Files
PaperClipAI/tests/runner-e2e/chat-catalog-run-policy.test.ts
T
DottaandClaude Opus 5.5 f1aef0cb58 fix(evals): grade full cohort 3 false failures on saved state, read receipts and rendered links (#21008)
## Thinking Path

> - Paperclip is the open source app people use to manage AI agents for
work
> - The chat eval catalog runs real chat journeys against real agents
and grades saved product state
> - Full cohort 3 failed six cases where the product behaved correctly
and the eval was wrong
> - A wrong failure hides real product failures in the noise, so each
check must accept valid behavior
> - Each check must still fail the broken product behavior it exists to
catch
> - This pull request replaces those checks with checks of saved state,
read receipts and rendered links
> - The benefit is fewer false failures, with no case made easier

## Linked Issues or Issue Description

Refs #21000

**What happened?**
- `projects.project-work`, `tasks.private-task`,
`status-cards.other-authors-card` and part of
`task-coordination.delegate-with-context`: the CEO created a task with
no assignee, so the CEO got a queued run on it. The CEO then reassigned
the task. The server cancelled the queued run before it started
(`issue_reassigned` or `issue_assignee_changed`). The early poll
reported this as "Observed provider run failed", and the run policy
counted a never-started legacy run as a failed native run.
- `budgets-costs.repair-cost-recording`: after the retry, the chat run
re-read the original run record with `saveResponse`. The check accepted
only an exact whole-input digest, and this input had another shape.
- `secrets.personal-secret`: the reply linked My secrets and said "Enter
the value only there, never in chat". `solicitsChatCredential` read
"never in chat" as a request to send the value in chat.
- `companies.import-preview`: the reply linked
`/COM/agents/morgan-package`. The check accepted only `/agents/<uuid>`.
- `cases.close-case`: the closure was correct. The result turn said
"Case COM-C1 is saved as closed". A keyword pattern did not match that
sentence.

**Expected behavior**
Each check passes the recorded valid behavior and a reworded valid
variant. Each check fails the broken behavior.

**Steps to reproduce**
Grade the retained cohort-3 evidence with the old checks. They fail. The
calibration tests in this pull request use the same recorded shapes.

## What Changed

- Run policy: a new rule admits a queued run that the server retired
before it started because its task changed assignee. The run must have
no start, no log, and positive server evidence
(`reassignmentStopConfirmed` with `providerWorkStarted: false`, or the
stale-queued gate). The task must not be the source chat. A later run by
another agent on the same task must exist. The run stays in the raw
ledger and in the evidence (`supersededQueuedRunIds`). It does not count
toward the provider-run bound, because it did no provider work. A case
can have at most one such run (`catalog-superseded-queued-runs`). The
early poll defers it to the grade instead of failing at once. Cases read
the ledger without it. Other cancellations stay failures.
- `budgets-costs.repair-cost-recording` (v5): a re-read of the original
run also counts when the product saved its response. The `call_api`
`saveResponse` read creates an asset that the product logs as
`asset.created` by that run. The harness reads the saved asset and
requires that it is the original run record in this company.
- `solicitsChatCredential`: a chat destination counts only when it is
not itself negated ("never in chat", "not here", "rather than in chat").
This is a scope rule, not a new phrase exception. "Paste it here" and
mixed requests still fail. `secrets.personal-secret` is v18.
- `companies.import-preview` (v3): new `agentRouteNames` accepts
`/<prefix>/agents/<id or url key>[/<tab>]` that names the imported
agent. It rejects the existing Morgan, other companies and other
origins.
- `cases.close-case` (v2): the result turn is graded on its own saved
replies. Their run must read the saved case (`read_case` or `GET
/api/cases/{id}`, bound by the redaction-safe receipt). The reply must
render a link to that case. The case must be done. The wording is not
matched. `api-read-receipts` now binds the dedicated `read_case` tool.
- The four reassignment cases get new oracle versions. Descriptors are
updated. No scenario yaml changed, so the TestOps manifest does not
change.

## Verification

- `npx vitest run --config tests/runner-e2e/vitest.config.ts` on the 17
affected test files: 516 tests pass. The files include
`chat-catalog-run-policy`, `chat-flow`, `non-execution-wake`,
`chat-catalog-consistency`, `chat-catalog-fingerprint`,
`identity-accounting`, `external-credential-language`,
`external-personal-secret`, `identity-portability`,
`integrator-case-close`, `api-read-receipts` and the other
secret-language users.
- Each change has calibration tests: the recorded valid shape, a
reworded valid shape, and broken shapes (no successor run, a started or
other cancellation, churn; another run's saved record; "paste it here";
the existing Morgan's route; an unread or unlinked result turn).
- `npx tsc -p tests/runner-e2e/tsconfig.json --noEmit` passes.
- `node tests/runner-e2e/source-sdk-public-inputs.mjs <HEAD> --check`
reports no change.
- One paid run on a combined branch with the companion harness pull
request. The result is in a comment on this pull request.

## Risks

- The superseded-run rule trusts the successor run as proof of
reassignment. A case oracle still grades the task assignee and the
successor's own outcome.
- The close-case result turn no longer checks the reply's words. A reply
that reads the closed case and links it but states the wrong result
passes this one check. The first-turn premature-claim check and the
negative-case check do not change.
- The credential grader change also affects other secret cases. It only
removes the negated-destination false positive.

## Model Used

- Claude Opus 5.5 (`claude-opus-5-5`), Anthropic, with tool use and code
execution in Claude Code.

## Checklist

- [x] I have included a thinking path that traces from project context
to this change
- [x] I have specified the model used (with version and capability
details)
- [x] I have checked ROADMAP.md and confirmed this PR does not duplicate
planned core work
- [x] I have searched GitHub for duplicate or related PRs and linked
them above
- [x] I have either (a) linked existing issues with `Fixes: #` / `Closes
#` / `Refs #` OR (b) described the issue in-PR following the relevant
issue template
- [x] I have not referenced internal/instance-local Paperclip issues or
links (only public GitHub `#NNN` / `github.com/paperclipai/paperclip`
URLs)
- [x] My branch name describes the change (e.g. `docs/...`, `fix/...`)
and contains no internal Paperclip ticket id or instance-derived details
- [x] I have run tests locally and they pass
- [x] I have added or updated tests where applicable
- [x] I have updated relevant documentation to reflect my changes
- [x] I have considered and documented any risks above
- [ ] All Paperclip CI gates are green
- [ ] Greptile is 5/5 with no open P2s, recommendations, or follow-ups
- [x] I will address all Greptile and reviewer comments before
requesting merge

