Files
PaperClipAI/ui/src/components/IssueThreadInteractionCard.tsx
T
scotttongandPaperclip 71f0c0c99e feat: add opt-in Coordinator workspace for chat, tasks, and decisions (#17983)
<!-- entire-trail-link-start -->
https://entire.com/gh/paperclipai/-/trails/147/changes/paperclip/147
<!-- entire-trail-link-end -->

## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work.
> - People coordinate work through conversations, tasks, and requests
for input.
> - These surfaces must share task state and preserve the context of
each decision.
> - The existing workspace makes people switch surfaces to follow that
context.
> - This pull request adds an optional Coordinator workspace with linked
conversations, tasks, documents, and decisions.
> - Each person can enable it in Settings > Experimental and return to
the classic workspace.
> - The benefit is a coherent path from a request to an assigned task
and reviewed work.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

**Subsystem affected**
UI, server, shared contracts, and database.

**Problem or motivation**
People need a consistent way to start tasks from agent conversations,
answer questions, review work, and return to the source context.
Decisions and task state must agree across these surfaces.

**Proposed solution**
Add a personal, default-off workspace experiment. Keep one conversation
per agent. Add task proposals, compact task and decision cards,
contextual document panels, and a Needs You queue with search, filters,
sorting, grouping, and history.

**Alternatives considered**
Replacing the classic workspace for everyone would remove the opt-out
path. Keeping separate decision state in each surface would create
conflicting answers. This change uses the existing canonical task and
interaction records instead.

**Roadmap alignment**
This supports the existing agent chat, task management, and human review
capabilities. It is an experimental presentation choice. The user
requested this isolated implementation after design review. No Discord
discussion is claimed.

## What Changed

- Add per-person workspace preferences, a default-off setting, and an
additive migration.
- Add Coordinator navigation, pinned destinations, task lists, agent
switching, and contextual panels.
- Link task suggestions and creation to the source conversation. Default
new task ownership to the current agent unless the user specifies
another owner.
- Share pending questions, decision receipts, exact review targets, and
history across tasks, chat, and Needs You.
- Preserve task access, assignment authorization, revision binding, and
required output review gates.
- Add compact document links, relative timestamps, composer controls,
and reduced-motion support for task and decision transitions.
- Add component stories, regression coverage, and capability-map
documentation.

## Verification

- Final head: `4b839aae1e314bd7e8635a766f1d205ff1c03ba6`, based on
master `8bc051245f77a47bee0f8ba45896b8bfa5922e0a`. Verified October 29,
2026 at 00:10 UTC: **MERGEABLE, 56 checks passed, four conditional
skips, no pending or failed checks**. [Current CI
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40790639688)
passed without a rerun on this head.
- Fresh Greptile **5/5**, zero new comments and zero open review
threads; Superagent passed with no suspicious changes.
[Checks](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17983/checks).
- Local workspace typecheck/build passed after the latest rebase. The
final account-read patch passed UI typecheck/build and all 12 related
preference/settings tests, including a delayed real-client request
across account changes. Earlier scoped checks cover review
deduplication/replay, decision deep links, cross-surface state, access
boundaries, and migration replay.
- Local database/browser rechecks after the latest rebase were limited
by exhausted macOS shared-memory IDs: `initdb` failed before database
creation. The local run passed 31 UI/snapshot tests and skipped 24
database tests; those skips and the blocked local browser start are not
claimed as passes. The independent Linux CI database and browser checks
passed. No running dev database or host setting was changed.
- Upstream migration 0403 is preserved. Preferences and durable review
retry aliases are generated as replay-safe migrations
`0404_tense_silver_sable.sql` and `0405_harsh_avengers.sql`; five newest
snapshots are retained. Every detected conflict was rebased and pushed
before waiting for CI/review, as requested.
- The PR is unmerged. The active master ruleset still requires
code-owner approval for the changed Paperclip skill; no approval or rule
change was performed.

<details>
<summary>Earlier verification failures, integration history, and
evidence</summary>

These entries preserve prior checkpoints and failures; the current
acceptance result is above.

- Focused UI and server checks from the isolated build are recorded in
the implementation plan.
- Browser checks covered the opt-in shell, navigation, task/document
links, and decision card states. No new live provider trial is claimed
for this handoff.
- Current acceptance head: `4b839aae1e314bd7e8635a766f1d205ff1c03ba6`,
rebased onto master `8bc051245` immediately after its GitHub
review-repair migration took 0403. Preferences are generated as
idempotent `0404_tense_silver_sable.sql`, preserving upstream
SQL/journal/snapshot history and five newest snapshots. GitHub reports
MERGEABLE after the immediate lease-protected push. Scott's updated
instruction is to rebase and push every conflict resolution first,
without waiting for CI or Greptile; verification follows the push.
- The final reviewed feature tree was consolidated for repeatable
single-commit rebases. The complete previous commit history remains
reachable through local recovery ref
`codex/coordinator-recovery-before-rebase-20261028` (resolved snapshot
`0e1bbdf4e`). The actual rebase completed, and its tree hash exactly
matches that resolved snapshot. The force-with-lease required the known
remote head `0e6ef7c44`, protecting against concurrent branch changes.
No PR merge or permission/runner setting change occurred. Fresh
CI/review are in progress for the current head.
- `2001132fa` received Greptile 5/5 with one nonblocking account-switch
read finding. Current head detaches path-coalesced preference GETs and
disables HTTP caching, retaining React Query's account-scoped sharing. A
delayed real-client GET regression proves account B can load its saved
choice before account A responds, and A's late response only updates A's
cache. Preference/settings tests 12/12 and UI typecheck passed; its
review thread is resolved. Fresh current-head CI/reviews are pending.
The prior CI chat shard 3 ended with “The operation was canceled” and no
assertion failure ([job
123171595631](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40789688333/job/123171595631),
`/tmp/pr17983-2001132-chat3.log`); no code/timeout change is attributed
to that cancellation.
- `843e823b4` reached fresh Greptile 5/5 with zero comments/open threads
and Superagent pass. All browser tests including the repaired YAML shard
passed, and 54 checks passed. General server shard 9 ended with “The
operation was canceled” and no failed assertion; its test step was
marked cancelled (job
[123164350893](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40787501761/job/123164350893),
log `/tmp/pr17983-843e-server9.log`). A single unchanged-head rerun was
started after the workflow completed, but master moved while it ran. A
local nested-clone check timed out in its 30-second database-startup
hook and then failed cleanup before the 20 database cases ran; this is
retained as a local verification limit
(`/tmp/pr17983-843e-nested-clone-check.log`), not claimed as a pass or
proof of the CI cancellation cause.
- Following Scott's instruction, the new conflict was rebased and pushed
immediately without waiting for that rerun. Upstream's
`0403_natural_cerise.sql` is preserved; regenerated preferences and
retry-alias migrations are `0404_tense_silver_sable.sql` and
`0405_harsh_avengers.sql`, replay-safe with five newest snapshots
retained. The YAML helper conflict combines upstream's click and header
behavior with the editor-selection guard and injected regression.
Recovery ref `codex/coordinator-recovery-843e823b4` preserves pre-rebase
work. Current head is MERGEABLE. Full workspace typecheck/build passed;
UI and snapshot checks passed 31 tests, but 24 database tests were
skipped by the local support probe, and the local browser server could
not initialize PostgreSQL. A direct disposable `initdb` diagnostic
established the host limitation: `could not create shared memory
segment: No space left on device` (`shmget`, shared-memory IDs
exhausted, not disk space). No dev database or host setting was changed.
Diagnostics: `/tmp/pr17983-2001132-initdb-probe.log`,
`/tmp/pr17983-2001132-db-probe.log`; checks:
`/tmp/pr17983-2001132-tests.log`, `/tmp/pr17983-2001132-browser.log`,
`/tmp/pr17983-2001132-types.log`, `/tmp/pr17983-2001132-build.log`.
These local skipped/blocked checks are not claimed as passes; fresh CI
on independent runners is in progress.
- `d18f683cd` reached fresh Greptile 5/5 with zero comments/open threads
and Superagent pass, but [E2E shard
7](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40785966243/job/123159719925)
failed parsing an Advanced YAML clipboard read beginning with “Skip to
Main Content.” The log is retained at `/tmp/pr17983-d18f-e2e7.log`.
Current head hardens the test helper to verify editor focus and
selection, clear stale clipboard content, and require the YAML header at
the start of a fresh copy before parsing. Saved-state assertions and
timeouts are unchanged. All six Advanced YAML browser journeys passed on
a disposable local instance (41.0s); the exact lost-response journey
also passed with a one-time injected surrounding-page copy, verifying
rejection/reacquisition (17.6s). The precise browser focus/clipboard
timing in CI remains unproven; the observed invalid-read path is now
guarded and deterministically exercised. Logs:
`/tmp/pr17983-yaml-clipboard-scope-browser.log`,
`/tmp/pr17983-yaml-clipboard-injected-browser.log`. Fresh current-head
CI and reviews are pending.
- `19e6dcb0b` passed Superagent and Greptile 5/5, with one nonblocking
deep-link finding. Current head preserves attention links using
`?decisionId=`: the requested pending decision is rendered even beyond
the first 40 cards, focused and scrolled into view, then only that
parameter is consumed so later refreshes do not refocus. Other URL
parameters remain. Needs You tests 10/10 and UI typecheck passed; its
review thread is resolved. The preceding post-rebase regression run
passed 45/45 tests. Fresh current-head CI/reviews are pending.
- `6d772b7cc` reached Greptile 5/5 with zero comments/open threads and
Superagent pass. While 32 checks had passed, master moved and caused a
documentation conflict in `maps/feature-map/onboarding.md`. Rebased
immediately, preserving both onboarding paragraphs. The complete
four-commit branch was pushed as `19e6dcb0b` before waiting on
CI/review, per Scott's instruction. A transient Git index lock
interrupted the first continue; the command sequence briefly pushed
intermediate `34e298c07`, then the completed rebase was immediately
pushed. All feature and security/retry fixes are present; local recovery
ref `codex/coordinator-recovery-6d772b7cc` preserves the pre-rebase
history. The only tree differences from that ref are upstream's two
smoke-test files and the combined documentation paragraph. GitHub
reports MERGEABLE. Fresh current-head verification is in progress;
prior-head review results are not current acceptance.
- `21efa3120` passed Superagent but Greptile scored 4/5 for a valid
retry-key persistence bug: an acknowledged duplicate key could reopen a
resolved review. Current head adds an additive, replay-safe
`0404_light_swarm.sql` migration for indexed, task-scoped aliases from
acknowledged retry keys to the canonical interaction. Alias registration
and retry lookup occur under the existing task lock; payload/actor
mismatch still conflicts, and each canonical review permits at most 100
aliases. Original and acknowledged keys replay the terminal result
rather than creating a new gate. Five newest migration snapshots are
retained. Service/routes tests 165/165 passed; final quality review plus
migration replay/snapshot checks 25/25 passed; server typecheck passed.
The P1 thread is resolved in code; fresh current-head reviews and CI are
pending.
- `69c2c7543` passed 55 checks and Greptile 5/5 with no open Greptile
findings, but Superagent check
[123140675812](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17983/checks?check_run_id=123140675812)
correctly flagged unbounded pending quality-card creation. Current head
fixes that under the existing task-row lock: equivalent requests with
fresh idempotency keys reuse the pending card; conflicting requests for
an unresolved deliverable return the existing interaction ID; pending
cards are capped at ten per task across all reviewers. Distinct outputs
remain independent, and already-answered items in a partially pending
batch can receive a fresh review. Added real-database concurrency,
cross-card duplicate, partial-answer, and hard-cap regressions. Quality
review 22/22 tests and final server typecheck passed; earlier
service/routes 163/163 tests passed before the final partial-answer
refinement. One added assertion initially expected a service HTTP error,
but duplicate keys are rejected earlier by the existing shared schema;
the assertion now verifies that validation. Fresh current-head
CI/reviews are pending; the action-required security result is not
treated as passed.
- `c9c575e5f` completed all 56 checks successfully with four conditional
skips, Greptile 5/5, and Superagent pass. Its two P2 review findings are
fixed in the current head: independently bound quality approvals now
each remain visible in attention; changing/clearing URL-backed
assignee/status filters updates the URL and survives task navigation.
Both review threads are resolved. Regression evidence: attention service
34/34 tests passed, CoordinatorTasks 20/20 passed, UI and server
typechecks and the full workspace build passed on `69c2c7543`. The first
new UI test run caught an assertion racing React Router's transition;
waiting for the navigation before asserting passes without weakening the
navigation/remount checks. These older-head green checks are not claimed
for the new fix commit.
- Preceding `0e6ef7c44` completed all 56 checks successfully with four
conditional skips, fresh Greptile 5/5 and no open findings, and passed
Superagent. A fifth migration-metadata collision arrived before the
final Runner job finished. Those green results are preserved as
prior-head evidence, not current acceptance.
- Previous fully verified migration head:
`0e6ef7c44696a377f35e69521b93587576374bd0`, integrating master
`f8226b051` after the fourth migration-number collision. Master added
terminal GitHub-response migration 0401 while the final native check
ran; upstream 0401 SQL/journal/snapshot is preserved unchanged, and
preferences are generated as idempotent `0402_yielding_blink.sql` on
top. Exactly the five newest snapshots remain. GitHub reports MERGEABLE
after the push. All 1,155 relevant
migration/review/interaction/native-execution/remote-assets tests,
workspace typecheck/build, migration guards and whitespace checks pass.
Fresh exact-head CI/Greptile/Superagent are pending.
- Immediately preceding head `36c67cf03` completed all 56 checks
successfully with four conditional skips, fresh Greptile 5/5 and no open
findings, plus passed Superagent security. No retry was needed for that
head's CI. Master advanced and introduced only a migration-metadata
conflict while its final native check ran, so that green result does not
establish acceptance of the current integration. Four consecutive
collisions (0398, 0399, 0400, 0401) during verification are retained as
concrete integration churn; a brief pause of competing migration merges
was requested, without assuming it happened or changing any repo
setting. The PR has not been merged.
- Prior fully verified head: `36c67cf03`, on the clean `30059c0ed`
integration of master `efd65c112`. The last Greptile P2 is fixed: Needs
attention retains the participant-agent scope through authoritative
server membership queries for each pending task, including historical
participation when another agent currently owns the task. It does not
approximate participation with current assignment or enumerate every
company task. The actual view-switch regression and all 31 focused
task/routing/collection tests, UI typecheck/build, token gates and
whitespace checks pass. Greptile completed a fresh 5/5 review on this
exact head (review 19) with zero new comments and no open review
threads. CI and Superagent remain in progress; no current-head CI
failure has been reported.
- Head `30059c0ed` received Greptile 5/5 with that one nonblocking
participant finding, now fixed. Superagent passed that head.
Current-base integration restored the ephemeral RunsOn fleet after a
superseded workflow retained queued aggregate jobs: normal cancellation
was insufficient; the single force-cancel request was interrupted but
readback confirmed that obsolete run cancelled and current CI began on
the trusted fleet. No cancellation retry or runner/security/workflow
changes were made. Its partial CI was superseded by the necessary
participant fix and is not current acceptance.
- Previous compatibility/base-sync head:
`30059c0ededc0eab4e04e8299a884f36db8b292f`, integrating master
`efd65c112` and the Inbox/workspace compatibility fixes. GitHub reports
MERGEABLE after the push. Coordinator keeps Inbox standalone under More
without rewriting the instance's Combined Inbox preference; opting out
restores that preference. Saved merged-Inbox URLs resolve to their
original owner, task status presets remain usable, and canonical
repeated `workspace` parameters retain scoped, deduplicated pagination
(including Needs attention). All 192 broader
routing/Inbox/sidebar/privacy/review tests and the final 16 task-page
tests pass, as do workspace typecheck/build, token gates and whitespace
checks. The two review threads are resolved. Fresh exact-head CI,
Greptile and Superagent results are pending.
- The preceding `d5b9be5bd` remained mergeable but its CI routing gate
intentionally fell back to GitHub-hosted runners: “stacked base merge
commit does not contain the current base branch.” All 45 downstream jobs
stayed queued. Current master was merged cleanly to refresh the pinned
base; no runner/security settings or workflow logic were changed.
Greptile scored that preceding head 4/5 with the two compatibility
findings fixed here. Its automatic Superagent scan was inconclusive at
checkout; the documented retry was still pending when superseded. Those
results do not establish acceptance of this current head.
- Previous approval/migration head:
`d5b9be5bd3b8d6b0437e42bf48138377f34fa67d`, integrating master
`ba5bba86d` and the stale-output approval correction. GitHub reports
MERGEABLE after the push. The fresh P1 finding is fixed: every submitted
item now validates and locks its bound output inside the resolution
transaction, whether or not it carries a required-quality-review
binding. Real database regressions verify that an advanced document
revision or deleted attachment refuses the entire batch without
recording approvals, and current ordinary output reviews still resolve.
All 272 combined migration/review/interaction tests pass; workspace
typecheck/build passed. Fresh exact-head Greptile and CI are pending.
The automatic Superagent scan ended inconclusive at checkout; one
documented on-demand retry is pending. These are explicit verification
limits, not passed security results. The P1 thread is resolved.
- Master consumed the next migration slot three times during this
