mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-14 00:14:02 +01:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - The chat-feature evals measure whether agents complete real chat requests through the product > - The chat catalog eval harness and its repairs live on the `chat-eval/master-candidate` branch, not on master > - Today's work made 139 of 242 chat evals pass in verified single-case live runs. Each product fix landed on master as its own pull request > - The eval-side changes (setups, graders, fault seams, evidence capture) still exist only on the candidate > - This pull request lands the harness on master. Master stays the source of truth for product behavior > - The benefit is one tree: evals run against master commits, and product fixes reach the evals as soon as they merge ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19441, Refs #19599, Refs #20270, Refs #20334, Refs #20342, Refs #20344, Refs #20354, Refs #20360, Refs #20373, Refs #20382, Refs #20409 **What existing behavior does this improve?** The chat catalog eval harness and the product it evaluates live on a long-running branch outside master. Eval fixes do not reach master, so master-based eval runs use old setups and graders. **Subsystem affected** `tests/runner-e2e` chat catalog harness, plus a small set of product changes that exist only on the candidate. **Proposed change** Land the harness on master. Every product fix from this eval work already merged to master as its own pull request. Conflicts keep master's product behavior. ## What Changed - Most of the diff (808 of 851 files) is under `tests/runner-e2e/`: chat-catalog domains, scenarios, descriptors, the TestOps manifest, private evidence tooling, and their tests. - Graders now check saved state, setup literals and rendered or clicked links. Many keyword and regex checks on free-form replies are removed. Each changed grader has a bumped `oracleVersion` and calibration tests (a valid reply, a reworded valid reply, and broken variants that must fail). - The shared link helper `hasLink` no longer treats a list link (for example `/COM/issues?view=mine`) as a link to every task without a URL key. - Setup fixes build real state through supported product routes: routine history, agent grants through the board grant route, budget holds with a real cap, and a storage-layer archive fault for `inbox-search.archive-partial-failure`. - Browser boundary journeys (sign-in, chat-disabled, onboarding) now write the standard pass evidence files. - Retargeted cases, approved by the maintainer: `agent-chat.chat-disabled` (Conference Room gate), `agents.restore-instructions` (no saved instruction history), `access.manage-membership` (member permission edits stay board-only). - The private evidence trusted files (`manual-private-handoff.ts`, `manual-private-retention.ts`, `manual-private-report-assets.ts`) are byte-identical to master. - Product files outside `tests/` (43 files, +1,328 −49) carry candidate-only changes that master does not yet have. Most are tests. The main code changes are in `request-human-input.ts`, `heartbeat-run-summary.ts`, `native-completion-feedback.ts`, `native-run-finalizer.ts`, `openapi.ts`, `secrets.ts` and `IssueChatLongThreadPerf.tsx`. ## Verification - `pnpm vitest run chat-catalog-domains chat-catalog-contract.test.ts chat-catalog-consistency.test.ts unit-launcher.test.mjs --testTimeout=180000` in `tests/runner-e2e`: 269 files pass, 3,550 tests pass. - `node --test chat-full-catalog-testops-manifest.test.mjs`: 10 pass. - `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`: no change. - `tsc` for `server` and `tests/runner-e2e`: clean. - Live single-case verification: 139 of 242 cases passed on paid runs, and a person read the saved evidence for each. These are single-case runs, not one full-cohort run. ## Risks - Large diff. Most of it is test-only, but the 43 non-test files change product code paths. Review those files first. - Some graders are now less strict on reply wording. A person must read replies for meaning on those cases. - 42 cases need disposable outside accounts (Notion, Slack, GitHub, Daytona and others) and stay blocked. `access.invite-teammate` stays failing until local agent isolation lands, because the runner's durable state keeps a live invite token. - The paid workflow compares the trusted private-evidence files with master. They are unchanged, so this risk is low. ## Model Used Anthropic Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), with tool use and code execution, in Claude Code. Subagents used the same model. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
31 lines
3.5 KiB
TypeScript
31 lines
3.5 KiB
TypeScript
import { afterEach, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
|
import type { ChatCatalogContext } from "./chat-catalog-contract.js";
|
|
const { poll, settle, send } = vi.hoisted(() => ({ poll: vi.fn(), settle: vi.fn(), send: vi.fn() }));
|
|
vi.mock("./api.js", async original => ({ ...await original<object>(), pollUntil: poll }));
|
|
vi.mock("./chat-flow.js", async original => ({ ...await original<object>(), sendChatMessage: send }));
|
|
vi.mock("./chat-catalog-domains/privileged-support.js", async original => ({ ...await original<object>(), settlePrivilegedChat: settle }));
|
|
vi.mock("@playwright/test", async original => ({ ...await original<object>(), expect: Object.assign(() => ({ toBeVisible: async () => {} }), { poll: () => ({ toBeGreaterThanOrEqual: async () => {} }) }) }));
|
|
import { privilegedPerformanceCases } from "./chat-catalog-domains/privileged-performance.js";
|
|
afterEach(() => { vi.useRealTimers(); vi.clearAllMocks(); });
|
|
function context() {
|
|
const values: Record<string, number> = { "perf-fixture-row-target": 487, "perf-fixture-markdown-rows": 150, "perf-mount-duration": 12.3, "perf-latest-duration": 8.1, "perf-max-duration": 12.3, "perf-total-duration": 20.4, "perf-commit-count": 2 };
|
|
const page = { url: () => "http://owned.invalid/chat", goto: vi.fn(async () => {}), getByTestId: (id: string) => ({ innerText: async () => String(values[id]) }), evaluate: async () => "unit browser", viewportSize: () => ({ width: 1280, height: 720 }) };
|
|
return { observationDeadlineAt: 570_000, scenario: { id: "developer-labs.long-thread-performance" }, input: { execution: { id: "chat-features.runner-opencode.local.developer-labs.long-thread-performance" }, page, api: { baseURL: "http://owned.invalid" }, evidence: vi.fn(), capture: vi.fn() }, refreshIssue: async () => {}, issue: () => ({ conversationState: "waiting" }) } as unknown as ChatCatalogContext;
|
|
}
|
|
it("actual measured-report followup and interpretation consume the original clock after browser work", async () => {
|
|
vi.useFakeTimers(); vi.setSystemTime(200_000); const ctx = context(), state: Record<string, unknown> = {};
|
|
settle.mockResolvedValue({ runs: [{ id: "first" }] }); send.mockImplementation(async (_page, _text, remaining) => { expect(remaining()).toBe(370_000); }); poll.mockRejectedValue(new Error("captured interpretation"));
|
|
await expect(privilegedPerformanceCases[0]!.act!(ctx, state)).rejects.toThrow("captured interpretation");
|
|
expect(send).toHaveBeenCalledExactlyOnceWith(ctx.input.page, expect.stringContaining('"commentCount":469'), expect.any(Function));
|
|
const options = poll.mock.calls[0]![0]; expect(options.deadlineAt).toBe(570_000);
|
|
const valid = { issue: { conversationState: "waiting" }, runs: [{ status: "succeeded" }, { status: "succeeded" }] };
|
|
expect(options.accept(valid)).toBe(true); expect(options.accept({ ...valid, runs: [{ status: "succeeded" }, { status: "running" }] })).toBe(false);
|
|
vi.setSystemTime(570_000); expect(options.accept(valid)).toBe(false);
|
|
expect(state.performanceReport).toMatchObject({ commentCount: 469, rowCount: 487, markdownCount: 150, mountMs: 12.3 });
|
|
});
|
|
it("elapsed browser measurement cannot reset the report send budget", async () => {
|
|
vi.useFakeTimers(); vi.setSystemTime(570_000); const ctx = context(); settle.mockResolvedValue({ runs: [{ id: "first" }] }); send.mockImplementation(async (_page, _text, remaining) => remaining());
|
|
await expect(privilegedPerformanceCases[0]!.act!(ctx, {})).rejects.toThrow(/exhausted/); expect(poll).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
|
|
expect(ctx.observationDeadlineAt).toBe(570_000);
|
|
});
|