent workspace. > - That setup cannot qualify an attached deployment with remote agent execution. > - This change adds one shared active follow-up journey through the normal task UI and API. > - Independent native operation, saved input, final reply, and cleanup checks make the result inspectable across targets. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Product E2E coverage for a user follow-up sent while a native agent is working. **Current behavior** The classic chat story holds work open with a local file. The shared deployment-targeted harness has no active follow-up journey. A running heartbeat alone cannot prove that work was active when input arrived. **Proposed behavior** Run one bounded command through the real native provider. Observe its active execution before and after one follow-up is saved. Require one final reply with the late requirement, correct task and agent identity, an empty input queue, and visible readback after reload. Use the same story on managed and attached targets. ## What Changed - Add a shared `followup-while-running` journey with normal task creation and reply submission. - Require a bound native turn and pending shell execution at the input boundary. Retain a closed receipt with source identity and a row hash. - Accept one steered work run or one normal successor (1–2 native runs). Preserve every other journey's declared run contract. - Reuse the saved native final reply observer, run binding checks, usage collection, target lifecycle and private evidence path. - Accept canonical builtin/process execution events independent of provider tool display names; calibrate against real OpenCode, Codex and ACP mappers. Reject Paperclip semantic tool names across native wrappers/prefixes and unnamed or ambiguous builtin calls. - Recognize only the observed legacy PRP v1 builtin/bash/unknown/readOnly=false command shape and fail promptly when owned work finishes before a live boundary can be observed. - Ready the task page/composer before the observed command boundary, use a bounded 90-second command, and preserve active-after-persistence proof. - Add adversarial oracle and retained-result calibration. Register the journey, include its sources in the definition hash, and document its coverage. - Keep six real browser document-readiness checks and verify shared-deadline behavior with a deterministic clock/state test that rejects timeout-reset mutations. ## Verification Exact current head `e72e20ad111bd94728d38606015d1fdac3c92929` passed [full CI run 41142552195](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142552195): all 49 workflow jobs reached accepted terminal results, including typecheck, build, every test lane and aggregate verify. All 59 reported checks are terminal: 55 success, three expected skips and one neutral 5/5 Paperclip review. Snyk passed. [Fresh Greptile review](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18345#issuecomment-6528913235) explicitly names this exact head and gives 5/5. No review threads remain open. The PR is mergeable. These source gates do not establish a live QA pass at this head. Fresh protected QA at this exact source and the separately recorded deployed application/runtime remains required before primary merge and daily admission. Historical live QA staging **PASS** on qualified commit `af9e091b15b5e24b6b2cc1b424523430cc2ab024`: 6/6 checks, all five phases including cleanup, two native work runs, and the configured model/environment check passed. The [sanitized qualification report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/evals-qa-smoke-41122620146-1/) records that exact measurement. Final integration head `e72e20ad111bd94728d38606015d1fdac3c92929` merges exact actual squash `18b1637b6371a6a6adade857e2a73654ee626fef` from [#18254](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18254) into previous head `e54d64743964b1a19d165537bebbe62c50389a23`. The merge had no conflicts. All 18 files in this PR's change set, the complete 45-file shared journey directory, and six shared native/evidence helpers retain their exact previous-head Git blobs: 59 scoped files in total. The production clarification helper remains blob `800a747284db19b8484650b6759e8bd1f356839d`. Follow-up 1–2 runs, question 1–3 runs, older exact counts, owned native event checks, active-before/after persistence proof, cleanup/accounting and feature mappings remain unchanged. Source integration head `e55d74491f5bcd99c1455e9ace02bd7ad7319fae` integrates exact actual squash `8595efc20bda3ce20a9fbbf34a5d156a6fcf6d57` from [#18385](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18385). The merge had no conflicts. All 17 files in this PR's change set and six shared native/evidence helpers retain their exact Git blobs from previous head `162e341cda5b627639b486b4019a1675bb018ea2`. This preserves the follow-up and question readiness checks, feature mappings, six closed follow-up check IDs, immutable before/after active-operation proof, follow-up 1–2 runs, question 1–3 runs and older exact counts. Previously reviewed head `e54d64743964b1a19d165537bebbe62c50389a23` adds a separate test-only reliability repair on top of that source integration. It replaces one scheduler-sensitive browser case with a deterministic Vitest clock and locator-state model that calls the actual production helper. The six other real Chromium checks remain byte-for-byte unchanged and pass **6/6**. Focused unit suites pass **51/51**, including the deterministic deadline case. This is six browser checks plus focused unit coverage, not seven browser checks. The model makes the panel ready at 100 ms, the supplied answer ready at 600 ms, and full valid content ready at 1,300 ms. It requires rejection at the shared 1,000 ms deadline and records immutable rejection state before simulating a 10-second scheduler stall. Both restarted-timeout mutations fail: resetting all waits wrongly resolves at 1,300 ms; resetting matcher timeouts while keeping the final real deadline guard rejects only at 1,300 ms with valid content present. The genuine helper rejects at 1,000 ms with the answer still incomplete. The production helper is unchanged, Git blob `800a747284db19b8484650b6759e8bd1f356839d`. That two-file test-only patch changed no journey, application, run, accounting, model or runtime behavior. Its six-browser/51-unit results are prior-head evidence; the complete patch is unchanged in the new integration. The final source also retains the actual merged question-primary squash `d9354bbfc35ef74333e90e596ce21dc8e59149b9` from [#18346](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18346). Later commits `409117451da260a03fc28a3107c7808ecbe68f8f` and `ea3e7b1d1bed562351fcf4722c7175001b987b59` bound question document readiness to one campaign deadline and test that waits cannot restart it. Commit `162e341cda5b627639b486b4019a1675bb018ea2` adds question/follow-up report feature mappings and coverage. These files are unchanged by the final merge. The imported upstream source has real application changes: [#18334](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18334) makes managed skill content durable and extends native skill-test contracts; [#18350](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18350) requires managed Cloud shared storage and bootstrap prerequisites. #18385 updates TestOps job metadata and repairs their combined maintenance fixture. The new merge additionally imports [#18383](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18383) at `81ecaf0654fe79a2a2dbda6588f033e39ee610e4`, which bounds failed lifecycle verification; [#18357](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357) at `45a3a92e6dc52d20923b9aa34a22fee2ec5443f9`, which persists sandbox-creation ownership and updates cleanup/adapter/plugin contracts; and #18254 at `18b1637b6371a6a6adade857e2a73654ee626fef`, which accepts a valid late Antigravity authorization URL while native authentication drains. This PR's diff against exact upstream `18b1637b6371a6a6adade857e2a73654ee626fef` contains only journey tests, report coverage and documentation. Harness source and deployed application/runtime identity are separate inputs. This source integration does not deploy the imported application changes or claim the QA target runs this application revision. This final SHA has not been measured by the historical run above: **fresh QA at this exact final head is required before primary merge**, followed by normal TestOps verification/admission. Fresh exact-head CI and review have passed as recorded above. The live measurement must record the actual separately deployed QA application/runtime identity. Seven whole-file blobs remain identical to the qualified SHA. All paths are relative to `tests/runner-e2e/`: | Journey/helper | Unchanged Git blob | | --- | --- | | `product-journeys/active-followup-evidence.ts` | `83a5d9fab52abb9849a40e83eca6b6a9c29bf587` | | `product-journeys/active-followup.test.ts` | `728160c610c18292d2cf06d4a87d25a8719f1734` | | `native-task-reply.ts` | `59d11f1a178dad9db3da8fa2342ff93643cb9922` | | `native-event-envelope.ts` | `305b0b456c59c511ee328e529ad574c0583075a0` | | `run-observations.ts` | `08c8ad184a821a7cd536926b3d7e3d1156a1e3da` | | `user-actions.ts` | `e9611348dc41e17899367dab2e3b36d3d1be9480` | | `stop-redirect-flow.ts` | `4580bd605a425bc72511e02d988492acbec8d60e` | The follow-up preservation comparison against historical `af9` has three explicit exceptions; no whole-file identity is claimed for them. The separately documented question readiness and report additions above also require final-source verification: 1. `product-journeys/agent-flows.ts` adds `question-answer-resume` to the `AgentJourney` type exclusion, alongside follow-up. Its remaining contents and runtime helper bodies are byte-for-byte unchanged. Qualified blob `a0afaa968c1d854476159fef21de7b6dd50a4a98`; final blob `0cc797c0ae594e7769338e63a80c4f67e29e4a54`. 2. The common run-count helper is centralized in `success-contract.ts` and re-exported by the catalog. It accepts follow-up **1–2**, clarification **1–3**, and each older paid journey's exact count. The follow-up catalog entry, maximum of two runs, six required checks, native dispatch, collection and retained-run contract remain byte-for-byte unchanged. The helper's text differs; its preserved count semantics are verified explicitly. 3. `product-journeys/active-followup-flow.ts` changes exactly one composer readiness assertion from Playwright's implicit five-second default to an explicit 30-second timeout, matching `submitTaskReply` for attached targets. Prompts, actions, native evidence, before/after persistence proof and grading otherwise compare byte-for-byte unchanged. Qualified blob `64392329198a1a4d9828e32834d4507e175216e6`; final blob `2746b5ba89e2af26b4097ba7897913186786ac5d`. This correction is why a fresh final-head QA run is required. - **310 focused tests passed at current final head `e72e20ad111bd94728d38606015d1fdac3c92929`**: 286 journey/evidence/catalog/report/shared-deadline tests in 14 files and 24 native authentication/real-child stream-order tests in two files. Both invocations used Node24 and one Vitest worker. The earlier `e55` integration also passed 365 focused tests, including 40 Cloud configuration and 40 TestOps metadata cases; those results remain prior-source evidence. - **157 explicit count assertions passed again at the current final head**, including both interactive ranges, older exact counts, invalid/fractional/non-number values and catalog/contract export identity. The maximum bounds and six closed follow-up check IDs also matched. - Maps and diff checks passed. The official QA runtime-import preflight passed on Node24 at the current final head without network access. It uses a dummy adapter and no credentials. It does not prove target connectivity, sign-in, model readiness or deployed application/runtime identity. Those require the normal protected QA run. No model/provider work or optional Runner release was dispatched. - Current local runtime dependencies use ignored isolated workspace-source views. No shared dependencies or compilers were changed. A previous local typecheck attempt hit stale reused Runner declarations. No full repository typecheck, test run or build was repeated locally; the successful exact-head full CI run above now supplies these gates. - CI on previous head `162e341cda5b627639b486b4019a1675bb018ea2` failed the Cloud/local maintenance fixture in [server shard 9](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41133716802/job/124331643100), plus dependent verify. The actual tested merge combined that head with master `198218bf554877fe3b7a83742eefb3b8f12392c6`. A Cloud child selected local-disk storage and hit the new shared-storage policy. This was a deterministic upstream fixture mismatch; no unchanged failed-job retry was used. - The actual #18385 repair configures a valid Cloud child, verifies local bytes independently, checks the expected provider mismatch and retains exact stored-config readback. Its own final head `b76d5dd40d7711f1b5f6b6316b1114c0aae02d57` passed 59 checks, including [server shard 9](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41133876636/job/124331450635). That prior result supports the repair; it does not replace this final head's fresh CI. Separate repair candidate #18392 and its source/evidence are retained as superseded history. - A local attempt to run the database fixture could not start PostgreSQL because the host exhausted macOS semaphores. A first setup attempt also failed package resolution before test execution. Skipped database cases and these setup failures are not passes. No kernel settings, shared processes or databases were changed. - The complete previous-head CI run [41138618869](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41138618869) finished with one underlying failure: [Runner Vitest shard 1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41138618869/job/124347859445) expected native Antigravity login success but observed failure at `antigravity-auth.test.ts:101`. The lane had one failed test, 1,994 passing tests and eight skipped tests. Aggregate verify failed only because of this lane. All other 57 checks were accepted, including build, typecheck, all server/browser suites, Runner shard 2, Snyk and exact-head 5/5 reviews. No unchanged retry was requested. - The independently reviewed #18254 repair removes an invalid cross-pipe ordering assumption: a valid URL on stderr can arrive after the authenticate response on stdout during drain. Its real-child regression forces both orders. The current final source imports that actual squash; the 24 focused authentication cases pass here. Fresh full CI and exact-head review have now passed for this source, as recorded above. The earlier failed result is not relabeled. - The original live compatibility failure is retained: an older PRP v1 pack labeled builtin `bash` as operation `unknown`, causing the observer to miss the command and never send the follow-up. Its exact shape was reproduced red before repair. Generic unknown operations, semantic tools, wrappers, read-only work and foreign provenance remain rejected. The historical qualified pass used the repaired oracle; no failed result was relabeled. - Earlier CI on `6fad965d69` hit an unchanged heartbeat test's three-second adapter-call wait; its original failure and one narrow rerun remain recorded. The qualified SHA subsequently passed CI. An earlier report-catalog subprocess failure is retained. The final focused Node24 run now includes that suite and passes after the documented report feature mappings. ## Risks The fixture asks the native agent to run one bounded `sleep 90` command. The observer must see actual active native execution; a fast or noncompliant turn fails rather than passing from elapsed time. A completed result requires one or two bounded native work runs, source attribution, configured model/environment, and collection. Unknown provider prices stay unknown. This change does not alter production execution or grant new access. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning and code execution. The host does not expose an exact underlying model version or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with available version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs; existing follow-up execution fixes do not provide this deployment-targeted test - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the enhancement template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket or instance-derived details - [x] I have run the new focused tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
