mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-25 17:45:53 +01:00
docs: explain durable continuation scheduling
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
391b429955
commit
2fc9b49d39
1 file changed
+162
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
|
||||
# Durable continuation scheduling
|
||||
|
||||
Paperclip does not keep an agent process alive between turns. A heartbeat run is
|
||||
finite: it starts, performs work, records a terminal result, and exits. If work
|
||||
must continue later, Paperclip represents that intent in database state and
|
||||
creates another heartbeat run when the continuation becomes eligible.
|
||||
|
||||
“Durable continuation scheduler” is a useful umbrella term, but it is not the
|
||||
name of one class or queue. Two related mechanisms provide the behavior:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Explicit continuation effects** are written by native status arbitration.
|
||||
2. **Stranded-issue reconciliation** is a startup and periodic safety net for an
|
||||
assigned open issue that has no live execution or durable wait path.
|
||||
|
||||
The second mechanism produced the repeated `issue_continuation_needed` runs on
|
||||
DOT-2.
|
||||
|
||||
## When it runs
|
||||
|
||||
The heartbeat scheduler is enabled unless
|
||||
`HEARTBEAT_SCHEDULER_ENABLED=false`. Its interval is configured with
|
||||
`HEARTBEAT_SCHEDULER_INTERVAL_MS` and defaults to 30,000 ms. The configured
|
||||
value is clamped to a minimum of 10,000 ms.
|
||||
|
||||
Continuation recovery runs:
|
||||
|
||||
- once during server startup, after orphaned runs are reaped, due retries are
|
||||
promoted, and already-queued work is resumed; and
|
||||
- on every heartbeat scheduler tick, after the same orphan/retry/queue cleanup.
|
||||
|
||||
The periodic tick calls `reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues()`. Consequently, a
|
||||
new recovery run normally appears within one scheduler interval. The interval
|
||||
is polling cadence, not a promise that every continuation waits exactly that
|
||||
long.
|
||||
|
||||
Explicit native continuation effects do not need to wait for this scan. The
|
||||
native status-decision committer writes an idempotent `agent_wakeup_requests`
|
||||
row directly. The normal queued-run machinery then claims it.
|
||||
|
||||
## What is durable
|
||||
|
||||
The system reconstructs intent from persisted control-plane records rather
|
||||
than an in-memory timer owned by an agent:
|
||||
|
||||
- the issue status and assignee;
|
||||
- the issue execution lock/run identity;
|
||||
- heartbeat run status, context, retry ancestry, and terminal timestamps;
|
||||
- `agent_wakeup_requests` rows;
|
||||
- native status decisions and their materialized effects;
|
||||
- pending interactions, approvals, monitors, blockers, and execution stages;
|
||||
- scheduled retry timestamps and recovery actions.
|
||||
|
||||
Because these records survive a process restart, startup reconciliation can
|
||||
resume queued work or repair an issue whose previous execution disappeared.
|
||||
|
||||
## Explicit continuations
|
||||
|
||||
A native result can report `yielded` with a continuation containing:
|
||||
|
||||
- a kind: `same_agent`, `retry`, `delegated_issue`, `response_wake`, or
|
||||
`monitor`;
|
||||
- a summary; and
|
||||
- an idempotency key.
|
||||
|
||||
The native status arbiter keeps the issue `in_progress` and emits an
|
||||
`enqueue_continuation` effect. The status-decision committer materializes that
|
||||
effect as an idempotent wake request. A monitor continuation uses
|
||||
`monitor_due`; other continuation kinds use `issue_status_changed` at this
|
||||
boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
This is intentional continuation: the result explicitly says more work is
|
||||
needed and leaves a persisted execution path.
