PaperClipAI/maps/feature-map/chat-channels.md

navigation

navigation
section sectionOrder order Apps, channels, and extensions 50 30

External chat and email

People can talk to an assigned agent through configured external channels, bind their identity, exchange files, and inspect delivery state. Each provider has a different identity, threading, and attachment contract.

Feature ID: chat-channels.

Implementation: endpoint setup, endpoint detail, email setup.

Agent access: companion.

Sub-features

• providers: chat-channels/providers — configure the available Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Telegram, GitHub, AgentMail, and experimental iMessage Photon and Speko paths; availability still depends on gates and provider support.
• identity: chat-channels/identity — link the external sender to the intended authorized Paperclip identity.
• conversation: chat-channels/conversation — route inbound messages to the selected agent and send replies to the correct thread.
• attachments: chat-channels/attachments — transfer supported files with inspectable delivery and failure states.
• lifecycle: chat-channels/lifecycle — inspect endpoint activity, repair auth, and disable delivery when required.
• outbound-email: chat-channels/outbound-email — start a task-bound AgentMail conversation, reply to its exact message, and inspect deduplicated publication and provider delivery.

How to get to it (user POV)

external-thread

Message the configured bot/address from its external provider and follow the corresponding Paperclip conversation/task.

endpoint-management

Open /apps/chat/:endpointId/settings and the endpoint’s other available tabs; identity confirmation uses /chat-identity/confirm.

outbound-agentmail

Use paperclipai email inboxes --company-id <company-id>, then email send --company-id <company-id> --file <new-email.json> or email reply --company-id <company-id> --file <reply.json>. Inspect email thread <email-task-id> --company-id <company-id> and email delivery <publication-id> --company-id <company-id>. Agent mutations must provide --run-id or the active PAPERCLIP_RUN_ID.

Driving it with Playwright and provider clients

Preconditions: follow the baseline. Use a test provider account/channel with permission to send messages. Gates differ: AgentMail bypasses the chat-connectors UI gate, GitHub uses enableGitHubReviewBots, and other chat providers use enableChatConnectors. Setup is covered in connection setup.

external-thread

Automated: channel integration uses provider fixtures; it does not prove a live Slack, Discord, Teams, Telegram, GitHub, email, or Photon delivery.

Monitor continuation regression: database checks verify the exact originating conversation, rejected forged/mismatched receipts, one working publication, no completion for a yielded run, and saved-response recovery. In a disposable live thread, request work that needs deferred repository preparation. Verify a useful continuation explanation, automatic resumption, and the final result in that same thread. A successful provider turn alone is insufficient.

GitHub review comment regression (2026-10-19): repeated PR review requests reuse one main App comment, including across restart and reconnect. Test a leading request for an external bot (@greptile review) and verify it creates no wake or acknowledgement. Stop execution before a milestone is staged, run maintenance, and verify the existing comment reports the stop; saved requests on a blocked task show paused state. Preserve newer progress and confirmed or uncertain replies. Repeat terminal reconciliation with native identity and no legacy wake fields. Check delayed acknowledgements, check-only assessments followed by formal reviews, and combined requests with separate pre-upgrade placeholders.

GitHub review attention regression: publish a 3/5 assessment, then wait for the next provider event. The task stays in review without a completion card or Mine entry. A later 5/5 review with passing required checks can finish quietly. A real repository-access request enters Mine until resolved. The native external-chat database suite checks these states and revoked endpoints using stored provider receipts; live model adherence remains a separate check. It also checks saved monitors, disabled repositories, multiple reviewed heads, read-only finish validation, withdrawal rollback, and separate approval gates.

Manual: For each supported provider being changed, send a unique message, verify the intended agent/company receives it, and inspect the actual external reply in the original thread. Repeat with an unlinked/unauthorized sender, duplicate inbound delivery, and one supported attachment. Record provider-specific results separately.