91261d5a03 |
fix(server): preserve budget history for deleted resources (#18389)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Budget views show saved policies, incidents and spend for each company. > - A policy can remain after its agent or project has been deleted. > - The overview currently stops when it cannot resolve that old resource. > - A current agent's budget then becomes unreadable during normal setup. > - This pull request preserves the historical row in display summaries. > - Admission and policy changes still require a real company-owned resource. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The budget overview throws `Agent not found` when a saved policy references a deleted agent. One old resource prevents the company from reading its current budgets. The same problem affects historical project policies and incident summaries. **Expected behavior** The overview should retain historical policy and incident IDs and spend. It should display `Deleted agent` or `Deleted project` for a missing resource. Read access must not grant permission to execute work or change a budget for that resource. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an agent and a budget policy for it. 2. Permanently delete the agent after its other dependencies have been cleared. 3. Read the company's budget overview. The existing service throws instead of returning its remaining current and historical rows. **Paperclip version or commit** The isolated repair starts from merged commit `d9354bbfc35ef74333e90e596ce21dc8e59149b9` and integrates the exact merged baseline test fix `8595efc20bda3ce20a9fbbf34a5d156a6fcf6d57`. It also integrates the actual merged Antigravity auth fix `18b1637b6371a6a6adade857e2a73654ee626fef` (#18254). The diff against the selected merged parent remains two budget files. **Related work** Earlier reports and implementations: #11058 and #4333. This extracts the product prerequisite from #18351 so it can qualify independently of that journey's other dependencies. The change contains only the budget service repair and four database regression cases. ## What Changed - Resolve deleted agent and project scopes only when building display summaries. Preserve their original IDs, policies, incidents and accounting records. - Reject a saved policy or incident that resolves to another company's resource. Propagate other read failures. - Keep missing-company resolution, work admission and policy changes strict. Validate company, policy and incident scope bindings before either incident action. A budget raise requires a live company-owned resource. Historical dismissal may proceed only for a genuinely deleted owned agent/project, and must reject live foreign or mismatched scopes. - Add four canonical PostgreSQL regression cases: deleted agent history, deleted project history, missing-scope admission and budget raises with safe historical dismissal, and foreign/mismatched references. The history cases also verify current ledger spend and unchanged stored rows. ## Verification - Real-service RED/GREEN against official PGlite with every canonical migration: the original overview throws for deleted history; the repair returns the historical IDs, incidents and spend while retaining current budgets. - Mutation regression RED/GREEN: missing-resource budget raises must reject before writes; owned deleted-scope dismissal must reject its linked pending approval, retain policy/agent/ledger data and incident history, and remove the incident from the active list. Live foreign and mismatched scopes reject both actions without mutations. - Current integrated head `b3434f5ad05fd3067379352700c36bfe826179c4`: all four canonical PostgreSQL regressions pass in [server 2/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142588583/job/124361194077), and all five existing budget-service tests pass in [server 7/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142588583/job/124361194080). Both use the CI merge against selected parent `18b1637`. - Clean-build declaration typing passes in the current CI typecheck gate. The earlier local source-alias no-emit check also passed, including the canonical actor argument. The local worktree borrows compiled dependencies from a sibling checkout; a later real-service import was blocked by its stale `sandboxCreationOperations` export, so clean-build CI is authoritative for the final integration. No production workaround was made. - `git diff --check` passes. Broad repository typecheck, tests and build run in current-head CI rather than repeated locally. Native local PostgreSQL could not start because this host exhausted its semaphore pool; no global IPC settings or unrelated processes were changed. - One unchanged Runner lane retry was authorized after a probable intermittent close-settlement fixture failure. The [original failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142588583/job/124360234111) occurred in `omitted-context` cleanup. A [fresh passing Linux lane](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142552195/job/124360110386) passed the same case and all 1,998 tests with byte-identical entire Runner and adapter-utils trees, lockfile, root package, scripts and workflows, against the same merged base. The fixture has a five-second close allowance with a 2.5-second suspension reserve; a host stall is not proven. No budget path or changed close input was found. The [single targeted retry](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142588583/job/124365812609) passed the same case in 1,034 ms and all 1,998 lane tests; dependent verification also passed. All 57 current PR checks are terminal and green. - The product helper requires all current CI and clean review before merge. Actual QA budget-overview proof will run on the combined final app before hiring qualification. No deployed success is claimed. The older `b4863dd` artifact was never deployed; selected parent `18b1637` adds sandbox/lifecycle changes and migration 0418, so whole-app identity is not claimed. The budget module and relevant budget contracts remain unchanged, and final hiring requires the combined final app with explicit source identities. ## Risks Budget summaries now return historical rows whose resources have been deleted. These rows use explicit display names and preserve their accounting data. They do not create a resource or relax work admission, authorization or budget grants. Historical incident dismissal changes only that incident and its linked approval; it does not resume work or raise a budget. Cross-company references still fail closed. There is no schema migration and no new background work. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific backend model ID or fixed context window. Used reasoning, repository tools, TypeScript and database test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the PR description documents the display-only history and strict-mutation contract) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1031.0-canary.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
18b1637b63 |
fix(runner): accept late Antigravity login URL during drain (#18254)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work performed by AI agents. > - The native Runner owns Antigravity subscription sign-in. > - Sign-in receives completion on stdout and the browser URL on stderr. > - The two pipes can deliver the completion result before the valid URL. > - The owner rejected that URL after it entered the completed phase. > - This pull request accepts one validated URL while the same child drains. > - A real child regression now proves the order and the failure controls. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18188, #18189, and #18190. Related qualification work: #18345 and #18356. The duplicate search found this existing PR, so this update preserves its history and adds the real child proof here. **What happened?** A valid sign-in can fail when the authenticate response arrives before the authorization URL on the other pipe. The completed phase then rejects the valid URL. The same existing success case failed in [current follow-up CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41138618869/job/124347859445). That log has no stream-order trace, so it does not prove its inner failure branch. **Expected behavior** Both valid delivery orders must succeed. Invalid or duplicate URLs, unexpected protocol requests, failed retirement, and failed credential verification must still fail. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a synthetic native child that completes authenticate on stdout. 2. Wait for stdin EOF before it emits the authorization URL on stderr. EOF proves that the parent accepted the result and began retirement. 3. The valid case fails on frozen master `45a3a92e6dc52d20923b9aa34a22fee2ec5443f9`. The invalid and duplicate controls pass there. 4. Run the same regression with this PR's existing production fix. All three cases pass. **Paperclip version or commit** Existing reviewed PR parent: `646f5cdf37898ad54e1fa1cdfe39f59844da3e7c`. Frozen actual master for the real child RED: `45a3a92e6dc52d20923b9aa34a22fee2ec5443f9`. ## What Changed - Accept one fully validated authorization URL in the authentication or completed-drain phase. Keep duplicate rejection and all existing URL checks. - Retain the ten existing in-memory controls for both valid orders and eight failure paths. - Add three real child cases for valid, invalid, and duplicate late URLs. Use stdin EOF to order the streams without sleeps or a mocked retirement handler. - Check exact protocol requests, child exit, close-once behavior, Google-call counts, and persisted refresh rotation. This update changes only the existing test file; it adds no production delta to the reviewed parent. ## Verification - Frozen actual master: the new valid real child case fails, while both negative controls pass. The original eight-control parent calibration also remains recorded in this PR's history. - Existing fixed source plus the new tests: 24 passed. This includes 11 existing authentication tests, ten stream controls, and three real child cases. - Late invalid and duplicate URLs fail with zero Google calls. The valid case makes two mocked identity calls and saves the rotated synthetic refresh token. All three retire the real child and close the command lease once. - Scoped owning TypeScript `noEmit` passes for the auth module and both test files. The temporary configuration is not committed. Diff and credential-pattern checks pass. - The tests use real child pipes and private synthetic files. Google responses and the command installation are mocked. No provider account, network request, model run, app, or QA deployment was used. - Full monorepo typecheck, tests, and build were not run locally. Fresh [normal CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41140757050) passes on `1744c9f3374f78b10c2f15c42f3cf5d3af8c3119`: 56 successful checks, two skipped, and one neutral. Typecheck, build, Rust, static, Runner, server and browser lanes pass. Greptile gives that exact head a fresh 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. The PR is mergeable and clean. The earlier parent's passing CI remains historical evidence only. ## Risks The change accepts a URL while the same authenticated child drains. It still validates the exact OAuth URL and rejects a second URL. Success still requires the authenticate result, verified credentials, and proven process retirement. No provider pins, contracts, timeout bounds, retries, or public APIs change. Existing documentation already specifies these sign-in semantics; no documentation change is needed. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with tool use and code execution. The exact runtime model ID and context window were not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
45a3a92e6d |
