Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-hardening.ts
T
DottaandPaperclip 0103cb2292 test: use neutral references in chat hiring evals (#13752)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip helps people manage agents and their work.
> - The agent chat hiring eval checks delegation, saved output, and
worker reuse.
> - It asks a worker to include a unique reference in each document.
> - The open wording let the worker choose a credential-style label.
> - The existing redactor removed that reference and failed the
coordination check.
> - This PR specifies a neutral reference line while keeping the same
grading checks.

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #13741.

**What happened?**

The Codex hiring eval saved a checklist with `Tracking token:
[REDACTED]`. The runner treats the chosen label as credential syntax.
The previous prompt only asked for the identifier and did not choose its
label. This tests a redaction boundary unrelated to hiring and reuse.

**Expected behavior**

The coordination fixture requests ordinary business content with a
neutral reference label. The grader still requires the exact identifier
in the saved output.

**Steps to reproduce**

Run `agent-chat-hardening.runner-codex.local.hire-delegate-reuse` with
the previous fixture. The retained failing attempt is in [campaign
35617045456](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35617045456).

## What Changed

- Request `Reference: ...` in the checklist and review documents.
- Increment the hardening suite definition to version 5 and record the
reference format.
- Document the fixture boundary. Production redaction and all grading
checks stay unchanged.

## Verification

- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:typecheck` passed.
- `pnpm test:e2e:runner:unit` passed: 424 tests in 37 files.
- The catalog lists exactly the Codex and Claude local hiring cells for
the selected case.
- [Live campaign
35620731321](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35620731321)
passed both selected local cells on `d8d7afe21`: native Codex
(`gpt-5.6-sol`) and Claude (`claude-sonnet-5`). Both passed on attempt
1, including cleanup. [Published eval
report](https://d1p6rlowie26tp.cloudfront.net/runner-e2e/campaigns/gha-35620731321-1/).
- Inspected saved evidence: each provider preserved both exact reference
lines, used the same hired worker for checklist and review, and
completed the final status query. Definition version 5 and hash
`2c1c9f754c049c3e7cafd6c8d0a137e7ca06d546ce1e7b07ad5b7823f0f28db9`
distinguish these results from the prior prompt.
- [PR CI
35620741101](https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/actions/runs/35620741101):
full build, type checks, and test partitions passed. One unrelated
Telegram integration test initially failed because two random fixture
company IDs produced the same seven-character issue prefix. The failed
shard passed on one retry; no test code was changed. All latest-head
merge checks are green.
- Greptile reviewed `d8d7afe21` at 5/5 with no review threads.

## Risks

The live models can still fail the coordination workflow. This change
does not qualify or change credential-redaction policy. Earlier failed
attempts remain part of the evidence; the new fixture has a distinct
definition version.

## Model Used

OpenAI Codex, GPT-6, with repository tools and code execution. The exact
deployment model ID and context window are not exposed in this task.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [x] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [x] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