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-11-11 22:07:06 -06:00

189 lines
19 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
import { gradeChatCatalogRuns, chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses, assertExpectedWorkerCancellation, chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed, createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier, chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun, chatCatalogReassignedQueuedRun, chatCatalogSupersededQueuedRuns, chatCatalogProviderRuns } from "./chat-catalog-run-policy.js";
import type { ChatRun } from "./chat-flow.js";
const succeeded: ChatRun = { id: "source-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo", status: "succeeded", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "source" } };
const worker: ChatRun = { id: "worker-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "worker", status: "running", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "task" } };
const scope = { companyId: "company", leadId: "ceo", source: { id: "source", companyId: "company", title: "Chat", status: "in_review", conversationState: "waiting" } };
it("requires successful native work by default and exact declared cancellation counts", () => {
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { expectedRunCount: 1 }, runs: [succeeded] }).passed).toBe(true);
const cancelled = { ...succeeded, status: "cancelled" };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { expectedRunCount: 1 }, runs: [cancelled] }).passed).toBe(false);
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 1, runPolicy: { kind: "terminal-counts" as const, terminalStatusCounts: { cancelled: 1 } } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled] }).passed).toBe(true);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded] }).passed).toBe(false);
});
it("admits declared separate active work while rejecting active CEO, wrong scope, unbound and excess work", () => {
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 2, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker] }).passed).toBe(true);
for (const bad of [{ ...succeeded, status: "running" }, { ...worker, companyId: "other" }, { ...worker, contextSnapshot: {} }, { ...worker, agentId: "ceo" }])
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, bad] }).passed).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker, { ...worker, id: "extra" }] }).passed).toBe(false);
});
it("admits a lead run outside the source only as a declared case handback", () => {
const handback: ChatRun = { id: "handback", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo", status: "running", runtimeMode: "native", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "task", wakeReason: "case_handoff" } };
const done = { ...worker, status: "succeeded" };
const declared = { expectedRunCount: 3, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1, maximumLeadCaseHandbackRuns: 1 } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: declared, runs: [succeeded, done, handback] }).passed).toBe(true);
// Undeclared (default 0), a lead run woken another way, and a second handback all stay rejected.
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { ...declared, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } }, runs: [succeeded, done, handback] }).passed).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: declared, runs: [succeeded, done, { ...handback, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "task", wakeReason: "issue_commented" } }] }).passed).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { ...declared, expectedRunCount: 4 }, runs: [succeeded, done, handback, { ...handback, id: "again" }] }).passed).toBe(false);
});
function reassignment() {
const receipt = { runId: "worker-run", taskId: "task", workerId: "worker", sourceRunId: "final-source" };
const stopped: ChatRun = { ...worker, status: "cancelled", errorCode: "issue_reassigned", resultJson: {
reassignmentStopConfirmed: true, nativeCancellation: { schema: "paperclip.native-cancellation.v1", runId: "worker-run", issueId: "task", companyId: "company", dispatchState: "acknowledged", acknowledgedAt: "2026-10-27T10:00:00Z", intentAuditId: "intent", acknowledgementAuditId: "ack" },
} };
const implementation = { scenarioId: "tasks.edit-properties", expectedRunCount: 4, minimumRunCount: 3,
runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1, expectedWorkerCancellation: "owned-task-reassignment" as const },
expectedCancelledWorkerRun: (observation: unknown) => (observation as { proofComplete?: boolean } | undefined)?.proofComplete ? receipt : undefined };
const observation = { proofComplete: true, state: { heldRun: { ...worker }, heldTask: { id: "task", companyId: "company", assigneeAgentId: "worker", executionRunId: "worker-run" }, riley: { id: "worker" } } };
return { implementation, stopped, receipt, observation, runs: [succeeded, { ...succeeded, id: "final-source" }, stopped] };
}
it("defers only the declared worker cancellation during polling and requires final independent proof", () => {
const v = reassignment();
expect(chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses(v.implementation)).toContain("cancelled");
expect(chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, run: v.stopped, observation: { ...v.observation, proofComplete: false } })).toBe(true);
for (const run of [{ ...v.stopped, id: "other" }, { ...v.stopped, agentId: "ceo" }, { ...v.stopped, companyId: "foreign" }, { ...v.stopped, errorCode: "user_cancelled" }])
expect(chatCatalogRunStatusAllowed({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, run, observation: v.observation })).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs }).passed).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(true);
// No cancellation remains a valid genuine ownership-denied branch; no proof is invented.
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: [succeeded, { ...succeeded, id: "final-source" }, worker] }).passed).toBe(true);
});
it("rejects wrong cancellation identities, scope, reason, acknowledgement and unrelated cancelled work", () => {
const mutations = [
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.runId = "unrelated"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.taskId = "other-task"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.workerId = "other-worker"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.receipt.sourceRunId = "unrelated-source"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.companyId = "foreign"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.agentId = "ceo"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.errorCode = "user_cancelled"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.stopped.resultJson!.reassignmentStopConfirmed = false; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { (v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as Record<string, unknown>).dispatchState = "pending"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { (v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as Record<string, unknown>).issueId = "other-task"; },
(v: ReturnType<typeof reassignment>) => { v.runs.push({ ...v.stopped, id: "another-cancelled-run" }); },
];
for (const mutate of mutations) { const v = reassignment(); mutate(v); expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: v.implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(false); }
});
it("requires exact scenario/flag/callback and leaves every undeclared active-work case unchanged", () => {
const v = reassignment();
expect(() => assertExpectedWorkerCancellation(v.implementation)).not.toThrow();
for (const implementation of [
{ ...v.implementation, scenarioId: "tasks.assignment-conflict" },
{ ...v.implementation, expectedCancelledWorkerRun: undefined },
{ ...v.implementation, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } },
]) { expect(() => assertExpectedWorkerCancellation(implementation)).toThrow(); expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: v.runs, observation: v.observation }).passed).toBe(false); }
expect(chatCatalogAllowedRunStatuses({ runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work", maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } })).not.toContain("cancelled");
});
it("binds cancellation proof presence through the actual lazy registry loader", async () => {
const { loadChatCatalogImplementation } = await import("./chat-catalog-registry.js");
const v = reassignment(); const { expectedCancelledWorkerRun, ...metadata } = v.implementation;
const descriptor = { ...metadata, modulePath: "./chat-catalog-domains/internal-tasks.js", exportName: "cases", sourceFiles: ["chat-catalog-domains/internal-edit-ownership.ts"], oracleVersion: "test", turnTimeoutMs: 120_000, attemptTimeoutMs: 600_000 };
const implementation = { ...descriptor, expectedCancelledWorkerRun, setup: async () => ({}), observe: async () => ({}), grade: () => ({ passed: true, checks: [{ id: "actual-proof", passed: true, detail: "Fixture-only registry control" }] }), verifyResult: async () => {} };
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(descriptor, async () => ({ cases: [implementation] }))).resolves.toBe(implementation);
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(descriptor, async () => ({ cases: [{ ...implementation, expectedCancelledWorkerRun: undefined }] }))).rejects.toThrow("cancellation proof");
const wrongDescriptor = { ...descriptor, scenarioId: "tasks.assignment-conflict" };
await expect(loadChatCatalogImplementation(wrongDescriptor, async () => ({ cases: [{ ...implementation, scenarioId: wrongDescriptor.scenarioId }] }))).rejects.toThrow("cancellation proof");
});
it("retains the executable cancellation proof at the outer final-run boundary", () => {
const v = reassignment();
const verify = createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation: v.implementation, companyId: scope.companyId,
leadId: scope.leadId, observation: v.observation });
expect(verify(scope.source, v.runs).passed).toBe(true);
// JSON declarations cannot replace the executable independent proof callback.
expect(() => createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(v.implementation)),
companyId: scope.companyId, leadId: scope.leadId, observation: v.observation })).toThrow("cancellation proof");
for (const run of [
{ ...v.stopped, errorCode: "user_cancelled" },
{ ...v.stopped, companyId: "foreign" },
{ ...v.stopped, resultJson: { ...v.stopped.resultJson, nativeCancellation: { ...(v.stopped.resultJson!.nativeCancellation as object), dispatchState: "pending" } } },
]) expect(verify(scope.source, v.runs.map(row => row.id === run.id ? run : row)).passed).toBe(false);
expect(verify(scope.source, [...v.runs, { ...v.stopped, id: "new-cancellation" }]).passed).toBe(false);
expect(verify({ ...scope.source, id: "different-source" }, v.runs).passed).toBe(false);
});
it("keeps an ordinary ownership-denial boundary strict without a cancellation declaration", () => {
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 2,
runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
const verify = createChatCatalogFinalRunVerifier({ implementation, companyId: scope.companyId,
leadId: scope.leadId, observation: undefined });
expect(verify(scope.source, [succeeded, worker]).passed).toBe(true);
expect(verify(scope.source, [succeeded, { ...worker, status: "cancelled" }]).passed).toBe(false);
});
it("treats only a never-started run cancelled by its own task's terminal status as lifecycle, and still grades it", () => {
// Shape recorded for tasks.website-task: the agent cancelled its own stray task before the queued run started.
const queued: ChatRun = { id: "stray-run", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo", status: "cancelled", runtimeMode: "legacy", startedAt: null,
errorCode: "issue_terminal_status", error: "Cancelled because issue reached terminal status (cancelled) before the queued run could start",
resultJson: { stopReason: "issue_terminal_status", timeoutFired: false }, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "stray-task", wakeReason: "issue_assigned" } };
expect(chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun(queued, scope.source)).toBe(true);
for (const run of [{ ...queued, startedAt: "2026-11-09T15:27:00Z" }, { ...queued, errorCode: "user_cancelled" }, { ...queued, status: "failed" },
{ ...queued, resultJson: {} }, { ...queued, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "source" } }, { ...queued, contextSnapshot: {} }])
expect(chatCatalogNeverStartedTerminalTaskRun(run, scope.source)).toBe(false);
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 3, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, worker, queued] }).passed).toBe(false);
});
it("admits a declared role-bound range above an exact terminal count, and nothing beyond it", () => {
const cancelled = { ...succeeded, id: "stopped", status: "cancelled" };
const ok = (id: string) => ({ ...succeeded, id });
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 6, minimumRunCount: 4, runPolicy: { kind: "terminal-counts" as const, terminalStatusCounts: { cancelled: 1, succeeded: 3 }, maximumTerminalStatusCounts: { succeeded: 5 } } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b"), ok("c")] }).passed).toBe(true);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b"), ok("c"), ok("d"), ok("e")] }).passed).toBe(true);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b")] }).passed).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { ...implementation, expectedRunCount: 7 }, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b"), ok("c"), ok("d"), ok("e"), ok("f")] }).passed).toBe(false);
// A maximum may only widen a status the exact counts already declare.
const undeclared = { ...implementation, runPolicy: { ...implementation.runPolicy, maximumTerminalStatusCounts: { failed: 1 } } };
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: undeclared, runs: [cancelled, ok("a"), ok("b"), ok("c")] }).passed).toBe(false);
});
describe("queued run retired by reassignment before it started (full cohort 3)", () => {
// projects.project-work: the CEO created the task without an assignee (its own queued run), then
// reassigned it to Morgan; the reassignment stopped the run while still bootstrapping.
const reassigned: ChatRun = { id: "ceo-queued", companyId: "company", agentId: "ceo", status: "cancelled", runtimeMode: "legacy",
startedAt: null, logStore: null, logRef: null, nativeIssueId: null, errorCode: "issue_reassigned", createdAt: "2026-11-12T00:55:19.299Z",
contextSnapshot: { issueId: "task", wakeReason: "issue_assigned" },
resultJson: { stopReason: "cancelled", reassignmentStopConfirmed: true, executionRecovery: { kind: "bootstrap", providerWorkStarted: false } } };
// tasks.private-task: the dispatch gate found the same kind of queued wake stale after the PATCH.
const staleGate: ChatRun = { ...reassigned, id: "ceo-stale", errorCode: "issue_assignee_changed",
resultJson: { stopReason: "issue_assignee_changed", timeoutFired: false, timeoutSource: "stale_queued_run_gate" } };
// Paid run 43143392360 (tasks.private-task): the new assignee's wake released the lock the queued run held.
const lockReleased: ChatRun = { ...reassigned, id: "ceo-lock", errorCode: "lock_released_on_reassignment", resultJson: undefined };
const morgan: ChatRun = { ...worker, id: "morgan-run", createdAt: "2026-11-12T00:55:56.398Z" };
const implementation = { expectedRunCount: 2, runPolicy: { kind: "source-settled-with-active-work" as const, maximumActiveWorkerRuns: 1 } };
it("admits it, outside the provider-run bound, only when the new assignee ran on that task", () => {
for (const queued of [reassigned, staleGate, lockReleased]) {
expect(chatCatalogReassignedQueuedRun(queued, scope.source)).toBe(true);
const runs = [succeeded, queued, morgan];
expect(chatCatalogSupersededQueuedRuns(runs, scope.source).map(run => run.id)).toEqual([queued.id]);
expect(chatCatalogProviderRuns(runs, scope.source).map(run => run.id)).toEqual([succeeded.id, morgan.id]);
const grade = gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs });
expect(grade.passed).toBe(true);
expect(grade.checks.find(check => check.id === "catalog-superseded-queued-runs")?.passed).toBe(true);
}
});
it("still fails without a successor, for started or other cancellations, on the source, and for churn", () => {
// No new assignee run: the reassignment never produced work.
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation, runs: [succeeded, reassigned] }).passed).toBe(false);
// A successor must be another agent's later run on the same task.
for (const other of [{ ...morgan, agentId: "ceo" }, { ...morgan, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "elsewhere" } }, { ...morgan, createdAt: "2026-11-12T00:55:00.000Z" }])
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { ...implementation, expectedRunCount: 3 }, runs: [succeeded, reassigned, other] }).passed).toBe(false);
for (const run of [{ ...reassigned, startedAt: "2026-11-12T00:55:20.000Z" }, { ...reassigned, logRef: "log" }, { ...reassigned, errorCode: "cancelled" },
{ ...reassigned, resultJson: { ...reassigned.resultJson, executionRecovery: { kind: "bootstrap", providerWorkStarted: true } } },
{ ...reassigned, resultJson: { stopReason: "cancelled" } }, { ...staleGate, resultJson: { stopReason: "issue_assignee_changed" } },
{ ...reassigned, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "source" } }, { ...reassigned, status: "failed" },
{ ...lockReleased, startedAt: "2026-11-12T00:55:20.000Z" }, { ...lockReleased, nativeIssueId: "task" }]) {
expect(chatCatalogReassignedQueuedRun(run, scope.source)).toBe(false);
expect(gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { ...implementation, expectedRunCount: 3 }, runs: [succeeded, run, morgan] }).passed).toBe(false);
}
// At most one superseded queued run per case.
const second = { ...staleGate, contextSnapshot: { issueId: "task-2" } }, morgan2 = { ...morgan, id: "morgan-2", status: "succeeded", contextSnapshot: { issueId: "task-2" } };
const churn = gradeChatCatalogRuns({ ...scope, implementation: { ...implementation, expectedRunCount: 3 }, runs: [succeeded, reassigned, morgan, second, morgan2] });
expect(churn.checks.find(check => check.id === "catalog-superseded-queued-runs")?.passed).toBe(false);
});
});