fix(environments): persist sandbox ownership before creation (#18357)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages companies and the agents that do their work. > - Remote execution creates provider resources that need a durable owner. > - The server could create a sandbox before it saved its lease. > - A failed lease write could leave cleanup data only on the old web server disk. > - This change saves a company-scoped operation before creation and transfers ownership atomically. > - Recovery finds the original Daytona resource or records an explicit manual reconciliation outcome. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A sandbox could exist without a lease after a database failure or company rebind. Failed cleanup recording could then create a local fallback file. Replacing that web server could lose the cleanup reference. **Expected behavior** A failed admission write makes no provider call. An interrupted creation retains a committed operation. Recovery must not create a second sandbox or destroy an attached lease. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run the disposable PostgreSQL cases in `server/src/__tests__/sandbox-creation-operations.test.ts`. 2. Reject the lease insert after the controlled provider creates its resource. 3. Start a new receiver process with a different empty web disk. It must find the same resource and create one cleanup owner. Related ownership report: Refs #14672. This change addresses new allocations before lease persistence. It does not replace existing lease recovery. ## What Changed - Add an idempotent migration and a small creation-operation table. Retain original company, environment and run identities across deletion. - Commit creation intent before run, ad-hoc lease, and plugin task replacement calls. Fence duplicate requests and ambiguous lease commits. - Retain a known returned task resource ID in the existing operation before attachment. Preserve manual reconciliation and never delete an ambiguously attached resource. - Keep company and run authority checks and atomic lease transfer with the lease owner. - Reuse Daytona names, labels, read-only inspection and claimed cleanup. Keep provider payload handling in the provider. - Retain nonsecret credential identity hashes. Refuse recovery lookup under a changed credential value. - Record manual reconciliation for missing/deleted or explicitly inactive saved credentials, versions, and provider vaults. Keep temporary resolution failures retryable. Never reactivate a disabled credential. - Use transaction signals and concrete deadlines. Failed records back off independently. Manual reconciliation stays durable and quiet. - Remove new orphan-file fallback writes from the covered paths. Keep legacy file replay and its tests for cutover. - Replace obsolete fallback-producer assertions with normal-entrypoint durability tests. Keep cleanup, diagnostics and warm handoff coverage. ## Verification - [Independent current-head verification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6534744320) passed 190/190 combined tests, 40/40 incoming TestOps tests, full workspace typecheck, and build. PR head `958af986130f25e136065ad30d1fdd843c46255c` has tree `e6c3e5b02182d5941a70ccf5bf55638df3c2e28d`, identical to tested combined commit `b9d7a9c2e9b30f0153685fb24a5f70b56132201f`. Real PostgreSQL, compiled Rust Runner and controlled object providers were used; external-S3 integration remains outside this local proof. - Current head `958af986130f25e136065ad30d1fdd843c46255c` normally merges master `8595efc20bda3ce20a9fbbf34a5d156a6fcf6d57`. The sole conflict was the maintenance test: a parameterized case now preserves both legacy-local `local_storage` and valid shared-S3 `provider_mismatch` checks, including the parent local receipt, exact version identity, missing-snapshot/no-seed refusal, and unchanged persisted row. The three master TestOps files remain intact. No production, schema, migration, or package changes were made after the fully qualified prior head `0b4d05505e`. Independent review approved the resolution; the full managed-skill-content file and Cloud guard controls pass 58/58 (105.11 seconds). [Required PR CI passed on this exact merge head, first attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41136987412): 54 successful checks and three intended skips. The additional Paperclip review is neutral at 4/5; two external Superagent checks (Contributor trust and Security Scan) remain in progress with zero annotations and no assessment, so they are not passing scan evidence. Greptile reviewed exact head `958af986130f25e136065ad30d1fdd843c46255c` at 5/5; the final thread audit has zero unresolved threads. All completed evidence below retains its recorded revision scope. The additional Paperclip Review on `958af98613` is neutral at 4/5 with a Ship verdict and no must-fix or should-fix item. Its optional observation is that a generic create rejection remains pending/manual even when an operator believes allocation did not occur. This change preserves uncertainty because the generic create-error contract does not prove provider absence; no new error classification or provider-specific compensation was added. - [Independent final-source verification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6534328247) passed all 189 real-PostgreSQL/Runner and controlled-fixture cases, full workspace typecheck, and build. The integration commit `c8411a8528386f4824b340ec5fdaaed1efb9ea69` has the same source tree as final PR head `0b4d05505e` (tree `bda65efc14b4c904d0f589154db77bb160641c8c`). Controlled object-provider coverage passed; the separately guarded external-S3 suite was not run because the bounded local MinIO pull was unavailable. This includes the two final compatibility fixes. - The first final-head CI attempt exposed one E2E timing failure in `disconnect-write-recovery.spec.ts:181`: the title stayed unchanged through the 15-second session-recovery poll. The same original case passed in 13.8 seconds on immediately prior head `7ec06f77b7`, and all UI/session/E2E source is identical across those heads. The failure log and CI artifacts are retained; no cause is claimed. One failed-job-only retry is authorized on this evidence, without changing a timeout, assertion, or production behavior. [The single failed-job retry completed successfully](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41133619710/attempts/2): all 35 E2E shard cases passed (6.6 minutes), including the original session-recovery case in 14.0 seconds. The initial failure remains disclosed and its cause remains unproven. - Final head `0b4d05505ee0aa72f2981cdff74761406960ec73` adds two independently reviewed integration fixes after the complete 7ec CI matrix exposed two deterministic failures. Server 9/12 failed legacy local-storage maintenance because the CLI reached the new Cloud server startup guard; server 5/12 found the Daytona package version did not match its bumped manifest. The failed run is retained at https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41131204203. It is not passing evidence and was not blindly retried. - Maintenance now constructs the existing explicit storage dependency after loading the required persisted Cloud snapshot, and passes it to both maintenance owners. It can verify legacy local storage before provider cutover while normal Cloud server startup remains guarded. The original case reproduced red locally, then the complete managed-skill-content and managed-cloud-prerequisites files passed 57/57 (32.05 seconds), including missing-snapshot refusal, unchanged stored configuration, and existing server guard controls. Daytona package version now matches manifest 0.1.10; the complete bundled package identity file passed 14/14 (3.98 seconds), and explicit manifest/lifecycle controls passed 2/2 (328 intentionally filtered; 3.42 seconds). An initial workspace-filter command matched no project and is not counted as pass evidence. The final diff changes no sandbox runtime or schema behavior. [Full CI is green on this exact final head](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41133619710/attempts/2): 56 successful checks, three intended skips, one additional incomplete/neutral Paperclip Review, and no pending or failed checks. The neutral review is not a passing assessment. [Greptile reviewed the exact final head at 5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6529396969), with no new actionable issues and all review threads resolved. - Final combined head `7ec06f77b7c14a745c569d18401f16df3d26b626` includes master managed-skills migration 0417 and shared-storage prerequisites from `198218bf55` through normal merges. Sandbox creation moves to generated `0418_curved_lady_mastermind.sql`; its idempotent SQL is byte-for-byte unchanged. The regenerated 0418 snapshot contains both sandbox creation operations and the master skill mutation receipts, and points to the master 0417 snapshot. Master SQL and journal history remain intact. Exactly five snapshots remain, 0414 through 0418. The only sandbox-specific changes since the approved credential policy are migration metadata/number and the matching test/document references; the sandbox runtime files are unchanged. - [Independent final combined verification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6533960026) passed on integration revision `e6f05b4cf0cd`, containing final sandbox head `7ec06f77b7` and actual master `198218bf55`: migration/declaration checks, all 158 real-PostgreSQL/Runner and controlled-fixture cases (251 seconds), full workspace typecheck (81 seconds), and build (35 seconds). - Final combined migration proof: fresh real PostgreSQL has both tables. A separate original-0417 sandbox table with a retained pending row survives two applications of the renamed 0418 SQL unchanged, with the expected primary/index and foreign-key structure. Migration numbering/safety checks pass. The normal runtime migration reapply case passes 1/1 (20 intentionally filtered cases; 46.69 seconds). The first temporary qualification harness stopped before any database assertion because its external `.ts` file selected CommonJS; the `.mts` harness corrected that setup and passed. Independent review approved the exact metadata and reference diff. Earlier full suite and live-provider results below retain their stated revision scope. - Credential-policy head `c606d473b03709f27577a55a1dfc0b0d3b4359fd` handles the remaining inactive-credential review warning. The existing boundary accepts only concrete secret-owner 422 codes and exact no-details disabled/coming-soon vault messages. Unknown 422, authorization errors, provider wrappers, and temporary database/provider failures still propagate. Independent source review approved this three-file correction. No generic resolver, schema, provider protocol, retry cap, or activation behavior changed. - Creation/cleanup qualification at `c606d473b0`: all 39 cases pass against real PostgreSQL (81.27 seconds). The new cases use actual disabled/archived saved secrets, a valid disabled version, and provider vaults created ready before normal API updates disable them or mark them coming soon. Each remains manual through restart/repeated scans, with zero provider lookup and no retry deadline. The independent plugin idle blocker remains intact. The temporary 503 control retains retry ownership and later recovers one cleanup owner. Before this correction, all five inactive-state cases remained pending; that failed evidence is retained. The prior 18-case known-ID task proof below belongs to `237144fcf6`, whose helper and task path are unchanged by this correction. - Known-ID head `237144fcf69a249c0e0310563428c0f55ed6d55c` also addresses the independent task-replacement reliability warning. The existing creation operation now saves only the known nonsecret returned resource ID before expiry validation and attachment. The write is scoped to operation/company/original environment and allows only a missing or matching ID. It changes no ownership state and copies no resolved configuration, credentials, or provider payload. Independent source review approved this four-file fix. - The complete real-PostgreSQL task suite passes 18/18 (9.52 seconds). Rejected attachments retain the ID through manual reconciliation and repeated scans. A real committed attachment followed by an injected lost response retains the same active lease and attached operation, with no release or second create. Same-ID retries work; conflicting IDs and foreign companies cannot change it. The initial three regression cases failed because the ID was absent, before the fix. - The shipped Daytona manifest does not declare task support, so it cannot enter this generic replacement path. The dispatcher requires both declared task support and an environmentTask worker method. Generic drivers without creation lookup still use manual reconciliation, with a known returned ID retained when the database write can commit. No automatic lookup capability or unconditional compensation was added. - Previous boundary-fix head `8ba77def151ea85eeae2db7693254db7f87673b0` fixes the fresh review finding about missing credentials. Only known secret-owner 404 results at the recovery secret-resolution boundary select the existing manual outcome. Provider inspection and transient database/provider errors remain retryable. Independent source review approved this change. - Secret-boundary focused acceptance at `8ba77def15`: all 34 cases pass against isolated real PostgreSQL. The complete creation suite passes 16/16 (100.75 seconds); the complete cleanup coordinator suite passes 18/18 (99.83 seconds). The new cases use normal saved-secret creation and deletion, confirm zero provider lookup, restart/repeated scans, no automatic deadline, preserved independent plugin idle blocking, and no additional idle blocker after the controlled worker supplies its quiet proof. A temporary 503 resolution failure preserves pending ownership and later recovers one cleanup owner. No additional live provider resource was created. - Failed attempts remain part of the evidence. The initial red run reproduced the pending-operation bug and also exposed a numeric-deadline test harness mistake, which was corrected. A later combined run reported an existing replacement-receiver failure and a new idle-fixture assertion failure; it was interrupted while the next test file remained in imports. An isolated diagnostic confirmed that the manual state was correct but the installed fixture plugin correctly blocked sleep without its independent quiet proof. The corrected test retains that blocker assertion before supplying the controlled worker witness. The unchanged replacement-receiver case passes in the final complete 16-case run; its earlier failure is not counted as a pass or assigned a proven cause. No timeout or production idle guard was relaxed. - Greptile reviewed previous combined head `7ec06f77b7c14a745c569d18401f16df3d26b626` at 5/5, with no unresolved review threads. Its CI produced the two concrete integration failures addressed above. The earlier CI and live evidence below remain historical evidence, not a claim that the current full gates have completed. - Master integration update: merged `dbff3747b8` and then latest master `76fde891cc` without rewriting branch history. Only `doc/DATABASE.md` conflicted; the sandbox ownership, object-backed run evidence, and cloud configuration sections all remain. The master merges changed no sandbox implementation, migration, or provider code. Migration numbering/safety checks pass and exactly five schema snapshots remain. At