verification pass: confirmation recovery took 0398, continuation
recovery took 0399, and GitHub acknowledgement recovery took 0400. Each
upstream SQL/journal/snapshot is preserved unchanged. Preferences are
now generated as idempotent `0401_white_lenny_balinger.sql` from
upstream 0400; exactly five snapshots remain, and replay coverage
locates this migration by table content. This is recorded concurrent
integration churn, not a claim that older green results apply to the
latest base.
- Head `ed3b68da9` fixed the two history/URL findings with 26 focused
regression tests, server/UI typechecks, workspace build and token gates
passing. Greptile then scored that head 4/5 with the stale-output P1
corrected in the current head. Its partial CI is superseded, not counted
as current acceptance.
- Previous filter-fix head: `ed3b68da9`, based on the `8458d39d9` merge
of master `063cfd438`. The two fresh Greptile findings are fixed:
history outcome filters now match recorded per-item verdicts in SQL
before pagination (mixed reviews remain in both applicable outcomes),
and same-page URL assignee changes/back/forward navigation update that
filter without clearing independent filters. All 26 focused
database/navigation/collection tests, server/UI typechecks, workspace
build, token gates and whitespace checks pass. The two review threads
are resolved. Fresh exact-head CI, Greptile and Superagent results are
pending.
- The `8458d39d9` migration integration also passed all 328 targeted
migration/interaction/confirmation tests, workspace typecheck/build and
Superagent security scan. Greptile scored that head 4/5 with the two
functional gaps fixed in the current head; those prior-head checks are
not current acceptance.
- Migration integration head:
`8458d39d9721f4cb312c2390070a0609f8cddd1a`, integrating master
`063cfd43813cabf18417605fb9eefb9aacf95c8d`. GitHub reports MERGEABLE
after the push. Master advanced twice during this conflict-resolution
pass: first its confirmation-recovery migration took 0398, then its
continuation-recovery migration took 0399. Both upstream migrations and
journal entries remain unchanged; Coordinator preferences are now
generated as idempotent `0400_sad_guardian.sql` from upstream's latest
snapshot. Exactly the five newest snapshots remain. The replay
regression now locates the table migration by content instead of
hardcoding a renumbered filename.
- All 328 targeted question/review/confirmation/migration tests passed
again after the second merge. Workspace typecheck/build and fresh
exact-head CI/reviews are in progress. The preceding `0c46f46d6` passed
workspace typecheck/build and Superagent security scan, but was
superseded because master consumed migration 0399 while those checks
ran. That prior-head result is not acceptance of the current head. No
production settings or runner/security permissions were changed, and the
PR has not been merged.
- Previous integration head: `0c46f46d6f2b23417ab872ce3cb6ff2673647287`,
integrating master `287b04d72f1b9fca1412e05435c75b8302ba0710`. GitHub
reports MERGEABLE after the push. The renewed conflicts were
`0398_snapshot.json`, `_journal.json`, and the top imports in
`issue-thread-interactions.ts`. Upstream's `0398` confirmation-recovery
index and journal history are preserved unchanged; Coordinator
preferences were regenerated as idempotent `0399_bouncy_miek.sql`, with
replay coverage updated and exactly the five newest snapshots retained.
Both terminal confirmation notifications and Coordinator task
assignment/required review behavior are preserved.
- All 328 targeted interaction/review/confirmation/migration tests pass,
as do workspace typecheck, map validation and whitespace checks. The
workspace build and fresh exact-head CI/Greptile/Superagent checks are
pending. The first migration-generation attempt hit the sandbox's local
IPC restriction before generating files; the unchanged authorized local
generation completed successfully. Prior-head green checks below do not
establish acceptance of this merge.
- Previous acceptance head: `8b7dcf739ed15afc51351fdfa0e0e5fbc75ab788`,
with master `1aa3a21ac` integrated and GitHub reporting MERGEABLE.
Greptile completed a fresh 5/5 review on this exact head with zero new
actionable findings and no open review threads. The [fresh CI
workflow](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40752864319)
completed SUCCESS on attempt 2 at 19:40:08 UTC, including all eight E2E
shards. Final completed check set: 55 succeeded, four conditional checks
skipped, zero pending/queued/running checks, and one
neutral/inconclusive Superagent scan. The auxiliary commitperclip review
and isolated native Runner compilation/cache-reuse check both passed.
This is not a claim that Superagent produced a passed security verdict.
GitHub still reports MERGEABLE against current master
`60b8089a44b4eaa37e627adbfdf2f130bda13335`.
- Current-head E2E: all eight shards and the aggregate passed, including
the previously failing YAML browser journey. Serialized server shard 9/9
failed: the protected YAML projection test exceeded its original
15-second timeout; its late update request then reached the next test's
reset mock (the captured payload is the prior test's model/label
update). All 88 tests in that exact unchanged file passed locally in
38.03 seconds, with no timeout or assertion changes. The original
slow-request cause remains unproven. CI failure log:
`/tmp/pr17983-8b7-serialized9.log`; local recovery:
`/tmp/pr17983-adapter-yaml-repro.log`. The single bounded unchanged
shard rerun passed, and the workflow completed SUCCESS. Rerun log:
`/tmp/pr17983-8b7-serialized9-rerun.log`. The initial failure is
retained; a passing retry does not establish its original slow-request
cause.
- Greptile scored preceding head `4873704be` 5/5 with one valid P2:
opened task decision records missed company-scoped live invalidation.
The current head uses the existing company decision prefix for
resolution and effect-completion events, and resets private record
payloads on access changes. Its thread is resolved. All 107 focused
record/live-update tests, UI typecheck/build, token checks and
whitespace checks pass.
- CI on `4873704be` failed E2E shard 7/8 in the Advanced YAML
lost-creation-response journey: its clipboard helper selected page text
starting with “Skip to Main Content” instead of YAML. The exact
unchanged journey passed in a disposable local browser instance (1 test,
17.1 seconds). No assertion, timeout or production behavior was
weakened; the original failure cause remains unproven. Failure log:
`/tmp/pr17983-487-e2e7.log`; local check:
`/tmp/pr17983-agent-yaml-repro.log`. The full unchanged Advanced YAML
browser suite also passed locally (6 tests, 37.8 seconds). Fresh
current-head CI subsequently passed this journey and all other E2E
shards.
- Both the automatic and one supported on-demand Superagent scan on
`4873704be` ended neutral/inconclusive: “Pinned PR scan merge-base
checkout failed or timed out.” These do not count as a passed security
verdict. The current head's automatic scan and one documented on-demand
retry also returned the identical neutral checkout failure, with zero
annotations or further diagnostics. This is an external scanner blocker,
not a passed security verdict. No security settings or permissions were
changed.
- Recorded decision links now render and focus the full source-task
record in both Classic and Coordinator, including recorded choice,
submitted inputs, and the existing effect-result resolver. Fresh
terminal records take precedence over older open-decision cache entries.
Context and account checks keep mismatched or inaccessible records out
of the DOM; no decision-history tab was added to tasks or chat. The
shared company live-run feed now drives live-only filtering, including
ended runs and terminal tasks with stale run entries. All 213 focused
tests, UI typecheck/build, token and whitespace checks pass; the final
focus follow-up passed all 188 task-detail tests and UI typecheck. The
first new navigation test failed because its test host omitted company
context; the host was corrected before the passing run.
- Previous integration head: `375c5e89516705050d94bab99336212841b2e6e1`
merges master `1aa3a21ac` after four additional upstream commits. The
sole conflict was competing imports in `server/src/services/issues.ts`;
both quality-review policy and inbound wake-notice notifications are
preserved. The PR-specific review import now sits beside
execution-policy imports instead of the frequently changing first line.
GitHub mergeability is rechecked after the push.
- On the combined master tree, workspace typecheck/build, all 153
affected UI tests, map validation, and whitespace checks pass. Four
server suites passed 77 tests; the fifth suite's module-import hook
timed out while broad verification was running. Its unchanged isolated
run passed all 41 tests in 7.2 seconds with the original timeout. This
records recovery without claiming the original import-timeout cause is
proven. CI on `375c5e895` passed every substantive job, including all
eight E2E shards and Superagent; Greptile found the two functional gaps
fixed in the current head. A short-lived `669d90876` commit added the
main fixes before the focused navigation follow-up.
- Immediately preceding head `9d9737b49` completed all 56 checks
successfully with four conditional skips, Greptile 5/5 and no open
findings, plus a successful Superagent scan. The signoff E2E shard
passed on its single accepted rerun; its initial cancellation/timing
failure is retained below. Master moved again while those checks ran,
requiring this final integration rather than treating the prior head's
green result as current acceptance.
- Previous head `9d9737b496911a6054d0ea22d1b42b28b115e9ab` includes
master `d30c8f42b842327ee1c18c41a2efd6ba623da5cd`; that head was
subsequently conflicted by moving master. The master merge preserved
durable account-bound writes and Coordinator UX. Workspace
typecheck/build, 416 focused UI tests, and 142 affected comment-route
tests passed. A stable full UI run on preceding head `938ad1665` passed
all 9,833 tests across 836 files; its final full workspace build also
passed.
- Greptile found nested proposal project inheritance and Classic
bound-revision links on `91be74952`. Both were fixed with 142
interaction-route tests, 113 focused UI tests, and UI/server typechecks.
Its next review identified a valid draft-preservation bug in the new
Classic loading UI. Head `9d9737b49` keeps loading/error notices outside
editors and annotations while preserving dirty drafts; 115 focused
review UI tests pass, including pending/failed revision loads and
continued draft editing. All related threads are resolved. Greptile
completed a fresh 5/5 review of
`9d9737b496911a6054d0ea22d1b42b28b115e9ab` with no open findings.
- CI on `938ad1665` exposed an integration regression with the newly
merged durable startup saves: the personal preference gate blocked the
task page before its first session lookup. The guarded title editor now
mounts while that lookup is pending, with presentation-specific tools
still gated. All 216 affected component tests pass. The unchanged
five-test `disconnect-write-recovery.spec.ts` browser suite passes
against a newly launched disposable local-trusted PostgreSQL instance on
port 33219, including the exact failed startup-save journey. No live
provider, hosted authentication or production proof is claimed. The
helper-owned test server exited and the port has no listener. UI
typecheck, built-browser assets, token and whitespace checks pass.
- Initial durable-write merge tests found duplicate imports and unscoped
draft fixtures, fixed before 416 focused tests passed. A sandbox
typecheck could not create its IPC socket; the supported rerun passed.
The first revision-link test used a wrong Return to latest button
assertion, corrected before the 113-test pass. The startup E2E
reproduction initially still failed because an outer shell gate also
blocked the page; the subsequent fix passed all five cases without
changing the test or its timeouts. A focused loading-header assertion
initially used an incorrect fixture title; correcting it preceded the
216-test pass. These failures remain recorded.
- Earlier routing gates fell back to GitHub-hosted runners while master
was moving or conflicted. Superseded queued runs were cancelled, then
the `938ad1665` routing gate explicitly selected the ephemeral RunsOn
fleet. Its CI actively executed and completed most tests; only the
diagnosed startup E2E shard and aggregate failed, alongside the valid
Greptile finding. Auxiliary GitHub-hosted workflows also completed
successfully on earlier heads, so queueing alone is not an
administrative blocker. Fresh [CI on
`9d9737b49`](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40744012678)
is the acceptance target; the previously failing startup E2E shard now
passes. A different signoff E2E shard failed during executor
resubmission when its fixture run was cancelled as
`issue_continuation_waiting_on_review`. The exact unchanged journey
passed locally (1 test, 46 seconds), and the preceding head with
identical server/signoff code passed that CI shard. This supports a
bounded rerun but does not establish the timing failure's root cause.
After the workflow finished, GitHub accepted one rerun of that failed
shard and its dependent aggregate; both passed, completing all checks on
that head. The failure log is retained at `/tmp/pr17983-9d9737-e2e7.log`
and the local reproduction at `/tmp/pr17983-signoff-repro.log`. No
assertion or timeout was weakened.
- On the first merge, full workspace typecheck/build, all 9,622 UI
tests, 267 tests across seven affected server suites, two migration
checks, map validation, token gates, and the PR diff whitespace check
passed. Greptile then found duplicate local task-search filtering and
lost completed item-review detail. Both are fixed, with 42 passing
focused UI tests and passing UI typecheck/build.
- A subsequent Greptile review found attachment confirmations without
working links and mobile history without a visible host. Confirmation
layouts now derive the authenticated immutable-content endpoint from the
attachment ID, and Needs You uses the existing full-screen mobile sheet.
All 119 focused tests pass, including missing/stale display URLs, both
review layouts, and both mobile history entry buttons. UI
typecheck/build and token checks pass. Full workspace typecheck/build
also pass after the second master merge.
- Greptile gave head 22f69c304 a 5/5 score with one non-blocking
desktop-history reopening finding. Head 6dd52b6d3 fixed it, passed all
nine history tests, UI typecheck/build, token gates, and the full
9,679-test UI suite, then received a fresh 5/5 review with zero open
findings. These are prior-head results; review on the master-sync commit
is pending.
- The chat and workspace CI jobs on head 22f69c304 were interrupted by
runner shutdown signals and cancellation before completing their tests.
Their logs do not report failing assertions. Those interrupted jobs are
not claimed as passes. The new head starts fresh runs.
- The first merge CI had a Slack session-sync idle assertion fail after
an unexpected database read. Its exact isolated reproduction passes, and
the chat CI shard passed on head 618c5a2a3. The original failure's cause
remains undetermined. The broader local reproduction, run concurrently
with full verification, instead encountered 21 timeout failures across
its two test chunks; it is not claimed as a passing full local server
run. A concurrent local UI run had eight failures (seven timeouts and
one delayed autosave assertion). The complete UI run on the final head
passed all 9,679 tests across 830 files with two workers; no test
timeout or assertion was weakened. This establishes recovery without
claiming that every earlier timeout's cause has been proved. An earlier
intermediate UI run also overlapped the second master merge and failed
the newly added Advanced-sidebar expectation, so it is not treated as
stable-tree evidence. The newly merged UI dependencies initially
required refreshing the local install from the upstream package
manifest; the generated local lockfile update is not committed, per
repository policy.
- Superagent returned neutral/inconclusive scans on the preceding heads
because its pinned merge-base checkout failed or timed out. The
available retry endpoint returned 404. These are not successful security
verdicts. The fresh scan on `91be74952` passed (PR scan passed; no
suspicious PR changes detected). The `938ad1665` scan again returned
neutral/inconclusive with the same pinned merge-base checkout error; the
check-suite rerun endpoint returned 404. The fresh `9d9737b49` scan
completed successfully at 18:22 UTC with no suspicious changes detected.
Earlier neutral scans are not counted as successful security verdicts.
- Prior head `57902152ac3218096fca669d33ff18400a2a86ae` passed 9,618 UI
tests across 826 files, received Greptile 5/5 with no open findings, and
completed CI with 56 passes and four conditional skips. These are
historical results, not acceptance of the latest merge commit.
- The first full build found generated capability-contract drift. The
generated outputs were refreshed. Initial sandbox runs could not open
local IPC sockets; verification was rerun with local test access.
- Current master was merged. The workspace preference migration was
regenerated after the existing migration history.
- The UI run first found two outdated expectations: early custom-answer
validation and the document access error copy. Both were corrected, and
the full UI suite then passed.
- The local server run found three failures in unchanged tests. The Muse
test passes with Python 3.13 instead of the host's Python 3.9. The two
workspace tests pass when their test process uses the expected master
default branch. These environment settings do not change application
behavior or global machine settings. The unsharded server run was
stopped after those reproductions; CI supplies the full sharded server
result. No successful full local server run is claimed.
- Skill inventory generation needs an external eval checkout, which is
absent locally. The existing generator functions refreshed only the live
skill inventory and its derived files. The checked-in eval inventory was
preserved. The inventory validation gate passes.
- Greptile found a dropped MCP review requirement, missing per-item
output links, generic item-review summaries, and a history-refresh
failure. The fixes have 32 passing database-backed server tests and
focused rendered-card tests. A follow-up partial-review finding was
corrected by forwarding the canonical mutation status before settling
the card. Attachments open through the authenticated immutable-content
route in both card layouts. The final focused UI set has 117 passing
tests, including these regressions.
- Both browser shards that first failed expected a disabled-chat
message. The copy was restored, and those shards passed in CI on the
next commit. The two journeys also passed locally. One local attempt
first timed out before feature disable while waiting for the provider's
initial message; its isolated reproduction passed. That earlier timing
failure remains recorded and is not presented as an explained
infrastructure failure.
- Serialized server shard 9 first failed during pnpm setup with
ECONNRESET, before dependencies or tests ran. Its single rerun passed
setup and all tests. The build and production runtime boot passed on the
first attempt, but that run's public-install step timed out during Pi
setup. The single build-job rerun passed compilation, runtime boot, and
clean public-install verification. Those setup scripts are unchanged by
this PR. The successful retry establishes recovery; the earlier Pi
timeout's underlying cause remains undetermined. The aggregate CI gate
is green: [workflow
run](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/40637789695).

