Files
PaperClipAI/maps/feature-map/workspaces.md
T
Nicky LeachandPaperclip aab87ce707 Prove workspace delivery before inspecting cleanup candidates (#18493)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - Completed tasks leave workspaces that need safe cleanup.
> - Providers without ancestry inspection currently need a recorded
merged PR before cleanup can start.
> - A squash merge changes commit identity, so direct ancestry cannot
prove that delivery.
> - This change proves delivery from the finalized HEAD and captured
destination before storage inspection.
> - Fresh storage checks and a second delivery check still protect
removal.
> - This reuses the existing worker and receipts. It adds no table or
timer.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #18410. Related: #13400 addresses workspace identity during
inspection; this change adds destination-aware delivery discovery.

## What Changed

- Resolve direct ancestry or discover an associated merged GitHub PR
without a recorded work product. Require exact HEAD, destination
repository and branch, and a reachable integration commit.
- Use the latest settled finalization receipt as a candidate. Reject
missing, failed, pending, conflicting, or changed evidence.
- Inspect storage only after positive remote proof for providers that
disable ancestry inspection. Recheck HEAD, branch, source identity and
delivery before removal intent.
- Add an optional provider capability for a specific PR recovery hint
and an optional prepared destination receipt. Older providers keep their
existing protocol.
- Wake cleanup when finalization writes settle or gain a workspace
binding. Keep remote-only retries for concrete unresolved delivery. Park
missing or unsupported candidate identity.
- Reuse the source project's explicit GitHub consent for delivery checks
through the existing authorization service. Revalidate the bound
repository and consent before removal; missing or revoked consent
retains storage without switching identities. Public sources remain
anonymous.
- Update the contracts, documentation, access map, and targeted
regressions.

## Verification

- Initial-head GitHub CI passed at
`5acd4c818be6f1764f8319f42891f9956c357c26`, including full build and
typecheck. Standard Greptile is 5/5 with no open threads. The first Apex
review scored 3/5 and found startup latency from remote proof lookups
and removal retry identity changes across provider capability changes.
Both corrections are pushed in `9d1a38df3d`, with the qualified
destination-ref length fix. Red regressions reproduced each issue.
Latest targeted checks passed: cleanup/worker 26, provider integration
41, SDK contract 8. Head `9d1a38df3d` passed standard and Apex reviews
at 5/5 with no open threads, plus all CI including full build/typecheck.
Canary Dry Run initially failed on an npm 404 fetching
`rollup-4.67.3.tgz`; the exact tarball subsequently returned HTTP 200,
and one targeted retry passed without source changes. Aggregate
verification also passed. After #18403 merged, master introduced
conflicts in shared workspace cleanup and metadata handling. Resolved
them in `7700832536`, preserving remote snapshot cleanup and Git
delivery-proof cleanup. Targeted merge verification: 93 tests passed in
the first run (59 opt-in skips), then all 16 remote lifecycle tests
passed with explicit database opt-in; map checks passed. The isolated
database is stopped. The merge head received standard review 5/5. Its CI
found two failures in unchanged test cleanup paths: native runtime
temporary-directory ENOTEMPTY and agent-chat cancellation lock timeout.
Those failures remain recorded and require successful final-head
verification. The subsequent project-consent change has targeted
coverage: authorization36, resolver33 and cleanup19 tests passed,
including revoked consent, anonymous public access and source-binding
races. The positive consent test failed before the fix. Current head
`c772679e05` has green GitHub CI, including full build/typecheck and
both previously failing test jobs, plus standard Greptile 5/5 with no
open threads. Neither cleanup failure required changes to its test path.
Apex also completed at 5/5 on this exact head (check `124651548532`,
summary updated 2026-10-31 20:45 UTC), with no open review threads. The
PR remains draft. Earlier failures remain recorded above.

- Final focused run on the rebased branch: **182 tests passed across six
files**, covering the resolver, delivery cleanup, provider bridge,
finalization notifications, existing workspace service and SDK
contracts. The disposable test database was stopped afterward.
- Targeted resolver tests: 33 passed. These cover ancestry, discovered
squash PRs, wrong HEAD/base/repository, removed integration commits,
bounded responses, cancellation and credential isolation.
- Targeted cleanup integration tests: 17 passed. Provider bridge
integration: 36 passed. SDK contract tests: 7 passed. Finalization
notification tests: 9 passed.
- A negative control that removed the final delivery check failed the
race regression as expected. The check was restored.
- Read-only live GitHub probe: the new resolver discovered PR #18410
from HEAD `3f5ade4cd42b707040e9a82fdaed343e3d736a09`, without PR hints.
It proved integration commit `6484f96c28bfb11a793ce4be6cc5ac15643a5a02`
reachable from observed master
`5bc029bf6c1db6647e96acea323f3723fd1d3eba`. GitHub also advertised the
exact original HEAD at `refs/pull/18410/head`.
- `node scripts/check-maps.mjs` passed. Structural checks do not prove
deployment behavior.
- Local tests are targeted by user request. Full build, typecheck and
test suite run in GitHub CI. A standalone server typecheck could not
complete because local Runner build declarations were absent; no
changed-file diagnostics were reported.
- Initial local execution hit a stalled pnpm wrapper, sandbox socket
denial and stale generated SDK declarations. Direct installed binaries,
the authorized isolated test database and rebuilt SDK resolved those
setup failures. No deployment was performed.

## Risks

- Destructive cleanup still requires fresh storage safety and lifecycle
checks. Remote proof alone never authorizes removal. A persisted removal
intent preserves existing recovery semantics.
- Legacy workspaces without an unambiguous destination or completion
HEAD remain retained. This does not guess the original default branch.
- Private repositories use the explicit standing GitHub consent on the
bound source project, with current membership, grant, repository access
and trust checks. No separate company token is required when that
consent is valid. Missing or revoked consent and unavailable or
rate-limited access retain storage; the worker does not borrow a task or
agent identity.
- A known undelivered commit keeps the existing five-minute retry
because external GitHub changes have no guaranteed ingress to this lane.
This can keep cleanup scheduled. Missing evidence parks instead.
- Providers need the new recovery capability to clean a squash merge
whose original HEAD is reachable only through its PR ref. Providers
without it remain conservative.
- The resolver currently supports GitHub.com. Existing local and
other-provider ancestry paths stay in place.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, repository tools and
parallel code agents. The exact runtime model ID and context-window size
were not exposed to this session.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-11-02 07:59:17 -08:00

17 KiB
Raw Blame History

navigation
navigation
section sectionOrder order
Projects and execution 40 30

Workspaces, services, and files

A project or task can use a managed workspace with inspectable files, Git state, services, and runtime controls. Operators can follow its lifecycle through provisioning, use, and closure.

Feature ID: workspaces.

Implementation: workspace list, execution workspace, project workspace.

Agent access: companion.

Sub-features

  • binding: workspaces/binding — identify the workspace actually bound to a task/run.
  • provisioning: workspaces/provisioning — observe readiness and failures instead of inferring readiness from a created record.
  • services: workspaces/services — start/stop supported services and inspect logs and exposed endpoints.
  • files-git: workspaces/files-git — inspect workspace files and repository state used for the deliverable.
  • closure: workspaces/closure — close/reopen or reconcile through permitted controls without losing work.

For a historical failed export whose exact sandbox was destroyed, the task recovery notice offers Continue from saved sources to an authorized board operator. Select surviving task attachments, record lost work and external action outcomes, then rebuild through fresh-session admission. The old failed run remains failed. Bounded bootstrap retries retain this decision and recheck their system wake, predecessors, saved files and current execution gates before provider startup. Later cancelled runs require their own confirmed stop and board file repair. Their evidence is preserved with the reconstruction and rechecked before dispatch. Stop retains unfinished native files; startup also repairs missing historical retention without replaying the cancelled turn. Daytona stop-only cleanup confirms retention and accepts an already archived source. Cancelled native file recovery can record a verified no-action outcome. Its confirmation stays optional and resets when the source changes. Retained sandboxes keep their existing export recovery path. Automated coverage: reconstruction. Live staging acceptance remains separate from these regression tests.

How to get to it (user POV)

task-workspace

Use the task’s workspace card or Files panel and follow its workspace link.

Native artifact-copy verification: in an admitted standard-mode task, save a synthetic API response and call download_artifact with its saved identity and a new workspace-relative filename. Independently inspect the file's complete byte count and SHA-256 through the admitted filesystem. Retry the identical request; reject a conflicting destination, symlink, revoked authority and foreign artifact. The transfer does not change the content's untrusted status. See API tools for support and limits. Provider-free regression evidence is not live remote qualification.

workspace-management

Open /workspaces, a project workspace, or /execution-workspaces/:workspaceId and its Services/Configuration/Runtime logs views.

Driving it with Playwright and the Paperclip CLI

Preconditions: follow the baseline. Enable isolated-workspace UI where needed. Use an owned disposable repository and environment; record workspace ID and branch.

task-workspace

Automated: workspace card and task binding cover host/binding contracts.

Manual: Run a task that writes a small file, follow the bound workspace, and inspect the file and revision. Reload and verify links still refer to the same workspace, not another checkout or a stale run.

For experimental native remote storage, follow the deployment prerequisites and explicit local import. With durable Postgres, S3, and a stable key configured, a new disposable Paperclip Runner sandbox task with a supported fresh source enrolls by default. Verify an explicit remoteWorkspaceStorageEnabled: false disables new enrollment, and an existing host workspace or configured local folder stays on its legacy path until explicitly imported. An enrolled workspace must keep remote authority when enrollment is disabled and fail admission if persistence prerequisites are lost. Write ordinary/binary files and, for Git, staged, unstaged, and unpushed work. Finish the run and inspect its saved version. Replace the webserver and verify the next task turn uses the same remote folder without a controller checkout. Then release the saved allocation and verify a new one restores the files, Git state, and managed same-project repositories without the old sandbox or original Git remote. Read-only cross-project referenced folders must fail admission. Separate workspaces may run concurrently; shared concurrent writers must be rejected.

Create a child that inherits a saved isolated workspace or operator branch. Verify it continues the same files after the prior writer saves, including on a new allocation. Two bound children must not acquire concurrent writer authority. The reservation regression and saved-file lifecycle suite exercise inheritance, access checks, and file continuity with real PostgreSQL. Their filesystem transport is local test execution, not live sandbox/provider proof.

The Files panel must label Live workspace or Saved copy with its save time. Confirm browse, preview, and download agree. A missing allocation with unsaved work must report unavailability rather than show an old save as current. Close must retain dirty/unfinished work and reject custom cleanup/teardown commands; a clean saved workspace can release compute while retaining files. Manual runtime commands, jobs, repairs, and service starts must reject remote workspaces before local filesystem access; agent task execution remains supported. The archive, storage, migration, retention, and lifecycle regression suites exercise these contracts separately. This recipe records required deployment checks; it does not claim a live provider or webserver replacement passed.

For a repository-free isolated task, complete an explicitly fresh retry, save a marker, then send ordinary new input. It must retain the bound attempt directory and marker. A later explicitly fresh retry must use a separate clean sibling. The production preparation regression uses PostgreSQL and real private directories; it also rejects changed bindings. The directory boundary suite checks namespace, missing-directory and symlink refusal. Neither suite proves a hosted provider turn.

For slow source preparation, configure a short PostgreSQL idle-transaction timeout in a disposable instance. Hold preparation beyond that interval and verify it retains its source lock, rejects competing preparation, and leaves ordinary reads available. The source-lock regression uses real PostgreSQL; it does not prove provider startup or deployed recovery.

Create an authorized task whose selected checkout is also used by private historical tasks and many old workspace records. Start and reuse it without a historical-source permission failure or remote-clone fallback. Verify task-bound file browsing works, while private historical task content and operation logs remain denied through app APIs. Root traversal and symlink escapes must remain rejected. The OS and execution environment own isolation between agents; Paperclip does not classify existing bytes by the task that wrote them. Existing workspace_source_restricted failures remain inspectable and recoverable, but new preparation does not produce that failure from filesystem history. Current trust, credential, binding, and publication checks still apply. The preparation-history benchmark supplies local service measurements, not provider deployment qualification.

For reconstructable Git expiration, finish a disposable task tree, run the internal lifecycle sweep after its 24-hour grace, and inspect candidate/reclaimed bytes. Advance its upstream first; use the ordinary task/workspace reopen control and verify the original commit, file contents, and subsequent persisted work. Current runs, previews, recovery, unique files and shared base clones must stay. The expiration tests exercise real local Git and database paths, interruption and concurrent reopening; cloud credentials and the deployed user journey require separate live evidence.

For task workspace selection, use the authorized task workspace API to choose a task directory, project source, or existing workspace. Verify that a change made during a run stays pending until the next normal admission. Submit another choice using the returned revision, then retry the superseded request; it must fail without replacing the newer pending choice. A projectless task must retain its files across resume and reassignment. Use the repository preparation API to add an authorized repository beneath that workspace; repeat the request and verify that it reuses the checkout and pinned revision. See task binding tests and repository access tests.

For native unfinished work, yield after preparation is staged and verify that normal admission prepares the repository and continues the same task without a timer or user message. A staging-only task that finishes must not wake again. The saved continuation must disappear when the repository is ready or belongs to another task. Source regressions cover those eligibility checks; a live provider journey is required to qualify the complete automatic resume.

An existing projectless folder alias of a sandbox-restricted project must be rejected for a standard local task before its adapter executes. Repeat after relocating the configured source; retained ownership must still enforce the boundary. This is separate from ordinary authorized file preview/download. For a registered worktree selected for a sandbox or SSH environment, configured and built-in provision scripts must not run on the controller during fresh creation, reuse, or rebuild, including host runtime provisioning. Repeat with standard trust and a protected read-only source, then with source write grants; permissions must not change execution placement. Verify isolated source copying and selected-environment dispatch still work. Repeat an explicit local isolated source choice: copying remains available but controller scripts must stay absent, including after binding or metadata changes and closed-worktree reopening. An implicit trusted local project default remains a positive provisioning control. Repeat with a newer configured default overriding an older primary source, then with a newer primary overriding an older nonprimary source. Both configured and built-in hooks must run for the implicit local default. Task creation and controller classification share configured-default, primary, creation-time and ID precedence. Explicit choices and saved copy-only markers still suppress hooks; changing the default must not rotate an existing binding or clear its marker. SSH keeps its explicit remote provision-command path; these checks do not claim a new sandbox provision transport. Low-trust closed-worktree reopening, including a board-comment reopen of a projectless task, must also suppress both kinds of host provision script. Returned checkpoints must reject file, symlink or missing parents before host writes, even if a nested file is marked unchanged. The retained host file and recovery evidence must survive rejection. These are automated safety contracts, not new live runtime acceptance.

An unchanged returned snapshot skips the host scan after acquiring the writer lock and checking authority. Concurrent host edits remain untouched; changed files, modes, symlinks and deletions still take the conflict path. The unchanged restore regression checks both hooks under the lock. This is source-level coverage, not a cloud latency result.

For a child created by an admitted agent with an explicit existing workspace, verify that a matching sandbox boundary permits creation before the child has an ID. A changed child policy, unrelated parent, or forged creator run must fail. See the child workspace trust regression. This automated contract does not add live acceptance evidence.

workspace-management

Automated: workspace detail and runtime service cover UI and runtime contracts separately.

Manual: Provision a disposable workspace, wait for readiness, start an available service, open its endpoint, and inspect a real response and logs. Stop it and verify it actually stops. Exercise close/reopen only after inspecting pending changes and active runs.

Gotchas

  • UI visibility, default isolation policy, the local environment row, a workspace record, and a running service are distinct prerequisites. A fresh instance still needs an owned cwd/repository and runtime commands; /workspaces lists existing work. Reopening depends on lifecycle, not a generic detail action.

  • A link or running badge does not prove the service is reachable from the user’s browser.

  • Workspace IDs, runtime leases, and repository paths are not interchangeable.

  • Remote workspace snapshots require external Postgres, S3, and the original encryption key. Edits after the last save still depend on the sandbox; there is no periodic workspace backup. The experiment does not remove the instance volume or establish zero-outage deployment for other data paths.

  • Terminal workspace cleanup wakes after committed task/workspace/PR/finalization changes and restores cooldown deadlines at startup. Empty lanes stop scanning. Metadata reads do not inspect storage. Providers without ancestry inspection use finalized HEAD and destination-aware GitHub proof before storage checks. Associated squash PRs need not be recorded manually; wrong HEAD/base, unreachable integration commits, or unavailable credentials retain the workspace. Compatible records share one advisory Git inspection per bounded page, while each record keeps its own delivery check. Destructive cleanup starts a separate Git scan even if an older scan is running. The worker tests cover quiet lanes and deadlines. The service tests cover real PostgreSQL signals and retained worktrees. These tests do not qualify an external wake alarm or a live provider deployment.

  • Organizational project, source project, task files, personal AGENT_HOME, and provider home have separate meanings. Private source ownership remains attached to copied files after source configuration changes or workspace closure.

  • Use recovery for divergence/export repair and CLI operations for local worktree tooling.

Storybook verification

closure

Capability ID: workspaces/closure.

Scope: ui Storybook: Close-readiness checks, pending changes/active runs, blocked/pending/error close, retry close and eligible reopening. Production: Confirm owned workspace shutdown, preserved files/Git state and permitted lifecycle transition/reopening; Browser Use session closure is unrelated. Workspace detail and operation-history reads do not inspect Git or remote storage. Delivery is unknown until explicit close readiness or lifecycle inspection. Verify that these reads work during an inspection outage, while destructive close still refuses unverified data. Sources: Source: ExecutionWorkspaceDetail.tsx, ExecutionWorkspaceCloseDialog.tsx, execution-workspaces.ts. Tests: execution-workspaces-routes.test.ts, execution-workspaces-service.test.ts, execution-workspace-reopen.test.ts