Commit Graph
2918 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
DottaandPaperclip 6ee17aae1c test: settle saved retry cleanup before idle assertion
Observe the specific succeeded retry before closing its task and draining all execution. Once execution has settled, advance bounded fake cleanup time while joining worker passes; retain the existing timeout, exact retry identity, output and zero-SQL assertions.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 21:55:27 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 822b173281 test: preserve retry producer boundaries in receipt recovery
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>

* fix/sleep-forward-02b-security:
  fix: wake retry scheduling only when retry state changes
2026-10-30 21:51:11 -05:00
Dotta 63c922a193 Merge commit 'c2ff3eb92113fb16713b270e34932636956ff16b' into fix/sleep-forward-02b-security
* commit 'c2ff3eb92113fb16713b270e34932636956ff16b':
  fix: wake retry scheduling only when retry state changes
2026-10-30 21:50:49 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip c2ff3eb921 fix: wake retry scheduling only when retry state changes
Separate retry-schedule notifications from ordinary queued-run eligibility. Preserve exact deadlines and prove native producer commit/rollback behavior without global retry scans on ordinary agent or issue edits.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 21:49:38 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip af7b7d3316 fix: park unchanged project budget execution waits
Lock and re-read project pause eligibility before publishing budget intent. Cover actual project Retry parking/release and concurrent pause admission without no-op hints.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 21:13:42 -05:00
Dotta c0fe0feffb Merge commit '19a97bbe57d1ebd3691c70dd822488efe7e5d3e1' into codex/sleep-stack-c1
* commit '19a97bbe57d1ebd3691c70dd822488efe7e5d3e1':
  fix(server): park persisted deferred admission refusals
2026-10-30 20:50:39 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 19a97bbe57 fix(server): park persisted deferred admission refusals
Distinguish a budget or agent refusal saved on the existing receipt from genuine recovery failure. Preserve HTTP409 messages and details, grant each new wait reason its existing finite grace, and retain failure backoff for unsaved or unexpected errors. Prove actual Retry admission,25-minute SQL quiet, independent warm producer-to-process release, missing/cancelled receipts and real PostgreSQL write failure.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 20:35:57 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 290d12cf4b merge: rehearse issue-recovery predecessor for saved receipts
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 20:24:05 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip dee5296b8a merge: rehearse current dispatch predecessor for issue recovery
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 20:23:55 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip fcc107739c merge: rehearse current master and UI prerequisite for dispatch
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 20:23:37 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip dff6c00468 Join receipt acceptance passes before advancing saved deadlines
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 19:50:27 -05:00
Dotta 0adba98c10 Merge commit 'e3fff84b6f81448c730dd165253a1a673f8d19b3' into codex/sleep-deferred-execution-receipts
* commit 'e3fff84b6f81448c730dd165253a1a673f8d19b3':
  fix: scope comment-triggered recovery to the affected issue
  test: await issue recovery dispatch and cancellation settlement
2026-10-30 19:45:15 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip c74f5f12ba Retain moved receipt deadlines and wake released execution gates
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 19:45:15 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip e3fff84b6f fix: scope comment-triggered recovery to the affected issue
Preserve company reconstruction for graph, run and eligibility changes. A real PostgreSQL producer regression verifies one assignment check among1000 open tasks, with broader eligibility reconstruction still intact.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 19:39:21 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7bb1af657a test: await issue recovery dispatch and cancellation settlement
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 19:38:27 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip ac6c5191ee Drive saved execution receipts from committed work and deadlines
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 19:22:39 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 87ae20ae65 fix(server): reconcile failed sandbox cleanup with signed absence (#18407)
Reconcile failed ephemeral Cloud leases through a signed cleanup-only absence observation when local historical inspection is unavailable. Preserve failure outcomes, exact resource bindings, retention and row-version fences; grant no run-continuation authority.

All 54 current-head checks/statuses passed. Greptile is 5/5, Medium, with no findings or unresolved threads. The 38 focused tests pass; both new reconciliation cases fail without the fallback. Isolated baseline and branch idle suites each pass all 225 cases. The original broader local teardown timeout is retained in the PR, and the full local run remains in progress.

Cloud protocol support is already serving in staging. Exact candidate composition and hosted provider sleep/wake qualification follow this merge. Production has not been changed.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:04:04 -07:00
Dotta 0fe6e038c2 Restore independent recovery duties and bound committed-source work 2026-10-30 18:58:39 -05:00
Nicky Leach 9e904ee519 perf(server): overlap independent heartbeat preparation reads (#18372) 2026-10-30 16:49:20 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 91261d5a03 fix(server): preserve budget history for deleted resources (#18389)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Budget views show saved policies, incidents and spend for each
company.
> - A policy can remain after its agent or project has been deleted.
> - The overview currently stops when it cannot resolve that old
resource.
> - A current agent's budget then becomes unreadable during normal
setup.
> - This pull request preserves the historical row in display summaries.
> - Admission and policy changes still require a real company-owned
resource.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

The budget overview throws `Agent not found` when a saved policy
references a deleted agent. One old resource prevents the company from
reading its current budgets. The same problem affects historical project
policies and incident summaries.

**Expected behavior**

The overview should retain historical policy and incident IDs and spend.
It should display `Deleted agent` or `Deleted project` for a missing
resource. Read access must not grant permission to execute work or
change a budget for that resource.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Create an agent and a budget policy for it.
2. Permanently delete the agent after its other dependencies have been
cleared.
3. Read the company's budget overview. The existing service throws
instead of returning its remaining current and historical rows.

**Paperclip version or commit**

The isolated repair starts from merged commit
`d9354bbfc35ef74333e90e596ce21dc8e59149b9` and integrates the exact
merged baseline test fix `8595efc20bda3ce20a9fbbf34a5d156a6fcf6d57`. It
also integrates the actual merged Antigravity auth fix
`18b1637b6371a6a6adade857e2a73654ee626fef` (#18254). The diff against
the selected merged parent remains two budget files.

**Related work**

Earlier reports and implementations: #11058 and #4333. This extracts the
product prerequisite from #18351 so it can qualify independently of that
journey's other dependencies. The change contains only the budget
service repair and four database regression cases.

## What Changed

- Resolve deleted agent and project scopes only when building display
summaries. Preserve their original IDs, policies, incidents and
accounting records.
- Reject a saved policy or incident that resolves to another company's
resource. Propagate other read failures.
- Keep missing-company resolution, work admission and policy changes
strict. Validate company, policy and incident scope bindings before
either incident action. A budget raise requires a live company-owned
resource. Historical dismissal may proceed only for a genuinely deleted
owned agent/project, and must reject live foreign or mismatched scopes.
- Add four canonical PostgreSQL regression cases: deleted agent history,
deleted project history, missing-scope admission and budget raises with
safe historical dismissal, and foreign/mismatched references. The
history cases also verify current ledger spend and unchanged stored
rows.