Co-authored-by: Paperclip <noreply@paperclip.ing>
2026-09-21 12:49:52 -05:00

245 lines
17 KiB
TypeScript

import { expect } from "@playwright/test";
import { updateIssueSchema } from "../../packages/shared/src/validators/issue.js";
import type { RunnerApi } from "./api.js";
import { readChatOutputDocument, sendChatMessage, type ChatFlowInput, type ChatIssue, type ChatRun } from "./chat-flow.js";
import { dropChatSendAcknowledgement } from "./lost-send.js";
type Agent = {
id: string; name: string; reportsTo?: string; adapterType?: string;
adapterConfig?: Record<string, unknown>; runtimeConfig?: Record<string, unknown>;
};
type Comment = { id: string; body: string; authorAgentId?: string; clientRequestId?: string };
type Document = { id: string; body: string; latestRevisionId: string; createdByAgentId?: string };
function mutableIssueSnapshot(issue: ChatIssue) {
// Follow the public mutation contract as it grows. Include relationships and
// fields governed by dedicated endpoints; omit derived read projections such
// as inbound references, which a legitimate status reply can add to the chat.
const keys = new Set([...Object.keys(updateIssueSchema.shape),
"id", "companyId", "responsibleUserId", "labels", "blockedBy", "blocks", "watchdog", "sourceTrust"]);
const record = issue as unknown as Record<string, unknown>;
return Object.fromEntries([...keys].map(key => [key, record[key]]));
}
export function assertChatHire(input: {
agents: Agent[]; leadId: string; hireName: string; hiredId?: string;
connectionId: string; binding: unknown; taskIds: string[]; tasks: ChatIssue[]; runs: ChatRun[];
}) {
const hires = input.agents.filter(agent => agent.name === input.hireName);
expect(hires).toHaveLength(1);
const hired = hires[0]!;
const lead = input.agents.find(agent => agent.id === input.leadId)!;
expect(input.connectionId).toBeTruthy();
expect(hired).toMatchObject({ reportsTo: input.leadId, adapterType: "paperclip_runner" });
if (input.hiredId) expect(hired.id).toBe(input.hiredId);
expect(hired.adapterConfig?.model).toBe(lead.adapterConfig?.model);
expect(hired.runtimeConfig?.aiConnection).toEqual(input.binding);
expect(input.tasks.map(task => task.id).sort()).toEqual([...input.taskIds].sort());
for (const id of input.taskIds) {
const task = input.tasks.find(task => task.id === id)!;
expect(task).toMatchObject({ status: "done", assigneeAgentId: hired.id, parentId: null });
expect(task.projectId).toBeTruthy();
const runs = input.runs.filter(run => run.contextSnapshot?.issueId === id);
expect(runs).toHaveLength(1);
expect(runs[0]).toMatchObject({ agentId: hired.id, status: "succeeded", runtimeMode: "native" });
expect(runs[0]!.contextSnapshot?.aiConnection).toMatchObject({ connectionId: input.connectionId });
}
return hired;
}
export function assertGroundedChatStatus(input: {
reply: string; expectedIssueIdentifier: string; blocker: string;
before: ChatIssue; after: ChatIssue; taskIdsBefore: string[]; taskIdsAfter: string[]; taskRuns: ChatRun[];
}) {
// Mentioning a correct label is insufficient: the answer could falsely call
// it resolved, or confuse a blocked task with an actively running provider.
const json = input.reply.trim().replace(/^```(?:json)?\s*/, "").replace(/\s*```$/, "");
expect(JSON.parse(json)).toMatchObject({
issueIdentifier: input.expectedIssueIdentifier, status: "blocked",
currentBlockerLabel: input.blocker, activeRunCount: 0,
});
expect(mutableIssueSnapshot(input.after), "Status reporting must preserve mutable issue state")
.toStrictEqual(mutableIssueSnapshot(input.before));
expect([...input.taskIdsAfter].sort()).toEqual([...input.taskIdsBefore].sort());
expect(input.taskRuns).toHaveLength(0);
}
export function assertChatSourceReview(body: string, expected: { planLaunchDay: string; briefLaunchDay: string }) {
// The user requests JSON, so an independent parser grades the actual saved
// deliverable. A claim in the chat or a copied source document cannot pass.
const json = body.trim().replace(/^```(?:json)?\s*/, "").replace(/\s*```$/, "");
expect(JSON.parse(json)).toMatchObject({ ...expected, consistent: expected.planLaunchDay === expected.briefLaunchDay });
}
export function assertCommittedSendRetry(input: {
commentId: string; clientRequestId: string; comments: Comment[]; taskId: string;