</details>

## Risks

- This touches shared task, interaction, and completion paths.
Regression tests must cover classic and experimental behavior,
authorization, duplicate answers, and stale review targets.
- The additive preference table must migrate before the setting is used.
The setting defaults off.
- The experiment changes navigation and message presentation. Canonical
task and document records remain the source of truth.
- The initial task brief and saved plan can repeat information. This
change fixes chronology; a broader redundancy policy remains a design
decision.

## Model Used

OpenAI GPT-6 Codex with reasoning and tool-assisted code editing, tests,
and browser verification. Earlier iterations used Codex models in this
task; their exact model IDs are not available in the current context.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs
- [x] I have described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue
template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links
- [x] My branch name describes the change
- [x] I have run relevant tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation
- [x] I have documented risks
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open recommendations or follow-ups
- [x] I will address review comments before requesting merge

---------

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-10-28 17:20:01 -07:00

4139 lines
161 KiB
TypeScript

import { createContext, useContext, useEffect, useMemo, useRef, useState, type ReactNode } from "react";
import type { Agent } from "@paperclipai/shared";
import { AlertTriangle, ArrowUpRight, Bot, Check, CheckCircle2, ChevronDown, ChevronRight, CircleDashed, Clock, ExternalLink, FileText, GitBranch, ImagePlus, KeyRound, Loader2, MessageSquareQuote, MinusCircle, ShieldAlert, ThumbsUp, TriangleAlert, Wrench, X, XCircle } from "lucide-react";
import { Link } from "@/lib/router";
import { formatAssigneeUserLabel } from "../lib/assignees";
import { describeInteractionAudience, type InteractionAudienceDescription } from "../lib/interaction-audience";
import { interactionResolutionErrorMessage } from "../lib/interaction-resolution-error";
import { buildDocumentAnnotationHash } from "../lib/document-annotation-hash";
import { itemVerdictHref } from "@/lib/item-verdict-links";
import {
isInteractionPreparingApproval,
buildSuggestedTaskTree,
collectSuggestedTaskClientKeys,
countSuggestedTaskNodes,
getCheckboxConfirmationSelectedLabels,
getItemVerdictProgress,
getQuestionAnswerLabels,
shouldHideInteractionCard,
normalizeRequestConfirmationTargetHref,
type AskUserQuestionsAnswer,
type AskUserQuestionsInteraction,
type IssueThreadInteraction,
type RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction,
type RequestConfirmationInteraction,
type RequestConfirmationTarget,
type RequestItemVerdictsInteraction,
type RequestItemVerdictsItem,
type RequestItemVerdictsResultItem,
type RequestItemVerdictValue,
type SuggestTasksInteraction,
type SuggestTasksResultCreatedTask,
type SuggestedTaskDraft,
type SuggestedTaskTreeNode,
} from "../lib/issue-thread-interactions";
import { cn, formatDateTime, formatShortDate } from "../lib/utils";
import { InteractionPreparationNotice } from "./InteractionPreparationNotice";
import { InteractionAudienceLine } from "./InteractionAudienceLine";
import { MarkdownBody, type MarkdownExternalReferenceMap } from "./MarkdownBody";
import { Button } from "./ui/button";
import { Checkbox } from "./ui/checkbox";
import { Collapsible, CollapsibleContent, CollapsibleTrigger } from "./ui/collapsible";
import { PriorityIcon } from "./PriorityIcon";
import { SHOW_TASK_PRIORITY_UI } from "../lib/ui-flags";
import { Textarea } from "./ui/textarea";
import { Tooltip, TooltipContent, TooltipTrigger } from "./ui/tooltip";
import { Badge } from "@/components/ui/badge";
import { ProposalJustification } from "../pages/secrets/proposal-review";
import { DropdownMenu, DropdownMenuContent, DropdownMenuItem, DropdownMenuTrigger } from "./ui/dropdown-menu";
import { AppLogo } from "@/pages/apps/AppLogo";
import { ConnectionIntentInteractionBody } from "@/features/connections/ConnectionIntentInteractionBody";
import { QuestionForm } from "./task-chat/QuestionForm";
import { useCoordinatorWorkspaceEnabled } from "@/hooks/useCoordinatorWorkspaceEnabled";
import { CoordinatorTaskCommitment } from "./coordinator/CoordinatorTaskCommitment";
import { DecisionCardFooter } from "./DecisionCardFooter";
const OTHER_ANSWER_ID = "__paperclip_other__";
/**
* The card's server-evaluated audience, shared with the per-kind subcards below
* (PAP-17287). A subcard that catches a rejected resolution needs to name who
* *can* respond, and re-deriving the audience per subcard would let two parts of
* the same card describe one policy differently.
*/
const InteractionAudienceContext = createContext<InteractionAudienceDescription | null>(null);
/**
* Turns a rejected resolution into copy for the inline error region: the
* server's own denial reason, plus who can respond when the denial is an
* audience refusal. Never invites a retry that policy will refuse again.
*/
function useResolutionErrorMessage() {
const audience = useContext(InteractionAudienceContext);
return (error: unknown) => interactionResolutionErrorMessage(error, audience);
}
/**
* The inline resolution error. Announced through an `aria-live` region because a
* denial is the only feedback a failed decision gets — the row stays put and no
* toast fires on the attention surface.
*
* The live region is the *outer* wrapper, mounted whether or not there is a
* message: a region has to be in the accessibility tree before its content
* changes for the change to be announced. The styled inner div deliberately
* carries no `role="alert"` — `alert` is itself an assertive live region, and
* nesting one inside another makes some screen reader / browser pairs announce
* the same denial twice (PAP-17289).
*/
function InteractionActionError({ message }: { message: string | null }) {
return (
<div aria-live="assertive" data-testid="interaction-action-error">
{message ? (
<div className="rounded-sm border border-destructive/60 bg-destructive/10 px-3 py-2 text-sm text-destructive">
{message}
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
}
interface IssueThreadInteractionCardProps {
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction;
/** Reuse the resolver without the task timeline's audit/header chrome. */
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
presentationVariant?: "default" | "coordinator-decision";
agentMap?: Map<string, Agent>;
currentUserId?: string | null;
userLabelMap?: ReadonlyMap<string, string> | null;
onAcceptInteraction?: (
interaction:
| SuggestTasksInteraction
| RequestConfirmationInteraction
| RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction,
selectedClientKeys?: string[],
selectedOptionIds?: string[],
rememberAction?: boolean,
) => Promise<void> | void;
onRejectInteraction?: (
interaction:
| SuggestTasksInteraction
| RequestConfirmationInteraction
| RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction,
reason?: string,
) => Promise<void> | void;
onSubmitInteractionAnswers?: (
interaction: AskUserQuestionsInteraction,
answers: AskUserQuestionsAnswer[],
) => Promise<void> | void;
onCancelInteraction?: (
interaction: AskUserQuestionsInteraction,
) => Promise<void> | void;
/** Render confirmation CTAs with the primary action rightmost (task-chat grammar). */
primaryActionOnRight?: boolean;
onSubmitInteractionVerdicts?: (
interaction: RequestItemVerdictsInteraction,
verdicts: { id: string; verdict: RequestItemVerdictValue; reason?: string }[],
) => Promise<void> | void;
onUploadImage?: (file: File) => Promise<string>;
externalReferences?: MarkdownExternalReferenceMap;
}
function resolveActorLabel(args: {
agentId?: string | null;
userId?: string | null;
agentMap?: Map<string, Agent>;
currentUserId?: string | null;
userLabelMap?: ReadonlyMap<string, string> | null;
}) {
const { agentId, userId, agentMap, currentUserId, userLabelMap } = args;
if (agentId) {
return agentMap?.get(agentId)?.name ?? agentId.slice(0, 8);
}
if (userId) {
return formatAssigneeUserLabel(userId, currentUserId, userLabelMap) ?? "Board";
}
return "Unknown";
}
/**
* Administrative terminal outcomes (P1): an interaction that was withdrawn by
* its board/agent, or auto-expired when its issue reached a terminal state.
* Both are stored as `status="cancelled"|"expired"` with the distinguishing
* fact carried on `result.outcome` (there is no dedicated `withdrawn` status).
*/
function getAdministrativeOutcome(
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction,
): "withdrawn" | "issue_closed" | null {
const result = interaction.result;
if (result && typeof result === "object" && "outcome" in result) {
const outcome = (result as { outcome?: string | null }).outcome;
if (outcome === "withdrawn" || outcome === "issue_closed") return outcome;
}
return null;
}
function getAdministrativeReason(interaction: IssueThreadInteraction): string | null {
const result = interaction.result;
if (result && typeof result === "object" && "reason" in result) {
const reason = (result as { reason?: string | null }).reason;
if (typeof reason === "string" && reason.trim().length > 0) return reason.trim();
}
return null;
}
function statusLabel(status: IssueThreadInteraction["status"]) {
switch (status) {
case "pending":
return "Pending";
case "accepted":
return "Accepted";
case "rejected":
return "Rejected";
case "answered":
return "Answered";
case "cancelled":
return "Cancelled";
case "expired":
return "Expired";
case "failed":
return "Failed";
default:
return status;
}
}
function interactionKindLabel(kind: IssueThreadInteraction["kind"]) {
switch (kind) {
case "suggest_tasks":
return "Suggested tasks";
case "ask_user_questions":
return "Ask user questions";
case "request_confirmation":
return "Confirmation";
case "request_checkbox_confirmation":
return "Checkbox confirmation";
case "request_item_verdicts":
return "Item verdicts";
case "connection_intent":
return "Connection request";
default:
return kind;
}
}
function statusIcon(status: IssueThreadInteraction["status"]) {
switch (status) {
case "accepted":
case "answered":
return CheckCircle2;
case "rejected":
case "cancelled":
case "failed":
return XCircle;
case "expired":
return AlertTriangle;
default:
return CircleDashed;
}
}
function statusClasses(status: IssueThreadInteraction["status"]) {
switch (status) {
case "accepted":
case "answered":
return {
shell: "border-emerald-400/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-emerald-500/60 bg-emerald-500/10 text-emerald-900 dark:bg-emerald-500/15 dark:text-emerald-100",
};
case "rejected":
case "cancelled":
return {
shell: "border-rose-400/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-rose-500/60 bg-rose-500/10 text-rose-900 dark:bg-rose-500/15 dark:text-rose-100",
};
case "failed":
case "expired":
return {
shell: "border-amber-400/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 text-amber-900 dark:bg-amber-500/15 dark:text-amber-100",
};
default:
return {
shell: "border-sky-500/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-sky-500/70 bg-sky-500/10 text-sky-900 dark:bg-sky-500/15 dark:text-sky-100",
};
}
}
/**
* A confirmation that targets the issue's `plan` document renders as a distinct
* plan card (PAP-95g): a full state-coloured outline — violet while in review,
* green once approved, red when changes are requested (PAP-75 palette) — with no
* left stripe, so plans stand out from comments and status rows.
*/
function isPlanConfirmation(interaction: IssueThreadInteraction): boolean {
if (interaction.kind !== "request_confirmation") return false;
const target = interaction.payload.target;
return target?.type === "issue_document" && target?.key === "plan";
}
function requestConfirmationResumeFailure(interaction: IssueThreadInteraction) {
if (interaction.kind !== "request_confirmation" && interaction.kind !== "request_checkbox_confirmation") return null;
return interaction.result?.resumeFailure ?? null;
}
function planStatusClasses(
status: IssueThreadInteraction["status"],
resumeFailure?: ReturnType<typeof requestConfirmationResumeFailure>,
outcome?: string | null,
) {
switch (status) {
case "accepted":
case "answered":
if (resumeFailure) {
return {
shell: "border-2 border-amber-500/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 text-amber-900 dark:bg-amber-500/15 dark:text-amber-100",
label: "Approved — agent resume failed",
Icon: AlertTriangle,
};
}
return {
shell: "border-2 border-green-500/80 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-green-500/60 bg-green-500/10 text-green-900 dark:bg-green-500/15 dark:text-green-100",
label: "Approved",
Icon: CheckCircle2,
};
case "rejected":
case "cancelled":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-red-500/80 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-red-500/60 bg-red-500/10 text-red-900 dark:bg-red-500/15 dark:text-red-100",
label: outcome === "withdrawn" ? "Withdrawn" : "Changes requested",
Icon: XCircle,
};
case "failed":
case "expired":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-amber-500/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 text-amber-900 dark:bg-amber-500/15 dark:text-amber-100",
label: "Expired",
Icon: AlertTriangle,
};
default:
return {
shell: "border-2 border-violet-500/80 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-violet-500/60 bg-violet-500/10 text-violet-900 dark:bg-violet-500/15 dark:text-violet-100",
label: "In review",
Icon: FileText,
};
}
}
/**
* A `request_confirmation` that carries a `payload.toolAction` block gates a
* write/destructive MCP tool call (PAP-13726 §D1). It renders as a dedicated
* tool-approval card (PAP-13745) instead of the generic confirmation rendering.
* The governing rule: approve = run, so the card never terminally reads
* "Accepted" — terminal states are Executed / Failed / Declined / Expired.
*/
function toolActionPayload(
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction,
): NonNullable<RequestConfirmationInteraction["payload"]["toolAction"]> | null {
if (interaction.kind !== "request_confirmation") return null;
return interaction.payload.toolAction ?? null;
}
function isToolActionConfirmation(interaction: IssueThreadInteraction): boolean {
return toolActionPayload(interaction) != null;
}
function secretProposalPayload(
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction,
): NonNullable<RequestConfirmationInteraction["payload"]["secretProposal"]> | null {
if (interaction.kind !== "request_confirmation") return null;
return interaction.payload.secretProposal ?? null;
}
function isSecretProposalConfirmation(interaction: IssueThreadInteraction): boolean {
return secretProposalPayload(interaction) != null;
}
/**
* A `request_confirmation` carrying `payload.connectionAuthorization` is asking
* one person to connect their own account so an agent can act as them
* (PAP-17835). It keeps the interaction kind and the server-addressed audience;
* only the presentation differs, and it reads that presentation from the payload
* rather than parsing the title string.
*/
function connectionAuthorizationPayload(
interaction: IssueThreadInteraction,
): NonNullable<RequestConfirmationInteraction["payload"]["connectionAuthorization"]> | null {
if (interaction.kind !== "request_confirmation") return null;
return interaction.payload.connectionAuthorization ?? null;
}
/**
* The five states the connection-authorization card can be read in (PAP-17859).
*
* `actionable` and `waiting` are the *same* pending row seen by two different
* readers: consent belongs to the addressed person alone, so who is looking
* changes what may be offered — not merely whether a button is greyed out.
*/
type ConnectionAuthorizationCardState =
| "actionable"
| "waiting"
| "connected"
| "declined"
| "expired";
function connectionAuthorizationCardState({
interaction,
isAddressee,
}: {
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
isAddressee: boolean;
}): ConnectionAuthorizationCardState {
if (interaction.status === "accepted") return "connected";
if (interaction.status === "rejected") return "declined";
if (interaction.status === "pending") return isAddressee ? "actionable" : "waiting";
// expired / cancelled / failed all mean the same thing to a reader here: the
// authorization run this card carried is over.
return "expired";
}
/**
* True only when the signed-in reader *is* the person the server addressed.
*
* Deliberately strict: an unknown viewer (`currentUserId` not loaded yet) is
* never treated as the addressee, so the Connect action cannot flash into view
* for someone who may not consent. The server re-authorizes the callback
* regardless; this only decides what the card offers.
*/
function isConnectionAuthorizationAddressee({
interaction,
currentUserId,
}: {
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
currentUserId?: string | null;
}): boolean {
const addressee = interaction.addresseeUserId;
if (!addressee || !currentUserId) return false;
return addressee === currentUserId;
}
/**
* The authorization URL this card may open, or `null`.
*
* A target is offered **only while the interaction is pending**. The server
* re-upserts this row with a freshly minted `state` every time it starts a new
* authorization run, so a pending card always carries a live target and a
* resolved/declined/expired one always carries a spent one. Gating on the
* status is therefore how "never reuse an expired OAuth URL" is enforced —
* there is no client-visible expiry on the payload to check instead.
*/
function connectionAuthorizationHref(interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction): string | null {
if (interaction.status !== "pending") return null;
const href = interaction.payload.target?.href;
if (!href) return null;
return normalizeRequestConfirmationTargetHref(href);
}
type ToolActionCardState =
| "pending"
| "running"
| "executed"
| "failed"
| "cancelled"
| "declined"
| "expired";
/**
* Derives the visible lifecycle state from the interaction status plus the
* `result.toolAction.status` written back by the gateway. The card must render
* the resolved state without polling — the lifecycle metadata is authoritative,
* so an optimistic "running…" reconciles to the server's terminal state.
*/
function toolActionCardState(
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction,
): ToolActionCardState {
const execStatus = interaction.result?.toolAction?.status ?? null;
if (interaction.status === "pending") return "pending";
if (interaction.status === "rejected") return "declined";
if (interaction.status === "cancelled") return "cancelled";
if (interaction.status === "expired") return "expired";
// Terminal execution outcomes take precedence over the coarse interaction
// status so a self-resolving "running…" advances to its real result.
if (execStatus === "executed") return "executed";
if (execStatus === "failed") return "failed";
if (execStatus === "expired") return "expired";
if (interaction.status === "failed") return "failed";
// accepted + approved/executing/unknown → the transient running state.
return "running";
}
function toolActionStatusClasses(state: ToolActionCardState): {
shell: string;
badge: string;
label: string;
Icon: typeof CheckCircle2;
spin?: boolean;
dimmed?: boolean;
} {
switch (state) {
case "running":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-amber-500/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 text-amber-900 dark:bg-amber-500/15 dark:text-amber-100",
label: "Running…",
Icon: Loader2,
spin: true,
};
case "executed":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-green-500/80 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-green-500/60 bg-green-500/10 text-green-900 dark:bg-green-500/15 dark:text-green-100",
label: "Executed",
Icon: CheckCircle2,
};
case "failed":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-amber-500/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 text-amber-900 dark:bg-amber-500/15 dark:text-amber-100",
label: "Failed",
Icon: XCircle,
};
case "declined":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-red-500/80 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-red-500/60 bg-red-500/10 text-red-900 dark:bg-red-500/15 dark:text-red-100",
label: "Declined",
Icon: XCircle,
dimmed: true,
};
case "cancelled":
return { shell: "border-2 border-border bg-transparent", badge: "border-border bg-muted text-muted-foreground", label: "Cancelled", Icon: XCircle, dimmed: true };
case "expired":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-border bg-transparent",
badge: "border-border bg-muted/60 text-muted-foreground",
label: "Expired",
Icon: Clock,
dimmed: true,
};
default:
return {
shell: "border-2 border-violet-500/80 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-violet-500/60 bg-violet-500/10 text-violet-900 dark:bg-violet-500/15 dark:text-violet-100",
label: "Awaiting approval",
Icon: ShieldAlert,
};
}
}
function TaskField({
label,
value,
tone = "default",
}: {
label: string;
value: string;
tone?: "default" | "subtle";
}) {
return (
<span
className={cn(
"inline-flex items-center rounded-sm border px-2 py-0.5 text-(length:--text-nano) font-medium uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow)",
tone === "default"
? "border-border/70 bg-transparent text-foreground"
: "border-border/60 bg-transparent text-muted-foreground",
)}
>
{label}: {value}
</span>
);
}
function createdTaskMap(
createdTasks: readonly SuggestTasksResultCreatedTask[] | undefined,
) {
return new Map(
(createdTasks ?? []).map((entry) => [entry.clientKey, entry] as const),
);
}
function TaskTreeNode({
node,
createdByClientKey,
agentMap,
currentUserId,
userLabelMap,
depth = 0,
selectedClientKeys,
skippedClientKeys,
showSelection,
onToggleSelection,
}: {
node: SuggestedTaskTreeNode;
createdByClientKey: ReadonlyMap<string, SuggestTasksResultCreatedTask>;
agentMap?: Map<string, Agent>;
currentUserId?: string | null;
userLabelMap?: ReadonlyMap<string, string> | null;
depth?: number;
selectedClientKeys?: ReadonlySet<string>;
skippedClientKeys?: ReadonlySet<string>;
showSelection?: boolean;
onToggleSelection?: (node: SuggestedTaskTreeNode, checked: boolean) => void;
}) {
const visibleChildren = node.children.filter((child) => !child.task.hiddenInPreview);
const hiddenChildCount = node.children
.filter((child) => child.task.hiddenInPreview)
.reduce((sum, child) => sum + countSuggestedTaskNodes(child), 0);
const createdTask = createdByClientKey.get(node.task.clientKey);
const isSelected = selectedClientKeys?.has(node.task.clientKey) ?? false;
const isSkipped = skippedClientKeys?.has(node.task.clientKey) ?? false;
const assigneeLabel = resolveActorLabel({
agentId: node.task.assigneeAgentId,
userId: node.task.assigneeUserId,
agentMap,
currentUserId,
userLabelMap,
});
