mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-11 05:11:49 +01:00
fix(runner-e2e): refresh SDK public input pins after lockfile refresh (#20618)
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The Runner support suite checks the SDK public source pins in `tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.json` > - The automated lockfile refresh #20615 changed `pnpm-lock.yaml` and `tests/runner-e2e/report-lock.json` > - It did not update the two lockfile values in the SDK pin registry > - So `ci / Runner support suite` and `ci / verify` fail on every PR and on master > - This pull request refreshes those two values > - The benefit is that PR CI is green again without a maintainer override ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #20615. Refs #20550 (the same kind of resync). **What happened?** After #20615, the Runner support suite fails in `source-sdk-public-inputs.test.mjs` ("source-sdk-public-inputs.json is stale for 1 pinned input(s): pnpm-lock.yaml (changed)"). It also fails in `source-sdk-evidence.test.ts` and `source-sdk-public-type.test.ts` ("Reviewed SDK reference policy does not match public proof"). **What did you expect?** The pin registry matches the committed lockfile and the reviewed report-lock policy, and the suite passes. **Steps to reproduce** On master `3bf7af6c77`, run `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs $(git rev-parse HEAD) --check`. It exits 1 with `"changed": true`. ## What Changed - `inputs["pnpm-lock.yaml"]` is now the git blob of master's lockfile (`6d825f97…`). I generated it with `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --write`. - `lockSha256` is now `b3208306…`. This is the `outputSha256` in `tests/runner-e2e/report-lock.json` after #20615, and the sha256 of the committed lockfile. `source-sdk-reviewed-fixture.ts` requires these two values to be equal. - No other values change. ## Verification - `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs $(git rev-parse HEAD) --check` exits 0 with `"changed": false`. - `shasum -a 256 pnpm-lock.yaml` equals `report-lock.json` `outputSha256` and the new `lockSha256`. - CI `ci / Runner support suite` on this PR runs the three failing test files. ## Risks Low risk. The change is test pin data only. It does not change product code, the lockfile, or the report-lock policy. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use in Claude Code. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 authored and GitHub committed
1 parent
42d4499489
commit
161ee3b9a2