merge head `f5d23d4a59828835d01c150f83fa2645fb2d3bec`, the two focused creation/coordinator suites pass all 32 cases against isolated real PostgreSQL (64.57 seconds). Those merge-head checks precede the missing-credential fix below. The earlier live Daytona proof still covers the unchanged normal creation/lookup/teardown path; the new missing-credential branch is qualified with real PostgreSQL and controlled provider hooks. The optional Superagent Security Scan was inconclusive on prior head `7ec06f77b7`: its pinned PR merge-base checkout failed or timed out, with a neutral conclusion and zero annotations. An earlier scan could not start within 120 seconds; a bounded rerun request returned HTTP 404. These scanner failures are not passing security-scan evidence. On final head `0b4d05505e`, the additional Paperclip Review check is neutral: its assigned review execution did not complete and produced no validated assessment. Fresh Greptile 5/5 and independent source review are separate evidence. Previous-head required CI, independent review, and the live Daytona qualification below passed. - [Complete previous-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41105726052) passed at `0b5cbb763ab8faa25aa0ff1d8a405cdc0d3db409`: 53 successful checks and three intended skips, including typecheck, full tests, build and E2E. Greptile is 5/5 on this head and both original findings are resolved. - Initial head: 200 PostgreSQL runtime, creation and coordinator tests passed. The corrected head also passes all 32 creation and coordinator tests, including deletion before/during lookup, a failed lookup after deletion, restart, settled polling and actual idle-safety checks. Cases cover failed admission, failed lease writes, concurrent recovery, lost provider replies, ambiguous transfer retries, company rebind, environment deletion, stopped runs, lookup backoff, restart, drain and settled SQL quiet. - Separate receiver processes: passed. A controlled HTTP provider retains the resource while three independent receiver processes use two empty web disks. Recovery creates one cleanup owner and never repeats creation. - Fresh PostgreSQL migration and two additional applications: passed. The pending creation row survives unchanged. - Server TypeScript and SDK/shared build checks pass after the corrections. Migration numbering/safety checks passed. Exactly five schema snapshots remain. - Daytona adapter: all 330 tests passed, including stable-name lookup, ownership checks, deletion and the updated manifest version. An earlier run exposed the version expectation and it was corrected. Previous-head CI passed. - Live Daytona acceptance passed on `0b5cbb763a`: isolated real PostgreSQL, normal runtime acquisition through independent receiver processes, actual Daytona plugin/SDK 0.203.0, one disposable Ubuntu 24.04 sandbox (1 CPU / 1 GiB RAM / 1 GiB disk). A forced lease insert failure retained the committed operation; a fresh receiver with empty disk found the same sandbox, repeated recovery retained one cleanup owner, and the actual claimed cleanup sweep expired the lease and resolved the operation. Independent SDK lookup returned typed not-found; ordinary recorded-ID inspection returned destroyed. This successful attempt made one create, one recovery lookup, and one teardown. Two earlier failed harness/provider-confirmation attempts are disclosed in the [live acceptance record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6530313054). The coordinator independently queried all three exact resource IDs through the SDK and confirmed typed not-found for each. - Complete CI-affected heartbeat/plugin warm-task suites passed 21/21 after test corrections. An unchanged workspace exposure case passed in isolation after the prior CI shard reported an unhandled readiness rejection. Complete previous-head CI and refreshed review passed. ## Risks - Deleted companies retain an explicit manual reconciliation outcome. Recovery does not retry missing credentials or insert a lease for a deleted company. - Only Daytona declares automatic creation lookup. Other uncertain providers retain `needs_reconciliation`. A missing creation name alone cannot prove that a late allocation will never appear. - Pending operations use the existing process-local signal and startup recovery model. This does not add cross-replica wake delivery or prove deployed sleep. - Legacy direct provider probes and custom-image setup use separate lifecycles. They are outside this replacement of the run-lease orphan-file fallback. The normal Test path that acquires a runtime lease is covered. - Existing orphan files still require the separate cutover inventory and settlement. This change does not delete them. - The schema change is additive. The new SQL can be reapplied. Historical SQL and journal entries are preserved; only the oldest generated snapshot is pruned. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with tool use, code execution and repository review. The harness did not report the context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge The required branch status checks (`ci / verify`, `ci / e2e`) and all test/build jobs passed on this head. The non-required Superagent Contributor trust and Security Scan checks are still running without findings; they are not claimed as passes. No required check or branch rule is overridden. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
81ecaf0654 |
fix(server): bound failed lifecycle verification (#18383)
Failed lifecycle verification could allocate another test environment every minute indefinitely. Count failed host verification tests separately from claims, persist a repair wait for confirmed configuration failures or three generic failed tests, and clear it through authorized retry or execution configuration changes. Preserve typed temporary execution-target failures through adapter checks so timeouts, transport failures and interrupted probes keep automatic recovery. Retain existing readiness, authorization, termination and cleanup gates. Document the policy and add real PostgreSQL persistence and actual OpenCode adapter regressions. Verified 398 focused tests (one Windows-only test skipped on macOS), repository-wide typecheck and build, structural checks, fully green current-head CI and Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved comments. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1030.0-canary.19 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8595efc20b |
fix(evals): support official TestOps job metadata (#18385)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and verifies real work through Product E2E tests. > - The fixed Chat feature workflow uses TestOps to select and report one backlog case. > - Official registration exposes a workflow-query URL and a Branch parameter. > - The existing reader accepts only workflow-file or numeric URLs, and the admin launcher requires an operation parameter. > - These assumptions reject valid official metadata before the feature can run. > - This pull request supports the exact observed form while preserving source, selection, and once-only execution checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #18322, #18375. **What happened?** The second zero-model bootstrap stopped with a generic job-mismatch code. Ordinary TestOps UI inspection then showed an official workflow-query URL outside the accepted literals and a Branch-only job. The exact first failed predicate in that bootstrap remains unknown. **Expected behavior** Accept that exact fixed-workflow URL. Preserve the existing master Branch value when the job has no operation parameter. Keep rejecting foreign URLs, unknown parameters, wrong branches, and conflicting operation IDs before mutation. **Steps to reproduce** Pass the official query URL and Branch-only metadata through the existing bootstrap, selection, and admin-launch owners. The new pure controls exercise those actual helpers without a CLI, backend, or model call. **Paperclip version or commit** This change starts from `0e15c92073a09e50df99190a37f69a86286b989b` after #18375. **Deployment mode** GitHub Actions and the protected TestOps reporting environment. ## What Changed - Share one exact URL predicate across bootstrap, evaluation selection, and admin preparation. Add only the observed official workflow-query literal. - Support Branch-only, operation-only, and Branch-plus-operation jobs with strict definition IDs, names, values, and duplicate checks. - Preserve the exact master Branch value. Set an existing operation parameter to `evaluate`; otherwise use the fixed workflow's existing default. - Use the same checked parameter vector for job and plan writes and their readbacks. - Report distinct fixed bootstrap predicate codes without response values. - Document when the protected operation-parameter ID is required. - Align one existing Cloud-maintenance test with the inherited managed-Cloud S3 policy. Preserve the same-version local-storage proof in the parent, use valid synthetic Cloud settings in the child, and check the expected provider mismatch without S3 requests. Retain the no-seed and unchanged persisted-row assertions. ## Verification - URL controls: three failures on the parent; all pass with the correction. - Branch controls: two failures and one correct rejection on the predecessor; all pass with the correction. - `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-feature-testops-api.test.mjs`: 40 owning pure/mock controls pass on Node 26.4.0. - Two MJS syntax checks and `git diff --check` pass. TypeScript noEmit was not run for this MJS/documentation change. - The first [normal CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41131094974) failed only in the managed-skill Cloud fixture and its dependent verification gate: 46 jobs passed, two failed, and one skipped. The tested merge included a new upstream policy that rejects the test's local-disk Cloud configuration. The exact caught runtime exception remains unknown. - Three pure controls using the actual policy validator pass: the old invalid Cloud fixture rejects, the new synthetic S3 fixture admits, and an invalid master key rejects. An initial tsx wrapper IPC permission error executed zero controls and remains a separate setup failure. - The PostgreSQL/maintenance-child test was not run locally. On new-head AWS CI, `managed-skill-content.test.ts` passed all 17 tests in server shard 9. - [Normal CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41133876636) is green on exact head `b76d5dd40d7711f1b5f6b6316b1114c0aae02d57`: 48 jobs passed and one skipped. Both required `ci / e2e` and `ci / verify` pass. - Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no actionable findings or unresolved review threads. - No actual CLI, backend, model, provider, app, database, build, or bootstrap was run to validate this correction locally. ## Risks The exact original bootstrap predicate is still unknown. This fixes a demonstrated metadata false negative and preserves the prior failed run. Actual backend parameter types and integration dispatch still need verification. Unknown metadata stops before the once marker and writes. This PR changes no workflow, credential, case, model, grader, clock, or private-evidence policy. It does not claim a passing feature result. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) with reasoning, code editing, tool use, and pure test review. The runtime does not expose the exact context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
198218bf55 |
fix(config): require shared storage for managed cloud (#18350)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Managed Cloud instances must retain shared objects and secrets across server replacement. > - Implicit storage defaults can select local disk or an unintended bucket. > - Cloud runtime settings now come from a canonical database snapshot. > - This pull request validates bootstrap prerequisites before database setup and effective S3 settings after snapshot resolution. > - The benefit is an actionable refusal before local signing state or HTTP setup, while valid canonical Cloud settings work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A managed Cloud instance could start with local disk storage, an implicit bucket, or a local key file. After canonical Cloud configuration landed, checking only environment or file values would also reject a valid database bucket. Shared schema defaults could make an omitted raw bucket appear explicit. **Expected behavior** Managed Cloud requires external PostgreSQL, a stable environment master key, and effective S3 settings with a nonblank bucket. The canonical snapshot remains the configuration authority. Invalid configuration refuses startup before signing or HTTP effects. Self-hosted defaults remain compatible. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Select managed Cloud with its tenant token or managed configuration document. 2. Leave storage as local disk, or omit the S3 bucket from a raw canonical snapshot. 