Files
PaperClipAI/server/src/__tests__/trust-preset-resolver.test.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip dbebf30c89 Add low-trust review containment (#7530)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is a control plane for AI-agent companies, so execution
policy and trust boundaries are part of the product's safety contract.
> - Low-trust review work needs narrower authority than normal
same-company agents because hostile PRs, comments, attachments, and
generated output can carry prompt-injection payloads.
> - The current V1 shape gives trusted workers broad company context,
which is useful for normal execution but too permissive for a reviewer
assigned to hostile content.
> - This branch adds a `low_trust_review` preset, source-trust tagging,
route-level containment, and quarantine handling so low-trust output
does not automatically flow into higher-trust wake context.
> - The branch has been rebased onto current `origin/master`, and the
low-trust migration was renumbered to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`
to avoid collisions with existing `0091` through `0096` migrations.
> - Greptile feedback was addressed by tightening low-trust detection,
preserving project-level trust policy checks, fixing issue-kind
promotion lookup, removing duplicate post-lease isolation assertion,
documenting fail-closed source-trust behavior, bounding ancestry checks,
enforcing runtime issue context for CEOs, awaiting accepted-plan monitor
authorization, and making low-trust issue source-trust tagging atomic.
> - The benefit is a first production slice of deny-by-default review
containment with regression coverage for the main control-plane pivot
surfaces.

Fixes #7531.

## What Changed

- Added shared trust-policy types and validators, plus
database/source-trust fields for issues, comments, documents, and work
products.
- Implemented server enforcement for low-trust issue scope, agent
self-view redaction, secret/plugin/runtime denial paths, promotion
checks, and quarantined continuation/wake context.
- Added focused low-trust regression tests for resolver behavior, source
trust, route authorization, heartbeat preflight ordering, runtime
containment, and quarantine redaction.
- Added board UI affordances for selecting/reviewing the low-trust
preset and surfacing source-trust badges in relevant issue views.
- Added `doc/LOW-TRUST-PRESETS.md`, updated
`doc/SPEC-implementation.md`, and committed the low-trust review
contract plan under `doc/plans/`.
- Rebasing note: the original `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`
migration was renamed to `0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses
`ADD COLUMN IF NOT EXISTS` so users who already applied the old-numbered
migration are not broken by the renumbered migration.

## Verification

- Rebased branch onto current `origin/master` and force-pushed with
lease to `origin/PAP-10211-low-trust-agent` at head `2719f31e3`.
- Confirmed the PR diff does not include `pnpm-lock.yaml` or
`.github/workflows` changes.
- Resolved upstream UI/comment conflicts by preserving deleted-comment
tombstone behavior and low-trust source-trust badges/metadata.
- Renumbered the low-trust source-trust migration to
`0097_low_trust_source_trust.sql`; the SQL uses `ADD COLUMN IF NOT
EXISTS` so users who already applied an old-numbered copy are not
broken.
- `pnpm exec vitest run ui/src/lib/issue-chat-messages.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/heartbeat-workspace-session.test.ts`
- `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/source-trust.test.ts
server/src/__tests__/workspace-runtime-service-authz.test.ts
ui/src/lib/trust-policy-ui.test.ts
ui/src/components/TrustPresetSection.test.tsx`
- `pnpm run typecheck:build-gaps`
- `git diff --check`
- GitHub checks pass on head `2719f31e3`: build, typecheck/release
registry, general tests, serialized server suites, e2e, canary, verify,
policy/review, Socket, and Snyk.
- Greptile Review passes with Confidence Score 5/5 and zero unresolved
Greptile review threads.
- No design screenshots/images were added because the task explicitly
says not to add them unless they are specifically part of the work.

## Risks

- Medium risk: this touches shared trust-policy contracts, server
authorization paths, heartbeat context generation, migration metadata,
and UI preset controls.
- Low-trust containment is intentionally deny-by-default; legitimate
future review workflows may need explicit allowlisted exceptions.
- Plugin/runtime/security surfaces are broad, so regression tests cover
the current known routes but future integrations must route through the
same containment layer.
- The PR is ready for review; GitHub checks are green and Greptile is
5/5.

> For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and
discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap
with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap
first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`.

## Model Used

- OpenAI Codex, GPT-5 coding agent, tool-enabled shell and GitHub CLI
workflow.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] UI changes are covered by focused tests; no screenshots were added
per task instruction not to add design images unless specifically
required
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-06-05 16:48:02 -05:00

