mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-19 10:36:26 +02:00
DottaandPaperclip
7b35de65aa
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Governed MCP access spans contracts, runtime enforcement, adapters, UI surfaces, and operator verification > - The parity reference PR #9534 is too large for effective automated or human review > - The feature therefore needs a linear stack whose individual diffs stay below the 100-file review limit > - This pull request is split 1/8 and focuses on fixture and demo MCP servers > - The benefit is a standalone, testable review boundary while preserving byte-for-byte parity at the top of the stack ## Linked Issues or Issue Description - Related parity reference: #9534 - Problem: Developers need deterministic local MCP fixtures and visible demo servers without pulling in the governed production runtime. - Proposed solution: Adds the Google Sheets and KV demo MCP packages, fixture catalog/servers, smoke harness, guide, and the root smoke/typecheck registration hunks. - Alternatives considered: keeping #9534 as one 403-file review, or rewriting the feature to manufacture seams; both were rejected in favor of path extraction plus compile-driven boundary moves. - Roadmap alignment: this advances the existing governed MCP/tool-access work already represented by #9534; it does not introduce a separate roadmap initiative. - Stack position: base branch is `master`. - Merge policy: merge bottom-up, in order, only after the complete eight-PR stack has been reviewed and the top-of-stack parity gate remains empty. - Requested review: QA for fixture and smoke coverage; Greptile on every PR. ## What Changed - Adds the Google Sheets and KV demo MCP packages, fixture catalog/servers, smoke harness, guide, and the root smoke/typecheck registration hunks. - Keeps this PR below 100 changed files and independently typecheckable. - Preserves the final tree from #9534 when combined with the other seven stack levels. ## Verification - `pnpm typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/google-sheets-mcp-server test` — 27 tests passed - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/kv-demo-mcp-server test` — 12 tests passed ## Risks - The new packages add dependencies that are intentionally not committed to `pnpm-lock.yaml`, per repository policy. - Stack risk: merging out of order can expose incomplete layers; mitigate by following the documented bottom-up merge policy. - Parity risk: later edits to an intermediate branch can drift from #9534; mitigate by re-running the empty top-of-stack diff before merge. > For core feature work, check [`ROADMAP.md`](ROADMAP.md) first and discuss it in `#dev` before opening the PR. Feature PRs that overlap with planned core work may need to be redirected — check the roadmap first. See `CONTRIBUTING.md`. ## Model Used - OpenAI Codex, exact model ID `gpt-5.4`; runtime-managed context window; medium reasoning with repository, shell, Git, GitHub CLI, and code-execution tools enabled. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] Internal references are omitted except the execution-plan link explicitly required for this coordinated split stack - [x] My branch name describes the change and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge ## Stack Coordination - Internal execution plan: [PAP-13874](/PAP/issues/PAP-13874#document-plan) - Parity reference: #9534 - Stack: #9556 → #9557 → #9558 → #9559 → #9560 → #9561 → #9562 → #9563 - Merge bottom-up only after full-stack review and an empty parity diff at #9563. --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
58 lines
1.4 KiB
JSON
58 lines
1.4 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "@paperclipai/google-sheets-mcp-server",
|
|
"version": "0.1.0",
|
|
"license": "MIT",
|
|
"homepage": "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip",
|
|
"bugs": {
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/issues"
|
|
},
|
|
"repository": {
|
|
"type": "git",
|
|
"url": "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip",
|
|
"directory": "packages/google-sheets-mcp-server"
|
|
},
|
|
"type": "module",
|
|
"bin": {
|
|
"paperclip-google-sheets-mcp-server": "./dist/stdio.js",
|
|
"paperclip-google-sheets-mcp-http-server": "./dist/http-server.js"
|
|
},
|
|
"exports": {
|
|
".": "./src/index.ts"
|
|
},
|
|
"publishConfig": {
|
|
"access": "public",
|
|
"bin": {
|
|
"paperclip-google-sheets-mcp-server": "./dist/stdio.js",
|
|
"paperclip-google-sheets-mcp-http-server": "./dist/http-server.js"
|
|
},
|
|
"exports": {
|
|
".": {
|
|
"types": "./dist/index.d.ts",
|
|
"import": "./dist/index.js"
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"main": "./dist/index.js",
|
|
"types": "./dist/index.d.ts"
|
|
},
|
|
"files": [
|
|
"dist",
|
|
"README.md"
|
|
],
|
|
"scripts": {
|
|
"build": "tsc",
|
|
"clean": "rm -rf dist",
|
|
"typecheck": "tsc --noEmit",
|
|
"test": "vitest run"
|
|
},
|
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
"@modelcontextprotocol/sdk": "^1.29.0",
|
|
"googleapis": "^164.1.0",
|
|
"zod": "^3.24.2"
|
|
},
|
|
"devDependencies": {
|
|
"@types/node": "^24.6.0",
|
|
"typescript": "^5.7.3",
|
|
"vitest": "^4.1.8"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|