const hasExplicitAssignee = Boolean(
node.task.assigneeAgentId || node.task.assigneeUserId,
);
const labels = node.task.labels ?? [];
const hasMetadata = hasExplicitAssignee
|| Boolean(node.task.billingCode)
|| Boolean(node.task.projectId)
|| labels.length > 0;
return (
<>
<div
className={cn(
"relative border-b border-border/60 px-3 py-2.5 last:border-b-0",
depth > 0 && "before:absolute before:left-3 before:top-0 before:h-full before:w-px before:bg-border/70",
)}
style={depth > 0 ? { paddingLeft: `${depth * 24 + 12}px` } : undefined}
>
<div className="flex items-start justify-between gap-2">
<div className="min-w-0 flex-1">
<div className="flex items-start gap-2">
{showSelection ? (
<Checkbox
checked={isSelected}
onCheckedChange={(checked) => onToggleSelection?.(node, checked === true)}
aria-label={`Include ${node.task.title}`}
className="mt-0.5"
/>
) : null}
<div className="min-w-0 flex-1">
<div className="flex min-w-0 items-center gap-1.5">
{/* PAP-411: priority UI hidden behind SHOW_TASK_PRIORITY_UI. */}
{SHOW_TASK_PRIORITY_UI && node.task.priority ? (
<PriorityIcon
priority={node.task.priority}
className="mt-px"
/>
) : null}
<div className="min-w-0 truncate text-sm font-medium text-foreground">
{node.task.title}
</div>
</div>
{depth > 0 ? (
<div className="mt-0.5 text-(length:--text-nano) font-medium uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-muted-foreground">
Child task
</div>
) : null}
{node.task.description ? (
<p className="mt-0.5 text-sm leading-5 text-muted-foreground">
{node.task.description}
</p>
) : null}
</div>
</div>
</div>
{createdTask?.issueId ? (
<Link
to={`/issues/${createdTask.identifier ?? createdTask.issueId}`}
className="inline-flex shrink-0 items-center gap-1 rounded-sm border border-emerald-500/50 bg-emerald-500/10 px-2.5 py-1 text-(length:--text-micro) font-medium text-emerald-900 transition-colors hover:bg-emerald-500/15 dark:text-emerald-100"
>
{createdTask.identifier ?? createdTask.issueId.slice(0, 8)}
<ChevronRight className="h-3 w-3" />
</Link>
) : isSkipped ? (
<span className="inline-flex shrink-0 items-center rounded-sm border border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 px-2.5 py-1 text-(length:--text-micro) font-medium text-amber-900 dark:text-amber-100">
Skipped
</span>
) : null}
</div>
{hasMetadata ? (
<div className="mt-2 flex flex-wrap gap-1.5">
{hasExplicitAssignee ? (
<TaskField label="Responsible" value={assigneeLabel} />
) : null}
{node.task.billingCode ? (
<TaskField label="Billing" value={node.task.billingCode} />
) : null}
{node.task.projectId ? (
<TaskField label="Project" value={node.task.projectId} tone="subtle" />
) : null}
{labels.map((label) => (
<TaskField key={label} label="Label" value={label} tone="subtle" />
))}
</div>
) : null}
{hiddenChildCount > 0 ? (
<div className="mt-2 flex items-center gap-2 rounded-sm border border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 px-3 py-2 text-xs text-amber-900 dark:text-amber-100">
<GitBranch className="h-3.5 w-3.5 shrink-0" />
<span>
{hiddenChildCount === 1
? "1 follow-on task hidden in preview"
: `${hiddenChildCount} follow-on tasks hidden in preview`}
</span>
</div>
) : null}
</div>
{visibleChildren.length > 0 ? (
<>
{visibleChildren.map((child) => (
<TaskTreeNode
key={child.task.clientKey}
node={child}
createdByClientKey={createdByClientKey}
agentMap={agentMap}
currentUserId={currentUserId}
userLabelMap={userLabelMap}
depth={depth + 1}
selectedClientKeys={selectedClientKeys}
skippedClientKeys={skippedClientKeys}
showSelection={showSelection}
onToggleSelection={onToggleSelection}
/>
))}
</>
) : null}
</>
);
}
function SuggestTasksCard({
footerSlot,
interaction,
agentMap,
currentUserId,
userLabelMap,
onAcceptInteraction,
onRejectInteraction,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
interaction: SuggestTasksInteraction;
agentMap?: Map<string, Agent>;
currentUserId?: string | null;
userLabelMap?: ReadonlyMap<string, string> | null;
onAcceptInteraction?: (
interaction: SuggestTasksInteraction,
selectedClientKeys?: string[],
) => Promise<void> | void;
onRejectInteraction?: (
interaction: SuggestTasksInteraction,
reason?: string,
) => Promise<void> | void;
}) {
const [rejecting, setRejecting] = useState(false);
const [working, setWorking] = useState<"accept" | "reject" | null>(null);
const [rejectReason, setRejectReason] = useState(
interaction.result?.rejectionReason ?? "",
);
useEffect(() => {
setRejectReason(interaction.result?.rejectionReason ?? "");
if (interaction.status !== "pending") {
setRejecting(false);
setWorking(null);
}
}, [interaction.result?.rejectionReason, interaction.status]);
const roots = useMemo(
() =>
buildSuggestedTaskTree(interaction.payload.tasks).filter(
(node) => !node.task.hiddenInPreview,
),
[interaction.payload.tasks],
);
const createdByClientKey = useMemo(
() => createdTaskMap(interaction.result?.createdTasks),
[interaction.result?.createdTasks],
);
const skippedClientKeys = useMemo(
() => new Set(interaction.result?.skippedClientKeys ?? []),
[interaction.result?.skippedClientKeys],
);
const totalTasks = interaction.payload.tasks.length;
const [selectedClientKeys, setSelectedClientKeys] = useState<Set<string>>(
() => new Set(interaction.payload.tasks.map((task) => task.clientKey)),
);
const taskSelectionSeed = useMemo(
() => interaction.payload.tasks.map((task) => task.clientKey).join("\n"),
[interaction.payload.tasks],
);
useEffect(() => {
setSelectedClientKeys(new Set(interaction.payload.tasks.map((task) => task.clientKey)));
}, [interaction.id, interaction.status, taskSelectionSeed]);
const taskByClientKey = useMemo(
() => new Map(interaction.payload.tasks.map((task) => [task.clientKey, task] as const)),
[interaction.payload.tasks],
);
const selectedCount = selectedClientKeys.size;
const [actionError, setActionError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const resolutionErrorMessage = useResolutionErrorMessage();
const createdCount = interaction.result?.createdTasks?.length ?? 0;
const skippedCount = interaction.result?.skippedClientKeys?.length ?? 0;
async function handleAccept() {
if (!onAcceptInteraction) return;
setWorking("accept");
setActionError(null);
try {
await onAcceptInteraction(interaction, [...selectedClientKeys]);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
async function handleReject() {
if (!onRejectInteraction) return;
setWorking("reject");
setActionError(null);
try {
await onRejectInteraction(interaction, rejectReason.trim() || undefined);
setRejecting(false);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
function handleToggleSelection(node: SuggestedTaskTreeNode, checked: boolean) {
const subtreeClientKeys = collectSuggestedTaskClientKeys(node);
setSelectedClientKeys((current) => {
const next = new Set(current);
if (!checked) {
for (const clientKey of subtreeClientKeys) {
next.delete(clientKey);
}
return next;
}
for (const clientKey of subtreeClientKeys) {
next.add(clientKey);
}
let parentClientKey = taskByClientKey.get(node.task.clientKey)?.parentClientKey ?? null;
while (parentClientKey) {
next.add(parentClientKey);
parentClientKey = taskByClientKey.get(parentClientKey)?.parentClientKey ?? null;
}
return next;
});
}
return (
<div className="space-y-3">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-xs text-muted-foreground">
<span>{totalTasks === 1 ? "1 draft issue" : `${totalTasks} draft issues`}</span>
{interaction.payload.defaultParentId ? (
<TaskField label="Default parent" value={interaction.payload.defaultParentId} tone="subtle" />
) : null}
</div>
<div className="overflow-hidden border border-border/70">
{roots.map((root) => (
<TaskTreeNode
key={root.task.clientKey}
node={root}
createdByClientKey={createdByClientKey}
agentMap={agentMap}
currentUserId={currentUserId}
userLabelMap={userLabelMap}
selectedClientKeys={selectedClientKeys}
skippedClientKeys={skippedClientKeys}
showSelection={interaction.status === "pending"}
onToggleSelection={handleToggleSelection}
/>
))}
</div>
{interaction.status === "accepted" ? (
<div className="rounded-sm border border-emerald-500/60 bg-emerald-500/10 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-emerald-900 dark:text-emerald-100">
<div className="text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-emerald-700">
Resolution summary
</div>
<p className="mt-1 leading-6">
{skippedCount > 0
? `Created ${createdCount} draft ${createdCount === 1 ? "issue" : "issues"} and skipped ${skippedCount} during review.`
: `Created all ${createdCount} draft ${createdCount === 1 ? "issue" : "issues"}.`}
</p>
</div>
) : null}
{interaction.status === "rejected" ? (
<div className="rounded-sm border border-rose-500/60 bg-rose-500/10 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-rose-900 dark:text-rose-100">
<div className="text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-rose-700">
Rejection reason
</div>
<p className={cn(
"mt-1 leading-6",
!interaction.result?.rejectionReason && "text-rose-900/75",
)}>
{interaction.result?.rejectionReason || "No reason provided."}
</p>
</div>
) : null}
{interaction.status === "pending" ? (
<div className="space-y-3">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center justify-between gap-3">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-xs text-muted-foreground">
<span>
{selectedCount === totalTasks
? `All ${totalTasks} draft ${totalTasks === 1 ? "issue" : "issues"} selected`
: `${selectedCount} of ${totalTasks} draft ${totalTasks === 1 ? "issue" : "issues"} selected`}
</span>
{selectedCount < totalTasks ? (
<span>
{totalTasks - selectedCount} will be skipped if you accept this interaction.
</span>
) : null}
</div>
<DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot} className="w-full">
<div className="ml-auto flex flex-wrap items-center justify-end gap-2">
<Button
size="sm"
disabled={!onAcceptInteraction || working !== null || selectedCount === 0}
onClick={() => void handleAccept()}
>
{working === "accept" ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Accepting...
</>
) : (
selectedCount === totalTasks ? "Accept drafts" : "Accept selected drafts"
)}
</Button>
<Button
size="sm"
variant="outline"
disabled={!onRejectInteraction || working !== null}
onClick={() => setRejecting((current) => !current)}
>
Reject
</Button>
{selectedCount < totalTasks ? (
<Button
size="sm"
variant="ghost"
disabled={working !== null}
onClick={() => setSelectedClientKeys(new Set(interaction.payload.tasks.map((task) => task.clientKey)))}
>
Reset selection
</Button>
) : null}
</div>
</DecisionCardFooter>
</div>
{rejecting ? (
<div className="space-y-3">
<Textarea
value={rejectReason}
onChange={(event) => setRejectReason(event.target.value)}
placeholder="Add a short reason for rejecting this suggestion"
className="min-h-24 bg-background text-sm"
/>
<div className="flex justify-end">
<Button
size="sm"
variant="outline"
disabled={!onRejectInteraction || working !== null}
onClick={() => void handleReject()}
>
{working === "reject" ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Saving...
</>
) : (
"Save rejection"
)}
</Button>
</div>
</div>
) : null}
<InteractionActionError message={actionError} />
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
}
function QuestionOptionButton({
id,
compact = false,
label,
description,
selected,
selectionMode,
onClick,
}: {
id: string;
compact?: boolean;
label: string;
description?: string | null;
selected: boolean;
selectionMode: "single" | "multi";
onClick: () => void;
}) {
return (
<button
type="button"
role={selectionMode === "single" ? "radio" : "checkbox"}
aria-checked={selected}
className={cn(
compact ? "flex w-full items-start gap-3 rounded-md px-3 py-2 text-left transition-colors outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring" : "w-full rounded-sm border px-4 py-3 text-left transition-colors outline-none focus-visible:border-ring focus-visible:ring-(length:--rad-3) focus-visible:ring-ring/50",
compact ? (selected ? "bg-muted text-foreground" : "text-foreground hover:bg-muted/50") : selected
? "border-sky-500/80 bg-sky-500/10 text-sky-950 dark:border-sky-400/80 dark:bg-sky-400/15 dark:text-sky-50"
: "border-border/70 bg-transparent text-foreground hover:border-sky-500/70 hover:bg-sky-500/10 dark:hover:border-sky-400/70 dark:hover:bg-sky-400/10",
)}
id={id}
onClick={onClick}
>
{compact ? <span aria-hidden="true" className={cn("mt-0.5 flex size-4 shrink-0 items-center justify-center border", selectionMode === "single" ? "rounded-full" : "rounded-sm", selected ? "border-foreground" : "border-muted-foreground/50")}>
{selected ? <span className={cn("size-2 bg-foreground", selectionMode === "single" ? "rounded-full" : "rounded-xs")} /> : null}
</span> : null}
<div className={compact ? "min-w-0" : "contents"}>
<div
className={cn(
"text-sm font-medium",
selected && !compact ? "text-sky-950 dark:text-sky-50" : "text-foreground",
)}
>
{label}
</div>
{description ? (
<div
className={cn(
"mt-1 text-sm leading-6",
selected && !compact
? "text-sky-900/80 dark:text-sky-100/80"
: "text-muted-foreground",
)}
>
{description}
</div>
) : null}
</div>
</button>
);
}
function AskUserQuestionsCard({
footerSlot,
interaction,
compact = false,
onSubmitInteractionAnswers,
onCancelInteraction,
externalReferences,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
interaction: AskUserQuestionsInteraction;
compact?: boolean;
onSubmitInteractionAnswers?: (
interaction: AskUserQuestionsInteraction,
answers: AskUserQuestionsAnswer[],
) => Promise<void> | void;
onCancelInteraction?: (
interaction: AskUserQuestionsInteraction,
) => Promise<void> | void;
externalReferences?: MarkdownExternalReferenceMap;
}) {
const [draftAnswers, setDraftAnswers] = useState<Record<string, string[]>>(() =>
Object.fromEntries(
(interaction.result?.answers ?? []).map((answer) => [
answer.questionId,
[...answer.optionIds],
]),
),
);
const [draftOtherAnswers, setDraftOtherAnswers] = useState<Record<string, string>>(() =>
Object.fromEntries(
(interaction.result?.answers ?? [])
.filter((answer) => answer.otherText)
.map((answer) => [answer.questionId, answer.otherText ?? ""]),
),
);
const [otherActiveQuestions, setOtherActiveQuestions] = useState<Record<string, boolean>>(() =>
Object.fromEntries(
(interaction.result?.answers ?? [])
.filter((answer) => answer.otherText)
.map((answer) => [answer.questionId, true]),
),
);
const [working, setWorking] = useState(false);
const [cancelling, setCancelling] = useState(false);
const [actionError, setActionError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const resolutionErrorMessage = useResolutionErrorMessage();
useEffect(() => {
setDraftAnswers(
Object.fromEntries(
(interaction.result?.answers ?? []).map((answer) => [
answer.questionId,
[...answer.optionIds],
]),
),
);
setDraftOtherAnswers(
Object.fromEntries(
(interaction.result?.answers ?? [])
.filter((answer) => answer.otherText)
.map((answer) => [answer.questionId, answer.otherText ?? ""]),
),
);
setOtherActiveQuestions(
Object.fromEntries(
(interaction.result?.answers ?? [])
.filter((answer) => answer.otherText)
.map((answer) => [answer.questionId, true]),
),
);
}, [interaction.result?.answers]);
const questions = interaction.payload.questions;
const requiredQuestions = questions.filter((question) => question.required);
const canSubmit = requiredQuestions.every(
(question) =>
(draftAnswers[question.id] ?? []).length > 0
|| (
otherActiveQuestions[question.id] === true
&& (draftOtherAnswers[question.id]?.trim().length ?? 0) > 0
),
);
function toggleOption(
questionId: string,
optionId: string,
selectionMode: "single" | "multi",
isFreeText = false,
) {
// A free-text option is a first-class version of the built-in "Other"
// affordance: selecting it reveals the inline text field and its typed
// value is submitted as the question's `otherText`.
if (optionId === OTHER_ANSWER_ID || isFreeText) {
setOtherActiveQuestions((current) => ({
...current,
[questionId]: !current[questionId],
}));
if (selectionMode === "single") {
setDraftAnswers((current) => ({ ...current, [questionId]: [] }));
}
return;
}
setDraftAnswers((current) => {
const existing = current[questionId] ?? [];
if (selectionMode === "single") {
return { ...current, [questionId]: [optionId] };
}
const next = existing.includes(optionId)
? existing.filter((value) => value !== optionId)
: [...existing, optionId];
return { ...current, [questionId]: next };
});
if (selectionMode === "single") {
setOtherActiveQuestions((current) => ({ ...current, [questionId]: false }));
}
}
async function handleSubmit() {
if (!onSubmitInteractionAnswers || !canSubmit) return;
setWorking(true);
setActionError(null);
try {
await onSubmitInteractionAnswers(
interaction,
questions.map((question) => {
const otherText = otherActiveQuestions[question.id] === true
? draftOtherAnswers[question.id]?.trim() ?? ""
: "";
return {
questionId: question.id,
optionIds: draftAnswers[question.id] ?? [],
...(otherText ? { otherText } : {}),
};
}),
);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(false);
}
}
async function handleCancel() {
if (!onCancelInteraction) return;
setCancelling(true);
setActionError(null);
try {
await onCancelInteraction(interaction);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setCancelling(false);
}
}
return (
<div className="space-y-4">
{!compact ? <div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-xs text-muted-foreground">
<Badge variant="outline" className="border-border/70 bg-background/70 px-2.5 py-1 uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-foreground/70">
<MessageSquareQuote className="h-3 w-3" />
Ask user questions
</Badge>
<span>
{questions.length === 1
? "1 question"
: `${questions.length} questions`}
</span>
</div> : null}
{interaction.status === "pending" && interaction.payload.questionSet ? (
<QuestionForm
footerSlot={footerSlot}
id={interaction.id}
presentation={compact ? "decision" : "default"}
questionSet={interaction.payload.questionSet}
draftKey={`issue-question:${interaction.companyId}:${interaction.id}`}
disabled={!onSubmitInteractionAnswers}
initialResponse={interaction.result?.answers ? {
schema: "paperclip.question_response.v1",
answers: Object.fromEntries(interaction.result.answers.map((answer) => [
answer.questionId,
interaction.payload.questionSet!.questions.find((question) => question.id === answer.questionId)?.answerMode === "text"
? { text: answer.otherText ?? "" }
: { selectedOptionIds: answer.optionIds, ...(typeof answer.otherText === "string" ? { customText: answer.otherText } : {}) },
])),
} : null}
onSubmit={async (response) => {
const answers = interaction.payload.questionSet!.questions.map((question) => {
const answer = response.answers[question.id];
const otherText = question.answerMode === "text" ? answer?.text : answer?.customText?.trim();
return {
questionId: question.id,
optionIds: question.answerMode === "text" ? [] : (answer?.selectedOptionIds ?? []),
...(otherText !== undefined ? { otherText } : {}),
};
});
try {
await onSubmitInteractionAnswers?.(interaction, answers);
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
}
}}
onCancel={onCancelInteraction ? async () => {
try {
await onCancelInteraction(interaction);
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
}
} : undefined}
/>
) : interaction.status === "pending" ? (
<div className="space-y-4">
{questions.map((question, index) => {
const hasFreeTextOption = question.options.some(
(option) => option.freeText === true,
);
return (
<div
key={question.id}
className={compact ? "space-y-3" : "rounded-2xl border border-border/70 bg-background/82 p-4 shadow-(--shadow-extract-9)"}
>
<div className="flex items-start justify-between gap-3">
<div>
{!compact ? <div className="text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-muted-foreground">
Question {index + 1}
</div> : null}
<div
id={`${interaction.id}-${question.id}-prompt`}
data-decision-prompt={compact ? true : undefined}
className={compact ? "text-lg font-medium leading-relaxed text-foreground" : "mt-1 text-sm font-semibold text-foreground"}
>
{question.prompt}
</div>
{question.helpText ? (
<p className="mt-1 text-sm leading-6 text-muted-foreground">
{question.helpText}
</p>
) : null}
</div>
{compact ? <span className="sr-only" id={`${interaction.id}-${question.id}-requirements`}>
{question.selectionMode === "single" ? "Choose one answer." : "Choose one or more answers."} {question.required ? "Required." : "Optional."}
</span> : <TaskField
label={question.selectionMode === "single" ? "Pick" : "Pick many"}
value={question.required ? "Required" : "Optional"}
tone="subtle"
/>}
</div>
<div className="mt-3 space-y-3">
<div
className="grid gap-3"
role={question.selectionMode === "single" ? "radiogroup" : "group"}
aria-labelledby={`${interaction.id}-${question.id}-prompt`}
aria-describedby={compact ? `${interaction.id}-${question.id}-requirements` : undefined}
aria-required={question.selectionMode === "single" && question.required ? true : undefined}
>
{question.options.map((option) => {
const isFreeText = option.freeText === true;
const optionSelected = isFreeText
? otherActiveQuestions[question.id] === true
: (draftAnswers[question.id] ?? []).includes(option.id);
return (
<div key={option.id} className="space-y-2">
<QuestionOptionButton
compact={compact}
id={`${interaction.id}-${question.id}-${option.id}`}
label={option.label}
description={option.description}
selected={optionSelected}
selectionMode={question.selectionMode}
onClick={() =>
toggleOption(question.id, option.id, question.selectionMode, isFreeText)}
/>
{isFreeText && optionSelected ? (
<Textarea
aria-label={`Describe your answer for ${question.prompt}`}
value={draftOtherAnswers[question.id] ?? ""}
onChange={(event) =>
setDraftOtherAnswers((current) => ({
...current,
[question.id]: event.target.value,
}))}
placeholder="Type your answer"
className="min-h-24 bg-background text-sm"
autoFocus
/>
) : null}
</div>
);
})}
</div>
{/*
* The built-in "Other" link is the fallback free-text affordance.
* Suppress it when the agent already authored a first-class
* free-text option so the card never shows two ways to type an
* answer (PAP-419).
*/}
{hasFreeTextOption || question.allowOther === false ? null : (
<>
<button
type="button"
id={`${interaction.id}-${question.id}-other`}
aria-expanded={otherActiveQuestions[question.id] === true}
className={cn(
"text-sm font-medium underline underline-offset-4 transition-colors outline-none focus-visible:ring-(length:--rad-3) focus-visible:ring-ring/50",
otherActiveQuestions[question.id]
? "text-sky-700 hover:text-sky-800 dark:text-sky-300 dark:hover:text-sky-200"
: "text-muted-foreground hover:text-foreground",
)}
onClick={() =>
toggleOption(question.id, OTHER_ANSWER_ID, question.selectionMode)}
>
Other
</button>
{otherActiveQuestions[question.id] ? (
<Textarea
aria-label={`Other answer for ${question.prompt}`}
value={draftOtherAnswers[question.id] ?? ""}
onChange={(event) =>
setDraftOtherAnswers((current) => ({