tasks: ChatIssue[]; runs: ChatRun[]; chatId: string;
}) {
expect(input.comments.filter(comment => comment.clientRequestId === input.clientRequestId).map(comment => comment.id)).toEqual([input.commentId]);
expect(input.tasks.map(task => task.id)).toEqual([input.taskId]);
expect(input.tasks[0]).toMatchObject({ status: "backlog", parentId: null });
expect(input.runs.filter(run => run.contextSnapshot?.issueId === input.taskId)).toHaveLength(0);
const original = input.runs.filter(run => run.contextSnapshot?.wakeCommentId === input.commentId ||
(Array.isArray(run.contextSnapshot?.wakeCommentIds) && run.contextSnapshot.wakeCommentIds.includes(input.commentId)));
expect(original).toHaveLength(1);
expect(original[0]).toMatchObject({ status: "succeeded", runtimeMode: "native" });
expect(original[0]!.contextSnapshot?.issueId).toBe(input.chatId);
}
export function isChatStopReady(events: Array<{ eventType?: unknown }>, phase: "startup" | "active"): boolean {
const active = events.some(event => ["turn.started", "turn.accepted"].includes(String(event.eventType)));
return phase === "active" ? active : !active && events.some(event => event.eventType === "native.process_start_requested");
}
export function assertChatRememberedAfterRestart(reply: string, remembered: string, marker: string) {
expect(reply).toContain(remembered);
expect(reply).toContain(marker);
}
export function assertChatStartupStopped(run: ChatRun, events: Array<{ eventType?: unknown; createdAt?: string }>) {
const cancellation = run.resultJson?.nativeCancellation as Record<string, unknown> | undefined;
const started = events.filter(event => ["turn.started", "turn.accepted"].includes(String(event.eventType)));
if (started.some(event => Date.parse(event.createdAt ?? "") < Date.parse(String(cancellation?.recordedAt)))) {
throw new Error("Harness missed startup Stop boundary: provider turn started before the Stop intent");
}
expect(cancellation).toMatchObject({ scope: "run", dispatchState: "acknowledged", dispatched: true });
expect(run.status).toBe("cancelled");
expect(started, "A stopped startup must never submit a provider turn").toHaveLength(0);
}
export async function runChatHardeningFlow(context: {
input: ChatFlowInput; marker: string; issue(): ChatIssue;
turn(message: string, count: number): Promise<void>; idle(count: number): Promise<void>;
tasks(): Promise<ChatIssue[]>; allRuns(): Promise<ChatRun[]>; comments(): Promise<Comment[]>;
}) {
const { input, marker, turn, idle, tasks, allRuns, comments } = context;
const { api, page, fixtures: f, execution, nonce } = input;
const companyPath = `/api/companies/${f.company.id}`;
const project = await api.post<{ id: string; name: string }>(`${companyPath}/projects`, {
name: `Chat coordination ${nonce}`, description: "Repository-free launch planning and review.",
});
const agents = () => api.get<Agent[]>(`${companyPath}/agents`);
const latestReply = async () => (await comments()).filter(comment => comment.authorAgentId === f.agent.id).at(-1)?.body ?? "";
const output = (id: string, token: string) => readChatOutputDocument(api, id, token);
try {
if (execution.task.id === "hire-delegate-reuse") {
const hireName = `Morgan Reviewer ${nonce}`;
await turn(`Hire exactly one teammate named ${hireName}, reporting to you, using your native runner, model, and available AI connection. Have that teammate write a concise launch checklist as a saved Paperclip document with the line "Reference: ${marker}". Put the work in one assigned task in ${project.name}. Link it here and let the teammate complete it.`, 2);
const first = (await tasks())[0]!;
expect(first).toBeTruthy();
const firstOutput = await output(first.id, marker);
const account = f.aiConnection!;
const hired = assertChatHire({ agents: await agents(), leadId: f.agent.id, hireName,
connectionId: account.connectionId, binding: account.binding, taskIds: [first.id], tasks: await tasks(), runs: await allRuns() });
expect((firstOutput as Document).createdByAgentId).toBe(hired.id);
await turn(`Have the existing ${hireName} review the checklist on ${first.identifier} and write a separate saved review document with the line "Reference: REVIEW${marker}". Create one review task in ${project.name}, assigned to that same teammate. Include the actual checklist in the handoff so they can review it. Preserve the original checklist and task.`, 4);
