mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-29 21:07:40 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
f8226b0515
<!-- entire-trail-link-start --> https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/210/changes/paperclip/210 <!-- entire-trail-link-end --> ## Thinking Path > - Paperclip coordinates agent work and presents results in chat. > - GitHub acknowledgements already persist the response action and provider receipt. > - A terminal run can still owe a final response after acknowledgement. > - Periodic maintenance searches those rows even when no relevant state changed. > - Committed run, issue, presentation, lease and publication changes identify when recovery can advance. > - The owner should recover from those events and real deadlines, then become quiet. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17656, which is merged. This existing terminal-response slice targets master. **Problem:** A saved GitHub response can remain nonfinal while its run, native presentation, publication or source is unresolved. Removing maintenance without covering those producers loses recovery. Polling settled history keeps the tenant active. **Expected behavior:** Committed supported changes wake the terminal owner. It reconstructs existing actions, preserves provider authority and pending publication ownership, waits at saved deadlines where needed, and becomes quiet after settlement. ## What Changed - Register terminal GitHub response work with the shared scoped deadline coordinator, using existing action/delivery/publication/run rows. - Notify response availability from supported run milestones, native identity, recovery resolution, issue updates and tree/workspace restoration writes. Preserve outer transaction commit/rollback. - Keep GitHub response interpretation in its platform owner. Use the bounded run projection for both direct authorization and scheduling, including native presentation guards and deliberate passive outcomes. - Retain the existing publication lease, markers, source/principal checks and final receipt precedence. A publication owner or uncertain outcome keeps its existing authority; the worker does not replay it. - Remove only recurring terminal-response recovery, preserving the manual path and neighbouring duties. Add no table or scheduler service. - Regenerate the original sparse terminal-work index as `0401_yummy_ultimates.sql`, concurrently and idempotently through the existing top-level migration runner. Preserve all prior SQL/journal entries and the five newest snapshots. ## Verification Published head: `88a209e28b969b5229e9a621aeddfd3cbae9b0cd`, integrated with landed #17656 (`ba5bba86dcdde32b14d4d7dec1b51898e5f6f22d`) and master `52b86c2032a189b0ea259c5b0cb7158b07ef788c`. - **74 distinct current cases pass:** 17 terminal-response lifecycle/producer cases (1,721 other chat cases skipped), all six queued-comment consumption regressions for the new upstream query optimization, all 30 heartbeat completion cases, all eight real/unit issue-tree control cases and all 13 startup cases. Database build, server typecheck/build, module boundaries and four fresh migrations through 0401 pass. - The earlier **304-case** prepared-parent matrix passes at `aa72f32641b2e2c680342cd49477272349aca9db`: all 253 GitHub workflow cases, 30 completion cases, eight issue-tree cases and 13 startup cases. It retains that revision scope. Repeated cases are not added to the current 74. - The terminal matrix covers finalized-history quiet, deleted Board sources, pending presentation/passive outcomes, outer rollback/commit, paused/new runs, restart/drain/standby, committed native identity, lease waits, full-page unrelated history, uncertain publication ownership and tree/workspace/exhausted-recovery producers. - A populated 0400 database upgrades to 0401 with all 399 prior migration receipts identical, exactly one added, and none added on replay. The terminal index is valid/ready on fresh and upgraded databases. Its SQL matches the original draft after whitespace normalization; generation keeps snapshots 0397–0401. - Normal integration `3c8339a541bf68bc9957b9d5a8df80d3a7c3452d` preserves the complete 24-path owned binary patch and all five new master paths. The landed parent tree also equals the previously published parent tree byte for byte. Both normal merge parents and the exact composition tree are checked. No force push or rebase occurs. - [The owner audit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/88a209e28b969b5229e9a621aeddfd3cbae9b0cd/doc/plans/2026-10-25-github-terminal-response-sleep-audit.md#acceptance-on-the-landed-github-parent-and-current-master) preserves the original producer, quietness, failure-isolation, skipped-suite and presentation-wait results with their scopes. Current passes do not erase earlier failures or turn skips into passes. - The audit-only follow-up leaves all owned source/test/migration hashes unchanged. **Fresh exact-head CI and Greptile 5/5 with no actionable findings remain required.** No full local repository suite, live GitHub tenant or deployed sleep result is claimed. ## Risks - Process-local notifications cover supported application writers and shared pools. Independent SQL writers and other replicas gain no new wake guarantee. - Native terminal status alone does not authorize fallback publication. Pending presentation and existing publication ownership remain separate obligations. - Stop can leave an in-flight provider request settling; admission fences stop a subsequent request. Unknown outcomes retain their existing recovery rules. - Index creation can take time on large histories. Concurrent/idempotent migration and existing replay recovery remain in charge. - Worker quiet does not establish host/database suspension. Cloud alarm coverage and sleep admission remain unchanged. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, using reasoning, repository inspection, code execution and real PostgreSQL tests. The exact model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>