mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-06 10:48:12 +02:00
270afd2fb819cfb5e064de0ff4d65a074b0083eb
4614
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
270afd2fb8 |
feat(ui): show running commit in staging account menu (#14410)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The account menu shows the signed-in user's identity. > - Staging users need to know which server commit is running after a deploy. > - The health endpoint already returns that commit, but the menu does not show it. > - This pull request adds the short commit below the email on staging hosts. > - Users can open the menu to check a deploy without opening deployment tools. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The account menu on staging instances. **Current behavior** The menu shows the user's name and email. It does not show the running server commit. **Proposed behavior** On `*.staging.paperclip.app`, show `SHA 8751e2d` below the email. Use the current `/api/health` commit. Show the full SHA on hover and link to the commit on GitHub. Refresh the health query when the menu opens. Hide the label on other hosts and when commit metadata is unavailable. **Reason and benefit** A user can confirm which commit a staging instance runs after an automatic deploy. **Breaking changes** None. The server already returns the commit field. Refs #14060 for related account-menu work. This change adds deployment information only. ## What Changed - Add the existing health response commit field to the UI type. - Share the staging host check and a separate health query across both account-menu variants. A menu refresh failure leaves the access gate health state unchanged. - Show a short SHA below the email. Link to the full commit on GitHub and include the full SHA in its accessible name and hover title. - Document the staging label and cover staging hosts, other hosts, missing metadata, refresh on reopen, and request failure isolation. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/SidebarAccountMenu.test.tsx` — 24 tests passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` — passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` — passed. - `pnpm build` — passed. The UI build and typecheck also passed again after review fixes. - Full test matrix — passed on the latest commit in [CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36447810742). The local `pnpm test:run` was stopped before completion after CI finished the same suites. The focused local tests, full local typecheck, and full local build passed. - Browser shard 6 passed on one rerun. Its first attempt lost part of the draft text in the existing attachment-receipt reload test. No code changed for the rerun. - Rendered the real account menu in a local browser fixture with a staging hostname condition and mocked health response. Confirmed the SHA fits below the email in the dark menu. - Greptile review — 5/5, all review threads resolved. - Manual check after deployment: open the menu on a staging host and compare the SHA with `/api/health`. Open the menu again after a deploy to refresh it. Confirm the label is absent on production and localhost. ## Risks - Low risk. Each menu opening on staging can make one additional health request. - The host check applies to `*.staging.paperclip.app`. Other staging domains will need an explicit update. - The label identifies the running server commit. It can briefly show cached data while the request completes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6. The exact model variant and context window are not exposed in this session. Used code execution, repository inspection, and browser inspection. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #123` / `Refs #123` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
e9debd3eac |
fix(workspaces): allow larger status output for readiness checks (#14414)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server checks workspace contents before it allows cleanup or branch reconciliation. > - These checks need the full Git status output to count untracked files. > - Nested task worktrees can make this output exceed the scheduler's default 1 MiB limit. > - A scan failure then blocks an otherwise inspectable workspace. > - This pull request raises the limit for these status checks to 32 MiB. > - The checks retain exact counts and still protect uncommitted work from cleanup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14194 and #14253. Those changes address snapshot enumeration. This PR addresses buffered execution-workspace status checks. Refs #13619 for separate work on caching these checks. The related journal identity failure is covered by #14312. **What happened?** Close-readiness checks failed when Git status output exceeded 1 MiB. A workspace with thousands of long untracked paths could not report its file count or complete readiness inspection. **Expected behavior** Allow up to 32 MiB of status output for execution-workspace readiness and branch reconciliation. Preserve exact counts. Continue to block cleanup when the workspace has uncommitted data or the scan exceeds its bound. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an execution workspace with a merged delivery. 2. Add 5,000 long untracked filenames under a nested task directory. The status output exceeds 1 MiB. 3. Request close readiness. Before this fix the status scan fails. After this fix it reports all 5,000 files. 4. Run the terminal-workspace sweep. Confirm that it preserves the workspace and files. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `14795136f5` before this fix. **Deployment mode** Server with managed Git workspaces. ## What Changed - Set a 32 MiB stdout bound for execution-workspace status scans. - Add a real Git regression with 5,000 long untracked paths and a cleanup-preservation assertion. Assert that the measured status output exceeds 1 MiB. - Document the bound and failure behavior. ## Verification - The new regression failed on master before the service change: the status result had no untracked files or count after the scan exceeded its bound. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts server/src/services/workspace-git-operation-scheduler.test.ts` passed: 82 tests, including the new regression. The regression and server typecheck also passed after the explicit byte-count assertion. - `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. The full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after the failures listed below. Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads on the latest head. All checks for head `45f93ad5ad` passed (53 successful, two intentional skips). - Full local validation did not pass. The attempt reproduced 13 company/runtime skill-cache permission failures, the terminal-workspace cleanup assertion, and a heartbeat feedback timeout. It was stopped during the general-server stage after these failures. Remaining general-server tests, other workspace groups, and serialized-server stages did not complete locally. Earlier clean-master checks reproduced the cache failures and isolated cleanup retries passed. The latest-head GitHub suite passed all of these groups. - One GitHub browser shard initially failed because its GitHub-connection test checked the resume-action array before the mocked request completed. The single failed-job retry passed without a source change. All latest-head checks are green. - No browser suites ran locally. This change does not affect browser behavior. ## Risks - Each active status scan can buffer up to 32 MiB before parsing. The existing scheduler bounds scan concurrency and queue size. - Output above the bound still fails the scan and blocks destructive cleanup. The change does not truncate output or change cleanup rules. - There are no API, database, or snapshot-streaming changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository inspection, code editing, and test execution. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full local-run failures and incomplete stages are documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.928.0-canary.5 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
6f40e23536 |
fix(logging): redact cloud authentication headers (#14413)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server records HTTP requests to help operators diagnose failures. > - Cloud requests carry tenant credentials and signed assertions in headers. > - The HTTP logger did not redact four of these headers. > - This pull request adds those headers to the existing redaction list. > - Operators retain the route, method, and response status without recording these values. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** HTTP request logs could contain cloud tenant credentials, session identifiers, runtime identity assertions, and cloud control assertions. **Expected behavior** The logger must redact these header values for successful requests and failed requests. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an Express app with the production HTTP logger and redaction configuration. 2. Send a request with the four cloud headers and distinct test values. 3. Inspect the serialized request headers for responses with status 200, 403, and 500. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `0f14d26123` before this fix. **Deployment mode** Server with cloud proxy authentication. The regression test uses an in-process Express server. ## What Changed - Redact `x-paperclip-cloud-tenant-token`, `x-paperclip-cloud-session-id`, `x-paperclip-cloud-runtime-identity`, and `x-paperclip-cloud-control` in HTTP request logs. - Test real logger output for HTTP 200, 403, and 500 with mixed-case request header names. Route 403 and 500 through the production error handler. Check response bodies, log levels, and server error context. - Check that the method, route, and status remain available. ## Verification The `server/src/__tests__/http-log-redaction.test.ts` suite passed, including all three new cloud-header cases. - Rebased onto master at `14795136f5`. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/http-log-redaction.test.ts` passed: 59 tests, including all three new response-status cases. The suite and server typecheck also passed after the error-handler coverage update. - `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. The full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after the failures listed below. Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads on the latest head. All checks for head `373d29e2f1` passed (53 successful, two intentional skips). - Full local validation did not pass. The attempt reproduced company-skill cache permission failures, the terminal-workspace cleanup assertion, a heartbeat feedback timeout, and one process-conversation timing failure. It was stopped during the general-server stage after these failures. Remaining general-server tests, other workspace groups, and serialized-server stages did not complete locally. Earlier clean-master checks reproduced the cache failures and isolated cleanup retries passed. The latest-head GitHub suite passed all of these groups. - No browser suites ran locally. This change does not affect browser behavior. ## Risks - These four values will no longer be available in HTTP logs. Route, method, and status remain available. - This change applies to new log entries. It does not remove old entries or rotate credentials. - No schema, API, or authentication behavior changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository inspection, code editing, and test execution. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full local-run failures and incomplete stages are documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.928.0-canary.4 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
14795136f5 |
fix(runtime): finalize and recover sandbox workspace exports safely (#14402)
Serialize native workspace finalization, validate streamed archives within bounded limits, and quietly recover unsafe exports from saved results. Preserve exact allocations for exhausted transient failures and provide export-only retry without rerunning the provider. Consolidates #14314, #14315, #14329, and #14334 while preserving the already-merged finalization label changes. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.928.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
3447609d22 |
fix(runner): stream and page large API responses within capture budgets (#14301)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Agents use governed API tools to inspect task evidence.
> - Large API results become saved assets with short previews.
> - Reading an asset through the same tool used to create another asset,
so the agent could not reach the rest of the evidence.
> - The 10 MiB response cap also blocked useful large results. Removing
all bounds allowed excessive disk use.
> - This pull request streams responses up to 1 GiB and makes saved text
readable in bounded pages. It adds durable run budgets and capture
admission limits.
> - Agents can inspect complete evidence while tool results, memory use,
and capture work stay bounded.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A large response became an asset. Reading that asset returned another
asset and the same preview. Responses above 10 MiB failed before the
agent could read any page.
**Expected behavior**
The agent can fetch a large response and read its saved text to EOF.
Each page stays bounded. New snapshots have a generous finite limit and
a durable run budget. Existing larger assets remain readable through
byte ranges.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Call a GET operation that returns more than 10 MiB of text or JSON.
2. Before the fix, the tool returns `api_transport_failure`.
3. With this change, responses up to 1 GiB become streamed snapshots
with artifact references.
4. Read `GET /api/assets/{assetId}/content` with `responseText:
{offsetBytes: 0, limitBytes: 8192}`. Follow `nextOffsetBytes` until
null.
Related work: #14186 added the API fallback tools. #14218 bounded API
discovery.
## What Changed
- Add authenticated UTF-8 text windows to `call_api`, with byte offsets
and total size. Keep each page at or below 24 KiB.
- Stream new responses above 24 KiB through private temporary files into
company-owned assets. Bound each capture to 1 GiB of decoded bytes.
Reject oversized declared lengths before reading and count streamed
bytes before writing.
- Reserve capture budget in the run record before spilling. Allow 4 GiB
per run. Settle successful captures to their actual size. Failed or
interrupted captures retain their full 1 GiB reservation. Run restarts
do not reset the budget.
- Enforce a 20 GiB company snapshot quota with database reservations.
Count legacy snapshots and unfinished storage work across runs and
processes. Asset deletion frees quota.
- Limit large captures to two per company and four per server process.
Hold slots through storage upload and temporary-file cleanup. Use a
10-minute download deadline and 30-second connection/idle-read timeouts.
- Return explicit size, budget, busy, and timeout errors. Preserve
unknown outcomes for mutations whose response cannot be captured.
- Read saved assets through authenticated storage ranges, with at most
two extra bytes for UTF-8 and EOF handling. Unpaged reads return the
existing asset and digest with a bounded preview. Reads create no copies
and do not consume capture budget.
- Keep existing assets above 1 GiB readable in pages. Use safe integer
offsets and PostgreSQL `bigint` asset sizes.
- Stream large S3 uploads through ordered multipart requests. Abort
failed uploads and remove partial local files.
- Revalidate run authority during downloads. Keep company authorization,
GET-only text paging, redirect denial, and mutation replay receipts.
- Document the separate 10 MiB upload limits. This PR does not raise
memory-buffered attachment ingestion limits. Future large video uploads
need streamed ingestion and storage quotas.
## Verification
- Full workspace `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` pass after
rebasing on master.
- Focused API and response tests: 1,761 pass. Cover declared and chunked
oversize responses, incorrect Content-Length, exact-limit success,
active-stream deadline, cancellation, cleanup, concurrency admission,
and mutation outcome handling.
- Real HTTP integration: 28 tests pass, including runnerd → PRP →
authority → HTTP, a 12 MiB snapshot, final-page/EOF reads, cross-company
denial, a persisted 3 GiB sparse asset, and large mutation receipt
replay.
- The HTTP suite verifies durable run-budget accounting, simultaneous
runs competing for company quota, legacy snapshot accounting, deletion
refunds, failed-storage reservations, cleaned-failure refunds,
metadata-rollback cleanup refunds, preservation after a lost commit
acknowledgement, and small/saved reads after capture-budget exhaustion.
- A standalone proof streams exactly 1 GiB through the production
capture helper, verifies the final bytes, and removes its temporary
file. It uses repeated 256 KiB chunks and records a peak process RSS of
191 MiB.
- Earlier storage verification covers exact S3 multipart boundaries,
cleanup/abort failures, and a 17 MiB transfer through the real AWS SDK
to a local HTTP S3 endpoint. No cloud S3 qualification was run for this
follow-up.
- The local full test run was interrupted for the company-quota changes.
A later targeted run hit exhausted macOS shared-memory slots before
tests started; two unattached PostgreSQL segments with dead owners were
reclaimed before retrying. All 55 current-head checks pass at
`aebb80ceeeee77d5a56b67bfffd835f2f846878c`, including the full CI test
suite, typecheck, build, browser suites, security scan, and Greptile
(5/5). There are no unresolved review threads. The combined rebased test
catalog also passes (48 tests).
- Earlier paging acceptance passed Daytona and separate staging at
`7739879e9`. Those runs predate the streaming and budget changes.
## Risks
- The 1 GiB response cap and 10-minute active-download deadline are
intentional product limits. Larger live results must use endpoint
pagination or a direct file workflow. Existing larger assets remain
readable through bounded ranges.
- A durable 20 GiB company snapshot quota counts stored runner-api
assets and active/orphan reservations across runs and processes. The
operator can set PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_API_COMPANY_CAPTURE_MAX_BYTES to a
finite value of at least 1 GiB. Deleting snapshots frees capacity;
possible orphan storage must be reconciled before releasing its
reservation.
- A failed capture uses its full reservation. A new large capture needs
a full 1 GiB available, even if it later completes at a smaller size.
Small reads and existing asset pages remain available.
- Concurrency limits apply per server process. The run byte budget is
shared through the database.
- The `integer` to `bigint` migration rewrites asset metadata and takes
an exclusive table lock. File bytes stay in storage.
- A live endpoint is fetched once before returning its snapshot.
Continue reading the saved artifact for stable pages. Mutations may
commit before any size or transport error; inspect state before
retrying.
- Attachment uploads and native file handoffs still default to 10 MiB.
Raising buffered ingestion paths to GiB sizes is separate work.
## Model Used
OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code execution and repository tools.