|
||||
|
||||
## Stranded-issue reconciliation
|
||||
|
||||
`reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues()` scans agent-owned issues in `todo`,
|
||||
`in_progress`, and relevant `in_review` states. Before creating work, it checks
|
||||
for reasons not to wake the agent, including:
|
||||
|
||||
- an active or queued execution path already exists;
|
||||
- a pending interaction or durable wait path exists;
|
||||
- the issue or its tree is paused;
|
||||
- a provider-quota monitor is pending;
|
||||
- the run was explicitly cancelled by an operator;
|
||||
- the assigned agent is not invokable;
|
||||
- invocation budget or retry/backoff policy prevents a run; or
|
||||
- recovery has failed enough times that the issue should be escalated instead.
|
||||
|
||||
For an eligible `in_progress` issue with no live path, it creates an automated
|
||||
wake/run with:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
wakeReason: issue_continuation_needed
|
||||
retryReason: issue_continuation_needed
|
||||
source: issue.continuation_recovery
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
This is a liveness repair, not evidence that the previous model requested
|
||||
another turn. Its invariant is: an assigned open issue should have either a
|
||||
live execution path, a durable reason to wait, or a visible terminal/blocking
|
||||
disposition.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why DOT-2 looped
|
||||
|
||||
DOT-2's runner repeatedly produced a successful result that reported `done`.
|
||||
The native evidence classifier did not accept the model's evidence references,
|
||||
so status arbitration preserved `in_progress` and created another continuation
|
||||
path. After each run exited, the periodic reconciler saw:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
assigned + in_progress + successful terminal run + no live/wait path
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
It therefore queued `issue_continuation_needed` again on the next approximately
|
||||
30-second tick. The new run received the original task title because the native
|
||||
model envelope also omitted the wake-comment text, so it repeated the same
|
||||
answer.
|
||||
|
||||
The fix has two parts:
|
||||
|
||||
- native model input now contains the redacted server-authored task prompt,
|
||||
including the current wake comment; and
|
||||
- ordinary low-risk issue completion can accept a schema-valid completion
|
||||
claim, while tools, governed effects, interactions, and approvals keep their
|
||||
independent authorization gates.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus a completed one-shot task becomes `done`; it is no longer a candidate for
|
||||
stranded-issue reconciliation.
|
||||
|
||||
## How to diagnose a suspected loop
|
||||
|
||||
Inspect the latest runs for the issue and compare these fields:
|
||||
|
||||
- `invocationSource` — recovery-created runs use `automation`;
|
||||
- `contextSnapshot.wakeReason`;
|
||||
- `contextSnapshot.retryReason`;
|
||||
- `retryOfRunId`;
|
||||
- terminal run status and `resultJson.authoritativeDecision`;
|
||||
- `resultJson.issueStatusAfter`;
|
||||
- issue `status`, `executionRunId`, and pending interactions/monitors;
|
||||
- lifecycle events explaining enqueue, suppression, escalation, or cleanup.
|
||||
|
||||
Repeated successful runs with `wakeReason: issue_continuation_needed`, an
|
||||
authoritative decision of `in_progress`, and no durable wait path usually mean
|
||||
the result/disposition contract is failing to converge. Fix the status or
|
||||
continuation decision; increasing the polling interval only hides the bug.
|
||||
|
||||
## Primary implementation locations
|
||||
|
||||
- `server/src/index.ts` — startup recovery and periodic heartbeat scheduler.
|
||||
- `server/src/config.ts` — scheduler enable flag and interval.
|
||||
- `server/src/services/recovery/service.ts` —
|
||||
`reconcileStrandedAssignedIssues()` and recovery wake creation.
|
||||
- `server/src/services/issue-rewake-throttle.ts` — repeated state-wake
|
||||
throttling and progress detection.
|
||||
- `server/src/services/native-runtime/status-arbiter.ts` — native terminal
|
||||
disposition and explicit continuation decisions.
|
||||
- `server/src/services/native-runtime/status-decision-committer.ts` — durable,
|
||||
idempotent materialization of native continuation effects.
|
||||
- `server/src/services/heartbeat.ts` — run lifecycle, immediate recovery, queue
|
||||
promotion, and wake execution.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user