mirror of
https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip.git
synced 2026-11-09 07:10:34 +01:00
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5
3895195f4b
## Thinking Path > - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for work > - Remote OpenCode runs stage a controller-owned provider pack into the sandbox before the provider starts > - Since #19558, an ordinary OpenCode continuation retains the pack that an earlier release admitted for its saved provider session > - After a controller release changes the pack, the controller no longer ships those bytes, and the continuation must stay blocked > - The configured-pack upload path did not detect that case: it read the build-time archive receipt for the old digest and failed with `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid`, a generic, retryable error that suggests corrupt image files > - This pull request compares the configured pack's identity with the selected identity before any upload and fails as `runner_remote_provider_artifact_incompatible` > - It also puts a fixed reason in each real archive integrity error > - The benefit is a correct, permanent classification that matches the bundled-image path, no wasted retries, and a diagnosable message for real archive corruption ## Linked Issues or Issue Description Refs #19558, #19743 **What happened?** On a hosted deployment, two remote OpenCode runs of a review agent failed before the provider process started. The error was `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid` (classified as a generic `native_session_interrupted`). Both runs continued an issue whose provider session was admitted by an earlier release. In both runs, the run log shows `provider_pack.compatibility`, `provider_pack.verify`, and `provider_pack.verify_preinstalled` fail, then `provider_pack.archive.verify` fails after 4–6 ms. Fresh runs of the same agent on the same controller passed pack preparation with the current pack. The cause is not a cache race. The archives are created at image build time (`Dockerfile` `runner-provider-pack` stage) and the server never rewrites them. The retained authority selects the old pack digest. `readProviderPackLayers` then compares the receipt's `providerPackDigest` (current release) with that old digest and throws `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid`. Directory staging (no archive) instead clears the staged remote pack, uploads the different pack, and fails only at the final verification. **Expected behavior** A continuation pinned to a pack that the controller does not ship fails as `runner_remote_provider_artifact_incompatible`, as the bundled-image path already does ("the image provider pack did not match the bundled release identity"). It does not clear or upload anything. Real archive corruption keeps `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid` with a fixed reason that the run report shows. **Steps to reproduce** 1. Build a provider pack and its archives for digest A. 2. Call `uploadVerifiedProviderPack` with that pack and a selected (retained) digest B. 3. Before this change: the call fails with `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid` (v1 and v2 archives), or resolves after it clears and re-uploads the remote pack (directory source). ## What Changed - `uploadVerifiedProviderPack` takes the configured pack's `sourceDigest`. If it is not the selected `expectedDigest`, the call fails with `runner_remote_provider_artifact_incompatible: selected provider pack <12 hex> is not the controller's pack <12 hex>; ...`. The check runs before the remote clear, the archive read, the directory hash and any upload. - The executor passes the configured pack's identity (`readRemoteProviderPackIdentity(root, false)`, the same reader that selects the current pack). - Archive integrity errors keep the `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid` prefix and add a fixed reason: `receipt_unreadable`, `receipt_identity_mismatch`, `receipt_invalid`, `layer_invalid`, `layers_unreadable`, `archive_unreadable`, `archive_not_file`, `size_mismatch` or `sha256_mismatch`. The run report keeps only the outer message, so the reason must be in the message. Filesystem causes stay on `cause` and do not put private paths in the message. - The v1 reader now uses the shared `verifyArchive` helper. - `doc/execution-semantics.md` documents the rule. ## Verification - Red before the fix (production files unchanged, new tests only): `npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/provider-pack-archive.test.ts` gave 5 failed / 38 passed. The v1 and v2 cases failed with exactly `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid`, which is the hosted error. The directory case resolved after it cleared and uploaded the remote pack. The reason tests got a bare `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid`. - Green after the fix: the same file gave 43 passed. - `npx vitest run src/services/native-runtime/native-session-executor.test.ts`: 1245 passed. This includes the #19558 continuation cases. - `remote-provider-pack`, `remote-provider-pack-authority` and `remote-provider-pack-verification` tests: 69 passed. - `pnpm --filter @paperclipai/server typecheck`: all layers passed. - Review follow-up (`c8156841a9`): an unreadable numbered layer now reports `archive_unreadable`. The layered-corruption test deletes `0.tar.zst` and checks for that reason before any transfer. The archive file gave 43 passed. - Hosted evidence came from read-only run, event and issue-run reads only. No hosted retries, recovery or deploys. ## Risks - This change does not unblock an affected session. It makes the failure honest and permanent: `runner_remote_provider_artifact_incompatible` is already a permanent, pre-session failure code, so the run is not retried with the same result. To recover, the session needs its original artifacts (the captured provider-artifact path, which #19743 repairs for new admissions) or an authorized continuity break. - Low risk for other paths. Fresh launches select the configured pack's own identity, so the digests are equal. Restored provider artifacts and compatible installed packs return before this upload path. - Callers that match `runner_remote_provider_archive_invalid` with a substring still match. No code compares the exact message. - Not tested end to end against a hosted sandbox. The executor-level wiring of `sourceDigest` has typecheck coverage but no dedicated executor test. ## Model Used - Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic. Agentic tool use with shell, code editing, test execution and read-only authenticated browser diagnostics. ## Checklist - [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context to this change - [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability details) - [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate planned core work - [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked them above - [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes #` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant issue template - [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip` URLs) - [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`) and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details - [x] I have run tests locally and they pass - [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable - [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes - [x] I have considered and documented any risks above - [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green - [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups - [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before requesting merge 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>