mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-29 12:59:13 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
f4f02880ca
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip keeps exact failed chat retries in durable action and wake receipts. > - Deferred and declined retries owe safe notices to their original conversation. > - Periodic publication maintenance repeatedly inspects those receipts when idle. > - Committing receipt, authority, lifecycle and lease changes already identifies when eligibility can change. > - A scoped owner reconstructs durable obligations, drains bounded candidates, retains contention, then becomes quiet. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description This existing failed-retry notice slice follows #17647. It removes the failed-retry notice duty from periodic publication maintenance while preserving the explicit manual API. Existing action, receipt, publication and source rows remain authoritative; no new table or scheduler is added. **Problem:** Removing the scan alone loses notices after real admission, cancellation, early refusal, requester or agent restoration, and relevant lease settlement. Millisecond cursor truncation can also repeat denied history. **Expected behavior:** Committed supported writes wake the scoped notice owner, which uses current authorization and precise cursors. Real retries survive failure, contention, restart and drain; settled work has no recurring SQL. ## What Changed - Extract failed-retry projection under the existing authorization owner. Preserve current receipt/source authority and provider transport authorization. - Register bounded scoped work using the existing delivery coordinator/scheduler. Preserve exact PostgreSQL cursor precision, contention and a wake arriving during reconciliation. - Extend the shared transaction-aware notification boundary to failed-retry notices. Cover admission, conditional denial, early refusal, requester changes, and agent lifecycle transitions to an invokable status. Two shared receipt hooks and their budget fixture correction already landed in the preceding inbound slice; preserve them once. - Notify when relevant native lease cleanup completes or a reusable lease is retired, preserving claim fencing and caller-owned transactions. - Avoid the discovery scan identified in #17647: known task scopes require zero discovery SQL; company/startup discovery uses a single DISTINCT projection from the same candidate predicate. Bounded current authorization still runs afterward. - Remove only this duty from periodic publication maintenance, retain manual behavior and startup reconstruction, and add real producer/lifecycle/query-budget regressions with an audit. ## Verification Published head: `fa95a1f2fb9d546aa62dbd3b43aa714f5c88bd35`, targeting master after #17647 merged at `1aa3a21ac41f602977638cf0be875b01a243e69f`. - **42 distinct current combined-master cases pass:** 21 retry-notice/native-lease/restored-input producer cases (1,651 skipped), plus all 21 app/startup and task-drain admission-release cases. Server typechecking, build and module boundaries pass. The final follow-up adds acceptance documentation only; all 17 owned server source/test hashes are unchanged. - The prior **404-case** matrix passes at prepared revision `c2c53b839497be6f5e28aa2cd5ba50cfd1d76d4a`: 259 across six complete consumer/lifecycle/environment suites, 20 notice/lease cases, 53 ordinary-notice and 72 Retry/budget cases. Those chat selections skip 1,651/1,618/1,599 cases. A subsequent 21-case combined producer check passes after the parent restoration repair. These earlier runs retain their revision scope. - The normal two-parent integration `43d0f84ea56845b8fc4946a7533ecbf7f07b679a` preserves the complete 19-path owned binary patch and all 23 unrelated master paths/deletions. The semantic merge base is the verified landed parent head `41f7e2c9e351efa6cfa5ef699c0e69df7425012b`; squash ancestry otherwise causes historical conflicts. Both parent commits and the exact resolved tree are verified; no rebase or force push occurs. - Three scope-discovery regressions fail before the fix. The first SQL projection fails with PostgreSQL 42702 (ambiguous company column), then passes after using a distinct company alias. Known task hints have zero discovery SQL; company/startup discovery has one query returning only distinct task scopes. Existing bounded projection/current authorization remain intact. - Current producer tests cover commit/rollback, parked authority restoration, real agent resume, early refusal, requester changes, native lease cleanup/replacement, drain/restart/shutdown, precise cursors and contention. Parent shared admission/denial/restored-input notifications are preserved once. No polling backstop or storage is added. - [The owner audit](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/fa95a1f2fb9d546aa62dbd3b43aa714f5c88bd35/doc/plans/2026-10-25-failed-retry-notices-sleep-audit.md#final-landed-parent-acceptance--october-28) records current commands, fixtures, failure history and limits. Fresh exact-head remote checks and Greptile 5/5 are pending; old-head reviews do not count. The owner audit preserves prior failures and their original revision scope. The old remote head's Runner receipt timeout, cancelled gate, and review error are not current passes; fresh exact-head checks and Greptile 5/5 are required. No full local repository suite, live provider tenant, external wake alarm, physical suspension or savings claim is made. ### Final remote gates Exact published head `fa95a1f2fb9d546aa62dbd3b43aa714f5c88bd35` has Greptile 5/5 with no actionable findings, successful current main CI and ready-triggered security scan. The final dependency/quality review workflow `40747725096` passed after waiting for a GitHub-hosted runner. No Ponytail verdict is present. Two automatic main CI requests and two identical-head quality-review requests were created one second apart. The older main run was automatically cancelled; only the proven duplicate, unstarted quality request was cancelled manually. Their same-head, same-workflow replacements both finish successfully. The merge guard verifies these replacements, all current checks and current required-status integration rules before excluding the superseded cancellation contexts. No actual failing review or current check is waived and no protection bypass is used. ## Risks - Process-local signals cover supported writers using this boundary, not independent SQL or other replicas. - Lease completion now reads/locks the exact row before updating. Reusable lease retirement wakes company scope because its previous issue can differ. Claims and transaction ownership remain enforced. - Broad discovery can inspect history inside PostgreSQL; DISTINCT reduces returned rows and round trips, without claiming constant database cost. Task hints are wake requests, so bounded reconciliation handles already exhausted scopes. - Native filesystem activation belongs to execution authorization and is not an eligibility input for this notice projection. Other notice/maintenance duties and Cloud sleep gates remain separate. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, based on GPT-6, with reasoning, local code inspection, shell execution, and PostgreSQL testing. The exact serving model identifier and context-window size are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>