3. Start the server. Startup must refuse. An explicit valid bucket in the canonical snapshot must work without a file or environment bucket. **Paperclip version or commit** Current base: `4edd10804e2b42941aa2038e90c362c13a0b98dc`. **Deployment mode** Managed Cloud. Ordinary self-hosted defaults remain unchanged. Related PRs: #18335 owns canonical Cloud runtime configuration. #18327 owns S3 run logs. #18352 owns credential persistence. #18347 owns cutover checks. This PR adds configuration prerequisites to those existing boundaries. ## What Changed - Validate external PostgreSQL and a stable environment master key at the Cloud bootstrap boundary, before database setup. - Validate effective S3 settings after canonical snapshot publication and before Cloud signing, runtime consumers, or HTTP setup. - Require a nonblank bucket in the Cloud snapshot schema. Reject omitted or blank buckets in every legacy Cloud file before one-time import normalization, even when an environment bucket is supplied. Keep shared self-hosted schema defaults. - Preserve typed bucket provenance at the existing file-read boundary. Accept explicit canonical bucket names, including `paperclip`, and environment settings when the snapshot is null. - Validate effective legacy storage with the existing resolver before seeding. A rejected candidate leaves no canonical rows, so a corrected source file can be imported on retry. Environment overlays are checked but never persisted. - Add real PostgreSQL snapshot and migration-retry tests, startup refusal tests, and environment/file compatibility controls. Document that Cloud always requires its stable environment key, even with an external default secrets provider. ## Verification - Latest focused acceptance passed 199/199 in six files (54.29 seconds), using the command below plus `server/src/__tests__/cloud-configuration-migration-postgres.test.ts`. Real PostgreSQL proves rejected storage leaves all three migration authority rows absent, then a corrected legacy file imports on retry. An external-default-secrets control proves the deliberate unconditional Cloud master-key contract. - Before the peer correction, the frozen product diff passed 178 tests in five files: managed-cloud-prerequisites, cloud-runtime-config, server-startup-feedback-export, config-file, and cloud-configuration-readers. Command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/{managed-cloud-prerequisites,cloud-runtime-config,server-startup-feedback-export,config-file,cloud-configuration-readers}.test.ts --maxWorkers=1 --no-file-parallelism`. Real PostgreSQL used a qualified POSIX test-only PG18.6 override because the host cannot supply the stock runtime's SysV semaphore allocation. - Coverage includes raw database and legacy omitted/blank bucket rejection, valid database and environment buckets, null snapshots, explicit default-named buckets, self-hosted compatibility, and refusal before local signing mutation. - The real AWS SDK configured-provider control uses a simulated loopback S3 service. It writes, reads from a fresh provider, and deletes an object. It also reads an encrypted credential with the stable environment key. This does not qualify production cloud permissions. - `git diff --check` passed. Final merges add unrelated master changes from #18241, #18363, and #18370; the focused storage product diff is unchanged. - Peer review reproduced a fresh legacy local-disk import that gained the default bucket before an S3 environment overlay. The importer now requires a raw explicit bucket for every legacy Cloud file. Six controls cover omission/blank values with and without an environment bucket; the full focused rerun passed 184/184 across all five files in 194.89 seconds. - Initial revised startup testing passed 167/168: one fixture omitted the database URL and failed before its intended key assertion. The corrected final run passed 178/178. An initial direct server typecheck failed because Runner declarations were not built; this is a setup failure, not a compile pass. Integration verification rebuilds dependencies before full checks. - Prior head `fae1e4aa` passed complete CI with 53 successes, two intended skips, and Greptile 5/5. `de71345f379cecb71dbfb219f35e14f942c10a3f` then passed complete CI (55 successes, three workflow skips, and a neutral external review), with Greptile 5/5 and zero unresolved threads. The external review identified the preseed rejection problem; its correction is committed at `75e04d0d77e19dcef0a8cb070b6b518f0f173b14`. The final merge head is `19b809ea2823a6a4e5ceb48ef2c2bac4721733d6`; [Fresh complete CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41127309762) passed on that head: 55 successful checks, three workflow skips, and one neutral external review. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no actionable issues. Both earlier external review threads are resolved with the tested fixes. Earlier infrastructure retries remain documented in [the first diagnosis](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18350#issuecomment-6529964690) and [the runner shutdown evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18350#issuecomment-6530364769). Earlier missing SDK build and fixture metadata failures were repaired before those passes. - Current frozen-head CI first attempt failed one unchanged Antigravity authentication success case in Runner Vitest 1/2 (`outcome=failure`, 1994 tests passed). The same file passed 11/11 locally in 2.33 seconds, and identical Runner source passed the prior complete CI run. Attempt 2 retried only failed jobs (the Runner shard and dependent aggregate). Both passed without a source change. No second retry was used. The exact timing cause is not established. [Failed job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41127309762/job/124309181778). - No production data, buckets, or live credentials were used. Complete local repository suites are not duplicated in this worktree; current-head required CI supplies the full suite gate. ## Risks - Managed deployments with local disk, omitted buckets, file-only keys, or missing external database URLs now refuse startup. Operators must supply valid prerequisites before rollout. - Required deployment environment overlays must remain stable across replacements. For example, a saved local-disk provider with an explicit bucket can use an environment S3 provider; removing that required overlay correctly refuses startup until the environment or canonical configuration is corrected. Environment settings are never silently copied into the canonical row. - Effective legacy storage must also pass before first seeding. A bad candidate does not create authority rows. Existing saved rows remain authoritative and can require environment overrides or a canonical configuration change if they are invalid. - A present legacy Cloud file needs an explicit raw bucket even if its saved provider is local disk or its environment supplies a bucket. Correct the file before one-time import, or use the existing absent-file/null-snapshot environment-only setup. Environment overlays are not persisted as operator choices. - A previously stored canonical nonblank `paperclip` bucket is authoritative. Prior normalization erased whether that value was originally explicit. This change cannot recover that provenance and does not reject existing nonblank canonical values. - Validation proves configuration shape, not cloud permissions, database reachability, or key compatibility with existing encrypted data. Keep the master key stable across replacements. - Cloud snapshot JSON parsing is stricter; omitted or blank raw S3 bucket values need correction. No database migration or provider operation changes are added. These prerequisites do not prove that every server persistence path is disposable. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`. Context window: unknown. The model used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0e15c92073 |
feat(skills): make managed content independent of web-server disk (#18334)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents use installed skills and exact version pins during execution. > - Managed skills still depended on mutable directories on the web server. > - A replacement server could lose acknowledged edits or remove an unassigned skill whose directory was absent. > - This pull request makes immutable versions the authority for managed content and installed repository reads. > - The server can rebuild delivery files from durable content after replacement. > - This establishes skills readiness for ephemeral web servers. General server draining and workspace recovery remain separate work. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Skills services, shared contracts, database receipts, Skill Studio, and runtime delivery. **Problem or motivation** A fresh web server must discover, read, edit, and deliver protected installed skills using the same database, object storage, secrets, and supported application artifacts. It must not need its predecessor's files or process memory. **Proposed solution** Use `managed` ownership with a null source locator. Read installed content by immutable version. Prepare packages before a short publication transaction. Persist execution selections before materialization. Recover exact pinned runtime assets and reject deletion while active or recovering pins exist. **Alternatives considered** Reconstructing a mutable installed directory preserves the old source-of-truth ambiguity. Permanent dual writes create two competing authorities. This change uses one managed model after a bounded legacy conversion. **Roadmap alignment** This improves the existing Skills Manager, Studio, version history, and Cloud execution capabilities. The maintainer supplied the implementation contract. This does not add a separate skills product or deploy fleet changes. Related work: #18082 supplies immutable package storage. #17273 addresses edits outside the API for linked local skills; this PR keeps that source category separate. #2648 is a closed earlier ephemeral-filesystem proposal. ## What Changed - Add managed ownership and focused content publication and execution materialization modules. Keep the archive format and package storage tables. - Publish managed create, save, delete, fork, rename, restore, and catalog content with version checks. Add durable create receipts. Preserve file-save receipt responses. - Return file version identities. Keep Studio drafts after a conflict and provide an explicit reload action. A delayed reload cannot overwrite newer typing or navigation. - Persist exact runtime selections, including empty selections. Rebuild pinned assets and verify their admitted digests on a replacement server. - Preserve source access on forks and disconnected copies. Keep the existing workspace policy category for managed skills. - Add bounded conversion, eligibility, and independent verification phases. Load persisted Cloud configuration in the standalone CLI without seeding or changing it. Reject partial current versions against installed inventories; recover only complete saved content or the exact source. Document storage migration blockers and the compatible rollback floor. - Add separate-process PostgreSQL/S3 qualification and update domain, retention, policy, and UI regressions. - Pass the plugin worker manager into Studio execution, admit restricted `skill_test` mode through native Runner contracts, and preserve admitted scope across native and REST tools. Native tests cannot create ordinary tasks, browse company data, or use external tools. - Select the exact durable Studio revision even when unassigned or Beta skills is off. Persist Studio output and audit atomically with native task completion, preserving the result on replay. ## Verification - Final revision `13e8af480b88ba6fea5737bac4bd81104d604792` passed full CI: all 49 workflow jobs completed successfully ([run 41127396098](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41127396098)). This includes typecheck, test suites, Runner checks, browser checks and build. Greptile review 15 is 5/5 on that same revision, with zero unresolved threads. The PR is ready for review. - Local workspace typecheck and build passed after integrating master. Focused checks passed: 33 execution/completion cases, 52 Runner HTTP cases, 16 managed-content cases, 17 Studio cases, the new real-process CLI regression, map checks and UI token gates. The CLI regression proves inspection does not seed missing Cloud configuration. Server typecheck passed after that fix. - The independent-process PostgreSQL/S3 matrix passed through normal HTTP skill routes. It covers A → B → C replacement, lost commit responses, upload crashes, concurrent saves, binary contents and executable delivery. Metadata listing and warm selected delivery retain zero object downloads. Local timing measurements are recorded; they do not establish hosted latency. - Hosted A → B → C passed on the owned disposable test tenant with external Postgres, S3 and a real remote Paperclip Computer. Predecessor temporary homes were absent. C read and executed B's acknowledged managed save. New runs used repository v1 while v2 was installed. Hashes matched an independently checked exact upstream commit. - Compatible image rollback to `6518b323` passed. Studio retained the unassigned fork's C save. A fresh remote run executed the newer managed content and historical repository pin. The actual shell event confirmed expected hashes, stdout, exit 0 and mode 0555. - Runtime candidate `9200e3fcb4` deployed successfully ([Cloud run 41124147876](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/actions/runs/41124147876)). The final Studio test delivered only the unassigned fork's exact v3, executed its script and persisted a successful output snapshot. Independent command-event inspection confirmed all three hashes, stdout, exit 0 and mode 0555. All 14 installations were version-backed. Independent verification checked all 25 versions: 23 remote objects, two bundled database snapshots, zero blockers. - The deployed image is `9200e3fcb4`. Later master integration, the client-only delayed-reload draft guard and the CLI bootstrap have separate automated proof. The CLI bootstrap was also exercised against the tenant's stored configuration and storage through the same read-only services. This PR does not claim that the deployed image is the final PR revision. - Live Studio checks exposed worker wiring, admission, access scope, exact selection and completion-publication gaps. They are fixed. Failed attempts remain in the evidence. The full local suite exceeded 80 minutes under host contention and was stopped. Later combined/isolated local attempts also timed out; they are not counted as passes. Full CI covers the integrated suites. Earlier CI found an obsolete restart-scope fixture, which was corrected and passed all 52 HTTP cases. - Reproduction and migration: [`doc/skill-ephemeral-web-servers.md`](doc/skill-ephemeral-web-servers.md). Source revisions, deployments, versions, run IDs, hashes and failure history: [`doc/plans/2026-10-30-ephemeral-web-skills.md`](doc/plans/2026-10-30-ephemeral-web-skills.md). ## Risks - Legacy conversion requires stopped admission and retired filesystem-authoritative writers. Pre-conversion binaries are not supported rollback targets afterward. - Cloud readiness requires remote object storage. Local provider receipts and provider mismatches remain blockers until objects are copied and verified. - Linked local sources retain filesystem semantics and are outside the cloud guarantee. - Cold reads still fetch the existing archive format. Warm runtime preparation retains the verified-cache path. - Bundled reconciliation preserves an installed head. Existing release snapshots remain selectable. An older server must not replace a newer head with its shipped files. - No production volumes, fleet defaults, or general deployment coordination change in this PR. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser use. The exact backend model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. No subagents were used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d9354bbfc3 |
Add a portable agent question and answer resumption journey (#18346)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip helps people manage agent work and keep human decisions
attached to tasks.
