mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-09 07:10:34 +01:00
21d2a577bb7a44cbfa2f75eaa8384d6875074791
6606
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 DottaandPaperclip
|
21d2a577bb |
feat: show and change routine responsible users (#19128)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip helps people manage AI agents and their work. > - Routines create tasks for repeated work. > - Each routine has a responsible person. > - The Overview did not show this person or permit a change. > - People need to see who will be responsible for automatic tasks. > - This pull request adds a small name picker beside Default agent. > - Authorized people can adopt a routine or transfer it to an active company member. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The routine Overview and the routine update API. **Subsystem affected** UI, server, and shared contracts. **Current behavior** The routine stores a responsible user. The Overview does not show that person. The update API cannot change that person. **Proposed behavior** Show Responsible user beside Default agent. Click the name to search active company members. Save only the new person and the current revision ID. **Reason and benefit** People can see who owns future automatic tasks. An authorized person can adopt a routine without making a new routine. **Breaking changes** The detail response adds an optional actor-specific field. The update API adds an optional responsible user ID. Existing requests keep their current behavior. Related: #17368 covers local Board ownership migration. This change adds the routine control and explicit transfer. ## What Changed - Show a quiet, searchable person picker beside Default agent. - Explain that automatic tasks use this person. Manual runs use the person who starts them. - Permit human operators with `tasks:assign`, instance administrators, and local operators to transfer responsibility. - Check active company membership inside the update transaction. - Save a revision and record the old and new person in the activity log. - Keep existing task responsibility and ownership during revision restore. - Show errors for failed saves and stale revisions. - Add tests for permissions, company boundaries, transfers, inheritance, and picker states. - Keep the picker disabled until saved data is refreshed. Refresh the activity list after a transfer. - Capture the actual previous person under the update row lock for the activity record. - Use shared query error handling and retain cached people during a connection failure. ## Verification - Focused checks cover 145 tests in 5 files. The first post-fix run passed 144 tests. One existing Fireflies route test timed out during the first import while the UI typecheck also ran. The same test passed in the pre-fix run. The isolated route suite then passed all 21 tests with no source change. - The new tests reproduce slow detail refreshes, activity refresh, and two concurrent transfers without a base revision. The concurrency test uses PostgreSQL row locks. - UI and server TypeScript checks passed at commit `1df9587eb`. - The UI production build passed for the updated head. - The branch includes master through `26391707f`. - Design token gates, query-error policy, and Git whitespace checks passed. The query-error policy reports zero findings. - Local browser checks passed on desktop and mobile for the initial feature commit. Search, selection, reload persistence, and revision creation passed. No page errors or horizontal overflow were found. The follow-up does not change the normal layout. - Earlier full local checks could not finish: Cargo was absent, and concurrent full test/build checks exceeded the 8 GiB memory limit. These attempts are not passes. - The first CI run failed on two error-rendering policy findings. That failure is fixed locally. The three findings from the first Greptile review are fixed and their threads are resolved. - Greptile reviewed `1df9587eb2d3e034c2769b1f6955ac52323c95bb` and scored it 5/5. It confirms all three prior findings are addressed. There are no open review threads. - [CI attempt 1](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42046369415/attempts/1) passed 53 checks. The server 8/12 shard failed only because the existing `history-http` runtime fixture did not become ready within 10 seconds (99 refused connections). The fixture and runtime source are unchanged from the merged master. That case passed locally on the same PR head with no source change. Its full 75-test suite also passed locally. The cause of the CI failure remains unknown. - [CI attempt 2](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42046369415/attempts/2) passed on `1df9587eb`: 54 successful checks, 3 skipped, and 1 neutral. No failed or pending checks remained. The original fixture-readiness failure remains recorded above. - A later review found that viewers with an explicit `tasks:assign` grant could see an editable picker even though writes were denied. Commit `8b95ee707` now mirrors active-membership and viewer restrictions in the GET capability flag. Instance-admin and local-operator behavior is preserved. - Three membership regressions failed on the incorrect editable flag before the fix. After the fix, all 43 routine-route and company-access cases passed (`--testTimeout 60000` accommodated this sandbox's cold route imports; no repository timeout was changed). The first pre-fix run timed out during the cold import in one case; the second pre-fix run reproduced all three assertion failures. - Layered server typechecking and whitespace checks passed after the permission fix. - [Fresh CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42057752313) passed on `8b95ee7075417527687b4a86cbaf63ba87408364` without a retry. Greptile reviewed this exact head, scored it 5/5, and added no new findings. All four review threads are resolved. The security status is also successful. - The separate Paperclip Review check is still queued because its assigned review worker requires runtime recovery. This is the remaining check before completion; the CI workflow itself passed. ## Risks - A transfer changes the person used for future automatic tasks. Existing tasks keep their current person. - Only people can transfer responsibility. The server checks the permission again on every write. - A stale revision rejects the save. The user must reload before retrying. - No database migration is required. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The exact runtime model ID and context window are not exposed to this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green (CI passed; separate Paperclip Review check pending) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
253bf071f0 |
fix(workspaces): preserve resolved pending merges in snapshots (#19429)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Task workspaces must survive replacement of the web server. > - Workspace snapshots therefore preserve both files and portable Git state. > - A resolved merge can still await its merge commit. > - The archive rejected this state, so an existing workspace could not migrate. > - This pull request saves and checks the complete supported merge state. > - The benefit is that migration preserves the user's choice to continue or abort the merge. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A legacy workspace contained a resolved merge with `MERGE_HEAD`, `MERGE_MODE`, `MERGE_MSG`, `ORIG_HEAD`, and `AUTO_MERGE`. Its index had no unresolved entries. The snapshot owner refused the operation. This kept the original safe but blocked migration. **Expected behavior** Save this supported state without changing the source. Restore it without the original repository, borrowed object store, or linked worktree. Retain the merge parents, selected index, later edits, and Git's normal safety checks. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Merge two branches that conflict. 2. Resolve and stage the conflict. Leave the merge uncommitted. 3. Capture the workspace. The base implementation rejects the merge marker. Related prior work: #19310 preserves an inactive rebase bookmark. No duplicate open merge-preservation PR was found. This is a workspace preservation fix, not a new roadmap feature. ## What Changed - Admit only resolved pending merges with valid, bounded metadata and available objects. - Retain and verify the merge mode, message, parents, original head, automatic merge tree, and index. - Verify copied metadata and object closure before publication. Keep the before/after source checks. - Keep unresolved conflicts, autostash, rerere, mixed operations, malformed state, and unsafe links blocked. - Test real ordinary, linked, and borrowed repositories through local and serialized capture. Delete all original sources before continuing or aborting the restored merge. - Document the supported state and the remaining refusal cases. ## Verification - Six new continuation cases fail against the unchanged base at the pending-operation guard. - The first candidate restored and continued the merges, but six abort assertions failed. The fixture rewrote the worktree without updating Git's index cache. It now first verifies that abort protects later edits, uses normal `git restore` to discard those fixture edits, then aborts. No archive assertion was removed. - The final archive and environment suites pass all 98 tests at `3c87d13d1b`, including linked-metadata protections and pending merges in ordinary, linked, borrowed, shallow, partial, and SHA-256 repositories. All 12 local/serialized continuation cases pass after source removal. - Full repository build and typecheck pass at `1544cc4a90`. The build first found a nullability error; an explicit rejection return fixed it. - The first full local test attempt stopped before tests ran because omitted package postinstall steps left PostgreSQL library links absent. Direct `initdb --version` reproduced the missing-library failure. Restoring the package links made that probe pass; the full test rerun is active. - The initial typecheck also found missing excluded-plugin SDK links after the same install. Running the repository postinstall link helper corrected this, and the full typecheck now passes. - All current-head CI gates pass at `3c87d13d1b`: 54 success, 2 skipped, 1 neutral. Fresh Greptile is 5/5 and no review threads remain open. - Review requested shallow and SHA-256 coverage. The current commit adds both plus partial-clone coverage; all 98 archive tests and the full server typecheck pass. - All six local chat shards pass. The monolithic local general-suite run reports one viewer-permission test failure and remains active. That exact test passes alone, and its full 505-test file also passes alone. The original failure cause is unresolved; this is not a full local-suite PASS. The complete current-head CI suite is green. ## Risks - This widens capture eligibility only for the checked resolved-merge state. No migration commits or aborts the source operation. - A missing object or changed metadata still blocks publication and retains the source. - Unresolved merges and other operation formats remain unsupported. Their preservation guard is unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, and code execution. The runtime does not expose a more specific serving model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used with the available version and capability details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task id - [x] I have run the affected tests locally and they pass; full-suite limitations are recorded above - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented the risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.11 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
8c578668b8 |
fix(heartbeat): start new queued runs promptly after restart and name the wait (#19431)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The heartbeat queue starts queued agent turns. Restarts and deploys
happen often.
> - After a restart, new queued turns waited minutes before they
started. The task showed only "Queued", with no reason.
> - The cause is startup order. The queued-run dispatch worker registers
only after many unrelated first passes finish one after another: tool
reviews, delivery workers, the terminal workspace sweep, native restart
recovery, and residual and issue recovery.
> - The server binds its listener before this recovery, and
`/api/health` answers during it. A deployment can route traffic to the
new server for minutes before queued work starts.
> - This pull request starts queued turns that never executed as soon as
plugin workers and adapters are loaded. It also names the wait while the
server starts, recovers, or shuts down.
> - The benefit is that tasks resume quickly after a restart and show a
visible reason while they wait.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
On a hosted instance, the server restarted twice for deploys. Both
times, queued runs on idle agents started about 3.5 to 4 minutes after
the restart. Before the restart, the runs also waited about 5 minutes
while the deploy drained the old server. During the wait after the
restart, the execution presentation showed `phase: queued`, `label:
"Queued"`, `cause: null`.
**Expected behavior**
Queued work resumes automatically and quickly after a restart. While it
waits, the task shows a reason.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a task drain (`POST /api/instance/task-drain`). Assign issues
to idle agents. The runs stay queued.
2. Stop the server (SIGTERM) and start it again.
3. Make any startup first pass slow (a large instance does this
naturally). Queued runs start only after every earlier startup pass
finishes.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.10
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
140fcf98ed |
fix(retry): name a declined task Retry and let a new click replace it (#19426)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A task interrupted by a restart or deploy must resume automatically, or offer a Retry that works on first use > - A board Retry saves an intent first. Dispatch then rechecks the requester's authority and saved source before it starts a run > - When that recheck refused the intent, dispatch returned a bare "deferred". The intent stayed saved with no reason, and the task still showed Retry > - Each later click with a new key joined that same intent, so Retry returned 202 and never started a run > - This pull request names the refusal on the intent and lets a new click replace an intent that can never start > - The benefit is that a Retry button that is shown starts one run, or explains why it cannot ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native task in a managed sandbox lost its runner twice. Saved-work recovery recovered the files. The task showed "Saved work recovered. Retry or send a message to continue." and `canRetry: true`. A Retry click returned 202 and logged `issue.retry_requested`, but no run started. A second click with a new idempotency key returned the same request ID and `state: failed`. No run started. **Expected behavior** If Retry is offered, a click starts exactly one run. If the Retry cannot start, the task names the reason, and a later click is a fresh attempt. A Retry accepted during the pre-deploy drain starts after the restart. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Recover the files of a failed native run so the hold offers Retry. 2. Save a Retry intent whose dispatch-time authority recheck fails (for example, the requester lost access). 3. Dispatch it: no run starts, and the intent has no wait reason. 4. Click Retry again with a new key: the response returns the first request ID, and no run starts. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on `b400914345` (staging served `4d49a31286`; the affected code is the same). Related: #19399 (automatic Retry after a lost runner), #19422. ## What Changed - `heartbeat/queue.ts`: when dispatch declines a task Retry because the requester can no longer change the task, or its saved board message changed, record a named wait (`retry_authority_denied`, `retry_source_changed`) and log it. Before, it returned "deferred" with no record. - `task-retry.ts`: a new click with a new key replaces an unadmitted intent that dispatch declined for its requester's access (`retry_authority_denied`). The old intent becomes `skipped` / `task_retry_replaced`, and activity records `replacedRequestId`. Waits on shared state (cleanup, recovery, an active run, preservation) still coalesce. The restart hook never replaces a user's click. Chat-owned intents keep their own owner. - `task-interruption-presentation.ts`: fixed public messages for the two new wait reasons. `retry_authority_denied` keeps Retry, because a new click is a fresh attempt. `retry_source_changed` is terminal: an edited saved message cannot be replayed, so Retry is hidden and the user sends a new message. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the rule. ## Verification - New regressions in `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts` use the real recovery, Retry and dispatch services on embedded Postgres. The fixture runs the automatic Retry from a lost runner, then that Retry's own run loses its runner, and recovery saves its files: - `starts exactly one run when Retry is pressed after the automatic Retry's own run lost its runner` (also checks that a replayed dispatch and a second click start no second run). - `does not let a Retry that could not start swallow a later Retry`: red before the fix in two steps. With no fix, the declined intent has no wait reason. With only the wait fix, the second click returned the first request ID. Green after the fix: one run, bound to the second click. - `dispatches a Retry accepted during the pre-deploy drain once the restarted server resumes`: green before and after. The drain does not lose a saved Retry. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts src/services/task-retry.test.ts src/services/task-interruption-presentation.test.ts src/services/quarantined-task-retry.test.ts src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts`: 892 passed. - Not verified on staging. After deploy, an intent that dispatch refuses shows a named `retryWait` reason. ## Risks - Low risk. Only intents that dispatch declined for their requester's access are replaced. All other coalescing stays. - A replaced intent's late dispatch finds it `skipped` and starts nothing, so a double click still starts at most one run. - The exact gate that held the staging intent is not confirmed from records. If it was a shared-state wait, the new code names it only if it is one of the two reasons above. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, local test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
8836a71113 |
test(testops): pin calibrated secret acknowledgment source (#19428)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage agents and inspect saved work. > - Protected chat evaluations use a fixed source and reviewed case declarations. > - The last four-case run produced one verified PASS and three original FAILURES. > - Review found narrow acknowledgment and partial-installation assertion gaps. > - Their local repairs preserve the original user goals and safety evidence. > - This PR pins the reviewed source for one bounded secret-pair measurement. > - A final uniform-ten measurement on that same source is still required. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19423, #19325, #19416, #19093, #19084, #19112. The core and full-catalog PRs remain open and unmerged. **What happened?** Launch 3310 retains one original PASS and three original FAILURES. Case 53 used the same undismissed form correctly. Company rejected a valid ordered save/ACK card before human entry. Personal rejected a canonical wake-on-accept/After Saving confirmation before private entry. Team rejected a truthful qualified required-skill partial-installation report. No original result is regraded. **What did you expect to happen?** Admit supported saved cards and truthful partial reports while preserving actual current-human save, immutable policy, acceptance, audit, continuation, private ownership, delivery and saved-resource evidence. Declined or canceled actions and false recovery claims must still fail. **Steps to reproduce** Inspect the original selected journeys from source `5f74dc6545ea66ac71255ac8e6010f5215a1f257` against their actual cards, responses and saved state. The local repairs calibrate the assertions; they do not establish that the next native secret journeys will finish within their original clocks. ## What Changed - Pin immutable source `d68c00a3d78e5cd56b77aedb31f1e8a0f6d6f84e` and its exact 242-row descriptor snapshot. Update only Company v17, Personal v16 and Team v10 oracle-version leaves in the 244-row manifest and retained repair metadata. - Append the measured limits after the exact historical condition prefix. Keep every runtime condition and dependency list unchanged. - Keep all 244 YAML identities, queries, contexts, outcomes, permissions, human/native bounds, clocks and model unchanged. Cap 2 and zero retries stay fixed. - Plan only cases 578 and 580 next, with original 480,000 ms and 660,000 ms cells. Team calibration is not a new native PASS. Final uniform ten remains required. ## Verification - All 40 local pin controls passed: `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-adapter.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-reconcile.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-completion-testops-cli.test.mjs`. - The exact source passed 352 fresh controls across ten files. These cover current confirmation, independent human accounting/history, contract, Team and all 242 declarations with zero fixture callbacks. Full runner E2E types passed. - SDK506 synchronization passed unchanged with registry digest `efa70621e9fb42aa185f7ee616a1a726aa3eccb367e67e28817cedf26ef2ade8`. No install, native build, SDK build or local model call was needed. - Fresh master `7e3caa7bac3f2c1a560158b28ec42381a153dfff` matches the accepted ten protected helpers, five source-parity files, 67 dependency-graph inputs and report-lock policy. No private helper imports ran during this preparation. - Local qualification used Node `v26.4.0`. An initial pin test import failed before the qualified dependency link existed; that setup failure remains retained. - Remote ref `codex/chat-secret-ack-v17-qualified-d68c00a3-20261106` was read back at the exact source above. Descriptor SHA256 is `3b62889da60db1c8daafcc23f0fefa7cfcda165224ba90214b2ac391215d3be0`. - New-head CI and reviews remain pending at PR creation. No paid evaluation ran here. ## Risks This source is unmeasured. Company used 344,242 ms for its initial native turn and had only 86,070 ms left at the false gate. Measured API handlers do not explain that time; no avoidable latency defect or full-flow fit has been proved. The gate repair does not create a native completion or private-save claim. Personal must preserve the actual canonical card policy through real save, acceptance and independent evidence. Team's local assertion calibration does not regrade result 5242 or qualify runtime migration. Every saved-state, actor, privacy and delivery check remains mandatory. Case 53's verified 241,214 ms / 300,000 ms journey is carried on unchanged code, not claimed as a new measurement or reliability result. All older failures remain retained. Secret journeys require independent semantic safety review before pass credit. Core and full-catalog PRs stay unmerged; the 196/244 gate remains. Only the secret pair is planned next, followed by the required uniform ten on the same source. No merge override or retry is requested by this PR. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex, with reasoning, tool use and code execution. The context-window limit is not exposed in this session. The native eval model remains `openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017` and was not run locally. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
7e3caa7bac |
fix(tree-control): resume work a pause gate refused after release (#19421)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The board can pause an issue tree. A pause stops work. Resume or
release must continue that work once.
> - PR #19394 made release re-dispatch a run that a pause Stop
cancelled.
> - That rule covers only a run that an operator Stop ended and that the
hold snapshot named.
> - A scheduled retry that comes due during a pause is not stopped. The
dispatch gate cancels it with `issue_paused`. The release did not see it
as owed work, so the task stalled with no run.
> - This pull request makes every gate that refuses work for a pause
record the covering hold. Release then re-dispatches that work exactly
once.
> - The benefit is that a paused task with a parked retry or a queued
run continues after release, with no manual wake.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #19394
**What happened?**
A child task had a `workspace_busy` scheduled retry. The board paused
the parent tree. The retry came due during the pause. The
scheduled-retry gate cancelled it with `issue_paused` ("Scheduled retry
suppressed because the issue is held by an active subtree pause hold").
The board released the hold. Four minutes later the child was still
`in_progress` with no run, no execution blocker, and no new activity.
**Expected behavior**
Release (or `mode: "resume"`) re-dispatches the refused work exactly
once. No reconciliation and no user message are necessary.
Stranded-issue recovery does not add a second run.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Give an assigned child task a parked `workspace_busy` scheduled
retry.
2. Pause the parent tree.
3. Let the retry come due while the pause is active. The gate cancels it
with `issue_paused`.
4. Release the pause. No run starts for the child.
**Paperclip version or commit**
master at
canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.9
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
2c7ee84221 |
fix(server): stop reporting work cancelled by a disconnected client (#19037)
A route that aborts its storage read when the response closes rejects with AbortError after the client has gone. The error handler reported that cancellation as a server crash. Skip the error sinks for an AbortError when the response was closed before it finished; report it otherwise. Fixes PAPERCLIP-BACKEND-5A Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b400914345 |
test(testops): pin calibrated four-journey fixture source (#19423)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip lets people manage AI agents and inspect saved work. > - The protected chat evaluation uses a fixed source and a reviewed case inventory. > - The last four selected journeys all reported FAILED. Their originals remain unchanged. > - Review found one fixture attention-state mutation and three narrow observation or assertion errors. > - The source repairs passed model-free controls, but their next native measurement has not run. > - This PR pins that reviewed source without merging its core or full-catalog overlays. > - The benefit is one bounded measurement with honest conditions and unchanged safety evidence. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19418, #19325, #19416. The last two core PRs remain open and unmerged. The older open source pin #18740 targets a different historical candidate. **What happened?** The multipart fixture dismissed a saved form before asking for its walkthrough. The Company guard rejected a bounded secure-page save instruction. The Personal route prefilter rejected a valid task citation beside the setup hint. The Team assertion rejected a truthful current unattached-skill report. Launch 3277 retains zero reported passes from four cases; none is regraded here. **What did you expect to happen?** Measure the same user goals with the original form still undismissed, supported secure-entry directions, independently validated task links, and truthful partial installation reports. Require all real saved-state, actor and privacy evidence. **Steps to reproduce** Run the protected selected journeys from source `58449c4ecd7fd374f21f175411ef3249f55c18a3`. Inspect each original failure against its user-visible result and saved state. The new source is a local calibration, not a claim that these native journeys now pass. ## What Changed - Pin immutable source `5f74dc6545ea66ac71255ac8e6010f5215a1f257`. - Copy its exact 242-row descriptor snapshot. Update eight oracle-version leaves in the 244-row manifest and retained repair metadata. Dependency lists stay fixed. - Update the expected target assertion and append the new limits after the exact historical condition prefix. Retain all existing runtime conditions. - Keep all 244 YAML identities, queries, outcomes, human/native bounds, clocks, model, cap 2, zero retries and trusted private interfaces unchanged. ## Verification - All 40 local manifest, adapter, reconciliation and CLI admission controls passed: `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-adapter.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-reconcile.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-completion-testops-cli.test.mjs`. - The exact source passed 375 affected controls across 20 files, including explicit installed-browser canaries and the 242-declaration gate with zero fixture callbacks. Full runner E2E typecheck passed. These component results are not native passes. - The 506-input SDK guard passed without refresh. The launcher, ten protected helpers, five source/controller parity files and 67 dependency-graph inputs match the accepted baseline. No install or build was needed. - Local qualification used Node `v26.4.0`. Earlier alias and declaration-output setup failures remain retained. The normal remote CI configuration is unchanged. - Verify remote ref `codex/chat-four-fixture-v16-qualified-5f74dc65-20261106` resolves to the source above. The snapshot SHA256 is `913090f18cc4e0f7d997b99586618080f1b5c847b2b5d74984d3c480baf5318d`. - New-head CI and reviews must finish before merge. No paid evaluation ran for this PR. ## Risks The source remains unmeasured. Removing the fixture dismissal does not guarantee that the agent will reuse the form: a later human comment still makes it historical, but it remains answerable and the latest human direction governs. The same-form fidelity check stays strict. The Company journey did not reach human secure entry; its later save, approval, binding and consumer delivery remain unproved. Personal setup hints are not trusted URLs; actual navigation and private ownership checks remain required. Team calibration gives no runtime-migration credit. All original failures remain retained. Secret journeys still require independent semantic safety review before pass credit. No native reliability or latency claim is made. The core and full-catalog PRs remain unmerged; the 196/244 gate stays fixed. A later full-ten run is a separate measurement. Required CI and genuine current-head review are pending at creation; no merge override is requested. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex, with reasoning, tool use and code execution. The context-window limit is not exposed in this session. Native eval configuration remains `openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017` and was not run locally. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
bf53060904 |
fix(recovery): continue saved input after verified workspace copy-back (#19422)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native execution preserves accepted results and task files after a failure. > - A later user message can request a new turn after the old execution stops. > - File recovery can finish by copying files back or by retaining a verified archive. > - The retained-result gate accepted the archive proof but missed a verified copy-back receipt. > - This change accepts that existing receipt for terminal failures and preserves execution authority and prior results. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A task keeps a user message queued with `finalizing_saved_result` after its old native coordinator reached `terminal_failure`. The accepted result and a successful, exact `workspace_recovery` copy-back receipt are saved. The gate only checks the alternate `workspace_recovery_snapshot` receipt. An older failed result can also keep a newer failed turn's saved input blocked. **Expected behavior** A new user message or deliberate task Retry can continue from verified recovered files after the old execution stops. Preserve the old result and unknown action outcomes. Keep an active finalizer or missing stop evidence blocked. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Retain an accepted result when a native run reaches terminal failure. 2. Complete host copy-back with the exact run, allocation, descriptor and final file digest. 3. Save a new user message or request task Retry. 4. Observe that admission still reports `finalizing_saved_result`. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced against `4d49a3128613b282fb344272ed7ca15f98dea2ac`. **Deployment mode** Authenticated native execution with retained workspace recovery. Local regressions use disposable PostgreSQL and the real heartbeat queue. They start no model provider or sandbox. Related work: #19355 covers saved input after Stop. #18267 concerns manual reconciliation of duplicate legacy holds; it excludes workspace and system recovery and does not fix this receipt gate. I searched open PRs and issues before starting this change. ## What Changed - Reuse the existing host-verified repair receipt when an accepted result belongs to a coordinator in `terminal_failure`. - Retain the separate checks for active controllers, environment termination, live executions, questions, approvals and current user authority. - Add message, saved-message and task Retry regressions, plus concurrent queue delivery and invalid-receipt cases. - Document this continuation path. Add no schema, API or background worker. ## Verification - All 483 tests pass across explicit continuation, task Retry, quarantined Retry and finalized recovery migration suites. - The final focused fixture has 17 cases. All pass with the change. With the original production gate restored, all four positive cases fail and all 13 safety cases pass. - Negative cases cover missing, unfinished and mismatched receipts, another task or source, unrecovered files, a live finalizer, an active controller, missing remote stop and active execution. - The real heartbeat path delivers one saved message under concurrent recovery calls. Later recovery calls create no second turn. The old accepted result and recovery budget stay unchanged; unknown outcomes stay unknown. - The first delivery fixture omitted the newer failed source needed by the recovery scanner. I corrected the fixture to preserve that history and repeated the unchanged-code comparison. Earlier failure logs remain in the verification record. - `pnpm -r typecheck`: passed. - `node scripts/check-module-boundaries.mjs` and `git diff --check`: passed. - `pnpm build`: passed. - Full local `pnpm test:run`: running with a 20-minute bound; no full-suite pass is claimed. All hosted CI checks passed. Greptile scored the exact head `d04fb98892fd77853ad03e6b44cd612e805abc13` 5/5 with no findings or review threads. - Hosted delivery of the already saved input still requires a qualified staging build containing this change. ## Risks The new path requires the existing exact repair receipt and a terminal failure. A coordinator still accepting or committing a result keeps the previous hold. Stop, owner and live-run checks still run before admission. The old result is neither applied nor replayed. Receipt verification adds bounded indexed reads only on this retained-result failure path. No migration or provider configuration changes are required. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`) through Codex in T3 Code, with xhigh reasoning. The context-window size is not exposed. Used code editing, tool calls and local test execution. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used, including the available runtime details - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this is a scoped bug fix - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have described the issue in this PR using the bug-report fields - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal task id - [x] I have run the affected tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added regression tests and updated relevant documentation - [x] I have considered and documented the risks - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open findings - [x] I will address all review findings before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.8 |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
11bc490cda |
fix(recovery): keep a stopped copy-back's files instead of holding the workspace (#19385)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - A native run can have its result accepted before the copy-back of its sandbox files finishes. If the copy-back fails, it retries. > - A board Stop during those retries ends the run. It sets the run's finalization to `terminal_failure` / `native_retry_cancelled`, and the result stays accepted. > - After that, nothing exports the files. The finalization worker skips terminal rows, and cancelled-workspace preservation skipped any run with an accepted result. > - The task workspace stays dirty and bound to the stopped run. Every later run on the task waits for the workspace, then fails setup with the unfinished-writer error. > - This pull request lets cancelled-workspace preservation also admit an accepted result whose copy-back a Stop ended. > - The benefit is that stopping a stuck copy-back saves its files and frees the task, like stopping any other run. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #16700, #17677, #18820, #19304 and #19305 (cancelled-workspace preservation). This pull request adds the accepted-result case to that path and keeps its other checks unchanged. **What happened?** On a hosted instance, a native run's result was accepted, but its copy-back kept failing and retrying. A board operator pressed Stop to unblock the task. The run became `cancelled`, its sandbox was stopped and kept, and its finalization moved to `terminal_failure` / `native_retry_cancelled` with the result still accepted. The next run on the task was cancelled with "Shared execution workspace is busy: run … ended, but its workspace save has not settled". About 24 automatic retries followed over an hour. The last one failed with "The workspace still has an unfinished writer or save operation." After that nothing ran: the task stayed `in_progress` with no run and no recovery action. A Retry or a new comment would hit the same block. The workspace stayed `dirty: true` with the stopped run as its writer, and no `workspaceRestoreRecovery` was ever recorded. The reason: `preserveCancelledNativeWorkspaces` requires `resultId IS NULL`, and `registerCancelledWorkspacePreservationWork` and `preserveNativeFailedWorkspace` both return early when `resultId` is set. **Expected behavior** Stopping a run during its copy-back retries keeps its files, as stopping any other run does. Paperclip's workspace recovery saves them and releases the workspace. Nothing commits or replays the stopped result. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Accept a native result for a run whose copy-back is in `retryable_failure`. 2. Stop the run with the board Stop. The finalization becomes `terminal_failure` / `native_retry_cancelled`. 3. Start another run on the task. It waits for the workspace and then fails setup. No save of the stopped run's files is ever recorded. The new database tests run steps 1 and 2 against PostgreSQL and check that the save is recorded. **Paperclip version or commit** `master` at `9ceaec6f97e`. **Deployment mode** Any deployment that uses remote (sandbox) task workspaces. Seen on a cloud-managed instance. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/native-runtime/native-failed-workspace-recovery.ts`: cancelled-workspace preservation now also admits an accepted result when the finalization is `terminal_failure` with `native_retry_cancelled`. That is the state a Stop leaves after ending copy-back retries. All three entry points use the same rule: - the startup scan `preserveCancelledNativeWorkspaces`; - the worker `registerCancelledWorkspacePreservationWork`; - `preserveNativeFailedWorkspace`, only when it is called with `requireCancelledStop`. Preservation still requires everything it required before: a cancelled run, an acknowledged Stop, no live finalization owner or controller lease, a prepared workspace reference, and the exact retained source. - An accepted result with any other failure code is still skipped; those runs keep their own export repair path. Failed (not cancelled) runs are unchanged. - The accepted result stays recorded and uncommitted. Preservation does not change the task's status or queue a run. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: describe the stopped copy-back case in the paragraph on writers stopped mid-run. - `native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts`: move the accepted-result fixture into an `acceptResult` helper, and add a test with three cases. ## Verification - Failing first. The new test "preserves files of an accepted result whose copy-back was stopped" has three cases: worker, startup scan, and a sandbox that the Stop already stopped and kept, through the real `prepareSandboxStopAndRetain` and `settleStopOnlyCleanup`. All three fail on `master`, with no `workspaceRestoreFailure` recorded, and pass with this change. - Each case checks that: - the save obligation and recovery action are recorded for the exact lease; - `inspectWorkspaceRecoverySource` finds one source; - the finalization keeps its `resultId`, `terminal_failure` and `native_retry_cancelled`; - the workspace stays held by the stopped writer until the save publishes; - no run or wake is created, and the task status is unchanged. - The existing "does not admit preservation for accepted-result" case still passes. It uses an accepted result with a different failure code. - `cd server && npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-cancelled-workspace-preservation.test.ts`: 44 passed. - Related suites, 10 files and 854 passed: - `native-failed-workspace-recovery`, `workspace-recovery`, `heartbeat/run-control` - `native-cancellation-request` (unit and integration) - `heartbeat-remote-workspace-busy`, `native-workspace-export-retry`, `native-workspace-reconstruction` - `native-stop-accounting`, `task-workspace-binding` - `cd server && npx tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.json`: pass. - Not run end to end on a live instance. Diagnosed from that instance's run, finalization, lease, workspace and recovery-action rows. ## Risks - On deploy, the startup scan and the worker will pick up existing cancelled runs in this state and record their saves. That is the intended repair, and it uses the same retention checks as other stopped writers. - A copy-back interrupted by a server restart can leave a `remote_workspace_snapshot` operation marked `running` after its process is gone. This change does not settle such rows. If one blocks the later save, the save follows its existing retry and board hand-off. - No schema migration. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) through Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs, read-only database queries). The runtime does not expose the context window or reasoning configuration. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
39096a55a4 |
fix(runner): answer lease renewal outside the PRP frame chain and name lease loss (#19419)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs in a managed sandbox talk to the server over one authenticated PRP connection. The runner (`paperclip-runnerd`) renews its connection lease on that connection. > - The server serializes every inbound PRP frame through one promise chain per connection. Before this change, `lease_renew` waited in that chain behind earlier events. An event whose business commit stalls (for example the commit of a tool event) therefore also stalls the lease reply. The runner then stops polling its provider (ACK backpressure) and exits with "active connection lease expired" when the lease runs out. > - When that happens, the server sees only a socket close. The run log and the terminal error say "transport loss", not "lease expired". > - A follow-up from #19407 asked for renewal to be handled outside the chain and for lease loss to be named. > - This pull request answers `lease_renew` (and `pong`) as soon as the frame is decrypted. It keeps in-order decryption and the order of state-changing frames. It also records why a lease was lost and reports it as `runner_connection_lease_expired`. > - The benefit is that a slow event commit can no longer starve lease renewal, and a lease loss is visible in the run log and error code. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19407 **What happened?** On staging, native runs with ACPX providers (Grok, Kimi, and Pi with OpenRouter/DeepSeek) ran a long foreground shell command that printed nothing (a 15–20 minute `sleep 60` loop). Each run went silent soon after `tool.execution.started`. The command finished in the sandbox, but the run never got the completion and stayed `running` until someone cancelled it. It happened in 3 of 3 attempts. The same task on Codex kept reporting activity and succeeded. **What did you expect to happen?** A quiet tool call keeps its runner connection and its lease. If the connection or lease is lost, the run log and the error code say why. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Assign a native ACPX agent a task that runs a foreground shell loop with no output for longer than 2 minutes. 2. Observe that the run goes silent and does not finish after the command ends. **Root cause analysis** - The ACPX path emits no PRP frames during a silent tool call. The runner has no timer, and the agent sends no `tool_call_update`. Codex keeps the connection busy, because its model polls the running command. Silence is the only adapter-specific factor that I found. I found no ACPX code path in runnerd that blocks the main loop: polls use a 1 ms timeout, and synchronous sidecar requests run only for server commands. - The staging build (`de1143448b`) did not include #19407. That build had no server pings. With a 60-minute connection lease (the default for `runner-prp-coordinator` and `DurablePrpCodexTransport`), the runner renews only every 30 minutes. A fully silent connection that goes through the sandbox preview proxy therefore carried no traffic at all. A route that the proxy drops without a FIN then becomes half-open forever. #19407 added 20-second pings and a 90-second termination, which closes that window. - The lease hypothesis from #19407 is real but secondary. The 60-second lease applies only when the TTL is not set. Renewal waited behind any slow event commit, and the server could not report lease loss. This pull request fixes both. ## What Changed - `DurablePrpControlPlane.attachWireConnection` decrypts each secure frame when it arrives, in counter order. Frames that arrive before the channel is secure, or behind such a frame, still decrypt in the chain. - `lease_renew` and `pong` are handled at once, outside the per-connection chain. Admission against persisted authority is unchanged. Events, command results, and handoff frames keep their serialized order. - `#renewLease` persists the renewed expiry with `save()`, so an event write that is already staged is absorbed into the same write. Before, the renewal used `commit()`, which would invalidate that staged event and close a healthy connection when renewal runs concurrently. - New `connectionLeaseFailure` getter (exported type `DurablePrpConnectionLeaseFailure`). It records `connection_lease_expired` when an authenticated connection is refused or closes with an expired lease. A new authenticated connection clears it. A credential revoked by a warm handoff is not reported, because a replacement runner owns the run. - `connectRunnerPrpIngress` reads that reason after a close. It logs `state=reconnecting failure=runner_connection_lease_expired` in the run log. If reconnect grace runs out, it fails with that code instead of `runner_ingress_unavailable` or `runner_ingress_auth_failed`, and keeps the reconnect error as the cause. - `packages/paperclip-runner/docs/durable-recovery.md` documents the new behavior. ## Verification - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/paperclip-runner exec vitest run src/control-plane` (220 passed). - New: "answers lease renewal while an earlier event commit is still in flight". It was red before the fix (no `lease_renewed` while `onCommittedEvent` waits), and it is green now. It also checks that the event later commits and ACKs, and that the renewed expiry survives. - New: "keeps a staged tool-progress write when a lease renewal lands mid-write". It holds a file-backed `tool.execution.progressed` write at `fsync`. It is red with the old `commit()` renewal (the event is dropped and the connection closes), and green with `save()`. - New: "reports an expired connection lease instead of closing silently". It was red before the fix and is green now. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/realtime/runner-prp-outbound.test.ts src/realtime/runner-prp-ws.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/runner-prp-coordinator.test.ts` (all passed). - New: "names an expired runner connection lease in the run log and terminal error when reconnect is refused/unauthenticated". It was red before the fix and is green now. - `src/live/runnerd-codex-transport.test.ts` has the same result with and without this change with a locally built `paperclip-runnerd`: the same 48 tests fail locally on both, for environment reasons, and the other 207 pass. ## Risks - Lease renewal now runs concurrently with an in-flight event handler. The handler builds its state candidate at commit time, and `save()` absorbs a staged event write. A new regression test covers the file-backed race. External checkpoint persistence commits events synchronously, and the renewal reply still waits for the checkpoint flush. - Renewal still stays silent while a warm handoff or a terminal lifecycle command is pending. The runner treats any other control frame inside those fences as fatal, so this pull request does not change that behavior. - No protocol, schema, or contract-digest change. The runner is unchanged. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs) and a read-only exploration subagent on the same model. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
4d49a31286 |
test(testops): pin reviewed four-case recovery source (#19418)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their work. > - The protected TestOps workflow evaluates a fixed source commit. > - The last five-case attempt retained two passes and three failures. > - Reviewed fixture changes address observed admission and reporting gaps. > - Product denial guidance and closed diagnostics remain candidate overlays. > - This PR updates only the immutable source pin and its public metadata snapshot. > - A bounded four-case measurement can test this candidate without merging catalog or core code. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19325, #19416, #19395. **What happened?** The current pin targets the prior five-case source. The next reviewed source changes question fidelity context, Personal menu observation, Company secure-save acknowledgment admission, and Team partial-install reporting. The last attempt's original failures remain unchanged. **Expected behavior** The workflow must admit the exact reviewed source and matching descriptors. It must preserve the selected model, native and human bounds, clocks, credentials, and zero automatic retries. **Steps to reproduce** Compare the current manifest and descriptor snapshot with source `58449c4ecd7fd374f21f175411ef3249f55c18a3`. Run the local manifest, adapter, reconciliation, and CLI admission controls listed below. **Paperclip version or commit** Controller base `90b8190c33e8f8eae44cae1f57721251fe1e1343`; candidate source `58449c4ecd7fd374f21f175411ef3249f55c18a3`. **Deployment mode** Protected AWS Product E2E through the existing TestOps workflow. ## What Changed - Pin the reviewed immutable source and exact descriptor snapshot. - Update four existing oracle-version leaves and Company/Personal source-file provenance. - Append current conditions while preserving the complete historical conditions prefix. - Retain all 244 case identities, YAML requests and outcomes, counts, model, clocks, runtime conditions and policy gates. - Change one expected target literal in the manifest test. No workflow, lock, runtime, SDK or credential changes. ## Verification - 40 local controls pass: `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-adapter.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-reconcile.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-completion-testops-cli.test.mjs` - Parsed all 244 rows. Only the four oracle versions and two source-file arrays differ. Runtime conditions are identical. The candidate snapshot matches committed source bytes. - The source qualification includes focused positive/negative controls, full runner E2E types, and unchanged SDK506 registry `efa70621e9fb42aa185f7ee616a1a726aa3eccb367e67e28817cedf26ef2ade8`. Counts from overlapping component sets are not summed. - All 67 controller dependency graph inputs match the accepted frozen-install proof. No install, SDK build or runtime build was repeated. - The existing selector admits exactly cases 53, 578, 580 and 610 in the native lane with cap 2. No workflow or settings change is needed. This local admission control did not submit a run. - Full repository build/typecheck/test commands were not repeated for this metadata-only change. Normal PR CI and fresh review remain required. ## Risks - The candidate has no new native PASS. Launch 3244 retains two original PASSES and three original FAILURES. Older failed and missing-original results remain unchanged. - Case 53 changes factual setup context to identify the existing visible form and adds stricter request fidelity. Its YAML query and original clock are fixed. This is not a latency fix. - Personal v14 treats the inline code path as an imprecise hint. Actual current-company UI links must establish navigation before private entry. Save, owner isolation, consumer delivery and final confirmation remain separate required proofs. - Team v8 fixes truthful partial-report admission. It does not qualify end-to-end runtime migration. - Company v15 accepts completed-entry acknowledgment questions. Actual current-human save, payload, source, continuation and governed-approval proofs remain mandatory. The corrected 403 handoff guidance is a recovery hypothesis. Closed diagnostics do not prove a native repair. - Pinned OpenCode model-free tests preserve the tested finish types in both directions. They do not prove real provider behavior or engine wait authority. - The next measurement selects only 53/578/580/610 once, with native cap 2, zero automatic retries and original bounds. A later uniform ten remains separately unrun. The unchanged 585 pass is carried-forward evidence. - Core #19325 and #19416 must remain open and unmerged. This PR does not merge the held full catalog or change its 196/244 gate. A maintainer will perform any normal merge and actual measurement after required checks. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), with reasoning, code execution and repository tools. The host did not report a context-window size. No model inference was used for local fixture controls. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>nightly/v2026.1106.0-nightly.0 canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.7 |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
c1d567ff6a |
fix(workspaces): isolate archived nested Git reconstruction (#19409)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Durable workspace import must preserve archived task files and Git history. > - A saved nested checkout can be a linked worktree whose branch belongs to its old absolute path. > - Archived import reconstructs that checkout in a new scratch directory. > - Ordinary linked recovery rejects the old branch at that new path. It can also write into a cache used by other import workers. > - This pull request reconstructs archived nested checkouts as private standalone repositories. > - Each import preserves saved files and extra history without changing shared worktree registrations or branches. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Archived workspace import fails when a saved nested linked checkout has a branch owned by the old path. The new scratch path fails the linked-worktree ownership check. The existing cache lock is process-local, so separate import processes also share mutable Git state without a common lock. **Expected behavior** Archived import must create an independent portable copy of the saved checkout. It must retain the saved commit, branch name, staged edits, working files, ignored recovery files, settings, and extra saved commits. It must keep the source cache unchanged and enforce source authorization. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create a managed nested linked checkout with an unpushed commit and staged and unstaged edits. 2. Save an encrypted restore point, including ignored files and an extra history tip. 3. Restore its saved contents under a different absolute workspace path. 4. Before this repair, the new path cannot adopt the branch owned by the old path. **Paperclip version or commit** The real Git regression fails before the repair at `fc1f5f3052`. The final branch includes the merged interrupted-upload and nested-source authorization fix from #19396. **Deployment mode** Archived remote workspace migration with real Git repositories, disposable PostgreSQL, and encrypted object storage. Local integration tests use the filesystem storage provider. Builds on merged #19402 and #19396. Related #19374 concerns interrupted clone staging; it does not implement private archived reconstruction. No duplicate open repair was found. ## What Changed - Enable private repository reconstruction only for archived migration. Ordinary linked recovery keeps its path ownership guard. - Add an object-only source to the managed checkout owner. A verified cache supplies only the saved commit and authenticated bundle prerequisites through scoped fetches. The private copy includes no unrelated task refs or objects, hard links, object alternates, or current cache files. - Fetch missing authenticated bundle prerequisites before importing a saved bundle in both private reconstruction and ordinary linked recovery. A pruned cache can use the approved remote; unavailable history still blocks restore. - Keep every authenticated restore point's extra commit under a private ref in root and nested private copies so portable archive capture and garbage collection retain it. Ordinary recovery keeps its existing history and expiration rules. - Share the verified, bounded ignore-file copy between root and nested reconstruction. Sources remain unchanged. - Retain source authorization before and after reconstruction and the final source-row locks from #19396. - Test concurrent private copies, source rejection, foreign task refs and objects, ordinary linked prerequisite recovery, a real migration, and cold restore after removing all original repositories. Test hard links, oversized excludes, unsafe info paths, and replacement during a descriptor read. ## Verification - Final affected run: 292 tests pass across ten suites. These cover real Git repositories, encrypted restore points, disposable PostgreSQL migration, portable archives, the restore-point ledger, source rejection, and concurrent copies. - Full repository typecheck and build pass after the scoped-object repair. Final server typecheck and full build also pass after restricting preserved refs to archive mode. - RED then GREEN: a linked checkout at a different path; a pruned bundle prerequisite still available from the approved remote; foreign task refs and objects entering the archive; root extra history disappearing after cold restore; and archive-only refs blocking ordinary standalone expiration. - Two concurrent private copies retain the saved head, branch, staged and unstaged edits, ignored recovery bytes, settings, and modes. Source refs, index, worktree registrations, and working files remain unchanged. - Delete the original checkout, cache, remote, and private copies after portable capture. Cold restore retains the saved files and extra history after garbage collection. No alternates or unrelated task objects remain. - Ordinary linked recovery retains its path ownership check and recovers pruned prerequisites. New and existing ordinary standalone destinations have no archive-only refs and remain eligible for expiration after normal object cleanup. - Unsafe exclude tests reject hard links, oversized files, nonregular paths, info-directory substitution, and replacement during the descriptor read. They preserve the target and replacement source bytes. - Preserve the failed attempts: an initial migration fixture changed its home after constructing the source path. Later expiration fixture attempts used a filtered current-head tip, omitted the local-source callback, or used cleanup that generated Git server-info files or left packed unreachable objects. Correct those setup assumptions before the actual regressions fail. Final affected suites pass. - Two earlier local full-suite attempts were interrupted before editing valid review findings. Neither is reported as a full-suite PASS. Final-head full CI passes; review is 5/5 with no open findings. ## Risks Archived imports use additional private disk space for independent Git objects. Missing, changed, or unsafe sources still block import. The repair does not weaken the default linked-worktree ownership check, change stored formats, or update live provider state. The shared checkout addition is optional and has no effect for existing callers that do not supply an object source. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with code editing, tool use, and test execution. The exact runtime model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.6 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
90b8190c33 |
fix(native-runtime): detect half-open runner ingress and project Stop for live runs (#19407)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Native runs in a managed sandbox talk to the server through a provider-ingress WebSocket. The server opens this socket to the runner (`paperclip-runnerd`) through the sandbox preview proxy. > - A staging run ran a 20-minute foreground shell command that printed nothing. After the first second, no run events arrived. The run stayed "Working" for over 35 minutes. No watchdog acted, and the run projection said `canStop: false`. > - The server only detected a lost runner connection from a `close` or `error` event. It never sent pings. A half-open route, for example a proxy that drops the connection without a FIN, never emits `close`. The run then waits forever and the 7-minute reconnect grace never starts. > - A long silent tool call is legitimate. The fix must tell "quiet but alive" apart from "nothing alive". A protocol ping does that: runnerd answers every ping with a pong while its provider waits on the tool. > - This pull request pings authenticated runner connections and terminates the socket after 90 seconds of total silence. The existing reconnect grace and transport-failure path then recover the run. It also makes the execution projection report `canStop: true` for every queued or running run. > - The benefit is that a run with a dead runner connection now ends in a bounded time instead of hanging. API readers also see the Stop that the board already offers. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native-runner run (managed sandbox, OpenCode with an OpenRouter model) ran a foreground shell command for about 20 minutes with no output. The last run event came at about T+1s. The command finished on disk, but the run never got another event and stayed `running` / "Working" for over 35 minutes. Its projection had `canStop: false` and `permittedActions: ["inspect_run"]`. A board cancel through the API worked. **Expected behavior** The server detects a dead runner connection and recovers or fails the run in a bounded time. A runner that is alive but quiet stays attached. The projection reports that a live run can be stopped. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native run in a managed sandbox. 2. Make the agent run a long foreground command that prints nothing. 3. Let the preview route drop the WebSocket without a close frame. 4. Before this fix, the run stays "Working" forever. ## What Changed - `server/src/realtime/runner-prp-outbound.ts`: after PRP authentication, `WsJsonWireConnection.monitorLiveness` sends a WebSocket ping every 20 s. Any inbound frame or pong counts as liveness. After 90 s with nothing inbound, it terminates the socket. That emits an ordinary `close`, so the PRP authority and the reconnect loop use the existing 7-minute grace and then fail the transport. If the server's own event loop stalls, the window restarts instead of blaming the runner. The 90 s bound is longer than runnerd's own 60 s connection lease, which already requires runnerd to read the socket. - `server/src/services/execution-projection.ts`: `canStop` is now `true` for every `queued` or `running` run. The old failed-native-retry rule is unchanged. - `server/src/services/execution-projection.ts`: a queued run now shows "Waiting for previous run to stop" (cause `previous_run_settling`) when a predecessor that admission checks (the task execution owner, the retried run, or the agent's latest settled run on the task) still has pending cleanup by `hasPendingRunCleanup`. Before, a turn queued after a Stop showed only "Queued" with no reason while the stopped run's controller still waited on the dead runner. That in-process wait (`claimQueuedRun` settling-owner gate) also made Retry a no-op. The liveness bound above makes that controller settle. Its existing cleanup then calls `startNextQueuedRunForAgent`, which starts the queued turn. - `server/src/services/run-cancellation.ts` and `server/src/modules/run-dispatch/adapters/postgres.ts`: a user-stopped native run whose runner was unreachable can later settle as `failed` (`native_provider_terminal_failed`) when its transport fails closed. The dispatch gate's message deferral required a `cancelled` source and compared the message with `finishedAt`. The user's follow-up message was therefore marked `skipped`, and the task asked for a second message. The new `recordedUserStop` helper honors the recorded user Stop on such a failed source, so the gate saves the message for the deferred-receipt worker. - `packages/shared/src/types/execution-projection.ts`: documents the `canStop` meaning. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: documents the ingress liveness bound and the new `canStop` meaning. ## Verification - Red then green: `runner-prp-outbound.test.ts` "detects a half-open authenticated ingress and fails the run within a bounded window". On the old code it failed because no ping was sent and the socket was never terminated. It now passes and the active-run `failure` rejects with `runner_ingress_unavailable`. - Safety: "keeps a quiet but live runner attached through a long silent tool call" checks that a runner answering pings stays attached for 20 simulated minutes with no termination and no failure. - Red then green: `execution-projection.test.ts` "offers Stop for every live run, including a long-silent native turn". On the old code it failed with `canStop: false`. - Red then green: `execution-projection-recovery.test.ts` "names the wait when a stopped predecessor still holds the task's runner" (real Postgres). On the old code the successor projected a plain "Queued". It also checks that the wait clears on lease release and ignores another agent's run. - Red then green: `workspace-recovery.test.ts` "continues a message sent after Stop when the stopped run later failed closed". On the old code it failed 3 of 3 runs with the receipt `skipped`. It now passes, and the full file passes twice (392 tests). The test now pins the message after the recorded Stop. Before, the fixture could write both in the same millisecond, which made the sibling variants flaky. - Passed: run-cancellation, explicit-native-continuation, run-dispatch and run-control suites (622 tests). - Passed: `npx vitest run src/realtime/ src/services/execution-projection*.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-run-privacy-routes.test.ts`, the native-runner-execution-driver tests, and the plugin-runner-task tests. - Passed: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`. - I read runnerd (`runner-core/src/durable/transport.rs`) and confirmed it answers `Ping` with `Pong` in its non-blocking read loop. - Not run: a live managed-sandbox reproduction. Staging and Daytona were not reachable from this environment. `plugin-runner-probe.test.ts` needs a local cargo build of runnerd, and it did not start in this worktree. ## Risks - A false termination is possible if a runner fails to answer pings for 90 s while it is still alive. runnerd already loses its own connection lease after 60 s without reading, so this bound does not add a stricter requirement. A terminated live runner reconnects within the existing grace. - If the preview proxy drops WebSocket control frames, ping alone does not prove liveness. Inbound PRP frames (runnerd's lease renewals, about every 30 s) still count, so a live runner stays attached. - `canStop` now means "the board can Stop now" for live runs. The UI already shows Stop for running and queued runs without reading this hint, so the UI does not change. - Out of scope: the inbound runner WebSocket server (`runner-prp-ws.ts`), and a lost OpenCode SSE event while the runner is alive. A stopped run whose controller hangs for a reason other than a dead transport still holds the queued successor. The projection now names that wait, but this PR does not force-release it, because the controller has no termination evidence. A queued reason for the agent concurrency cap is also not covered. The wait label calls the admission predicate (`hasPendingRunCleanup`) for up to three predecessor runs per queued run. This adds a few reads to projections of queued runs only. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use (shell, file edits) in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Dotta
|
92452524f4 |
fix(server): recover authenticated empty retention checkpoints (#19417)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Ephemeral server enrollment must preserve existing task files. > - Archived task directories can depend on encrypted retention checkpoints. > - A missing object blocks migration even when its authenticated contents were exactly empty. > - Metadata counters alone cannot prove that no saved files existed. > - This change verifies the exact candidate against the original encrypted key envelope before normal migration publication. > - The benefit is lossless migration of this bounded case without resetting task history or weakening ordinary restore. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Migration stops at an archived empty directory when its retained encrypted object is missing. The original encrypted key envelope still authenticates the payload hash, byte length, company, workspace, checkpoint ID, and generation. **Expected behavior** Administrative migration can reconstruct those exact original bytes when storage confirms absence and every authenticated check passes. It must keep missing nonempty, expired, corrupt, or ambiguous sources blocked. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Capture and encrypt an empty task directory. 2. Retain its reference and encrypted key envelope. 3. Remove the old directory and storage object. 4. Run the normal remote workspace migration. **Paperclip version or commit** The regression fails before this change at `205ffcb606`. Related preservation work is in #19396, #19402, and #19409. No duplicate open fix was found. **Deployment mode** Administrative migration to external workspace storage. Tests use real encryption, real filesystem storage, and disposable PostgreSQL. ## What Changed - Let the encryption owner verify a candidate against the existing scoped encrypted key envelope. Normal ciphertext validation keeps its previous order and checks. - Share the task-directory encoder with an exact empty payload constructor. - Add a default-off loader option for confirmed missing empty checkpoints. Only the administrative migration caller enables it. - Keep the original checkpoint reference and object unchanged. Publish the recovered bytes through the existing snapshot and source-fence owners. - Reject forged counters, wrong identities, missing nonempty data, present corruption, unreadable present objects, unknown absence, and expiry. ## Verification - Final affected run: all 238 tests pass across five crypto, snapshot, retention, and migration suites. Full repository typecheck and build pass; server typecheck and full build also pass after the cancellation repair. - RED then GREEN: exact missing-empty recovery and cancellation of a stalled HEAD through the real storage-service boundary. Cancellation retains the caller's original abort reason. - Disposable PostgreSQL migration publishes a cold-restorable empty archive. Archived status, task status, task binding, original reference, and the absent original source stay unchanged. Replay keeps one canonical snapshot. - Negative cases reject forged empty counters, an authenticated directory or file, every foreign identity field, expiry, present corruption, unreadable present objects, unknown absence, and missing nonempty data. Ordinary restore keeps its previous failure behavior. - Initial verification retained one new fixture-path failure after 145 passes, and a typecheck rejected the fixture's widened schema literal. Correct the fixture to use the returned staging path and its explicit reference type. The final complete affected run passes. - The new HEAD request runs only after a failed read with the administrative option enabled. It uses the existing cancellation contract and adds no polling or background work. - Final-head full CI passes; review is 5/5 with no open findings. This PR does not claim deployed enrollment or a live migration result. ## Risks Recovery requires the original valid encrypted key envelope and an exact format match. A format change or unavailable key continues to block migration. Existing ciphertext hash, size, authentication, and ordinary restore behavior remain enforced. This change has no schema, provider-session, API, or UI contract changes. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with code editing, tool use, and test execution. The exact runtime model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub references) - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
a4bb059f59 |
fix(heartbeat): retry transient sandbox provider lease refusals and explain the block (#19412)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A task runs in an execution environment. A managed sandbox
environment gets a lease from a sandbox provider (for example Daytona)
before the agent starts.
> - When the provider answered sandbox create with a temporary error
(HTTP 502), the run failed as the generic `setup_failed`.
> - `setup_failed` is the fail-closed code for unknown setup errors. It
gets no automatic retry, so the task went to `blocked` at once. The task
showed only "Couldn't finish this attempt".
> - A user had to find and press Retry. The Retry then worked, which
shows that the failure was temporary.
> - This pull request classifies temporary provider refusals during
lease acquisition from structured fields. It retries them within the
existing bounded bootstrap budget, and it explains the block when the
retries are used up.
> - The benefit is that a short provider outage no longer stops a task.
When the outage continues, the task shows the cause and a Retry that
works.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A task was assigned to an agent that uses a managed Daytona sandbox
environment. Sandbox creation returned `HTTP 502`, and the cleanup of
the provisional sandbox could not be confirmed. The run failed with
`setup_failed` and the error `Failed to acquire lease for environment
"Paperclip Sandbox" (sandbox): Daytona sandbox creation failed (HTTP
502); cleanup could not be confirmed for paperclip-create-…`. Three
seconds later the task was `blocked`. No automatic retry was scheduled.
The task showed no specific reason. A manual Retry started a new run
that completed normally.
**Expected behavior**
A temporary provider error (HTTP 5xx, 429, timeout) before the agent
starts must retry automatically with bounded backoff. The task must show
why it waits. If the retries are used up, the task must show the cause,
a next action, and a Retry that works on the first click.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Configure an agent with a sandbox environment.
2. Make the provider return HTTP 502 on sandbox create.
3. Assign a task to the agent.
4. See that the run fails with `setup_failed` and the task goes to
`blocked` with no retry.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at `612da1e8e0`.
## What Changed
- Plugin SDK: an `environmentAcquireLease` error now carries a closed
diagnostic envelope (HTTP status or a closed errno code) across the
worker RPC. It takes the status of the create call only, not of the
compensating cleanup lookup. The existing creation-cleanup ownership
envelope is unchanged. New module: `environment-acquire-error.ts`. The
resume diagnostic helpers are shared.
- Server: new `EnvironmentProviderUnavailableError` and code
`environment_provider_unavailable`. The environment run orchestrator
sets it as the cause of `lease_acquire_failed` only when structured
evidence shows a transient status (408, 425, 429, 500, 502, 503, 504, or
a closed connection errno). It never parses message text. Saved-sandbox
resume and stopped-worker refusals keep their own codes.
- Setup failure (`failRunSetup`): a fresh, pre-dispatch run records
`environment_provider_unavailable` with a `providerFailure` (phase
`startup`, retryability `transient`). The run uses the bounded bootstrap
retry (30 s, then 60 s). An accepted interaction continuation keeps its
own continuation retry, as for `plugin_worker_unavailable`.
- Recovery: the new code is registered with the other bootstrap codes.
It is not sent to the generic continuation retry. It does not create an
execution-reconciliation hold, because no provider work started. On
exhaustion the stranded notice has the title "Sandbox provider was
temporarily unavailable" and a specific next action.
- UI: `ProviderFailureNotice` labels the `sandbox` provider as "Sandbox
provider". The task notice shows the provider failure, "Paperclip will
retry automatically" while a retry is scheduled, and Retry after
exhaustion.
- Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` describes the policy and the
sandbox ownership rule.
## Verification
Red before the fix, green after the fix:
- `server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts` › "transient
sandbox provider refusal during lease acquisition":
- "retries automatically and runs exactly one successful successor
without user action": the real heartbeat. The lease runtime returns a
Daytona 502 once, then delegates. Before the fix: one `failed` run and
no successor. After the fix: one `scheduled_retry` successor with no
hold and a `retry_scheduled` presentation. After promotion, exactly one
successor succeeds.
- "explains the block with a working Retry once automatic retries are
used up": three refusals. The task is `blocked` with a "Sandbox provider
was temporarily unavailable" notice. The presentation is `{ state:
"failed", canRetry: true, providerFailure: { httpStatus: 502 } }`, and
no execution-reconciliation hold exists. One `requestTaskRetry` is
accepted, and its run succeeds.
- `server/src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts` › "routes a …
sandbox provider lease refusal through bounded bootstrap recovery": the
real orchestrator wrapping. Only the fresh, structured 502 is retried. A
message-only 502, a 400, a run after provider dispatch, and a retained
native run stay `setup_failed`.
- `packages/plugins/sdk/tests/environment-acquire-error.test.ts`: the
real worker RPC. The test checks the create status (not the 404 cleanup
lookup), the errno, no provider text, the unchanged cleanup envelope,
and that forged envelopes are rejected.
Commands:
```sh
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk exec vitest run tests/environment-acquire-error.test.ts tests/environment-creation-cleanup.test.ts tests/environment-resume-error.test.ts
cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts src/services/recovery/ src/services/heartbeat/run-completion.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/retries.test.ts src/services/legacy-execution-recovery.test.ts src/services/task-interruption-presentation.test.ts src/services/task-retry.test.ts src/__tests__/environment-runtime.test.ts src/__tests__/heartbeat-retry-scheduling.test.ts
cd packages/plugins/sandbox-providers/daytona && npx vitest run
pnpm --filter @paperclipai/plugin-sdk typecheck && pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck
```
I did not run a live Daytona 502 on staging. Re-check on staging after
deploy (see Risks).
## Risks
- Sandbox leaks or double creation: each retry is a new run with a new
durable creation record and a new provider name
(`paperclip-create-<operationId>`). The failed attempt stays owned by
its own record, and the existing creation reconciler settles it. A retry
never reuses or abandons it. While a provisional sandbox waits for
reconciliation, up to two more sandboxes can be created for the same
task. This is the same as a manual Retry today.
- Plugins built with an older SDK do not send the envelope. Their
refusals stay `setup_failed`, which is the current behavior.
- An in-process error with `status`/`statusCode` 500–504 or a connection
errno during lease acquisition is now retried twice. The budget is
bounded and shared with the other bootstrap codes.
- An RPC timeout on the host side is not classified by this change.
> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (Anthropic), model ID `claude-opus-5-5`, used through
Claude Code as an agent with tool use (shell, file edits, test runs).
Extended reasoning was on.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.5
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
558a5143ed |
fix(workspaces): reject damaged Git entries before workspace capture (#19160)
Workspace capture now checks that each .git entry is the root of its own repository before it reads any Git state. A structurally damaged entry (an empty .git directory, a gitfile for a removed worktree, an invalid HEAD, or missing objects/refs) stops capture with the closed reason remote_workspace_archive_invalid_git_repository instead of a raw "Command failed: git ..." error, and capture no longer saves an enclosing repository's state as the workspace's own. Other Git failures (dubious ownership, a full disk, a timeout, a failing Git program) keep their existing diagnostics. Metadata reads are bounded and never block on named pipes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
205ffcb606 | Verify live Claude and Codex ACPX eligibility before parking (#19295) | ||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
b918ee165d |
test(evals): pin coherent chat feature follow-ups (#19411)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages agent work and its permission boundaries. > - The chat catalog runs feature checks from an immutable source. > - The last full-ten attempt had five reported passes, four failures and one missing original. > - Local evidence identified narrow assertion, setup and evidence-retention repairs. > - This PR updates the trusted source pin and its exact descriptor snapshot. > - The next five-case measurement can test the affected features under the same model, clocks and native cap. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19395, #19405, #19093, #19084, #19112. The previous source remains preserved. This PR selects reviewed source `f5692c57dafaf9afbef479c25fcd277815932516` on `codex/chat-full-ten-coherent-qualified-f5692c57-20261106`, tree `b9e302d2ea7b605a60125dec8c81672eac7a3c57`. The full catalog and all core PRs remain unmerged. Core #19405 is included only as a source overlay. ## What Changed - Update the source target, exact descriptor snapshot and the matching pin checks. Preserve historical conditions, frozen source anchors and the prior query clarification. - Record Company ACK handling and Company/Personal negation corrections, plus the skill-update preview negation correction. A denied or unapplied action still fails when the agent claims it completed. - Disclose the Team setup change: a disposable catalog package selects the approved OpenCode runtime and same-company account. Other file bytes and non-runtime sidecar fields stay unchanged. Original and effective package identities and hashes are recorded. A real PostgreSQL install without caller overrides proves the saved runtime. This gives no end-to-end runtime-migration or override-handling credit. - Include defensive failed-turn evidence retirement and generic, schema-valid human-input examples. The old case 53 missing-original ENOENT cause is not diagnosed. The examples are a usability hypothesis, not a schema repair or native-success claim. All 244 YAML definition fields (query, assumed context and expected outcome) remain byte-identical versus source 936c. The Team derived runtime fixture and task setup context change is disclosed above. Native/human bounds, clocks, DeepSeek 1017, credentials, SDK506/efa, launcher, private interfaces, native cap two and zero automatic retries remain unchanged. Only descriptor `sourceFiles` and oracle versions change. The 196/244 gate stays unchanged. ## Verification Pin-local checks: ```sh node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-adapter.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-completion-testops-contract.test.mjs ``` - All 49 pin/admission controls pass locally. They join all 244 identities, historical query overrides, native bounds and the exact 242-row descriptor snapshot. - Source qualification: 447 controls across 32 suites, full E2E TypeScript checks and normal contract generators pass. The separate 21 core contract controls are carried-forward component evidence; they are not added to 447. Local source checks used Node 26.4.0. AWS runtime settings are unchanged. - The selected source descriptor SHA256 is `24fe88af167724c6fb120d3984296aab47c993a65782158e03d80a936fbd94ed`. - The actual source launcher is byte-identical to 936c: SHA256 `2b9a6953ee51f0ea0dbbd475b0491d9a6c39a1d6835eeaa912e0dbb7cf987724`, Git blob `c88df15f509b2ac8638af826647a97d45f16bd1f`. - All 506 registered SDK inputs and the ten trusted helper bytes are unchanged. Five required source-helper joins pass. No SDK renewal or native build is part of this PR. - The current controller's 67 dependency inputs match the qualified frozen reporting graph. No reporting-lock, package, permission or workflow change is included. - Exact head `b833036fb477b55b05cbdf1f4feb2e2c5387b420` is green: CI run 42166216108 attempt 2 succeeded, Windows succeeded, and both current reviews are 5/5 with zero unresolved threads. The check rollup has 56 successes, three configured skips and one neutral result. New representative cases 53, 578, 580, 585 and 610 are unrun. A later uniform-ten regression is separate. - CI attempt 1 remains retained: one cloud-auth browser fixture read a trailing health response after context teardown began, after all task-recovery assertions had passed. One authorized rerun of only that failed job and its dependent checks succeeded on the unchanged head. This does not fix or qualify fixture reliability; no eval or model run was retried. The previous full-ten outcome remains five reported passes, four failures and one missing-original/reporting gap. Case 585 reached only its first preview before the false rejection; its update phase is unqualified. Case 610's old noncompletion and runtime-override journey remain unresolved. All original failures and evidence remain retained. No old result is regraded or replaced. ## Risks The local repairs may not produce a native pass. The new Team setup tests installation with an already selected runtime package; it does not qualify runtime migration. Failed-turn retirement has local regression coverage but does not establish the cause of the old case 53 reporting gap. The core guidance overlay remains unmerged and its native benefit is unproved. Normal protected merge and a new authenticated measurement are still required. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex. It used code inspection, local test execution and GitHub tooling. The context window size is not exposed. No model inference or provider call was made for this PR's local checks. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
66d3fa97a9 |
fix(workspaces): preserve ignored files in archived Git imports (#19402)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Durable workspace migration must preserve archived files and saved recovery data. > - An archived Git workspace can contain ignored recovery receipts and bundles in its encrypted restore point. > - The importer reconstructs a private repository from a verified source before it applies that restore point. > - Reconstruction omitted the source repository's local ignore rules. The restored files then changed classification, and the exact restore-point check failed. > - This pull request copies the verified local ignore rules into the private repository before restoration. > - The source stays unchanged, and the original restore-point integrity checks still apply. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An archived workspace with saved files under an ignored recovery directory failed migration with `restored_contents_mismatch`. The task commit and staged index matched. The ignored files were restored, but the private repository treated them as untracked work because its `info/exclude` rules were missing. **Expected behavior** Reconstruction from an existing verified source must preserve its local ignore policy. Saved ignored files must survive migration and a cold object-store restore with their original classification. Import must not follow a symlink to an unrelated ignore file or edit the source repository. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Exclude a recovery directory in the managed source repository's `info/exclude` file. 2. Save staged edits, unstaged edits, an ignored recovery receipt, and an ignored binary bundle in an encrypted restore point. 3. Archive and remove the task worktree. 4. Import the archived workspace. Before this change, restore-point validation fails because the reconstructed repository lacks the local exclusion rule. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `879140cbbd`. **Deployment mode** Cloud workspace migration with a retained verified Git source, PostgreSQL, and encrypted durable object storage. The tests use real disposable PostgreSQL, Git repositories, and encrypted filesystem-backed object storage. Related migration work: #18826, #19138, and #19396. No duplicate open fix was found. ## What Changed - Copy the verified source's `info/exclude` file into the private reconstructed repository before applying its restore point. - Bound the read to one MiB. Reject symlinked, non-regular, hard-linked, or changing source files. - Keep the original source bytes unchanged. - Add regressions that check staged and unstaged edits, ignored recovery files, cold restore, and rejection of a symlinked ignore file. - Document the reconstruction behavior. ## Verification - Before the repair, the saved-ignored-files regression fails with `restored_contents_mismatch`. - After the repair, both focused cases pass. - At rebased head `81a0b1c041`, all 206 tests across migration, snapshot storage, archive, and migration concurrency suites pass. The merged interrupted-upload and nested-source approval regressions remain intact. - Server package typecheck passes. - Full repository typecheck and build pass at the rebased head. The full local test suite is running. The prior local full-test run was interrupted for rebase, and is not a passing result. - Initial CI hit a 15-second timeout in unchanged `activity-routes.test.ts`; the exact case passed in a focused local run. The browser shard lost its self-hosted runner, as confirmed by its check annotation; GitHub did not retain its full log. Those failures remain recorded. An unchanged retry was superseded by the required conflict rebase. At exact head `81a0b1c041`, all 53 CI checks and both required aggregate gates pass; Greptile is 5/5. The full local suite remains in progress, so no local full-suite PASS is claimed. A second automated review noted the existing nested-checkout counterpart. This PR fixes root reconstruction. The nested linked-checkout repair and its saved-ignored-files/cold-restore regression are implemented in #19409, which is required before the migration rollout uses nested imports. This PR leaves that sibling recovery path unchanged. The two identical scope warnings are addressed through that linked repair. ## Risks The copy applies only when an archived Git restore-point source is still present and verified. It changes only the private reconstruction directory. Missing sources retain the existing restoration path. Unsafe or unstable local ignore files block import and retain the original migration obligation. No database migration or saved format changes are included. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with code editing, tool use, and test execution. The exact runtime model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.4 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
612da1e8e0 |
test(server): drain throttled follow-up in busy recovered-source execution-control test (#19403)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The server runs durable execution-control workers, which include the workspace-recovery sweep > - `execution-control-work.test.ts` has a test for a Retry that commits during a busy recovered-source pass > - This test fails intermittently in PR runs that do not touch it, so it blocks unrelated PRs > - The test assumed that one `settle()` pass always ends idle, but the worker can correctly owe a throttled follow-up pass > - This pull request makes the test drive fake time through that throttle window while it waits for the sweep to finish > - The benefit is a deterministic test that still proves every source is visited and the worker becomes quiet ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** `execution-control durable work > visits a newly committed earlier Retry during a busy recovered-source pass, then becomes quiet` failed in 2 of the last 250 failed `PR` workflow runs (jobs 127272079294 and 127206639630). Both failures were identical: `AssertionError: expected 1 to be +0` at `vi.waitFor` in `settle()` (`execution-control-work.test.ts:146`). The test took about 6s, which is the 5s `waitFor` limit plus overhead. **Expected behavior** The test passes on every run. Its result does not depend on runner speed. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Add a 300ms real-time delay in `registerExecutionControlWork` after `await duty.run()` and before `await duty.next()`. This simulates slow database I/O on a loaded runner. 2. Run `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/execution-control-work.test.ts -t "busy recovered-source pass"` in `server/`. 3. The test fails 3 of 3 times with the same CI error. **Root cause** - `registerExecutionControlWork` lets a duty make one full pass per `EXECUTION_RECONCILIATION_INTERVAL_MS` (15s), measured from the start of the previous full pass. - The released recovery jobs call `worker.wake()` when they finish. If a wake arrives while the full pass is still reading its next deadline, `hasPending()` stays true. The coordinator then keeps its idle-tracked intent until the next permitted pass, up to 15s of fake time later. - `settle()` advances fake time by 15s and then waits 5s in real time for `idleWorkSnapshot().active === 0`. The full pass starts inside that 15s advance, so the follow-up is due after the window ends. The wait then expires. - On a fast machine the jobs usually finish after the deadline read, so the test passes. On a slow runner the order changes, so the test fails. - This is correct product behavior: the worker owes the follow-up pass. The defect is in the test's timing assumption. ## What Changed - In the busy recovered-source test, replace the bounded `settle()` loop with a `vi.waitFor` that advances fake time by `EXECUTION_RECONCILIATION_INTERVAL_MS` on each attempt. It waits until every source was visited and no idle-tracked work is active. - The test still calls `quiet(c)` after this, so it still asserts no further scheduling and no database calls during the next 90s. - The shared `settle()` helper is not changed, because `reschedules an earlier deadline…` asserts an exact `nextWakeAt()` after `settle()`. ## Verification - Red: with the 300ms delay injected (not committed), the test failed 3/3 times with the CI assertion. - Green: with the same injection at 300ms (3 runs) and at 1000ms (1 run), all four recovered-source Retry tests pass. - Without injection, the full `execution-control-work.test.ts` passed 5/5 times with 12 CPU-burner processes running. - `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/execution-control-work.test.ts` in `server/`. ## Risks - Low risk. This is a test-only change. The test still requires every source to be visited, the worker to become idle, and then 90s of quiet. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, GitHub CLI). Default context window. No extended thinking mode. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
223687bbb9 |
test(server): size heavy chat-channel tests to their workload to stop timeout cascades (#19404)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Chat channels connect GitHub, Slack, and other providers to tasks,
and `chat-channels.integration.test.ts` covers them against a real
embedded Postgres
> - Two parameterized tests do much more database work than the other
tests in the file, but they use the global 15s `testTimeout`
> - On a slow CI runner they time out. Vitest then keeps the timed-out
test body running, and that body breaks later, unrelated tests in the
same file
> - This failure blocks PRs that do not touch chat code
> - This pull request gives the two heavy tests a time budget that fits
their workload
> - The benefit is that a slow runner no longer turns one heavy test
into a cascade of 2–7 failures
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
In run 42098299218 (job 127495756270, shard `General tests (chat
(3/3))`), 7 chat tests failed in two Vitest processes on a PR that
changed only unrelated test files:
- Process 1: `reactivates denied retry notices when authority is
restored during bounded pass` timed out at 15000ms. Then `… during
requester merge` failed with `A function to advance timers was called
but the timers APIs are not mocked`.
- Process 2: `preserves one current GitHub Retry across backlog_51` and
`… consumed_backlog_52` timed out at 15000ms. About 110 tests later,
three pre-run FIFO tests failed: `advances pre-run FIFO selection past a
suppressed page with microsecond timestamps (manual)` (`expected +0 to
be 1`), `retires an already-visible pre-run FIFO notice once without
publishing scheduler failures` (`expected [] to have a length of 1`),
and `retries a contended pre-run FIFO receipt before I/O and observes
cancellation after the lock releases` (`expected undefined to match
object { state: 'retry' }`).
**Expected behavior**
These tests pass on a slower runner. A timeout in one test does not
change the result of a different test.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. On `master`, in `server/`, run:
`pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/chat-channels.integration.test.ts -t
"GitHub Retry across (backlog_51|consumed_backlog_52)|advances pre-run
FIFO selection past a suppressed page|retires an already-visible pre-run
FIFO notice once|retries a contended pre-run FIFO receipt before I/O"
--testTimeout=1200`
2. The lower timeout simulates a slow runner. The two backlog tests time
out, and then the same three FIFO tests fail with the same assertions as
in CI. The `scoped` FIFO case passes, as it did in CI.
3. Run the same command without `--testTimeout`. All 6 tests pass.
**Root cause**
- The workload is large. `backlog_51` and `consumed_backlog_52` deliver
51–52 real inbound GitHub messages through the full delivery path.
`bounded pass` inserts and authorizes 100 rejected retry notices.
- CI timing data supports this. On passing runs these tests take
5.4–7.7s (backlog) and 3.6–5.3s (bounded pass), and lighter tests in the
same file take 0.5–1s. On the failing runner, the lighter tests were
2–3x slower (for example, `idle` took 1856ms instead of 500–680ms). This
put the heavy tests over 15s.
- When Vitest times out a test, it does not stop the test body. The body
keeps running while the next tests start:
- The unfinished backlog tests left 51+ `deferred_issue_execution`
inbound wakeups. The pre-run FIFO tests use unscoped, bounded passes
(`enqueueInboundWakeupPublications`, `processPendingPublications`). The
leftover rows filled those pages, so the new test's row was not reached.
- The unfinished `bounded pass` body later ran its `finally` block,
which calls `vi.useRealTimers()`. This disabled the fake timers that
`requester merge` had just installed.
## What Changed
- `preserves one current GitHub Retry across %s`: set an explicit 60s
timeout.
- `reactivates denied retry notices when authority is restored during
%s`: set an explicit 60s timeout. Increase the `bounded pass` wait for
its held 100-row reconciliation from 10s to 30s, so that the inner wait
does not become the new limit.
- The same file already uses explicit 20s, 25s, 30s, 40s, 60s, and 90s
budgets for other heavy tests. No product code changed.
## Verification
- Red: the reproduction command above fails on `master` with the CI
cascade. A tighter `--testTimeout=1600` on `reactivates denied retry
notices` also shows that later modes fail after `bounded pass` times
out.
- Green: the same reproduction command with this change (still
`--testTimeout=1200` for all other tests) passes 10/10 selected tests,
including the three FIFO tests.
- `pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/chat-channels.integration.test.ts
-t "GitHub Retry across|reactivates denied retry notices|pre-run FIFO"`:
46 passed.
## Risks
- Low risk. This is a test-only change. A real hang in these two tests
now fails after 60s instead of 15s. This is well inside the job limit.
- The cascade can still occur if one of these tests needs more than 60s.
That would mean a runner about 10x slower than a normal one.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude
Code with tool use (shell, file edits, GitHub CLI). Default context
window. No extended thinking mode.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
ec94e43c4a |
test(server): budget the 130 MB isolated re-home test for its data volume (#19400)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Isolated repository re-home moves a task workspace onto the shared project clone, so the private clone can be deleted > - One re-home test moves two 65 MiB files on purpose, to prove that large changes still move > - On CI this test times out at the 15000 ms default in pull requests that do not touch re-home > - The test does a fixed, large amount of CPU work, and a loaded runner cannot finish it in 15 seconds > - This pull request gives that one test a 60000 ms budget that matches its data volume > - The benefit is a stable server shard, with no change to what the test proves ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A survey of failed `PR` workflow runs found intermittent failures of one test in pull requests that do not touch re-home: ``` FAIL src/__tests__/isolated-repository-rehome.test.ts > isolated repository source re-home > re-homes a workspace whose changes exceed the default restore point limits Error: Test timed out in 15000ms. ``` Examples: jobs 127465954304, 127499682176, and 127538360101 (shard `general-server-without-chat` 7/12). The survey counted 4 such failures. The other 27 tests in the file passed in each of these runs. **Expected behavior** The test passes on every run, and it still proves that a 65 MiB untracked file and a 65 MiB saved ignored file move with an exact snapshot match. **Steps to reproduce** Run the unchanged test on master while the CPU is oversubscribed: ```sh cd server node load.mjs 72 pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/isolated-repository-rehome.test.ts -t 'exceed the default' --reporter=verbose ``` `load.mjs` starts 72 busy-loop Node processes (4 per core on an 18-core machine) and runs the command. The test fails with `Test timed out in 15000ms`. **Root cause** The file sizes are part of the test contract. #17410 added the test to prove two fixes that only show above 64 MiB: `applyRestorePoint` streams `git diff --binary` into `git apply`, and the ignored-file read sizes its buffer from the tree. So the files cannot get smaller. Each full pass over the workspace writes both files into a Git object store, so it hashes and deflates 130 MB. One test run makes about eight passes: the test's `before` snapshot, the re-home `before` snapshot, the capture, the import into the shared clone, the apply, the two verification snapshots, and the test's final snapshot. That is about 1 GB of SHA-1 and zlib work, plus the byte comparison. I timed the phases with the re-home hooks on an idle machine: snapshot 0.6 s each, capture and import 1.9 s, worktree add and apply 0.9 s, verification 1.0 s. With 2 busy processes per core the same phases took 1.3 s, 3.9 s, 1.3 s, and 2.1 s. The work is CPU-bound and scales with load. No phase waits on a timer, a lock, or a background task. The 15000 ms default is the cause. ## What Changed - Give `re-homes a workspace whose changes exceed the default restore point limits` an explicit 60000 ms test budget. - No other test changes. No production changes. No retries, no skips. ## Verification Red, on master, 72 busy-loop processes: ``` × ... re-homes a workspace whose changes exceed the default restore point limits → Test timed out in 15000ms. ``` Green, with this change, same load: ``` ✓ ... re-homes a workspace whose changes exceed the default restore point limits 30414ms ``` So the test needs about 30 s at 4 processes per core, which is half of the new budget. A hung re-home still fails inside 60 s. Full file, idle: 28/28 tests pass. ```sh cd server pnpm exec vitest run src/__tests__/isolated-repository-rehome.test.ts ``` ## Risks - Low risk. One test budget changes. - A real slowdown in the re-home path of up to 4 times would no longer fail this test. Other tests in the file keep the 15000 ms default. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits) and extended reasoning. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9668e73b4b |
fix(native): continue a turn automatically when reattachment loses its runner (#19399)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Native runs in managed sandboxes recover through reattachment: after a server restart, and for a same-run retry when a turn ends without a semantic result > - Reattachment fails closed when the original runner or sandbox is gone (`native_remote_recovery_lease_mismatch`, `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`) > - Saved-work recovery then saves the files, but the task stays blocked with "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." The recovered hold offers no Retry > - A restart, deploy or maintenance window must not need a user message to continue work > - This pull request requests the task Retry automatically, once, when it is safe, and offers Retry on the recovered hold when it is not > - The benefit is that interrupted work continues after infrastructure events, and a user who must act gets a Retry that works on first use ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A native task in a managed sandbox was interrupted. In one case a server restart claimed a queued user-comment turn for reattachment. In another case a turn completed without a semantic result, and the same-run retry claimed the run for reattachment with no restart. In both cases the original runner or sandbox lease was gone. The run failed with `native_remote_recovery_lease_mismatch` or `runner_remote_process_identity_unavailable`. Recovery saved the work. The task stayed `blocked` with "Saved work recovered. Send a message to continue." The execution blocker had `canRetry: false`. A manual `POST /api/issues/:id/retry` started a run that succeeded. **Expected behavior** After an infrastructure interruption, the task continues automatically when the interrupted turn's outcome is known. Otherwise the task offers a Retry that works on first use. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Start a native task in a managed sandbox from a user comment. 2. Lose the sandbox lease or the remote runner process (for example, restart the server during a maintenance window). 3. Let reattachment fail and saved-work recovery complete. 4. See that the task waits for a new message and offers no Retry on the execution blocker. **Root cause** Reattachment (`reattach_remote_runner`) correctly refuses to replace a missing runner or allocation. Nothing then continued the user's request. The automatic continuation rule only allows a new user turn after reconciliation. `getExecutionBlocker` hid Retry whenever a workspace restore hold existed, also after the files were verifiably recovered. The same-run retry path also re-enters the restart-recovery owner, so its event said "after server restart" with no restart. ## What Changed - New `server/src/services/heartbeat/restart-interrupted-turn.ts`: after a reattachment claim executes, if the run failed because its runner or allocation was lost, request the same task Retry that `POST /issues/:id/retry` creates. It runs once per run (idempotency key `restart-interrupted-turn:<runId>`), under the authority of the user who sent the message, assigned the task, or clicked Retry. It requires that the run recorded no provider turn or that its last provider turn is settled. System wakes, in-flight turns, and a Retry that this hook already requested do not continue automatically. - `heartbeat/recovery.ts`: call the hook after each reattachment claim. Label same-run retry reattachment as "Reattaching to the existing remote runner to resume this run", and add `trigger: "same_run_retry"` to the event payload. - `execution-blocker.ts`: a failed run whose saved work is verifiably recovered now offers Retry (`canRetry: true`) with "Saved work recovered. Retry or send a message to continue." An intentional Stop keeps "send a message" only. - `task-retry.ts`: optional `initiatedBy: "restart_recovery"` records the activity as actor `system`/`restart-recovery` with `onBehalfOfUserId`. - `doc/execution-semantics.md`: document the rule. ## Verification - New regressions in `server/src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts` use the real recovery, Retry and dispatch services on embedded Postgres: - `continues a user turn once ... after $title and recovery saved the work` (3 cases: restart lease loss before the turn, same-run retry with the runner gone after a settled turn, same-run retry with the lease gone after a settled turn). Each asserts one queued successor bound to the Retry and the user's authority after recovery, idempotent hook calls, system activity attribution, and no second automatic attempt for the automatic Retry's own failure. - `does not continue automatically when $title, and offers a Retry that works on first use` (in-flight turn, system wake, unrelated error). Each asserts no successor, `canRetry: true` on the blocker and the interruption presentation, and one successor after one Retry click. - Red before the fix: all 6 tests fail (no successor, blocker `canRetry: false`). Green after the fix. - `npx vitest run src/services/workspace-recovery.test.ts src/services/task-retry.test.ts src/services/task-interruption-presentation.test.ts src/services/execution-blocker-read.test.ts src/services/heartbeat/recovery.test.ts src/services/explicit-native-continuation.test.ts src/services/quarantined-task-retry.test.ts src/__tests__/workspace-restore-repair-route.test.ts src/services/native-runtime/native-failed-workspace-recovery.test.ts`: 1098 passed. - Not verified on staging. After the next deploy, check a task interrupted by a restart: it should continue without a message, or show Retry. ## Risks - The automatic Retry uses the original user's authority. Admission rechecks that user's current permission, stop proof, saved-work recovery, approvals, pauses, budget and ownership. A refused request leaves the visible Retry. - A settled turn that ended without a result is continued with a fresh Retry turn from saved work. A turn whose outcome is unknown (in flight) is not. - The hook runs after the claim's execution returns. If the server stops between the failure and the request, the task shows Retry instead. - Not in scope: same-run disposition recovery still cannot start a new runner in the existing sandbox after the original remote runner exits. This change continues the task with one fresh Retry turn instead. If that Retry turn also ends without a result and loses its runner, the task shows Retry. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, local test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge Related: #19355 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
e7fb554647 |
test(server): load setup-token route modules during suite setup (#19398)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The setup-token login route lets an owner sign in to Claude for a
sandbox environment
> - The route suite `server/src/routes/setup-token-route.test.ts` fails
on CI in pull requests that do not touch it
> - The first test in the suite times out at 15000 ms, and the other 29
tests pass
> - The first test pays the one-time import cost of the agent route
graph inside its own test budget
> - This pull request moves that import to suite setup, which has a
30000 ms hook budget
> - The benefit is a stable server shard with no change to what the
tests prove
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A survey of failed `PR` workflow runs found intermittent failures of one
test in pull requests that do not touch this area:
```
FAIL src/routes/setup-token-route.test.ts > company-and-environment setup-token route — full path > drives start, status, prompt, code, and completion with no agent id
Error: Test timed out in 15000ms.
```
Examples: jobs 127423956746 and 127457298585 (shard
`general-server-without-chat` 12/12). The survey counted 5 such
failures.
**Expected behavior**
The full-path test passes on every run. The test budget measures the
route behavior, not the module import.
**Steps to reproduce**
Run the unchanged suite on master while all CPU cores are busy:
```sh
cd server
node load.mjs 24 pnpm exec vitest run src/routes/setup-token-route.test.ts --reporter=verbose
```
`load.mjs` starts 24 busy-loop Node processes and runs the command. The
first test fails at 15005 ms.
**Root cause**
`createApp()` called `vi.importActual("../routes/agents.js")` and four
other modules on each call. The first call loads and transforms the full
agent route graph. I timed it: `createApp()` took 11670 ms of the 11698
ms test on an idle machine. The HTTP steps took less than 30 ms. On a
loaded CI runner the import alone crossed the 15000 ms test budget.
Later tests reused the module cache, so only the first test failed.
## What Changed
- Add `loadRouteModules()`, which imports the route and logger modules.
- Call it once in the suite `beforeAll`, after `vi.resetModules()` and
the mock registration. The hook budget is 30000 ms in
`server/vitest.config.ts`.
- `createApp()` now reuses the loaded modules. Each test still builds a
fresh Express app, a fresh transport, and a fresh log capture.
- This follows the pattern in
`server/src/__tests__/agent-skills-routes.test.ts` (#16396).
- No timeout changes, no retries, no skips.
## Verification
Red, on master, with 24 busy-loop processes on an 18-core machine:
```
× ... drives start, status, prompt, code, and completion with no agent id 15005ms
```
Also red on an idle machine on 1 of 3 runs (15006 ms; the other runs
took 11790 ms and 13748 ms).
Green, with this change:
- Idle, 3 runs: 30/30 tests pass. The first test takes 42 to 46 ms.
- With 24 busy-loop processes: 30/30 tests pass. The first test takes 40
ms. The file takes 19.4 s in total.
```sh
cd server
pnpm exec vitest run src/routes/setup-token-route.test.ts --reporter=verbose
```
`tsc --noEmit -p server` reports no errors in this file.
## Risks
- Low risk. The change touches one test file only.
- The import cost now counts against the 30000 ms hook budget. Locally
it is 12 to 15 s idle. The mocks register before the import, as before,
so each test sees the same mocked services.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude
Code with tool use (shell, file edits) and extended reasoning.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
da34bcd48d |
fix(workspaces): resume archived imports from their saved upload (#19396)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Durable workspaces let a replacement web server restore saved task files. > - Legacy workspace imports keep a journal and an encrypted upload receipt across interruption. > - An archived Git import can rebuild a missing source from its saved task commit and edits. > - A fresh clone can also contain newer remote refs. Those refs change the archive manifest even when the task files are unchanged. > - This pull request recovers the exact authenticated upload for an interrupted archived Git import. > - The original journal, source binding, task binding, and execution checks still control publication. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** An archived Git workspace import stopped after its upload persisted. A retry rebuilt the source from the remote repository. New remote refs changed the archive manifest, so the original upload receipt rejected the retry with `remote_workspace_snapshot_operation_content_changed`. **Expected behavior** The retry must recover its original saved upload and complete the same import. It must keep the saved task commit, staged edits, unstaged edits, lifecycle state, and task binding. A changed source or task binding must still block publication. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Archive a Git task with staged and unstaged edits, save its restoration recipe, and remove its local repository. 2. Start the workspace import and lose the upload reply after object persistence, or interrupt its independent restore after the upload is acknowledged. 3. Advance the remote default branch and add an unrelated branch. 4. Retry the original import. Before this change, both interruption cases fail with the same content-change error. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `d8b0eae68772a3bd2bb4a8163b5ce95764b97cff`. **Deployment mode** Cloud workspace migration with external PostgreSQL and durable encrypted object storage. The regression tests use real disposable PostgreSQL, an HTTP Git remote, and encrypted filesystem-backed object storage. Related merged work: #18826 and #19138. No duplicate open fix was found. ## What Changed - Add scoped recovery of an acknowledged snapshot or a pending upload whose object persisted. Authenticate the archive before returning it. Recovery alone does not publish the snapshot. - Resume archived Git imports from those exact saved bytes. Keep the original operation and all publication checks. - Lock and recheck each saved nested source’s company, project, and repository identity in the final publication transaction. - Keep mutable local sources on the existing capture and content-comparison path. - Add regressions for both interruption points, unrelated remote changes, source revocation during recovery, and local edits after interruption. - Document the retry behavior. ## Verification - Before the repair: both new archived retry regressions fail with `remote_workspace_snapshot_operation_content_changed`; the mutable-source control passes. - After the repair: all 204 tests in the migration, snapshot storage, archive, and archive environment suites pass. The suites use real PostgreSQL and encrypted storage. - Server package typecheck and full repository typecheck pass on `bffebbab60edbdf50b42fc37a9e58beb01ceb94d`. - An added source-revocation test initially expected a later expiry error. The existing publication fingerprint rejected the change first. The test now requires that earlier `remote_workspace_migration_publication_changed` error and still checks that authority was not published. - The review finding was reproduced before the safety repair: changing a saved nested repository URL after upload still allowed publication. The new regression requires rejection, and unchanged approved nested sources still restore. - Full repository typecheck and build pass on the final head. The full local test command stopped at one Slack manager authorization fixture with `socket hang up`; the exact case then passed in isolation on the same head, and all three CI chat shards passed. The original local failure is retained. - The first CI server shard run had 4,724 passes and one runtime-process readiness failure in an unchanged fixture. The exact fixture passed in isolation. One unchanged rerun of that shard passed. The first failure remains recorded in the workflow history. - The earlier candidate’s full local test run was stopped after the confirmed review finding; that interrupted run is not reported as a pass. - All CI gates, including `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`, pass on `bffebbab60edbdf50b42fc37a9e58beb01ceb94d`. Greptile is 5/5 on that head, with no remaining findings or unresolved review threads. ## Risks Recovery applies to archived Git sources, whose saved recipe and lifecycle checks still run before publication. A source change during recovery must keep the snapshot unpublished. Missing or corrupt saved objects still fail authentication or retain the existing import obligation. Mutable local sources still reject changed contents. This change adds no database migration and changes no saved archive format. ## Model Used OpenAI GPT-6 in Codex, with code editing, tool use, and test execution. The exact runtime model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
5c185db77c |
fix(tree-control): resume work a subtree pause interrupted (#19394)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - Task tree control lets the board pause a task tree and then resume
it.
> - A pause stops the runs that are active in the tree. The release must
then continue the work that was pending.
> - A child task whose run was active at pause time did not start again
after release. The child became blocked and asked for a user message.
> - A pause is an operator hold, not a failure. It must not strand work,
and it must not require reconciliation for a run that never started.
> - This pull request re-dispatches interrupted work one time on
release, and it settles a legacy Stop that never entered the adapter.
> - The benefit is that pause and resume keep a task tree moving without
manual recovery, and real safety gates stay in force.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A parent task delegated two children. One child's run was active (in
host workspace preparation, before the adapter started) when the board
paused the parent's tree. The pause cancelled that run. After the board
released the hold, no new run started for that child. The child became
`blocked` with the execution blocker cause
`legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation`. Later the next action became
"Send a message to continue." A sibling child that had no active run at
pause time resumed normally.
**Expected behavior**
A run that a subtree pause cancels is an operator hold. On release, the
pending work starts again one time, automatically. It does not go
through execution reconciliation when the run never entered its adapter.
It does not wait for a user message.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Create a parent task and a child task that is assigned to an agent.
2. Wake the child. While its run is in host preparation (or queued),
call `POST /api/issues/:parentId/tree-holds` with `{ "mode": "pause" }`.
3. Call `POST /api/issues/:parentId/tree-holds/:holdId/release` without
`wakeAgents`.
4. Before this change, no new run starts, and `getExecutionBlocker`
reports `legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation` for the child.
**Root cause**
- (a) The pause records each interrupted run in the hold member snapshot
(`activeRunId`). Nothing used that record on release.
- (b) Release woke tasks only when `metadata.wakeAgents === true`.
Without it, release relied on stranded-issue recovery. That recovery
stands down when the latest run was cancelled by an operator
(`isOperatorCancelledRun`). So the interrupted child had no owner.
- (c) The pause Stop of a legacy run in preparation is written directly
as `cancelled`. Legacy terminalization classifies a cancelled run with
no bootstrap evidence as an unknown outcome. It records
`legacy_execution_requires_reconciliation`, although the gated dispatch
never entered the adapter.
- Native runs: the verified native Stop does not create the
reconciliation hold, but gap (b) applies to native runs too. The release
change is runtime-independent.
## What Changed
- `issueTreeControlService.findOwedPauseResume` decides if a task is
owed one resume. The task's latest run must be an operator Stop that a
pause hold member snapshot names, recorded while that hold was active.
The task must still be executable by the same agent, and no pause may
still cover it. The obligation belongs to the run, so overlapping pauses
keep it until the last covering release.
- New `services/issue-tree-resume.ts` re-dispatches owed work with wake
reason `issue_tree_resumed` (`holdId` and `interruptedRunId` in the
context). A compare-and-set claim (`treeHoldResume`) on the interrupted
run makes the resume happen at most once. A failed wake returns the
claim.
- Pause release and `mode: "resume"` call it for every member of the
released hold, also without `wakeAgents`. When `wakeAgents` is true, the
existing loop wakes every executable member.
- A task that still has an execution blocker is not replayed. The
release writes `issue.tree_resume_wake_skipped`, the blocker stays
visible, and the obligation stays unclaimed.
- `releaseHold` updates only an `active` hold. A repeated release gets
`409`.
- `settleCancelledLegacyPreparation`: when the executor that owned a
cancelled legacy run proves that dispatch never entered the adapter, it
records bootstrap evidence and resolves that run's
`legacy-execution:<runId>` hold as `false_positive`. It also corrects an
automatic no-replay disposition and restores a `blocked` status only
when that disposition made the change. Then it re-dispatches owed work,
for a release that happened while the Stop was unwinding. It requires a
requested Stop with no existing recovery receipt, and no process,
session, native finalization, unreleased lease, or execution-start
event.
- `settleUnrecoverableExecutions` waits while a legacy executor still
holds its controller lease, and records a `legacyCancellationBlock`
receipt when it blocks a task for a cancelled legacy run.
- Docs: `doc/execution-semantics.md` and `doc/composer-stop.md` describe
the resume rule.
## Verification
- New regression
`server/src/__tests__/issue-tree-pause-resume-run.test.ts` uses embedded
Postgres, the real heartbeat, and the real tree-control routes:
- A run paused during preparation: nothing runs during the hold, there
is no blocker, and release creates exactly one `issue_tree_resumed` run
that succeeds. A second release returns `409` and creates no run.
- Release before the stopped preparation finishes unwinding (with the
periodic disposition run in between): exactly one resumed run after the
executor settles.
- An automatic no-replay disposition that ran first: the blocker clears,
the status returns to `in_progress`, and release resumes once.
- Overlapping child and parent pauses: no resume while the parent pause
remains, then exactly one resume after it is released.
- A queued run cancelled by the pause: release creates exactly one
resumed run.
- A task reassigned to a user during the hold: no resume.
- A mid-turn legacy Stop with unknown outcome: no replay, the
reconciliation blocker remains, and `issue.tree_resume_wake_skipped` is
logged.
- Red before each fix: the first 4 cases failed on master; the 3 review
cases failed on the first PR commit. All 7 pass now.
- Also passed locally: `issue-tree-control-routes`,
`issue-tree-control-service`, `heartbeat-workspace-busy`,
`heartbeat-undispatched-execution-wait`, `execution-control-work`,
`legacy-workspace-restore-recovery`, `legacy-continuation-authority`,
`task-retry`, `legacy-execution-recovery`, `agent-conversations`,
`heartbeat-retry-scheduling`, `satisfied-connection-intents`.
- Not verified here: a live staging pause/resume. Re-check on staging
after deploy.
## Risks
- Behavior change: release now starts the work that the pause
interrupted, also without `wakeAgents`. Before, that work stayed idle.
Other idle tasks still wake only with `wakeAgents`.
- The settlement trusts the executor's adapter-entry flag. The flag is
set only inside the atomic dispatch gate, which refuses a cancelled run.
The settlement also requires no process, session, lease, or execution
event.
- A native run whose Stop has not finalized at release time is not a
target. Stranded recovery and explicit wake still apply.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used through Claude
Code with tool use (shell, file edit, test execution).
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
6ca7b151f7 |
feat: compact an agent's context from the task Properties panel (#19378)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A task's Properties panel shows the assignee agent's context window
(paperclipai/paperclip#19273)
> - The board can see that the context is nearly full, but it cannot act
on it
> - A full context makes the agent compact at an unplanned time, often
in the middle of work
> - This pull request adds "Compact now" to the Context hover card
> - The benefit is that the board can compact the agent's context
between runs, at a time it chooses
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs paperclipai/paperclip#19273
**Problem**
The Context row shows how full the agent's context window is. The board
cannot ask the agent to compact it.
**Proposed solution**
A "Compact now" button in the Context hover card. It runs the harness's
own compaction: Codex `thread/compact/start`, and Claude's `/compact`
command through ACP.
**Alternatives considered**
A separate PRP `session.compact` command. Both harnesses run compaction
as a turn, so a compaction turn keeps the existing durable turn binding,
interruption, and recovery. A separate command needs a second turn
lifecycle.
## What Changed
- UI: the Context hover card shows Compact now with three states:
available, Compacting…, and unavailable with a reason (agent mid-run,
harness unsupported, task closed). The Storybook story shows each state.
- Server: `POST /api/issues/:id/context/compact` (board only,
`decideIssueAccess` `issue:mutate`, activity log
`issue.context_compaction_requested`). It queues a short run marked by
`contextSnapshot.contextCompactionRequestId`. `GET
/issues/:id/context-usage` returns the `compaction` state.
- Server: a compaction run does no task work. The native status arbiter
preserves the task status. The lifecycle skips handoff, liveness
continuation, review-path disposition and the issue comment, as it does
for goal-control runs.
- Runner TS: `startTurn({ compact: true })`. The Codex harness session
sends `thread/compact/start`. The runnerd transport maps it to PRP
`turn.start` with `compact: true` (Codex) or `text: "/compact"`
(Claude/ACPX). The native runtime option `sessionCompaction` requires a
resumed session and settles with a synthesized yielded result.
- Runner Rust: `turn.start` accepts `compact: true` for Codex.
`CodexProvider::start_compaction_turn` sends `thread/compact/start` and
binds the turn from the `turn/started` that follows the empty response.
- Fix (from #19273): Codex emitted `context.compacted` on both the start
and the end of one compaction item. It now emits it once, and the count
is distinct by `compactionId`.
- Fix (from #19273): the conversation event view dropped
`context.compacted`, so a finished run never showed the divider. The
view now keeps compactions, plus context readings for runs that
compacted. A finished run's compactions show as thread dividers.
- Fix: the Codex harness stamps before/after sizes on the compaction
event. Codex reports the compacted size before the compaction item ends,
so the old neighbour-based guess showed the wrong size.
## Verification
- `pnpm -r typecheck`, `pnpm build`, `pnpm check:token-gates`, `node
scripts/storybook-catalog.mjs`: pass.
- New tests: `server/src/__tests__/context-compaction.test.ts`,
`status-arbiter.test.ts`, `issue-context-usage.test.ts` (duplicate
compaction counts once), `ui/.../context-usage-row.test.tsx`,
`native-session-runtime.test.ts` (context compaction), Codex driver and
runnerd transport tests, Rust
`codex_compaction_turn_binds_the_turn_reported_after_its_empty_response`.
Rust `codex_provider` suite: 115 passed.
- `pnpm test:run` locally: one failure in
`chat-channels.integration.test.ts`. It reads
`.claude/skills/slack/SKILL.md` from the main checkout, which is not
present in this worktree. It is not related to this change.
- Live, local worktree instance, Codex agent on the Paperclip runner:
clicked Compact now. The run succeeded. Context went from 35k to 9.4k
tokens, and later 9.4k to 9.2k. The task stayed In Review. The thread
shows "Context compacted · 9.4k → 9.2k tokens" and the meter dropped.
- Live Claude proof: pending. The local Claude agent needs an Anthropic
API key. claude-agent-acp handles `/compact` as an echo-less turn, and
the runner already maps its "Compacting completed." notice to
`context.compacted`.
## Risks
- A compaction run resumes the agent's session. If the session cannot
resume, the run fails with `native_context_compaction_unavailable` and
the task is unchanged.
- Compact now is not available while the agent runs on the task, because
compaction interrupts the active turn.
- The conversation view now returns context readings for runs that
compacted. Runs that never compacted return the same events as before.
- An old runner binary ignores `compact` and rejects the `turn.start`
because it has no text. It does not start an ordinary turn.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, through Claude Code
with tool use and code execution.
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
240d46e2ec |
fix(native-runtime): join the deferred observer seen when a duplicate append arrives (#19397)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native runtime writes runner events through
`PaperclipControlPlanePort.appendEvent`.
> - A terminal event can defer its post-commit observer. A duplicate
append of the same event must join that observer. It must not run
`onDuplicateEvent`.
> - The duplicate looked up the observer only after its own event
transaction finished. If the original observer settled during that
transaction, the observer left the map. Then the duplicate ran
`onDuplicateEvent`.
> - This made the test "joins the exact deferred observer on duplicate
append..." fail on slow CI (job 127633060467, and once on Windows).
> - This pull request captures the pending observer when the duplicate
arrives. The join decision no longer depends on database latency.
> - The benefit is a deterministic join and a stable test.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
The server test `paperclip-control-plane-port.test.ts > joins the exact
deferred observer on duplicate append and replays it after a new port
opens` failed intermittently with `Error: must join the original owned
observation`. The test gives the duplicate append 30 ms and then
releases the original observer. On a slow runner, the duplicate's event
transaction took longer than 30 ms. The original observer settled and
its `.then` handler removed the map entry. The duplicate then found no
observer after its transaction and ran `onDuplicateEvent`. (The CI
failure took 90 ms.)
**Expected behavior**
A duplicate append that arrives while the original deferred observer is
pending joins that observer. Database latency does not change this
result.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Add a 60 ms sleep inside the `appendEvent` transaction when the
receipt disposition is `duplicate`.
2. Run `pnpm vitest run
src/services/native-runtime/paperclip-control-plane-port.test.ts -t
"joins the exact deferred"` from `server/`.
3. The test fails with `must join the original owned observation`. This
is the same error and stack as CI.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.3
|
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
879140cbbd | Retain ACPX read events before idle sidecar replacement (#19290) | ||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
958f9aa9f3 |
feat(issues): limit agent-created task trees to parent and child (#19312)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Agents split work into tasks. A task can have a parent task. > - Today agents can nest tasks to any depth: parent, child, grandchild, and deeper. > - Deep agent-made trees are hard to follow, and an agent that works on a child task makes grandchildren by default. > - This pull request limits agent-created trees to two levels: a top-level task and its children. > - A request for a grandchild does not fail. The server puts the new task beside the requester and tells the agent. > - Board users keep full control. They can still nest to any depth. Existing deep trees stay valid. > - The pull request also records which task created each new task, so the audit trail stays complete when the parent changes. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. This is the feature description. Related: #16853 (budgets that include descendant work) also reasons about task trees; this change does not alter its traversal. **Subsystem affected** Issues (tasks): create, child create and move in the issue service and routes. Agent tools, chat suggestions and creation provenance use these paths. **Problem or motivation** Agents create subtasks as deep as they want. An agent that runs on a child task gets that child as the default parent, so its follow-ups become grandchildren. The trees become deep and hard to read. The parent link is also the only record of which task created a follow-up, so that record is lost when the parent changes. **Proposed solution** Limit agent-created trees to a parent and its children. When an agent asks for a grandchild, put the new task under the requester's parent and return `parentAdjusted`. Do not reject the request. Keep board users unrestricted. Record the originating task in a new server-set `origin_issue_id` column. Keep `origin_run_id` as the originating run. **Alternatives considered** Reject grandchild requests with an error. We did not do this, because agents then fail mid-task. Add a database constraint. We did not do this, because existing deep trees must stay valid and nesting can return later. ## What Changed - Add `MAX_AGENT_TASK_HIERARCHY_DEPTH` (2) and the `IssueParentAdjustment` type in `packages/shared`. - Add `resolveNewTaskParent` and `planIssueParentChange` in `server/src/services/issues.ts`. `create`, `createChild` and `update` use the agent limit by default (`parentDepthPolicy: "flatten"`). - The issue create, `/children` and PATCH routes pass `allow_nested` for board users. For agents, the routes check authorization against the parent that the server actually writes. - The requester keeps its behavior when the server moves a task beside it: `blockParentUntilDone` blocks the requester, and the new task inherits the requester's workspace and privacy. - The server never moves a task above a low-trust boundary root that contains the requester. - These subsystems keep any depth, because they find their work by parent: watchdog reviews, monitor recovery, email-channel placement, and routines that a person configured. - An agent move of a task that has children skips only the parent change and returns `reason: "has_children"`. - Add `issues.origin_issue_id` (nullable, `on delete set null`, indexed) in migration `0434`. Only the server sets it. The `createdFrom` detail field, the `createdFromIssueId` filter and task-creation provenance read it first. - Chat prompts now let a chat agent create one task, a task with children, or separate tasks. The conversation is never a parent. - The runner `create_task` tool accepts an optional `parentTaskId`. A chat agent can create a top-level task and then put subtasks under it. The run must be able to read and change the parent. A conversation is never a parent. The depth limit still applies. Project tools map the field to `parentId` through the issue route. The protocol manifest, semantic contracts and eval fixture are regenerated. - Watchdog runs that have an active watchdog keep their requested parent on all create paths, because their access is limited to the watched subtree. - Fix a bug that the test drive found: the chat (MCP) `create_task` ignored the requested `status`, so a `backlog` task became `todo` and started to run. It now uses the same rule as the native tool. - Update `skills/paperclip`, `doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and add the plan `doc/plans/2026-11-05-two-level-task-hierarchy.md`. ## Verification - `cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/agent-task-hierarchy-depth.test.ts src/__tests__/agent-task-hierarchy-depth-routes.test.ts`: 19 new tests for service and route behavior, all pass. - Related suites (64 files: issues service, thread interactions, privacy, watchdogs, provenance, runner tool authority, decisions, routines, project tools): 1208 tests pass. Two tests changed because of the intended behavior and pass now. Two `email-channels.integration` tests fail locally because the test cannot find a bundled skill file from this worktree path. This change does not touch that code. - `packages/db`: migration safety, snapshot drift and journal tests pass. - Typecheck passes for `server`, `packages/shared`, `packages/db`, `cli` and `ui` (local `ui` errors come only from generated Storybook catalog files that are absent). - Local test drive on an isolated instance with real Claude agents: 29 of 29 use cases pass, including an agent on a child task (follow-ups placed beside it, with the notice) and a chat that creates a top-level task with three subtasks. - I did not run the full `pnpm test:run` or `pnpm build` locally. CI runs them. ## Risks - Behavior change for agents: some follow-ups that were grandchildren are now siblings. The parent of the requester is woken when all its children finish, which now includes these tasks. - The runner `create_task` input contract adds one optional field, so the protocol manifest and the pack contract change. The tool output does not change: it shows the actual `parentId`, and the activity log records `parentAdjusted`. - Migration `0434` adds a nullable column, a foreign key and an index. It does not backfill rows. - `IssueCreationSource.run` is now nullable. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`) in Claude Code, with tool use (shell, file edits, local test runs). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [ ] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Dotta
|
d8b0eae687 |
test(evals): pin completed timeline command account for full-ten measurement (#19395)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The chat catalog needs fixed source and explicit conditions for each measurement. > - The latest timeline run delivered a complete account within its original deadline. > - Its assertion missed ordinary exitCode notation and a command with an omitted subject inside a named worker bullet. > - The reviewed source corrects those bounded textual checks while retaining independent history and command proof. > - This pull request pins that immutable source for one full-ten measurement. > - Original failed grades and unresolved Company timing remain visible. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19392, #19086, #19388. This follows the prior source pin. The latest timeline response correctly described requirements, a real failed command, saved pause, human reassignment, repair and successful verification. Its original grade still failed one narrative assertion. This pin carries the reviewed correction without merging the full catalog or its production overlays. ## What Changed - Pin source `936c3bbe0e83ca15616254f23d9023b2065fc5fb`, tree `e5c64d67935497164b098e31e995f87ba7875d06`. - Advance only the timeline oracle from v11 to v12 in the candidate snapshot and manifest. - Retain all 244 current queries, contexts, expected outcomes, model, credentials, clocks and human/native accounting. - Record one planned full-ten bounded measurement at native cap 2 and zero automatic retries. - Change only the manifest, its target assertion and the exact candidate descriptor snapshot. ## Verification - I verified the immutable source branch readback before I published this pin. - The new narrative control fails on the parent. The fixed source passes 300 timeline, native-proof and declaration controls, including all 242 lazy declarations with zero fixture callbacks. - The response from result 5094 is accepted by the local diagnostic. The original grade is retained as FAILED; this is not a new native PASS. - Fresh full runner E2E types and the SDK guard over 506 inputs pass in the qualified source graph. An earlier isolated worktree type attempt had dependency-alias errors; the clean source qualification supersedes that setup gap. - Controller: `node --test tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-adapter.test.mjs tests/runner-e2e/chat-full-catalog-testops-reconcile.test.mjs` — 40 controls pass. - The snapshot equals the committed source descriptor bytes. All 244 rows compare equal to the prior pin except the timeline oracle version. - Source descriptor SHA256: `19185aa5298c93d159c3d8547661fd6ef22185e74be1c18b8497bae2ef8051c7`. - Controller manifest SHA256: `822494b170139a8204ff36b33891e2f4960ac0aba6800e9856f2d25dd24de7c6`. - Launcher, protected evidence wire and the accepted 506 SDK inputs remain unchanged. The source SDK registry stays `efa70621e9fb42aa185f7ee616a1a726aa3eccb367e67e28817cedf26ef2ade8`. - Exact pin head `31f47fcdfb600e6b15b35ed50c2a447d03681f06` has 56 successful checks and three configured skips. Both protected checks pass. Greptile is 5/5 for this head with zero open threads. Paperclip Review completed neutral at 5/5. GitHub reports CLEAN and MERGEABLE. These checks do not qualify the unrun native experiment. ## Risks - Original timeline result 5094 remains FAILED. All three native runs succeeded and the account was complete in 248,876 ms, but the original narrative check failed. Local calibration does not rewrite that grade. - Original Company result 5093 ended without first-CEO completion. Its model/runtime timing cause remains unresolved. This source makes no Company runtime or latency fix claim. - The full-ten measurement is unrun. It is a bounded experiment, not proof of deterministic timing, reliability or an all-ten pass. - Company retains two base human inputs plus at most one independently verified UI approval, minimum two and maximum three native runs, and 480,000 ms. Timeline retains three native runs, one human input and 720,000 ms. No condition is waived. - Secret journeys still require independent semantic safety review. Metadata shape alone does not establish that a proposed name is non-sensitive. - The interaction-accept and API-search overlays remain separate, reviewed, unmerged core PRs. This pin does not merge them or the full catalog. The 196/244 admission gate stays fixed. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. The host does not expose an exact context-window size. No model or paid provider was called for local controls. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge |
||
|
|
f8cb4957dc |
fix(ui): default Tasks to All tasks with a neutral sort header (#19393)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The Tasks page helps people inspect work across their company. > - A new viewer currently starts in Mine and can miss other company tasks. > - The task table also shows an active sort header before the viewer selects a sort. > - This pull request starts new viewers in All tasks and keeps the default sort header neutral. > - People see company work in newest-update order and keep their saved view choices. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** The initial task view and the task table's default sort state. **Subsystem affected** ui/ — React board UI. **Current behavior** Tasks opens Mine when the viewer has no saved view. The table highlights Last updated even when the viewer has not selected a column sort. **Proposed behavior** Tasks opens All tasks when no saved view exists. The table keeps newest-updated tasks first without an active header or arrow. A column selection or an explicit sort URL activates the selected header. **Reason and benefit** New viewers can inspect company work immediately. The header distinguishes default ordering from an explicit sort choice. **Breaking changes** The first-visit view changes from Mine to All tasks. Saved views and explicit view URLs keep priority. Existing Inbox and Needs attention preferences retain their meaning. The change does not alter task access or database contracts. **Additional context** Refs #19363. This change builds on the grouped task menu from that merged pull request. It uses the existing menu and design tokens. ## What Changed - Default the Coordinator and combined task surfaces to All tasks. - Preserve saved personal views and migrate previous picker choices. - Keep implicit Last updated descending order separate from active header state. - Test default ordering, explicit sorting, reset behavior, view selection, and preference migration. - Update the product and implementation docs. ## Verification - Passed 118 focused tests across task routing, table sorting, views, and collection preferences. - Passed `pnpm check:token-gates`, `pnpm -r typecheck`, and `pnpm build`. - Full `pnpm test:run` is running. Its result will be updated here. - Greptile passed the current head with 5/5 and no findings or open review threads. - Browser check: All tasks uses the grouped My work and Organization menu. Last updated has no active highlight by default. Selecting the header adds the sort URL and active direction. Removing the explicit sort restores the neutral header. - Manual check: Open Tasks with no saved task view. Confirm All tasks opens. Select Mine, leave Tasks, and return. Confirm Mine remains selected. ## Risks - The new default shows more accessible company tasks on the first visit. Saved view choices remain intact. - Task tables share the sort-state change. Explicit sort links and column clicks retain active styling. Default row order stays newest-updated first. - No schema, API, permission, or execution changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family. This session does not expose the exact model ID or context-window size. Used reasoning, code editing, terminal commands, and browser verification. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Scott Tong <scott@scottsmbpm5max.lan> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.2 |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
5ab7b78f2b | Runner: retain the provider across hosted park and reclaim (#19140) | ||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
7c04adb2d6 |
test(evals): pin company environment and API search repairs (#19392)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip manages AI agents and their governed actions. > - The TestOps controller runs an immutable product-eval source. > - The last company-secret attempt rejected a safe metadata question before private entry. > - A governed approval also had a redundant server notification and wake path. > - Natural-language API search could hide the resource needed for a timeline answer. > - This pull request pins the reviewed source and its exact descriptor snapshot. > - New native evidence must still prove the affected journeys. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19381, #19093, #19387, #19388. This is the next controller pin for those reviewed changes. The core pull requests remain unmerged. ## What Changed - Pin source `2c99c248e839f41b520fc2d7e3702169ac6cb0a2` and its exact descriptor snapshot. - Advance company oracle v12 to v13. Admit bounded environment-name questions without a required authored pattern or exact prompt template. Preserve independent human-answer validation. - Include the reviewed interaction-accept notification and API-search ranking overlays. Record their route and catalog dependencies in the company and timeline provenance. - Retain the existing cap of two, zero retries, DeepSeek1017 model, and all 244 current YAML definitions. Company keeps 480000ms, native2..3, base human2 plus one independently proved approval. Timeline keeps720000ms, native3/human1. ## Verification - Source:396 controls in9 suites,2046 API catalog controls,145 route controls, full runner TypeScript check, and unchanged SDK506 input guard passed. Fresh-master API PR has2059 controls; its other baseline tests are absent from this catalog source. - Controller:133 contract, API, adapter, reconcile, streaming and manifest controls passed. Existing report-lock preparation returned `already-reviewed`. - All current YAML definitions and launcher bytes remain unchanged from the prior source. No model or native eval ran for this pin. - The original company5059 and timeline5060 remain failed. Company private entry, approval and final binding remain unproved on this successor. - Exact-head normal checks are terminal:56 success,3 intentional skips, and one neutral Paperclip review. Greptile and Paperclip both report5/5 with no findings; review threads are empty. The next TestOps/AWS run follows the protected controller merge. ## Risks The new source is not a native feature pass. Its effect on model completion is unproved. The original480000ms company budget may still be too short for three native turns. No budget change or count waiver is included. The full catalog remains outside master and its existing admission gate remains unchanged. The controller reuses byte-identical SDK506 evidence; no compiler or registry renewal is claimed. Actual post-merge helper imports still need qualification against the merged controller lock. The CI virtual merge includes a newer upstream lock than the local frozen dependency proof. ## Model Used OpenAI `gpt-6.1-sol` through Codex, with repository tools and code execution. The host did not report its context window. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either linked existing issues or described the issue in-PR - [x] I have not referenced internal or instance-local Paperclip issues or links - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal ticket id - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is5/5 with no open findings - [x] I will address reviewer comments before requesting merge Co-authored-by: Paperclip <paperclip@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
4033f7f17f |
fix(recovery): let a task Retry run keep its bounded transient retry (#19384)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - A user can click Retry on a blocked task. Paperclip then admits one new run that continues in the saved workspace > - That run can fail before the provider starts, for example when the download of the saved workspace snapshot gets a transient `ECONNRESET` > - The scheduler classifies this failure as transient and tries to schedule the normal bounded retry > - The automatic-retry admission accepts only continuations that a user comment started. It refuses a Retry continuation (`commentId: null`, `taskRetryRequestId` set) with `continuation_user_authorization_missing` > - So the task does not retry. Paperclip escalates the restore failure, and the task becomes blocked again after one network reset > - This pull request lets a plain task Retry renew its authority for the bounded transient retry, with its own receipt for each new run > - The benefit is that a transient setup failure after Retry uses the normal retry budget and does not block the task ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** A run started by the task Retry button failed during setup: `remote_workspace_restore_failed: step=snapshot_download; storage=transport_closed code=ECONNRESET`. The run event said "The automatic retry could not revalidate the original user continuation." (retry reason `transient_failure`, attempt 1 of 2). No retry was scheduled, and the task became blocked. **Expected behavior** A transient setup failure of a Retry-admitted run gets the same bounded automatic retry as a run that a user comment started. **Root cause** `admitExplicitContinuationRetry` in `server/src/services/explicit-native-continuation.ts` required `explicitUserContinuation.commentId` to be a GUID. A Retry continuation has `commentId: null`. Also, dispatch in `server/src/services/execution-continuation.ts` bound a Retry receipt to exactly the run that it admitted, so a successor run could not prove its authority. Refs #19207 (it named remote restore failures and left a board recovery action) Refs #19340 (it retries quarantined tasks in their saved workspace) Refs #19326 (same bounded retry path for an out-of-date Runner) ## What Changed - `admitExplicitContinuationRetry` now accepts two kinds of authority. The comment path is unchanged and moved into `readCommentRetryAuthority`. The new `readTaskRetryRetryAuthority` accepts a plain task Retry only. The Retry request must be coalesced, from a user, with the same generation and actor, strategy `continue`, and no chat, queued-message, canonical-intent or fresh-workspace readiness. Interrupt and failed-run retries stay one-run. - The successor run gets its own `explicit_user_continuation_retry` receipt with the same `taskRetryRequestId` and actor and `automaticRetry.sourceRunId` set to the parent. The Retry request stays bound to the run that it admitted. - Dispatch (`buildExecutionContinuation`) accepts a Retry successor only from its own receipt, its exact `retryOfRunId` parent, the current `executionRunId` and the unchanged Retry intent. The direct path for the admitted run is unchanged. - Tests in `server/src/services/task-retry.test.ts`: one regression for the full retry chain, and eight refusal cases. ## Verification - Red: before the fix, the new test failed with `{ outcome: "not_scheduled", errorCode: "continuation_user_authorization_missing" }`. This is the same refusal as the incident. - Green: `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server exec vitest run src/services/task-retry.test.ts` gives 58/58. - The regression test proves these points: the first retry is scheduled with `{ previousRunId: parent, commentId: null, taskRetryRequestId }`; the Retry request stays bound to the admitted run; dispatch accepts the successor; a repeated schedule call adopts the same successor without a second receipt; a second transient failure retries from its immediate parent; the budget then stops with `retry_exhausted`; dispatch refuses the successor when its own receipt is removed. - The refusal cases prove that no successor and no receipt are created after: wrong actor, unadmitted request, wrong generation, request bound to another run, chat Retry, fresh-workspace readiness, reassignment, superseding work. - Nearby suites pass (601/601): `execution-continuation`, `legacy-explicit-continuation-recovery`, `explicit-native-continuation`, `execution-continuation-provenance`, `quarantined-task-retry`, `issue-queued-comments-routes`, `task-retry`. - I did not run the layered server typecheck locally because of a disk limit in the sandbox. CI must confirm it. ## Risks - Behavior change: a plain task Retry run that fails transiently now retries automatically within the existing bounded budget (2 attempts). The scheduler still decides which failures are transient. The same rule already applies to runs that a user comment started. - Chat, queued-message and fresh-workspace Retries, failed-run retries and Interrupt keep their one-run contracts. - No schema or migration change. - Documentation gap: `doc/execution-semantics.md` (line 1210) says "One-run Retry and Interrupt intents retain their separate admission contracts; they are not renewable user-message authority." That sentence must change to describe this rule. The author's publication path cannot carry the full 320 KB file, so that one-sentence edit is still pending. The proposed text: "A plain task Retry that continues in the saved workspace renews the same way: the successor's receipt names the same Retry request and actor, while the Retry request itself stays bound to the run it admitted. Dispatch accepts that successor only from its own receipt, its exact retry parent, and the unchanged admitted Retry request, so a transient failure before or during that run, such as a reset saved-workspace download, uses the normal bounded retry budget instead of blocking the task. Chat, queued-message and fresh-workspace Retries, failed-run retries, and Interrupt intents retain their separate one-run admission contracts; they are not renewable authority." > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), used through Claude Code as a Paperclip agent, with tool use and code execution (shell, Vitest on embedded PostgreSQL). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (the `doc/execution-semantics.md` sentence above is pending) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Nicky Leach
|
96516a8622 | Keep ACPX output while Core reconnects (#19365) | ||
|
github-actions[bot]andlockfile-bot
|
675f7283dd |
chore(lockfile): refresh pnpm-lock.yaml (#19389)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip uses a dependency lock for reproducible builds. > - Dependency changes on master need matching lock entries. > - Paid eval reports also pin a reviewed offline correction. > - Reports must install before paid model work starts. > - This automated PR keeps the lock and report proof together. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What happened?** Dependency manifests on master changed after the last committed lock refresh. **Expected behavior** Frozen installs must match those manifests. Eval reports must retain matching offline lock proof. **Steps to reproduce** Run a frozen install before and after this lock refresh. ## What Changed - Refresh the dependency lock from the manifests on master. - Include the matching offline report correction and hashes. ## Verification - Pinned pnpm resolution completed with lifecycle scripts disabled. - The report proof refresh accepted the reviewed committed baseline. - The workflow rejected changes outside the lock and report proof files. ## Risks The lockfile bot merges this PR without CI or review when every added package version is at least 3 days old on npm. Otherwise the PR waits for a maintainer, and the daily refresh tries again. The bot merges only the exact commit this workflow generated from manifests already reviewed on master. Unknown report lock baselines remain blocked. This update changes no permissions or paid enable gates. ## Model Used None — generated by pnpm and the deterministic report-lock updater. ## Checklist - [x] Thinking path and problem description included - [x] Generated lock and matching report proof included - [x] Release-age gate decides between bot merge and maintainer review Co-authored-by: lockfile-bot <lockfile-bot@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
c9c4949c86 |
build(deps): bump zod from 4.4.3 to 4.6.6 (#17364)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The shared validators use zod to check API input, and the Runner contracts check some of the same values again > - zod below 4.6.6 has a high-severity memory issue (GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5), so this bump is necessary > - zod 4.6 also changes string `min`, `max`, and `length`: they now count Unicode code points, not UTF-16 units > - The Runner question parser and the goal readers still use JavaScript string length, so emoji text can pass zod and then fail later > - This pull request bumps zod and keeps the string-length bound on those schemas > - The benefit is that we get the security fix, and these inputs still fail at validation ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs GHSA-mrhx-c7xc-m3w5. **What happened?** With zod 4.6, three CI tests failed on this bump. Two showed an emoji body that is over the agent commentary ceiling and that zod now accepts. The third is the scheduler timeout described under Verification. **Expected behavior** A dependency bump does not widen an API limit. Text over the limit gets a validation error. **Impact** Emoji text between the two bounds passed validation and failed later: - A question set is created, and then each answer gets a 422. The question stays pending and nobody can answer it. A schema and parser run confirmed the mismatch. This was not run over HTTP. - The Muse route returns a 500 because `parsePaperclipQuestionSet` throws an error that is not an `HttpError`. This comes from reading the code. It was not run. - A Runner goal normalizes to null and replaces the stored goal, or it is marked blocked. This comes from reading the code. It was not run. ## What Changed - Bump zod to `^4.6.6`. The lockfile resolves 4.6.7. (Dependabot) - Add `maxStringLength` to `packages/shared/src/validators/text.ts`. It checks zod `max` and JavaScript string length. - Use `maxStringLength` for the question-set text fields, the Runner goal objective, and the agent commentary body. - Add regression tests for the question-set bound and the goal objective bound. - Dependabot recreated the branch on current `master` (`@dependabot recreate`) to resolve `pnpm-lock.yaml` conflicts. This happened twice. The lockfile is Dependabot's. Each time, the two fix commits were applied again without changes. ## Verification - Compared zod 4.4.3, 4.6.5, 4.6.6, and 4.6.7 directly. The change to `max` is in 4.6.5 or earlier, and 4.4.3 does not have it. - Passed locally: `packages/shared` tests `agent-commentary`, `validators/issue`, and `runner-goal`, plus `tsc --noEmit` in `packages/shared`. - Passed locally on the first fix commit: server `agent-commentary.integration`, `agent-commentary-helper`, and `openapi-routes`. The later commit changes these schemas again. CI passed these tests at `b5e9dc7352`. - Local testing was focused. GitHub CI is the full regression check. CI passed at `b5e9dc7352`, including `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. - Greptile reviewed `b5e9dc7352`. The score is 5/5, with no inline comments. - After the recreate, the fix commits applied cleanly as `bad62c3ba5` and `3294552e65` on Dependabot's `46789d1487`. Their diff is the same as the diff Greptile reviewed. The lockfile still resolves zod 4.6.7. The focused `packages/shared` tests (`validators/issue`, `runner-goal`) and `tsc --noEmit` in `packages/shared` passed again locally. A second `pnpm-lock.yaml` conflict came before CI finished at `3294552e65`. - Second recreate: Dependabot ignored the first `@dependabot recreate` (no reaction and no update job after 20 minutes). It acted on the second command and pushed `83c328c15c`. The fix commits applied cleanly as `dd3e87d93e` and `95b450048f`, with the same diff. The lockfile still resolves zod 4.6.7. The same focused tests and `tsc --noEmit` passed again locally. Greptile first scored `95b450048f` 4/5 with one P2: the description did not explain the source changes. Greptile read Dependabot's replacement description, which was live during that review. The description was restored and the thread resolved. The new review scored `95b450048f` 5/5 with no findings. CI failed at `95b450048f` in two shards. Neither failure comes from the zod change: - `server (9/12)`: `server/scripts/reporting-lock-policy.test.mjs` fails with "Reporting lock changed; review the dependency correction before install". #19283 added this test today. It requires the committed `pnpm-lock.yaml` hash to match `tests/runner-e2e/report-lock.json`. Every pull request that changes the lockfile fails it until the hashes are renewed, for example #17172 and #17911. - `workspaces-a (1/2)`: `cli/src/__tests__/company-import-export-e2e.test.ts` timed out waiting for its child server. The same test failed the same way on two unrelated branches in the same hour (runs 42115721271 and 42109846042). A rerun of this shard at `95b450048f` passed. The rerun of `server (9/12)` failed again on the reporting-lock test. - #19356 fixed the reporting-lock gate for Dependabot lockfiles and merged. A re-run reuses the old merge commit, so the empty commit `482d76686e` starts a run against current `master`. `pnpm-lock.yaml` and the reporting-lock proof on `master` did not change since this branch's base. - CI at `482d76686e`: `ci / policy` passed, and `server (9/12)` skipped the reporting-lock test as #19356 intends. `e2e shard (6/8)` failed once in `cloud-auth.spec.ts` ("apiResponse.json: Response has been disposed", a Playwright race in a route handler). The same test passed at `95b450048f` with the same code. A rerun passed. All checks pass, including `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e`. - Earlier failure: `issue-monitor-scheduler.test.ts` ("lets the board check a scheduled monitor on an in_progress task") timed out in CI at `d60b5f56d8`. It passed 5 of 5 local runs with the first fix. The cause is unknown. The test waits 3 seconds for heartbeat runs to settle, so CI load is possible, but this is not proven. The test passed in the CI run at `b5e9dc7352`. This shows recovery. It does not explain the earlier timeout. ## Risks - All other zod string bounds now count code points. Emoji text can be up to 2N UTF-16 units and 4N UTF-8 bytes (it was N units and at most 3N bytes). This pull request does not change those bounds. - An audit of those bounds found no other concrete failure. It checked index limits, byte limits, `.length` guards, provider limits, and security `min` checks. It used code search and sampling, so it is not exhaustive. - Not verified: Slack `topic` and `purpose` use `.max(250)`, and we did not confirm how Slack counts that limit. - `.min(N)` is now stricter for emoji text. A single emoji no longer passes `.min(2)`. - `@dependabot rebase` or `@dependabot recreate` on this branch will remove the manual commits. This happened twice to resolve lockfile conflicts, and the commits were applied again each time. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code execution, in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused tests only; see Verification) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [ ] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes (no documentation change needed) - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green (at `482d76686e`) - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups (5/5 at `95b450048f`) - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --- Bumps [zod](https://github.com/colinhacks/zod) from 4.4.3 to 4.6.6. <details> <summary>Release notes</summary> <p><em>Sourced from <a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/releases">zod's releases</a>.</em></p> <blockquote> <h2>v4.6.6</h2> <blockquote> <p>Six malicious commits pushed to <code>main</code> on September 21 with a compromised git credential were reverted the same day in <a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6620">#6620</a> and have since been removed from the history of <code>main</code>. None were ever published to npm. The npm provenance for 4.6.6 names 284243fb, the pre-rewrite copy of 9c219833 with identical contents.</p> </blockquote> <h2>Commits:</h2> <ul> <li>0cd3af5e9f50ad11bbcd4407a46a21b8848ba574 docs: load the en locale directly in Zod Mini</li> <li>9d5e60f162997b764b40d45aa02481888db50dea docs: import locales from zod/locales, not z.locales</li> <li>34a626f307871ecbb0123947559328dc52ed5e3e docs: tighten the z.locales tree-shaking note</li> <li>74304ce5b5796b5edb9a88ceb8e170b6ea3e82df release: stage npm versions instead of publishing them (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6622">#6622</a>)</li> <li>b2ef983e0711ff6517d6020b021071e2e5653efa docs: add Code for Japan to bronze sponsors</li> <li>8fb2faf0584828a6a027d8279db36f6f52784462 docs: crop the Code for Japan logo and list it first in bronze</li> <li>bacad518c41610d654658172d325874bf0ee6290 docs: square the Code for Japan logo to match the other bronze tiles</li> <li>c42596bd1c87e941d7241d10e012c5c196adcc10 release: hold the run on the release-approval environment until the staged versions are approved (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6638">#6638</a>)</li> <li>a2ba4a67986a3e6b2b131be30084a2f460d9ea67 fix(types): declare record output and input as members, not base type arguments (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6645">#6645</a>)</li> <li>a0ebf970f2d752e5f58527cd2942ff48be4f46bd fix(v4): check array, set and map size bounds before parsing elements (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6652">#6652</a>)</li> <li>529f78dd9431b07f49647fee3aa0819b3f8b66b7 4.6.6</li> <li>9c219833c3a3764fa1f1ea9c5ecec8254a63c0b1 ci: stage at verbose so a failed OIDC token exchange says why</li> </ul> <h2>v4.6.5</h2> <h2>Commits:</h2> <ul> <li>d2b135cfb7a3582b9eb515756b9166bcb9521f4a docs: add the 4.6.x patch highlights to the 4.6 post</li> <li>f1448f7cee00df9fe1e9ad84a000aa1828cc8bc1 docs: fold the 4.6.x patch highlights into the 4.6 post's own sections</li> <li>de65a5cb39ed22a507fac935788f718fa88d104f docs: lead the properties section with the check and add a Zod Mini tab (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6598">#6598</a>)</li> <li>56222cd1532c07bcb91b67df529cab4c0a215330 feat(instanceof): key the .properties() shape off the instance type (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6600">#6600</a>)</li> <li>ca0229a404818290e6cdcfefcd7eb2d04bcbb543 Revert "feat: add z.currencyCode() over a vendored ISO 4217 list, refreshed weekly by CI (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6595">#6595</a>)"</li> <li>cc4cd4ee9c52fcaa10964e48cc144541e41a5ed9 Revert "Revert "feat: add z.currencyCode() over a vendored ISO 4217 list, refreshed weekly by CI (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6595">#6595</a>)""</li> <li>0f3f5ee3ca56c7574bf849e54f79e9a6e02562ee 4.6.5</li> <li>59bbc03e10c636b9eb3c393dfeb552819774ec21 chore: re-pin the integration peers to the workspace zod after the 4.6.5 bump</li> </ul> <h2>v4.6.4</h2> <p>A patch on top of <a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/releases/tag/v4.6.3">4.6.3</a>.</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/d6bc1e30"><code>d6bc1e30</code></a> feat: add <code>z.currencyCode()</code> over a vendored ISO 4217 list, refreshed weekly by CI (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6595">#6595</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/ad32d751"><code>ad32d751</code></a> perf: <code>z.url()</code> rejects an invalid URL with <code>URL.canParse()</code> instead of a throwing constructor, about 50x faster; fewer allocations on the validation path (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6588">#6588</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/2bb08717"><code>2bb08717</code></a> chore: re-pin the integration peers to the workspace zod after the 4.6.4 bump</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/f6e1701a"><code>f6e1701a</code></a> chore(deps): bump next to 15.5.25 and vite to 7.3.6 (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6153">#6153</a>)</li> </ul> <h2>v4.6.3</h2> <p>A patch on top of <a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/releases/tag/v4.6.2">4.6.2</a>.</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/413cce9a"><code>413cce9a</code></a> fix(v4): make z.properties() a check again (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6594">#6594</a>) — removes the standalone <code>z.properties()</code> schema from 4.6.0; <code>z.instanceof().properties()</code> and <code>.check(...z.properties())</code> are unchanged</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/75d63ee1"><code>75d63ee1</code></a> docs: show only the <code>.properties()</code> method form in the 4.6 post</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/46da9572"><code>46da9572</code></a> docs: match the error-message examples to what the parsers emit</li> </ul> <h2>v4.6.2</h2> <p>A patch on top of <a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/releases/tag/v4.6.1">4.6.1</a>.</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/9446b5cc"><code>9446b5cc</code></a> fix: preserve undefined prefault outputs and object keys (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6587">#6587</a>) — closes <a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6585">#6585</a></li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/0c483c58"><code>0c483c58</code></a> docs: the <a href="https://zod.dev/blog/zod-4-6">Zod 4.6 announcement post</a> (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/pull/6546">#6546</a>)</li> </ul> <!-- raw HTML omitted --> </blockquote> <p>... (truncated)</p> </details> <details> <summary>Commits</summary> <ul> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/9c219833c3a3764fa1f1ea9c5ecec8254a63c0b1"><code>9c21983</code></a> ci: stage at verbose so a failed OIDC token exchange says why</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/529f78dd9431b07f49647fee3aa0819b3f8b66b7"><code>529f78d</code></a> 4.6.6</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/a0ebf970f2d752e5f58527cd2942ff48be4f46bd"><code>a0ebf97</code></a> fix(v4): check array, set and map size bounds before parsing elements (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6652">#6652</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/a2ba4a67986a3e6b2b131be30084a2f460d9ea67"><code>a2ba4a6</code></a> fix(types): declare record output and input as members, not base type argumen...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/c42596bd1c87e941d7241d10e012c5c196adcc10"><code>c42596b</code></a> release: hold the run on the release-approval environment until the staged ve...</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/bacad518c41610d654658172d325874bf0ee6290"><code>bacad51</code></a> docs: square the Code for Japan logo to match the other bronze tiles</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/8fb2faf0584828a6a027d8279db36f6f52784462"><code>8fb2faf</code></a> docs: crop the Code for Japan logo and list it first in bronze</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/b2ef983e0711ff6517d6020b021071e2e5653efa"><code>b2ef983</code></a> docs: add Code for Japan to bronze sponsors</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/74304ce5b5796b5edb9a88ceb8e170b6ea3e82df"><code>74304ce</code></a> release: stage npm versions instead of publishing them (<a href="https://redirect.github.com/colinhacks/zod/issues/6622">#6622</a>)</li> <li><a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/commit/34a626f307871ecbb0123947559328dc52ed5e3e"><code>34a626f</code></a> docs: tighten the z.locales tree-shaking note</li> <li>Additional commits viewable in <a href="https://github.com/colinhacks/zod/compare/v4.4.3...v4.6.6">compare view</a></li> </ul> </details> <br /> 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Nicky Leach <nicky@paperclip.ing> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
|
8f79a32898 |
fix(connections): keep agent access consistent through setup and permission changes (#19352)
Task-hosted tool setup kept requester-only defaults, and audience edits could leave runtime installations restricted after permission bindings were widened. Large provider catalogs could also fail before creating an access card. Use the normal agent audience defaults for new tool setup, preserve explicit selections through verified OAuth and draft resumption, and synchronize permission bindings and runtime installations atomically. Enforce agent-edit authority and preserve existing access during additive account reuse. Validation: 915 focused regression tests, typechecks, and builds passed. All 54 CI checks passed and Greptile Apex scored the reviewed head 5/5 with no unresolved threads. Broad local test failures, recoveries, and incomplete heartbeat coverage are documented in the PR. Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.1 |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
36643d9378 |
fix(native): retire finished owners whose continued turn rotated authority (#19373)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The native runner runs per-turn agent sessions in managed sandboxes.
A controller keeps a durable session root for each session.
> - When a per-turn owner finishes without a saved runner checkpoint,
the next turn retires that owner. Retirement first checks that the
session root holds only known entries.
> - The runner transport writes two entries that the check does not
know: `authority-epochs/` and `runtime-context.json`. A continued turn
writes `authority-epochs/` when it rotates authority from the turn
before it.
> - So the third turn of an ephemeral-lease task cannot retire the
second turn's owner. The run fails with
`native_continuation_requires_reconciliation` and the task waits for a
user message.
> - This pull request classifies every session-root entry in one
contract module, and adds a test that scans the writers so the list
cannot drift again.
> - The benefit is that follow-up turns continue without manual help,
and any future refusal names the unexpected entry.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #18846, Refs #19061, Refs #19355
**What happened?**
On staging, the third turn of every task for one agent (gpt-5.6-sol,
native runner, ephemeral sandbox lease) failed. The error was
`runner_state_identity_mismatch:
prior_owner_terminal_state_indeterminate;
retirement_refused=unexpected_root_entry`. The first two turns
succeeded. The task then went to `blocked` with "Saved work recovered.
Send a message to continue."
**Expected behavior**
The third turn retires the finished second-turn owner and continues the
conversation.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Assign a task to a native agent that uses an ephemeral sandbox lease.
2. Let the first turn finish. Reopen the task with a comment so a second
turn runs and finishes.
3. Reopen the task again. The third turn fails with the error above.
**Paperclip version or commit**
Staging near 9a79384958; reproduced locally on master
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
de1143448b |
fix(queue): clear interaction receipts a run already delivered (#19376)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Agents ask people for input through thread cards: questions, confirmations, plan approvals and connection requests > - When a person resolves a card, Paperclip queues the response for the agent. The task chat shows it above the composer as a read-only receipt, for example "Answered: Questions" > - A second wake can carry the same receipt. One example is a recovery continuation that raced the response's own wake. The agent receives the response from the first run, but the second wake stays deferred > - The composer then shows a receipt that the agent already has. The user cannot edit, discard or clear it. The same receipt also blocks the agent's handback with `interaction_response_queued` > - This pull request treats a receipt as pending only until a run that carries the interaction has started > - The benefit is that an answered card leaves the queue once the agent has it, for every card kind ## Linked Issues or Issue Description No public issue exists. A hands-on onboarding test on a staging cloud workspace (Claude subscription path) found this bug. **What happened?** During onboarding, a queued item stayed above the task-chat composer. It said "Answered: Questions", but the user had already answered the questions. Later items also stayed after the interview answers and after the user connected GitHub. The user could not trash, steer or edit them. Evidence from the staging workspace (interactions, wake diagnostics and run records for the onboarding task): - The first questions card (no title, so its label is "Answered: Questions") was answered at 17:37:48. - Run `ba3bc7d6` (`issue.interaction.respond`) delivered that answer from 17:37:48 to 17:38:27. - A recovery wake (`issue.interaction_continuation_recovery`) for the same card was requested at 17:37:48 too. It stayed deferred behind `ba3bc7d6` and then ran again as `cacb095d` (17:38:33 to 17:39:17). During that time the composer showed the stale "Answered: Questions" receipt. - The plan approval had the same pattern from 17:42:06 to 18:20 (fixed at its source by #19332). The declined Slack connection receipt sat behind that chain. **Expected behavior** A receipt leaves the composer queue as soon as a run has received it. The agent can hand back the task after it has received the response. **Steps to reproduce** 1. An agent asks a question card on a task. 2. A user answers it. The response wake starts a run that carries the answer. 3. A second wake for the same card is deferred behind that run or a later run. 4. `GET /api/issues/:id/queued-comments` returns the second wake's receipt as an immutable entry until it runs. ## What Changed - `server/src/services/queued-interaction-response.ts`: `readQueuedInteractionResponse` returns no receipt when a run for the same issue has started with this interaction in its context and is `running` or `succeeded`. A cancelled or failed run does not count, so that response is still owed. `hasQueuedInteractionResponse` (the handback guard) uses the same rule. - `server/src/routes/issues.ts`: `findQueuedCommentWake` skips a delivered receipt, so a later undelivered receipt can still show. - `server/src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts`: red/green tests for every card kind and outcome: answered questions, accepted and rejected confirmation, accepted plan (checkbox) approval, connected and declined connection. Each runs with a `succeeded` and with a `running` delivering run. Controls check that an undelivered receipt still shows, that a later undelivered receipt shows instead of a delivered one, and that the handback guard ignores a delivered receipt. - N-02 (hover shows raw JSON): `master` already shows only the one-line summary in the label and hover (`queuedMessageLabel`). This PR does not change the UI. ## Verification Red, on `master` code with only the new tests added: ``` $ cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts -t "receipt" × clears a ask_user_questions answered receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1309ms × clears a ask_user_questions answered receipt once a running run already delivered it 1041ms × clears a request_confirmation accepted receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1436ms × clears a request_confirmation accepted receipt once a running run already delivered it 829ms × clears a request_confirmation rejected receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 666ms × clears a request_confirmation rejected receipt once a running run already delivered it 776ms × clears a request_checkbox_confirmation accepted receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1179ms × clears a request_checkbox_confirmation accepted receipt once a running run already delivered it 4227ms × clears a connection_intent accepted receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1954ms × clears a connection_intent accepted receipt once a running run already delivered it 1634ms × clears a connection_intent rejected receipt once a succeeded run already delivered it 1505ms × clears a connection_intent rejected receipt once a running run already delivered it 1064ms × shows a later undelivered receipt instead of an earlier delivered one 480ms × does not hold agent handback for a receipt the agent already received 1272ms ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ Failed Tests 14 ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ AssertionError: expected [ 'Answered: Questions' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ 'Accepted: Approve hiring 2 agents' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ 'Rejected: Approve hiring 2 agents' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ Array(1) ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ 'Connected: GitHub connection' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ 'Declined: Slack connection' ] to deeply equal [] AssertionError: expected [ Array(1) ] to deeply equal [ 'Declined: Slack connection' ] AssertionError: expected true to be false // Object.is equality Tests 14 failed | 11 passed | 85 skipped (110) ``` Green, with the fix: ``` $ cd server && npx vitest run src/__tests__/issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts -t "receipt" Tests 25 passed | 85 skipped (110) ``` Neighbouring suites, with the fix: - `issue-queued-comments-routes.test.ts` (full file, on current `master`): 110 passed. - `question-response-delivery`, `queued-comment-consumption`, `issue-thread-interaction-routes`, `satisfied-connection-intents`, `issue-comment-reopen-routes`, `issue-execution-policy-routes` together with the queued-comments file: 494 tests passed. One run hit an embedded-Postgres `afterAll` cleanup timeout under 7-file parallel load. The same file passed alone twice. - `heartbeat-process-recovery.test.ts -t "plan approval|accepted interaction|answered question|answered interaction|onboarding first task"`: 14 passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: passes. ## Risks - Low risk. The change only hides a receipt that a started run already carries. An undelivered receipt keeps its current behavior. - The redundant wake itself is not cancelled here. It still runs later as a normal continuation, but it no longer holds the composer queue or blocks handback. #19332 removes the main source of these duplicate wakes. - Each receipt read adds one indexed-by-company lookup on `heartbeat_runs` for the issue. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, used in Claude Code with tool use (shell, file edits, browser inspection of the staging workspace API). ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
434d224c3a |
fix(ui): retry stale chunk reloads while a deploy settles (#19361)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - The board UI loads each page as a lazy chunk. After a deploy, an
open tab can ask for a chunk from its old build.
> - #17349 added a recovery: the app reloads the page one time when a
chunk fails to load. A loop guard permits only one reload in five
minutes.
> - Staging error monitoring still reports `Failed to fetch dynamically
imported module` from builds that include #17349. The events come 1–10
seconds after page load, and 1–10 minutes after page load.
> - During a deploy, the old server and the new server can both answer
for some seconds. The reloaded page can then miss a chunk again. Also, a
second deploy can occur inside the five-minute window. In both cases the
guard stops the recovery, and the user sees the error page. One more
reload a few seconds later would recover.
> - #18518 keeps old chunks available after a deploy, but only on
deployments that enable shared UI assets. Other deployments still depend
on the reload recovery.
> - This pull request permits up to three reloads in the guard window.
The reloads wait 0 s, 2 s and 5 s, so that the deploy can settle. After
the last reload, the error page shows and reports as before.
> - The benefit is that a stale tab recovers through a normal deploy
without an error page and without error-monitoring noise. A chunk that
stays broken still shows the error after a small, fixed number of
reloads.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
Refs #17349
Refs #18518
**What happened?**
A browser tab stayed open during a staging deploy. A lazy page chunk
failed to load with `TypeError: Failed to fetch dynamically imported
module`. The route error boundary showed "This page hit an error" and
reported the error. The release included the one-time reload from
#17349. The reload did not occur because the loop guard had already used
its single reload in the last five minutes.
**Expected behavior**
The app reloads again after a short wait while the deploy settles, and
the page loads. The error page shows only when the chunk stays broken.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Open a board page on a deployment without shared UI assets.
2. Deploy a new build. While the old and new servers both answer, go to
a page that was not loaded yet.
3. The chunk fails, and the page reloads one time.
4. The reloaded page gets its HTML from one server and a chunk request
goes to the other server. The chunk fails again.
5. The guard stops the recovery, and the route error page shows.
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
|
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
9ceaec6f97 |
fix(issues): stop showing resource waits as failed attempts (#19369)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The task page shows one interruption banner. The server builds it
from the task's latest run.
> - An auto-retry that waits for a busy workspace, AI connection or
runner update is not a failure. The dispatcher re-checks the resource,
so the run can stay `scheduled_retry` after its retry time.
> - The projection did not know about these waits. After the retry time
passed, it fell through to "Couldn't finish this attempt" with a Retry
button.
> - Retry cannot free the resource. The banner cleared for the 10-second
grace and then came back. Users had no way to fix it.
> - This pull request projects a scheduled resource wait as `working`,
with no Retry.
> - The benefit is that the failed-attempt banner shows only for real
failures.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
During onboarding on Paperclip Cloud staging (Claude subscription and
Codex subscription paths), the onboarding task showed "Couldn't finish
this attempt. Your message is saved." with a Retry button. The banner
did not name an attempt. Retry cleared it briefly, then it came back.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Start a task run while another run holds the same workspace.
2. The run is cancelled with `workspace_busy`, and a `scheduled_retry`
run is created with `scheduledRetryReason: "workspace_busy"`.
3. Keep the workspace busy after `scheduledRetryAt`. On the staging
company, one retry stayed scheduled for 16 minutes past its retry time.
4. Open the task. The failed-attempt banner shows. Click Retry. The
banner comes back.
**Expected behavior**
No failed-attempt banner while the system waits for a shared resource.
The run status already says "Waiting for workspace"
(`execution-projection.ts`).
## What Changed
- `server/src/services/task-interruption-presentation.ts`: a
`scheduled_retry` run whose `scheduledRetryReason` is `workspace_busy`,
`ai_connection_busy`, `ai_connection_pool_wait` or
`runner_revision_wait` (and that has no system recovery) projects as
`state: "working"`, `canRetry: false`. User gates and failed Retry
preparations stay authoritative because they are checked first.
- The batched query now selects `scheduledRetryReason`.
- Tests: a Postgres integration test (`task-interruption-query.test.ts`)
that seeds the staging run chain for each reason, and unit tests for the
guard cases (failure-lane retries, paused agent, failed Retry
preparation).
## Verification
Red on `master` (fix not applied), `cd server && npx vitest run
src/__tests__/task-interruption-query.test.ts -t "overdue"`:
```
× does not present an overdue workspace_busy wait as a failed attempt 213ms
× does not present an overdue ai_connection_busy wait as a failed attempt 25ms
× does not present an overdue ai_connection_pool_wait wait as a failed attempt 13ms
× does not present an overdue runner_revision_wait wait as a failed attempt 11ms
- Expected
+ Received
- "canRetry": false,
+ "canRetry": true,
- "state": "working",
+ "state": "failed",
Tests 4 failed | 11 skipped (15)
```
Green with the fix, same tests plus the new unit tests:
```
✓ task-interruption-query.test.ts > does not present an overdue workspace_busy wait as a failed attempt
✓ task-interruption-query.test.ts > does not present an overdue ai_connection_busy wait as a failed attempt
✓ task-interruption-query.test.ts > does not present an overdue ai_connection_pool_wait wait as a failed attempt
✓ task-interruption-query.test.ts > does not present an overdue runner_revision_wait wait as a failed attempt
✓ task-interruption-presentation.test.ts > scheduled resource wait presentation > keeps an overdue workspace wait out of the failed-attempt UI
✓ task-interruption-presentation.test.ts > scheduled resource wait presentation > keeps failure retries, user gates and failed Retry preparation authoritative
```
Neighbouring suites: `task-interruption-presentation`,
`task-interruption-query`, `workspace-recovery`, `agent-project-access`,
`heartbeat-dependency-scheduling`: 5 files, 458 tests passed.
Server `tsc --noEmit` reports no errors in changed files. The only
errors locally come from the unbuilt `@paperclipai/paperclip-runner`
vendor package, which this change does not touch. No UI change, so `pnpm
check:token-gates` is not applicable.
Evidence: the staging onboarding task's run history shows
`workspace_busy` cancellations at 17:46, 17:52 and 18:10, each followed
by a `scheduled_retry`. One had `scheduledRetryAt` 17:53:57 and started
at 18:10:20. The next run succeeded at 18:20.
## Risks
- Low risk. Presentation only; dispatch and admission do not change.
- If a resource wait never clears, the task shows no failed-attempt
banner. The run status still shows "Waiting for workspace", and the
existing retry-attempt limits still end the wait.
- Not in scope: genuine failures without a provider or workspace
explanation still show the generic text, and an overdue failure-lane
retry still shows as failed.
## Model Used
- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, via Claude Code with
tool use (shell, file edits, browser for read-only staging evidence).
## Checklist
- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
4550253dc9 |
feat(ui): rename Needs you to Inbox and move Mine into Tasks (#19363)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Coordinator gives people navigation for conversations, tasks, and decisions. > - The decision entry is called Needs you, while a separate Inbox remains under More. > - Coordinator's personal task filter does not retain the full behavior of the original Mine view. > - This pull request names the decision entry Inbox and hosts the original personal work views inside Tasks. > - People keep their triage tools and saved choices without moving between two task destinations. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description **What existing behavior does this improve?** Coordinator navigation and the personal Mine view in Tasks. **Subsystem affected** UI navigation, task view routing, task collection preferences, and browser coverage. **Current behavior** Needs you opens the decision feed. More contains another Inbox destination. The default Coordinator task filter matches task creators and assignees. It does not use the full personal participation rules, archive behavior, shortcuts, grouping, or saved columns of the original Mine view. The organization task table also resets its column choices on reload. **Proposed behavior** Inbox opens the same decision feed with the inbox icon. Tasks defaults to Mine and remembers a person's selected view per company. Mine uses the existing personal Inbox implementation and preferences. It retains read/unread title weights, keyboard navigation, read/unread shortcuts, archive and undo, mobile swipe-to-archive, grouping, and saved columns. Old Inbox links open the matching task view. The organization task table saves its columns and order per person and company. **Reason and benefit** People get Chat, Tasks, and Inbox as distinct navigation entries. Personal work remains a view within Tasks without losing the existing triage behavior. **Breaking changes** Coordinator no longer offers the previous Inbox destination under More. Old Inbox URLs redirect into Tasks and retain query parameters and fragments. The Needs you label becomes Inbox; its decision feed, count, history, and resolution paths stay in place. Classic retains its separate optional combined-list setting. **Additional context** Refs: #19360, the workspace-defaults PR now integrated from master. Refs: #10620, related Inbox attention ordering. Duplicate searches found no open PR for this navigation and Mine integration. Roadmap review found no separate new execution feature in this scope. ## What Changed - Rename Coordinator's desktop and mobile decision entry and page to Inbox. Use the inbox icon. Remove the old Inbox item under More. Clarify that the combined-list experiment applies only to Classic. - Add one Coordinator task-view router. Host Mine, Unread, Recent, Blocked, and Everything through the existing Inbox owner. Keep organization views in the task table and board. Normalize legacy filtered URLs before mounting a collection so clearing the last filter preserves the current layout and local filters. - Reuse the existing Mine API, participation, read state, archive cache, undo, keyboard, mobile gesture, grouping, and preference paths. Existing personal column choices carry over. - Save organization task-table columns and order per person and company. Keep controls usable if browser storage fails. - Update navigation tests, routing and persistence regressions, exact-run retry browser coverage for each workspace variant, product documentation, and the affected Storybook notes. Keep existing story IDs. ## Verification - Preference, routing, navigation, task table, and inherited Inbox regression tests pass in focused runs. After integrating master and addressing the review finding, all 187 focused tests, UI typecheck, and token gates pass. - Full build and repository typecheck pass after integrating master. The full UI suite previously passed: 894 files, 11,169 tests passed, and one skipped. All 14 desktop/mobile triage and exact-run retry browser cases, including a fresh production UI build, pass after integrating master. - The full repository test suite was not run locally for this UI-only change; full PR CI is running. - Browser checks use a fresh isolated local instance and a deterministic process agent for real run-attributed unread activity. They exercise legacy URLs, title weights, saved grouping and columns, read/unread shortcuts, archive/undo, and a real mobile touch gesture. - Earlier browser fixtures were corrected: own activity is read, agent comments need valid run attribution, and undo uses `u` after the archive refresh completes. The Inbox content heading is scoped separately from the layout heading. - The final settings wording correction passes all 63 settings tests. - The [next CI browser run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42137377960/job/127629100535) caught an old URL assertion for denied run retries. The test now pins each workspace variant and covers Coordinator Tasks explicitly. The old expectation fails deterministically for Coordinator; all 12 retry cases pass with the corrected destination, preserving exact run identity and truthful queued, deferred, and denied feedback. - Token gates, map checks, and Storybook catalog checks pass. All 30 map/catalog script tests pass. Storybook play tests were not run. - Greptile reviewed [the final commit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/commit/5f2f3789b83af259f694f379afb769465688fb72) at **5/5** with no new actionable findings. Its sort-only link finding is fixed and resolved: three cases fail before the fix and pass after it. `sortField` and `sortDir` keep organization links on the organization table. [Current-head CI](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42139668774) is running. - [CI exposed a routing race](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42135293421/job/127621981587) when removing the last label from a legacy Everything link. Four deterministic regressions failed before the fix and now pass: collections only mount after URL normalization. The existing end-to-end component cases confirm local filters, board layout, fragments, and history survive the change. - The [initial server shard 4 run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/42131163087/job/127608751620) failed an unchanged monitor-drain idleness assertion: two active operations remained instead of zero. The complete scheduling suite passes locally (54 tests). One isolated CI retry passed, including its dependent verification gate. The original timing failure's root cause is not established. ## Risks - Mine includes the existing tasks, approvals, failed runs, and join requests, preserving the original personal participation and attention rules. - Shared URLs with organization filters or table sort parameters still open the organization task collection. Task back-links retain their original fragments. - Saved preferences are browser-local. Mine keeps its existing storage keys; the organization table and selected Coordinator view use person/company scopes. - No database or server API contract changes are included. Existing company access, personal participation, and decision permissions retain their owners. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, repository tools, code execution, and browser automation. The exact serving revision and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Scott Tong <scott@scottsmbpm5max.lan> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandPaperclip
|
46414fcfa4 |
test(evals): pin timeline and governed Company approval at native cap two (#19381)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The chat catalog uses a fixed source and explicit execution conditions. > - A correct timeline response failed because its completed edit and attached command result were not recognized. > - Company credential setup can require a real human approval after the secure save. > - The controller must declare that optional approval and its run bounds before it admits the source. > - This pull request pins the reviewed source and caps native catalog overlap at two. > - The next run can test these conditions without treating local controls as native acceptance. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs: #19357, #19086, #18971, #19093. This follows the prior fixed-source catalog pin. It changes only controller metadata, admission, tests, and load policy. The complete catalog and separate core feature PRs remain unmerged. ## What Changed - Pin immutable source `fe547be84826b4611d3ba9ee1a7d7aa0bd0a2843`, tree `a23723ea5244e6ce8cee11e9c4b476acb6978fcd`. - Advance only timeline v10 to v11 and Company v11 to v12. Add the declared Company proposal helper to its source closure. - Declare Company minimum two and maximum three native runs. Retain two base human inputs and permit at most one independently verified UI approval. Retain its original 480000ms attempt. - Carry the literal Company-only approval marker from the descriptor into the manifest. Reject foreign markers, changed bounds, and a mismatch with static source task metadata. - Cap native catalog execution at two workers. Keep the external lane serial and retain zero retries. - Keep all244 requests, contexts, expected outcomes, model, clocks, credentials and other case bounds unchanged. ## Verification - Source:421 focused controls across seven suites pass. Full runner E2E TypeScript check passes. - Explicit model-free approval UI canary passes one test with three local scenarios. It checks accepted approval, wrong human, and failed response. The first sandbox attempt stopped at Chrome launch; the allowed execution passed. - Controller:40 manifest, adapter and reconciliation controls pass. - SDK506 inputs remain byte-identical to the accepted registry `efa70621e9fb42aa185f7ee616a1a726aa3eccb367e67e28817cedf26ef2ade8`. - Launcher and trusted private evidence wire remain byte-identical. Source contract/flow accounting changes are explicit. - Source descriptor SHA256: `50e90d8c02ad57f444e27b522efe694db9734d47bdbc3a058475af77bac8b2ca`. - Controller manifest SHA256: `0447315601ed21ba15d6ea0ecd7fb89bc79ad6262db2594cd12ac774aa8d6c21`. - Review the two changed rows. The next planned experiment selects timeline and Company once at cap2 before a full ten-case run. No native run on this source has passed yet. - Exact controller head `d49dfc59ab7fddfe1a1de7e81bdb9c4e13400f30`: normal CI has56 successful checks and three configured skips. Protected `ci / verify` and `ci / e2e` both pass. Greptile5/5 and zero open threads are verified for this head. ## Risks - Original timeline5056 and Company5057 remain FAILED. Timeline5056 supplied the correct account; the local revised check passes its diagnostic only. Company5057 saved the secret but left the binding approval pending. - Company native3 completion within480s is unproved. This change does not raise its clock or claim to fix latency. - Two-worker execution is a changed load condition. It does not prove a concurrency cause, reliability, or eight-worker qualification. - Secret journeys require independent semantic safety review before pass credit. The documented closing-comma warning and arbitrary metadata-prefill classifier limitations remain follow-ups in the functional secret PR; a native failure is not waived. - Candidate core PRs remain unmerged. The full-catalog196/244 admission gate remains fixed. Local controls do not qualify all244 journeys. - Local checks use Node26.4.0. They do not replace actual AWS runtime qualification. - The separate Paperclip Review app remains queued while its assigned task waits for maintenance. It has no completed assessment. GitHub reports `UNSTABLE` and `MERGEABLE`; this is not an all-checks PASS claim. No review retry or staging mutation was performed. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6.1 Sol (`gpt-6.1-sol`), with reasoning, repository tools and code execution. The host does not expose an exact context-window size. No model or paid provider was called for local controls. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing> |
||
|
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
|
7440cfc9b1 |
fix(issues): accept queued Send while the previous run has not started (#19370)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - A task chat queues a message while the agent is busy. The
queued-message bar shows a Send button when no turn is running.
> - Send calls `POST /issues/:id/queued-comments/interrupt` with no
target run.
> - The issue can hold an execution run that has not started yet
(`queued`) or that waits for a retry (`scheduled_retry`). The GET
response then shows a deferred queue with no target run, so the UI shows
Send.
> - The interrupt route refused that click with 409. The UI then showed
"Couldn't send. Message is still queued."
> - This pull request saves the click as interrupt intent in that state.
The queue is delivered when the previous run stops.
> - The benefit is that the button the UI offers now works, and the
message goes next.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
Cloud onboarding test, Codex subscription path (N-06): the tester
clicked Send in the onboarding task. The UI showed "Couldn't send.
Message is still queued."
**Expected behavior**
Send is accepted. The message stays in the queue and is delivered next,
when the previous run stops.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Have an issue whose execution run is `queued` (not started) or
`scheduled_retry`.
2. Post a message. It is deferred behind that run.
3. Click Send on the queued message.
4. The route returns 409: "This queue does not support interruption"
(paperclip_runner) or "The previous run has not stopped" (legacy
adapters).
**Paperclip version or commit**
`master` at
|
||
|
Devin FoleyandClaude Opus 5.5
|
33269e1fec |
fix(observability): report directory-merge lock holder diagnostics (#17755)
A directory-merge lock timeout (ERR_WORKSPACE_RESTORE_LOCK_TIMEOUT) already carries allowlisted holder evidence, but server Sentry capture dropped it. - Add directoryMergeLockTimeoutDiagnosticsFor in adapter-utils: closed labels, booleans and bounded durations; no owner PID or paths. - server captureException: lock timeouts get an event-local directory_merge_lock context and error_code=workspace_restore_lock_timeout tag; default grouping and message unchanged. - run-failure-diagnostics restoreLock* fields use the shared reader (same allowlist and order). - Document the record in doc/workspace-restore-locks.md. Diagnostics only; does not change lock acquisition, timeouts or retries. Refs PAPERCLIP-BACKEND-4Q Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5
|
3a8f95d928 |
fix(ci): let verified Dependabot lockfiles merge through the reporting-lock gate (#19356)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Only trusted environments may change `pnpm-lock.yaml`: the lockfile refresh workflow and Dependabot. Contributors never commit it. > - Paid evaluation jobs also install a lock only when the reporting-lock proof (`tests/runner-e2e/report-lock.json` and `.patch`) admits it. > - #19283 added a CI test that checks the committed lock against that proof. Only the refresh workflow writes the proof, so every Dependabot lockfile pull request now fails CI. Examples are #17364, #17172, and #17911. > - A merged Dependabot lockfile also breaks the refresh workflow. `prepare-report-lock.mjs --refresh` refuses to renew the proof for a lock that the proof does not already admit. > - This pull request lets a verified Dependabot lockfile pass, and it keeps both lockfile rules strict. It also closes a gap in the contributor rule. > - The benefit is that Dependabot security updates can merge again, and only trusted environments write lock content. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19283, #17364, #17172, #17911, #19303. **What happened?** `server/scripts/reporting-lock-policy.test.mjs` fails on each Dependabot pull request that changes `pnpm-lock.yaml`. The error is "Reporting lock changed; review the dependency correction before install". A Dependabot pull request cannot change the proof files, so it can never pass. After a merge, the lockfile refresh also stops at "Committed report lock is not reviewed; refusing to refresh its proof". **Expected behavior** - Contributors cannot change `pnpm-lock.yaml` or the reporting-lock proof. - Dependabot can change `pnpm-lock.yaml`. - The lockfile refresh workflow can change `pnpm-lock.yaml` and the proof. - After a Dependabot lockfile merges, the refresh workflow admits it and renews the proof. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Open a Dependabot pull request that changes `pnpm-lock.yaml`, such as #17364. 2. Let CI run. The `server (9/12)` shard fails on the reporting-lock policy test. **Security gap found during this work** The old rule skipped the lockfile check when `github.head_ref` was `chore/refresh-lockfile`. A contributor could open a pull request from a fork branch with that name and commit a lockfile change. The old rule also exempted any pull request that Dependabot opened, including commits that other people pushed to its branch. ## What Changed - Add `.github/scripts/lockfile-trust.mjs`. It decides which writers may change lock content: - The refresh workflow: the head is `chore/refresh-lockfile` in this repository, and `github-actions[bot]` opened the pull request. - Dependabot: Dependabot opened the pull request from this repository, and the head `pnpm-lock.yaml` matches a Dependabot commit. That commit must have `dependabot[bot]` as its author, GitHub (`web-flow`) as its committer, and a verified signature. The script reads these fields from the GitHub API. - The reporting-lock proof files count as lock content. Only the refresh workflow may change them. - `pr-trusted.yml` policy job: replace the inline `head_ref` and author exemption with `lockfile-trust.mjs pr`. The job runs the script copy from the base commit, so a pull request cannot change the check that judges it. If the base predates the script, the job uses the earlier rule. - `refresh-lockfile.yml`: add `lockfile-trust.mjs merged`. It checks that the last lockfile change on `master` is a GitHub-signed merge of a Dependabot pull request, and that the lockfile at the pull request head matches a verified Dependabot commit. If both checks pass, it gives the lockfile SHA-256 to `prepare-report-lock.mjs --refresh --trusted-lock-sha256`. - `refresh-lockfile.yml` PR step: check `pnpm-lock.yaml` and both proof files before it exits as unchanged. A refresh that renews only the proof now opens a pull request. - `prepare-report-lock.mjs` and its `.d.mts` declaration: `refreshReportLock` accepts a trusted lock hash. If the trusted lock already resolves, the proof admits it exactly with an empty patch. If not, the proof records the resolution as the reviewed correction, as before. - `reporting-lock-policy.test.mjs`: skip on Dependabot pull requests. The policy job verifies those lockfiles. The general test job gets `PAPERCLIP_CI_PR_AUTHOR` for this purpose. This keeps the test, so it still merges cleanly with #19303. - `check-pr-lockfile.mjs` (advisory gate): allow Dependabot lockfile changes, and flag changes to the proof files. - `CODEOWNERS`: add the two proof files. - `doc/RELEASE-AUTOMATION-SETUP.md`: describe the writers, the `@dependabot recreate` path, and the proof renewal after merge. ## Verification - `node --test '.github/scripts/tests/*.test.mjs'`: 707 passed. This includes 17 new tests in `lockfile-trust.test.mjs` and 3 new tests in `check-pr-lockfile.test.mjs`. The new tests run the `pr` command against real git histories with a stub `gh`. - `tests/runner-e2e/prepare-report-lock.test.ts`: 10 passed, including 3 new trusted-lock refresh tests. I ran it with a minimal Vitest config, because the runner-e2e config builds a provider bundle first. - `server/scripts/reporting-lock-policy.test.mjs`: passes normally, and skips with `PAPERCLIP_CI_PR_AUTHOR=dependabot[bot]`. - Live check of the `pr` mode against #17364 with the real GitHub API: - With the real author, it reports "pnpm-lock.yaml matches verified Dependabot commit 83c328c15c…" and `writer=dependabot`. - With a contributor as the author and `chore/refresh-lockfile` as the head ref, it fails. - Live check of the `merged` mode at the real merge commits of #16018, #16020, and #15361. All three report a trusted lock hash. For #16018 and #15361, `master` changed after Dependabot's commit, so GitHub's merge produced different lockfile bytes. An exact-bytes rule would refuse them. That is why the rule trusts GitHub-signed merges of a verified Dependabot head. - Greptile reviewed `513ca2def8` at 4/5 with one P1: a proof-only refresh was never committed, because the PR step checked only `pnpm-lock.yaml`. `edbeb1ea0d` fixes it. A new test in `lockfile-refresh-merge.test.mjs` runs the step's change check on a proof-only change. The test fails without the fix. - CI `Typecheck + Release Registry` failed at `edbeb1ea0d`: `prepare-report-lock.d.mts` did not declare the new options argument (TS2554 twice in `prepare-report-lock.test.ts`). `9139aaad85` updates the declaration. A local `tsc -p tests/runner-e2e/tsconfig.json` shows the 2 errors with the old declaration and none with the new one. - CI at `9139aaad85` failed in six general test shards. None of them run code that this pull request changes, and PR CI loads `pr-trusted.yml` from `master`. The failures: - `heartbeat-plugin-environment.test.ts`: "expected 'running' to be 'succeeded'" - `status-card-evaluation-work.test.ts`: a deadline comparison - `isolated-repository-rehome.test.ts`: timed out after 15 seconds - `chat-channels.integration.test.ts`: GitHub webhook recovery scheduling - `company-import-export-e2e.test.ts`: child server start timeout, which also fails on unrelated branches - `workspaces-b`: every test passed, but an `EPIPE` error came after `acpx-engine/execute.test.ts` I started a rerun of the failed jobs. - Superagent found a P1 at `9139aaad85`: a verified signature proves who committed, not who authored. A collaborator could sign a commit with their own key and set Dependabot as the author. `4fe180d6c1` also requires GitHub (`web-flow`) as the committer. New tests cover the spoofed-author case. #17364, #16018, #16020 and #15361 still verify against the GitHub API. - `git merge-file` merges this test change with #19303 without conflicts. - Not run: the full repository test suite and typecheck. These changes touch only CI scripts, workflows, one helper, and tests. GitHub CI covers full regression. ## Risks - `pr-trusted.yml` loads from `master`, so the new policy takes effect only after merge. This pull request's own CI uses the earlier rule. - A Dependabot pull request that is behind `master` now fails if someone merges `master` into it and the lockfile changes. Use `@dependabot recreate`. The policy job error says this. - Paid evaluation jobs refuse a merged Dependabot lockfile until the refresh pull request merges. The refresh merges without review when it adds no new package versions. If the release-age gate holds it, the wait lasts until a maintainer merges it or the daily refresh runs. During that time, the reporting-lock policy test also fails on other pull requests, which is the current behavior for any unrenewed lock. - The rule trusts GitHub as the signer of Dependabot commits and of merge commits (`web-flow`). Superagent uses the same trust root. - People with write access can still push to `chore/refresh-lockfile`. This was already true. The bot merges only its own head commit (`--match-head-commit`), and code-owner review covers anything else. - A future manual proof renewal, such as #19283, now needs the refresh workflow or an admin merge. A contributor pull request that changes the proof files fails. ## Model Used - Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code execution, in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused tests; see Verification) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Nicky LeachandClaude Opus 5.5
|
e6c74982fe |
fix(workspaces): report why a workspace provider operation failed (#19362)
## Thinking Path
> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - A project can store its task workspaces with a workspace storage
provider plugin. Core calls the plugin's `workspaceOperation` method to
prepare, inspect, finalize and remove a workspace.
> - `callWorkspaceProvider` catches every rejection of that call and
throws the same conflict: "Workspace storage operation is incomplete;
retry the same workspace".
> - A provider error, an RPC timeout, a crashed worker and a worker that
never got the call all look the same in the run, the log and the API.
The message tells the user to retry, also when the failure is a fixed
configuration problem that a retry cannot fix.
> - In one diagnosis, three different configuration failures in a row
showed this same message. Finding each cause took trace span counts and
database reads.
> - This pull request lets a provider send a reason from a closed set,
and makes Core tell transport failures apart from provider failures.
> - The benefit is that a failed run says what failed and whether a
retry can help. Provider text and values still never cross into Core.
## Linked Issues or Issue Description
**What happened?**
A workspace provider's `workspaceOperation` failed. The run failed with
"Workspace storage operation is incomplete; retry the same workspace",
`errorCode: setup_failed`, and no reason in the run record or the
`heartbeat execution setup failed` log. Retrying did not help, because
the cause was a provider configuration problem.
**Expected behavior**
Core tells these cases apart: the worker did not receive the call, the
call timed out, the worker stopped during the call, or the provider
reported a failure. For a provider failure, Core shows a bounded reason.
Core tells the user to retry only when a retry can help.
**Steps to reproduce**
1. Install a workspace storage provider plugin whose
`onWorkspaceOperation` throws during `prepare` (for example, because of
missing provider settings).
2. Run an agent task in a project that uses that provider.
3. See the failed run: the error is the generic retry message, and the
run record and logs do not show the cause.
**Paperclip version / commit**
`master` at
canary/v2026.1106.0-canary.0
|