mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-27 19:35:13 +01:00
DottaandPaperclip
f1922d95e1
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - Runner tests must exercise the same verified launch boundary as real providers. > - The assigned-tool test from #17740 used an executable JavaScript script as its OpenCode fixture. > - Linux launches verified executable bytes from a sealed, unlinked memory file. > - Node cannot reopen that deleted script path. Cleanup then hid the startup error. > - This pull request uses the native fixture wrapper already used by the adjacent OpenCode integration test. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #17740. Related fixture qualification work: #14529. **What happened?** The merged-source Cloud readiness job failed twice in the new assigned-tool integration test. Linux could not start the script fixture from the verified executable file. The later cleanup error hid the original `ENOENT` error for `/memfd:paperclip-verified-launch (deleted)`. **Expected behavior** The test must pass through the real Rust Runner, OpenCode proxy, and HTTP MCP bridge on Linux. It must also report the original error if cleanup fails. **Steps to reproduce** Run `vitest run src/live/runnerd-opencode-assigned-tools.test.ts` in the Runner package with its Linux binary and built proxy. The original fixture fails during startup. The native wrapper passes the assigned-tool assertions and durable close. ## What Changed - Launch the existing JavaScript server fixture through a native wrapper. - Qualify an owned Node copy on Linux with strict file permissions. - Bundle the current production proxy into the test's temporary directory. The test no longer skips when shared `dist` output is absent. - Preserve both the original error and a cleanup error. - Remove the temporary fixture even when setup fails. ## Verification - Reproduced the failure in a local Linux container with the exact merged Runner binary from the published Core image. - The same Linux test passes after this change. It checks the assigned discovery call, the completion call, and successful durable close. - The updated test passes on macOS. - A real Linux compiler-failure probe leaves zero fixture directories behind. - `pnpm -r typecheck` and `pnpm build`: passed. - Runner TypeScript checks pass after the cleanup review change. - Full technical CI passed on `6ee1865af3310f13523b11407f9e41879832f543`. - Fresh Greptile review: 5/5, with no unresolved findings. - Fresh Paperclip Review published 5/5 on `6ee1865af3310f13523b11407f9e41879832f543`, with no actionable findings. - The optional Entire assessment remains pending because this branch has no assessed Entire Change. The maintainer approved merging after CI and both reviews pass. - The full local test suite was not repeated. Earlier attempts hit host PostgreSQL semaphore limits. CI provides the full suite check. ## Risks Low risk. This changes one test fixture. Runtime behavior and launch verification stay the same. The test now needs the C compiler already required by the adjacent native fixture tests. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6 family, with reasoning, tool use, and code execution. The runtime does not expose the exact backend model ID or context-window size. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>