> - Product E2E journeys verify the browser, native agent, saved state,
and cleanup.
> - The classic suite already checks a choice question followed by a
text question.
> - Deployment-targeted journeys need the same behavior on an attached
instance.
> - Production questions can use provider input, the dedicated semantic
tool, or the authenticated native API fallback.
> - The basic journey must verify the original card and native
continuation for each supported path.
> - This pull request shares the scenario and browser actions, adds
strict API receipt evidence, and verifies the saved document after
reload.
> - Separate tool-documentation qualification and the original failed
measurements keep their existing scope and outcomes.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What existing behavior does this improve?**
It adds portable coverage for answering agent questions and resuming the
same task on an attached deployment.
**Current behavior**
The classic suite has the two-question scenario. The portable catalog
does not expose it. Its shared native-path grader recognizes provider
and dedicated semantic receipts, but rejects a valid completed native
API creation receipt.
**Proposed behavior**
Expose `question-answer-resume` as a deployment-targeted journey. Answer
one choice question and one text question in the browser. Require
server-owned creation evidence, unchanged forms, exact board answers,
bound continuation, an agent-authored task document, and readback after
reload.
**Reason and benefit**
The same story can qualify local and hosted targets through their normal
provider setup and cleanup. It catches lost answers, duplicate or
foreign work, premature output, and stale documents.
## What Changed
- Register the journey with a three-run maximum and positive model
allowance. Accept one to three attributed work runs at both collection
and retained-result boundaries.
- Share the existing two-question scenario, browser answer actions, and
behavioral grader. Keep separate tool-documentation grading unchanged.
- Recognize a completed native API creation receipt only when its HTTP
201 result retains the original pending card, exact
task/company/agent/source run, idempotency key, and full normalized
form. Require the receipt to remain unchanged after the answer and
through the final checkpoint. Missing, pending, foreign, or altered
proof still fails.
- Check signed-in board ownership, each native continuation, no
premature or extra output, document authorship, and the saved revision
after reload.
- Wait for the authenticated product region before screenshots. Recheck
origin and path after readiness. Bound readiness and capture by the
campaign deadline.
- Add closed stage-specific errors, catalog coverage, sanitized receipt
calibration, and documentation. Include the provider-form and
browser-question presentation helpers in the definition fingerprint.
## Verification
- Fresh QA staging qualification passed at
`7f7de8be286a436010a48af89aba1727b4451493`: all 11 required checks
passed, cleanup passed, and all three native runs used the configured QA
target and model. The [sanitized run
report](https://pages.paperclip.ing/evals-qa-smoke-41121966520-1/)
records the measured pass. This is one successful qualification, not a
reliability claim.
- Final integration head `ae0d9d289831c770a413658d3520fb1dc8ad60e3`
contains the one main merge through
`fd008979f5794fda3d5f54151d36acd31d0de140` and an exact cherry-pick of
the four-file qualified search fix
`4edd10804e2b42941aa2038e90c362c13a0b98dc` from #18370. Patch identity
matches. It preserves the project and search registrations and atomic
search readback. The question live qualification ran at the earlier SHA
above; the final integration head has separate local and CI
verification.
- Eighteen question journey, helper, and test file blobs are identical
between the qualified and integration SHAs. This includes clarification
flow and evidence, question grader and browser helper, the sanitized
receipt fixture, screenshot helper, provider-form helper, browser
question presentation, continuation scenario/readiness/flow, shared
agent validation, and user actions. The question run-count contract and
dispatch branch are also unchanged. Reviewers can compare those paths
directly between the two commits.
- All 622 selected Product E2E, catalog, question-resumption,
necessary-question, report, and readiness tests pass after the main
merge. After the exact search delta, all 145 narrow
question/search/project/contract tests and all nine real Chromium search
regressions pass. Map checks, combined credential-free preview, source
fingerprints, and the earlier workspace-link preflight pass. The local
TypeScript attempt reports stale Runner declaration errors for
`onAccountingEvent` in unchanged native-session code; fresh official CI
provides the clean-build type gate. The three search source/test blobs
match the qualified search merge, and the three project source blobs are
unchanged.
- An in-memory probe executes the actual launcher fingerprint
expression. Each project, search, and question implementation input
changes the digest. Separate red probes first reproduced the omitted
provider-form and browser presentation helpers; both pass after their
source inputs are added.
- The sanitized retained native API response-shape regression fails
before the grading correction and passes afterward. Negative controls
reject missing, pending, foreign, changed, spoofed, or wrongly bound
receipts, answers, continuation, model, environment, and document
evidence. All nine provider/semantic/API path combinations pass
calibration.
- The real local Chromium screenshot probe fails before the readiness
repair and passes afterward. Login redirects and sign-in pages at task
URLs remain excluded with no screenshot files.
- The two original attached failures remain retained: the first stopped
at early screenshot capture; the second stopped before answering at the
former API provenance gate. An earlier sandbox run also retained one
report subprocess failure; the full selected tests then passed with
local subprocess IPC access.
- The prior integration CI had an unchanged canary mock `EADDRINUSE`
failure. That history is retained; its documented retry is owned by the
coordinator. No application API, schema, production UI, model, runtime
policy, credential, or deployment configuration change is included.
Final integration head
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
56957f2bd9 |
fix(ci): isolate test selection and require current CI CODEOWNERS (#18376)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - PR CI selects affected suites and test files to reduce feedback time. > - A selected test inherited the parent selection when it launched an independent runner fixture. > - Ordinary source filenames containing config or setup also forced broad coverage. > - AWS runner access must depend on current CI CODEOWNERS, not only a stored numeric roster. > - This pull request fixes both selection problems and verifies owners before AWS allocation. > - Contributors retain GitHub-hosted CI. Authorized maintainers retain AWS test and final verification jobs. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18362 and #18348. The selected server run for #18369 failed in `vitest-chat-shards.test.ts` because its temporary fixture inherited `PAPERCLIP_CI_TEST_SELECTION` and attempted `git rev-parse HEAD` outside a Git repository. #18366 could not use graph selection because `session-config-metadata.test.ts` matched the broad filename rule. The AWS setting was already enabled. The reviewed outsider PRs correctly used hosted runners; a maintainer PR used AWS, including final verification. This change strengthens that boundary rather than enabling AWS for outsiders. ## What Changed - Remove selection settings from Vitest child environments after the wrapper validates the selected shard. - Match conventional Vite/Vitest configuration filenames rather than any occurrence of config or setup. Keep graph tracking for actual setup and configuration dependencies. - Bind rerun actor lookup to the exact run attempt. Require the author, event sender and rerun actor to be current CI CODEOWNERS and members of the existing numeric allowlist. Read the resolver and CODEOWNERS from one protected master revision. - Run metadata authorization on GitHub-hosted capacity before any AWS allocation. Keep authorized test and final verification placement on the AWS fleet. - Add a real selected-server regression that launches nested chat fixtures, negative authorization cases, and qualification for a real config-named test. - Update the developer and profiling guides. - Retire eight legacy PR workflow SHA authorizations and one deleted qualification-branch reference from the live `paperclip-public-pr` runner group. The remaining three references are the trusted PR workflow and the existing full-stack/protocol evaluation workflows on master. No active PR run referenced the retired versions. ## Verification - Selection regression tests: 13 passed, including the real nested chat runner. - Routing, planner and profiling tests: 100 passed, including 69 routing cases. - `actionlint` passed for both changed workflows. `git diff --check` passed. - Confirmed protected master still requires CODEOWNER review. A live lookup found four CI owners, with three of six numeric roster entries eligible and three denied by the new owner check. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. The full local Vitest suite was stopped after repeated embedded PostgreSQL initialization failures; it did not pass. On final revision `0b40ae15b7996603e405edd4157a5c337e0405c7`, both Linux qualification jobs and all required CI gates passed. The main PR workflow completed with 48 successful jobs and one intentional skip, including final verification. [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41126881716). Greptile reviewed the final revision at 5/5 with no inline findings. - Shard and workflow contracts: 44 passed. CI first caught an outdated assertion that required the routing job to use AWS; it now requires hosted authorization, and the policy job passes. - A read-only live gate exercise preserved the existing merge-freshness denial when master advanced beyond the available merge ref. It allocated no runner and was not a successful admission proof. ## Risks - The short metadata authorization job now depends on GitHub-hosted queue capacity. This prevents a stale roster from allocating AWS before current CODEOWNERS are checked. Authorized test and final verification jobs still use AWS. - Identity/API failures fall back to hosted CI. No caller can override the trusted owner list with PR contents. - Configuration dependencies still require conservative graph handling. Existing setup dependency, opaque I/O, stale manifest and wrong-lane tests remain in place. - The runner group is restricted to selected repositories and selected workflows. Its workflow allowlist was verified and narrowed through the GitHub settings UI. Legacy pinned callers must update to the current trusted workflow before using AWS; active PR runs used master references. The current PR workflow authorization and evaluation workflow authorizations remain in place. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6. The exact serving variant and context limit are not exposed in this session. Used reasoning, repository inspection, code execution and GitHub tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass — targeted suites passed; the full local suite hit the PostgreSQL startup limitation documented above, and full Linux CI passed - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
a1845b3b64 |
