mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-10-07 07:23:08 +02:00
Devin FoleyandPaperclip
e9debd3eac
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work. > - The server checks workspace contents before it allows cleanup or branch reconciliation. > - These checks need the full Git status output to count untracked files. > - Nested task worktrees can make this output exceed the scheduler's default 1 MiB limit. > - A scan failure then blocks an otherwise inspectable workspace. > - This pull request raises the limit for these status checks to 32 MiB. > - The checks retain exact counts and still protect uncommitted work from cleanup. ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #14194 and #14253. Those changes address snapshot enumeration. This PR addresses buffered execution-workspace status checks. Refs #13619 for separate work on caching these checks. The related journal identity failure is covered by #14312. **What happened?** Close-readiness checks failed when Git status output exceeded 1 MiB. A workspace with thousands of long untracked paths could not report its file count or complete readiness inspection. **Expected behavior** Allow up to 32 MiB of status output for execution-workspace readiness and branch reconciliation. Preserve exact counts. Continue to block cleanup when the workspace has uncommitted data or the scan exceeds its bound. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Create an execution workspace with a merged delivery. 2. Add 5,000 long untracked filenames under a nested task directory. The status output exceeds 1 MiB. 3. Request close readiness. Before this fix the status scan fails. After this fix it reports all 5,000 files. 4. Run the terminal-workspace sweep. Confirm that it preserves the workspace and files. **Paperclip version or commit** Reproduced on master at `14795136f5` before this fix. **Deployment mode** Server with managed Git workspaces. ## What Changed - Set a 32 MiB stdout bound for execution-workspace status scans. - Add a real Git regression with 5,000 long untracked paths and a cleanup-preservation assertion. Assert that the measured status output exceeds 1 MiB. - Document the bound and failure behavior. ## Verification - The new regression failed on master before the service change: the status result had no untracked files or count after the scan exceeded its bound. - `pnpm exec vitest run server/src/__tests__/execution-workspaces-service.test.ts server/src/services/workspace-git-operation-scheduler.test.ts` passed: 82 tests, including the new regression. The regression and server typecheck also passed after the explicit byte-count assertion. - `pnpm build` and `pnpm -r typecheck` passed. The full local `pnpm test:run` was attempted and stopped after the failures listed below. Greptile is 5/5 with zero unresolved review threads on the latest head. All checks for head `45f93ad5ad` passed (53 successful, two intentional skips). - Full local validation did not pass. The attempt reproduced 13 company/runtime skill-cache permission failures, the terminal-workspace cleanup assertion, and a heartbeat feedback timeout. It was stopped during the general-server stage after these failures. Remaining general-server tests, other workspace groups, and serialized-server stages did not complete locally. Earlier clean-master checks reproduced the cache failures and isolated cleanup retries passed. The latest-head GitHub suite passed all of these groups. - One GitHub browser shard initially failed because its GitHub-connection test checked the resume-action array before the mocked request completed. The single failed-job retry passed without a source change. All latest-head checks are green. - No browser suites ran locally. This change does not affect browser behavior. ## Risks - Each active status scan can buffer up to 32 MiB before parsing. The existing scheduler bounds scan concurrency and queue size. - Output above the bound still fails the scan and blocks destructive cleanup. The change does not truncate output or change cleanup rules. - There are no API, database, or snapshot-streaming changes. ## Model Used OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository inspection, code editing, and test execution. The exact deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this session. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass (focused suites; full local-run failures and incomplete stages are documented above) - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge --------- Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>