GitHub review prompt regression: open a PR and push twice. Each task message contains the event and commit identifiers; configuration comes from the admitted delivery snapshot and the PR description is fetched when needed. Inspect the native provider's submitted envelopes: a verified resume sends only the current batch and any changed configuration, while a fresh session receives full review instructions and task context. Change configuration between pushes and verify the queued older request retains its original snapshot. Integration fixtures cover the database and prompt contracts; they do not prove live provider delivery.

For Slack, enable Require at-mention and Allow direct messages. Send a plain DM and follow up without a mention: both should reach the agent, with top-level replies to top-level DMs. Channel messages and thread replies still require a mention when that setting is enabled. Disable direct messages and confirm a plain DM is rejected. Use a private channel for threaded conversations.

For Slack acknowledgement latency, mention the bot with and without an attachment. Eyes should appear after authorized task/comment persistence, independently of file preparation, subscription and agent startup. Duplicate delivery must keep one receipt; the final reply must remove only its source message's eyes. Record live mention-to-reaction timing separately from the PostgreSQL fixture tests and the chat.slack.receipt transport span described in Observability.

During a top-level DM run, verify that the bot adds eyes to the source message and removes them when the final reply arrives. The pinned Slack SDK encodes a linear DM with an empty thread timestamp; receipt transport accepts that address while still validating the channel and the source message timestamp.

For an agent with two linked Slack endpoints, compare assignment preparation and tool discovery in the run trace. Endpoint checks may overlap in pairs. Confirm that both permitted tool sets remain available, then revoke one linked identity and confirm that the next preparation excludes it. The database regression uses real PostgreSQL with one connection and controlled credential resolution; it does not prove live provider latency or an end-to-end response target.

Catalog discovery rechecks live authority and current credentials without computing the unused compatibility fingerprint. Assignment snapshots and governed calls retain full revision resolution. The same regression verifies identical catalog membership, absence of digest SQL during discovery, and revocation on the next preparation. A faster component is not proof of a faster Slack reaction or final reply; measure those separately on the deployed revision.

For GitHub and Slack tool continuity, start a task from the channel, then admit a later monitor or retry run for the same task. Check that the later run can discover and call its channel tools without a new inbound message. For GitHub, also continue from a board message by the same accepted requester and complete the review in the original conversation, including when the original source is recorded only in legacy wake metadata. Revoke the linked identity and check that the next call fails. Repeat the boundary checks with another task, agent, company, and requester. The channel and provenance fixtures above cover these contracts with synthetic providers; record a live journey separately. For a long-lived task, repeat more than 100 continuations and check that tool access remains available. Fail a later GitHub run after a final answer and check that the earlier answer remains intact.

endpoint-management

Automated: channel integration covers shared endpoint/delivery behavior; live credential repair and provider ownership remain manual checks.

Manual: Inspect the bound agent and identity, recent activity, and delivery failure details. Repair a disposable credential, retry a safe message when offered, and verify exactly one external reply. Disable the endpoint and confirm new traffic is not silently processed.

For publication failures, reject one operation with a provider 403 and verify that its failure remains visible while unrelated tools and publications continue. Repeat with an authentication failure: the endpoint must require attention and stop provider traffic, while the connection's enabled setting remains unchanged. Reconcile persistent receivers and restart the service; authentication failures must remain stopped while transient disconnections can still recover. The PostgreSQL suite uses controlled provider failures for these cases; live provider credential repair remains a separate acceptance check.

GitHub connections in attention or revoked state show a repair notice above the settings. Reconnect GitHub → Reconnect saved App checks the same App with stored credentials and repairs delivery. Replace App credentials is the fallback, with the saved App ID, a link to its GitHub settings, and PEM upload or paste instructions. The production management Storybook's 04 Recovery group covers these views, pending/failure/success, mobile, and light theme with simulated provider responses. Verify actual credential validity and restored delivery separately against GitHub; a Storybook success does not establish live recovery.

For GitHub, submit a disposable PR and verify the summary heading uses the bot's display name and the check remains Paperclip Review. For two separate bots on one PR, verify their App-scoped checks and comments remain independent.

For GitHub publication recovery, interrupt a response after GitHub accepts a write and verify one summary, finding, and App-scoped check. Retry the same tool call and verify it returns the saved receipt. Include text longer than 500 characters and coverage with more than 50 entries. Change only the text suffix or final coverage entry and verify rejection without another write. Remove the durable publication and verify that a retry cannot dispatch a new write. Leave a transient failure queued, restart the instance, and verify publication resumes at its saved deadline without another inbound message. Revoked access and permanent rejections must stop retries. These recipes are separate from live provider proof.

Configure optional project and workspace defaults at the connection and destination levels. Start a new conversation and inspect its task workspace. Verify that inheritance, an explicit selection, and clearing a default remain distinct. Changing defaults must not move an existing conversation or interrupt its run.

For experimental Speko, enable chat connectors, choose an agent during setup, and verify the provider credentials. On an assigned task, use Talk to agent to open browser voice controls. Check microphone denial, mute, end/restart, navigation during a call, and access revocation. Inspect transcripts and the connection's call history. Callback preferences, incoming phone configuration, and incoming-call approval are separate settings and authorization journeys. The voice components and fixture tests cover presentation; they do not establish live answer retrieval or telephone playback. Those provider outcomes remain explicit release gates.

outbound-agentmail

Automated: Email channel integration uses controlled providers to test durable child tasks/intents, deduplication, reply binding, attachments, delivery, revocation, budgets, run authority, and company boundaries. No dedicated end-to-end CLI email test was identified; these fixtures do not establish actual recipient delivery.

Manual: Use a disposable parent task, authorized AgentMail inbox, and recipient you own. Put endpointId, a stable UUID idempotencyKey, text, parentIssueId, to, and subject in the new-message JSON; supply eligible attachmentIds only if needed. Send, inspect the child conversation/publication, and verify actual received mail. Repeat the identical request/key and confirm one child and provider send; changed content with that key must conflict. Reply with endpointId, conversationId, exact replyToMessageId, text, and a fresh stable idempotencyKey; inspect the actual recipients and received reply. Replies must reject caller-supplied recipient/subject/parent overrides. Test wrong inbox/task/company/run, a canceled task, revoked access/credentials, and an inaccessible attachment. Inspect uncertain provider outcomes before using the administrative resolution path.

Sources: Email CLI, request schema, email routes, and email authority/publication.

Gotchas

• New outbound email requires a parent task. A reply binds to its stored conversation/message and cannot replace recipients or subject; a queued 202 is not a delivered message.

• Visibility flags do not pause existing delivery. Disable the disposable endpoint itself to test stopped traffic.

• One provider’s passing fixture does not qualify another provider or live delivery.

• An accepted send request does not prove the recipient received the message or file.

• Use steering and questions for their channel-specific interaction checks.

Storybook verification

attachments

Capability ID: chat-channels/attachments.

Scope: ui Storybook: Mount TaskChatBubble attachments and ChatEndpointDetail provider-specific consent/upload/delivery failure and unknown-outcome states. Local email attachment dialog remains a prototype. Production: Transfer a disposable supported file through each affected provider; verify recipient delivery, read scope, duplicate/replay handling and failure/unknown state without treating notification as file-upload proof. Sources: Source: TaskChatBubble.tsx, ChatEndpointDetail.tsx, chatEndpoints.ts, chat-channels.ts. Tests: TaskChatBubble.test.tsx, task-chat-attachments.test.ts, chat-channels.integration.test.ts, issue-attachment-routes.test.ts

Documentation scope: Chat and email channel setup

Shared recipes name provider checks; each provider transport/thread/identity/file-size/type combination needs separate live evidence and deeper instructions.