The runtime does not expose an exact serving model variant or
context-window size. The earlier paging work also used browser testing
and subagents.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
---------
Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
canary/v2026.928.0-canary.2
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
cea8dda472 |
test: evaluate completion updates after native task handoffs (#13969)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Users can delegate work through onboarding and Agent Chat. > - A completed task does not prove that its result reached the original conversation. > - Existing tests do not isolate completion after the source chat becomes idle. > - This pull request adds four explicit native-runner probes across Claude and Codex. > - The probes preserve the result and reply so we can separate delivery failures from inaccurate answers. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13775. Refs #13813. These evals extend native-runner qualification. They measure completion updates before we choose a product change. ## What Changed - Add the opt-in `completion-updates` suite with two stories for each native provider. - Test completion in the existing onboarding task flow and after an Agent Chat handoff becomes idle. - Gate the chat worker on a brief inside its managed project workspace. Prove the source is idle before releasing the worker. - Check durable task completion, saved output, a subsequent source reply, and rendered access to the result. - Preserve replies, task state, screenshots, run events, and a separate semantic review rubric. - Add grader regression tests and update the documented eval contract. - Preserve the suites added on master and include four completion cases in the 306-cell catalog. Production behavior and prompts are unchanged. ## Verification - Passed all 565 eval support tests across 45 files after merging current master: `node node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts`. - Passed eval TypeScript: `node node_modules/typescript/bin/tsc -p tests/runner-e2e/tsconfig.json`. - Confirmed four selected cells: `node cli/node_modules/tsx/dist/cli.mjs tests/runner-e2e/launch.ts --list --suite completion-updates`. - Four-cell behavior campaign on source `ad47cf1da2b1e36f19f4227cfeb53998720b0b5b`: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36072337485. - A screenshot-only follow-up waits for the restored source reply to render after result-link navigation. Its one-cell Claude onboarding verification passed on final head: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36075716141. Corrected report: https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-36075716141-1/. The original four-cell onboarding screenshots caught navigation loading; its saved reply evidence remains valid. The follow-up again found stale wording: "That work will run next" was posted 38 seconds after the child was Done. The four-cell campaign keeps its original source and measurements. - Published evidence: https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-36072337485-1/. - Suite definition: `afba4d85d6c53d9f64c08b37a2e9cc20481b78f5bd7e2fa012045e2c69444d9d`, version 6. Models: native `gpt-5.6-sol` and `claude-sonnet-5`, local execution, one attempt per cell. All four cleanup checks passed. Onboarding billing coverage is partial; reported zero cost must not be read as a free run. | Story | Automated delivery/access | Separate semantic review | | --- | --- | --- | | Codex onboarding | Pass | Pass: accurate completion reply with an accessible result | | Claude onboarding | Pass | Fail: reply says it will save the note once the task runs, after the note is already saved and the task is Done | | Codex idle chat handoff | Fail | Worker completed and saved the note; no completion reply during the full observation window | | Claude idle chat handoff | Fail | Worker completed and saved the note; no completion reply during the full observation window | Both chat cases positively recorded the source waiting and the worker at the brief gate before release. Both saved outputs include the brief-only start time. The opt-in campaign is red because it exposes current behavior. It is not a required merge gate. The PR does not fix that product behavior. Semantic review is a recorded human/agent assessment of retained evidence; it is not an automated prose-quality judge. - Second campaign: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36071065098. Codex chat reached the idle boundary and completed its task, then received no completion reply during the full window. Claude onboarding again returned a stale handoff answer. Claude chat exceeded the prior 110-second handoff setup budget; this revision raises that bounded setup window to 180 seconds. - Retained baseline: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36069427676. Onboarding passed delivery/access for both providers, but Claude gave a stale handoff answer. Chat cases stopped at fixture problems; they do not establish a completion-delivery failure. This revision fixes the workspace path and competing reference requirements. - On the previous head `4023a2a3c28d45c9eb2c42d452ce99ffba5c7b73`, 54 PR checks passed and two were skipped, including typecheck, tests, and build. Broad checks ran in CI, not locally. That head received Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved findings. The unchanged mobile repository-settings browser test passed on one targeted retry after a detached/disabled Save-button timeout. - Merged current master in `9b4491e1f` and resolved the catalog-count conflict. Eval support tests and eval TypeScript pass locally. All individual CI jobs passed on this merge commit, including build, typecheck, server tests, runner checks, and browser shards. The final aggregate check also passed: 54 checks passed and two were skipped. Greptile reviewed this exact commit at 5/5 with no unresolved findings. ## Risks - These explicit probes can expose current product failures. They do not change the default paid test selection. - Mechanical delivery and result access do not establish answer accuracy. The preserved reply still requires semantic review. - A fixture failure before the idle boundary or worker completion cannot establish a completion-update failure. - The handoff setup window lasts three minutes. The worker brief wait is bounded at four minutes. The observation window lasts two minutes after worker completion. It retains later replies without erasing earlier accessible delivery. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 (`gpt-6-astra`), with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and GitHub tool use. The runtime does not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8751e2de46 |
fix(ui): distinguish finalization recovery from live observation (#14326)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task board shows which recovery actions are active. > - A native run can stop while a person must repair its workspace. > - The board previously called that state “Recovery in progress.” > - The label implied that work would continue without operator action. > - This pull request derives the label from the recovery owner and live continuation. > - Operators can distinguish scheduled recovery from a repair that needs attention. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A blocked task showed “Recovery in progress” after native finalization stopped and no automatic continuation remained. **Expected behavior** Show “Recovery needed” for an idle board repair or when no live recovery path exists. Show “Recovery in progress” while the recorded continuation can run, including an explicitly admitted export whose exact callback is executing even if the old recovery action remains board-owned. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a native run whose workspace export cannot be recovered automatically. 2. Inspect the task recovery action and badge. 3. Compare the board-owned action with the old “Recovery in progress” label. Related work: #14314 serializes native workspace finalization and fences stale recovery outcomes. This change reports the recovery action that currently owns the task. ## What Changed - Show “Recovery needed” for board-owned active-run recovery unless the exact native export callback is positively verified as executing. - Require the native continuation run and a live or future continuation before showing progress. - Project native activity from the exact company, source issue, and run. Include active workspace export while the original heartbeat remains failed. - Require an executing callback before using a running export row as evidence. Preserve activity for long exports and clear it when the callback joins. - Give native resume its own card explanation. Preserve ordinary watchdog observation behavior. - Remove the redundant ownership sentence from all six recovery-card explanations that used it. - Document the labels and add regression cases for stopped, scheduled, and active recovery. ## Verification - Copy-only follow-up (`c68aef04c`): all 167 focused recovery UI tests and token gates pass. No UI occurrence of the removed sentence remains. `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, and current-head CI pass (54 successful checks, two optional Storybook checks skipped). Greptile is 5/5 with no open review threads. The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` was stopped after the full CI suite passed; it did not complete locally. - Original regressions: seven failures before the change, then 52 focused cases pass. - Review regressions: seven UI failures and nine database failures before the follow-up. All 75 database/API recovery tests, 167 UI tests, and 18 workspace lifecycle/finalizer tests pass. A further three RED cases cover explicit board retry activity; one RED case rejects orphaned running export rows after controller loss. Wrong company, issue, run, service, phase, and completed-operation cases remain inactive. - Final recursive typecheck, production build, token gates, and complete local suite coverage pass. Embedded PostgreSQL startup/socket failures passed in isolated retries with the canonical test environment; no expected behavior was weakened. The recovery regression added during the earlier full run passed in its final complete 75-case file. - Before the copy-only follow-up, all 56 CI checks passed on `c2f84cd89c905cda85c53aaf5bb83b7250900fe6`; Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved review threads. The final native-activity staging repeat passed on integrated source `2bedd0f23bf4698b1f8b818f6796900647030427`. - Verified on a separate staging instance: a real failed Daytona workspace export retains its board-owned repair action and displays “Recovery needed” in the task list. The repair card remains actionable without starting another provider turn. - Real staged export-only repair: the actual task list showed “Recovery in progress” while the original run had a positively identified running export operation, then Done after exact copyback of all 20,000 nonce-bound files. The accepted result and full provider session/turn/terminal envelopes remained unchanged. All 17 independent final checks passed; the browser downloaded the exact 19-byte result. The separate fixture was cleaned up with independent provider-absence verification. A control transport process restarted during repair; it did not submit another provider turn. - Final deployed-source repeat on `d884e1ab046cc76004e35e6091e9e6e2c918c9eb`: explicit per-turn ephemeral Daytona allocation, actual browser export repair, and a saved full activity projection referencing the exact executing export operation with no scheduled retry. The task list showed recovery in progress, then Done; all 21 final checks passed, including 20,000 exact host files, unchanged provider provenance, and provider deletion only after committed copyback. The downloaded 19-byte result matched independently. This integrates #14334; no source change was required here. ## Risks - The label depends on the persisted recovery action. A separate runtime defect can still stop work; this change makes that condition visible. - Future recovery kinds must supply a valid continuation path before they can display progress. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with code execution, browser testing, and subagent tool use. The runtime does not expose an exact serving model variant or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.928.0-canary.1 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
cbc5132e6c |
fix(adapters): expose a verified provider stop before workspace restoration (#14311)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agent adapters own local or remote provider processes. > - Run cleanup must know when the final provider process has stopped. > - A remote timeout or a lost transport does not prove that the provider stopped. > - Retried provider invocations also make an earlier stop signal stale. > - This pull request adds a verified final-invocation stop callback before workspace restoration. > - The dependent instruction revision change uses that boundary to preserve private instruction edits safely. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Adapter completion did not expose a reliable point between provider shutdown and workspace restoration. Cleanup could lose provider-written files, or treat a remote timeout as proof that a process stopped. **Expected behavior** Cleanup runs once after the final provider invocation has a verified stop receipt and before workspace restoration. An incomplete remote command keeps collection pending. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a remote provider that returns a timeout without a numeric exit code. 2. Let the adapter return or retry the provider. 3. Attempt to collect provider-written files during cleanup. The adapter has no verified final-process boundary to use. This is the prerequisite for the stacked canonical instruction revision pull request. It has no database or UI dependency. Related #13291 verifies remote termination for later recovery; this change exposes the earlier adapter-owned stop boundary before workspace restoration. The scopes do not duplicate each other. ## What Changed - Add a stop callback to adapter execution context and a final-invocation fence. - Confirm local child closure and complete remote exit receipts. Reject remote timeouts, missing exits, transport failures, and SSH exit 255 as stop proof. - Invoke collection once before workspace restoration in eight CLI adapters and at the confirmed ACP stop boundary. - Preserve the stop observation when a later log flush fails. - Run bridge and workspace cleanup in `finally` even when collection rejects. ACP records a safe error without exposing a raw filesystem path. Grok keeps collection errors separate from workspace restore failures and preserves completed provider results when both cleanup steps fail. - Correct the existing Cursor test shell fixture so bounded remote file reads run against real fixture files. ## Verification - Three stop-boundary regressions failed before the callback implementation and passed after it. - Independent prerequisite branch: 377 tests passed across 24 adapter, process-target, and ACP suites. Two added collector-rejection tests failed before the cleanup fix and passed after it. - A third regression reproduced Grok misclassifying a collection failure as failed workspace restoration. Two additional cases covered completed and failed provider turns when collection and restore both fail. The Grok and restore-classifier suites passed 48 tests. - All nine affected package typechecks and affected package builds passed; Grok checks passed again after its classification fix. - Integrated instruction branch: native local, legacy local, and native Daytona each passed three browser tasks with exact persisted bytes, fresh-task readback, history/restore, and explicit conflict resolution. Unchanged warm Daytona passed three turns. Legacy Codex passed all five checks again after the exception-safe cleanup fix. - Alternate staging passed the same three-task native Daytona flow: exact stopped-run save, independent downloaded readback, browser history/restore, and explicit resolution of a real concurrent edit. The deployed source was `14c3d810c9e05625121b3d27767aea9317b03125`, which covers the initial adapter callback. Later Grok cleanup failures are qualified by the adapter tests above. - The final combined native Daytona flow passed again on deployed `2bedd0f23bf4698b1f8b818f6796900647030427`: three fresh tasks proved ordinary instruction edits, independent readback, History/Restore, concurrent board conflict, and explicit candidate resolution. This native staging flow does not claim to exercise the Grok adapter. ## Risks - An unverified remote stop intentionally does not trigger collection. A later controller with verified stop evidence must recover it or report the copy unavailable. - The callback is optional. Callers that do not register it retain their existing behavior. - The callback runs before workspace restoration and can delay cleanup if its caller does not bound its own work. The dependent instruction collector uses bounded reads and retries. A rejected callback still permits bridge and workspace cleanup; it cannot claim an instruction save. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with tool use and code execution. The runtime does not expose the exact deployment variant or context-window size. Multiple Codex agents implemented and verified the change. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4b38db9622 |
fix(runtime): stream workspace Git snapshots through disk manifests (#14253)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Managed runs copy a selected workspace to an execution environment and restore its changes. > - Git snapshots select the files for that copy and for later recovery. > - A fixed output limit stops large generated trees before the run can start. > - Increasing the limit still keeps the complete filename lists in memory. > - This pull request stores those lists and merge baselines in disk manifests. > - Large snapshots can now complete with bounded filename buffers and explicit failure handling. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14194. This is the streaming follow-up to the merged 32 MiB limit fix. Related: #13619 and #11621 cover workspace scan admission and demand. This change keeps the shared scheduler and changes the snapshot data path. ## What Changed - Stream changed, untracked, deleted, and ignored paths through the shared scheduler and the standalone adapter path. - Use SQLite manifests for file selection, duplicate removal, ignored-path lookup, baseline capture, and merge lookup. - Set a configurable 30-minute snapshot deadline. Keep the existing interactive scan deadlines. - Wait for each child process and pending sink write before removing temporary storage after failure or cancellation. - Use NUL archive lists and bounded deletion batches. Preserve unusual names, explicit selection, nested repositories, and source root checks. - Store manifest references in native recovery format v2. Check their location and digest before recovery reads. Keep v1 descriptors readable. - Remove temporary manifests at lifecycle completion. Use fixed-size temporary copy names for long basenames. - Admit each manifest with a SQLite page allowance based on current disk capacity. Keep a configurable free-space reserve and fail explicitly when either limit is reached. - Preserve a host file that replaces a directory deleted by the sandbox, and continue the rest of the restore. ## Verification - Current head `5ab622ec43cd16d35429d79dedee6a5d8e3d2df2` has 54 successful checks/statuses and two skipped Storybook jobs. No checks failed or remain pending. - [CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36318966368): typecheck, build, all test shards, E2E, Rust checks, and the aggregate verify job. - [Greptile is 5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14253#issuecomment-5855670338) on the current head. All four review threads are resolved. Security checks passed. - 229 focused tests passed across Git sync, runtime staging, merge, manifest integrity, native recovery, and the scheduler (214 adapter/runtime tests and 15 scheduler tests). - A real 40,000-file fixture produces 43,428,890 filename bytes. The original standalone and scheduled scans fail. The new test passes all four filename paths, complete staging, exclusion of late files, unusual names, and deletion replay. - Recovery tests reject changed bytes, symlinks, and paths outside the controller state directory. Adapter-utils typecheck passed. - A test executor returned buffered output and caused two retry integration failures. The fixture now uses the shared streaming scheduler. All 13 tests passed with `corepack pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-project-repositories.test.ts`. The same CI shard now passes. - Ran `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm build` locally. Each full local command hit SIGKILL/exit 137 in the 4 GiB container. These local commands did not pass. The current-head CI gates above provide the full verification. - A real-Git disk-capacity regression confirms a typed failure and removal of the incomplete manifest. Repeated writer attempts cannot exceed the permitted page count. - Follow-up real Daytona and separate staging qualification passed with the related archive validator (#14315) and exact-owner finalization fix (#14314). Three successive turns copied back all 60,000 files with 39,828,890 filename bytes and five unusual names. Independent host inventories verified every file and the pinned Git HEAD. Native, provider, session, and process identities stayed fixed; no retry remained. The task reached Done, and its browser-downloaded final proof matched exactly. The reusable regression is #14316, including an assertion of the effective environment idle policy. ## Risks - SQLite manifests use disk space. Each receives one quarter of the available capacity above the host reserve at creation. The reserve defaults to 256 MiB and has a 64 MiB configuration minimum. Disk capacity, filesystem quotas, per-path limits, Git resource use, and execution deadlines remain limits. - Each path and sink chunk has a 64 KiB limit. SQLite connections use a 1 MiB page cache. Invalid or incomplete records fail explicitly. - Restore transport keeps fixed and configured archive exclusions. A remotely created Git-ignored file can be transferred, but the host merge excludes it through the manifest. - Provider archive buffers, Git and tar memory, repository metadata, legacy v1 arrays, and the separate referenced-source resolver retain their own limits. Existing provider safety validators still buffer textual tar listings: Daytona allows 32 MiB and Kubernetes allows 64 MiB. These separate transport limits can stop a sufficiently large restore before merge. This change does not claim bounded total process memory or unlimited transport size. - New descriptors use v2. Existing v1 recovery remains supported; a downgrade cannot read v2 descriptors. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The exact deployment ID and context limit are not exposed in this run. The agent used code editing, terminal execution, tests, and GitHub tools. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
890d11137f |
fix(ui): register artifact tabs without opening the panel (#14193)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Tasks keep agent outputs in the Artifacts tab.
> - An output can arrive while the user writes a message or reads a
document.
> - Opening the side panel on arrival interrupts that work, especially
on mobile.
> - This pull request adds the Artifacts tab without opening the panel
or changing the selected tab.
> - Users can open their outputs when they choose.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
New agent outputs opened the task side panel or mobile drawer. An
arrival could also replace the selected document or workspace file.
Existing outputs did not always register an Artifacts tab.
**Expected behavior**
Register one Artifacts tab for existing and new outputs. Keep a closed
panel closed. Preserve composer focus, the selected tab, and document or
file links.
**Steps to reproduce**
Open a task from the inbox. Close its side panel. Enter a message draft.
Create an agent output in that task. The panel must stay closed and the
draft must keep focus. Open the panel to see the Artifacts tab. Repeat
on a mobile viewport.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Base commit:
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
bacc0e6a98 |
docs: remove automatic agent escalation from coordination skill (#14188)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages work for AI agents. > - The coordination skill tells agents how to handle blocked work. > - The skill directs blocked work to managers and other agents. > - Those agents may lack the same access or authority. > - These extra assignments delay the required human action. > - This pull request removes automatic escalation advice. > - Agents must identify the missing capability and use the correct approval or human-input path. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Issue type** Incorrect information. **Where is the issue?** The critical rules in `skills/paperclip/SKILL.md` and blocker guidance in `skills/paperclip/references/api-reference.md`. **What's wrong?** The skill tells agents to escalate through `chainOfCommand`, ask another agent for help, and avoid human help. A manager title does not grant permission to fix a connection or complete an administrator action. **Suggested fix** Remove blanket escalation and agent-first rules. Keep normal delegation when the recipient has a concrete capability for a bounded task. Use saved human-input interactions or existing connection and approval flows for human-only actions. Searches for open PRs with “escalation”, “chainOfCommand”, and “ask another agent” found no duplicate skill change. Recovery-routing PRs change server behavior, which is outside this change. ## What Changed - Remove the chain-of-command escalation rule and both repeated agent-first directives. - Replace manager handoffs in the API reference with direct blocker handling. - Keep reporting fields, normal delegation, approval gates, and the ban on bypassing permission denials. - Keep the ban on cancelling cross-team tasks. Request a decision instead of automatically assigning the task to a manager. ## Verification - Final head `1483e82cc3fe10a7c910230b3779635d6d54c162`: Greptile 5/5, no outstanding findings, all CI checks pass (optional Storybook jobs skipped). - Created a fresh worktree at `.worktrees/skill-blocker-guidance` from the current master commit. - Ran `git diff --check`: passed. - Ran Node assertions against both documents: passed. Removed directives are absent. Human-input and capability-based delegation guidance is present. - Checked that checkout conflict, approval, dependency, and normal delegation instructions remain. - Attempted `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm test:run`, and `pnpm build`. None could run because this environment has no `pnpm` executable. - Refreshed both generated capability inventories and their derived contract after skill heading positions changed. Both generator and live-inventory checks pass. The eval and MCP baselines remain unchanged. - Ran `node --test packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/check-capability-inventory.test.mjs`: all four tests pass. - Ran `node packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/check-capability-inventory.mjs` and `node packages/paperclip-runner/scripts/generate-capability-contract.mjs --check`: both pass. - Added explicit requester routing for agent and human scope questions. Focused Node assertions pass. ## Risks - Agents can request human input earlier for actions that require human authority. - Existing runs or installed copies can keep old skill text until refreshed. - This change does not alter server recovery routing or permission checks. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and shell execution. The runtime does not expose a verifiable exact model ID or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.928.0-canary.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
0f14d26123 |
fix(runtime): allow bounded large untracked workspace snapshots (#14194)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Remote runs need a snapshot of the task workspace before the agent starts. > - The snapshot lists untracked filenames through the shared Git scan scheduler. > - A generated directory with a few thousand long filenames can exceed the 1 MiB output limit. > - This stops setup and prevents the agent from continuing its task. > - This change gives that listing a 32 MiB bound and keeps the explicit file snapshot. > - Normal generated trees can now pass setup, while larger snapshots still fail at a finite limit. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #11572 and #12214 for the existing bounded scan and ignore-scan protections. **What happened?** An agent continuation failed during workspace setup with `Workspace Git scan exceeded its output limit`. A real Git fixture reproduces the untracked-file path: 5,000 long filenames in one generated directory exceed its 1 MiB output limit. **Expected behavior** The workspace snapshot must support ordinary generated trees with thousands of files. It must keep a finite output bound and select explicit files before staging. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Commit a base file in a Git repository. 2. Add 5,000 untracked files with long names in one new directory. 3. Call `readGitWorkspaceSnapshot` with the normal scan limits. 4. Observe the output-limit error before this change. **Paperclip version or commit** Base commit: `640dee1`. **Deployment mode** Remote sandbox execution from source. ## What Changed - Increase the untracked-file snapshot output bound from 1 MiB to 32 MiB. - Keep explicit file selection, the shared scheduler, the timeout, and the other scan bounds. - Test that 40,000 long filenames above the old 8 MiB bound reach the snapshot. Reuse those files with deeper paths to prove that output above 32 MiB still fails. - Test that files created after the snapshot, including an ignored secret, stay out of the overlay archive. - Check the workspace root identity and reject selected paths with symlinked parent directories before upload. - Test root replacement after path resolution, including root-level selected files. - Preserve existing workspace root aliases by capturing the resolved root before snapshot selection. Test that later alias retargeting cannot change the archive contents. - Stop staging on permission and I/O errors; continue to allow missing files. - Test these failures and preserve selected symlink entries. - Accept valid case-renamed directories by checking ancestor file types. A modeled case-insensitive regression failed before this correction and now passes. - Give the 40,000-file fixture enough time to remove its files. - Document the larger bound and staging behavior. ## Verification - Red: the 5,000-file regression failed with `stdout maxBuffer length exceeded` before the fix. - A separate check through the real server scheduler reproduced `workspace_git_scan_output_limit` on the original code. The revised code selected all 5,000 files. - The late-file regression failed against the first PR revision because the archive contained `drafts/late.secret`. It passes with the final explicit-file approach. - The staging regressions failed before the review fix: a substituted parent directory and permission/I/O errors were accepted. All three cases now stop before upload. - Green: 134 tests passed across `git-workspace-sync.test.ts` and `sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts` with Vitest 4.1.11. This includes complete selection above 8 MiB and rejection above 32 MiB. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/adapter-utils... typecheck` passed after the revision. - The module-boundary check and `git diff --check` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` stopped in the Rust runner steps because this environment has no `cargo` executable. - The full `pnpm test:run` attempt ended with `SIGKILL` during the general server suite. It did not finish. That full-suite result belongs to the earlier revision. Fresh checks are required for this revision. - The new regression fails at the old 8 MiB bound with `stdout maxBuffer length exceeded`. All 134 focused tests pass with the 32 MiB change. - The affected typechecks and module-boundary check pass. The full local typecheck requires Cargo, which is absent in this environment. - Final verification for `b43e9bc95e55382c6a9bfe200487c164770c8be8`: 54 successful checks/statuses and two skipped Storybook checks. No checks remain pending or failed. - The [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36315569674) passes on attempt 2. The first attempt had one unrelated preview-fixture readiness timeout. That exact test passed locally; its CI shard passed on the single rerun. - [Greptile reports 5/5](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14194#issuecomment-5852045501) on this revision. All review threads are resolved. - [Security review accepts the documented memory tradeoff](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/14194#discussion_r4115149465) for this finite mitigation. The separate streaming follow-up will remove full-list buffering. - This revision also passes affected local typechecks and the module-boundary check. Full local typecheck/build stop because Cargo is absent. The full local Vitest attempt was stopped after about 18 minutes once all remote gates passed; it did not complete locally. ## Risks - Each untracked-file scan can buffer up to 32 MiB instead of 1 MiB. The scheduler still limits concurrent scans and execution time. - Snapshots above 32 MiB still fail with the existing error. Tracked and ignored-file scan bounds stay unchanged. - A workspace that replaces a selected path’s parent with a symlink now fails staging. - Detailed logs from the reported host were unavailable. The exact command that exceeded its limit on that host is unconfirmed. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific model build or context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7e0f051d3b |
Align task property icons with assignee avatars (#13319)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app that people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The task properties panel helps operators inspect and update task data. > - The status, assignee, and project rows used different leading icon sizes. > - The mixed sizes made the rows look uneven. > - The assignee avatar already provides the correct 24px visual size. > - This pull request sets the status and project visuals to that same size. > - The benefit is a tidy and consistent properties panel. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The task properties panel showed a 12px status icon, a 24px assignee avatar, and a 16px project tile. **Expected behavior** The status, assignee, and project rows must use the same 24px leading visual size. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a task. 2. Open the Properties panel. 3. Compare the Status, Assignee, and Project rows. ## What Changed - Keep the Status glyph at 16px and use spacing to give it the 24px avatar footprint. - Set the Project row tile to the 24px small tile size. - Add a regression check for the Status row size. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/IssueProperties.test.tsx` (72 tests passed) - `pnpm check:token-gates` (all gates clean) - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` (passed) - Full repository typecheck and build reached the Rust runner step, but this environment does not contain `cargo`. - The full test command was stopped after unrelated chat integration tests did not finish. The focused UI suite passed. ## Risks - Low risk. This change only changes visual sizes in three property rows. - The wider status footprint can use slightly more horizontal space in a narrow panel. > This fix does not overlap with planned core work in `ROADMAP.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-5.6, tool use and code execution enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [ ] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.927.0-canary.5 nightly/v2026.928.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
d423fc4411 |
fix(ui): use large mobile selector modals (#14250)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The new task dialog lets an operator assign work on a phone. > - The mobile picker used fixed coordinates inside the Radix wrapper. > - iOS Safari already makes fixed coordinates relative to the visual viewport. > - The old code added the visual viewport offset a second time. > - This pull request removes the second offset and gives the mobile wrapper full viewport geometry. > - The benefit is a visible picker and search field when the iOS keyboard opens. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The assignee and project pickers could move outside the visible screen in the new task dialog on iOS. **What did you expect to happen?** The picker and its search field must stay visible above the bottom edge and the software keyboard. **Steps to reproduce** Open the new task dialog on an iPhone. Select Assignee or Project. The picker can move outside the visual viewport when Safari pans the page. **Paperclip version or commit** The problem exists after the change in PR #13343. **Deployment mode** The problem affects the board UI in local and authenticated modes. Refs #13343 ## What Changed - Use visual viewport local coordinates for the new task dialog. - Give the mobile Radix popper wrapper full viewport geometry. - Render both shared selector components as large, titled mobile modals. - Keep desktop selectors as anchored popovers. - Cover the new-task assignee, new-task project, composer assignee, and generic searchable selector in Storybook. - Add iPhone-sized Storybook states for the assignee and project pickers. - Update viewport tests for the corrected coordinate model. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx src/components/InlineEntitySelector.test.tsx` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - Playwright used the iPhone 14 device profile. All mobile modals were inside the 390 by 664 CSS viewport. - Each mobile modal was `x=16, y=16, width=358, height=632`. - A desktop check kept the anchored popover at `width=320, height=211`. ## Risks - Low risk. The CSS only changes narrow mobile viewports. - The full-screen popper wrapper does not receive pointer events. The picker still receives pointer events. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5.6, Codex agent with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task ID - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant Storybook documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
74508357fa |
fix(ui): keep mobile task pickers in view (#14249)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The new task dialog lets an operator assign work on a phone. > - The mobile picker used fixed coordinates inside the Radix wrapper. > - iOS Safari already makes fixed coordinates relative to the visual viewport. > - The old code added the visual viewport offset a second time. > - This pull request removes the second offset and gives the mobile wrapper full viewport geometry. > - The benefit is a visible picker and search field when the iOS keyboard opens. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** The assignee and project pickers could move outside the visible screen in the new task dialog on iOS. **What did you expect to happen?** The picker and its search field must stay visible above the bottom edge and the software keyboard. **Steps to reproduce** Open the new task dialog on an iPhone. Select Assignee or Project. The picker can move outside the visual viewport when Safari pans the page. **Paperclip version or commit** The problem exists after the change in PR #13343. **Deployment mode** The problem affects the board UI in local and authenticated modes. Refs #13343 ## What Changed - Use visual viewport local coordinates for the new task dialog. - Give the mobile Radix popper wrapper full viewport geometry. - Keep the mobile picker at the visible bottom edge. - Add iPhone-sized Storybook states for the assignee and project pickers. - Update viewport tests for the corrected coordinate model. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui exec vitest run src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx src/components/InlineEntitySelector.test.tsx` - `pnpm check:token-gates` - Playwright used the iPhone 14 device profile. Both picker boxes were inside the 390 by 664 CSS viewport. - The assignee picker box was `x=16, y=366, width=358, height=282`. - The project picker box was `x=16, y=366, width=358, height=282`. ## Risks - Low risk. The CSS only changes narrow mobile viewports. - The full-screen popper wrapper does not receive pointer events. The picker still receives pointer events. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI GPT-5.6, Codex agent with tool use and code execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task ID - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant Storybook documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
be43c23e2d |
fix(recovery): preserve pending native result finalization (#14219)
Preserve native coordinator ownership while accepted results await workspace copy-back, assessment, or arbitration. Check that ownership in the terminal update so a coordinator recorded after the liveness read is also protected. Keep terminal task authority and exhausted-retry cleanup unchanged. Validation: 28 focused recovery tests, local typecheck/build, 52 passing CI checks, and Greptile 5/5 with no open findings. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.927.0-canary.4 nightly/v2026.927.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
5ee9e751fb |
fix(runner): discover assigned tools when direct catalogs exceed limits (#14218)
Keep assigned app tools accessible when the combined Runner catalog exceeds its operation or byte limits. Reserve task and completion tools, then expose bounded discovery and call tools for large catalogs. Fetch oversized schemas in reauthorized chunks without blocking later search results. Retain task ownership, work-mode restrictions, pinned assignments, current gateway authorization, approvals, and audit. Small catalogs stay direct. Validation: 46 focused server tests, two Runner capacity tests, local typecheck/build, 52 passing CI checks, and Greptile 5/5 with no open findings. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.927.0-canary.3 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
640dee1802 |
fix(runner): acquire reusable leases when switching to warm sessions (#14187)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip coordinates agent work across task turns. > - Warm runners need reusable sandbox leases. > - Lease acquisition read only the environment reuse setting. > - Startup then read the agent's new warm setting and rejected the ephemeral lease. > - This fix requests reuse before acquisition, with provider checks intact. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Switching an existing native runner task from per-turn to warm fails with `runner_warm_environment_requires_reusable_lease`. Environment `reuseLease` defaults to false. Acquisition therefore creates an ephemeral lease, and capability narrowing correctly denies reuse. **Expected behavior** Changing lifecycle between turns requests a compatible lease without replacing the task workspace or changing the shared environment. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native runner task with inherited lifecycle and environment reuse disabled. 2. Change the agent from per-turn to warm. 3. Continue the task on a reusable-capable sandbox provider. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `a6c4e7a`. Related: #12904 established warm workspace continuity; this fixes the earlier lease-selection mismatch. ## What Changed - Pass agent settings into acquisition and derive a run-scoped reuse request. - Respect explicit environment lifecycle overrides; leave other adapters unchanged. - Keep provider capability, ownership, cleanup and restore gates intact. - Add orchestration and database-backed transition tests; document the contract. ## Verification - Red: three new assertions failed before the fix. - Green: 156 tests pass in environment-run-orchestrator, environment-runtime, native-sandbox-lifecycle, and environment-execution-target-capabilities. - Database-backed regression proves ephemeral → reusable → resumed lease, same workspace, and unchanged stored environment. Provider RPCs are mocked, not live Daytona. - `git diff --check` passes. - Latest-head CI passes typecheck, build, tests, runner checks, E2E, and canary dry run. Greptile: 5/5; no open threads. - Recovery uses the persisted lifecycle. Direct regression: red before, six cases green after. CI runs the added Vitest cases. - Full local checks were unavailable (missing dependencies and earlier memory limits). ## Risks Warm mode now requests retained resources despite an environment's default `reuseLease:false`. Existing idle timeout and cleanup still apply. Unsupported providers remain denied. No migration, credential [REDACTED], or shared-environment mutation. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex agent; reasoning, code editing and test execution. Exact model ID and context size were not exposed to this run. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details available) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket [REDACTED] or instance-derived details - [x] I have run targeted tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f2ed0b65c4 |
fix(runner): enable API tools by default (#14186)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native runner exposes tools for company tasks.
> - API search and call tools cover operations without a dedicated tool.
> - The current default hides these tools unless an operator sets an
environment variable.
> - This pull request enables the tools when that variable is absent.
> - Operators can still disable the tools or restrict them to selected
companies.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #13003, which added the guarded API tools.
**What happened?**
The native runner does not advertise `search_api` or `call_api` with the
default server configuration.
**Expected behavior**
The tools are available without a special environment variable. Existing
authorization checks still apply.
**Steps to reproduce**
Remove `PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_API_TOOLS_ENABLED` and
`PAPERCLIP_RUNNER_API_TOOLS_COMPANY_IDS`. Create a normal runner
authority. Inspect its tool definitions.
**Paperclip version or commit**
canary/v2026.927.0-canary.2
|
||
|
|
a6c4e7a8d1 |
fix(heartbeat): cancel obsolete execution continuations before dispatch (#13761)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A comment can queue execution before the task changes state. > - The task may be completed, cancelled, deleted, or reassigned before setup checks ownership. > - The ownership guard must prevent that obsolete execution from starting. > - This pull request records that guard outcome as cancellation and settles the wake request. > - Missing history and authorization errors remain failures that operators can investigate. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A comment can queue a run just before a user marks its task Done. The ownership guard stops setup before adapter dispatch, but the run becomes a setup failure and can put the agent into an error state. **Expected behavior** Cancel obsolete work when the typed task ownership guard rejects it. Keep genuine setup errors visible. Do not change the task's terminal state or current owner. **Steps to reproduce** Queue a task continuation, then mark the task Done or Cancelled before continuation setup. The run should settle as cancelled without invoking the adapter. Deleting or reassigning the task must also prevent dispatch. Missing source history or explicit user authorization must still fail. **Paperclip version or commit** Refreshed against master `b2e9e82f053af14777fd68e8834fff6bb64c84c4`. Related: #13546 covers lost issue-lock claims, and #13888 covers persisted continuation decisions and retry budgets. This change handles the final continuation ownership guard during setup. Thanks to @MrBlackTongue for the original typed cancellation implementation and regression coverage. This update preserves the contributor's commits, resolves the master conflict, and narrows cancellation to task ownership invalidation. ## What Changed - Add a typed `StaleExecutionContinuationError` for `continuation_task_ownership_changed`. - Use existing cancellation settlement for that typed guard, including the run, wake request, issue execution ownership, and agent state. Suppress immediate recovery of obsolete work. - Preserve failure classification for missing source context, missing user authorization, and untyped errors, including an untyped error with identical text. - Cover Done and Cancelled tasks with real database checks. Retain company and assignment guard coverage. Verify cancellation performs no adapter dispatch or automatic replay. - Document the cancellation event and its error classification in the run-log guide. ## Verification Current head: `b875486e81`. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts server/src/services/execution-continuation.test.ts --maxWorkers=1 --no-file-parallelism -t 'authorized continuation context|obsolete continuation setup|untyped continuation setup failures'`: 17 passed; 316 unrelated tests excluded by the name filter. - `pnpm test:run`: local full run is still finishing. It is not a clean pass: the observed failures are three company-skills cache checks (`EACCES` while renaming read-only cache directories on macOS), one tool-access assertion, and one comment-wake timeout. The three cache failures reproduce in isolation in unchanged code. The tool-access check passes in isolation, and the entire comment-wake file passes (29 tests), including explicit feedback after completion. Final full-run totals will be added when available. - [CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36282532652): all gates green on this head. An unchanged Runner workspace-diff test initially returned no diff; an isolated check passed, and the failed job plus its dependent gate passed on retry with no code change. Original failed job: 108517010989. - Greptile: 5/5 on the full current head, with no unresolved review threads. Branch is current with master and conflict-free. - Diff check and local secret/PII scan passed. No customer data or private deployment identifiers are included. ## Risks The classification change is limited to the typed ownership guard. A task with missing history remains a failure rather than being treated as an expected cancellation. Existing company, task-owner, terminal-state, and authorization checks still prevent dispatch. Cancellation retains its specific reason in the run log and does not grant a retry. No schema, dependency, or API changes; no migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex assisted investigation, implementation, code review, and test execution. The exact serving model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the bug issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run the focused regression tests locally and they pass; full-suite results are tracked above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Devin Foley <devin@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.927.0-canary.1 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
b2e9e82f05 |
fix: stop remote Grok runs before continuing queued messages (#14100)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The execution service owns each run and saves messages sent while it runs. > - Interrupt must stop the current executor before it delivers those messages. > - Remote Grok commands did not register the host cancellation control. > - A cancelled task run could still write Done and prevent queue recovery. > - This pull request connects remote cancellation and revokes cancelled run writes. > - Saved input can use the existing queue admission rules after verified cleanup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Interrupting a queued message marked a remote Grok run cancelled before its sandbox stopped. The old run could still post a reply and mark the task Done. Its saved follow-up remained deferred behind execution recovery. **Expected behavior** Stop revokes run write authority and waits for verified termination. Saved messages remain durable and enter one successor through normal admission after cleanup. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Run a task with `grok_local` in a remote sandbox. 2. Send a follow-up and use Interrupt while the command runs. 3. Let the old command attempt a task status update after cancellation. 4. Observe the task disposition and the saved message queue. **Paperclip version or commit** The gap is present in master at `d3e0f0a238`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated server with a Daytona sandbox. Related work: #14028 and #14046 handle bounded continuation. #13291 covers infrastructure interruption and verified remote cleanup. #13332 addresses atomic recovery holds. This change handles direct Grok operator cancellation and stale task writes. ## What Changed - Register remote Grok cancellation before preparation. Keep command ownership until the host confirms sandbox termination. - Reuse the sandbox cancellation boundary for the direct CLI invocation. Reject fresh attempts after cancellation and preserve workspace restore failure evidence. - Reject writes from cancelled task JWTs and runs with a pending stop. Preserve diagnostic reads and existing conversation error codes. - Recheck run authority under a database lock before task updates and interaction responses commit. - Preserve authorized handoffs that stop their own run. Only the server-issued stop receipt for that request permits the final task update. - Add tests for hung commands, unverified stops, early cancellation, copy-back failures, late Done, late interaction responses, authorized handoffs, exact lease receipts, and one queue successor across concurrent restart sweeps. - Document the cancellation and write-authority contract. ## Verification - Targeted adapter, cancellation-boundary, authentication, queued-message, interaction-service, and activity-route tests passed. The expanded run passed 214 tests; one new test had an incomplete fixture. After correcting the fixture, all 8 selected follow-up cases passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed on `179c86caf1bf0d89914a503d46e24af7e4b8c557`. - `pnpm build`: passed on the same commit. - `pnpm test:run`: the general-server group completed with 13,521 passed, 99 skipped, and 18 failed tests. It then stopped, so the remaining local groups did not run. Five Slack, email, and wake-batching failures passed on focused reruns after correcting the local environment. The remaining 13 failures reproduce as `EACCES` on rename in unchanged skill-cache code on macOS. Two custom-image suite setup hooks also failed to start embedded PostgreSQL after the machine exhausted shared-memory slots; all 31 tests in that file passed on rerun after the local resource issue was resolved. CI covers all test groups. - CI: 53 checks passed and 2 were skipped on the latest commit, including the aggregate verification gate. The last server shard passed on its single rerun after a preview-server startup timeout. The affected file also passed locally with 28 passed and 3 skipped. - Greptile: 5/5 on the latest commit. Both review threads are resolved. - No live deployment or staging task mutation has been performed. ## Risks - Stopping the sandbox can prevent file copy-back. The result preserves workspace restore failure evidence; termination does not imply restored files. - If provider termination fails, the adapter keeps ownership of its outstanding command and does not acknowledge Stop. - The write restriction now applies to ordinary cancelled tasks. Reads remain allowed. Task and interaction checks add a shared run-row lock to agent mutations. An exact server-issued receipt permits the task request that stopped its own run to complete its handoff. - Existing terminal tasks are not reopened automatically. An operator must correct a historical late Done before its saved queue can continue. - No schema migration or UI change. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository inspection, code execution, and test tools. The precise backend revision and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.927.0-canary.0 |
||
|
DottaandCodie
|
01d9a12185 |
fix: make keyboard shortcut enablement a personal preference (#14141)
Store keyboard shortcut enablement per user and expose it in Profile settings. Co-Authored-By: Codie <Codie@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
d3e0f0a238 |
fix(server): validate CLI auth challenge IDs (#14095)
Reject malformed CLI challenge UUIDs before database access while preserving secret and authentication precedence. Document the HTTP responses and pin the supervisor test fixture to the CI-selected Node executable. Validated by 21 focused tests, root typecheck/build, and full CI. Mac broad-suite baseline limitations are documented in the PR. Greptile 5/5. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.926.0-canary.4 nightly/v2026.926.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
1e3a148f46 |
fix(connections): retain safe broker rejection diagnostics (#14098)
Preserve fixed broker rejection reason codes within strict size/time limits while retaining public error codes and status. Unknown bodies remain generic; no raw response or credential material enters the error. Validated by 33 consumer tests, a synthetic producer HTTP contract fixture, root typecheck/build, and full CI. Greptile 5/5. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
ffa32373bc |
fix(runtime): honor provider acquisition timeout defaults (#14097)
Declare provider acquisition budgets so slow Daytona creation does not hit the host’s 30-second fallback. Bound creation and setup to one deadline and preserve scoped cleanup ownership after timeout. Legacy drivers retain their original call shape. Validated by 238 provider/manifest tests, focused database and heartbeat regressions, root and standalone provider typecheck/build, and full CI. Local broad tests also expose recorded Mac baseline limitations. Greptile 5/5. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.926.0-canary.3 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
7f3c06dac4 |
refactor(ui): remove the legacy Cloud organization switcher (#14061)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its sidebar provides navigation between organizations. > - The generic organization switcher slot lets installed plugins own that navigation. > - Both Core UI shells still contain the old Cloud portfolio menu. > - Cloud now uses its private Account plugin for this menu. > - This pull request removes the duplicate Cloud menu and keeps the built-in company menu. > - This reduces Cloud-specific code without changing the plugin host contract. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13832 and #13854. Related #14060 changes the account popup, not this organization switcher. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Organization navigation in both sidebar shells. **Current behavior** Core retains Cloud portfolio fetching, stack rows and stack-entry links behind the plugin replacement slot. **Proposed behavior** The installed switcher plugin owns Cloud navigation. Core lists local companies when no usable replacement exists. The Members-page Cloud invitation action keeps its existing portfolio API; it is a live caller, not an old-image fallback. ## What Changed - Remove Cloud portfolio queries, stack rendering and Cloud creation/entry branches from both built-in menus. - Remove the unused stack-entry URL helper. - Keep company selection, ordering, invitations, logout and plugin error handling. Hide local company creation on managed hosts, where the server forbids it. - Update switcher tests and the navigation contract. ## Verification - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed, including Rust checks with the installed Cargo toolchain on PATH. - `pnpm exec vitest run --project @paperclipai/ui`: 637 files and 6,727 tests passed. - Focused switcher, plugin host and Cloud link tests: 26 passed after the managed-host creation guard. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - Full `pnpm test:run` was attempted, then stopped after failures in unchanged server tests. Targeted reproduction found an ancestor skills-directory collision for Slack and macOS EACCES errors renaming the company skills cache. Other local failures appeared in email connector skill setup and a process-turn test. This is not a local full-suite pass; clean Linux CI covers the complete suite. - Full `pnpm build`, UI production build and Storybook build passed. All [latest-head CI checks](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36201814444) passed, including the full Linux test matrix, browser tests, typecheck, build and release checks. Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved comments. ## Risks - A managed host without a usable switcher plugin now gets the ordinary company menu. It no longer gets the old Cloud portfolio menu, and local company creation remains unavailable there. - The Cloud portfolio endpoint remains required by the Members-page invitation action. This PR does not remove that live endpoint or change its authorization. - No database, authentication, plugin protocol or deployment changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, repository inspection and code execution. The exact deployment identifier and context-window size are not exposed by this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.926.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
4ca404b49a |
fix: record safe sandbox restore failure diagnostics (#14064)
Record a bounded diagnostic for failed workspace and staged-asset restores. Preserve the original error, retry policy, and archive safety checks. Never copy raw provider messages, credentials, paths, or asset names into the log. Nested failures log once; safe fields survive throwing property getters. Verified 129 focused restore/Claude tests, typecheck/build, and green full PR CI. Greptile 5/5 with all review threads resolved. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.926.0-canary.1 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
c3ddb288b1 |
fix: validate work product execution workspace references (#14063)
Reject invalid and cross-company execution workspace references with a useful 422 before changing the work product. Hold the validated reference through the transaction so concurrent deletion cannot turn validation into a 500. Verified 13 focused tests, full typecheck/build, and green PR CI. Greptile 5/5 with no unresolved comments. The known UI copy-toast flake passed on an unchanged-commit retry and in a focused local run. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.926.0-canary.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
96bf004a79 |
fix: use persisted state for lifecycle continuation and retry budgets (#13888)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Its control plane decides when a task can continue, wait, stop, or complete. > - Legacy continuation could change when an agent changed its wording without changing task state. > - Shared attempt counts also let repair and infrastructure retries affect each other's limits. > - This pull request uses persisted state and separate, bounded allowances for these decisions. > - If automatic repair stops, the task explains what happened and offers a guarded retry. > - Paired tests and real-provider evaluations verify that Stop, approvals, ownership, and spending limits remain authoritative. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related work: Refs #13761, Refs #11126, Refs #13610. These cover obsolete continuation dispatch and retry storms. Open and closed issues and PRs were searched for related lifecycle, continuation, and retry work. **What happened?** Legacy continuation depended on English wording and progress heuristics. Repair, failure retry, and productive continuation could consume shared counts. When bounded repair stopped, the task showed a technical recovery message without a clear next action. **Expected behavior** Persisted disposition and owned execution paths determine the next action. Missing disposition prompts bounded agent repair. Explicit work mode determines planning mode. Narrative changes and raw activity counts cannot replenish allowances. An exhausted repair shows a readable notice. An explicit retry checks current controls and preserves the assigned agent. **Steps to reproduce** Run `pnpm test:lifecycle-baseline`. The paired probes keep structured state constant while varying completion, planning, blocker, and progress prose. Run the explicit `lifecycle-baseline` and `continuation-accounting` Product E2E suites for real-provider coverage. In Storybook, open **Design previews / Recovery notice** to inspect the production component's normal, pending, acknowledged, unavailable, failure, and mobile states. ## What Changed - Hide the image attachment button, icon, and drop/paste hint in answer composers. Image paste and drop support remains available. - Merge current master and retain both browser regression sets. Use a production-stamped service worker in the offline recovery browser fixture. - Share one state-based legacy continuation decision across immediate, delayed, and recovered dispatch. Bind bounded repairs to their source run and episode. - Remove title and description wording from work-mode authority. Agents can still write requested plans in execution mode. - Persist separate failure-retry and productive-continuation counters. Disposition repair and resource waits cannot consume or reset those allowances. - Validate delayed repair identity, then recheck current gates before provider dispatch. Fence native startup cancellation. - Show **Agent needs attention**, a plain-language explanation, **Retry agent**, and expandable details in both task interfaces. Report request progress, acknowledgement, and errors inline. - Store typed recovery notice metadata. Recognize older active notices only through exact stored action and run IDs. Notice text never grants retry authority. - Use the existing recovery-action endpoint for retry. Recheck current action, status, owner, agent availability, dependencies, active runs, pending questions and confirmations, approvals, pause controls, and budget. Duplicate requests do not wake twice. - Add component, page, route, database, contract, and Storybook coverage. Keep the scenario inventory and executable evals here. Historical reports and snapshots live in the [commit-pinned paperclip-evals archive](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-evals/blob/ce3e5afcd4a1184650f586a2b5b8be5874c66c8b/experiments/2026-09-lifecycle-authority/README.md). - Preserve unsaved project fields while the same project URL changes to its canonical alias. Do not reuse data across projects or companies. This separate fix addresses the repeated repository-editor browser failure without changing the browser test. - Keep the development service worker from intercepting Vite module reloads. Update the connection-intent browser fixture to record progress and completion through the agent API. ## Verification Merge preparation on September 25, commit `c1e8e4b7ddd9fbc4913ed55ce21b8e12906c2f97`: - Merged master `bd2030932` and resolved the browser test-list conflict by keeping both sets of regressions. - Deterministic lifecycle baseline: 1,090/1,090 assertions passed; no failures, skips, or missing selected evidence. Unit 423, runner 184, database integration 397, grading 86. - Browser support: 17/17 passed. The offline recovery test first failed with an unstamped development worker, then passed with the production stamp. Its assertions are unchanged. - Focused interaction UI and offline fallback tests: 19/19 passed. Verified the custom-answer composer in Storybook: no attachment controls or hint; entering an answer enables Next. - Recursive typecheck, production build, token gates, and diff checks passed. The worktree is clean. No new real-provider campaign was run. - Current CI and review: [Current PR CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36166011243): 55 successful checks and two optional Storybook skips. Greptile scored this exact commit 5/5. Hiding the question attachment controls is an intentional UI change; paste/drop remains available. Earlier recovery UI verification, commit `21be0fec0e90e86b6d662b8ee4831847cd041cdb`: - Recursive typecheck, production build, token gates, and diff checks passed. - Focused UI coverage: 338 tests passed across six suites (336 before the interaction guard, with the two affected suites rerun at 149 passed after it). Covers both task interfaces, the real page mutation, pending/error acknowledgement, stale state, and unavailable controls. - Recovery database integration: 352 tests passed before the interaction guard. The complete recovery-action and mutation-route suites passed 181 tests after it. The two new pending question/confirmation regressions failed before the fix and passed afterward, including resolved-interaction controls. Shared validator suite: 31 passed. E2E catalog suites: 34 passed. - Browser inspection passed for light/dark themes, mobile layout, expandable details, pending retry, acknowledgement, failure, and disabled retry. Storybook renders the production component; its request is simulated. - The broad local run hit two chat callback-order wait failures and was stopped after all CI unit/database/runner shards passed. Both local failures passed when rerun without the competing full-suite process. - CI exposed a repeated project-repository draft-loss race during canonical redirects. A new unit regression failed before the fix; all nine project-page tests now pass, including controls for other projects and companies. Both unchanged repository browser tests passed against a fresh local server. UI typecheck, production UI build, and token gates passed after this fix. - [Earlier PR CI passed](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36072486798) on `21be0fec0e90e86b6d662b8ee4831847cd041cdb`: 55 successful checks, two optional Storybook skips, and no failed or pending checks. The repository browser shard passed with the production fix. Greptile is 5/5 on this exact commit with no unresolved review threads. The PR is mergeable. Historical, source-qualified lifecycle evidence: - Lifecycle baseline: 1,074 assertions. Native session coverage: 447 tests. Product E2E support: 515 tests. Browser support: 11 tests. Full earlier verification is retained in the archive. - [Real-provider campaign: 8/8 passed, zero retries](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35881382080-1/index.html), source `e88d210417280140b44a36449027290adcb1aeaa`. Evidence and cleanup checks passed. This includes deliberately exhausted repair cases that correctly remain blocked; it does not mean every task finished Done. This campaign predates the recovery UI change. - Archive migration verified all 16 original JSON files byte-for-byte and all 24 checksum entries. App tests do not need private archive access. [Archive PR #27](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip-evals/pull/27) is merged. ## Risks - Agents that omit durable disposition receive at most two repair attempts by default. Prose-only completion exposes missing state rather than silently changing scheduling. - A retry is an explicit board action. The server rechecks current controls. A successful response confirms the task returned to To do; it does not claim that the provider has already started. - Existing notice metadata remains valid. Only older active notices with matching structured evidence receive the new UI. Historical notices without that evidence keep their existing rendering. No schema migration is required. - Old run records require conservative retry accounting. Tests cover old counters, alternating retry lanes, restarts, and exhausted repairs. - Historical snapshots require private `paperclip-evals` access. The app index retains public campaign links. Live campaigns qualify specific sources and scenarios; no new real-provider campaign has run for the recovery UI commit. > This fixes existing lifecycle and recovery behavior and does not duplicate planned core work. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex assisted implementation, reasoning, code execution, and review. The exact serving model ID and context window are not exposed in this task. Historical real-provider evaluations used Codex model `gpt-5.6-sol`, separately from the implementation assistant. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.925.0-canary.6 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
6bc830b62b |
fix(recovery): escalate an issue whose interrupted run has spent its retry budget (#14046)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The stranded-issue sweeper is what puts an assigned issue back on a
live path when its run dies.
> - A failed or interrupted run gets a bounded transient retry; when
that budget is spent, the retry scheduler queues nothing and reports the
exhaustion.
> - The sweeper treated that "nothing queued" like every other "nothing
queued" and skipped the issue, on every tick, forever: `in_progress`, no
run, no path, no notice.
> - Three server restarts in a row (a deploy storm) are enough to spend
the budget, so this is reachable in ordinary operation.
> - This pull request makes the sweeper escalate a spent budget to a
board-owned recovery action, the same visible `blocked` state its other
dead ends use.
> - The benefit is that no issue can sit assigned and silent after its
retries run out.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing issue found. Related work: #14028 (this branch's
predecessor: queue drain-time wakes, retry interrupted corrective runs)
fixed two neighbouring gaps but not this one.
**What happened?**
A routine-created issue's run was interrupted by a graceful server
shutdown, and both bounded transient retries were interrupted by the
next two shutdowns. The retry scheduler logged "Bounded retry exhausted
after 2 scheduled attempts; no further automatic retry will be queued"
and stopped. On every tick after that, `reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues`
reached the generic continuation lane, `enqueueStrandedIssueRecovery`
delegated to `scheduleRecoveryRetry`, which returned null (exhausted),
and the sweeper counted the issue as `skipped`. The issue stayed
`in_progress` with no run, no recovery action, and no comment for hours
until a person woke the agent by hand. The same hole exists in the
assigned-`todo` dispatch lane.
**Expected behavior**
When the transient retry budget for an interrupted or failed run is
spent, the sweeper should treat it as the dead end it is: escalate the
issue to `blocked` with a board-owned recovery action and a notice,
exactly as it does when a continuation retry chain or an assignment
retry chain is exhausted. Leaving the budget spent across restarts is
correct and unchanged; leaving the issue silent is not.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Assign an agent using a conversation adapter (its interrupted runs
carry `conversationContinuation`, so legacy reconciliation does not
terminalize them) an issue and let a run start.
2. Interrupt the run with a graceful shutdown, let the transient retry
start, interrupt it, and repeat once more so `scheduledRetryAttempt`
reaches 2.
3. Run the stranded-issue sweep. Before this change: `skipped` every
tick, issue `in_progress`, no run, no recovery action. After:
`escalated`, issue `blocked`, one active board-owned
`issue_recovery_actions` row, a "No live execution path" notice.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
canary/v2026.925.0-canary.5
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
bd6caf51bb |
fix: preserve restore failure results and stop unsafe retries (#14035)
Preserve agent output and earlier execution errors when workspace restore fails. Report the restore phase and confirmed saved-plan links. Require verified repair before retrying unsafe archives, while preserving approval states and the retry budget. Verified with full CI, 506 focused regression tests, and Greptile 5/5 with all review threads resolved. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.925.0-canary.4 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
5b09d66183 |
fix(heartbeat): keep drain-time wakes queued and retry interrupted disposition handoffs (#14028)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The server's heartbeat scheduler queues, admits, and recovers agent
runs.
> - A control plane arms an instance task drain before it restarts the
process, so no new run starts mid-restart.
> - Two recovery paths treated that transient hold as a permanent
verdict: a wake that arrived during a drain was written as `skipped` and
never replayed, and a corrective disposition run that the restart
interrupted counted as an exhausted attempt, so the issue went to
`blocked`.
> - Both outcomes leave an assigned issue with no run and no path until
a person notices.
> - This pull request keeps drain-time wakes in the durable queue and
gives an interrupted corrective run the same bounded transient retry any
interrupted run gets.
> - The benefit is that a graceful restart never strands or blocks an
issue by itself.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
No existing issue found. I searched open PRs that touch the task drain
(#13527 adds opt-in termination of active runs; #13965 handles deferred
wakes after a stale cancellation). Neither replays drain-time wakes or
changes the corrective-handoff escalation.
**What happened?**
1. An operator accepted a plan confirmation while the instance was in a
task drain (a control plane armed it before a deploy restart).
`enqueueWakeup` wrote the assignee's continuation wake with `status:
"skipped"` and `heartbeatSkip.reason: "task_drain"`. The drain is
process-local and cleared on the restart seconds later, but nothing
replays skipped wakes. The issue stayed in `todo` with no run for 20
hours until a person retried it by hand. The stranded-issue sweeper did
not help: a `todo` issue whose latest run succeeded is treated as
deliberately handed back.
2. On another issue, the watchdog correctly raised
`successful_run_missing_state` and queued the single corrective handoff
run. A graceful server shutdown (the same deploy restart) interrupted
that run with `server_shutdown_interrupted`. On the next boot,
`reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues` saw a corrective run at
`handoffAttempt >= maxHandoffAttempts` and escalated the issue to
`blocked` with a board-owned `missing_disposition` recovery action. The
agent never got to finish one corrective attempt.
**Expected behavior**
A task drain holds admission, not the request. A wake that arrives
during a drain must run once the drain lifts or the process restarts. An
interrupted corrective run is not evidence that the agent could not
choose a disposition; it should be retried like any interrupted run, and
escalate only when that retry budget is spent or a finished attempt
still leaves no disposition.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Assign an agent an issue and `POST /api/instance/task-drain` with a
Cloud control assertion (or call `startTaskDrain({})` in a test).
2. Trigger any wake for that agent (assignment, comment, or an accepted
`request_confirmation`).
3. Observe the `agent_wakeup_requests` row: `status = skipped`, `reason
= heartbeat.scheduling_suppressed`, `payload.heartbeatSkip.reason =
task_drain`. Stop the drain or restart: no run is ever created for that
wake.
4. For the second case: let a `finish_successful_run_handoff` run be
interrupted by SIGTERM during a graceful shutdown, then boot. The issue
moves to `blocked` on the startup sweep without any retry.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
canary/v2026.925.0-canary.3
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
bd20309323 |
fix(ui): keep mobile task pickers above the keyboard (#14022)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their tasks. > - The New Task dialog lets a person select an assignee and a project. > - A mobile browser reduces the visible viewport when the software keyboard opens. > - The dialog accepted invalid viewport data, and the pickers stayed inside a transformed container. > - This behavior could collapse the dialog or move a picker search field above the visible area. > - This pull request validates viewport data and puts mobile pickers in the visible viewport. > - The benefit is that a mobile user can see and use each picker while the keyboard is open. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** On a mobile device, the Assignee and Project pickers in the New Task dialog could move above the visible viewport. A short invalid viewport value could also collapse the dialog to a line. **Expected behavior** The dialog and each open picker must stay in the visible viewport while the software keyboard is open. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open the New Task dialog in a mobile browser. 2. Open the Assignee picker or the Project picker. 3. Focus the picker search field so that the software keyboard opens. 4. Observe that the picker can move above the visible viewport. **Paperclip version or commit** `efce9356b5` **Deployment mode** Local dev and hosted browser UI. ## What Changed - Ignore zero, negative, and non-finite Visual Viewport measurements. - Keep the last safe dialog geometry until the browser gives a valid measurement. - Put entity pickers outside the transformed dialog container. - Size and position the mobile picker from the dialog Visual Viewport values. - Add unit tests for invalid viewport recovery. - Add Chromium tests for the Assignee and Project picker states. ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/components/NewIssueDialog.test.tsx` passed with 34 tests. - The Chromium viewport test passed 35 of 35 runs with five repeats and no retries. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/ui typecheck` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - `pnpm build-storybook` passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - A full local Vitest run reached restricted workspace-runtime tests that require sibling worktree and runtime writes. Remote CI will run the supported test environment. ## Risks - Risk is low because the new picker layout applies only to mobile widths. - The layout depends on Visual Viewport data when the browser supplies valid values. - Unit and browser tests cover invalid data, mobile pickers, tablet layout, and desktop layout. > This change fixes a focused UI bug. It does not duplicate a core feature in `ROADMAP.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex with GPT-5. The agent used reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser automation. The runtime did not expose the context window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.925.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
e2f1a66aa7 |
feat: support default-hidden experimental settings (#13980)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source control plane for AI-agent companies. > - Operators can hide settings that their users must not change. > - The server shares the effective restrictions with the UI and settings API. > - An explicit list must change whenever a new experimental flag is added. > - This pull request adds a wildcard with named exceptions to the existing setting. > - Core applies the policy to its current catalog, so new flags stay hidden automatically. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #11823 introduced settings visibility. #13907 added workspace isolation visibility. I searched related PRs and issues and found no duplicate wildcard implementation. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Operator control of experimental setting visibility through `PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS`. **Subsystem affected** Shared settings policy and its existing server health and mutation consumers. **Current behavior** Operators must name every hidden experimental toggle. A new Core flag can become visible until the operator updates that list. **Proposed behavior** `instance.experimental.*` hides current and future experimental toggles. Entries such as `!instance.experimental.enableEnvironments` leave named controls available. Explicit hidden keys and the hidden parent page take precedence over exceptions. **Reason and benefit** Operators can maintain a short list of allowed controls instead of a second copy of Core's full feature catalog. **Breaking changes** Existing explicit lists and unset configuration keep their behavior. The new syntax is opt-in. Older images ignore it, so operators must retain explicit restrictions until those images are upgraded. Visibility does not change feature values. ## What Changed - Expand the wildcard into concrete catalog keys in the shared parser. - Limit exceptions to known experimental controls and preserve explicit restrictions in either input order. - Test a synthetic future catalog addition, duplicate and invalid entries, API rejection, same-value echoes, and the effective health payload. - Document the syntax and the transition for deployments with mixed image versions. ## Verification - Targeted parser, future-catalog, health, and settings-route tests pass: 95 tests across four files. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passes, including Rust checks, with the installed Cargo directory on PATH. - `pnpm build` passes. - All current-head CI gates pass, including the full test shards, Rust, build, browser E2E, and canary dry run: https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36083292578. One unchanged runtime-exposure cold-start test passed on its first retry. - The full local `pnpm test:run` did not pass on macOS/Node 25: the first server group reported 13,356 passed, 18 failed, and 99 skipped, with six failed files (including two failed suite setups). Failures were in unchanged runtime/company skill cache, chat/email connector fixtures, embedded-Postgres setup, and workspace cleanup tests. A standalone filesystem probe reproduced the read-only-directory rename permission failure. Missing connector fixture paths, database startup failures, and two integration assertions also occurred; the remaining local groups were not reached after this group failed. The corresponding CI lanes all pass. These local failures are not claimed as fixed by this PR. - Browser suites were not run because this changes the shared policy, not UI rendering or browser workflows. Health payload and route tests cover the shared UI/API contract. ## Risks A malformed exception remains hidden and is reported as unknown. Exceptions cannot override an explicit hidden toggle or parent page. Older images ignore wildcard syntax; keep their explicit list during a mixed-version rollout. No schema or feature-value changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact runtime variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
1dbffb4c04 |
fix(daytona): clean up sandbox allocation after create failure (#13979)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their execution environments. > - The Daytona provider creates sandboxes before it returns a lease. > - Daytona can allocate a sandbox, then time out while waiting for it to start. > - The SDK throws without returning the allocated sandbox handle. > - Paperclip previously lost the resource identity and could leave a running sandbox behind. > - This pull request keeps an exact creation identity and deletes a matching failed allocation. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #13882. Searches for Daytona create cleanup and orphan fixes found no duplicate for this path. **What happened?** In [Grok qualification campaign 36080870743](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36080870743), Daytona sandbox creation exceeded 300 seconds. No native runner or provider session started. The SDK threw, but an ownership-filtered provider lookup found the allocated sandbox still running. The disposable resource was then deleted separately. The original attempt and its failure remain retained. **Expected behavior** A failed create must retain enough identity to clean up an allocated sandbox. Cleanup must never delete another attempt's resource. If the provider cannot confirm cleanup during sandbox lease acquisition, the host must retain a durable cleanup record and retry the exact owned allocation after restart. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Have Daytona allocate a sandbox for an environment acquisition. 2. Make the SDK throw while waiting for startup, before it returns the sandbox handle. 3. Before this fix, acquisition fails without deleting the allocated sandbox. 4. The regression tests reproduce this failure and verify exact-owner deletion. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed at `1b0551bb7c8de3c54f4bee64dbe2c88328b3645e`. The same creation path exists on master; this fix starts from `efce9356b`. ## What Changed - Assign each cold create a unique provider name and creation-attempt label. - On create failure, look up that exact name and verify every ownership label before deletion. - Wait for provider deletion with bounded lookup and deletion calls. - Preserve the original create error after successful cleanup. Report both errors and the provider name when cleanup cannot be confirmed. - Treat a missing lookup after an uncertain create as unconfirmed cleanup: a delayed provider request might still create the sandbox. - Transfer only validated ownership fields through the acquire-lease RPC error; provider exceptions and arbitrary error data are not serialized. - Persist a pending-cleanup lease before the host retries deletion. Reuse the existing cleanup sweep and durable spool, retaining the original environment scope after its row is deleted. - Fence retries by company, environment, run, provider account, unique creation name, and every ownership label. Missing provisional-name lookups remain unresolved. - Journal an ownership-verified provider ID before host-driven deletion. Its absence then confirms cleanup after a lost deletion reply or final database update; failed journal writes block deletion. - Keep ownership labels separate from the mutable input Daytona modifies during create. - Report confirmed host-side deletion accurately while still rejecting the failed acquisition. - Add protocol, malformed-evidence, cross-scope denial, controller-restart, and deleted-environment regressions alongside the original bounded cleanup tests. ## Verification - SDK suite: 92 passed. Daytona plugin suite: 277 passed; six opt-in live tests skipped. Environment-runtime suite: 103 passed, then all four focused observation/recovery variants passed after adding a foreign-observation case. SDK and provider TypeScript checks and `git diff --check` pass. - Regressions failed before the respective fixes: missing durable ownership, misleading successful-cleanup message, and SDK mutation of the ownership labels. - Controlled real-Daytona proof at `d2ac1c95b32ca64daf039c0427137657f351c0e0`: create a real sandbox; inject an SDK failure and a failed immediate lookup; persist the validated ownership envelope; have a child journal the observed provider ID before deleting; deliberately drop its successful deletion receipt; reconcile absence from another fresh process and confirm it with a separate provider read. Passed, with no manual cleanup and zero model calls. The live proof uses an owner-only envelope file; actual host database/spool recovery is tested separately in the environment-runtime suite. - The preceding controlled attempt failed because the real SDK mutated the labels object. That failure is retained. The harness deleted its exact owned sandbox, and a fresh lookup confirmed absence. The fix copies the SDK input labels separately from the ownership snapshot. - [Repository CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36095925399) passes on this exact head, with a clean 5/5 review. The unchanged Cursor remote-command test passed its one bounded rerun after a 10-second timeout; the same test had already passed on the combined tree. The original failure is retained. Earlier `199f0852` CI and immediate-deletion proof are retained, without being promoted to the new source. - Combined-source verification uses temporary PR #13990 against the Grok feature branch. No Docker or Rust build runs on the developer laptop. ## Risks Creation failures now add up to ten seconds for lookup and fifteen seconds for deletion confirmation. The SDK still owns the initial creation timeout. If a request materializes only after the failed lookup, its durable pending record remains eligible for later cleanup; a never-observed creation name is never reported deleted from a 404. A previously observed provider ID can be reconciled as deleted. The host and SDK must be deployed together. Durable handoff applies to plugin-backed sandbox lease acquisition used by heartbeat and runner login. Probe and custom-image interactive setup retain immediate cleanup and explicit failure reporting, but do not use this lease-recovery path. A worker crash before delivering the failure envelope still cannot be recovered through this mechanism. A cleanup error never returns a lease. Successful creation behavior is unchanged except for the provider name and ownership label. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository tools and code execution. The exact serving identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
f56aee5423 |
fix(evals): capture complete durable run event streams (#13977)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and records their durable work outcomes. > - Product E2E checks those outcomes through the browser and public API. > - A successful long run can emit more than 1,000 durable events. > - The harness read one page and missed the later completion evidence. > - This pull request reads every page before it checks runtime invariants. > - Invalid or incomplete capture still fails. A missing page cannot produce a pass. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #13882 (Grok qualification). A duplicate search found no existing event-pagination fix. **What happened?** The local structured-question case in [campaign 36071063537](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36071063537) completed the task and passed its six outcome matchers. It failed native runtime invariants because the capture contained exactly 1,000 events. The last captured event preceded the run's completion by more than a minute. The API caps each response at 1,000 rows. The harness did not request the next page. **Expected behavior** Read the complete durable event stream through the public API before checking semantic-result and terminal-event counts. Reject incomplete or malformed evidence. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Complete a native task that emits more than 1,000 durable events. 2. Place the semantic-result and terminal events after row 1,000. 3. Capture the run with the Product E2E harness. 4. Before this fix, the invariant checker sees only the first page. **Paperclip version or commit** Observed at `4196a4cd76db434854b679035e4146c7f69689ce`. The same single-page capture exists on master. The original failed result remains unchanged; missing historical tail evidence is not reconstructed or graded as a pass. ## What Changed - Add a bounded event collector that advances through the public `afterSeq` cursor. - Use it for task success/failure evidence and shared chat run evidence. - Reject invalid pages, missing or non-increasing sequence numbers, repeated cursors, failed later requests, and an exhausted page limit. - Test completion events beyond the first page, exact page boundaries, and malformed evidence. - Correct the existing Everyday catalog test from 38 to the maintained 47 cells. The suite stays explicit-only. - Document the complete-capture requirement and its bound. ## Verification - Product harness typecheck passes. - The full credential-free harness suite passed 477 tests. After adding the chat integration regression, all 34 chat evidence tests pass. - Seventeen pagination tests cover the valid tail and malformed-evidence cases. - `git diff --check` passes. - [Full repository CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36080683422) passes at `aed6f79c089226be79e75dcf390969561ec4f787`: 52 successful checks and two intentional skips, including Rust, typecheck, build, server tests, and browser shards. Greptile gives this exact head 5/5 with no findings. No local Docker, Rust build, browser suite, or model invocation was used for this change. - [Live Grok requalification](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36080870743) is running on combined source `1b0551bb7c8de3c54f4bee64dbe2c88328b3645e`, with the runner, scheduler, and evidence fixes. Its full credential-free harness passes all 493 tests and typecheck. Live results are pending; the original campaign remains a failed measurement. ## Risks Long runs need more read-only API requests and larger private evidence files. Capture stops with an explicit error after 100 full pages. This changes neither production APIs nor provider behavior. It does not relax an invariant or change a historical grade. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository tools and code execution. The exact serving identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c96c751f39 |
fix(heartbeat): claim task ownership with queued runs (#13973)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their tasks. > - The scheduler can start several runs for one agent. > - Each task still needs one execution owner. > - Task creation and recovery can queue assignments for the same task. > - The scheduler previously marked both runs running before starting either executor. > - This change claims the run and task ownership in one transaction. > - Tasks with different IDs retain concurrent execution. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13882. Related queue work: #11830 and #13965; those address different admission and cancellation paths. **What happened?** The Grok subscription Product campaign exposed two assignment runs for one task. Task creation and periodic recovery started runs within 200 ms. Both acquired Daytona sandboxes. One failed before provider work with `paperclip_runner_attachment_staging_not_authorized` because the other owned the task. Fixture cleanup then found an active session. The original failed result is retained in [campaign 36071063537](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36071063537). **Expected behavior** Only the task execution owner may start provider setup. Competing queued work must wait. Different tasks may use the agent's available slots. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Set an agent's concurrent run limit to two. 2. Queue task-creation and recovery assignment runs for the same task. 3. Resume the queue while holding adapter execution open. 4. Before this fix, both runs become running. Only one has the task execution lock. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master `8781f06a8` and in the Grok campaign at `4196a4cd`. ## What Changed - Use the same company-scoped task ownership gate for assignments, direct comments, and queued comments. - Leave competing work queued while another live run owns the task. Transfer a terminal pointer only after the tracked executor and durable environment leases/finalization settle, including cleanup on another controller. - Commit the running state and task execution owner together. - Preserve the dedicated review path and the native replacement checkout guard. - Add sixteen database regressions for assignment/comment orderings, unrelated concurrent tasks, and cross-controller cleanup fences. ## Verification - Live subscription Product E2E planning passed on its first attempt in both Daytona (351,197 ms) and local execution (268,883 ms), with 6/6 matchers and cleanup passing in each, on combined source `1b0551bb7c8de3c54f4bee64dbe2c88328b3645e` ([campaign](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36080870743)). The local screenshots and persisted state show the same plan revised, the first approval rejected, the revised approval accepted, and one completion. The full campaign remains unqualified because of a separate startup retry and EC2 Spot interruption. - The new same-task regression failed before the fix: two running rows instead of one. - All seven focused concurrency cases passed. Three comment cases failed before the shared gate was added. Five cross-controller cleanup cases failed before the durable gate was added. A warm-retention regression also failed before its successful release receipt was admitted; missing/failed receipts and a different retention policy stay blocked. - `node ../node_modules/vitest/vitest.mjs run src/__tests__/heartbeat-stale-queue-invalidation.test.ts` from `server`: 48 passed. Native cleanup admission adds one passing test; task-drain release adds two. Total focused checks: 51 passed. - `git diff --check`: passed. - Current-head [CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36078495577) passes repository typecheck, tests, Rust checks, build, and browser suites. The unrelated repository-form browser shard passed one bounded rerun without assertion or code changes; its original navigation failure remains retained. No local Docker or Rust build was used. - The failed test's exact two sandboxes were checked: one was already absent; the other was deleted after its company, environment, and run labels matched. ## Risks The claim transaction adds a task row lock. It follows task-before-run lock order. A competing run stays queued until the current owner releases the task. The change does not alter attachment authorization, provider permissions, schemas, or public APIs. Review is 5/5 with all threads resolved on `23c0d13b6`. All CI checks pass on that exact head. Live Grok requalification will use the combined runner and scheduler source. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with repository tools and code execution. The exact serving identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ### Live regression verification The Daytona plan/revise/accept lifecycle in [Grok campaign 36080870743](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36080870743) passed on its first attempt at combined source `1b0551bb7c8de3c54f4bee64dbe2c88328b3645e`, in 351,197 ms, with all six outcome matchers and cleanup passing. The earlier competing-run failure remains retained. This is one live planning result; the complete Grok matrix and repeated qualification are separate gates, and this campaign also has separately retained infrastructure failures. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.925.0-canary.1 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
efce9356b5 |
fix(ui): offer recovery when the app fails before React starts (#13970)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The browser must load its JavaScript before React can render a task. > - A failed import can stop that process before the React error boundary exists. > - The HTML entry then leaves an empty page with no recovery action. > - This PR adds a small recovery screen that works without React. > - The user can retry the same page and return to saved task content. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13824 and #13895. This is a follow-up to their browser startup investigation. **What happened?** Interrupting the app bundle or a required import leaves an empty React root. A startup exception has the same effect. A React error boundary cannot handle these failures because React has not started. **Expected behavior** The page must explain the startup failure and offer a manual retry. A late successful load must dismiss the recovery message without a reload. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a saved task in the browser. 2. Abort the application bundle request, or make a required module return HTTP 503. 3. Observe the empty page before this change. With this change, use Reload page after the fault clears and verify the saved task and comment. **Paperclip version or commit** The failing regression baseline used master at `8781f06a8`. **Deployment mode** Local source build and compiled UI. Tests cover both initial navigation and a page controlled by the production service worker. The exact cause of the older intermittent Vite stall remains unconfirmed. Forty app loads and thirty replays of retained responses did not reproduce it. This PR fixes the missing recovery path; it does not claim to remove that historical cause. A normal HTTP 304 response is not a failure. ## What Changed - Add an inline startup guard and recovery screen in the HTML entry. It does not depend on the app module graph. - Show a manual reload action after a startup error or after 30 seconds without rendered root content. - Remove the notice, timer, observer, and error listeners when the app starts. Never reload automatically. - Keep the recovery screen outside the React root so it cannot satisfy app-readiness checks. - Add browser tests for interrupted imports, a stalled import, an evaluation error, service-worker-controlled retry, repeated offline retry, and cleanup after successful startup. - Return a static, uncached HTML retry screen when a service-worker-controlled navigation fails offline. It contains no task content. - Add a full-app test that retries an interrupted compiled bundle and checks the saved task, comment, composer, route, and absence of agent runs. - Document the coverage and the limits of the historical diagnosis. ## Verification - Red baseline: four recovery cases failed; the normal-startup case passed. After the change, all five recovery cases passed. The review found an offline retry gap; that additional case failed before the worker fix and passed afterward. - Full provider-free browser-support suite: 16 passed. - Compiled-app browser tests: four passed, including saved-task reload, interrupted-bundle recovery, slow-CPU service-worker reload, and sidebar navigation. - Expanded service-worker, offline response, PWA, and worker build-ID unit tests: 37 passed. The two old plain-text offline expectations were reproduced as failures and updated for the HTML retry contract. - UI production build, full local repository typecheck (`pnpm -r typecheck`), runner-E2E typecheck, and design token checks passed. - Manual browser check: a temporary server failed the compiled bundle once. The recovery screen appeared. Clicking Reload page restored the same saved task, comment, and composer. - Full local `pnpm build` passed. - Full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted with a bounded deadline and stopped after it timed out. Workspace runtime/cleanup tests reported timeouts on this host. The monolithic local run is not a pass. The focused tests above and the complete Linux CI run provide the successful verification. - Final-head [CI run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36072201966) passed. All 53 check runs succeeded; the two Storybook jobs were intentionally skipped. The legacy security status also passed. - Greptile reviewed `f83e0f51fb760541d83353f2c1df4e182f3948f9`: 5/5. Both review findings are fixed and resolved. ## Risks - The guard only handles startup before React renders root content. Existing React boundaries handle later rendering errors. - A slow startup can show the message after 30 seconds. A later successful render removes it; the page does not reload by itself. - The fallback uses native HTML when the app stylesheet is unavailable. - The worker changes only its offline navigation response. It returns static HTML with a reload button and `Cache-Control: no-store`. Its cache allowlist, private-response protections, task state, provider prompts, and grading rules stay unchanged. - This does not establish or fix the unknown cause of the historical intermittent Vite stall. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex. The session exposes the GPT-6 family but not an exact served model ID or context window size. Used reasoning, code editing, shell tools, and browser testing. No subagents were used. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.925.0-canary.0 nightly/v2026.925.0-nightly.0 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8781f06a87 |
feat(connections): enable MCP aggregators by default (#13964)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents for work. > - Connections let those agents use external services with explicit access rules. > - Zapier, Arcade, Composio Connect, and Executor already have setup and runtime support. > - Their experimental switch still blocks discovery and setup by default. > - This pull request removes those gates and the Settings toggle. > - Users can connect these providers without enabling an experiment. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #13755. Refs #13941. **What existing behavior does this improve?** Apps browsing, inline setup, and agent connection search for the four MCP aggregators. **Current behavior** An instance must enable the MCP aggregators experiment before users or agents can start setup. **Proposed behavior** All four providers are available by default on local and managed instances. Old stored and managed values still parse but cannot disable them. ## What Changed - Remove the aggregator gates from Apps, inline setup, server setup, and agent search. - Remove the Settings toggle and its UI hook. - Retain the old setting key only for upgrade compatibility. Normalize it to true and ignore managed overrides, as Apps already does. - Replace opt-in fixtures with default-on coverage. Test old false values, all four setup flows, provider choice, and the removed toggle. - Update current connector guidance and remove the opt-in from the runner acceptance fixture. ## Verification - 306 focused tests passed across eight files: shared remote MCP contracts; server remote MCP lifecycle, aggregator fallback, settings normalization, and managed overlay; UI Apps browsing, setup, and experimental settings. - Server and UI TypeScript checks passed. - UI token gates and `git diff --check` passed. - The full local suite was not run, per the maintainer's instruction. All 54 CI checks passed; two checks were skipped. One unrelated workspace-preview readiness timeout passed on one failed-shard retry. - The setup fixtures use simulated MCP responses. This change does not claim new live provider acceptance. ## Risks - Existing instances now show all four providers, even if the old flag was false. This is intentional. - External provider choice, credentials, company isolation, agent grants, and tool policies still apply. Showing a connector does not authorize an external account. - No data migration is required. The compatibility key keeps old managed configuration documents valid. - Historical Zapier live acceptance remains incomplete in the existing evidence report. The maintainer explicitly requested the default-on rollout for all four existing providers; the report records that scoped exception. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (`gpt-6-astra`) through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, and test execution. The context window size is not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.924.0-canary.5 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
aa8fc86331 |
feat(connections): prefer native apps and ask users to choose external providers (#13941)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Connections give agents governed access to external services. > - Native connections should remain the first choice for a supported app. > - Other apps may be available through an external MCP provider. > - The user must know which external provider handles the connection and choose it before setup. > - This pull request adds ranked alternatives and server-authored instructions to connection search. > - Agents can follow the returned instructions while Paperclip validates saved choices and access. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Related: #13879, which fixed inline MCP provider setup. This PR adds discovery and provider selection on top of that work. **Subsystem affected** Cross-cutting: shared connection contracts, server search and intent services, native runtime, CLI, inline setup UI, and evals. **Problem or motivation** An agent cannot offer a clear external-provider choice when Paperclip has no native connection for an app. Adding provider-specific branches to the core prompt would make those instructions harder to maintain. **Proposed solution** Prefer a native connection. Otherwise return verified alternatives in Composio, Arcade, Executor, Zapier order. Include an external-service disclosure, a question with None, and the next instruction in the search result. Validate the saved human choice before creating a selected fallback setup card. Reuse existing provider accounts and verify underlying app access separately. **Alternatives considered** Do not silently choose a provider. Do not claim that broad execution tools prove support for every app. Reuse existing questions and connection intents rather than add another connection model. **Roadmap alignment** Extends the existing MCP Tool Gateway & Apps and Agent evals & feedback capabilities. The MCP aggregators experiment remains the gate. No duplicate provider-routing PR was found in the public search. ## What Changed - Add a dated support index and authorized cached-tool evidence for external routes. - Return provider questions and next-step instructions from `connections_search`. - Preserve pending choices and declines across continuation. Validate company, task, agent, human, app, and current route eligibility. - Carry the selected app into new setup and account reuse, validate explicit provider requests against persisted human messages, and distinguish provider readiness from app authorization. - Sync native, MCP, REST, and CLI contracts. Keep core agent instructions provider-neutral. - Add production-component Storybooks, focused database tests, and three real-agent browser eval cases. - Record the plan, observed failures, fixes, passing evidence, and acceptance limits. ## Verification - Latest head `586f0e6cd`: 54 checks passed, 2 skipped; Greptile 5/5 and all review threads resolved. - After rebasing on master `18dac1e1e`: 64 focused shared, validator, route-contract, and database tests passed; server typecheck passed. - Embedded-browser test drive on the rebased head: native Jira card, HubSpot external-provider question, Arcade account reuse, one actual MCP read against a local synthetic fixture, reload persistence, and None preventing further calls. A real OpenAI-backed agent performed discovery and continuation. - UX observation: the agent initially combined mutually exclusive request fields; the server rejected it and the agent recovered without changing access. This extra retry remains visible in the transcript. - After rebase: 23 focused eval grader/catalog tests, affected TypeScript checks, token gates, production UI build, and Storybook build passed. Full local tests are intentionally excluded at the maintainer's request. - Before rebase: four browser/real-agent attempts passed: native Jira, None, and reuse of the second provider on two Codex profiles. - Browser evals used an isolated deterministic MCP fixture through the real Paperclip gateway. They do not prove production compatibility with all four providers. - Review `Apps / Connections / Provider choice` in Storybook. Choose Arcade, continue through Access, and verify the app name, external-service disclosure, and URL configuration. - The detailed verification report is `doc/connections/2026-09-23-aggregator-routing-verification.md`. ## Risks - The public support index is finite and can age. Account capability and app authorization still require verification after selection. - Existing installed-tool permissions remain in effect. Provider choice is not a new execution permission boundary. An early Mini attempt skipped search; clearer provider-neutral instructions made the targeted rerun pass. This is not a measured reliability rate. - Explicit requests skip provider confirmation only when a clear persisted human message or saved provider choice supports them. Other phrasing falls back to confirmation; the agent query alone is not consent. These routes do not add tool permissions. - No database migration or legacy Composio broker is added. Real-provider acceptance remains separate from fixture proof. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser tools. The exact deployment variant and context-window size are not exposed in this session. Product evals separately used the repository's primary Codex and Codex Mini profiles; those agents supplied test behavior, not independent provider compatibility proof. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.924.0-canary.4 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
18dac1e1ef |
feat(connections): add experimental memory providers and remote MCP access (#13942)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Connections give agents governed access to external tools. > - Agents need durable memory across tasks and execution environments. > - Mem0, Zep, Supermemory, Cognee, and Honcho provide hosted memory tools. > - This pull request adds their setup flows behind an experimental toggle. > - It also delivers assigned MCP tools through the native remote Codex runner. > - Operators can connect a provider once and use the same governed tools locally or in Daytona. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Problem or motivation** The Apps catalog lacks a complete set of memory providers. Remote native Codex agents also need access to assigned managed MCP tools without receiving provider credentials. **Proposed solution** Add five memory connectors behind the disabled-by-default Experimental memory connectors setting. Use the existing connection setup and permissions UI. Default their tools to Allowed. Preserve company boundaries, operator permission changes, provider scopes, and audit attribution. **Alternatives considered** Direct provider credentials in each sandbox would duplicate setup and bypass the managed gateway. The remote runner instead uses its existing protocol channel to call the gateway on the server. **Roadmap alignment** This maintainer-requested experiment supports the Memory / Knowledge and Connected Apps roadmap areas. It adds provider connections without introducing a separate memory UI. Related connector authoring documentation is tracked in #13692; no duplicate memory-provider implementation was found. ## What Changed - Add provider definitions, official branding, and the experimental setting for all five providers. - Use OAuth for Zep and Supermemory, API credentials for Mem0 and Honcho, and a bundled Cloud API bridge for Cognee with no runtime downloads or subprocesses. - Default memory tools to Allowed and classify destructive actions explicitly. - Fix personal remote credential resolution and propagate provider tool errors. - Relay assigned managed MCP tools to remote native Codex through the runner protocol. Recheck current authority for each call and rotate stale tool contracts. - Add 21 Storybook states and complete OAuth walkthrough fixtures. - Document provider research, sanitized tool inventory, and live local and Daytona proof. ## Verification - Passed workspace typecheck: `pnpm -r typecheck`. - Passed production build: `pnpm build`. - Full local `pnpm test:run`: 13,273 passed, with failures from process/readiness timeouts under parallel load. Reran all 16 affected suites with one worker: 456 passed, leaving two macOS `/var` versus `/private/var` path assertions. Both passed with `TMPDIR=/private/tmp`. No test failures remain unverified. Latest-head remote CI passes all 54 checks (two optional Storybook jobs skipped). Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved findings. - Latest Cognee gateway regression: 71 passed, including public deployment without a runtime host and immediate recovery after a provider error. Bundled bridge tests: 25 passed. - Browser setup and real agent tasks exercised all five providers. Mem0, Cognee, Zep, and Honcho have successful store/retrieve proof. - Supermemory now has scoped read/write consent. Local storage and real Daytona write, document read, and semantic recall passed; indexing completion was verified before claiming success. - All five providers were exercised through a real Daytona sandbox and its native runner MCP relay. Provider credentials remained on the server. The final bundled Cognee bridge also passed a fresh Daytona store/recall run. All disposable sandboxes were removed and verified absent after testing. - Storybook is rebuilt and contains the experimental toggle, catalog, setup, permissions, and error states. The Zep and Supermemory access steps advance correctly. ## Risks - Provider OAuth scopes and plan limits remain independent of Paperclip tool permissions. An Allowed tool can still be rejected by the provider. - Providers can queue memory indexing; save acceptance does not prove that semantic recall is ready. - Remote tool contracts must stay synchronized with current connection authority. Regression tests cover revocation and stale contracts. - This change has no database migration. Existing connections remain usable when the experimental catalog toggle is disabled. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 Astra (`gpt-6-astra`), with reasoning, repository edits, code execution, and browser automation. The exact context window size is not exposed in this session. Live acceptance agents used `gpt-5.6-sol`. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
|
e006c18f20 |
test(paperclip-runner): stabilize the assigned-skills ACPX runtime host test (#13453)
Release sealed skill homes before test cleanup and reuse one prepared sandbox across the assigned-skills test opens. Preserve the current skill-refresh and prompt assertions without increasing test timeouts. Co-Authored-By: Devin Foley <devinfoley@users.noreply.github.com> Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.924.0-canary.3 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
2914501c08 |
test(chat): retire fixture leases before recovery sweeps (#13952)
Retire verifying chat fixtures and their synthetic endpoint leases after service shutdown. Add a regression that recovers a stale receipt while preserving another company's lease. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
f3a214fe77 |
Fix relative symlinks in secondary sandbox repositories (#13953)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agents and their task workspaces. > - A task can use several independent Git repositories. > - Sandbox staging copies secondary repositories from temporary clones. > - The copy changed relative symlinks into absolute host paths. > - Those links broke skill discovery and made workspace restore fail. > - This change preserves link targets while keeping extraction checks intact. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Staging a secondary repository rewrites a link such as `.claude/skills/demo -> ../../skills/demo` to an absolute path in a temporary Git clone. That clone is then removed. The link is broken in the sandbox, and Daytona refuses the outbound archive during workspace restore. An agent can finish its turn but still have its run fail during restore. **Expected behavior** Repository links keep their original targets after staging. Links within a repository remain usable, and changes return to the local checkout. Unsafe outbound archive links still fail before extraction. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a project with a primary repository and a secondary repository. 2. Commit a relative skill directory link in the secondary repository. 3. Stage the workspace for sandbox execution and inspect the copied link. 4. Restore that repository through Daytona. Before this fix, the link points at a removed host temporary directory and restore rejects it. **Paperclip version/commit** Reproduced on `0f8750627f11d855552abce9a837d7f3b67c9ddf` in the multi-repository sandbox path. Related: #13442 introduced multi-repository provisioning. #13882 adds native Grok but keeps legacy adapters; #12991 addresses Grok instruction isolation and leaves skill staging unchanged. Searches of open/closed PRs and open issues found no direct fix for this copy behavior. ## What Changed - Set `verbatimSymlinks: true` when copying secondary Git clones. This [Node option](https://nodejs.org/api/fs.html#fspromisescpsrc-dest-options) preserves the stored link target instead of resolving it against the temporary source. - Test directory, file, chained and dangling links after temporary-clone cleanup. Assert the copied Git checkout remains clean. - Cover skill-link reads, edits and restore in fresh, warm-adoption and durable-seed workspace modes. - Extend Daytona checks for valid relative directory links and rejected absolute targets. - Document the staging behavior. ## Verification - Four regression cases fail without the source fix: one clone test and three staging modes. - `pnpm exec vitest run packages/adapter-utils/src/git-workspace-sync.test.ts packages/adapter-utils/src/sandbox-managed-runtime.test.ts packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona/src/plugin.test.ts`: 301 passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm test:run` was started locally, then stopped after the full Linux CI suite passed. It did not finish locally; this is not a full local-suite pass. - Full PR CI: 53 checks passed, two conditional skips, on `07b30ff298baab327a4e60708ade899935688a3f`. Three server shards were interrupted by runner shutdowns; the unchanged mobile repository test timed out waiting for a disabled Save changes button. One same-commit failed-job rerun passed. Original attempts remain in [run 36036538369](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/36036538369). - Greptile: 5/5 on the same head, no review threads or actionable findings. - Diff scanned for secrets and private identifiers; no matches. ## Risks Low risk: the production change is one copy option. It preserves symlinks instead of following or materializing their targets. Daytona extraction guards, workspace exclusions, authentication and database behavior do not change. This prevents corruption in newly staged snapshots. It does not rewrite an already corrupted warm workspace or durable seed; those need fresh staging from the source checkout. No live provider run or customer-task replay was performed. The tests use real Git, filesystem and tar operations with mocked provider transport. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with tool use and code execution. The exact serving model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.924.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
0f8750627f |
fix(codex): preserve typed ACP quota classification and reset time (#13945)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip runs agents and recovers failed tasks. > - Codex ACP can report usage exhaustion as a typed terminal failure. > - The shared engine removes provider text before it stores the result. > - Codex did not use the existing terminal classifier hook, so a quota failure became a generic turn failure. > - This change classifies explicit usage exhaustion before that text is removed. > - Recovery can then use quota backoff and the supported reset clock. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A Codex ACP `limit` failure with explicit usage-exhaustion text produced `acpx_turn_failed`. Recovery could schedule the ordinary short retries because the quota classification and reset time were lost. **What did you expect to happen?** Keep the failure visible and use the existing provider-quota wait. Preserve a supported reset timestamp without storing provider text. **Steps to reproduce** Return a terminal ACP session failure with category `limit` and title `You've hit your usage limit for GPT-5. Switch to another model now, or try again at 4:30 PM (America/Chicago).` The real child-process regression tests exercise both pinned ACPX versions in persistent and oneshot modes. **Paperclip version** Base commit: `32573876d4`. Related work: #13651 and #13831 provide the shared hook and Claude classification. #11854 includes quota handling as part of optional credential rotation, but reads the already-sanitized result; this patch handles the typed terminal boundary without adding rotation. #13549 reads recovery text after this boundary and cannot recover discarded provider text. #9011 concerns the Codex CLI backoff. This change leaves those other mechanisms in place. ## What Changed - Register a Codex terminal-failure classifier with the existing ACP engine hook. - Recognize explicit usage exhaustion only in a typed `limit` failure. - Reuse the Codex reset-time parser and existing provider-quota recovery fields. - Leave context, turn, rate, budget, storage-capacity, and unknown failures on their existing paths. - Test real ACP children, both dependency patches, privacy, and recovery classification. Document the boundary. ## Verification - 88 focused tests passed across Codex ACP, parsing, and server recovery classification. - An initial cross-adapter run passed 53 tests, including the existing Claude quota suite. - Removing only the classifier registration makes five new integration tests fail; restoring it passes all 19 new tests. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build` passed. - Full Linux CI passed on `b10d60e002`, including all unit/integration shards, browser shards, typecheck/build, runner checks, and release/package gates. - The duplicate local `pnpm test:run` reported three skill-cache failures and two runner-suite failures. It is not claimed as a full local pass. - The three skill-cache failures reproduce in a clean worktree at the unchanged base commit (3 failed, 107 passed, 3 skipped across the skills and runner files). The cache rename reports `EACCES` on macOS. - An isolated runner-suite run reports two embedded PostgreSQL startup failures before its assertions (37 tests pass). No runner source is changed; the Linux CI runner and server suites passed. - Greptile reviewed the current head at 5/5 with no actionable findings or unresolved threads. ## Risks - Explicit usage-exhaustion failures now wait for quota recovery instead of short generic retries. - Unknown wording retains the existing behavior. The generic historical terminal-limit message alone cannot establish quota exhaustion. - Reset parsing keeps the existing Codex clock formats. A missing or unsupported reset uses the existing quota backoff. - No schema, credential, UI, dependency, or deployment changes. Provider text stays in memory and is absent from results and logs. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 via Codex. Exact runtime model variant and context-window size were not exposed. Used reasoning, repository inspection, editing, and local tests. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.924.0-canary.1 |
||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
32573876d4 |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#13840)
Auto-generated lockfile refresh after dependencies changed on master. This PR only updates pnpm-lock.yaml. Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b0155a681a |
feat(slack): connect Paperclip conversations and scheduled messages (#13920)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Slack conversations use the same tasks and agents as the Paperclip board. > - A board reply must reach that Slack conversation and let the agent continue the work. > - An assigned agent also needs its Slack tools during normal tasks and scheduled routines. > - Both paths must keep the linked user's authority, delivery rules, and conversation history. > - This pull request adds those paths and reduces setup friction for Slack bots. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **Subsystem affected** Server orchestration, Slack connector tools, shared contracts, and chat setup UI. **Problem or motivation** Replies entered in Paperclip did not provide a complete round trip to the linked Slack thread. Slack and board wakeups could select different model sessions for the same task. Agents also lacked their assigned Slack tools outside Slack-origin work, which prevented a routine from sending its responsible user a briefing. Inviting a bot could leave the new channel disabled. **Proposed solution** Mirror human board messages with author attribution and route the agent result to the same thread. Use the same session key across both entry points. Supply Slack tools to the connection's assigned agent in normal tasks and routines, using the current responsible user's verified link. Enable newly invited channels while preserving explicit disabled choices. Add a browser-agent setup prompt to the Slack wizard. **Alternatives considered** A separate Slack scheduler or task dispatcher would duplicate existing Paperclip workflows. Reusing the connection owner's identity would grant the wrong authority. Replaying old channel history could start unintended work. This change uses ordinary task wakeups, routine dispatch, and Slack's original invitation mention event instead. **Roadmap alignment** Extends the shipped Scheduled Routines and governed Apps capabilities. It does not add a separate task lifecycle. Related work: #13828 and #13809. Related test stabilization: #13877. The existing plugin Slack-control proposals are separate from this built-in connector change. ## What Changed - Queue human Paperclip messages for the original Slack thread with display-name attribution and stable delivery identities. Require the author’s current linked Slack identity and recheck access before delivering messages or agent replies. - Apply pause, dependency, cancellation, and closed-workspace guards before explicit Board sends request work and again when the durable outbox dispatches it. - Route agent results back to Slack and preserve model-session continuity, including replies that reopen completed tasks. - Resolve assigned Slack connections for normal agent tasks and routines. Recheck the responsible user's link, membership, and permissions at execution. - Add `slack_open_dm` for the responsible user's bot DM and request the `im:write` scope. - Enable newly discovered invited channels. Keep explicit OFF choices and normal admission and deduplication rules. - Add a copyable Slack setup prompt for a computer-use agent, with Storybook coverage. Share the prompt-button component with GitHub. - Update Slack tool documentation and runtime instructions. - Stabilize the mobile project browser test by waiting for the final canonical route before editing, preserving all persistence assertions. ## Verification - Live staging: invited the bot after the first mention. The channel became enabled and the bot answered that original mention. - Live staging: a normal Paperclip reply appeared in Slack with author attribution. The agent completed the calculation and replied once in the original thread and in Paperclip. - Live staging: a codeword entered in Slack was recalled from Paperclip. A following Slack calculation used the result from the Paperclip turn. Run metadata confirmed the same model session for both entry points. - Live staging: a scheduled routine used `slack_open_dm` and `slack_post_message` to deliver one DM. The existing app was reinstalled with `im:write`. The test routine was paused after verification. - Before the master merge: 397 focused feature tests passed. The continuity fix passed all 76 issue comment/update route tests and six focused route/integration cases. Typecheck, build, and token gates passed. - Review fixes: 47 focused integration cases passed, covering link revocation/replacement, private membership removal, guarded outbox dispatch, concurrent workers, lost scheduler responses, a real one-connection pool, exact reply provenance, and attachment retries. All 99 issue-comment route tests and the Slack catalog browser test passed. - Full local typecheck, production build, token gates, and module-boundary checks passed. The full local test command passed 25,915 tests before a 15-second timeout in `issue-thread-interaction-routes.test.ts`; that entire suite passed on isolated rerun (81 tests). Remaining serialized coverage is provided by the current-head CI shards. - An unchanged Cursor adapter test hit its 10-second limit in CI; all five tests in that file passed on a local rerun in 3.11 seconds, and the failed CI shard passed on its single retry. - The preview-server readiness test passed a local rerun (28 tests). The mobile-project readiness fix passed three repetitions of both browser tests (6/6). - Final commit `64ac0d9897f4353375996f1b1b38e5040bdeb0a0`: all CI gates passed, including all eight browser shards, all server/chat suites, typecheck, build, runner checks, and security checks. Greptile reviewed this exact commit at 5/5; all review threads are resolved. ## Risks - Human messages on a Slack-linked task now publish to its Slack thread. The task banner states this behavior. Incoming Slack messages and internal agent bookkeeping must not echo back. - Normal tasks and routines can now use the assigned bot. Authority remains bound to the current responsible user's link; it does not fall back to the connection owner. Revocation, private-context limits, and queued-write checks still apply. - Existing Slack apps need `im:write` and a reinstall to open DMs. Other existing capabilities remain available without that scope. - New invited channels default to enabled. Explicit disabled choices remain disabled. Channels created by bot tools still require a person to enable responses. - No database migration or new provider credentials are required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 through Codex, with reasoning, code execution, GitHub CLI, and browser tools. The runtime does not expose a more specific model build identifier or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
c341588bdb |
fix(ui): add Cloud invitations to the Members page (#13922)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - People manage collaborators from the Members page. > - Cloud manages invitations outside the tenant's local invitation system. > - The local Invites tab is hidden on Cloud, so this page has no way to invite a person. > - This pull request adds an Invite people action for the current Cloud stack's owner or admin. > - The action opens the existing Cloud People settings for that stack. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A Cloud owner opens Organization Settings → Members and finds no invitation action. The tenant-local Invites tab is hidden, and the page does not link to Cloud's invitation flow. **Expected behavior** Cloud owners and admins can start an invitation from Members. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Sign in to a Cloud-managed instance as the current stack's owner or admin. 2. Open Organization Settings → Members with `company.invites` hidden. 3. Look for an invitation action beside the page heading. **Paperclip version or commit** `7b7c4d4172d6aac14919e2682b702ae87bc17653`. **Deployment mode** Cloud-managed, authenticated. Related search: #2388 proposes broader member-management UI. This change only connects the existing Members page to Cloud invitations. No duplicate Cloud invitation action PR was found. ## What Changed - Add **Invite people** beside the Members heading for the current Cloud stack's owner/admin. - Read the role from the authenticated Cloud portfolio. Ownership of another stack does not enable the action. - Navigate to the current stack's People settings on the configured Cloud origin. Keep the local Invites tab hidden when configured. - Cover allowed roles, denied roles, loading, failed refresh, missing configuration, current-stack selection, and self-hosted behavior. Document the navigation contract. ## Verification - Focused Members and Cloud link tests: 23 passed. - Full UI suite: 6,669 passed across 634 files. - UI typecheck and `pnpm check:token-gates`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - All PR CI checks passed, including the full general, serialized, browser, and runner test jobs. The duplicate local repository-wide `pnpm test:run` was stopped after CI completed; it is not reported as a local pass. - Manual acceptance after tenant rollout: an owner/admin opens Members, selects **Invite people**, and reaches the same stack's Cloud People settings. A member does not see the action. ## Risks - The action needs a tenant app update before it appears on an existing stack. - The portfolio request must identify the current stack and its role. The action stays hidden when that information is unavailable or the request fails. - Cloud rechecks invitation authorization at the destination. No schema, API, or invitation-acceptance behavior changes. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with reasoning, code execution, and repository tools. The session does not expose a more specific model identifier or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin Foley
|
7b7c4d4172 |
fix(ui): recover an archived Cloud stack from its own health probe (#13913)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - On Paperclip Cloud, a stack whose organization is archived is served through the Cloud harness router. > - An archived stack answers every tenant request — including the SPA's own health probe — with a 423 archived status page. > - If the SPA is already loaded (a stale tab, or a load that raced the stack's archival), that 423 surfaces as a dead "Failed to load health" screen with no way out. > - This pull request recovers it the same way an expired tenant session already does: a top-level reload re-enters the Cloud harness, which redirects a fresh browser navigation on an archived host to the portfolio. > - The benefit is that an archived stack never traps the user on a broken health screen. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. Description follows the bug template: **What happened?** A Cloud stack that becomes archived while its SPA is open (or is opened in a stale tab) shows a "Failed to load health" screen. The SPA's health probe receives the harness's 423 archived status page and has no recovery path, so the browser is stuck on a dead screen. **Expected behavior** The browser should leave the archived stack for the Cloud portfolio, as it already does for an expired tenant session — no dead "Failed to load health" screen. **Steps to reproduce** 1. On a Cloud-managed instance, open an organization's SPA in the browser. 2. Archive that organization (or open a stale tab for one that was archived). 3. The SPA's health probe returns 423 (archived) and the page shows "Failed to load health" with no way out. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` (Paperclip Cloud managed instances). **Deployment mode** Cloud-managed (`authenticated`). Self-hosted instances are unaffected: the 423 archived status page only originates from the Cloud harness router that fronts managed stacks; a self-hosted server serves its own health. **Subsystem affected** UI: tenant document recovery (`ui/src/lib/tenant-session-recovery.ts`), which the health/client/heartbeats/audit API surfaces already route error responses through. ## What Changed - `isArchivedStackRecoveryError(status, body)`: true for a 423 whose body carries a `statusPage.code === "archived"`. - `isTenantDocumentRecoveryError` unifies the existing 401 tenant-session codes with the new archived case; the recovery coordinator now fires on either. - The recovery action is unchanged — a single top-level reload — so an archived stack re-enters the harness and is redirected to the portfolio. The existing single-reload guard prevents any loop, and only the exact `archived` code triggers it (suspended/deleted/other 423s pass through as normal errors). ## Verification - `pnpm exec vitest run src/lib/tenant-session-recovery.test.ts src/api/auth.test.ts src/api/audit.test.ts` — pass. - New tests: the predicate accepts a 423 archived body and rejects suspended/deleted/error-shaped/503/null; the coordinator triggers the same single top-level reload for an archived body and stays inert for unrelated responses. - `pnpm exec tsc --noEmit` in `ui/` is clean. - Pairs with the harness-side redirect (paperclipai/paperclip-cloud#545): the harness redirects fresh navigations on an archived host to `/orgs`; this makes an already-loaded SPA trigger that navigation on its own health 423. ## Risks - Low. The recovery path and its single-reload guard are unchanged; only the set of conditions that trigger it grows by one exact code. Non-archived 423s and all other statuses behave as before. ## Model Used - Claude Fable 5 (`claude-fable-5`), via Claude Code CLI, extended thinking and tool use enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting mergenightly/v2026.924.0-nightly.0 canary/v2026.924.0-canary.0 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
94a0aa7726 |
fix(ui): hide workspace isolation controls for managed hosts (#13907)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - Workspace isolation keeps task checkouts separate. > - Managed hosts can enable isolation and hide its experimental toggles. > - Project, task, and routine forms still expose choices that override that policy. > - This pull request adds an operator visibility key for those controls. > - Workspace access stays available, and execution keeps its existing policy. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Operator control over workspace isolation settings in the UI. This follows the settings list cleanup in #13905. **Current behavior** Hiding the experimental isolation toggles leaves project policy editors, task selectors, routine and pipeline overrides, recovery actions, and workspace configuration visible. **Proposed behavior** Set `PAPERCLIP_HIDDEN_SETTINGS=workspaces.isolation` to hide these controls. Keep workspace navigation, status, files, and runtime access. Hide experimental toggles separately. Instances that do not set this key keep their controls. **Reason and benefit** Users on managed hosts should use the host's isolation default. A hidden form must not submit a stale draft that overrides it. ## What Changed - Add the UI-only `workspaces.isolation` key to the shared visibility registry. - Hide project workspace policy, task and subtask selectors, routine and pipeline overrides, and isolated re-issue actions. - Hide the workspace Configuration tab and redirect direct links to workspace issues. - Omit hidden new-task and routine overrides. Keep explicit task/subtask workspace launch context, saved policies, and automatic branch values for workspace routine runs. - Wait for the health visibility policy before showing controls. Keep workspace access and all execution APIs available. - Document the key and test visibility, form payloads, deep links, and unchanged workspace access. ## Verification - All 52 CI checks pass on `50cc770d33` (two expected skips). The branch is mergeable. Greptile is 5/5 with no unresolved comments. - `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. - `pnpm build` passed. - `pnpm check:token-gates` passed. - Targeted UI checks passed: 346 tests across 14 suites, including hidden project/task controls, stale task drafts, routine branch defaults, recovery actions, configuration deep links, and workspace access. - Shared settings-visibility tests passed: 11 tests. - `pnpm test:run` was run and stopped after reproducing five failures in unchanged server tests: two `chat-channels.integration` cases (linked-request provenance and direct external-chat finals) and three `company-skills-service` cases (runtime refresh, concurrent download, and explicit update). The earlier local run for #13905 showed the same failures. The full local suite is not claimed green. Targeted UI/shared checks pass. All PR CI shards, including the affected chat and skills suites, pass. - Reviewed the diff for secrets, private links, and run artifacts. ## Risks This key changes UI visibility only. It does not reject API calls or change feature values. Operators must enable isolation and its default through their existing policy mechanism. Older app versions ignore the new key until upgraded. Removing the key restores the controls. No schema changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 (Codex), with reasoning, repository tools, and test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally; targeted checks pass (full-suite limitation documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |