mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-21 08:22:20 +02:00
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters, UI surfaces, and operator verification > - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated or human review > - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs stay below the 100-file review limit > - This pull request is split 2/8 and focuses on database schema and shared governance contracts > - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Related parity reference: #9534 - Problem: The governed access model needs additive persistence and synchronized shared types before server enforcement can compile. - Proposed solution: Adds migrations 0148–0169, tool-access and Smoke Lab schema, shared types/validators/gallery helpers, and the minimal compile-required contract consumers identified by boundary testing. - Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves. - Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate roadmap initiative. - Stack position: base branch is `pap10341-split/01-demo-servers`. - Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate remains empty. - Requested review: QA for migrations/validators; Greptile on every PR. ## What Changed - Adds migrations 0148–0169, tool-access and Smoke Lab schema, shared types/validators/gallery helpers, and the minimal compile-required contract consumers identified by boundary testing. - Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable. - Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven stack levels. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` — passed, including migration numbering and safety checks - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/db test` — passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/shared test` — passed ## Risks - Migration or contract mistakes could affect every upper layer; all migrations are additive/idempotent and compile consumers are included in this boundary. - Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers; mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy. - Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from #9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and code-execution tools enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link explicitly required for this coordinated split stack - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Stack Coordination - Internal execution plan: [PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan) - Parity reference: #9534 - Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563 - Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff at #9563. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
463 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
463 lines
14 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import {
|
|
acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
askUserQuestionsResultSchema,
|
|
createIssueThreadInteractionSchema,
|
|
requestConfirmationPayloadSchema,
|
|
requestConfirmationResultSchema,
|
|
submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema,
|
|
} from "./validators/issue.js";
|
|
|
|
describe("issue thread interaction schemas", () => {
|
|
it("parses request_confirmation payloads with default no-wake continuation", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
|
|
acceptLabel: "Apply",
|
|
rejectLabel: "Revise",
|
|
rejectRequiresReason: true,
|
|
rejectReasonLabel: "What needs to change?",
|
|
declineReasonPlaceholder: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.",
|
|
detailsMarkdown: "The current plan document will be accepted as-is.",
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "none",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
prompt: "Apply this plan?",
|
|
acceptLabel: "Apply",
|
|
rejectLabel: "Revise",
|
|
rejectRequiresReason: true,
|
|
rejectReasonLabel: "What needs to change?",
|
|
allowDeclineReason: true,
|
|
declineReasonPlaceholder: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.",
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: true,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("round-trips versioned tool action payload and lifecycle metadata", () => {
|
|
const payload = requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Approve send_email?",
|
|
toolAction: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
actionRequestId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
invocationId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
toolName: "send_email",
|
|
toolDisplayName: "Send email",
|
|
connectionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
|
|
applicationId: "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444",
|
|
appDisplayName: "Gmail",
|
|
risk: "write",
|
|
previewMarkdown: "Send an email to the reviewed recipient.",
|
|
argumentsSummaryJson: '{"to":"recipient@example.com"}',
|
|
argumentsHash: "reviewed-arguments-hash",
|
|
expiresAt: "2026-07-12T16:00:00.000Z",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
const result = requestConfirmationResultSchema.parse({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
outcome: "accepted",
|
|
toolAction: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
status: "executed",
|
|
errorCode: null,
|
|
errorMessage: null,
|
|
updatedAt: "2026-07-12T15:05:00.000Z",
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(payload.toolAction).toMatchObject({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
toolDisplayName: "Send email",
|
|
risk: "write",
|
|
argumentsHash: "reviewed-arguments-hash",
|
|
});
|
|
expect(result.toolAction).toMatchObject({ version: 1, status: "executed" });
|
|
expect(requestConfirmationPayloadSchema.parse({ version: 1, prompt: "Legacy confirmation?" }).toolAction)
|
|
.toBeUndefined();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts issue document targets for request_confirmation interactions", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee_on_accept",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Accept the latest plan revision?",
|
|
allowDeclineReason: false,
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
issueId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
documentId: "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222",
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
label: "Plan v2",
|
|
href: "/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("request_confirmation");
|
|
if (parsed.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
|
|
expect(parsed.payload.target).toMatchObject({
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
label: "Plan v2",
|
|
href: "/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts custom targets for request_confirmation interactions", () => {
|
|
for (const href of [
|
|
"https://example.com/checklist",
|
|
"http://example.com/checklist",
|
|
"/PAP/issues/PAP-123#document-plan",
|
|
"#document-plan",
|
|
]) {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Proceed with the external checklist?",
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "external-checklist",
|
|
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
|
|
revisionNumber: 1,
|
|
label: "Checklist v1",
|
|
href,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed.kind).toBe("request_confirmation");
|
|
if (parsed.kind !== "request_confirmation") return;
|
|
expect(parsed.payload.target).toMatchObject({
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "external-checklist",
|
|
label: "Checklist v1",
|
|
href,
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parses ask_user_questions supersede flags and expired results", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
title: "Choose scope",
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
|
|
questions: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "scope",
|
|
prompt: "Which scope should I use?",
|
|
selectionMode: "single",
|
|
options: [{ id: "small", label: "Small" }],
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "ask_user_questions",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
supersedeOnUserComment: false,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(askUserQuestionsResultSchema.parse({
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
answers: [],
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
summaryMarkdown: null,
|
|
})).toMatchObject({
|
|
expirationReason: "superseded_by_comment",
|
|
commentId: "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111",
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unsafe request_confirmation target hrefs", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
kind: "request_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Proceed?",
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "external-checklist",
|
|
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
|
|
label: "Checklist v1",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
for (const href of [
|
|
"javascript:alert(1)",
|
|
"data:text/html,hi",
|
|
"//evil.example/path",
|
|
"file:///tmp/x",
|
|
"mailto:user@example.com",
|
|
"slack://channel?id=1",
|
|
"vscode://file/tmp/x",
|
|
"ftp://example.com/file",
|
|
]) {
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
target: {
|
|
...base.payload.target,
|
|
href,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("href must be a root-relative path, same-page fragment, or http(s) URL");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parses request_checkbox_confirmation payloads with checkbox defaults", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
|
|
{ id: "item-2", label: "Old screenshot", description: "Captured during QA." },
|
|
],
|
|
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-2"],
|
|
minSelected: 0,
|
|
maxSelected: 2,
|
|
acceptLabel: "Archive selected",
|
|
rejectRequiresReason: true,
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "issue_document",
|
|
key: "plan",
|
|
revisionId: "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333",
|
|
revisionNumber: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
allowDeclineReason: true,
|
|
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-2"],
|
|
minSelected: 0,
|
|
maxSelected: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects invalid request_checkbox_confirmation option references and bounds", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
|
|
{ id: "item-2", label: "Old screenshot" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
options: [
|
|
{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" },
|
|
{ id: "item-1", label: "Duplicate" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("Option ids must be unique within one checkbox confirmation");
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["missing"],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("defaultSelectedOptionIds must reference existing option ids");
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
defaultSelectedOptionIds: ["item-1"],
|
|
minSelected: 2,
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("defaultSelectedOptionIds must satisfy minSelected");
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
minSelected: 2,
|
|
maxSelected: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("maxSelected must be greater than or equal to minSelected");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects unsafe request_checkbox_confirmation target hrefs", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
kind: "request_checkbox_confirmation",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Which items should be archived?",
|
|
options: [{ id: "item-1", label: "Draft report" }],
|
|
target: {
|
|
type: "custom",
|
|
key: "external-checklist",
|
|
revisionId: "checklist-v1",
|
|
label: "Checklist v1",
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
for (const href of ["file:///tmp/x", "slack://channel?id=1", "vscode://file/tmp/x"]) {
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
target: {
|
|
...base.payload.target,
|
|
href,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("href must be a root-relative path, same-page fragment, or http(s) URL");
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts empty checkbox selections and rejects duplicate selected option ids", () => {
|
|
expect(acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({ selectedOptionIds: [] })).toEqual({
|
|
selectedOptionIds: [],
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(() => acceptIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
selectedOptionIds: ["item-1", "item-1"],
|
|
})).toThrow("selectedOptionIds must be unique");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("parses request_item_verdicts payloads with defaults", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "api", label: "API route", description: "Server submit endpoint" },
|
|
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs", previewMarkdown: "Document the route." },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
continuationPolicy: "wake_assignee",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["reject"],
|
|
allowBulkApprove: true,
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("accepts request_item_verdicts defer when enabled explicitly", () => {
|
|
const parsed = createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
|
|
items: [{ id: "api", label: "API route" }],
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject", "defer"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["reject", "defer"],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
expect(parsed).toMatchObject({
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject", "defer"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["reject", "defer"],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects invalid request_item_verdicts item and reason references", () => {
|
|
const base = {
|
|
kind: "request_item_verdicts",
|
|
payload: {
|
|
version: 1,
|
|
prompt: "Review these generated items.",
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "api", label: "API route" },
|
|
{ id: "docs", label: "Docs" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
} as const;
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
items: [],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
items: [
|
|
{ id: "api", label: "API route" },
|
|
{ id: "api", label: "Duplicate" },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("Item ids must be unique within one item verdict request");
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
items: Array.from({ length: 201 }, (_value, index) => ({
|
|
id: `item-${index}`,
|
|
label: `Item ${index}`,
|
|
})),
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow();
|
|
|
|
expect(() => createIssueThreadInteractionSchema.parse({
|
|
...base,
|
|
payload: {
|
|
...base.payload,
|
|
verdicts: ["approve", "reject"],
|
|
requireReasonOn: ["defer"],
|
|
},
|
|
})).toThrow("requireReasonOn must reference enabled verdicts");
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it("rejects duplicate request_item_verdicts submit ids", () => {
|
|
expect(() => submitIssueThreadInteractionVerdictsSchema.parse({
|
|
verdicts: [
|
|
{ id: "api", verdict: "approve" },
|
|
{ id: "api", verdict: "reject", reason: "Needs revision" },
|
|
],
|
|
})).toThrow("verdict item ids must be unique");
|
|
});
|
|
});
|