const observed = await tasks();
const second = observed.find(task => task.id !== first.id)!;
expect(second).toBeTruthy();
const reviewOutput = await output(second.id, `REVIEW${marker}`);
expect((reviewOutput as Document).createdByAgentId).toBe(hired.id);
expect(await api.get(`/api/issues/${first.id}/documents/${encodeURIComponent(firstOutput.key)}`)).toEqual(firstOutput);
await turn(`Give me a brief status update on ${first.identifier} and ${second.identifier}: identify their owner and recorded status. Do not create or change work.`, 5);
assertChatHire({ agents: await agents(), leadId: f.agent.id, hireName, hiredId: hired.id,
connectionId: account.connectionId, binding: account.binding, taskIds: [first.id, second.id], tasks: await tasks(), runs: await allRuns() });
const reply = await latestReply();
expect(reply).toContain(first.identifier!); expect(reply).toContain(second.identifier!);
expect(reply).toContain(hireName); expect(reply).toMatch(/done|completed/i);
await input.evidence("chat-hire-reuse.json", { agents: await agents(), tasks: await tasks(), firstOutput, reviewOutput, runs: await allRuns() });
} else if (execution.task.id === "blocked-status-review") {
const blocker = `VENUE${marker}`, staleBlocker = `BUDGET${marker}`;
const source = await api.post<ChatIssue>(`${companyPath}/issues`, {
title: `Launch brief ${nonce}`, status: "blocked", projectId: project.id,
description: "The launch brief is waiting for its recorded blocker to be resolved.",
initialPlan: "The approved launch day is Tuesday.",
});
const docResponse = await api.request.put(`/api/issues/${source.id}/documents/brief`, {
data: { title: "Launch brief", format: "markdown", body: "The launch brief schedules the launch for Wednesday." },
});
expect(docResponse.ok()).toBe(true);
const sourcePlan = await api.get<Document>(`/api/issues/${source.id}/documents/plan`);
const sourceBrief = await api.get<Document>(`/api/issues/${source.id}/documents/brief`);
await api.post(`/api/issues/${source.id}/comments`, { body: `Earlier blocker: ${staleBlocker}. Waiting for the budget.` });
await api.post(`/api/issues/${source.id}/comments`, { body: `Budget is resolved. Current blocker: ${blocker}. Waiting for the venue confirmation. Keep this task blocked; no execution is active.` });
const sourceBeforeStatus = await api.get<ChatIssue>(`/api/issues/${source.id}`);
await input.evidence("chat-status-review.json", { source: sourceBeforeStatus, sourcePlan, sourceBrief });
await turn(`What is the actual current status of ${source.identifier}? Read its latest recorded blocker and execution state. Reply with only JSON containing issueIdentifier, status, currentBlockerLabel, and activeRunCount. You may include an explanation field. Just report; do not change it or create work.`, 1);
const sourceAfterStatus = await api.get<ChatIssue>(`/api/issues/${source.id}`);
assertGroundedChatStatus({ reply: await latestReply(), expectedIssueIdentifier: source.identifier!, blocker,
before: sourceBeforeStatus, after: sourceAfterStatus, taskIdsBefore: [source.id],
taskIdsAfter: (await tasks()).map(task => task.id), taskRuns: (await allRuns()).filter(run => run.contextSnapshot?.issueId === source.id) });
const config = execution.profile.buildAgent({ environmentId: f.environment.id, environmentFixtureId: execution.environment.id,
workspacePath: input.workspacePath, secretRefs: f.secretRefs, executionId: nonce });
const reviewer = await api.post<Agent>(`${companyPath}/agents`, { ...config, name: `Riley Reviewer ${nonce}`, role: "engineer", reportsTo: f.agent.id });
await turn(`Have ${reviewer.name} review the saved brief on ${source.identifier} against that task's saved plan, in one separate task in ${project.name}. Give the reviewer both source documents. They should save a JSON review document with planLaunchDay, briefLaunchDay, and a boolean consistent, then complete the review task. Preserve the source task and both documents.`, 3);
const review = (await tasks()).find(task => task.id !== source.id)!;
expect(review).toMatchObject({ status: "done", assigneeAgentId: reviewer.id, parentId: null, projectId: project.id });