223 lines
6.5 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import {
agentPermissionsSchema,
type LowTrustBoundary,
LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_RAW_OUTPUT_DISPOSITION,
LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
} from "@paperclipai/shared";
import { normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy } from "../services/issue-execution-policy.js";
import {
isIssueWithinLowTrustBoundary,
resolveCoreTrustPreset,
} from "../services/trust-preset-resolver.js";
const companyId = "11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111";
const otherCompanyId = "22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222";
const projectA = "33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333";
const projectB = "44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444";
const projectC = "55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555";
const rootIssueId = "66666666-6666-4666-8666-666666666666";
const issueA = "77777777-7777-4777-8777-777777777777";
const issueB = "88888888-8888-4888-8888-888888888888";
const issueC = "99999999-9999-4999-8999-999999999999";
const agentA = "aaaaaaaa-aaaa-4aaa-8aaa-aaaaaaaaaaaa";
const agentB = "bbbbbbbb-bbbb-4bbb-8bbb-bbbbbbbbbbbb";
function lowTrustBoundary(input: Partial<Omit<LowTrustBoundary, "mode">>): LowTrustBoundary {
return {
mode: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
companyId,
...input,
};
}
function boundaryPolicy(boundary: ReturnType<typeof lowTrustBoundary>) {
return {
authorizationPolicy: {
trustBoundary: boundary,
},
};
}
describe("resolveCoreTrustPreset", () => {
it("defaults to standard with no boundary", () => {
const result = resolveCoreTrustPreset({
companyId,
agent: { companyId, permissions: { canCreateAgents: false } },
});
expect(result).toMatchObject({
kind: "standard",
preset: "standard",
boundary: null,
});
});
it("intersects low-trust agent, project, and issue policy boundaries", () => {
const result = resolveCoreTrustPreset({
companyId,
agent: {
companyId,
permissions: {
trustPreset: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
authorizationPolicy: {
managedBy: "core-trust-preset",
trustBoundary: lowTrustBoundary({
projectIds: [projectA, projectB],
rootIssueId,
issueIds: [issueA, issueB],
allowedAgentIds: [agentA, agentB],
allowedToolClasses: ["git.read", "tests.local"],
}),
},
},
},
project: {
companyId,
executionWorkspacePolicy: boundaryPolicy(lowTrustBoundary({
projectIds: [projectB, projectC],
issueIds: [issueB, issueC],
allowedAgentIds: [agentB],
allowedToolClasses: ["git.read"],
})),
},
issue: {
companyId,
executionPolicy: {
authorizationPolicy: {
trustBoundary: lowTrustBoundary({
issueIds: [issueB],
allowedToolClasses: ["git.read", "github.pr.read"],
}),
},
},
},
});
expect(result.kind).toBe("low_trust_review");
if (result.kind !== "low_trust_review") throw new Error("expected low-trust result");
expect(result.boundary).toMatchObject({
companyId,
mode: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
rootIssueId,
projectIds: [projectB],
issueIds: [issueB],
allowedAgentIds: [agentB],
allowedToolClasses: ["git.read"],
});
expect(isIssueWithinLowTrustBoundary(result.boundary, { companyId, id: issueB, projectId: projectB })).toBe(true);
expect(isIssueWithinLowTrustBoundary(result.boundary, { companyId, id: issueC, projectId: projectC })).toBe(false);
});
it("fails closed for unknown presets", () => {
const result = resolveCoreTrustPreset({
companyId,
agent: {
companyId,
permissions: {
trustPreset: "trusted_but_weird",
},
},
});
expect(result).toMatchObject({
kind: "denied",
reason: "unsupported_trust_preset",
source: "agent",
});
});
it("fails closed when low-trust has no concrete project or issue scope", () => {
const result = resolveCoreTrustPreset({
companyId,
agent: {
companyId,
permissions: {
trustPreset: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
authorizationPolicy: {
trustBoundary: lowTrustBoundary({ allowedToolClasses: ["git.read"] }),
},
},
},
});
expect(result).toMatchObject({
kind: "denied",
reason: "missing_low_trust_boundary_scope",
});
});
it("denies cross-company policy sources and boundaries", () => {
const sourceMismatch = resolveCoreTrustPreset({
companyId,
project: {
companyId: otherCompanyId,
executionWorkspacePolicy: boundaryPolicy(lowTrustBoundary({ projectIds: [projectA] })),
},
});
expect(sourceMismatch).toMatchObject({
kind: "denied",
reason: "cross_company_boundary",
source: "project",
});
const boundaryMismatch = resolveCoreTrustPreset({
companyId,
issue: {
companyId,
executionPolicy: {
authorizationPolicy: {
trustBoundary: {
mode: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
companyId: otherCompanyId,
rootIssueId,
},
},
},
},
});
expect(boundaryMismatch).toMatchObject({
kind: "denied",
reason: "cross_company_boundary",
source: "issue",
});
});
it("normalizes and preserves trust policy JSON alongside existing policy data", () => {
const permissions = agentPermissionsSchema.parse({
canCreateAgents: false,
trustPreset: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
authorizationPolicy: {
managedBy: "ee-permissions",
customEeField: { mode: "visualized" },
trustBoundary: lowTrustBoundary({ rootIssueId }),
},
});
expect(permissions.authorizationPolicy?.customEeField).toEqual({ mode: "visualized" });
const executionPolicy = normalizeIssueExecutionPolicy({
reviewPreset: {
id: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
version: 1,
rawOutputDisposition: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_RAW_OUTPUT_DISPOSITION,
},
authorizationPolicy: {
managedBy: "core-trust-preset",
trustBoundary: lowTrustBoundary({ rootIssueId }),
},
});
expect(executionPolicy).toMatchObject({
stages: [],
reviewPreset: {
id: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_PRESET,
rawOutputDisposition: LOW_TRUST_REVIEW_RAW_OUTPUT_DISPOSITION,
},
authorizationPolicy: {
managedBy: "core-trust-preset",
trustBoundary: { rootIssueId },
},
});
});
});