fix(evals): capture TestOps registration after watch (#18375)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and verifies their work through Product E2E tests. > - The fixed Chat feature workflow prepares a TestOps case and plan before any model run. > - Its first zero-result bootstrap completed, but the watched child did not receive the generated job-run ID. > - The official watch log contained a job-run ID, so the missing child variable did not prove that registration was absent. > - This pull request reads official context after watch and validates the linked backend records. > - The workflow retains closed registration metadata and stops on unknown or foreign context. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #18322. **What happened?** The successful zero-result bootstrap retained `official_job_run_id_missing` from its watched child. It could not prove the backend job and workflow binding needed for the next setup step. **Expected behavior** After successful watch, read the generated context, validate its current GitHub run and fixed workflow, and retain only closed IDs and parameter metadata. **Steps to reproduce** Run the fixed workflow's `bootstrap` operation on master. Inspect its setup artifact after watch completes. No evaluation or synthetic passing result is needed. **Paperclip version or commit** The original bootstrap used merged #18322. This follow-up starts from `76fde891ccc29283b3f5c8dcdce089c5b3d937d1`. **Deployment mode** GitHub Actions metadata-only setup in the protected reporting environment. ## What Changed - Run an internal context reader after successful bootstrap watch in the same protected step. - Parse only numeric official job-run and launch IDs in memory. Do not log or save raw command output. - Validate current-run, project, launch, job, workflow, and bounded parameter metadata before writing an exclusive registration receipt. - Retain the two known registration receipt paths with the existing setup artifact. - Preserve the original inside-watch receipt, case reconciliation, provider isolation, and evaluation limits. ## Verification - `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-feature-testops-api.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/testops-chat-reporter.test.mjs`: 48 pure/mock/FS controls pass (36 prior and 12 new). The actual local Node version was 26.4.0. Normal Node 24 CI remains required. - Four MJS syntax checks and `git diff --check` pass. No TypeScript noEmit claim is made for this MJS-only helper change. - Actionlint passes for the changed workflow. - Normal [GitHub Actions CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41123894542) passes on exact head `58396de10f0c49294b0bbc0f4709c29990d57d53`: 48 jobs succeeded and one skipped. Both required `ci / e2e` and `ci / verify` pass. - Greptile reviewed that exact head at 5/5 with no actionable findings or unresolved review threads. - No local CLI, provider, model, app, database, or build qualification was run. No replacement bootstrap or paid evaluation was dispatched. ## Risks The official context or backend DTO shape can differ from the supported format. The reader then stops with a closed failure receipt. Pure tests do not qualify the remote CLI or backend. The original zero-result bootstrap and its missing child-context observation remain part of the history. The case's actual outcome remains unmeasured. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) with reasoning, code editing, tool use, and pure test review. The runtime does not expose the exact context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
6174b4d7c8 |
fix(runner): allow session reset after confirmed task retirement (#18373)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Native warm sessions retain a Runner owner between turns. > - Closing that owner must stop execution and preserve valid recovery state. > - A failed suspension can leave a rejected close promise after the task has stopped. > - A session reset then retries that same promise and blocks every fresh session. > - This PR separates task retirement proof from checkpoint reuse for a new session. > - A reset can proceed after exact stop proof, completed handoff, and file collection. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #18011. That change preserves checkpoint authority during warm preparation. This change handles a stopped owner whose checkpoint cannot be reused. Related: #14695 covers managed files retained with warm processes. A search found no duplicate stopped-owner reset fix. **What happened?** A warm Runner can stop and complete its task handoff while close reports `runner did not durably suspend before checkpoint`. The transport caches that rejected close promise. Core retains the warm owner. Each session reset retries the same promise before it can launch a provider. A controller restart clears the in-memory owner and permits recovery. **Expected behavior** A reset to a new normalized session should release the old owner when its exact task has proved that execution stopped and its handoff completed. Core must collect stopped instruction files before it admits the new session. An unconfirmed owner must continue to block replacement. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a warm native run through a plugin task provider. 2. Change configuration so Core retires the warm owner. 3. Let the task stop and complete, but fail durable suspension proof. Close keeps its rejected promise. 4. Reset the session and start another run on the same task environment. 5. Observe the old close error before any new provider work starts. ## What Changed - Keep a lease-bound retirement receipt in the plugin task owner. It requires `executionStopped: true` and successful task completion after credential handoff. - Accept an unrecoverable suspension error only during retirement for a different normalized session, with that exact owner's receipt and settled Core tool results. - Collect stopped instruction files before releasing the warm owner. Preserve old checkpoint evidence. - Keep same-session, active-owner, incomplete-handoff, unrelated-owner, unresolved Core tool results, and other close-error fences. - Report Core tool settlement on the close error after ingress retirement and drain. Default missing proof to false. Expose the error through the server's Runner shim. Add regression tests and document the recovery boundary. ## Verification - The reset regression fails with the new handling disabled and passes with it enabled. - Both affected suites passed: 1,032 tests. The final 15 focused owner/reset cases pass after adding the tool-settlement guard. - The assembled regression uses the real task-owner and backend binding. Its controlled task provider proves stop and completion. Close returns the same rejected promise on every call. - Negative cases cover incomplete handoff, other close errors, same-session continuation, provider change with the same session ID, unrelated receipts, unresolved Core tool results, and failed file collection. Collection can later succeed without replaying stop or reading the old checkpoint. - Five real-process transport cases pass. They cover an insufficient suspension deadline, the cached rejected promise, late tool completion within and beyond the deadline, interruption, and result-persistence failure. Unsettled callbacks produce `semanticToolsSettled: false`. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed with the repository's pinned Rust toolchain on PATH. After the final contract change, Runner TypeScript build and server `tsc --noEmit` passed. - The local full-suite run was stopped at the requester's direction. Full regression and build coverage are delegated to GitHub CI. - Full GitHub CI passed on `ef0040d80af679ce6d4a130468e15f75678c1f4c`. Standard Greptile reviewed the same commit: 5/5, zero comments. Apex then reviewed that same commit: 5/5, zero comments. Final checks confirm no unresolved review threads and no merge conflicts. - Initial full CI on `00c002fd5a` failed one scheduled-retry route test at 18/20 cancellations. Controlled cancellation latency reproduced the short poll-budget failure. Before the next cycle, master advanced with #18322, which coordinates that test at the first completed batch. The separate local timeout commit was dropped during rebase. The upstream test passes locally. The rebased run passed 46 targeted owner/reset and scheduled-retry route cases. This PR has no scheduled-retry source or test diff. - No deployed provider run or tenant rollout is claimed by these source tests. ## Risks The exception applies only to a new normalized session and an exact completed plugin task. The old checkpoint remains evidence and cannot authorize reuse through this path. The original suspension failure can remain visible on its run. This fix prevents repeated startup failures after a reset; it does not hide unconfirmed cleanup or make every suspension succeed. Missing task receipts and failed file collection continue to block replacement. No schema migration, plugin protocol change, Rust Runner binary change, or new polling is required. Tests use a controlled task boundary; they do not certify every external provider implementation. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with tool use and local code execution. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal issue or instance details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] Greptile Apex is 5/5 with no unresolved findings - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4edd10804e |
fix(evals): batch task search result readback across renders (#18370)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and saved work.
> - Product journeys check user actions against saved state.
> - The task search journey compares the exact visible task identities.
> - A search can replace rows while the harness reads an old indexed
locator.
> - The attribute read can then time out after the correct results
appear.
> - This pull request reads the visible links together and preserves
strict result checks.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #18355.
**What happened?**
An attached Cloud attempt passed the task search journey. A later
attempt on the same harness and app revision failed at search-result
readback. Its owned screenshot showed the correct target and completed
control. Authentication, collection, and cleanup passed. The failure
remains recorded and the journey has not been admitted to the daily
plan.
The reader called `all()`, then awaited `isVisible()` and
`getAttribute()` for each indexed locator. When a search replaced the
old collection between those reads, the next attribute read waited for
an index that no longer existed.
**Expected behavior**
Read the matching visible links together. Compare the complete identity
set against the owned target and controls. A render transition must not
consume the whole poll deadline on a stale row index.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Render three task links in the task collection.
2. Let the reader observe the third link as visible.
3. Replace the collection with the two correct search matches before its
attribute read.
4. The old reader times out waiting for `nth(2)`, even though the two
correct rows are present.
## What Changed
- Read visible link attributes in one batch. Discard a detached snapshot
and retry within the existing poll deadline.
- Keep the exact identity comparison, duplicate detection, control
exclusion, saved-content checks, and zero-run checks.
- Add a real Chromium render-transition regression and invalid-result
cases. Extend the stateful flow test for a detached snapshot.
- Document the readback boundary. No app UI, target configuration, or
cleanup behavior changes.
## Verification
- Review follow-up: the existing journey wait helper is now exercised
with the real Playwright poll. Its first read evaluates the actual
reader callback on detached browser DOM nodes and returns no evidence.
The second read contains an extra owned control. Only the third, exact
pair succeeds. The test observes all three reads. The 30-second deadline
and grading behavior are unchanged.
- Rebased onto current master, including the merged project journey.
Credential-free discovery confirms exactly one `project-task-context`
and one `task-search-filter` entry.
- Latest rebased checks passed: all nine Chromium search regressions,
all 381 Product journey unit tests, runner typecheck, discovery, maps,
and diff checks. Exact head
|
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
b056026407 |
fix(ui): keep task plugin views available for manual access (#18363)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage agents and their tasks. > - The task side panel can display a plugin's agent view. > - Users need that view even while a task is idle. > - Activity currently controls both manual discovery and automatic opening. > - This pull request keeps manual access available and uses activity to request automatic opening. > - The same authorized agent viewer serves both entry points. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A task view disappeared when its run ended. Users could not select it until the current run reported matching activity and its readiness check passed. This also excluded declared manual views without an activity mapping. **Expected behavior** The task launcher offers declared views for its running or assigned agent. Selecting one uses the same viewer as the agent detail page. Matching activity and readiness open the pane and select the view by default, once per run. **Steps to reproduce** Open an idle task assigned to an agent with an installed task-panel contribution. Open the panel launcher. The view is currently missing. Related work: #18131 and #18239. ## What Changed - Return manual panel declarations independently of run activity and readiness. - Mark panels that should open automatically after matching activity and readiness. Keep existing run attribution, retry bounds, and dismissal behavior. - Keep an open viewer mounted when a run ends. Focus an already open manual view when activity starts. - Preserve saved manual tabs while plugin and initial run discovery load; remove contributions after discovery confirms they are absent. - Share the run-scoped dismissal key between the task page and panel controller so dismissed views do not reveal an empty pane. - Use the current running agent for declared manual views that have no activity mapping. - Update the plugin authoring contract and feature recipe. ## Verification - Two new regressions failed before the fix: idle discovery returned no view, and a manual contribution opened automatically. - 105 focused hook and panel tests pass. They cover idle/manual access, declarations without mappings, completion, saved-tab restoration, automatic focus, activity attribution, retry bounds, dismissal, and missing/disabled plugins. - Thirteen task-page panel integration tests pass. New regressions reproduce and fix a dismissed manual view revealing the outer pane. They cover desktop/mobile and both workspace modes, and verify that a later run can still open the view automatically. - `node scripts/check-token-gates.mjs`, `node scripts/check-maps.mjs`, and `git diff --check` pass. - Local UI typecheck failed with the reused dependency cache: workspace modules/exports and generated Storybook catalog files are missing or stale. It reported no errors in the changed files. The final head passed the clean GitHub typecheck. No broad local build or repository test run was attempted. - The preceding head passed [GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41116028688), with 48 jobs succeeding and one skipped. Its final review scored 5/5 and identified a narrow saved-view restoration race. This revision adds the missing initial-run loading guard. Two delayed-response regressions failed before the correction and now pass; they cover a different assignee and an unassigned task. - The final head `bbde3a28f7ac0390da8f3fe81eb9abd2f3020695` passed [GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41119772438) and the additional [full CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41121827023), each with 48 successful jobs and one skipped. Standard Greptile scored 5/5 on this head; both review threads are resolved. The small final loading correction used the permitted exception to another final-review cycle. - The additional full CI run initially failed the canary bundle install because npm advertised a newly published `tslib@2.9.1` archive before its tarball was available (HTTP 404). After the archive became available, one retry of the failed canary and dependent aggregate passed. No dependency or lockfile change was needed. - Hosted acceptance of this follow-up requires merge and deployment; the earlier hosted activation checks cover the previously merged behavior. ## Risks Manual views can now open while idle or before readiness. Each viewer retains its normal authorization and status handling. Declarations without an activity mapping now appear in the launcher. Automatic opening still requires authenticated activity and the authorized readiness result. Saved tabs wait for plugin discovery before removal. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository inspection, terminal tools, browser verification, and code execution. The exact serving variant and context window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandPaperclip
|
fd008979f5 |
test: wait for the evidence expiry worker to settle (#18241)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip coordinates AI work and retains execution evidence. > - Evidence retention uses an asynchronous worker and a shared scheduler. > - The retention test checked the next deadline as soon as an archive disappeared. > - File removal can finish before the worker publishes that deadline. > - This pull request waits for worker settlement before asserting its next wake. > - The test keeps its deletion, busy-session preservation, and quiet-worker checks. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** CI for #18239 failed in `native-harness-backup-expiration.test.ts`. The healthy-expiry test observed the file removal while `nextWakeAt()` was still null. Subtracting the current time then produced a large negative number. **Expected behavior** The retention test should check the deadline after the asynchronous worker has settled. **Steps to reproduce** Run the server test shard with a slow filesystem completion. The deletion predicate can become true before scheduler publication finishes. ## What Changed - Keep the existing file-removal wait open until tracked work is idle and the expected busy-session retry deadline is registered. - Keep the held archive and quiet-worker assertions. ## Verification - Original CI failure: [server shard 3/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40976031169/job/123804262266). - The targeted test passes with its real PostgreSQL fixture: `node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --project @paperclipai/server server/src/__tests__/native-harness-backup-expiration.test.ts -t 'lets healthy saved expiry preempt' --maxWorkers 1`. - After rebasing onto master, the focused retention test passes again with its real PostgreSQL fixture. The PR now changes one test, with seven insertions and two deletions. - Master independently fixed the authentication timeout and GitHub-recovery checkpoint race. Their redundant commits were dropped during rebase. - [Full GitHub CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40984842413) passes on `bbaa7c3c384f6c220ce2c979f0e9b5d01ddb1f77`: all 48 jobs succeeded. Standard Greptile is 5/5 on that head, and GitHub reports the PR clean. - Broader coverage runs in GitHub CI. No local full build or full test suite was run for this assertion-only change. ## Risks Low risk. The retention test waits for the condition it already asserts. The existing deletion, busy-session preservation, future-deadline, and quiet-worker checks remain in place. No production code or time budget changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository inspection, terminal tools, and code execution. The serving variant and context window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1030.0-canary.18 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
76fde891cc |
Add bounded recovery file inventory before server cutover (#18347)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Accounting, credential recovery, and sandbox cleanup can retain legacy files on an instance volume. > - Replacing that volume while files remain can lose unresolved work. > - There is no verified production backlog, so an empty installation needs no migration. > - The recovery owners must decide whether each record is valid and settled. > - This pull request adds a bounded file inventory and an optional cutover gate. > - The benefit is a safe check that preserves obligations without reading secret material. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** Operators need to check the actual affected instance directories before replacing a web server. A skipped corrupt file or failed read must not appear clear. **Proposed solution** Add a Node script that inspects only the three legacy recovery directories for an explicitly chosen instance. Default mode reports counts. The optional check mode blocks when files or uncertainty remain. **Alternatives considered** A bulk migration system has no established backlog to migrate. Reimplementing the owner parsers could expose credentials and still would not prove settlement. This check never reads file bytes. **Roadmap alignment** This is a small operational prerequisite for safe cloud server replacement. It does not add a recovery backend or change resource ownership. Related recovery-owner changes: #18354 (accounting), #18352 (credentials), and #18357 (sandbox ownership). This inventory remains independently usable with existing files. ## What Changed - Add a pure classification policy and a bounded filesystem boundary. - Add `node scripts/recovery-cutover.mjs --instance-root /absolute/instance` with optional `--check`, directory override, and entry budget. - Report observed lower-bound counts and safe status summaries. Do not print paths, filenames, identifiers, raw errors, or file contents. - Add one dependency-free CLI acceptance suite and a Vitest bridge so the same cases run in normal server CI. - Document existing owner entry points, override selection, stopped producers, and retained-volume requirements. ## Verification - `node --test scripts/recovery-cutover.test.mjs`: 9 cases pass. The suite starts the actual CLI with synthetic legacy directories. - Pending receipts, nested credential files, orphan records, malformed bytes, temporary files, unreadable files, unsafe paths, symlinks, read failures, bounds, and configured overrides all block safely. - Empty or absent recovery directories clear. Source file bytes remain unchanged. Report-only mode and check-mode exit codes are tested. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/recovery-cutover.test.ts --pool=forks --maxWorkers=1`: the normal CI bridge passes and runs the same 9 cases. - Cached frozen dependency installation, script syntax checks, and `git diff --check` pass. The lockfile is unchanged. - Independent source review found the read-only boundary sound. - [Complete current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41097614666) passed at `bf5cc7f067041c10cd0294ff26756678da943976`: 53 successful checks and two intended skips, including typecheck, full tests, build, and E2E. Greptile is 5/5 with no review threads. - One failed-job retry was needed for an existing heartbeat timing failure in server shard 4. The relevant heartbeat source and tests match the base branch. Local diagnostic runs had 61 pass/2 fail and 7 pass/1 fail, with changing timing failures; neither run is claimed as green. The bounded retry and all failed evidence are [recorded here](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18347#issuecomment-6529629804). No heartbeat code or test was changed. ## Risks - The scan is a point-in-time inventory. Stop producers for the final gate. It is not an atomic drain certificate or protection against hostile path mutation. - All files remain unverified. The check cannot certify validity or Postgres settlement. Existing owners retain that responsibility. - The scan does not inspect other instances, volumes, Runner delivery, or database obligations. It does not establish that production cutover is ready. - No migration, deletion, decryption, or replay command is added. Symlink paths are rejected, including system aliases; use canonical absolute paths. ## Model Used - OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. Context window size was not supplied. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f53db0c70f |
perf(server): overlap OpenCode setup and trace reply recovery (#18367)
Overlap eligible OpenCode GitHub and assigned MCP preparation. Trace deferred reply discovery and recovery, and forward the native GitHub transport recorder. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
e54354d9d3 |
fix(ai-connections): save quota credentials without recovery files (#18352)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Managed AI connections keep the selected account in the secret store. > - Server quota refresh can receive a replacement token before its database save commits. > - That path currently writes an encrypted recovery file on the web server. > - Cloud web replacement should not need that file to use a saved account. > - This pull request saves the replacement directly and retries the same value in memory. > - The benefit is a smaller cloud storage contract with an explicit sign-in recovery limit. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Server-owned OpenAI quota refresh and credential persistence during web replacement. **Current behavior** Quota refresh checks local encrypted recovery storage before token exchange. It writes the replacement to that storage before the secret transaction commits. A replacement web receiver can therefore need the old web volume. **Proposed behavior** Required database reads and locks must succeed before exchange. The same logical refresh saves its returned replacement directly, with at most three save attempts. It checks the current secret after an uncertain commit response. A process that loses the unsaved replacement can require sign-in again. **Reason and benefit** Postgres remains authoritative. This removes new quota recovery files without adding another credential vault. Existing files remain readable for cutover. Local-only Google retirement keeps its existing behavior. Remote Google subscription sessions remain unsupported. Related public work: Refs #14056 for managed Codex credential handover. Searched open and closed credential-refresh pull requests; this change does not duplicate their provider login work. ## What Changed - Keep the exchanged replacement and its source generation in the current refresh operation. Save retries do not repeat OAuth exchange. - Reconcile a lost commit response from the saved credential. Grant changes, secret versions, session epochs, selectors, and revocation prevent a stale save. - Stop creating or preparing quota recovery files. Preserve existing record settlement and local Google compatibility. - Document the v1 sign-in limit and existing Runner persistence-before-completion contract. - Add PostgreSQL and controlled-provider regressions for save rollback, lost replies, revoked or changed authority, receiver process loss, and pending Runner credential handover. ## Verification - [Complete current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41099132607) passed at `e4ed6551a707c814ddb2395a7358106b1e04857a`: 53 successful checks and two intended skips. This includes full typecheck, tests, build, and E2E gates. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed at `1ebe75984be9bf19d518728d4ff440a2d7f3dbce`. Later branch changes only repair tests. Rebase adds an unrelated master UI performance fix; the credential and Runner handover source did not change. - Focused credential tests passed: 2 files, 160 tests (145.62s). Command: `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/ai-connections.test.ts server/src/__tests__/plugin-task-credential-writeback.test.ts --maxWorkers=1 --no-file-parallelism`. - `pnpm test:run` was deliberately interrupted after 17m41s in its first general-server chat integration phase, before any suite result. The controller exited 130 and its wrapper exited 1. This is an incomplete local run, not a full local pass or an observed test failure. The coordinator stopped duplicate long local work; the complete current-head CI suite subsequently passed. All owned test and PostgreSQL processes were confirmed stopped. - Database tests use real PostgreSQL 18.6 with POSIX semaphores through a test-only loader. Provider requests use controlled fixtures; no production OAuth mutation was made. - Greptile reviewed current head `e4ed6551a707c814ddb2395a7358106b1e04857a` at 5/5 with zero comments. - The captured focused-test logs contain none of the replacement-token fixture values. - The receiver-loss test kills a separate Node process after one HTTP token exchange while PostgreSQL blocks its secret insert. A new receiver then uses the existing sign-in flow. - The Runner case rejects a real deferred secret commit. Provider completion remains uncalled until a new receiver commits the retained credential. - Initial setup failed because this host exhausted System V semaphore resources. Another setup attempt lacked built SDK entries. Both were setup failures, not passes. After setup repair, the first real run passed 159/160 tests; the remaining test asserted the retired directory-fsync contract. The replacement test forbids recovery writes and requires one committed exchange without a file. ## Risks - If all three saves fail and the producing server process exits, the unsaved replacement is lost. The next failed use can require sign-in again. This is the accepted v1 limit. - Existing unresolved recovery files still require inventory and settlement before their old volume is removed. This PR does not perform deployment or delete those records. - Local Google subscription retirement still needs its existing local recovery ownership. It is outside the supported remote cloud scope. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and controlled integration tests. The context window size was not supplied. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |