test(runner): align warm review and final response grading with production

This commit is contained in:
Dotta committed 2026-09-19 21:50:26 -05:00
1 parent 12d895c422
commit cadc628d9f
6 files changed
+56 -45

No files matched your search

+1 -1
View File
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ canonical Plan revision, capture its pending UI, approve in the browser, and
prove exactly two successful runs. `warm_three_turn` provides exactly two
browser follow-up messages, preserves one project/execution-workspace scope,
verifies host file contents after every turn, and finishes within three
ten-minute turn deadlines. Native warm turns 1 and 2 create a real confirmation card with `request_human_input` before reporting `needs_review`; the pending card supplies the required review gate. A disposition string alone does not create that gate. Turn 3 reports Done without another card.
ten-minute turn deadlines. Native turns 1 and 2 include an actionable human review in the completion report's `attentionRequests`. Paperclip creates the review gate from that report. An explicit question-tool wait yields the turn and suppresses its final prose, so it is not interchangeable with this completion-review fixture. Turn 3 reports Done without another review.
Every selected case runs in its own isolated Paperclip process, and independent
cases may run concurrently. Follow-up turns inside one case retain their shared
+9 -20
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import { createIssueThreadInteractionSchema } from "../../packages/shared/src/validators/issue.js";
import { normalizePrpResultSignals } from "../../packages/paperclip-runner/src/protocol/result-normalization.js";
import {
connectionReviewSuite,
runnerEnvironments,
@@ -26,27 +26,16 @@ import {
} from "./selectors.js";
describe("runner E2E catalog", () => {
it("gives native warm turns a real review card before reporting needs_review", () => {
it("supplies an actionable human review in native warm completion examples", () => {
const prompts = [daytonaWarmContinuityTask.buildPrompt("nonce"), ...daytonaWarmContinuityTask.buildFollowupMessages!("nonce")];
for (const [index, prompt] of prompts.entries()) {
const match = prompt.match(/call request_human_input with (\{.*\})\. Reuse/);
if (index === 2) {
expect(match).toBeNull();
continue;
}
expect(match, `turn ${index + 1} must create its review interaction`).not.toBeNull();
const request = JSON.parse(match![1]);
const interaction = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
kind: "request_confirmation", idempotencyKey: request.idempotencyKey,
title: request.title, summary: request.prompt, continuationPolicy: request.continuationPolicy,
payload: { ...request.payload, prompt: request.prompt },
});
expect(interaction).toMatchObject({
kind: "request_confirmation", continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: { target: { type: "custom", revisionId: `nonce-T${index + 1}` }, rejectRequiresReason: true },
});
expect(request.interactionKind).toBe("confirmation");
expect(prompt.indexOf("call request_human_input with")).toBeLessThan(prompt.indexOf("then call paperclip_finish"));
const match = prompt.match(/attentionRequests:(\[.*?\]),evidence:/);
expect(match).not.toBeNull();
const signals = normalizePrpResultSignals({ attentionRequests: JSON.parse(match![1]) });
expect(signals.ignoredAttentionRequests).toEqual([]);
expect(signals.actionableAttentionRequests).toHaveLength(index === 2 ? 0 : 1);
if (index < 2) expect(signals.actionableAttentionRequests[0]).toMatchObject({kind:"review", ownerClass:"human"});
expect(prompt).not.toContain("call request_human_input");
}
});
+5 -18
View File
@@ -811,22 +811,10 @@ function warmTurnInstructions(turn: 1 | 2 | 3, nonce: string) {
);
const marker = warmTurnMarker(turn, nonce);
const finalTurn = turn === 3;
const nativeReviewRequest = {
interactionKind: "confirmation",
idempotencyKey: `daytona-warm-review-T${turn}-${nonce}`,
title: `Warm continuity turn ${turn}`,
prompt: `Is this warm continuity task ready to complete after turn ${turn}?`,
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
payload: {
version: 1,
acceptLabel: "Approve completion",
rejectLabel: "Continue work",
rejectRequiresReason: true,
allowDeclineReason: true,
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
target: { type: "custom", key: `daytona_warm_turn_${turn}`, revisionId: `${nonce}-T${turn}`, label: `Warm continuity turn ${turn}` },
},
};
const reviewRequests = finalTurn ? [] : [{
kind: "review", ownerClass: "human",
summary: `Review the verified turn ${turn} workspace file and decide whether this task is ready to complete or needs another revision.`,
}];
const legacyCompletion = finalTurn
? `In a legacy runner, make exactly one public-API completion write after verification: PATCH /api/issues/$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID with {"status":"done","comment":"${marker}"}. Include Authorization and X-Paperclip-Run-Id. Do not POST a separate comment.`
: `In a legacy runner, after verification POST exactly one request_confirmation to /api/issues/$PAPERCLIP_TASK_ID/interactions with {"kind":"request_confirmation","idempotencyKey":"daytona-warm-review-T${turn}-${nonce}","resolverPolicy":"human_only","title":"Warm continuity turn ${turn}","summary":"Review completed warm continuity turn ${turn}.","continuationPolicy":"wake_assignee","payload":{"version":1,"prompt":"Is this warm continuity task ready to complete after turn ${turn}?","acceptLabel":"Approve completion","rejectLabel":"Continue work","rejectRequiresReason":true,"allowDeclineReason":true,"supersedeOnUserComment":false,"target":{"type":"custom","key":"daytona_warm_turn_${turn}","revisionId":"${nonce}-T${turn}","label":"Warm continuity turn ${turn}"}}}. Capture the returned interaction id. Then make exactly one issue PATCH with {"status":"in_review","comment":"${marker}","reviewInteractionId":"<returned interaction id>"}. Include Authorization and X-Paperclip-Run-Id on both writes. If the issue PATCH fails, retry only that PATCH and never create another interaction. Do not POST a separate comment. After both writes succeed, end the response and heartbeat immediately; do not wait or poll because the reviewer action will start the next turn.`;
@@ -836,8 +824,7 @@ function warmTurnInstructions(turn: 1 | 2 | 3, nonce: string) {
? `Create ${file} with exactly this one line followed by a newline: ${lines[0]}`
: `Before changing anything, read ${file} and verify its content is exactly ${lines.slice(0, -1).join("\\n")} followed by a newline. Then append exactly ${lines.at(-1)} followed by a newline.`,
`After the write, verify ${file} contains exactly these lines, once each and in order: ${lines.join(" | ")}.`,
...(!finalTurn ? [`In a native runner, after verification and before reporting needs_review, call request_human_input with ${JSON.stringify(nativeReviewRequest)}. Reuse its idempotencyKey on a retry; do not create another card. The pending card is the review gate; do not report done while it is waiting.`] : []),
`In a native runner, use the current turn completion revision and criterion IDs (CURRENT_TURN_REVISION below is a placeholder, not a literal), then call paperclip_finish exactly once with {reportedWorkDisposition:"${finalTurn ? "done" : "needs_review"}",summary:"${marker}",completionClaim:{contractRevision:CURRENT_TURN_REVISION,objectiveSatisfied:true,criteria:[{criterionId:"objective",status:"satisfied",evidenceRefs:[]}],remainingWork:[]},evidence:[],verification:[{commandOrCheck:"read ${file}",status:"passed"}]}. Wait for that tool call to succeed, then emit exactly ${marker} once as the complete user-facing final response.`,
`In a native runner, use the current turn completion revision and criterion IDs (CURRENT_TURN_REVISION below is a placeholder, not a literal), then call paperclip_finish exactly once with {reportedWorkDisposition:"${finalTurn ? "done" : "needs_review"}",summary:"${marker}",completionClaim:{contractRevision:CURRENT_TURN_REVISION,objectiveSatisfied:true,criteria:[{criterionId:"objective",status:"satisfied",evidenceRefs:[]}],remainingWork:[]},attentionRequests:${JSON.stringify(reviewRequests)},evidence:[],verification:[{commandOrCheck:"read ${file}",status:"passed"}]}. Wait for that tool call to succeed, then emit exactly ${marker} once as the complete user-facing final response.`,
legacyCompletion,
`In a legacy runner, the PATCH comment is the complete visible response. After its 2xx response, finish silently: do not print, echo, or emit ${marker} again as assistant text.`,
`Do not include ${marker} in any other visible response or write. Do not recreate, truncate, reorder, or duplicate prior lines.`,
+17
View File
@@ -166,3 +166,20 @@ export async function evaluateMatchers(
matchers.map((matcher) => evaluateMatcher(matcher, observation)),
);
}
export function persistedFinalRunMessage(
comments: Array<{ id: string; createdByRunId?: string | null; body?: string | null }>,
run: { id: string; resultJson?: Record<string, unknown> | null },
): string {
const runComments = comments.filter(comment => comment.createdByRunId === run.id);
const decision = run.resultJson?.presentationDecision;
const selectedId = decision && typeof decision === "object" && !Array.isArray(decision)
? (decision as Record<string, unknown>).commentId : null;
// Read the persisted comment selected for the user, not a finish summary or
// attachment preparation message. Missing selected evidence must still fail.
if (typeof selectedId === "string") {
return runComments.find(comment => comment.id === selectedId)?.body ?? "";
}
return runComments.map(comment => comment.body ?? "").join("\n");
}
+2 -5
View File
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ import { classifyFailure } from "./failure-classifier.js";
import { runnerE2EServerControlPaths } from "./harness-env.js";
import { setupConnectionReview } from "./connection-reviews.js";
import { setupLiveFixtures, type LiveFixtureValues } from "./live-fixtures.js";
import { evaluateMatcher, type MatcherResult } from "./matchers.js";
import { evaluateMatcher, persistedFinalRunMessage, type MatcherResult } from "./matchers.js";
import {
acceptedPlanSessionResetFailures,
hasTerminalMalformedPlanConfirmation,
@@ -1707,10 +1707,7 @@ for (const execution of executions) {
const message = agentComments
.map((comment) => comment.body ?? "")
.join("\n");
const finalRunMessage = agentComments
.filter((comment) => comment.createdByRunId === finalRun.id)
.map((comment) => comment.body ?? "")
.join("\n");
const finalRunMessage = persistedFinalRunMessage(agentComments, finalRun);
const pendingInteractions = terminal.interactions.filter(
(interaction) => interaction.status === "pending",
);
+22 -1
View File
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ import {
} from "./harness-env.js";
import { runnerExecutionById, runnerMatrix } from "./catalog.js";
import { assertEmbeddedDatabaseIsolation } from "./instance-isolation.js";
import { evaluateMatchers } from "./matchers.js";
import { evaluateMatchers, persistedFinalRunMessage } from "./matchers.js";
import {
assertSecretFree,
findSecretLeak,
@@ -1310,3 +1310,24 @@ describe("runner E2E macOS shared-memory cleanup", () => {
]);
});
});
describe("persisted final response selection", () => {
const comments = [
{ id: "attachment-comment", body: "Prepared file for this response.", createdByRunId: "run-1" },
{ id: "reply", body: "FINAL", createdByRunId: "run-1" },
{ id: "other-run", body: "unrelated", createdByRunId: "run-2" },
];
const run = { id: "run-1", resultJson: { presentationDecision: { commentId: "reply" } } };
it("grades the real final comment independently from an attachment's preparation comment", () => {
expect(persistedFinalRunMessage(comments, run)).toBe("FINAL");
});
it("fails closed when the selected final comment is missing or belongs to another run", () => {
expect(persistedFinalRunMessage(comments.slice(0, 1), run)).toBe("");
expect(persistedFinalRunMessage(comments, { ...run, resultJson: { presentationDecision: { commentId: "other-run" } } })).toBe("");
});
it("keeps legacy fallback and does not replace absent visible text with a summary", () => {
expect(persistedFinalRunMessage(comments, { id: "run-1" })).toBe("Prepared file for this response.\nFINAL");
expect(persistedFinalRunMessage([], { id: "run-1", resultJson: { summary: "FINAL" } })).toBe("");
});
});