## Verification

- Real-service RED/GREEN against official PGlite with every canonical
migration: the original overview throws for deleted history; the repair
returns the historical IDs, incidents and spend while retaining current
budgets.
- Mutation regression RED/GREEN: missing-resource budget raises must
reject before writes; owned deleted-scope dismissal must reject its
linked pending approval, retain policy/agent/ledger data and incident
history, and remove the incident from the active list. Live foreign and
mismatched scopes reject both actions without mutations.
- Current integrated head `b3434f5ad05fd3067379352700c36bfe826179c4`:
all four canonical PostgreSQL regressions pass in [server
2/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142588583/job/124361194077),
and all five existing budget-service tests pass in [server
7/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142588583/job/124361194080).
Both use the CI merge against selected parent `18b1637`.
- Clean-build declaration typing passes in the current CI typecheck
gate. The earlier local source-alias no-emit check also passed,
including the canonical actor argument. The local worktree borrows
compiled dependencies from a sibling checkout; a later real-service
import was blocked by its stale `sandboxCreationOperations` export, so
clean-build CI is authoritative for the final integration. No production
workaround was made.
- `git diff --check` passes. Broad repository typecheck, tests and build
run in current-head CI rather than repeated locally. Native local
PostgreSQL could not start because this host exhausted its semaphore
pool; no global IPC settings or unrelated processes were changed.
- One unchanged Runner lane retry was authorized after a probable
intermittent close-settlement fixture failure. The [original
failure](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142588583/job/124360234111)
occurred in `omitted-context` cleanup. A [fresh passing Linux
lane](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142552195/job/124360110386)
passed the same case and all 1,998 tests with byte-identical entire
Runner and adapter-utils trees, lockfile, root package, scripts and
workflows, against the same merged base. The fixture has a five-second
close allowance with a 2.5-second suspension reserve; a host stall is
not proven. No budget path or changed close input was found. The [single
targeted
retry](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41142588583/job/124365812609)
passed the same case in 1,034 ms and all 1,998 lane tests; dependent
verification also passed. All 57 current PR checks are terminal and
green.
- The product helper requires all current CI and clean review before
merge. Actual QA budget-overview proof will run on the combined final
app before hiring qualification. No deployed success is claimed. The
older `b4863dd` artifact was never deployed; selected parent `18b1637`
adds sandbox/lifecycle changes and migration 0418, so whole-app identity
is not claimed. The budget module and relevant budget contracts remain
unchanged, and final hiring requires the combined final app with
explicit source identities.

## Risks

Budget summaries now return historical rows whose resources have been
deleted. These rows use explicit display names and preserve their
accounting data. They do not create a resource or relax work admission,
authorization or budget grants. Historical incident dismissal changes
only that incident and its linked approval; it does not resume work or
raise a budget. Cross-company references still fail closed. There is no
schema migration and no new background work.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. The session does not expose a more specific
backend model ID or fixed context window. Used reasoning, repository
tools, TypeScript and database test execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the
PR description documents the display-only history and strict-mutation
contract)
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 18:36:36 -05:00
Dotta 9eee45ed2d Merge branch 'codex/sleep-run-task-recovery' into codex/sleep-issue-state-recovery
* codex/sleep-run-task-recovery:
  fix: normalize run dispatch hints to company identity

# Conflicts:
#	server/src/services/run-dispatch-notifications.ts
2026-10-30 18:28:44 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 972fbc0760 fix: normalize run dispatch hints to company identity
Wider interaction and execution objects must coalesce into one company dispatch scope.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 18:24:45 -05:00
Dotta ab5108611d Run recovery producer acceptance on isolated PostgreSQL fixtures 2026-10-30 18:15:23 -05:00
Dotta ff5586cb74 Merge branch 'codex/sleep-run-task-recovery' into codex/sleep-issue-state-recovery
* codex/sleep-run-task-recovery:
  fix(environments): persist sandbox ownership before creation (#18357)
  fix(server): bound failed lifecycle verification (#18383)
2026-10-30 18:10:01 -05:00
Dotta dc4456c76b Drive issue recovery from scoped source writes and saved deadlines 2026-10-30 18:10:00 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 7db456e235 Merge origin/master and retain both Cloud skill fixture contracts
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 18:03:08 -05:00
Dotta 06c28d4d2f Merge branch 'codex/sleep-run-task-recovery' into codex/sleep-issue-state-recovery
* codex/sleep-run-task-recovery:
  test: prove timer deadlines survive settled drain holds
  fix: back off expired deadlines during domain drain
  perf(heartbeat): let the dispatch worker own startup retry promotion
  fix(server): scope run retention hints to affected companies
  fix(heartbeat): scope and batch dispatch wakeups by owner
  fix(evals): support official TestOps job metadata (#18385)
  fix: release settled deadline work holds during drain
  fix(agents): revalidate error-clear authority before write intent
  test(skills): verify Cloud CLI reads through shared object storage

# Conflicts:
#	server/src/services/issues.ts
#	server/src/services/run-dispatch-notifications.ts
2026-10-30 17:52:37 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 228196a110 test: prove timer deadlines survive settled drain holds
Expect committed producers to release idle admission while retaining a resume deadline, then verify actual dispatch and final quiet after resume.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:47:09 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 45a3a92e6d fix(environments): persist sandbox ownership before creation (#18357)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages companies and the agents that do their work.
> - Remote execution creates provider resources that need a durable
owner.
> - The server could create a sandbox before it saved its lease.
> - A failed lease write could leave cleanup data only on the old web
server disk.
> - This change saves a company-scoped operation before creation and
transfers ownership atomically.
> - Recovery finds the original Daytona resource or records an explicit
manual reconciliation outcome.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**
A sandbox could exist without a lease after a database failure or
company rebind. Failed cleanup recording could then create a local
fallback file. Replacing that web server could lose the cleanup
reference.

**Expected behavior**
A failed admission write makes no provider call. An interrupted creation
retains a committed operation. Recovery must not create a second sandbox
or destroy an attached lease.

**Steps to reproduce**
1. Run the disposable PostgreSQL cases in
`server/src/__tests__/sandbox-creation-operations.test.ts`.
2. Reject the lease insert after the controlled provider creates its
resource.
3. Start a new receiver process with a different empty web disk. It must
find the same resource and create one cleanup owner.

Related ownership report: Refs #14672. This change addresses new
allocations before lease persistence. It does not replace existing lease
recovery.

## What Changed

- Add an idempotent migration and a small creation-operation table.
Retain original company, environment and run identities across deletion.
- Commit creation intent before run, ad-hoc lease, and plugin task
replacement calls. Fence duplicate requests and ambiguous lease commits.
- Retain a known returned task resource ID in the existing operation
before attachment. Preserve manual reconciliation and never delete an
ambiguously attached resource.
- Keep company and run authority checks and atomic lease transfer with
the lease owner.
- Reuse Daytona names, labels, read-only inspection and claimed cleanup.
Keep provider payload handling in the provider.
- Retain nonsecret credential identity hashes. Refuse recovery lookup
under a changed credential value.
- Record manual reconciliation for missing/deleted or explicitly
inactive saved credentials, versions, and provider vaults. Keep
temporary resolution failures retryable. Never reactivate a disabled
credential.
- Use transaction signals and concrete deadlines. Failed records back
off independently. Manual reconciliation stays durable and quiet.
- Remove new orphan-file fallback writes from the covered paths. Keep
legacy file replay and its tests for cutover.
- Replace obsolete fallback-producer assertions with normal-entrypoint
durability tests. Keep cleanup, diagnostics and warm handoff coverage.

## Verification

- [Independent current-head
verification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6534744320)
passed 190/190 combined tests, 40/40 incoming TestOps tests, full
workspace typecheck, and build. PR head
`958af986130f25e136065ad30d1fdd843c46255c` has tree
`e6c3e5b02182d5941a70ccf5bf55638df3c2e28d`, identical to tested combined
commit `b9d7a9c2e9b30f0153685fb24a5f70b56132201f`. Real PostgreSQL,
compiled Rust Runner and controlled object providers were used;
external-S3 integration remains outside this local proof.
- Current head `958af986130f25e136065ad30d1fdd843c46255c` normally
merges master `8595efc20bda3ce20a9fbbf34a5d156a6fcf6d57`. The sole
conflict was the maintenance test: a parameterized case now preserves
both legacy-local `local_storage` and valid shared-S3
`provider_mismatch` checks, including the parent local receipt, exact
version identity, missing-snapshot/no-seed refusal, and unchanged
persisted row. The three master TestOps files remain intact. No
production, schema, migration, or package changes were made after the
fully qualified prior head `0b4d05505e`. Independent review approved the
resolution; the full managed-skill-content file and Cloud guard controls
pass 58/58 (105.11 seconds). [Required PR CI passed on this exact merge
head, first
attempt](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41136987412):
54 successful checks and three intended skips. The additional Paperclip
review is neutral at 4/5; two external Superagent checks (Contributor
trust and Security Scan) remain in progress with zero annotations and no
assessment, so they are not passing scan evidence. Greptile reviewed
exact head `958af986130f25e136065ad30d1fdd843c46255c` at 5/5; the final
thread audit has zero unresolved threads. All completed evidence below
retains its recorded revision scope. The additional Paperclip Review on
`958af98613` is neutral at 4/5 with a Ship verdict and no must-fix or
should-fix item. Its optional observation is that a generic create
rejection remains pending/manual even when an operator believes
allocation did not occur. This change preserves uncertainty because the
generic create-error contract does not prove provider absence; no new
error classification or provider-specific compensation was added.

- [Independent final-source
verification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6534328247)
passed all 189 real-PostgreSQL/Runner and controlled-fixture cases, full
workspace typecheck, and build. The integration commit
`c8411a8528386f4824b340ec5fdaaed1efb9ea69` has the same source tree as
final PR head `0b4d05505e` (tree
`bda65efc14b4c904d0f589154db77bb160641c8c`). Controlled object-provider
coverage passed; the separately guarded external-S3 suite was not run
because the bounded local MinIO pull was unavailable. This includes the
two final compatibility fixes.
- The first final-head CI attempt exposed one E2E timing failure in
`disconnect-write-recovery.spec.ts:181`: the title stayed unchanged
through the 15-second session-recovery poll. The same original case
passed in 13.8 seconds on immediately prior head `7ec06f77b7`, and all
UI/session/E2E source is identical across those heads. The failure log
and CI artifacts are retained; no cause is claimed. One failed-job-only
retry is authorized on this evidence, without changing a timeout,
assertion, or production behavior. [The single failed-job retry
completed
successfully](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41133619710/attempts/2):
all 35 E2E shard cases passed (6.6 minutes), including the original
session-recovery case in 14.0 seconds. The initial failure remains
disclosed and its cause remains unproven.
- Final head `0b4d05505ee0aa72f2981cdff74761406960ec73` adds two
independently reviewed integration fixes after the complete 7ec CI
matrix exposed two deterministic failures. Server 9/12 failed legacy
local-storage maintenance because the CLI reached the new Cloud server
startup guard; server 5/12 found the Daytona package version did not
match its bumped manifest. The failed run is retained at
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41131204203. It is
not passing evidence and was not blindly retried.
- Maintenance now constructs the existing explicit storage dependency
after loading the required persisted Cloud snapshot, and passes it to
both maintenance owners. It can verify legacy local storage before
provider cutover while normal Cloud server startup remains guarded. The
original case reproduced red locally, then the complete
managed-skill-content and managed-cloud-prerequisites files passed 57/57
(32.05 seconds), including missing-snapshot refusal, unchanged stored
configuration, and existing server guard controls. Daytona package
version now matches manifest 0.1.10; the complete bundled package
identity file passed 14/14 (3.98 seconds), and explicit
manifest/lifecycle controls passed 2/2 (328 intentionally filtered; 3.42
seconds). An initial workspace-filter command matched no project and is
not counted as pass evidence. The final diff changes no sandbox runtime
or schema behavior. [Full CI is green on this exact final
head](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41133619710/attempts/2):
56 successful checks, three intended skips, one additional
incomplete/neutral Paperclip Review, and no pending or failed checks.
The neutral review is not a passing assessment. [Greptile reviewed the
exact final head at
5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6529396969),
with no new actionable issues and all review threads resolved.
- Final combined head `7ec06f77b7c14a745c569d18401f16df3d26b626`
includes master managed-skills migration 0417 and shared-storage
prerequisites from `198218bf55` through normal merges. Sandbox creation
moves to generated `0418_curved_lady_mastermind.sql`; its idempotent SQL
is byte-for-byte unchanged. The regenerated 0418 snapshot contains both
sandbox creation operations and the master skill mutation receipts, and
points to the master 0417 snapshot. Master SQL and journal history
remain intact. Exactly five snapshots remain, 0414 through 0418. The
only sandbox-specific changes since the approved credential policy are
migration metadata/number and the matching test/document references; the
sandbox runtime files are unchanged.
- [Independent final combined
verification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6533960026)
passed on integration revision `e6f05b4cf0cd`, containing final sandbox
head `7ec06f77b7` and actual master `198218bf55`: migration/declaration
checks, all 158 real-PostgreSQL/Runner and controlled-fixture cases (251
seconds), full workspace typecheck (81 seconds), and build (35 seconds).
- Final combined migration proof: fresh real PostgreSQL has both tables.
A separate original-0417 sandbox table with a retained pending row
survives two applications of the renamed 0418 SQL unchanged, with the
expected primary/index and foreign-key structure. Migration
numbering/safety checks pass. The normal runtime migration reapply case
passes 1/1 (20 intentionally filtered cases; 46.69 seconds). The first
temporary qualification harness stopped before any database assertion
because its external `.ts` file selected CommonJS; the `.mts` harness
corrected that setup and passed. Independent review approved the exact
metadata and reference diff. Earlier full suite and live-provider
results below retain their stated revision scope.

- Credential-policy head `c606d473b03709f27577a55a1dfc0b0d3b4359fd`
handles the remaining inactive-credential review warning. The existing
boundary accepts only concrete secret-owner 422 codes and exact
no-details disabled/coming-soon vault messages. Unknown 422,
authorization errors, provider wrappers, and temporary database/provider
failures still propagate. Independent source review approved this
three-file correction. No generic resolver, schema, provider protocol,
retry cap, or activation behavior changed.
- Creation/cleanup qualification at `c606d473b0`: all 39 cases pass
against real PostgreSQL (81.27 seconds). The new cases use actual
disabled/archived saved secrets, a valid disabled version, and provider
vaults created ready before normal API updates disable them or mark them
coming soon. Each remains manual through restart/repeated scans, with
zero provider lookup and no retry deadline. The independent plugin idle
blocker remains intact. The temporary 503 control retains retry
ownership and later recovers one cleanup owner. Before this correction,
all five inactive-state cases remained pending; that failed evidence is
retained. The prior 18-case known-ID task proof below belongs to
`237144fcf6`, whose helper and task path are unchanged by this
correction.

- Known-ID head `237144fcf69a249c0e0310563428c0f55ed6d55c` also
addresses the independent task-replacement reliability warning. The
existing creation operation now saves only the known nonsecret returned
resource ID before expiry validation and attachment. The write is scoped
to operation/company/original environment and allows only a missing or
matching ID. It changes no ownership state and copies no resolved
configuration, credentials, or provider payload. Independent source
review approved this four-file fix.
- The complete real-PostgreSQL task suite passes 18/18 (9.52 seconds).
Rejected attachments retain the ID through manual reconciliation and
repeated scans. A real committed attachment followed by an injected lost
response retains the same active lease and attached operation, with no
release or second create. Same-ID retries work; conflicting IDs and
foreign companies cannot change it. The initial three regression cases
failed because the ID was absent, before the fix.
- The shipped Daytona manifest does not declare task support, so it
cannot enter this generic replacement path. The dispatcher requires both
declared task support and an environmentTask worker method. Generic
drivers without creation lookup still use manual reconciliation, with a
known returned ID retained when the database write can commit. No
automatic lookup capability or unconditional compensation was added.

- Previous boundary-fix head `8ba77def151ea85eeae2db7693254db7f87673b0`
fixes the fresh review finding about missing credentials. Only known
secret-owner 404 results at the recovery secret-resolution boundary
select the existing manual outcome. Provider inspection and transient
database/provider errors remain retryable. Independent source review
approved this change.
- Secret-boundary focused acceptance at `8ba77def15`: all 34 cases pass
against isolated real PostgreSQL. The complete creation suite passes
16/16 (100.75 seconds); the complete cleanup coordinator suite passes
18/18 (99.83 seconds). The new cases use normal saved-secret creation
and deletion, confirm zero provider lookup, restart/repeated scans, no
automatic deadline, preserved independent plugin idle blocking, and no
additional idle blocker after the controlled worker supplies its quiet
proof. A temporary 503 resolution failure preserves pending ownership
and later recovers one cleanup owner. No additional live provider
resource was created.
- Failed attempts remain part of the evidence. The initial red run
reproduced the pending-operation bug and also exposed a numeric-deadline
test harness mistake, which was corrected. A later combined run reported
an existing replacement-receiver failure and a new idle-fixture
assertion failure; it was interrupted while the next test file remained
in imports. An isolated diagnostic confirmed that the manual state was
correct but the installed fixture plugin correctly blocked sleep without
its independent quiet proof. The corrected test retains that blocker
assertion before supplying the controlled worker witness. The unchanged
replacement-receiver case passes in the final complete 16-case run; its
earlier failure is not counted as a pass or assigned a proven cause. No
timeout or production idle guard was relaxed.
- Greptile reviewed previous combined head
`7ec06f77b7c14a745c569d18401f16df3d26b626` at 5/5, with no unresolved
review threads. Its CI produced the two concrete integration failures
addressed above. The earlier CI and live evidence below remain
historical evidence, not a claim that the current full gates have
completed.

- Master integration update: merged `dbff3747b8` and then latest master
`76fde891cc` without rewriting branch history. Only `doc/DATABASE.md`
conflicted; the sandbox ownership, object-backed run evidence, and cloud
configuration sections all remain. The master merges changed no sandbox
implementation, migration, or provider code. Migration numbering/safety
checks pass and exactly five schema snapshots remain. At merge head
`f5d23d4a59828835d01c150f83fa2645fb2d3bec`, the two focused
creation/coordinator suites pass all 32 cases against isolated real
PostgreSQL (64.57 seconds). Those merge-head checks precede the
missing-credential fix below. The earlier live Daytona proof still
covers the unchanged normal creation/lookup/teardown path; the new
missing-credential branch is qualified with real PostgreSQL and
controlled provider hooks.

The optional Superagent Security Scan was inconclusive on prior head
`7ec06f77b7`: its pinned PR merge-base checkout failed or timed out,
with a neutral conclusion and zero annotations. An earlier scan could
not start within 120 seconds; a bounded rerun request returned HTTP 404.
These scanner failures are not passing security-scan evidence. On final
head `0b4d05505e`, the additional Paperclip Review check is neutral: its
assigned review execution did not complete and produced no validated
assessment. Fresh Greptile 5/5 and independent source review are
separate evidence. Previous-head required CI, independent review, and
the live Daytona qualification below passed.

- [Complete previous-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41105726052)
passed at `0b5cbb763ab8faa25aa0ff1d8a405cdc0d3db409`: 53 successful
checks and three intended skips, including typecheck, full tests, build
and E2E. Greptile is 5/5 on this head and both original findings are
resolved.

- Initial head: 200 PostgreSQL runtime, creation and coordinator tests
passed. The corrected head also passes all 32 creation and coordinator
tests, including deletion before/during lookup, a failed lookup after
deletion, restart, settled polling and actual idle-safety checks. Cases
cover failed admission, failed lease writes, concurrent recovery, lost
provider replies, ambiguous transfer retries, company rebind,
environment deletion, stopped runs, lookup backoff, restart, drain and
settled SQL quiet.
- Separate receiver processes: passed. A controlled HTTP provider
retains the resource while three independent receiver processes use two
empty web disks. Recovery creates one cleanup owner and never repeats
creation.
- Fresh PostgreSQL migration and two additional applications: passed.
The pending creation row survives unchanged.
- Server TypeScript and SDK/shared build checks pass after the
corrections. Migration numbering/safety checks passed. Exactly five
schema snapshots remain.
- Daytona adapter: all 330 tests passed, including stable-name lookup,
ownership checks, deletion and the updated manifest version. An earlier
run exposed the version expectation and it was corrected. Previous-head
CI passed.
- Live Daytona acceptance passed on `0b5cbb763a`: isolated real
PostgreSQL, normal runtime acquisition through independent receiver
processes, actual Daytona plugin/SDK 0.203.0, one disposable Ubuntu
24.04 sandbox (1 CPU / 1 GiB RAM / 1 GiB disk). A forced lease insert
failure retained the committed operation; a fresh receiver with empty
disk found the same sandbox, repeated recovery retained one cleanup
owner, and the actual claimed cleanup sweep expired the lease and
resolved the operation. Independent SDK lookup returned typed not-found;
ordinary recorded-ID inspection returned destroyed. This successful
attempt made one create, one recovery lookup, and one teardown. Two
earlier failed harness/provider-confirmation attempts are disclosed in
the [live acceptance
record](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18357#issuecomment-6530313054).
The coordinator independently queried all three exact resource IDs
through the SDK and confirmed typed not-found for each.
- Complete CI-affected heartbeat/plugin warm-task suites passed 21/21
after test corrections. An unchanged workspace exposure case passed in
isolation after the prior CI shard reported an unhandled readiness
rejection. Complete previous-head CI and refreshed review passed.

## Risks

- Deleted companies retain an explicit manual reconciliation outcome.
Recovery does not retry missing credentials or insert a lease for a
deleted company.
- Only Daytona declares automatic creation lookup. Other uncertain
providers retain `needs_reconciliation`. A missing creation name alone
cannot prove that a late allocation will never appear.
- Pending operations use the existing process-local signal and startup
recovery model. This does not add cross-replica wake delivery or prove
deployed sleep.
- Legacy direct provider probes and custom-image setup use separate
lifecycles. They are outside this replacement of the run-lease
orphan-file fallback. The normal Test path that acquires a runtime lease
is covered.
- Existing orphan files still require the separate cutover inventory and
settlement. This change does not delete them.
- The schema change is additive. The new SQL can be reapplied.
Historical SQL and journal entries are preserved; only the oldest
generated snapshot is pruned.

## Model Used

OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with tool use, code execution and repository
review. The harness did not report the context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge


The required branch status checks (`ci / verify`, `ci / e2e`) and all
test/build jobs passed on this head. The non-required Superagent
Contributor trust and Security Scan checks are still running without
findings; they are not claimed as passes. No required check or branch
rule is overridden.

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:38:23 -05:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip 81ecaf0654 fix(server): bound failed lifecycle verification (#18383)
Failed lifecycle verification could allocate another test environment every minute indefinitely. Count failed host verification tests separately from claims, persist a repair wait for confirmed configuration failures or three generic failed tests, and clear it through authorized retry or execution configuration changes.

Preserve typed temporary execution-target failures through adapter checks so timeouts, transport failures and interrupted probes keep automatic recovery. Retain existing readiness, authorization, termination and cleanup gates. Document the policy and add real PostgreSQL persistence and actual OpenCode adapter regressions.

Verified 398 focused tests (one Windows-only test skipped on macOS), repository-wide typecheck and build, structural checks, fully green current-head CI and Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved comments.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 15:29:43 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 875d763c1d fix: back off expired deadlines during domain drain
Keep a future in-memory resume wake when domain dispatch is paused independently of coordinator admission. Preserve the saved obligation without rescheduling its expired deadline into an immediate skipped-attempt loop.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:27:49 -05:00
Dotta e3322c4a62 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into codex/sleep-run-task-recovery
* origin/master:
  fix(evals): support official TestOps job metadata (#18385)

# Conflicts:
#	server/src/__tests__/managed-skill-content.test.ts
2026-10-30 17:13:31 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 65602133e7 perf(heartbeat): let the dispatch worker own startup retry promotion
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:10:16 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 2955e0e22e fix(server): scope run retention hints to affected companies
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:06:46 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 15cc12dba6 fix(heartbeat): scope and batch dispatch wakeups by owner
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:06:23 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 8595efc20b fix(evals): support official TestOps job metadata (#18385)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and verifies real work through Product
E2E tests.
> - The fixed Chat feature workflow uses TestOps to select and report
one backlog case.
> - Official registration exposes a workflow-query URL and a Branch
parameter.
> - The existing reader accepts only workflow-file or numeric URLs, and
the admin launcher requires an operation parameter.
> - These assumptions reject valid official metadata before the feature
can run.
> - This pull request supports the exact observed form while preserving
source, selection, and once-only execution checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs: #18322, #18375.

**What happened?**
The second zero-model bootstrap stopped with a generic job-mismatch
code. Ordinary TestOps UI inspection then showed an official
workflow-query URL outside the accepted literals and a Branch-only job.
The exact first failed predicate in that bootstrap remains unknown.

**Expected behavior**
Accept that exact fixed-workflow URL. Preserve the existing master
Branch value when the job has no operation parameter. Keep rejecting
foreign URLs, unknown parameters, wrong branches, and conflicting
operation IDs before mutation.

**Steps to reproduce**
Pass the official query URL and Branch-only metadata through the
existing bootstrap, selection, and admin-launch owners. The new pure
controls exercise those actual helpers without a CLI, backend, or model
call.

**Paperclip version or commit**
This change starts from `0e15c92073a09e50df99190a37f69a86286b989b` after
#18375.

**Deployment mode**
GitHub Actions and the protected TestOps reporting environment.

## What Changed

- Share one exact URL predicate across bootstrap, evaluation selection,
and admin preparation. Add only the observed official workflow-query
literal.
- Support Branch-only, operation-only, and Branch-plus-operation jobs
with strict definition IDs, names, values, and duplicate checks.
- Preserve the exact master Branch value. Set an existing operation
parameter to `evaluate`; otherwise use the fixed workflow's existing
default.
- Use the same checked parameter vector for job and plan writes and
their readbacks.
- Report distinct fixed bootstrap predicate codes without response
values.
- Document when the protected operation-parameter ID is required.
- Align one existing Cloud-maintenance test with the inherited
managed-Cloud S3 policy. Preserve the same-version local-storage proof
in the parent, use valid synthetic Cloud settings in the child, and
check the expected provider mismatch without S3 requests. Retain the
no-seed and unchanged persisted-row assertions.

## Verification

- URL controls: three failures on the parent; all pass with the
correction.
- Branch controls: two failures and one correct rejection on the
predecessor; all pass with the correction.
- `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-feature-testops-api.test.mjs`: 40
owning pure/mock controls pass on Node 26.4.0.
- Two MJS syntax checks and `git diff --check` pass. TypeScript noEmit
was not run for this MJS/documentation change.
- The first [normal CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41131094974)
failed only in the managed-skill Cloud fixture and its dependent
verification gate: 46 jobs passed, two failed, and one skipped. The
tested merge included a new upstream policy that rejects the test's
local-disk Cloud configuration. The exact caught runtime exception
remains unknown.
- Three pure controls using the actual policy validator pass: the old
invalid Cloud fixture rejects, the new synthetic S3 fixture admits, and
an invalid master key rejects. An initial tsx wrapper IPC permission
error executed zero controls and remains a separate setup failure.
- The PostgreSQL/maintenance-child test was not run locally. On new-head
AWS CI, `managed-skill-content.test.ts` passed all 17 tests in server
shard 9.
- [Normal
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41133876636)
is green on exact head `b76d5dd40d7711f1b5f6b6316b1114c0aae02d57`: 48
jobs passed and one skipped. Both required `ci / e2e` and `ci / verify`
pass.
- Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with no actionable findings
or unresolved review threads.
- No actual CLI, backend, model, provider, app, database, build, or
bootstrap was run to validate this correction locally.

## Risks

The exact original bootstrap predicate is still unknown. This fixes a
demonstrated metadata false negative and preserves the prior failed run.
Actual backend parameter types and integration dispatch still need
verification. Unknown metadata stops before the once marker and writes.
This PR changes no workflow, credential, case, model, grader, clock, or
private-evidence policy. It does not claim a passing feature result.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) with reasoning, code editing, tool
use, and pure test review. The runtime does not expose the exact
context-window size.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:04:59 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 2bdda5dcf2 fix: release settled deadline work holds during drain
Preserve dirty generations with an in-memory resume deadline while allowing settled transaction holds to end during drain. Keep unresolved database intent fenced by the coordinator.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 17:02:11 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip bd5a104c41 fix(agents): revalidate error-clear authority before write intent
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 16:59:00 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 9466bca1ad test(skills): verify Cloud CLI reads through shared object storage
Use the real S3 provider with a controlled HTTP fixture and a stable test key. Preserve read-only/no-seeding behavior and verify corrupt, missing, and restored object outcomes under managed Cloud policy.

Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 16:56:40 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip d820f2bae4 refactor(recovery): expose scoped issue recovery obligations
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 16:53:01 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 50217ad02a test(heartbeat): use test-only signal setup and inspect saved stdout
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 16:42:27 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 098111c2ca test(heartbeat): retain process output and lifecycle acceptance evidence
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 16:42:12 -05:00
Dotta b57f5e5869 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into codex/sleep-run-task-recovery
* origin/master:
  fix(config): require shared storage for managed cloud (#18350)
  feat(skills): make managed content independent of web-server disk (#18334)
  Add a portable agent question and answer resumption journey (#18346)
  fix(ci): isolate test selection and require current CI CODEOWNERS (#18376)
  fix(evals): capture TestOps registration after watch (#18375)
  fix(runner): allow session reset after confirmed task retirement (#18373)
  fix(evals): batch task search result readback across renders (#18370)
  fix(ui): keep task plugin views available for manual access (#18363)
  test: wait for the evidence expiry worker to settle (#18241)
2026-10-30 16:36:30 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 922ae50f3f test(heartbeat): verify dispatch against real PostgreSQL clocks
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 16:36:26 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 198218bf55 fix(config): require shared storage for managed cloud (#18350)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Managed Cloud instances must retain shared objects and secrets
across server replacement.
> - Implicit storage defaults can select local disk or an unintended
bucket.
> - Cloud runtime settings now come from a canonical database snapshot.
> - This pull request validates bootstrap prerequisites before database
setup and effective S3 settings after snapshot resolution.
> - The benefit is an actionable refusal before local signing state or
HTTP setup, while valid canonical Cloud settings work.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

A managed Cloud instance could start with local disk storage, an
implicit bucket, or a local key file. After canonical Cloud
configuration landed, checking only environment or file values would
also reject a valid database bucket. Shared schema defaults could make
an omitted raw bucket appear explicit.

**Expected behavior**

Managed Cloud requires external PostgreSQL, a stable environment master
key, and effective S3 settings with a nonblank bucket. The canonical
snapshot remains the configuration authority. Invalid configuration
refuses startup before signing or HTTP effects. Self-hosted defaults
remain compatible.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Select managed Cloud with its tenant token or managed configuration
document.
2. Leave storage as local disk, or omit the S3 bucket from a raw
canonical snapshot.
3. Start the server. Startup must refuse. An explicit valid bucket in
the canonical snapshot must work without a file or environment bucket.

**Paperclip version or commit**

Current base: `4edd10804e2b42941aa2038e90c362c13a0b98dc`.

**Deployment mode**

Managed Cloud. Ordinary self-hosted defaults remain unchanged.

Related PRs: #18335 owns canonical Cloud runtime configuration. #18327
owns S3 run logs. #18352 owns credential persistence. #18347 owns
cutover checks. This PR adds configuration prerequisites to those
existing boundaries.

## What Changed

- Validate external PostgreSQL and a stable environment master key at
the Cloud bootstrap boundary, before database setup.
- Validate effective S3 settings after canonical snapshot publication
and before Cloud signing, runtime consumers, or HTTP setup.
- Require a nonblank bucket in the Cloud snapshot schema. Reject omitted
or blank buckets in every legacy Cloud file before one-time import
normalization, even when an environment bucket is supplied. Keep shared
self-hosted schema defaults.
- Preserve typed bucket provenance at the existing file-read boundary.
Accept explicit canonical bucket names, including `paperclip`, and
environment settings when the snapshot is null.
- Validate effective legacy storage with the existing resolver before
seeding. A rejected candidate leaves no canonical rows, so a corrected
source file can be imported on retry. Environment overlays are checked
but never persisted.
- Add real PostgreSQL snapshot and migration-retry tests, startup
refusal tests, and environment/file compatibility controls. Document
that Cloud always requires its stable environment key, even with an
external default secrets provider.

## Verification

- Latest focused acceptance passed 199/199 in six files (54.29 seconds),
using the command below plus
`server/src/__tests__/cloud-configuration-migration-postgres.test.ts`.
Real PostgreSQL proves rejected storage leaves all three migration
authority rows absent, then a corrected legacy file imports on retry. An
external-default-secrets control proves the deliberate unconditional
Cloud master-key contract.
- Before the peer correction, the frozen product diff passed 178 tests
in five files: managed-cloud-prerequisites, cloud-runtime-config,
server-startup-feedback-export, config-file, and
cloud-configuration-readers. Command: `pnpm exec vitest run
server/src/__tests__/{managed-cloud-prerequisites,cloud-runtime-config,server-startup-feedback-export,config-file,cloud-configuration-readers}.test.ts
--maxWorkers=1 --no-file-parallelism`. Real PostgreSQL used a qualified
POSIX test-only PG18.6 override because the host cannot supply the stock
runtime's SysV semaphore allocation.
- Coverage includes raw database and legacy omitted/blank bucket
rejection, valid database and environment buckets, null snapshots,
explicit default-named buckets, self-hosted compatibility, and refusal
before local signing mutation.
- The real AWS SDK configured-provider control uses a simulated loopback
S3 service. It writes, reads from a fresh provider, and deletes an
object. It also reads an encrypted credential with the stable
environment key. This does not qualify production cloud permissions.
- `git diff --check` passed. Final merges add unrelated master changes
from #18241, #18363, and #18370; the focused storage product diff is
unchanged.
- Peer review reproduced a fresh legacy local-disk import that gained
the default bucket before an S3 environment overlay. The importer now
requires a raw explicit bucket for every legacy Cloud file. Six controls
cover omission/blank values with and without an environment bucket; the
full focused rerun passed 184/184 across all five files in 194.89
seconds.
- Initial revised startup testing passed 167/168: one fixture omitted
the database URL and failed before its intended key assertion. The
corrected final run passed 178/178. An initial direct server typecheck
failed because Runner declarations were not built; this is a setup
failure, not a compile pass. Integration verification rebuilds
dependencies before full checks.
- Prior head `fae1e4aa` passed complete CI with 53 successes, two
intended skips, and Greptile 5/5.
`de71345f379cecb71dbfb219f35e14f942c10a3f` then passed complete CI (55
successes, three workflow skips, and a neutral external review), with
Greptile 5/5 and zero unresolved threads. The external review identified
the preseed rejection problem; its correction is committed at
`75e04d0d77e19dcef0a8cb070b6b518f0f173b14`. The final merge head is
`19b809ea2823a6a4e5ceb48ef2c2bac4721733d6`; [Fresh complete
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41127309762)
passed on that head: 55 successful checks, three workflow skips, and one
neutral external review. Greptile reviewed this exact head at 5/5 with
no actionable issues. Both earlier external review threads are resolved
with the tested fixes. Earlier infrastructure retries remain documented
in [the first
diagnosis](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18350#issuecomment-6529964690)
and [the runner shutdown
evidence](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18350#issuecomment-6530364769).
Earlier missing SDK build and fixture metadata failures were repaired
before those passes.
- Current frozen-head CI first attempt failed one unchanged Antigravity
authentication success case in Runner Vitest 1/2 (`outcome=failure`,
1994 tests passed). The same file passed 11/11 locally in 2.33 seconds,
and identical Runner source passed the prior complete CI run. Attempt 2
retried only failed jobs (the Runner shard and dependent aggregate).
Both passed without a source change. No second retry was used. The exact
timing cause is not established. [Failed
job](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41127309762/job/124309181778).
- No production data, buckets, or live credentials were used. Complete
local repository suites are not duplicated in this worktree;
current-head required CI supplies the full suite gate.

## Risks

- Managed deployments with local disk, omitted buckets, file-only keys,
or missing external database URLs now refuse startup. Operators must
supply valid prerequisites before rollout.
- Required deployment environment overlays must remain stable across
replacements. For example, a saved local-disk provider with an explicit
bucket can use an environment S3 provider; removing that required
overlay correctly refuses startup until the environment or canonical
configuration is corrected. Environment settings are never silently
copied into the canonical row.
- Effective legacy storage must also pass before first seeding. A bad
candidate does not create authority rows. Existing saved rows remain
authoritative and can require environment overrides or a canonical
configuration change if they are invalid.
- A present legacy Cloud file needs an explicit raw bucket even if its
saved provider is local disk or its environment supplies a bucket.
Correct the file before one-time import, or use the existing
absent-file/null-snapshot environment-only setup. Environment overlays
are not persisted as operator choices.
- A previously stored canonical nonblank `paperclip` bucket is
authoritative. Prior normalization erased whether that value was
originally explicit. This change cannot recover that provenance and does
not reject existing nonblank canonical values.
- Validation proves configuration shape, not cloud permissions, database
reachability, or key compatibility with existing encrypted data. Keep
the master key stable across replacements.
- Cloud snapshot JSON parsing is stricter; omitted or blank raw S3
bucket values need correction. No database migration or provider
operation changes are added. These prerequisites do not prove that every
server persistence path is disposable.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-6.1-sol`. Context window: unknown. The
model used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and test
execution.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 16:21:46 -05:00
DottaandPaperclip 0e15c92073 feat(skills): make managed content independent of web-server disk (#18334)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agents use installed skills and exact version pins during execution.
> - Managed skills still depended on mutable directories on the web
server.
> - A replacement server could lose acknowledged edits or remove an
unassigned skill whose directory was absent.
> - This pull request makes immutable versions the authority for managed
content and installed repository reads.
> - The server can rebuild delivery files from durable content after
replacement.
> - This establishes skills readiness for ephemeral web servers. General
server draining and workspace recovery remain separate work.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**

Skills services, shared contracts, database receipts, Skill Studio, and
runtime delivery.

**Problem or motivation**

A fresh web server must discover, read, edit, and deliver protected
installed skills using the same database, object storage, secrets, and
supported application artifacts. It must not need its predecessor's
files or process memory.

**Proposed solution**

Use `managed` ownership with a null source locator. Read installed
content by immutable version. Prepare packages before a short
publication transaction. Persist execution selections before
materialization. Recover exact pinned runtime assets and reject deletion
while active or recovering pins exist.

**Alternatives considered**

Reconstructing a mutable installed directory preserves the old
source-of-truth ambiguity. Permanent dual writes create two competing
authorities. This change uses one managed model after a bounded legacy
conversion.

**Roadmap alignment**

This improves the existing Skills Manager, Studio, version history, and
Cloud execution capabilities. The maintainer supplied the implementation
contract. This does not add a separate skills product or deploy fleet
changes.

Related work: #18082 supplies immutable package storage. #17273
addresses edits outside the API for linked local skills; this PR keeps
that source category separate. #2648 is a closed earlier
ephemeral-filesystem proposal.

## What Changed

- Add managed ownership and focused content publication and execution
materialization modules. Keep the archive format and package storage
tables.
- Publish managed create, save, delete, fork, rename, restore, and
catalog content with version checks. Add durable create receipts.
Preserve file-save receipt responses.
- Return file version identities. Keep Studio drafts after a conflict
and provide an explicit reload action. A delayed reload cannot overwrite
newer typing or navigation.
- Persist exact runtime selections, including empty selections. Rebuild
pinned assets and verify their admitted digests on a replacement server.
- Preserve source access on forks and disconnected copies. Keep the
existing workspace policy category for managed skills.
- Add bounded conversion, eligibility, and independent verification
phases. Load persisted Cloud configuration in the standalone CLI without
seeding or changing it. Reject partial current versions against
installed inventories; recover only complete saved content or the exact
source. Document storage migration blockers and the compatible rollback
floor.
- Add separate-process PostgreSQL/S3 qualification and update domain,
retention, policy, and UI regressions.
- Pass the plugin worker manager into Studio execution, admit restricted
`skill_test` mode through native Runner contracts, and preserve admitted
scope across native and REST tools. Native tests cannot create ordinary
tasks, browse company data, or use external tools.
- Select the exact durable Studio revision even when unassigned or Beta
skills is off. Persist Studio output and audit atomically with native
task completion, preserving the result on replay.

## Verification

- Final revision `13e8af480b88ba6fea5737bac4bd81104d604792` passed full
CI: all 49 workflow jobs completed successfully ([run
41127396098](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41127396098)).
This includes typecheck, test suites, Runner checks, browser checks and
build. Greptile review 15 is 5/5 on that same revision, with zero
unresolved threads. The PR is ready for review.
- Local workspace typecheck and build passed after integrating master.
Focused checks passed: 33 execution/completion cases, 52 Runner HTTP
cases, 16 managed-content cases, 17 Studio cases, the new real-process
CLI regression, map checks and UI token gates. The CLI regression proves
inspection does not seed missing Cloud configuration. Server typecheck
passed after that fix.
- The independent-process PostgreSQL/S3 matrix passed through normal
HTTP skill routes. It covers A → B → C replacement, lost commit
responses, upload crashes, concurrent saves, binary contents and
executable delivery. Metadata listing and warm selected delivery retain
zero object downloads. Local timing measurements are recorded; they do
not establish hosted latency.
- Hosted A → B → C passed on the owned disposable test tenant with
external Postgres, S3 and a real remote Paperclip Computer. Predecessor
temporary homes were absent. C read and executed B's acknowledged
managed save. New runs used repository v1 while v2 was installed. Hashes
matched an independently checked exact upstream commit.
- Compatible image rollback to `6518b323` passed. Studio retained the
unassigned fork's C save. A fresh remote run executed the newer managed
content and historical repository pin. The actual shell event confirmed
expected hashes, stdout, exit 0 and mode 0555.
- Runtime candidate `9200e3fcb4` deployed successfully ([Cloud run
41124147876](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-cloud/actions/runs/41124147876)).
The final Studio test delivered only the unassigned fork's exact v3,
executed its script and persisted a successful output snapshot.
Independent command-event inspection confirmed all three hashes, stdout,
exit 0 and mode 0555. All 14 installations were version-backed.
Independent verification checked all 25 versions: 23 remote objects, two
bundled database snapshots, zero blockers.
- The deployed image is `9200e3fcb4`. Later master integration, the
client-only delayed-reload draft guard and the CLI bootstrap have
separate automated proof. The CLI bootstrap was also exercised against
the tenant's stored configuration and storage through the same read-only
services. This PR does not claim that the deployed image is the final PR
revision.
- Live Studio checks exposed worker wiring, admission, access scope,
exact selection and completion-publication gaps. They are fixed. Failed
attempts remain in the evidence. The full local suite exceeded 80
minutes under host contention and was stopped. Later combined/isolated
local attempts also timed out; they are not counted as passes. Full CI
covers the integrated suites. Earlier CI found an obsolete restart-scope
fixture, which was corrected and passed all 52 HTTP cases.
- Reproduction and migration:
[`doc/skill-ephemeral-web-servers.md`](doc/skill-ephemeral-web-servers.md).
Source revisions, deployments, versions, run IDs, hashes and failure
history:
[`doc/plans/2026-10-30-ephemeral-web-skills.md`](doc/plans/2026-10-30-ephemeral-web-skills.md).

## Risks

- Legacy conversion requires stopped admission and retired
filesystem-authoritative writers. Pre-conversion binaries are not
supported rollback targets afterward.
- Cloud readiness requires remote object storage. Local provider
receipts and provider mismatches remain blockers until objects are
copied and verified.
- Linked local sources retain filesystem semantics and are outside the
cloud guarantee.
- Cold reads still fetch the existing archive format. Warm runtime
preparation retains the verified-cache path.
- Bundled reconciliation preserves an installed head. Existing release
snapshots remain selectable. An older server must not replace a newer
head with its shipped files.
- No production volumes, fleet defaults, or general deployment
coordination change in this PR.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools, code
execution, and browser use. The exact backend model ID and
context-window size are not exposed in this session. No subagents were
used.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 16:18:27 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip 6174b4d7c8 fix(runner): allow session reset after confirmed task retirement (#18373)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work.
> - Native warm sessions retain a Runner owner between turns.
> - Closing that owner must stop execution and preserve valid recovery
state.
> - A failed suspension can leave a rejected close promise after the
task has stopped.
> - A session reset then retries that same promise and blocks every
fresh session.
> - This PR separates task retirement proof from checkpoint reuse for a
new session.
> - A reset can proceed after exact stop proof, completed handoff, and
file collection.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18011. That change preserves checkpoint authority during warm
preparation. This change handles a stopped owner whose checkpoint cannot
be reused. Related: #14695 covers managed files retained with warm
processes. A search found no duplicate stopped-owner reset fix.

**What happened?**

A warm Runner can stop and complete its task handoff while close reports
`runner did not durably suspend before checkpoint`. The transport caches
that rejected close promise. Core retains the warm owner. Each session
reset retries the same promise before it can launch a provider. A
controller restart clears the in-memory owner and permits recovery.

**Expected behavior**

A reset to a new normalized session should release the old owner when
its exact task has proved that execution stopped and its handoff
completed. Core must collect stopped instruction files before it admits
the new session. An unconfirmed owner must continue to block
replacement.

**Steps to reproduce**

1. Complete a warm native run through a plugin task provider.
2. Change configuration so Core retires the warm owner.
3. Let the task stop and complete, but fail durable suspension proof.
Close keeps its rejected promise.
4. Reset the session and start another run on the same task environment.
5. Observe the old close error before any new provider work starts.

## What Changed

- Keep a lease-bound retirement receipt in the plugin task owner. It
requires `executionStopped: true` and successful task completion after
credential handoff.
- Accept an unrecoverable suspension error only during retirement for a
different normalized session, with that exact owner's receipt and
settled Core tool results.
- Collect stopped instruction files before releasing the warm owner.
Preserve old checkpoint evidence.
- Keep same-session, active-owner, incomplete-handoff, unrelated-owner,
unresolved Core tool results, and other close-error fences.
- Report Core tool settlement on the close error after ingress
retirement and drain. Default missing proof to false. Expose the error
through the server's Runner shim. Add regression tests and document the
recovery boundary.

## Verification

- The reset regression fails with the new handling disabled and passes
with it enabled.
- Both affected suites passed: 1,032 tests. The final 15 focused
owner/reset cases pass after adding the tool-settlement guard.
- The assembled regression uses the real task-owner and backend binding.
Its controlled task provider proves stop and completion. Close returns
the same rejected promise on every call.
- Negative cases cover incomplete handoff, other close errors,
same-session continuation, provider change with the same session ID,
unrelated receipts, unresolved Core tool results, and failed file
collection. Collection can later succeed without replaying stop or
reading the old checkpoint.
- Five real-process transport cases pass. They cover an insufficient
suspension deadline, the cached rejected promise, late tool completion
within and beyond the deadline, interruption, and result-persistence
failure. Unsettled callbacks produce `semanticToolsSettled: false`.
- `pnpm -r typecheck` passed with the repository's pinned Rust toolchain
on PATH. After the final contract change, Runner TypeScript build and
server `tsc --noEmit` passed.
- The local full-suite run was stopped at the requester's direction.
Full regression and build coverage are delegated to GitHub CI.
- Full GitHub CI passed on `ef0040d80af679ce6d4a130468e15f75678c1f4c`.
Standard Greptile reviewed the same commit: 5/5, zero comments. Apex
then reviewed that same commit: 5/5, zero comments. Final checks confirm
no unresolved review threads and no merge conflicts.
- Initial full CI on `00c002fd5a` failed one scheduled-retry route test
at 18/20 cancellations. Controlled cancellation latency reproduced the
short poll-budget failure. Before the next cycle, master advanced with
#18322, which coordinates that test at the first completed batch. The
separate local timeout commit was dropped during rebase. The upstream
test passes locally. The rebased run passed 46 targeted owner/reset and
scheduled-retry route cases. This PR has no scheduled-retry source or
test diff.
- No deployed provider run or tenant rollout is claimed by these source
tests.

## Risks

The exception applies only to a new normalized session and an exact
completed plugin task. The old checkpoint remains evidence and cannot
authorize reuse through this path. The original suspension failure can
remain visible on its run. This fix prevents repeated startup failures
after a reset; it does not hide unconfirmed cleanup or make every
suspension succeed. Missing task receipts and failed file collection
continue to block replacement. No schema migration, plugin protocol
change, Rust Runner binary change, or new polling is required. Tests use
a controlled task boundary; they do not certify every external provider
implementation.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with tool use and local code execution. The
exact runtime model ID and context-window size are not exposed in this
session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub references)
- [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal issue
or instance details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] Greptile Apex is 5/5 with no unresolved findings
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 13:57:12 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 294d8ca1c2 perf(heartbeat): schedule retry promotion from durable deadlines
Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 15:53:26 -05:00
Nicky LeachandPaperclip fd008979f5 test: wait for the evidence expiry worker to settle (#18241)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip coordinates AI work and retains execution evidence.
> - Evidence retention uses an asynchronous worker and a shared
scheduler.
> - The retention test checked the next deadline as soon as an archive
disappeared.
> - File removal can finish before the worker publishes that deadline.
> - This pull request waits for worker settlement before asserting its
next wake.
> - The test keeps its deletion, busy-session preservation, and
quiet-worker checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**What happened?**

CI for #18239 failed in `native-harness-backup-expiration.test.ts`. The
healthy-expiry test observed the file removal while `nextWakeAt()` was
still null. Subtracting the current time then produced a large negative
number.

**Expected behavior**

The retention test should check the deadline after the asynchronous
worker has settled.

**Steps to reproduce**

Run the server test shard with a slow filesystem completion. The
deletion predicate can become true before scheduler publication
finishes.

## What Changed

- Keep the existing file-removal wait open until tracked work is idle
and the expected busy-session retry deadline is registered.
- Keep the held archive and quiet-worker assertions.

## Verification

- Original CI failure: [server shard
3/12](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40976031169/job/123804262266).
- The targeted test passes with its real PostgreSQL fixture: `node
node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --project @paperclipai/server
server/src/__tests__/native-harness-backup-expiration.test.ts -t 'lets
healthy saved expiry preempt' --maxWorkers 1`.
- After rebasing onto master, the focused retention test passes again
with its real PostgreSQL fixture. The PR now changes one test, with
seven insertions and two deletions.
- Master independently fixed the authentication timeout and
GitHub-recovery checkpoint race. Their redundant commits were dropped
during rebase.
- [Full GitHub
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40984842413)
passes on `bbaa7c3c384f6c220ce2c979f0e9b5d01ddb1f77`: all 48 jobs
succeeded. Standard Greptile is 5/5 on that head, and GitHub reports the
PR clean.
- Broader coverage runs in GitHub CI. No local full build or full test
suite was run for this assertion-only change.

## Risks

Low risk. The retention test waits for the condition it already asserts.
The existing deletion, busy-session preservation, future-deadline, and
quiet-worker checks remain in place. No production code or time budget
changes.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository inspection, terminal tools,
and code execution. The serving variant and context window size are not
exposed in this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 13:28:00 -07:00
DottaandPaperclip 76fde891cc Add bounded recovery file inventory before server cutover (#18347)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Accounting, credential recovery, and sandbox cleanup can retain
legacy files on an instance volume.
> - Replacing that volume while files remain can lose unresolved work.
> - There is no verified production backlog, so an empty installation
needs no migration.
> - The recovery owners must decide whether each record is valid and
settled.
> - This pull request adds a bounded file inventory and an optional
cutover gate.
> - The benefit is a safe check that preserves obligations without
reading secret material.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Problem or motivation**

Operators need to check the actual affected instance directories before
replacing a web server. A skipped corrupt file or failed read must not
appear clear.

**Proposed solution**

Add a Node script that inspects only the three legacy recovery
directories for an explicitly chosen instance. Default mode reports
counts. The optional check mode blocks when files or uncertainty remain.

**Alternatives considered**

A bulk migration system has no established backlog to migrate.
Reimplementing the owner parsers could expose credentials and still
would not prove settlement. This check never reads file bytes.

**Roadmap alignment**

This is a small operational prerequisite for safe cloud server
replacement. It does not add a recovery backend or change resource
ownership.

Related recovery-owner changes: #18354 (accounting), #18352
(credentials), and #18357 (sandbox ownership). This inventory remains
independently usable with existing files.

## What Changed

- Add a pure classification policy and a bounded filesystem boundary.
- Add `node scripts/recovery-cutover.mjs --instance-root
/absolute/instance` with optional `--check`, directory override, and
entry budget.
- Report observed lower-bound counts and safe status summaries. Do not
print paths, filenames, identifiers, raw errors, or file contents.
- Add one dependency-free CLI acceptance suite and a Vitest bridge so
the same cases run in normal server CI.
- Document existing owner entry points, override selection, stopped
producers, and retained-volume requirements.

## Verification

- `node --test scripts/recovery-cutover.test.mjs`: 9 cases pass. The
suite starts the actual CLI with synthetic legacy directories.
- Pending receipts, nested credential files, orphan records, malformed
bytes, temporary files, unreadable files, unsafe paths, symlinks, read
failures, bounds, and configured overrides all block safely.
- Empty or absent recovery directories clear. Source file bytes remain
unchanged. Report-only mode and check-mode exit codes are tested.
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/recovery-cutover.test.ts
--pool=forks --maxWorkers=1`: the normal CI bridge passes and runs the
same 9 cases.
- Cached frozen dependency installation, script syntax checks, and `git
diff --check` pass. The lockfile is unchanged.
- Independent source review found the read-only boundary sound.
- [Complete current-head
CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/41097614666)
passed at `bf5cc7f067041c10cd0294ff26756678da943976`: 53 successful
checks and two intended skips, including typecheck, full tests, build,
and E2E. Greptile is 5/5 with no review threads.
- One failed-job retry was needed for an existing heartbeat timing
failure in server shard 4. The relevant heartbeat source and tests match
the base branch. Local diagnostic runs had 61 pass/2 fail and 7 pass/1
fail, with changing timing failures; neither run is claimed as green.
The bounded retry and all failed evidence are [recorded
here](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/18347#issuecomment-6529629804).
No heartbeat code or test was changed.

## Risks

- The scan is a point-in-time inventory. Stop producers for the final
gate. It is not an atomic drain certificate or protection against
hostile path mutation.
- All files remain unverified. The check cannot certify validity or
Postgres settlement. Existing owners retain that responsibility.
- The scan does not inspect other instances, volumes, Runner delivery,
or database obligations. It does not establish that production cutover
is ready.
- No migration, deletion, decryption, or replay command is added.
Symlink paths are rejected, including system aliases; use canonical
absolute paths.

## Model Used

- OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol`, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution.
Context window size was not supplied.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-30 15:21:13 -05:00