...current,
[question.id]: event.target.value,
}))}
placeholder="Type your answer"
className="min-h-24 bg-background text-sm"
/>
) : null}
</>
)}
</div>
</div>
);
})}
<DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot}>
<div className={compact ? "flex flex-wrap items-center justify-end gap-3" : "flex flex-wrap items-center justify-between gap-3 rounded-2xl border border-border/70 bg-background/75 p-4"}>
{!compact ? <div className="text-sm text-muted-foreground">
Submit once after you finish the full form.
</div> : null}
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2">
{onCancelInteraction ? (
<Button
size="sm"
variant={compact ? "ghost" : "outline"}
disabled={working || cancelling}
onClick={() => void handleCancel()}
>
{cancelling ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Cancelling...
</>
) : (
"Cancel question"
)}
</Button>
) : null}
<Button
size="sm"
disabled={!onSubmitInteractionAnswers || !canSubmit || working || cancelling}
onClick={() => void handleSubmit()}
>
{working ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Submitting...
</>
) : (
interaction.payload.submitLabel ?? "Submit answers"
)}
</Button>
</div>
</div>
</DecisionCardFooter>
<InteractionActionError message={actionError} />
</div>
) : interaction.status === "cancelled" ? (
<div className="rounded-2xl border border-rose-300/60 bg-rose-50/85 p-4 text-sm leading-6 text-rose-950 dark:border-rose-500/40 dark:bg-rose-500/10 dark:text-rose-100">
<div className="font-semibold">
{interaction.result?.outcome === "withdrawn"
? questions.length === 1 ? "Question withdrawn" : "Questions withdrawn"
: "Question cancelled"}
</div>
{interaction.result?.cancellationReason ? (
<p className="mt-1">{interaction.result.cancellationReason}</p>
) : interaction.result?.reason ? (
<p className="mt-1">{interaction.result.reason}</p>
) : (
<p className="mt-1">No answer was recorded.</p>
)}
</div>
) : interaction.status === "expired" ? (
<div className="rounded-2xl border border-amber-300/70 bg-amber-50/85 p-4 text-sm leading-6 text-amber-950 dark:border-amber-500/40 dark:bg-amber-500/10 dark:text-amber-100">
<div className="flex items-center gap-2 font-semibold">
<AlertTriangle className="h-4 w-4" />
{interaction.result?.outcome === "issue_closed"
? questions.length === 1
? "Question expired when the issue closed"
: "Questions expired when the issue closed"
: questions.length === 1
? "Question expired by comment"
: "Questions expired by comment"}
</div>
<p className="mt-1">
{interaction.result?.outcome === "issue_closed"
? "This question request expired automatically when the issue reached a terminal state."
: "A later board/user comment superseded this question request. Create a fresh request if answers are still needed."}
</p>
{interaction.result?.commentId ? (
<a
href={`#comment-${interaction.result.commentId}`}
className="mt-3 inline-flex text-sm font-medium underline underline-offset-4"
>
Jump to comment
</a>
) : null}
</div>
) : (
<div className="space-y-3">
{questions.map((question) => {
const labels = getQuestionAnswerLabels({
question,
answers: interaction.result?.answers ?? [],
});
return (
<div
key={question.id}
className="rounded-2xl border border-border/70 bg-background/82 p-4"
>
<div className="text-sm font-semibold text-foreground">
{question.prompt}
</div>
<div className="mt-2 flex flex-wrap gap-2">
{labels.length > 0 ? (
labels.map((label) => (
<TaskField key={label} label="Answer" value={label} />
))
) : (
<span className="text-sm text-muted-foreground">No answer recorded.</span>
)}
</div>
</div>
);
})}
{interaction.result?.summaryMarkdown ? (
<div className="rounded-2xl border border-emerald-300/60 bg-emerald-50/85 p-4">
<div className="mb-2 text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-emerald-700">
Submitted summary
</div>
<MarkdownBody externalReferences={externalReferences}>{interaction.result.summaryMarkdown}</MarkdownBody>
</div>
) : null}
</div>
)}
</div>
);
}
/** A custom target key is a machine identifier (e.g. `github:org/repo:pull:16`),
* not display copy, so unlabeled custom targets render no chip. */
function isDisplayableRequestConfirmationTarget(
target: RequestConfirmationTarget | null | undefined,
): target is RequestConfirmationTarget {
if (!target) return false;
return target.type !== "custom" || Boolean(target.label);
}
function requestConfirmationTargetLabel(target: RequestConfirmationTarget) {
if (target.label) return target.label;
if (target.type === "issue_attachment") return "Attachment";
const revision = target.revisionNumber ? ` v${target.revisionNumber}` : "";
if (target.type === "issue_document" && target.key === "plan") {
return `Plan${revision}`;
}
return `${target.key}${revision}`;
}
function requestConfirmationTargetHref({
interaction,
target,
}: {
interaction: Pick<IssueThreadInteraction, "issueId" | "id">;
target: RequestConfirmationTarget;
}) {
if (target.type === "issue_document" && target.revisionId) {
return `/issues/${target.issueId ?? interaction.issueId}${buildDocumentAnnotationHash({ documentKey: target.key, revisionId: target.revisionId, interactionId: interaction.id, threadId: null, commentId: null })}`;
}
if (target.type === "issue_attachment") {
return `/api/attachments/${encodeURIComponent(target.attachmentId)}/content`;
}
if (target.href) return target.href;
if (target.type === "issue_document") {
const issueId = target.issueId ?? interaction.issueId;
return `/issues/${issueId}#document-${encodeURIComponent(target.key)}`;
}
return null;
}
function RequestConfirmationTargetChip({
interaction,
target,
tone = "default",
}: {
interaction: Pick<IssueThreadInteraction, "issueId" | "id">;
target: RequestConfirmationTarget | null | undefined;
tone?: "default" | "subtle";
}) {
if (!isDisplayableRequestConfirmationTarget(target)) return null;
const href = requestConfirmationTargetHref({ interaction, target });
const className = cn(
"inline-flex max-w-full items-center gap-1.5 rounded-sm border px-2 py-0.5 text-(length:--text-nano) font-medium uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow)",
tone === "default"
? "border-border/70 bg-transparent text-foreground"
: "border-border/60 bg-transparent text-muted-foreground",
href && "transition-colors hover:border-sky-500/70 hover:bg-sky-500/10",
);
const content = (
<>
<GitBranch className="h-3 w-3 shrink-0" />
<span className="min-w-0 truncate">{requestConfirmationTargetLabel(target)}</span>
</>
);
if (!href) return <span className={className}>{content}</span>;
if (target.type === "issue_attachment" || /^https?:\/\//i.test(href)) {
return (
<a href={href} target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" className={className}>
{content}
</a>
);
}
return (
<Link to={href} className={className}>
{content}
</Link>
);
}
function RequestConfirmationResolution({
interaction,
}: {
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
}) {
const outcome = interaction.result?.outcome;
const target = interaction.payload.target ?? null;
const staleTarget = interaction.result?.staleTarget ?? null;
if (interaction.status === "accepted") {
const resumeFailure = requestConfirmationResumeFailure(interaction);
if (resumeFailure) {
return (
<div className="space-y-2">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-sm leading-6 text-foreground">
<span className="font-medium">Confirmed</span>
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip interaction={interaction} target={target} />
</div>
<div className="rounded-sm border border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-amber-900 dark:text-amber-100">
<div className="text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-amber-700">
Agent resume failed
</div>
<p className="mt-1 leading-6">
{resumeFailure.status === "retrying"
? `Paperclip is retrying the agent resume after approval (attempt ${resumeFailure.attempt}/${resumeFailure.maxAttempts}).`
: "Paperclip needs attention before the agent can resume this approved work."}
</p>
{resumeFailure.errorCode ? (
<p className="mt-1 leading-6">
Latest cause: <code className="font-mono text-(length:--text-micro)">{resumeFailure.errorCode}</code>
</p>
) : null}
</div>
</div>
);
}
return (
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-sm leading-6 text-foreground">
<span className="font-medium">Confirmed</span>
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip interaction={interaction} target={target} />
</div>
);
}
if (interaction.status === "rejected") {
return (
<div className="space-y-2">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-sm leading-6 text-foreground">
<span className="font-medium">Declined</span>
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip interaction={interaction} target={target} />
</div>
{interaction.result?.reason ? (
<div className="rounded-sm border-l-2 border-rose-500/70 bg-rose-500/10 px-3 py-2 text-sm leading-6 text-rose-900 dark:text-rose-100">
<MarkdownBody>{interaction.result.reason}</MarkdownBody>
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
}
if (interaction.status === "cancelled" && outcome === "withdrawn") {
// Withdrawn is a neutral administrative retraction (P4 design review): the
// card-level withdrawn footer carries the "Withdrawn by …" attribution and
// reason, so this body only anchors the target chip — no rose/red styling
// and no duplicated reason text.
return (
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-sm leading-6 text-foreground">
<span className="font-medium">Withdrawn</span>
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip interaction={interaction} target={target} />
</div>
);
}
if (interaction.status === "expired") {
const expiredByComment = outcome === "superseded_by_comment";
const expiredByIssueClosed = outcome === "issue_closed";
const expiredByTargetChange = outcome === "stale_target";
return (
<div className="space-y-3 rounded-sm border border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-amber-900 dark:text-amber-100">
{/*
* issue_closed already carries its label in the header status badge
* ("Expired · issue closed"), so this eyebrow would duplicate it
* verbatim — only render the eyebrow for the states the header shows
* generically as "Expired".
*/}
{expiredByIssueClosed ? null : (
<div className="text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-amber-700">
{expiredByComment ? "Expired by comment" : "Expired by target change"}
</div>
)}
<p className="leading-6">
{expiredByComment
? "A board comment superseded this confirmation before it was resolved."
: expiredByIssueClosed
? "This confirmation expired automatically when the issue reached a terminal state."
: "The requested target changed before this confirmation was resolved."}
</p>
{expiredByComment && interaction.result?.commentId ? (
<Button asChild size="sm" variant="ghost" className="h-7 px-2 text-amber-950 hover:bg-amber-500/15 dark:text-amber-50">
<a href={`#comment-${interaction.result.commentId}`}>Jump to comment</a>
</Button>
) : null}
{expiredByTargetChange ? (
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2">
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip
interaction={interaction}
target={staleTarget}
tone="subtle"
/>
{isDisplayableRequestConfirmationTarget(staleTarget)
&& isDisplayableRequestConfirmationTarget(target) ? (
<ChevronRight className="h-3.5 w-3.5 text-amber-700" />
) : null}
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip interaction={interaction} target={target} />
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
}
if (interaction.status === "failed") {
return (
<p className="text-sm leading-6 text-muted-foreground">
This request could not be resolved. Try again or create a new request.
</p>
);
}
return null;
}
function ToolActionResolution({
state,
interaction,
}: {
state: ToolActionCardState;
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
}) {
const result = interaction.result?.toolAction;
const [resultOpen, setResultOpen] = useState(false);
const output = state === "executed" ? result?.resultSummary?.trim() : null;
let formattedOutput = output;
if (output) {
try { formattedOutput = JSON.stringify(JSON.parse(output), null, 2); } catch { /* Plain-text results remain readable. */ }
}
const labels = {
pending: "Waiting for approval",
running: "Approved · Running…",
executed: "Succeeded",
failed: "Execution failed",
declined: "Declined",
expired: "Expired",
cancelled: "Cancelled",
};
const Icon = state === "running" ? Loader2 : state === "executed" ? CheckCircle2 : state === "failed" ? AlertTriangle : state === "expired" ? Clock : MinusCircle;
const detail = state === "failed" ? result?.errorMessage?.trim() || "The action could not complete."
: state === "declined" ? interaction.result?.reason?.trim()
: null;
const status = <>
<Icon className={cn("h-3.5 w-3.5 shrink-0", state === "running" && "animate-spin", state === "failed" && "text-destructive")} />
{labels[state]}
{result?.rememberedAction ? " · Always allowed" : ""}
</>;
return (
<div className="space-y-1 text-sm text-muted-foreground" aria-live="polite">
{output ? (
<Collapsible open={resultOpen} onOpenChange={setResultOpen}>
<CollapsibleTrigger asChild>
<button type="button" className="flex items-center gap-1.5 rounded-sm hover:text-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring" aria-label={resultOpen ? "Hide result details" : "Show result details"}>
{status}<ChevronDown className={cn("h-3 w-3", resultOpen && "rotate-180")} />
</button>
</CollapsibleTrigger>
<CollapsibleContent>
<pre className="mt-2 max-h-64 overflow-auto whitespace-pre-wrap break-words rounded-md bg-muted p-3 font-mono text-xs text-foreground">{formattedOutput}</pre>
</CollapsibleContent>
</Collapsible>
) : <p className="flex items-center gap-1.5">{status}</p>}
{detail ? <p className={cn("break-words", state === "failed" && "text-destructive")}>{detail}</p> : null}
{state === "executed" && result?.resultHref?.trim() ? (
<a className="inline-flex items-center gap-1 underline underline-offset-4 hover:text-foreground" href={result.resultHref} target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">View result<ExternalLink className="h-3 w-3" /></a>
) : null}
</div>
);
}
function RequestToolActionCard({
footerSlot,
interaction,
state,
onAcceptInteraction,
onRejectInteraction,
externalReferences,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
state: ToolActionCardState;
onAcceptInteraction?: IssueThreadInteractionCardProps["onAcceptInteraction"];
onRejectInteraction?: (interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction, reason?: string) => Promise<void> | void;
externalReferences?: MarkdownExternalReferenceMap;
}) {
const payload = interaction.payload.toolAction!;
const [working, setWorking] = useState<"accept" | "always" | "reject" | null>(null);
const [actionError, setActionError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const resolutionErrorMessage = useResolutionErrorMessage();
const isPending = state === "pending";
const variant = payload.risk === "destructive" ? "destructive" : "cta";
useEffect(() => {
if (!isPending) setWorking(null);
}, [interaction.id, isPending]);
async function decide(decision: "accept" | "always" | "reject") {
setWorking(decision);
setActionError(null);
try {
if (decision === "reject") await onRejectInteraction?.(interaction);
else await onAcceptInteraction?.(interaction, undefined, undefined, decision === "always");
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
return (
<div className="text-foreground">
<div className="flex items-start gap-3">
<span role="img" aria-label={payload.appDisplayName || payload.toolDisplayName}>
<AppLogo name={payload.appDisplayName || payload.toolDisplayName} size={36} />
</span>
<div className="min-w-0 flex-1 space-y-1 text-sm">
<MarkdownBody externalReferences={externalReferences}>{payload.previewMarkdown || payload.toolDisplayName}</MarkdownBody>
{!isPending ? <ToolActionResolution state={state} interaction={interaction} /> : null}
</div>
</div>
{isPending ? (
<DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot} className="mt-3">
<div className={cn(!footerSlot && "mt-3", "flex flex-wrap items-center justify-end gap-2")}>
<Button size="sm" variant="ghost" disabled={!onRejectInteraction || working !== null} onClick={() => void decide("reject")}>
{working === "reject" ? "Declining…" : "Decline"}
</Button>
<div className="inline-flex" role="group" aria-label="Approve request">
<Button size="sm" variant={variant} className={payload.rememberActionScope ? "rounded-r-none" : undefined} disabled={!onAcceptInteraction || working !== null} onClick={() => void decide("accept")}>
{working === "accept" || working === "always" ? <><Loader2 className="h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />{working === "always" ? "Saving…" : "Approving…"}</> : "Approve & run"}
</Button>
{payload.rememberActionScope ? (
<DropdownMenu>
<DropdownMenuTrigger asChild>
<Button size="icon-sm" variant={variant} className="rounded-l-none border-l border-background/30" aria-label="Approval options" disabled={!onAcceptInteraction || working !== null}>
<ChevronDown className="h-4 w-4" />
</Button>
</DropdownMenuTrigger>
<DropdownMenuContent align="end">
<DropdownMenuItem onSelect={() => void decide("always")} title={payload.rememberActionScope} aria-description={payload.rememberActionScope}>
Always allow
</DropdownMenuItem>
</DropdownMenuContent>
</DropdownMenu>
) : null}
</div>
</div>
</DecisionCardFooter>
) : <DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot} className="mt-3" />}
<InteractionActionError message={actionError} />
</div>
);
}
type SecretProposalCardState = ToolActionCardState;
function secretProposalCardState(
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction,
): SecretProposalCardState {
const proposalStatus = interaction.result?.secretProposal?.status ?? null;
if (interaction.status === "pending") return "pending";
if (proposalStatus === "executed") return "executed";
if (proposalStatus === "failed" || interaction.status === "failed") return "failed";
if (proposalStatus === "expired" || interaction.status === "expired") return "expired";
if (
proposalStatus === "rejected"
|| proposalStatus === "withdrawn"
|| interaction.status === "rejected"
|| interaction.status === "cancelled"
) {
return "declined";
}
return "running";
}
function secretProposalStatusClasses(state: SecretProposalCardState) {
if (state === "failed") {
return {
shell: "border-2 border-red-500/80 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-red-500/60 bg-red-500/10 text-red-900 dark:bg-red-500/15 dark:text-red-100",
label: "FAILED",
Icon: XCircle,
};
}
return toolActionStatusClasses(state);
}
function SecretProposalIdentityHeader({
state,
}: {
state: SecretProposalCardState;
}) {
const dimmed = state === "declined" || state === "expired";
return (
<div className={cn("flex items-start gap-3", dimmed && "opacity-60 grayscale")}>
<div
aria-hidden
className="flex h-10 w-10 shrink-0 items-center justify-center rounded-lg border border-border/70 bg-muted/60 text-foreground"
>
<KeyRound className="h-5 w-5" />
</div>
<div className="min-w-0 flex-1">
<div className="text-base font-bold leading-tight text-foreground">
Bind an existing secret
</div>
</div>
</div>
);
}
function SecretProposalDetails({
payload,
}: {
payload: NonNullable<RequestConfirmationInteraction["payload"]["secretProposal"]>;
}) {
return (
<dl className="grid gap-3 rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-muted/30 p-3 sm:grid-cols-2">
<div className="min-w-0 space-y-1">
<dt className="text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-muted-foreground">
Source secret
</dt>
<dd className="truncate text-sm font-medium text-foreground">{payload.sourceSecretLabel}</dd>
</div>
<div className="min-w-0 space-y-1">
<dt className="text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-muted-foreground">
Target agent
</dt>
<dd className="truncate text-sm font-medium text-foreground">{payload.targetAgentName}</dd>
</div>
<div className="min-w-0 space-y-1 sm:col-span-2">
<dt className="text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-muted-foreground">
New config path
</dt>
<dd className="break-all font-mono text-sm text-foreground">{payload.configPath}</dd>
</div>
</dl>
);
}
function SecretProposalResolution({
interaction,
state,
resolvedByLabel,
}: {
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
state: SecretProposalCardState;
resolvedByLabel: string | null;
}) {
const result = interaction.result?.secretProposal ?? null;
const who = resolvedByLabel ?? "the board";
const when = interaction.resolvedAt
? formatDateTime(interaction.resolvedAt)
: result?.updatedAt
? formatDateTime(result.updatedAt)
: null;
if (state === "running") {
return (
<div aria-live="polite" className="flex items-start gap-2 rounded-sm border border-amber-500/50 bg-amber-500/10 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-amber-900 dark:text-amber-100">
<Loader2 className="mt-0.5 h-4 w-4 shrink-0 animate-spin" />
<div>
<div className="font-medium">Approved by {who} — creating the binding</div>
<p className="mt-1 text-amber-900/80 dark:text-amber-100/80">
Paperclip is re-checking authority and the proposal snapshot before writing.
</p>
</div>
</div>
);
}
if (state === "executed") {
return (
<div aria-live="polite" className="flex items-start gap-2 rounded-sm border border-green-500/50 bg-green-500/10 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-green-900 dark:text-green-100">
<CheckCircle2 className="mt-0.5 h-4 w-4 shrink-0" />
<div>
<div className="font-medium">Binding created · approved by {who}</div>
<p className="mt-1 text-green-900/80 dark:text-green-100/80">
The target agent can now use the proposed config path{when ? ` · ${when}` : ""}.
</p>
</div>
</div>
);
}
if (state === "failed") {
const errorCode = result?.errorCode?.trim();
return (
<div aria-live="assertive" className="space-y-2 rounded-sm border border-red-500/60 bg-red-500/10 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-red-900 dark:text-red-100">
<div className="flex items-start gap-2">
<XCircle className="mt-0.5 h-4 w-4 shrink-0" />
<div>
<div className="font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow)">
FAILED · binding was not created
</div>
<p className="mt-1 text-red-900/80 dark:text-red-100/80">
The request was accepted, but execution failed closed. No secret value was exposed.
</p>
</div>
</div>
{errorCode ? (
<div className="rounded-sm border border-red-500/50 bg-background/60 px-3 py-2">
<span className="text-(length:--text-nano) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow)">
Error code
</span>{" "}
<code className="font-mono text-foreground">{errorCode}</code>
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
}
if (state === "declined") {
const reason = interaction.result?.reason?.trim();
return (
<div className="space-y-2 rounded-sm border border-red-500/50 bg-red-500/10 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-red-900 dark:text-red-100">
<div className="flex items-start gap-2">
<XCircle className="mt-0.5 h-4 w-4 shrink-0" />
<div>
<div className="font-medium">Rejected by {who}</div>
<p className="mt-1 text-red-900/80 dark:text-red-100/80">The binding was not created.</p>
</div>
</div>
{reason ? (
<div className="rounded-sm border border-red-500/40 bg-background/60 px-3 py-2 text-foreground">
<MarkdownBody>{reason}</MarkdownBody>
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
}
return (
<div className="flex items-start gap-2 rounded-sm border border-border bg-muted/50 px-4 py-3 text-sm text-muted-foreground">
<Clock className="mt-0.5 h-4 w-4 shrink-0" />
<div>
<div className="font-medium text-foreground">Proposal expired{when ? ` · ${when}` : ""}</div>
<p className="mt-1">The binding was not created. A fresh proposal is required.</p>
</div>
</div>
);
}
function RequestSecretProposalCard({
footerSlot,
interaction,
state,
resolvedByLabel,
onAcceptInteraction,
onRejectInteraction,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
state: SecretProposalCardState;
resolvedByLabel: string | null;
onAcceptInteraction?: (interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction) => Promise<void> | void;
onRejectInteraction?: (
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction,
reason?: string,
) => Promise<void> | void;
}) {
const payload = interaction.payload.secretProposal!;
const [working, setWorking] = useState<"accept" | "reject" | null>(null);
const [actionError, setActionError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const resolutionErrorMessage = useResolutionErrorMessage();
const isPending = state === "pending";
useEffect(() => {
setActionError(null);
if (!isPending) setWorking(null);
}, [interaction.id, isPending]);
async function handleAccept() {
if (!onAcceptInteraction) return;
setWorking("accept");
setActionError(null);
try {
await onAcceptInteraction(interaction);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
async function handleReject(reason?: string) {
if (!onRejectInteraction) return;
setWorking("reject");
setActionError(null);
try {
await onRejectInteraction(interaction, reason);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
return (
<div className="space-y-4">
<SecretProposalIdentityHeader state={state} />
<SecretProposalDetails payload={payload} />
<ProposalJustification justification={payload.justification} />
<div className="flex items-center gap-2 text-(length:--text-micro) text-muted-foreground">
<Clock className="h-3.5 w-3.5" />
Expires {formatDateTime(payload.expiresAt)}
</div>
{isPending ? (
<ConfirmationActionRow
footerSlot={footerSlot}
resetKey={`${interaction.id}:${interaction.status}`}
approveLabel={interaction.payload.acceptLabel ?? "Approve & bind"}
reviseLabel="Add reason…"
rejectLabel={interaction.payload.rejectLabel ?? "Reject"}
approveVariant="cta"
allowRevise={interaction.payload.allowDeclineReason !== false}
rejectRequiresReason={interaction.payload.rejectRequiresReason === true}
reasonPlaceholder={interaction.payload.declineReasonPlaceholder ?? "Optional: explain why this binding should not be created."}
working={working}
actionError={actionError}
preparingApproval={isInteractionPreparingApproval(interaction)}
canApprove={Boolean(onAcceptInteraction)}
canReject={Boolean(onRejectInteraction)}
onApprove={() => void handleAccept()}
onReject={(reason) => void handleReject(reason)}
stackActionsOnMobile
/>
) : (
<SecretProposalResolution
interaction={interaction}
state={state}
resolvedByLabel={resolvedByLabel}
/>
)}
</div>
);
}
/**
* The single approval grammar shared by every plan / task-approval card
* (PAP-418): **Approve · Revise… · Reject**. "Revise…" reveals an attached text
* field for the changes you want (the former "decline with a reason" path);
* bare "Reject" sends the work back with no note. These are the default words —
* producers may still override the accept/reject labels for domain-specific
* confirmations (e.g. "Delete selected"), but the shape stays consistent.
*/
const CONFIRMATION_APPROVE_LABEL = "Approve";
const CONFIRMATION_REVISE_LABEL = "Revise…";
const CONFIRMATION_REJECT_LABEL = "Reject";
/**
* The one action control every confirmation card renders (PAP-418), collapsing
* what used to be a two-button card plus a separate sticky Plan-pane bar into a
* single consistent surface. Producer flags tune which affordances appear:
* `allowDeclineReason: false` drops the Revise… path so only Approve/Reject
* remain; `rejectRequiresReason: true` drops the bare Reject so every rejection
* carries a note. The revise text stays attached to the card.
*/
function ConfirmationActionRow({
footerSlot,
resetKey,
approveLabel,
reviseLabel = CONFIRMATION_REVISE_LABEL,
rejectLabel,
approveVariant = "default",
primaryActionOnRight = false,
allowRevise,
rejectRequiresReason,
reasonPlaceholder,
working,
actionError,
approveDisabled = false,
preparingApproval = false,
canApprove,
canReject,
onApprove,
onReject,
composeReason,
extraReasonSatisfied = false,
revisePanelChildren,
stackActionsOnMobile = false,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
/** Changing this (interaction id + status) collapses the revise panel and
* clears its draft text — the row is reused across interaction updates. */
resetKey: string;
approveLabel: string;
reviseLabel?: string;
rejectLabel: string;
approveVariant?: React.ComponentProps<typeof Button>["variant"];
primaryActionOnRight?: boolean;
allowRevise: boolean;
rejectRequiresReason: boolean;
reasonPlaceholder: string;
working: "accept" | "reject" | null;
actionError: string | null;
approveDisabled?: boolean;
preparingApproval?: boolean;
canApprove: boolean;
canReject: boolean;
onApprove: () => void;
onReject: (reason: string | undefined) => void;
/** Compose the final reject reason from the typed text (plan cards append
* screenshot markdown here). */
composeReason?: (text: string) => string | undefined;
/** A required reason is already satisfied by an attachment (e.g. screenshots),
* so an empty text box should not block sending the revision. */
extraReasonSatisfied?: boolean;
/** Extra affordances rendered inside the revise panel (e.g. screenshot attach). */
revisePanelChildren?: ReactNode;
/** Give domain cards with longer action labels an intentional narrow-screen
* hierarchy instead of relying on opportunistic flex wrapping. */
stackActionsOnMobile?: boolean;
}) {
const [revising, setRevising] = useState(false);
const { enabled: coordinatorEnabled } = useCoordinatorWorkspaceEnabled();
const [reason, setReason] = useState("");
const [attempted, setAttempted] = useState(false);
useEffect(() => {
setRevising(false);
setReason("");
setAttempted(false);
}, [resetKey]);
const trimmed = reason.trim();
const reasonMissing = rejectRequiresReason && trimmed.length === 0 && !extraReasonSatisfied;
function submitRevision() {
setAttempted(true);
if (!canReject || reasonMissing) return;
onReject(composeReason ? composeReason(reason) : trimmed || undefined);
}
return (
<div className="space-y-3">
{preparingApproval ? <InteractionPreparationNotice /> : null}
<DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot} className={coordinatorEnabled && revising ? "hidden" : undefined}>
<div
data-testid="confirmation-actions"
hidden={coordinatorEnabled && revising}
data-mobile-layout={stackActionsOnMobile ? "stacked" : "inline"}
className={cn(
stackActionsOnMobile
? "grid grid-cols-2 items-stretch gap-2 sm:flex sm:flex-wrap sm:items-center sm:justify-end"
: "flex flex-wrap items-center justify-end gap-2",
primaryActionOnRight && "flex-row-reverse justify-start",
coordinatorEnabled && revising && "hidden",
)}
>
<Button
size="sm"
variant={revising ? "outline" : approveVariant}
className={stackActionsOnMobile ? "col-span-2 w-full sm:col-auto sm:w-auto" : undefined}
disabled={!canApprove || working !== null || approveDisabled || preparingApproval}
onClick={onApprove}
>
{working === "accept" ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Approving…
</>
) : (
approveLabel
)}
</Button>
{allowRevise ? (
<Button
size="sm"
variant="outline"
className={stackActionsOnMobile ? "w-full sm:w-auto" : undefined}
disabled={!canReject || working !== null}
onClick={() => {
setAttempted(false);
setRevising((current) => !current);
}}
>
{reviseLabel}
</Button>
) : null}
{!rejectRequiresReason ? (
<Button
size="sm"
variant="ghost"
className={stackActionsOnMobile ? "w-full sm:w-auto" : undefined}
disabled={!canReject || working !== null}
onClick={() => onReject(undefined)}
>
{working === "reject" && !revising ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Rejecting…
</>
) : (
rejectLabel
)}
</Button>
) : null}
</div>
</DecisionCardFooter>
{revising ? (
<div className="space-y-3 rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-background/75 p-3">
<Textarea
value={reason}
onChange={(event) => setReason(event.target.value)}
placeholder={reasonPlaceholder}
aria-invalid={attempted && reasonMissing}
className={cn(
"min-h-24 bg-background text-sm",
attempted && reasonMissing && "border-rose-500 focus-visible:ring-rose-500/25",
)}
/>
{attempted && reasonMissing ? (
<p className="text-xs text-destructive">Add a note describing the changes you want.</p>
) : null}
{revisePanelChildren}
<DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot}>
<div className="flex flex-wrap justify-end gap-2">
<Button
size="sm"
variant="ghost"
disabled={working !== null}
onClick={() => {
setRevising(false);
setAttempted(false);
}}
>
Cancel
</Button>
<Button
size="sm"
variant="outline"
disabled={!canReject || working !== null}
onClick={submitRevision}
>
{working === "reject" ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Sending…
</>
) : (
"Send revision"
)}
</Button>
</div>
</DecisionCardFooter>
</div>
) : null}
<InteractionActionError message={actionError} />
</div>
);
}
function connectionAuthorizationStatusClasses(
state: ConnectionAuthorizationCardState,
copy: { providerName: string; addresseeLabel: string },
): {
shell: string;
badge: string;
label: string;
Icon: typeof CheckCircle2;
} {
switch (state) {
case "actionable":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-sky-500/70 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-sky-500/60 bg-sky-500/10 text-sky-900 dark:bg-sky-500/15 dark:text-sky-100",
label: "Action required",
Icon: KeyRound,
};
case "waiting":
// Not a warning and not a failure: someone else's decision is simply
// outstanding. The calm inert lane keeps it out of the reader's queue.
return {
shell: "border-border bg-transparent",
badge: "border-border bg-muted/60 text-muted-foreground",
label: `Waiting for ${copy.addresseeLabel}`,
Icon: Clock,
};
case "connected":
return {
shell: "border-2 border-green-500/80 bg-transparent",
badge: "border-green-500/60 bg-green-500/10 text-green-900 dark:bg-green-500/15 dark:text-green-100",
label: `${copy.providerName} connected`,
Icon: CheckCircle2,
};
case "declined":
return {
shell: "border-border bg-transparent",
badge: "border-border bg-muted/60 text-muted-foreground",
label: "Not connected",
Icon: MinusCircle,
};
case "expired":
default:
return {
shell: "border-border bg-transparent",
badge: "border-border bg-muted/60 text-muted-foreground",
label: "Authorization expired",
Icon: CircleDashed,
};
}
}
/**
* Connection authorization — "Connect your Gmail to continue" (PAP-17796
* Surface F, corrected in PAP-17859).
*
* This is deliberately *not* the generic Approve / Revise… / Reject grammar it
* used to fall through to. Authorization is not a review: there is nothing to
* revise, "Reject" is the wrong word for declining to link your own account,
* and only one person in the company can answer at all. So the card composes
* one title, one body, and exactly the affordances the reader legitimately has:
*
* - the addressed person gets the single primary **Connect <Provider>** target
* plus a plain **Not now**;
* - anybody else gets **Waiting for <Person>** and no action at all — a
* policy-forbidden action is omitted, never rendered disabled, and the card
* must not imply a teammate can consent on their behalf;
* - once resolved it states the outcome, who resolved it, and when.
*
* The primary action is a link to the server-minted authorization URL, not an
* accept call: the OAuth callback is what resolves this interaction, so the
* card never claims success the provider has not granted.
*/
function RequestConnectionAuthorizationCard({
footerSlot,
interaction,
state,
isAddressee,
providerName,
addresseeLabel,
requestingAgentLabel,
resolvedByLabel,
resolvedByAgent,
onRejectInteraction,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
state: ConnectionAuthorizationCardState;
/** Is the signed-in reader the person the server addressed? */
isAddressee: boolean;
providerName: string;
addresseeLabel: string;
requestingAgentLabel: string | null;
resolvedByLabel: string | null;
resolvedByAgent: boolean;
onRejectInteraction?: (
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction,
reason?: string,
) => Promise<void> | void;
}) {
const [working, setWorking] = useState(false);
const [actionError, setActionError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const resolutionErrorMessage = useResolutionErrorMessage();
const href = connectionAuthorizationHref(interaction);
const declineReason = getAdministrativeReason(interaction);
useEffect(() => {
setActionError(null);
setWorking(false);
}, [interaction.id, interaction.status]);
async function handleNotNow() {
if (!onRejectInteraction) return;
setWorking(true);
setActionError(null);
try {
await onRejectInteraction(interaction);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(false);
}
}
// One body, composed here rather than split between the header summary and a
// payload prompt that repeats the title.
//
// The server's summary is written in the second person ("needs *your* Gmail
// identity for work running as *you*") because the server addressed one
// person. Shown to a teammate it names the wrong account, so a reader who is
// not the addressee gets the same fact stated about them. Caught by rendering
// the card, not by reading it.
const agentLabel = requestingAgentLabel ?? "An agent";
const lead = isAddressee
? interaction.summary?.trim()
|| `${agentLabel} needs your ${providerName} identity for work running as you.`
: `${agentLabel} ${state === "connected" ? "needed" : "needs"} ${addresseeLabel}'s ${providerName} identity for work running as them.`;
// Only the actionable state needs the consent boundary spelled out; the other
// states carry it in their own status line.
const consentSentence = state === "actionable" ? "No one else can complete this step." : null;
return (
<div className="space-y-4">
<p
className="max-w-3xl text-sm leading-6 text-muted-foreground"
data-testid="connection-authorization-body"
>
{consentSentence ? `${lead} ${consentSentence}` : lead}
</p>
{state === "actionable" ? (
<div className="space-y-3">
{href ? (
<DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot}>
<div
data-testid="connection-authorization-actions"
className="grid grid-cols-1 items-stretch gap-2 sm:flex sm:flex-wrap sm:items-center sm:justify-end"
>
<Button asChild size="sm" variant="cta" className="w-full sm:w-auto">
<a href={href} target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">
Connect {providerName}
<ArrowUpRight className="ml-1.5 h-3.5 w-3.5" />
</a>
</Button>
<Button
size="sm"
variant="ghost"
className="w-full sm:w-auto"
disabled={!onRejectInteraction || working}
onClick={() => void handleNotNow()}
>
{working ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Saving…
</>
) : (
"Not now"
)}
</Button>
</div>
</DecisionCardFooter>
) : (
// A pending card with no usable target is a server-side gap, not an
// invitation to reuse an old URL.
<ConnectionAuthorizationStatusLine
Icon={TriangleAlert}
testId="connection-authorization-no-target"
headline="This authorization link is unavailable"
detail={`Ask ${requestingAgentLabel ?? "the agent"} to send a fresh ${providerName} authorization link.`}
/>
)}
<InteractionActionError message={actionError} />
</div>
) : state === "waiting" ? (
<ConnectionAuthorizationStatusLine
Icon={Clock}
testId="connection-authorization-waiting"
headline={`Waiting for ${addresseeLabel}`}
detail={`Only ${addresseeLabel} can connect their own ${providerName} account.`}
/>
) : state === "connected" ? (
<ConnectionAuthorizationStatusLine
Icon={CheckCircle2}
testId="connection-authorization-connected"
headline={`${providerName} connected`}
detail={
<>
Connected by{" "}
<span className="font-medium text-foreground">
{/* "You" is display-cased for a badge; this is mid-sentence. */}
{(resolvedByLabel ?? addresseeLabel) === "You" ? "you" : resolvedByLabel ?? addresseeLabel}
</span>
{resolvedByAgent ? <ResolvedByAgentChip /> : null}
{interaction.resolvedAt ? ` on ${formatDateTime(interaction.resolvedAt)}` : ""}
</>
}
/>
) : (
// Declined or expired. No Connect action: the authorization target this
// card carried is spent, and the agent asks again with a fresh one
// rather than the board replaying a dead URL.
<ConnectionAuthorizationStatusLine
Icon={state === "declined" ? MinusCircle : CircleDashed}
testId={state === "declined" ? "connection-authorization-declined" : "connection-authorization-expired"}
headline={state === "declined" ? `${providerName} was not connected` : "This authorization request expired"}
detail={
declineReason
?? `${requestingAgentLabel ?? "The agent"} can ask again with a new ${providerName} authorization link.`
}
/>
)}
</div>
);
}
function ConnectionAuthorizationStatusLine({
Icon,
testId,
headline,
detail,
}: {
Icon: typeof CheckCircle2;
testId: string;
headline: string;
detail: ReactNode;
}) {
return (
<div
data-testid={testId}
className="flex items-start gap-2 rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-muted/30 p-3"
>
<Icon className="mt-0.5 h-4 w-4 shrink-0 text-muted-foreground" />
<div className="min-w-0 space-y-0.5 text-sm">
<div className="font-medium text-foreground">{headline}</div>
<div className="leading-6 text-muted-foreground">{detail}</div>
</div>
</div>
);
}
function RequestConfirmationCard({
footerSlot,
interaction,
compact = false,
isPlan = false,
primaryActionOnRight = false,
onAcceptInteraction,
onRejectInteraction,
onUploadImage,
externalReferences,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction;
compact?: boolean;
isPlan?: boolean;
primaryActionOnRight?: boolean;
onAcceptInteraction?: (
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction,
) => Promise<void> | void;
onRejectInteraction?: (
interaction: RequestConfirmationInteraction,
reason?: string,
) => Promise<void> | void;
onUploadImage?: (file: File) => Promise<string>;
externalReferences?: MarkdownExternalReferenceMap;
}) {
const [working, setWorking] = useState<"accept" | "reject" | null>(null);
const [actionError, setActionError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const resolutionErrorMessage = useResolutionErrorMessage();
const [shots, setShots] = useState<{ name: string; url: string }[]>([]);
const [uploading, setUploading] = useState(false);
const [uploadError, setUploadError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const fileInputRef = useRef<HTMLInputElement | null>(null);
// Screenshots ride along in the revise note as markdown image refs so the
// board can attach images when sending a plan back — no schema change needed.
const allowScreenshots = isPlan && Boolean(onUploadImage);
const rejectRequiresReason = interaction.payload.rejectRequiresReason === true;
const allowRevise = interaction.payload.allowDeclineReason !== false;
const reasonPlaceholder =
interaction.payload.declineReasonPlaceholder
?? (interaction.payload.acceptLabel === "Approve plan"
? "Optional: what would you like revised?"
: "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.");
useEffect(() => {
setActionError(null);
setShots([]);
setUploadError(null);
if (interaction.status !== "pending") {
setWorking(null);
}
}, [interaction.id, interaction.result?.reason, interaction.status]);
async function handleAddScreenshots(files: FileList | null) {
if (!onUploadImage || !files || files.length === 0) return;
setUploadError(null);
setUploading(true);
try {
const uploaded: { name: string; url: string }[] = [];
for (const file of Array.from(files)) {
if (!file.type.startsWith("image/")) continue;
const url = await onUploadImage(file);
uploaded.push({ name: file.name || "screenshot", url });
}
if (uploaded.length > 0) setShots((current) => [...current, ...uploaded]);
} catch {
setUploadError("Couldn't upload that image. Try again.");
} finally {
setUploading(false);
}
}
function composeReason(text: string) {
const trimmed = text.trim();
if (shots.length === 0) return trimmed || undefined;
const images = shots.map((s) => `![${s.name}](${s.url})`).join("\n");
return [trimmed, images].filter(Boolean).join("\n\n");
}
async function handleAccept() {
if (!onAcceptInteraction) return;
setWorking("accept");
setActionError(null);
try {
await onAcceptInteraction(interaction);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
async function handleReject(reason: string | undefined) {
if (!onRejectInteraction) return;
setWorking("reject");
setActionError(null);
try {
await onRejectInteraction(interaction, reason);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
return (
<div className="space-y-4">
{interaction.status === "pending" ? (
<div className={compact ? "space-y-3" : "space-y-3 rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-background/75 p-4"}>
<div data-decision-prompt={compact ? true : undefined} className={compact ? "text-lg font-medium leading-relaxed text-foreground" : "text-sm leading-6 text-foreground"}>
{interaction.payload.prompt}
</div>
{interaction.payload.detailsMarkdown ? (
compact ? <details className="group/confirmation-details">
<summary className="flex cursor-pointer list-none items-center gap-1 rounded-sm text-xs font-medium text-muted-foreground hover:text-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring">
<ChevronRight aria-hidden className="h-3.5 w-3.5 transition-transform group-open/confirmation-details:rotate-90 motion-reduce:transition-none" />
Details
</summary>
<div className="mt-2 rounded-sm bg-muted/40 px-2.5 py-2 text-sm text-muted-foreground">
<MarkdownBody externalReferences={externalReferences}>{interaction.payload.detailsMarkdown}</MarkdownBody>
</div>
</details> : <div className="border-t border-border/60 pt-3 text-sm">
<MarkdownBody externalReferences={externalReferences}>{interaction.payload.detailsMarkdown}</MarkdownBody>
</div>
) : null}
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip
interaction={interaction}
target={interaction.payload.target}
/>
</div>
) : null}
{interaction.status === "pending" ? (
<ConfirmationActionRow
footerSlot={footerSlot}
resetKey={`${interaction.id}:${interaction.status}`}
approveLabel={interaction.payload.acceptLabel ?? CONFIRMATION_APPROVE_LABEL}
rejectLabel={CONFIRMATION_REJECT_LABEL}
approveVariant={isPlan ? "cta" : "default"}
primaryActionOnRight={primaryActionOnRight}
allowRevise={allowRevise}
rejectRequiresReason={rejectRequiresReason}
reasonPlaceholder={reasonPlaceholder}
working={working}
actionError={actionError}
preparingApproval={isInteractionPreparingApproval(interaction)}
canApprove={Boolean(onAcceptInteraction)}
canReject={Boolean(onRejectInteraction)}
onApprove={() => void handleAccept()}
onReject={(reason) => void handleReject(reason)}
composeReason={composeReason}
extraReasonSatisfied={shots.length > 0}
revisePanelChildren={
allowScreenshots ? (
<div className="space-y-2">
{shots.length > 0 ? (
<div className="flex flex-wrap gap-2">
{shots.map((shot, index) => (
<div
key={`${shot.url}-${index}`}
className="group relative h-16 w-16 overflow-hidden rounded-sm border border-border/70"
>
<img
src={shot.url}
alt={shot.name}
className="h-full w-full object-cover"
/>
<button
type="button"
aria-label={`Remove ${shot.name}`}
className="absolute right-0.5 top-0.5 rounded-full bg-background/90 p-0.5 text-foreground opacity-0 transition-opacity group-hover:opacity-100"
onClick={() =>
setShots((current) => current.filter((_, i) => i !== index))
}
>
<X className="h-3 w-3" />
</button>
</div>
))}
</div>
) : null}
<input
ref={fileInputRef}
type="file"
accept="image/*"
multiple
className="hidden"
onChange={(event) => {
void handleAddScreenshots(event.target.value ? event.target.files : null);
event.target.value = "";
}}
/>
<Button
type="button"
size="sm"
variant="outline"
disabled={working !== null || uploading}
onClick={() => fileInputRef.current?.click()}
>
{uploading ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5 animate-spin" />
Uploading...
</>
) : (
<>
<ImagePlus className="mr-2 h-3.5 w-3.5" />
Attach screenshots
</>
)}
</Button>
{uploadError ? (
<p className="text-xs text-destructive">{uploadError}</p>
) : null}
</div>
) : null
}
/>
) : (
<RequestConfirmationResolution interaction={interaction} />
)}
</div>
);
}
const CHECKBOX_SUMMARY_LABEL_LIMIT = 8;
function RequestCheckboxConfirmationResolution({
interaction,
}: {
interaction: RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction;
}) {
const target = interaction.payload.target ?? null;
const [expanded, setExpanded] = useState(false);
if (interaction.status === "accepted") {
const totalOptions = interaction.payload.options.length;
const selectedLabels = getCheckboxConfirmationSelectedLabels({
payload: interaction.payload,
result: interaction.result,
});
const selectedCount = interaction.result?.selectedOptionIds?.length ?? selectedLabels.length;
const visibleLabels = expanded
? selectedLabels
: selectedLabels.slice(0, CHECKBOX_SUMMARY_LABEL_LIMIT);
const hiddenCount = selectedLabels.length - CHECKBOX_SUMMARY_LABEL_LIMIT;
const hasHiddenLabels = hiddenCount > 0;
const chipClassName =
"inline-flex items-center rounded-sm border border-border/60 bg-transparent px-2 py-0.5 text-(length:--text-nano) font-medium uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-muted-foreground";
return (
<div className="space-y-3">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-sm leading-6 text-foreground">
<span className="font-medium">
{selectedCount === 0
? "Confirmed with no options selected"
: `Confirmed ${selectedCount} of ${totalOptions} ${totalOptions === 1 ? "option" : "options"}`}
</span>
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip interaction={interaction} target={target} />
</div>
{visibleLabels.length > 0 ? (
<div className="flex flex-wrap gap-1.5">
{visibleLabels.map((label, index) => (
<TaskField key={`${label}-${index}`} label="Selected" value={label} />
))}
{hasHiddenLabels ? (
<button
type="button"
onClick={() => setExpanded((current) => !current)}
className={cn(
chipClassName,
"cursor-pointer transition-colors hover:border-border hover:text-foreground focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-1",
)}
aria-expanded={expanded}
>
{expanded ? "Show less" : `+${hiddenCount} more`}
</button>
) : null}
</div>
) : null}
</div>
);
}
if (interaction.status === "rejected") {
return <RequestConfirmationResolution interaction={interaction as unknown as RequestConfirmationInteraction} />;
}
if (interaction.status === "expired") {
return <RequestConfirmationResolution interaction={interaction as unknown as RequestConfirmationInteraction} />;
}
if (interaction.status === "failed") {
return (
<p className="text-sm leading-6 text-muted-foreground">
This request could not be resolved. Try again or create a new request.
</p>
);
}
return null;
}
function CheckboxOptionRow({
id,
label,
description,
checked,
disabled,
onToggle,
}: {
id: string;
label: string;
description?: string | null;
checked: boolean;
disabled: boolean;
onToggle: (checked: boolean) => void;
}) {
return (
<label
htmlFor={id}
className={cn(
"flex cursor-pointer items-start gap-2.5 border-b border-border/60 px-3 py-2 last:border-b-0 transition-colors",
checked ? "bg-sky-500/10" : "hover:bg-sky-500/5",
disabled && "cursor-not-allowed opacity-60",
)}
>
<Checkbox
id={id}
checked={checked}
disabled={disabled}
onCheckedChange={(value) => onToggle(value === true)}
aria-label={label}
className="mt-0.5"
/>
<div className="min-w-0 flex-1">
<div className="text-sm font-medium leading-5 text-foreground">{label}</div>
{description ? (
<p className="mt-0.5 text-sm leading-5 text-muted-foreground">{description}</p>
) : null}
</div>
</label>
);
}
function RequestCheckboxConfirmationCard({
footerSlot,
interaction,
primaryActionOnRight = false,
onAcceptInteraction,
onRejectInteraction,
externalReferences,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
interaction: RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction;
primaryActionOnRight?: boolean;
onAcceptInteraction?: (
interaction: RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction,
selectedClientKeys: undefined,
selectedOptionIds: string[],
) => Promise<void> | void;
onRejectInteraction?: (
interaction: RequestCheckboxConfirmationInteraction,
reason?: string,
) => Promise<void> | void;
externalReferences?: MarkdownExternalReferenceMap;
}) {
const options = interaction.payload.options;
const optionIds = useMemo(() => options.map((option) => option.id), [options]);
const validOptionIds = useMemo(() => new Set(optionIds), [optionIds]);
const minSelected = interaction.payload.minSelected ?? 0;
const maxSelected = interaction.payload.maxSelected ?? null;
const defaultSelected = useMemo(
() =>
new Set(
(interaction.payload.defaultSelectedOptionIds ?? []).filter((id) => validOptionIds.has(id)),
),
[interaction.payload.defaultSelectedOptionIds, validOptionIds],
);
const [selectedOptionIds, setSelectedOptionIds] = useState<Set<string>>(() => new Set(defaultSelected));
const [working, setWorking] = useState<"accept" | "reject" | null>(null);
const [acceptAttempted, setAcceptAttempted] = useState(false);
const [actionError, setActionError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const resolutionErrorMessage = useResolutionErrorMessage();
const optionSeed = useMemo(() => optionIds.join("\n"), [optionIds]);
useEffect(() => {
setSelectedOptionIds(new Set(defaultSelected));
setAcceptAttempted(false);
setActionError(null);
if (interaction.status !== "pending") {
setWorking(null);
}
}, [interaction.id, interaction.status, interaction.result?.reason, defaultSelected, optionSeed]);
const rejectRequiresReason = interaction.payload.rejectRequiresReason === true;
const allowRevise = interaction.payload.allowDeclineReason !== false;
const reasonPlaceholder =
interaction.payload.declineReasonPlaceholder ?? "Optional: tell the agent what you'd change.";
const selectedCount = selectedOptionIds.size;
const totalOptions = options.length;
const atMax = maxSelected != null && selectedCount >= maxSelected;
const belowMin = selectedCount < minSelected;
const aboveMax = maxSelected != null && selectedCount > maxSelected;
const selectionValid = !belowMin && !aboveMax;
const validationMessage = belowMin
? minSelected === 1
? "Select at least 1 option."
: `Select at least ${minSelected} options.`
: aboveMax && maxSelected != null
? maxSelected === 1
? "Select at most 1 option."
: `Select at most ${maxSelected} options.`
: null;
function toggleOption(optionId: string, checked: boolean) {
setSelectedOptionIds((current) => {
const next = new Set(current);
if (checked) {
next.add(optionId);
} else {
next.delete(optionId);
}
return next;
});
}
function handleSelectAll() {
const capped = maxSelected != null ? optionIds.slice(0, maxSelected) : optionIds;
setSelectedOptionIds(new Set(capped));
}
function handleClearSelection() {
setSelectedOptionIds(new Set());
}
async function handleAccept() {
setAcceptAttempted(true);
if (!onAcceptInteraction || !selectionValid) return;
setWorking("accept");
setActionError(null);
try {
await onAcceptInteraction(interaction, undefined, [...selectedOptionIds]);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
async function handleReject(reason: string | undefined) {
if (!onRejectInteraction) return;
setWorking("reject");
setActionError(null);
try {
await onRejectInteraction(interaction, reason);
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
} finally {
setWorking(null);
}
}
if (interaction.status !== "pending") {
return (
<div className="space-y-4">
<RequestCheckboxConfirmationResolution interaction={interaction} />
</div>
);
}
const selectionSummary = totalOptions > 0 && selectedCount === totalOptions
? `All ${totalOptions} options selected`
: `${selectedCount} of ${totalOptions} ${totalOptions === 1 ? "option" : "options"} selected`;
const boundsHint = maxSelected != null
? `Pick ${minSelected === maxSelected ? `exactly ${maxSelected}` : `${minSelected}-${maxSelected}`}.`
: minSelected > 0
? `Pick at least ${minSelected}.`
: null;
return (
<div className="space-y-4">
<div className="space-y-3 rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-background/75 p-4">
{/* Show each piece of state once: a connection-authorization prompt is
the same sentence as the card title, so repeating it here is noise. */}
{interaction.payload.prompt === interaction.title ? null : (
<div className="text-sm leading-6 text-foreground">{interaction.payload.prompt}</div>
)}
{interaction.payload.detailsMarkdown ? (
<div className="border-t border-border/60 pt-3 text-sm">
<MarkdownBody externalReferences={externalReferences}>{interaction.payload.detailsMarkdown}</MarkdownBody>
</div>
) : null}
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip
interaction={interaction}
target={interaction.payload.target}
/>
</div>
<div className="space-y-3">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center justify-between gap-2">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 text-xs text-muted-foreground">
<span>{selectionSummary}</span>
{boundsHint ? <span>{boundsHint}</span> : null}
</div>
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2">
<Button
size="sm"
variant="ghost"
disabled={working !== null || selectedCount === totalOptions || (maxSelected != null && selectedCount >= maxSelected)}
onClick={handleSelectAll}
>
Select all
</Button>
<Button
size="sm"
variant="ghost"
disabled={working !== null || selectedCount === 0}
onClick={handleClearSelection}
>
Clear selection
</Button>
</div>
</div>
<div
role="group"
aria-label="Selectable options"
className="max-h-80 overflow-y-auto rounded-sm border border-border/70"
>
{options.map((option) => {
const checked = selectedOptionIds.has(option.id);
return (
<CheckboxOptionRow
key={option.id}
id={`${interaction.id}-${option.id}`}
label={option.label}
description={option.description}
checked={checked}
disabled={working !== null || (!checked && atMax)}
onToggle={(value) => toggleOption(option.id, value)}
/>
);
})}
</div>
{acceptAttempted && validationMessage ? (
<p className="text-xs text-destructive">{validationMessage}</p>
) : null}
<ConfirmationActionRow
footerSlot={footerSlot}
resetKey={`${interaction.id}:${interaction.status}`}
approveLabel={interaction.payload.acceptLabel ?? CONFIRMATION_APPROVE_LABEL}
rejectLabel={interaction.payload.rejectLabel ?? CONFIRMATION_REJECT_LABEL}
primaryActionOnRight={primaryActionOnRight}
allowRevise={allowRevise}
rejectRequiresReason={rejectRequiresReason}
reasonPlaceholder={reasonPlaceholder}
working={working}
actionError={actionError}
preparingApproval={isInteractionPreparingApproval(interaction)}
canApprove={Boolean(onAcceptInteraction)}
canReject={Boolean(onRejectInteraction)}
onApprove={() => void handleAccept()}
onReject={(reason) => void handleReject(reason)}
/>
</div>
</div>
);
}
// --- Per-item verdicts (C3) ---------------------------------------------
const VERDICT_LABEL: Record<RequestItemVerdictValue, string> = {
approve: "Approve",
reject: "Reject",
defer: "Defer",
};
/** Present-tense past-participle label for a resolved verdict chip. */
const VERDICT_RESOLVED_LABEL: Record<RequestItemVerdictValue, string> = {
approve: "Approved",
reject: "Rejected",
defer: "Deferred",
};
function verdictChipClasses(verdict: RequestItemVerdictValue) {
switch (verdict) {
case "approve":
return "border-emerald-500/60 bg-emerald-500/10 text-emerald-900 dark:bg-emerald-500/15 dark:text-emerald-100";
case "reject":
return "border-rose-500/60 bg-rose-500/10 text-rose-900 dark:bg-rose-500/15 dark:text-rose-100";
default:
return "border-border/70 bg-muted/40 text-muted-foreground";
}
}
function VerdictConsequenceChip({ verdict }: { verdict: RequestItemVerdictValue }) {
const Icon = verdict === "approve" ? CheckCircle2 : verdict === "reject" ? XCircle : MinusCircle;
return (
<span
className={cn(
"inline-flex items-center gap-1 rounded-sm border px-2 py-0.5 text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow)",
verdictChipClasses(verdict),
)}
>
<Icon className="h-3.5 w-3.5" aria-hidden />
{VERDICT_RESOLVED_LABEL[verdict]}
</span>
);
}
function ItemVerdictDeepLink({ item, interaction }: { item: RequestItemVerdictsItem; interaction: RequestItemVerdictsInteraction }) {
const href = itemVerdictHref(item, interaction);
if (!href) return null;
const isInternal = !href.startsWith("/api/") && (href.startsWith("/") || href.startsWith("#"));
const className =
"inline-flex items-center gap-1 text-xs font-medium text-primary hover:underline focus-visible:outline-none focus-visible:ring-2 focus-visible:ring-ring focus-visible:ring-offset-1";
const label = (
<>
Open
{isInternal ? <ArrowUpRight className="h-3 w-3" aria-hidden /> : <ExternalLink className="h-3 w-3" aria-hidden />}
</>
);
if (isInternal) {
return (
<Link to={href} className={className}>
{label}
</Link>
);
}
return (
<a href={href} target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" className={className}>
{label}
</a>
);
}
function ItemVerdictSegmentedControl({
itemId,
verdicts,
value,
disabled,
onSelect,
}: {
itemId: string;
verdicts: RequestItemVerdictValue[];
value: RequestItemVerdictValue | null;
disabled: boolean;
onSelect: (verdict: RequestItemVerdictValue) => void;
}) {
return (
<div
role="group"
aria-label="Choose a verdict"
className="flex shrink-0 flex-wrap items-center gap-2"
>
{verdicts.map((verdict) => {
const active = value === verdict;
const variant = verdict === "reject"
? (active ? "destructive" : "outline")
: verdict === "approve"
? (active ? "default" : "outline")
: (active ? "secondary" : "outline");
const Icon = verdict === "approve" ? Check : verdict === "reject" ? X : MinusCircle;
return (
<Button
key={verdict}
type="button"
size="sm"
variant={variant}
disabled={disabled}
aria-pressed={active}
aria-label={`${VERDICT_LABEL[verdict]} this item`}
className="min-h-11 min-w-24"
onClick={() => onSelect(verdict)}
data-verdict={verdict}
data-item-id={itemId}
data-active={active}
>
<Icon className="h-4 w-4" aria-hidden />
{VERDICT_LABEL[verdict]}
</Button>
);
})}
</div>
);
}
interface VerdictDraft {
verdict: RequestItemVerdictValue;
reason: string;
}
function RequestItemVerdictsCard({
footerSlot,
interaction,
onSubmitInteractionVerdicts,
externalReferences,
}: {
footerSlot?: ReactNode;
interaction: RequestItemVerdictsInteraction;
onSubmitInteractionVerdicts?: (
interaction: RequestItemVerdictsInteraction,
verdicts: { id: string; verdict: RequestItemVerdictValue; reason?: string }[],
) => Promise<void> | void;
externalReferences?: MarkdownExternalReferenceMap;
}) {
const payload = interaction.payload;
const items = payload.items;
const enabledVerdicts = useMemo<RequestItemVerdictValue[]>(
() => payload.verdicts ?? ["approve", "reject"],
[payload.verdicts],
);
const requireReasonOn = useMemo(
() => new Set<RequestItemVerdictValue>(payload.requireReasonOn ?? ["reject"]),
[payload.requireReasonOn],
);
const allowBulkApprove = payload.allowBulkApprove !== false && enabledVerdicts.includes("approve");
const reasonLabel = payload.reasonLabel ?? "Reason";
const resolvedById = useMemo(
() => new Map<string, RequestItemVerdictsResultItem>((interaction.result?.items ?? []).map((item) => [item.id, item])),
[interaction.result],
);
const [drafts, setDrafts] = useState<Map<string, VerdictDraft>>(new Map());
const [applyingItemIds, setApplyingItemIds] = useState<Set<string>>(new Set());
const [working, setWorking] = useState(false);
const [attempted, setAttempted] = useState(false);
const [actionError, setActionError] = useState<string | null>(null);
const resolutionErrorMessage = useResolutionErrorMessage();
// When the server merges newly-resolved items, drop their local drafts and
// clear the applying/working state so the terminal chips take over (S3 → S4).
useEffect(() => {
setDrafts((current) => {
let changed = false;
const next = new Map(current);
for (const id of [...next.keys()]) {
if (resolvedById.has(id)) {
next.delete(id);
changed = true;
}
}
return changed ? next : current;
});
setApplyingItemIds(new Set());
setWorking(false);
setActionError(null);
}, [resolvedById]);
const progress = getItemVerdictProgress({ payload, result: interaction.result });
const isTerminal = interaction.status !== "pending";
const isExpired = interaction.status === "expired";
const isComplete = interaction.status === "answered" || progress.decided === progress.total;
const draftEntries = [...drafts.entries()];
const draftCount = draftEntries.length;
const invalidDraftIds = new Set(
draftEntries
.filter(([, draft]) => requireReasonOn.has(draft.verdict) && draft.reason.trim().length === 0)
.map(([id]) => id),
);
// Apply is enabled as soon as there is ≥1 draft (spec §1). If a required
// reject reason is missing, clicking Apply reveals the inline error instead
// of silently submitting — the reason gates the actual submit (spec AC).
const hasDrafts = draftCount > 0 && !working && Boolean(onSubmitInteractionVerdicts);
const canApply = hasDrafts && invalidDraftIds.size === 0;
function toggleDraft(itemId: string, verdict: RequestItemVerdictValue) {
setDrafts((current) => {
const next = new Map(current);
const existing = next.get(itemId);
if (existing?.verdict === verdict) {
next.delete(itemId); // per-item undo
} else {
next.set(itemId, { verdict, reason: existing?.reason ?? "" });
}
return next;
});
}
function setDraftReason(itemId: string, reason: string) {
setDrafts((current) => {
const existing = current.get(itemId);
if (!existing) return current;
const next = new Map(current);
next.set(itemId, { ...existing, reason });
return next;
});
}
function handleApproveAll() {
if (!allowBulkApprove) return;
setDrafts((current) => {
const next = new Map(current);
for (const id of progress.pendingItemIds) {
const existing = next.get(id);
next.set(id, { verdict: "approve", reason: existing?.reason ?? "" });
}
return next;
});
}
async function handleApply() {
setAttempted(true);
if (!onSubmitInteractionVerdicts || draftCount === 0 || invalidDraftIds.size > 0) return;
const verdicts = draftEntries.map(([id, draft]) => ({
id,
verdict: draft.verdict,
reason: draft.reason.trim() ? draft.reason.trim() : undefined,
}));
setWorking(true);
setApplyingItemIds(new Set(verdicts.map((entry) => entry.id)));
setActionError(null);
try {
await onSubmitInteractionVerdicts(interaction, verdicts);
// Success: the parent refetch updates `interaction.result`, the effect
// above clears drafts + applying state, and terminal chips render.
} catch (error) {
setActionError(resolutionErrorMessage(error));
setApplyingItemIds(new Set());
setWorking(false);
}
}
const applyLabel = draftCount === 0
? "Apply 0 decisions"
: `Apply ${draftCount} decision${draftCount === 1 ? "" : "s"}`;
return (
<div className="space-y-4">
{/* Prompt + details (S1) */}
<div className="space-y-3 rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-background/75 p-4">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center justify-between gap-2">
<div className="text-sm leading-6 text-foreground">{payload.prompt}</div>
<VerdictProgressBadge progress={progress} pendingReason={invalidDraftIds.size > 0} />
</div>
{payload.detailsMarkdown ? (
<div className="border-t border-border/60 pt-3 text-sm">
<MarkdownBody externalReferences={externalReferences}>{payload.detailsMarkdown}</MarkdownBody>
</div>
) : null}
{interaction.payload.target ? (
<RequestConfirmationTargetChip interaction={interaction} target={interaction.payload.target} />
) : null}
</div>
{/* Stale / superseded notice (S6) */}
{isExpired ? (
<div className="rounded-sm border border-amber-500/50 bg-amber-500/10 px-3 py-2 text-sm text-amber-900 dark:text-amber-100">
<div className="flex items-center gap-2 font-medium">
<AlertTriangle className="h-4 w-4" aria-hidden />
{interaction.result?.outcome === "superseded_by_comment"
? "This review expired after a later comment."
: interaction.result?.outcome === "stale_target"
? "This review expired after the target changed."
: "This review expired."}
</div>
{progress.decided > 0 ? (
<p className="mt-1 text-xs leading-5">
{progress.decided === 1 ? "1 item was" : `${progress.decided} items were`} already applied and cannot be
reverted. Remaining items were cancelled.
</p>
) : null}
</div>
) : null}
{/* Item list (S1/S2/S3/S4) */}
<ul className="space-y-2" aria-label="Items to review">
{items.map((item) => {
const resolved = resolvedById.get(item.id);
const applying = applyingItemIds.has(item.id);
const draft = drafts.get(item.id);
return (
<li
key={item.id}
className={cn(
"rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-background/60 p-3",
draft && !resolved && "border-border",
)}
data-item-id={item.id}
data-item-state={resolved ? "resolved" : applying ? "applying" : draft ? "draft" : "pending"}
>
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-start justify-between gap-3">
<div className="min-w-0 flex-1 basis-64">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2">
<span className="text-sm font-medium leading-5 text-foreground">{item.label}</span>
<ItemVerdictDeepLink item={item} interaction={interaction} />
</div>
{item.description ? (
<p className="mt-0.5 text-sm leading-5 text-muted-foreground">{item.description}</p>
) : null}
{item.previewMarkdown ? (
<div className="mt-2 rounded-sm border border-border/50 bg-muted/20 px-2.5 py-2 text-xs">
<MarkdownBody externalReferences={externalReferences}>{item.previewMarkdown}</MarkdownBody>
</div>
) : null}
{resolved?.reason ? (
<p className="mt-2 text-xs leading-5 text-muted-foreground">
<span className="font-medium text-foreground">{reasonLabel}: </span>
{resolved.reason}
</p>
) : null}
</div>
<div className="flex shrink-0 flex-col items-end gap-1">
{resolved ? (
<VerdictConsequenceChip verdict={resolved.verdict} />
) : applying ? (
<span className="inline-flex items-center gap-1.5 rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-muted/40 px-2 py-0.5 text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-muted-foreground">
<Loader2 className="h-3.5 w-3.5 motion-safe:animate-spin" aria-hidden />
Applying…
</span>
) : isTerminal ? (
<span className="inline-flex items-center gap-1 rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-muted/30 px-2 py-0.5 text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-muted-foreground">
<CircleDashed className="h-3.5 w-3.5" aria-hidden />
Not decided
</span>
) : (
<ItemVerdictSegmentedControl
itemId={item.id}
verdicts={enabledVerdicts}
value={draft?.verdict ?? null}
disabled={working}
onSelect={(verdict) => toggleDraft(item.id, verdict)}
/>
)}
</div>
</div>
{/* Draft reason field (S2) — reveals when the draft verdict needs a reason */}
{!resolved && !applying && draft && requireReasonOn.has(draft.verdict) ? (
<div className="mt-3 space-y-1.5">
<label
htmlFor={`${interaction.id}-${item.id}-reason`}
className="text-xs font-medium text-foreground"
>
{reasonLabel}
</label>
<Textarea
id={`${interaction.id}-${item.id}-reason`}
value={draft.reason}
onChange={(event) => setDraftReason(item.id, event.target.value)}
placeholder="Give the agent a reason so it can act on this item."
aria-invalid={attempted && invalidDraftIds.has(item.id)}
className={cn(
"min-h-16 bg-background text-sm",
attempted && invalidDraftIds.has(item.id) && "border-rose-500 focus-visible:ring-rose-500/25",
)}
/>
{attempted && invalidDraftIds.has(item.id) ? (
<p className="text-xs text-destructive">A reason is required to {VERDICT_LABEL[draft.verdict].toLowerCase()} this item.</p>
) : null}
</div>
) : null}
</li>
);
})}
</ul>
{/* Complete summary (S5) */}
{isComplete && !isExpired ? (
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2 rounded-sm border border-emerald-500/50 bg-emerald-500/10 px-3 py-2 text-sm text-emerald-900 dark:text-emerald-100">
<CheckCircle2 className="h-4 w-4" aria-hidden />
<span className="font-medium">
{progress.decided} decided · {progress.approved} approved · {progress.rejected} rejected
{progress.deferred > 0 ? ` · ${progress.deferred} deferred` : ""}
</span>
</div>
) : null}
{/* Pinned batch bar (S1/S2) — only while items remain actionable */}
{!isTerminal && progress.pendingItemIds.length > 0 ? (
<DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot}>
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center justify-between gap-2 border-t border-border/60 pt-3">
<div className="text-xs text-muted-foreground">
{draftCount > 0
? `${draftCount} draft verdict${draftCount === 1 ? "" : "s"} ready to apply`
: "Mark verdicts, then apply them in one pass."}
</div>
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2">
{allowBulkApprove ? (
<Button
type="button"
size="sm"
variant="outline"
disabled={working || progress.pendingItemIds.length === 0}
onClick={handleApproveAll}
>
<ThumbsUp className="h-4 w-4" aria-hidden />
Approve all
</Button>
) : null}
<Button
type="button"
size="sm"
variant="default"
aria-disabled={!canApply}
disabled={!hasDrafts}
onClick={() => void handleApply()}
>
{working ? (
<>
<Loader2 className="h-4 w-4 motion-safe:animate-spin" aria-hidden />
Applying…
</>
) : (
applyLabel
)}
</Button>
</div>
</div>
</DecisionCardFooter>
) : null}
<InteractionActionError message={actionError} />
</div>
);
}
function VerdictProgressBadge({
progress,
pendingReason,
}: {
progress: ReturnType<typeof getItemVerdictProgress>;
pendingReason: boolean;
}) {
const pct = progress.total > 0 ? Math.round((progress.decided / progress.total) * 100) : 0;
return (
<div className="flex items-center gap-2">
{/* Von Restorff accent when a draft reject is missing its reason */}
{pendingReason ? (
<span className="inline-flex items-center gap-1 rounded-sm border border-amber-500/60 bg-amber-500/10 px-1.5 py-0.5 text-(length:--text-nano) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow) text-amber-900 dark:text-amber-100">
<AlertTriangle className="h-3 w-3" aria-hidden />
Reason needed
</span>
) : null}
<div
className="flex items-center gap-2"
role="progressbar"
aria-valuemin={0}
aria-valuemax={progress.total}
aria-valuenow={progress.decided}
aria-label={`${progress.decided} of ${progress.total} decided`}
>
<div className="h-1.5 w-16 overflow-hidden rounded-full bg-muted">
<div
className="h-full rounded-full bg-primary transition-[width] motion-reduce:transition-none"
style={{ width: `${pct}%` }}
/>
</div>
<span className="whitespace-nowrap text-xs font-medium text-muted-foreground">
{progress.decided} of {progress.total} decided
</span>
</div>
</div>
);
}
export function IssueThreadInteractionCard({
interaction,
presentationVariant = "default",
footerSlot,
agentMap,
currentUserId,
userLabelMap,
onAcceptInteraction,
onRejectInteraction,
onSubmitInteractionAnswers,
onCancelInteraction,
primaryActionOnRight,
onSubmitInteractionVerdicts,
onUploadImage,
externalReferences,
}: IssueThreadInteractionCardProps) {
const { enabled: coordinatorEnabled } = useCoordinatorWorkspaceEnabled();
const compactDecision = presentationVariant === "coordinator-decision";
// Single enforcement point (PAP-424, plan from PAP-420; extended by PAP-437):
// a card that should never be drawn — a degenerate `ask_user_questions`
// (placeholder junk like the onboarding `Test / A` card, no genuine question)
// or a stale sibling the server auto-expired when its creator posted a newer
// question (`superseded_by_newer_interaction`). Every render site (both thread
// backbones + the attention resolver) routes through this component, so
// suppressing here suppresses it everywhere at once. The interaction is still
// created and stored server-side; only the render is suppressed. Composition
// sites additionally filter it so no empty slot lingers.
if (shouldHideInteractionCard(interaction)) return null;
const isPlan = isPlanConfirmation(interaction);
const isToolAction =
interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" && isToolActionConfirmation(interaction);
const isSecretProposal =
interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" && isSecretProposalConfirmation(interaction);
const connectionAuthorization = connectionAuthorizationPayload(interaction);
const isConnectionAddressee =
connectionAuthorization && interaction.kind === "request_confirmation"
? isConnectionAuthorizationAddressee({ interaction, currentUserId })
: false;
const connectionAuthorizationState =
connectionAuthorization && interaction.kind === "request_confirmation"
? connectionAuthorizationCardState({ interaction, isAddressee: isConnectionAddressee })
: null;
const toolActionState =
isToolAction && interaction.kind === "request_confirmation"
? toolActionCardState(interaction)
: null;
const toolActionStyles = toolActionState ? toolActionStatusClasses(toolActionState) : null;
const secretProposalState =
isSecretProposal && interaction.kind === "request_confirmation"
? secretProposalCardState(interaction)
: null;
const secretProposalStyles = secretProposalState
? secretProposalStatusClasses(secretProposalState)
: null;
const resumeFailure = requestConfirmationResumeFailure(interaction);
const planStyles = isPlan
? planStatusClasses(
interaction.status,
resumeFailure,
interaction.result && "outcome" in interaction.result ? interaction.result.outcome : null,
)
: null;
// Interactions can be directed at a specific agent or board user. Resolved
// before the status styling because the connection-authorization badge names
// the addressee ("Waiting for Carol").
const addresseeLabel = interaction.addresseeAgentId || interaction.addresseeUserId
? resolveActorLabel({
agentId: interaction.addresseeAgentId,
userId: interaction.addresseeUserId,
agentMap,
currentUserId,
userLabelMap,
})
: null;
const connectionAuthorizationStyles = connectionAuthorization && connectionAuthorizationState
? connectionAuthorizationStatusClasses(connectionAuthorizationState, {
providerName: connectionAuthorization.providerName,
addresseeLabel: addresseeLabel ?? "the addressed person",
})
: null;
const activeStyles =
connectionAuthorizationStyles ?? secretProposalStyles ?? toolActionStyles ?? planStyles;
const adminOutcome = getAdministrativeOutcome(interaction);
const adminReason = adminOutcome ? getAdministrativeReason(interaction) : null;
// P4 (design review R2): a withdrawal is a neutral administrative retraction by
// the requester — NOT a board "no". It must not inherit the `cancelled` card's
// rose/red border + XCircle, which is pixel-identical to a rejected plan and
// mis-signals a denial to anyone scanning the thread. Give withdrawn its own
// inert lane (sibling to the calm `expired` state): muted border/badge +
// MinusCircle ("retracted"). This overrides the plan/tool-action/status styling
// so a withdrawn plan or confirmation reads "closed", not "changes requested".
const withdrawnStyles =
adminOutcome === "withdrawn"
? { shell: "border-border bg-transparent", badge: "border-border bg-muted/60 text-muted-foreground" }
: null;
const StatusIcon = withdrawnStyles
? MinusCircle
: activeStyles
? activeStyles.Icon
: statusIcon(interaction.status);
const iconSpin = secretProposalStyles?.spin ?? toolActionStyles?.spin ?? false;
const styles = withdrawnStyles ?? activeStyles ?? statusClasses(interaction.status);
const createdByLabel = resolveActorLabel({
agentId: interaction.createdByAgentId,
userId: interaction.createdByUserId,
agentMap,
currentUserId,
userLabelMap,
});
const resolvedByLabel =
interaction.resolvedByAgentId || interaction.resolvedByUserId
? resolveActorLabel({
agentId: interaction.resolvedByAgentId,
userId: interaction.resolvedByUserId,
agentMap,
currentUserId,
userLabelMap,
})
: null;
// P4: audit-visible distinction between agent and human resolution.
const resolvedByAgent = Boolean(interaction.resolvedByAgentId);
// PAP-17280: the effective audience, shown *before* anyone responds so a
// reader never has to guess whether an open card is waiting on them. Derived
// from the same server snapshot the resolver routes enforce, so the copy
// cannot promise a wider audience than the API allows.
const audience = describeInteractionAudience({
interaction,
creatorLabel: createdByLabel,
addresseeLabel,
});
if (coordinatorEnabled && !compactDecision && interaction.kind === "suggest_tasks") {
return <InteractionAudienceContext.Provider value={audience}>
<CoordinatorTaskCommitment interaction={interaction}>
<div className="p-4 space-y-3">
{interaction.status === "pending" ? <InteractionAudienceLine audience={audience} /> : null}
<SuggestTasksCard interaction={interaction} agentMap={agentMap} currentUserId={currentUserId}
userLabelMap={userLabelMap} onAcceptInteraction={onAcceptInteraction} onRejectInteraction={onRejectInteraction} />
</div>
</CoordinatorTaskCommitment>
</InteractionAudienceContext.Provider>;
}
if (interaction.kind === "connection_intent" && interaction.payload.accessRequest) {
return (
<div id={`interaction-${interaction.id}`}>
<ConnectionIntentInteractionBody
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
currentUserId={currentUserId}
addresseeLabel={addresseeLabel ?? "the addressed person"}
/>
</div>
);
}
if (isToolAction && interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" && toolActionState) {
return (
<InteractionAudienceContext.Provider value={audience}>
<RequestToolActionCard
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
state={toolActionState}
onAcceptInteraction={onAcceptInteraction}
onRejectInteraction={onRejectInteraction}
externalReferences={externalReferences}
/>
</InteractionAudienceContext.Provider>
);
}
const statusText =
adminOutcome === "withdrawn"
? "Withdrawn"
: adminOutcome === "issue_closed"
? "Expired · issue closed"
: activeStyles
? activeStyles.label
: statusLabel(interaction.status);
// The decision surface already names its source task. The actionable prompt
// carries the heading; keep only distinct context, not a second task title.
const bodyNamesDecision = interaction.kind === "ask_user_questions"
|| (interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" && !connectionAuthorization && !isSecretProposal);
const bodyContext = interaction.kind === "ask_user_questions"
? [interaction.payload.questionSet?.description, ...interaction.payload.questions.flatMap(question => [question.prompt, question.helpText])]
: interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" ? [interaction.payload.prompt, interaction.payload.detailsMarkdown] : [];
const summaryIsRepeated = bodyContext.some(text => text?.trim() === interaction.summary?.trim());
const addressedElsewhere = Boolean(interaction.addresseeAgentId
|| (interaction.addresseeUserId && interaction.addresseeUserId !== currentUserId));
return (
// Every nested subcard resolves the same interaction, so they all explain a
// denial with the same audience the header states (PAP-17287).
<InteractionAudienceContext.Provider value={audience}>
<div data-presentation={presentationVariant} className={compactDecision ? "coordinator-decision-content space-y-4" : cn("rounded-lg border p-5 shadow-none", styles.shell)}>
{compactDecision ? <>
{!bodyNamesDecision && interaction.title ? <h2 className="text-lg font-medium">{interaction.title}</h2> : null}
{interaction.summary && !summaryIsRepeated && !connectionAuthorization && interaction.kind !== "connection_intent" ? <p className="text-sm text-muted-foreground">{interaction.summary}</p> : null}
{interaction.status === "pending" ? <div className={addressedElsewhere ? undefined : "sr-only"}><InteractionAudienceLine audience={audience} variant="compact" /></div> : null}
</> : <div className="flex flex-wrap items-start justify-between gap-4">
<div className="min-w-0 flex-1 basis-64">
<div className="flex flex-wrap items-center gap-2">
<span
data-testid="interaction-status-badge"
className={cn(
"inline-flex items-center gap-1 rounded-sm border px-2.5 py-1 text-(length:--text-micro) font-semibold uppercase tracking-(--tracking-eyebrow)",
styles.badge,
)}
>
<StatusIcon className={cn("h-3.5 w-3.5", iconSpin && "animate-spin")} />
{isSecretProposal ? (
<span className="flex flex-col sm:flex-row sm:items-center sm:gap-1">
<span>Secret binding</span>
<span className="hidden text-current/60 sm:inline">/</span>
<span>{statusText}</span>
</span>
) : connectionAuthorization ? (
// One state, in the reader's own terms: "Action required",
// "Waiting for Carol", "Gmail connected". The interaction kind
// is machinery the person being asked does not need.
<span>{statusText}</span>
) : (
<>
{isPlan ? "Plan" : interactionKindLabel(interaction.kind)}
<span className="text-current/60">/</span>
{statusText}
</>
)}
</span>
{addresseeLabel ? (
<Tooltip>
<TooltipTrigger asChild>
<Badge
variant="secondary"
className="gap-1"
data-testid="interaction-addressee-badge"
>
<Bot className="h-3 w-3" />
For {addresseeLabel}
</Badge>
</TooltipTrigger>
<TooltipContent side="bottom" className="max-w-xs text-xs">
Directed to {addresseeLabel}. Agent-addressed interactions are owned by that agent and are kept out of the open organization attention feed.
</TooltipContent>
</Tooltip>
) : null}
</div>
<div className="mt-3 text-lg font-bold text-foreground">
{interaction.title
?? (interaction.kind === "suggest_tasks"
? "Suggested task tree"
: interaction.kind === "ask_user_questions"
// Only a human-only card is genuinely "for the operator";
// an open card is answerable by any teammate (PAP-17280).
? interaction.payload.title
?? (audience.policy === "human_only"
? "Questions for the operator"
: "Questions to answer")
: interaction.kind === "request_checkbox_confirmation"
? "Checkbox confirmation requested"
: isSecretProposal
? "Secret binding requested"
: connectionAuthorization
? `Connect your ${connectionAuthorization.providerName} to continue`
: isToolAction
? "Tool approval requested"
: interaction.kind === "request_item_verdicts"
? "Review these items"
: isPlan
? "Plan review"
: "Confirmation requested")}
</div>
{/* A connection-authorization card composes its own single body
below, because the closing sentence depends on whether the
reader is the person who may consent. Rendering the summary here
as well would be the second body PAP-17859 removed. */}
{interaction.summary && !connectionAuthorization && interaction.kind !== "connection_intent" ? (
<p className="mt-2 max-w-3xl text-sm leading-6 text-muted-foreground">
{interaction.summary}
</p>
) : null}
{interaction.status === "pending" ? (
<InteractionAudienceLine audience={audience} className="mt-3" />
) : null}
</div>
<Tooltip>
<TooltipTrigger asChild>
<div className="rounded-sm border border-border/70 bg-transparent px-3 py-2 text-right text-xs text-muted-foreground">
<div className="font-medium text-foreground">{formatShortDate(interaction.createdAt)}</div>
<div>proposed by {createdByLabel}</div>
</div>
</TooltipTrigger>
<TooltipContent side="bottom" className="text-xs">
Created {formatDateTime(interaction.createdAt)}
</TooltipContent>
</Tooltip>
</div>}
<div className={compactDecision ? undefined : "mt-5"}>
{interaction.kind === "suggest_tasks" ? (
<SuggestTasksCard
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
agentMap={agentMap}
currentUserId={currentUserId}
userLabelMap={userLabelMap}
onAcceptInteraction={onAcceptInteraction}
onRejectInteraction={onRejectInteraction}
/>
) : interaction.kind === "ask_user_questions" ? (
<AskUserQuestionsCard
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
compact={compactDecision}
onSubmitInteractionAnswers={onSubmitInteractionAnswers}
onCancelInteraction={onCancelInteraction}
externalReferences={externalReferences}
/>
) : interaction.kind === "request_checkbox_confirmation" ? (
<RequestCheckboxConfirmationCard
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
primaryActionOnRight={primaryActionOnRight}
onAcceptInteraction={onAcceptInteraction}
onRejectInteraction={onRejectInteraction}
externalReferences={externalReferences}
/>
) : connectionAuthorization
&& interaction.kind === "request_confirmation"
&& connectionAuthorizationState ? (
<RequestConnectionAuthorizationCard
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
state={connectionAuthorizationState}
isAddressee={isConnectionAddressee}
providerName={connectionAuthorization.providerName}
addresseeLabel={addresseeLabel ?? "the addressed person"}
requestingAgentLabel={connectionAuthorization.requestingAgentName ?? null}
resolvedByLabel={resolvedByLabel}
resolvedByAgent={resolvedByAgent}
onRejectInteraction={onRejectInteraction}
/>
) : isSecretProposal && interaction.kind === "request_confirmation" && secretProposalState ? (
<RequestSecretProposalCard
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
state={secretProposalState}
resolvedByLabel={resolvedByLabel}
onAcceptInteraction={onAcceptInteraction}
onRejectInteraction={onRejectInteraction}
/>
) : interaction.kind === "connection_intent" ? (
<ConnectionIntentInteractionBody
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
currentUserId={currentUserId}
addresseeLabel={addresseeLabel ?? "the addressed person"}
addresseeName={interaction.addresseeUserId ? userLabelMap?.get(interaction.addresseeUserId) : undefined}
/>
) : interaction.kind === "request_item_verdicts" ? (
<RequestItemVerdictsCard
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
onSubmitInteractionVerdicts={onSubmitInteractionVerdicts}
externalReferences={externalReferences}
/>
) : (
<RequestConfirmationCard
footerSlot={footerSlot}
interaction={interaction}
compact={compactDecision}
isPlan={isPlan}
primaryActionOnRight={primaryActionOnRight}
onAcceptInteraction={onAcceptInteraction}
onRejectInteraction={onRejectInteraction}
onUploadImage={onUploadImage}
externalReferences={externalReferences}
/>
)}
</div>
{footerSlot && ((interaction.status !== "pending" && interaction.kind !== "connection_intent") || (connectionAuthorization && connectionAuthorizationState !== "actionable")) ? <DecisionCardFooter leading={footerSlot} /> : null}
{adminOutcome === "withdrawn" ? (
<div
className="mt-4 border-t border-border/60 pt-3 text-xs text-muted-foreground"
data-testid="interaction-withdrawn-footer"
>
<div>
Withdrawn by{" "}
<span className="font-medium text-foreground">{resolvedByLabel ?? "an agent"}</span>
{resolvedByAgent ? <ResolvedByAgentChip /> : null}
{interaction.resolvedAt ? ` on ${formatShortDate(interaction.resolvedAt)}` : ""}
</div>
{adminReason ? (
<div className="mt-1 italic text-muted-foreground/90">"{adminReason}"</div>
) : null}
</div>
) : adminOutcome === "issue_closed" && interaction.resolvedAt ? (
// The header badge + body already explain the issue-closed expiry;
// the footer is just the audit timestamp.
<div
className="mt-4 border-t border-border/60 pt-3 text-xs text-muted-foreground"
data-testid="interaction-issue-closed-footer"
>
{formatShortDate(interaction.resolvedAt)}
</div>
) : resolvedByLabel && !isToolAction && !connectionAuthorization ? (
// The connection-authorization card states its own resolver and
// timestamp inside the "Gmail connected" block, so the shared footer
// would repeat it.
<div
className="mt-4 flex flex-wrap items-center gap-x-1 gap-y-0.5 border-t border-border/60 pt-3 text-xs text-muted-foreground"
data-testid="interaction-resolved-footer"
>
Resolved by <span className="font-medium text-foreground">{resolvedByLabel}</span>
{resolvedByAgent ? <ResolvedByAgentChip /> : null}
{interaction.resolvedAt ? ` on ${formatShortDate(interaction.resolvedAt)}` : ""}
</div>
) : null}
</div>
</InteractionAudienceContext.Provider>
);
}
/**
* Small audit chip marking that an interaction was resolved by an agent (rather
* than a human board member) — governed agent resolution introduced in P2.
*/
function ResolvedByAgentChip() {
return (
<Tooltip>
<TooltipTrigger asChild>
<Badge
variant="outline"
className="ml-1 gap-1 border-indigo-500/50 py-0 text-[length:--text-micro] text-indigo-700 dark:text-indigo-200"
data-testid="interaction-resolved-by-agent-chip"
>
<Bot className="h-3 w-3" />
Agent
</Badge>
</TooltipTrigger>
<TooltipContent side="bottom" className="max-w-xs text-xs">
Resolved by an agent under the organization's interaction governance policy — audit-distinct from a human board resolution.
</TooltipContent>
</Tooltip>
);
}