const document = await output(review.id, "planLaunchDay");
assertChatSourceReview(document.body, { planLaunchDay: "Tuesday", briefLaunchDay: "Wednesday" });
expect((document as Document).createdByAgentId).toBe(reviewer.id);
const reviewRuns = (await allRuns()).filter(run => run.contextSnapshot?.issueId === review.id);
expect(reviewRuns).toHaveLength(1);
expect(reviewRuns[0]).toMatchObject({ agentId: reviewer.id, status: "succeeded", runtimeMode: "native" });
await turn(`Summarize ${review.identifier}'s recorded review result and tell me whether ${source.identifier} is still blocked. Read the saved evidence; do not change or create work.`, 4);
const reply = await latestReply();
expect(reply).toContain("Tuesday"); expect(reply).toContain("Wednesday"); expect(reply).toContain(source.identifier!); expect(reply).toMatch(/blocked/i);
expect((await tasks()).map(task => task.id).sort()).toEqual([source.id, review.id].sort());
expect(await api.get(`/api/issues/${source.id}/documents/plan`)).toEqual(sourcePlan);
expect(await api.get(`/api/issues/${source.id}/documents/brief`)).toEqual(sourceBrief);
expect(await api.get(`/api/issues/${source.id}`)).toMatchObject({ status: "blocked" });
await input.evidence("chat-status-review.json", { source: sourceBeforeStatus, sourceAfterStatus, sourcePlan, sourceBrief, review, document, reviewRuns, reply });
} else if (execution.task.id === "committed-send-retry") {
const interception = await dropChatSendAcknowledgement(page, marker);
try {
await sendChatMessage(page, `Create exactly one task titled Later ${nonce} in ${project.name}, assigned to yourself, in backlog. Save an initial plan containing ${marker}. Do not start it. Link the task here.`);
const sent = await interception.committed;
// The real agent completes the accepted request despite its lost HTTP ACK.
await idle(1);
const saved = (await tasks())[0]!;
expect(saved).toBeTruthy();
const plan = await api.get<Document>(`/api/issues/${saved.id}/documents/plan`);
expect(plan.body).toContain(marker);
await interception.dispose();
await input.restart();
// Replay the exact interrupted public request, including its original key.
// This tests transport retries, not automatic replay of a failed provider turn.
const retried = await api.post<Comment>(sent!.path, sent!.data);
expect(retried.id).toBe(sent!.commentId);
await page.goto(`/${f.company.issuePrefix}/chats/${f.agent.id}`, { waitUntil: "commit", timeout: 60_000 });
await expect(page.getByTestId("task-chat-composer-input")).toBeVisible({ timeout: 60_000 });
await turn(`What is the saved status of ${saved.identifier}? Just report it; do not create or change work.`, 2);
assertCommittedSendRetry({ commentId: sent!.commentId, clientRequestId: String(sent!.data.clientRequestId),
comments: await comments(), taskId: saved.id, tasks: await tasks(), runs: await allRuns(), chatId: context.issue().id });
expect(await api.get(`/api/issues/${saved.id}/documents/plan`)).toEqual(plan);
expect(await latestReply()).toMatch(/backlog/i);
await input.evidence("chat-committed-send-retry.json", { commentId: sent!.commentId, task: saved, plan, runs: await allRuns() });
} finally {
await interception.dispose();
}
} else throw new Error(`Unsupported chat hardening case ${execution.task.id}`);
} finally {
// Preserve the records the matchers inspected even when an assertion fails.
// Failed API reads remain explicit evidence instead of replacing the failure.
const capture = async (name: string, load: () => Promise<unknown>) => {
try { return { name, value: await load() }; }
catch (error) { return { name, error: String(error) }; }
};
const state = await Promise.all([
capture("agents", agents),
capture("runs", allRuns),
capture("chatComments", comments),
capture("tasks", async () => Promise.all((await tasks()).map(async task => ({
task,
comments: await capture("comments", () => api.get(`/api/issues/${task.id}/comments?order=asc`)),
documents: await capture("documents", async () => {
const summaries = await api.get<Array<{ key: string }>>(`/api/issues/${task.id}/documents`);
return Promise.all(summaries.map(document => capture(document.key,
() => api.get(`/api/issues/${task.id}/documents/${encodeURIComponent(document.key)}`))));
}),
})))),
]);
await input.evidence("chat-hardening-state.json", state);
}
}